09-18-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 18,1995 ROIT The Orono Planning C'ommission met on the above date with the followi.ig members present; Chair Stephen Peterson, Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, Candace Rowlette, and Elizabeth Hawn Janice Berg was absent The following represented the City Staff Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Septic Inspector Steve Weckman. and Recorder Sherry Frost Councitmember Goetten was present. Chair Peterson called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m (#1) #2064 ROBERT S. OLSON & IRVIN T. GEFFRE, 4665 BAYSIDE ROAD - SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT/VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS 7:02-7:18 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Gaffron reported that the application is a request for a lot line rearrangement between Lot 1, Block 2, owned by GelTre and Outlot C, owned by Olson This property was platted last year with an outlot for the 14 acre rear parcel The outlot was created for future development No septic tecting has been done nor any park dedication fee taken As part of the original proposal, Olson agreed to sell Geffre the portion of Outlot C with the shed on it, and outlot A. At the current time, Geffre has a I 94 acre lot, and the portion of Outlot C would add 35 acres Outlot A consists of .27 acre, yielding a total of 2.56 acres in a 2-acre zoning district and would, therefore, conform in area The remaining Olson property will total 14 2 acres The proposal would require a setback variance for the shed, which is over the 1000 s.f. standard and is, therefore, considered an oversize accessory structure subject to minimum lot area and setback requirements The proposed setback is 30', where 50' is required from the new south (rear) lot line. It presently exists at 12* from the northerly lot line. It will meet the required 30' east/west side setbacks. T!ie oversize accessory structure requires two standard variances; one for its size of 2450 s.f where 1200 s.f is allowed, and needing a lot size of 6 acre minimum The allowed footprint of all accessory structures on the property is 2400 s f Existing on the property is a detached garage, a small shed, a quonset, and the oversize accessory structure. These structures total 4182 s.f requiring a variance of 1 782 s.f The size of lot required to accomodate this much accessory structure is a 5 acre minimum. Gaffron asked the Planning Contmissioners to consider recommending a reduction in the number of accessory buildings to reduce the number of variances. I