Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutwetland delineation-2013 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com May 27, 2013 Willie Abbott The Broadway Group • 1000 Brown Road South Orono, MN 55391 RE: Project Name: 2350 Watertown Road Delineation Comm. No.: 2013-30 Project Location: City of Orono T118N, R23W, SW 1/4 of Section 34 Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Dear Willie: As discussed, Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE)visited the above referenced site to perform a official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. Adjacent site land use includes residential, wetlands, park land, and woodlands consisting of plants and trees typical of a residential area. This parcel is a combination of a residential lot(Figure 6)with woodlands, grassland, and wetlands east of Willow Drive and north of Watertown Road. Figure 1 is a site location map of the property. All figures referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins and classify the wetland habitat. Rural Disturbed Species Noted Wet Meadow-Shrub Swamp Species Trees Herbs Cottonwood Narrowleaf Cattail Box Elder Lake Sedge Green Ash Reed Canarygrass Red Maple Giant Goldenrod Bur Oak Broadleaf Cattail Basswood Shrubs Black Willow Shrubs Common Buckthorn Red Osier Dogwood Green Ash Vines Riverbank Grape Herbs Ground Ivy Brome Grass Kentucky Bluegrass Stinging Nettle Canada Thistle Tall Goldenrod Common Dandelion Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 1 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com The growing season for this site is approximately from 4/15 to 10/15 where the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. The growing season in 2013 appears to be late due to a cold weather pattern. This site is in the big woods subsection ecoregion according to Minnesota DNR and the annual precipitation averages 30.45 inches. The presettlement vegetation was maple-basswood forest in this area. The precipitation for the previous three months along with the comparison of the 5/1/13 precipitation worksheet data was as follows: April March Feb Worksheet(Wks) 5.60* 1.64* 1.05* 30% less than 1.55 1.22 0.42 30% more than 3.11 2.06 0.97 2010 Wks Interpret Wet Normal Wet Multi-month score (3*3) + (2*2) + (1'3) = 16 Wet(15 to 18 being wet) *- NWS Data The delineation was performed on May 1, 2013 and it is unlikely the precipitation totals in this period affected the boundary of any wetlands in this delineation, even though the period was wetter than normal. Precipitation data is located in Appendix A. This wetland delineation was performed and reported by Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists—Professional Wetland Scientist#1000, University of Minnesota/BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019, American Fisheries Society—Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171. Methodology The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were catalogued and assigned a wetland indicator status according to the North American Digital Flora:National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland plants.usace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2009. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant's scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine)were assigned an obligate (OBL)1, facultative wet(FACW), and/or facultative (FAC)wetland status. With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute % cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50%of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetative cover. Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0(USDA NRCS 2010) if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in applvinq the Field Indicators of Hvdric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic(reduced)and aerobic(oxidized)conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. OBL=Obligate Wetland,occurs an estimated 99%in wetlands. FACW=Facultative Wetland,has an estimated 67%-99%probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wetlands,34%-66%probability. FACU=Facultative Upland,occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23% probability. UPL=Upland,almost never occurs in wetlands,<1%probability.N1=No Indicator, insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+)or lower(-)frequency of occurrence with an category. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 3 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis &Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2. Many of the soils have a high organic matter content 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Field Indicators of Hydric Soils Al Histosol. Classifies as a Histosol (except Folist)or as a Histel (except Folistel). User Notes: In a Histosol, typically 16 inches or more of the upper 32 inches is organic soil material. Organic soil materials have organic-carbon contents by weight of 12 to 18 percent or more, depending on the clay content of the soil. These materials include muck (sapric soil material), mucky peat(hemic soil material), and peat(fibric soil material). A2 Histic Epipedon. A histic epipedon underlain by mineral soil material with chroma 2 or less. User Notes: Most histic epipedons are surface horizons 8 inches or more thick of organic soil material. Aquic conditions or artifical drainage is required. A3 Black Histic. A layer of peat, mucky peat, or muck 8 inches or more thick that starts within the upper 6 inches of the soil surface; has hue of 10YR or yellower, value of 3 or less, and chroma of 1 or less; and is underlain by mineral soil material with chroma of 2 or less. User Notes: Unlike indicator A2, this indicator does not require proof of aquic conditions or artifical drainage. A4 Hydrogen Sulfide. A Hydrogen sulfide odor within 12 inches of the soil surface. A5 Stratified Layers. Several stratified layers starting within the upper 6 inches of the soil surface. At least one of the layers has value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, or it is muck, mucky peat, or a mucky modified mineral texture. The remaining layers have chroma of 2 or less. For any sandy material that constitutes the layer with value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic soil material, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: Use of this indicator may require assistance from a trained soil scientist with local experience. The minimum organic carbon content of at least one layer of this indicator is slightly less than is required for indicator A7. An undisturbed sample must be observed. Individual strata are dominantly less than 1 inch thick. A hand lens is an excellent tool to aid in the identification of this indicator. Many alluvial soils have stratified layers at greater depths; these soils do not meet the requirements of this indicator. Many alluvial soils have stratified layers at the required depths but do not have chroma of 2 or less; these do not meet the requirements of this indicator. The stratified layers occur in any soil texture. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 4 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond&Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com A10 0.75 inch Muck. A layer of sapric muck 0.75 inch or more thick with value 3 or less and chroma 1 or less, starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: this indicator requires a minimum muck thickness of 0.75 inch. Normally, this expression of anaerobiosis is at the soil surface; however, it may occur at any depth within 6 inches. Muck is sapric soil material with a minimum content of organic carbon that ranges from 12 to 18 percent, depending on the content of clay. Organic soil material is called muck if virtually all of the material has undergone sufficient decomposition to limit the recognition of the plant parts. Hemic and Fibric soil material do not qualify. Generally, the sapric muck is black and has a"greasy"feel; sand grains should not be evident. All Depleted below dark surface. A layer with a depleted or gleyed matrix that has 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or less, starting within 12 inches of the soil surface, and having a minimum thickness of either: a. 6 inches or b. 2 inches(if the 2 inches consists of fragmental soil material) c. Common in Mollisols—on this wetland site, could be Glencoe or Webster Loamy or clayey layer(s) above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less. Any sandy material above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, and, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic material. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: This indicator often occurs in Mollisols but also applies to soils with umbric epipedons and dark colored ochric epipedons. For soils with dark colored epipedons more than 12 inches thick, use indicator Al2. A depleted matrix requires value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2, or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. Al2 Thick Dark Surface. A layer at least 6 inches thick with a depleted or gleyed matrix that has 60 percent or more chroma 2 or less starting below 12 inches of the surface. The layer above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 2.5 or less and chroma of 1 or less to a depth of at least 12 inches and value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less in any remaining layers above the depleted or gleyed matrix. In any sandy material above the depleted or gleyed matrix, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic material, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: This indicator applies to soils that have a black layer 12 inches or more thick and have value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less in any remaining layers directly above a depleted or gleyed matrix. This indicator is most often associated with overthickened soils in concave landscape positions. A depleted matrix requires value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2 or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 5 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com A16 Coast Prairie Redox. