The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-19-2018 Planning Commission Packet PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE IV GU (-14.- l q, aal ❑ COUNCIL 01► PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Pilease,.o e. e k r •: �c: r^ z ' e a i s a. .. `r . a? T "ow PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. 1114 r � "�/ " 1\ I G S f?() �� eViceiSdc4/ 2. ( i( L. 'TONE 5 (t) iticATI45 d E #9 3. 41 820 o(S .r4( ,9 4. $,.5 5. ‘77d ,411 2 (_1(.; dAL) 6 �x.r 6. (Id �`-r G �'vPoc4 tick f 7. 4i /gain Op.A vn (,t A 1,v\i„,., 44, 1„1414 L. 8. 1. , r-,1‘0.- r 1/ zE ,f-77, j 2- J 9. b :� ® 6‘1.-4-- 1.. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC AGENDA City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for March 19, 2018; 6:30 PM Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Council Representative: Victoria Seals Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet— located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. New Business 1. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2018. 2. 18-3996 George Stickney, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South, Preliminary Plat (LA18-000022) (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 3. LA18-000013 Nathan VanCamp, 601 Minnetonka Highland Lane, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 4. LA18-000015 Michael Jones, 3186 North Shore Drive,Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA18-000016 Dale Gustafson, 1370 Cherry Place, Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 6. LA18-000019 Mark Williams, 2697 Casco Point Road, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 7. LA18-000020 Kuhl Design, 2280 Fox Street, Conditional Use Permit (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 8. LA18-000023 City of Orono,Amend Article XI of the City Code related to wetlands and wetland setbacks (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 9. LA18-000024 City of Orono, Text Amendment to Sections 78-1 and 82-2 related to zoning and subdivision definitions, including in-kind, dry buildable and others (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 10. Update on February 12, 2018 City Council meeting. 11. Planning Commission Liaison for April 9, 2018 Council Meeting: Chad Olson 12. Other issues for discussion. Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notifications b ,wr,# .e..r1 iLong LakeA, t7 i ■ jog ong �O`VO 9I .,-�Flit_t.tt- _ ^rt j 12 Li Long Lake t 14attnaI S.rri ■ N ata F31V 1 y,"fi * ,. Sb , �'rfSHO�E 1 . • ry ,..: �Ys4 Bayside 0 LT rfloOtLimits Legend `� a City Li _ AGENDA • x - - pia City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for i March 19, 2018; 6:30 PM . --- — - • Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, / , _ '` -., " Orono, MN 55356 118-000013 Orgill 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us i Orono 0 1�s Council Representative: Victoria Seals �et& a , o County Real 151 West Branch Rd , -- 2zw �, New Business 4 .04 1. Approval of Planning so z " �,, Commission Meeting _ fr :` Minutes of February 12, Cies# French Lake 2018. Lake $ 2. 18-3996 George Stickney, "•*• r ti (LA18-000022) 825 Old Crystal Bay �,)., ' `",... arch S fi Cir a Or ± ! Road South, Preliminary Plat (Staff: Melanie Curtis) ` 3. LA18-000013 Nathan VanCamp, 601 Minnetonka + Highland � � a� Lane, 8 - . . Mi nnetonka.Beach Variance ,i. V Lynwood Blvd o - .r..*.. � +� - — } _ (Staff: Laura Oakden) v 1110/1.111.1 CI% _r shoet►ne v�;. — Spring Park 4. LA18-000015 Michael Jones, . Mound o u nd •-• iff °' �� 3186 North Shore Dr., ��La Variances .... • *<•., _ tall. Melanie Curtis) • , A1g-000019 5. LA18-000016 Dale Gustafson, • +� ti a ' ,- Wiish re Brvat ' '' 1370 Cherry Place, �a`t�r� Variances #� (Staff: Laura Oakden) ... ...... In ,,((�� 6. LA18 000019 Ai ��, •. Mark Williams, •� ,, .0*. '•.� 2697 Casco Point Rd, L® • •"'••• Variance 60 •f • - (Staff: Laura Oakden) 6. �:�.� Tonka Bay :' } a •• _ 7. LA18-000020 Kuhl Design, ao i • 2280 Fox Street, 0. • ... .. •. Conditional Use Permit Greemrc�od (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 40 - . --*****.' -' • • tea- r • WM Disd.Imer: _ This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a 0 2,240 Feet BOLTON survey and is not intended to be used as one.This Q drawing is a compilation of records,information,and data & M E N K located in various city,county,and state off ccs,and other sources affecting the area shown,and is to is used for ©Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 3/16/2018 8:29 AM reference purposes only.The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Real People.Real Solutions. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse,Commissioners Kevin Landgraver,Bruce Lemke,Denise Leskinen,Chad Olson,and Loren Schoenzeit. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief,Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart,City Planners Melanie Curtis and Laura Oakden,and Recorder Jackie Young. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 16,2018 Landgraver moved,Leskinen seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of January 16,2018,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 2. 18-3998 JAMES AND MARY JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND STREET VACATION,6:32 P.M.—7:00 P.M. Chuck Algon,Developer;Mark Gronberg, Surveyor;and Brian Benson,Attorney-at-Law,were present. Barnhart stated the applicant is requesting preliminary plat and street vacation approval to subdivide the existing lot at 1400 Bracketts Point into five separate lots and relocate a portion of the public Bracketts Point Road to the middle of the peninsula. The project proposes subdividing a 13.78-acre parcel into 5-lot single-family residential lots. All of the lots meet the minimum 2-acre dry buildable requirement and 200 feet of lakeshore. The Planning Commission reviewed this as a sketch plan. The application tonight does meet the zoning requirements and Comprehensive Plan requirements in terms of density and use. The significant feature of this project is the relocation of Bracketts Point Road to the center of peninsula. Bracketts Point Road intersects with North Shore Drive at the north end and converts to a private road at the hammerhead. The private road services three homes. The applicant is proposing to vacate the red portion of the road,which includes the hammerhead, and relocate the road to generally the center of the peninsula and providing access to the five lots on either side. As part of that relocation,the applicant is proposing to vacate an existing sanitary sewer trunk line and relocate it. The relocation of the trunk line will require the need for a second lift station serving the area. The City would prefer the lift station over a deep trunk line and potential conflicts with water table and soil stability. Barnhart displayed the new location of the road and sanitary sewer on the overhead. Barnhart stated in terms of improvements on the property,there is currently a large home,a tennis court,a caretaker's building,and some other improvements. The home will remain but the caretaker's building and other improvements will be removed. No structural coverage variance is required for the house. As part of this project, a number of trees will be removed partly because of the grading and some of the other improvements associated with relocating the road. The trees to be removed are primarily located in the southwestern portion of the property. Overall the applicant will be removing 77 trees over six inches Page 1 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. in girth and replacing them with 61 trees,many of them along the new Bracketts Point Road. Staff is recommending that some of the trees be shifted to create a more natural look. There are no wetlands on the property. One of the comments received during the sketch plan review was to verify with Hennepin County that the proposed subdivision would not require any improvements to the intersection of Bracketts Point Road and Shoreline. The County has indicated they have not identified any needed improvements. Another comment related to some possible Native American significance to the site. The applicant has diligently worked with the State Historical Preservation Office and other agencies to ensure that this site has no verifiable evidence of Native American activity. If any such physical evidence is found,a condition of the development is that the developer will contact the State Historic Preservation Office. At this point Staff is recommending approval of the application subject to the conditions that are outlined in Staff's memorandum. Landgraver asked whether there will be any trees removed along the shoreline. Barnhart indicated only one tree has been identified to be removed in the 0-75 foot zone. Thiesse asked if the City Engineer has reviewed the application. Thiesse asked whether there is any concern with three homes accessing off of the cul-de-sac. Barnhart stated the City Engineer has reviewed the application and has provided comments. Those comments will need to be addressed as part of the final plat. The applicant is proposing a public cul-de- sac to terminate at the property line and then turn into a private driveway for three homes. The current hammerhead will be replaced with the cul-de-sac. Thiesse asked if there is any lakeshore involved with the easement vacation. Barnhart stated there is not. As part of the vacation review process,discussions were held with the DNR and they have no concerns and, in fact,supported the vacation. Chuck Algon,Developer,stated they have no additions or corrections to Staff's report and that they accept it as is. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. Bruce Paddock, 1500 Bracketts Point Road,stated he is here tonight representing himself and the property owner at 1490 Bracketts Point Road. Paddock stated in his view he can safely say on behalf of all the residents of Bracketts Point that this property is a very special place in the City of Orono. Paddock stated there was a very good reason why George Brackett settled on Bracketts Point and built a summer retreat there. The local Indians before him considered this very sacred and holy ground. As a result, Paddock stated in their view any new development should be additive to the surrounding properties for future generations to come and not diminutive. Paddock stated after review of the proposed development, in his view the project generally will be additive and much more efficient to Bracketts Point but that he will reserve his final approval until after the discussion by the Planning Commission. Page 2 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Paddock stated in his opinion this is an opportune time to ask for a public roadway to run from County Road 15 all the way down to Bracketts Point ending in the existing cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac currently serves three properties. Paddock stated he would urge the City in fairness to all property owners to extend the public roadway from County Road 15 all the way down to the end so it serves everybody equally. As long as the relocated roadway is built to city standards,those same standards should be extended to the three lots that the private road serves. Paddock stated his second concern relates to Lots 4 and 5. Paddock stated he believes Lot 4 contains the original Pillsbury mansion,which is at least 30,000 square feet. That house will now be placed on a property a little over three acres. Paddock stated in his opinion this is a very large structure and it needs a larger parcel to add value to that home as well as Bracketts Point. Paddock suggested the buyer of Lot 4 also be required to purchase Lot 5,especially if they plan on retaining that structure because the tennis court and swimming court could then be saved,which would make it 5-plus acres. If the buyer of Lot 4 elects to raze the home and build a new home,then separation of the two properties would be acceptable. Paddock stated overall it is a good project and will enhance Bracketts Point. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. Landgraver asked what the City's view is on extending the public road to the end of the point. Barnhart stated it is his belief the Council feels the whole road should be private versus public. Barnhart noted generally subdivisions are served by private roads. Thiesse asked if the right-of-way would change quite a bit if the road were made public. Barnhart indicated he does not have any information on that tonight but that it is likely there is no right-of-way currently on the private section. Rief stated the City would need to determine what that right-of-way is and that Staff is not prepared to answer that tonight. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission should react to the request in front of them,and if they feel differently about the proposal,they should incorporate that into their recommendation. Thiesse commented they are both very good comments but that he is not sure the Planning Commission has control over that. Landgraver asked what the structural coverage is for the house. Barnhart stated based on the information he has tonight, it is 6.9 percent. Landgraver stated according to City Code, it is a reasonably sized structure on a big lot. Barnhart noted Lot 4 is the biggest lot in the subdivision. Landgraver commented in theory someone could purchase the adjacent lot. Page 3 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen stated she understands the comment about keeping Lots 4 and 5 together but that the City has no way to compel the developer to do that since the lots meet the City's subdivision standards as far as minimum lot size and setbacks. Schoenzeit commented it appears the applicant has their is crossed and i's dotted. Thiesse stated he has heard from Staff that the Council is leaning more towards a private road. George Stickney,340 Peavey Road,indicated he was involved with the parties that are here tonight with a subdivision in 2007. The roadway has a 30-foot right-of-way and it is a nice beautiful roadway that is built to city standards as well as curb and gutter to the new cul-de-sac site. There is also a 90-foot right- of-way to the end of the road with a center island so the snow plows can get in there. Stickney stated the current public roadway along the lakeshore is not as wide and nice as what is being proposed. Stickney stated there is an opportunity tonight to extend the public road for those people who want to see Bracketts Point. The proposed road will be straighter and will not zig-zag. Stickney indicated the roadway will make it easier for fire trucks to access and will not increase the outlot size. In addition,the road is in awesome shape. Thiesse noted this is the first time the Planning Commission has heard any concerns about the road remaining private. Thiesse stated in his view it is a good plan and that he likes the recommendation to stagger the trees more. Thiesse stated he would also like the City Engineer to look at the road prior to it going to the City Council to see whether it is a viable option. Barnhart stated the City can always respond to requests to convert a private road to a public road and that it does not need to be part of an application. Generally the City will look for the road to be built to city standards and has been properly maintained. Thiesse stated he would like the road to be looked at to ensure the road is in great shape. Landgraver commented it is an interesting proposition and that there does not appear to be anything precluding that at this time. Landgraver stated those three people could petition the City to make it a public road if they so choose. Barnhart stated they can petition for that at any time and that it does not need to be part of this application. Thiesse stated he has no intention of holding the application back but that he would suggest the City Engineer look into it. Landgraver stated if the City Council elects to make it a private road,then it becomes a moot point,but that overall it is getting the road away from the lakeshore and relocating the utilities into a more easily maintained and serviced area. Landgraver stated Lot 4 may not be the perfect size for the existing residence but in his view it is a good faith effort to develop the site. Landgraver stated he is in support of the application. Page 4 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 18-3998,James and Mary Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road,vacation of the roadway and the sanitary sewer easement,subject to the conditions outlined in Staffs Report. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. Leskinen moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 18-3998,James and Mary Jundt,1400 Bracketts Point Road,preliminary plat,subject to the conditions outlined in Staffs Report. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 3. LA18-000001 ALLEN MERRILL,VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY(GRAND VIEW AVENUE)BETWEEN 1161 AND 1153 ELMWOOD AVENUE,7:00 P.M.—7:39 P.M. Allen Merrill,Applicant,was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting to vacate an unimproved platted right-of-way that is directly abutting his property to the north of his rear lot. The property has one PID number. The right-of-way was originally a product of a plat from 1887. The applicant is requesting vacation of the right-of-way east from the intersection with Elmwood. There is currently a lift station located in the Elmwood right-of-way just south of this unimproved right- of-way. The Public Works Department is planning to place a generator in the area to support power to the lift station. There is currently sanitary sewer that runs through the right-of-way and some blacktop improvements over part of the area which functions as a turnaround area for vehicles and helps with space for snow removal. The west end of the right-of-way functions as a turnaround for the road since a cul-de-sac is not present. While there may be some benefit to the public in the future to adjust the right-of-way through a land swap to accommodate the improvements, including the pavement outside of the right-of-way,that proposal has not been presented or proposed. State Statute states no vacation shall be made unless it appears to be in the interest of the public to do so. The Council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer,drainage,electric,telegraph,and telephone,gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes. The right-of-way in question is in use for existing utilities and there are proposed future utilities planned for this space in the near future. Staff believes approving this request would conflict with City Code and recommend denial of the request. It would also conflict with Minnesota State Statute which states a vacation should be done if it is in the interest of the public. One comment from a neighbor has been received and is in support of the vacation. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Kari Winning, 1161 Elmwood Avenue,stated she is speaking here tonight on behalf of Mr.Merrill and that it is her understanding the neighbor does support the vacation of the right-of-way. With regard to the sanitary sewer,Winning noted there are no manholes in the actual right-of-way. One of the manholes is on the back lot owned by Mr.Merrill and the other manhole is on the lot owned by Mr. Hanna. Page 5of12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Winning stated while there is sanitary sewer running underneath the property requested to be vacated, there is not a manhole on the actual right-of-way and no utilities currently above ground on the right-of- way. Winning stated it is their understanding there has been some discussion about placing a generator on that right-of-way but there has been no formal notification to the neighbors. Both property owners would be happy to give an easement to the City so they can access that generator. With regard to the right-of-way, it is not currently being used for anything and was originally intended to extend up to North Arm Drive. Winning stated it is their understanding the front part has previously been vacated and the original purpose of the right-of-way would no longer be applicable. Because there is now a house in that area,there could not be a street running up there,which was the reason for the original vacation. Winning stated the neighbors generally support the vacation with regards to the turnaround and that the generator would primarily benefit one neighbor. Mr.Merrill does understand the need for the generator and would be willing to provide an easement for access. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Robert Hanna, 1153 Elmwood Avenue,stated this part of Orono has changed greatly in the last four years,and that if you look at the lot lines and the roadway, it is a mess. The platted road currently goes through three mailboxes and a little corner of the garage on his property. Hanna commented he is not sure how that happened but that it is a mess and has gotten worse with two more houses being built. Hanna stated from his perspective,the pavement improvement is on his lot and that he understands the need for emergency vehicles to turn around. The back part of the lot,which is what is being talked about tonight, is unused,and if the road could be straightened out,that would be very helpful. Hanna encouraged the Planning Commission to look at this with fresh eyes and say that the proposed vacation makes sense as long as the City can access whatever they need to. Hanna noted the utilities are already running over what is owned by him and has never been an issue. It will not be an issue if the lot is vacated. Hanna stated what is on the map is not what is really being used and owned currently and that he would encourage the Planning Commission to look closely at what is happening in that back corner. Jeff Craig, 1205 Elmwood Avenue,stated he does not support the vacation,and that the unfortunate piece is that all of the traffic from 1161 Elmwood all the way up the road has increased since he purchased his house. In the past few years two more houses have been built,which has created three times the amount of traffic. Craig stated the second piece is the turnaround. The plat as currently mapped is not really accurate as far as what the space is. The mail truck,UPS,garbage people and other vehicles have to back down Elmwood Avenue to access that area. Craig stated the way that it is being used right now is that the right- of-way is being used as a way to access the hill because vehicles cannot go up from the street due to the steep topography. Page 6 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Craig stated his concern goes beyond the traffic,and that if the vacation is approved,there will be two more buildable lots in the area. Craig pointed out the lot that was unbuildable until three years. Craig stated all of a sudden it became a buildable lot and that he was not aware they were going to build on that site. Craig stated his concern is creating two more buildable lots that would be 50' x 135'. Craig stated at some future point in time those lots could be sold off and utilized or Mr.Merrill could construct a garage in that area. Craig stated due to his concerns,he would prefer it not be vacated. Jennifer Welsh, 1180 Elmwood Avenue, stated the road is an old fire lane and that it is not a two-lane road. If two cars meet,one car has to back up. In addition to the narrow road, Welsh indicated she has been running into problems with water and mud. Currently the drainage ditches are overflowing with mud and gravel,which spills over onto the neighbors who live downstream from her. Welsh indicated she cleaned it up because the drainage ditch is not being maintained but that she cannot keep cleaning it up because it is coming from further up. Welsh reiterated that there are problems with this road and that the City needs to figure out the best way to handle it. Welsh requested they look at how much hardcover will be back there and the environmental impacts that it will have on the area since it is very close to the lake. James Theisen, 1295 Elmwood, stated when he moved in 20 years ago,there were nine properties being serviced off of Elmwood and now there are 11 homes located on a very narrow roadway. Theisen stated he was very surprised that house was allowed to be built,and that from what he understands,the property back on North Arm Drive had an outlot which was not supposed to be split off. It unfortunately was split off and two new homes have been built. Theisen stated the road is very problematic and very narrow. The vacation is problematic given the possibility of building another home or building. The boundary that is truly Bob's property is the turnaround. Theisen stated he is opposed to the vacation due to access concerns for the present properties and the potential for future building. Theisen stated the road really is a one-way road and the two new homes have made it much more difficult. Theisen stated cars have to back up all the time to get out of the way and that a better solution would be change the configuration rather than vacating land. Scott Christianson,Elmwood,stated he has resided on Elmwood for 25 years and that the area is getting to be quite the disaster. Christianson stated he blames the City for allowing some of these homes to be built on lots that were never buildable before. In addition,the lift station issue will be a huge cost to the taxpayers,and the only reason that is a problem is that the house was allowed to be built and the driveway goes right over the top of it. The land is also used for snowmobile access. Christianson noted there is some serious runoff coming down North Arm in addition to the traffic problems. Christianson stated in his view the end game is to build another house or two in that area, which is why the neighbors are against it. Allen Merrill,Applicant,stated no one is more disappointed in the new homes than he is and that in his view a lot of this is residual frustration from those homes being built. Merrill indicated he has no intent of splitting the properties off or developing the land and that at most it will be a playground for his children. Page 7 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. City Administrator Rief stated the City is aware that this is a problem area and that the City is willing to fix it but they need assurances that the City can gain access closer to the lift station or possibly a cul-de-sac to help the turnaround situation. Rief concurred that there is a lot of traffic in the area and that he would be willing to discuss potential solutions with the neighbors if they would like to at another time. Jim Theisen asked what the sole purpose of the vacation is and how it will benefit the neighbors. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission has been asked to look at the vacation request and determine if there is any benefit to the City or the neighbors if the area is vacated. Allen Merrill stated he has no intentions of developing the lot behind him and that what he is potentially looking at is maybe constructing a garage there. Merrill stated the only reason to vacate the strip is so he can pick up another ten feet so he can have room to possibly build a garage. Merrill agreed that parking and garage space for everybody is tight and that he is willing to work with the City if they want to figure out a way to build a cul-de-sac. Merrill stated when he bought his place, it was newly constructed and that he got the back lot with it. Merrill noted he tells all the neighbors that they can use his parking area and that he did put some gravel down so people could park back there. Merrill noted they cannot park in the street since it is a one-way street and that he can understand what the neighbors are talking about with the traffic. Merrill indicated he would be supportive of widening out Grand View up to County Road 151 but that he does not want to pay the additional specials to do it. Merrill stated when it was first brought up about the genset,he thought it would really make a mess,and that he talked to the engineers about it blocking the turnaround. Merrill noted he suggested the City vacate that little strip and that he and Bob Hanna would give them a full easement to maintain the generator and everything else back there. Merrill stated he did not know that the City decided to move it towards the east. Merrill reiterated that no new homes will built there if the area is vacated. Thiesse noted the City said that for 50 years on the other lot and that there is now a house there. Merrill commented he maybe would consider putting up a garage but never a house. Jennifer Welsh stated the neighbors are very much interested in working with the City on the road. Welsh stated after hearing about the garage and the gravel problem, she is even more concerned about the runoff from County Road 151 and North Ann. If more hardcover is added,there will be more runoff. Welsh commented she hopes this area is not vacated. Scott Christianson stated variances are usually for hardships or grandfathered-in property. Christianson commented it seems like people are doing what they want up front and then get the variance later at the cost of the neighbors or the City Code. Christianson noted the graveled lot was cleared once maybe five or six years ago and that now the gravel is back. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. Landgraver noted there was litigation to get that lot built and that the City was opposed to it. Thiesse pointed out if those lots were to be divided,they would substandard. Page 8 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated those lots would actually need to be subdivided if the right-of-way is vacated and it currently has one PID number. The other lot was a special combination. Thiesse noted the City would not allow the lots to be subdivided if they are substandard. Rief stated if the two back lots are combined,that would change that. Curtis noted they are separate PID numbers and they would still require a subdivision. Curtis stated the City would need to authorize a substandard lot since the land is located in a one-acre district. Curtis stated it is not an individual single-family lot and is part of the lakeshore lot. Craig stated if they went through a subdivision and the City allowed it, it would be a buildable lot. Curtis stated it is contrary to the City's plan and philosophy to make that a buildable lot. Curtis noted the other lot was a single lot of record,which is a completely different scenario. Thiesse stated this is not a single lot of record. Leskinen stated the Planning Commission needs to react to the application in front of them and that in a nutshell the vacation does not meet state statutes or city code and does not rise to the level of being vacated. Thiesse stated he would like to see further discussion with the City and the neighbors on what can be done to improve the roadway. Schoenzeit stated that process could include the vacation if it has City or public interest in it,but as presented, it has neither. Landgraver stated as presented, it does not benefit the citizens of Orono or the neighbors. Rief stated the comments tonight show the City needs to look at this area and determine what can be done to fix it. Rief stated the generator is a top priority of the City. Landgraver moved,Leskinen seconded,to recommend denial of Application No.LA18-000001, Allen Merrill,vacation of right-of-way between 1161 and 1153 Elmwood Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 4. LA18-000004 GATES GENERAL CONTRACTORS,INC.,710 BIG ISLAND, VARIANCES,7:39 P.M.—7:44 P.M. Chris Neugent, Gates General Contractors,was present. Curtis noted in 2016 variances were granted to the property permitting additions to an existing cabin on the property which had been reconstructed from an old historic footprint. The property owners are now requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to permit enlargement of two additional areas of the cabin. The enlargements include an 89 square foot screen porch expansion and an 85 square foot mudroom addition. Page 9 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Due to the property's orientation and the relationship spatially to the two adjacent lakeshore lots,the entire property is lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line with no legal buildable area. Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the point-like nature of the lot and support granting the variance to the average lakeshore setback. Hardcover and structural coverage are not issues. Curtis stated no public comments have been received. Thiesse commented he believes the last time the applicants were here they wanted to encroach into the 0-75 foot area and the Planning Commission did not recommend that. Curtis indicated that is correct. Chris Neugent,Gates General Contractors,stated he had nothing to add to Staff's report. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Thiesse commented the application is fairly straight forward. Landgraver concurred that it is fairly straight forward and they are not proposing huge additions. Landgraver stated he is in favor of the application. Leskinen moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No.LA18-000004, Gates General Contractors,Inc.,710 Big Island,granting of average lakeshore setback variances. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 5. LA18-000006 ELEVATION HOMES, 1390 FOX STREET,VARIANCES, 7:44 P.M.—7:48 P.M. Bill Costello,Elevation Homes,was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting lot area and lot width variances to take advantage of the Tier 3 hardcover limit of 35 percent and to construct a single-family home on a non-conforming lot of record. The lot was part of a plat that was recorded in 1887 before the RR-1B zoning district was implemented. The proposed home meets all of the required setbacks. The lot consists of 0.46 acres in a two-acre zone and is 133 feet where 200 feet is required. Staff finds there to be practical difficulties inherent with the property due to its size and width in the RR-1B District. The applicant's property had contained a single- family residence for many decades. The ability to have the same type of hardcover amenities as other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Bill Costello, Elevation Homes,stated he has nothing to add to Staff's report. Page 10 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. Oakden noted the property is located in a Tier 3 area but is nonconforming and limited to 25 percent hardcover without the variances. Landgraver noted of the 35 percent hardcover potential,the applicants are only planning on using 25 percent. Schoenzeit asked how the size of the lot compares to the rest of the neighborhood. Oakden indicated it is very comparable to the other lots. Landgraver stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of some improvements to other homes in the area. Schoenzeit moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000006, Elevation Homes, 1390 Fox Street,variances based on staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 6. UPDATE ON FEBRUARY 12,2018,CITY COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart reported on the following City Council actions: • The City Council held the public hearings on the applications heard at the January Planning Commission. • A request to vacate the fire lane at 2618 Casco Point was denied by City Council. • The variances for 3155 Casco Point Circle were approved. • The 684 Tonkawa Road request for the decks was approved. • 'The City Council approved the Knaeble preliminary plat on Togo Road. • Approved Rehkamp Larson application. • The City Council tabled the request on Arbor,which is the one where the structural coverage was higher. The City Council did not seem to be supporting it but allowed the applicant time to redesign. The application will come back to the Planning Commission in March. • The City Council did support the concept plan amendment for the apartment building on Kelly Parkway. The applicants will be submitting an application in the near future. • The City Council directed Staff to make some changes to the rental housing ordinance. The Council is initiating a rental license requirement and placing a prohibition on renting of properties for less than 30 days. The ordinance will go into effective April 1. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON FOR MARCH 12,2018,COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart noted John Thiesse is the scheduled Planning Commission representative for the March 12, 2018,City Council meeting. Page 11 of 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday,February 20,2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 8. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Landgraver asked whether the City should go through a bid process to determine the value of a piece of land whenever there is a request to vacate. Barnhart stated it is not really the City's land to sell and that the benefit to the public must be determined. If there is no public benefit,the property can be vacated and it usually goes back to the adjoining property owners. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT Leskinen moved,Olson seconded,to adjourn the Orono Planning Commission meeting at 7:55 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. ATTEST: John Thiesse,Chair Page 12 of 12 Item 2 Date Application Received: 12/27/17 _ ^ • O Date Application Considered as Complete:02/20/18 120-Day Review Period Expires: 06/20/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief,City Administratorff(ri: .kESHO From: Melanie Curtis, Planner tY1GG Date: 19 March 2018 Subject: #LA18-000022,George Stickney o/b/o Judson Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road 5,Subdivision/Preliminary Plat(Topside) Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a residential subdivision of the 20.5 acre property to create one additional lot for a single family home where one lot currently exists. The Plat is proposed as a Front/Back Lot subdivision. Flexibility regarding the average lakeshore setback requirements as applied to Lot 1 is also part of the request. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval contingent upon meeting the MCWD and City Engineer's recommendations and permitting requirements of the MCWD. PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW Conformity with 2010-2030 Orono Community Management Plan The 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Low Density Residential,0.5 to 2 units per acre. The proposal involves creation of two lots with a calculated density of 0.097 units per acre(or 1 unit per 10.2 acres) based on the gross area;0.1 units per acre upon removal of the wetland acreage.The proposal is less dense than the prescribed minimum density contemplated within the comprehensive plan. Conformity with LR-1A Zoning District Standards The property is currently zoned LR-1A One Family Lakeshore Residential(2.0 acre).Two delineated wetlands on the property do not impact available buildable areas of the lots.City sewer lines exist in Old Crystal Bay Road South,directly abutting the property.According to City Code 82-224, because sewer is available the lots should be served by City sewer(and private water supply wells). The applicant has requested a waiver from the sewer connection requirement until such time when the property is further developed. The existing"horseshoe"driveway configuration would remain as it serves the existing home and the two vacant lots(PID 09-117-23-21-0005&09-117-23-31-0004),situated between the subject property and the properties on Little Orchard Way,currently owned by Mr. Dayton.The northern portion of the"horseshoe" driveway will be upgraded in width and contained within an Outlot to serve as the private shared driveway access for the new Lot 1 and the existing home on Lot 2. The preliminary plat drawing illustrates the proposed building pad areas for the new lot. It FILE#LA18-000022 19 Mar 2018 Page 2 of 5 reflects the applicant's requested flexibility regarding the average lakeshore setback requirements for Lot 1.They propose a lakeward footprint extent as close as 80 feet from the OWHL(reference Exhibits B& K). With the exception of the average lakeshore setback for Lot 1, the LR-1A side and rear yard setbacks will be met;all lots provide the minimum 100-foot lot width measured at the lake and lake(front)setback. Relationship to Surrounding Development Development in the area is primarily±2.0 acre lots within the Little Orchard Road and Farview Lane neighborhoods.The proposed subdivision is generally consistent with respect to the rural lakeshore character of the lot areas with the surrounding neighborhood. Lot Areas Proposed: Wetland Dry Buildable Total 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S-Existing 0.74±acre 18.84±acres 20.58±acres Lot 1 NA 5.17±acres 5.17±acres Lot 2 0.74 acre± 12.66±acres 13.4±acres Old Crystal Bay Road/CSAH 84 ROW Dedication 0.37±acre Outlot A 1.64±acres Lot 2 is shown meeting the minimum 150%acreage requirement for the LR-1A district,as well as 150%of the setbacks as required of a back lot subdivision. General Site Characteristics This site is on the northeastern side of Maxwell bay. It has a wooded slope near the lakeshore and pasture with wetlands on the non-lake portion of the property.There is an existing home, guest house, and barn located on the property,all which will remain following the subdivision; the setbacks and area requirements are met. The existing driveway configuration will remain, described above. The Conservation Design Report by Jacobson Environmental(see Exhibit H) provides a more detailed overview of the natural site characteristics.According to the report,the owner will be implementing a 20-foot wide no-cut buffer along all proposed lot lines(10-feet on either side)to preserve the existing trees for screening.Significant trees may only be cut if they are diseased or damaged,and will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. The Report states that reed canary grass was identified within the wetland basins on proposed Lot 2,and no management is proposed. Planning Commission should review the Report and discuss the recommendations. Hardcover Allotment and Tier Assignment.The entire property is within Hardcover Tier 1 allowing 25% impervious surface. Per the tier assignment methodology established in 78-1701, all proposed lots will remain within Tier 1. Each of the lots exceed the area requirement limiting structural coverage. Air conditioning units serving the existing Dayton home are shown on the west side of the new lot line.These units should be relocated to be within the boundaries of Lot 2. Average Lakeshore Setback The existing home at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South and the home at 3051 Farview Lane T T f FILE#LA18-000022 19 Mar 2018 Page 3 of 5 determine the average lakeshore setback line for the home on the new lot.The developer has requested flexibility in the form of waiver of the average lakeshore setback requirement for Lot 1.They have proposed a building envelope area on the plat drawing to reflect their desired encroachment/setback waiver.The home would be permitted as close as 80 feet from the OHWL.The orientation of the owner's house to the east is facing mostly directly south and east and is such that no views of the lake will be impacted by the location of a home on this property. The home at 3051 Farview Lane has no lake views over this property due to the existing trees and topography as well as their own home's orientation to lake which are primarily western views. Road/Right-of-Way Dedication: A 33-foot right-of-way dedication is shown along Old Crystal Bay Road South (CSAH 84). City Engineer Comments The City Engineer's comments are attached. If there are any changes needed the applicant can respond to those prior to placement on the City Council agenda. Ultimately,the developer should prepare a final plat application which responds to and incorporates these recommendations. Easements Drainage& Utility.The City requires standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in the Plat and drainage easements over the wetland areas.The easements are not shown on the proposed plat drawing;the Final Plat must meet the City standards. Drainage Easements shall be granted over any stormwater facilities that may be required by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Please refer to the comment letter from Elizabeth Showalter from the MCWD regarding stormwater treatment. Driveway. The property is proposed to be platted in a front/back lot configuration whereby the "back lot"does not have frontage on Old Crystal Bay Road South.The access is provided via a minimum 30-foot wide private driveway outlot. A Drainage and Utility easement shall be granted over the entirety of Outlot A.Access easements shall be provided over Outlot A for proposed Lots 1 and 2;a maintenance agreement for the driveway improvement should also be prepared by the applicant. It should be noted for the record that the 30'access outlot cannot in the future be converted to a roadway to allow for a further division of Lots 1 or 2 without a complete replat involving the outlot and Lot 2,at a minimum. Subdivision Code Section 82-256(c)(4)d.states that no more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot.A future division would require a 50' road corridor and creation of a 24' paved roadway to serve 3+lots. Park Dedication The City has plans for trails that may specifically require dedication of land from this property. A 10'wide trail easement along the road frontage,should be granted as part of the plat as suggested by the Parks Commission. Y Y f � FILE#LA18-000022 19 Mar 2018 Page 4 of 5 The Park Fee is determined as 8%of the fair market value of the land being subdivided, but must be between a minimum of$3,250 and a maximum of$5,550 per residential dwelling unit. For the proposed development,the Park Fee would be based only on the new lot.The City's Assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land for establishing the amount of the fee. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements The City's consulting engineer has provided comments regarding this proposed plat with regard to stormwater management and drainage concerns,some requiring additional action or plan revisions by the developer. However,the developer should contact MCWD and provide confirmation regarding the permits or approvals they will require for this subdivision. Rain gardens/filtration basins are shown adjacent to the defined wetland buffer. The development is subject to the 2018 Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of$4,030.00 per acre. For the 2-acre zoning districts,any lot exceeding 2.0 gross acres,including wetland,shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 2.0 acre parcel.Therefore$4,030 x 4[2 lots x 2.0=4.0 total acres] =$16,120.00. Utility Locations and Availability The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area(MUSA). Sewer is available to the property in Old Crystal Bay Road South.The Code requires the connection to sewer where available, however the applicant has asked for a waiver of this requirement.They have provided acceptable septic system designs for the new Lot 1 as well as a new alternate site for the existing home.The City Council has the authority to deviate from the sewer connection requirement if they determine there are extraordinary conditions. The property was not assessed for the sewer; nor was a sewer stub installed when the sewer was constructed in Old Crystal Bay Road. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval in accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer as well as the requirements of the MCWD.The Planning Commission should offer a recommendation regarding the sewer connection although the City Council will make the final decision.The Planning Commission's options for action on the proposed plat are: • Recommend approval of the plat with the average lakeshore setback waived,with appropriate conditions; • Recommend denial,stating reasons;or • Table the application providing direction and guidance to the developer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Preliminary Plat Drawing Exhibit C. Project Summary Exhibit D. Landscaping Plan Exhibit E. Sewer Connection Waiver Request Exhibit F. Septic Plans a. Lot 1 t , FILE#LA18-000022 19 Mar2018 Page 5 of 5 b. Lot 2 Exhibit G. Septic Review Comments—Peitso 01/05/18 Exhibit H. Conservation Design Plan by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC 12/15/17 Exhibit I. Wetland Delineation—Jacobson Environmental 10/19/17 Exhibit J. MCWD—NOD Wetland Approval 12/19/17 Exhibit K. Average Lakeshore Setback Exhibit—by staff Exhibit L. MCWD—Development Comments Exhibit M. Sewer Maps Exhibit N. City Code Sections Exhibit 0. Map Exhibit P. Property Owners List Exhibit Q. Engineer Comments PC #LA18-60002i City of Orono Exhibit A Subdivision Application Street Addis= Application# 2750 Kelley Parkway va Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: Staff: Main: 952-249-4600 ' f fax 952-249-4616 AppNcaOon Fee: ter'is • �� Mailing Address: Escrow: P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bey,MN 55323-0066 Notes: PROPERTY INFORMATION: //j��` Site Address: V2S o is Cr k ea" AA O(alL/0 /1/JProperty Identification Number(PIN): 117 23 21 000 I Date Property Acquired(month/year): �/ (r9 9 I >a Abstract D Torrens(Please check one) Present use of property: Ig Residential; number of Units I nO Other(specify) Zoning District: APPLICANT INFORMATION: D check herg,if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: a.re tt,/. t c ,e Phone(Primary): O-°1 s7 t��7 6 369 1 ctn. Z l 7 Mailing Address: (a tr „.v .4p f,j p Q gal # co sr /,� � City: ,dyx a ZIP:,C713Q Email: y c ,w,a tl y c j a it ry Q . ft)fYi! PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant ,OctProperty check here If Owner address should be used for billing Name: f4aicCAl / Phone(Primary): etz. n7-147 7 Mailing Address: r 014 r Mp . `� City:0140A./0 ZIP: 03-39/ Email: y4 �j /y_ EXISTING LAND USE: ��/ Number of Tax Parcels: / Oct 117 2321 O uo r Development Size: +ti Acres Dry Land .7 Acres Wet Land 20. 75- Acres TOTAL,all parcels PROPOSED LAND USE: 0 Division for Tax Purposes ' .Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units: / New Units: / Total Units: 2 Proposed Gross Density 2 Units per 20,1 acres Minimum Lot Size: P7 /Zcp Square feet dry buildable land Proposed Use(checkgif Residential 0 Other(specify) Subdivision Application—January 2017 Page 5 r � DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Middle Last z.�- . too _,. _4',• 1. � i'� • , Address �`` t City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. Si•/ -ture RNGEIVED DEC 12 2017 Subdivision Application-January 2017 # 3 9 96 CITY OF ORONO Page 13 _ PC #LA78-000 TOPSIDE xwcoRaFLa7z XE9N CO PM AT 022 V PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR I i 604566.6 �___ N IN COR BEC.4, Exhibit B W $ ILlll T.117 M,R.23W.. JUDSON DAYTON FOUND IN GOVT LOT 1,SEC.4-117-23& PT °f° Ea I a7tro.-z ,,.. 7 7 I_-. Y`/ I • W]i (1 alv ezlE rcs sanuER�r ezrHauoN I + � - IN GOVT LOT 7,SEC.9.117-23 1-\ \ COR OF LOT II l 1 (> I a r Ex7E5srox p awn LNE 6� i'N 50� 'E HENNEPIN COUNTY,MWNESOTA 7 C/ 5000636E awmwD M �r'- C IA 2724 OF LUT. wU¢SUa.ro.nor aFLaTM.AWw.,0.]90 oN F o BF 8 5 s>¢ 7 �� T�_�_: Tom, _ <R , \� � s - ._. 1 � �z,- ;at�'�-85gJs6 E ,.... E2n 7d 199.32...2x2 ss, I� �-axs4 a 0 SO 120 240 ^ X 61.41 of -... SCALE IN FEET I� -_- - vim- --- - �'� �TL©�- �"'r . .'°°-L3, - ", 1� ' I nor mIffl I b.- N >z°�z E I �� Z w Q Cg N77 � C-' P�` ---; >--.'/ - y ---T 3..`., \ \` i m.." io1. ;off .d-...os SK110NaAM°O;iii a n ave r' n h l� wF NI ?''-fr° ,.., ---:,s N 88°241X•W LSE COROF UT.9EC.. r I i" '\\ l4,4 ' - .- ' ;. � ,\ , \�.� nrl f3,U.NU LNFAtL 'A, '''�' 1 ave • a_ ./ Sns•24'OC E�•301 4! ®! - `1 1,. \ + .ncae EwTOUNT,, (f") K (�� 'r 351, _ /t �_ _t �0 SOWN we croN• N. '1 I I.... �V SBB°5347 E 2680.81 r< weer ` _M -- L + '� 1, . 1002E adv-03,.-_�w`-'-j'- ___--r--- ,h 0.! y_- __ __ J 1 i( le. B REW +.. 1 / f- \ / _ \,1 00400 1 w i �`,.. - - �I CO aMAT '.1 i CORSE_iro \\r-- SECTION... g•q, h ✓ . +f` 1246.- DRY WE-♦ R �I 1_ I x 7 '9 / .'��. y'wLa ,� \ --7 - N:,s P." I wLsalo MAY L1p n1 I- 93939, i ' .'e� ( ` /-t",,- G Y 'fes tx4d.�TDZAI .. "W I RERcxmcro.eeawn .E U S$ I� rt.•I t . .„,--'\\,. ,\' /; '. 