Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORON’J, MINNESOTA <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD lECEMBER 10, 1975 <br />^feyo^ Robert L, Searles called to order a Special Meeting <br />the Orono City Council on the above date \vith the fol­ <br />lowing members present: Councilmembers Massengale, Butler, <br />Paurus and Welsh. City Attorney, Bruce Malkerson and <br />Clerk/Administrator, Walter R. Benson. (Councilmembers Butler <br />and Welsh left early) All maii)ers of the Planning Commission, <br />Park Coimiission and Bjman Rights Commission had been notified <br />to attend including persons \dio were known to have an interest <br />in ^e proceedings. The official City newspapers were also <br />notified of this Special Council f>feeting. <br />ATTENDANCE - 7:35 P.M. <br />ORONO CITY HALL <br />Mayor Searles addressed those in attendance requesting their <br />guidance and comments concerning the Orono-Long Lake Sewer <br />Interceptor proposal of the Metropolitan Waste Control Com­ <br />mission. He explained that the proposal was for a gravity <br />interceptor draining the Orono and Long Lake Treatment Plants, <br />going through wetlands or around the perimeter of the wetlands, <br />into Wayzata. The Mayor called attention to the report en­ <br />titled "Environmental Assessment-Orono-Long Lake Interceptor", <br />dated February 1974, by the National Biocentric, Inc. The <br />City came into receipt of this report in November 1975, and <br />alth^gh it*s contents would not be part of the evenings dis­ <br />cussions, the Council had transmitted to the Metropolitan <br />Waste Control Commission 115 objection or changes (attached <br />herein) for incorporation into the transcript of the Public <br />Ifearing held December 4, 1975. The Council explained their <br />C^rplexity due to late receipt of the Report and because only <br />^OTight, at 7:30 P.M., just prior to the meeting, had the <br />City received the Final Plans on the project. The project <br />would have many implications, one of which was disrupting <br />swamps that we have been protecting with Ordinance No. 125. <br />There are alternatives to the present plan, such as a pres­ <br />sure interceptor going along Fbx Street or Orono Orchard <br />Road. The City would have to find it in the public interest <br />to grant a variance to the Wetlands Ordinance. The Mayor <br />noted that the Environmental Report flagged the environmental <br />hazards of the proj^t and Massengale emphasized that the <br />risks involved are irreversible. The Mayor introduced Gene <br />Hickok, Hydrologist, of Hickok *1 Associates vho had come to <br />die mating in m advisoi/ capacity at the request of the <br />Council, ^fr. Hickok agreed with the Council»s statement read <br />at the ^ii^ic Hearing that stated the basic policy of Orono <br />and leader's in protecting marsh areas. He had not yet seen <br />the Final Plan but had a sketch of the project. To him it <br />looked like about 3 1/2 miles of pipe either in the flood <br />plain or close to it. 3 1/2 miles is a major concem and <br />alternate routes were not very detailed. The Mayor noted <br />within the next coiple weeks 90% of tiie available Federal <br />Funds would have to be put together, if the project was to <br />get underway. Hickok felt the Pollution Control Agency <br />coi^d possibly lay over funds for another year. Searles felt <br />/^iting another year would not be out of line considering the <br />r^qjes woind be in the ground 50 to 100 years. Hickok went an <br />to describe a portion of the project noting that the chosen <br />route made provision for ditch dams every 500 feet. One <br />potential was in the excavation of the line thru marsh soil <br />which could open up clay seals of peimeable materials. Water <br />ORONO-LONG LAKE <br />INTERCEPTOR