Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MEETING <br />Wednesday, April 23, 2003 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Local Board of Appeal and Equalization met on the above mentioned date with the <br />following members present: Acting Mayor Bob Sansevere, Council Members Jim Murphy, Jim <br />White, and Jay Nygard; Representing staff was City Administrator Ron Moorse and Recorder <br />Kristi Anderson. <br />Hennepin County Appraisers Kim Jensen and Kevin Wynn were present. <br />Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent. <br />Acting Mayor Sansevere called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. <br />APPEALS <br />Acting Mayor Sansevere explained that appeals would be heard in the order in which persons <br />arrived and signed in at the Council Chambers. He suggested that residents who have not yet <br />contacted the City to have a second review by the appraisers performed prior to this evening, <br />should do so. He recommended that review of these additional properties take place prior to <br />Council hearing them on May 12, 2003 at its reconvened Board of Appeal and Equalization <br />meeting. <br />Moorse asked the assessors to provide background of the appeal process. <br />Jensen explained that the 2003 valuation year was extremely busy as the appraisers implemented a <br />new system. Over the past year, they have strived to work out the kinks which might have caused <br />qualities to be assessed too high. In addition, input error and numerous refinancing appraisals have <br />put additional burden on the appraiser's office. <br />Jensen indicated that they use the mass appraisal process which is subject to individual review. <br />Since valuations were completed, the appraiser's office received 155 calls, performed 73 reviews, <br />and made 53 adjustments to a lower valuation. Jensen noted that lakeshore properties' assessed <br />value rose an average 17.7 %, while off - lakeshore properties grew 10.7 %, with commercial at <br />14.7 %. <br />Sansevere asked what the review process entailed beyond the City Council level. <br />Jensen stated that the County Board of Review was scheduled for June 16, 2003, and appeals could <br />be heard by appointment, if received by June 9, at that time. Beyond the County, Jensen indicated <br />that appeals could be heard by the Minnesota Tax Court. <br />Sansevere encouraged seniors over 65 to investigate relief options via a senior property tax deferral <br />program which entitles them to pay a portion, $450 in taxes, and defer the remainder until the <br />property is sold. <br />Jensen reminded the public that the board can increase, decrease, or choose to make no change <br />during the review process. She added that, typically, valuation increases would not happen until the <br />following year, say 2004 in this case. She requested that the Local Board make a recommendation <br />PAGE 1 of 6 <br />