Laserfiche WebLink
Melanie Curtis <br /> From: Melanie Curtis <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:41 PM <br /> To: 'greg@spensagroup.com' <br /> Subject: Parking lot questions-2687 Wayzata Blvd <br /> Attachments: admin_ci_orono_mn_us_20090217_151548.pdf <br /> Greg <br /> The City's Engineer,Tom Kellogg and I drove through the site last Thursday afternoon to inspect the condition of the <br /> parking lot and discuss your proposed improvements. <br /> You may have heard that we also accidentally got locked in the parking lot as we arrived a few minutes before 4pm and <br /> when we went to leave to and behold the gate was shut!! What a surprise! <br /> I attached 2 resolutions for your review. In 2001, Larry Palm made a conditional use permit application to permit outside <br /> storage on the property and the City approved a plan for parking lot improvements and the establishment of"natural" <br /> green space along the northern portion of the gravel parking area. <br /> The City Engineer would need to review your plans for the improvement and paving of the parking lot. We would be <br /> looking for detail such as depth and type of base material, as well as a detail for the asphalt coat. The plan review would <br /> be primarily to assure that the site drainage does not negatively impact the property to the east and the majority of the <br /> drainage is directed to the south. The City does have a desire to see the existing gravel in the north portions of the <br /> gravel lot removed and additional green space established. Please call or email me to discuss this or to set up a meeting <br /> with myself and Tom Kellogg if you wish. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Melanie <br /> p.s. Regarding the"proof of parking" or parking deferment: <br /> City Code Section 78-827 <br /> (q) Deferment of parking. A reduction in the number of required parking stalls may be permitted by a conditional <br /> use permit as outlined in section 78-823 provided that the following conditions are met: <br /> (1) Evidence is provided demonstrating that the parking requirements of the proposed use will be less <br /> than the parking required under this section during the peak demand period. Factors to be considered when reviewing <br /> the proposed parking demand shall include, but not to be limited to: <br /> a. Size,type,and use of building. <br /> b. Number of employees. <br /> C. Projected volume and turnover of employees. <br /> d. Projected frequency and volume of delivery or service vehicles. <br /> e. Number of company vehicles. <br /> f. Storage of vehicles on the site. <br /> (2) In no case shall the amount of parking provided be less than one-half to the amount of parking <br /> required by the ordinance. <br /> (3) The property owner can demonstrate that the site has sufficient property under the same ownership to <br /> accommodate the expansion of the parking facilities to meet the minimum requirements of this section if the parking <br /> demand exceeds on-site supply. <br /> (4) On-site parking shall only occur in areas designed and constructed for parking in accordance with this <br /> section.The area reserved as"proof-of-parking" shall be sodded or seeded and maintained as green space. No <br /> permanent buildings shall be permitted in the "proof-of-parking" area. <br />