Laserfiche WebLink
\ <br /> f <br /> / � <br /> F� ' - ��. <br /> ' _ . <br /> cit� o� oR,oNo <br /> • (�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � N0. 2408 <br /> � � • • <br /> A RESOLQTION APPROVING AN AI�NDMENT <br /> OF ORONO RESOLQTION NO. 2295 � <br /> THAT WOQLD CONTINITE TO GRANT ,A VARIANCE <br /> �.'O MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.22, SDBDIVYSION 2 <br /> WHEREASa Rollin Lacy (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner <br /> of the property located at 2655 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter "the City") and legally described on Exhibit A attached <br /> herewith (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for the purpose of <br /> amending the original variance approval that would have al lowed a total of <br /> 12,995 s.f. or 35.2$ of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area and would <br /> now seek approval of 12,825 s.f. or 34.7� of hardcover for a total net <br /> reduction of a 130 s.f. or .4�. <br /> NOW, TH�REFORE, BE IT RESOLV$D by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> • FINDINGS <br /> , 1. This application was reviewed as an amendment of Resolution No. <br /> 2295, originally reviewed as Zoning File No. 1213. <br /> 2. This amendment involves a request to maintain an accessory <br /> structure, originally scheduled for removal, measuring 14.4" by 16'4", <br /> totaling 236.16 s.f. in hardcover. In exchange, the applicant has <br /> agreed to not construct approximately 366 s.f. of proposed deck area <br /> within the lakeshore yard. . <br /> 3. The Orono Council reviewed �he applicant's request on April 11, <br /> 1988 and recommended approval of the proposed amendment to Resolution <br /> No. 2295, File No. 1213, based upon the following findings: <br /> A) The proposal will result in an overall reduction of 130 s.f. <br /> of structural hardcover or .4$ within the 75-250' setback area. <br /> B) The accessory structure has historical value to the property <br /> and is reported as one of the first structures on this property. <br /> C) The subject structure meets al 1 required setbacks. <br /> D) There has been no change in the 0-75' setback area, still <br /> maintained at 0� hardcover, and the 250-500' setback area remains <br /> • at 9.2� of hardcover. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this request including the reports <br /> by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the <br /> proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />