Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
septic info including old designs
'hllhnnesota Pollution Compliance Inspection Form Control Agency Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 (SSTS) Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) For tracking purposes: requirements and attached forms-additional local requirements may also apply. th by CL Of 010134 Submit completed form to Local Unit of Government(LUG)and system owner / t J within 15 days / II System Status System status on date(mmiddtyyyy): L-to-tic{ 0 Compliant-Certificate of Compliance MI Noncompliant-Notice of Noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date,unless shorter time (See Upgrade Requirements on page 3) frame outlined in Local Ordinance.) Reason(s)for noncompliance(check all applicable) ❑Impact on Public Health(Compliance Component#1)-Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)-Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Tank Integrity(Compliance Component #2)-Falling to protect groundwater Q Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)-Failing to protect groundwater lm Soil Separation(Compliance Component #4)-Failing to protect groundwater C]Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance Component #5)-Noncompliant Property Information Parcel ID#or SeciTwp/Range: Property address: 1'1 3 O o`q cR-4-Xi trcri,4-(Qom,;v'S-Za rs v Reason for inspection: M' <-(i4 s -• Property owner. Owner's phone: . or Owner's representative: +l.c1 rc4k•,1d0Wfi.A-- Representative phone: LM? ..-440 - Local regulatory authodty: t.►.•(-< 010).1O Regulatory authority phone: a&Z.-'? S° -W V O Brief system description: 1e-'1000 a ,A<AA IUoei e4.14avwi,-1040,Y- 4 3 4 arn-isOh Comments or recommendations + Certification I hereby certity that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system.No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system,Inadequate maintenance,or future water usage. Inspector name: 6, Certification number. (a a,fl Business name: 5"4 '��'� yS 1�j 14L� , License number. -2,0/,/,! Inspector signature:Y � � �(1, ✓"' Phone number '7 --4q r)-3 ralo(o Necessary or Locally Required Attachments 33 Soil boring logs El System/As-built drawing ❑Forms per local ordinance 0 Other information(list): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4.31 • 1/24.112 Property address: 1 13 0 o w t_4 +4A-- 'moo Inspector initials/Date: 10— J p y 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 Date of Installation: 1 'i c O 0 Unknown Verification method(s): Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food Beverage 0 Yes it No Soil observation does not expire.Previous soil Lodging2 observations by two independent parties are sufficient, Com•fiance criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local For systems built prior to April 1,1998,and ❑Yes ®No requirements differ not located In Shoreland or Wellhead ® Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) Protection Area or not serving a food, 0 Two previous verifications(Mach boring logs) beverage or lodging establishment: 0 Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no dreinfreld) Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical 0 Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 0 Other(See Comments/Explanation) Non-performance systems built April 1, 0 Yes 0 No Cornments/Explanation: 1996,or later or for nonperformance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage,or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically • saturated soil or bedrock.* "Experimenter,'Other,or 'Performance' ❑Yes 0 No indicate de•the of elevations systems built under pre-2008 Rules;Type IV g c r or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media '.4 a.8. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced inspector 5%*L, .5 License required) B. Periodical] saturated soiVbedrock 5 34 Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. tem se•.ration gcs - 1.3, ' 04 separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. D. --•wired com•Ilance se.:radon` Any"no"answer above indicates the system is May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Falling to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*-Compliance component#5 of 5 III Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? 0 Yes ❑No If"yes",A below Is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes 0 No If"yes",B below Is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design if the answer to both questions is"no",this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit number. Have the Operating Permit requirements been met? ❑Yes 0 No b. is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑Yes []No Any"no"answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requirements(Minn.Stat§115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(17PHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance.If the system is falling to protect ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.if an existing system is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or Its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict This provision does riot apply to systems In shorefand areas, Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law. www.pca,state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwlsts4-31 • 1/24/12 • Property address: ►l 3 0 oA.,d 9-7o Inspector initials/Date: 4 (o-to-j�j 1. Impact on Public Health—Compliance component#1 of 5 Com•Mance criteria: Verification method(s): System discharge sewage to the ❑Yes No 0 Searched for surface outlet •round surface. ® Searched for seeping in yard/backup in home`s System discharge sewage to drain the ❑Yes ®No Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes or surface waters. 0 Homeowner testimony(See Comments/Explanation) System cause sewage backup into Yes ®No ®Black soil above soil dispersal systems dwelling or establishment ❑ System requires'emergency pumping 0 Un Any"yes"answer above Indicates the system Is CI Unaablblee ttoo d dye test verify(See Comments/Explanation) an imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. ❑ Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: 2. Tank Integrity-Compliance component#2 of 5 Com•Mance criteria: Verification method(s): System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes 0 No 0 Probed tank(s)bottom cesspool,drywall,or leaching pit. 0 Examined construction records Seepage pits meeting 7080.2550 may be 0 Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach) corn. ant if allowed in local ordinance. Sewage tank(s)leak below their ❑Yes 0 No ❑ Observed liquid level below operating depth desi•ned o.-ratine de.th. ❑ Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: ❑ Probed outside tank(s)for"black soil' Any"yes"answer above Indicates the ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) system Is Falling to Protect Groundwater ❑Other methods not listed(See Comments/Exptenatbn) Comments/Explanation:^ // Wl// v-< ) 't'Q�� 11.1 S i -1 gr-e-Qi.1 -f+ c-5 >ao-s'llas?i v` 3. Other Compliance Conditions-Compliance component#3 of 5 a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged,cracked,unsecured,or appear to structurally unsound- 0 Yes' ®No 0 Unknown b. Other issues(electrical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety. 0 Yes* ®No 0 Unknown *System Is an Imminent threat to public health and safety Explain: c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector 0 Yes' ®No 'System is falling to protect groundwater Explain: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-196-6300 • 800.657.3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwlsts4-31 • 1/24112 • i s Minnesota Pollution SSTS. Abandonment Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North Reporting Form St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) Program) Instructions This form is offered to meet the abandonment requirements of Minn. R.7080.2500 and Disclosure Requirements of Minn.Stat. §115.55,subd.6. Future water supply well placement can also be affected by an abandoned SSTS. The use of this form is not mandatory; however the information on this form must be submitted to the local government unit(LGU) within 90 days after the abandonment.This form may be completed by a certified SSTS practitioner or by an individual who has direct knowledge of how the system was abandoned. Property Information Date of abandonment: (7 ) 20//41 Reason for abandonment: 1\16c.4-) 9'y�'e(N( Property owner name(s): j1 l(/t l"A2L,50 j /' Property owner's` addres : City: I/30 0 I CYC/Si4-I 6, f.d State: AO ''Z1 Zip: Site address(if different): City: State: Zip: Compliance Information 1. All solids and liquids removed from all tanks? Yes 0 No Disposal Site: £17 A 4' 2. All electrical devices and devices containing mercury removed? fYes 0 No Disposal Site: 3. All underground sewage tanks crushed and filed with soil or rock material? Yes 0 No or Removed and disposed off site? 0 Yes ES,No Disposal Site: 4. Contaminated materials*removed and disposed off site? 15Ia Yes 0 No Disposal Site: 5. All underground cavities**crushed and filled with soil or rock material? res 0 No or: Removed and disposed off site? ❑Yes ®No 'l Disposal Site: \\ 6. Future discharge to system permanently denied?f R Yes 0 No Method(s)used: Cud C✓LQ/y/dd *Contaminated materials= Distribution media,soil or sand within three feet of the system bottom,distribution pipes,geotextile fabric/rosin paper/straw, tanks,contaminated soil around leaking tanks, any soil that received sewage from a surface failure(7080.2500 subp.3). **underground cavities m Cesspools, leaching pits,drywells,seepage pits, vault privies,pit privies,pump chambers (7080.2500 subp. 1).Does not include chamber media, drop boxes,or distribution boxes. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-03 • 11/21/08 Page 1 of 2 Map Include location of building sewer, septic tank(s), soil dispersal system, cesspools, seepage pits, and other pits. Also include a permanent reference point(s) and dimensions. T North /403 a %*-77/. D111k fp`r`(v\P e.,61)Ailyej 3-0)0 Certification I hereby certify the system was abandons r accords ce with Minn. R. 7080.25,,and any to al requirements. Name(please print): a )6,\ O 2/ Title: T I2eS/d evi Address: /426,51 (,,cJkc'r6 ( 1—/t/ City: 441..&/t_2— State: /44. Zip: S 5 cJ( Phone: „ ./' 7s r3 ” fes 9?) 2— L' # Date: A-0/ Signature: / j �.. A' www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296.6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq•wwrsts4.03 • 11121108 Page 2 of 2 a. Setbacks. The minimum setback distance requirements are as follows: Sewage Soil Feature 1 Tank Treatment (feet) Area Water supply well: Deep well I 50 50 Shallow well 50 100 Wetland 50 50 Lake: General development 75 75 Recreational development 75 75 ------------ Natural environment 150 150 44 0 Tributaries, streams 75 75 Driveways,sidewalks, decks and other hardcover 10 10 Property lines, buildings and buried pipes 10 20 Lawn sprinkler systems 10 10 Ji3c cj Cç/ -/ l &y us:0 ld yjcifn ' , i I \ \ 1 1 , A 8 7 6, 42'6 1-13 . I - I-, 1-k, Li/141 L-17 iel i c Ta m N 4 S I v4z 1 62( L`.__ A 6 . o o0 • • • CITY of ORONO , '< ,( H 1:_ •'►� Municipal Offices ,�� Street Address: Mailing Address: \\$E$x 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 1 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 To Current Owner: Address: �/30 Old Uy6toll acct' Kd S City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. 6STEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1_ "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISIS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-7): J inspection indicates: Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this ear (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped 7-16-- ). Make sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not through white inspection pipes. This allows for the proper cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter discharge out of septic system. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION(8-10): 8�Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: C�ca:��-:� a•-• Sufi:L 'r°`^16 Ido— 0\, Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 ....,.z m .nn 1,e s --0.---IV. 7011) 0 CI'T'Y of ORONO Ai:ki \\,� �� If,.,:., % ��, Municipal Offices \t1 `' �G Street Address: Mailing Address: 1Est1 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 To: The Current Owner of Address 9 13 0 0 ( v L Ci.S t-A- l i3,9'4 S City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Hall. Imminent Public Health Threat Yes r No l/ If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 952-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action. System Identified as Non-Compliant Yes No If yes, system must be brought into compliance by: December 31,2007 December 31,2010 Other Septic Tank(s) Pump out Needed Yes No The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and pumped out every three years. City records indicate the tank(s) were last pumped out on --Z _ d . The tank(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this allows for proper cleaning. Comments: /6_,Lat—i2, <b - .. Inspector: Date of Inspection /0 ,O S . Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us . • • �-� CITY of ORONO 'i : ti Municipal Offices '";:f-.a. G Street Address: ���• .¢'� Mailing Address: 'E8f10 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 Owner: /1\.o("147%5 C D'wG k\ S Address: 1 130 0 id Lryi4) 13„y - City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 10 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISIS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-10): ST Tank inspection indicates: OPumpout not needed at this time. 6 Tank must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out every 3 years. Tank was last pumped 5 M-6 U ). 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank at next pumpout If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle(does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. D IELD CONDITION(11-14): I I (Ti) Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. . • 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated eluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. COMMENTS: ��See I oak S 0 k ce -23S - o\ 01\ctcc. AffirtfOr-OILC - Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. CITY OF ORONO 0 Municipal Offices (Ck)— O Post Office Box 66 - ,- IP Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a r AI ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT �' �) '�;� INSPECTION REPORT 1 � �9kESI�04� Owner: / ADAMS Cohici/ Address:// Ot to e()Ic/H( ,g4-y /2e/ S. (553610 Permit #'s: 24/59 Dates: 10 -026-89 Contractors: (9(,l/0CW / &C• City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is )04an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): ' 0 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has orhas not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this la 'fication may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): 9 Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. CIDInspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): field inspection indicates: i� Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): Au) cc"- ` ; COMMENTS: Al 6 - (gtFi`1c ini ;( (6i 4S" -, /"dA 10 - -99 Date of Inspection Ilreptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner ., (--0,o O .11.\-\k„,,,, CITY of ORONO pa - si'.'- -it �• `, $,1 I G�14 Municipal Offices \ ,\\N,:tI'.) *y Street Address: Mailing Address: EgHOg 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Owner: (10/041 Address: 1130 Old Crystal Bay Rd. S. Permit #'s: 2459 Dates: 10/26/89 Contractors: Quickway Exc. (This is [x] an existing system [ ] new construction) . STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level 91(.] has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the saturated soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 9 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. (During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanks [ ] were or [4] were not confirmed to be watertight by the licensed pumping contractor. If the tanks were not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.) INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) : low COMMENTS: ?=597 716/04----- Date of Inspection Se is System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO Municipal Offices //C>1:-(34Ck Post Office Box 66 ,t.,r 0_ Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 l ON—SITEWA SEWAGE TREATMENT j�) INSPECTION REPORT 49kESHO4 Owner: c ( 7.011/ Address: fiXO p' CI,C�„! AI' S, Permit #'s: , Dates: /9-04-21 Contractors: ( ,lrLthG. City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is D4.-an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): ® "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic1 has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): la Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. Inspection pipe is located directl over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have n, . ..._. in the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): // Dr field inspection indicates: Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope.setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils.water table,etc.): • COMMENTS: 7_2 - 'Rz Date of Inspection c System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pupping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT CITY INSPECTION REPORTOF POST OFFICE BOX 66 O R O N O 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay,MN 55323 / 473-7357 OWNER IO7r!` S '�'8y1/13 r�1//�fiCi ADDRESS #30 al r9"4"/&y' � R T PERMIT NO.'S. 021/Sti / - DATES '�6. / CONTRACTORS L //� 1 City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is an existing system 0 new construction) 1 Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. El2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly;no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time,but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. El4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location,but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( 0 Checked items may require your action) Tan�jJnspection indicates: 0 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not 9-Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years,they ed out this year to help prevent future problems, should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. 'Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 0 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. 0 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,�/and system condition) dequate High water table s-Low Fair ❑ Lot size 0 Medium 0 Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream 0 High 0 Inadequate ❑ Drainage 0 System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS: Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner .a.., `-APPLICATION FOR SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMIT - CITY OF ORONO 0-459Box 66 (1335 So Brown Rd) -- Crystal Bay, MN 55323 *************************************************************************** General Instructions: - 1. You may apply for septic system permits by mail or in person at the City offices. However, permits will not be mailed out and must be picked up in person at the City offices. 2. Permits are not valid until you receive a permit card. 3 . Work must not begin unless the permit card is available on the job site. 4. Permits will be issued only to contractors holding a City of Orono Septic System Installer' s License. 5 . All work must be done in accordance with the approved septic system design. Design reports are net considered approved unless accompanied by the "City of Orono Septic System Approval" cover sheet signed by the City Inspector. 6. The following inspections will be required for all septic systems : a) Pre-installation site inspection to include inspector, installer, and general contractor. b) Tank installation prior to covering. c) Drainfield trench installation prior to covering. (For mounds, inspection is required after rough-up but prior to sand placement, and again during pressure distribution piping installation in the rock bed.) d) Final inspection to verify proper final cover depths and to verify that all pump station (where required) components are functional and comply with codes. 7 . Individual holding MPCA Installer Certificate shall be present during all inspections. 24-hour notice is required for all inspections . *************************************************************************** APP JOB SITE ADDRESS: ___P -3C9 a24 Xi , Occupancy Type: Residential Commer'ial ()ter Owner' s Name: r&c-c- 1 gio 21 t S Phone: /7c l` g Mailing Address: City: Zip: Septic Contractor's Name: L4 /C4 -r'tix C_ Bus.I - Zip : Z Phone:_1 7 t : Mailing Address: - V-( Ciy' �� Arct ********************a*************:****************** ********************* - over - Io-z6c6 .� _ --;11-1-'.-1 +,ac '.rewe.�,t.. -?.r•'� "C�r...�.` �C..�...i rsws.�rw.c _ m - r. .-. -`- -� �:+.4^iwrt .�= '�` 3 sr�r }-�"krLt� s s- rY »",�sraw�lr+•7►C f rt1 *r •ro-r SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMIT. APPLICATON - PAGE 2 -.._.- -�-- Permit Type & Fees (check one) New Construction, Full System $75.00 Replace Existing System (1 or more new tanks & drainfield) $50.00. . . Partial Replacement (replace just tanks or just drainfield) $30.00. $0.50 State surcharge: added to above permit fees - - _ SEE FEE SCHEDULE FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL PERMIT FEES P I DO NOT MAIL PAYMENT WITH THIS APPLICATION *************************************************************************** NOTE: Applicant must initial all spaces. Fill in all appropriate blanks, check all appropriate boxes. Initial al v 1. I have received a copy of the system design including the / . City of Orono Septic System Approval Cover Sheet. l 2. I will b installing the following: A. Tanks: recast Concrete Other Manufacturer Tank Capacities: 1) /00 (9 gal. 2) /COO gal. 3) /000 gal. B. Pump Station (if required) Pump make & model 7e4a3v %ar►va, (attach pump curve & literature) ; system design requires /,/Q gpm at 2-e feet of head. High water alarm make & model G__c_i/41a-Aa,--,r p L(,/ Outside electrical work to be completed by _installer electrician other . Inside electrical work must be completed by electrician. C. Treatment System: (/ Trenches: 7 j 0 s.f. Mound Depth of rock below pipe 1.2. ' Rock bed dimensions _'x Drop Boxes Sand bed dimensions 'x Distribution Box Pressure Dist. Pipe Diam. " Manifold Pipe Diem. " D. Final Cover/Topsoil to be: borrowed from site • (show location on site plan) _ . trucked in ************************************************************************** he undersigned hereby applies to the City of Orono for issuance of a eptic system installation permit, agrees to do all work in strict zcordance with the ordinances of the City and the regulations of the State f Minnesota, and certifies that all statements made . on this application :e complete, true and c-rrect. .gnature of Applicant: .�/.`/ Date: /0 'CA Certification No. : c ego Pur . • CITY OF ORONO Permit # `(5q SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL Fee $ ' .5. 6,0ir Entered By As T The General Contractor will be given a copy of this report and is ili responsible for its distribution to all sub-contractors. Septic system 1. design is not considered as approved unless this sheet is attached. 1 LOCATION: // 30 SO bt414 A.& Cia'y s "L 4A- GENERAL CONTRACTOR: E,e '9.7.S.-'609/g SEPTIC CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: -1We MA S CO<W EL- 0 APPROVED CONDITIONALLY APPROVED:/ Note Changes Below COMMENTS: Ti�KS 1600 �'!n0Q`/000 w/l/W'e 1 ,A1e01. is CAIN F/ tD - AI 114, - '( 0 s 4-. -r-i2-w c.44-es (No E uc,r7 aw..) pc,g. 1 J �- So)C O<ST1e 63 4T /O&.) — /2" SCK vl NDi PtPe�� I�-� • - r/ i b-Vele/r V intwtr stskti4Acte iI lkSeld d N f mkt.. 7 21-^' Ivo w - K45t5f) -rA-N K-S /0 ' ep-o- mvi__ ee,oeose-t .e-c- .,-s . 0 w--) /C 0 Fr 3)444/0 Pert-4, s tis , eizt.:Kaki 6 44-11madvATE-- S Pre 9t- : NOTICE TO INSTALLERS: Any changes to the approved plan and specs must have prior approval of the Inspector (473-7357). Call for inspections 24 hours in advance. NOTICE TO GENERAL CONTRACTORS: Drainfield sites must be protected prior to and after system installation to avoid compaction of the natural soil. Drainfield areas must be fenced off to eliminate all traffic over them. , ! ,, , 3 9 7 , / 4 I---/I---/ • Date Approved By L. q / �\... . ......Q�!•CJV Lam... .�• ••\ 4V�€�6. ig' / • 8a-Sii•= Z9'X81 \ o0. "L9 ZpL . �I b • xo5 Li-...... \ •-•-k._ • : \_._______ (1!'-1-aa aas) I \ 1.4..••.1 e* '�fo s�,b�• •' asc�o asodoa ` i °�/O aoa�:l" 1 ` �.,...1�aaai. '1'��y�'a� f �,�dS aS / • o uawaso� �it!I!}`i pup aSou�o�o-� I � \'/j/ r / �e� j 1 II 1 1r'•' j f gid:' � 1 $ /o bo e I i /.p{/7 i` 6 : \ • ‘....^a't,� 4........ "....N...,..... \ \''6 \ I°pasodo \. • • • S-P TESTING, INC. 951 KATYDID LANE ST. MICHAEL, MN 55376 497-3566 Steven B.. Schirmers April 19, 1989 .Phyllis Colwell Lot 1, Block 1 Colwell Addition Orono, Henn. Co. , MN • • This system is Designed for a Type 1, four bedroom home and in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. The soils on this site are SCS soils mapped - LrC - Lester loam, more typical of Heyder . soils . A seasonally high water table was located at 58" , 60" & 62" (mottled soil) . The bottom of each trench must be lo- cated at least 3 ' above the seasonally high water table. The soils at a depth of 18" & 24" have a percolation rate averaging 8 . 8 min/inch and are adequate for a standard treatment system. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather :proof enclosure. A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure. (Mercury floats are a good method) . The supply line pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. All neighboring wells are located more than 100 ' away from the proposed treatment area. Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction as much as possible. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively. Recommend to pump the septic tank every year if there is only 1 tank & every 2 years if, there are 2 tanks. • • • Soil and Percolation Tests Steven B. Schirmers SBS/ds Septic System Design •r+ .. . / . L .; . 1 i .r.s.;:. i f' P i . , 4/ . ' • KEEPAI-[ REA✓r FG v1P(cEur-OFf \ • OF THF r'EATMF N7 AREAS _ • • ,� $F.FOR e AFrrR CONSTRUCT/0A1 •- • - - \. • •. _,, . . . . 2 ,4 . . S . _ _. a - to 1--.-_:_ tils> f \ ‘‘).1C...' 11'5 .V%,__ _ � '' • 9c-a 9 • pati s_ U4}Q- ., e/98.9 - 0. 91 C o /4 •S').1 is 0 - : �, iS°4�' '`;949.3 / , ^` +i t 'PAY-O�sS o \\���. ' ��� 4 .(o 5 ._pL`C L1 - .Pc-,CROS,�P (' 93 y mss. 3 qy�3 \_'`�. �1 �y3Rm dv-kL • v> / fir �,S'LoNa ~ I.- PY-OPOS y , - • 6�T �(,V JI • A-v.v'A.m i y1.L'- 0.FT / �il��1* a�5sa.PG w/3'w�oG s .�.ad`w.FT xQq>�slo�! gyS.o 94Sg usS- 3--re-eu 1.«5 Iv...o)•at, 1 EL - ' _ PROPERTY OF: ----_ -------/r--------- i. - --- —— -- - - S Per cololion Tests Scale:____Z_'' 5'4 -- i -L81`1_..15.2''P.__O _ 4k coY�R_— XSoiI Borings -- oL•uJc- trL----- A .- ________._ Or ,fix/5r/A/6 HaysE IN L-oTg _ Bench Morkeir1 dot'� oto. 7±114___V____.-__95‘.o p =t2y, �of F To-moo 1\t' - Note: This system is to be constructed to meet O 0/t10� H . f,/E Go — - --- -- -- the Minnesota Pollution Control agency ��g $-p TESTING INC. • Chapter 7080 & Local Ordinance �-- 6? Designed By: 6o�— _- - �'-` Note Check all underground utilities Dote:.1/1&89 PH.612-497-3566 - existing grade .• --- (bock fill 6"min. 3"to4" layer of uncompocted 1 ' hay or straw covered with : i a 4.pipe dia. , > red rosin paper '� :t I lj rock filter material rake sidev.•a'ls a bottom to ` • remove. smearing t_- -; SET-'BACKS 1-s--•-18'3611 HOUSE System must be: _ - - • Tank _a1 from property lines TRENCH X- SECTION. 