The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-00311 - addition CITY OF ORONO I* 20 I ! i 'e 11 0' 3 i i I*' 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 04/09/2018 ORONO, MN 55356- (952)249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 710 BIG ISLAND PIN : 22-117-23-24-0009 LEGAL DESC : RECREATION POINT LAKE MTKA : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY : 434-RESIDENTIAL VALUATION : $ 34,000.00 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED: ELECTRICAL(STATE) NOTE: PRIOR TO RELASE OF ESCROW MONEY AN AS-BUILT SURVEY AND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. INITIAL: APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 535.28 GATES GENERAL CONTRACTORS STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 17.00 3500 VICKSBURG LANE N TOTAL 552.28 SUITE 400-351 Payment(s) PLYMOUTH,MN 55447- CHECK 2907 552.28 (612)723-6345 Minnesota State License#: BUIL-BC006793 OWNER NEUGENT,CHRISTOPHER&LESLIE 2110 PORTICO GREEN WAYZATA,MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date o 's• . ce,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at an time after ,rk has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assurin_all require , pections are requested in conformance with the S : e Buil•''g• e.This permit may be revoked at any time for•. ca •e. • / 9 //T Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issu=: Signature Date i,. CITY OF ORONO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONif FOR NEW STRUCTURES OR ADDITIONS ffJr°Z. le.-0.41 Mailing Address: Permit number: s 3QJ7 ,/J O POBox66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: ,> -/9-'S) Received by: a ,, Street Address:' n 6� L. 2750 Kelley ParkwayNoi C( Plan review fee: 3 /t�k� o�� Orono, MN 55356 U sH Main: 952-249-4600 Total Fee: I F • �O/�`R23/ Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: qID `T --��_ V Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodel Showca3.se ome or other Display Home? ❑ Yes ❑ No /f yes,a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPIACAINT INFORMATION: i // L . Name: l 1 °i1' C ��c State License# kJ° • e„ Expiration Date: Phone: cell - -41e��AVAINAr. office --1 Mailing Address: -' , VA1Cr: .% .. M •,.- D: mom_ " Contact Person: Z la__41. _ Applicant is: "'' r / Homeowner (circle One Email and/or Fax: . PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: /,.kri`s 4- L e- ILkU PA Phone(day): - - `_ . Address: A l o ( k- City: ZIP: . --.3 Email and/or Fax te-- 1e- , kyGe ± Q ; �� _ ,,5� ARCHITECT/ENGINEER INFORMATION: 11 Name: Phone(day): Address: City: ZIP: Email and/or Fax: PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of project: _ 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3.Structure Type 4.Sewage Disposal& New ConstructionWater Supply 0 Single Family with 0Accessory Bldg./Garage ❑Addition attached garage 0 Deck 0 Public Sewer ❑Accessory Building Single Family with 0 Office/Commercial ❑ Relocation detached garage 0 Residence 0 Private Sewer ❑Other:(specify) 0 Multiple Family/Condo 0 Retaining Wall(s) 0 Public 4-feet or greater 0 Public Water **Any earth movement may also require 0 Commercial 0 Storage MCWD review&permits. 0 Industrial 0 Warehouse MCWD 0 Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) 0Other:(specify) 0Other(specify) 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.orq CT...... Estimated Construction Valuation(excluding land) $ _.34 % Last Updated: January 2016 STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1.Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) a. Length(ft.)= Number of bedrooms= 2. Occupancy: b.Width(ft.)= Number of garage stalls: 3. Occupant Load: Areas in square feet Attached= c. Basement= Detached= 4. Type of Construction: d. 1St Story = e.2nd Story= 5. Code Edition: f. '%Story = g.Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable ❑ ❑ Building Permit Escrow Agreement and Fees ❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee ❑ 0 Completed Application Form ❑ ❑ Proposed Building Plans—2 full size sets,to scale and 1 reduced 11 x 17 or 8%x 11 set ❑ 0 Minnesota State Energy Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Requirements ❑ ❑ Survey—2 full size,to scale(meeting ALL survey requirements) ❑ 0 Hardcover Calculations ❑ 0 Septic System Certification ❑ 0 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)Permit or Documentation from MCWD stating no permit is required ❑ 0 Landscape Walls and/or Retaining Wall Plans ❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) ❑ ❑ Access Permit ❑ 0 Data Privacy Advisory Form APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested,a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a$10,000 escrow to ensure completion the as-built survey and all site improvements. 0 0Applicant's Signature: Date: — - ( _ Owner's Signature: Date: Last Updated: Ja ry 2016 PLAN REVIEW. CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES I ADDITIONS Address: 1 tb y 19 IS , Permit No.: 2Oi,0v0 - 00311 Description of work: 4--S (1 lelclic'hi F Date Rec'd: 3. 1g. / g 14., o p... Septic review by: Date Approved: Zoning review by: Date Approved: 3 .30 . (N( Building review by: l�L ,��i �Lti Date Approved: 5 /, `g Grading review by: ,m idw Qt4`CAVI Date Approved: & '23 .18/ Zoning District: IZS Zoning File#: LAt% '' Resolution? 40 Reso� Wp #: 37 Reso Date:3'IZ •l0 Signed: Yes No Resolution / NA Zoning: Lot Area: 2-3f SF AC Width: Structural Coverage: SF % Survey Submitted: s D No Date of Survey: 12-'13-(7 Revised date(?): Landscape plan submitted? D Yes Landscaper: Nom f _1 _ a --- D No/ None proposed Proposed Setbacks: � ''VII Fr9r(�(Lake) R r(Street) ( 6N E ) ( N V E W ) Other Buildings Wetland o Side Side 1 tAk t(1(. 2-11' 71' 01(- Building Height Analysis: Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof* (See". ilding height" (a) definition): First Floor Elevation (from building plans): (b) Highest Existing ground level (per survey) o I' above lowest ground level, (c) whichever is lower: .. Difference between (b) and (c)*: (d) _/ DEFINED HEIGHT *If highest existing adjacen .rade is above FFE-Height is(a) -(d): (e) *If highest existing adja -nt grade is below FFE-Height is(a) +(d) Shoreland District MCWD Permit Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff Met? Yes D No Permit Number: D Yeslo D N/A D Yes 71‹.o D N/A-see attached VCM(,tllL 3J/C1frl J%L Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed Overlay District Tier Hardcover Hardcover Variance Required CUP Required (circle one) (% and sf) (% and sf) 44) 0 71:1- es D No D Yes p o Os 4145 2 3 4 5 p Type(s): Type(s): OVSOIL s Updated: June 2017 z:\forms\plan review checklist 06-2017.docx Fees to be Charged YES NO Permit Plan Review State Surcharge t/ Investigation Fee V' SAC—Number of SAC Units !/ Other(specify) l,— Square Footage $ per Square Footage Basement X = $ 1St Floor X = $ 2nd Floor X = $ Garage X = $ Estimated Construction Value: $ J O& Orono Inspections Required . , Work Requiring Separate Permits (1(Footing ❑ Site , , 0 Plumbing 0 Grading/Filling O Poured Wall 0 Silt Fence/Erosion Control 0 Mechanical 0 Fire O Foundation Survey 0 Hardcover Removal 0 Fireplace 0 Water Connection O Framing 0 Other(specify) ❑ Masonry 0 Sewer Connection O Waterproofing/Drain tile 0 Mfg. 0 Lawn Irrigation ❑ Foundation Waterproofing 0 Other(specify) 0 Landscaping Framing 0 Septic Insulation ❑ As-Built Survey Final ❑ Lathe Required State Permits ❑ Other(specify) 0 Well )/(Electrical Electrical REMARKS (in-house): OFFICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED: ❑ See Builder Acknowledgement Form Prior to release of escrow money an as-built survey and hardcover calculations must be submitted and approved. Updated: June 2017 z:\forms\plan review checklist 06-2017.docx , W t ii 22-05-00 J 8- 14-02-12 8-02-04 co x N LUC26Z M 1A2 to ili LUS26 Al LUS26 i a i N y o v Al N fp I CD 2, M SLU26 `n o ;S , Al LUS26 z' ; z 4-, .. ��_ . a d V. Al 1 > > v o .� Al - . .- LUS26 m m m m m Al 5-)8 DIMENSIONS ON TRUSS LAYOUT ARE FROM OUTSIDE OF SHEATHING. THE LEFT END OF EACH TRUSS IS DENOTED WITH A LITTLE TRIANGE. 