My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: wetland setbacks
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Oliver Hill
>
2340 Oliver Hill - 34-118-23-33-0072
>
Correspondence
>
Re: wetland setbacks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:57:17 PM
Creation date
5/16/2018 11:10:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2340
Street Name
Oliver
Street Type
Hill
Address
2340 Oliver Hill
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
3411823330072
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Melanie Curtis <br /> From: Rob Erstad <rcerstad@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Tuesday,January 09, 2018 2:08 PM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Subject: Re: 2340 Oliver Hill Road <br /> Thank you for your email response, Melanie. I appreciate your time. <br /> It does say that, but the "side and rear yards only" language is clearly meant to exclude front yards,not wetland <br /> setbacks. Instead one must look to the section regarding wetland setbacks (78-1605). This section states only <br /> that the wetland setback is a "Minimum distance setback from delineated edge of wetland to any <br /> , hardcover, septic systems or wells". This is open to interpretation as <br /> to what is being measured from. I am again left to ask whether the roof can then overhang it. <br /> I don't recall specifically whether I discussed this with you, but I had discussed it with one of the women in <br /> your office (I can't recall which one, and it doesn't matter...I'm not looking to get anyone in trouble) at an earlier <br /> date. I very specifically asked this question. <br /> I need specific answers in writing to a few questions before I can proceed with any further home planning or <br /> even making this move. I will stop by this afternoon. Thank you for your time. <br /> (I apologize if my tone is not positive--I try very hard to follow the rules and plan accordingly. This is an <br /> extremely frustrating development. Please know I am not personally upset with anyone.) <br /> Rob Erstad <br /> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: <br /> Rob <br /> Thank you for sending your proposed plans. You're right, the MCWD wouldn't have any issues with the cantilevered <br /> portions of the home as the 35-foot setback it is a City wetland setback. <br /> I reviewed the plans and the City Code again with others in the Planning department and have come to the same <br /> conclusion: the cantilevered portions of the home have to be removed from the wetland setback. <br /> Section 78-1405 Nonencroachments: in section 78-1405(a)(1) the code states that eaves,gutters, and"other similar <br /> features"are permitted to encroach up to 2 feet into a required yard area; however, according to section 78-1405(a)(4) <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.