1-1_ V3s}S -i'v - - '>S' from wells (min, of two trenches) ' from bldgs. ., , - = 'u w - -Treatment-.area -_'from lakes-, �S�strtaums ���s (max. length 100.) Treatment area moo' from property lines MAN14a Eg 'Mx t;" _ �'from wells . AZ` rIL . _.2_9_.from btdgs. -/ r- - 1Q.'from trees ote:Power supply and switches must be in a weather ; - SOIL BORING ELEVATIONS - ti - proof enclosure outside -pumping chamber. WA-L-L O�5-r -Qomin _ = - r- 9y --� THII EL.-gyt3•Z -(E}�10-54S•g t -- __a._ p;Pe -= --a -; -- TH."2 EL.�c�trr_3 Tank :{ r-; ;-r-"�- ° TH"3 EL.- t3 • . / Tank _ ' _' __ �_ Grade do /°slope Drop to Tank g rw� 1-+>aE TH~4 EL.-24/..5-- Min. L. 2±ti S - t q c�N - At least 41/2 of undisturbed Min. I"to 8' - �pump;ng - earth between trenches i TH75 EL.-1q6-9 • Max.1"to 4' ' .ELEVATION at PROPOSED PUMPING 4"to 6"dia.pipe Chamber DROP ,BOXES- f CHAMBER-'14 .0 (ground elev.) __ . Pr-otizbsc,gzs_Yko- 14,-FCti11�0 • • _ - t -5-L--9St SYSTEM DESIGN - - APPRow.. St-Acr. vi-aiy8.0 TYPE•-3,9 BEDROOM - Percolation rate 'd•t:'min./inch (design , - min./inch) .0 - . 4-7 400 7 • - t n . - $4, FY . Treatment area. required w/1A" of rock filter materia'i 10°/. = S sq.ft. of trench bottom area ne=.ed i-____" trench width = lin.ft.of trench needed , number of drop boxes_ Number of tanks required a , 1st tonk)ooCgol_, 2nd tank/cxx..= s ilii is • (to be determined by the inslo'er), Clean rock?(acu.yds. ( 3/4" to 2 1/2"dia.,includes 2"above pipe) PROPERTY OF:!O L W 1. L. AA) • Pumping chamber copacity= 25% of daily sewage flow'of kop gat. Qgal.+Reserve.slorage-ccgal.+ Pipe•Q¢-bock draina-ge gal.N= 0SFF�? gal.cop.nn LC T ‘ t 2l.Ot-k- 1 /s C.G .. 1�, �v FfeP.Sm4 +•n,v� JOl i n o ( Reserve storage = gal./ bedroom= gal. t pipe bock drairoge- . gal./1001in.ft._� pipe- length of pipe needed opal—CH. = 3'_,ga1.) Pump size Iia- hp w/mercury float pump controls 1-Isqty a3 1AV'A-O ms}x, Q\ 1.4kR�bL Lig rest ) rn�yi •) S-P TEST/NG / C. Note: When constructing bed - , this area should be shaped Note: Distance from treatment orea to neighboring wells— ' Designed B 03. c C - to divert run-off from entering treatment area. L�`?- .4--1-57'-';2- -1-144}-\ lootf Date:3/.1.E./13.2. , PH. 612-497-3566 • L-13 CERTIFICATION # 00627 Logs of Soil Borings • ,Location or Project. Lot' 1, block 1, Colwell Add. , Orono Borings made by S-P Testing, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 5-19-87 Classifiction System: AASHO ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two) : Hand X , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X Depth, Boring number 1 Depth, Boring number 2 in in feet Surface elevation 948 . 2 feet Surface elevation 946 . 3 '0 - 0 - Topsoil dark brown loam Topsoil Dark brown loam 0 - 10" 0 - 10" 1 1 Brown • 10" - 1 ' 2"clay loam Brown sandy clay loam Yel wisl, 2" _ 1 ' 8" byooam 10" - 1 ' 10" Yellowish brown loam 2 - • Brown sandy loam 3 _ Brown loam fine sand 3 - 1 , 10" - 3 ' 2" Brown fine sand 4 - . 2 ' 4" - 4 ' 2" 4 - I 3 ' 2" - 4 '2" Brown medium sand Brown loamy fine sand 4 ' 2" - .4 ' 10" 5 - 5 ' -mottling Brown sandy 5 - 4 ' 2" - 5 ' 2"-mottling 4 ' 10" . - 5 ' 4" loam Rusty brown loamy Rusty gray brown fine sand 6 - fine sandy •loam 6 - 5 ' 4" - 6-1/2 ' S ' 2" - 6 ' 8" - Rusty .gray silty 7 fine- sand 7 - Rusty gray silty fine sand 8 6-1/2' - 8 ' End of boring at 8 feet. End of boring at 8 feet. Standing water table: Standing water table: present at feet of depth, present at feet of depth, hours 'after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole X Not present in hole X Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at 5 feet of depth. Observed at 5 ' 2" feet of depth. Not present in hole Not present in hole Comments : Comments : • L-13 CERTLFICATION # 00627 Logs of Soil Borings • Location or Project Lot 1, Block 1, Colwell Add. , Orono Borings made by S-P Testing, Inc. Steve Schirmers Date 5-19-87 Classifiction System: AASHO USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two) : Hand X , , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X Depth, Boring. number 3 Depth, Boring number 4 in in feet Surface elevation 948 . 8 feet Surface elevation 946.5 0 - 0 - Topsoil dark brown loam 0 - 1 ' 1 - 1 - Brown 1 ' - 1-1/2 ' loam SAME AS BORING #2 Brown sandy loam 2 2 - 1-1/2 ' - 2 ' 2" Brml ' , edium to 2 , 2" - 2 8„fmine sand 3 3 - Brown loamy fine sand • 4 - 4 - 2 ' 8” - 4-1/2 ' Brown fine sand 5 - 5 ' 2"-mottling 5 - 4-1/2 ' - 5 ' -mottling Gray brown fine sand • 6 - 6 - 5 ' - 6 ' 2" • Gray brown silty 7 - 7 - fine sand •qq 8 - 8 - 6 ' 2" - 8 ' End of boring at 8 feet. End of boring at 8 feet. Standing water table: ' Standing water table: present at feet of depth, present at feet of depth, hours after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole x Not present in hole X . Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at 5 ' 2" feet of depth. Observed at 5 feet of depth. Not present in hole Not present in hole Comments : Comments : • • L-13 CERTIFICATION # 00627 Logs- of Soil Borings .Location or Project' Phyllis Colwell , Lot 1, Blk.1, Colwell Add. , Orono Borings made by S-P Testing, Inc . Steve Schirmers Date 4-11-89 Classifiction System: AASHO ;' USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used !check two) : Hand X , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X • Depth, Boringnumber 5 6 p � . in • Depth, Boring number feet Surface elevation.. 945 '9 feet Surface elevation 945 . 8 v - 0 • Topsoil dark brown Topsoil dark brown loam 1 - lbam 0 1' 1 - - 0 - 1 ' 8" Brown clay loam • 2 Brown loam' , 2 - 1 - 2 ' Brown sandy loam 3 - 1 ' 8"• - 3 ' ; 3 - 2 ' - 3 ' 2" Brown ,loamy sand - 4 ' Brown loamy sand 4 - 4 - Brown •medium sand w/thin layers of sandy loam 4 ' 10"-mottled 4 '• - 5 ' -mottled 3 ' 2" - 5 ' 5 - Rusty brown medium sand 5 - 'Rusty olive brown sandy 5 '. - 5-1/2 ' 5 ' - 5-1/2 ' silty loam Rusty 'gray brown 6 - ` medium sand 6 - Rusty olive brown 5-1/2 ' - 6-1/2 ' loamy sand Rusty gray brown fine sandy 7 - 6=1/2 ' - 7 ' 2" silty lo. m7 - 5-1/2 ' - 7 ' 4" Rusty gray brown loamy Rusty gray silty loam 8 - I 7 ' 2" - 8 ' sand 8 - 7 ' 4" - 8 ' End of boring at . 8. . feet. End of boring at 8 ' feet. Standing water table: • Standing water table: present at feet of depth, present at feet of depth, hours after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole X ' Not present in hole X Mottled soil : . • • Mottled soil : Observed at 5 '. feet 'of depth. Observed at 4 ' 10" feet of depth. Not present in hole • • Not present in hole Comments : Comments : . ..., N . . . • . •\ 1 • . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET t �a.nt� �~ Percolation test readings made by Steven B. Schirmers on 5-20-87 starting at 10 : 48 p.m. , Test hole locationLot 1,B 1 k. 1,Co 1 we 11 Add. SR$�nber 1 ,Date hole was prepared 5-19-87 • ; Depth of hole bottom 24 inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches , Soil data from test hole: • 1 Depth, inches Soil texture , 0 — 10" Topsoil dark brown loam 10" — 14" Brown clay loam i 14" — 20" Yellowish brown clay loam 20" — 24" Yellowish brown loam Method of scratch;ng sidewall Knife , Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches Date and hour o:initial water fillin 5-19-87 00 ,ta. 12 it u epth�f initial water filling inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches — Time Percolation ' Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks ' minutes' inches level,inches minutes per inch 10 : 39 prefill 6 10 : 48 11: 18 4-1/2 6.7 30 min 11 : 24 11: 54 " " ' " " " 11: 55 j 12 : 25 • " lu " " 1 Percolation rate = 6 7 minutes per inch. • . . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • Steven B. Schirmers 5-20-87 10 : 49 Percolation test readings made by on - starting at 'P ` Lotl,B1k. 1,Colwell Add. ,Orono Wale) 2 Test hole location —. ,Hole number ,Date hole was prepared 5-19-87 Depth of hole bottom 24 _inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: 1 Depth, inches Soil texture • 0 — 10" Topsoil dark brown loam 10" — 22" Brown sandy clay loam 22" — 24" Brown sandy loam • i I i Method of scratching sideway Knife a 2 Depth of gravel in bottom of hole inches 3 : 00p.m. Date and hour of initial water filling 5-19-8 7 ,Depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches J ', i Time J Percolation ' Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minutes . inches level,inches minutes per inch 10 : 39 prefill 6 i 10 : 49 11: 19 4-3/4 6.3 30 min 11 : 23 11: 53 n4-3/8 6. 9 11 II a 11: 57 112 : 27 ` 4-1/4 7.1 11 II ! I !{ I 1 1 1 I •0 -"1 1 6 . 8 • 1 Percolation rate = _—minutes per inch. • 1 ,, ' . • \ I . . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET Percolutiontestreadingsmadeby Steven B. Schirmers on 5-20-87 _starting at 10 :50MCP , 44,4) Testholclocatior otl,Blk. 1,Colwell Add. ,C :c;no 3 5-19-87 o e number ,Date hole was prepared 1 Depth of hole bottom 2 4 inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches 4 Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture , 0 — 10" ' . Topsoil dark brown loam 10" — 22" Brown sandy clay loam 22" — 24" Brown sandy loam • Method of scratching sidewall__.K n i f e Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 • inches 3:00p.m. Date and hour of initial water filling_ 5-19-87 ,Depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom — Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hour Automatic siphon , Maximum water depth abo,'e hole bottom during test 6 inches Time I Percolation ' Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks ' • minutes inches level,inches minutes per inch 10 : 39 prefill 6 10 : 50 11 : 20 fin 4-1/2 6 .7 30 min 11: 22 11: 52 I ii4-3/8 6 .9 II II . 