Laserfiche WebLink
��� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br /> ` ST.PAUL DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS / <br /> � Y 1421 U.S.POST OFFlCE 3 CUSTOM HOUSE �� C fS <br /> `'S�T.PAUI.MINNESOTA SS/01•9BOB v <br /> �� � <br /> October 23, 1990 � n„�� ��_(��(�h ( -'�` <br /> REPIY TO �4` <br /> ATTENTION Of <br /> Construction-Operations I <br /> Regulatory (91-333N-92) -- <br /> SUBJECT: Pond Excavation, Fill (Sidecasting of Excavated Material) , and Grading <br /> in Unnamed Wetlands near but not adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. <br /> 16 and SE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec. 17, T. 117 N. � R. 23 W. , City of Orono, Hennepin <br /> County, Minnesota <br /> Clair T. Rood <br /> 2215 Kenwood Way <br /> Wayzata, Minnesota 55391-9700 <br /> We have reviewed the information you provided about your project. The <br /> work is authorized by a nationwide Department of the Army permit, provided the <br /> enclosed conditions and management practices are followed. We also have provided <br /> some suggestions in this letter to improve the wildlife habitat value of the <br /> pond. In short, you can construct the pond as designed, but we suggest that you <br /> consider some modifications. <br />. Although we have not made a site inspection of your property, the soil <br /> survey and wetland maps in our files suggest that the affected wetland is <br /> somewhat larger than the area outlined on your map. However, if your map shows <br /> all the excavation, grading, and fill, it appears that the total wetland that <br /> may be filled or graded would be 0.9 acre or less. Because this wetland appears <br /> to be part of a small drainage area separated from Lake Minnetonka except for <br /> a culvert drainage connection under the railroad right-of-way, the nationwide <br /> permit authorizes up to an acre of fill or grading. <br /> Zf you wish to enhance the wildlife value of the site, however, you should <br /> modify the design of the pond. A deeper pond, such as your proposed excavation, <br /> might support some fish over the winter, but the wildlife value of the excavation <br /> may be minimal with such steep side slopes. Enhanced wetlands or ponds designed <br /> to attract wildlife generally have very gentle slopes (at least 8:1 around a <br /> major part of the excavation, and ideally 10:1 or flatter) . They also <br /> incorporate irregular edges, rolling bottom contours, and organic soil to promote <br /> the growth of different types of wetland plants and to maximize use by waterfowl, <br /> other birds� and animals. For wildlife purposes, ponds are generally no deeper <br /> than 4 to 5 feet, with much of the pond less than 2 feet. <br /> To improve fish habitat, you need a deep pond, such as you propose, and <br /> different types of substrate materials, depending on the species you wish to <br /> support. The 12-foot depth you propose would keep some area at the bottom from <br /> freezing, and the aerator would help during both the colder and warmer. <br /> Unfortunately, even with aeration, the proposed pond might still be too small <br /> to support desireable fish during extreme temperatures. Side-slope sloughing <br /> may also be a problem that could decrease depths and alter the bottom material, <br /> rendering the pond less suitable for fish. <br />