Laserfiche WebLink
, ;,, . � <br /> _ =r . � � <br /> �. <br /> � d�F`�.: ` � Ci.t of ORONO <br /> �� � � � <br /> � f ��. . <br /> °�� ���b RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> .��� � • � <br /> `�'�'�' . ' NO. i�.�S� 1720 ��` <br /> • t"-'�'.;.�, <br /> '�'�`�`., <br /> • ' • • : <br /> _�. . <br /> A RESOLIITION VACATING AN IINUSED PORTION OF <br /> PARR AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF BERGQIIIST AND <br /> . WICRLUND'S PARR, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 11, RANGE 23 <br /> IN CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA . . <br /> � WHEREAS, The City of Orono is a municipal corporation � <br /> organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; <br /> and � . . <br /> WHEREAS, on July 25, 1984, I:D. Caples and Virginia A. <br /> Caples filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the <br /> vacation of a portion of Park �Avenue originally dedicated in the <br /> plat of Bergquist and Wicklund's Park legally described as <br /> follows : � - . . <br /> '� That part of Park Avenue lyirig East of the West line of Lot <br /> 10 , Block 3 , and its �Northerly extension , and lying <br /> Northwesterly of a line drawn from the most Southerly corner <br /> • of Lot 9, said Block 3, Northeasterly through a point on the <br /> Northeasterly line of said Lot 9 distant 15 feet <br /> Northwesterly from the Easterly corner of said Lot 9,' all in <br /> "Bergquist & Wicklund ' s Park, Hennepin Co. Minn" ; and <br /> . � . � , <br /> . � WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a <br /> public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on <br /> August 20 , 1984 , regardinq said vacation and all persons <br /> interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and <br /> . WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the <br /> Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested <br /> vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said � <br /> vacation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in <br /> consideration of the following findings: � <br /> 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any <br /> adjoining property. � <br /> 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve <br /> or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for <br /> utilities and access purposes hereinafter described. <br /> 3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as � it exists <br /> ; serves no public purpose. <br /> • � <br /> page 1 of 2 � <br />