11: 58 12 :28 , t, NI II " " • I I Percolation rate =_ 6 .8 minutes per inch. • • • PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • "C. a.m.) Percolation test readings made by Steven B. Schirmers on 5-20-87 .starting at 10 : 51 p.m. (dua) Test hole locationLotl.B1k :1,Colwell Add. ,c i nber 4 ,Date hole wasprepared 5-19-87 • Depth of hole bottom 18 inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: . Depth, inches Soil texture 0 — 12" Topsoil dark brown loam 12" — 18" Brown loam Method of scratching sidewall Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches •00 .m. Date and hour of initial water filling 5-19-87,Depth oi initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom ----' Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon • ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches _ — i Time • Percolation Time I interval,' Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks • minutes inches level,inches minutes per inch 10 : 39 prefill 6 10 : 51 11: 21 4-5/16 7.0 30 min 11: 22 11: 52 ' 4-1/8 7. 3 a 11: 59 12 : 29 • II • Percolation rate = 7. 2 ._minutes pGr inch. • . • CERT.#00G27 • • • • PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • Percolation test readings made by S—P Testing, Inc . on 4-12-89 starting at 9 : 40 p.m. , duirl Test hole location Lot1,B1k.1,Colwell• Add,Qron• 5 4-11-89 Hole number ,Date hole was prepared • Depth of hole bottom 24 inches,.Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: • Depth, inches • Soil texture 0 — 20" • .Topsoil dark brown loam 20" — 24" Brown loam • • Method of scratching sidewall Knife • 2 Depth of gravel ir bottom of hole inches • 4-11-89 4:00p.m . 12 Date and hour of initial water f illino ,Dept. o. initial water filling inches above hole bottom Method used to rna,ntain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon • ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches . Time Percolation 'rime interval,, Measurement, Drop in water . rate, Remarks minutes i ' inches level,inches minutes per • inch 9 : 30 prefill 6 . 9 : 40 9 :55 1 15 .0 15 min 10 : 11 ! 10 : 26 " II It 10 : 27 10 : 42 • " j " II " f i • • • i f . I Percolation rate = 15.0 minutes per inch. .. CERT.ff00627 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET A Percolation test readings made by S—P TPqting, Tnr,_ on 4-12—R9 starting at 9 . 41 1r. Test hole locationL°t 1,B 1 k. 1,Co lwe 11 Add. ,, 9t er 6 ,Date hole was prepared 4—11—8 9 • 24 6 Depth of hole bottom inches,Diameter of hole inches Soil data from test hole: • Depth, inches • Soil texture i 0 — 12" Topsoil dark brown loam I 12" — 24" Brown clay loam • 1 Method of scrs!chinL, sidewall Knife 1 i. Depth of gravel in hottorn of hole 2 inches 4-11-89 4 : 00pm 12 1 Date and hour of initial water filling ,Depth of initial water filling inches above hole bottom t Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water:depth in hole for at least4 hours Automatic siphon ' 1 ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches 1T -1 i .Time Percolation Time ! interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minutes inches level,inches minutes per 1 • inch 4 9 : 30 prefill 6 . 9 : 41 9 : 56 i • " : 1-1/2 10. 0 15 min , 1 10 :10 10 : 25 . " 10 : 28 10 : 43 • I j " . r ii . j I -- I . Percolation rate = 10. 0 minutes per inch. • 1 • -i - .;a 'i r �''� --- MOUND FILL 4"- 6" - .� vi p s S r i 7 -- -- -- _ . + 4���0����� _ TO ALLOW FOR . _, • -,;.. moo`..) c., ire -Ty ,.:>.;;:e...,"-____7_,,.% � SETTLING • :.- �_,���� �\ -<' `�` 1. �_S_}lf���i.j ';;sj �,_ a^j..,Y-f?,i:'" I — j,,-~GRASS COVER• . � �� . r '+}"��. 1 .r - ;' 6,I TO 3 4' OF_ SOIL - - � '� = 1" - " '' �' COVER ABOVE. ROCK - (� 4 +• am / 5. %r -- -- _ +I DIA. ' �, '' 6. ,i 1�,: 0., f .A-. ,� CLEAN ROCK • � am . i/ / / ,,/J cv., ,,. � _�-'�:.qs-„�2<�,rh, ,moi- - - ql�_ 61I LAYER OF UN MPA • CO CTED '.jer- ARV i- �'= '' ri' HAY OR STRAW COVERED WITH 4I .rp �E E : � • {�,< �/ ROSIN ` :,, D ..,*1 .1.-;-.!1.-:::.! PAPER 'or -R9. EM•. .,•:.;,;4f:1:::1--w,� ... : /i REO _ :. i�TD •ff' Vii- .. ,-Z =;i:. 1 - // Geotexti le Fabric .0o4�Ep j.:,,.v.- � --4:-,,P...:-,...-, " "^ -- - TRENCH BOTTOM MUST BE LEVEL B AR.: f ( \� 7/ `.5t4.1�;, ,,-5/ �/ THROUGHOUT LENGTH BAR '- >. -c �j o ' VZ •ssZs \\.\, - —L/-----;`°-- 2” MINIMUM ROCK COVER ABOVE PIPE rz /�/� -��. ---6 MINIMUM ROCK DEPTH BELOW PIPE // SEA I L_ __-- /ri j'�-- P_.e -- 4" DIA. RIGID PERFORATED PLASTIC PIPE WITH ONE �� 'S° pT if / `� ROW OF HOLES ALONG BOTTOM \\ \ /�r - WATER TABLE OR IMPERVIOUS LAYER SUCH AS CLAYPAN, \\ /// ROCK, ETC. \\\ /r 1 t ( TRENCH ROCK COVERED WITH PERMEABLE SYNTHETIC FABRIC OR 4" LAYER OF MARSH HAY OR \4:\DIAMETER INSPECTION -- PIPE TO NEXT STRAW COVERED WITH UNTREATED BUILDING - INLET • DROP BOX PAPER (RED ROSIN) --- WELL WITH CAP 1 ; W _EARTH BACKFILL AT LEAST �� 6" ABOVE TOP OF ROCK �` 4;DISTRIBUTION . PIPE- . _ - - _ - - ; -: 4-, ' • -.--i-: . z �__ 0 r4 1 - _ `(,•(' . AT LEAST 6" DEPTH OF CLEAN • • . . - ° . . . - • �: ;� ROCK 3/4 TO 2 h/z� DIA. SEE NOTE 5. Q fi` • DROP BOX* � • sic_ - . cf_<<.�, V4 . !- —MAXIMUM LENGTH = 100 FEET • OVERFILL NOTES: I. BOTTOM OF TRENCH MUST BE LEVEL. TOP OF TRENCH -- 4 TO 6 INCHES ROCK MUST BE LEVEL. INSPECTION WELL 2. SLOPE ON DISTRIBUTION PIPE IS BETWEEN y_ LEVEL AND 4 INCHES PER 100 FEET. �� �/ RECOMMENDED SLOPE IS LEVEL. i' BACKFILL �6 �TO 12" OF SOIL BACKFILL 3. DISTRIBUTION PIPE CAN BE PERFORATED ti PLASTIC INSTALLED WITH ONE ROW OF <<<SLc< <-'ik.�• L� —1��c ' O � HOLES ALONG THE PIPE BOTTOM. PIPE o 1 2" DEPTH OF MUST HAVE A BEARING STRENGTH OF o ROCK ABOVE AT LEAST 1000 LB/FT. 4' ` c• o j PIPE • ROCK o AT LEAST 6" OF 4. SCARIFY TRENCH BOTTOM AND SIDEWALLS • ..� . _ o ROCK BELOW AS HIGH AS ROCK WILL BE PLACED IN THE Y " . r ' PIPE. SEE TRENCH IN ORDER TO EXPOSE NATURAL SOIL. NOTE 5. REMOVE LOOSE SOIL BEFORE PLACING ROCK. 18" TO 36" ---,--15. WHERE TREES ARE PRESENT OR LIKELY TO BE PRESENT DURING THE LIFE OF THE SYSTEM, 12 INCHES OF ROCK MUST BE PLACED UNDER THE DISTRIBUTION PIPE. TRENCH CONSTRUCTION DET/ 1 LS NOTES OUTLET TO I. ALL PIPES SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4- INCH TRENCH DIAMETER. INLET FROM 'iii' SEPTIC TANK • . 2. ELEVATION OF INLET AND SUPPLY LINE TO . OR PREVIOUS NEXT DROP BOX MAY BE ADJUSTED UP OR DROP BOX - SUPPLY LINE DOWN FOR DESIRED EFFLUENT LEVEL IN TO NEXT _ DROP BOXI*: - 3. SUGGESTED TRENCH LIQUID LEVEL IS AT —�-- ° al "---- TOP OF TRENCH ROCK IF PERMEABLE SYNTHETIC FABRIC COVERS ROCK; AT TOP . OF OUTLET PIPE IF HAY OR STRAW COVERS ROCK. INVERT OF INLET MUST BE AT LEAST ONE INCH HIGHER THAN INVERT OF SUPPLY PIPE TO NEXT DROP BOX. p4. OUTLET TO 1 _ TRENCH 5. TRENCHES MAY OUTLET ONE SIDE OR BOTH SIDES OF DROP BOX. —h-- T i _ _ SUPPLY I ,--• I INLET - �� 1 1 I I SUPPLY LINE , 1 I NA, . II.._I _-T- I � . -3 i II i!� I OUTLETS - I�' -�- TO TRENCH L - _ _ - _ J OUTLET TO d TRENCH oo DROP BOX ,= _ -.. . - i.y--REDWOOD, CFD"AR OR WATER TIGHT a LOCKABLE ELECTRIC BOX- TREATED POST 4 x 4 min) PLUGS OR ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS ------ ---- ;``.. ---ALL ELECTRIC CONNECTIONS MADE -` - _ _ � � INSIDE BOX 2 PVC CONDUIT SCHEDULE 80 - - �PACC - - LOOP OF POWER CORD FORMANHOLE COVER CHAINED & LOCKED 6"� _ - SETTLEMENT • SEALED MANHOLE RINGS — } _ _ _-.-.�---- J _— v .IA I FINALI. ,_GRADI- J, / '_ • _-- _ AT LEAST 12 . UNION -I . �B FLOW GRADE_ - - - • -- - iv!-:_r . WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY • ,�....:s , Y PIPE IS LAID ON A UNIFORM SLOPE FROM PUMP STATION UP TO SOIL TREATMENT AREA - - . A ; FOR PROPER DRAINBACK . - SEALED TANK COVER • - -- IF PIPE AT TANK MUST BE LOWER THAN UNION TO GET ELEVATION FOR DRAINBACK, PLASTIC ROPE OR CHAIN .4 A 1/4 INCH WEEP HOLE MUST BE USED WITH ANCHOR --- WEEP HOLE ALARM FLOAT ON SEPARATE - ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT ' NOTES: ELECTRICAL WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY START LEVEL V _ MUST NOT RUN OVER •ANY TANKS BUT �� '� MUST BE LAID BESIDE. OTHER TANKS 3 ;t AND MUST BE -PLACED IN CONDUIT ALONG POST SHUT-OFF LEVEL V ELECTRICAL CORDS FROM PUMP AND • FLOATS MUST BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT. WIRES CANNOT HAVE GROUND PUMP CONTROL FLOAT ;, ,� CONTACT. • I0.0 : .;4 ' V soli", • -- • ' • Nil EIALam 4•0 044 •i lio • • . COVER - • ....C.. : ,,, ... - —I& _ # \P 11, -- -.- _ 4.:: - . - Eli . v 1 1 1___Akt,_ . . - : - • . I •=-. --.._-_,. / tt 1 I �. M 1 , r� i ' CONCRETE + % ; MANHOLE ; s a. : � RING . •WI. METHODS OF SECURING MANHOLE COVER TO PREVENT • • . UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY r • I • I 0 •_ II- PENCIL • . . _ . ._ _ . . • . _ . • • • . _ . • . . • _ • • .__ . • ii , ' MARKS �,_,:. j�J . . . . . . 1 � . ._.:,.. - :,. . . , • ��•.�5. :�� t�1:' JL 4 \i 'cam'•.-: � � :'��. . . • �/ / MANHOLE— II ,::•/-:.•:.: • , V INLET • t� ��� SCUM `_j. _:w. •1-, Ii • OUTLET `;' r-=OUTLET LEVEL 1'- 1= )7 4: - ---• -- - _ •iF 11 ._— SCUM CLEAR SPACE' ' 11 _ f__II �1 LI-. ; ;LEA: OUT TANK WHEN • r.-_-4._ ' IS " OR LESS OR — — _ -- B " IS2" OR LESS BLACK COLOR V • • SLUDGE '1 • DISTINGUISHES SLUDGE _ • _ _ . , __ •• :':.;•: :.,. LAYER FROM LIQUID i+te a{`y'jtt-. `g?.:;;i's:•• • • . . . . .. "r.