Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> > f' <br /> ��-�\ <br /> / \ <br /> ,i�� �� <br /> o :,� o - <br /> � * i CITY of ORONO <br /> � ��l~��^ <br /> r� '^'�� '` ''''�" :�' �j Munici Offices <br /> �� `��,�`:,�,�j`�'"'�� � � Posc o�soX 66 <br /> \ P� <br /> \ ce <br /> ,� �� ,��;l'��h / cry�say,�5s�z3.00� <br /> �kE3il�g'� <br /> August 16, 1991 <br /> Sally Olson <br /> Burnet Realty - Relocation Department <br /> Suite 200 <br /> 1501 West 80th Street <br /> Bloomington, MN 55431 . <br /> Re: 315 Silver Meadow Drive - Septic System/Lot Line Issue <br /> Dear Ms. Olson: <br /> This letter is to reiterate the City's position regarding <br /> the slight encroachment onto 375 Silver Meadow Drive of the mound <br /> sewage treatment system located at 315 Silver Meadow Drive. <br /> I met with Ed Sullivan of Sullivan's Services and the <br /> potential purchaser of the property at the site on Tuesday, <br /> August 6, 1991. Although a critical lot corner stake adjacent to <br /> Old Crystal Bay Road was not found, we concurred that based on <br /> the area being mowed by the neighboring property owner, a few <br /> square feet of the downhill toe of the mound was across the lot <br /> line. Because the sand bed extends across the lot line, this <br /> area could potential ly be considered part of the soil treatment <br /> area of the mound. <br /> We discussed the possibility of inerely removing this area <br /> of the mound and regrading the dikes so that none of the <br /> treatment area is over the line or within the 5' drainage and <br /> utilities easement either side of the lot line. Mr. Sul livan and <br /> I agreed that there would be some risk, albeit very slight, that <br /> this work could potentially result in future seepage towards the <br /> neighbors property. <br /> In order to obtain a greater lot line setback than 5' , it <br /> would be necessary to remove a portion of the rock bed and � <br /> distribution system from the northerly end of the mound and <br /> replace that muc�h area on the south/end. The amount of <br /> construction traffic and activity needed to accomplish this would <br /> have a high potential for damaging the system. Also, the end of <br /> the mound where expansion would occur has likely already been <br /> compacted by construction of the initial mound system. This <br /> compaction would possibly negate the benefits of adding� to the <br /> system. We felt that there would be a significant chance that "' _ <br /> the mound could fail if this cut/replacement work occurred. <br /> TELEPHONE-473-7357�FAX-473-0510 <br />