0 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR Z Z CONCERNS,PLEASE CALLili I- N ' JOHN @ 651-688-3609 OR EMAIL:JMILLER@VILLAUME.COM — E W 0 0 - w plc _se3 Z E. O 17) L CD c v a N 3 V. N 0 -0 • E N Q LI V i.-5 1 t Job Truss Truss Type Qty Ply !Roof 303242-A Al Common 8 1 Job Reference(optional) VIIleums Industries,St Paul,MN 8.210 s Feb 23 2018 MITek Industries,Inc. Fri Mar 2 12:26:08 2018 Page 1 ID:Io6a4Qa83DcJ8nNgnjh2gAzezEy-J6MtFl9_Zs9WohDrCbk?Xsx1 p1 K7w5ppwJsH8Wzeysz -3-0-0 7-1-8 14-2-12 I 3-0-0 7-1-6 7-1-8 4x6= Scale=1:31.0 3 riei 4.95 F12 M 6x1OMT18HS= 6x1OMT18HS= 4 2 qq 1171 � 4 1 6 3x4 3x8 3x4 I 7-1-6 14-2-12 7-1-6 7-1-6 Plate Offsets(X,Y)-- [2:0-2-8,Edge],[4:0-2-8,Edge],[5:Edge,0-2-8] LOADING(psf) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL. in (loc) l/defl Ud PLATES GRIP TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.91 Vert(LL) -0.05 5-6 >999 240 MT20 197/144 TCDL 7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.37 Vert(TL) -0.14 6-7 >999 180 MT18HS 197/144 BCLL 0.0 * Rep Stress Incr YES WB 0.38 Horz(TL) 0.01 5 n/a n/a BCDL 10.0 Code MNSRC2015/TPI2007 Matrix-MS Weight:52 lb FT=20% LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 BOT CHORD WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud*Except* 5-6=-61/340 W1:2x3 SPF No.2 WEBS BRACING- 3-6=0/258,2-6=0/626,4-6=0/397 TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied, except end verticals. NOTES- BOT CHORD 1)Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. 2)Wind:ASCE 7-10;Vult=115mph(3-second gust) MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be V(IRC2012)=91mph;TCDL=4.2psf;BCDL=6.0psf;h=25ft;Cat.II;Exp installed during truss erection,in accordance with Stabilizer B;enclosed;MWFRS(envelope)gable end zone;cantilever left and Installation guide. right exposed;end vertical left and right exposed;Lumber DOL=1.60 plate grip DOL=1.60 REACTIONS. (lb/size) 3)All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise indicated. 7 = 1019/0-5-8 (min.0-1-10) 4)This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load 5 = 700/Mechanical nonconcurrent with any other live loads. Max Horz 5)*This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.Opsf on the 7 = 52(LC 12) bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide Max Uplift will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. 7 = -101(LC 8) 6)Refer to girder(s)for truss to truss connections. 5 = -39(LC 9) 7)Provide mechanical connection(by others)of truss to bearing plate Max Gray capable of withstanding 101 lb uplift at joint 7 and 39 lb uplift at joint 5. 7 = 1019(LC 1) 5 = 700(LC 1) LOAD CASE(S) FORCES. (Ib) Standard Max.Comp./Max.Ten.-All forces 250(Ib)or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-3=-912/46,3-4=-899/35,2-7=-954/136, 4-5=-635/75 BOT CHORD ' 5-6=-61/340 I Job Truss i Truss Type Qty Ply Roof 303242-A A2 Common Structural Gable 11 1 Job Reference(optional) Villaume Industries,St Paul,MN 8.210 s Feb 23 2018 MiTek Industries,Inc. Fri Mar 2 12:28:12 2018 Page 1 ID:Io6a4Qa83DcJ8nNgnjh2gAzezEy-BtcO5gCVd4VyGIXcRRoxiiejoeh3suoPgxgVH Izeysv -3.0.0 7-1.8 14-2-12 3-0-0 7-1.8 7.1-6 I 4x8= Scale=1:31.0 3 4.95 rii , II r • `? ST1 74 6x10MT18HS= il 7 W3ST4 ' 13x10MT18HS= y17ST3 ST2 w — rVir w " _ �." k Y 3j-1 4 5 3x4 II 3x8 3x4 II 7-1.8 I 14-2-12 7-1.8 7-1-8 Plate Offsets(X,Y)-- [2:0-2-8,Edge],[4:0-2-8,Edge],[5:Edge,0-2-8] LOADING(psf) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL in (loc) I/deft Ud PLATES GRIP TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.91 Vert(LL) -0.05 5-6 >999 240 MT20 197/144 TCDL 7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.37 Vert(TL) -0.14 6-7 >999 180 MT18HS 197/144 BCLL 0.0 ' Rep Stress lncr YES WB 0.38 Horz(TL) 0.01 5 n/a n/a r BCDL 10.0 Code MNSRC2015/TPI2007 Matrix-MS Weight:63 lb FT=20% LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 TOP CHORD WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud*Except* 2-3=-912/46,3-4=-899/35,2-7=-954/136, LOAD CASE(S) W1:2x3 SPF No.2 4-5=-635/75 Standard OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud BOT CHORD BRACING- 5-6=-61/340 TOP CHORD WEBS Structural wood sheathing directly applied, except end verticals. 3-6=0/258,2-6=0/626,4-6=0/397 BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. NOTES- MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be 1)Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. installed during truss erection,in accordance with Stabilizer 2)Wind:ASCE 7-10;Vult=115mph(3-second gust) Installation guide. J V(IRC2012)=91mph;TCDL=4.2psf,BCDL=6.0psf;h=25ft;Cat.II;Exp B;enclosed;MWFRS(envelope)gable end zone;cantilever left and REACTIONS. (lb/size) right exposed;end vertical left and right exposed;Lumber DOL=1.60 7 = 1019/0-5-8 (min.0-1-10) plate grip DOL=1.60 5 = 700/Mechanical 3) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For Max Horz studs exposed to wind(normal to the face),see Standard Industry 7 = 52(LC 12) Gable End Details as applicable,or consult qualified building designer Max Uplift as per ANSITTPI 1. 7 -101 LC 8) 4)All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise indicated. 5 = -39(LC 9) 5)All plates are 2x3 MT20 unless otherwise indicated. Max Gray 6)Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. 7 = 1019(LC 1) 7)This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load 5 = 700(LC 1) nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 8)*This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0psf on the FORCES. (Ib) bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide Max.Comp./Max.Ten.-All forces 250(Ib)or less except when shown. will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. TOP CHORD 9)Refer to girder(s)for truss to truss connections. 2-3=-912/46,3-4=-899/35,2-7=-954/136, 10)Provide mechanical connection(by others)of truss to bearing 4-5=-635/75 plate capable of withstanding 101 lb uplift at joint 7 and 39 lb uplift at joint 5. Job Truss Truss Type Qty Ply Roof 303242-A B1 Common 3 1 'Job Reference(optional) Villaume Industries,St Paul,MN 8.210 s Feb 23 2018 MITek Industries,Inc. Fri Mar 2 12:28:14 2018 Page 1 ID:Io6a4Qa83DcJ8nNgnjh2gAzezEy-7Fk8VLDl9img Wcg?YsrPn7B5HSPdKgkhlFJbMAzeys -1-5-8 5-8-12 11-5-8 12-11-0 , 1-5-8 58.12 1 5-8-12 1-5-8 4x4= Scale=1:26.4 3 f 1 4.95 12 P 4x4= ,.,1 4x4= 2.__ __________.-------___r ��4 - ye__ 7 -....- ....m... 4x10= 82x4 11 2x4 I 5-8-12 11.5-8 5-8-12 5-8-12 Plate Offsets(X,Y)-- [2:0-1-8,0-1-12],[4:0-1-8,0-1-12] LOADING(psf) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL. in (loc) l/defl Lid PLATES GRIP TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.78 Vert(LL) -0.02 7-8 >999 240 MT20 197/144 TCDL 7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.24 Vert(TL) -0.06 7-8 >999 180 BCLL 0.0 * Rep Stress Incr YES WB 0.22 Horz(TL) 0.00 6 n/a n/a BCDL 10.0 Code MNSRC2015/TP12007 Matrix-MS Weight 43 lb FT=20% LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 WEBS WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud 2-7=0/368,4-7=0/368 BRACING- TOP CHORD NOTES- Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purlins, except 1)Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. end verticals. 2)Wind:ASCE 7-10;Vult=115mph(3-second gust) BOT CHORD V(IRC2012)=91mph;TCDL=4.2psf;BCDL=6.0psf,h=25ft;Cat.II;Exp Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. B;enclosed;MWFRS(envelope)gable end zone;cantilever left and MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be 1 right exposed;end vertical left and right exposed;Lumber DOL=1.60 installed during truss erection,in accordance with Stabilizer plate grip DOL=1.60 Installation guide. 1 3)This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. REACTIONS. (lb/size) 4)*This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0psf on the 8 = 716/0-5-8 (min.0-1-8) bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide 6 = 716/0-5-8 (min.0-1-8) will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. Max Horz 5)Provide mechanical connection(by others)of truss to bearing plate 8 = -20(LC 9) capable of withstanding 61 lb uplift at joint 8 and 61 lb uplift at joint 6. Max Uplift 8 = -61(LC 8) LOAD CASE(S) 6 = -61(LC 9) Max Gray Standard 8 = 716(LC 1) 6 = 716(LC 1) FORCES. (lb) Max.Comp./Max.Ten.