Laserfiche WebLink
. ' `:4 <br /> � � � Cit� o� ORONO <br /> • � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � " NO. 2120 <br /> • - • •� <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> A CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT <br /> PER MIJNICIPAL ZONING COD$ <br /> SECTION 10.03, SDBDIVISION 19 <br /> ' FILE #1098 <br /> WHEREAS, C. Wayne LeNeave (hereinafter "the applicant") has an <br /> interest in the property located at 360 Wakefield Road within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 6, Block 1, <br /> Wakefield Farms Second Addition (hereinafter "property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a <br /> Conditional Use Permit to permit the excavation of a decorative pond per <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. t <br /> • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1098. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rural <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. On January 20, 1987, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the <br /> application as proposed and recommended approval, finding: <br /> A) The site of the proposed pond is a low area on the property <br /> that is not currently a designated wetland. <br /> B) The proposed pond excavation is intended to be approximately <br /> 7,000 s.f. in area and 5' maximum depth. The estimated 1,000 <br /> cubic yards of spoil material to be excavated is proposed to be <br /> removed to a site within the City of Wayzata. <br /> C) The pond is intended to retain a 11 inf luent run-of f with no <br /> proposed outlet, and banks excavated at a gradual 4-1 slope. <br /> D) The pond is proposed to be constructed near the boundary with <br /> the adjacent property to the south. That affected property <br /> • owner is on public record as favoring the project. <br /> E) The City Engineer has reviewed the project and finds that the <br />' site is relatively high in the Lake Minnetonka Watershed, and� <br /> will likely act _as a better nutrient retention . area -than the <br /> existing site, a potential benefit to the watershed. _ <br /> Page 1 of 4 " _ __ <br />