|
�...+... .+...w. ++r.y ;Tg.n.n. -w 2' r".,..,.tna ......o.. �.. -.., ,. .., tt..,. .tt.r z _ Y _ _ ... -..,. ;.Y. -v _ •AY
<br />MEETING OF THE P.ZA�iP1ING COIvIIVIIS-SION,
<br />QZI{LAGE OF ORONO,ON FEBRUARY 2291962
<br />r :Pres:enta D.J.Russell,•Chair. j embers :R.L.Searles,W.V7. "kolf6"S.M.'
<br />' c Halperin,ft.A.Curry and 1l..S.Rice;also D.J.Ball',Clerk and S.B.
<br />/ sBelt See*
<br />:'
<br />'Case " Report of the .committee viewing Lots 99- 100. -101 and
<br />,:Spring Park Addh. R.1.Searles moved that two,(2) building
<br />sites of approximately equal size be recommended; °rfor th set four .
<br />lots Curry seconded. Motion Carried..
<br />Dean Neilson' 8 request for non- conf :orming use .,of olds y
<br />Crystal ay church property. Searles moved that bermi :ssion;'.`:be F
<br />recommend ®d for use of the church basement for, garage and" atorage=
<br />of ,equipment as, anon- conforming use fqr a peiod;,_of five (5).
<br />yeara,,with.: provision that no equipment b:e stored outsde'andM =that,
<br />there b.e no advertising on the property. Wolfe se.c.onde,d...Carrie.d.
<br />Caee 6 41, - Rezoning of the Peterson property to lght.nd`u8trisl.
<br />w esen o review opposition.were•0barles Bellowe�Atty and'f6ui
<br />pr:opert ovmers from Myrtlewoods C1ark,Andere.6n,Esrnes and'. f
<br />Ful'lerto�'., The .following points were brought farth,i 'a3
<br />1: There is no tenant-,nor is the build, ng d'.e,signed' for
<br />b a special tenant
<br />{ s, 2 lndustrial development will lead to serious
<br />problems.
<br />-
<br />L Possibility of lowering of water table by heavy :industrial: �-
<br />r•Y
<br />This property has a reasonable possibility for -residential
<br />raw development when U.S.° 12 is: finally located,
<br />4 ;•+t a,
<br />5
<br />The spot zoning of this corner wi 11 set a precedent.
<br />w 6': There 'has been no application for rezoning signed by• the
<br />mwners�'of, t4a property.
<br />Tj There . is• a question of disturbance of ;natural surthwoe
<br />f
<br />-drainage.
<br />.'. It :was monied by Searle ®,seconded by Hal:perin,that it be redommended
<br />that an application for•rezoning,signea by the property owners be ;'
<br />submitted together with satisfactory details of ultimate use,be'fore ' -.
<br />ofinal action Is taken. Motion carried. `
<br />t: TherW'be no further business,the meeting was. adjourndlew,
<br />� � ,. � .a ,: `�` . ��' ;:� � �' �,_ , „ t , ;;,. , v. �:. , r.., t dc.µ. !.v,.•y, t`7YlS+, ``
<br />a
<br />'7777' . ~ t ..CZ•..
<br />. s...' ..,..._. a.... tiw.. a ._..w..rw...,...n............ _...,..+t .._...«.a•__..,...s, ,.Y�....ti.. •.c...u;Z,�._ :. - :..1r rr. .:. f:_:..ti I.J.rr . _ .•hi:.;. 4 . Y. •. i.,,.
<br />
|