0.74..AC IRET - _- / , > :i` W /•s awe 8=a // T s!S {li C> 4 ( fK / ,fir - cc 's 1 -7�f'A e / '�/ -W/E�T�CA� 3 � �l �.P ' ,.. � I ' � i§ d �� l �. id L J t t \\ / y..l `EECTIpNG7� urr �R 3941 I �^ 9 �, ,.// I, �� __ Mr' SIN tip ': �; I r , ry -- ((�/ WETLAND I� "- 6 F _ �� A ' 1\ i =y 3 SF 'J !8 -� i�AZ'4'(`P�RT�t'`Nr_t==-7----'J� / , / j5�.. R902.,FT3o07NOF N1•j4'001W 463,8 I 1 II ��- e - ��}I� ,-,!-_1•2,-.,..-c-77--\(---- ...'/ - l =a LIREocbv - :E E'aa.TLo11 xann AowAr S 43 I N0.02'1rW 1x23.70 e 11 :0.1.01, v3,LOT 7, An a/ SECTIO9-117-23 �y 9' 8 \\ _ //TT l y .94004 CO PORE RESERVE DISTRICT i t493., 1\ t �\ \ "i1 - CART IRON MONUMENT FgND €$ ; • III ,i1 . / � Ice'ISI I LAKE \a •Ii g 5 Ih r •/ �; ysr. aI1I.._. !II: 1 �yI ers Il`4 \\ ♦V / �� Roamed Legal Description: I I t S J •b \ d' That pert d Lot 35,InA ditaa Subdivision No.230,Hennepin County.Whineaal.,end d Govenim 4 Lot 7,0 Semon 9,Towns*117 Note,Range 23 West d the 510 Principal Mer1W1.demand es follows: --. - - bepinlrg W a poet 302.81 feet South d the Norm Rleand)00Goo.00 Mat Weal d Els East let d said Goverment Lot 7;Blanco East lot. •W,to North Bnsd said Lot a distance d 462.00 feel b the East �b ,/ ins d said Lot 7:tenor NOM.026 the East line d saki Government Lot 7,a distanced 302.81 feet 008 Npaesai corner d old lot.,410.continuing Norm along the North and Scrum Centerline d Section 4, S L '�' , Township 117,Range 23.a distance of 216.7 Nst b an said 00.010 e Earths*extension d the Scan Ins d Lot 941n the above mentioned Auditors Subdivision No.230,Hennepin Canty,Merwol 7 6. a IL t (� '4°/ thence Westerly Wog the Southerly boundary Ina d said Lot 34 and extension thereof to 00,Southwest owner d said Lot 3418 Southerly along the etl8l&m of the West Ilse d said Lot 34 b a point 1071.18 6 MINNETONKA t• ay- teat18.4Southerly measured along the West Be d sate Lot 34 as the emersion thereof.from the North.6,Sonar d sold Lot 34;tomos Westerly 01 actin 81 degrees 06 minutes b Be dam born the 00 lip 'd,'1 10600l.'Daae.159.66 NW:mance 00.04193 Wastanly O..point g 2 degrees 30 minutes b the right ham the test desobed Sone,0 distanced 124.86 Mat tier Southwesterly on e 0 52 40.al crave b the Idl with a radius aD 388.68 Net,a distanced 193.75 fee tote ptl.d oro 10.01 'Bance Southwesterly on a tangential Cove b the Ion with a ratites d 212.81 leek a disterhu d 160.52 feek tenor �'` - iq � Southwesterly n a straight lie tangent b said test described curve a distance d289 Mel b08 the Sd�m1y 9a 64.4010.00dOglSe41wr4:Berea West Wag Be Skim line dkidBodian 28529 feet.said last -Y- described woad berg the Southeast corner d Government Lot 1 0 aid Seam 4 lance Southwesterly ds6etl' 35 degrees n mien b w 46 from saki MW described deem,a distance d 01 o.3 leek ly thence Sodhweebty de 45 degrees 28 minutes b the left horn said lest escri ed course,a distance 01115.00 art thence Southwesterly deflecting ctin 21 degrees 40 minutes b la tight from said Mee _ ave dwulbed course a distanced 174.00 het,more or loss b the shored Mamba Bey,lake htinsalorhsa,thence SoumeBeMdy along the shore d sold lake b its i4erse on Mil•Ge foaehg Southerly await& I-9 with the Earl time d above mentioned Government Lot 7 0 sold Becton 9,from a pant bearing Sash 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 secede West and distant 66.76 Net frown the point d beginning,said Iasi Weer 7,2010. 9ke Mimefonke wee 829.29 h,N(Y61B29, - ds0dbed course being hereinafter referred a and dsgndet a6 Line X;tenor Norm parallel wit the East Me d sold Government Lai 7 b said point bearing Swan 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 camas NW and i on July 7,2010. '- 1 dteer.76676 feel from said port of beginning.thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 0Sonds East 786.76 het b the point EBepavarg said last to-Wit d ranee being IrmhMw.ywmd to and designated 11 i Eta a We'd.EXCEPTING horn above described premises.■o foaming d 4001;1 tract(hereinafter sometims referred to as the EXCEPTED TRACT)tont S•gnn6g et the Sane Poi* bagrvi93 to above I KO*s2a,SC soling to e d lass MDepo a nt•l9onsene dsabed:thence Nati 52 degrees 03 mutes 14 seconds West,41.75 feet pence South 81 degrees 57 nix10 55 xmds West,316.24 Net thar0Ce Seth 26 daps 48 53minute. seconds West 558 Net !VIII, NSVD-1929,ecw.Nhp b the Mlroewta Deponent dCosmvetion. a ,AZE3c CA nae p los to the shore d Maxwells Bey.Lake Minnetonka',txnoa Southeasterly along the More d said lake b on MerastUon with sell Una X haraiea've Osabed;thence NOM Wong said Lobe%foto ff Ber3hhwM w Chiseled'X'on te nath.wi cone of twpun4lla4s 0 titin,iA N etere.mw1 win Lha Y s 50000 000 4eserbod;OerKe Nab 12 elegises 54 meths 40 seconds Eel Wag said lie Y.76676 Mel to to paha d ba9Mig. ,.5 0 Days Bay Deny elevation s 93237 ft,5055.1$49. .--,.,C,.':. 5 O G,.. IA BAr',t0.1f1 S. 2 5l1,,,q" For to purpose ol the foregoing OSCriWiore,to East fine d to aforesaid Goverment Lot 71n said Section 9,TOwaftp 117,Rage 23 West of the 5th PriKapal Meaiarh,is aiecaned to a a due NOM and g$pR iY • Denotes cm metre found G,AL ARE C..6 AC3 S 5wth01e. I I'I I vv I :06su16chan 00180/001 AREA 69 ACRES -I- I Ft -Denoteseav0p easel m X01.000 County ocard etee r+IA I y ,N N^Ww"11 Dents bearing WOW on dmipim SHORELINE OF Mx%WE14S) - f s1,-.,_'Gia L R ' A 1:I-T"JJ111 BAY ON 7-7-X110 p 17-407 PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit C 825 Old Crystal Bay Road Topside Development 20.58 total acres .74 acres of wetland 19.84 acres of dry land - Lot 1: 5.17 acres (all dry) New Lot - 825 Old Crystal Bay Road remaining lot: 13.77 acres total Proposed Lot 2-Existing Home .74 acres of wetland 13.03 acres of dry land - Outlot A: 1.64 acres (all dry) o Shared driveway within the Outlot area, at least 10' south of the northerly boundary line. RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2018 CITY OF ORONO „,_ .,,,e,,,:,,,. .„ :..,,,,w:A., ,...,..,:..,,,,i4l., } s u� t„,•'''”'11,..:,. ...,,,:._...,,.1-:"*,:',...,.7.,'„.1....'',.k-4.: �� W r� 1 ZZ •aU . Vi -.� '' uJ F— ;` f + LLI < < ,-; ,...—,, ...4.4450;,,... , t 4:%'_:.-----f;_.- W Lij E , 0Zz � � " 0 CC •-' '* iiiii"Fs.l' ,t. ' if r • ;,... , Z W W ' ". y, .141.-1404, ,�t. a • .._. .-_-',,,,-.1-..' '. .::::41:i';:.-::::': iit you " 9 1 " 1 1 , 7.-‹*°,1*--':',,-*.'":,'4 s. .� " rt " - r , � A Fa 41 ' *1[: a '4'-:.-.';;;'' , .` r e,,,''` ay `:: , ,: a _ . it. , , - e - ?v. ',..., , :::-..,it-7:::t4,,,,,,4,1'!' `11 e( Y It b: giIlk 17. c t. R" /" : p< /' S der' I ., r i r .�a. ��e r; a PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit E JUDSON E. DAYTON RECEIVED 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD MAR 0 9 2018 ORONO, MINNESOTA CITY OF ORONO March 8, 2018 City of Orono Attn. Melanie Curtis, Planner Planning & Zoning Office 2759 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Re: Application for waiver of sanitary sewer connection requirement, regarding requested plat approval for the two lot plat of Topside. Ladies and Gentlemen: My wife and I own the property at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road, Orono, Minnesota. We have filed an application for plat approval with the City. We hope to divide our one parcel into two parcels. The total parcel is 20.75 acres in size. We are proposing to split off the westerly portion of our land, such that there would be two parcels in place of the one existing parcel. The main parcel on which our house is located would be 13.57 acres. The second parcel, the westerly parcel, would be 5.17 acres. A single-family home would be constructed on the westerly parcel as well. (The difference between the total acreage and the individual parcel acreage is explained by the Outlot at 1.64 acres and Old Crystal Bay Road at .37 acres.) In preparation for the pending application, we performed, at quite some expense, percolation testing and other work in anticipation of establishing septic systems and drain fields on the property. As we have determined, both the existing site and the proposed site, have more than adequate size and soils conditions to support required septic sites. Recently, however, we were informed that we might have to install a sanitary sewer line to the two lots, to obtain City approval to add one additional lot. We have also learned, though, that "extraordinary situations" might allow for "deviations...in those instances where considered justified by the city." Accordingly, we are asking that the 1 City deviate from (waive) the dictates of the applicable ordinance, or, in the alternative, that the City grant us a variance from the general requirement that the two lots be connected to the public sanitary sewerage system. The reasons for our request, and why our situation is unique or "extraordinary," are as follows: 1. Minor Impact. Only one lot is being added. Most subdivisions, both existing and planned, consist of many lots, oftentimes spaced closely together. Were those multi-lot subdivisions not to have sanitary sewer connections, the environmental impact could be extreme, and the City would have to monitor multiple sites. 2. Inability to Spread the Cost. Again, in a multi-lot subdivision there is a material difference between spreading the cost of connecting to the public sewer system over multiple lots, as opposed to our situation where the cost could only be apportioned between two lots. Here, the extraordinarily small number of lots (two) is unique. Further, in our case, we will be paying the entire cost ourselves. There is no one to pass this cost to or share it. 3. Large Parcel Size. The total parcel is 20.75 acres, and the two lots will be 13.57 acres and 5.17 acres in size. In other words, the site and each parcel are extraordinarily large. These are not lots measured in square feet but in acres. 4. Extraordinary Areas for Placement of Septic Sites. Because of the extraordinary lot size, the areas available for the placement of septic systems are also extraordinary. Nothing must be shoehomed in to fit the lots. 5. Extraordinary Sewer Line Length. To connect to the public sewer system lying along Old Crystal Bay Road, would require an extraordinarily long sewer line connection. The connecting line, from Old Crystal Bay Road to the easterly line of the westerly lot would be approximately 1,000 feet. That is an extraordinary distance for a connecting sewer line. Then, after running westerly approximately 1,000 feet, the connection to each lot would have an additional run of approximately 500 more feet, to reach the existing and planned improvements on the lots. 2 6. Extraordinary Cost. The cost to install a connecting sewer line of the length stated above would be approximately $50,000. To run connecting lines from the common line to the improvements on the two lots would add approximately $42,000 for the main lot, and approximately $32,000 for the westerly lot, for a total cost of about $120,000. That is an extraordinary cost by anyone's definition. When one considers that that cost would have to be incurred to add but one more lot to the one lot that exists, the cost consideration is even more extraordinary, especially since we would be paying the entire cost ourselves. 7. Extraordinary Environmental Impact. A private sewer line that must be excavated over the distances here in question would have a greater effect on the environment, than would a sewer line of a more typical shorter length. Again, this is an extraordinary situation. The City may see other factors that make this situation unique and extraordinary, but those set forth above demonstrate that our situation is extraordinary. Accordingly, we respectfully request either (i) a "deviation" from the dictates of the ordinance pursuant to Section 82-224(e)(1), or (ii) a variance from the requirements of the ordinance, and that we be allowed to proceed with the addition of one more lot without being required to connect our two resulting lots to the public sewer system. Thank you. Sincerely, Judson Dayton 3 PC #LA18-000022 • Exhibit Fa Joseph Olson D.B.A. Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing Joseph J. Olson—MPCA License #810 11481 Riverview Rd. NE,Hanover, MN 55341 (763) 498-8779 fax (763) 498-8290 December 8,2017 Topside Proposed lot 1 Orono,Hennepin County This on-site Sewage Treatment System is partially designed for a Type 1,five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. Once the house size,location and septic primary and future sites are chosen this design can be completed. The periodically saturated soils were located at 18-22 Inches(mottled soil). Due to the periodically saturated soils,a pressurized mound system will need to be installed to treat the septic effluent.The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3'above the saturated soils. Absorption areas do not overlap and are greater than 20 feet from the property line. The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 4 M P1. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area.The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure.A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device;this is in case of a pump failure. Use 7/32-inch aerforatioggon the laterals, Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment areas before and after construction.The treatment area must be fenced off before construction begins.This Design is not valid&the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for the On-Site Sewage Treatment systems occurs. Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,act.)human water&toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks.Garbage disposals are not recommended.Additives must not be used;they may cause harmful damage to your septic system.It is recommended that you pump the septic tank s every two years. Sincere Joseph J.Olson OOtl , �'00-- " vu-----t--28-3.01 / / Of — (4)/ La‘0 / / ////7 / s--\ � \ N g / // / /4 ' �� \ ,,\ \ N) I I //7/ / row- r (-- \ ` ...----;? 18 I ( if I 4). 1 J , i(TA: ----,...4:50.8 -.•.- \-\. \ \ Pri H 3-L5 \ NeCPsIE / f I • Thi F_L, 1 \ \XI 1 1 1 k`. _ 1 \ \ / -4 ,, 4 \ /1 `" / J ` i_____-----'---4, M T9 8.8 �. `\ 1111 , �..�'_ •J / SiTi // .,g tiT''".¢ 0 �r I 2 " j /L1 .) /o 1 / /Ip4/ 1 -- - • , // / D/ J i--• J I I I / \ 7,46)// 1 -- -X.------------___,:'-----i )( ) z-ac ), Y 457 ( ( 1 i \ V— ---- `-- /) I i \ 7 \_,‘\\\c Nc ,\,—___ .7 \ , / . , , 1.,( \ \\,\\ --- --L-- -.--------'- \ / ___/\ 6'° . \ \\ / --/_____--- \ /N ( —— / ---- ' N /c \\\\\\\\\ t-------. \ \ �� \�\\\\�\ \ \ i\ /\�' ---- -•-- \ \\ \\\ I o \ \ / i --, � k ) r\\ \ / \\\ \ Oji` / EXISTING \�\\�\ • \ A / i � HOUSE Scn�.E: 1"=Go \�\ ��\ o� V / #825 \�� \ \ 0?, .\\`AN. \ — --1` 201ipurple cod. Mound Design www.SepticResource.com (vers 15.2) Property Owner. Judson Dayton Date: 12/4/2017 Site Address: Topside Addition PID: 0911723210001 Comments: Proposed Lot 1 Site A instructions: Q =enter data =adjust if desired = computer calculated - DO NOT CHANGE! I) 5 bedroom Type I Residential System 2) 750 GPD design flow .3) Yes Garbage disposal or pumped to septic 50%larger tank with multiple comp/tanks 4) 2250 Gat Septic tank(code minimum) 2250 Gal Septic tank(design size / LUG req'd) Tank options: none 5) 1.2 GPD/ft?mound sand loading rate contour loading rate of 12 req's a min 62.5 ft. long rockbed 46) 10.0 ft rockbed width 63.0 ft rockbed length 7) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 3.0 ft perforation spacing (maximum of 3 for both) end feed manifold connection 8) 3 laterals 61.0 feet long 21.0 perfs/lateral 63 perfs total (1/2 a perf means the first perf starts at the middle feed manifold) 9) 7/32 inch perfs at 1 feet residual head gives 0.56 gpm flow rate per perforation for this perf size&spacing,&pipe size on line 12, max perfs/lateral= 30 , line#8 must be less--> OK io) 4.0 doses per day (4 minimum) i i) 188 gallons per dose (treatment volume) 2.00 5x 12) 2.00 inch diameter laterals must be used to meet"4x pipe volume"requirement 2.00 3x 13) feet of 2.0 inch supply line leads to #####gallons of drainback volume (Tip:"top feed"manifold to control the drainback) 14) r######gallons TOTAL pump out volume(treatment+drainback) 15) feet vertical lift from pump to mound laterals, leads to a: 16) 36 GPM @ ##### feet of head, Pump requirement (note: >50gpm may require an extra 3-6'of head) n) [ 750 gal Dose tank(code minimum) 1300 gal Dose tank(design size/ LUG req'd) at 25.49 gpi leads to a i8) r #inch swing on Demand float, or timed dosing of #####min ON (confirm pump rate with drawdown (this delivers Average flow, =70%of Peak design flow) #####hrs OFF test and adjust as necessary) 19) 12 inches from bottom of tank to"Pump OFF'float 20) ######inches from bottom of tank to"Pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"Timer ON"float if time dosed 21) 0####inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level"float,or ##### inches to"Hi Lever float if time dosed 22) [1##/###gallons reserve capacity (after High Level Alarm is activated) 23) 0.60 gpd/ft2 Absorption area Soil Loading Rate, which gives a mound ratio of 2 (minimum) (this must match the soft boring log) desired mound ratio 2.0 2.h 6 percent site slope (0-20%range) 15 (%downslope site slope, if different than upslope) :s) 22 inches, or 1.8 ft. to Redox or other limiting condition (need at least 12"to be a Type I) Treatment zone contains 0 inches of 0%soil credit, and 0 inches of 50%soil credit. Giving a: 26, 14 inch,or 1.2 ft. Sand Lift Mound CRITICAL FOR FUTURE CERTIFICATIONS!!! 27) 20.0 ft.Totat ABSORPTION width (with sand beyond rockbed as follows:) 28) 0.0 ft. ups lope and sideslope 10.0 ft. Downslope Individual slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 29) 4:1 upslope ratio 10 ft. upslope berm 30) 4:1 sideslope 15 ft.sidestope berms 31) 3:1 downslope 21 ft. downslope berm 32) Overall Dimensions: 10.0 ft.wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 41 ft.wide by 93 ft. long Mound footprint 4"inspection pipe 18"cover on top k Upslope berm t0 } Downslope berm 21 I Mil 12" cover on sides (6"berry caP&6 topcoat) 1.2 Clean sand lift 111 Depth to Limiting i_imiting Con'ditfon -------—------ ' _— ----- Absorption Width � z0.0 -- Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally In both directions. For slopes,195, Absorption WYdth is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed 331 Rock Bed: 10.0 ft. by 63.0 ft.by 6 inches under pipe, plus 20%gives 21 yd'or 1.4= 29 ton 34) Mound Sand: (note:volume is based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbed, Exchange sand for loamy cap if desired) 23.9 up + 68.4 downslope + 11.3 ends+ 34.2 under rock= 165 yd'or 1.4- 232 ton plus 20% 331 Loamy Cap: 37 ft. by 89 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 74 yd'or•1.4= 104 ton 36, Topsoil: 41 Ift. by 93 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 85 yd'or 1.4= 119 ton _1-hereby that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and taws. �r Rusty Olson"s Solt ti:Perc 810 12/4/2017 gner Signature Company License# Date 2011 purple code Mound Design www SepticResource corn fivers 15 2) Property Owner: Judson Dayton Date: 12/4/2017 Site Address: Topside Addition PID: 0911723210001 Comments: Proposed Lot 1 Site B instructions: I =enter data =adjust if desired = computer calculated. DO NOT CHANGE! i) 5 bedroom Type { I Residential System 2) 750 GPD design flow 3) Yes Garbage disposal or pumped to septic 50%larger tank with multiple comp/tanks 4) 2250 Gal Septic tank(code minimum) 2250 Gal Septic tank(design size/ LUG req'd) Tank options: none 5) 1.2 GPD/ft2 mound sand loading rate contour loading rate of 12 req's a min 62.5 ft. long rockbed 6) 10.0 ft rockbed width 63.0 ft rockbed length 7) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 3.0 ft perforation spacing (maximum of 3 for both) end feed manifold connection 8) 3 laterals 61.0 feet tong 21.0 perfs / lateral 63 perfs total (1/2 a pert means the first pert starts at the middle feed manifold) 9) 7/32 inch perfs at 1 feet residual head gives 0.56 gpm flow rate per perforation for this pert size&spacing, &pipe size on line 12, max perfs/lateral= 30 , line#8 must be less - > OK )o) 4.0 doses per day (4 minimum) II) 188 gallons per dose (treatment volume) 2.00 5x 12) 2.00 inch diameter laterals must be used to meet"4x pipe volume"requirement 2.00 3x 13) feet of 2.0 inch supply line leads to #####gallons of drainback volume (Tip:"top feed"manifold to control the drainback) )4) ######gallons TOTAL pump out volume (treatment+drainback) is) feet vertical lift from pump to mound laterals, leads to a: 16) 36 GPM @ #####:feet of head, Pump requirement (note: >50gpm may require an extra 3-6 of head) 17) 750 gal Dose tank (code minimum) 1300 gal Dose tank(design size / LUG req'd) at 25.49 gpi leads to a is) ###### inch swing on Demand float, or timed dosing of ##### min ON (confirm pump rate with drawdown (this delivers Average flow, =70%of Peak design flow) ##### hrs OFF test and adjust as necessary) 19) _ 12 inches from bottom of tank to"Pump OFF"float 20) ###### inches from bottom of tank to"Pump ON"float, or 12 inches to"Timer ON"float if time dosed 2)) ######inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level"float, or ##### inches to"Hi Level"float if time dosed 22) ######gallons reserve capacity (after High Level Alarm is activated) • 231 0.60 gpd/ft2 Absorption area Soil Loading Rate, which gives a mound ratio of 2 (minimum) (this must match the soil boring log) desired mound ratio 2.0 24) ' 6 (percent site slope (0.20%range) 15 (%downslope site slope, if different than upslope) 251 20 inches, or 1.7 ft. to Redox or other limiting condition (need at least t 2"to be a Type I) Treatment zone contains 0 inches of 0%soil credit, and' 0 inches of 50%soil credit. Giving a: 26) 16 inch, or 1.3 ft. Sand Uft Mound CRITICAL FOR FUTURE CERTIFICATIONS!!! 27) 20.0 ft.Total ABSORPTION width (with sand beyond rockbed as follows:) 28) 0.0 ft.upslope and sideslope 10.0 ft. Downslope Individual slope ratios give BERM widths(topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 29) 4:1 upstope ratio 11 ft. upslope berm 30) 3:1 sidestope 12 ft. sideslope berms 31) 3:1 downslope 22 ft. downslope berm .32) Overall Dimensions: 10.0 ft. wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 43 ft.wide by 87 ft. long Mound footprint 4"inspection pipe 18"cover on top Upslope berm 11 1 Downslope berm 22 < } 12"cover on sides ,,----L - Or loamy cap k 6`topsoil) 1.3 C(ean sand lift I 1,7 Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition — '�----------___-- Absorption _ Absorption Width f 20.0 ' ____ ----- ——_ Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Wan is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption*kith is measured downhill from the upstope edge of the Bed 33) Rock Bed: 10.0 ft. by 63.0 ft. by 6 !inches under pipe, plus 20%gives 21 yd3 or`1.4= I 29 'ton 34) Mound Sand: (note:volume is based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbed, Exchange sand for loamy cap if desired) 25.7 up + 71.6 downslope + 9.6 ends+ 38.1 under rock= 174 yd3 or 1.4= I. 244 'ton plus 20% 35) Loamy Cap: 39 ft. by 1.7.3i—lft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 72 yd'or'1.4= 101 ton 36) Topsoil: 43 ft. by 87 ft. 6"deep,plus 20%gives 84 yd'or`1.4= I 118 'ton I hereby ce that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. ----- Runty Olson"s Soil Et Perc 810 12/4/2017 gner Signature Company License# Date i Installer Summary 2250 gallon Septic tank(minimum) Tank options: none 1u7e rarger tank wan'wimple comps td°;ns 1300 gallon Dose tank(minimum) at 25.49 gpi 36 GPM @ ##### ft. of head, Pump required ######inch swing on Demand float which translates to roughly ##### inches of float tether length if time dosing is required--> #####minutes ON time& #####hours OFF time ######inches from bottom of tank to"pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"timer ON"float ###### inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level Alarm"or ##### inches to"Hi level alarm" if time dosed ft. of 2.0 inch supply line with end feed manifold connection (Tip: "top feed'manifold to control drainback) 16 inch,or 1.3 ft. Sand Lift Mound 10.0 ft.wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 3 laterals 2.00 inch diameter 61.0 ft. long 3.0 ft. lateral spacing 7/32 inch perfs 3.0 ft. perforation spacing No Effluent filter&alarm 3 clean out&valve box assemblies 120.0 ft.Total sand ABSORPTION width (minimum) 0.0 ft. upslope and sideslope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum) 10.0 ft. Downslope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum i Specific slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 4:1 upslope ratio 11 ft. upslope berm 3:1 sideslope 12 ft.sideslope berms 3:1 downslope 22 ft. downslope berm 4" inspection pipe 18"cover on top Upslo berm 11 Pe Downslope berm 22 ) iii 12" cover on sides (6"loamy cap&6"topsorl) 13 Clean sand lift _____ _ 1.7 Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition --.4--------------- Absorption Width 20.0 — __ _------ Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the Beo'equatly in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption $'ldth is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Rock Bed: 21.0 yd3 or'1.4. - 29 ton 6 inches under pipe Mound Sand: 174 yd3 or 1.4.. 244 ton calculation based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbe Loamy Cap: 72 yd3 or'1.4= 101 ton 6" deep Topsoil: 84 yd3 or'1.4- 118 ton 6"deep INSPECTOR CHECKLIST - mound I opside Addition O WELL setbacks: 20'to pressure tested sewer line (5 psi for 15 min) 50'to everything 100 to dispersal area with shallow well PROPERTY LINES setback: 10'to everything Road setback: platted: 10'prop line. Metes&bounds: out of road easement,or outer ditch. LAKE I BLUFF setback: 20'for bluff. Lakes: GD _, RD_, NE . Protected Protected wetland . — Building setbacks: 10'for everything, 20'for dispersal area. WATER LINE under pressure se 10'to bed,tank&sewer line. (else sewer line' 12"below) O Sewer line&baffle connection (no 90's, 3'between 45's, slope min 1'in 8', max 2"in 8') (no depth reqs, clean out every 100', Sch 40 pipe) ElSeptic tank and risers (water tight, insulated, proper depth,existing verified by pumping) mfg 2250 gallons none Riser over outlet, riser over inlet or center, and 6"+ inspection pipe over any remaining baffles. — No effluent filter&alarm Dose tank risers and piping (water tight, insulated,proper depth, drainback) — mfn 1300 gallons 0 dose pump 36 gpm ######head VERIFY PUMP CURVE ##### min ON ###### hr OFF El float setting drop ##### inches at 25.5 gpi "DESIGNED" ##### inches approx float tether length ##### gal dose divided by gpi "INSTALLED"= inches float drop(field corrected LABEL pump requirements and drawdown on riser or panel J Cam lock reachable from grade-30"max. .1-hook weep hole. Supply line access (no hard 90's) 2.0 inch supply pipe: Sch40, sloped 1/8"+, supported by 4"sch40 sleeve or compacted, and buried 6"+. splice box/control panel/electrical connections flow measurement: CT, ETM, time dosed, home water meter mound absorption area rough up mound rock dimensions 10.0 X 63.0 Sand lift depth 16 inches. (Jar test:2"sand leaves c 1/8"silt after 30 min) ❑ Absorption Sand beyond rock 0.0 upslope 10.0 downslope ElBerried topsoil beyond rockbed 11 upslope 12 sideslope 22 downslope Hcover depth of 12-18"+ VERIFY 3 laterals (1-2'from edge of rock) 2.00 inch pipe size (Sch40 pipe&fittings) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 7/32 inch perforations 3.0 ft perforation spacing Air inlet at end of laterals, and at top feed manifold if necessary. VERIFY clean outs (no hard 90's) 4'inspection pipe to bottom of rock,anchored VERIFY _ Abandon existing system-if necessary I lite-use existing tank certification monitoring plan and type welt abandonment form -if necessary was t+��JY► r System Elevations ► s=,,,i,; ,i :.1:`.----.,..„ benchmark T 1 _` T _ SHWT / Mound r (Grade elevations are existing. If a loamy cap different final grade is desired it should be shown and described here.) (1 lateral i t bottom rock .\ grade (at upslope rock bed) ``` SHWT (at upsiope rock bed) I ' i 1 ( I I C1. I r r Sewer pipe exiting house Septic Tank Septic Tank (if applicable) Pump Tank Grade Grade Grade Grade Pipe inlet inlet inlet Tank bottom Tank bottom Tank bottom Soil Observation Log wuu.ScpticRcsource.com .ers 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner i project: Judson Dayton Date H/23/2017 Property Address/PID: Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Survey Information 0 refer to attached soil survey Parent matl's: 9 Till 0 Outwash ❑Lacustrine ❑Alluvium ❑Organic ❑Bedrock landscape position: ❑Summit 9 Shouk>er 9 Side slope 0 Toe slope soil survey map units: L3713 slope 6-14 % direction-Convex Soil Log#1 9 Boring 0 pt Elevation 948.8 Depth to SHWT 18 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-6 Topsoil <35 I0yr3/I Loose Moderate Block) 6-10 Sandy Loam <35 I 0yr4/3 Friable Strong Block) 10-18 Sandy Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Block) 18-26 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y4?8,1-6.'IOy Friable Strong Block) 26-30 Sandy Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y4/8,1-6.'10yFriable Strong Block) Comments: -- Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Log#2 0 Boring 0 At Elevation 948.8 Depth to SHWT 22 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 lOyr3 1 Loose Moderate Blocky 8-14 Loam <35 10yr4 3 Friable Strong Blocky 14-22 Sandy clay Loam <35 10yr5.'4 Friable Strong Brock) 22-30 Loam <35 I0yr5:4 I0y4 8,1-6 IOy Friable Strong Bkxa,y Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Log#3 El Boring 0 Pit Elevation 950.8 Depth to SHWT 20 Inches _Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 lOyr3/1 Loose Moderate Blocks 8-14 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 14-20 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 20-30 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 I0y4/8,1-6/10y Friable Strong Block. hereby cert fy ' work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local req's. Rusty Olson's Soil & Pere. 810 D tgner Signature Company License # Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Log#4 0 Boring 0 pit Elevation 950.7 Depth to SHWT 20 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-14 Topsoil <35 10yr3?1 Loose Moderate Blocky 14-20 Clay Loam <35 10yr4'3 Friable Strong Block) 20-30 Clay Loam <35 10yrSt4 I0y4!8,1-6'10y Friable Strong Blocky <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular block) >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong '"0Ss1°c <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular block) >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Log#5 ❑Boring ❑pit Elevation 948.8 Depth to SHWT 22 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 10yr3/I Loose Moderate Blocky 8-14 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong . Blocky 14-22 Clay Loam <35 t 0yr5/4 Friable Strong Block) 22-30 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 I0y4/8,I-6'I Oy Firm Strong Block) <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massIVc I hereby certify t.is work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local req's. .� Rusty Olson's Soil & Perc. 810 igrter Signature Company License # Soil Observation Log www.ScpticRcsource.com vers 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner project: Judson Dayton Date 11/23/2017 Property Address;PID: Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Survey Information 0 refer to attached soil survey Parent marl's: Q-nu ❑Outwash ❑Lacustrine ❑Aliuv.um 0 Organic 0 Bedrock landscape position: 0 Summit 2 shoulder 0 Side slope ❑Toe slope soil survey map units: L3713 slope 6-14 % direction- Convex Soil Log#6 2 Boring C Pit Elevation 950.8 Depth to SHWT 20 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment°o matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 I0yr3/I Loose Moderate Blocky 8-14 Loam <35 10yr4 3 Friable Strong Blocky 14-20 Clay Loam <35 10yr5.4 Friable Strong Blocky 20-30 Clay Loam <35 10yr5.'4 10y4,8,1-6:1 Oy Friable Strong Blocky Comments: Proposed lot 1 Topside Development Soil Log#7 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 948.5 Depth to SHWT 22 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0.8 Topsoil <35 I0yr311 Loose Moderate Blocky 8-16 Loam <35 10yr4.'3 Friable Strong Blocky 16-22 Sandy clay Loam <35 I Oyr5.14 Friable Strong Blocky 22-30 Sandy clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 lOy4i,I-6i 10y Friable Strong Block) Proposed lot l Topside Development El Boring 0 Pit Elevation Depth to SHWT Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape I hereby cert this work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local req's Rusty Olson's Soil&Perc. 810 Designer Signature Company License# Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 1 Hole number: 1 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12' inches, Diameter of hole 6"^inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-6 Topsoil 10yr3/1 6-12 Sandy loam 10yr4/3 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:01 9:16 6" 5.5 2.7 9:31 9:46 6" 5.5 2.7 9:47 10:02 6" 5.5 2.7 r AVERAGE PERC. RATE 2.7 MPI L Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc, starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 1 Hole number: 2 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole 6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth,inches Soil texture 0-8 Topsoil 10yr3/1 8-12 Loam 10yr4/3 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches r Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:02 9:17 6" 4.3 3.5 9:30 9:45 6" 4.2 3.6 9:48 10:03 6" 4.1 3.7 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 3.6 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 1 Hole number. 3 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom 12" inches, Diameter of hole 6'_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth,inches Soil texture 0-8 Topsoil 10yr311 8-12 Loam 10yr413 Method of scratching side wet: Knife Depth of gravel In bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time lime Depth Drop in H2O Parc Rate 9:03 9:18 6" 3.8 3.9 9.29 9:44 6" 3.7 4.0 9:49 10:04 6" 3.7 4.0 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.0 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc.starting at 8:51 AM On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 1 Hole number: 4 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12" inches, Diameter of hole 6" inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12 Topsoil 10yr3/1 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:04 919 6" 3.5 4.3 9:28 9:43 6" 3.5 4.3 9:50 10:05 6" 3.5 4.3 AVERAGE PERC.RATE 4.3 MPI Joseph Olson D.B.A. Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing Joseph J. Olson—MPCA License#810 11481 Riverview Rd. NE, Hanover, MN 55341 (763) 498-8779 fax (763) 498-8290 December 8,2017 Topside Proposed lot 2 Orono,Hennepin County This on-site Sewage Treatment System is partially designed for a Type I,five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. Once the house size,location and septic primary and future sites are chosen this design can be completed. The periodically saturated soils were located at 16-24 Inches(mottled soil). Due to the periodically saturated soils,a pressurized mound system will need to be installed to treat the septic effluent.The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3'above the saturated soils. Absorption areas do not overlap and are greater than 20 feet from the property line. The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 4 MPI. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area.The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure.A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device;this is in case of a pump failure. Use 7/32 inch perforations on the laterals. Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment areas before and after construction.The treatment area must be fenced off before construction begins.This Design is not valid&the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for the On-Site Sewage Treatment systems occurs. Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,act.)human water&toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks.Garbage disposals are not recommended.Additives must not be used;they may cause harmful damage to your septic system. It is recommended that you pump the septic tank s every two years. Sine ly, • Joseph.1.Olson a ocr rk , Ou .-- d`• X33.01 / j P''SCC . * —------------ '---———— i 44)1 iz‘ / Pv<// ''j 7 j// // '--Art* — - ,. _ \\\ A\C) (NI*. ) I I 1 li / / lillt zr\- (----' \\,,..\ -.\ / o I H 3-L5 3 �• j ( 1 4�`�/ 95a.e • , \ I I �—-� lit • TH. -L 1 l 1 1 - I / .-,- - 14. 5‘. 041�. 9 - /' J 1 • , 1 `` l ' , , ‘ 8.8 ../.44 4 \:.- --;4" I j fl / '10 1 1 \ �sil�g /471/I •.9 `- '• .4 1 ) / / , c. nti .• ' 1 / ) 1114+ .1 ) / \ rA .B15- 4 WE / ?" __J I / \ o ,� �.-----....� --�.� \ / � � DoT / Lt./ i ( __: \ __ `� )/ \ 2sN \-- \ \ eG� 0\ * / __________i_____ ---... \ \ / / \ \\----- ----/--- -' \ \4 / N., /( / . .N \/'\\\ �� \ \ \4 \\\\ \i/\ \IINI \ -- ":17- \ \\ 0, \ )/ ) r7---- , / // \\� \ \ . 1 \\ � \ \ �� EXISTING \\\� \ �� / / / HOUSE sc«L : 11`=(, ____ \\\ \ /// #825 \\�\\ \ (��' moo, 2011 purple cede Mound Design www.SepdcResource com (vers 15.21 Property Owner: Judson Dayton Date: 12/4/2017 Site Address: Topside Addition PID: 0911723210001 Comments: Proposed Lot 2 Site A instructions: Q =enter data �.J =adjust if desired ( ( ■ computer calculated - DO NOT CHANGE! 1) 5 bedroom Type i Residential System 3) 750 GPD design flow 3) Yes Garbage disposal or pumped to septic 50%larger tank with multiple comp/tanks 4) 2250 Gal Septic tank(code minimum) 2250 Gal Septic tank(design size / LUG req'd) Tank options: none s) 1.2 GPD/ft2 mound sand loading rate contour loading rate of 12 req's a min 62.5 ft. long rockbed 5) 10.0 ft rockbed width 63.0 ft rockbed length 7) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 3.0 ft perforation spacing (maximum of 3 for both) end feed manifold connection 8) 3 laterals 61.0 feet long 21.0 perfs/ lateral r 63 perfs total (1/2 a perf means the first perf starts at the middle feed manifold) 9) 7/32 inch perfs at ( 1 feet residual head gives 0.56 gpm flow rate per perforation for this perf size&spacing, ft pipe size on line 12, max perfs/lateral= 30 , line#8 must be less •-> OK io) 4.0 doses per day (4 minimum) ii) 188 gallons per dose (treatment volume) 2.00 5x 12) 2.00 inch diameter laterals must be used to meet"4x pipe volume"requirement 2.00 3x 13) feet of 2.0 inch supply line leads to #####gallons of drainback volume (Tip: "top feed"manifold to control the drainback) 14) ######gallons TOTAL pump out volume(treatment+drainback) IS) feet vertical lift from pump to mound laterals, leads to a: 16) 36 GPM @ ##### feet of head, Pump requirement (note: >SDgpm may require an extra 3-6'of head) 17) 750 gal Dose tank(code minimum) 1300 gal Dose tank(design size / LUG recd) at 25.49 gpi leads to a is) [###### inch swing on Demand float, or timed dosing of #####min ON (confirm pump rate with drawdown (this delivers Average flow, =70%of Peak design flow) #####hrs OFF test and adjust as necessary) 19) 12 inches from bottom of tank to"Pump OFF"float 20) ######inches from bottom of tank to"Pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"Timer ON"float if time dosed 21) A#####inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level"float,or ##### inches to"Hi Level"float if time dosed 22) rar#####Igaltons reserve capacity (after High Level Alarm is activated) • 23) 0.60 gpd/ft2 Absorption area Soil Loading Rate, which gives a mound ratio of I (minimum) (this must match the soil boring tog) desired mound ratio 2.0 24) 10 percent site slope (0.20%range) 10 (%downslope site slope, if different than upslope) 25) 24 inches, or 2.0 ft. to Redox or other limiting condition (need at least 12"to be a Type I) Treatment zone contains 0 finches of 0%soil credit, and 0 inches of 50%soil credit. Giving a: 26) 12 inch,or 1.0 ft. Sand Lift Mound CRITICAL FOR FUTURE CERTIFICATIONS!!! 27) 20.0 ft.Total ABSORPTION width (with sand beyond rockbed as follows:) 28) 0.0 ft.upslope and sideslope 10.0 ft. Downslope Individual slope ratios give BERM widths(topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 29) 4:1 upslope ratio 9 ft. upslope berm 30) 4:1 sideslope 16 ft. sideslope berms 31) 4:1 downslope 27 ft. downslope berm 32) Overall Dimensions: 10.0 ft.wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 46 ft. wide by 95 ft. tong Mound footprint 4" inspection pipe 18"cover on top J<Upslope berm 1 9 I) Downslope berm 27 LIM 12" cover on sides • (6"loamy cap&6"topsoil) 1,0 Clean sand lift 2.0Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition ---------__ _ { Absorption Width~x20.0 ( � — ----- _,.__ Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed 33) Rock Bed: 10.0 Ift.by 63.0 ft. by I' 6 inches under pipe, plus 20%gives 21 yd'or'1.4= 29 ton 34) Mound Sand: (note:volume is based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbed, Exchange sand for loamy cap if desired) 18.4 up + 96.7 downslope + 13.3 ends+ 35.0 under rock a 196 lyd3 or 1.4- 275 ton plus 20% 35) Loamy Cap: 1 42 ft. by I 91 Ift. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 85 yd'or"1.4- ( 119 ton 36) Topsoil: 46 ft. by f 95 ft. 6'deep, plus 20%gives 98 yd3 or'1.4- 137 ton I hereby cel, that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. Rusty Olson's Soil Er Perc 810 12/4/2017 41"ner Siature f '3n Company License!! Date 2011 purple code Mound Design www Sepiieftesource.com (vers 15.2) Property Owner: Judson Dayton Date: 12/4/2017 Site Address: Topside Addition PID: 0911723210001 Comments: Proposed Lot 2 Site B instructions: I I =enter data =adjust if desired I = computer calculated-DO NOT CHANGE! )) _ 5 bedroom Type I Residential System 2) 750 GPD design flow 3) Yes Garbage disposal or pumped to septic 50%larger tank with multiple comp/tanks 4) 2250 Gal Septic tank(code minimum) 2250 Gal Septic tank(design size/ LUG req'd) Tank options: none 5) 1.2 GPD/ft2 mound sand loading rate contour loading rate of 12 req's a min [ 62.5 ft. long rockbed 6) 10.0 ft rockbed width I 63.0 ft rockbed length 7) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 3.0 ft perforation spacing (maximum of 3 for both) end feed manifold connection B) 3 laterals 61.0 feet long 21.0 perfs / lateral 63 perfs total (1/2 a pert means the first pert starts at the middle feed manifold) 9) 7/32 inch perfs at 1 feet residual head gives 0.56 gpm flow rate per perforation for this pert size&spacing, &pipe size on line 12, max perfs/lateral= 30 , line#8 must be less--> OK 10) 4.0 doses per day (4 minimum) I)) 188 gallons per dose (treatment volume) 2.00 5x 12) r 2.00 inch diameter laterals must be used to meet"4x pipe volume"requirement 2.00 3x 13) feet of 2.0 inch supply line leads to #####gallons of drainback volume (Tip: "top feed"manifold to control the drainback) 14) ######gallons TOTAL pump out volume(treatment+drainback) 1 s) feet vertical lift from pump to mound laterals, leads to a: 16) 36 GPM @ ##### feet of head, Pump requirement (note: >50gpm may require an extra 3-6'of head) 17) 750 gal Dose tank(code minimum) 1300 .gal Dose tank(design size/ LUG req'd) at 25.49 gpi leads to a 18) /#####inch swing on Demand float, or timed dosing of #####min ON (confirm pump rate with drawdown (this delivers Average flow, -70%of Peak design flow) #####hrs OFF test and adjust as necessary) 19) 12 inches from bottom of tank to"Pump OFF"float 20) ######inches from bottom of tank to"Pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"Timer ON"float if time dosed 21) ######inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level"float, or ##### inches to"Hi Level"float if time dosed 22) #A####gallons reserve capacity (after High Level Alarm is activated) • 223) 0.60 gpd/ft2 Absorption area Soil Loading Rate, which gives a mound ratio of 2 (minimum) , (this must match the soil boring log) desired mound ratio 2.0 24) 4 percent site slope (0-20%range) 10 (%downslope site slope, if different than upslope) 25) 16 inches, or 1.3 ft. to Redox or other limiting condition (need at least 12"to be a Type I) Treatment zone contains[ 0 inches of 0%soil credit, and 0 inches of 50%soil credit. Giving a: 26) 20 inch, or 1.7 ft. Sand Lift Mound CRITICAL FOR FUTURE CERTIFICATIONS!!! 27) 20.0 ft.Total ABSORPTION width (with sand beyond rockbed as follows: 28) 0.0 ft. upslope and sideslope 10.0 ft. Downslope individual slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 29) 4:1 upslope ratio 13 ft. upslope berm 30) 3:1 sideslope 12 ft. sideslope berms 3)) 3:1 idownstope 17 ft. downslope berm 32) Overall Dimensions: 10.0 ft. wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 40 ft.wide by 87 ft. long Mound footprint 4" inspection pipe 18"cover on top k Upsiope berm 13 ;* Downslope berm 17 =mins ifiifiii P 12" cover on sides • (6"loamy cap&6"topsoil) 1.7 Clean sand Lift 1.3 Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition --------- — _ t Absorption Width~f 20.0 j'__` _ Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the 5w/equally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption MN9'dth is measured downhill from the upstope edge of the Bed. 33) Rock Bed: 10.0 ft. by 63.0 ft.by 6 inches under pipe, plus 20%gives 21 yd'or'1.4= 29 ton 34) Mound Sand: (note:volume is based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbed, Exchange sand for loamy cap if desired) 35.9 up + 60.5 downslope + 10.4 ends+ 43.6 under rock 1180 yd'or'1.4- 253 ton plus 20% 35) Loamy Cap: r 36 ft. by 83 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 67 yd'or"1.4- 94 ton 36t Topsoil: [ 40 ft. by r 87 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives l 78 yd'or'1.4.= 109 ton I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. Rusty Olson"s Soil Et Pert 810 12/4/2017 gner Signature Company License/ Date ' i Installer Summary 12250 'gallon Septic tank(minimum) Tank options: none iva,tdtgei Ldr1K WWI mu►upte Lump,lanK! 11300 'gallon Dose tank (minimum) at 25.49 gpi 36 GPM @ ##### ft. of head, Pump required ######inch swing on Demand float which translates to roughly ##### inches of float tether length if time dosing is required--> ##### minutes ON time& ##### hours OFF time ######inches from bottom of tank to"pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"timer ON"float ######inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level Alarm"or ##### inches to"Hi level alarm"if time dosed l Ift. of , 2.0 inch supply line withlend feed 'manifold connection (Tip:"top feed"manifold to control drainback) 20 inch, or 1.7 ft. Sand Lift Mound 10.0 ft.wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 3 laterals 2.00 Inch diameter 61.0 ft. long 3.0 ft. lateral spacing 7/32 inch perfs 3.0 ft. perforation spacing No Effluent fitter&alarm 3 clean out&valve box assemblies 20.0 ft.Total sand ABSORPTION width (minimum) 0.0 ft. upslope and sidestope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum) 10.0 ft. Downslope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum) Specific slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 4:1 upstope ratio 13 ft. upstope berm 3:1 sidestope 12 ft. sidestope berms 3:1 downslope 17 ft. downslope berm 4"inspection pipe 18"cover on top L7cieanEt slope berm 13 Downslope berm 17 _ _ C_ond_,1 1.3 Depth to Limiting LimitingCondition �"'------- --_,— Absorption Width 120.0" -- -- -- _----- __ ( Note: For 0 to 1%slopes, Absorption NHdth is measured from the Der/equally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption N7dth is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed Rock Bed: 21.0 yd3 or•1.4• 29 ton 6 inches under pipe Mound Sand: 180 yd3 or•1.4= 253 ton calculation based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbe Loamy Cap: 67 yd3 or 1.4w .. 94 ton 6"deep Topsoil: 78 yd3 or"1.4= 109 ton 6"deep INSPECTOR CHECKLIST - mound Iopside Addition WELL setbacks: • 20'to pressure tested sewer line (5 psi for 15 min) 50'to everything 100'to dispersal area with shallow well PROPERTY LINES setback: 10'to everything Road setback: platted: 10'prop tine. Metes Es bounds: out of road easement, or outer ditch. LAKE/BLUFF setback: 20'for bluff. Lakes: GD RD_, NE Protected wetland .__. Building setbacks: 10'for everything, 20'for dispersal area. WATER LINE under pressure sr 10'to bed,tank Et sewer line. (else sewer line> 12"below) ElSewer line&baffle connection (no 90's, 3'between 45's, slope min 1"in 8', max 2"in 8') (no depth req's, clean out every 100', Sch 40 pipe) Septic tank and risers (water tight, insulated, proper depth,existing verified by pumping) mfq 2250 gallons none Riser over outlet, riser over inlet or center,and 6"+inspection pipe over any remaining baffles. _ No effluent filter ti alarm Dose tank risers and piping (water tight, insulated,proper depth, drainback) mfg 1300 gallons dose pump 36 gpm ######head VERIFY PUMP CURVE #####min ON ###### hr OFF float setting drop ##### inches at 25.5 gpi "DESIGNED" ##### inches approx float tether length ##### gal dose divided by gpi "INSTALLED". inches float drop(field corrected LABEL pump requirements and drawdown on riser or panel Cam lock reachable from grade- 30"max. J-hook weep hole. Supply line access (no hard 90's) 2.0 Inch supply pipe:Sch40, sloped 1/8"+, supported by 4"sch40 sleeve or compacted, and buried 6"+. splice box/control panel/ electrical connections flaw measurement: CT, ETM, time dosed, home water meter mound absorption area rough up mound rock dimensions 10.0 X 63.0 Sand lift depth 20 inches. (Jar test:2"sand leaves < 1/8"silt after 30 min) El Absorption Sand beyond rock 0.0 upslope 10.0 downslope Germed topsoil beyond rockbed 13 upslope 12 sideslope 17 downslope cover depth of 12-18"+ VERIFY 3 laterals (1-2'from edge of rock) — 2.00 inch pipe size (Sch40 pipe f&fittings) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 7/32 inch perforations 3.0 ft perforation spacing Air inlet at end of laterals, and at top feed manifold if necessary. VERIFY clean outs (no hard 90's) 4"inspection pipe to bottom of rock, anchored VERIFY Abandon existing system-if necessary Re-use existing tank certification monitoring plan and type well abandonment form -if necessary iI ...N.A. ...v.,..s.v 4 System Elevations \ t.....1,,,.-z.--A,,:,.,.A Iftaiflat.AdilitiVi..4.Ve M.benchmark x i ! - -- - SHWT �f�Mouncf r (Grade elevations are existing. If a loamy cap different final grade is desired it should lateralbe shown and described here.) bottom rock grade (at upslope rock bed) SHWT (at upstope rock bed) ll ! Ah} VaAtut tt. tuld0NN4041,LFIAMI- _. .=uAJ V Y —7 ..."'El ''.--/. i \ / 1 I' / I / / r r Sewer pipe exiting house septic Tank Septic Tank (itapphicable) Pump Tank Grade Grade Grade Grade Pipe inlet inlet inlet Tank bottom Tank bottom Tank bottom Soil Observation Log %,%,%k SepticResource.com verb 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner/project: Judson Dayton Date 11/23/2017 Property Address/PID: Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Survey Information p refer to attached soil survey Parent matt's: 0 Till D Outwash 0 Lacustrine 0 Alluvium ❑Organic 0 Bedrock landscape position: ❑Summit 0 Shoulder Q Side slope 0 Toe slope soil survey map units: L3713 slope 1(1 % direction-Linear Soil Log#1 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 947.1 Depth to SIIWT 26 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 10yr3/1 Loose Moderate Btocky 8-16 Loam <35 I0yr4/3 Friable Strong Block) 16-26 Clay Loam <35 I0yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 26-30 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y418,1-6(10y Firm Strong Blocky Comments: • Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Log#2 ❑' Bor1rtg 0 lit Elevation 946.9 Depth to SHWT 24 Inches Depth (in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil <35 10yr3I1 Loose Moderate Blocky 8-14 Loam <35 IOyr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 14-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 24-30 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y4/8,1-6!10y Firm Strong Block} Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Log#3 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 951.4 Depth to SHWT 18 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-4 Topsoil <35 10yr3/l Loose Moderate Blocky 4-10 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 10-18 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Block) I8-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 lOy4%8,1-6?IOy Firm Strong Blocky 1 hereby cert'th' vork was completed in accordance with MV 7080 and any local reqs. ``___...... Rusty Olson's Soil & Perc. 810 signer Signature Company License# Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Log#4 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 951.4 Depth to SHWT 16 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment°10 matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-4 Topsoil <35 I0yr3/I Loose Moderate Blocky 4-10 Loam <35 10yr413 Friable Strong Blocky 10-16 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 16-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 I0y4r8,1-6/10y Firm Strong Blocky <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Log#5 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 944.5 Depth to SHWT 20 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-12 Topsoil <35 I0yr3/l Loose Moderate Blocky 12-20 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong Block) 20-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 I0y4/8,1-6'I Oy Friable Strong Blocky <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular block) >S0 firm moderate prismatic plan rigid strong massive <35 IOOSe loose single gram 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate pnsmatic platy rigid strong massive 1 hereby cerci •s work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local reel's. Rusty Olson's Soil& Perc. 810 signer Signature Company License # i Soil Observation Log NNN.ScpticResourcc.com tiers 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner I project: Judson Dayton Date 11/23/2017 Property Address t PID: Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Survey Information 0 refer to attached soil survey Parent mat's: 0 7111 ❑Outwash D tacustrine [Alluvium ❑Organic ❑Bedrock landscape position: 0 Summit 0 Shoulder 0 Side slope ❑Toe slope soil survey map units: L378 slope 10 % direction- Linear Soil Log#6 ❑Boring 0 Pit Elevation 951.4 Depth to SH WT 26 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-4 Topsoil <35 10yr3/1 Loose Moderate Mucky 4-10 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 10-18 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 18-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y41,I-6//I0y Finn Strong Blocky Comments: • Proposed lot 2 Topside Development Soil Log#7 0 Bing G Pit Elevation 950.0 Depth to SHWT 24 Inches " Depth(in) Texture fragment"/o matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-4 Topsoil <35 10yr3JI Loose Moderate Blocky 4-10 Loam <35 I0yr43 Friable Strong Block) 10-16 Clay Loam <35 IOyrS 4 Friable Strong Block> 16-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5f 4 I 0y41,I-6?I Oy Firm Strong Block) Proposed lot 2 Topside Development y 0 Boring ElPit Elevation Depth to SHWT Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment"'o matrix color redox color consistence grade shape I hereby certify • work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local rey's. Rusty Olson's Soil & Pere. 810 signer Signature Company License r Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 2 Hole number: 1 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12" inches, Diameter of hole 6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-8 Topsoil 10yr3/1 8-12 Loam 10yr4/3 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:05 9:20 6" 3.2 4.7 9:27 9:42 6" 3.1 4.8 9:51 10:06 6" 3.1 4.8 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.8 MPI • Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 2 Hole number. 2 Date hole was prepared: 11/23117 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole 6' inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture Q-8 Topsoil 10yr3/1 8-12 Loam 10yr4/3 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:06 9:21 6" 3.3 4.6 9:26 9:41 6" 3.2 4.8 9:52 10:07 6" 3.2 4.8 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.7 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 2 Hole number: 3 Date hole was prepared: 11123117 Depth of hole bottom_12'_inches, Diameter of hole 6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-4 Topsoil 10yr311 4-10 Loam 10yr413 10-12 Clay loam 10yr5/4 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23117 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 9:07 9:22 6" 3.7 4.0 9:25 9:40 6" 3.6 4.2 9:53 10:08 6" 3.5 4,3 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.2 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by. Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 8:51 A.M.On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 2 Hole number: 4 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12" inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-4 Topsoil 10yr3I1 4-10 Loam 10yr4/3 10-12 Clay loam 10yr5/4 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 1 9:08 9:23 6" 3.4 4.4 9:24 9:39 6" 3.3 4.6 9:54 10:09 6" 3.3 4.8 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.5 MPI • PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit Fb Joseph Olson D.B.A. Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing Joseph J. Olson—MPCA License #810 11481 Riverview Rd. NE, Hanover, MN 55341 (763) 498-8779 fax (763) 498-8290 December 8,2017 Topside Proposed lot 3 Orono,Hennepin County This future on-site Sewage Treatment System is designed for a Type 1,five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. The existing four-bedroom system is compliant.See enclosed compliance form. The periodically saturated soils were located at 14-22 Inches(mottled soil). Due to the periodically saturated soils,a pressurized mound system will need to be installed to treat the septic effluent,The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3'above the saturated soils. Absorption areas do not overlap and are greater than 20 feet from the property line. The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 4 MPI. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area.The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure.A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device;this is in case of a pump failure. Use 7/32-inch ocrforations on the laterals. Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment areas before and after construction.The treatment area must be fenced off before construction begins.This Design is not valid&the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for the On-Site Sewage Treatment systems occurs. Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,act.)human water&toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks.Garbage disposals are not recommended.Additives must not be used;they may cause harmful damage to your septic system.It is recommended that you pump the septic tank s every two years. Since , Joseph J.Olson • • • •..: • • Vat 5" -44-‘-j-----12_4_.6 • g3°33' GO" E N ��Va ° V 4 .-12-4 . --- 5 : .. \ be_.:1•4*„..... --——___:- cia:bi 1.3.„-kiscian. .� ��-��\ —' W124+-- /~ \ryil O / :%; (it- # totZr / \ ,--- ------- ( \i , pox M 7.... _r1 � tN---- 4&-----—----A-— \ 1 •'• / `,kN -- SB y3 \ \ 945 _.� p� , \ /t• „ ,.// / /1 ( / : �)'� ;v1�� 11 ... , � I 1 1`0 1 1 / ( l I ,� \ / 1 /� ' / / t15_31 V\ fr \ , SB 4 3 \ / '/ \6\3\ \ \ X '1 CX1�10, \ / ! E \ . \ / '�aYSTaM ,--.--- // / \ \ ,� / / I / \ \ \ �� / / 1 /: / I / �- . / I ^~� z- WETLAND I BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY �` / 'sem / / / / / -- �..-�- 2011 purple code Mound Design www SepticResource corn (vers 15 2) Property Owner: Judson Dayton Date: 12/4/2017 Site Address: Topside Addition PID: 0911723210001 Comments: Proposed Lot 3 Future Site instructions: =enter data =adjust if desired = computer calculated- DO NOT CHANGE! i) 5 bedroom Type I Residential System 2) 750 GPD design flow 3) Yes Garbage disposal or pumped to septic 50%larger tank with multiple comp/tanks 'i) 12250 IGal Septic tank(code minimum) 2250 Gal Septic tank(design size / LUG req'd) Tank options: none 5) 1.2 GPD/ft2 mound sand loading rate contour loading rate of 12 req's a min 62.5 ft. long rockbed 6) 110.0 Ift rockbed width 63.0 ft rockbed length 7) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 3.0 ft perforation spacing (maximum of 3 for both) end feed manifold connection s) I 3 laterals 61.0 feet long 21.0 perfs/ lateral 63 perfs total (1/2 a pert means the first perf starts at the middle feed manifold) 9) 7/32 inch perfs at 1 feet residual head gives 10.56 gpm flow rate per perforation for this perf size 6t spacing, &pipe size on line 12, max perfs/lateral= 30 , line#8 must be less--> OK 10) 4.0 doses per day (4 minimum) i)) 188 gallons per dose (treatment volume) 2.00 5x 12) 2.00 inch diameter laterals must be used to meet"4x pipe volume"requirement 2.00 3x 13) feet of 2.0 inch supply line leads to #####gallons of drainback volume (Tip: "top feed"manifold to control the drainback) 14) I######Igalions TOTAL pump out volume(treatment+drainback) 15) feet vertical lift from pump to mound Laterals, leads to a: 16) 36 GPM @ ##### feet of head, Pump requirement (note: >50gpm may require an extra 3-6'of head) 17) 750 gal Dose tank (code minimum) 1300 gal Dose tank(design size / LUG req'd) at 25.49 gpi leads to a is) ######inch swing on Demand float, or timed dosing of ##### min ON (confirm pump rate with drawdown (this delivers Average flow, -70%of Peak design flow) ##### hrs OFF test and adjust as necessary) 19) 12 inches from bottom of tank to"Pump OFF"float 30) ###### inches from bottom of tank to"Pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"Timer ON"float if time dosed 21) ###### inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level"float,or ##### inches to"Hi Levet"float if time dosed 32) ######gallons reserve capacity (after High Level Alarm is activated) 23) 0.60 gpd/ft2 Absorption area Soil Loading Rate, which gives a mound ratio of 2 (minimum) (this must match the soil boring log) desired mound ratio 2.0 24) 4 percent site slope (0-20%range) 4 (%downslope site slope, if different than upslope) 25) 20 inches, or 1.7 ft. to Redox or other limiting condition (need at least 12"to be a Type i) Treatment zone contains 0 inches of 0%soil credit, and 0 inches of 50%soil credit. Giving a: 26) 18 inch, or 1.5 _ft. Sand Lift Mound CRITICAL FOR FUTURE CERTIFICATIONS!!! 27) 20.0 ft.Total ABSORPTION width (with sand beyond rockbed as follows:) 78) 0.0 ft. upslope and sideslope 10.0 ft. Downslope Individual slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 29) 4:1 upslope ratio 12 ft. upslope berm 30) 4:1 sidestope 16 ft. sideslope berms 31) 4:1 downslope 19 ft. downslope berm 32) Overall Dimensions: 10.0 ft. wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 41 ft. wide by 95 ft. long Mound footprint 4"inspection pipe 18"cover on top Upslope berm 12 Downslope berm 19 ) gy Mill 12" cover on sides • (6"loamy cap&6"topso6) 1.5 Clean sand lift _ _ __ I 1.7 Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition `________ _ Absorption Width 120.0 I------_ ---------_ Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequatly in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. 33) Rock Bed: 10.0 ft.by 63.0 ft. by 6 inches under pipe, plus 20%gives 21 yd'or"1.4= 29 ton 34) Mound Sand: (note: volume is based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbed, Exchange sand for loamy cap if desired) 1 34.7 Iup + 64.5 downslope + 12.5 ends+ 139.7 under rock 182 ye or"1.4= 254 ton 'plus 20% 35) Loamy Cap: l 37 ft.by 91 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives I 75 Iyd'or•1.4= 105 ton 36) Topsoil: 1 41 Ift. by 95 ft. 6"deep, plus 20%gives 87 yd'or"1.4= 122 ton I hereby ce fy that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. Rusty Olson"s Soil Et Perc 810 12/4/2017 signer Signature Company License# Date Installer Summary 2250 gallon Septic tank (minimum) Tank options: none Sub target lauK wan maple Lump,tanKs 1300 gallon Dose tank (minimum) at 25.49 gpi 36 GPM(# ##### ft. of head, Pump required ######inch swing on Demand float which translates to roughly ##### inches of float tether length if time dosing is required--> ##### minutes ON time& #####hours OFF time ######inches from bottom of tank to"pump ON"float,or 12 inches to"timer ON"float ######inches from bottom of tank to"Hi Level Alarm"or ##### inches to"Hi level alarm"if time dosed ft. of 2.0 inch supply line withlend feed manifold connection (Tip: "top feed"manifold to control drainback) 18 Inch,or 1.5 ft. Sand Lift Mound 10.0 ft.wide by 63.0 ft. long Rock bed 3 laterals 2.00 inch diameter 61.0 ft. long 3.0 ft. lateral spacing 7/32 inch perfs 3.0 ft. perforation spacing No _Effluent filter 8 alarm 3 clean out&valve box assemblies 20.0 ft.Total sand ABSORPTION width (minimum) 0.0 ft. upslope and sideslope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum) 10.0 ft. Downslope (sand beyond rockbed, minimum) Specific slope ratios give BERM widths (topsoil beyond rockbed)of: 4:1 upslope ratio 12 ft. upslope berm 4:1 sideslope 16 ft. sidestope berms 4:1 downslope 19 ft. downslope berm 4'inspection pipe _ 18"rover on top Upslope berm 12 Downsloag berm 19 MP gr 12" cover on sides (6"berry cap&6"topsoil) „mid 1.5 Clean sand lift — _1 1.7 I Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition `.-----------___ Absorption Width r z0.o r—"-——~---_ — — Note: For 0 to 1%slopes,Absorption Width is measured from the Bee/equally in both directions. For slopes>1%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed Rock Bed: 21.0 yd3 or'1.4= 29 ton 6 inches under pipe Mound Sand: 182 yd3 or'1.4= 254 ton calculation based on 3:1/4:1 slope from top of rockbe Loamy Cap: 75 yd3 or"1.4= 105 ton 6"deep Topsoil: _ 87 yd3 or"1.4= 122 ton 6"deep INSPECTOR CHECKLIST - mound I opside Addition ElWELL setbacks: 20'to pressure tested sewer line (5 psi for 15 min) _ 50'to everything 100'to dispersal area with shallow well PROPERTY LINES setback: 10'to everything — Road setback: platted: 10'prop line. Metes Et bounds: out of road easement, or outer ditch. LAKE I BLUFF setback: 20'for bluff. Lakes: GD RI) NE . Protected Protected wetland Building setbacks: 10'for everything, 20'for dispersal area. — WATER LINE under pressure se 10'to bed,tank Et sewer line. (else sewer line > 12"below) ijSewer line Et baffle connection (no 90's, 3'between 45's, slope min 1"in 8, max 2"in 8') (no depth req's, clean out every 100', Sch 40 pipe) ElSeptic tank and risers (water tight, insulated, proper depth,existing verified by pumping) mfq 2250 gallons none Riser over outlet, riser over inlet or center, and 6"+inspection pipe over any remaining baffles. _ No effluent filter Et alarm Dose tank risers and piping (water tight, insulated, proper depth,drainback) mfg 1300 gallons dose pump 36 gpm ######head VERIFY PUMP CURVE ##### min ON ###### hr OFF El float setting drop ##### inches at 25.5 gpi "DESIGNED" ##### inches approx float tether length ##### gal dose divided by gpi "INSTALLED". Inches float drop(field corrected LABEL pump requirements and drawdown on riser or panel Cam lock reachable from grade• 30"max. J-hook weep hole. Supply line access (no hard 90's) 2.0 inch supply pipe:Sch40, sloped 1/8"+, supported by 4"sch40 sleeve or compacted, and buried 6"+. — splice box/control panel/electrical connections flow measurement: CT, ETM, time dosed,home water meter mound absorption area rough up — — mound rock dimensions 10.0 X 63.0 Sand lift depth 18 inches. (Jar test: 2"sand leaves< 1/8"silt after 30 min) IDAbsorption Sand beyond rock 0.0 upslope 10.0 downslope El Bermed topsoil beyond rockbed 12 upslope 16 sideslope 19 downslope Hcover depth of 12.18"+ VERIFY 3 laterals (1-2'from edge of rock) 2.00 inch pipe size (Sch40 pipe Et fittings) 3.0 ft lateral spacing 7/32 inch perforations 3.0 ft perforation spacing Air inlet at end of laterals, and at top feed manifold if necessary. VERIFY clean outs (no hard 90's) r— 4'inspection pipe to bottom of rock,anchored VERIFY Abandon existing system -if necessary Re-use existing tank certification monitoring plan and type — well abandonment form -if necessary 1 1 ,.t�AA+N+w,+lywaNA` System Elevations �E1 ii -�` benchmark 'w 1 t - - - - SHWT r Mound 1r {Grade elevations are existing. If a loamy cap different final grade is desired ftshould lateral be shown and described here.) bottom rock grade (at upslope cock bed) `` SHWT (at upsiope tock bed) '� ..,1 .._ 11. .....�_. 1_..._ �..... . _._. 11:7n 1 It `'- �-- r • Sewer pipe exiting house Septic Tank Septic Tank lir applicable) Pump Tank Grade Grade Grade Grade Pipe inlet inlet inlet Tank bottom Tank bottom Tank bottom Minn=:: ,utionllCompliance Inspection Form Contt 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 (SSTS) Doc Type Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) For local tracking purposes: requirements and attached forms–additional local requirements may also apply. Submit completed form to Local Unit of Government(LUG)and system owner within 15 days System Status System status on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 11/2612017 CI Compliant—Certificate of Compliance ❑ Noncompliant—Notice of Noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date, unless shorter time (See Upgrade Requirements on page 3) frame outlined in Local Ordinance.) Reason(s)for noncompliance(check all applicable) ❑Impact on Public Health(Compliance Component #1)–Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)–Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑Tank Integrity(Compliance Component #2)–Failing to protect groundwater ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)–Failing to protect groundwater ❑Soil Separation(Compliance Component #4)–Failing to protect groundwater ❑Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance Component #5)–Noncompliant Property Information Parcel 1D#or Sec/Twp/Range: 0911723210001 _ Property address: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S.,Orono,MN _ Reason for inspection: Property Transfer Property owner: Judson Dayton Owner's phone: – — ..._ or Owner's representative: George Stickney Representative phone: 952-250-1075 Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Regulatory authority phone: 952-249-4600 2-1500 gallon septic tanks.1-1500 gallon lift station and 550 square feet of mound rockbed.per city Brief system descriptbn: records Comments or recommendations: Certification 1 hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system,inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. Inspector name: Joseph J Olson Certification number: 1255 _ Business name: Rusty 0 s Soil&Perc.Testing License number 810 ^ Inspector signature: Phone number: 763-498-8779 Necessary ocally Required Attachments ® Soil boring logs ®System/As-built drawing 0 Forms per local ordinance 0 Other information(fist): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4.31 • 1/24/12 Page 1 of 3 Property address: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S.,Orono,MN Inspector initials/Date: J.O. 11/26/17 1. Impact on Public Health—Compliance component#1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System discharge sewage to the 0 Yes ®No ® Searched for surface outlet end surface. ® Searched for seeping in yard/backup in home System discharge sewage to drain tile 0 Yes ®No 0 Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes or surface waters. 0 Homeowner testimony(See Comments/Explanation) System cause sewagebackupinto -f 0 'Black soil"above soil dispersal system Y0 Yes ®No dwelling or establishment. ❑ System requires"emergency"pumping 0 Performed dye test Any"yes"answer above Indicates the system is ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) an Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. 0 Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: 2. Tank Integrity-Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes ®No 0 Probed tank(s)bottom cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit. 0 Examined construction records Seepage pits meeting 7080!2550 may be ' 0 Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach) cwnDliant it shower in/oeai ordinance 0 Observed liquid level below operating depth Sewage tank(s)leak below their 0 Yes ®No 0 Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) designed operating depth. It yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks 0 Probed outside lank(s)for"black soil" 0 Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) Any "yes"answer above indicates the ®Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) system is Failing to Protect Groundwater. Comments/Explanation: Peterson Company pumped the tanks. 3. Other Compliance Conditions—Compliance component#3 of 5 a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged,cracked,unsecured,or appear to structurally unsound. 0 yes' ®No 0 Unknown b. Other Issues(electrical hazards.etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety 0 Yes' (D No ❑ Unknown *System is an imminent threat to public health and safety Explain: c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector 0 Yes* ®No 'System is falling to protect groundwater Explain: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296-6300 • 800-657.3864 • TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-rhvists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 2 of 3 • Property address: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S.,Orono, MN inspector initials/Date: J. O, 11/26/17 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 Date of installation: 10/12/95 ❑Unknown Verification method(s): Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food Beverage ®Yes 0 No Soil observation does not expire.Previous soil Lodging? observations by two independent parties are sufficient, Compliance criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local For systems built prior to April 1, 1996,and 0 Yes ❑No requirements differ not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ® Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring togs) Protection Area or not serving a food, 0 Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no drainheld) Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanaton) separation distance from periodically saturated soll or bedrock. 1 ❑ Other(See Comments/Explanation) Non-performance systems built April 1, ®Yes 0 No Comments/Explanation: 1996,or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock' "Experimental", 'Other",or "Performance" ❑Yes 0 No Indicate depths of elevations systems built under pre-2008 Rules;Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media 100.0 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector 1 License required) I B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 98.4____ Drainfield meets the designed vertical j C System separation 2.6 separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. Required compliance separation* 2.6 Any "no"answer above indicates the system is May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*-Compliance component#5 of 5 ®Not applicable Is the system operated under en Operating Permit? 0 Yes 0 No If"yes",A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? 0 Yes 0 No If"yes",B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design If the answer to both questions Is "no",this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit number: Have the Operating Permit requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑Yes 0 No Any"no"answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requirements(Minn,Stat §115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safely(17PHS)must be upgraded,replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance If the system is failing to protect ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance If an existing system is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation then the system need not be upgraded.repaired,replaced, or its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas Wellhead Protection Ames,or those used in connection with food, beverage and lodging establishments as defined in law www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296.6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available In alternative formats wq-wwists4.31 • 1/24/12 Page3of3 Soil Observation Log www.SepticResource.com vets 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner/project: Judson Dayton Date 11/24/2017 Property Address/PID: Proposed lot 3 Topside Development Soil Survey Information 0 refer to attached soil survey Parent mall's: 0 Tin ❑outwash 0 Lacustrine 0 Alluvium ❑Organic 0 Bedrock landscape position: 0 Summit [Q Shoulder 0 Side slope 0 Toe slope soil survey map units: L3713 slope 4 % direction-Convex Soil Log#1 0 Boring 0 Pit Elevation 945.6 Depth to SHWT 20 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-14 Topsoil <35 10yr3/1 Loose Moderate Blocky 14-20 Loam <35 I0yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 20-30 Clay Loam <35 I0yr5/3 10y4/8,1-6/10y Firm Strong Block) Comments: Proposed lot 3 Topside Development Soil Log#2 0 Boring 0 pt Elevation 945.4 Depth to SHWT 18 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-12 Topsoil <35 10yr3/I Loose Moderate Blocky 12-18 Loam <35 10yr4!!3 Friable Strong Blocky 18-24 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y4I8,1-6.`l 0y Firm Strong Blocky Proposed lot 3 Topside Development Soil Log#3 0 Boring ❑Pit Elevation 950.5 Depth to SHWT 66 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-48 Fill <35 10yr31I Loose Moderate Blocky 48-60 Topsoil <35 I0yr413 Friable Strong Blocky 60-66 Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Blocky 66-72 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 10y4/8.1-610y Firm Strong Blocky I hereby certify this work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local req's. Rusty Olson's Soil & Perc. 810 igner Signature Company License # Proposed lot 3 Topside Development Soil Log#4 0 Boring ❑ Pit Elevation 947.5 Depth to SHWT 23 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment°/o matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0.9 Fill <35 10yr3'I Loose Moderate Blocky 9-16 Topsoil <35 I0yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 16-23 Loam <35 10yr5l4 Friable Strong Blocky 23-30 Sandy Clay Loam <35 10yr5!4 10y4;11,1-6110y Finn Strong Blocky <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granular blocky >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive Proposed lot 3 Topside Development Soil Log#5 0 ming 0 Pit Elevation 945.7 Depth to SFIWT 22 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-16 Topsoil <35 10yr3!1 Loose Moderate Blocky 16-22 Loam <35 10yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 22-28 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/3 10y4!8,t-6r10y Firm Strong Blocky I hereby certify this work was completed in accordance with,%IN 7080 and any local req's Rusty Olson's Soil &Perc. 810 esigner Signature Company License# Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 2:05 P.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 3 Hole number. 1 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12" inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12 Topsoil 10yr3/1 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automate Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 2:15 2:30 6" 4.0 3.7 2:33 2:48 6" 3.8 3.9 2:49 3:04 6" 3.8 3.9 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 3.8 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 2:05 P.M. On 11/24/17 Location: Lot 3 Hole number: 2 Date hole was prepared: 11/23/17 Depth of hole bottom_12 inches, Diameter of hole 6" inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12 Topsoil 10yr3/1 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 11/23/17 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 2:16 2:31 6" 3.8 3.9 2:32 2:47 6" 3.7 4.0 2:50 3:05 6" 3.7 4.0 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.0 MPI PC #LA18-000022 From: Roaer Peitso Exhibit G To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road S#18-3996 Date: Friday,January 05,2018 10:12:16 AM Melanie, As far as the septic systems they seem viable and measures need to be taken to protect the septic sites as required in our City ordinance before any large equipment or vehicles drive on the property. City of Orono Roger Peitso Building Official Phone:952-249-4600 Direct: 952-249-4625 Email: rpeitso( ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 KFSNo?-'` PC #LA18-000022 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Exhibit H Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.4,.,.,m.r.o. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com December 15, 2017 RE: Project Name: Old Crystal Bay Conservation Plan Comm. No.: 2017-344 Project Location: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South Orono—Hennepin County PID 0911723210001 T117N, R23W,Section 9 Project Description: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South Conservation Plan Executive Summary& Development Steps The purpose and intent of this conservation design is to meet the goals of the City of Orono's Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management as specified in the Community Management Plan (CMP). In general, these goals pertain to water quality, wetland protection, and the preservation and enhancement of the"rural character"of the City. Emphasis is also placed on the preservation of woodlands, wetlands, and wildlife habitat. The City of Orono's Zoning Code also describes the intent of the conservation design as to reinforce and establish ecological connections throughout the City and preserve and improve the aesthetic views of Orono. Subcategories that are listed within the Environmental Protection section of the CMP help to detail more specific individual goals and guidelines which can be related to the overall goals listed above. Pertinent to this project, the subcategories emphasize development densities, which require no less than two acres per one home.This regulation is enforced in order to maintain the historic identity and character of Orono. Low density developments will assist with the preservation of open spaces, and,from a sewer and water systems standpoint, will protect groundwater and surrounding lakes and other surface waters. It is also emphasized that the primary method of sewage treatment and disposal will be performed through municipal sanitary systems. This project proposes to divide an existing 20.75-acre parcel located at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road into two residential lots and an outlot. These will be referred to as Lot 1, Lot 2, and Outlot A for the purposes of this report(see Figure 7C—Proposed Property Map). The lots will be approximately 5.17 acres, 13.40 acres, and 1.64 acres in size, respectively. The property currently consists of a residential home, guest house, and horse barn. These structures will remain as-is, and will be contained within the boundaries of Lot 2. Lot 1 is currently vacant, and a residential home and septic site are proposed for construction.A shared driveway is proposed for construction through Outlot A to provide access to both Lot 1 and Lot 2. Three wetlands exist on the current parcel, and will be contained within the boundaries of Lot 2. Wetland impacts will be completely avoided, and wetland buffer requirements will be implemented. The proposed home for Lot 1 will be situated so that it will minimize impacts to existing trees and maintain the aesthetic quality of the site. Building setbacks of 10 feet are proposed along all lot boundaries minimize tree removal and retain privacy between lots. 1 ' a Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne 3acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com The existing landscape,of Lot 1 is entirely upland, vacant, and wooded. The trees identified within this lot were dominated by oak and maple, with a few hickory(see Figure 8—Tree Survey Map). The existing landscape of Lot 2 consists of three wetlands, grassland areas, and woodland areas, along with a residential home, guest house, and horse barn. The three wetlands were delineated in October 2017 by Jacobson Environmental.A map showing the wetland boundaries can be found on Figure 5. Coon Creek Watershed District's notice of decision for the delineation is anticipated. Basin 1 was dominated by reed canary grass, yellow foxtail, and giant goldenrod, and was located on the northeastern portion of Lot 2. Basin 2 was mostly open water with some wild blue iris along the edges, and was located northeast of the homestead on Lot 2. Basin 3 was dominated by reed canary grass, and was located north of Basin 2 across the main driveway on Lot 2. Because no tree impacts are proposed for Lot 2, a tree survey was not completed for this portion of the parcel. The existing landscape of Outlot A is entirely upland, and contains a gravel driveway.A few significant trees were located within the lot, including oak, spruce, ash, and pine. No rare,threatened, or endangered plants were observed on the parcel when the wetland delineation was completed in October 2017. Rural Oasis Study The project site is adjacent to the Old Crystal rural oasis analysis corridor identified in the Rural Oasis Study(see Figure 14). This project proposes using a shared driveway to access Lot 1 and Lot 2, which will minimize any changes to the appearance of Old Crystal Bay Road.A gravel driveway is pre-existing in the location of the proposed shared driveway, so impacts to the rural character and environmental health of Orono from the parcel split and home construction is extremely negligible. Natural Resource Inventory A. MLCCS Land Cover Classification The City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory identifies the landcover of Lot 1 as forests(30000)and woodland (40000). Lot 2 has areas identified as artificial surfaces and associated areas(10000), planted or cultivated vegetation (20000), forests(30000), and woodland (40000), and herbaceous(60000). A more detailed look at available MLCCS data classified the forest area on Lot 1 as"maple-basswood forest", and the woodland areas on the parcel as"altered/non-native deciduous woodland" (see Figure 11 —Land Cover Classification Map). The forest areas of the site are identified as"moderate quality", and the north and central portions of the site are identified as"altered non-native plant community—no native species present" (see Figure 10—Land Cover Quality Map). B. Tree Community Identification A tree survey was completed within the proposed Lot 1 and Outlot A(see Figure 8). According to the City of Orono's significant tree(8"-29" DBH)and specimen tree(z30" DBH) definitions, 117 significant trees and 36 specimen trees were identified within Lot 1 and Outlot A. These lots were dominated by oak and maple, respectively. 2 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Species Quantity Size(DBH) #Specimen Ash 5 12"-26" - Boxelder 1 14 - Elm 11 10"-36" 6 Hickory 4 10"-14" - Maple 51 10"-38" 3 Oak 76 8"-45" 26 Pine 1 25" - Scotch Pine 2 16"-36" 1 Spruce 2 14"-16" - C. Wetland Delineation A wetland delineation was conducted by Jacobson Environmental on October 12, 2017. Three wetlands were delineated within the parcel, all located within the projected Lot 2 boundaries. Basin 1 was identified as a Type 1 PEM1Ad ditched seasonally flooded basin. Basin 2 was identified as a Type 5 PUBH shallow open water basin. Basin 3 was identified as a Type 2 PEM1 Bd ditched fresh wet meadow. The scope of this project will not impact any wetlands. The wetland delineation report was submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in October and LGU approval is anticipated soon. D. Topography The topography of the site can be seen on the Figure 4—Topographic Map, depicting MN Lidar topographic data. Maxwell Bay is located on the southwest border of the site and has the lowest elevation across the site. Basin 2 is also a low spot within the project area, surveyed at approximately 938 feet. The northwestern corner of proposed Lot 1 is low and appears to slope downward offsite into a small wetland. E. Conceptual Greenways&Open Space Corridors The City of Orono—Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment Map shows that the project roughly within a conceptual greenway corridor. The portions of what was considered "maple- basswood forest" appear to be included within the corridor. To ensure minimal impacts are made to this site and ecological corridors are maintained, a 10-foot wide no-build setback is proposed along each side of the proposed lot lines, which will keep a 20-foot wide buffer between lots, at minimum.This is expected to maintain the ecological corridor within the site. Conservation Design A. Topography The topography of the site is highest on the southern portion of the property. The landscape slopes down to the north towards Basins 1, 2, and 3. The southwestern edge of the site is along Maxwell Bay, and the topography quickly grades down to the lake edge. The northwestern edge of proposed Lot 1 slopes down to the northeast offsite, into what appears to be a wetland off of Maxwell Bay. 3 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com B. Drainage Patterns The existing drainage patterns have been primarily maintained. The topography of the site is not anticipated to be drastically altered, therefore, site drainage will typically continue to flow to the three delineated wetlands on the site. C. Invasive Species Invasive species were evaluated in October of 2017, and included reed canary grass. Outlined locations of this species can be found on the Figure 10—Invasive Species Map. Reed canary grass was found within Basins 1 and 3.All invasive species were found within Lot 2,which will not be altered for the project. Because invasive species were typically only found on the unaltered lot, no invasive vegetative management plan is suggested at this time. D. Existing Trees The majority of the trees existing on the subject property appear to be in fair to good health with no major diseases observed. Trees that must be removed for house and driveway construction will be removed and disposed of according to the Orono city code. The trees that are impacted will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio and will abide by all Orono city codes regarding tree replacement. A 20-foot wide buffer will exist between all lots(10 feet on either side of the lot line)to minimize tree removal. E. Significant Tree Stand Criteria A few of the forested areas of the project area meet the criteria for significant tree stands by occupying 500 or more square feet with contiguous crown cover and DBH over 6 inches. The trees identified on the central and southern portion of proposed Lot 1 were typically part of a significant tree stand. The proposed home construction is located within a small portion of this tree stand. The precise placement of the home will be determined as to minimize the need for tree removal and uphold the favorable views between existing homes surrounding the site. No significant tree stands were identified within Outlot A. F. Wetland Impacts The delineated wetlands within the parcel boundaries will not be impacted during construction or development activities, and buffer rules and setbacks will be followed. Buffers and setbacks will assist in maintaining the quality and functionality of the wetlands by providing additional surface water treatment to runoff. G. Ecological Communities Portions of the ecological communities of the site are of medium quality(typically what was identified as the maple-hardwood forest areas). The majority of the northern and central portions of the site have been classified as altered with no native species present. The driveway access proposed for Outlot A does not appear to alter or further degrade the ecological communities onsite.A gravel driveway currently exists at the location of the proposed shared driveway, which is expected to minimize or potentially remove any impacts to Outlot A. The construction of the home on Lot 1 will produce some impact to the area of medium quality forest within the lot, but tree removal will be minimized whenever possible. H. Positive and Negative Views The project proposes a 10-foot no-cut zone on each side of the proposed lot lines,which will 4 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com uphold the current positive views as defined in the Orono City Code. I. Landmarks No existing landmarks are currently on the site. Density& Performance Bonuses The applicant is not requesting any density or performance bonuses. Preservation& Buyer Education The applicant plans to uphold a 20-foot wide no-cut buffer along all proposed lot lines(10 feet on either side of the line). Significant trees in this zone will only be cut if they are diseased or damaged, and will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. New homeowners will be educated regarding the conservation and natural resource management of the subject property as presented in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Natural Resource Inventory at the closing of the home sale. 5 FIGURES 1. Site Location Map 2. 2017 Aerial Photo Site Map 3. Soils Map 4. Topographic Map 5. Wetland Delineation Map 6. Existing Property Map with Current Parcel Boundaries 7. Proposed Property Maps a. Proposed Parcel Boundaries Showing Project Area Property Lines b. Proposed Property Legal Description c. Proposed Property Lot Boundaries 8. Tree Survey Map 9. Invasive Species Map 10. Land Cover Quality Map 11. Land Cover Classification Map 12. Conceptual Greenway Corridor Map 13. Rare Species Map 14. Rural Oasis Study FIGURES _ _ ,.......... ,,,...., ,, 51,D1 . r SITE 1__ is ..,..„, :4z:,,,,,r4, .„;,:. .„iiii ».r . _ .„.. . .. -- ..: .. . . .., . .'-...,,...: , ... .......... � L . .-2;"..." ' 4 3 I " , SITE ' ' '' ' , . \ 1Dz . M 9 `e. ''' . Yom. � Map layers Hennepin County Parcels Sections 0 •.15 .3 .45 Miles Figure 1 - Site Location Map __ Google Maps 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd S , { # ' F I .:21,10111 OM ,, _., 't -(1, L .,..e}Titir,:,,,. , ,r, ..,....; ' • ••,•... 0v✓. r ' z„, a Ihk):. ir ! e r r r- A ISL fr 0v- d. x.825 01d Crystal .:: -. • +.t«„ +` , a p ►- t ---- Bay'Road South r t a T O , . 1 ( ,fir PF.i.,�.' 4 ' ' , h..: d'.• ,! V :�r-n �` a► ,, .:.... _ t ... Your Boat Club-'7...., tr. wrd t• •1 t. ``-- . Ta�teyhMinnetownki I4, Ili , 1' N.; 4'°1'', le 4/1 ....11 g„ '1., . , 2' „,::` I Noerenb 1. 2 - ?, �; ° French z \ �r �� _t a Memorials m - P ' rS, c� ;County ParK +r + r i +6 �1 1”' " o '�10r C r ' - lie.e� Noerenber •`fit` ^« i"+ Memorial Gardr,; ,Nsti� r • . . , a efe i. ;e+ ., 4�at�� ''t . a7104 'Minnetonka , orthy7s�hcre�Marina , unch Y at CeGocigI kr-tr. ,% i ,,/ r "t' �— ..t l y`�` ,��t�r`+ • +_, 1NShore,ur•CRYST/Al B,AAYi',. Imagery©2017 Google,Map data©2017 Google United States 1000 ft Figure 2 - 2017 Aerial Photo Site Location Map Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3 Soil Map) M M T .7';', 451480 452570 452660 452750 452840 452930 453020 453110 453200 453290 44°57 54"N - 44°ST 54"N 47R J 1 L22j_ _'" S L3iB _ i a � �' ° zr /.4111161"VDX132A L37B c 4 L37B se W i fl • ,,,,i L22D2'='.- L378 1 ''''', ' \ 'ill .. . ;. L'2 2( 2 i r. fit m • 4 itet chard• .' 0©10 Galap 715 9 ETotr 6A u u8d V4 t�GaBg •. ` '• � • 44°5736"N 4...' P 1 I 44°57 36"N 452480 452570 452660 452750 452840 452900 453020 453110 4532W 4555290 3 3 b * Map Scale:1:3,940 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet m Hellas a N 0 50 100 200 300 gl Feet 0 150 300 rd600 900 Map f�J :Web MercaOor Coer mdin oraOPs:WG584 Edge tics:IJTNI Zone 15N WGS84 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 iiiiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soil Map Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name ACM In AOI Percent of AOI L22C2 Lester loam,6 to 10 percent 0.9 2.7% slopes,moderately eroded L22D2 Lester loam,10 to 16 percent 8.9 25.6% slopes,moderately eroded L22E Lester loam,10 to 22 percent 1.6 4.6% slopes L378 Angus loam,2 to 6 percent 12.1 34.8% slopes L64A Tadkee-Tadkee,depressional, 1.3 3.9% complex,0 to 2 percent slopes L132A Hamel-Glencoe complex,0 to 9.2 26.5% 2 percent slopes w Water 0.7 2.0% Totals for Area of Interest 34.6 100.0% ODA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Figure 4 - Topographic Map '' --"..."""7L'"'....i_ 1 \' 7:—1:'- 4 . a :ter e' i 1 , # ',-- c‘- t C ) I ' I -.) NI —4044 # 4 ,:.\ ilk . i \ cli ,_.,„ ..„ 1 ___,, \ _, .. , _ .. _ , _. _ _ ,, . ..._ _ ,, 01 , D.:. ... , . s;:-,„ \ ''' ''‘, . .---------N ,-------- _ (..,..i i, , , , ( 0 r / to [ 1 — --. '5-'71 ( /),,) :-....-Iii° . 7, -- _. 8 a y .i,' /— . 4 ‘..1 ti 1 / / ,/ J . / _,...3' -...'''' . N,, 1 --' j7)11 t / 1 / : y \\ ��_ �� , l -- I/--', . N ‘, — , , '.qi. r--) 4/ , :...----„....„. _ , ,... , \ l , (;,.. % 1 The Slate of Minnesota and the Mnnesole Department of Nature)Resources make.no represenlalgns 0Op. etpreaeed or Implied,with respect to the used rape or geographn data pm0ded ies he ewth regardless of Rs format or the means of Rs trenmWston.There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the aawaoy.currency,soeadity.or relabbty of IMs data for any purpose.The user a«ape the data'as le' Scales 1 2,912 N The Sate of Minnesota assumes no raspona61ft for loss or damage xcurred as a result of any user Mance on erre data.Al maps and other material Bovied here.are protected by copyright. Extreme care was used during era comp/atom of this product.However,due to changes.ownership and I the need to rely on outside nkcmebong,errors or omesmne may east.a you should discover en oversight. I we encourage you to let us know by isen all the DNR at 1-BBB-6an0J67 or by ail al efo.dm®elate.mn.us. Note:Elevation images sod contours were generated from WAR derived elevation surfaces acquired 2007-2012. Caa1M on 127132017 Figure 5 - Updated Wetland Delineation Map '.:4-.•:••,•,...• ,-- ` #' . 9 N 1.40 - DITCH s K� CULVERT • .r 271 . ; " ia, - ; CULVERT '-'1' +�� , �.' DITCH 3:U R t. Basin 3 3.IAl T ,IIi. ! ... C 4 . i,` 2-WET '2-UP 3'15"i-r. Mr!: y- 3' 'ft... x; a -Y. 4 ,:0,.!!':,t!0-4'f.' Basin 2 .._.3 .'. Vi n ... ; 4 ; -,. ...7., ,i, , '-',•'!' .:.--.„:-...,...:,,,,:7 if,../.,,.-,,.-:•pr„,,,...-...-,,-...-::-7,,,.-;,',„-,...- 1 001440". 46:---410! - -f-- - .., „. ,.. .... • i,• 3,„ l 3 e� ;, r �_ Map layers a Sample Points y a (— i Hennepin County Parcels � 0 .025 .05 .075 .,, Miles t . Figure 6 - Existing Property Map Showing Current Parcel Boundaries - .• •4d. ,.. _ \/ -------- . ' ' . •\. 7,-' ' • s - I „ ,irear i , + _ . . .... --... - - - b 1 , N //1 i , - / Itt a Map layers Hennepin County Parcels , ,,,, .033 .067 .1 .>, IR ', , Miles asimmi - - Figure 7A- Proposed Property Map Showing Proposed Parcel Lines -- NENN CO CW ATN 1/4 COR U HWCOROFLOT 34 SEC T 117N.ft 23W FOUND LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR z � r.„:„. JUDSON DAYTON a ix $ IN GOVT LOT 1,SEC.4-117-23& I g e. 5"E"ER vE<Fe59M°"" aifi w IN GOVT LOT 7SEC.9-117-23 g 6.Q t gp N Q HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA g FAT OF VEA,Z70 €v RV CORNER Y K in yJe�v \L OF LOT 34 3011TH LINE OFA a,I VI,E%TENSOON OF 30UTHLFEI ,9IZ ),- T wCFmOWLT4 BE ix W d1NA 1 ' :':; s.sr I, .�� `J 0 80 100 320 CO ti vs rle Nara., I� V i........1 C yIN FEET3 L U rN, 81,,A•4^ r , �l t s9N NT N¢N EmaE a 06, Qd� L 0 T s `✓ �\ °"s1 cTaN..i. :SW pP • t W E l 1,�� $ � S56'5S4T'E O.mles boanos Eased on Nennepn Co coordinates f•77 tti NW2'10PW .nom,SEc i�T ��' '\4•`j .�/.._.s -e,w,.,..-r... I N �` I366'6TITEI Senate boNrgs Wad u,WNawmpea. -A S 8B'2d'O4'E 26301 ;' ^\ .\�\[ `• PARCEL 3 G.• 7 +� AT ..r �-r,- �, SOUTH ONE OF aecTNN+. .� �>�v NOM HE 30UTN 1�#f.6 / ;, Galea i9 J `, '� LeE Off TOT,. $' � '1' NENN CO CW AT aECTw 4:4 .1 N.. of IIOR LaE9ODv'I'LOT], - -I 'CIX 9EC.aCHENN CO CIM AT SE COR 0.]I W.OF aINFM.WWU W� b1H""�- KKa�T.11TN E'7.LI R 1, »FOUND S 89'S317'E 2560.51 Fent T.117 N.,R.23 W..FWNO [I ♦ ; I I j ART MONT OF VAT LYE F>�3 R.OiOC30.C.WFSfa 8 / 1\ /.;V gg ',kg: as 1 �`• P / WETLAND 3':'• `Bid/ I[.)s vs I C..) / L EAST of caul Lor i,. w, \ =A O';/ \-� '''...--/ . -aa. _- ""' imruT ni Na aw. Q� ct qA i / \M1 /•( WETLAND 2 `97.-Ttp�if _—_... _ ._Si.�zrm—T�'Lw-'—__—._.'$'III d I\ J l`4 JI L l« 't N Ba'TI'SI W 962.18 I f 1/ 4 FyroFr WOFEA LINE OFROSTcE(HP�,1F�TptmT ��LT, t uU.On. N \ C 1 :% '� 'Z LaE OF my,LOTILFL MTH1bFTN.. I! 1-1(.1'6;:4.',' -....— _,4; -- • / 1 i a.K� 1 \ • o `I k 4i it / • ' 7 �•�/ / �l_ 2 j i� 41 A,/ Y at ': 7 1" LAKE p , J��,' � lib; ' /, PARCEL E 2 :,K/ PARCEL T 'o 1101 I Sr/ Eg6Taei / ggg SHORELINEOF MA%VFELLf9) F 0 •� 1 .-,.ED •may. l "" fill BAT ON 7.7.2010 I1;i te r' k EAST LINE OF GOVT LOT 7, I f$S E A' ' 1 4 \ \ SECTION 9.117-23 - L x,11 ' okl : SURVEY m 3 ` ,ry t a DUNE 4 rI li --( — V t /� iTIw 44, I .'Ifs -4. // MAXWELL BAY MINNETONKA `4- o. ' r �� w HENN.CO PARK RESERVE DISTRICT A Q v I Wafer.1.o AdwE M.walrWa,.y 929.26 A,BOSS-:6.19. C.[4 n„�1 •j t''''s9a� 1, CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND --, On1Uly7,2010. 52^. f .F.<'cL 9.'4.:',A['''.. - 0,,,,,... i o•I HO.Mom away alwaten d Lake MmrWNla Nr 930.516.. a”" T 5..191 � NOVO.1926.waningt . to Mwwaale Down of Canavabon. I SIAL ARL -470 \';Rc: -" LINEEVN+haEL MTHEANT DI., 4 C.:1 4,1,1's LBA OF OOVT LOT7 _ BancMduelled on wItI.• ed ICwnonl ABE comer d w er rnonouse 'F-1 NL)AR A --- .6F I-- t Oryx Boy Dam:elowbon to 632.67 6.,NOVO-1926. L... .- zl . l 17-407 Figure 7B - Proposed Parcel Descriptions .. LOT LINE RE-ARRANGEMENT FOR JUDSON DAYTON ZYx- IN GOVT. LOT 1,SEC.4-117-23& IN GOVT. LOT 7,SEC.9-117-23 (4.2;E HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA di Existing Legal Deacrlooars: Proposed Legal Descriptions: cagIlt IL Parcel t That part of Government Lot 7 in Section 9,Township 117 North,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridien, Parcel t That part of Government Lot 7 in Section 9,Township 117.Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,described as y i described as follows:Beginning at a point 302.81 feet South of 1M North tine and 482 feet West of the East line of said thence Beginning52degrees a point minutes feet Southconof the North1. Ire and 462 feetSouth West degreesf the East5Ina uf seski seconds Lot 7;t Q o Government Lot 7;thence South 82 degrees 13 minutes West 97 teat thence South 31 degrees 07 minutes 10 seconds West Maria North thence e S ut 3dg14 sm rat s s c ods75 feet t,59.3ce 81 57 degree 50 sminute 18 s 10535 45South 19degrees e minutese 29 seconds La Wast eton a; e thence South 4 degrees 00 minutes 8 seconds to 281.39 feet;thence South 13 degrees 25 minutes 37 seconds West,187.85 feet,thence South 9 degrees 32 minutes 30 West,145 feet more or less,to the shore of Maxwells Bay,Lake Minnetonka;thence Southeasterly along the shore of said lake to �g g Y seconds West286.14 feet thence due South to the shore of Maxwells Bay,Lake Minnetonka;thence Southeasterly along se intersection with a tine running Southerly,parallel with the East line of the above mangoned Government Lot 7 in said Section 9, S9 "11 to shore of Said tate W k14 an r98GgW n W1 a Ane running Southerly.parallel with Est losafthsabosa amhtaead Trom a point bearing South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and distant 768.78 feet from the point of beginning,said last ,ore Government Lot 7 in said Section 9,from a point bearing South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and distant 768.76 described course beteg hereinafter referred to as Line X to said pont being South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and W w feet from the point of beginning,said last described course being hereinafter referred to and designated as Line X;thence North distant 768.76 feet from said point of beginning;thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds East,766.76 feet in the point of CO §a along Line X to said point being South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and instant 766.76 feet from said point of beginning,said last described course being designated es Line Y. Z 3 i3 beginning;thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds East,766.76 feet to the point of beginning,said test described ,ddg course beingFor the purposes of the foregoing description designated as Line Y. Cru 3 0 For the purposes of the foregokg description (a) The East gm of the aforesaid Government lot 7 in said Section 9,Township 117 North.Range 23 West of the 5th (a) The East liof the aforesaid t be a due Northt Lei 7 n and Section 9,Township 117,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Principal Meridian,is assumed b bee due North and South line. Meridian.is assumed o be a due and South Nile. (b) The point of beginnings the same as the point of beginning of the description of the property conveyed to Leonard G. (b) The point of beginning is the same as the point of beginning of the deecnption of the property conveyed to Leonard G. Carpenter and Geraldine K Carpenter,husband and wife, Trustees Deed dated September 26.1938,between Carpenter and Geraldine K.Carpenter,husband and wife,by Trustees Deed datedD.September cis6.sed,938 between DN Caarles rson edVella record al Trustees under the Last Wil and d Testament Hen a inCur D.Male,ora,deceased.and saidr Charles Koon d o, el as etees under the Last er and d Testament Hem oa in ur Mete,deceased,N,and said 1938,in o,kind forof in the the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County,Minnesota,on November 10. .4:-.1 in oolt 144 filed for record in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County.Minnesota,on November 10.1938, 1938,in Book 1445 Deeds,Page 293,and r in Boat 1445 of Deeds.Page 293.and (c) Line X and Line Y are the Westerly boundary of the property conveyed by said Trustees Deed of September 26,1938 (e) Line X and Line Y are .Westerly boundary of the property conveyed by said Trustees Deed of September 26,1938 to said Carpenters. to said Carpenters. Parcel 2:That part of Government Lot 7 in Section 9,Township 117,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridien,described as Parcel 2:That part of Government Lot 7 in Section 9,Township 117,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,described as follows: Beginning at a point being 302.81 feet South of the North line and 462.00 feet West of the East line of the said thence: nth 52 Beginning degreesae p03d anatee 14es South o/es Nod gee end thence62 lot thWst d g e Ea5 mIne ut acs secondssesof 7; Government Lot 7:thence South 82 degrees 13 minutes West 290 2 feet;thence South 35 degrees 05 moues West.194.4 feel; 11heria feNth St 03 degrees 14 seconds West 41.75 feet;, 6.South 81 degrees of minuets No West. thence South 13 degrees 57 minutes West 167.65 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described;thence 49 minutesn feet thence sS s Eh st,596.73 73feet9 minutese29 seconds West,5 rrnn feet 55o the point beginning:210.89 thencefeet North 9 degrees23 North 13 degrees 57 minutes East,167.65 feet thence North 35 degrees 05 minutes East 194.4 feet;thence North 82 degrees 13 de9 mi29 u es 24 East,5s West, thence South less81 degreesto 57 enoMates secondsWestinnerathence South as minutesterft East 193.2 feet thence South 31 degrees 07 minutes 10 seconds West 281.39 feet thence South 13 degrees 25 minutees all `+s minutes 24secondsto 562 feet more aor g South the shoreeof Maxvel ratBay.18 e Minnetonka;Wet, thence actual point 37 seconds West 16765 feet thence South 9 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West,286.14 feet;thence due South to the shore along the bseginning; shoreline h an intersectiones0in with a line bearing 4 degrees pint of b gn ning.seconds West,from the actual point of Maxwells Bay,Lake Minnetonka;thence Westerly along said shoreline to an Intersection with a line bearng South 5 degrees of beginning;thence North 4 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds East to the actual point of beginning. 