-All forces 250(Ib)or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-3=-704/36,3-4=-704/36,2-8=-663/89,4-6=-663/89 WEBS 2-7=0/368,4-7=0/368 Job Truss 'Truss Type Qty 'Ply Roof 303242-A B2 Common Supported Gable 1 1 I 1 Job Reference(optional) Villaume Industries,St Paul,MN 8.210 s Feb 23 2018 MiTek Industries,Inc. Fri Mar 2 12:28:15 2018 Page 1 ID:Io6a4Qa83DcJ8nNgnjh2gAzezEy-bSHW1hENv?uX7mFB6ZMeKLkP9soJ3KhrXv29udzeyss -1-5-8 5-8-12 11-5-8 12-11-0 1-5-8 5-8-12 f 5-8-12 1 1-5-8 4x4= Scale=1:26.4 6 4.95112 5 7 Id 4 r y 8 3 Pet .91 9 2x4 II r, T4 114141 2 S 10 • I T� ;i 11 9Q 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 2x4 11 2x4 I I 11-5-8 11-5-8 LOADING(psf) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL in (loc) 1/deft Lid PLATES GRIP TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.20 Vert(LL) -0.02 11 n/r 120 MT20 197/144 TCDL 7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.02 Vert(TL) -0.02 11 n/r 120 BCLL 0.0 * Rep Stress Ina YES WB 0.05 Horz(TL) -0.00 12 n/a n/a BCDL 10.0 Code MNSRC2015/TP12007 Matrix-R Weight 42 lb FT=20% LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 2)Wind:ASCE 7-10;Vult=115mph(3-second gust) BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 V(IRC2012)=91mph;TCDL=4.2psf;BCDL=6.0psf;h=25ft;Cat.II;Exp WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud B;enclosed;MWFRS(envelope)gable end zone;cantilever left and right exposed;end vertical left and right exposed;Lumber DOL=1.60 BRACING-CHORD plate grip DOL=1.60 TOP Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purlins, except 3) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For nd verticals. studs exposed to wind(normal to the face),see Standard Industry eBOT CHORD Gable End Details as applicable,or consult qualified building designer Rigid ceiling directly applied or 6-0-0 oc bracing. as per ANSI/TPI 1. MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracingbe 5)All Gablepltrees areis continuous MT20 unless otherwise indicated. e9 5) requires bottom chord bearing. installed during truss erection,in accordance with Stabilizer ' 6)Truss to be fully sheathed from one face or securely braced against Installation guide. 1 lateral movement(i.e.diagonal web). 7)Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. REACTIONS. All bearings 11-5-8. 8)This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load (Ib)-Max Horz nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 20=-20(LC 9) 9)'This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0psf on the Max Uplift bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide All uplift 100 lb or less at joint(s)20, 12, 17, will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. 18, 19,15,14,13 10)Provide mechanical connection(by others)of truss to bearing Max Gray plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s)20,12,17,18,19, All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s)16,17, 15, 14, 13. 18,19,15,14,13 except 20=263(LC 19), 12=263(LC 20) LOAD CASE(S) FORCES. (Ib) Standard Max.Comp./Max.Ten.-All forces 250(lb)or less except when shown. , NOTES- , 1)Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 1 • • Job Truss 1 Truss Type Qty I Ply Roof 303242-A B3 Common Girder 1 i 2 Job Reference(optional) Villaume Industries,St Paul,MN 8.210 s Feb 23 2018 MiTek Industries,Inc. Fri Mar 2 12:26:20 2018 Page 1 I D:Io6a4Qa83DcJ8nNgnjh2gAzezEy-yP5PmPIWkYWpEX89v6yp1 ORCItQ7kVGagBmwZgzeysn -1-5-8 2-11-10 5-8-12 8-5-14 11-5-8 12-11-0 1-5-8 I 2-11-10 2-9-2 2-9-2 2-11-10 1 1-5-8 4x4 H Scale=1:28.4 5 4.95112 2x3 / 2x3// 4 6 4x4% �#, r► 4x4 17 3 .....447,4x41;13 / 2 — 1110 �) \\ /r�1 —8 If f us ' 'k # H , 9 •. - n - - n 41% 20 21 11 22 10 23 18 12 14 LUS26 3x4= LUS26 3x4= LUS26 16 4x10 H LUS26 LUS28 4x10 LUS26 LUS26 0.6-4 1-4-12 3-10-11 7.6-13 11-5-8 0&41 0-10-8 I 2-5-15 I 3-8-3 i 3-10-11 Plate Offsets(X,Y)-- [2:0-4-8,0-0-3],[8:0-7-3,0-0-31 LOADING(psf) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL in (loc) I/deft Ltd PLATES GRIP TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.40 Vert(LL) -0.05 10-11 >999 240 MT20 197/144 TCDL 7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.36 Vert(TL) -0.09 