09-26-1978 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. CITY OF OROP10 Regular P4eeting of the Orono Council, 7: 00 P.M. September 26, 1978 The Orono Council Met on the above date with the �ollowing mer.lbers present: PZayor Van Nest, Councilnembers Butler and Pesek. Absent: Council- members PZassengale and Paurus. Also present: City Planner Olson, Cit�� Engineer Olson, Finance Director huehn, Chief of Police Kilbo, and Deputy Clerk Strom. Absent: City Administrator Benson. � Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the Consent CONSEPIT AGENDA* Agenda* with all staff data and supportive inforr:ia- tion to be included in the ?�Iinutes in the sequence they occur. Piotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) . I10 comments from the Park Commission PARK COi•u2ISSION No comr:�ents fror.t the Lake P4innetonka Conservation LMCD REPORT District representative. No corunents from the Planning Comnission. PLANNIi1G COr4MISSION l�r. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the SUBDI��ISION record the following subdivision request of 255 Sixth Avenue North P�Zrs. Roy Hollander, 255 Sixth Avenue tdorth, #412 dated July 18, 1978, which states : Mrs. Roy Hollander Sketch plan review: The applicant has two existing parcels totallinQ approximately 37 acres. Zoning District is RR-1B, two-acre lot area, 200 ft. lot width. The eastern parcel contains a barn and two houses. The western parcel contains Mrs. Hollander's house. The proposal is to divide the properties into 15 residential lots. There is a considerable amount of wetlands on the property as shown on the sketch and our wetlands map. One of the proposed lots is noted as 1. 6 acres dry and 1. 1 acres wet. All other lots are at least two acres dry. A soil survey and individual septic testing will be necessary for proper review of the lot arrangernent. The roadway is shown as a loop connection of 50 ft. right-of-way width. 6�ith this nur.lber of lots, previous approvals have required 60 ft. right of way. The access location is subject to County approval. The west access also serves existing houses and is a separate RLS tract. Ownership and other easement riahts should be reviewed. (Continued)