Laserfiche WebLink
(4,, <br /> s O <br /> bto_ _ CITY of ORONO <br /> � 4 I <br /> � ikt Ms.s. G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 1kESH0gc NO. e3. 6 9 0 in <br /> A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> AND SECTION 11.30, SUBDIVISION 5 (C) <br /> AND DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION <br /> OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 372 WESTLAKE STREET <br /> FILE #2099 <br /> 'WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing <br /> under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City <br /> Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public <br /> health, safety and general welfare; and <br /> WHEREAS, Loren Brueggemann (hereinafter „the applicant”) has an interest in, <br /> and Dean Maeser (hereinafter "the owner") is owner of the property located at 372 Westlake <br /> Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 1, Hillside Park, Hennepin County, <br /> Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant and owner have applied to the City of Orono for <br /> variances to the lot area, lot width and side street setback requirements of Municipal Zoning Code <br /> Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B), and variances to the lot area and setback requirements of <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 11.30, Subdivision 5 (C), to allow the replat subdivision of the <br /> three lots which constitute the property, to result in two buildable lots; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application, the recommendations <br /> of the City staff and the Planning Commission, and the comments and written statements <br /> submitted by the applicant, owner, and their consultants. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota hereby denies the requested variances as described above and further denies the <br /> requested subdivision based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this <br /> property: <br /> Page 1 of 9 <br />