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface that is at least 4 inches thick and has a matrix chroma of 3 or less with 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses and/or pore linings. User Notes: These hydric soils occur mainly on depressional landforms and portions of the intermound landforms on the Lissie Formation. Redox concentrations occur mainly as iron dominated pore linings. Common or many redox concentrations are required. Chroma 3 matrices are allowed because they may be the color of stripped sand grains or because few or common sand-sized reddish chert particles occur and may prevent obtaining chroma 2 or less. S1 Sandy Mucky Mineral. A layer of mucky modified sandy soil material 2 inches or more thick starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: "Mucky" is a USDA texture modifier for mineral soils. The content of organic carbon is at least 5 percent and ranges to as high as 14 percent for sandy soils. The percent required depends on the clay content of the soil; the higher the clay content, the higher the amount of organic carbon required. An example is mucky fine sand, which has at least 5 percent but not more than about 12 percent organic carbon. S3 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat. A layer of mucky peat or peat 2 inches or more thick with value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less, starting within 6 inches of the soil surface, and underlain by sandy soil material. User Notes: Mucky peat(hemic soil material) and peat(fibric soil material) have a minimum organic carbon content of 12 to 18 percent, depending on the content of clay. Organic soil material is called peat if virtually all of the plant remains are sufficiently intact to permit identification of plant remains. Mucky peat is at an intermediate stage of decomposition between peat and highly decomposed muck. To ascertain if mucky peat and/or peat are present, determine the percentage of rubbed fibers. S4 Sandy Gleyed Matrix. A gleyed matrix that occupies 60 percent or more of a layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: Gley colors are not synonymous with gray colors. They are the colors on the gley color pages in the Munsell color book (Gretag-Macbeth, 2000). They have hue of N, 10Y, 5GY, 10GY, 5G, 10G, 5BG, 10BG, 5B, 10B, or 5PB and value of 4 or more. For this indicator, the gleyed matrix only has to be present within 6 inches of the surface. Soils with gleyed matrices are saturated for periods of a significant duration; as a result, there is no thickness requirement for the layer. S5 Sandy Redox. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface that is at least 4 inches thick and has a matrix with 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses and/or pore linings. User Notes: "Distinct" is defined as readily seen but contrast only moderately with the color to which compared. "Prominent" is defined as contrasting strongly in color. Redox concentrations include iron and manganese masses(reddish mottles)and pore linings (Vepraskas, 1994). Included within the concept or redox concentrations are iron-manganese bodies occurring as soft masses with diffuse boundaries. Common(2 to less than 20 percent)or many(20 percent or more) redox concentrations are required (USDA, NRCS 2002). If the soil is saturated at the time of sampling, it may be necessary to let it dry to a moist condition for redox features to become visible. This is a very common indicator of hydric soils and is often used to identify the hydric/nonhydric soil boundary in sandy soils. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 6 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com S6 Stripped Matrix. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface in which iron-manganese oxides and/or organic matter have been stripped from the matrix and the primary base color of the soil material has been exposed. The stripped areas and translocated oxides and/or organic matter form a faintly contrasting pattern of two or more colors with diffuse boundaries. The stripped zones are 10 percent or more of the volume and are rounded. User Notes: This indicator includes the indicator previously named"polychromatic matrix" as well as the term"streaking". Common or many areas of stripped (unmasked) soil materials are required. The stripped areas are typically 0.5 to 1 inch in size but may be larger or smaller. Commonly, the stripped areas have value of 5 or more and chroma of 1 and/or 2, and the unstripped areas have chroma of 3 and/or 4. The matrix(predominant color) may not have the material with chroma of 3 and/or 4. The mobilization and translocation of oxides and/or organic matter is the important process and should result in splotchy masked and unmasked soil areas. This may be a difficult pattern to recognize and is more evident when a horizontal slice is observed. Fl Loamy Mucky Mineral. A layer of mucky modified loamy or clayey soil material 4 inches or more thick starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: "Mucky" is a USDA texture modifier for mineral soils. The content of organic carbon is at least 8 percent but can range to as high as 18 percent. The percentage required depends on the clay content of the soil; the higher the clay content, the higher the content of organic carbon required. An example is mucky sandy loam, which has at least 8 percent organic carbon but not more than about 14 percent. F2 Loamy Gleyed Matrix. A gleyed matrix that occupies 60 percent or more of a layer starting within 12 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: Gley colors are not synonymous with gray colors. They are the colors on the gley color pages of the Munsell color book. They have a hue of N, 10Y, 5GY, lOGY, 5G, 10G, 5BG, 10BG, 56, 106, or 5PB and value of 4 or more. The gleyed matrix only has to be present within 12 inches of the soil surface. Soils with gleyed matrices are saturated for periods of a significant duration; as a result, there is no thickness requirement for the layer. F3 Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent or more of chroma 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either: a. 2 inches if the 2 inches is entirely within the upper 6 inches of the soil, or b. 6 inches, starting within 10 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: A depleted matrix requires a value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2, or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. The low chroma matrix must be the result of wetness and not a weathering or parent material feature. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 7 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com F6 Redox Dark Surface. A layer that is at least 4 inches thick, is entirely within the the upper 12 inches of the mineral soil, and has: a. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma 1 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings, or b. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less and 5 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. User Notes: This is a very common indicator used to delineate wetland soils that have a dark surface layer. Redox concentrations in mineral soils with a high content of organic matter and a dark surface layer commonly are small and difficult to see. The organic matter masks some or all of the concentrations that may be present. Careful examination is required to see what are commonly brownish redox concentrations in the darkened materials. If the soil is saturated at the time of sampling, it may be necessary to let it dry to at least a moist condition for redox features to become visible. Soils that are wet because of ponding or have a shallow, perched layer of saturation may have any color below the dark surface. It is recommended that delineators evaluate the hydrologic source and examine and describe the layer below the dark colored epipedon when applying this indicator. F7 Depleted Dark Surface. Redox depletions with value of 5 or more and chroma of 2 or less in a layer that is at least 4 inches thick, is entirely within the upper 12 inches of the mineral soil and has: a. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less and 10 percent or more redox depletions, or b. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less and 20 percent or more redox depletions. User Notes: Care should be taken not to mistake mixing of an E or calcic horizon into the surface layer for depletions. The"pieces"of E and calcic horizons are not redox depletions. Knowledge of local conditions is required in areas where E and/or calcic horizons may be present. In soils that are wet because of subsurface saturation, the layer directly below the dark surface layer should have a depleted or gleyed matrix. Redox depletions should have associated microsite redox concentrations that occur as Iron pore linings or masses within the depletion(s) or surrounding the depletion(s). F8 Redox Depressions. In closed depressions subject to ponding, 5 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings in a layer that is 2 inches or more thick and is entirely within the upper 6 inches of the soil. User Notes: This indicator occurs on depressional landforms, such as vernal pools, playa lakes, rainwater basins, "Grady" ponds, and potholes. It does not occur in 3 foot wide microdepressions on convex or plane landscapes. We have reviewed the report for vegetative species at the boundary and data sheets for hydric soil indicators and we have revised selected wetland boundary areas which were staked with flags and orange wetland boundary flagging, they are shown on the final map as red lines. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 8 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com F12 Iron-Manganese Masses. On flood plains, a layer 4 inches or more thick with 40 percent or more chroma of 2 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft iron-manganese masses with diffuse boundaries. The layer occurs entirely within 12 inches of the soil surface. Iron-manganese masses have value and chroma of 3 or less. Most commonly, they are black. The thickness requirement is waived if the layer is the mineral surface layer. User Notes: These iron-manganese masses generally are small (2 to 5mm in size)and have value and chroma of 3 or less. They can be dominated by manganese and therefore have a color approaching black. The low matrix chroma must be the result of wetness and not be a weathering or parent material feature. Iron-manganese masses should not be confused with the larger and redder iron nodules associated with plinthite or with concretions that have sharp boundaries. This indicator occurs on flood plains along rivers, such as the Apalachicola, Congaree, Mobile, Savannah, and Tennessee Rivers. Hydrology The presence of current wetland hydrology was determined through direct observation of free water in the excavated soil pit, saturated soil conditions or soil redoximorphic features. However, the effect of on-or off-site hydrologic alterations may not always fully be accounted for when routine delineation methods are used. In the Midwest Region, hydrology indicators are in four groups: A) indicators based on the direct observation of surface water or groundwater during a site visit Indicator Al: Surface water Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the direct, visual observation of survace water(flooding or ponding)during a site visit. Indicator A2: High water table Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the direct, visual observation of the water table 12 in (30 cm)or less below the surface in a soil pit, auger hole, or shallow monitoring well. This indicator includes water tables derived from perched water, throughflow, and discharging groundwater(e.g., in seeps)that may be moving laterally near the soil surface. Indicator A3: Saturation Category: Primary General Description: Visual observation of saturated soil conditions12 in. (30cm)or less from soil surface as indicated by water glistening on the surfaces and broken interior faces of soil samples removed from the pit or auger hole. This indicator must be associated with an existing water table located immediately below the saturated zone; however, this requirement is waived under episaturated conditions if there is a restrictive soil layer or bedrock within 12 in. (30 cm)of the surface. B) indicators of evidence that the site is subject to flooding or ponding Indicator 61: Water marks Category: Primary General Description: water marks are discolorations or stains on the bark of woody vegetation, rocks, bridge supports, buildings, fences, or other fixed objects as a result of inundation. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 9 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Indicator B2: Sediment deposits Category: Primary General Description: Sediment deposits are thin layers or coatings of fine-grained mineral material (e.g., silt or clay)or organic matter(e.g., pollen), sometimes mixed with other detritus, remaining on tree bark, plant stems or leaves, rocks, and other objects after surface water recedes. Indicator B3: Drift deposits Category: Primary General Description: Drift deposits consist of rafted debris that has been deposited on the ground surface or entangled in vegetation or other fixed objects. Debris consists of remnants of vegetation (e.g., branches, stems, and leaves), man-made litter, or other waterborne materials. Drift material may be deposited at or near the high water line in ponded or flooded areas, piled against the upstream sides of trees, rocks, and other fixed objects or widely distributed within the dewatered area. Indicator B4: Algal mat or crust Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a mat or dried crust of algae, perhaps mixed with other detritus, left on or near the soil surface after dewatering. Indicator B5: Iron deposits Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a thin orange or yellow crust or gel of oxidized iron on the soil surface or on objects near the surface. Indicator B7: Inundation visible on aerial imagery Category: Primary General Description: One or more recent aerial photographs or satellite images show the site to be inundated. Indicator B8: Sparsely vegetated concave surface Category: Primary General Description: On concave land surface(e.g., depressions and swales), the ground surface is either unvegetated or sparsely vegetated (less than five percent ground over)due to long-duration ponding during the growing season. Indicator B9: Water-stained leaves Category: Primary General Description: Water-stained leaves are fallen or recumbent dead leaves that have turned grayish or blackish in color due to inundation for long periods. Indicator B13: Aquatic fauna Category: Primary General Description: Presence of live individuals, diapausing insect eggs or crustacean cysts, or dead remains of aquatic fauna, such as, but not limited to clams, aquatic snails, aquatic insects, ostracods, shrimp, other crustaceans, tadpoles, or fish, either on the soil surface or clinging to plants or other emergent objects. Indicator B14: True aquatic plants Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the presence of live individuals or dead remains of true aquatic plants. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 10 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Indicator B6: Surface soil cracks Category: Secondary General Description: Surface soil cracks consist of shallow cracks that form when fine-grained mineral or organic sediments dry and shrink, often creating a network of cracks or small polygons. Indicator B10: Drainage patterns Category: Secondary General Description: This indicator consists of flow patterns visible on the soil surface or eroded into the soil, low vegetation bent over in the direction of flow, absence of leaf litter or small woody debris due to flowing water, and similar evidence that water flowed across the ground surface. C) indicators that the soil was saturated recently Indicator C1: Hydrogen sulfide odor Category: Primary General Description: A hydrogen sulfide(rotten egg)odor within 12 (30 cm) of the soil surface. Indicator C3: Oxidized rhizospheres along living roots Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing 2 percent or more iron-oxide coatings or plaques on the surfaces of living roots and/or iron-oxide coatings or linings on soil pores immediately surrounding living roots within 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil surface. Indicator C4: Presence of reduced iron Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing reduced (ferrous) iron in the upper 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil profile, as indicated by a ferrous iron test or by the presence of a soil that changes color upon exposure to the air. Indicator C6: Recent iron reduction in tilled soils Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing 2 percent or more redox concentrations as pore linings or soft masses in the tilled surface layer of soils cultivated within the last two years. The layer containing redox concentrations must be within the tilled zone or within 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil surface, whichever is shallower. Indicator C7: Thin muck surface Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a layer of muck 1 in. (2.5 cm) or less thick on the soil surface. Indicator C2: Dry-season water table Category: Secondary General Description: Visual observation of the water table between 12 and 24 in. ( 30 and 60 cm) below the surface during the normal dry season or during a drier-than-normal year. Indicator C8: Crayfish burrows Category: Secondary General Description: Presence of crayfish burrows, as indicated by openings in soft ground up to 2 in. (5 cm) in diameter, often surrounded by chimney-.like mounds of excavated mud. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 11 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Indicator C9: Saturation visible on aerial imagery Category: Secondary General Description: One or more recent aerial photographs or satellite images indicate soil saturation. Saturated soil signatures must correspond to field-verified hydric soils, depressions or drainage patterns, differential crop management, or other evidence of a seasonal high water table. D)vegetation and soil features that indicate that wet conditions are recent and not historical. Indicator D9: Gauge or well data Category: Primary General Description: Stream or lake gauge data, or groundwater well data, indicate that the site is inundated or has a water table 12 in. (30 cm)or less below the surface for 14 or more consecutive days during the growing season in most years(at least five years in 10, or 50 percent of higher probability), or meets an alternative wetland hydrology standard established for a particular geographic area or wetland type. Indicator D1: Stunted or stressed plants Category: Secondary General Description: In agricultural or planted vegetation located in a depression, swale, or other topographically low area, this indicator is present if individuals of the same species growing in the potential wetland are clearly of smaller stature, less vigorous, or stressed compared with individuals growing in nearby drier landscape situations. Indicator D2: Geomorphic position Category: Secondary General Description: This indicator is present if the immediate area in question is located in a depression, drainageway, concave position within a floodplain, at the top of a slope, on the low-elevation fringe of a pond or other water body, or in an area where groundwater discharges. Indicator D5: FAC-neutral test Category: Secondary General Description: The plant community passes the FAC-neutral test. With these indicators, only one primary indicator needs to be present, or at least two secondary indicators for the hydrology criterion to be met. Wetland Classification Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998) are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 12 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"-40", noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange "wetland boundary" flagging tape or flagging tied on vegetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped by others using modern survey methods. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Results Basin T Basin 1 is a PEMC Type 3 shallow marsh with a reed canarygrass fringe comprised of 15% narrowleaf cattail, 70% reed canarygrass, 5% black willow, 3% red osier dogwood, and 2%giant goldenrod, along with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Hamel soil to saturated Glencoe soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. Basin 2 Basin 2 is a R3UB Type riverine wetland comprised of 90% narrowleaf cattail, 7% reed canarygrass, and 1%giant goldenrod with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from common buckthorn to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from Hamel upland soil to Glencoe soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. The National Wetland Inventory Map(NWI) (Figure 2) identifies no wetlands which were flagged on the subject site. According to the DNR Protected Waters Map (PWI) (Figure 4) of Hennepin County the site has no public waters on the site. Figure 5 shows the wetlands present on-site. Figure 6 is a parcel map of the area. According to the Web Soil Survey(Figure 3) the following hydric soils existed on the parcel: Hamel Glencoe Minnetonka Udorthents Photographs were taken of the site and some are included in Appendix C. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 13 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District) and other agencies. I certify that I reviewed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. G � 5. 3-/x7/200. Wayne E. Jacobson Date Professional Soil Scientist#30611 Professional Wetland Scientist#1000 Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019 Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. Regulators: Catherine Bach, MCWD Melissa Jenny, USCOE Lynda Peterson, BWSR Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 14 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map 93°36000'W 93°35.000'W WGS84 93°34.000'W • �, z ry.rtu� _ 0 °� '�rc� ` ✓ I 4J .1 'lrtnity,�.h�, ---,•-•—•---- a- -•"4- ..L"--�s,---a o G v �1 ' - •�CgWpty. ,� • !1042 1: � Ji ! ,^ ti.,_ 1,• • . • , .-/-`' • • S� .. v(1LS 11.1) OOPS •f• * • b rr.+mrn. �� ¢ I 1, • t p n • Lake ; vj °' r /�1'' <�- . , 3_ q y - Cladaen I .. <..,. f_ - •4-. e E3'rovytl r CS pyo - ''"' — k. . r. - m _ 10.:.. d. ,. ..,,,,•__ . , _ -- ,, v.-_,. .,-. .. Keile r .,° I igh Se p ` I --' pa. j�, �' . ... jaz Pkwy z. _ . . / } r r I _ ,- ,, ... I -f , ■ il i 2* !• 7,, a hit i !1 ._ _ +� t. Long �4 ' iw • } a flrei•s .. ,. r. E > 44 1. ` _ — ._. z +. 4 ii _ 7 ') t M_ 4 . r - r 4-77 1 .•t_..! t-.;)_t_ t . , • z• r, 6, 0 - I t ...Cu'• ! o3,14.1.,..--„ p 1. rn q, 1 4, 1 v"y `...� 1.. �t • rn •• _ M 1_ i , I • _ ; • . i f rand: e• 4; ` ` ;, /I -N,.. ._ '^ .fid. f r ..„..4.. ,0. tk• :I _. °v, •- 2 om i w• 115 h ® ..�• t� (��� �. J Q�QI �, { f e S k a 51104Yn Rd V 1• . - r, }' •F • • •, fl • i prole ♦ ..r_. .�•...•. •O.____. .,I • ".,.:...,i•, c > "'�" / ff• rr f4e •�Yt1 ? '! i•( •6e` i�,�•�-1:+v) {t • : '� ` '` . W4y"' ' ; 1 ``-7- .- / <C • ., �"" •i) •,. -"."*-4-.'V(iron w°i a• o .>y ... m 1 r r ti t-CO y.Ct4H' ..t.A, ei Flo-rri N0 : ,;2 G :° t j . m !� / N �Of,, I N • OC il Oi �, 1' 'i :�L 1/ z ' ` Fox st • .o Ca Jin' ` •�-�: I . '9s” ° i p. !s-• .•� t y•°`s 0 f o - O `u'-✓-Fox $t '" ' • `• ',o "• z ( fi. o it.' .G, c o 0 �. �V t`/, a ` Fl-1 .i 7,, �G. 1 ''1 }: 102 0 °a ��^ i ,I• '1,1• •• N.,.. • ,�, '" ..fi if f v f© 1 _ , I , , M4xwetl $a .}� '. i «a '��° w '�', r ff Tan ager -► d ` N —_. Lake ^ti. 1, „1 •%/ T,•Ii t' /• r . i `i Y-9. _. ,, -co-,..- dRMap sated With, )2'i,, a °naL ra hi As1 }j r 93°36.000'W 93°35.000'W WGS84 93°34.000'W NATIONAL 0.0 0.5 miles TNN GEOGRAPHIC °''x° 0.0 0.5 1.0 km 05/26/13 �t """' Figure 2 NWI Map -14 r U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service!' National Wetlands Invento ,- .� May 2013 s a" , ��� _ ,.. �` ' Wetlands I 1 • 4 # Ns t =res rsaI€r Ema gent ' Sr - •restwater czres'ea:'Sh'Ub t=" t �� F.marine aa�Marne Deepwater a ,a i :j a , . .,. ! Es'uartrrt a•t_M.a't•te - ..111111 ae �s s � 44, .avert 94- 4. k.� ` .r aEf i �' � 1A+ [ ♦ �,...+ , y r _ {`.flier •. f , �• c ...��4'' t tic ' gii. II ._. , _ , ,..„.. 4, ,.. . ..f.1 I rel+ , t, 7 it * lif 11 "" • `11• 14 K" , 4'' R" .# ` �. 1. " h4 "� • • os-t • '..ft ,..t ;,,, r ' „...,.. a:, ,..'. octt. -' . `'- - k f . ,".f .4.'*4 '. 'It- --. - * L I ,••,,,,,„ , y. __iv, .; it it' -•..,„, „Et., , - r . ,,,, . , ..-..., ,.., . ,..,, ...... ,,,, of . �' le... fin'' __ i yh fir iii e - .. .. this map is for c.mrai sereence only.The US fish and Wiaiif.Samos is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on thio nip.All wetlands Malted data ahou d be toad in accordance with the layer nwtadata foend on the WNNnds Mayyw webs.* User Remarks: III Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3 Soils Map) a M 0 a w n in m 453950 454000 454050 454100 454150 454200 44 56 55' i ,,,,41011 M'S8'55" rv( 1111 S' 8 E 0 III +n $ i $o , 0 ' ,4 , t. s-, ‘ A E. "".°" i o r/ , . , 1(4e o ta t , it ll ---.. ... , , z:.,i:i_.:,-: ,„*t At. ;, • 4644,4144... • • tt...., :: , , liammull , ,Aye{c fit � �^1','-'11,. t� �, t s il 1 , r ` � , 4 v r V' 'it 1 ' ' ,t� o o ( ".. ir..�"{� *� a iii s, ,4 a v a n . v N '� ,.'dgx kiitfaV pp�� ii. 1 . Orli 44'58'40' - 453950 454000 454050 454100 454150 454200 in Map Scale:1 2,170 if printed on A size(8.5"x 11')sheet. m N Meters 01 m ^ 0 20 40 80 Feet 120 N ' 0 50 100 200 300 USDA Natural Resources ►. Web Soil Survey 5/26/2013 tt� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soils Map Map Unit Legend Hennepin County,Minnesota(MN053) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L9A Minnetonka silty clay loam.0 to 2 percent slopes 0.1 0.4% L22C2 Lester loam,morainic,6 to 12 percent slopes,eroded 1.1 4.4% L25A Le Sueur loam,1 to 3 percent slopes 0.7 2.5% L26A Shorewood silty clay loam,0 to 3 percent slopes 4.1 15.9% L26B Shorewood silty clay loam,3 to 6 percent slopes 9.8 37.8% L26C2 Shorewood silty clay loam.6 to 12 percent slopes. 2.8 10.9% eroded L378 Angus loam.morainic,2 to 5 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% L132A Hamel-Glencoe,depressional,complex,0 to 3 percent 6.1 23.7% slopes U2A Udorthents,wet substratum,0 to 2 percent slopes 1.1 4.2% Totals for Area of Interest 25.9 100.0% ,I).% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5126/2013 iiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 19+P E N N i E / IP - - 52,I1) '-4T c.�o la Y 11•n - RESERVE IP /SAI/ , ,. 119! / ` 7EV0, •.1(M `lM1! Stolt) Y Jrr& r MEM,, _ 4 us 1 YA �`C. --r Ties�" 160P w•1 e'• ymn L. I 1 LONV LAKF. �� ' 39 1 , 3' VF W�1 14' -- ---)Ii( 3. .o•,w. �r 1— —•_,l. -. r ti. 1 _ :IIa++ ,t31.T, tea.e`i I 1 •�• I iI+ux. -- f,,} ti� 1. •.731 I '93 `' • r100.) & vv.I �' lases \ E _ i'55? 4t) myrrr __ 1;Fli VP•,,,.„, 12, II V9yo,v ; =OM �� I P 9Y1v/; � '1! S1IT , I ' , - ,• MEL; �,,FITEM! VI � /I Iiiiitiou. ,,, ,rompAllii......4,/ Fir.1:4 MOUN1 wroo.• U 1 Int itilsll` .7r' ,C / �p7C�7 f7 r., . 2' irt • or, 7 orp„ 3 fI ®_ .07" 71- - K., �j cs•co t MT r S 107 TI • xA, . I' ''�7Z217 I4 ,.,... 6 .__ „ , „ . I ' _ .Awq -. ' _..�_...... 11 m9 Figure 4 DNR Public Waters Inventory Map— 1-lennepin County TN Jacobson Environmental, PLLC Approximate Scale 1” = 5,280' Project No. 2013-30 • Certificate of Survey 1 /----------Ni Prepared for: William Abbotr i I \ Lama • Found Non Monument ,( 40.5....A.....,( 40.5....A..... N 8970'34' W 214.01 (9 Sot Test(by other) / rer.or '--N.the of Lot 2,Block 7, i ULMER ESTATES _ SCALE ,.,n Q 01 60 0 !0 6D 170 j %. Wa414•10t 417 1 �` P G 11 1 inch 60 feet `'S / 2f'W>�T' / fie\z. I QIt \`(ddhealed byJacobson�' "�� N 8971'00" W 321.28 £n`wonmMtol, PLLL:an �% ,..• +� ti May 1, ?1173) ` ---N. line of Lot 2,Block 1, HUNTERS GREEN 1 -i _ J did ty Easement ti 1 / ^— `�- . Maple _ Lane �� � . L, K 1 11 ..(. Lot 2, Block 1, w , N h l e u P HUNTERS GREEN \ �A - 1': e Lot 2, Block 1, viii �\ I' ULMER ESTATES basting��9r �, I z 4-op 1 i-'SYy line of Lot 2 Black 1, ~�• b \ HUNTERS GREEN45 I ii as ±q IV N 8921'00" W 301.28 o4 oW � Figure 5 Wetland Delineation Map SW ol N t . / Boundary Description(supplied by client) i I I h e1 Lot 2, Block I, ULMER ESTATES. and Lot 2. ,; Block I, HUNTERS GREEN, Hennepe County, • u Minnesota Subject to any and oil sosemenra on N of record. MO Numbers 34-118-2J-33-0055 2 34-118-2.7-33-0038 Properly Address* 2350 Watertown Rood Orono, MN ,--S tine of Lot 2, Block 1, \ ULMER ESTATES Mat, The purpose of this survey is to ‘‘,\.. .....,.....1 .-- i 181.01per show the location of the wetlands delineated N 8970'34' W 234.01 -� BDrson Environmental, PLLC on May 1, Bearings based on oasurr ed datum. u p /1 Job Number. 7522 SCHOBORG l hereby by m thou this my dire t of swvey was prepared by me er under my dNact wpervte/on and Book/Page: LL that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the LA SERVICES laws of the State of Minnesoto. Survey Date: 1/21/1 t/JD/14 5/4J 5/$/01 drawing Name: abbott lwg INC. drawn by KLS Paul 8. Schoborq Rests/one: 783-972-322? 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE Date: W,field/!S 2013 Registration NA 14700 www.SchobwgLaodcorn Delano, MN 55.328 � 1 Hennepin County Property Interactive Map Page 1 of I Interactive illMapsFigure 6 Parcel Map We4.crce 'tom- .1arA\j I. 'f ... .._ •�p p Results elr " �! • 59 4„•` r z r-11- YTi • ii Largos i' y� � } 2 ! ...a aC ar" 'rs V¢ b{ e nag ry. E r_^.acs, # __.,k,:,.,: r `. .. w,' .s*& c,aF,} - £ fit" •k r ve Lk�e m nzs a ' -'1 2,-,:::.., PID:3411823330055 '-' , ' 38 Address Unassigned I ¢ fi i ' Orono,MN O�JO a 9 r+ '. ,:`-t !: OwntrfTa�sysr .� H ! i• ,Y ' .a f..r W E Martin&P O �, r� Martrn WILLIAM owner � �!'.. MARTIN _ 3 r ff". ? Aim'. ,,>, Fl. Taxpayer. 2360 WATERTOWN a1. _ 1 RD LONG LAKE MN t � -7 "x_�, 55358 's' s .. Tax District •�, • i School Disc 278 k ,. } l Sewer Dist +� + �, u Watershed Dist y _ .... d No. /.+ . 'RV A. fH± 2"' *s M C Parcel Wil °. 'A-'le' 2.68 acres • +t ♦;-. Parcel Area: 116.566 sq fl •_ �`. `.i TonaoslAbstnet: Abstract {{ >.2 - .» Addition: Ulmer Estates g¢ + - j z�' - ,, Lot 002 ,• Block: 001 . x 1 Metes 8 Bounds: •, `+�`` " Tax Data)PayabIe 2013) ".., V i Market Value: 5120.000 c- ,. sr+• Total Tax: $1.392.80 .' : ^' '4 ". 1` h c �S Loped 1 z•,..'s_ " ^ �t a - ,,,Whitlk. ' "4"'''s ' —' ' y� a . 4/16/2013 http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/property/map/default.aspx?pid=3411823330055 APPENDIX A Precipitation Data Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Page 1 of 2 Minnesota Climatology Working Group Wiz' State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search J Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 118N township name: Medina range number: 23W nearest community: Long Lake section number: 34 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 Score using 1971-2000 normal period first prior month: second prior third prior month: (values are in inches) April month: February 2013 March 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: 0.00 0.00 0.00 there is a 30% chance this location will have less 1.26 1.19 0.40 than: • there is a 30%chance this location will have 2.76 2.12 0.98 more than: type of month: dry normal wet dry dry dry monthly score 3 * 1 = 3 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 1 = 1 multi-month score: 6 (Dry) 6 to 9(dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Score using 1981-2010 normal period NWS 12442/1 - first prior third prior month: month: second prior (values are in inches) April month: February 2013 March 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: S.4,t) ',It 1, 6+ *, _1. 4.5- there (, 05"there is a 30%chance this location will have less 1.55 1.22 0.42 than: • there is a 30% chance this location will have 3.11 2.06 0.97 more than:• type of month: dry normal wet y„w4. y,o,,,,,.,o I ft)a4- monthly score 3 *5 = 9 , 2 *x= 4- 1 *3 = 3 1G(w4.+) http://climate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=454774&... 5/24/2013 Hlgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Page 1 of 2 'Closest Station' Climate Data Retrieval The data matching your request is at the bottom of this page or should appear there within one minute. Target location is Lat: 44.98559 Lon: 93.57367 set location retrieve only this station: r218300 TONKA vi years: 2012 vi to`2013 v number of missing days allowed per month: "3...... retrieve data from the following data sources: _ I Precipitation from High Density Network •/_l Precipitation from National Weather Service i Temperature from National Weather Service ...i Snow from National Weather Service get monthly a{ get daily useDNRhid: FalselTrue Target: lat 44.98559 lon 93.57367 mon year cc tttN rrW 55 nnnn 00000000 pre aaaaaa Tmx Tmn aaaaaa sno SnD dis Jan 2012 217935 .49 4 mi . Feb 2012 217935 1.73 4 mi . Mar 2012 217935 1.70 4 mi . Apr 2012 217935 2.96 4 mi . May 2012 217935 9.45 4 mi . Jun 2012 217935 3.55 4 mi . Jul 2012 217935 4.75 4 mi . Aug 2012 217935 1.50 4 mi . Sep 2012 217935 .30 4 mi . Oct 2012 217935 1.35 4 mi . Nov 2012 217935 .85 4 mi . Dec 2012 217935 1.20 4 mi . Jan 2013 211448 .66 9 mi . Feb 2013 211448 1.05 9 mi . Mar 2013 211448 1.64 9 mi . Apr 2013 211448 5.60 9 mi . May 2013 211448 5.64 9 mi . Jun 2013 m 999 mi . Jul 2013 m 999 mi . Aug 2013 m 999 mi . sep 2013 m 999 mi . Oct 2013 m 999 mi . Nov 2013 m 999 mi . Dec 2013 m 999 mi . Where indicated: Missing values are shown as'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as'-'. 'TTTT RR SS' is the 'public land survey(PLS)'or'legal'location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC 'TIC' locations plus 100. 'NWS ID' the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the'PLS'will always be correct for precipitation data while the'NWS ID'will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the'NWS ID' number applies to all shown data. 7 return to retrieval selection i http://climate.umn.edu/H1Dradius/radius.asp 5/24/2013 APPENDIX B Sample Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site. A1, m. -t!` (.d:I I D.qi 1•4._ City/County: e4fte,, je Sampling Date 5/l/20,1 Applicant/Owner: h/►MA_LA_ 1tt. State:rMA/ Sampling Point: I up Investigator(s): /4) ::r Section,Township,Range: 04"l TI 18'Nl 8231) Landform(hillslloope,terrace,etc.): IR:l Isi�e Local relief(concave,convex,none): LOHv Slope(%). L..,, Coag: Long: Datum. Soil Map Unit Name: 1+0,04a,I NWI classification: Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No K (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation %J Soil .n1 ,or Hydrology ^1 significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No Are Vegetation N ,Soil N ,or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No K Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No___x__, within a Wetland? Yes No ( Remarks: 4 CAOPOYA', 11' `th.- h lo$:a 4Krlys:s 4 S.L *I s3 wits a tvlr.cflet..7lyy+►1 VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. /200W14/ dam•;sa. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3D'YELL_$) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: — 2. (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (8) 4. Percent of Dominant Species / 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: {p1 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1511#19,0:...$) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Multioly by: 2. _ OBL species _ x 1= -- 3. FACW species x 2= 4 FAG species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= =Total Cover UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 el v I"'.l3p y' FA/' 1 Column Totals: (A) (B) 1. IrG ✓� Ife,+c /ZviY 2. p.,,„, 14_R-h►wJ;5 ir _ -� Prevalence Index =EVA= 3. SIL! ? �� Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: -4 c-�•�a��s.s 1� . N J l 4. _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5._ Na-Dominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 6. g _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. pr =Total Coves 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present.unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I5' ✓1q,tsot 7� 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes K No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2 0 SOIL Sampling Point: 1"vp Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvoe' Loc' Texture Remarks O 1 012.3/) - cl�� (,�,,a., 1DY122/f 18'24 1.y 4'/1 c(- �aa,M 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sollst _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) — Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) — Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peal or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No K Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:checkall that apply) econdary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(01) _ Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) 4c. FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(09) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): ',lot-- Saturation Present? Yes )C. No Depth(inches): Ir Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_)4 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: bb j+ Gf; 1,.. " ' City/County: a`eyp, Sampling Date: 5./1/10/ Applicant/Owner: Ler,I I i . � st- State: MA,/ Sampling Point: I—LJCr Investigator(s): Wb:Zr- • Section,Township,Range; �� Tt ivy, R231,) Landform(hillslope,terrace.etc.): leirdlr�/f t"A Local relief(concave,convex,none): GarsGa.,� Slope(%): 1 Lat: T Long; Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: 14Q.4d1.4 NWI classification: pFfe. Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No K (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N .Soil I`f ,or Hydrology l y significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes )C' No Are Vegetation N .Soil )\/ ,or Hydrology // naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes K No Hydric Soil Present? Yes )*- No Is tho Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )C No within a Wetland? Yos X , No Remarks; /441-0 0•111. y ' y re j:£ f''Lr(y--:S 11/41 MIS at 14,0 1-hrar •743., t VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 17 Pew'', dam% Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size:jaLoguiL,Ask %Cover Species? tatus Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2.. (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2.. (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: J Ors (NB) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: at 1yV11 .. Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1= _ 3. FACW species x 2= _ 4. FAC species x 3= _ 5. FACU species x 4= _ =Total Cover UPL species x 5= _ Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 ✓'i�t�� Column Totals: (Al _ (B) 1.--7P iNl f4,f+4e. -AT --y-- DBL 2. ✓ -4142_ -Etta!) Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. , 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Expla n) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology roust 41,,c =Total Cover be present.unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1✓ vSy(�.JS 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation Total Cover Present? Yes_ _ No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:jr_Vi Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-18 lona 5/1 T441 LS:r_1 Ip I /► 7 cv t/4-._2.._ _e1.._ r + -1, a 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix, Hydric Sola Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(M6) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) — Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(SO) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matnx(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophyke vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes )C No Depth(Inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of oneis recuired:check all that amity) 5econdary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Surface Soil Cracks(136) x High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Drainage Patterns(810) Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(814) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(61) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils(C6) $ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(DO) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No % Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes r No Depth(inches): 1 D Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): D Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: .417pst+ h City/County: ta/+d/ .5-/1/1011 Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: £4'►11 tv AI*.it State: 144W Sampling Point:, 2-.vp Investigator(s): Section,Township,Range: 0÷ T1 I , R2:31t) Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): 19.I Isfef` Local relief(concave,convex,none): rase% Slope(%): 2- Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: 4,144,pa- NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No )[ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation �/ ,Soil hf ,or Hydrology fV ,significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? Yes )r No Are Vegetation N .Soil N ,or Hydrology /V naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is tho Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No G� within a Wetland? Yes No )e Remarks: 444e)lt,j •1 `f•- h p fo_ fr v(ys:s ,rt a *1:1 w•ts a u/•...thor.._9 VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. hoer?MM/ 00..e ea. Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: TreeStratum (Plot size: 3A irw.(_.i sl %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. I 1:Al41"4161'1, :vw Fd Y FALIJ That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Z (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A/B) cO =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: l 5 'v 4...$) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. 444i44,. c".N.rsWit:" �'g, � Total%Cover o1; Multioly Dv: _ 2. OBL species x t= _ 3. FACW species x 2= _ 4. FAC species x 3= _ 5. FACU species x 4= _ $D =Total Cover UPL species x 5= - Herb tratum (Plot size: S N :...t) Column Totals: (A) _ (B) 1. >,k,o,,,s.as •�o _ . F4c. 2. Prevalence Index =D/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 4 _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 7Q =Total Covei be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 s ►•ndt.40 1. Hydrophytic 2 Present?Vegetation Yes X No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Z"V f Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks l I-2421L iota.