Laserfiche WebLink
- � �� <br /> � � <br /> �'�'������z�,,:, � CI'I'Y of OR�11�TU <br /> � �� � <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L`�kEs��`'�� No. 5 5 2 -, <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES <br /> TO MUNICIPAL 70NING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 78-1288 AND 78-1436 <br /> FILE NO. OS-3146 <br /> WHEREAS, Marlc R. Palm and Pamela J. Palm, (hereinafter "the applicants") are <br /> owners of the property located at 1447 Parl: Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the <br /> City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 8, Block 15, Saga Hill Revised, Heiuiepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants llave submitted an application requesting variances to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to pennit 3,372 s.£ (33.6%) hardcover in the 75-250' <br /> lal:eshore setback zone where 3,812 s.f. (37.9%) exists and 2,512.5 s.f. (25%) is allowed; to <br /> pennit 1,534 s.f. (48.6%) hardcover in the 250-500' lalceshore setbacic where 1,607 s.f. (50.9%) <br /> exists and 946.5 s.£ (30%) is allowed; and a variance to Section 78-1436 to permit a 5' setbacic <br /> where 15' is required for constntction of a new 25' x 30' (748 s.f.) detached gara�e to replace an <br /> existinQ detached garage; and <br /> VVHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with <br /> Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Plaiuzin� Codes, the Orono Plai�i�ing <br /> Commission held a public hearing on October 17, 2005, at which time the PlatuliilQ Commission <br /> on a vote of 5-0 tabled the application and directed the applicants to draft a revised plan tl�at <br /> would reduce the aarage to 750 s.f. or less, relocate it at a 15' setbacl: fi•om the street and 10' <br /> from the side lot line, orient it as side-loading, and provide a ��ading plan for City Engineer <br /> revie�v; and <br /> VVHER�AS, applicailts submitted a revised plan for an 800 s.f. (25x3?j ;arage <br /> 18' from the street lot line and 5' from the side lot line. Planning Commission reviewed the <br /> revised plan in Januaiy 2006 and on a vote of 5-0 recommended approval only to the extent of <br /> the ?002 approval, i.e. ;araae size less than 750 s.f., �' setback, and hardcover as appro��ed in <br /> 2002. The Council reviewed the revised plan on Febniary 13, 20�6 and tabled the application <br /> peildinQ submittal of a ne�v plan me-etin� the Plaiuling Coi�lmission recomtnendation; and. <br /> S�'��'I�_�S, a furthe,� re�ised plail ��as suhi��itt�d hv the applicants and revie«�ecl <br /> by the City Coullci] o�� October 2;, 2006, <br /> Pa�e 1 of% <br />