\.:A-•.7.z:• ''Aie '- 7/ • 4. V/ • w MEASURE SCUM AND SLUDGE ACCUMULATIONS IN. THE SEPTIC TANK V M SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION STREET ADDRESS 26730 / lae ..4.&4152e- bkiVeF LOT 3 BLOCK I. SUBDIVISION C`w L "Y1W'r"70ti1 MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE 4 1 ,C/C► /989 ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED P s rs 3o1L. gote ups Des/GA.,) For- - Ble Artie NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT: OBORINGS OPERC TESTS OSYSTEM DESIGN SITE PLAN () OTHER gCOMMENTS PR I h✓V4Rn /Mit% A'Z-reoeiuA -- Siff/Ps' io n Litz- y-touNI==. suis- us DATE THIS SHEET FILED /g--a-a' sct BY 4A SUBDIVISION FILE NO. /#0. To: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 5, 1989 Subject: #1405 Thomas G. Colwell, 2640 North Shore Drive - Proposed Preliminary Plat - Site Evaluation Review Having reviewed the site evaluation submitted for the above referenced plat, I would make the following comments : 1. Testing was done by SP Testing Inc. Primary and alternate sites were located on Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 3, Block 1. A single site was tested on Lot 2, Block 1. 2. Lot 2 contains the existing residence known as 2640 North Shore Drive. That residence has had a failing septic system since at least 1986. Since that system has never been repaired, the tested site will have to be used immediately. A new alternate site should be tested as part of this subdivision process. There appears to be ample area just north of the proposed primary site to support an alternate site. 3. The proposed drainfield sites on Lot 1 contain suitable soil conditions for a standard trench drainfield system. The primary and alternate sites are adjacent to each other. Adequate setbacks are maintained from both the proposed lot lines and from the existing wetland. Note that Lot 1 abuts Old Crystal Bay Road, and apparently is intended to gain access to Old Crystal Bay Road via a driveway 800' in length. There are two municipal sewer stubs available to Lot 1 at Old Crystal Bay Road, however, it is my understanding in discussions with the site evaluator and surveyor that it will be more cost effective and less disruptive to construct a septic system than to attempt to make this extremely long connection. 4. The primary and alternate sites on Lot 3 are near the :1,017 north end of that lot, and would require mound systems due to a seasonally high water table located as near as 32" below the surface. The primary and alternate sites are adjacent to each other on a slope of 4-6%. Ample room remains for location of a fairly large residence with the typical amenities on the 2+ dry buildable acres in this lot. 5. Similarly, the primary tested site on Lot 2 requires a mound system. This site is located at the southerly end of the lot, on a slope of 3-6%. There is no conflict with the existing well, and I would anticipate that testing will find a suitable alternate site directly north of the proposed primary site. #1405 Thomas G. Colwell, 2640 North Shore Drive - Proposed Preliminary Plat - Site Evaluation Review May 5, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Regarding the proposed easement for access, that access is over the existing driveway. Any major revision of the proposed subdivision that will revise the actual location of the access drive must be considered in relation to the tested drainfield sites. The slopes on Lot 3 suggest that the proposed sites are the best sites on the property and should be preserved if at all possible. Lot 1 could be much more flexible but there is no guarantee that other locations within Lot 1 could support a standard trench system as can the tested site. One of the conditions of preliminary plat approval and final plat approval should be fencing off of the primary and alternate sites on each lot to avoid disturbance. Given the above assumptions and conditions, this appears to be a reasonable and feasible 3-lot subdivision. Summary - Lot 1 - Standard trenches both sites Lot 2 - Replace existing system - Test for a new alternate site Lot 3 - Mound required both sides • • S-. - T.�;S TNG, INC. '51 KATYDID LANE ST. MICHAEL, MN 55 I. 4 0 f]i; 497-3566 Steven B. Schi s April 19 , 1989 • Phyllis Colwell Lot 3 , Block 1 Colwell Addition Orono, Henn. Co. , MN This system is Designed for a Type 1, four bedroom home and in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances . The soils on this site are typical of SCS soils mapped - LrC - Lester loam. A seasonally high water table was located at 32" , 34" , 46" , 60" &68" . Due to the seasonally high water table, a pressurized mound system will need to be installed. The bottom of the rock bed must be located at least 3 ' above the seasonally high water table. The soils at a depth of 12" have a percolation rate averaging 6.1 min/inch and are adequate for treating septic effluent. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The manifold and supply line, pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have their ends capped. Be sure the rock and sand fill material are clean. The sod layer below the entire mounded area must be turned over, just break up the sod, be sure not to over work. • The power supply and switches must •be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure. A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure. (Mercury floats. are a good method) . All neighboring wells are located more than 100 ' away from the proposed treatment area. Keep all heavy equipm.ent •off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction as much as possible. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. With proper installation and maintenance, this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively. • Recommend to pump •the septic tank every year if there is only 1 tank & every 2 years if there are 2 tanks. • Soil and Percolation Tests • Septic System Design Steven B. Schirmers SBS/ds S c);.5 I St' * - .,.....: -_rc::::7,______ ..„4,....„ i . • ' K£ZP ftG� f1EAYY E4'U/PP4A"Air OFF • OF T/'4E TR,AT HrA'T AREAS PEFOR ,e• +• Adv.%. AFT,FR COASTRucTiaN yc6+) S. I .j-49.S. PccCbs'�' _ L� �.�'. T 5 f4. IS.�"O-P.-OF 'Roe".MARK/t4 PRo—. . rX44 9 tr1"lh}��~ a` PERTY CORNER FLUSH WITH OjROUNO _ t 1k po. '_, �'` // '') e4 Eta- 96a.f flssU.,;ty vFF--o-PO i yo- nye QQ l )' S �` ., .rt g •ZF-oPcsv-Q i \ co:. - 40,��' 6 ` y3•` N• 'if . ;l - 405 JU N • x � � (a9'�l3 S iti - - t--3zSIM,„.0 .17'oPoso ' N r U ti• on . ri___(..,y7._ems _ t _ \ / �y A N S o}� t� VIII ------- 3 / _-__.-__ \ Nrj --;- 30' •• G - ------ 0• �, _-_ \` % `\�' \\ �_�� i� ��i �i ' ''I '' Jam, �\ \ \ \ ,_\` ------------J'__ Pr t:RTY OF ----= — - -- ,� �' Sr Percolation Tests Sale: J_ �'-s 4• —_ -------. .. - XSoii Borings —P\-_)‘_.%-;\ ‘__4) -- .6,0.1..W. L1. ..:" T3M ~- Bench Wrk _L _ QC1CL_Coi- i-)E1� PP Note: This system is 10 be constructed to rneet O -O. • AL NrIC(/. G 0. the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 'ab6- ,$-p TEST/NG/NC. Chapter 7080 & Local Ordinance Designed By. - 4e _ Note : Check all underground utilities Dole /Lei, PH.6t2-497-3566 I: • H _,) INNNN r :1 I --I \i"\ \A.'‘ �`-rr- cam. <�. o' / _ -- _ 3 0l ,__._o,. y s.S Ss . SET- BACKS I 1 o io' . - HOUSE System must be • Tonka from property !,;nes _ _ _��t s v� .G-'1-1.--\__O�.l... -9$tet'-, ; ;T ?E' from ;;e;!s •_ ' .Q f re:n bias. • psi Tec!i-,-,e!,t - streams • Treatment creo _�� frcrn property lines �NOTE:Peyer supp!y and switches must be located in a Miµ`K�'-f.ii s rr,Rx.C."-1�" S from we".'s weather proof encosure outs+de the pumping chamber and manhole • aCO born btdgs. _ /O_ from trees — 4 , -_ r , i \�!_ I 1-- c__-__ -- _—_� SOIL BORING ELEVATIONS (..1-411.-.Y---(2_41- 11 - aQ min.- t r II, t - - • 11�13,�do se���YP'i -- -----� THr_I EL.-Pma. X11 #f," -C�.943.s / Ter;K rode -% TH. 2_EL. -14S-S- - . Tank .:I g r Ori to-Tank ! PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION MOUND SYSTEM TH»3 EL.-948a Nin. I��foB� -� �tii1�t �z. mAr%�co�n TH. 4 �L:94r_3 t i Max. 'to 4 -� Q Pumping TH.. 5 EL. .3 -1 4 to 6 dio. Chamber ELEVATION of PROPOSED PL'"1,P;NG I pipe CHAMBER-9 3'1.D •I SYSTEM_ D __ __MOl=ND • Y � ��� .-s-vi, SLY--°� Q� 94 S.o li - TYPE--_, JL BEDROOM , Ave.roge percolation ratet.- 1 min./inch (design.83sq.ft treatment area per gal. of daily sewoge flow) I -4:-?-c--)o gal.;''cy x.83sq.ff./gal. '�`�4l sq.ft,of treatment Oreo 4(0% 'I-, sq.ft. + + S 3 ' ti q. (= 10f..width=_S ft.Tength of bed area+side slope run__HAI I x, _heigFf= `� ft.x.. 3 ft-Town:ore() needed) aeon rock needed- Sy_?_sq.ft.treatment area x1.64-1 depth of rock=S1�t z p cuff:-27=��cu.yds,(„/4 oto 21/2'dio. includes 2"of rock above pipe) Cleon Bond fill below rock needed 1'�0 cv.yds. opprex. , sondy loom bock fill._,?____,C_a,.yds.opprox. topsoil 6�� ..e..! cu. 1a�% . �,}a Number of tanks required � Gor^,t�1Fr�o o �o� 7.�e-0 --0 -I-oft-50N._Fr:� my-c-t�+ oag-_st.cvc--7Q . _cu.`9 1�I u red_a , 1st tank got. ,2nd lank/60o gal,m:n Arns PL Q `r 141.11 N-‘,J L, ��,a„1•�c- + Pumping chamber co 25% r - pocity- of doily sewage flow of�o�gal.= /SO gol.+reserve sioroge of 15 0o-A.1/B1 ..._(_ ___0_gal.+pipe bock doge- of yo-S gal,/IOOIin.ft.ofJ_2.2." supply pipe, ►in.ft.nee , " PROPERTY OF:P14 t-t-t S��QLW �tri 1 pply P P , 9 gat... man4fo d 1 S( gal./►OO linft of a dia.pipe,lin.ft.needed '1 , J total copoci+,y needed 7 �I LoT-� !