+./t — ?m-2* isgga4'/1 -'t Zti3r'YR�1'-a -� -�— - - a1s�"' lA geK 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary lndicatorslminimum of one is reauired:check all that aaoiv) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(89) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(614) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(65) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No 1G Depth(inches): ?24. Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 7 I` Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No >C (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous Inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: Abbot+ City/County: Azo." Sampling Date: 5/1/271 Applicant/Owner: Lt/t I 11a- Alflifip g-f- State: MA/ Sampling Point: 2-14/e ' Investigator(s): Wf Section,Township,Range: 0+) Tt l$7/J 1Q23(,d Landform(hitlslope,terrace,etc.): &2'U.s' Local relief(concave,convex,none): a±srtuuw Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: 1..4.2-0 NWI classification: PEMC.. Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No IC , (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation r/ ,Soil / f ,or Hydrology i1.1 significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances`present? Yes X' No Are Vegetation /V .Soil it/ ,or Hydrology /V naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes )C. No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is tho Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes QC,. No Remarks: '^0%,a'. �..eS�10,E 4 wtro:s rtb coal f z svgs VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. hoer-m/ dam,; Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: Ledir/: %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Z (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: I Pb (A/B) =Total Cover Sapllno/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15-�v,40( Prevalence Index worksheet: R 1. h*i eMMt+ii G-if?,.-44 Csec 4O _� FAG Total%Cover of: Multiply bv: 2. OBL species x 1= 3. FACW species x 2= 4 FAC species x 3= _ 5. FACU species x 4= 40 =Total Cover UPL species x 5= _ Herb Stratum (Plot size: 6.111.40(1.‘“) Column Totals: (A) (B) 1. 2. Prevalence Index =B/A= — 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Dominance Test Is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7, _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) B. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Qrp =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. /Voodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 iiesalwo; 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes, X. No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2 0 SOIL Sampling Point: 2"1„Z Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc7 Texture Remarks 4"4' i to 1/1 - G141 I!•e-t 4'-24- ipyt4-11 1.51/R4'16_1_ G _4 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soilss: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain In Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(Al 0) la Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes )G No Depth(Inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(139) , Surface Soil Cracks(86) ,$. High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) ^ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Gauge or Well Date(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No )C._ Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes 1$ No Depth(inches): 'j Saturation Present? Yes K No Depth(inches): C Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: Abpsi+ W:!Im.,t! �"f �1t City/County: Qneyj n Sampling Date3yr/lob i Applicant/Owner: LJ i 1 1 t.. AI*,it State: ,44W Sampling Point: 3--vP Investigator(s): 11.,fre:Zr Section,Township,Range: 04-i Tl law) R2:310.)Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): 4!i l tS ts�., Local relief(concave,convex,none): r__a11.KiG. Slope(%). 3 Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Gl.44.4_ NWI classification: Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No K (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N ,Soil t`( •or Hydrology 1 J significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No Are Vegetation N .Soil N ,or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes )L No Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No Is the Samplod Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No__X__ Remarks: 4 Cc4o9111 ': ' 'A, k/h.. h (v�to flow frscs a'7`breleepel Yet r3 i,,01$ a wr-,rt-/ia,,.41,1.4, VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. O P?4/ fid.,r.;o e, Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3o t nod!.ice) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. 'T.7 1:A Rs,.l.,...ti�...A co TieF/4/,) That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: "3 (A) 2. Pvispe.t.1.l f' �.',:'/v.,A,. .e_.l _IS__ _r___— /Total Number of Dominant 3• Aril' )b _Id_ Pidies Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species r 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Ts (A/B) 1.1- =Total Cover Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1.S-"14.1..(i,,4) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. 9444.w,t..s 4e4444. .,�� __Z _y F.tL Total%Cover of: Multiply Dv: _ 2. OBL species x 1= _ 3. FACW species x 2= _ 4. FAC species x 3= _ 5. FACU species x 4= 2.5 =Total Cover UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum (Plotsize: 5l lilt:.is) p Column Totals: (A) _ (B) 1. P"':Lo'1 L Alves ik1 I42_. FRC() 2. .440.4 t;w-b44,.+:en _7p__ FAe, Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. — 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation 5. _.__. )4 2-Dominance Test Is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Exploit)9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must SID =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I 5 1 vle,t:1. 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes x No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 1--up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color(moist) _ % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks °`l2 I YR 2/i - 4'11 J04441 )0Y/24/' SY%4/4 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS:Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) , Dark Surface(57) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(AID) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes )C No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aaoly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(89) , Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(81) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gouge or Well Data(D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No lG Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 7 14 Saturation Present? Yes No 'c Depth(inches): 7 24- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes capillary capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: Akbe. -I� WIIlp.t, Cit /Count �+ Sampling �.� City/County: eY10 Sam lin Date: 5-/l/14715 Applicant/Owner: WI I I t.. A ,ri- State: ,t4.V Sampling Point: 3-'•we-T- Investigator(s): tri/g6:1- Section,Township,Range: 0�"J i I$N f RZ'3W Landform(hillslope,terrace.etc.): ��r.,..t!o.^ Local relief(concave,convex,none): Gert Gw, fQ- Slope(%): I Let: r Long: Datum, Soil Map Unit Name: is I Mcot. NWI classification: R 3u8 Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No K (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation r/ ,Soil !'1 ,or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes it- No Are Vegetation N .Soil N ,or Hydrology /1/ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes )r. No Is tho Sampled Aroa Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes__._ _ No within a Wetland? Yes X . No Remarks: Acc,A,i1:,, 'il' `lig.,. h 1 ;Q 461,rl7,s:s or7 ctvt4d "Lt tz iv-is a wa ,or-40'ywt VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. 17Pers14/ dr-e sa. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 i 1.141 f..j %Cover Species? St us Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: I (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: I (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: IDD (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I St yLtt..s) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: _ 2. OBL species x 1 = _ 3. FACW species x 2= - 4. FAC species x 3= - 5. FACU species x 4= _ =Total Cover UPL species x 5= _ Herb Stratum (Plot size: S r r'i1.1:✓A Column Totals: (A) _ (B) 1. Cs..tro leic--t-1w-zS I0 _ O h 2. Am f_�:. .. vet,/.�.44,....47c y FALv Prevalence Index =B/A= — 3. c..!"I1.1Y^4.e 1 In ifs 1j Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5, _ ZG 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ,_„- 3-Prevalence Index is S3.0' 7, _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 9. 10. 9 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratu �5 r r be present.unless disturbed or problematic. rn (Plot size: 1. Hydrophytic 2 n Present? Yes C No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type` Loc' Texture Remarks 1 DX'12. A.Dialack_ 4--15 1 DYf-241 -7.5)42f*-,7-- , -e1=._ 1g-2+ 10 to Z+-/t ;--- 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains, 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,MeMatrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: _ Histosol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(66) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain In Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(Al 0) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) - Redox Dark Surface(F8) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes NICNo Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: primary Indicators(minimum of one is required check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) , Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(814) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Ze Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Gauge or Well Data(09) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No )C Depth(inches): "f Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): '1-I- Saturation Present? Yes $ No Depth(inches): 14- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLANDDETERMINATIONDATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site! A10#1,00 + �;I I pn ..ii may``4%. City/County: a+4,10.3 Sampling Date. c/1/2.011 Applicant/Owner: Lit,I I is ,QWp,g-t- State: /k4A/ Sampling Point:_ 4--up Investigator(s): fag...r. Section,Township,Range: 0+l TI I8w, R Z31,..) Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):_ h t sl ru.. Local relief(concave,convex,none): Gp.,.ees. Slope(%):_,_ Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: G(a4,...= NWI classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No K (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation n/ ,Soil, +`1 ,or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? Yes, )t^ N3 Are Vegetation /1 Soil // ,or Hydrology 1P -naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Sal Present? Yes_ - No X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No x within a Wetland? Yes-, - No Remarks: A4#11.11'' .1111. `; _ 4 14".1:a f.lrlys:s 471blei414n" '7itt r3 MIS a L - .49ipe-4l1,0,1 VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. how"/ dam,;a e, Absolute. Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3D/✓'4,46✓,$) %Cover Softies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1• Acs PM-y.Ni(O �}G y F4". That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. !/ Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: , (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: )OL) (A/B) 417 =Total Cover Saollna/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: (5 i),n„ ✓. [zs) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 lat Argr}yr rw.L:C-A _fag --'— _ Total%Cover ol: Multiolv by: _ 2. OBL species x 1= _ 3. FACW species x 2= _ 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= (.D =Total Cover UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 nvigt1.<<) Column Totals: (A) _ (B) 1. Q h--w1/4.s e./1-4114.p..-Pc" -(42.ga- —V Fie- -2. Prevalence Index =B/A= - 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. __ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ y 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7, _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Expla n) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4,17 =Total Gavel be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I Jr'Ii-At of 1. Hydrophytic 2, Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes_4).C._ No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:. 4-op Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Toe' Loc' Texture Remarks o--4 bor'R 2/j — - --- .. — Ila.r,re., 4-244- ►oy23/ _ r7.1 y1► fists 'Type: C=Concentralion,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) , Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peal or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No )( Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of oneisieouired:check all that aunty) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _ Gauge or Well Data(DO) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No )C Depth(Inches): - Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 7 24 Saturation Present? Yes No Y Depth(inches): 7 tif Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_)[_ (includes capillary fringe)_ T Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: A! b s. 4 14)1I I p. , .A._ City/County: £i biel Sampling Date* r/l/2o1 Applicant/Owner: Lilt I I l.. ,4p. State: MA/ Sampling Point: 4-Goer Investigator(s): Wga- Section,Township,Range: '4 i TI I8'')'1 R2.314) Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): Iiaae.,A.,,s_4,4 Local relief(concave,convex,none): eDv1Gw.dt.,.. r Slope(%): L Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: G/.mgr.. NWI classification: R3 V8 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation /,/ ,Soil IV ,or Hydrology !y significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No Are Vegetation N,Soil I/ ,or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 7G No Hydric Soil Present? Yes_.x._ No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )e No within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: �L A4crvir>r1=.�w -i)* Y/10.- hr !Pi lc 'Mirtyf:S -rhe 4.81 -/Zt tz. mis Q 1.4"....-1-1,4,--4,1%4 VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. ho✓m4/ de ;41.,e, Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3D'y.Ao,"41 %Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 'Z. (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2. (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: !DD (A/B) =Total Cover Saos' ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: , ,tn.4.,Js) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: _ 2. OBL species _ x 1= - 3. FACW species x 2= - 4. FAC species x 3= - 5. FACU species x 4= _ =Total Cover UPL species x 5= _ Herb Stratum (Plot size: t✓wt s✓9 Column Totals: (A) _ (B) 1. Ur 4-:6+4 oat:I.:A.... 4V, y FAG 2. PblAl...e 2 As.......1,4e.w401C,‘," _g12_. _ .5.Ziegid Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _V,„2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53,0' ?. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Expta n) 9 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t/op =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: .5 rr j,/:✓q 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point T^LJ67- Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 10 DrIZ WI - , !s> wt — lo-�� iD 3/1 _ 7.5v4R et 1 t tw► — !e -2.2. ho YR eh/) �� Yn¢�G.� ? � 1 e i..7 /Aiwa 22—Z4- 4110 44./ 'Type: C=Concentration.D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric S ioils:-- _ _ Histosol(Al) , Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(55) _ Dark Surface(Si) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that acoly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(89) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Drainage Patterns all 0) Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ` Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(01) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) 44,Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) -C FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Data(00) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No K Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes )c. No Depth(inches): 4" Saturation Present? Yes r No Depth(inches): O Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No-- (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos.previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 APPENDIX C Site Photographs • , , • ' , ...,..,. . ..•,. , .,, ..1...,•, ' , :"4 ' % I, '• - ..'s: i',-.;It)41 •,',.i.• ., , .,,' , '„T• • • , . , :. ,..,tilft- ..k, , ' N . :, ' o,„„:;:„.., • . 1') ,rw • ,ii,.-4.00„. -4... . ... ' . O., - V, . , •,.1 ',,'''..P 1",,,• 4, a i -...' MM." lid$04#1108'5'.• •-,;'J-,•,"...40•,••••7. ,., .,,... . , .., .. .,•, • - lir,Itlit Vk/P " , ..:. t ti:•"''"'''"1 ' • , • 111101P111P,r7f ..-':'..... ' ' ,r :, '.'1.,•.,,!" ....Tif • ..,„?... -""'. 7' • ' •N•,,,:. „co. ;',G;;;ii.tvi:,..:",-,:,v..,;;:,;..‘.-.,,:-,;-,1•61,0,tj.;;-'...-e•:,‘,0, „WI; "r'-'' ',:1'1.'0'4.,t,.f,' :i . '. •;,:..: .-;: ';'; "'• ' ' • '• ' . -, : itlifilikill g•t I'''.''..k t'q..11••Pili":'t.i... ',•, .A i•..•,.:',:• ..'r•k;t!,.: •1.••i lip t•igi,t i I!•1. ' - ,...",:'20•1t.,,,•"• '' , •!:•.!!..r ; ,•'•,•140,t,tl. .:1' '.:'''•'li'P:'111.A.F.:'10•!r,......;.','t''..';': '•••00...4:•;•?!.;'•it 141)74 ...',ItX ' '.,•ti'.‘si.•'•' :'1ZiP%•.•, .L."''''': ' :e'• t;I'': ' • • • . ,,•••• •''''•'• J.7":. '. H..-l''..-':•:•':-::...,... .. ::' ' .......:"'" ..'.1 " -.," ''''.f.' " :- ' ••'''' .....: .-7: ,.. ''',. -'".4',.;:.:.t.....ett;;•ir?'"°':••''7••• •*"'': 4'4';"''''-t•t•.;' ' ..‘..' .:-.'''''-'-- . .:.'':•-'.."•rt..7',.::, .:.'''.-- - ' ..' ..' ,r'7 • -•.-- '-.....*:'::.--.':'.. .:',',,*:;-14.Y.74-‘a...4:447r ::A.77;'Zt:2 7•-;. :.••••‘.::::,•::-.-::-..;;;••;';' :..7-7.2-. ."-...• •'•'-.:.:.;-• ;-•••••,•;17,..•-,' .,:1- .',-:. .,;--.!.'":-. , ,',........,:'1.":f',-..:,:.: -.7',,,-:2'''sr.;-.0!:.:47-115„-:,•7.--!-,§-.L.A-i-ii .,-,.'',--•:---,-.r-:7.i:,i':::: •••;.--'..:,...: :;-: .. ..• 7.,........•:-..;-•••: .--—.- - . ••-••• :.;;,,:....,-.„,-- ; ... .:,: -..,.:- ..,,. ...:.:. : - ,"--,,.,.:.:..:;--.f.;..„t-,14e.uog.,, ..".7...;-::-..,,,.'4..?....::--':71,.-..t,In•-•-•::5:4%..:`,...",1,-;:lt.;;;;;;;::-,..---.t7----' :'''-•,f ,.- '•-.. :,‘-'4',..74116.0.4..-4: v•---.-:,-..•?'•,„.• -- ....,--..''-: .....".7-- . -•:. ;.'•::-.._ .1.--:.:,;,,ii,as,,,,,;r7.1.•;t4PX:1".,,:-T.:Laritter*-027",.! -7,:',;,,7,- . ••-• ';.-.-...7-..•••-w •-•: -••--,• -,-r•--;,--.-....,-:..-...• .....:•••'t.'47i.,1 -'' ••••'•,:..t.' - , . '•*••- •••:',.4,. '•'')••••••••• •1111i1r,.L....70, .:44....e'', ' ...•••••,.....v.. - ... ..-7 ....:4 * -:, -."'..",,A:,,,:...,-,":...'..''''' „*.. - ''',.,.... • .''' ,--...'' i'",-.. -..-.--,,,,.,1,•",:ti:.;,...414#,„,•- .....i.,_,:t5Tii;:,-ifte&7..,,,,,,,,,,;..,A4;;;V„%ifP'!':%4%,,7,.- " ,..'.4; ".•''I- e.zi.1:::-;, ,,,.. ...,-•-'.:",...:-.....‘'..--....7_,, - ;,...' z.,,,,-,::,.. 4."410‘•••-7-'1;-"••e. "1•?9":. ....j-. - ..-4.--!'"'-'ii....•-.;11•`-''''-''...."'cViAi::.'-'4-' '''' '- .. ,.?`.1.; .:•"1?..' ''' '' '"'"''''''--It.;4110.wir: 44"*.r4L7471-1''' .:-..•':.'' ',,--'-'-'''.ar,-,-.:.'"-4- ,....,,eke ......:;,,,r,#,. --7,•4•••••••• ' . -,.'",' -,-4.1- :•-•Ati."•: .1., ....,......;.....::'' : '1";i...,-,..4•4;,, ;. J.,..,,,itier.,,-:-;*„,a4r,-,,,,4. • ,....s..tiiiirs...„ , .„....iirr:.:.,,,,.. 1-••• -.. twLirifix of-".•'-;,74.'"it,: --.. - ..."...of'...,,".::*-e...:1,i2:.'.•Jr:'''-, , ••.,:.:1...'-:!:-:-.. ..:::-. . : ,:u,,,. ....N•'' ". - - , ',-•'-'t- :deb-'grib....i.. ,' brt ''' :: 4a7'- ','.•:•W'*.-.:.....,,i --17,;i•-• •,.#3,`'''ita .--;A.i.-;!•••••1'10... ' 4".,•.-7.:'.'.-.! .4 ,..4'..t,•;•-e)r'-'1041167i /4.1.1 A ,,41r-..r!,A•'-• V-''' ''illoq!"' • k flig,. . . , -, ..`••-• 1--••,,!'stiallit ",,i .,sc,,. 4P ,,e. 4. . ,_Aro., ;,'''1' •::_W.,. -...„,..L....17 ......_1 4•4460,t.' /41÷4 _ . •2' ', ig-e'- tV•42C-.- 4•L71 .17.,,,,,,, , .I.:«4': . . ; '.....I.'' • 71' . .‘"r- .; ' ;.:''. •--.; :. ,:;•.:, :•/!..• .27:-. ..... ..•,,.:,,, , ,...; n..:-...„-..-7:;-,------,7,.•••....,t--..L;.::4;- :.;;;;;;;,,, . - 7,i',..lte,, ,ir.,• • ;..... .-..::,,,..,,,,,.:- . _.."; *4.,, ,,,...,..i.•Lg.' ; r '-",'.'54:' ,' .-:::''1401.?•42•"'•:- If,'-' ,..''-;,,,...4.41,,, ,',": ::..,?1* :-1,,,,I, ;',•-...- . .--, • ,.-.:,,g1411111 ,i0,514 " .''..........:410.•'.. ,,,Ii_. -•,,,--...,.;--.',7%:..,.•.:::. .-;',..'' i....7......402f.•,,..Ais.,..-----,',44.---, , ,„ •- -,,•".r.',.....1 '..7- 7'•:-"4.'^, :.--;-• , .... -,',........411i.•:--eii ...- .-...,,,ele:.7'. -40-s•• .