23 minutes West,from the actual point of beginning;thence North 5 degrees 23 minutes East to the actual point of beginning. For theu p rpaes of this description the East gra of said Government Lot 7 is assumed to be a due North and South line. For the purposes of this description the East line of said Government Lot 7 is assumed to bee due North and South line. Parcel 3:That part of Lot 35,in Auditors Subdivision No.233,Hennepin County,Minnesota,and of Goverment Lot 7,In Section 9, Township 117 North.Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,described as follows:beginning ata point 302.81 feet South of Parcel 3:That pat of Lot 35,In Auditors Subdivision No.230,Hennepin County,Minnesota,and of Govemneet Lot 7,in Section 9, the North fine and 462.00 feet West of the East line of said Government La 7;thence East parallel with the North line of said Lot 7 I t Township 117 North,Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,described as follows:beginning et a point 302.81 feet South of a distance of 482.00 feet to the East line of said Lot 7;thence North along the East tine of said Government Lot 7.a distance of g the North tine and 462.00 feet Went of the East fine of said Goverment Lot 7;thence East parallel with the North One of said Lot 7 302.81 feet to the Northeast corner of said lot,thence con Inung North along the North and South centerline of Section 4,Township a a distance of 462.00 feet to the East the of said Lot 7:thence North along the West line of said Government Lot 7,a distance of 117,Range7i t 302 81 feet to the Northeast corner of said lot thence continuing North along the North and South centerline of Section 4,Township 2d.a s distance of Subdivision No feet, en intersection County, with the otaterle thence Westerlysof the hline th Lot 34 in ar above tE I 117,Range 23,a distance of 218.7 feet loan intersection with the EasterlyLot 34 andal Audiles No.230,Hennepin County,M thence along the sSouthery boundary line of said ➢,3 extensionstof the South line of La 34 in the above Lot 34 extension thereof to the Southwest corner of said Lot 34Southerly along the extension of the West line of said Lot a mentioned Auditors Subdivision No.230,SouthwestHencornerin County,Minnesota;thence thence Westerly along the Southerly boundary Ire of said 34 to a point 1071.18 feet Southerly measured along the West line of said Lot 34 and the extension thereof,from the Northwest 1t!,1 p g 1E Lot 34 and extension thereof to the of said Lot Southerly along the extension of the West line of said Lot corner of said Lot 34;thence Westerly deflecting 81 degrees 06 minutes to the right horn the last described course.159.66 feet #1§i I 34 to a pont 1071.18 feet Southerly measured along the West line of said Lot 34 and the extension thereof,from the Northwest thence continuing Westerly deflecting 2 degrees 30 minutes to the right front the Mat described course,a distance of 124.65 feet; t a_s�I corner of said Lot 34;thence Westerly deflecting 81 degrees 06 minutes to the right from rub to lest described course.159 66 met: thence Southwesterly on a tangential curve to the left with a radian of 388.66 feet a distance of 193.75 feet to the point of 3 E i .1 thence continuing Westerly deflecting 2 degrees 30 minutes to the right from to last described course,a distance of 124.65 feet a: thence Southwesterly on a tangential curve to the tell with a radius of 38866 feet,a distance of 193.75 feet to the point of compound curve;thence straight eslerly on a tangential t verve to the left with a raise of 212.81 feet a distance of 180.52 feet f y E l compound curve;thence Sohuthweaterly on a tangential verve to the left with a radio of 212.81 feet a distance of 180.52 feet thence Southwesterly in a straight rte,tangent to said last descried curve a distance of 2.89 eet to the Southerly line of aforesaid E G! thence Southwesterly in a straight line,tangent to said last described curve a distance of 2.89 feet to the Southerly line of aforesaid GSovernment 4;thencetLotWest along the South line of said Seery d 285.29 feet eg last 17 minutesnted to being the sSoaid corner of 22 . Section 4:thence West along the South fine of said Section,285.29 feet,said last described point being the Southeast corner of Government Lot e in said Section a thenceSo Southwesterly deflecting ect 45 degrees3degreei o tee horn mid Met cribdescribed course, ��2 e Government Lot 1 in mid Section 4;thence Southwesterly deflecting 35 degrees 17 minutes to the left(Horn sad last described aceta,ca eo f 15.of eel:110eat thanes ester y Belt c re 40mi28 minutes ea to the left srom std est described course, ,ad course,a distance of 110.3 feet;thence Southwesterly deflecting 45 dgines 28 minutes to the left troth said lot described course. a ddistance 14.115.00 feet.thence es t the rho deflecting Man 21 degrees minutes to the right from said est alongtsuer of,a a distance of 115.00 feet;the Southwesterly deflecting 21 degrees 40 minutes to the right horn said Met described course,a of te4A0 feet v more or bas to the shuts of Maxwelfe Bay,Lake Minnetonka;fabov;trona ned Govern nthe ssassaid I distance of 174.00 feel,more or less to the shore of Maxwells Bay Lake Minnetonka;thence Southeasterly along the shore of said eke to its intersection a aurin wehn a fiche running S4 mksjltherty parallel with the East line of above mentioned m Government Lot 7 in said Section X lake to 4s intersection with a gra running9.from a point bearing South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and distant 766.78 feet from the point of beginning,said last Southerly parallel with the East line of above mentioned Government Lot 7 in and Section described course being hereinafter referred to and designated as Line X;thence North pereeel with the East fine of said 9,from a point bearing South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and distant 788.78 feet from the point of beginning,said last Government Lot 7 to said described course being hereinafter referred to and designated as Line X,thence North parallel with the East tine of said point beads South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 feet West and distant 766.76 feet from said point of Government Lot 7 to said pont bearing South 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West and distant 766.78 feet from said point of beginning;thence Nath 12 degrees sa minutes 40 seconds Eael 768.78 feet to tie point of beginning said Mel described course beginning;thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds East 786.76 feet to the prim d beginning said last deathbed se thbeere hereinafterl, referred to and designated as Line V.EXCEPTING from above described premises,the blowing described tract premises,the bflaving described tract (heNorthr sometimes referred o es the EXCEPTED TRACT)to-win:Beginning at the same point of beginning as above described; tri qq being hereinafter referred to and designated as Line Y.EXCEPTING from above describedthence 52 degrees 03 minutes 14 seconds West 41.75 feet;thence South 81 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds West 316.24 feet 65' (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the EXCEPTED TRACT)to-wit:Beginning at the same prim of beginning as above described; thence South 23 degrees 52 minutes 24 seconds West,562 feet,more or less to the shore of MexwdM Q x, thence South 62 decrees 13 minutes West 290.2 feet thence South 35Bey,Lake Minnetonka;along degrees 05 minutes West,194.4 feel;thence South 13 thence Southeasterly along the shore of said eke to an intersection with said Line X hereinabove4 described;thence North said 5r5n t degrees 57 minutes UVeat.187.65 feet thence South 5 degrees 23 minutes West.265.00 feet more or less to the shore of Line X to its intersection with Line Y as hereinabove described:thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds East along and (ul Maxwees Say,Lake Minnetonka;thencelofts intersection stery along the shore of sad lake o an intersection with said line X hereinabove Line Y,768.78 feet b the point of beginning. Ml North described;thence along said Lute X to its with line Y as hereinabove described;thence North 12 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds East along said Line Y,768.76 feet to the poke of beginning. For the purpose of the foregoing ascriptions,the East fine of the aforesaid Government Lot 7 in said Section 9,Township 117, , , For the purpose of the foregoing descriptions,the East line of the aforesaid Government Let 7 in said Section 9.Township 117. Range 23 West of the 5th Prindpel Meridian,is assumed to be■due North and South ere, . Range 23,is assumed to be a due North and South line. I5I wan - - Figure 7C - Proposed Property Map Showing Parcel Detail TOPSIDE „44m„01- > PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TTi 1`17 N a°.23 i 2 JUDSON DAYTON U/ "� a.E r- ,'' FO*00D,R.z3w O eE FourD iori 141.1 23..3124.14•20 IN GOVT LOT 1,SEC.4-117-23& < ',r`y'gmo,:i.oF;re",uo•, 7 i L__' !i IN GOVT LOT 7,SEC.9-117-23 y HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA 4 \ (l N 001)5'56.F I I a A AID'BUS qty" 236. Ave um n.L NE I O10 Nan°°es•E/ ! ' ( ;f i---, �e 27.24 _ 37,......._ 1 U" f-\L �.J r'_i /.) y 1v :^I \ ,481,115 E Nv .E 2,270 -L T _ Q-2>,, 0�'.''�`'�"60 120 240 t `"� Nat'at •E _5°0 aeaTuc�s % i () BC�Oo. r` Ps'l�..��9OOB, 114.86 ,,,.;rte _ \ 9°3 0s W'F,2]2 55 • 22.24 _ \\ e_.$ _8.0'73 ' - 1 T70-�DitEiLL--122`2 1e4- - 189.22 h SCALE IN FEET II , .. ----,--- .OtiTL°1 A _-___ tml'B'sw'e\ I Y I CI!-�1 m 2'00 /,. 4,a "4,- 10242 ( ( Z 1 ,.r ass -->� 7b,. __ __ E a O Up ( a2y a.+5d5vp$' ` i` _ \ 4`00....._w TrE c �.. Axos4o7Um7xd Re21eaw y l,. i3�Se-F. 8 ,0 1 7.4-:�, w -'C U l ..S I ,.� x�.0t s�n,a 0 TM - i SE COR N WNW'44 0 4 81 MC_ 7 .,' $ .410 -� ,q� - N'- 400 21 • ~- {~.,�.. '. + ..-` �.: t sus____\ .`{ 1 �nx� SOUTH tore ,�-N i_...e cvr.rw fxv `�\�I 386°53'47',2660.81 i 688,4•04-E 2isLH Y • 1 I l�t 'q .tt ----- MEWLcw 5110111312110.1 �a15 .."- 2e / ! '' ` -_-WOWL ea 33 3.1 . +\�� ----4 1-- 00 �_-________J\ �_____R Li.OC m'✓r o 1 -. ♦ r vxnr I V • - - I KMCOONAT an ION T_ H. .an NHnr.ram /r.� `ce�tuq �� f I +mnSEC C X aLd nx in - - rw w (gat; � Z ..sa22 w ' � � v uHHs o. �� `(1 vawHT O, '1 - -fA 134W-ACTOTAL- W - PER CR b 0 0. I `' JI ..• 0 • l', fn - 'F ^ •1t�. C/ r, h; O• -tt.• ',��'.j c w ' cx v 4 � A / { fid ' a 4(/Li_ t JC i�v :Q i' P q o 4r 1 7\� 'y / �t,"'" Z,-____ _• t1 1` /7 .�xlEoeowr grew >: d t - WETLAND 3 1 5 C 1 r --- - b 4Y ry 5.17,Ac , .. ---_ 1 -j 1 a ✓ � i4 �� l ;» \V - 4tZ I„ WETLAND 2 V ---5� Er I '-':V::--- } -,-r)\ (/ f f 7 g N�s.s'? s Aim -•7I nv=--z-- E1 B��CNTOF < i l'„''' . ` �:-7�! J�J`-•• fTe�417TedRu07 4,83•,4•04 W 482.18 1,:1 I F14,,r;a1 ‘---...'''-•t°,-,_ - N4'/ waiiNTar.AypWm _ fi q ;. $ ‘,3^C'',"•• , ;b ..-t U 0ia0v0 Lary Worth... !\� NP0213•W 132370 s -- - 7 / ! EAST IBE OF GOVT LOT 7 i S 7 SECTON 8117-23 MENN.CD PARK RESERVE DISTRICT i ,, ,} ` // ,1'. a, CAST IRON MONUMENT FOIBID y }' LAKE v ti / , TPH3 r abaix- e:. Ij No/R eeaswedlat Bwn�n•o 6nNE.math'reams.re�c 7: a etroaei++onn i East pangs!ave aa"'8..baNMadme �n.7«am.msdoWl mma�r�the s.aon4 4- b y e.1 wOPreed Lew Daum/lion: 2116 j- pont South the rth 482.00 kW Weal the East lino of ot 7;thence NOM said dIstanoo of - ♦f , That paWarmived Lot 36.M Audda4 Subdivision No.230,Hennepin County,Minnesota.and 0f GOtermrad Lot 7,In Section e,Towslq,117 North Rang.23 NAM ode 5th - Mandl.,demobs.]as follows Q 3 M • 2 Township 117.Range 23,a distance a 218 7 fed to an YWre Loo wXn IM Eeebdy 0nbrnon a the Soon line 411.01 341n the above mentioned Auditors SuINBN of N0 230.Hennepin Camay.Mammas ( % ♦ dense Westerly along de boundary mine a said La 34 an asaem Baled to the SaMwest mase a said Loo thence Soberly along the enlrelon a to NYat line of emit Lot 34 toe pot 1071.18 F n.' 4 - mat Souter*measured Norm the NMd line of said Lot 34 and the ecler0im owed,from the N0Nn.wt arras of said La 34:Bene 16Mdaly 400edig 61 dogmas 06 mimosa to 0e right from the last MINNETONKA S ♦ dsembed mese.159.66 met:thane continuing WoWrly dsloalng 2 degrees 30 minutes to MS I Rom de teal described c0u0.a dlou0pe d 124.65 fed:Worms Southwesterly an e lagsutW curve to the B - e8 05.redo.of 308,6°for,00,01.0,0.a 183.70 Me b 5e WV°d 0anpumd Gun.;Owns SOoPw•elay On a tangential wive b Be left with•radius of 212.81 did.a d,0term d 180.22 fed:Bene 9} sa00040 ey0,'060 yd ee,apadmmad lou 000 oed mrve•Solon.a2.0*rodbdr son NMly erea.roe.ald Sealon 4,thence wad along WSouth wtedo Section.26518 ed.re last • �, A. dewbae pose hang 0e Southeast manor.]Government let t n.aid Section 4:Nerve SodIW.mMy dsMtivg 35 degrees t7 minutes m 0e Yfl from lad.]mambas.]asses.a distance d 110 3 feet: Nam 3aalwwabdy dslmcag 45 degree.28 mmnUs to the nit Pan said 1.d 00000664 omma.a diatoms of 115.00 did:Olen Southwesterly thillacting 21 Meyer 40 mnNs to dor riot from said Mast A• described mine,a dlalonoa a dor 174.00 Met.more WSW Oe n anoof Mammas Say.Lake Minnetonka:thence Southeasterly along the Mom a re lake b its itor001 ssd with a tae mining tlwafty Saerlwaftl Nwua.M.um a'0M wnllra.ma wan.20�n.,NOVD-1918, - M wN the East lieal above mmndated 000.01, nt la 7 in sad healon 9.Pan0pout Mowing Sate 12 depress 54 minutes 40savors&Niland d'teat 706.70 bet form the pond d booming,W.]last l q de.crlbd mer bang hereinafter Tensa to and derailed mane X/moo Nath parallel MIN 01.EM Mea said Oovamn..n La 7 b s.1 point baby South 12 d•gmas 54 minute.40 swam.Ween and m L.y7.2010. Omani 796.70 feet Rom re polo d b.gmnng.Vence Note 12 dogmas 64nnreaas 40 setae•East 701370 test 10 01e pat a pY 'g1padd IW.]revealed 0005.being 0.00004801/smd b are designated Z�0' H ..t cowl waver.1.ve0.n d lair 4aMdmwa 4,r rb.51 0 - b \ as Line Y.EXCEPTING from antro desaib0 pewee,0w following described Barn(Me0Wer wrMee•Waned to as 810 E%XCF.PTTEO TRACT)town:6ettrvth9 d Be sae Porn of Nn O''T gA7err� Sa831 beginning V NGVPta28.aaado g lo Wm Minna..Oer.aanr.m Comwrau �`. drmoed:0wr.Nath 52 neper 03 ay,ak 14 aspmda;Win 41 75 be(0wne ng 001 m degrees ki k.W.0605.00.West,31d14 Net 0076 iw deo,0,0, minutes 5 ng gid t Web its/set, N w[N FY` nier0tar i Li Parva Masw8Me delakeMiaenceN Nam.Srees54 mi•lag0esoon dreallone to an 410 V.70.75 Isaddlow%*06bog roda.vEed;dance North along rid LkeAbN. > 0rrMen a NI,deist. on 32 rat.Ni3 O.T8 dtlr P.mnDlia.r I's Cf - nlBr•ecbn wN lona Y as MetllebOve dsecrbd:thence NOM 12 de000s 54 minutes as seconds Ear Mag re Lse Y,7°�.7�Ism b t6 point of beginning. r Brew°9y O.m:devalMa932S]n.,NOVD1B18. 1nr 5 l Fr 5 2040�_ JRO .e 3..321 For the purpose of the lanNOlnC descriptions.the End line d the Glasse Gavamwut let]2194113 Swim B.Township 117,Rang.28 Nall.]Na SN Principal Midden,a awned m 6 s due Nate and I iss Denotes elwa11a1 \ TOTAL n,tA 2__7♦ 0"h". • :13•0019111.0n 1T0/3•110‘310 JF r - C Ems.: 7 .Grams von nawar _ t doors bearing mud on Hennepin Caddy 02011.01. ,Wring mood m 4.0mtpmn SHORELINE OF MA%NELlf6) L Ef 2,/: 3 „�__7. i.I Donors BAY ON 7-7.2010 17-407 Figure 8 - Tree Survey Map - - TREE INVENTORY IN THE AREA OF i "�� n PROPOSED DRIVES AND HOUSES FOR vi s3 SI < s JUDSON DAYTON iy g w IN GOVT LOT 1,SEC.4-117-23& <J" v ci�.r I IN GOVT LOT 7,SEC.9-117-23 0 �e c, S 'I 7 > i�N RI' g HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA a,y.§P �r oz a/06 9 17. 9 679.7 N B��E f 301 E-_.-- A E �7 \ 961 oeYM•E z3zss ' W $�3 r"" � ye5 k��_L,},�-�_ uuc._.--.;;;._-_-_-_-1:41t=---4,---. y� -. "- '� 0 ` 160 320 CO \ °�At __--z.cf _®-. LTJ i Y - l',- � ��. NCOM'S1•E. m ebaeleeee4'� re o „,,,,,,-,•,--- �, '� -- 1 -•� SCALE IN FEET (� N7s 8 i�� L 0 T 3 5 t I \ 1 I. -I4. d bi! 04000 81"Al / �_' '<.� \j..,e-r-n+.w ear.--s...r. .8 -. • 40611 - /:'' .`\ ] � 1 •�,----oe--secz.w•E 26501. / ® ------------------ \A\ .'••.EEO ` !- -- _, m17 �w tyti 9tlTi9t ® I L lI 1 P `lam 8 ®4 "st6 I,a \\ ALIO SUBNO ' 2Y g 4 a 1 At 1X co 85,�O®� E4 cr�4�� 1091,941E 3'°66 9 •www -- = €- ''-4'. I0 i d ,' ,0l9 N 68.2494 W 482.18 I, I 41 "ry,l'c,L'' n: mil ®' — '- - ✓ ,, ` TREE LIST U 1 � P LP1 OL�Iy 1_ i -� Owar '01 1010,2E 50 240AK 200 12 ELM C.. ?. ` r Y. 4 ` I '01 IOM 51 24OAK202 20 MAPLE jp� I 102 232 8 OAK 52 23 320AK APL 20 MAPLE .\ /�• 3' I 0.t 7900, 63 ]2 OAK 202 22 MARE CO � I I I '04 25 OAK 54 10 OAK 201 20 ELM ©• , /� / '05 ?200, 10 ELM 205 20 OM Of l % _.�' I1 I , •06 10 MAPLE 56 28 MAPLE 208 32 ELM 1 ¢;; 1 •ni i.MI 9 f �� e I I 107 35 OAK 57 30 MAPLE 207 2440,2E HULA 106 504 OAK 55 24 MAPLE 218 29MAR0001 2 ap f� • �� 109 3e OV( 55 24 MAPLE 210 3000, 9 i ler! 110 38 OAK 39 OAK 211 280411 8 F W m / I� 111 2500, 51 1200, 212 18 OAK Y MR �� ® _S "' t II >S OAK 82 14 MAPLE 213 24 MAPLE 1 '13 1e OAK 63 14 0021 214 32 040 M1 I �, 14 1600, 54 1200, 215 18 MAPLE i■ • 115 20 OM 55 22 MAPLE 215 16 MAZE `` R 'yi LAKE \ 2 N.f w �i, 116 25 OM 06 28 MAPLE 217 10 MAPLE = f \ ;qlJ = L'�A+, 111 25OAK 57 34 ELM 218 224 20445 s 'IA;'' 118 26oM • 14 MAPLE 219 72 OV( tai! ml 119 10 ELM W 1a MAPLE no 14 MAK 2 ' � � ) 121 1158 MALE 71 1a MAPLE 221 18 MAPLE 71 iS MAPLE 222 15 OAK t• Pui I 121 10 MAPLE 72 /6 MAPLE 223 14 OAK fill i ■ /9' 173 2000, 73124 36 MAPLE 20 MAPLE 224 15 OAK I tl BAY ONM]OFOMAKWEllf9) O\ ,!l!SSS�� 1 pSIA.' .1•34 7- W 125 16 PLMAPLE 74 22 MAPLE 225 14 OAK In: I 1+, A ^� 75 14 MAPLE E 718 24 MAPLE 227 24 OAK . .4-.•"A 127 22 MAPLE129 36 MAPLE 777 14 e 12 SLE 718 2400, A sj ' h! 129 18 MAPLE 78 29 MAPLE 229 18 OAK ,8 RI 8 �, �jy' ' 1 110 23 MAPLE 79 19 MAPLE 210 to OAK 'il ,LI SURVEY �. 131 12 MAPLE 180 14 OM( 231 15418 7 LINE. r �� 152 16 MAPLE 81 14 SOX 232 25 00, '9 E a r''^II , ;333 27OOA(. 03 310411 LOEK 234 25OAIt `I BA 2'35 20 OAK 1 1 I (ill I '! 6,4 ,0,,,,....r. S /j 1335 36OAK 0020 05 1610,2E 236 {OAK $. F �!+r 137 m OAK es 19 OAK 727 36 OAK ( ', a2.� r. 13399 14K4K9LOM 57 400445 2OAK 39 Mn OAK Gi MAXWELL BAY MINNETONKA . '' �7 140 p OAX 93 31'°O29 '"242 'OAK 240 �°p" J9 'e ASH 142 10 HICKORY 82 MAPLE 243 38040 Y 143 14 OAK 30 78 MAPLE 244 25 Water nav95Pn of lake Meesm1Mw919298..NOVD-1929. OHNE 7 � F, 145 10 HICKORY 94 111 MAZE 0,5144 12 HICKORY 450 Wtd,7,2010. JUDSDNN UAVI N4 95 14 MAPLE 246 38 0AK On 4 ROTC 5 95 15 AMPLE 217 14 SPRUCE 1{] bOM 97 15 MAPLE 248 16 ABN 4990,11 Mown wale.ab.eaen d Leila Minnetonka 1me 54930.519.. O C M 55 1, 1 ''T9£1n 115 18 MAZE 941 108410.25 ELM 249 16 SPRUCE Nta•V01929,eomMing 10 the Mmes.OMabnm9 d COneen5608 t o 1LEL Y41H EAST 99 38 OAK 250 20 ASH TOTAL A A-11.45 ACRE: 149 18 MAPLE Sm1tl8nMbad4eeetl-ran 80 tmk4wwmm.Idme wlroAUuea O.EI AM4 /f..S.♦ 7114Eti \ 4011 252 25 AWE 261 22 ABH at Grays 2142 Cam:NPw90n k 932878..NOVO-1925 WED AND AREA- _.1.-A��ES 253 16 SCOTCH 5520 E ".-RY ZT4 G 4 251 38 SCOTCH PINE I+ II11 17-407 Figure 9 - Invasive Species Map • l111Fell. i' r 'ti';:i-',..4,-;,...10,..-','.1:', :,,,4„,„...,-.... _. ,' at a:.. ...6,„Arc ,e. r '4'''''' •- . ip, �. s ,p,,y� , i} ` rdp.a Fp 1s A �a E. y'a 7 S t4t1,1 . ' #r...,1'. e r s f . r :. ..: ‘` it i „ vll • - / rg 3 .gyt -t - ! fi '*ii."...' !_ 14 e �.,# Yp,jA y ' 'i #' :r.,„. i \ ilif -:.. 4 ' ; ' '“, 11:,Ifl,,::44: 4 .,...... ... „, , ,,,.. w . ma - aM ..." , 1r A ii..-§,h • . . • .5,t3 ..c A Ik f. is �._. Map layers rx ( (Hennepin County Parcels v`,J 4► -' /) Reed Canary Grass 0 .03 .06 .09 Miles Figure 10 - Land Cover Quality Map Hennepin Hennepin County Natural Resources Map _._ Win.. / 4.,- , , ' '' - '----.. ....,..., •- ,••... •, .. , ., ,›, Fo0 x .. _ _ jpw. Ib A I's + '*- ? t l # .lt r .,N ,it. < 11/0 , t`` '\ i* , P r t ki ' C - ,. /, ,.. .1,4. t ,"----: ,,,v, , ' I 441011 . 44 k - . • s ► It raMott.1. ire ;. Figure 11 - Land Cover Classification Map Hennepin County Natural Resources Map 111 1111111 Alter,dlnon- at de ld ous(^X Zz•a it' -,M' 4 "AA- Medium-tall grass ra+ e-ba s 1 ood 11303 Short grasse! if.,0tweiii--.---,—...._ III1 i Red pine t1 Figure 12 , .,�>, ".. .4'' 1"."U&a'i�' 188`'7" ç7..�-"4T-1.:6-;"".- -.,,,4 „%,,,,o.„,„ ra Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment ---t. 'Ntr-'4 ,% C of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Invent° f �;,. "u` ry` k `4' 77 --. 0 40,7 ea : - A:30.- '-— - '• -1- ' 'i -.; a •'�4 � fr -- s;' ?� .1-44#:.: tT �� } , � `t `•R7ti Irv' '_�%• T �S .%tel f i yy .#r�. _ `' 1) -; ,:'�%0 0. Site -- "= r `, , Iii o ,11 P < ;"'_ •�A f,,�, b.� ..1"s --: mit. i -.!rte , -' 4:ZO, t. auk i` � :'s a k a w -44 s.x +" �, j �. • 4 . lb ._...4.4 . il,-." f' Nt /fit `�• •r - - ‘( hh " y cd _ rl : a raj Ar;. 1... .E. .. .. .., . . , ti z a•i.,. I . s � Legend III Nowwpin County xi ivy ear i ..4.!Steep Slope Sacs 4 III DNR Scientific and Natural Areas �::�,o.,a °`*` -Regional Parks Natural Community Quality Conceptual Greenway Corridor ®High Quality _Adjacent Greenway Corridors Medium Quality 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 Other Natural and Semi-Natal Communities I I Feet 1 inch equals 4,500 feet —Streams _ Existing Wetlands 100 Year Floodplain Figure 9 City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 23 March 2006 Figure 13 - Rare Species Map Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory • y ., e•:fT } .. ;"" , 7, +f ' �s. `1' . .11y :.%,,„ 4etr.S b t S yl§F ' ib N ‘,- L,r w. tr 4.,.;,...- •:,,,, t _ I t Site ' . • Legend II=Cty Boundary NI FloedpHn bras -Oak woadlandbnahland NI Water Iy span marsh -l.miard hardwood Brest Poor fon sedge wings El We meadow Natural Cemmunilbs with Potential for Rare Species MilliMapabasserood forest Poor fenshrub subtype UN Wet mamba-seasonally'owed Alder swamp BB;fa iced emergent mash Rtl,let Ng wee meadow-son nommen y 1laodew Birch bog./pram shubland•saoomad sods MI Id sed ernergw,t mash-seasonal y flooded 1.1 Rich fat scope subtype _Wet meadow shrub subtype gm Black ash swamp In Si sad hardwood swamp R .fen shrub subtype Mow swamp =Black ash swamp-seasonally Wadded IIIIII Moad hardwood/warp-masons y Sodded -BMW,swamp weans ectype —Canal mash-season,If.wooed =Oak bast -Tamarack swamp =Cata l marsh-sem oe-a-only nooded NM Oak forest mono wbypa MI Tamarack swamp mmworoph c subtype 0 2.250 4.500 5.000 , Feet N l Inch equals 4,500 feet Figure 10 City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 26 March 2006 Figure 14 - Rural Oasis Analysis Corridors I B: CR 6 west 'au". 4 16' 4 t 1 L 1 -1W 1 11141ill ''1 i i 1 Z'l—i 1.• Mb t IIIIMA I 4.4) ...fp ., ik / !Et 141111A1E4111110111511111111 -_-.: 11111 111 ire mk. I ....a 4.: . go -. , weir 47440.L.051rw ilillakill A7,30:- carR 6 eallsItink. ill ' riIIIIIPPragiat -,111. A ', Ilk ' a., 4,5 111 NEI i iliiiiimi 4 U1 a It . III C: Highway 12 hall ire qiel ii.- * .,,-• I --) /NM ....."' Illillii1I rtr'i -W4.4i1tl141i1"1l"i1lr-1l,aAi -11hB:A*"1 1,1 iIi, N.,.,.b...1.lh=.'',,'iHiI4lil16P4.■.1a.1.t1.e11r1wft i-4l"ii41:4 .itsrI ir '/ 6° -OCnt igtYLake / , : MiblIIIIIL IF474111111 101b-r.'71,1111 .--,....trilit ger al . rr, iiii „„041 r>.-...,...., . , K 400 L o Qf$ ' 412.11 .4iliabh... , ...RN ),......_ I Site - 11111111411E0411:4;.. - hr, .;-iiiii•INo, -.1' I'':Aral I , -..mpiw".111/1' 10 .. ..•49 04 '4.t.,-0 i. ,%„.1,4 b_ :ft.', lib ....$4 co , 4. ititiol/A 1 ! II 0 lt--at:., e • `:;,- -•t - Ms. ' 4 2 1 1 AN ..litafipilli Zil rig.. .1: ! ...1.110110111111 AN.' .44 ' ' Iiit, 400 i v ' 7.,..„117,•ril41, 1;1444111111 S:bb;;Yal: .... 1 . a:voilL4..‘11111311, I Villimiii ...- 5 + 111 .'"" -1.4mm ammumillikv, _ilk k , law Vi• *-,,4::„.. ..0,11 , iv/mm.41 rosissuwaiwkaild . 7 lit 5411111111Milliiiil I - ,11 H• ' I •• mr.. . . 1 0 ;'RD. 'till. 11111t4 itutrif ---7% „ . _ I .71Ill..... • • , IV10101 . • • MN INS •radii k .7,s,i griii mi 1r,, 4.. 4, ,,,,.iTio„ mow 0 Bay ( L • 2 111111 4? ' ' f - 3 • 6 'E- '`'..:::"'''' '11° tall rm.% '' '...:- --•-•..\,Op ", , -2 .,•1 II S --, .-7.701 lar , 12a1 " , *4-....)7.5.--e.-.1. "th - --ipitia-,,::,,,,, ,k\ -.-- , , ,- _ kr,tr lir fa ';'„L •- '1-4 .\ i 11"111 ' 1' • '• .tr• ...k. * • 7.50r.0;,...6,41,74 .51 PN. WI , smith . ,Vri/ , itL II 1=1 -, 11 ,. "AI titit 1 ;okt- milli J: North Shore Ir./..04 11111+1 -4' , , ' ‘r. p ,- - ,i F-A-14.4.-fiN 11745" RI i ,„ \th, , :-..-.. ,... ....., _ .. , Analysis Corridors 01?ON 0 Rural Oasis January.2005 PC • #LA18-000022 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Exhibit Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802• Email: jacobsonenvOmsn.com October 19, 2017 RE: Project Name: Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay Comm. No.: 2017-299 Project Location: Orono— Hennepin County PIDs# 0911723210001, 0911723210004, 0911723210005 26.47 acres Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE) visited the above referenced site on October 12, 2017 to perform an official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest region. The project site was approximately 26.74 acres in size, and was located at Sec. 9, T117N, R23W, Orono, Minnesota. See Figure 1 for a Site Location Map. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map identified two wetlands within the property boundary (see figure 2—NWI Map). The soil survey identified the soils Lester loam (ratin=0,2),Angus loam (rating=5), Tadkee-Tadkee depressional complex(rating=92), and Hamel-Glencoe complex(rating=90). The DNR Public Waters Inventory shows that one public water exists on the property (see Figure 4—PWI Map). Three basins were delineated within the site boundary, which are summarized below and shown on the Figure 5—Wetland Delineation Map. Basin Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation ID Circular Cowardin Eggers & Reed - 1 Type 1 PEM1Ad Seasonally flooded Reed Canary Grass, Giant basin (ditched) Goldenrod, Yellow Foxtail 2 Type 5 PUBH Shallow open water Wild Blue Iris 3 Type 2 PEM1Bd Fresh wet meadow Reed Canary Grass, Virginia Wild (ditched) Rye The growing season in this area is approximately from mid-April to mid-October, when the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. This delineation was completed during the growing season. The previous three month's precipitation data suggest that the sampling period occurred under normal conditions. Antecedent precipitation data is located in Appendix A. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 1 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv(Tmsn.com All figures and appendices referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text.The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins, and classify the wetland habitat. This wetland delineation was performed and reported by Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists—Professional Wetland Scientist#1000, University of Minnesota/BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019,American Fisheries Society—Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171. Methodology The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps,wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were cataloged and assigned a wetland indicator status according to: Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin, 2016. The National Wetland Plant List:2016 Wetland Ratings, Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant's scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine)were assigned an obligate (OBL)1,facultative wet(FACW), and/or facultative (FAC)wetland status. With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute% cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50% of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetative cover. Soils 1 OBL=Obligate Wetland,occurs an estimated 99%in wetlands.FACW=Facultative Wetland,has an estimated 67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative,is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands,34%-66% probability. FACU=Facultative Upland,occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23%probability.UPL=Upland,almost never occurs in wetlands,<1%probability.NI=No Indicator,insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+)or lower(-)frequency of occurrence within a category. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenvOmsn.com A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators(i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0(USDA NRCS 2010) if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic (reduced)and aerobic(oxidized)conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, 1 Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2 Many of the soils have a high organic matter content 3 The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4 Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5 Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Wetland Classification Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 3 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenvCalmsn.com Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998) are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"-40", noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange "wetland boundary"flagging tape or flagging tied on vegetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped using GPS. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange numbered pin flags tied with pink ribbon. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Results Basin 1 Basin 1 was a Type 1 PEM1Ad ditched, seasonally flooded basin. The basin was dominated by Reed Canary Grass, Giant Goldenrod, and Yellow Foxtail. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by Smooth Brome, Big Bluestem, Green Ash, Black Walnut and Ground Ivy. Hydric soil was not found at the upland sample point and primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed in the upland. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys I4 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenvOmsn.com The wetland boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a change in topography. The basin was not shown as wetland on the NWI map, and was located within an area mapped as Hamel-Glencoe complex (rating=90) by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 1-UP and 1-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 2 Basin 2 was a Type 5, PUBH, shallow open water community. The basin was dominated by open water and Wild Blue Iris. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by Red Maple, Common Buckthorn, and Ground Ivy. Hydric soil was not found at the upland sample point and primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed in the upland. The wetland boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a change in topography. The basin was not shown as wetland on the NWI map, and was located within an area mapped as Angus loam (rating=5) by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 2-UP and 2-WET correspond to this basin. Basin 3 Basin 3 was a Type 2, PEM1Bd, ditched, fresh wet meadow. The basin was dominated by Reed Canary Grass and Virginia Wild Rye. Adjacent upland was typically dominated by Red Maple, Common Buckthorn and Ground Ivy. Hydric soil was not found at the upland sample point and primary hydrology indicators were not observed in the upland. The wetland boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a change in topography. The basin was not shown as wetland on the NWI map, and was located within an area mapped as Angus loam (rating=5) by the Web Soil Survey. Sample data sheets 3-UP and 3-WET correspond to this basin. Maxwell Bay Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 5 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com This DNR public water abuts the property to the west. The shoreline consists of several feet of riprap and the ordinary high water mark(OHW)does not reach above the riprap. No wetland exists along Maxwell bay within the property boundary. Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCAApproval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU and other agencies. I certify that I performed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. 97#'&— . 1 0/1 9/1 7 Wayrfe E Jacobso Date Professional Soil Scientist#30611 Professional Wetland Scientist#1000 Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019 Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171 Jacobson Environmental,PLLC. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 6 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans • Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: iacobsonenvOmsn.com TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES 1 . Site Location Map 2. NWI Map 3. Soils Map 4. PWI Map 5. Wetland Delineation Map 6. Topographic Map 7. Hydric Soils Map APPENDICES A. Precipitation Data B. Sample Data Sheets C. Site Photographs D. Wetland Delineation Approval Forms Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 7 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans , Figures _- Google Maps 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd S Figure 1 Site Map ',,I.,Hoi>>or nk� • `S� 1 • II le r h ' it The Woods Chapel 4. '�► \ . 'I 0, r,l - , *. I E s1 d � .. ,,i---* ® " Funks Leathercraft0 J' '. Ft P +� � e y_ (- • 1 Bergg;en Paul W� '- 1 :-*1::** \ Itt. • lab :,; ' , ,-r , ".- - . 47-z .4116;44;,i... ' -7/44.*)00,' I ''' -,47, ., 4., 4110 .r ) .� ' *'' / • �t. !ta^'$r. 825 Old Crystal , .a �' -"-'-Bay-Road South 1 ' _� a 5 (• a f 0 "f , NS p 4 '_,fir Your Boat Club N. * � ,, 1, Minnetonk ' YJ,'6 ._ -'fir/ i w ' Ta "' '',e' „e 44- . asii it . .....' * ..Pok ,.. 1;,,,c. :0.ti.. a k ., s 6, i 1 '''''' * '*: ' ' ,''I(• 1 i 'a. ' - Illifi 1 ''''. i I ' Noefen ç ' French -m""i`s ; (, atair County Pm fir ;;•':..', 1 r m. o,1ti 0,: ow, • .'; �. SNoerenb Qrq ^k , ', r 3 . r .. r - .•` .- is M,nic,,,I! 3rdens ,, shor "% r •�if r I ' • , ,c e 5 e0 a ► , rY . 44, - s `" fir, ( i ,� .. �`t f�`., ,..; ,, Minnetonka r; -Marina unoh `~ ay a t \' ?�;,r . ''''. _GOO le'rts mar 2 v,' - ••• ''” . \ y 'a�'a` ole.w „� f` 4 44.sl t,.-�.`C R Y-S T[A L_E3 A Y �.�' Imagery©2017 Google,Map data©2017 Google United States 1000 ft U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - 1 ! -tiOn---fir) National Wetlands Invento Figure 2 National Wetland Inventory • '4 . l PUBGx • r gni,, Lei +.a't, '',( lr, PEM1A lrk . '-s4:•: ''.1'' ' 11110- .s '.." - t.v i Ilk t K�z4 1 ra" PEM1C .:_,. -tts,ss `- ,�, ' ., ',''':14:-4-'1r5;. - '''‘'''''k.:.'.\*1:6:'''''io''' 48:4,,'‘.1,,,,t•,.• :' .."...' C - -.:3'i A 1 . • .,� r PUBF 1:5,224 �' 1100, • :: IIP 0 0.0425 0.085 0.17 mi • T 1 ' r , i '!b 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km ,,.,4 October 14, 2017 This map is for general reference only.The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map.All wetlands related data should Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland I Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. • Estuarine and Marine Deepwater • Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other El Estuarine and Marine Wetland 0 Freshwater Pond Riverine National Wetlands Inventory(NW) This page was produced by the NW mapper Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3 Soil Map) P 452480 452570 452663 452750 452840 452930 453020 453110 45.3200 453290 m 44°57 54'N ...10.110 .. ii 44°57 54"N III Ilk --- '7B _ '" { L22 f • do — �'� � ' ...4, ., AO • t / / r f / L37B L132A ti I , i fit , L37B y g 1 i 44441 o W L22D2•+r ;.; L37B 1 'NN-N\NN.N.'"-A,‘ it K.* - „,„ ., 1 L22C 2 .4t ,,,ii .4 '..,-. V ch N\-14111( _... , • •. • NZ, s2'oB0 Chap maw uoa b®wand ata MB@ orga1 ° tcS ,r� 44°57 36'N . 0 °./ 44°57 36"N 452480 452570 452860 452750 452840 452930 453020 453110 453200 453290 3 3 Map Scale:1:3,940 f prinked on A landscape(11"x 8.5')sheet Meters m N o 50 100 200 300 0, Feet 0 150 300 m &o 900 Map projectlorl:Web Mercator Corner o3ordnates:WGS84 tics:UlM Zone 15N WGS84 A USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soil Map Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI L22C2 Lester loam,6 to 10 percent 0.9 2.7% slopes,moderately eroded L22D2 Lester loam,10 to 16 percent 8.9 25.6% slopes,moderately eroded L22E Lester loam,10 to 22 percent 1.6 4.6% slopes L37B Angus loam,2 to 6 percent 12.1 34.8% slopes L64A Tadkee-Tadkee,depressional, 1.3 3.9% complex,0 to 2 percent slopes L132A Hamel-Glencoe complex,0 to 9.2 26.5% 2 percent slopes W Water 0.7 2.0% Totals for Area of Interest 34.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Figure 4 - PWI Map .. ...ii.,.., 3 . . ...„ u ,„. 7ii'4" ' _. . . , .... . 3� a � t. . ,. *Ii*.:,....„..., . • k _-, inr4140110r, itillte, ' or .,11000,,.v.. , �. +r 'e Aii* f. F w� e s •l " v of ; . r i .r sy 7 a '# + a _, .Ny t ,g 1.- f 10._ ‘ - . .ht , . ..- '-' 1)7' .7.-`‘'i r. , A 7, ,,, ,., . _„_,... = ,,,, , ,,,,.... ,..,:. fat.,os.,1. • .- ..r •• ,, . ,,,..„,.. . .t Map layers* n Hennepin County Parcels p�,,� ' \\ PWI -.-', .>r- j - ----Public Watercourses ice+&' `I+" TO 0 .033 .067 .1 r • si i _ ____ cd5 3' Miles 4! i Figure 5 - Wetland Delineation Map 4 ite a. ? > 44 '... 1 4 W__'' w .t :.- _..w.„.-, . - ----- . w t ` .-iiit .. • , c ?na '` ' c ;; DITCH� �s N.. 3% = CULVERT ,f` .7.--.4.,- ` i Ns a • A'. .ro • K' -Nik ''. CULVERT ,: .;� x \ _ / DI•i CH C r,_. Basin 3, • 3-UP a . . 3-WET a a YL 2-WET •2-UP ".'4' 'If, Iv `jy itre .. Rabin 2 ,.\•�: ..s > '4 Nom_-' Y• :, i ',v .R i 'iii--,:.;' i act s. y, y ,. 'may _ �? S,, P :�':F :,,...., , , 4 s 41 y .kr., -¢, ' "' a '. Map layers / ' Sample Points "" Hennepin County Parcels r F 0 .025 .05 .075 s °r °- Miles min Figure 6 Topographic Ma!:•_______ y //„. \,.. • ( ,-;---.»,„,,,-----..:-_,___ .., _.; ... .st..... , ___. ,„ \,,;.,___.,,, , ...-) ,-. . k t____-, ), , :::, ..,..„, -i --.) \ ,-- •------ • ( y ? ____,---\ „ - . , , , ,..,--„,. C-,..-- . • • .,-...-..,. ., l • - r, (',„- • 4 ' •-\\,----- • \ — 1 - , • -• - -.\ ---'... - ‘," '••••-• •,:•' 1 ;1) ,.-,\' ,' --7:-'-- 1 0 . \ ''-"--' I - • /-.'Wl/1 i-`,.... (///,/ •,..— 'r- ((i/ \'' \ r ,.• _- , .... ,,---- (..': ,,, ./.__..\..,..._...___.:_ i',...- _....,__---:--.-_- .-,....-__-'t::..\ ,4111.1i)\11.1._..(1= 4.:..._.1,....: ,,:_., ,_(: :1'11):....,,,.,..---1,,.,,..17:, 'i ' ---------- : a , / . , ----• I .--- ) ll i.. +3)\,,(•\ •-•,,,), .. , ,.. , ( ___, .. AP '• ,-, '3 -- 1.1 ,-;;) 4:1 \-1)lc -.2 • -,____••,.:_, '..;,'.•••*.• -- ;, )di L.C( •,,,,/ f : , (.__,--.z_,-,,,, )) ) \ .... . • , ----,- ..?,<- - \ ' ,,.,, , 1 • . ... . --,2-• 1-\ (--,,-,;.-_7,, ___— i ) - --,): 41,01 ., 10 1 ___ , . - • - . , ,, ._. _ .. . __ , ''., (-----=--,------‘ --,--:'.*--------"; •• _ -- - -------------r- ,.. r" --:-------- .__,.' -='-_ , , o O. ,-.----:-. 1' - '- - - -- ---.-. ' -. .-1.-..'..-- ..,, ,-/_:-- 'i - . //.. .....__.....,../: . cI - •••.-.- . ' , • I \'. '. ... . L, I I' i i 1 , , , ----- -) k!Ali j..— ‘7.-) ,/ •'1/Z '-'.'S---,*--•----------•:=:•-• •v\‘. Z"--•••.' - - • 4-: I 1 'It ( 1 V (i1• / ) . ' • i t / • •-• ,-,.3,--; ., .."'.-7 .---J. - - .s:-...•,. - --- —' —, • ---..\:\ . \'•-_I 1 ,) / I ,,,, i / ,...,,.., 1 1 , • .., "... H,1,,...„,t, - At,s• z-""--'''-_'-", •.,.,,_,, , \r,•-ok.,.. ., 4),,' "••••,..,_•.::•,••„,„ •. •(•\";--..,., 1•,, •____, . ..„,..- .______ ' • •••"-••'---, •••••••„.'" ••••.`\-.)' ch 4. ...."1._ ., ,•::::,--„,..,,,•,\) `,•",-, .a.! -;___ >;",-,:, 1,•'- ,,...,.•,, 'id'•• ......,- - • ------"--%,\ • - e'fo 1\4 , 1'-,.\\,_ • ----...--). -----:: -'•..\. •.,, " it, 1 •• V,•-•'-. . .---d , .,\... Maxwell / k :•.- i ''''', willib .-:7--7-- ,,,,..._ tdo•v,:, ••;:;,,., ,,., • ..... 1 - -; q ((• Bay ... i, .. ,... . T,• ,..„„ ) ) )/ /------ , 11„,I,k4;(..14,, Sz...., • \ \ v,,:•, ,...,,,,„....: ' -' ,i I \ , ,\ • IA \ •!..\ ^-------.,..%,,./ ./.1 1 ii;;--72---7,- . - ' * 1- '11 '''''' . 'Thp .1', .. •• ----_ '''' 1 4 ,--;•,,, .'", .-"ti• -..'—', __,---",,,/r;,-,//...4 .r 1 i.,./.?,•,,,,:.,,, , ', -,-_-------..-:-.--_--__... ,,i,:• 7") ',---'s--_ 7-7. - The State of Minnesota and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources makes no representations 0 0 0275 0 055 011 0 165 or warranties expressed or implied,with respect to the use of maps or geographic data provided IIN - 1111111N1,1. herewith regardless of its format or the means of its transmission.There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy,currency,suitability,or reliability of this data for any purpose.The user accepts the data"as is." Scale:1:6,761 N The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred as a result of any user reliance on this data.All maps and other material provided herein are protected by copyright Extreme care was used during the compilation of this product.However,due to changes in ownership and the need to rely on outside information,errors or omissions may exist If you should discover an oversight, • we encourage you to let us know by calling the DNR at 1-888-646-6367 or by e-mail at info.dnr@state.mn.us. Created on 10/14/2017 Note:Elevation images and contours were generated from LiDAR derived elevation surfaces acquired 2007-2012. Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 7 Hydric Rating Map) 452480 452570 452880 452750 452840 452330 453020 453110 453200 453290 44°57 54"N ^ '4 _..... ..,,.. ,. 0 44°57 54'N F7 '-- -,. .k ..,.. • ::7$+4 � r• ��'�7''� A s I'�`XIi__i 11,9gPa A, W , .:"' .�:< y-a,_.:. % of „R....*..".66.6,,,..6662,-'6; i o P n� t. - L22 2 T .,, s*,.. N. / chard Nta) ��,. it . Illit . J .lam * .:.4 • g©b0[gyp nag n046®naoaM as a@ 44"51 36 N ti 44°57 36"N 452480 452570 452880 452750 452840 452930 453020 453110 453200 453290 3 3 Map Scale:1:3,940 if pcap printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")street lq N Meters N 0 50 100 200 300 N Feet 0 Iso 300 600 Map projection:Web Mercator- Corner coordir3ates:WGS84 Edge tics:11TNlsoo Zone 15N WC�584 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 7 Hydric Rating Map Hydric Rating by Map Unit Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L22C2 Lester loam,6 to 10 2 0.9 2.7% percent slopes, moderately eroded L22D2 Lester loam,10 to 16 0 8.9 25.6% percent slopes, moderately eroded L22E Lester loam,10 to 22 0 1.6 4.6% percent slopes L37B Angus loam,2 to 6 5 12.1 34.8% percent slopes L64A Tadkee-Tadkee, 92 1.3 3.9% depressional, complex,0 to 2 percent slopes L132A Hamel-Glencoe 90 9.2 26.5% complex,0 to 2 percent slopes W Water 0 0.7 2.0% Totals for Area of Interest 34.6 100.0% Rating Options Aggregation Method:Percent Present Component Percent Cutoff:None Specified Tie-break Rule:Lower ail Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Appendices Appendix A Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us ri Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Crystal Bay section number: 9 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 Score using 1981-2010 normal period first prior second prior values are in inches third prior month: month: A'R'following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from September August month: radar-based estimates. 2017 2017 July 2017 estimated precipitation total for this location: missing 7.52R 4.12R there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.33 2.99 2.65 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.14 5.02 4.05 type of month: dry normal wet missing wet wet monthly score missing 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 3 = 3 multi-month score: missing 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Other Resources: • retrieve daily precipitation data • view radar-based precipitation estimates • view weekly precipitation maps • Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office- DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us 13 Nearest Station Precipitation Data Retrieval Minnesota's precipitation data archive is searched for data closest to a selected target location for each month. Values from the site closest to the target location are returned below after clicking the retrieve monthly data or retrieve daily data buttons. The precipitation data are made up of measured rainfall and the measured liquid content of snowfall. Temperature, snowfall, and snow depth data from National Weather Service reporting stations are no longer retrieved from this application. To obtain those data, see our newest data retrieval tool (May 2014). National Weather Service precipitation data continue to be available from this application. Obtaining data for legal purposes Guide for column headers in the data table target location: Hennepin-Excelsior-Crystal Bay 117N 23W S9 (latitude: 44.95646 longitude: 93.59411) click to select target location years: 2017 • to 2017 • number of missing days allowed per month: 3 retrieve monthly data I retrieve daily data results: Target: T117 R23 59 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn 00000000 pre (inches) dis Jan 2017 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG .56 5 mi . Feb 2017 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG .72 5 mi . Mar 2017 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG .56 5 mi . Apr 2017 27 117N 22w 29 BYRG 4.19 5 mi . May 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 5.38 4 mi . Jun 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 3.43 4 mi . Jul 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 3.77 4 mi . Aug 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 8.87 4 mi . Sep 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 2.06 4 mi . Oct 2017 m 999 mi . Nov 2017 m 999 mi . Dec 2017 m 999 mi . Where indicated:Missing values are shown as'm'.Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as'-'.'TTTT RR SS'is the'public land survey(PLS)'or'legal'location of the observed data.Section values greater 36 are SECTIC'TIC'locations plus 100.'NWS ID'the National Weather Service Cooperative station number.Note that the'PLS'will always be correct for precipitation data while the'NWS ID'will always be correct for the temperature data.If no PLS info is supplied the the'NWS ID'number applies to all shown data. State Climatology Office-MnDNR-Ecological and Water Resources Appendix B WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 1-UP Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM Section,Township,Range: Sec.9,T117N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameHamel-Glencoe JWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Juglans nigra 20 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 40.00% (A/B) 50 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 50 x 2= 100 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 85 x 4= 340 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 145 (A) 470 (B) 1 Bromus inermis 40 Y FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.24 2 Glechoma hederacea 25 Y FACU 3 Pilea pumila 20 Y FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Setaria pumila 10 N FAC _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % _ Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR2/1 100 loam 12-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam • *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) _2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ _ *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) _Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 1-WET Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM lection,Township,Range: Sec.9,T117N,R23W Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel-Glencoe 4WI Classification: PEM1Ad Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION —Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (NB) 10 =Total Cover Saoling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 95 x 2= 190 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 105 (A) 220 (B) 1 Echinochloa crus-galli 60 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.10 2 Elymus virginicus 15 N FACW 3 Solidago gigantea 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Setaria pumila 10 N FAC _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is. 3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 95 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc*" Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR2/1 98 7.5YR4/6 2 C PL silty clay loam 12-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weftand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required). _Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) _(C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) _Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Point 1-WET contained episaturated soil. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 2-UP Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM >ection,Township,Range: Sec.9,T117N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): footslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameAngus loam SWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N 'yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer rubrum 60 Y FAC that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 75.00% (A/B) 75 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 15 x 2= 30 4 FAC species 100 x 3= 300 5 FACU species 30 x 4= 120 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 radius ) Column totals 145 (A) 450 (B) 1 Rhamnus cathartica 40 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.10 2 Glechoma hederacea 30 Y FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 70 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Point 2-UP contained 25% leaf litter. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth M;attixX Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR2/2 100 loam 8-18 10YR3/2 100 loam 18-24 10YR4/3 100 loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) — *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) —Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that cooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots—Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) _(C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) _Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): >24 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 2-WET Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM lection,Township, Range: Sec.9,T117N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameAngus loam MI Classification: PUBH Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y F yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION —Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (NB) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 5 x 2= 10 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 15 (A) 20 (B) 1 Iris versicolor 10 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.33 2 Elymus virginicus 5 Y FACW 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 15 =Total Cover _(explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Point 2-WET contained 80%open water. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam 10-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: It is the professional opinion of Jacobson Environmental that this soil is hydric; this point appears to be inundated year-round. • HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required() X Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) _Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): +4 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Point 2-WET inundated 4". US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 3-UP Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM section,Township,Range: Sec.9,T117N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): footslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NamEAngus loam 4WI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION —Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Acer rubrum 60 Y FAC that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Tilia americana 10 N FACU Total Number of Dominant 3 Juglans nigra 10 N FACU Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) 80 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 100 x 3= 300 5 FACU species 60 x 4= 240 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 160 (A) 540 (B) 1 Rhamnus cathartica 40 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.38 2 Glechoma hederacea 40 Y FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 80 =Total Cover _(explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Point 3-UP contained 15% leaf litter. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 3-UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc*" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam 10-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) _Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl _Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) _Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B9) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes No Depth(inches): >24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No Depth(inches): >24 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/12/17 Applicant/Owner: Judson Dayton State: Minnesota Sampling Point: 3-WET Investigator(s): WEJ,ACM Section,Township,Range: Sec.9,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameAngus loam 4WI Classification: PEMIBd Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation N ,soil N ,or hydrology N naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y `yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION —Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub strat (Plot size: 15'radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 60 x 2= 120 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) Column totals 80 (A) 160 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.00 2 Elymus virginicus 20 Y FACW 3 Solanum dulcamara 10 N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Carex lacustris 5 N OBL _Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Iris versicolor 5 N OBL X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 553.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 80 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Point 3-WET contained 15% leaf litter. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 3-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR2/1 100 silty clay loam 10-24 10YR2/1 100 clay loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) ~_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ _ *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: It is the professional opinion of Jacobson Environmental that this soil is hydric. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(B2) _(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): - Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Appendix C h:r ,.4�„ '-...__'11-,,,i7:4040,10....„,,, uiou. " r v. br 44 sxs t ,C �; r. 1-UP 1-WET j> i4 -, .-' r t ' ' . �. .scat •`k5. 4 kV • v. ak Fe. 1-Representative 2-UP : _ _ __ I ti _ s _. .. 2-WET 2-Representative • 1,4 to r/ S r z;Y r ti • `1s • rr • IV • 3-UP 3-WET • • 3-Representative Appendix D Project Name and/or Number: 2017-299 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant,lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Judson Dayton Mailing Address: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South,Orono,Minnesota 55391 Phone: (612)867-4427 E-mail Address: judsondayton@mac.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Wayne Jacobson Mailing Address: 5821 Humboldt Avenue South,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430 Phone: (612)802-6619 E-mail Address: jacobsonenv@msn.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 0911723210001,0911723210004,0911723210005 Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): Sec.9.,T117N,R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 26.47 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: htto://www.mvp.usace.armv.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatorvDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland,lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 2017-299 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts.Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Type of Impact Duration of County,Major Aquatic Resource Aquatic Existing Plant (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Size of Watershed#, ID(as noted on Resource Type drain,or Permanent(P) Size of Impact' Aquatic Community and Bank (wetland,lake, Type(s)in overhead view) remove or Temporary Resource 3 Service Area# tributary etc.) vegetation) (T)1 Impact Area` of Impact Areas 'If impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". 'Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts S0 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet). 'This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". `Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3"Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. 'Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-aoolication consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below,I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize Wayne Jacobson to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request,supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 2017-299 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU)provide me with the following(check all that apply): X Wetland Type Confirmation XDelineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). XPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PJD)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters,including wetlands,identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination(AJD)is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). http://www.mvp.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Resulatorv/DelineationJDGuidance.asax Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit J Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1.PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Judson Dayton Dayton 825 Old Crystal Bay 10/19/2017 W17-50 Complete ®Attach site locator map ®Attach approved boundaries Type of Decision: • ®Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss 0 Exemption ❑ Sequencing I! ❑Replacement Plan ❑Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): 0 Approve 0 Approve with conditions 0 Deny Summary(or attach): 2.LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 12/19/2017 1 Approved ❑Approved with conditions(include below) 0 Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Judson Dayton has applied for a wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road(PID 0911723210001,0911723210004,0911723210005)in the City of Orono, Hennepin County,Minnesota.Legal description: Section 9,Township 117N,Range 23W.The boundary&type approval was requested October 19,2017. A wetland delineation was conducted by Jacobson Environmental on October 12,2017.A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on October 19,2017.Three wetlands were delineated within the project area.Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 1 seasonally flooded basin.Wetland 2 was identified as a Type 5 shallow open water wetland.Wetland 3 was identified as a Type 2 fresh wet meadow wetland. MCWD reviewed the boundaries in the field on November 15,2017.A change to the boundary was requested and the amended boundary map is attached. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as documented in the delineation report submitted on October 19,2017 and delineated in the field on October 12,2017.This decision is valid for five years.A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. rr BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq.ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp.9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Elizabeth Showalter Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail 12/19/2017 (952)641-4518 `grAPPL_ eshowalter@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal(30 days)has expired.If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal,the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and $0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 4.LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member:Stacey Lijewski-Stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us /.1 BWSR TEP member:Ben Carlson—ben.carlson@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ❑ DNR TEP • DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member):Becky Horton— becky.borton@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different):Judson Dayton-judsondayton®mac.com ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only):Melanie Curtis- mcurtis(aci.orono.mq us,jacobsonenv®msn.com n Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Ryan Malterud— R an.m.malternd@usace.army.mil • BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5.MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP!representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutb*sr/worIcareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Hwy.2 Div.Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions,see:http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers:www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St.East,Suite 700 St.Paul,MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 6.ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: 0 Approved boundary map El 0 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 Google Maps 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd S Figure 1 Site Map i;•ron ♦ .+y ; �� . 11 . 4114 The Woods Chapel 4•0? '"' -' t iI'lltt.H: ® e' Funk it''r. r' , 71 ) t 1r. �yT 1 'A ..lt,I it ::....4._`: "4:0.7.0, Herg _ r A 11ek' E ;26.' t. . '�.. i-.4'."417 ra: ........_411Z1'p i. fir? ,::',71: l � x d . JO * or X 825 Oki Crystal "'� _ - •....c 'a►-= Ba'y�R d.Sou r ., -, _ 14\ ..•--' II -'V , + d` -�._. _ • ' , f Your Boat Club' 10 - s',i ° i w ' T Minnetonkw, �!"}` C t } i t _ T. r* 5t ,k c i a Noeren4ber " � French �" h `� c A•iemorlal� m 'V J-- P , :. r �.'' r . r -4. ,;. ,�¢.•�.`•i�� c�,,' Bounty Paarke o' Li, I. 47..".4 rl'„ Ip " ' r L''`e:,� 4 "ne�Dr p ' a- �r� ` y.9aY. ._, �e,� Memona!Gardens .44;Shore. ` ) �� ff' r . y4 7I, .. 104 • ,fir + ,( s r t '¢ 'its .,, f " Minnetonka r .4,,,;, v Narthshore�Mara ._w aunch {� ``` : a4.v'it ane r s ' �� , CeC700g�e�rts d Fr w� ', 1' t Yom";��r rte+ i• v Shore'Dr•CRYTlAL,BAY N, \Lam': ._ �,, a Imagery©2017 Google,Map data©2017 Google United States 1000 ft Figure 5 - Updated Wetland Delineation Map ` v�� . ` �� . ir, , _ vego le •-.„., 0...._ , ,,. , IIP ro ..,L. Ir. 20A5F,IPP-_____AINS NEVIDii. X ,* imp«rf . ....- . JePti " ''- ""Iir --' -'" — 0 X ..." '1111§1Wir.;‘, illiilifeolferfiwa-wor,„.„....millailliMiliet, 0 _ • 11101110000 0 :8' .4, • IP 0 .13 4" '."'.: 4,4; ' 03 •C ' Ift i'Ar: • ',' p tItv't . '„,..,.;:lAcy ,,, ' '-'t v ',iv , Atsc * - ... e lip .., 4. , ,„4.....r,...dir; -41•'-,itailk: .1074 *. . . ' 4 • 4t, 11* :404 t „4 L 1 • '4' s•2, . . A,.....tillik -. ,:•„,,n.• :).4.„ ,1,.. -i......4: , .. -- . ..% ...... II. ,AlliFfr lAtt" 'Cc! . - t --.4.- „ , , , •• '°• . . 5 • a . . - , ..,,, 75 . -ikaitt` tIt'l „,,, :tie' 4t *,- . ” ,,,,:. 1.. ,i, , ,,,,,, . * . . . , . _ 7 „ ,..,.. . . _ . . , ...,.. ,..... , •AV ' . ''' - . 4 ., .. • , • \ ., . 1 ,.,' •••.,S I... k ,, 'i . , ' ••_IL. •— '- 4 , --- - /, .Alt • - _ .,,,, 4,- , " , ... i . / '.., .. ' ' , ' ,7 -.4' ' 41 „ .1 •,_ .< ''' / / ....- ,--- 44, .....,,- '''''',IR , -- -'• ' ',.• .t. --... , ..- s,..,,,i.,' ,. ir.....,.„ ,),,„w,-lir—t•4%ti,. , siii7 :•,_4 ,„,... cu ." ,i,P‘.: ' '4.*" CD L— •7 ,.- 4 %- • > .... _c:. it iolif- i Li) . .. ,.,. 7 .., ....„.,,. ..,...., . ,,,. .,.„ .,..„,„..,,, .... ., . ..,„„,,474.'1,4.0 .. ''' , . . =' � .; '''';'S... Existing House @ .r `Y"� ; . ' ''�, .•ag, 825 OCB _ . \ ,.. �.. qqyy�� • k-At-,.. ,,',: • AC On.,..11."4,!,.•• • -, 14,-,-"- piy • .s� N _ .'a 1 . Lot 2 Home s • i :^, ,� site location f .e k 't tit, ,. ..,- . x.,..., . , .. _ .„.„.._ ,, . .. ._ ..... . . .. . Average Lakeshore Exhibit (Facing South) t tt ..... gik• .# , ' Bey, •" 'XV. .' : t - `- ., ie ‘..t.: s •A tii,i ix. . a .,g F Fy w y��1if� .�" •r- Ts! .. • Y Lik --,,,,t,': S C+ r ti » ,r., s am. .. ,A 3051 Farview PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit L MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER QUALITY OF LIFE March 7, 2018 Melanie Curtis 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: 825 Old Crystal Bay Road, Orono Dear Ms. Curtis, Thank you for providing me with an opportunity to comment on the proposed subdivision at 825 Old Crystal Bay Road in the City of Orono. First,the preliminary plat plan provided to me depicts the wetland boundaries included in the application for Boundary and Type Concurrence under the Wetland Conservation Act.Those boundaries were adjusted in the field, and the approved wetland boundary for Wetland 1 is larger than originally delineated.The approved boundary is attached. I recommend that the applicant update the preliminary plat drawings with the approved wetland boundary. Second, I would like to formally address the MCWD permitting requirements for the project. Single family homes are exempt from the stormwater management rule, but subdivision of a parcel of one acre or more into three or more lots, requires stormwater treatment. The MCWD adopted definitions define parcel as contiguous land under common ownership, so the parcel for the purposes of determining stormwter treatment includes the two lots owned by Judson Dayton to the southeast of the property proposed for subdivision under this application.While this plat only involves a two lot subdivision, it is my understanding that a future project will involve lot line adjustment and construction of new homes on the two lots to the southeast. Considering the project in aggregate, under the common scheme of development framework,the overall subdivision is required to provide stormwater treatment.The scope of treatment is dependent on the amount of site disturbance and increase in impervious surface, and phosphorus, rate,and volume control must be provided for either the new or existing impervious surface. Whenever the stormwater management rule is triggered,the buffer provision of the wetland protection rule is triggered,and buffers must be provided downgradient of disturbance. Due to the complicated nature of the project, I recommend that the applicants schedule a pre-application meeting with District permitting staff. If you have any questions, please contact me at eshowalter@minnehahacreek.org or 952-641-4518. Sincerely, Elizabeth Showalter Permitting Technician We collaborate with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water for current and future generations. 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard,Minnetonka,MN 55345 • (952)471-0590 • Fax:(952)471-0682 • www.minnehahacreek.org .._. a , , ft: --.-1 I► - �� _ w,. - #LA18-000022 I .> •" i may•° R ; .r • 5i , t „ ` 41. Exhibit M #� � ,� k. 1. 1,,.,_:.).)i.-: ,�, � 0..S. .>.. ° t � 1 a - "-� 1,1-' • 1,- - a _ tb pit' 5 t;,'S a�' J ** y� 1 r �l � 44'1 — ;�.f`"- _ ,k Legend IT- `, • 1 .rr a ' ." ' r �,` ® Sanitary Manhole I 1 wX11 - x 1 `-A. ,t ;wi r �' �1 Sanitary Manhole(MCES) i ! .a �r• ..p 0 _ Ai Lt .1 i�Mk''- - .r .-yt <8 Sanitary Lift Station * KF- / • al irk•° „ ,, it r ; K:\139\13906005\Cod\RP005\dwg\139060050403.dwg Thursdoy,September 04.2008 2:05:35 PM Mill CD CD CO CD ' - - - 8 M 5V8 '' "91 I -— —— —-- ___ o 8 r 1 .; I I �aS 9462' 1 II .oa 5 o I r II �� SNE 8 I'; rw 1, "w M'` I i' P�A I �m R m m ' A g 9469 — it riig I,I c gg 1 g O�a 111 w ill- J 8 to 1 r I :6) \ L' ❑ _21I i> - 8 — _co ' • 9436 1 =O A , w. n n I 77 u � ag , 0 1 e� 9425 I �. I vD - I o 8 ' i , I 5,,- , w I r F I 1 I . CI ,m� y I '11 , I \ M. 1 1 _ .-..°V18 8 = $,^:l 1 N - 8450 I L �L' —. ---.. AO . ,o O c o $m 8 CO 1111 A !. I A,., p' � A' n I I':I ,..,.L 1 ii8 sest) ' 0 Ilei � \\` C' S m r I �ay 8 961 9 C 1t1 n 71 m I ,� , ') -I I1 _) 11 70 1 n X69I 1\ 0 of.N I c� u 1 —1 !•.' Z V o �� 1 I'� yu A_ A '� 17 :i 0 Iki o 9,.e R 8 n i a ons ? z AL, dJ 1 I cr) ,- �A If; 1 n mom( P, �N. 4Is Q� 11 TO - \ fArl }w to Ili� I— +Ino r-� 1 „ Lm Z En,J $°E I `■■�� , � ,a . 9601 ; z / $- 0II, \I m m 8 2 `' L `4;41„, _, y/' \'\` cn g, /1`I,�Z 881 " o0 7 Imp 1 O A'<o 11\ II 'I gZ is if. 2m �\ \\ Z .9� j m g ^ Ne=x m y o \ o III 1 t{ � µ 1 ,‘ P a� r.' I , n 9g 987 IS / L s'm^ 0 r O 8 I � _<c)� �� • ISI n A I 1s' o › ' Avg 1 996A / / ,( , • 4 \ \ • co ID CO (JI (.1 .in N 1 C . w• \, f7 ORONO, MINNESOTA se.v. orae. IIRS DIRECT SOPEMAISIOR 2335 West Hi9hwaY 36 I AY A OW PREPARED LICENSE!,°PO EE9 .4 FARVIEW LANE SEWER #BOI125tr00 St.Poul,MN 55113 le:.,•I a 1 E,R OMER W"" 0119.40 p` w B K Phone:651-636-4600 suw WiS n a'. FORCEMAIN PLAN Fax 651-636-1311 OM at/;s/mor OBC7,1700 3008 wwwponesiroo.corn Mtt '/"' uc.eo. .. -M0110 NO,0 PC #LA18-000022 Exhibit N Sec.78-305.-Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1A district shall exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Side Yard Lot Lot Front Side Rear Adjacent Area Width Yard Yard Yard (acre) (feet) (feet) (feet) to Street (feet) (feet) r 2 200 50 30 30 50 (c) Within the LR-1A zoning district, the side yard setback for lots that are non-conforming as to their width shall be the lessor of 30 feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than ten feet. (Code 1984, § 10.23(6); Ord. No. 18 3rd series, § 3, 9-27-2004; Ord.No. 173 3rd series, § 4, 6- 27-2016; Ord.No. 199 3rd series, § 2, 6-12-2017) Sec.78-1370.-Special standards for back lots created after January 1, 1994. Back lots which were created as part of a subdivision that received preliminary subdivision approval after January 1, 1994, are subject to the following special requirements in addition to the standards required in section 82-256: (1) Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as follows: a. Lot area shall be 150 percent of the zoning district requirement. Wetlands may be allowed as area credit for meeting the 150 percent back lot area requirement, as long as the back lot contains sufficient contiguous dry buildable land to satisfy the minimum acreage requirement of the underlying zoning district. b. Lot width measured parallel to the front or street lot line at the street yard setback line of a lakeshore back lot, or at the front yard setback line of a non-lakeshore back lot, shall meet the zoning district width requirement. The street yard or front yard for any back lot will be a yard starting where the narrow access outlot corridor ends and the lot begins. Lakeshore back lots shall meet the lot width standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line, and at the street yard setback line. c. The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150 percent of the zoning district front yard requirement. d. The required side yard and rear yard depths for back lots shall be 150 percent of the zoning district yard requirements. The required lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirements. (2) A front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards; except that the required side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning district. (3) Access requirements shall be as follows: a. Access outlots shall be 30 feet minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. b. In approving front/back lot divisions, the city may require that both front lot and back lot share a driveway access within the access outlot if the council determines that creating an additional access to the existing street will be a potential safety hazard. c. Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least ten feet from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. d. No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. e. No access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent access outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private road meeting city standards. (4) Screening requirements shall be as follows: a. Driveways constructed in access outlots shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the city, at all points to the rear of the required street yard of the front lot, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yard of adjacent lots. • b. The street yard of the back lot shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the city, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear yards of adjacent lots. (5) Accessory structures shall adhere to all requirements of this chapter, with the following additional requirements: a. Accessory structures within a back lot shall be allowed no closer than ten feet to a neighboring property's side or rear yard. b. Accessory structures shall not be allowed within the required street yard of a back lot nor within the required rear yard of a front lot which abuts the street yard of a back lot. c. No accessory structure shall be allowed within an access outlot. (Ord.No. 122 2nd series, § 2, 12-13-1993; Ord.No. 64 3rd series, § 1, 9-14-09) Sec.82-224.-Sewerage facilities. (a) General requirements. Where public sanitary sewer is available, the subdivider shall install sanitary sewer facilities in a manner prescribed by the city's construction standards, specifications and provisions of this Code. All plans shall be designed in accordance with the rules, regulations and standards of the city, state health department, and other appropriate agencies. Plans shall be approved by these agencies. (b) Connection. Where a public sanitary sewerage system is reasonably accessible, the applicant shall connect the system and provide sewers accessible to each lot in the subdivision. (c) Central system. Where public sanitary sewerage systems are not reasonably accessible but will become available within a reasonable time (not to exceed 15 years), the applicant may choose a central sewerage system. The maintenance cost shall be assessed against each property benefited. Where plans for future public sanitary sewerage systems exist, the applicant shall install the sewer lines, laterals and mains to be in permanent conformance with such plans and ready for connection to such public sewer mains. (d) Septic system. Where sanitary sewerage systems are not reasonably accessible and will not become available for a period in excess of 15 years, the applicant may install a sewerage system in accordance with chapter 58, article II. (e) Design criteria for sanitary sewers. (1) Generally. These design criteria are not intended to cover extraordinary situations. Deviations will be allowed and may be required in those instances where considered justified by the city. (2) Design factors. Sanitary sewerage systems should be designed for the ultimate tributary population. Due consideration should be given to current zoning regulations and approved planning and zoning reports where applicable. Sewer capacities should be adequate to handle the anticipated maximum hourly quantity of sewage and industrial waste together with an adequate allowance for infiltration and other extraneous flow. Sewers shall be designed in accordance with standards and specifications approved by the city. (Code 1984, § 11.43) Sec.82-256.-Double-frontage lots,access to lots,and front/back lot divisions. (a) Double-frontage lots. Double-frontage and reversed-frontage lots shall be avoided except where necessary to provide separation of residential development from traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. (b) Access from any arterial roadway. Lots shall not, in general, derive access exclusively from an arterial roadway. Where driveway access from any arterial roadway may be necessary for several adjoining lots, the council may require that such lots be served by a combined access drive in order to limit possible traffic hazard on such roadway. Where possible, driveways shall be designed and arranged so as to avoid requiring vehicles to back into traffic on any arterial roadway. (c) Front/back lot subdivisions. Flag lots and easement back lots shall not be created. Front/back lot divisions shall be allowed only in conjunction with the creation of an outlot to provide access from the back lot to the public or private road. Such outlot shall not be allowed as creditable lot area for either the back or front lots. Front/back lot subdivisions shall adhere to the following standards: (1) Applicability. a. Front/back lot divisions may be used when existing property dimensions are narrow and deep, such that lot width does not allow for a side-by-side lot split, but acreage is adequate to provide a front lot and a back lot without requiring an area variance when the area of the outlot access corridor is excluded. b. Front/back lot divisions may be used for individual lot splits but may not be used when subdividing a large parcel into numerous lots if creation of a back lot is merely a convenience to the developer rather than supported by unique site factors. c. A front/back lot division shall not be allowed when any existing residence on a neighboring property abutting the proposed access outlot is located nearer its affected side lot line than a distance equivalent to the zoning district required front yard depth. (2) Dimensional standards. Dimensional standards for back lots shall be as follows: a. Lot area shall be 150 percent of the zoning district requirement. Wetlands may be allowed as area credit for meeting the 150 percent back lot area requirement, as long as the back lot contains sufficient contiguous dry buildable land to satisfy the minimum acreage requirement of the underlying zoning district. b. Lot width measured parallel to the front or street lot line at the street yard setback line of a lakeshore back lot, or at the rear of the front yard setback line of a non-lakeshore back lot, shall meet the zoning district width requirement. The street yard or front yard for any back lot will be a yard starting where the narrow access outlot corridor ends and the lot begins. Lakeshore back lots shall meet the lot width standard at the shoreline, at the lakeshore setback line and at the street yard setback line. c. The depth of the required street yard or front yard shall be 150 percent of the zoning district front yard requirement. d. The required side yard and rear yard depths for back lots shall be 150 percent of the zoning district yard requirements. The required lakeshore yard of a lakeshore back lot shall meet the zoning district lakeshore yard requirements. (3) Dimensional standards for front lots. A front lot created as part of a front/back lot division shall meet all zoning district area, width and setback standards; except that the required side yard of the front lot adjacent to the access outlot shall be equivalent to the side street yard requirement for that zoning district. (4) Access requirements. a. Access outlots shall be 30 feet minimum width, and shall be wide enough to accommodate drainage, snow removal and screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. b. In approving front/back lot divisions, the city may require that both front lot and back lot share a driveway access within the access outlot if the council determines that creating an additional access to the existing street will be a potential safety hazard. c. Driveways within a back lot shall be located at least ten feet from the side or rear lot lines of adjacent lots. d. No more than two residences may be served by a driveway located within an access outlot. e. No access outlot may be platted abutting an adjacent outlot except when the intent is to combine the two access outlots for creation of a public or private road meeting city standards. (5) Screening requirements and accessory structure standards. Front/back lot subdivisions shall be designed in a manner such that the screening requirements and accessory structure standards of section 78-1370 can be met. (6) Effective date. The requirements and standards of this section shall apply only to those front/back lot divisions which received preliminary plat approval after January 1, 1994. (Code 1984, § 11.31(5); Ord.No. 122 2nd series, § 3, 12-13-1993; Ord.No. 64 3rd series, § 2, 9- 14-2009) pC Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map #LA1s-000022 Hennepin Exhibit O Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: l • 'i tile • 04-117-23-3 Q•4:1„,;,,..' = z ,1 04-117-23-43 • tiAiiiiillx,,,,i,.cler,-. E4' Ilr' ,,_ ,,, . __ _ 0�-117-23-22 +9-11 09.117 3-12 te . 1 il/ d a{K �e 3 `� b i fit.' ` A" '+P" Y`�" J.3`RR(^ .. ..t." ik a... •o _ 09-117-23-2 09-1 -23- 09-117-23-1'2 #. < ' zr< r .iii �'},` 5 . a w r y 'k , a /x t, y,`Ar ..3. � r '''- '1.":1;4`„::(q).:-. },0j; I { ' - = ` 'OW4 09-117-23-13 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: ( ' i i l i i i l 825 Old Crystal Bay Road South Orono,MN 55391 For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street Sou th RECE��aY Minneapolis,MN 55487 GC G2��''11�� gis.info Street pin.us :It3 DEC12Z011 CITY OF ORONO 9 PC #LA18-000022 RUN DATE:12/04/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) Exhibit P 38 04-117-23 33 0008 38 04-117-23 43 0012 38 09-117-23 21 000/ L WANG&L SHANG H F KAHLER&E KAHLER JAY R SWENSON 3059 FARVIEW LA 2725 RAINEY RD 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 LIXIAO WANG H F KAHLER&E KAHLER JAY R SWENSON LING SHANG 2725 RAINEY RD 2850 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 3059 FARVIEW LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04117-23 33 0009 38 04-117-23 43 0014 38 09-117-23 21 0008 D J DELANEY&F K DELANEY RICHARD K WYSOCKI ETAL W R LANGTON&M K LANGTON 3051 FARVIEW LA 2770 RAINEY RD 2870 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID J&FRANCINE K DELANEY RICHARD&APRIL WYSOCKI WILLIAM R LANGTON 3051 FARVIEW LA 2770 RAINEY RD MICHELLE K LANGTON LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 2870 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0002 38 04-117-23 43 0017 38 09-117-23 21 0009 T G KELLEY&ASHLY N KELLEY TREES TO BE PRIVATE RD ASSOC STEVEN BLUM 2879 FARVIEW LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2885 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 TYLER G KELLEY TREES TO BE ASSOCIATION STEVEN BLUM ASHLY N KELLEY 2685 RAINEY RD 1880 FOX ST 2879 FARVIEW LN WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0003 38 09-117-23 12 0001 38 09-117-23 210010 S L DANIELSON/S M DANIELSON KEATON R FREES MARY L HOLMES 2811 FARVIEW LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2865 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 SCOTT DANIELSON KEATON R FREES MARY L HOLMES SHARI DANIELSON 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 2865 LITTLE ORCHARD WAY 2811 FARVIEW LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0008 38 09-117-23 12 0002 GARY L WILSON JAMES P&HEIDI H WILLIAMS 2943 FARVIEW LA 840 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 GARY L WILSON JAMES P&HEIDI H WILLIAMS 2943 FARVIEW LA 840 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0009 38 09-117-23 12 0005 SHIRLEY 1 BILLIGMEIER ANDREW J ELLWEIN TR SUBJ/L E 2935 FARVIEW LA 850 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 SHIRLEY BILLIGMEIER MICHAEL D ELLWEIN 2935 FARVIEW LANE 850 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23340010 38 09-117-23120006 MARGHERITA G HARRIS REV TRST CS&S H LANNOM 2927 FARVIEW LA 870 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 MARGHERITA GALE HARRIS TRST CHARLES S&SUSAN H LANNOM 2927 FARVIEW LA 870 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0014 38 09-117-23 21 0001 A L SCHREINER&W R SCHWARTZ JUDSON M DAYTON ETAL TASTES 3060 FARVIEW LA 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 AMANDA L SCHREINER JUDSON M DAYTON WILLIAM R SCHWARTZ TCF TOWER SUITE 860 3060 FARVIEW LA 121 S 8TH ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 3 R 117-23 3 38U SO M ATO21 3 9 9 6 KAREN JOAN BAKER REVOC TRUST JUDSON M DAYTON ETAL TASTES 790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 KAREN JOAN BAKER JUDSON M DAYTON 790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S TCF TOWER SUITE 860 WAYZATA MN 55391 121 S 8TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 38 04-117-23 43 0008 38 09-117-23 21 0005 RECEIVED KEATON R FREES JUDSON M DAYTON ETAL TASTES 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S � GO ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 11 KEATON R FREES JUDSON M DAYTON 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD TCF TOWER SUITE 860 WAYZATA MN 55391 121 S 8TH ST CITY OF ORONO MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 r ,r, Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED DEC 1LZZ01/ # 3996 CITY OF ORONO PC ` #LA18-000022 [ \ BOLTON & MENK Exhibit Q Real People.Real Solutions. Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com March 15,2018 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono,MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 2018-3996 Topside Engineering Review#1 Dear Melanie: As requested,we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1. Per City Code,this location is designated for connection to City sanitary sewer when developed. However,the applicant has submitted an application for waiver of sanitary sewer connection due to perceived hardships. We have discussed this requirement and application for waiver with the City Engineer and defer to the City regarding sanitary service for this plat. 2. Perimeter erosion control measures(siltfence,rock entrance,etc.)should be indicated on the plan. If septic sites are allowed,protection fencing should also be installed around sites. Measures should be installed by the Contractor and inspected by the City prior to any other work. Contractor must provide minimum 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 3. Retaining walls 4' or greater in height must be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer. Tiered walls less than double the height of the lower wall apart will be considered one wall. Wall plans should be submitted for review and approval prior to construction. 4. It is unclear what is proposed for common driveway. If the driveway for Lot 2 is connected directly to Lot l's driveway instead of the common driveway in Outlot A, an easement for the shared portion will be necessary. 5. A Final Landscape Plan should be submitted with the Final Plans. The Plan should include the following: a. Types and locations of proposed restoration. b. De-compaction of existing soils under removed impervious surfaces with 12"ripping depth prior to placement of topsoil. c. Trees to be removed. d. Trees to be preserved. e. Additional trees to be planted. 6. A Flowage and Conservation easement will be required over all wetlands. 7. Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided as follows: a. Over all stormwater management facilities used to meet regulatory requirements. b. All swales and storm sewer providing drainage for multiple properties. c. 5' along all side lot lines, unless adjacent to Development boundary. d. 10' along all front lot lines, rear lot lines, and adjacent to Development boundary. 8. A conservation easement should be provided over the 20' buffer of trees to be maintained H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-2018-xxxx Topside\Topside_PrePlatReview-1_2018-03-15.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. l Preliminary Plat Application 2018-3996 Topside Page 2 between lots and the undisturbed portion of the significant tree stand on Lot 1,as identified in the Conservation Design Master Plan,to preserve as many of the mature maple and oak trees as possible. 9. The applicant may be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 10. If more than 1 acre is disturbed, the applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit(NPDES)to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity. If required,a copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity,and Final Plans should include a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 11. If the applicant is required to install stormwater management facilities on site to meet MCWD or NPDES requirements, a Maintenance Agreement should be submitted for all stormwater management structures and facilities and be recorded with the County. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities, and outline reporting requirements. 12. Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. If you have any questions or comments,please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton&Menk, Inc. .6 .6rt4E 6(4 Robert E. Bean,Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-2018-xxxx Topside\Topside_PrePlatRevfew-1 2018-03-15.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Item 3 Date Application Received: 2.19.18 OA Date Application Considered as Complete:2.19.18 . , fig- VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 4.20.18 1.To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members <i Dustin Rief,City Administrator ICES HO�`� From: Laura Oakden,Planner Date: March 19,2018 Subject: LA18-000013, Nathan VanCamp,601 Minnetonka Highland Lane, Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval Background The applicant is proposed to build an addition to an existing home. The home is surrounded by three streets. Thi?applicant is proposing to build the addition towards the one shared lot line away from all the streets. This shared lot line is considered the rear yard and has a 30 foot setback in the LR-1B district. The applicant is looking to place the addition 18.8 feet from the rear property line. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Front 35' 62' No Change Rear 30' 38.9' 18.8' Street(North) 20' 82.9' 50.1' Street(South) 20' 40.1' No Change Wetland 35' +/-20' No Change Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 18,861 s.f. (0.43 acre) Allowed: 3,772.2 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2018 s.f. (10.6%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 3 18,861 s.f. 6,601.35 s.f. 4,962 s.f. 5,109 s.f. (35%) (26.3%) (27.1%) s 17 Marc❑❑M2= Age 2 of❑ Applicable Regulations: Rear Setback(78-350) There is a 30 foot setback requirements for principle structures to the rear property line. The applicant is asking for an 18.8 foot setback due to the constraints on the lot. This lot is surrounded on 3 sides by right of way and has a wetland located within the front yard on the east side of the lot. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community,existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration,and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd.6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicants propose to construct an addition to the existing residence on a residential property which is in line with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance resulting in a permit for an addition to a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls The request to permit an additions to the existing home within the 30 foot rear street area appears to be reasonable as the adjacent properties do not appear to be adversely impacted; the home is confined by streets in 3 sides and a wetland to the east of the home limited the build envelope on the property. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing home, and neighboring homes are separated sufficiently to allow for light, air, and open space between the homes and the proposed addition, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The scale or setbacks of the proposed addition to the home will not alter the character of the neighborhood.The setback in question is the rear yard because the frontage along Tonkawa is the shortest street frontage,although the front of the house faces Minnetonka Highlands Lane. From a character of the neighborhood,the ❑GE IITEEJ ri Marc.❑ ;vo[i cage❑of❑ rear yard looks and feels like a side yard which would require a 10 foot side yard. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The lot is unique because it is surround my right of way on three side and a wetland is located on the east side of the parcel which covers a large portion of the front yard.The proposed addition seems to be reasonable for this existing home and lot. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The proposed home with the addition will be generally in line with the neighboring homes. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant have indicated that this criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The existing wetland and being surrounds on 3 sides by right of way creates a limited building area for an addition to the home;the variance is necessary and will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds there is inherent practical difficulties exist with the location of the wetland and the • n[iCILTL LU Marc:ElLCAD nage of proximity of the right of way on 3 sides of the parcel. The addition would create an 18.8 feet rear yard setback toward the only internal shared property line. Due to the orientation of the home the rear yard acts as a side yard for the property owner and neighboring residents. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The Planning staff recommend approval for a rear setback of 18.8 feet. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List and Map Letter View Exhibit A LA18-000013 Land Use Application Summary PC Application Date: 02/19/2018 Address: 601 MINNETONKA HGLD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0611723410091 Land Use Number: LA18-000013 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: NATHAN VANCAMP Address: WENDY S VANCAMP 601 MINNETONKA HGLD LA LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Nathan VanCamp Address: 601 Minnetonka Highland Lane Orono , MN 55356 Project Description: Rear Yard Setback & Second Driveway Entrance Land Use Application Type: Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary(2).htm[3/15/2018 1:44:00 PM] Letter View Exhibit B LA18-000013 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM Pc LA18-000013 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The proposed addition will provide expanded garage, living space, storage and a fourth bedroom to accommodate a growing family of five. Use of the secondary driveway off of Elm Street to access the new tuck-under garage will be in a manner that is consistent with the current driveway usage. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The location of the wetland and surrounding streets make it impossible to build an addition without infringing upon the setback requirements. The proposed addition is intentionally the furthest possible location from wetlands to maximize the buffer area. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed addition maintains the homes original design and will make the home more proportional with the size of the surrounding homes. In addition to the primary driveway from Minnetonka Highlands Lane, the property has two culverted entrances off of Elm Street that existed when purchased by the homeowners and this accessibility was part of the appeal of the property. Neighbors have confirmed these entrances existed at least 24 years. The previous homeowners built the home and it is likely these entrances have been in use since the time the home was built, in 1977. Continued use will not impose on the neighborhood or surrounding streets. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The proposed improvements will be more cost effective than purchasing a different home in the Orono that offers the required space. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(2).htm[3/15/2018 1:43:50 PM] Letter View ' Response: The proposed addition must be located on the west side of the home to adhere to the 35 foot setback from a wetland, which is located on the east side of the home. Expanding garage space utilizing the primary (south facing) driveway is not possible due to the wetland setback. This is another factor for the proposed garage entrance facing the north, using the secondary driveway entrance connecting to Elm Street. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The property has a unique combination of conditions including being surrounded by three streets and containing a delineated wetland. The boundary requirements associated with these limitations make the proposed work the best alternative solution and do not constitute grounds for other exemptions where these conditions are not present. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The ability to access the rear of the property from Elm Street is used extensively by the homeowners for recreation and maintenance. The fourth bedroom and storage are needed to accommodate a family of five. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The secondary driveway does not allow for vehicles to pass through the property and will not be a safety concern for the surrounding streets from that perspective. The home addition will not impose on the character, or function, of the adjacent property. To substantiate this, a few surrounding neighbors have signed letters in favor of the project, including the neighboring property where the rear setback would be closer than allowed. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Continued use of the Elm Street drive entrance is needed for delivery of the homes primary fuel source (firewood). It is not practical to manually move firewood from the front driveway to the rear of the home. Additionally, the driveway is used recreationally for off street trailer parking. The added bedroom and storage space is needed to comfortably accommodate the family and the homeowners will likely need to purchase a different home if the variance application is denied. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(2).htm[3/15/2018 1:43:50 PM] Exhibit C LA18-000013 PC CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYpA MP OF LOTSFOR NATHAN MINNETONKA ONKUMMIT PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA BLOCK 8 8 66 eit 1O ; ; 9 1 ELM STREEI2aeye- , ' N 82°52;45' (...n --- _ `T, 1R 1we---Ne- Ili-, - - __s-•Ee--) wxr Ii co--_91s-- �I far. i CI'D r,' /� :,I WO \�\I tD a LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES . crive AY I\-- v wom I in 0 Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 9, MNNETONKA SUMMIT PARk -CSL _ F roaIrrt rA+o :eta.` tri --�� { I \` •0 I �y •: denotes iron marker found( T ( ' 11 • ti -en--_—�`�\ \\ ° i(o) 1111111 \\ ` 3 <4 (906.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum - 1•f'1 ---917--: denotes existing contour line, mem sea level datum O E's l\4 \- ppopos o ADDITION t !EXISTING HOUSE (c) axn 1 N Q-4' O Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. N \ (M X01 1 / N E-' This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above • l / o described property, and the location of an existing house, \\ b \ ('ca I (A) 1 � O 1 TOS` two sheds, spot elevations, topography and a6 visible Cr-\ \ � °O _..........._...ix, dw. I to V additionddver" and thereon. Ithe doesonot purportosed 'on of a to show proposedny �•--J/ ,GIO I \\ 11 a y �n F"") i' other improvements or encroachments. �\ �� •I ; i\• BLACKTOP I NOTE: Accuracy of hardcover location, and extent of \ ''\\,,, \� \\I DRIVEWAY \ \ Aa. additional hardcover is limited by ice and snow cover. • 1. \ ! \ \ a•Ato• / \ a,,, ` \ a -ears' \ ...._6,..0 _son / 66 Ii N 89°39'4ki" W \,-� \150.00\\ /awe o" wee (A. ----- ••,..• \ / 11 MINNE''I'ONKA �� I HIGHLANDS LANE 4- 1 1 wte CElpPP* Mknsot Sr.:. GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. wonaE °°7yeWn41" "°17naE1~-2d CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, &3ITE PLANNERS the laws of tMsAAL ee'd° a�w"'uder 1-is to 445 NORTH WL LOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55358® - as aro. 952-473-4141 WOOL Marl:S.arabsr9 MEerseta Limos +bar 12755 16-006 .-- 'c,,,,,- ,4“..ft ---"" _ , „,„ **4,ipl t i , ". .,,, ,. . i :,, ,,,, ,,,,, , ,. t..1., , , , i ,, _ .. „. „gilt ,. .,.. .. . . . , ?,,t, i* ..s , , . eF ... x r, upt . . t # yp. 4 \La ; r a'� x_ .. rN 'yy a 4, w .. y( * , ''' t,,,y. ..1 ,. ((.. . li- r \ f ' .. e ,r, T - * .„ e , , \N. . . . i. lill I ,,..-Ae...A.,1 . vec, ' ,,*t l''' , ''4' " * ' " —77.t/ #` aye. �1 4. ..s i GPS Located Wetland Boundary �� ,!..\34Jtia Overlaid on 2009 Aerial Photo arrowhead Approximate Parcel Boundary GPS Wetland Edge e I l�'I I'(>Il i I E'Cl rl] 601 Minnetonak Hgld La �w i Feet Orono. MN 55356 c O U 5 ll I t 1 11 g 0 25 50 100 Nathan VanCamp North Elevation Exhibit D LA18-000013 PC roposed addition 22 ft. I I fr _- .. _ El _ _ _.. f_ .=7M-17:71— , . «gin ; . Ir _ } , ! i _ ear Set ack '' ; i4 i =ft.t It ' l' i, it, ,1 It ° ' , I > t' ''I 4 _ 1. I_ ,I. in Irmo" i 1^gym _.. _ 1 k 1 Existing oravel Driveway(o) Scale: 2 ft. = 1--1 South Elevation at an endy an_a, p Minnetonka ig lands ane rono M . roposed ddition 22 ft. I T .mow _ H ilL mail Ella nesitsii ` ■ice_;� ;, Hear Set tack r HaHft. —1 .1r .,i il-ra\. _ hil, i . nt-..__ ...--- Existing Blacktop Driveway(D) Scale: 2 ft. = f--F \ at an endy an a p West Elevation Minnetonka ig lands ane rono M roposed ddition 2 ft. I I o` b Side Set❑ack ❑❑❑ft. r � ,!;: 77i1— 11��y�'i�• � Lantileverft. Side Set ack ft. • Scale: 2 ft. = '--4 Exhibit E LA18-000013 PC City of Orono Ho Hardcover Calculation Worksh ei q,' Property Address:vaiotoo/ /li v 7air/k4 ,46167✓60f.*-Of d4' E 6vA.vc-4 .491 Prepared by: 0,44 EA C f A1'frrC/d rel /A,c_ Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 (MP Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:4-1.c [c 3 71:.101'L ;b In the following table identify items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing _ hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Surrey Hardcover item(Describe) Length x Width (square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A /��1.r44( C /Z9O S.F. B .TTGCiP 7 8 S.F. C Caw('A FTE . /,!S S.F. D J/ is ro/ IlA!!.' tf,04r //8 y S.F. E JWE.? 59 S.F. F fa R,t LIE/ Ate/i/r um.)' /682 S.F. G Der& f f`re• S 3 z 5 S.F. Am D oce74'//E D ECK d )7 '5 /17 S.F. i 1.6-0004 f 'd f?ER /8 S.F. SAD 33 S.F. K te,os.0 AETA1 i,'/C 14444 2 2 S.F. L 1O IER OffrtllEE y S.F. M S.F. N S.F. S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F._ S.F. S.F. ✓ S.F. �► S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover SVP/ S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See Citypode Sec 78-1684): fC cvoaD A 6'741 rvA#i✓a wit a L 2 9 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 2.9 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subbed line(2)from line(1)] Y5'62 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area /, 86/ S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 2 fr 3/ (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herek; however,if any in fo oration is not consistent with provisions of the Cly Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8of9 City of Orono -4i, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: At Co/ Af/A TavACt All G//4dAief IINf C141.L'C'tAl4°) sk: *1.