My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Hearing Flag Lot Issues 08/18/93
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Public Hearing Flag Lot Issues 08/18/93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:11:53 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:11:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING ON FLAG LOT ISSUES <br />• August 18, 1993 <br />The Planning Commission of the City of Orono held a public hearing to discuss Flag Lot <br />Issues pursuant to notice at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, August 18, 1993 at the Orono Council <br />Chambers. Chairman Charles Schroeder and Planning Commission members Candy Rowlette, <br />Sandy Smith and Charles Nolan were present. Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant <br />Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, and Recorder Lin Vee were present <br />representing staff. <br />Chairman Schroeder called the meeting to order explaining that the meeting was to <br />discuss the issue of flag lots in general terms and asked Gaffron to provide some general <br />information and history about flag lots in Orono. <br />Gaffron defined flag lots from resource books, "Flag lots are permitted in rural and <br />developing municipalities to permit development of back land areas while still maintaining their <br />rural character. " A flag lot could be defined as typically separated from a public or private road <br />by another lot which gains access to the public or private road via a narrow corridor that is <br />typically 10' -50' in width. "The usual requirements for a flag lot are as follows: minimum lot <br />area at least twice the area in the zone where located exclusive of the right -of -way connecting <br />the lot with the public road; minimum front, side and rear yard requirements to be met on the <br />portion excluding the right -of -way; minimum of 20' and maximum of 50' for right -of -way; not <br />more than 1 flag lot for each right -of -way; rights -of -way should be a minimum distance apart <br />• of at least the minimum lot width in the particular zone. " <br />This definition does not necessarily relate to anything the City has done or is presently <br />doing. Prior to our Shoreland Ordinance, there were a couple methods to look at subdivision <br />of a narrow, long piece of property that was either on or off the lake and someone wanted to <br />create a back and front lot. <br />In a lakeshore situation, one method is to create a flag lot that abuts the lake and a back <br />lot that abuts the street without lakeshore access. The opposite situation would never be allowed <br />because the lake lot would need to have a shoreline width equal to the requirement for the <br />district. The Code has said that lot width is measured at the front or street setback line from <br />the side lot line. Gaffron illustrated these situations. Prior to the recent Shoreland Ordinance, <br />the lot width for a lakeshore lot would be measured at the 75' setback and the street setback and <br />a flag lot would require a variance. With the Shoreland Ordinance, the width is measured at the <br />shoreline and at the 75' setback but at no other locations, making a flag lot a possibility. <br />To avoid variances in the past, a private easement was granted to access the street. <br />Another way was to create an outlot, typically a private driveway outlot, owned by the person <br />who uses it. This allows the back lot to meet the width standard without a variance. The outlot <br />area is not considered with the dedicated area for either the back or front lot. <br />40 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.