Laserfiche WebLink
OR4N� PARK COMMISSION MEETII'ti1G <br /> MINUTES FOR JUNE 2, 1997 <br /> , ATTENDANCE <br /> The Park Commission met on the above mentioned date with the fallowing members <br /> present: Chair Susan Wilson, Commissioners Sherokee Ilse, Andrew McDermott, James <br /> White, David Bea1, Van Erickson, and Peter Welles. Mayor Jabbour and Council Member <br /> Flint were in attendance as well as Planning Commissianer Lili McMillan. Representing <br /> Staff were Public Service Director Greg Gappa, Assistant Planning and Zoning <br /> Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Planner Elizabeth Van Zommeren, and Recorder <br /> Sherry Frost. Chair Wilson called the meeting to order at 8:45 p.m. fallawing the Park <br /> Tour. <br /> (Agenda item#1 precedes Agenda Item#4.) <br /> (#2)REVIEW SKETCH PLANS FOIt SAGA HILL SUBDIVISION <br /> Jim Waters was present representing LGA Investment Graup. <br /> Gaffron reviewed the sketch plans for twa subdivisions on Saga Hill. t�ne subdivision <br /> consists ofthe 7 acre Soskin property and the 1-1/2 acre Sollner property in the one acre <br /> zoning district within the MUSA boundary. The second subdivisipn containing about 28 <br /> acres includes the Van Sloun and Morgart properties in the 2-acre zoning outside the <br /> MIJSA and the Sollner property in the one area zoning within the M[JSA The Planning <br /> Cammission reviewed the sketch plans at their 1VIay meeting. <br /> The seven lot subdivisian in Application#2239 proposes two lots with a cul-de-sac off af <br /> Garden Lane with another cul-de-sac to the east for four other lots. The Planning <br /> Commission supported this plan. A problem wouid occur in that Garden Lane would need <br /> ta be continued to provide access to the park property, and it wauld not make sense to <br /> have a cul-de-sac. <br /> Several options had been presented. Gaffron noted that the City needs to provide access <br /> to the Hennessey property to the north. Tlus access would be dif�icult from both Garden <br /> Lane and fram the north. There is a large ravine to the north af Lot 2 as well as on the <br /> south end. Drainage easements would be required. Gaffron indicated that there may not <br /> be 71ots in this subdivision as 1/2 acre of dry contiguous land is required on the side of <br /> the ravine. <br /> The Park Cammission was asked ta consider whether Park Dedication would be in the <br /> form of land or fee. <br /> 1 <br />