-I,, • ....rt',...010-1- • ••701-1-41r7 41101...--Wilk-4.1":' ;AWL v“.--"''-':''''''': - ' '''',--' '''. -';',1,',' z., •;‘,...,.. ..„„&. ...401,---:-.4t-fek .:4„... 40.-...: Wetland #1 . . . .:... .,,,.... . -... . .i. - 4,,.,..- .. -.-•:-- ........„.. . ,.... - ..„. ....„ .ii„..3„.... 104,- ,00m.4,:..,:,., , :4„,,.: p..,—..:41111101$1k, ,AONOtAirolirliik,r‘-' . . . • 4 1'1''''''. ''',7-1;-"''' •-IV•.'" ,,....:•izi-• ';g: ' '•,- .:4....-...- .lt,- -44- I....7 .. : ,,.„.... ,.... . t**, • • ‘•','..t4441Q.4"/'2.'.41';441'rreia'.t1;-:•'•''.'-'":iNiAit ''.1',: • ..;%*';-f.k1.1 Nt, -t,.f.,_ .ar: ...-;. -..-- .4. ....4,..--,-;;;.- . : ' -. * .-4:4 :::' ..--emt.k V--.•:EitPve; ,f-., - .4,-,..?4.-Ij •'t. to..''.100. tes-. 77.---:-. •Jk-..4.. 7' -''') A, :;- .,-"P`r.41',,vt, • •4. -..r..1%:' g 9, ,4%.•lc- ..604e,. -..... . . ...0.,-;.-...:1 _-.... .1-ci.:':',1T..,..: • • ."4 AviLikic, .......vv•• ,.4;:. "i': 4,..*,,,t .40 ,.... ..•v 4.. ...,,, .•„, ,.., 1,44 .'.......,... i :s.,...c.:.•.-,7:...,,,,,,-..,••- -•-.• . . 4,A :347...',.•': •• r' ..4 'fr„ilt....17t4.40t,' ..- •--",' likt*' ATIAT-.1) 'v--:' - .;-`1,A..."*"'.:•4`.:44!..'7"'A'-•Z".• Y'-' :'''.'5.":::,k'-:.'::,,'74.i.Ili; ',: 4%.."4•---... v$4.:••••,'".•:'..,--.101.4-%7-... • .:•-ci . L.:if' 0';':*10`-°-•‘•SV' 4. i":. ' :.- . s'','('' '''...'.1:L',05-,:-'''!:''''‘,.",AN4-Sqi4s...•r4'.. Al!: ?! --.-4.V.ii:* 4.4_,•••••;,,:.`,. ._',. - ,./7.1',. ': !,,,...",;" ‹, ,' , ,>,', 1,,\ ' .„ . ‘' ,,,' \ r. ,,,,,. .:, .,..-......,,,;!., i..:, ,,,,..k,....7-:,.-.:...qe:e.. — ..,: ,,,40,-..!At— -....',;.•." '': '' .fr f° ' -'',- .4,' .. ., , ,-‘.k-' . .1, I . 1 .... ./•? ..1.•'...:!- ,-.r-;-i•1::1.-Z...:::,::%.- •••,..:_- .s-' ,• :V :.. '..• ',-.-s!, ',1--.j•,',- ..:,„ :',;,;,,..., P,'-,,•,,1"' , 1-: _r1 V,::'it • -,..') i--;.,-',...% :1•::nc,..7.0, _ii:..i....;,, •-•, • , , ..I . -•7• i '.. '‘ '•, -•4,• ..•,,,,, ' •11. 1••", ,6 i . .•;/44.4.i•_.-•17.•k'itiiti,,:,;:7 ......'..'...:•-,, ...., • . 7 , . i ,, • si-16..4•• '.%,..,..,;•,•••-:,...0-7,...---....:.. ••,., , .4„...t, , 4. /paw.. ., .. • • .... . , ,, Na_ ' ;•070.b:::.... ,:::;,,,,wirl.7,11 i.•1••.....10-i. ',':- :•'3P,„,-.4.$741.., • - .. grw-Vo:", ... - '..,!?•-•' ..-; -.-. ..,,. 4 • ' , •, ... • . .•'''... '•'.. . ......q: ''. -. - ,.;:i'; 1:;.7'''' . .,..•:-..•.,.. , .. ,...:,4*. ; •''. :'..-•••!:.'•-•,,tiM • • . •-, • ; :P•••..•.:f.••C. '. ••.•• .... ..,..--P-„ .. ••,i e.: i... 4; •'' ..;:•'-.1-.7.•7/0704,..l..•: • .'.-;.•.:•-r-•-,:•?.:,;,,,'-7.•'..•;:27'.......,•••.1t;;; f...,,, 4.-;.-•-y„,....,•-, _.•..... „ , ,•,,,, 1:,.!,,.4.-..• !„--r:• .:.-. 4....!..1.,.;•••,1..-_,,,ttes7.17-xs:-,4144`,., • 7.10.i.* ..:•.,?i.....VA''''',":'7,!i.P.......,,,-±.i>1146,.7,i.;,:••/.. • ,:.. ! ...•. • -- ' ' '. .,. ••':.;'.'I..4,,•,'. .•%''•••:,-;,..t. •-•. .,,,•'.f,'•‘-• ....;-71-1.;.,,...-7,.....4. ....,,w.-.4,,,,•:",,..‘, ,,f,-.-41.. .*.:!‘,„- ..::....„-,,.:,,,,,,typt,.. - .. .fr ..„-,.: -,,, • ..-.,..........:•....-... ,.-...,:....,•-•,-,.........--,"•,- .. . 4- :: --..--..;..,--. -..,..-.....-iro.--. •v., v.,..,;.4.„,7,,, .- - --.- .. . -. ---...- .:., ---.,.....-:-....4,---i, ?:,-4-.1t,;.itml-E.-ittlp... -0-.,,-;4.--,v..:•--4-;• 4•,,;...,,,,,:•';•• ;,..-,,,••••,ii ., It' '• _..t..,. •. .•- 't'•7! . .,:. .7'.t.,..;',..t. ..- ....•-- .,to A... ....'. '.:•...A; 1:,.',...; .,'A....t.t-.qt. ...e:4, vii;•••...•,-..... •i,.... I,:;:. .-24i- ',..- . ;44,,,-.-7-,,,!:.5..;.„.-r- .v„, , , •,,. - .., , .-,-:•:v, -^,- gio'',hoe'''. :.•4. ....'‘v.,:i. :-., .. ...4.., .r. hRt ..-.:.-.•... .:. :le•-• . -•-. - • • .. .1- 3-----, . •1:04' •-,p'-'-'4:4- • 2-:iirk. ,V,.•. tA.4_„i . .•.•.-,..1,-. ,,piecf,:e4. .,-..).7.0,7..-..,....,$ ,,••• '•,......1fr', .•f• ,,-.... ..,, ';:-. ,:er v-,•,.... -,-• , .,, -Jilt.--...cr,. •;•:.,.....A...N. . .-.7,....:. _-j...;•,,- .0 „.... ,.....-.... ...t....,„. ,,. .,...., „..,.,..‘,„,oe .4,...;.., .."., vi •., ....z.„. .,,, , e -.• .....F..144..4<- .... '• • .** •''" •''••. : ' • . •' .'• ' '.' - '.„ :, ....1,4a........ .. ..47A16,A:•. ` • ''' .: te.."";41'.;::.',.... :r 114 it, 1•2..",......_....'.....' .-.•‘!":: ••''''''''4k•L'''''.(;...4.t"..;k::•".:.•Ctiltt.4•7;2-...1.•;k7 ..:11P.A.t1t.'id•-''''?4.''..;14 fk..y4*-4-4o.",..i. --ri .- .;,...,-..„..-.4....-,;.,--,444-7i;. ....:-.:- . 4...1:1-.,--,:::.;,,.....:::.: ;,•,....:7,a,.•?-4'.ftr.-,e4;`,3V.4:4 *;.i.!.: .........4% .6,,IL:: ' itN, ,,,,. ..4...n,....1,. %,:,,:li,.. .? .;:t•• •!••••; •.•. '7--09'•4.i4;ii.....t. 46,',7%•''.: - • -4.4•0' .'1.:;'•i"• .41/47//.'''''''''f'A.3041/4*".4?13114,Z*0 AM210..)0454.:'•• '-*,'„.--7'-;t•:1.''•1_...!9/:'.:..-•:;,,:..,-..k4.•.'.,.••4-1•.r%:..•,:.,(4..-.,7.., %-.I ..?.•!.:-.-:.:•-..-1...:,,-v.•'.,,..,....::..,:.;-•„••••Y.-..,.:.-.7,:.-.:'.,.!:.....!.-.,"‘."..z.•.•..•-,..-.-.”:-.•••;:..•-•.•'•.".-.t)'.•,"..;•..-41A..,...7,-•,,•••:"0;.:" ,.:.••,.•'7..;..4'1.•7,:...1..•,',5,,•'7'.••.'N•4.ie,4-:i4•,;•;:S.•,-*.••*7...i.P.r.i....!',oW--•i'•k - ' ` 7"- ••iti..., • •,•„•t•e„Aps.4e4,3 - •'', - .. '..'.‘” "-:..-' :".•'-'''•••••:.•,••••••••:''.•"-- -..'sir.,4 41.',Ies..-'4--'.44T;,..- • 'y ' "`: , ''' ...- .e'• :- :•)•—"r.;-6.-°",3'-• ".--,:.*:..:,. :r. -b!:•711••'..---7.-. 1,.”.J • •Re_."Ae•1,4,,,.r.oil ....,.IN... 1..4,4We%t• •ri - .-7-.. ;....:-._• ,-,-..4...-,. .ay. . v.v..x.r.m.Ole•v% . inc. . ...re-: i'..^1.•'• • .:'1•"- •-•.':7 1.."*"-erlirkerli...f...•,-...., 1:-:.tr, •-.'-s • ?A....,'.,....h--e1,‘kn•• .. '>11‘. .'-"? • .--Ar,..r4/4..w. - :4. 4/trio• .,..,•' ••4 . • ‘. C4t..1...,jia., . ...• , : ...!.z Afg.• ' ';ti''.44 - • •Zi,1 i,e7r.::,... .,__A.44,;::11.. '-`,.... 17'-'l'" • '''-',...t4`r: .'''. 71-`''`t*-• -: • • 'f"." -2--, ,xia,A, .,...if...- .p:, ----4; i„„ ...._,, ,j4 7.---y..... 1.44, t., 1. i-,4 !..."..1,,,•,.,..:",,,,I... .":4Att:-. . '''.1.,4t41....-.t, 1,1'' • .40.! . c '----,..-- 1. ' = •Zi---.. . ... ••- 4:r. '''. t"-"i4t..*1 . 67.3.1% '' 7r...";;61 g•=0'i : '..v.'441: ''''' 41 1 ,,,,' •.:S. Y:V A-,Vi ..•10111t4; 4:.'4 . iitit4 -L4, 4.; , , A L...,:7„..z.,,-.:.:Air.:4":• --' 'C. . ., 7 :•••-p. 4.77...?.4. A l'4,-..;*2 ::„..1.,‘4". ,... ::....-"b_, 7- ....:...,,,-`4„.•• ,• .,,,,,, ,....oyie f.,„„,T,_../.............../ •:,- .,..... ...,40,,,,,,...4_:!7,,- _. _4.,.,,..;,, .. 1, 6.*;•,,Ak ,ott ,...ik.1„.:1-..t?.., 1-'-.*,;,.•:-14,,17..-- ---roic-T'4- .;fr.... ..:.-ft.--__\. •. • ,,,7 40.4,.-..-AKT..‘,:ktr#0_4:, .Ater • 4 \ 4v, 14 0-.• !..4Y:14!•41k ' Vir.:‘,,„,..... *4:-S Vet'-eiv e--\:;_ft. '4'.'f r latir r'4'e.41-4.!. I'l Wetland #2 .0;•••• '''Z:Vts,.• • . 4,---".` • • _.1.--:-. -4- -Id .ar - , _.•,,,,4,.. ••,,,,„....44 .4.., ._ . t _ ... „.• ,:. A,...t•-.e.•-..,•!-,.,_.,--....1,--, -4' ' . ; .,.... A.. ,,,....4-iiN ..,A t,,i;t7161:,'' 4.;•••'.,, ..,...,. It., . , Ai:..,,, ..,, ..,_ t.4 ,....,-., 2,,..,,, , .,. •11,y e. ...Nit:4C- !lit.. tor, . - •..Nt 4 1,1 -4,,..1. 'Ait•Aok .... -••• - . 7 . ...v .., ,,,. „ -(- .F-4 #1.,. '•-• -.1v• l'.7.--Z-t,7,,f,, Is „,.,- ,..•• :4..e. 1•11. 7.4•fi:ix;,P*.iej, - '•alat.,s.v7i'., -....; . tet-'*'4•*17* .'ici.:%4, .-_-,: ha •-.$*,--'•-W••••-'-•.a''.•7 "' ,;.•••:-.*:. .0';:.,:!.:f1:5'', '&44..,•-:it- ;111..s•-":''•:',-z1C f'-%7', '-'•-z", ':' 41.4 Ilirjci - . ,6,,,•••• C...; 1,,.., t r.,;t_. ... , . . ,,A,. ,: • ,141•••••N"44 *,..., 1,-, • -• , • f 4 i.- . ' -9.-:.-- •4‘....1 4 7.I i if Vk i• ••1,.-:-., ...44*or r.; ---qtr.. ..-.- 'k.%0" . i 4.' '... •-•4... , 2:4,...,0••- .r...,....)1n*,-.. -., ..:'-...f:.*-..'441e -:e-Itir ' '....r. ... az..0'.-, ' -:LI• •:, X- -- s APPENDIX D WCA Wetland Type and Boundary and USCOE Approval Forms Print Form H US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District Request for Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Review Please enter the following general information about the property under review: Name of property owner 'Win a- 41404Property Address (No. & Street,City,State,Zip Code) -2 3.5-o I rte .a go.v..C) Pe"..,./g3} /.-tp.1 5f '5 , Lat. Long. (decimal degrees) County Kr„fri _,,7 Location: $w 1/Section 'j4- Township 11OW Range 234, — Size of review area 49j. acre(s) By submission of this wetland delineation report I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District provide me with the following(check only one box): 7 Wetland Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with awetland delineation is a written notification from the Corps concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the wetland boundaries delineated on a property. Under this request. the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the wetlands on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area. ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination is a non- binding written indication that there may be waters of the United States, including wetlands, on a parcel or indications of the approximate location(s)of waters of the United States or wetlands on a parcel. Preliminary_jurisdictional determinations are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. `v., Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States or navigable waters of the United States, or both,are either present or absent on the property. An approved jurisdictional determination precisely identifies the limits of those waters on the project site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved jurisdictional determinations can be relied upon by the affected party fora period of five years. An approved jurisdictional determination may be appealed through the Corps' administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota and Wisconsin (http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/). Requester Date 35/2$120/3 Name(typed) 41,,tog, e-e>/o s4.1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Application for Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: 23,3b ,Q,a,,i Local Government Unit: £ 47. ,F a„w,frip aid:64 Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): -fl I r JZz3w swro-of3q- 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: 41;t t;`, A`�,,.t.� Address: 1 pp, ,'�.A.(_Q..4, City, State, Zip: D-�oJ��! 53-3"7/ E-mail: W;f t; 414.. 829"'•*:1„Gpyyf Phone: 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): 1cte40 54..AoContact Person: (,tsar , �`y 00 Address: F371 � JUc_-K.4 City, State, Zip: en,oic/7,, 4k.fies5. MA./ E-mail: .1 i►Golo�owt 424V IQ 144 SK•Czy,? Phone: ,/ _ gO Z_6v (,f 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: PS Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) ba Wetland Type (Eggers& Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner to pursue this determination. / 8'/Zo/ Applica r Auth d Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08