***/ Prepared by: Date: G4avdfitC if ,/ffGC/4rr , / - /-Z4-/8 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier. (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: ROPOSED HARDCOVER) In the following to e, identify eiritems of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total , _(Square Feat) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A A,y/OLi/E a'itiFr/A,ci /290 S.F. B "-)'Toa/ ,1 B S.F. C COO./CrtCM- „ //S S.F. D BC4ekroe Atioft...aY ,, _ //1Y S.F. E - 1-s-- (TG 16' "'At OV61) ---5-9— S.F. F GA.at-d Aft UFcr/e r /tre2-34/ RErAec orApvrD _ a 9/ S.F. G Gorr& f_17-6-or (Erilti.dc) 325 S.F. H (*.wit 4% Ltrio Ii /37 S.F. I fti�oa 10 ..i EA /• /8 S.F. J J'yE© J/ .33 S.F. K odoefrLl it ETI r iviA/C 1.414 44- 41 2 9 S.F. L #0.04r!..0 eft "OAP FR I, y/ S.F. M /.torarec/ w/iPT/oA., S97 S.F. N _ S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z - S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover Si 38 S.F. . Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78--1664): & tsw&ar? "Frt,.v/,r/G 1,4,./L, 2 9 S.F. S.F._ S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 2 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] SL 0 9 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area /R,A6/ S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage I(3)+(4)] 27, 0? % Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 Exhibit F LA18-000013 PC January 4,2018 George Roscoe 4030 Elm Street Orono,MN 55356 To Whom It May Concern: I understand that Wendy and Nathan VanCamp are planning to submit a Variance Application and Building Permit Application for their residence located at: 601 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Orono,MN 55356 The Variance Application and Building Permit Application include: 1. A home addition on the west side of the property,extending approximately twenty two (22)feet from the existing structure towards the lot line. The proposed addition would be within the lot line setback. 2. Continued use of the existing secondary driveway off of Elm Street,which would connect to a garage entrance on the north side of the addition_ I believe that the proposed work will not cause an adverse impact to my property and I support the proposed Variance Application and Building Permit Application. Sincerely, 1/7 /ZD/t5 George Roscoe Signed Date ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) (i ''C, any! felly 14ro;eti of ` 70 E 5�1 dl) b oc o Aprk-it name(s)I [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 161 An also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this adowtMedgement, I (we) am (are)not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Coundl that I (we)am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Coundl approval. Date 4cCier/ A- J (76%e If you have any Information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. January 4,2018 Jessica Newman 615 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Orono,MN 55356 To Whom It May Concern: I understand that Wendy and Nathan VanCamp are planning to submit a Variance Application and Building Permit Application for their residence located at: 601 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Orono,MN 55356 The Variance Application and Building Permit Application include: 1. A home addition on the west side of the property,extending approximately twenty two (22)feet from the existing structure towards the shared lot line. The proposed addition would be within the lot line setback between our homes. 2. Continued use of the existing secondary driveway off of Elm Street,which would connect to a garage entrance on the north side of the addition. I believe that the proposed work will not cause an adverse impact to my property and I support the proposed Variance Application and Building Permit Application. Sincerel , ..2( Jessica wman Signed Date ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM „we) jes51,_ 1\teorAii of jai ikonri of . )k&ttiS (printe( ) Lk- nam s 1 [print address] have reviewed3.plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at kV M ifinek nL I d s LY iso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that In executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are)not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. tein.2 pro Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Laid Use Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. January 4,2018 Matthew Fritz Kristine Fritz 4055 Elm Street Orono,MN 55356 To Whom It May Concern: I understand that Wendy and Nathan VanCamp are planning to submit a Variance Application and Building Permit Application for their residence located at: 601 Minnetonka Highlands Lane Orono,MN 55356 The Variance Application and Building Permit Application include: 1. A home addition on the west side of the property,extending approximately twenty two (22)feet from the existing structure towards the lot line. The proposed addition would be within the lot line setback. 2. Continued use of the existing secondary driveway off of Elm Street,which would connect to a garage entrance on the north side of the addition. I believe that the proposed work will not cause an adverse impact to my property and I support the proposed Variance Application and Building Permit Application. Sincerely, �- I/S118 Matthew Fritz Signed Date i ' 1 %l i/ /i8 1 ' 'I e F tz Signed Date ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) Me-- &vi f ri b w' . -,--1--7. of 1055 E,n, Sine,,,{-, O,p [print n (s)] (print address] have the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ( Ol Is IA also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we)am (are)not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Coundl approval. 'Pi,i . f.--. t-c-7- -7-21/3 /1/P1 Property ' Date - . . . gi'' '°{1.—IiiiQ iLii ..: r If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application—September 2017 Pepe 15 } Item 4 Date Application Received: 02/19/18 O�? Date Application Considered as Complete:02/19/18 ek� VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04/20/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members �t i C`� Dustin Rief,City Administrator �kFSHo�� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner i'y1GG Date: 19 March 2018 Subject: #LA18-000015, Michael Jones,3186 North Shore Drive Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a hardcover variance in order to re- construct an existing non-conforming detached garage in a conforming location. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant is the owner of the property.The new residence was constructed in 2009;the applicant proposes to tear down the existing deteriorating, nonconforming detached garage and build a new detached garage in a conforming location. In order to do so,a hardcover variance would be necessary. The property currently has a 28%hardcover taking into account the required, assumed hardcover to serve the detached garage. The existing garage does not have an existing improved (paved)driveway;the new detached garage would require hardcover for a driveway serving the garage.The proposed hardcover level would not exceed the existing level, including the assumed driveway. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330&78-1279—Detached Garage Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street—Doors Existing 463 sf garage=10' face away from the New 784 sf garage=15' Existing = 10.9' New =25' street. West Side Existing 463 sf garage=10' Existing=5.9' New=37' New 784 sf garage=15' East Side Existing 463 sf garage=10' Existing=142' New=82' New 784 sf garage=15' Lakeshore 75' Existing=+240' New=±221' Average Lakeshore The existing and proposed garage are conforming with respect to the average lakeshore setback. , FILE#LA18-000015 19 Mar 2018 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 34,730 s.f. (acre) Allowed: 6,946 s.f. (20%) Existing: 3,362 s.f. (9.6%) Proposed: 3,683 s.f. (10.6%) Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 34,730 s.f. 8,682.5 s.f. 9,735 s.f.* 9,699 s.f. (25%) (28%) (27.9%) *The existing hardcover reported includes 927 square feet of"assumed"driveway hardcover according to City Code Section 78-1683. Applicable Regulations: Hardcover Variance(Section 78-1700) The property has an existing nonconforming detached garage. Due to the condition, location, and appearance of the garage the property owner plans to demolish it and build a more functional garage in a conforming location.While the existing garage does not have an improved driveway,for hardcover purposes the Code assumes a minimum amount of hardcover to serve garages.Assuming the hardcover for the existing garage,the proposed garage will have a larger footprint,to meet the homeowners' needs,yet a smaller driveway to serve it due to the relocation at a conforming setback.The applicant has proposed to stay within the existing hardcover level—with the assumed hardcover. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN§462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variance requested is consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. The FILE#LA18-000015 19 Mar 2018 Page 3 of 5 requested hardcover variance is reasonable and necessary as the existing location of the garage is nonconforming,and the proposed location is conforming.The new garage will be located closer to the existing driveway resulting in less driveway hardcover. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The variances to permit a detached garage to be constructed in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The uniqueness of the shape,the long narrow driveway neck,and the orientation of the subject property create difficulties for the property owner's reasonable request to rebuild a detached garage. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The unique shape of the property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The existing condition of the long thin neck of driveway to reach North Shore Drive contributes to the hardcover overages,and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The hardcover variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood;there is an existing improvement on the property situated at a substandard setback which more directly impacting the neighbors to the south and west.The hardcover variance is reasonable and necessary as the most logical location for the improvement is closer to and adjacent to the existing driveway.The hardcover for the property will not increase above the existing hardcover level which includes the assumed driveway. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a detached garage is an allowed use in the 1.R-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The unique shape and orientation of the Property is not common in the surrounding neighborhood. The long narrow driveway neck results in excess driveway hardcover without the proportionate land area to balance it out necessitate granting a hardcover variance. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The unique shape qualities of the Property are not common in the surrounding neighborhood. FILE#LA18-000015 19 Mar 2018 Page 4 of 5 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Granting the requested variance will provide relief to the applicant regarding the lot shape and existing conditions of property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The shape and orientation of the Property create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variance is necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds practical difficulties exist due to the property's unique shape and size. The existing detached garage can be legally reconstructed in the same footprint and location.While it doesn't exist currently, the assumed hardcover serving the existing garage could be constructed at any time by the property owner.The permitting requirements apply if the project results in over 50 cubic yards of disturbance. Therefore the applicant's argument regarding the use of the total assumed hardcover as"existing"hardcover level may be reasonable.Please review the applicant's hardcover analysis in Exhibit B. Their proposal includes maintenance of the hardcover at or below the existing plus assumed driveway hardcover level of 28%; correcting a setback encroachment by constructing a new,larger garage closer to the existing driveway. Staff supports the variance. Public Comments Public comments have been received and area attached as Exhibit H. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? FILE#LA18-000015 19 Mar 2018 Page 5 of 5 Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval. The Planning Commission may consider the following alternative motions: 1. Approval. 2. Table for redesign (provide reasoning and direction). 3. Denial. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Project Narrative Exhibit C. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit D. Existing Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit F. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Neighbor Comments Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Letter View PC Land Use Application Summary #LA18-000015 -------- Exhibit A Application Date: 02/21/2018 Address: 3186 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0911723320010 Land Use Number: LA18-000015 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: MICHAEL&NATELE J N JONES Address: 3186 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Michael Jones Address: 3186 Northshore Dr Wayzata, MN 55391 Project Description: 3186 North Shore Drive-Detached Garage Rebuild Land Use Application Type: Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: Land Use Application Summary.htm[3/14/2018 10:09:36 AM] PC #LA18-000015 Exhibit B PROJECT NARRATIVE Detached Garage Replacement for Michael & Natele Jones 3186 North Shore Drive Orono, MN, 55391 Prepared by: Michael Jones, Homeowner February 16, 2018 Introduction I have an existing,detached two-car garage on my property that is in poor condition. The existing building is also nonconforming in that it resides 5.9 feet from the property line bordering 3200 North Shore Drive. When I purchased the property in 2009, I planned to rehabilitate this garage. However, I soon realized that initiative just wasn't practical given the condition of the structure. Due to several factors discussed within this document, I estimate the cost to rehabilitate the existing structure would exceed the cost to do a complete teardown and rebuild. In addition, relocating the garage away from the property lines would benefit my neighbors by making it conform to city code. I am requesting a hardcover variance from the city which will allow to replace my existing,dilapidated garage with a new garage that will meet Orono's setback requirements. Though still over the city's 25% hardcover limit for Tier 1 lots, my proposed structure would result in less computed hardcover than what currently exists today using Orono's latest hardcover rules. Finally, my irregularly shaped lot is a hardship that puts me at a disadvantage with the city's hardcover calculations due to a long, narrow driveway"access strip" out to North Shore Drive. 1 Existing Structure It is estimated the existing garage was built around 1930. The building has a dirt floor basement,a two-stall garage on the main level,and a stairway leading up to the second level. There is a brick fireplace and former living quarters on the second floor. There is no electricity or plumbing to the building. There are two 8'wide garage doors on the front as well as two service doors. One of the service doors leads to the basement. 'OM i w.• I ..... INelIN • rii rF•. F .I< 1 /.. ^x44.. f W £ • , Alretki /, • y {7�Ibti r 2 The building had been altered in the late 1970's. Concrete pillars were added to the basement in an attempt to remedy a deteriorating foundation and sinking concrete slab on the main level. P F4y ryi */: ,1' _ iiiiiiiiiirit_ - .-• , m y 4 - T R Y . "f 7 3 M i t .aa N y• i.� ,I' , • :It 1 i 'Ni ,t a n!t 11„)iiiiii.. ilk yf Crumbling Foundation y, ' ♦\- ."~Y � a i + i '-461416441400,11111001111 -1114 4 f yIt:#(4' . Cracked/Sinking Concrete Slab 3 The garage sits on a sloping grade towards the southern property line. ,,',, . k V!..$'• k 1(1;'- , . •26‘ • * ir, ; i 1111111111011 spy - _ . t r , _ . _ . a i 3, , i "T...:$61+4,444 ,. it i N ' . '-', l'A'..0 ,.w_ The garage sits 5.9 feet from the 3200 North Shore Drive property line and 10.4 feet from the 3188 North Shore Drive property line. ,r � � 23.2 iXISTVG� 1 4g GARAGE o ........ _939. .„--........ ....,--- �\ k a`--,„ a f� .' ```-. �.9 232r/ `~- , /� o ir `~ 1 `. 4 A tree has grown into the edge of the roof on the western side. A high voltage,overhead powerline is also very close to the roof of the building. The roof is sagging,and it leaks excessively. Rodents have inhabited the building for many years. ,' -, ,,) , '..: ,,,,ite:41:,,,, , , : 4 ..--44:: „a. I rk L: 3::::;;;ItArf A ( 7- - - . �`-, '� � iii * ii. t j4 r. I, 3 t ~ . f 0` ( ifr, , r 1t 7 ` Y, ! . .- ,< .rrice s r Style & Character The existing garage does not match the style or quality of my home nor the surrounding homes. There have been significant improvements in recent years with the neighboring properties. The building in it's current condition is an eyesore and it is a distractionfrom the beautiful homes in the area that surround it. le .. ,,,„,:„, .,;.. ., . ' 1 , , ,lavifi ., •,,..,o.t. .., . ,.., ,..,:k.... ._ ,t,1,,1 ._\.to ,k/. 4 r \ A, 0.-,-,ii. •- 1 c l 11144111 Ir . g i fin I ii _ ..... 1 - , , i 1 ., t 111 II 1111E1 Existing Home at 3186 North Shore Drive 5 Assumed Hardcover Driveway/Apron Per City Code Section 78-1683,the existing detached garage has "assumed hardcover"for a driveway and apron. Given that the existing building resides in the far southwest corner of the lot,the minimum assumed driveway to the garage measures 70'x 8'with an additional apron size of approximately 17'x 15'. These dimensions meet the city's current "Driveway Standards"as listed in the January 2018 Hardcover Information Packet. The resulting"assumed" hardcover is 927 square feet. also, 4 �,." (940.9 i ►�LL • ' .- 28" �i ►� ' 0.8) \ OAK �. 24" y 1 / , BLACK J NO% �♦ Al S OAK , v V • OAK / r ,�5O� IN I`�J '�' ,b ° 7 P.WRIOL VP lit _ _ 1 % �. - N - 1 I ' O ` .„I \ ,` I p,41 EXISTING - ,..,07-� air "ASSUMED" ... "\...... / \ APRON / ri.:�� 30.E 1 r � �:i `sem \ 1 `�"�. �.. / IN 'i 26" \ \\ 23.2 \ \ EXISTING'-- i s • ;- \ .o GARAGE o -93a�-.� — , \\ \. ► oma` b ,s —�� t il \ IS 8.9\ 23.2, �0: \ c \ - I . 1 1S \ 6 Proposal Due to the number of major, structural issues with the existing garage, rehabilitation does not make financial sense. There are simply not enough good qualities in the existing building that make it worth preserving. Additionally, rebuilding a new structure at the same location is not practical given the slope of the grade,the proximity to the powerline,the amount of"assumed" hardcover for the driveway/apron, and finally the nonconforming setback distance to the neighboring properties. My proposal is to demolish the existing garage and to build a new accessory structure in a different location that meets all property line setback requirements. The site of the existing garage would be filled in to flow with the existing grade on the sides of the structure. The area would be finished off with a combination of sod, shrubs,trees, and other landscaping. The new structure would be built on a new concrete slab closer to the existing home and main driveway. A new driveway apron would adjoin the new structure and the existing driveway"turn-around" area. EXISTING / N \\ �, HOUSE ,F�-°1Or \\ (940.7) \ \ � #3186 'x"" V �,.�)\ \\ \sk. \ \ PADO •771•01" • \ I / \ \ / (941.9) (941.5) \\ (94)' • / / ,E7 CONCRETE WALK i f` 4.4 / S / /' l a) / iii / I�- 1) !/ // I , 44, \ / / .... ,,, (9411 1• \ \ / \ \ .••• / // FX/s \ \ C nNQ (.r/! _7 \ \ �R 4 /1 \ \ / \ \ / '/ e., \\ ___ f (' '9) Y \ (iae \ (940.9) /// \ ...• / �C q"DRO1( ,,,- \ 24. N F� ,`�1 ` ' 'i7• ',( / OAK // -/' 250' / R ) pRO,o SETBACK //j GgRq�s�� Ll , GF - �t►' //,/' 1 7 The main floor of the new structure would be used as a workshop as well as for general storage. There would be attic access for storage, but no dedicated stairway to the second level.There would be no basement in the new structure. The new structure would have electricity, but no plumbing service. The style,color,and roof line of the proposed structure would match the existing home. 12:12 .1A1/4 CEDAR SHAKES 12A11Il1h. 16 11: ui114. IIIKI1f1r. NI 111111111111. 111111111111111, 111111111111111 I■■�IIII 111111111111111. 411111tu11m11 nu11�11111111k ,Q1 11111111111101 m��, mnllmnmb11111111111111111r111t 111111111�11111�1U. zoo/ 11111111f1r111■11111111111111111/1■1111111I111111111111111►. 7-0"OVERHANG —.... ' 111111111111111 iii M HARD!PLANK SIDING 8 1/4"(7"REVEAL) h > . - . NI , 8"AZEKTRIM > �11� .I:III STONE > - 8 Hardship — Irregular Lot The lot has a hardcover disadvantage due to it's irregular shape. The 250' narrow strip of driveway is the only means to access the property. This zone is almost entirely hardcover. If this access strip zone was disregarded,the remainder of the lot would be well below the city's hardcover limits. . a-- ,,••- nruVE EPSELS.. vvE11E.060 ' IN BLOCKS 2&4,CRYSTAL BAY I , '". ` HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESO1 • rs'►-'!Y -� 0 70 40 rj ,-. :\,.., . • A.• -- EXISTSYG SCALE M FEET I� EXXSTtNG \�, le.,' .; USE ``;44 � �; •(,ti\ • IIIb 'r . � ' n, •-, ! i /1. \ .•• -. ., . /4 0S al `-- ' 'p A .% i {� f �- \ . r ., \\ 7 LK } 9 Hardcover With the existing structure and the city's current hardcover rules,the property is currently at 28.0% hardcover(9,735 square feet out of 34,730 square feet). By moving the new structure closer to the main driveway, I am able to build a larger accessory building with a smaller driveway/apron, and have less hardcover at 27.9% (9,699 square feet out of 34,730 square feet). If the"driveway access strip" leading out to North Shore Drive was disregarded in the calculations, my current and proposed hardcover would be 23.7%and 23.6% respectively. - ..' k ... 11•1111•0111/111...L. YVI\LV 4 ► IN BLOCKS 2&4,CRYSTAL BAY HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESO1 LCd ; r r 1 �.• - walla �"a ar.. ` 4A .. , ..' SCALE a. FEE/ . - e , , , ,... ., ,. . . t. L' fir,,; : >,` i `:,...-'ly' .0'. '''-- 414.':- '- -i '�.. - . s \ 1 1.‘ 6 7 Se'mak: 7 S' \ Hardcover-Total Lot Hardcover—Disregarding Access Strip With Existing Garage 28.0% 23.7% With Proposed Garage 27.9% 23.6% 10 Neighbor Support I have shared my proposed plans with four of my neighbors, including two of the adjoining properties. All four of these neighbors have expressed their support for this project. Email responses are provided below. From:Michael Rucinski(mailto:michael@orangecloudholdings.comj Sent:Sunday,February 11,2018 8:06 AM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:3186-Proposed Site Plan From: Michael&Holly Rucinski 3188 North Shore Drive Orono,MN 55391 To whom it may concern, Mike Jones has shared with me the proposed site map for 3186 North Shore Dr,Orono,describing his plans to tear down the existing accessory building and build a new accessory building.After reviewing the proposed site map Holly and I fully support this proposal as long as the Orono architectural standards for accessory buildings are met. Best regards, Michael Rucinski Co-Founder+Managing Partner Orange Cloud Holdings Corp OramteCloudHoldinas.com +1.612.600.5558 From:Scott Falkum(mailto:scott.falkum@gmail.com) Sent:Monday,February 12,2018 10:10 PM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:3186 Proposed Site Plan Hello Mike, Thanks for reaching out to us regarding your proposed garage. The front elevation looks great(matches well with the existing home),is of similar size to the existing garage to be razed,and is further from the property line (conforms to setback requirements),so from our point of view,we'd very much welcome the new garage. Please consider this email as official support for your proposed project. Let us know of any questions. Thank you Mike. Scott&Natalia Falkum 3200 North Shore Drive 612-384-1027 11 From:Kristin Finney(mailto:kristinmfinney@gmail.comj Sent:Thursday,February 15,2018 1:36 AM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:Assistance with City of Orono Hi Mike, We support your garage project plans! Best Regards, Kris&Mark Finney 3210 North Shore Drive Wayzata,MN From:Rick Born[mailto:Rick.Born@rbaconsulting.comj Sent:Sunday,February 11,2018 11:58 PM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:Assistance with the City of Orono Mike, Upon review,this all looks fine to me and i have no problem supporting it.Let me know how else I can help. Thanks, Rick Sent from my iPhone 12 Summary I am requesting a hardcover variance that would allow me to replace my existing detached garage with a new structure. My request from the city is to allow me to up to 27.9%of my total lot area as hardcover(9,699 square feet out of 34,730 square feet). On Monday, February 5, 2018 I met with Melanie Curtis, Orono City Planner to review my draft plans for my proposed project. I received positive feedback from Ms.Curtis on the overall plan,and she provided assistance with the next steps with the variance process. I have submitted this project narrative along with additional supporting documents. Assuming that my variance application is approved, I will proceed with finalizing plans with the architect and land surveyor,and my application for a demolition and building permit will follow. I believe that my proposal is a reasonable resquest,and I have confirmed support for the project from my surrounding neighbors. 13 PC PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM #LExhibi 0015 Exhibit C #LA18-000015 1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: I have an existing,detached two-car garage on my property that is in very poor condition. The existing building is also nonconforming in that it resides 5.9 feet from the property line bordering 3200 North Shore Drive. I am requesting a hardcover variance from the city which will allow to replace my existing,garage with a new garage that will meet Orono's setback requirements.Though still over the city's 25% hardcover limit for Tier 1 lots, my proposed structure would result in less computed hardcover than what currently exists today. 2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The lot has a hardcover disadvantage due to it's irregular shape.The 250 foot narrow strip of driveway is the only means to access the property.This zone is almost entirely hardcover. If this access strip zone was disregarded,the remainder of the lot would be well below the city's hardcover threshold. 3) The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The existing garage does not match the style or quality of my home nor the surrounding homes.There have been significant improvements in recent years with two of the neighboring properties.The building in it's current condition is an eyesore and it is a distraction from the beautiful homes in the area that surround it. Neighbors have expressed their concerns with the appearance of the existing building.The style,color, and roof line of the proposed garage would match the existing home. 4) Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: I estimate the cost to rehabilitate the existing structure would exceed the cost to do a complete tear down and rebuild. In addition, relocating the garage away from the property lines would benefit my neighbors by making it conform to city code. 5) Practical difficulties include,but are not limited to,inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116J.06,Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6) The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7) The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8) The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The existing building resides 5.9 feet from the property line bordering 3200 North Shore Drive.The proposed building would meet the city's setback rules. 9) The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The lot has a hardcover disadvantage due to it's irregular shape.The 250' narrow strip of driveway is the only means to access the property.This zone is almost entirely hardcover. If this access strip zone was disregarded,the remainder of the lot would be well below the city's hardcover threshold. 10) The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: An existing structure exists on the property. Per Minnesota state law, I have the rights to rebuild/repair it. 11) The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: My proposal improves the appearance of my property and the surrounding homes and it will meet all setback requirements. 12) The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Existing neighbors have raised concerns regarding the appearance of the existing garage stating that it does not fit with the surrounding structures. My proposed plans have been shared with four of my neighbors,and I have their full support.Supporting letters from neighbors are attached with my application. PC OLA18-000015 • Exhibit D S. tA 43" �� el0� _ ,% CURRENT SURVEY �' ��' •�'°` MICHAEL JONES IN BLOCKS 2 Si 4,CRYSTAL BAY PARK tee" HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA • • • . ;�J b- G ;,;, 040 30 • r • \, 1,'.u""; • • EXIBiwO • SCALE IN FEET + I jlir' ' \ i a.. " J ., " EXIE ING � NOUBE .. 1.�'''s I' MOWING C,]� N3116 `4. i \1 ' �k Sao 11; , 1' A 47 , `w�, ',.:<-" 1111`„ # s. "' ', `, �\)' .- .__.--,e'---:.- rb. 4'' • ,\ r'd, �` 3 • y- \ = . 4 • • • • • �xi J , 'C- / \kli,,,l'f-7 7 E.4Tl.G ELEVATORS: )FOst'0 ®® ,• ' LEGAL 00501i1O(40 PRAMS Bat sods al M.A.3 s 4.a 0. 1Sr sarS mSr"..I Yr w. r.....WI / 'sods4 eine Wms seas. .. ..s e.sd .. , ..se , C�1....,w..�d.nap ��a.olery t«5,Fea..c+rra eaY ro.:,I1.1r<rraa.rwt�rte«�°a.. .744 0 .1,«q ,BB.. fel;5. 411.R BB ry 1 tJ ai�M� V. ..� ,. .,,a a�..tY row SPA.arra.a:al est.e:t ti N�of p,..vas qem...1?.4" "«e"4:,,-.:.-, .m,,.to B..«. .tl.1.-1.74, dt «u.t netuw•et.,e teeak Lge c.el..a m der el gee Me reelneenerly Me el.57 t5,b k 4,5 71e 6"°5 a 1a—.1 w.1 2 4%141.1 k wow..0 a..wN+wi=.:«..a Ld 5 e S.b...l 1100 Iwt:uivw rertl—.tory 7 Yr pF1�N sp-p,Mnlq.C4n1Y.,/-wen t � e 600.0 7.e. RNE i= 671.stw.w..tear Da—.I wem sea lea Solo. `O 14). i :ems as..w eN'at«e.-3.,101 5e It O.BO .vol • / / ...4,4%.04,414174 vrv1eg.peygY.w 1aa.eb4. 1.00,4 epee IW / ROTE:ACCURACY OF HARDCOVER LOCATION,ATOacme OFAOORONAL HMOCOVER IS IMMO BY KC AND SNOW COVER �A'—e ACROSS _I GRONBERO&ASSOCIATE8,INC. __ '"m oea ws�s.MID alRwvaRs.LAM iW16B ---- -were -ala'-aye o *++25 445 N.wLLLOw OHNE LONG LAKE,IN 16340 _.T DM nes-u susr ,.s PNO$1E$314734141 FAX I52. 3.4431 PC #LA18-000075 Exhibit E w II O034PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR V tlN� 1,o°`",>� ,��/ MICHAEL JONES IN BLOCKS 2&4,CRYSTAL BAY PARK IiENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA • _ - • - 0 r ;;,�J • %" -.,..,—,,,------„__67_:- ;.; s;�.;v, 0 20 40 so;-,'''' / / f', . /---Ve.,,r .-‘,* -- --- . PCIST0M3 I'l�' _ 1 �, �,• 43200 11, A ` -� ,� ,"` ' • • i - V. '1 , • • • • • • -. i\ 1 t ). t. • . \\ • • EXIS11.0 ELEVATIONS: -\� \l j 1)Garag ® e " ` i Fvtt no._® Y �� ion eASIOLY cm. ` Aid --.-___ le..e[SOiiw K SPEWS- _ % 6 441 0.1.oI kda .ti.,.t ante Eer M.a al Yaw A-..r er.xwed aFa ra.....0 eta..am2,.a mc.. \ eiI ..LY t 9e[Y;.0)00'''',.7,=" q Fdh:0500.asrt*fl0 009 0s a.a 959,) ..�,:, , i v e :.;�l:"'a. N0 oR� 1we o0 y0p.*9(0 0<5 lr eOLA mMC tl�iw m� 0 eM M tit:: M iv N F.e: mal ef!Nae tw to of r.. IAL B.ae:.n a owe m“:wm.u.a.nn.l..+V..r.N�ol Mose 1 ar.ro Bey Pael.Ma sot.Crystal H ll tl0 m.eat,Nary ata N OaNas y 100 nenroml.n,tR W Lel s,Mask t,lYrrla Pay l b 0n.nw0.o.l.y sr,..ral'1. k ata. u.wuu.wbar a�.or.w LM s e dabs et 2190 Int Vs nenMnevll 00 no r-4 of ...a,a f..n0y.le.weta e ameba Mart. R \ , —I.—r tsa WWI..ten./few TOM Ma Itral*Own 0."°. / rota at...-34.07 St ft 0.50 ac,., Inn Ow ,, F al,.... . ..�.,..r . ....n.aa c.1 Inc a a«.- NOTE ACCURACY OF IYIROCOVEN LOCATION,NO MINT OF ADDITIONAL HARDCOVER I LOWED FFr ICE AND SNOW COVEN REVislatas e (iRONBERG&ASSOCIATES, INC. --8- _.swats MINIONOMMOdill wa4Ia.e AMO ' e .SNSS�LAND SIOESVOM.LAND PLANNERS --- ----oeANA' AG../.dr..-6.,,,, 'ga 446 N.WILLOW OHNE LONG LAKE MN 55356 5,e ru-o ma ismaisaimA ia.ir " _ PHONE 563173414/ FAIL'$534734435 PC = #LA18-000015 Exhibit F I I 2" LEDGE I I 48"H. x 8"W. POURED FROST WALL 1 TREATED PLATE ON 16"x 8" CONT. CONCRETE FOOTINGS • REBAR PER CODE I n I • • • I I I CONCRETE SLAB ABOVE UNEXCAVATED I I I I I I I I I I I Io, O ,7-4 2 I I N in • 4'-111/2" 18.-1"M.O. 4'-111/2"- - DRAWING DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE-FOUNDATION MICHAEL&NATELE JONES SCALE:'/."=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE DR,ORONO,MN 28'-0" LINE OF ATTIC STORAGE ABOVE T Z D A_m CONCRETE SLAB E (6" -3000 PSI) z c 2x6 FRAMING OVER 2" RIDGID FOAM INSULATION C (r) N 16" O.C. n c 18'x 9'OVERHEAD DOOR 2868 DRAWING DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE—LOWER LEVEL MICHAEL&NATELE JONES LE:'Is"=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE r 'ONO,MN 28'-0^ 2x6 FRAMING t Z z cn w o v v a n Q o OPEN TO BELOW 2o m 6'X12' m 0 5 7o O zC ATTIC STORAGE C V1 T rn D cn C io 70 a 00 bo 4'-o" 10'-0' 8'-0,' 10'-o" DRAWING DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE-UPPER LEVEL MICHAEL&NATELE JONES SCALE:'/."=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE DR,ORONO,MN 12:12 , CEDAR , \ SHAKES 12 „.• .iali1I.�.._ iiiI111i11111n. `` .il�11II11111I11IIIIIU b '��► / Aim/ 1 Til AI111II11 WAIL �..; 4111111111 111111111• AH1114111111 1111111111111. I 11111111111111► . gill hi , , 1 1 I 1 I S I I II IIi 11 1111 1f 1 1Mil I 11 II I I IT 2'-0” OVERHANG —Tz HARD! PLANK SIDING 8. 1J1'4" (7" REVEAL) ......31P . . - 1C7 11, 6" AZEK TRIM STONE :®. eceo oen:--a ie- a.S9l..�+ o. .. .�ea�.a 18'-0" X 9'-0" GARAGE DOOR DRAWING DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE—FRONT ELEVATION MICHAEL&NATELE JONES -LE:%"=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE P 'ONO, MN 12:12 DRAWING DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE-BACK ELEVATION MICHAEL&NATELE JONES SCALE:'''A"=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE DR,ORONO,MN 28'_0' DRAWI"'"4 DATE:02.12.2018 PROPOSED DETACHED' SE-SIDE ELEVATION 1 MICHAEL&NATF'- 'ONES .E:%"=1' 3186 NORTHSHORE f )NO,MN 28'-0" DRAWING DATE:TE:02.12.2018 MICHAEL&NATELE JONES =1' PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE-SIDE ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 3186 NORTHSHORE DR,ORONO,MN PC City of Orono #LA18-000015 'iLoA1N Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Exhibit G Property Address: 3186 Northshore Drive `'_�tcuo Prepared by: Michael Jones Date: 2/16/2018 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 64'x 30' 2,744 S.F. g Driveway 370'x 10' 5,132 S.F. C NC Pads 7'x 3' 21 S.F. D Sidewalk 19'x 3' 133 S.F. E Retaining Walls 16'x 1' 34 S.F. F Porch 18'x 9' 155 S.F. G Stairs/Landing 10'x 4' 39 S.F. H Playset Deck 5'x 5' 25 S.F. I Stepping Stones 12'x 13' 160 S.F. J Detached Garage 23'x 20' 463 S.F. K "Assumed"Apron 24'x 17' 367 S.F. L "Assumed"Driveway 70'x 8' 560 S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. O S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 9,833 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): G Stairs/Landing 10'x 4' 39 S.F. H Playset Deck 5'x 5' 25 S.F. E Retaining Walls 16'x 1' 34 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 98 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 9,735 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 34,730 S.F. EXISTING Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 28.0 (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: January 2018 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono ,, oNo, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet I Property Address: 3186 Northshore Drive `''+fs,-Ti%� Prepared by: Date: Michael Jones 2/16/2018 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House 64'x 30' 2.744 S.F. B Driveway 370'x 10' 5.132 S.F. C A/C Pads 7'x 3' 21 S.F. D Sidewalk 19'x 3' 133 S.F. E Retaining Walls 16'x 1' 34 S.F. F Porch 18'x 9' 155 S.F. G Stairs/Landing 10'x 4' 39 S.F. H Playset Deck 5'x 5' 25 S.F. I Stepping Stones 12'x 13' 160 S.F. J Deatched Garage(TO BE REMOVED) 23'x 20' 463 S.F. K "Assumed"Apron(TO BE REMOVED) 24'x 17' 364 S.F. L "Assumed"Driveway(TO BE REMOVED) 70'x 8' 560 S.F. M Detached Garage(NEW) 28'x 28' 784 S.F. N Driveway/Apron(NEW) 20'x 18' 604 S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 9,797 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): G Stairs/Landing 10'x 4' 39 S.F. H Playset Deck 5'x 5' 25 S.F. E Retaining Walls 16'x 1' 34 S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 98 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 9,699 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 34,730 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 27.9 % Last Updated: January 2018 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 PC • #LA18-000015 Neighbor Support Exhibit H I have shared these plans with four of my neighbors, including two of the adjoining properties. All four of these neighbors have expressed their support for this project. Email responses are provided below. From:Michael Rucinski(mailto:michael@orangecloudholdings.com) Sent:Sunday,February 11,2018 8:06 AM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:3186-Proposed Site Plan From: Michael&Holly Rucinski 3188 North Shore Drive Orono,MN 55391 To whom it may concern, Mike Jones has shared with me the proposed site map for 3186 North Shore Dr,Orono,describing his plans to tear down the existing accessory building and build a new accessory building.After reviewing the proposed site map Holly and I fully support this proposal as long as the Orono architectural standards for accessory buildings are met. Best regards, Michael Rucinski Co-Founder+Managing Partner Orange Cloud Holdings Corp OranaeCloudHoldin&s.com +1.612.600.5558 From:Scott Falkum(mailto:scott.falkum@gmail.com] Sant:Monday,February 12,2018 10:10 PM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:3186 Proposed Site Plan Hello Mike, Thanks for reaching out to us regarding your proposed garage. The front elevation looks great(matches well with the existing home),is of similar size to the existing garage to be razed,and is further from the property line (conforms to setback requirements),so from our point of view,we'd very much welcome the new garage. Please consider this email as official support for your proposed project. Let us know of any questions. Thank you Mike. Scott&Natalia Falkum 3200 North Shore Drive 612-384-1027 12 From:Kristin Finney Imailto:kristinmfinney@gmail.comj Sent:Thursday,February 15,2018 1:36 AM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:Assistance with City of Orono Hi Mike, We support your garage project plans! Best Regards, Kris&Mark Finney 3210 North Shore Drive Wayzata,MN From:Rick Born Imaiho:Rick.Born@rbaoonsulting.comJ Sent:Sunday,February 11,2018 11:58 PM To:Mike Jones<mike@jones7.us> Subject:Re:Assistance with the City of Orono Mike, Upon review,this all looks fine to me and I have no problem supporting it.Let me know how else I can help. Thanks, Rick Sent from my iPhone 13 PC #LA18-000015 RUN DATE:02/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) Exhibit I 38 08-117-23 41 0001 38 09-117-23 32 0009 38 09-117-23 33 0013 SCOTT FALKUM/NATALIA FALKUM CASEY CAPITAL VI LLC ZACHARY 1 PARISE 3200 NORTH SHORE DR 3180 NORTH SHORE DR 3145 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SCOTT FALKUM/NATALIA FALKUM CASEY CAPITAL VI LLC ZACHARY J PARISE 3200 NORTH SHORE DR 1161 WAYZATA BLVD E N302 3145 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0002 38 09-117-23 32 0010 38 09-117-23 33 0015 MARK A&KRISTIN M FINNEY MICHAEL&NATALIE 1N JONES H B COBURN&RANDI H MORITZ 3210 NORTH SHORE DR 3186 NORTH SHORE DR 1406 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARK FINNEY MICHAEL&NATELE J N JONES HUTCHINS B COBURN KRIS FINNEY 3186 NORTH SHORE DR RAND(HOLLYN MORITZ 3210 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 1406 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0003 38 09-117-23 32 0011 38 09-117-23 33 0016 ROBERT G&JANET L LABATT M RUCINSKI&H RUCINSKI JONATHAN AANESTAD 3202 NORTH SHORE DR 3188 NORTH SHORE DR 3185 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT&JANET LABATT MICHAEL RUCINSKI JONATHAN AANESTAD 3202 NORTH SHORE DR HOLLY RUCINSKI 3185 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 3188 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0004 38 09-117-23 32 0012 RLA FAMILY L P JAMES A DAHL 3224 NORTH SHORE DR 3190 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RLA FAMILY L P JAMES A DAHL ATTN RICHARD A ANDERSON 3190 NORTH SHORE DR 3222 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0005 38 09-117-23 32 0013 RLA FAMILY L P THOMAS K CONNELLY 3240 NORTH SHORE DR 3115 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RLA FAMILY L P THOMAS K CONNELLY ATTN RICHARD A ANDERSON 3115 NORTH SHORE DR 3222 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 41 0006 38 09-117-23 32 0018 RLA FAMILY L P KELLY J MARX/MELODEE S MARX 3250 NORTH SHORE DR 3135 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RLA FAMILY L P KELLY J&MELODEE S MARX ATTN RICHARD A ANDERSON 1 WEBSTER PL 3222 NORTH SHORE DR HOPKINS MN 55305 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 44 0006 38 09-117-23 33 0001 J M PERRILL&G H PERRILL J L&P MANDEL 3220 BOHNS POINT LA 3155 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JENNIFER M PERRILL J L MANDEL&P MANDEL GREGORY H PERRILL 3155 NORTH SHORE DR 3220 BOHNS POINT LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 32 0006 38 09-117-23 33 0002 DANIEL J MCGLYNN REVOC TRUST WAGENER PROPERTIES LLC 3090 NORTH SHORE DR 3165 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DANIEL J MCGLYNN WAGENER PROPERTIES LLC 3090 NORTH SHORE DR 2605 W WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 09-117-23 32 0007 38 09-117-23 33 0003 RICHARD A BORN&TRACEY BORN MAURICE J WEGENER TRUSTEE 3120 NORTH SHORE DR 1420 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RICHARD A BORN&TRACEY BORN MAURICE J WAGENER 3120 NORTH SHORE DR 1420 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 32 0008 38 09-117-23 33 0009 M S WALLACE&D D WALLACE M&C RUSSIN 3160 NORTH SHORE DR 3175 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL S&DONNA D WALLACE MICHAEL&CATHERINE RUSSIN 3160 NORTH SHORE DR 3175 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. , PC #LA18-000015 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit J Date: 2/22/2018 ------------.......\ 'A\ 3080 ile I 3090 \307 fei "r"-------.--*---''.."./7----".------ -- 3160 \ 3180 3210 (71 3200 (B) RI PI 3224 3262 ttaf 3260 (4) (1) 3240 324 3286 325, 316F. ill) R4) ill l (s) sto0C e 3268 Is) 3202 ---'r 1 th MI 13) 12) NO '190 3135 024 3264 3290 3185 3175 ' 324 3168 322. ` 3135 122) III3240 00 (21313250 1 . 3185 3290 3264 s 441111406 (�) 3175 3145 (21) 051 tai, 0,270 3155 n) 3220 A 3165 (2Y 3230 m 1420 3260 \,............................................" el 13) ""'"..s....'".....'"..s."......''''...."/ r,r,l n Ln �noc Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: IIIIIIt This data (i) is furnished AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy.(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (iii) is notsuitable for legalengineering or surveying purposes Hennepin County shall not be Sable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data For more information contact Hennepin County GIS Office 330 6th Street South Minneapo is.MN 55487/gisinfo@hennepin us Date Application Received: 2.19.18 ek�O�O Date Application Considered as Complete:3.7.18 60-Day Review Period Expires: 5.6.18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Membersyet i' G� Dustin Rief,City Administrator �xEsHo�� From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: March 19, 2018 Subject: LA18-000016, Dale Gustafson o/b/o Erik Nafstad, 1370 Cherry Place,Variance, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting to construct a retaining wall in the 75 foot lakeyard setback Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends for the Planning Commission to discuss the practical difficulties for retaining walls in the lakeyard. Background The applicant has submitted an application to add retaining walls and landscaping to the shoreline of the property at 1370 Cherry Place. The property abuts Lake Minnetonka. It has a slope along the shoreline. There are currently stairs leading down the slope creating access to the Lake.There is also an existing boat house they are proposing to retain.The applicant proposes to build new stairs to the lake around the boat house and add retaining walls to support the slope.This plan includes multiple retaining walls running along the stairs and running along the slope. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-168Q and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 23,590 s.f. 5,897.5 s.f. 4,089 s.f. 4,239s.f. (0.54 acre) (25%) (17.3 %) (17.9%) Applicable Regulations: Lake Setback Variance(Section 78-1279) Retaining walls are not permitted within 75'of the lake,therefore the applicant is requesting a setback and hardcover variance.The applicant's plan involves replacing the existing stairs, replacing the existing retaining walls,and constructing additional retaining walls. The applicant is hoping to proactively prevent any further erosion and potential failure of the lake yard with tiered retaining walls to stabilize the area. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the LA18-000016 3.19.18 Page 2 of 4 proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Preserving and protecting the existing slope in the lake yard is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. The proposed retaining walls will be screened with vegetation to maintain the rural nature of the lake.This will likely not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.. The proposed retaining walls are recessed into the earth to limit their visual impacts and support the stairs and slope on the property,maintaining the rural character of the lake. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The owner proposes to install Improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The owner has proposed a solution which will protect against failure of the slope. The existing slope of the lake yard was not a result of actions by the owner and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.The variance to permit structure within the 75-foot setback will help to maintain the existing slope and character of the area. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home with stairs for lake access is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. LA18-000016 3.19.18 Page 3 of 4 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The slope of the property combined with the pre-existing improvements is a unique condition to the subject property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The subject property's specific slope is beginning to erode and stairs have become unsafe,creating conditions which do not apply to adjacent properties. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Granting a lake setback variance to allow the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback is reasonable and necessary to preserve the property rights of the owner and supported by the vulnerable lake yard slope on the property. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.Granting the lakeyard setback variance allowing the retaining walls within the 75-foot lake setback will not adversely impact health,safety,comfort or morals,or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties which support granting the lakeyard setback variance to permit the construction of the tiered retaining walls and in-kind replacement of the stairs within 75 feet of the OHWL. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is connected to sanitary sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff is suggesting approval of the project with screening of all of the retaining walls be required to preserve the natural look of the shoreline when viewed from the lake. Public Comments To date,one comment against development in the lake yard in general has been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Has the applicant met the standards of practical difficulties to warrant a variance? 2. There are many variations of design to provide stair access to the lake. Has the LA18-000016 3.19.18 Page 4 of 4 applicant made an attempt to meet the city standards for stairs access to the lake? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Access to the lake is activity contemplated by the zoning ordinance. However, there are other options to stone stairs built into the steep slope, including wood stairs on pillars, in this case requiring additional hardcover in the lake yard. The Planning Commission should discuss whether the practical difficulty standards are met with the proposal. If the commission finds practical difficulties apply then a motion should be made for approval of the variance request. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Property Owners List and Map Exhibit E. Public Comment Letter View Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 02/21/2018 Address: 1370 Cherry P1 Orono, MN 55364 Parcel Number: Land Use Number: LA18-000016 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: Address: Applicant: Name: Dale Gustafson Address: Project Description: Replace stairs and build new walls in 0 - 7511 impact zone Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 0 Appeal of Admin Decision 0 Concept Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Plan Application 0 Subdivision Application 0 Subdivision Exception 0 Vacation Application 0 • Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: D14 413/4P.1.1---' Land Use Application Summary(4).htm[3/19/2018 3:40:24 PM] Letter View PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA18-000016 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Conditions vary from site to site, but there are steeper lake shore slopes on many properties that require steps and walls to provide useable steps to the lake. With the desire to make the step safer and more usable for older and younger residence lower step height is required. This requires a few more steps and possible a little more wall. The end result is that it may slightly increase the hard surface in the 0-75 ft area of the property. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes, the natural grade is steep and that means it will require walls supporting the step slabs. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Yes, The new steps are winding down the slope and will be well planted to minimize the view of steps on the hill. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: True, the owner has chosen a more expensive solution to improve the look, function and durability of the area. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Not Applicable 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: True, the only reason for this Variance is because there is a need to add some hard surface to accommodate step slabs to be places on the upper or lower side to retain the bank. 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: Not Applicable 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: True, generally people need to create access to the lake and it requires some addition of hard surface to construct the stairs. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(4).htm[3/19/2018 3:39:36 PM] Letter View Response: When similar aging and change occurs on other projects of this "scope" the conditions for extra hard cover may apply. The procedure of access improvement will likely require the addition of some hard surface. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: True, generally people need to create access to the lake and it requires some addition of hard surface to construct the stairs. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: It certainly will not. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: This project will enhance the beauty of the shoreland for winter and summer a like. It also will protect the bank from possible erosion thereby protecting the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. • Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(4).htm[3/l 9/2018 3:39:36 PM] •''^^ 4 }, O • 00 U Wa0 d '961' • Q --1362--J : /i %I �tx1w IL 1111 • / , ', x ,11 ; -�1ti1 \11\ \� , , I , 1I_ ,�, • y I am, ' 7 1 / i 1 ' ,1 j t 1 t}'^ 1 1} 1 I t i,i ' 1/ r 1 . — _ _-1_ " -- r 1' I Ll r, 1 ; 11 t 1'11 11111 X111 ' 1)1' } , I 1. r. Y. 1 i ,�" ,t '4�%tL_/l/ I r�;I."Ij, I_Iit1 1 1 1 r t•r 1-1. I-t'i ( 1 m� l , I t , !. l j l4 j !' • , I 111111t, � 1i 1, .- =•in• / I / 11/ /1/ , GyJ/y j / µ?I /,1 It It 1 I I i I n; I : 1, i / 1 11 / / �/l ,/ i I 1 ; IF/ j1/ I I I ' I� 96 0 DRAINAGE // / / I //I// / I 7,/, , I, / 11 j1 l , 1 i / 1 ,€ ; l 1 1, ,. / 11 I ' l / / / 1 i,' 1 ' I I l j 11 ; /1 I. l i -�. I / s • • ......)c 11 , �fIII, r '/ l/ / Isa / , I ! r � 1iIli/ 1 , ,c , , 1 I, j / s 1 ; Il ' 11 I I aii ) ( /i , , ,4.,"a, Jr,,,a,:, _.eamib , ' 1 • r. s. - - i I I , I 1 I '/fi. ...— , s, ,IVIIIIMIMIRS itik, m/i I I ■ _ i 1 I i- ,1 i i i, p =� 1�jj.'�'1 ji.��j 11 t' I ,,...._*.p.-,4_11...,.. isvel a.„,.. 5 1 11 t \. - L, �i..•• I•VN 143,-.:•'w. t ' I _ 1 1 1 /.� , .Iii ,, : ,,. , .) Le) / t — A'. :AT," \```` I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 - ®I'li 1.a' r I slec va CO / ' 'C.1. '1 t , 1`I I I II ' I i 1 i j ', / .r..- Y 1 1 = - ' t , i i I ' , 1 ,,4a i_. _ yr C �._� ,�y1�,,tt 1 1 Om, 1 1I 1 1 t - r • 1 l •i■Y��"'(ti , 11 1 t I 1 t ! i 1 "4 � II IBEI I/111111��i�• C House \ 1` 1,% \ 11 ,t, , 1 1 1.,11 1 1 , I� 1 I II 1 i Cijj��,,} II 1 1, 1 11111 11111 ' �t11 a 1 II ' j bid Y ` '1 , !1 1 i I Iii I`..i �I ii 11 1 1 1 1 �I � ' I J r 1 1 1 1 I 1 l' 1 1 11 ', I I I ` 1 1 Ili i ' •, ... ` - t II I Id. .L, 1 ; I, 'I 1i, 1114,i i I 1 ''(1 1 I )SCAT SIG 959 I 1 ! 1 I 1 11 N - 1 • 0 % ; 1 ' 11 ', 1 1 1 , ' I ' ' , -, l`1 1 1 1 1 , 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i l , I l 96,, : 967 960 �` I I 11 1 1 1 1 r I I l i t ill l i I III I.' ' ' : I I ' , I II; I• \, \ . ; I I ; 1 1 ' i I } ''� II ' K _ f .\ i I I � I 1 �'r 1 i I ' 1 �` �I 'i,j1l 1 l i i 1, a..1 }I I ; \ 'i ,` 1,,'N 11I ; I 111'i 1 1 `\ I t t , i ldnl ' t 1 '11 \ , iin. I , ;II .,1 , , ;_i . , __ I ' 1 4 ' 11 11 \ 1 1 \ 111 1 'I' 14 1 1;l . , , 1, i I I I i I 1— 1• .j I 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1.11) ; 1 i 1 l I 1 11 I 1 1. 1`1 1 'IA_ /I■ I 1 11 c l" y�1 1 ;1 11 //': I ill I ,. ��` I ) 11 1t ' 1 1 11 i , 1 1-i I I l i 1 I I I I', 11 11 t 1 I l I 1 1 LI :1C'La-Srk_/4,4` ?F'4 f N r`��'4.--“-'4- I!_ 1 I ' �„r'-is,' I •i1'/th /' tl / '1, j 1 , i I IIII ' ; I ISI 1 1 11 ' 1 ' 11I' 11,, III Its 1111 / 1 ' i1 1 1' ' 11 1 /f f ;iI111 ,!111 i;1l I 1II 1 ' i III illi II 11liy1 'Ii1! ' , N`' I cQ) , lIi I , II / 'i iii Il, , lI I1lIM " ;I ', I, 1" , 1 / /1 1 1 11 r r l 1r I I i 'In \ U 1 1 1 1 / /1 /MI , 11 Ir r 'y11111 1 Jh I 1 .0,--------,,, / / y, I Il, 1 tV I, ' tt 1/ 11 1/ 1111I /� 111 �� „ ' 1111 , 0 , /'' „ 111 \` /��' i' ,'� / I 1 I _� t RECEIVED ...----/ All// , Wall and Step details / / i) RECEIVED All walls less then 4ft tall / FEB 2,,"r0'U FEB 2'I 2U18 Grades adjusted to steps CIN OF OP.ONO CIT'OF ORONO 1;1,- Greendale Design Nafstad Family •�,, Landscape Construction : 1.144... 1 'i'•`�* old hands at new design1370 Cherry Lane '�, Scale: finch=8 feet , '' '"'a`""-* Orono, MN55364 February 21,2018 ` 1845 Wisconsin Ave.No.Golden Valley,RW 55427 Tel.(769)544-4215 0 8 18 \ 410,./"m ` , ■ ,ice. GNW • • \./� g v :tion . . — . 4 „, i . .„. , iii... . ... w. ... 4140.--, , „rw,20. .....6 sib .1.3• . 4,i,,, , ,...,_ 111/4 • A • t 0 .j I Exalting vegetation says ■ C r • f 1 , ' Seeded Low Grow Fescue Gras ;I1 Low Grow Fescue Grass i 27/Utile BnwrGr a=Gu— '1, 41r4 �l r -,_,_ 1 &Black Chokebeny • 24 Dwarf Bull Honeysuckle A at• ��I y adY,�— - , • i! 4 Dwarf Appe Trees •■ t7/Summar Spires �'i �. re......`"A ,� � �41'.�` 20/Dwarf Bush tionel'euckle II II a■ Mixed Ground Cover Plane ��r�rea Lbw —� _ \ W Dakota Goldderm Spiry ■ al area by Path dared yellow 2a/ - == :6eira .S TO 1/Big Tuna Mugho Pine /4,'TT.g•.. � a�1:4144...01.1—W`/,•. a ` 1P!Blue Spruce Sedum e` ( ifir�r I• ON Med Claylike Buffer IN shrub srohandra 0•11410 AC' `: pry Vit° ' .. co 1 1• tc, fir. „ �� c ■ : axmnamlm w House �� ,+,: /'.L, ,�. ,4015j` �� I • 1 5/Black ChacelXrry • AIL `.tiorli- - . �, 18/Blue spruce sedum i /Al • ��• 4/Low Grow sumac 1 ill el is Ite1011iir AM EEL td W. to ! (L Buddhron then reptant native OI 144/Green Carpet Pecnyardra existing vegetation 0 Existing vegetation stays 3 0 J RECEIVED wan and Step details RECEIVED FEB 2 3 70th All walls less then Oft tall Grades adjusted to steps FEB 2 3/Old CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO .''"r' Greendale Design Nafstad Family , Landscape Plantings �` old hands at new design 1370 Cherry Lane Scale: 1 inch=8 feet i . *fOrono, MN55364 February 21, 2018 It i 1 1845 ; M , v 55427 Tel(763)544-4215 ,.,„ 0 8 16 1 � I I I . I I I I I IS / (BITUMINOUS CHERRY/ PLACE CURD /H O1.OYts- r I y V n , /. I• L`� ^)Pass i II h iiii,? I S $ %g l <_ C{ °i/ I 0 • 6 j 1,1 \ 1/1111.%/8F / I b C7 / 1 / l. ti / p € o �, wrBe ; € E ` R •. N X114 2 -rI / ' kg<14r 8 I ` ZN C7 mal (/Or 1 7j11 "111 ' 11 tYt i\) 0 : --kti II'i i Iaroxn�� St ~I�" g� {, IED /�XJ 8 ,, I IMT ` 4,,,,--.2. --- i�1 I' . �^o ® o \ RAI EO /-7 { I� I I 1 I Tl s\ ,OE K ( - 1`,I /y 'y� I )Q ) 1 - ' - --) •. , , , _i , , - t _� ti —I_ ` cRA°YOE / 'IV _ _ °Ea` T qt, ;0. ' ,-:-.::-....z.-_-:z._-,:_------,a.-:----"_-:----=-41"..."--:15,*--.7:..--:43:-_-_--.-:-.-7:: ..-z.°47Zi-=-1.,----: a I1T z-''-' r— ti Z1!ii (y_ ==_=____ - ±_ ___ 4 i 100.7i ��= = o it' j •-_ORDINARY NOI WATER 928.4 n LAKE MINNETONKA O WATER SURFACE ELEVATION 7/0/12.D28.95 F 0 D f Z J < y N; 1 )0 .N � • Ir a x i 51,9 a s_9m. IiC�.1 • g t as 8 csa"g� 0, y = oN o ;'R s M g i-:::4 "`O _ .. : 41 p y _ .-4.1i az o� g �C'. z po� >4 C4 ov m w 'o'v-. 23 i 3 c e m c ,� 3 z '.°6-S; y 1 m 5 64 :gig$°4 2 g g t ti w 701 W o - a o 0 r 5 :%9..3i9nm a i5 4,,NW.7.-mc o� M �s^ obto AS - BUILT HARDCOVER SKETCH 1 370 CHERRY PLACE, ORONO, MN I . N onto. --/ , A A% - Il 1 I - STAIRS© III /iiv,/ilii% -RETAIN0 SF.IN©WALL I 52 S.F. LI f � 1 kRETAIMNG — ;WALL © , , 0 1 ./////./ 7 S.F. • r I! 1[£.= ., __ 0 O HOUSE �.j, DECK & �..f //� II ' ' itT 320WALK -- 1293 SF. - � 1--STAIRS (--- I i / / /i 1 r' 358 S.F. 'I ro N i w 1 `DRIVEWAY- N2 ( --RETAINING `- 1 1 932 S.F. cn -.) RETAINING i \1 / STAIRS--- -- ri I a 15 S.F® WALL it 1 34 SF� I ®10 S.F. \ I'I ®LOT S STAIRS- I I 82 S.F. I I I -75I - x x x _ x I //rnwiiii/ --2361-- ....... i I �t- N arsrzo- T / % J`!� ' I /7/// j/UV\ w DATE: 7 0107!i 3 r, r � 0 30 60 90 DRAWBY:AAN �.• N 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET <-9 U •e FILE NO.: 12199 II, y.�-- � � SER VICES A.,. a _,,o r, 708 1ST AVENUE NE,01 //1 BuFFALo, MN 55313 PH.763.682.1 78 1 W W W.MEYERROHLIN.COM City of Orono %toNo, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet 1l Property Address: 1370 Cherry Place s.44,s,,0,-` Date: Prepared by: Greendale Design 2/16/18 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one 0 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A Garage 26.2/24.3 637 S.F. B Driveway 36/26+/- 932 S.F. C Sidewalk 320 S.F. D Stairs 3.7/9.3 34 S.F. E Retaining wal (not within 75'of OHW 10 S.F. F Retaining wal (not within 75'of OHW 7 S.F. G Deck/Stairs 358 S.F. H Retaining wal(not within 75'of OHW 15 S.F. I Porch 232 S.F. J House 1293 S.F. K Stairs 52 S.F. L Boat House 207 S.F. M Retaining wall (not within 75'of OHW 10 S.F. N Stairs along side of Boat House 82 S.F. O S.F. p Total Hardcover as per 10/7/2013 as built 4189 S.F. Q S.F. R Add in formerly Excludable items in the 0 t0 75 area S.F. S S.F. T Retaining Wall by steps to boat house 10 S.F. U Retaining wall 7 S.F. ✓ Retaining wall 15 S.F. W Portion of deck that has pervious surface below 82 S.F. X 114 S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 4303 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 23,590 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)1 18.2% (Proposed Hardcover next page) Variance Application—September 2017 Page 11 City of Orono ,/ oN' Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 1370 Cherry Lane Prepared by: Greendale Design Date: 2/1 6/1 8 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)0 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B Proposed Hard Cover for Lakeshore Area S.F. C S.F. D New Stone steps to lake 3ft/winding 284 S.F. E S.F. F Retaining walls by step 5 locations 92.3 S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. w S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 4303 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. Hard Surface as calculated in 2014 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover as ammended from original work 308.9 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] New Hard Cover Added 4303.0 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 23,214.0 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)j 19.9% % (Proposed Hardcover next page) • Variance Application—September 2017 Page 11 City of Orono ' ' ' •o\ Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ,. , ,; Property Address: 0, c fi - /ate_ ' ,I FdHp0. Prepared by: i er„gohby jca Date: /0/1/i3 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one Aileir Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER (.ft S - 8'/LT) In the following table identify awl items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key toTotal Surve Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width ree S u Feet) ?,cif'" .. ,w, ai 1i; EI*M, I' k. meat da a ._ A 66 .Z s Z..ft-3 C.31 S.F. B D Pi VGwAL( 34,x2lo -+ 9 3 Z., S.F. C S i De.,A/6>rt4 '3 o S.F. D STEP 145 3.7x T.3 34 S.F. E R -TAIt4 mid WA-1-1, Offer w+rrg IS'D,1.Ayte) /o S.F. F Q a1',4,N/NA wA L_c_. Nor wirM#/Is'co-4.4440 7 S.F. G Dacacl sTA5 'mac 3 58' S.F. H RgTAfNiN& "1•41-1-6/01"w,vw,i?64oF1,4ex) 15 S.F. • I - P0/2G14- 4t* Z32S.F. J /ie I,#5 E 129 3 S.F. K S?"i4/RS $2 S.F. L 80ATM:WS E 7a7 S.F. M ETA,N iw4 WALL .(a»NiN 75erc_ x ) • /0 S.F. N • .S77a-ii2S �Z S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q • S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. • X S.F. ✓ S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover i-I-I F ' I;xc idit ircatit;e ` oilatSit !' i RSM :. * .... a 'Wow/A/A!✓,4LL /0 S.F. F /i M 7 S.F. 1-Iii S.F. Peg nay .0' Jc. wtrii / .v100.5 Svjr'Acf Baraw S.F. I S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 00 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] DS.F. (4) Total Lot Area 2.3 5 0 S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)1 1'1. 3 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) January 8,2013 • Exhibit D Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map LA18-000016 Hennepin PC D 12601171 1270 lu) 1254(m 1280 08) (271 1295 1300( 161 1305 1370 01) 368 ilk(50) (1) 18 1310 ill 41 (18) 376 t ; A 1330 1375 (24 i9 cm 1.1 1360 1380 Rs) 1377 ) eal _ 1395 1 1385 (23) ) 1390 1 , 1400 az I 1421 (i3) 11j 1415 C211 1410 MI/ I 1 1437 rpt{ 1430 1437 • 1435 11111111141430 ...../..----.....7/////! 1450 t tet 1453 7)) 1445 (24) t 146117011470 (17) O1: 1475 (E) 147709) D 3928 (111) 1493 (8) 30 3980 081 3926 1505 3908 (1a) 3AQSt Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: 11 I 1 I 1 1 1 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy.(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (iii) is notsuitable for legalengineering or surveying purposes Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damageinjury or loss resulting from this data For more information contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis.MN 55487 I gis info@hennepin us RUN DATE:02/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:I 38 07.117.23 41 0004 38 08-117-23 32 0018 38 08-117-23 33 0021 ANDREA HENTGES PHILLIP CASEY&LESLEE CASEY E A SCHMIDT 1395 CHERRY PL 1318 SPRUCE PL 1415 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ANDREA L HENTGES PHILLIP CASEY&LESLEE CASEY E ALLEN SCHMIDT 1395 CHERRY PL 1318 SPRUCE PL 1415 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0052 38 08-117-23 32 0021 38 08-117-23 33 0022 D J ASHFELD&E L ASHFELD DANIEL J&HEATHER M TOTMAN E ALLEN&CAROL A SCHMIDT 1376 NORTH ARM DR 1360 CHERRY PL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 DANIEL.'ASHFELD DANIEL J&HEATHER M TOTMAN E ALLEN&CAROL A SCHMIDT ERICA L ASHFELD 1360 CHERRY PLACE 1415 CHERRY PL 1376 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0053 38 08-117-23 32 0022 38 08-117-23 33 0023 M A DABU&A M DABU ERIK W NAFSTAD DAVID REIGEL 1374 NORTH ARM DR 1370 CHERRY PL 1435 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 MICHAEL DABU ERIK W NAFSTAD DAVID REIGEL ANGELA DABU 1370 CHERRY PL 1435 CHERRY PL 1374 NORTH ARM DR ORONO MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 41 0094 38 08-117-23 32 0023 38 08-117-23 33 0024 S MCSHERRY&SHEILA MCSHERRY T&G BLOUNT MARK R DONGOSKE 1377 NORTH ARM DR 1390 CHERRY PL 1445 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 STEVEN MCSHERRY TERRY J BLOUNT MARK R DONGOSKE SHEILA MCSHERRY 1390 CHERRY PL 1445 CHERRY PL 1377 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0001 38 08-117-23 32 0024 38 08-117-23 33 0081 CITY OF ORONO JOSHUA PAUER&ASHLEY PAUER T A TORGERSON/K B TORGERSON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1375 CHERRY PL 1410 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO JOSHUA PAUER&ASHLEY PAVER TERESA A&KEVIN B TORGERSON P O BOX 66 1375 CHERRY PL 1410 CHERRY PL CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117.23 44 0073 38 08-117-23 32 0025 T WILDENBERG/S WILDENBERG S D SANDBERG&C B SANDBERG 1421 NORTH ARM DR 1380 NORTH ARM DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 TRAVIS W WILDENBERG SCOTT D SANDBERG SARA E WILDENBERG 1380 NORTH ARM DR 1421 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0074 38 08-117-23 32 0026 VIL OF ORONO LIN YAN&AMY YONGLI SH1 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1330 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO LIN YAN&AMY YONGLI SHI PO BOX 66 1330 CHERRY PL CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 32 0001 38 08-117.23 33 0012 ROBERT H GREELEY DANIEL L FENNELL 1385 CHERRY PL 1400 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ROBERT H GREELEY DANIEL L FENNELL 1385 CHERRY PL 1400 CHERRY PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 08-117-23 32 0002 38 08-117-23 33 0015 CITY OF ORONO CHRISTOPHER D PATNODE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1430 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO CHRISTOPHER D PATNODE P O BOX 66 1430 CHERRY PL CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 38 08.117-23 32 0017 38 08-117-23 33 0016 ROSS RIFKIN/CHRISTINE RIFKIN T M SCHAIBLE&M L SCHAIBLE 1310 SPRUCE PL 1450 CHERRY PL ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ROSS N RIFKIN TODD&MICHELLE SCHAIBLE CHRISTINE Z RIFKIN 1450 CHERRY PL 1310 SPRUCE PL MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Exhibit E LA18-000016 PC From: RNRifkin To: Laura Oakden Subject: RE: 1370 Cherry Place-Retaining wall Plans-Land Use Application#18-000016 Date: Wednesday,March 14,2018 2:32:19 PM Attachments: Nafstad Construction 22118.odf Hello Laura, Thank you for providing the plan design document supporting the variances request for 1370 Cherry Place. Here are our comments Thank you for bringing them to the attention of the Planning Commission. We are not in favor of what appears to be an extensive footprint within the 75 foot setback. We would prefer a design with minimal footprint in the setback area. We are also concerned about future development of aging grandfathered structures that don't appear to be addressed in this plan. Will granting current variance requests limit possible future variance requests? We suggest consideration of a more comprehensive design that addresses improvements of aging structures certain to require future action. We are concerned about a piecemeal string of additional variance requests further encroaching into the setback area over time. Finally, we are concerned about setting precedent that encourages continual extensive variances that erode setbacks around Orono lakeshore which Orono ordinances are meant to protect. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our input. Sincerely, Chris and Ross Rifkin 1310 Spruce Place Orono, MN 55364 (952) 925-2520 From: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Sent:Tuesday, March 13, 2018 4:12 PM To: rossrifkin@gmail.com Subject: 1370 Cherry Place- Retaining wall Plans Hello Ross, Here is the submitted plan for the proposed retaining walls and stair replacement for 1370 Cherry Place. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments you would like to submit for the Planning Commission to consider. Thank you, Laura Oakden Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: loakden( ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us Item 6 Date Application Received: 2.28.18 ��Np Date Application Considered as Complete:3.2.18 60-Day Review Period Expires: 5.1.18 • To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members yFt i Ci Dustin Rief,City Administrator 'Ikf sHO�� From: Jeremy Barnhart,Community Development Director Date: March 19,2018 Subject: LA18-000019, Mark Williams o/b/o March and Mark Enger, 2697 Casco Point Rd,Variances, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an Average Lakeshore Setback and 75-foot Lakeyard setback, Hardcover in the Lakeyard, Lot area and Lot Width Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission to discuss the multiple variances. Background The application is proposed to demolish the exiting home and construct a new single family house. The existing lot matching the neighboring homes. This lakeshore lot is lower in the street third of the lot,forming a bowl,which limits the building envelope of the lot.The new proposed home sits partially within the footprint of the exiting home. The applicant is asking for variances to center the home on the lot with creates a new encroachment into the 75-foot lakeyard with the porch and corresponding hardcover. The application is also proposing to move the home back from 61 feet from the OHWL to 64.5 feet from the OHWL. To meet the average lakeshore setback they would need to be 66 feet from the OHWL which is the same distance as their neighbors to the south. (The property to the north is vacant). The applicants are also are requesting lot area and lot width variances. The applicant has submitted a narrative attached as Exhibit D. In summary,of the new structure,approximately 140 sq ft of the single story porch is within the 75 lake yard and roughly 30 sq feet is in the average lake setback,where no structure exists. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1C Required Proposed Rear(street) 30 178' Side 7.5 9.1' Side 7.5 7.5' Lakeshore 75' 64.5'-does not meet Average Lakeshore 66' 64.5'-does not meet Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' LA18-000019 3.19.18 Page 2 of 5 Actual 20,509s.f. (0.47acre) 60'@ 75' 60.5'@ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage:. Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 20,509s.f. (0.47acre) Allowed: 4,101 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,783 s.f. (13.5%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier 5,127.25 s.f. 6,254 s.f. Roughly 5,125 s.f. Roughly Tier 1 20,509 s.f. 420 s.f. 280 s.f. (25%) (30.5%) w/in 75' (25%) w/in 75' Applicable Regulations: Placement of Structures on Lots(78-1279) Lake Minnetonka requires a 75-foot lakeyard setback for all structures. The Average Lakeshore Setback also applies. Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade,stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes,flagpoles and pump houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries.The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. (a) In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way,the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. The applicant is proposed to center the new home on the lot and the proposed porch creates a new encroachment outside of the existing home's footprint. The new home is 64.5 feet from the OWHL where 75 feet is required. Hardcover restriction Zones(78-1680) Within 75 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of any lake or tributary,and within any bluff or shore impact zone, no hardcover shall be placed, located or constructed, except for driveways,stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes as regulated by the shoreland overlay district. The applicant is proposed to center the new home on the lot and the proposed porch creates a new encroachment outside of the existing home's footprint. The new home is creating roughly 140 sq.ft.of new hardcover. Lot Width and Lot Area(78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district.Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot,are able to be redeveloped LA18-000019 3.19.18 Page 3 of 5 without variances if specific standards are met;such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules,chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer;and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicants' need for setback and hardcover variances results in the property's inability to conform to#1 and#3 above.Therefore, lot area and width variances are also required in order to redevelop the property. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community,existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat.§216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd.6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home in a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the ordinance. Due to the unique grading on the street side of the lot and the dip in the shoreline on the lakeside.The building footprint of the lot is constrained.The 75 foot lakeyard setback and hardcover seem reasonable and in harmony. The Planning Commission should discuss the general intent of the average lakeshore setback variance request. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone that is moving farther away from the lake then the existing home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner by replacing the existing residence with a new home which has less hardcover then existing and the new home will be moved 3 feet farther from the lake compared to the existing home; but the size and width of the lot is below the minimum lot size standards of the Zoning Code. LA18-000019 3.19.18 Page 4 of 5 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and shape,and its proximity to the lake. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the surrounding homes. d. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The size and grading of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of the lake and Casco Point Road creates a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The size and grading of the lot as well as its orientation along the curve of the lake and Casco Point Road creates a unique circumstance which is peculiar to the Property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.Staff finds this condition to be true. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variances would not impair health,safety,comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The size and grading of the property;its position along Casco Point Road and the lakeshore,limits the building envelope for the homeowners;the variances would alleviate difficulties which pertain to this lot. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. LA18-000019 3.19.18 Page 5 of 5 Practical Difficulties Analysis The planning commission should discuss whether the minimal encroachments are appropriate, given the location of the existing structure,and the neighboring properties distance from the lake. Engineer Comments 1. The applicant should be required to have a service connection that is separate from the neighbor to the south. 2. The applicant should consider granting easement to the neighbor to the south as that properties sanitary service seems to encroach. 3. The drainage on the north east portion of the lot appears to flow to a drainage structure on the lot to the north. An agreement should be worked out with the owner to address future access and maintenance. Public Comments Both neighbors have submitted the acknowledgement forms Exhibit E. One has submitted written comment for the Planning Commission to review, Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Will these variances effect the neighboring vacant lot? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Does the Commission find standards for granting the average lakeshore setback variance are met? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission should discuss the requested variances and if the commission finds reasonable findings then they should consider recommending approval. If the Planning Commission proceeds with a recommendation to approve. The approval should follow the engineer's recommendation to require the applicant to connect their own sewer service for the property separate from the neighbors. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey and Elevations Exhibit D. Project Narrative Exhibit E. Property Owners Acknowledgement Form Exhibit F. Comments from the Public Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map Exhibit H. Photos Letter View Exhibit A LA18-000019 Land Use Application Summary PC Application Date: 02/21/2018 Address: 2697 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 2011723230004 Land Use Number: LA18-000019 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: MARY C ENGER& MARK M ENGER Address: 2697 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Mark Williams Address: Project Description: Setback variance to lake, replacing existing structure Land Use Application Type: Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: ii \OL Land Use Application Summary(1).htm[3/15/2018 1:16:09 PM] Letter View Exhibit B LA18-000019 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM PC LA18-000019 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The current house and property conditions do not allow for building options to the north or south as this would require additional variances and impact the current neighboring home/lot. This lot is a non-conforming lot and cannot be redeveloped without triggering more variances. The lot as it exists is best suited for the same/similar structure as was originally built on the property. The retention of this type of historical lake Minnetonka home, with its lakeside front porch, also remains the main goal of the homeowners. The intention is build a new version of the home that has been there. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The Hill In order to safely utilize the property, it could be argued that the house and garage should not be moved away from the lake towards the street. In order to maintain enough acceleration space to get cars up the driveway to the Casco Point Road, it would be undesirable to move the house backwards on the site (as it is already difficult during extreme weather conditions) Moreover, because of the steep slope of the hill at the street side of the property, it is unrealistic (as well as undesirable) to place a new garage within this area, as it possible a car coming down the hill could slide into the structure if not given enough space. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The clients goal is build a very similar home to what is currently on site. Stlye and size are similar in nature. We have considered both neighbors and their views to the lake in our design. We are moving the home back from its current position by 3.5'. We are also reducing the massing of the porch area vs. what is currently the porch area. The existing porch has more walls than windows and has a large roof on the 2nd story covering it. On the proposed new home, we have narrowed up the porch, as well as making it all windows, which will allow for less house massing. We also have significantly scaled back the 2nd story roof structure to make it less impactful from a visual standpoint. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The cost of remodeling this home to bring it up to 2018 standards does not make financial sense compared to the value of a new home. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: Not applicable 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: Not applicable 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(1).htm[3/15/2018 1:13:32 PM] Letter View Response: Not applicable 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: 1. In 2001, the neighbor to the south at 2715 Casco Point Road, received a lake setback variance based largely on the hill from the main road to the home and the safety concerns outlined above. 2. The neighbor to the north at (2695 Casco Point) removed their home several years ago and the drainage was modified (see survey for drain field). This has caused flooding problems and water runoff issues. Our intentions are to re-shape drainage to better manage this situation and which would not be feasible if the home were moved closer to the street in addition to the ?hill safety? argument. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Not applicable 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: We are replacing the existing home with a similar home, while improving the site for both neighbors. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of the variance will not negatively impact the site, but will in fact make it safer and more suitable than its current condition. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: As discussed in #2 and in the narrative the shape of the lot and the steepness of the hill coming off Casco Point Rd, it is necessary to keep the home at the proposed setback for the safety of the homeowners and guests coming and going from this home. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form(1).htm[3/15/2018 1:13:32 PM] Exhibti C + LA18-000019 PC The Gregory 00009.hoc INVOICE NO V3 an. Propo,..2 Molding 01.yrd.ht, FE NO _ 109 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY L.area to 011W -20.509,411.L, Lote'r,.74..r.,..:0 14*-01,14k7:' =52(1.5 50,,t9 s ift SCALE 9. LAND SURVEYORS E4,411.w - 2.427 1,1 ft Sokkv . 2.438 xy ft RECalowito UNDER DE LAWS Oi STAI'Ver:pill, Rex',,,,C,, 350.1 ft Drr.ca,ay a 2.143 ary ft Tv,'VA,ewer I* rwpwe 6',q,t ,2ear ftrell 350 sq fr t •o...a........ 0.............. Wm.*,Mow...N..121t I rr,!In krtrrl,rn *urtleynrs Tertifiralt er,,,,,,, 7, 2753 .9 f ro.:Wa• .. 69,..y ft • ,357% r, ..-e - 6 5.aft Lanrav to , _ Site Plan For: 7,...{ft rtr LI c............e......... No.269, Deck at Late = 1 12 54 ft ' ,)00,0114.111.14•00,1v1i., MARK D.WILLIAMS CUSTOM HOMES •• „ . - lima to Tgje,,taet• 24.99% ............., . Wm.., . . , . ' ,....., ,.,... Adios Y.est,Pam.Ilea Orem MN P 1 replan 1=1.14414mo . / , a 4,.........4 2.,Tamil.II T.lap IL ' / .- ''.. 'KBrieelmatoTap rad...atm lot*ea C 1.6 Pa.Inted ril A ..,====..........,,......., andhael cme of POW, .1rdr........................................ . r . Elm wen,.!.al Gm ...............a...,en•••••••••••• . Ir.f......••••.*gr..irdltre6.10,61.10111.• / T.r01.6..1•11101.0.•Am•••WI**.trairlor 0.P.,0..11 IA.('Oft lank lAntoory rood..S ik-rol ‘. ... / • i, . UN n moftwaratur, _ ... ...I..+Odds At nonomfontang Iola i.1 ;_.•''',.,1.'.''''''''''', /414.1144404%.% , ,,* ‘4.../4;„ , I I r ,. .,.... s' ,../ Ve 41''.''f‘ii/0"// 4-:'-/ .P.‘ 4 24.--,*/1) : /— 7.1/4 ,- -'=--. . - f mol.10 No , . , '` .3 1 ...wad,...... ....,r 1 , Irernersa limp f rot ,3, 'wpm Lard PM e „ Afr•-•T ,..., ,' '1 ..„_.k. .\ /''''-'r__ / qttf. - ........iv ..,,, 5 _._. .,..' IN / ,.\ / / , \,; / -,-l - _ ..,,,,,, ,. i.• / No.275 ..--, -... , 1 6.; ' 110' " •---- ' Gar .`.. T • 4, ; . -41----1- . , .•. 111 Re V‘si ---' ' 11W1 , ...,... . ''. rr'..\\ •g ''') ''' ;4--sqCAa),v-oquIi.b;vy,,z,-x.'.e:k.,....- 4- , „ - „ . .'.. / :. I/ • / x ., , ; , .t d. k / 0.c. ) , , ... .. -, \ .........,...... „ . Lepl Desomption: -.... ‘ Lot 4.AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 269 -- '‘ /,.„, Hennepin Canny,Mime.. - _ \. // , • The aft esmtowl.nomi mr•Ham pt.of mord or Manna. peVa•S try OW I say M111•0 OM,*bor..,et rog..1.pimmoil by me or urAlw my dnien.Approon and IAN I es•641.1gems1 WA Sump under fogr Ira ol Ow MY el kimono* Surveyed INA Illk dft,of rebury 20111 , ,,,...,,,,...,.... . / t.....4. Now. .,..94 k______ lam Rep.No 2014 + + + + ..'...o.s 00000000000.00 zseoz al'eea wWi' .. �,: + + INVOICE NO. 56648 The Gregory Group,Inc. dRa. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY F.B.NO. l A7-30 �wa.ramn%z SCALE:1"= 20' LAND SURVEYORS Hardcover REGISTERED UNDER THE IAN'S OF STATE OF SRN?IESl1TA Lot area to 0HW =20,509 sq ft •DeAdes F41ip Iron&I 1M1"""r sen�.'"°A.aaa Nae, test saotmv' Go/drn = 1.262ft o cana.al�en wn"n.M a''''''.,Naanawsxzssec 9 sq 3uruet nrs (Certificate Driveway = 4,154 sgR J Garage = 422 sq ft o" Sidewalk = 778 sq ft front Stoop = 52 sq ft zoo amen steam Bewren w rt No.2691 Rear Stoop = 19 sq ft MARK D.WILLIAMS CUSTOM HOMES / \ \ti Egress well = 42 sq k Basis for i/ e Egress Stoop= 6 sq ft '/ 1\ Landing to ,�,mbearings. Pmlxrtv located in Senses /i/ tt J \ , Garage Lake Steps = 7 sq ft 2/.Township 111.Range 23. \\ \ Deck at Lake = l l2 sq ft Nennepn comm..Minnesom A - rota, = 6.254 sq ft ' /I tt — Percentage = 30.49% es'°os o /, 9 / h \ \\� ' '' / r / / ne'rc rs,:em. {/ Addres'2697 Cantu Pant R«d.Orono,MN a` ..,// n Benchmuk:Top nm of hvdmnt I«etId on Cance Pn Road a / e ' g ex _ et the armheam tamer of pmpem. 3q" jii7� .. Ce \ F.Iwebon 958.83 Ret 4,',./IP1/4/ '4(''''t''''''' ‘;:l.'2'lit ,2---------''''--''''' w �\ n �>y 4P � �ti s 0 n 34.. n whrfP Ql ,P" ell IIIIss en,':"" be t - \ .. r� bNo.2697 /� V of ' / .°�j }i ///4� ry J t,y 393. i� � 10.„,,,„v \I \`\I I ' \yl y a .a, I. NG8 1 ' ,' , -- ,I. ?651 I % t w ,� d Garage \,/ i ,� % ..`. d 11 No.2715 \\I \�� \ _ Garage ,, ry \,�a q �I')orymo sm n N ,�' t �,� I� r 0 r�1h o \ a(an r 1 �� ' 'I J l'_ ��\ mo n i I v0 e 1. i Q \ • w323 f I 1 , i' p. 1 \ —. / / i R .RIcZ' O Legal Description: Lot 4.AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 265 /� Hennepin County.Minnesota / The only meaner to flown are from plata of record or information \ / provided by 0650. / I certify that this plan.apootict ion.or Wort wee prepared by mt. \ — / or under my deed supervision and the I am a Only Licensed by. Snevetor under the laws of the Sate of Minnesota. - / snaeyeathis2Shaeyor3nly2Gn. /////��)) /n/ Ra. ormnM 9..N.=..,. . ' /I/ // ♦ LL %%��LGGII s xs<nnwrm�cesaae e y \ Greg'j'.Py/tech,Miro.Reg.No.24%2 THe + + REVIEW PLAN 4 This plan I..t a reviw stage and Is NOT a permit set.Plea.e review yp6 the plan in its entirety and let DPP know M you have any changes prior Jp6.y to oo proceeding.T.plan will he placed on hold until we raceM +AAI' coni,,,,„..„onthe p1 you totproceed,your meaning no additional work will h / �� done on plan until we rapM your approval to _- I / Mir' 03/062018 115:17 PM �e i• —nom .. .I• IIIIIIIIIIIII;. I 11I t:ye ........................._, . i ,,. _. I sass .. 55. I ._ '•:III11111111/1 >.•:..,....III -..:.. 1 ....,,,, 1••I••I I•:I::I 1: =i1cy=- - _ 1'.3--_-_ S1 - -_. _ r_"�ir- P]�li$€ MINIMMIIM IM. _ _ �I • LEFT c4LEVATION RICHT ELEVATION •id• J ....s.uM.M ......,•,.. ✓Y rt' d If514 �ai� p it R di •i■l 1■ __ __��_�-_�-��-_�___-- -----�T .�' '■ J iii% ?: I_,_ p 7:7311L.�� iti _ d.tier _■rail _1 ■ t ii. 4-'7�� new �� — .. ice— __ - . srapw■CM ��.. sass.,, .,.s. .a. tt , : ,r ■■ �� uiii[iiiiliiI to „ EZ. mil ::: '�`-, - tI:m::II:.......711: ri -- : 7.111:1M. .II'��III� .•� .. ` ; $C I �f■ Q� 1 n � Mt. SM-- will/A \ e.wpnaw I ' l 1111'11 _ _�1=4,... 11�. IIIL!!!flJ!!!II 7 ! ::TFia1u1,ui .„,,,,_.......r _ 11 LAKE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION "w�"�ape WI o VIA RMTAL sate litt'no. PI g 110550,1•441,1 10 M EXTERIOR NOTES °",wua' ae ..mase., - Wil. aaee.0 v..m,e MUT 500 10:1M11 FLOW e UMY • aoe.wl:P.m<'W. ptrwwpe.e.pr..m..... MOM= • map., ww..mwa •'• .rc.� 7.1 `/..r.aama wnswrr.wtxrwwnm..wa M 14>NM MIK • 1.1005161.2155,15\MY.0.59107 NM 55514e aLtlr NOVO • AI VrVW emeaa..�wevov_n 0001 HP real • m=TRle vprr ��ea.n....r it 11101111,102 Wilar. yi:.. Y1068NNI11 'ON080 s..",.....,.nm s„,.u.nn� .n a.nrou.-..,. .shvi11m.0 vii: 'aa Dzoa 03613 Lem , li 1 gF°N NJIS30 R 91�NVld u au o GGn m: IY ' j� VS0 NAGAI I MAW,14J Gmto e .1.�N8aIS32i mama 3 A ([ �"�i iI gg 1 ,rI 11 i g 110 11 ! 2 1E :,! 2 11 1IiihI ; 1 i R ;RillilPgy ��1RaiE3 ,A� !lI tlai1i6il1 1oIEF1illi! ei : gI` 1i 1 i1JI1 EI1! � 81, 1 i5IIE6 1l.�1.115i lie .PYO3 11 2�i C:Jhh;1 ! a if RI 7ki i!Ii� 1111 11111....1. st € I !If E 1 i r g1 iiIii i1flj 0lar. wi;clf Wfealsi Mipil !jilt 5£lIg REVIEW PLAN ! This plan Is ata review stage and is NOT a permit set Please review 3 the plan In Its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior ..}} to us proceeding.The plan will be placed on hold until we receive 5!6F confirmation from you to proceed,meaning no additional work will be 9 done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward. Mg i 03/06/2018 1:09:28 PM �Il .dig gl;ii fi oil) Ia — Dw .re 5.. a MON Viii. §I! . Itt ! vet. e' $l 1 I, .7 d d j 7// // /4 I Is o n` -t.. APPIX g 44. , . _ ... tltl , Ma.ee .. «, u ems. • d Jim . i I Inc-- i i e Ly .' rwFaa e.p. 3 I .a.a !c Gel s. 1 i e_ea,a .rte° %.�;26146, Mai r, e�cal' L SEE ES/SNEERING PMGE9 hi-$% ' .7 J . t____ �- FIFjT FLOOR PLAN d �` i1. ptatesp Oe nunwarownr {{ terata 11. i, ill. nil?77.1L fi a linen MOT FLOOR FIROIRO ' ax n n [ e. Oa* zeig m O • •Yana ro rw'a e.aM aOa r.a ern a Mutat L mem CI 00 twenswinea mama El K3 ase mrw%.evasaow•ona.a sea . I . . °es mtanru wpa•M•asrwn Ola pg • n.FROM m,..0 0.MNIN•aaarwaoaw R`I —_ ._— ._--. -__--_ ___.__.._-= 6Y�Y.JCVa CO YR MN • MN OM NMaas reams,aad.r.i wwoeua O ileatinffeainZa '.d .v.V w V. O•/ • FLOOR TOM 1101 rowan MOM OR. 'Z s RMO rare Oren•raa ARM WIN a II�� I• ianriP.MCia • aamrowwa cm VOW taw MOO n.r _ • MALL ORR AT ILL MOOR IS PAM OMR 140••• ORM IMO MOWER • FROM utns axpmuw.r MA roar woe OMR,Ona aOata•a.p am MOORS TO a PROMFIl-res Mtn.,•a'we•FLOOR• LS MT exe,w t. NY Kamm,r im.eoDem%memo m.ws.ems. a "PM wns.al eeaa.MAR.onpm.ro . AT FMAR wu+mROi ee<OOe®m OW. w..an NORMS MY iq0 — Mbar mfg ulna arantw P87E61.n t InIIasa nKIR? TOT WIL aw ear.n WON TO .aaa. .aa,aea,w,aaew..,d.a� 3 o REVIEW PLAN ill This plan is ata review stage and is NOT a permit set Please review Me e plan in its entirety and let DFP know If you have any changes prior g to us proceeding.The plan will be placed on hold until we receive . confirmation from you to proceed,meaning no additional work will be id k done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward. '. 03/06/2018 1.0928 PM 1.1.1;1y 3 etlYt o'f1 Y BOO .91 .k 111,moues Yalu !rI ref ref, Nr H {�+ ION LAM NT Mal ONIONTIONIA r 11 1 Lr P 1VV Nft b a sr 134 ebri • 0 SP1 a x z z Els ta1111 7&11 .11 UlgriZZ z VP It mai 1i 0 N..r wma ) 'j CO II 14:—.F1,- �pq y t see PNBNIERIN8 PAWS SI-5X I sap,..a 4 I ➢ gd ,© 5EGOND FLOOR PLAN. a ,101,0., blt IIIIIN � �,�� 1& Imatagoanza . Sawa a.Naa.Oft N.SIM.NAN nom.rFlr lmmonmee21 g NJ .•wlma Mirararecr"inwpa`a anreaNmr W • n W mNWT AU•1011•100/1 a aa.r moa Nu gSC av QV WO aN.s.w.0ala,NNa,erera.N.e. Z WY *r etwa:aaraP.� ON OM MC A err s,..MOI.ION g0 �N NO MX es.N1N.aN.aaa, ______ 21 am • 00/Allsae AT Y.es0.1 PM marISKONIs 1.a.eN0119OMNI! • aws.wAs eN..omw Oa N.rear roam Weary NEM agar AM MONO MOM p .arewNN • TOM ras11oa . naawa taboo eacea a we%warn MANN atm NMI Man=ewaa • iwes MINIM WORM fare elwrsata MOM MOW NN wra.aa.Nas/AM imrNasw r. MIN NO AT amn�'aaY aNamN.., KO • cess awe a:wcrw NOWT wase ane “1•11110.110110scn n.aT. u0a. MO'rN-11 11017"r11:ea sa TINIALL r 01 wm .aoa.amsa.anNlr.N.a. 4 fi6q� � 1 -AwW(w,%40,9 -j D ---finsv i .. _ , • +�H. r, crnt9',, • n iw --t---- 1 -+1T. F'� ' -' F 4,' r 1:14 `.7 .1%- 'j �F 1 AA- • 1� f17 81C„ 1` C ►z- r,a.— -- i`i h Or __._ICrt_ 41 v - _- 4 . _. . +tG� o a ,r . . wvW • II _. IMO . N t. 1 ,91 . 1 '[7-f/'. • 11 r, r _Il - ----,---/ - , _ — - .� i 1 +.97;5• friiPttO otkva.tuaf lam` E LtM. N-Pt+2:1 ICT. FLe.0.12 P.t,AN 06I16F+ ' t44_ 3504--lc67` --,.)- _ \16, h 1.6q1. _.CA-sCo .rorq-r 'ZIP Int 2r Wt.cu...04S.Ccx Conn, aoisitt, NRpz_ N .rv 1cr3 2622;', NIT- 11 •-> '-o" g,d CauvlUPEA at4 Q I w�co .- — II I� _ II I, -. .. --- �— __Li --- ----- yrfi¢, xy 1 I q�T�tl�.. -_--- �. — •• _- 0T _icy_Vo-_-- .moi.. _--._---. - b , i . w 1.11 --- ---------- ,inar ¢ � 4 ® I 1 11 :.�{iK . _l4/.-tAaArtTtt \_. 0, -- 1 r Y . I 11 b`-x 04 _ LIiJ — --IV-7X I • n�3 t►.tGrzs. . / It ° ; �- I --'369T --CA4 co Porto-two < 0, (_• ~ bk.Wf.14dlo[ S _-_Nle-. Yr . — tus __I�dAIf{. ----- -3 '� tV. s..e 9 WI-4 Ai enVs NL'{INLI. . I ~ t �� VI f C++ r ?h-5.- . .... y , T-w I ,i, '- Int•—ta 44.4,0i 1f ' (l 2t?Yt3t 1 Ii jU IIa, l k � I -- _ —� tZbt Ell• 2tsP t�: Purl ,{u M !29'2 .� ' ( ` I`8t`�(t—1----'''-nr1=-"H; , _ It `V 1 --(;fEC _ 2M'L ' ,_IIP-Of1-1'Jj-_ _I. tx.l2p ' O —F — --1-111(119. 0. I • HH' / - ;I ;„,..._i_ ,.If , j : -- JFrrt . �Ii , 'Fri_r 1 , ,..\.___,..„....,! .r , _ , i,.„ mi .I ____,..,1 , 3 2 . Q ' N! d ' _ I * , f i I , . ,, ,,.-_ , ,,, s I 1 i , , , ,,..„; , ., , ; ....: , , . , , w 1I , . ..„, , , ,ai 1 I , t, M ,1 -,,.... 41"—= s.Z. iI -- M Ma II % 3 1111, iI 2 ,/,:_, , --...".... . ..., 4b, ! . : \--1-- !II ,I _ IA-1--r AIM ' — I worm 1 c` 1 --.,..J I 416'-0" uu4.4- cc,_ U • ion.,.. __F4,...,„ . .._."wr. P^�W I.J ._... u V . , ,_—, . .. .. _._ xi Or__- / 6�•t T pc�N I Vo , 1 A litmos I ■■ 12-it ■ COI® c� —,1— Iyt Ret • 1 oe hid srI r rz.t. L,.M L N X 12`( __....-5.vu_-43,?j___5.L i,' i•-__e L-t.Vh-RP Ni_ _.. -_--.--__- - G t.YzS MAt2.K 1X111.Lt, M ___CAM. . -- -. 26 c1,7 c%c,Cco p.eptit-t- R`O ht M k, 5 ROI 0 12 0 K O • _ .,20%, - — 1217coVvz.i rdiAx eiiCprN4 GftvEnA4ea 4t01 4F • MVP.0144 1440/Aftep 724.1%/t401•01%DC/0AD Ll00V. 1-51,7--------._._._-._ t Pi(`I --_..._._.. P41 2 Sc iso 2611 2gs9 ! _t Ks_ .-�r_•:,1— 22.-re 0.0...)24) --_. 2212 '(V-taos) 7 I pknv tea t a ,I' /. &fo 4414%.raw n, n9 -�X t9T+.}{bvhML ,-- \S 1-tM�Oe�dl�Qid?y @ ttBv4G.Yrih�i GO or 90 WIC FtiaT.Pt¢tNr_tN�c / `, _, /I.' 4McE t4 _ _ hart se,-iisAtAce I -- t • A r'�;_ 4toE 2a 2 zi72 �58�4 —ryCtytcR-sum. • ,>`/' - � 'q c��' \ NrsM.M644144 PJ�t{Oe2"'WA: .. 1 0 u - toes aji u�c -rely f k°». / � N41-47 Of WA* /***..."....k. . --!.:10..-_ \37 IRO /' ` `� \ ares �.''. • /, -'1 '4b7%"*%"'"%stss'"%.„..„_..........................:H.,,,_ .. • 'Ij,q 1 s •� - 21t�0folo / ...---------.............----------....---------... _.,..,....s.,,,...s.,....... j:- ' eM phc o_..._- I-1 o-t,-A--t-�- --- -_-------- • Exhibit D LA18-000019 PC Proposal for variance request 2697 Casco Point Road, Orono Mn History and Current Situation History of Home: • The home was the family home of Mary Enger and her siblings.Their parents bought the home and the home has a long tradition of extended family gatherings throughout the years and they have continued to present date. Intention: • The plans of Mary and Mark Enger are to retire in the home and make it their permanent residence.Their desire is to retain the essence of the original home and the cottage lake home charm of what they now call home. Current Home condition: • Originally the plan was to remodel the home to bring it up to the family's needs and while modernizing the plumbing, electrical and heating.After extensive consideration and design consultation,the remodel was not realistically feasible. • Currently the home is in need of all major components to be upgraded including: Foundation,insulation,roof,siding,window,plumbing, HVAC and electrical. • After thorough consideration the excessively increased costs of a remodel vs a rebuild would be a significant financial hardship.The rebuild would be more energy efficient and environmentally updated as well as a more sound financial investment for the family. • The lot and original home currently range from a 66.4 to a 61.1 (as the lakeshore is curved) setback from the lake and there is 30.49%total hardcover. Floor plan updates: • The updates requested would be for the safety and long-term livability of the home and its occupants.This would entail attaching the garage,adding a main floor 3/4 bath in place of the existing lh bath and providing a room to allow for the possibility of main level living for an elderly or disabled person. Lakeside impact: • The lakeside setback would stay as the home currently sits.We have worked with the City Planner of Orono in designing the home to maintain its current footprint and volume for the area where the home is being asked to be granted a set back variance. • There is also erosion of the retaining walls along the lake,we will work with a landscaper,the city and the DNR on appropriate permitting to bring this up to date as well. Proposed Project The applicant has developed a rebuild that emulates the existing home in style and scale. Designs,elevations and a survey are attached with this submission,that demonstrate the plan as outlined below: 1. We have designed the rebuild to be to meet the existing home dimensions and volume for the area in which it encroaches into the lakeshore set back. 2. The current home is 61'from the lake and the home is 30'wide. 3. Exiting home is 14'closer to the lake as it sits now than city ordinance allows for new homes. 4. The proposed rebuild is asking for a 10.5'setback variance for a 28' wide (2'smaller than existing) dwelling up until the 75'setback mark. In fact.we are moving the house back 3.5'from its current position. At that point the home design will be modified to meet clients needs as explained throughout. 5. We will also be centering the home on the lot (see existing survey and proposed survey).This will allow for equal space from both neighbors and room to plant trees for privacy on both sides. 6. The neighbor to the south's lake views will not be changed as the home will not sit any closer to the lake then it already does. In fact we are moving the house 3.5'back away from the lake from its current position. 7. The neighbor to the north,is a vacated empty lot that will be a new build at some point. 8. Existing hardcover is at 30.49%.The large majority of this is driveway and the large parking turn around.We are attaching the garage to both reduce this unattractive element as well as attach garage to the home.The new hardcover will be a reduction of 5.5%. 9. The new hardcover%is being proposed at 24.99% 10.The house hardcover%is 13.5% Hardship and Description of unusual property conditions. Narrowness The current house and property conditions do not allow for building options to the north or south as this would require additional variances and impact the current neighboring home/lot. This lot is a non-conforming lot and cannot be redeveloped without triggering more variances.The lot as it exists is best suited for the same/similar structure as was originally built on the property.The retention of this type of historical lake Minnetonka home,with its lakeside front porch,also remains the main goal of the homeowners. The Hill In order to safely utilize the property,it could be argued that the house and garage should not be moved away from the lake towards the street. In order to maintain enough acceleration space to get cars up the driveway to the Casco Point Road,it would be undesirable to move the house backwards on the site (as it is already difficult during extreme weather conditions) Moreover,because of the steep slope of the hill at the street side of the property, it is unrealistic (as well as undesirable) to place a new garage within this area,as it possible a car coming down the hill could slide into the structure if not given enough space. Further Arguments 1. In 2001,the neighbor to the south at 2715 Casco Point Road,received a lake setback variance based largely on the hill from the main road to the home and the safety concerns outlined above. 2. The neighbor to the north at (ADDRESS) removed their home several years ago and the drainage was modified (see survey for drain field). This has caused flooding problems and water runoff issues. Our intentions are to re-shape drainage to better manage this situation and which would not be feasible if the home were moved closer to the street in addition to the"hill safety"argument. Thank you for your consideration and helping us build a beautiful home that my clients will enjoy with their family for generations to come. Mark Williams Exhibit E , • LA18-000019 PC ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) / 2 J//A) 4$ of r�?YS alSee / / [print name(s)] [print address] have the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the roperty located at 97 als referred to as Land Use Application No. /A-- 00001r fa I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans =•_ t at the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Ale Property Owner ` / Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application,please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Q fl • ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I '✓ 'A r, ✓ /1` ^�/ //l//ltdc�, of �; ( '� C( 0ei• /i , (we) [print address] [print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Q 617 t rpt y''f if j also referred to as Land Use Application No. l i) —06 06 ( 7 Iwe) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans_a_nd that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ..„------ ri; Property Owner Date r j Property Onmer Date t If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use �tl:a. A plication, please submit your comments to the Building && Zoning Office at least 10 p days prior to the scheduled meetingdate. ='0, pit '" k it ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM it of I (we) [print address] [print name(s)] have reviewed the plans for the proposed use of the property located a improvement or proposed No. ______ also referred to as Land Use Application this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval t toe) (are) aware of C I (we) understand that in executing for the City <�: ....r.,val of the property or use but merelyI,k confirm rct or use requires nCouncil approval. Exhibit F ' LA18-000019 March PC To: Laura Oakden/Planner@ City of Orono From: Tom Jungels/ Keith Jungels @2715 Casco Pt Rd.,Orono/Adjacent neighbor to the south of 2697 Casco Pt Rd Regarding: #18-000019 Mark Williams, 2697 Casco Pt Rd Thank you for helping us understand the proposed variance request and city code information relative to the new home design by Mark Williams...Mark Williams did call and email with information as well, Thanks... After our discussions, we have a couple of concerns/comments: 1) With the minimum set back of 7.5 ft for the building and 5ft setback for the driveway being implemented by our property line, we have a concern about water runoff/drainage..We suggest a plan that will control the water from not entering our property. Being near a flood zone with varying elevations causes a variety of drainage issues that need to be controlled both during and after construction. 