10-11 >999 180 BCLL 0.0 * Rep Stress Inca NO WB 0.41 Horz(TL) 0.02 8 n/a n/a BCDL 10.0 Code MNSRC2015/TP12007 Matrix-MS Weight: 104 lb FT=20% LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 6)*This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0psf on the BOT CHORD 2x6 SPF 1650E 1.5E BOT CHORD bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud 12-14=-140/1735,14-20=-220/2999,20-21=-220/2999, will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. SLIDER 11-21=-220/2999,11-22=-141/2339, 7)Provide mechanical connection(by others)of truss to bearing plate Left 2x6 SPF 1650F 1.5E 1-6-0, 10-22=-141/2339, 10-23=-169/2833,18-23=-169/2833, capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s)except(jt=lb)2=240, Right 2x6 SPF 1650F 1.5E 1-6-0 16-18=-93/1569 8=229. BRACING- WEBS 8)Use Simpson Strong-Tie LUS26(4-10d Girder,4-10d Truss,Single TOP CHORD 5-10=-84/1117,6-10=-86/293,5-11=-102/1362, Ply Girder)or equivalent spaced at 2-0-12 oc max.starting at 0-6-4 Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purlins. 2-12=-1844/157,14-15=-79/1471, 13-15=-68/993, from the left end to 11-5-8 to connect truss(es)Al(1 ply 2x4 SPF),A2 BOT CHORD 2-15=-87/1556,12-15=-1894/122,3-15=-1893/147, (1 ply 2x4 SPF)to back face of bottom chord. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. 8-16=-1556/136, 18-19=-50/1064, 17-19=-66/975, 9)Fill all nail holes where hanger is in contact with lumber. 8-19=-66/1270,16-19=-1732/113,7-19=-2173/167 REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2 = 3153/0-5-8 (min.0-2-8) NOTES- LOAD CASE(S) 8 = 3059/0-5-8 (min.0-2-6) 1)2-ply truss to be connected together with 10d(0.131"x3")nails as Standard Max Horz follows: 1)Dead+Roof Live(balanced):Lumber Increase=1.15,Plate 2 = -39(LC 13) Top chords connected as follows:2x4-1 row at 0-9-0 oc. Increase=1.15 Max Uplift Bottom chords connected as follows:2x6-2 rows staggered at 0-9-0 Uniform Loads(plf) 2 = -240(LC 8) oc. Uniform 1-5=-84,5-9=-84,12-16=-20 8 = -229(LC 9) Webs connected as follows:2x3-1 row at 0-9-0 oc. Concentrated Loads(lb) Max Gray 2)All loads are considered equally applied to all plies,except if noted Vert:10=-680(B)14=-685(B)16=-690(B)20=-680(B)21=-680(B) 2 = 3153(LC 1) as front(F)or back(B)face in the LOAD CASE(S)section.Ply to ply 22=-680(B)23=680{B) 8 = 3059(LC 1) connections have been provided to distribute only loads noted as(F) or(B),unless otherwise indicated. FORCES. (Ib) 3)Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. Max.Comp./Max.Ten.-All forces 250(lb)or less except when shown. 4)Wind:ASCE 7-10;Vult=115mph(3-second gust) TOP CHORD V(IRC2012)=91 mph;TCDL=4.2psf;BCDL=6.Opsf;h=25ft;Cat.II;Exp 2-13=-2121/132,3-13=-1722/111,3-4=-3349/244, B;enclosed;MWFRS(envelope)gable end zone;cantilever left and 4-5=-3292/248,5-6=-3147/237,6-7=-3196/234, right exposed;end vertical left and right exposed;Lumber DOL=1.60 • 7-17=-1319/83,8-17=-1719/104 plate grip DOL=1.60 - BOT CHORD 5)This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load • 12-14=-140/1735,14-20=-220/2999,20-21=-220/2999, nonconcurrent with any other live loads. Christine Mattson From: Adam Edwards Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 12:51 PM To: Christine Mattson Cc: Roger Peitso Subject: RE:710 Big Island/#2018-00311 Chris, I've reviewed the subject grading plan. It does not show any proposed grade changes. Stamped Approved. Adam From:Christine Mattson Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:22 AM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject:710 Big Island/#2018-00311 Adam, We received a building permit application for an addition to the 4-season porch and a mud room addition. The property received a variance for construction forward of the average lakeshore setback. Please review and provide comments. Thank you! Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono I MN 155356(physical address) PO Box 66 I Crystal Bay I MN 155323-0066(mailing address) lit 952.249.4620 18 952.249.4616 cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us I www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm 1 ipNp tfr CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y� G` NO. 6 8 3 7 tltESHOis-t N* reardid Id- A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. LA18-000004 WHEREAS, on December 29, 2017, Christopher Neugent and Leslie Neugent (hereinafter the "Applicants"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 710 Big Island and legally described as: That part of Government Lot 6, Section 22, Township 117, Range 23 West, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line extended of Recreation Point (now vacated) with the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence Westerly and Southerly along the shore line of said lake, to its intersection with the Southerly line extended of Lot H, said addition, vacated; thence Southeasterly through a point marked with a judicial monument distant 165 feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot H along the Southerly line thereof, to the Southeast corner thereof, which corner is marked by judicial monument; thence Southeasterly in a straight line to the Southwesterly corner of Lot T of said addition, vacated, which corner is marked by a judicial monument;thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said Lot T to the judicial monument,;thence North along the East line of said addition,vacated,through a point marked with a judicial monument distant 320 feet from said Southeast corner of said Lot t, to the point of beginning (hereinafter the"Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow expansion of a screen porch and creation of a mudroom addition, lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and 1 irr2r9. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ti� G1 No. 6 8 3 7 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File # LA18-000004. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the RS Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 2.38 acres in area and has a defined lot width of±380 feet at the 75' setback and±460 feet at the OHWL. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Average Lakeshore Setback 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance."The variances are minimal and generally consistent with the intent of the ordinance. This criterion is met. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan."The requested variances are consistent with the residential goals within the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,'as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: 2 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y yNO.• b 8 3 7 t a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The minimal additions to the cabin are reasonable on this wooded, 2+ acre residential property. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The property's orientation at the point of the island; the separation between the subject cabin and the neighboring cabins; the existing tree stands combined with the elevation and setback of the existing cabin on the property in relation to the lake result in a unique circumstance allowing for a the cabin additions to be almost completely screened from views off the property; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The cabin additions will be screened adequately year-round, will be keeping with the style of the cabin, and will screened from views from off of the property. This condition is met. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties."The Applicants have not requested consideration based on economic criteria. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78."This criteria is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located."The use is permitted; this criteria is not applicable. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." This criteria is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property."The property is an existing lot of record and contains a large number of mature trees for screening. The topography of the property increases as it moves away from the lake and the owner feels the proposed additions to the cabin are logical and will not adversely impact adjacent properties. This criterion is met. 3 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL :'‘A G` NO. 6837 � ESHO 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located."The property is situated at the northwestern most point of the island. The applicant's proposal does not appear to be out of character with the area. This criterion is met. