My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: subdividing
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Orono Orchard Rd S
>
015 Orono Orchard Road South - 02-117-23-22-0002
>
Correspondence
>
Re: subdividing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:10:39 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 12:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
Address
015 Orono Orchard Rd S
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0211723220002
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gye/n/ 24- a/Ad akkirjGd/ <br /> Business Planning,Development&Design <br /> LEL.. <br /> October 11, 1993 <br /> rOCTa is r4 1993 <br /> Jeanne A. Mabusth <br /> Zoning Administrator <br /> City of Orono <br /> 1335 S. Brown Road <br /> Orono, MN <br /> Re: 15 Orono Orchard Road South, The Jim and Cami Farley Residence <br /> Jeanne, <br /> My thank you for the time, attention to this property and its subdivision potential. I have <br /> reviewed with the Farley's the "developing realities"...i.e. pending ordinances, outlot <br /> requirements, minimum dry and buildable requirements and the intensity of either class of the <br /> subdivision process. <br /> Editorially, as we discussed, The Farley's, with their sincere desire to sensitively integrate 2 <br /> homes on 4 acres, are severely restricted by the protectionistic forces they support. What irony! <br /> As we complete the preliminary review of the prospects for development on their behalf, notes <br /> from the May 16, 1986 zoning meeting were reviewed. They are enclosed. The staff <br /> recommendations are contingent but also affirmative. Could I ask that you send me a note <br /> discussing their 1986 recommendations in the context of approval in 1993? Is intent to approve <br /> contained here or does failure by Robinson to formally proceed nullify the intent? The Farley <br /> intent is demonstrable compatible with City goals...is there something we might all hang our hat <br /> on to allow them variance? <br /> My thanks to you again for the courtesy of your time. A brief note would be appreciated. <br /> Sire:,el; , <br /> imoth, ' . Engen <br /> nc. <br /> • '/mmt <br /> n'losures <br /> cc: Jim and Cami Farley <br /> File: 0015:City of Orono <br /> 315 Manitoba Avenue <br /> PH 612-449-0590 or 612-449-9692 <br /> Wayzata,Minnesota 55391 �� FAX 449-0789 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.