My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1988 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
10-17-1988 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 8:42:55 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 4:14:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ffimiTSS OF THE PLARNIHG COMMISSIOH HEBTIHG OCTOBBI 17« 1988 <br />ATTSHDANCB 7:00 P.M. <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the <br />follov;ing members present: Chairman Kelley, Johnson, Bellows, <br />Cohen, Moos and Hanson. Planning Commission member Biown arrived <br />at 7:15 p.m. The following represented the City staif; Building <br />& Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron, Public Works Director Gerhardson, City <br />Engineer Cook and City Recorder Scheffler. Council Represent a*. ve <br />Goetten was also present. <br />#1348 O. LARRT LEE <br />1050 GARDEN LANE <br />CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:35 - 8:35 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicants' representative, Mr. James Krautkremer, was <br />present. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that this application <br />involved a 30 Lot subdivision of a 36.7 acre parcel. There are <br />currently 5 separate owners of this property; Palmers, Valek, <br />Sollner, Hawkinson, and O. Larry Lee/Yorktown Development. <br />Mabusth went on to say that Lots 5, 6 and 10 require a lot width <br />variance. Lot 11 on Tonkaview will require a lot area variance. <br />Kelley asked what the lot width standard was? Mabusth replied <br />140' must be met to the rear of the front yard setback line which <br />is 35' in from the street. The existing house on Lot 9 should be <br />shown on the plat in order to confirm that the setbacks are met <br />from the new division lines. A through road is being proposed <br />from Tonkaview to West Branch Road. The property will be sewered <br />but municipal water is not available. The developers will be <br />responsible for providing municipal services to the property, as <br />well as the road. <br />Planning Commission member Johnson asked if the road on the <br />east side by West Branch was located on half of each lot line. <br />Mabusth confirmed that and added that the road had already been <br />platted with previous subdivisions. <br />Mabusth explained that there are certain vacations proposed <br />with this application. The City's standards have changed in that <br />the City only asks for roadways to be 50 feet in width. The <br />existing road is 60' in width and the City will ask for a <br />reduction. It may be more appropriate to vacate the entire road <br />and put in the new road at the 50' width. The applicant is <br />proposing to vacate a portion of Highview Lane, as well as a <br />10' alley that extends along the north lot lines of lots within <br />the Burquist-Wicklund Addition that runs along Tonkaview. <br />The City has explored the possibility of a future access
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.