My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: MWCC easement
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
G
>
Gander Road
>
710 Gander Road - 04-117-23-44-0005
>
Correspondence
>
Re: MWCC easement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:15:09 PM
Creation date
12/8/2016 1:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
710
Street Name
Gander
Street Type
Road
Address
710 Gander Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0411723440005
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O O <br /> 3= A � C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ����T�,� ,� <br /> � �t �, Municipal Offices <br /> '�� ,. ,�" � � Gti, <br /> a � Street Address: Mailing Address: <br /> ��kESH��� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 <br /> Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> November 16, 1994 <br /> Mr. Robert Carlson <br /> Re: MWCC Easement in Lot 2, Block 1, Foxwood Second Addition <br /> Dear Mr. Carlson: <br /> At your request I have reviewed our subdivision file in regards to the 35' wide MWCC easement <br /> also shown as a "drainage and utility easement" dedicated to the public on the plat of Foxwood <br /> Second Addition. <br /> As you know, this easement did not appear on the initial plat of Foxwood approved in 1978. <br /> The sanitary sewer easement had been granted to MWCC in the spring of 1975. My review of <br /> the Foxwood Second Addition subdivision file finds absolutely no references to this easement. <br /> It does not show up on any of the preliminary plat drawings, it is not discussed in any of the <br /> memos or meeting minutes, and is not called out in either the preliminary approval or final plat <br /> approval resolutions. The preliminary plat approval resolution references the Coffin-Gronberg <br /> survey of 8/22/84 revised 7/18/86. This survey doesn't show the subject easement. <br /> There is no documentation in the file that the City Attorney did or did not require placement of <br /> the easement on the plat drawings. The easement as granted to MWCC was merely for sanitary <br /> sewer purposes, and not fQr general drainage or utility purposes. The City has no apparent <br /> reason to retain a drainage and utility easement coinciding with the MWCC easement. If the <br /> City Attornev r�qiiired the easement be shc�wn on the plat drawings or if County or State <br /> rPgulations required it t� be sh�wn, it probahly should have been shown as a "sewer easement <br /> per docum�rit #1138926" rather than as a "drainage and utility easement" which automatically <br /> is dedicated to the public via the standard plat dedication language. <br /> Given the above information, and given your discussions with MWCC which apparently have <br /> concluded they are willing to release the easement, I can find no apparent reason why the City <br /> would oppose a vacation of the public's interest in this easement should you make such an <br /> application. <br /> Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.