$� � L�LE-4 >�o� �, -��gol.(plus area for pump) u�� n,,,-). /Do_O o..-1 c--V) Distribution pipe /1 11 - - 0?-0)-16 Y11 y 1 1-4 Vs N . c n. -2..do. 1St- lin.ft. " p� _ Y dia. perforations 34. o Pump size })a,hp. (pumpoble copocity 141 .gal. 4 cycles/day) u_ - ' t- C-'--t'• •:, _ c-sc Note : When cons •-tructing bed , this area shou►d be shoped Note: Distonce from treatment oro to neighboring wells- i S-P TEST/NG /N - to divert run-off from entering treatment area. .�,�17/-1'T � -n-4 r-1 1 Oa , Designed 9y: - Dote :x/11/2 -, PH. 612-497-3566 L-13 CERTIFICATION 00627 LO s of Soil Borings ` 8 ' Location or Project Phyllis Colwell , Lot 3 , Block 1, Colwell Add. , Orono Boring made by S-P Testing, Inc . Steve Schirmers Date 4-11-89 Classifiction System: AASHO ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two) : Hand X , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X Death, Boring number 1 iDepth, Boring number 2 in in feet Surface elevation 947. 7 feet Surface elevation 948 .5 0 - 0 - Topsoil dark brown Topsoil dark brown loam : loam l - 0 - 1' 2" 1 - 0 - 1 ' Brown loam • 1 ' - 1-1/2 ' Brown loam Brown sandy loam • 2 2 - 1-1/2 ' - 2 ' 2" • 2 ' 8"-mottled soil Brown loam 2 ' lO"-mottled soil 2 ' 2" - 2' 10" 3 - 1 ' 2" - 3 ' 2" 3 - Olive brown strong loam 3 ' 2" - 3 ' 8" Rusty olive brown Olive brown sandy loam fine sandy silty loam 4 - 3 ' 8" _ 4 ' 4" 4 2 ' 10" - 4 ' 2" • Rusty olive ' brown 4 ' 2" - 4-14-1/2 ,211Y; loam brown fine 4 ' 4" - 5.' sandy silty loam 5 - 5 _ Rusty olive brown Rusty olive brown loam' silty loam 5 ' - 3 ' 8" . ff 6 Olive 5 , 8„ - 6 ' brosandine 6 - 4-1/2 ' - 6 ' • 7 - 7 - 8 - 8 End of boring at 6 ' feet. End of boring at 6 ' feet. Standing water table: Standing water table: present at feet of depth, present at feet of depth, hours 'after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole X Not present in hole X • Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at 2' 10"feet of depth. Observed at 2 ' 8" feet of depth. Not present in hole • Not present in hole Comments : Comments : L-13 CERTIFICATION # 00627 Logs of Soil Borings Location or Project Phyllis Colwell , Lot 3 , Block 1, Colwell Add. , Orono Boring.• made by S-P Testing, Inc: Steve Schirmers Date 4-11-89 Classifiction System: AASHO ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two) : Hand X. , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X Depth, Boring number 3 Depth, Boring number 4 in in feet Surface elevation 948 . 2 feet Surface elevation 946. 3 0 - Topsoil: dar•k brown loam Topsoil dark brown 1 - 0 -• 1 ' 1 - loam Brown clay loam 0 - 1 ' 8" Dark brown clay loam 2 - 1 ' - 2 ' 2" 2 - 1 ' 8" - 2 ' 2" 2 ' 8"-mottled soil. Brown Brown clay loam • 2 ' 2," -' 2 ' 10" loam 2 ' 2" - 2 ' 10" 3 - Rusty olive- brown silty 3 - 2 ° 1'0" - 3 ' 4" loam Brown loam Rusty olive brown 3 ' 10"-mottled soil 4 - fine sandy silty loam 4 - 2 ' 10" - 4 ' • 3 ' 4" - 4-1/2 ' Rusty olive brown fine 4 ' - 4 ' 8" sandy silty lcam 5 - Rusty olive brown 5 - Rusty olive gray gray silty loam silty 4 ' 8" - 5 ' 4„ loam strong Rusty olive brown silty 6 - 4-1/2 ' - 6;' 6 - 5 ' 4" - 6 ' loam 7 - 7 - ' 8 - ' 8 - I End of boring at 6 ' -feet. Ehd of boring at 6 ' feet. Standing water table: Standing water table: present at feet of depth, present at feet of depth, hours after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole , X ' Not present in hole X Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at 2 ' 8" f Observed at 3 ' 10" feet of depth. het o.. depth. Not present in hale • Not present in hole Comments : Comments : . L-13 CERT,IFICATION # 00627 Logs of Soil Borings •- Location or Project Phyllis Colwell , Lot 3 , Block 1, Colwell Add. , Orono Bor'incs.' made by S-P Testing, Inc . Steve Schirmers Date 4-11-89 Classifiction System: AASHO ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two) : Sand X , or Power , Flight g or Bucket X • Depth, Boring number 5 !Depth, Boring number 6 in in feet Surface elevation 944 . 3 feet Surface elevation 943 .5 • 0 - I 0 Topsoil dark; brown• Topsoil dark brown 1 - • loam 1 - loam • • 2 0 _ 2 ' 2" 2 - _ 0 - 2 ' Brown loam Brown loam 2 ' - 2 ' 10" ' 3 - 3 _ Brown sandy loam 2 ' 2" - 3 ' 10" • 4 - 4 _ • Brown sandy loam 5 - 3 ' 10" - 5 ' 5 - 2 ' 10" - 5 '-mottled soi: Olive brown sandy loam Rusty olive brown fine 5 ' 8"-mottled soil w/traces .f sandy silty loam _ + 5 ' - 6 ' .silt loam6 - 5 ' - 6 ' • • • • 8 - 8 - • End of boring at 6 ' • feet. End of boring at 6 ' feet. Standing water table : Standing water table: • present at feet of. 'depth, present at feet of depth, hours 'after boring. hours after boring. Not present in hole X Not present in hole X Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at 5 ' 8" feet of depth. Observed at 5 ' feet of depth. Not oresent in hole Not present in hole Comments : • Comments : • CERT.*00(527 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • Percolation test readings made by S—P Testing, Inc. on4-12-89 : . startinb at 9 : 4 8 Test hole location ot 3 .B 1 k. 1,Co 1 we 11 Add. ,.no,e number 1 ,Date hole was prepared 4-11—8 9 • Depth of hole bottom 12 inches,•Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: • Depth, inches Soil texture 0 — 12" Topsoil dark brown loam • • Method of scratching sidewall 1 Knife 2 Depth of gravel in bottom of hole inches 4-11—8 9 ppp Date and hour of initial water fi':lins� 17ept -ot initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom --' Method used to tnaintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon 6 ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test inches • • l J Time Percolation Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minutes inches level, inches minutes per inch •, 9 : 30 prefill 6 9 : 48 10 : 03 • '3-1/4 j 4. 6 15 min • 10 : 04 . 10 : 19 ! 3-3/16 j 4. 7 " 10 : 35 10 : 50 3 j 5. 0• " • i I • • ' I i • • 4 Percolation rate = ' 8 • minutes per inch. CERT. OCC.2.7 • • • • . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET • 411/1A Percolation test readin.gs made by S—P Testing, Inc on 4-12-89 starting at 9 : 47 P.m. ,oxionn Test hole locationaYb Add. 2 , nirmber ,Date hole was prepared 4-11-89 12 6 Depth of hole bottom inches, Diameter of hole inches Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 1 • • 0 — 12" . . Topsoil dark brown loam • •, Method of scratchirL, sidewail Knife" 2 Depth of gravel i't bottom of hole inches 4-11-89 4.: 0Qwn 12 Date nal hour of initial water . , .)ept ,mtial water filling inches above hole bottom Method used to mailitain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon 6 ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test inches. •I Time Percolation Time interval, • Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks • minutes ;• •-ic'nes level, inches minutes per inch .41 9 : 30 prefill 6 9 : 47 10 : 02 2-1/ 8 7. 1 15 min 10 : 05 10 : 20 .' " II II 10 : 34 10 : 49 I/ It II • • 1 • 1 ... I . I 7 • Percolation rate = .1 _minutes per inch. ., -. CERT.%00627 • • . . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET — Percuationtestreadingsmadeby • S-P Testing, Inc. 4-12-89 9 :46 °n Wait.) _starting at p.m. , Lot3 ,31k. 1,Colwell Add. ,Orono 3 4-11-89 ' i Test hole location ,Hole number ,Date hole was prepared • ; Depth of hole bottom 12 inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture i s • I 0 — 12" Topsoil dark brown loam • 1 Method of scratchingsidewali Knife 1 Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches 1 4-11-89 4 : 00pm 12 I Date and hour of initial water filling ,Depth of initial water filling inches above hole bottom —--; Automatic siphon ' j Method used to maintain at.east L orches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours , Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches .j Time Percolation , t Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks •• minutes inches level, inches minutes per 1 inch 4 9 : 30 prefill 6 9 : 46 10 : 01 2-1/8 i 7.1 15 min 1 10 : 06 10 : 21 . " II I III i II II , 10 : 33 10 : 48 " " " . II i 1 J ! 1 i I j 1 • I 1 , Percolation rate = 7.1 minutes per inch. 1 t J C! RT. *nnr27 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET 1 f . S—P Testing, Inc . 4-12-89 9 : 45 La• m. Percolation est readings race by on starting at p • , I date) Lot3 ,Blk.1,Colwell Add. ,Orono 4 4-11-89 i Test hole location ,Hole number ,Date hole was prepared • I 1 Depth of hole bottom 12 inches,Di=eter of hole 6 inches So"data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture K 0 — 12" Topsoil dark brown loam • •• 1 I Method,of scratching sidewall Knife j Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 • inches t 4-11-89 4 : 00pm 12 I Date and hour of initial water filling ,Depth of initial water filling inches above hole bottom 1 Method siphon • . Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours ~ ,4 ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test 6 inches Time Percolation ! • Time interval, • Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minutes ; ' • , inches level,inches minutes per I • j inch 'I 9 : 30 prefill 6 f I 9 : 45 10 : 00 • IT ! 2-7/8 5. 2 15 min , 10 . 