HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 5105 3..31 88
,4o
O .ilio
= , , CITYofORONO
�'� 1� „ �AV. �� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��
`�kESII04 N 0.
i'., A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
t-'; TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-305 (B), SECTION 78-1279 (6),
SECTION 78-1288, AND SECTION 78-282
FILE NO. 04-2970
WHEREAS, Robert P. Mack and Ardell M. Mack, husband and wife
(hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1525 Bay Ridge
Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
Tracts I and J, Registered Land Survey No. 192, files of Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-305 (B), 78-1279 (6), 78-
1288 and 78-282 for a side setback variance to allow a side setback of 18' at the
southeast corner of the home when 30' is normally required and 18' currently exists,
average lakeshore setback variance to allow an encroachment of approximately 50', and a
hardcover variance to allow 27% hardcover in the 75-250' zone when 25% is normally
allowed and 28% currently exists. in order to replace a flat roof with a pitched roof which
raises the ceiling in the existing living room, and to construct a car port at the front
entrance of the home.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application «as reviewed as Zoning File #04-2970.
2. The property is located in the LR – lA zoning district, which requires a
minimum lot area of 2 acres. The applicant's property is 0.858 acres.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on January 20, 2004 and recommended approval of the side setback,
Page 1 of 6
0.3*1/1 )
CITY of ORONO
�l !M �� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
90ItAkes-ao ' NO. a d 5
average lakeshore setback, and hardcover variances based on the
following findings:
a. The existing setback is non-conforming.
b. The proposal will not further encroach on the existing side yard
setback.
c. No additional living space is being added.
d. The raised roof will not affect any sightlines.
e. The square footage of removals proposed is greater than the square
footage of new hardcover proposed bringing the lot closer to
compliance.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings,the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-305 (B), 78-1279 (6), 78-
1288 and 78-282 in order to replace a flat roof with a pitched roof which raises the
ceiling in the existing living room, and to construct a car port at the front entrance of the
home subject to the following conditions:
Page 2 of 6
0°.1V)
= ,, , CITYofORONO
,r,
1, � � RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL
THE C0` -1 ESIIO
NO.
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and
annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 5,785 s.f. or 27%per the
proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A.
Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change
the nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and
increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in
existing hardcover.
3. Applicants shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative
landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover
surfaces.
4. Required removals of hardcover shall be completed by the final inspection.
5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building
permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval,
or the variance will expire on that date(January 26, 2005).
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 26th day of January, 2004.
Page 3 of 6
s
0!:(141 )
, CITY of ORONO
' ^ioitliVo' A., .
IA Is � z,G RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
.,:lkZS804 NO.
;ir
y ATTEST
,4444-ttfidl-----* ' ,
4
e4� AiLinda SV' e,C
ty Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayorti Ut
Y : .:d
-:-%:' ,...i'':,,'.,''.:
�r Y Y
'1,7_::; ,;P-'ix :. . '''''' '1, . V .1 ' M- 79/141-/L
,1'44.Pr 'e.. :Owners)
r
Page 4 of 6
•
0 %
o
. .:‘,;v\,,'r- CITY of ORONO
�,t , ����wlio'r ple 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
l
`9.kES�I� NO. 51 t0`
4
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
"I'''- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this.) day of
t, i, 2004 by Barbara A. Peterson. Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
`"-e--
tc.
:RACHEL CQC;P`IIS- , Notary Public J
') :NOTARY PUBLIC-i.;'. v "i\ faI
WCommtaion-Expiros
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
r The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of
i- l3 u o'-'' % 2004 by Linda S. Vee, Citi- Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City_
' " 7:`7T Notary Public 0
NOTARY PUBLIC-M: - OTA
My Commission Expires J .31 2CG
Page 5 of 6
VV 0.ili
0 0
=A;, w� CITY of ORONO
��1 ;, G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL •
ikEs-04.0 N0.
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County of Hennepin )
This instrument was acknowledged before me this Ziay of V , 2004
by Robert P. Mack, husband of Ardell M. Mack. G�ti
rN
'Z?
11` Ir„
BARBARA G. S(LUS \
NOTARY EUS!!O %..:,,.._ y�
My Commission Enires,L.n.31,'303 1
-,.�_. —,-,---,--.------- Notary Public
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County of Hennepin )
This instrument was acknowledged before me this„f9 day of 7A,,y4,c"�/ , 2004
by Ardell M. Mack, wife of Robert P. Mack. t
N!Ph DEMISE M.LESKINE,, t r
i' r NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA Lkj:1Z(-1('X. „i--/—
/--(.7
*Commission Expires Jan.31,23C
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
yr I rcH(, I J l rSC Li, K.L.S. NU. 192 N
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
i •
ikA1141;iNelL ANALYSIS ,.
• ::•'" 1
•
/ / S 89°59'44" E 325.94 /
• . /
522 147.69 4 2.7 69+—
126.01 ,
- - i - - - 005.4• = / '
/ 26.5 /�?,�y
ch ' i ' fi O
k! / / , ,. 5 W /�
^ , ARPORT y „ , /
Q / 64,1c,4 4.,D — �` .s 2• p� /
f `�,��'/ r \ N Lf'� / ;',.:' ter°
' ck
/ , -`\\A\ s 1. .2 w S.6 4`'0 ,e /n;
v !fpj'
/ / uld 34. f / U
23.2 �, r
4 16.7 a / •• N
/ / op
�/
.lLM 104.63 ! 126.83 88.51 SiL ,
_ Ca
N 89• 21” E 320.67 measured 320.28 RLS NO 192
///
74+_
IT
61 NARDGov4;R- To DE nr4CNIEP 019 s.f)
pip proY'd
tip- -D 5tio E v OA s•C /-
Poll v f-alowtr Tout. NEI vEu�•1; E of io wvedl Fitchet R-064LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: knf OVGJSt
Tracts I and J, Registered Land Survey No. 192, files of Registrar of Titles, •
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Phis survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, the location of on existing
louse, deck and driveway thereon, and the proposed location of a proposed carport. It does
lot purport to show any other improvements or encroachments.
o : Iron mo-ker
Me : Judicial landmark
Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum
tit
1®e
• C
Cr(
:13
1 1 17SO
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR c9s.
O TiTLES
HENNSPRCOUNTY,tleiNgESOTA
CERTIFIEI: '477LED ON
APR 0 5 2.504 our
-(-13TRAR OF TIILES
BY DEPUTY
-
-s-s