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant."This statement is true. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter."The proposed cabin additions will not impair the health, safety, comfort or morals of the public.This criterion is met. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The Applicants have demonstrated practical difficulties which support granting average lakeshore setback variances to permit the improvements lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. This criterion is met. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby denies variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 to permit construction of the mud room and screen porch addition lakeward of the average lakeshore setback; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey by Kemper & Associates, Inc. dated 12/13/17 and building plans dated 12/08/17 submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed on the cabin additions within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (March 12, 2019). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4 gtik O�p CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6837 iosHO°. 4. The undersigned Applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Applicants and the Applicants' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of March, 2018. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: OyyveitLiiy)a9-49.1- aaCarlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 5 N.- Tr '`e' o A Snewto�INC. - THE NEUGENT PROPERTY • � Fmlizli Q . /I 710 BIG ISLAND W. 0 W �l i''sj P''. \ CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA — gea S. I ,1 �_ (PR OS D H rxaxwmws> : fit /� �� LAKE MINNETONKA B a __ ig NETONKA II r/ .\� -- __ ♦ / �s. i" ' ,tai ite �`O .i / r_��mt _v��•L I VIII, .. �,!: kr• itti �" •-' % 11. / 14 7'lluw- :Oft / ityar „,,,v 41100111), 0 AM ` m . . 10,06, l�)MEND " `/,// �// [It" 0 � � ��i� � rt a nu NO,Maw78. �" � ••• wt.. 44214‘,.... t4M4karl'1411. masimill. ipp.4,111Wrillill -.- ......••••••"...* //// .,;i1 417r at.' 1 'Tr /my- ..*-;,'-•,-11k,--• t''-',A'. 'Nogg" 01 mitterriamp r.......-4--•-:=-..- 1.11O.MIS ....,... I �l 17)# ker. ,i0.9...._114r, - � •40,41%,IF - �� ►, 4..e M1 '" (ait le, 1 '7 IAEA SNAPPY 4"id5 .A.4 , AI� �\ 11/ k imik. _Effetier..."- I 4111111P7 5'. fF,� lj WMaWb�Mfart _...�.�i.,r,,.. .77 'i I .ADDITIONS �I► 'w17�.... -4'4,,,, 0 10 , 14.A 1 4111 �WM.,.��':�., fib 11 I an sumer ter- _ ter,-ter ► (,), _ _ 1 i •W•••31•WA•00 POMO MM.•0...PI #4111041 ' �, . �.IS�,.._I-x- A 7 r ; G�� 110111044 =Lae......m.,pp n a ,: _ Q MMMwx NMI MMM u�u .-.... oh,A t If to le 41 ' t AO ye,- _ AMNON@ IMAGE COPERACE NEMO 1�j.a f 41— �oasww.�wxrlEltuu itt, Ai i/ 4, 71/111.1111,104.„ 1 d r tililArifit ' saw on nom.•.ow n 'VW man w os et et ,. .w . '.' ' '.:;: t'4 ._ -"i ii :o r,.11 p.....- , - ,A 4 r_ it , i tail fri .4 POMO cam .UV MOON MOW frit MO ,W,,.• --!F*--4!","..•. ttoy 1114-00-2100 rOX.1,380-110M 1 11'7 .401' .. 4..."*S. :''"".. *AN, vont MAP < "° ,'! SS .: ow "Att.o - SURVEY _._� +r-. CERTIFICATE OF p __.w _ ,M ____. Reviewe. for Code Compliance City of Orono Date . th .Reviewer 401111101r IINLJ Copy 1.. „ . . .... !JHF ______177"/ ... ,...-- icrn _ ,,,_ .., c_.. , 1_,,,,, .,„,t_ tt 1.1 it k ri - - rill— . _-l_.. _ _______1 1111111111111 - rilli ri--._ !! RiMigiiiiiiiinall L. I 1 City of Orono Planning&Zoning Plan Review Site Plan Review Date: . ./�:1( PROVED /p APPROVED WITH REVISIONS(see notes) 0 DENIED room name: clientdetails: architect: date: FLOOR REcErVED EXTERIQR PlAN NEUGENT (CABIN) SALA ARCHITECTS ]2/08/17 PLAN:=�. MAR 1 9201 2110 PORTICO GREEN • PORCH 410 5UN WAYZATA, MN 55341 contractors scale: EXER.TIOR CITY OFORONO )5 PANNE l Sl.9YIlk 5.l Y�YMk,iOL:.�N.,.o. C=,ATFS 1 /1AII _ iknt