07 10 : 22 H H I, I U 10 : 32 10 : 47 ' i " up l j • • j 1 Percolation rate = 5 • 2 minutes per inch. a • CERT. . i#00627 PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET• �- 4-12-89 9 :44 atm, Percolation test reacaS—P nv,s made byTesting, Inc. on starting at p.m. laum) Lot3 ,B1k. 1,Colwell Add. Orono 5 4-11-89 Test hole location •,Hoe number Date hole was prepared • Depth of hole bottom 12 'inches,Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data from test hole: • • Depth, inches Soil texture • 0 — 12" • Topsoil dark brown loam • Method of scratching sidewalt • Kn i f P Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches 4-11-89 4 : 00pm_ 12 Date and hour of initial water!i!ling ,Depth oT initial water filling inches above hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon • ,Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test ti inches Time Percolation• "ime interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minute, inches level, inches minutes per inch 9 : 3 0 pre£ill 6 � I 9 : 44 9 : 59 • 11 3 i 5.0 15 min 10 : 08 ! 10 : 23 " 2-7/8 5 . 2 " " X31 10 :46 2-13/16 i 5. 3 " " • • . • • 5 . 2 Percolation rate = minutes per inch. . Crm, O.P . PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET 1 Percolation test reaclin't,s made by S—P Te�_tin Inc . 4-1 2-89starting ���j 4► on at 9 s 4 i p•m, • iJ le) T . Lot3 ,B1k. 1,Colwell Add. ,p,ron bee 6 , Date hole was prepared 4-11-89 a .est hole location • 12 6 i r Depth of hole bottom inches, Diameter of hole inches Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 1 • 0 — 12n Topsoil dark brown loam 1 i i • Method of scratching sidewall Knife I Depth of gravel in bottom.of hole 2 inches i Date and hour of ;• tilt. , 4-11-89 4.00Din r t 12 _.i � t waterfilling cp;l initial water fil,inEt inches above hole bottom t Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic siphon in 6 , Maximum water depth above hole bottom during test inches . .....4 Time i Percolation Time interval, Measurement, Drop in water I rate, I Remarks minutes inches level, inches minutes per i • .j inch 9 : 30 prefill 6 , 9 : 43 9 : 58 2-1/4 6. 7 15 min 10 : 09 ! 10 : 24 2-1/8 7. 1 10 : 30 10 : 34 2-1/16 7. 3 i { 1 1 I t r ` l i 1 • t Percolation rate = 7'0 ' minutes per inch. II . l • • -PER =ORATED - Pr--.7.;----- LATERALS SANDY LOAM SOIL— - ,,��. -;a•� _ .� .;r jay/yam \. LAYER OF STRAW OR ;','f ..;.,.•� MARSH HAY COVERED `- . • =`� • '� / /' WITH RED ROSIN PAPER % i// ,r• ,. i ' 4. f ,,; /.� // / ". I '2 OR 2 : j' - . PIPE FROM PUMP /�: : '� i , y.:;�';• // . �% �" g, _ CLEAN BOCK - ..�;��" .�� �� r" Y t: // • • / e ,� DIVERSION FOR � ,/% % / �' NOTES. SURFACE WATER • 6" TOPSOIL �� - -f / j y ,�/ L SELECT AS LEVEL A SITE AS POSSIBLE FOR THE MOUND. i7j' = 2. REMOVE EXCESS VEGETATION.PLOW. DISK OR USING BACKHOE RAKER TEETH. - /7 ROUGHEN THE SURFACE SOIL 6 INCHES DEEP DO THIS ONLY IF T!-h: MOISTURE i- /- /./ CONTENT IS LESS THAN THE PLASTIC LIMIT (SOIL IS PLASTIC IF IT CAN BE -OILED _r • INTO AN '/s INCH WIRE).DO NOT REMOVE ANY OF THE SURFACE SOIL. MOUND �."� •+S"�� PERFORMANCE ON CLAY SOIL DEPENDS ON EXTREME CARE TO PREVENT COM HCTION •, / AND PUDDLING OF THE CLAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT USE HEAVY CDNSTRUC- -� - +« --• �'= •`? ' • - ION EQUIPMENT AND DO NOT CONSTRUCT THE MOUND WHEN THE CLAY SOIL IS ��..,.,. ...-----r•---• - -. - y / / J IN A PLASTIC CONDITION. "=��` �'� ' 3. USE ONLY TRACK-TYI£ EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTING THE MOUND SO AS NOT �� ' -� .�• TO COMPACT THE ORIGINAL SOIL. • `~ _- �^ _ - �9�,.-� / �� `• • I -'/-• - 4. TION RATE NO SLOWER THAN 120 MINUTES PENATURALR INCH AND NO FASTER THAN 5 ' --`?"--r.... y _ ' . I �] •' . MINUTES PER INCH.BEFORE PLACING THE LAYER OF CLEAN SAND. • / . '° 1 .4 ` ' G - r- y.--„,-,•:, 5. THE 12 INCH LAYER OF CLEAN SAM) IS PART OF THE MOUND CONSTRUCTION. SAND S h 1+ t - .r`' - .-!. :,- • J IS CONSIDERED CLEAN IF IT CAN PASS THE"FRUIT JAR TEST FOR CONCRETE SAND N ~ S ` n 1.O E „ ► 4;' :` 6 THE TOP OF THE CLEAN SAND LAYER AND THE TOP OF THE ROCK BED MUST BE n' AN ` ��-J�� . „ ' ---,,.-..).i.-,_! ....„-,,...41:,._,..--_-,...,.,•,....,-.....,..:_v,.....-,-,--,." CONSTRUCTED LEVEL ANp i `,• 7' DISTRIBUTION PIPES ARE it/2-INCH DIAMETT_R SPACED 40 INCHES ON CENTER FI LL SOD 36 �\ ; •` AND CONNECTED TO A MANIFOLD IN THE CENTER OF THE ROCK BED. PIPES HAVE 1_ / INCH PERFORATIONS DRILLED EVERY 36 INCHES AND POINTING DOWNWARD. BR ENA'). !-. ---.. .,_-_::::•,.-...,_•-..,•. 'r , UsE A NEW DRILL BIT TO AVOID BURRS INSIDE THE PIPE. 0 F\ �I� `"a '••• .a NINE INCHES OF ROCK ARE PLACED UNDER THE PERFORATED LATERALS AND 2 Up - INCHES ABOVE FOR A TOTAL ROCK DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. 9.THE ROCK IS FIRST COVERED WITH A LAYER OF HAY OR STRAW WN;CH IS THEN /� • ``:-J--- COVERED WITH A LAYER OF RED ROSIN PAPER LAPPED 6 INCHES AT THE SEAMS. • SARN`�TIJ R, -�10.AT LEAST,__- pa INCHES OF LOAMY SAND SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE '`A L :a... ROCK BED- II. A 6-INCH LAYER OF TOP SOIL SHOULD BE PLACED R THE �� E EAYE�12 THAWN GGRASS A SOIL COVER CAN BEAT LEASTST6uSHED.INCHES IN THE CENTER OFiTHEMOUND MOUNOSO ABOVE THE ROCK LAYER SO THAT HEAVY RAIN WILL RUN OFF. 13. SIOE SLOPES OF THE DIKES SHOULD BE NO STEEPER THAN 4,1 ON CLAY SOILS AND 3,1 ON SANDY SOILS. M.-O • LAYER.DEPENDS ON THE AMOUNT_OF DAILY SE £)- 15. MAXIMUM EFFLUENT DOSE PER PUMP CYCLE SHOULD BE NO MORE THE TABLE VALUES. 16. MINIMUM PUMPING RATE IS SHOWN IN TABLE. PUMPING HEAD MUST BE ADEQUATE TO OVERCOME ELEVATION DIFFERENCE. FRICTION LOSS PLUS 5 FEET FOR PERFORATED LATERALS. E-4 •. LAYER OF GEOTEXTILE • LOAMY SAND CAP FASRIC , PERFORATED LATERAL ' GRASS COVER 6 INCHES TOPSOIL CLEAN SAND FILL . � �- MAXIMUM SLOPE - --s- -' - 3TO ! CLEAN ROCK 4" TOPSOIL PLOWED OR 3/4 TO 21/2 INCHES DISKED SURFACE , % SLOPE 0 SUBSOIL- ',„)', CROSS SECTION A - A • • PIPE FROM PUMPING CHAMBER • \ \ ' \• \ I �. il � • i . 1 l 1 I I-- PERFORATED n- LATERALS I". NIII • E. • • I i III Z _ k-f3ED AREA I s 0, c "'. W C3 A • i { W • 0 L.) v r--• . 20 • o o l 20 " .. INCHES I '�'� d' " INCHES . . . C--- L. __ ._ i T - —D I KE -----r—�0 FEET I —DIKE MAX. TOTAL WIDTH \ / ! 1Hf 11 . PLAN VIEW • • • - - • - • • LAYOUT-•OF PERFORATED FIFE LATERALS FOR . PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION (N MOUND FERFOPlATED PLASTIC IC PIPE ••.()) \-- FERFOR/LT!ONS SFACED 30" OR 36" FH�/OIJ sF�s'jf G Fro CN CENTER. PERFORATION EftfO f_i.0 S z , V 2, " j P EV/ ORE/4f� .4Y @E /;E, /6 — MANIFOLD PIPE - PERFORATIONS ON 60TTCM OF PLASTIC FIFE 40 (ALTERNATE LOCATION OF PIPE. FROM PUMP) - END CAP 40', \a LAO`1L tN PIPE FRO FE Ff°FA! Et) PUMP NG CHAMBER OF trorg k END PERFORATION OF A PERFORATED LATERAL - -- Grass Cover 711, cf / �, �'opsa ►I ,•/•/ / • Layer of Geotextile Fabric (or layer Loamy Sand Layer of hay or straw covered with red .c. . • _ - • rosin paper) t.c IPforg%ted _ .j. c`i P `6 C• 5.�4• : c�i ( .c• Laeral � — Perforation Drilled Horizontally CCC(. 4 c: into CapNear Top C • L. - c c' c: Lac (.. •c. /4 Plus At Least 12" to Edge{-Drain Field Rocks . - C <<<<C��• of Rock Layer : .::•::***...'...'...'•::*.*•••'•••••• ••••••••:•".: : ••'• :••••:•% ..::-::.•4441Vi:* •:...* i.!.....'• 1:.:.:.'•::.....::•:•:•.,.2 • Perforations Located at Clean Sand Lae• Bottom of Lateral Layer • ry • • `i•. '�i' • , M - Original Soil Properly Scarified 4,- Before Before Placing Sand Layer . ( r i • _ I-REDWOOD CEDAQ OR WATER TIGHT a LOCKABLE ELECTRIC BOX- \ TREATED'POST 4 x 4 min) PLUGS OR ELECTRICCONNECTIONS �,a._� ---------- ALL INSIDE CONNECTIONS MADE 2" PVC CONDUIT SCHEDULE �3c0 ---- _ -1 MANHOLE COVER CHAINED a LOCKED 6"SPACE1 LOOP OF POWER CORD FOR • - • SEALED MANHOLE RINGS SETTLEMENT ., :-- _ FINAL GRADE , AT LEAST 12" ' BELOW GRADE UNION f - WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY ____r_. - 'j--"-PIPE IS LAID ON A UNIFORM SLOPE FROM _ ��•�•.•..-; s _ 114.:.; _ �� Al. PUMP STATION UP TO SOIL TREATMENT AREA /;___ FOR PROPER DRAINBACK • - -- SEALED TANK COVER • -- IF PIPE AT TANK MUST BE LOWER THAN UNION TO GET ELEVATION FOR DRAINBACK, PLASTIC ROPE OR CHAIN ;, A 1/4 INCH WEEP HOLE MUST BE. USED WITH ANCHOR ---1WEEP HOLE ALARM FLOAT ON SEPARATE - ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT NOTES: ELECTRICAL WIRE FROM POWER SUPPLY _SIART LEVEL V ` _ MUST NOT RUN OVER ANY TANKS BUT j -`'\ • - MUST BE LAID BESIDE. OTHER TANKS 3" \ ii AND MUST BE .PLACED IN CONDUIT ALONG POST SHUT_OFF LEVEL V _' ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL CORDS FROM PUMP AND • FLOATS MUST BE RUN THROUGH CONDUIT. WIRES CANNOT HAVE GROUND PUMP CONTROL FLOAT ;, ,� CONTACT. - 000 ; 171 • • METAL COVER 4011 , + • •\ ©, I I to �� I I :y . -.1.:.:..............._____________\ II) I . 1 CONCRETEik ii .,,; MANHOLE s - _ : . RING * Aoki METHODS OF SECURING MANHOLE COVER TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY • - . ii 11 • PENCIL • - . - - - . - - - • - - - - - - - - - — MARKS ---;- - "ri'- . . - . . 6. i �y�--y4• - • In : ; MANHOLE 1 I' _ ki • �i • ♦� ill J • INLET `ate 4 SCUM _ �. ' II 3 OUTLET t.. _.--... ..- .7..... ,, . ,1 ':i1,<,} OUTLET LEVEL - �, �'v_z di. �1 I `y° V - SCUM CLEAR SPACE= ' - - CLEAN OUT TANK WHEN: -- It — — - —_ -' _ .. . ,7 4 ' ' IS 3" OR LESS OR — -- _ __ _ _ _ _• ' B B IS 12" OR LESS -_ f , • BLACK COLOR �� • t. '•. : ' SLUDGE . •::-'.11 .• - DISTINGUISHES SLUDGE 4.4'.‘,1.1,...::•.• •;:•.:-.:.. . _ . , _ LAYERwFROM LIQUID /+• ^•,'•••b`'•:, = -- . .. - • °;; _ 'r• J/ iris :�l �Jk.4 �- • F-. V/ w MEASURE SCUM AND SLUDGE ACCUMULATIONS IN THE SEPTIC TANK