2) We discussed the sewer/lift station on our property that is being utilized by 2697 Casco Pt. Rd. We suggest that now would be an appropriate time for 2697 Casco Pt. Rd. to secure their own sewage disposal system as part of their comprehensive plan. 3) The lakeshore set back variance from 75 ft to 65 ft is not of major concern for us. We also compliment the exterior design as being a nice improvement to our neighborhood. PC LA18-000019 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map PC • 2601 06) y T Li 142) 2617 05) 262302) 2618 (38) 2635 01) 2645 00) 410 2648 2649 179! r. 2665 01) 2677 666 allihn 2683 (1) 2684 0) 2684 (p N) 2691 (4,/ 2686 2715 0)) 2700 (72) 2745 t6) 2710 t71j 2696 2705 a+) /11114111t 2765 119j � i 2750 R01 2725 . , • rot (1St s 2700 27' 3800 2745 I Q I131 • 2720 97 ' 09) `01 274 � 2700 1171 3800 `4 2795 2720 271 (401 CO 2740 2787 2776 t12) alt�O 013) o,4 110i 2735 I 2799 �N 2794 3750 re) (II) d, (71) 2801 3799 1831 3779 3730 2800 0) Mt 2805 111) 3759 0°) (15) 3753 PI 2807 2824 �) 3721 (18) 28112813 ,.., 28152817 Buffer Size: 350 feet o 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: IIIIIIIII This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy:(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (iii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be table for any damageinjury or loss resulting from this data For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South.Minneapolis.MN 55487/gis.info@hennep,n us 38 20-117-23 23 0001 38 20-117-23 23 0012 38 20-117-23 24 0014 GERALD ERICKSON CAMILLE M&JEFFREY P COLE LAWRENCE D PILLAR SANDRA ERICKSON 2776 CASCO POINT RD 6827 CARDINAL COVE DR PO BOX 584 WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0002 38 20-117-23 23 0018 38 20-117-23 24 0015 ROBERT E BREON REED L LARSON TING FANG LM JULIE C BRANDSMA 2773 CASCO POINT RD 2725 ETHEL AVE 2691 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0003 38 20-117-23 23 0019 38 20-117-23 24 0016 MARY A PETERSON RICHARD A PUTNAM AMBER M PEIFER 6445 VIRGINIA DR 2765 CASCO POINT RD 2745 ETHEL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0004 38 20-117-23 23 0020 38 20-117-23 24 0017 MARY C ENGER&MARK M ENGER ZHIHUA LIU&YING LIU KENNETH R SADDLER 2697 CASCO POINT RD 2677 CASCO POINT RD SHERALYN K SADDLER WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2755 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 38 20-117-23 23 0021 38 20-117-23 24 0018 SHIRLEY A JUNGELS DAVID D GUTERMUTH DONNA L LILE THOMAS J JUNGELS LYNN J GUTERMUTH 2765 ETHEL AVE 7730 LOCHMERE TER 2665 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 EDINA MN 55439 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0006 38 20.117-23 23 0022 38 20-117-23 24 0019 STEVEN R PETERSON KARL S FREIENMUTH ATLAS HOMES INC 2745 CASCO POINT RD 2659 CASCO POINT RD CI0 MARK WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 14450 113TH AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 38 20-117-23 23 0007 38 20-117-23 24 0001 38 20-117-23 24 0020 MICHAEL G BASKFIELD DAVID L RUNKLE JEFFREY A SCHUTT SHARON J BASKFIELD 2684 CASCO POINT RD PIA E SCHUTT 2755 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 40 TWIN MAPLE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 38 20-117-23 23 0009 38 20-117-23 24 0002 38 20-117-23 24 0021 CITY OF ORONO TODD M KIMMES JEFFREY LOEHMANN P O BOX 66 2660 CASCO PT RD SARA JOHNSON CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 2710 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0010 38 20-117-23 24 0003 38 20-117-23 24 0022 CITY OF ORONO DAVID L RUNKLE DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING P 0 BOX 66 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2700 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0011 38 20-117-23 24 0004 38 20-117-23 24 0045 CITY OF ORONO DAVID L RUNKLE MARC COHEN P O BOX 66 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2697 ETHEL AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 240046 MICHAEL D REVIER 2691 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0017 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0021 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:02/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS UST) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 23 0001 38 20.117-23 23 0012 38 20.117-23 24 0014 G ERICKSON/S ERICKSON TRUSTS C M COLE&J P COLE LAWRENCE D PILLAR 2683 CASCO POINT RD 2776 CASCO POINT RD 2705 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 GERALD ERICKSON CAMILLE M&JEFFREY P COLE LAWRENCE D PILLAR SANDRA ERICKSON 2776 CASCO POINT RD 6827 CARDINAL COVE DR PO BOX 584 WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0002 38 20.117-23 23 0018 38 20-117-23 24 0015 ROBERT BREON/JULIE BRANDSMA REED L LARSON TING FANG LIN 2691 CASCO POINT RD 2773 CASCO POINT RD 2725 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT E BREON REED L LARSON TING FANG LIN JULIE C BRANDSMA 2773 CASCO POINT RD 2725 ETHEL AVE 2691 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0003 38 20-117-23 23 0019 38 20-117-23 24 0016 PETERSON-V-LIMITED PTNRSHP R&1 PUTNAM AMBER M PEIFER 2695 CASCO POINT RD 2765 CASCO POINT RD 2745 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARY A PETERSON RICHARD A PUTNAM AMBER M PEIFER 6445 VIRGINIA DR 2765 CASCO POINT RD 2745 ETHEL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0004 38 20-117-23 23 0020 38 20-117-23 240017 MARY C ENGER&MARK M ENGER ZHIHUA LIU&YING LIU K R SADDLER&S K SADDLER 2697 CASCO POINT RD 2677 CASCO POINT RD 2755 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARY C ENGER&MARK M ENGER ZHIHUA LIU&YING LIU KENNETH R SADDLER 2697 CASCO POINT RD 2677 CASCO POINT RD SHERALYN K SADDLER WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2755 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 38 20-117-23 23 0021 38 20-117-23 24 0018 Ti&S A JUNGELS ETAL TRUST D D GUTERMUTH/L J GUTERMUTH DONNA L LILE 2715 CASCO POINT RD 2665 CASCO POINT RD 2765 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SHIRLEY A JUNGELS DAVID D GUTERMUTH DONNA L LILE THOMAS J JUNGELS LYNN 1 GUTERMUTH 2765 ETHEL AVE 7730 LOCHMERE TER 2665 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 EDINA MN 55439 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0006 38 20-117-23 23 0022 38 20-117-23 24 0019 S R PETERSON&K A PETERSON KARL S FREIENMUTH ATLAS HOMES INC/ROSS GABRIEL 2745 CASCO POINT RD 2659 CASCO POINT RD 3800 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEVEN R PETERSON KARL S FREIENMUTH ATLAS HOMES INC 2745 CASCO POINT RD 2659 CASCO POINT RD C/O MARK WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 14450 113TH AVE N MAPLE GROVE MN 55369 38 20-117-23 23 0007 38 20-117-23 24 0001 38 20-117-23 24 0020 M G BASKFIELD/S J BASKFIELD D L RUNKLE&L F RUNKLE J A SCHUTT&PIA E SCHUTT 2755 CASCO POINT RD 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2750 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL G BASKFIELD DAVID L RUNKLE JEFFREY A SCHUTT SHARON J BASKFIELD 2684 CASCO POINT RD PIA E SCHUTT 2755 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 40 TWIN MAPLE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 38 20-117-23 23 0009 38 20-117-23 24 0002 38 20-117-23 24 0021 CITY OF ORONO TODD M KIMMES J LOEHMANN&S JOHNSON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2660 CASCO POINT RD 2710 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO TODD M KIMMES JEFFREY LOEHMANN P O BOX 66 2660 CASCO PT RD SARA JOHNSON CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 2710 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0010 38 20-117-23 24 0003 38 20-117-23 24 0022 CITY OF ORONO D L RUNKLE&L F RUNKLE D P BUESING&L R RUNNING 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2700 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO DAVID L RUNKLE DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING P O BOX 66 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2700 CASCO POINT RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0011 38 20.117-23 24 0004 38 20-117-23 240045 CITY OF ORONO D L RUNKLE&L F RUNKLE MARC COHEN&IRV COHEN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2686 CASCO POINT RD 2697 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO DAVID L RUNKLE MARC COHEN P O BOX 66 2684 CASCO POINT RD 2697 ETHEL AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:02/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 20-117.23 24 0046 MICHAEL D REVIER 2691 ETHEL AVE ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL D REVIER 2691 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 320017 TAMMY L WOODISIMARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TAMMY L WOOD'S MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117.23 32 0021 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 55391 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hcnncpin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy andlor completeness of the information contained herein. CITY OF ORONO 1 I II I I I 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY * 2 1 8 - 0 0 1 5 DATE ISSUED: 02J221 2018 ORONO,MN 55356- (952)249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 2697 CASCO POINT RD PIN : 20-117-23-23-0004 LEGAL DESC : AUDITOR'S SUBD.NO.265 : LOT 004 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT NOTE: THIS$700 ESCROW IS TIED TO ZONING APPLICATION LAI8-000019 PAID BY MARK D.WILLIAMS CC 5074 APPLICANT ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT 700.00 MARK D.WILLIAMS CUSTOM HOMES,INC. TOTAL 700.00 Payment(s) P.O.BOX 268 EXCELSIOR,MN 55331- CREDIT CARD 5074 700.00 (612)251-9750 Minnesota State License#:BUIL-BC494403 OWNER ENGER,MARY&MARK 2697 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA,MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issued By Signature Date Exhibit H LA18-000019 File Summary Report: 18-000038 PC Case Information: Case#: 18-000038 Status: Open Disposition: Address: Neighborhood: 2697 CASCO POINT RD Priority: WAYZATA MN 55391 Open Date: 02/21/2018 Property Owner:MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER Parcel Number:2011723230004 Sub-Division: How Received: Internet Close Date: Responsible User: Type: Permitting Approximate Location: Description: Setback variance to lake, replacing existing structure Legal Description: Categories: Permits: Permit# Permit Type Status Application Date Issue Date Citizens: Name Home Address Home Phone Business Association Phone Chronological History: Date Type User Activity Status • 1 Yo it `-i' t' a if.,k., sairyA' g: ., e {,� 'k'� �, t• r {:: ACJ� :. "A t _ --,,,,,I I: .. i'^' �K: p r to , .. , • _ i .,Y i ` 41.4g : itfli: ''' , 4 3 6 '''' pr- sv• ._.- f i ib. ,0•'•, ,. �a` het i�^�'Qvi• }�Fw / • Vii' ~/ s ` f _ ,' :�y �; ;`..,yam ` (1�,'' !ap.,1.f t `• ...'•-'3'.;-' d • p oaf + r — , _ . P.- —1, ,r „FA. . _ _ .. . ,, . ,..- 4,,,....},*:-.% - ,'..viiltor 0,0' e,tixe4 tr: , •,414: .- --- ,',.4•••,,, .. ..,..i[ f t ,�i" Lam.' tU- ... \‘4111111111111111k ,1 • N i k - +e% i ' . ., . : ,,,,„ 414„... v r;we- -Awn su.41. ','* ,-. v....fp, •.'-"ik or,ir gfi 00b. • P.-1 I..-. ,# •e'Aillr"-,,•vit. - ,• '. • ' *V !VA .4 i r q A siiithIbpAroAk' nop:1;ko'Nt•k ..*-.4. -. I i - ff , ' , 41, Are . ii., v ki .- "--111-''''' ' at •k.' • , of -44 g• 010.: - wa, Asipr,imilik,A,ii. • ... ''-... ti i / t ',NT- 4,17'..ii,:k WS, t IP • A .#.- . t I 1. :m "V ,• :14 iilf0i;j005%1 • 't 10'.11:i<.:' % ra_thOito,:k b Alr 44;,,,,, ',4,+, 't" ,,'0--4 '..-4-.1-ta ai 9 k _ • 4,-4 -.74"- ': -"0 6 .*%,,kit'%' , f ftip,'141.". ,,,-,1 `...lt t„,,,„ OA. ' - -•-• - ic.. l'. tA 04" ( fr,e- Jars ., 1-.44,_,Iuk, ...,,,,1:,..r.,:-... ,-,..„1,p ;41'...litii: .1...,:.:. ' .,,.*„ - ' .•,i.. ti , , ...••lit.1/4. .....0.-r- •,,,__ 'i - , ,41,, __:••,. •,1F.,,,IL . !41, .. , -.: , — !a. 1 Eri ?_ 4.7 ., , ,,, -,.. ,.... ,.7, v A--..-Nr ..14, ••••7 =-latro: ,As. ',, 4. ,,,,,,i,„.."•V`t1,6, 9 '40;,- ''...".•" V '• a;,. •••••. 4/'., '. .:, . ,•'' F.• Y A ft-4'.4.•''S") 1...,, ,--:. - 1."1.-'''' Pal :. --; ' -4.110 . -. . •-- - ' - f . , • '',....irl,,, I ..q .,,,.. - . •t• 4 'Pt V'',4, -, f- Pr •''Nigi`'"-• if ieiai ,• .s - .u. ,.. , .. 'for , . . .. • IR. -- ..„„........• I 1111.1Is ,III ) -gramorgi A r4 - ollIMINI Th- ••= ----i 0\ • ,t 41 ' _ ,... r klt , ct h A ------ - _ \ I t 1/4\‘k.tnii .'4174:SkAre:rdii 1 \ A, A\"tt "41"•"‘-A I.44‘ .., ,•-•,kiliirkeihr,,, k kir N,%IN,i,m' ' k• ....„'N •%1 VW_ • ..i • 0 11 ...„ „, \ ,, \ ''' V ‘,\• 'AT A'';'••• • ' ...'' '. '1116 Amber 4 ° _ -.1 1"1 .-- 1 ,,, •-• , 10.111" 4474r, 0,1 4.1 ' 444•, fer r / - , •:s‘' 'ht1,- , 4-wh r,„,1 ,, ' -. ' -••*dir.' •-ir• , 00 t ,s_ ':'' ar.•:.;,1 Ak4,4, als, . • . -.,., ,.;,.0,,, 1 • • , "--c--..,- It - ,-,. ,aet.• ,. ,,......‘f . , i OP _ I `111b0, OR ' . 1" 'Y.' 'lit - ...,o„ .....„... , 1 I ' ,,7, olt4.4.., --,,,tth .. • , --- , .7,,m,,,,,. . __ _,,, , - ... .. „-. ,, :- -- - ,;),,_ .4 1 1 1 : ik ‘,,,, ,.. iiii: - '- - f ,,,,- d ki 44, i......... ielov,,,, t. A, to , . APPIPC, Ir.....--- ...... i INN •''1%.,` W .,: .:.1' ---'''• -..... •--4.17. oh.,..‘, , l 1 • 0 4, ill --4,! •.t.-.-- '''''',* • • i . ' . ••P' .3.,- • ',mi. -,,,,,...., I color:- •. ,, _AWards1;ii ``. IA:4 - •-•,,, W -= ,„, . 41-0. 441' %,. V NOP _ -s6.....,..._, __. .” --ow....0...........,-,„:-..,... ' ' -- -`' -14 Slit.,„,„.„--- ,t,z,...... •:' --Oh --11.--. _ ' '-.'"."'..#; '•-"..""16 •NVIIIIML 1.......74111"-- ......,....„.., ,., rirk e '4 ' . ,',., :0,. . /iv ...5 , ak• . . „Mt:0 . ":‘•• . ... ',.. /04,,t. . - . ,,,c, , .• * • !(. S'4, .!.2 - c.- '• . ...A,,.J-.•.. . i....'N..tJ.4v..' , V.. ; b_; . . ." . / ! •:'-' •, ...,, •ILii ,i,t-.',- ;.•".*;., .• ••',.,:I - . .. :: ___. • _ r- 1 t , . . . • , _-- - •,,.-t?.-,::.... ";:...4,4; ___.-- - . - ----- f. i n- 1 ' r ---7 : _.• , 4 -,• 1111111 ,„1111 - , .4-(.• -- . _____--------- ... __------- --;. ' • - . , _ . .-• ,_ . : _ • _...._..... ... ._. . ,. .._. , . .•.._,,_,,. ,_ ,.. ... • . ... . . _ . .. I --- - 111 1111 lir :'L 1 . t, .",„,......,..: 1 v . rb,?...,. .._,, ... ....' ... .. .. .. :,...k. -, , .,,. L:::,----- . . ......_ . . ....., ... -- . ... ..,. ....... ...•. _,,...2,-....,--. ....mai:" ... ,- -eisiirate - -- . - - ,4... ....Y.A .- P', ..!;. lti . .,,,,i,,,,,•-,'' ' -.-.,P, ' J- ' ' " ir . . ,.... ...,,,„„ii_., ,p..14,,,,, : sx.-:• . . • . - ,, ;-*-Ty . , .-,,,, N• , 1 • '''' : ."A:.•:..i;• a ,;.• i a:,:i.;,; . .;;,,, A2.t.a:.''.:'''-.1,..lia ala 1.?,)‘, n'T litaWiLlitrAll 1" ..i•-••-• ttt •' •:AP?, •.• ,.-ta.:.. . , • k ..:,.. 4„,, ..,p,„,,,•,„,4,,, ••••,..!,,.....,,, T-«7 ' '0..k.•• -11fiz•-•44 - • .!0 I. ' ;;,_ , , , c ... .t 'If At.'. tiSZ' ,_...1: :,,E0VI,,,A. -.4.:,;01, , — ' ,-,. . .., ,,. ,, f.••,.•;:-A,.:,-... . I . -s,--,,,,....-, , _..,,:.,,,, ,.,.. •-•4 4.:,-...,, .,..-;,t•a-04 r. .....k.•4 ','y.'4i.v: • , 'i. .., 4,i, ;!;7'. •- '' .''-:: '`'-.. !,-,i'`‘rfir':;'‘-.."'.'•..,.4.4• '',....N., -, --•.,,, ,,,.;:-..', ..,,r...2 ...,,itr • r tei," . - .... k •-,X},;:'t.f.:,.. ',"', r *ni i 4it '•: ,. .,..., t:401%,r,ii. , , . ./:AO.-•Aliti'.•,.-`,^ ' ,- t .' .-.'.7rte.' .',;'1 Alil tr.$., ; --. -",!-A •i b.., . •,.., , . .,''• ,Iii. i 4., -1.,', .-.,.. ::----1-. f-7.• 7.--. ef,'14 4,- ,_::-• ,...,:,. . •.:,• .-..;.4 ,• ..,• . i 4 ,,, _ ...,1,.....A _, r. ,..- •, .42 ,....., :,:. .,.. ,.,..4,... . ' .9',,,Nt5frrat " '1- . . .. i ' -;. 4. ,... ' • ''',, * ' .t iv I..*_ • .e. .. %11. . 40 . ' • . ;' . -.... , . . -1.1_,..,_____ A ' , 1., " --, ,.. - 0:A; or ..•,- i I I —Al°"'l :091'.--- ....Y...11i"' . 0': • '' 4,;::-.A ._._ -;,,,,.• .. , ,, ' ,....., ., .„,..., ,,:. •••• :‘,.,. „ - --• le. . -..:.• :•-• , .' •:f. . „.„..... 4. . • "- ----- V.I• --4 .' ., 1.00'.'''. ..,4? ,w 010, - •.I: ..,......./ -_... •--- - , 0 i '."' r.,, j 036 • Ife- -_,.....- _,,,..-..0-4.-- _ , . . .'t' " •- 7 ,,," • I . .. !.4;4, • . ' --*1',.....- ...-• . -'.-. k, , •'1' ..-'- • ...... ".- , ' ... - _• . . . /IC' . ' -le- •• - _..... - .. .. ,,,........-- •,-- . - - .e•---°t" ,...1.: -7•:,- - - ,:.*,-1.... _., - , .,..„,,,k4.,,, ,'74,1:hi,,'.t..:'.:'r":,,L,''-'::;':•Z".•'..•7..r1:71La;':'.."41•:VH:Ht';'•;:li �` A „ Y.e } 'A inn - 10 -_ - - tea• Y -. : ,:."•/ •�3'". _ /'-ASR' 74'....47-7-.4-74— __ • 11411110- _••11• !� ,r 'ems' p¢axwy� y}� -tY _ ,;aaar.C.45 ilr" • P• ,.,.�..... x • • • • a. ""�rl ll ► ¢r A . .;,.'„ii,,04.'Ate 1,,-;.4.! :,-," -'4'..:1',,1,4,,'.•,-.'' '.'"•.`-:-'' .-;-'6%.7%,111.,TV-r-Ai. ''. i wr 6,74,-, 44P-r"‘ '1 +`fie r ' s . ,,4ii. a 1' 04.- , r - r Siff .fes"..,_: s _" .. �` - _, •-•• • _ I. . . • ., ._ . ._ ..... . ••,,,_ __ 4 _..„ .. . , . , ... .• _.:;a ..: . . "••3!"1. ,. .. .. ..._ .N. 4AL ". . .If.::na----"-'‘1. drit:t.X • . .0 . -,.. - .,,,,:-'.- '.,cornt-7' •w "5::: ,'#:' ' ' • ''"ft. 7. '• . ' . . ' 'A'1; _ , •. -. it; ' • ' ..•,‘•,. ' '411-• .• .. ,,...- ' -:::.- ZIA* II. '• •- . ... •4 ......e...-- ." -, 4. ' "- ! ........ -. k. .'••" 'og liglir r:: ""'•• "'":"....;,'"'i"; - I ::-.. ,, . , 1 i kla i? ' 1 '', i- I 0100 ...1 -,.44.--.Fam, -44111111.111116111M 1 — -- ,"...1.• m.4.-M11 _M. , - - --.44_--,,--7- - .2 - 'IN. -----'- 111111F''." "' --"'": 1... - , ,, .,.. -... ..,. _ . - _ - _ -o, _...--..,..mp-ma,,--. --.e4.' - . -7 ,-4;.,. .,....... -,...---.:?..---.-..- -•: --------41-- $ ....-- --.- . . - -- . ' - - 4rot11"4"- --- _ - - -, - _ -- ---- . ----- -,..ri-mmemaimp ,___ leg. g.ir....i -.......,,... . . . — WSW --,::;., - -"ni' ' ' • ; ,'' ' '. .., . 0001111111 -• -"".....'.".'m'.-.."- . ;1111.1117 ' • ,••••••*-"....., ,--...a61C--- ,I bi. i'd x .. ik . '' 1 4 1 iihr•si, L• ,. ,11t_ t ....blivr.:.1 ._.., IA \ A._ . ._•. :••• „-- ...A ,!-t _ -----allit i ', ‘•••,, -: ''' N N .. . - ---, -=•, s, ii ,:','"'" --•..1,- 4„,' „eli -11011 7, , `: ' '- •,',4,,,.:::.i...'-'" 't..-YA t. - , ' '',. t I , ,, , _ • - -, '-*IP '7`..,' • ; ... ..• -. - -' .., -- ._... • -,-- T- - - ... ,,. Ar ....1. -44o- .Ma." ''' ,;•1"!*'.'" ir4.01* ..., ....., ..ce ... wpIro - I-. .., • 4140' -4''' •. . '• . - '4 _,- . , .4%.1. , 1 Nap A ' _ — - —._ >�_ I ' Yy .i.)r xv... s►x� t . .. 7"--say-+'e wk ,4, .�" 1:4'4,„ 41114,1:::Ya ' ,yam. ; 1",. '' y' o-� , .4 ifs ... ^ y I r 3 -.4 F q.. 1 3. Y - F 41 _`! O A` � '`.'1./` ' �• '.tib s f f -L,, �r — fi v 4..^..0* ', .pwc •. 7,e � .. ' 'c ---4, wily �M'y'.-: Air ' f fi. � 'Ey { Kms_. i '1 . .., _ {. .400....• 1t. -1 _.ms+ z, .„ - � :-....,:-""F' . sa y NU. a : — �S. _ .s ,IL., y r- t^ a .... . • ••' ..• '- If... *:ii-'',44.*-','.# -ot',„,.:tt... " •4,..• •,. . , .,- t 4,-,K,,..-..--. '..0.,..1' ..''. ''.• . ,t, ... - • 4. • .:•;!.: '•• --`4._,,•,..1 • ,. ,,ittiV•.-, ' ,-..-7,01 • .. , •• ,' ' -4 ,..,. . .-: '... ."1.'' „F.''. '.;A'• 1111%„- ' - :JD..i; .. ''',.-. . ,-*4''' 4 '.i''. '''' '' *.`. 41i-'N 1 i •;:, •••i'''A :;4!. -•if 4*.1, ;•.k.'''`-' • •.. .,%,..,,o), '2'. 14.1.411 .,. .i ...- - „VW, ,i'i, .:;),. i , ,,,,,:. ;"••- •".-';'.7• ''•-••'.4 • '8:AtTi'l'''''';-:';'0:1 '''•1• •114"•4,- 0" i 4.:, .‘•.2-; ' t-;, '4 ° ' • ,,,,17.',4-• •-.011--11- r •' -:-Wi'.4.-41 ,11L.!. ‘ ir.,tirr•i-r i„X.:1,-', 1;,•-'".,r, ;.". .. .. .., „„-,. • .. ..-- . , .,, , . . ..„,.. ,, . i .i;•eit•—..:,F.Inte ,,0110-1•13. .L. ,J v.t., ,-",„. : .. , :.: --4;. • • ,,olli . , . -, I.', 7: ' . .'...;.'''' '4-r.'•!!....*.t.?.i'-': ._. , . ..... • • ,.. s,'%IP 1"r-r;740'',ift, liesi-am.ci‘!. ., ,-„,„•;,....,,,•. . ' •-:'.; ,•44?" '',',07. '1.Fir..-m•-:-;:ti-4,--,-;-.,-;:.i'' - ,..,,,-.',.',4- 4 ---......... .-- . ,•'',.....- ' ' . .,...,,,,,.: 4 4 t..,i4*:.%...: . '....:, : . -- -........'...„.1* .1:... '' ..........---- ..L.. ...-.- . - . .....,.- , .. ... ,..7.:*T-411k. ..." ' •ira: IiiirtillailligailaSSIP - ; . . „...... . ...: - • ••••••••••••011W., ....,^::'.- • -,r,..Irkw. .._,.....,;;;;-.. i .-... - ''''.11641411111 iiirirni 4, •. 44,1,. •-' ,-, . ... ,. ,;‘,,. .41. - ',..c.'• '' ' •4 1• ?. ..,,, ,.-. :,-,._ , , ::',...; • vie . 4, -__.-.7__-!'_•,-,:::,--_-.., ,•_- -...-_, .,-;A _-- . ".., , ,,,'4' -:.-'''.''• . - ' ..l'i'l .''' - -7•-:4•4. . .,--04.1t f'1 ;%1...- 1 t 4. -, `,,, 1.-`?: • •. • •• .,, .. - - , , . , . . -t ;,,- , -- •'-• ''-.==, .'-- '' - •'. . ,,. -.ti4-.. oe,,,,,_4,;',. r •,..e,-..--•...,40, - - -''''' ---'' -,','",.! 40 ' •-. °1>;:".,2:,.:'...**,-•:::-! '„1 .. ..4-f.'-'4-*";.". •- ;.r•-*-','"'"71'- ''''" , ' ' •.- : ,,,, -AI- '- ,4 :.. . ... ..,...„...,..„- „,,....,.,,,: . ,.. . , . •,,.. ..„,,, ,.,,:,,,,._,..;_,.,,.. .,...,,,...„..,..b. '4*- ,•:77...;k2 ''. - • .'711' :L...k."• • . • . 1-- 4e..1. ',.. ,..._,/ ''''• - . "'V . '''• ;',.' ....,.. i.: ,:l..111 A..... . sy ;... ',..kt "..,4:•. , ,,,,I.,.. 1. '-'*-• --- b• ' ..:.... . •..' 1. ., I-- .,..: ' A24;tia.k ''„ '4•1,'- '..*:.: 4-.' '*'1. ' ' • •••• I. . . •... :' ..54`;; ;toklt.fie;_.. ' ,..i•,--;-,.;,...,...Vi -- ' • ''41/4 4Ske:Igierid.'1, ..•-•••C".; .',,g.''. - --'•. • • ' , . ., • ••..-„,• t;'• ,4 ..-•;;.,.. ;,. -P•'Is. 'Itils: ;. . .t.,--- I •: '' 1.• — Ctt'c't. : •- .','"-- --• . • -;....;—. . ',;.;. •'''' -,- '-'?'t 4-•,t. ;' „i, . .' ..- •'').77 t. , ,,,. .'..,,,-. .. -.„:. -.....--, _4-!. -_,i-,-.' , 4410MISIOP .4.,,,yefr.......c.t,•%-°,*(e4.°, :all,'-' qt. -• ,...:'' ..- 11° -: •:I""$-V,1.7 .-,P• . _ • ''.,•:-:7i* ..,,, -, ••• -: ..-t..--,; , or - - ......... , .__ ' 1 1 1 r •°., .— --...._ -..- 1 1- , — — t I'-'•-- •, - .1 ' 11. '' ,. I,, - 7 vi i :t. .. J! , ill i, IIIi: 21. ...1, L.7.1.......,.il I ;1 111' i • 1-•'1 11111 • t - , , -- ; - , - .• ........,.......... • t.. '11* .Ill ' ..... ... _... . . .. •..; - , . . -A ,... et i.t. — --------40. _ ......„ .......... ..-- -- - .*_..... .:74,..pr.,,.,..-. . "*"in_imilii-,--- -- - __—_-..--,:-- .. . -- ---.• —4,---.....i...... . it d It �'t _ X1-5 -. }� �.. 7 d' At''111:14rHiti:1;4!1 o -.. .-.^.,. .A. ' a .....�...r..�'...._�--- _ —,.,.. --- �..,.uc'�'.,}..- e' s. -J p II 'J 9 i; 611 tit-- !!!Sl'i...:14'44,...''''''-,-:.;;:,;11!...'''..!.;,•••* .!. gt! 1:•,.:.?:4'''''.! 4 '046-- 7"41'..4-!••!"*- !.*---! ._ '!' ! , Ji , sk. *,a VM L A „too .c..-. _... ,- ...„4,0i..2v.:.„..i.„, i 1 ii.-- 1 ...... . •„...„.........."E!!--.' ' ------4 1' !.- .1 T ., • •++s9 iii` ' • i !i. � i p-• fi. .. k 1 f•4 • .> _..moi 'ice .111-1'4F......- - . - . -N -• - Y.,, .„,-..."*': “iit..-t. , ' ‘Itit • 7 r ' 7, ..W'' '' ''4, •. ),,..." 1 i f 111A...?'7.4'WA ',,i- 4 i ti, r • op',, ' ....•_tw- • lik-,,*, 4. ,r*,--ri,.. ' 4. ._-,40d1.0..--41#177:.7...,. • ,.• „..- , , . NI toii-,-. •: -4,, ,..4P'4,. ,k, ik -V.1,6,'. iLlki, it ,A,„ ".i'. r,:',.0;•,4.-• • • • 114t4, i - --,\ • 4r4o-r ylp• -- ''"t 0*' - •, '0? , ' Arlfitg..-', --• -, Ake,1.. ,..... ,if 11.;f4"..... -:: ,: - wt,... 4.:. ',-...., - -;,'„,- 11.4 ., 4-, 4, — ,- .. •_ ...st. sok ,,4 .4... ... ,;*40., ,, dip ! i;•t.,11114.4,1.N.:AN NI 101 Ili lAW, ZI.IM.At Al ikt;I: 1. . c; ''''''' ..... . '.‘ . .,W.T. ''.Wilts,&I.41 /. P thir 7s:•,:..16% .n r‘63,,Temprzt,,-, n v.- ,. ••,,, „,..,40,,•":..t.•A.A.'. Ti,Iiii. , ''''''& te,.. ..,..---4.1-4-ittt;,eA,'',.....,- i- T.--"-- ..,.--.11. '.*.‘iiigir4.- 4.• ion Or. ,,,a,,...4-.. i • ,. .• • .. "! .lib .. 1''!t11 t- •,,,. , ..4Y.I.'. /AMP. . -40,-. . lift ' ' .... .. •"',N,. ., - . ,,Apt,,,_-- .-,, : 4 ....-- 44110 ' U . 1 vi ., ••••• ..-ofia.,r. i :41p....s.,:••• .........:4100... 1..: ,- '.--. . ..-..•'...''' . . gOr .11-` •,a''i.-:'-'. .0- „.2.40410. '''• - • - '- -4411a 01 flf-• ..., ,_ „,..,,,, .., ,, 4ISVIg' / .V.tr ,..." . - . ., , . 0 'r '1'4.17".. -- I : • •. . . • i ...............0 .7 ,,, _,.. - -••,‘ giusimos...._ t • •• , 1,I1MP A •k , . . _.,......,.. , . , Iii! _ ia....=:..a!,4omi.r.- ----:--------.,-- :: -, _ ...... _ •_ _ .„...... . . , . — . , . ...,„„ ... - _ - ,. . ... - _ . . .... . ....-- ...,-.. ..,... Ir. __ . .:•,..t.,- , . . ...., _, . . 4., . . ,., :. . -..._. . . , -.. . . , . ----, . , ' , . '., • h:e'i'l',..i '.;.'‘. , - ,I. ,.. .$ . ei,., i * il i'•. - . , —Tr 1, - Ma I ';I • , , . .. : _t: I '. f.. - I - 1 . • .f. . . . ,. , ,,• 611jP1111. - - ......--- • ---.:' ----.— ,-.0............64.0.• --s, -..,...„........,...?,...!.- .,-,..t.„,... , . .. . '''... loar—••• „ 24111 _. .. .. ' fi3 , ........ . ... , . . .,-,..!, .. ":- „,... .,, ,---- . , ..-.^.,:,' ',, ''„...• .• ,, . -' 001,•- * ...-•-:'!-,..*7 - - iiigr' - *. '' . V'' .. •P "f''t. 11,14, ''''',,'' . . .s."e`•;4'*-4'' "-VI' •.-. ,,. ... "'I.e.? -4.,,tir.,,....,•,‘ - - 4 , 1,11, ...‘,..,, ."'-'_` -- : ' 'ir , • ....- 0, . ,'‘•7. ,-,,,,,,N '•'''',, :A.,:,. ......'1`:'''. • .,1 --,. . ...''"tk.'''''' -N.' ,,,,c.r; ,.i,t.., ,,,„,.,..,... - •,,,:-;,6-- . ,.. -%,.. .. „,,:,.......,,,,...:,.,...-... 1 4-: .,,,,,,,,. ., .• .- ---... , . ,..--.,,t,-;•.'.,;.;;-. -,..,..,.,,,.. ,,,,,. _ . - -'-it Li - -- _ - : - I • .71;.'1',;x,•;-.'..:••t-,-,•. - '-' ti 1:41111;:7 Oa i '''' 1 , 111 1, '., , .1 1 . 4 , i \ , Ili ... 4 ; ;. ; I ,_li i.,..,Lt t' r I I ' .; . - 1 '-'” ' ''. --it-- , r' ' i 1 _ ._.1. ± i----r Pi .7 _..,....--.... ..-- —'"11.1111111111, '',"•-... .91111;1111.0.0" ...., ._ s,....:1I: ...___ --- -- _,_______,..,-. ....._ --:- -^- - ..,.. " - '''''' ',. ,...4 - ' '..__.-:* .-"-t-,--'-..". . ...._ --,,,,.-_______- - '',--- ".ft.... -,..,„-- .. - . - t--- ---***i:'-',,`,:%-7''"r'''''4"40,mnta,.. *-- -:'- '"---- '''.- .- -- ..,' . „ .„, ,.,', ,t - ; . ,.....1 ,;,„ .;„.,,,,_, --,:. i Mr -'''''' 1 Alit I i r _ , - - ,.'. -'._ 11• , i -........ ..„ ......... '-;N AINIH411.1 110111. ; ..' I ,r1, ---- 1. '' ' ,'',.-''',."--,;_.; -.?-;-',-;_if.4-t2"rialh,...• --:,------- ' ,,,, .. .411.1111111110111111.11 : ; ' . " :'1r' , ,•:-, I' i • ri.4 ''' 't-_,}•,;--i"..t, , 1 '-' : 'T" 1 ' i ', 1: i 1 J lc' -,''' ', i ....omMidpf ' '-I; . ' . ,''. -- - -, :,-. 'e 7" • . - . . '.. t I . , . i ''• . ,-... . '`' ' -- _ ;,---..---,_:,,--- .. ., .. MOH --- - ! „--.... -„.. ,......... .=..,.., , MN Milli . . ... I .. . .. , . . 1 , 'MI , • - --- ., . , 1 , ,._ L 1I. , .. ----T t.'a • '1111111111Pir . .. . - .. -. . .. . , . .. , . .-,4 !.1. ....vivo fl,...,..............u....m, , , „,,,,.................—____ ..igs---iiiiii111111 - n - r nviligOw1. • , ., ...„ :jV.:-- ,, ---*----',-•_••.7---t .-Fr''..4f.'i.-- , '-;•:4-''':•., ..-,..•_•;: -. . , ., -• .--- , • . . . •• .. -.., : . ,. . ...V •. .4 'f:' •r,-•.- .1 .. C.$ •''' I ''' ' . .•' .. • , e , • • 4 .....-- . I . i'--•.; - - ' '' , '. ' ,i1 • ''ictlki! •, ' ' : -.a&v. • - • -,7.- 1.7-*4'..,;' -.* ', ..•r ligri '• • • , • e '. . - -- ' • .4.4.: - . .1 , .r‘ •• •A. ‘14i.'• .. . ., , .• • . . ' , .., .,‘, .....•.. ,l,•i. ',, l'Vi r, . ,i-i ,. "' 1011111 7 47 , 4-L '- „,e ik ,, .J ••:.. , p.--- !, i %• . % ,3ill , I* ' • * ' ' Tr' :,..,-*•-f,-.,,,,i'4---:-.- --.....". ' 1 )1 . .......*-•-• _ . ___,- _ _ -"Ailig•I .....,--'7-. ''. . . • ... - •.- le, . - . _ , . .. . -- , • . , — .,_ -. - - _ ” • . ilk — ' ' • -,- --'",,i'1,""immallt - """17 ..;.01160*,.. :. --z-* '. -... N, ..• o., `„..,,Ve'A ,.,,,•.L..',..,-;,.. • , 7-;.''..it';'.'-•:.i-• . ., -..," ' . ...-•••;- ,4* ._ . -- . - ,.•- ,..4.- „if.- •, v- • ' .°‘;.4;':.,.$Nr 4.0,6,'2/,,..-... - - ,14.,., . .„ _ ''''' ''V, .t.4 ' ' '-' 2 •±,.... 4•*U•••• ,:r..•:41'•' P .', ,.... ,.: ,-,.., , ti...,,,,,..,.,,, ,-..Vj .r$i•..;:.V.-'4,-,; ' 7,-,, .-3:,•? ... . ..............— . .$4-''' ' • .. • _ •.,,4,,titi..,.-p:...:-,r;07,--...414t4.4 .:.-r ---10001 1 .. '••..• — - •,.,.•• .! fr es* ,'. .."-, 1 r''' A., -, .-,-,,. - - . - _.,...:-..,-„,....•.,. ____...., . ...,_,,, ..,..-, .. 7• • ••••4• , -: •-•-;;7`,..1., .f.:7-7. t ' --17.•...-4,- .... 'roak. • ••••• ••-••• .:...-.,,-•. if f•;,,,t,;.:24,1t•-taa#::__ ,7-:„..'-„.-it"-,•:• _ wear • —.,, • 0'I I..'t ...„, i a •- ,....„.;,,- ',.1\111\t' . 1 ' • . 1 - '''''''' Isl'•\ '1 !ii ---- 1111111111111 _ , -. .. •., ., .. . , ....„,„ dor s -",s,,,, • -- ....__, .0".....s... sie,.. 7;,..,. • , -.-- dm, ! «ri ?w 14 i"� c rti p • ■ n i .iii 1� 9 ` 111.0 — ti �' — Air 41 f 5• , £ Gti . ,*►• ix ? �. .a - +Yt a te+ .' --• f . .. „rte 1• .�... -- • io. yIiIR a' ,. „... t111. i i 41 i r"-- 'i`t ' ► INK } + ,rl f mb- 4 ., s r ` 1 7,'''^f"! ' ##* '-f• _1 441101111°V. lam• . moi. • if"' - - �- _ • ` '" _,�:.. _`'•ate"'.::,.""'moi..-.w� _ .`r. �r _ r .v , c r v 1 I r t -af — _ �,..,,..r - ► -. -c t +, '!!+' .s—.,... fiel 4164.r. - -... N .•'y k\ 7 .• "rte arm*� �` BLAGKOWlAK t A �� DISPOSAL •-r, 9',w"7R vg-4- -Lit. `y�i,. �t .452-472 33f`'- 0 • • • 141041wiwk :. f' r i - f tf •i ce 4 •_72iffillidalliPPP.' ill ill ill 111111:11 g • r • A • ti r' _r i. • 41111. Al& MPS '. '..:-''.;'," i,;...JOpI' �, - immumtp municcommi nwl r �. ._... -' 'r Item 7 Date Application Received: 02/22/18 Date Application Considered as Complete:03/12/18 94 %WNp 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/11/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members �� i q Dustin Rief,City Administrator ti 01- From: Melanie Curtis, Planner VY1GG Date: 19 March 2018 Subject: #LA18-000020, Kuhl Design o/b/o Anders Myhran 2280 Fox Street, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to install a full bathroom, including shower, in an accessory pool building. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant wishes to install full bathroom facilities in an accessory pool building on their property.The building will be seasonal in nature and a conditional use permit is required due to the proposed shower/bathing facilities. Applicable Regulations: Plumbing in the Pool House CUP(Section 78-418(6)) The proposed seasonal pool house is permitted,the applicant's request to install a bathroom with full bathing facilities requires a CUP.A full bathroom within a pool house is not an unusual request as many homeowners with pools prefer to provide restroom and showering facilities for pool guests in a pool house. Applicable Regulation:Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)as the use permit was applied for or in modified form.On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan;The proposed use is residential in nature and residential use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this neighborhood. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V,division 3 of the City Code; The proposed pool house improvement including the plumbing fixtures are compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3) Adequately served by police,fire,roads,and stormwater management;The proposed use will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. FILE#LA18-000020 19 Mar 2018 Page 2 of 4 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The applicant understands that the approvals will be contingent with compliance with the septic system codes.Staff believes this criterion is met. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; Staff believes this criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed pool house is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The pool house with plumbing is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the proposed pool house with plumbing is expected to be residential in character and consistent with that of the principal structure on the Property. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The use of the pool house with plumbing is not expected to have any adverse impacts. No information has been presented to indicate such. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The pool house will be situated in a confirming and will not be significantly visible when viewed from off the Property on the street side,and the views from the neighbors will be be screened somewhat by existing vegetation and the physical separation.In the opinion of staff,additional screening or buffering will not be required. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration,odors,fumes, dust,electrical interference,general unsightliness,or other means; The proposed pool house with plumbing is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion,or unsafe access; It is anticipated that the proposed pool house with plumbing will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic,and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed pool house with plumbing has been visually designed to conform to the residence on the property,and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; Applicants are hereby advised of this requirement;and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety,or general welfare.Staff believes this criterion is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Further approval shall be granted only when the following criteria are met: FILE#LA18-000020 19 Mar 2018 Page 3 of 4 1. The council finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with a bathtub or shower will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory building. 3. The accessory building is conforming in location,size and height. 4. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory building will not be: a. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. b. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. c. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Septic System Status The septic system on the property requires some upgrades,and an escrow has been collected by the City to guarantee those upgrades happen.The project will conform to all applicable septic codes.The building official provided the following comments: 1. As-built survey of the previous retaining wall project needs to be provided to verify proximity of walls to alternate septic site. 2. Verification that the alternate septic site was not compromised during the work on the retaining wall project which was completed in 2017 is needed. 3. A permit for the septic system is required and installation of the septic improvements must commence as soon as possible this spring,weather permitting. Conditional Use Permit Analysis • Staff finds that the property and the proposal comply with the CUP criteria and the City Code requirements regarding a pool house use with a full bathroom. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval conditioned upon septic system compliance and the property owner's agreement to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory FILE#LA18-000020 19 Mar 2018 Page 4 of 4 building will not be: 1. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. 2. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. 3. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Project Narrative Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Site Plan Exhibit E. Proposed Building Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map PC • #LA18-000020 Land Use Application Summary Exhibit A Application Date: 02/22/2018 Address: 2280 FOX ST LONG LAKE,MN 55356 Parcel Number: 0311723320014 Land Use Number: LA18-000020 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: ANDERS MYHRAN Address:2280 FOX ST LONG LAKE,MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Dan Murphy Address: Project Description: Pool House to include full bathroom Land Use Application Type: Conditional Use Permit Applicant Signature: /4-1 /4-74 PC #LA18-000020 Exhibit B 2280 Fox Street Project Narrative: The project at 2280 Fox street will consist of a Summer ONLY pool house. The plan is to create a pool house that will have a bar area, seating area, fireplace, 3/4 bath and changing room. There will be NO heat source in the Pool House and all plumbing, appliances and misc items will be winterized at the end of the pool season. This pool house will have three open sides with retractable screens and no insulation. The overall design will be consistent with the exterior of the existing house to include but not limited to stucco sidings, beams and a cedar roof. PC #LA18-000020 AS-BUILT SURVEY FOR: Exhibit C ANDERS & LYNN MYHRAN N871'E PUT 18282.550 PLAT 1 �`1 ��,�-e1r,,.a -C______ _ SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET O N \ y '�Cxw.e ` b%a.o maauh.ar mit ,] Legend on or C..). F- I• we. -_lQ NOW..Tr.. 0 <',;,, TT .,,I CI...,,.Tr.. w . x900.0 Ex.,E.union . (:) x(300.0) Pr.pak.e Eew., J _ �-vro Ex.,Contour .. J .- Prows Contour IIT Nia.ERe...Coo. A0 Denotes wrwe _�* .. 'lam G.'P �' . xnr.. R.5. 5:30. per. .. ), \ an- Qar. .\ .• 5 X P e x- I. x.., x.-r .. , N rJ S. w C}� R �§ xa. x • .176.175:Y G a, o x42.. a A.a '` � F_ BSERVNIUS SURFACE: S \cas w - Ee.aip Nowa-1.343.SF xwu x1 1 r1 xse7 I () -- Or.Wolk w EGO,0.c.52 873 Sr ary . '.r. ` ' r` ' zsa I�� _� m 1 4.3)2.Sr .'"xear p.m MA * ra Atli'/f, PROPOSER/AS-RUST ARr4c; -��I . /.. .,•4444,• lot Mo-08.175S SF wr,. xr, rte. . r.si +� , w N1PE1Md2 SURFACE: E...Nome-1,013.SF I _ I 0.142•% Sl7i SF 333.Sf®SF r s a. Br.Wolk.525.SF . . .. A� 4 e x �a Ry Total tA3f[]JQ ®Y ri I , re. I _ra+. '°' �,o' * woes ere. NN' I I I 1r• ...0 1YY• x R/ I v. xwa PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 2.Wake 1,BILL NELIEYS LAND FIRST Ir xrr. Rr�N ORISON.Now..Cow,.Minn.... enr I 3.r+.. I .S.,:.., x$41.3ares Imo. ., Xt.. tl1 001.11A10: GN: rope Fos m 2300 Fox Se ENvmon.970.6. I tsrws*Na^ E3rrJ z I N..3. 1...1x .• , er I oTnee NOTE: No Search Woo Made fa Any E.* 1 I I �� ° �1 -w 1 _ I leux CIMMA NOM M MrNIMy w are and en P�.ra �..L. ewe Naw.. Ur 6. Nwuld M nallEed I xwe am. xrv. ,res is a Nesbn or.00.114 a,..wan. I w. I I 0."7 hereby certify LM t.max,Von.s rest ea Prepared eE �I �� emu , ..0 weesl me Nods m Wreck evh^ekran e.d that I ern.duly rep* 1 Land surveys war N.kers.1 the Wale a rmnewto. //_ ea I w C xm4 R.SRO.LAW 59511 .NC. I Noe^ 1ee..x I wn I , I 3.w • _ - -I— 27.53 MEAS. —w Woodrow A Brwn,0.1.5. MN REG 15230 58749 58,w...'ry. a r. 27.50 PLAT.... y Oned: 05-31-2013 x sou R O FOX STREET W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 80.10 GO.Awma So..Suit.22e. WosneplLa 5x25 Sup(952)2)354-4254 Fa:(352)e54-4288 1ERN., DAN 05-31-2013 86-13 Sara 1 loon.20 ren 1 Or 1 86-13 128/74 REF: 97-12A 128/7 PDF created with pdFacary Pro tris venbn v..odlloctorwcom PC #LA18-000020 Exhibit D A) O ,s,4604„,„a arogibio, „ Vp7;t S'®orsc,QP JR7 3 lP$�r'V '• rCW Sae' au �O 953 '0 Bpu 846 O® BOW 9500 BC 958 �0®, -!,.., +(•r•F, ee_ 41, II _ - .... a 'iF sow 4t/ Tows.5 — 0 r a r _. I' 44 ® 1 / • _ •O p ;. t _7 •,,, ? -i I I �I 0 Q `� co • HE / { _ BQN;,,",r, I 1 ;1Pill ° -..- / s . '- I U • • It 0t 42 Bo 9e> • L I _ . 111i1111•11•1. POO-AN,NOT',O .... .. '4 ji NOT TO BE NSTn__EG I,."1.E , • .095E+50N c.c.,eallr uoMf...e-i..,raM.a^n j Ca.-.Ai 4-c+'s�dlC4 1 N.-0T.FR vNOSCAVE FENTU2EE • ..e d, ..W 0. _{ POO, ND-,ETroFD e' T.W �.rt 1 • ._c. _ 41)11L.._ • • 0 Wel • • • • • • • • SEPTIC • Scale DESIGN/SALES REP:Matt Burton Myhran DESIGN ASST:Robert Latham 2369 MO,.Rd O .,11,10 MrmYNMa4.wss,lo:. .� 2017 Asbuilt 100927 AM -asp,. SOurxYIEW olemad By N 2017 B 15 My van Re setl v2018.w F .651,155.734 sc +-Wa.�m.�om rDi9161fa• 2280 Fox Street Orono, MN 55356'.- �-= "''....-.. o,„�„ - --y.pyay�y __ Cote Revision Noies I Plan!List-Back l' GRAVEL Cly Common Nam* �_. _ CARD 4 Cardinal Dogwood -_ CEWP 2 Columnar Eastern White Pine ® R: COB 5 Chbagoland Green Boxwood DPB 3 Dakota Pinnacle Birth 0 ,,,,• DPB DSA 7 Degroors Spke Arborvitae TOW o ',et/////ii/ EWP 1 Eastern White Pine iiia GN 94A EXT 27 Existing Tree iWiit 3j •,�� : i.,,,}:., GMB 5 Green Mountain Boxwood b ,+ `� 4f1144, - ' KFG 8 Kid Foerster Feather Read Gra re%!/.2V.°'° as at a `°R oA MDA 18 Maggie Daley A.M. °°.' °.It .. °,°'..r. ....:14:,,,°: o®. MFG 8 Miscanthus Flame GrassTOW 946 MTP 5 Mugho Tannenbaum Pine TOW 955 �� _'It�j� a r , L 14i� s$° 1.�' tsow 9a4' my 5 Mohican Viburnum • - BGv950 Tow 953' �� bro ..C� PDG 8 Prak a Dropsa.dIP _• TA 3 TectmyArborvitae -33 4. .< 953 TONT 9-' ♦.F. . + -, .. ,. e 950 { no �_ ��l�F.41 Ia {l* a T SOA,L.tI,v. / fe. .2': ,-•, ..,‘. . .=Ir_ .-. ,-—mug #esiy• _/___ ' .: sii it • 4•4 : i.: --- l'cwP5° _ - op,. v "/i" e'''''"945 aI ±. �; ` i cn.. v^ .053'6" .. - 3,S e.S li'a` .44 // .$-•. •••.4 4 ,v,i p4k*,743, 4..,•...•mg • eCYv 95a' - r$v - ♦ VI*. terigA 956Ck 417.1 N.N. _. j `O • 97k 7, --- 14:2411M , 'W n Alt;f. � a� T. O♦wBW9. 53' / L:c .- 410111F 414, BOW 957 r e — '1/0• ' \ Erwbn Gated , 59 Fence \t 7117C1111 .' - ...a O 5a, Wel -- a, Scale DESIGN/SALES REP:Matt Burton t"=10' Myhran DESIGNASST:Robert Latham 2383Pio1Knob Rd �,-- 0.0:1/17/18 Mendota Nelgbt..MN 55120 4'^• 2018 Landscape Concept Rem... 017 8_ 651p33e SOUTNYIEW qNr 1/1 /18 8 15 Myhran_Revhed_v2018.vwu Fax 5s+.a5s+rat .oum.awebtir Can +DESIGN, 2280 Fox Street Orono, MN 55356 dupoYm>wbmshwebaMed o..Rwa.e:_t-_ Date ReviYm NOMI — -•-'� I 9'411" s 7171- l-1 I 1-Iz s1-1 L I I !AWN(or)FU ED 2519 3W I 1.-I I II I .. II Q I I I s I: .trr..I () 1 I R,- 4: .- N I! A 11 D I N I ipiii.. ii 11.1 L� I II Ci Z -D I l W 1 II rn 1 I� 70 1 III 1 1 I 11 I I Iii 1 t 1 4' �\N ---,----..N-- -N,A --\ \ . Iv 0 1 I 1.I I1I ( ii I I 1 I I 1_^ I I 1 I I I x 7-6" -108" ), 7'-6" to Kil I \ N Z A N 0— 7470 — m D iNl Illm < 101 rnzow D N v07.05 A 1011 I IZ 1 ^2'i5;,4I rn IIA v RI ,�A=�o I n '[d6dER' ro INI N I 4c7 _ 2-4 r- I I' I- _,,,_2-..1 N._.-1/4.._ 1,0L.,,_._/_- .;,.._ _ _._._ e; _ _ _ _ ; .\ 1 _ is_. ,i.- ,-. ^' i°' /131 .g I N O Ata > 2 a 1 3'-I I/2 I ,,,,). (1,0„ o q I A�o 1 MT \. STONE SURROUND, I = -"-1 3-, I D 17.0 W 7 ae.tcn roar+ TV ABOVE U ��s>I.xncc w - n wi I I REF DW r ,,,,Low n vC 71 � ur nu/o � �� 4 1, tt UC IIII.11111 emme p rt D lAWN 2527 WOOD FP W/ !AWN 2527 P L 3'-(7" Jr p;216 I GAS STARTER 1 : • : �, 28'-0" l' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a COPYRIGHTa pod house addition to the home of KUHL another re""m °K`U`i be using tle PensILD K for omen:Ion.It Al Sot anaorm my for t>� Lynn&Anders Myhran DESIGNKuhl Design Bolsi ef;b;,,;v II Q o es &aawoa.raaoq+id�tNLw.Weathert o • q 2280 Fox Street BUILDa copy of which be rnwle o When those conditions an satisfied,the mo Orono,MN 55356 se a+ nosy be ed without Infringementof Kuhl Design&MK Cappiyi 1 e o I In D O.; a r bili, 7.1 x ipt Tiill ; tlr IS--I tihk. -4 at ,1,400,„ —� I 0-9" b Z1 !!. ` I so" Z Air 0 lei. oho cn iIqIiiII.� _ r1, 0 rn n M`�■ :f=�■► 1 m N �m It■�0 Z2 .411 ■ ag 1.1 id -LP— Wu a Lip Ilk . rn . ► (1) 1iii k li crn D SL_ IIIiIIIII qm mill tJIIImIIIIIi m uZ A --_ 1tI Nm i, Ir11 w t. I lop ■ , 4.11104—as .u: tEr al ` jj„ i`t 4-1,..1.1....„ it � i ■°..: D 'N.�■ itorrimikt 711.._. 'r,a; : Mai a — BIL_Rin, a .1 .011 ■ %'9': _� E IN'!Ii IIIiI1I;I ' I SII- 111 [.'i�ilignat I IE I NI Ifiot... es . ,,,,, if Amo• a 111 rItared I ��./rdit, - IIH11 = chilI la l I 01111111 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a pool house addition to the home of KCOPYRIGHT....g b.ingOESIGu.plLeos KUHL /a wnsbuction,Mwngretaneoo...ryror NDESIGN "".hww 0a.(0pay di: 'osdoo.. Lynn&Anders Myhran BUILD Build Design B copyrightdngenee agreement. I 2280 Fox StreetISIS SAM tt,NORMS a copy of which will be made aw,wahle. When those conditions are satisfied,the Orono.MN 55356 a.s...,.07.3..469 designs my be used without Infringement of Kuhl Design Builds'CopytighL IE Z,'S F ____l. __ F 9y O k s O , _ -:::„:37.-7:-.--.1.+:.,., \-\\ V \ I 0 p i :-' a ! t , - . 1 - , ' } i 1 it.. 1 / 3 i itiv: 3 1 j1 t �f ." / 1 I ( 1 Yf 1 varimoi ff W� 1` J N 1 -.=- - i j J l _ 4 ,f r' ` , . , yl 1 " , f ,i i \ LI,. r _..:.. --! ; \I ''..-‘., V'7iik'' .j:t'A I N s Mfr \\ —1j • II y I ri / r T I \ l d 0 ______----:— I -- \ ,/ - 1 70 / r _7 \\\ - ; V i, / / !s'.'.:11\ / • ‘ //lii-,)/ r 1 / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT KUHL DESIGN BUILD a pool house addition to the home of KUHL K anomer contractor will be using the pane for oonsioaon.It MI first be n.00.aaary for Lynn&Anders Myhran BUILDDESIGN the homeowner fog>pay all design fees due Kuhl Dealgn Build.and(Y)sign Kuhl Design Bute shroud 6teae areafn copy of which mil be made available. a 2280 Fox Street When those wMPouns are aetlenW,the Orono,MN 55356 ea..w 111:+x.» Eos gos re.y m used wlUroo n'n"g."°"r m Kuhl Design Builds.Copyright. PC #LA18-000020 38 03-117-23 23 0009 38 03-117-23 32 0028 JOHN C&KIMBERLY K MUELLER GRAHAM MERRY Exhibit F 2240 ABINGDON WAY 3750 HUNTINGTON AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 38 03-117-23 23 0022 38 03-117-23 32 0029 AIMEE R GUIDERA BRETT&LAURA BOHLANDER WILLIAM J GUIDERA 540 WILLOW DR S 2325 WILLOW HILL DR ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0013 38 03-117-23 33 0001 KARAYN RAE CUNNINGTON CITY OF ORONO 2300 FOX ST P O BOX 66 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 03-117-23 32 0014 38 03-117-23 33 0002 ANDERS MYHRAN ALVIN W LANDBERG JR 2280 FOX ST P O BOX 8 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0016 38 03-117-23 33 0003 IRMA J KELLEY DENNIS G&KAREN L PEDERSON 2320 FOX ST 2285 WEBBER HILLS ROAD ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0020 38 03-117-23 33 0004 JAMES R&HELEN L JOHNSON BYRON B&THERESA R JOHNSON 2240 FOX ST 2275 WEBER HILLS RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0021 38 03-117-23 33 0007 1 P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST TCF NATIONAL BANK 2260 FOX ST 1405 XENIUM LANE ORONO MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55441 38 03-117-23 32 0022 38 03-117-23 34 0008 P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST EDWIN W/CHRISTINA K RITCHIE 2260 FOX ST 2180 WEBBER HILLS RD ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0026 NIHAR SHAH&NIMA DESAI 2300 WILLOW HILL DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0027 BENJAMIN P HALLEN ERIN M SCANLON 2300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE:02/22/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 03-117-23 23 0009 38 03-117-23 32 0028 1 C MUELLER&K K MUELLER GRAHAM MERRY 2240 ABINGDON WAY 500 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 JOHN C&KIMBERLY K MUELLER GRAHAM MERRY 2240 ABINGDON WAY 3750 HUNTINGTON AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 38 03-117-23 23 0022 38 03.117-23 32 0029 AR WI GUIDERA B BOHLANDER&L BOHLANDER 2325 WILLOW HILL DR 540 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 AIMEE R GUIDERA BRETT&LAURA BOHLANDER WILLIAM I GUIDERA 540 WILLOW DR S 2325 WILLOW HILL DR ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0013 36 03-117-23 33 0001 KARAYN R CUNNIGTON TRUSTEE HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2300 FOX ST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 KARAYN RAE CUNNINGTON CITY OF ORONO 2300 FOX ST P O BOX 66 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 03-117-23 32 0014 38 03-117-23 33 0002 A MYHRAN&L M MYHRAN ALVIN W LANDBERG JR ETAL 2280 FOX ST 2325 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 ANDERS MYHRAN ALVIN W LANDBERG JR 2280 FOX ST P O BOX 8 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0016 38 03-117-23 33 0003 IRMA J KELLEY TRUSTEE D&K PEDERSON 2320 FOX ST 2285 WEBBER HILLS RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 IRMA J KELLEY DENNIS G&KAREN L PEDERSON 2320 FOX ST 2285 WEBBER HILLS ROAD ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0020 38 03-117-23 33 0004 JR&HLJOHNSON BB&TR JOHNSON 2240 FOX ST 2275 WEBBER HILLS RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 JAMES R&HELEN L JOHNSON BYRON B&THERESA R JOHNSON 2240 FOX ST 2275 WEBER HILLS RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0021 38 03-117-23 33 0007 P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST TCF NATIONAL BANK 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 680 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 J P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST TCF NATIONAL BANK 2260 FOX ST 1405 XENIUM LANE ORONO MN 55356 PLYMOUTH MN 55441 38 03-117-23 32 0022 38 03-117-23 34 0008 J P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST EDWIN W RITCHIE ETAL TRUSTEE 2260 FOX ST 2180 WEBBER HILLS RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55391 ]P FOUNDATION REVOC TRUST EDWIN W/CHRISTINA K RITCHIE 2260 FOX ST 2180 WEBBER HILLS RD ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 32 0026 NIHAR S SHAH&NIMA A DESAI 2300 WILLOW HILL DR ORONO MN 55356 NIHAR SHAH&NIMA DESAI 2300 WILLOW HILL DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0027 B P HALLEN&E M SCANLON 2300 FOX ST ORONO MN 00000 BENJAMIN P HALLEN ERIN M SCANLON 2300 FOX ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. • PC #LA18-000020 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit G Date. 2/22/2018 /16Intict,o' r �/ Inr v; 3 Vir 4111V 14ebbe, /t///, Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: II This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy.(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind. and (iii) is notsuitable for legal engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shat not be liable for any damageinjury or loss resulting from this data For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South.Minneapolis MN 55487/gis.infof Hennepin us Item 8 * a% To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief,City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director tSH04F'G Date: March 19,2018 Subject: #LA18-000023,City of Orono Text Amendment:Wetland Regulations Public Hearing Application Summary: The city is considering an ordinance that would alter the wetland wetland setback requirements. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should consider changes to the wetland setback regulations. Background With respect to the environmental goals outlined in the comprehensive plan,and in part the Wetland Conservation act requirements,the city establishes wetland Setbacks,an area where no construction may occur. The watershed district establishes a Buffer,when required by their rules. A Buffer does not allow construction or grading,and requires natural vegetation. In 2017 (Case No. 17-3922),the Council reviewed the rules related to wetland delineation and setbacks, and adjusted the delineation requirements for certain projects, and considered changes to the wetland setback requirements, but did not amend these rules. Last fall,the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to reconsider the setback requirements. The Council felt that the additional setback impedes the use of a property with marginal benefit,when considering the Watershed District does not require a buffer in all situations. Based on Council's direction,staff has prepared an ordinance that requires a setback (of 25 feet)when there is not a wetland buffer. When there is a wetland buffer,any structures are required to be outside of the buffer. This modification reduces the distances between improvements and the wetland edge from current levels: Current Proposed When buffer is required Buffer+10 feet Buffer When buffer is not required 35 feet 25 feet This change also allows a structure in theory to be located at the buffer edge; in these situations,the homeowner runs the risk of impacting the buffer with construction activities (vegetative loss,compaction of soils,grading,etc.). Recognizing the watershed district is a regional agency,and looks to its City partners to protect the watershed on a more local scale(lot by lot),the Commission and Council should be cautious when considering reductions to wetland protection measures. The additional setback provides advantages including Increases land area to allow for infiltration and overland flow Adds area to conduct housekeeping activities without impacting buffer FILE#LA18-000023 March 19,2018 Page 2 of 2 Promotes a rural character by moving the built environment away from the natural resource. These additional benefits are consistent with Orono's long standing vision of protecting the natural resources,especially the lakes. Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance PC Exhibit A LA18-000023 March 19, 2018 1 ORDINANCE NO. 196, THIRD SERIES 2 3 CITY OF ORONO 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 5 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 7 PERTAINING TO WETLAND REGULATIONS 8 9 10 THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: 11 12 SECTION 1. Section 78-1605 shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as 13 follows: 14 15 Wetland buffer areas and setbacks. 16 17 (a)This subsection establishes authority for wetland buffer areas around protected wetlands. 18 Buffer areas are necessary and beneficial to maintain the health of wetlands. Buffer areas protect 19 the edge of wetlands from erosion while filtering sediment, chemicals and other nutrients from 20 runoff that drains into wetlands. Buffer areas can improve the biological diversity and health of a 21 wetland environment while reducing the adverse impacts of human activities. 22 23 (b)All wetlands within the City of Orono are within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 24 (MCWD), which has rules and regulations for the establishment and maintenance of wetland 25 buffers. In an effort to avoid overlapping or conflicting regulations, the city defers jurisdiction for the 26 establishment and maintenance of wetland buffers to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If 27 application of MCWD buffer regulations is in conflict with city regulations, the Watershed District 28 requirements shall apply. 29 30 (c) Setbacks. Where the MCWD has established or requires a wetland buffer, the wetland buffer 31 rules shall apply. 32 i. Where the MCWD does not require a buffer, a twenty-five foot setback shall be required 33 between the edge of all wetlands from any building (principal or accessory)or other 34 structure, septic systems, or wells. The wetland edge shall be determined as required in 35 Section 78-1604 of this Code. 36 37 _ - : - _ _ _ , e - -=- - _- • - - -- • : - -- - - - - , - -• . - -- -- -- 3 8 - e-- -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- • - - - 41 ---' - - --- - ' -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - welts: - e_ • - ' ' 45- eet • - - buffer-is-required 42 43 • 44 ii. Setback revegetation. Areas within the required setback area subject to filling, grading 45 or excavation as part of a construction project shall be revegetated immediately upon 46 completion of such earthwork. 47 48 (d) The City of Orono has established wetland protection strategies in the Orono Surface Water 49 Management Plan (SWMP) (January 2011). A protection classification has been assigned to each 50 wetland in Orono based on the stormwatcr susceptibility and functional assessment for each 52 -- -- - - - - - - -- e e - - -- .. - - - - - e--- . „ - 'e-- _ - 53 described as follows: Protection Susceptibility Rating Description Cla"sification Requirements (B - Bounce - Change in event)(P - Phosporus) "Preserve" Highly Susceptible - _ . . - _ B: Maintain bounce at or - ... . ..- below existing conditions impacts from runoff; have the highest degree P: Limit loadings to of protection (0.14 Lbs/Ac/Yr) "Manage 1" Moderately-- Moderately susceptible B: Maintain bounce at or to quantity and quality below existing conditions • .__ _ _ _ plus 0.5 foot less stringent than Susceptible Preserve, provides P: Limit loadings to protection to maintain predevelopment loadings their characteristics times 2 (0.28 Lbs/Ac/Yr) "Manage 2" Less stringent protection than Manage 1 . - _ .2'2. .2' .•* _ plus 1.O foot of characteristics is desirable P: Limit concentration to predevelopment concentrations (200 ppb) "Manage 3" Least Susceptible Wetlands are B: No quantity _ .. requirement (e.g., cultivated or canary gra-s monotypc) or lack of wetland characteristic; not P: Limit concentration to runoff; no quantity and 225 ppb only limited quality treatment of runoff is required 54 2 55 The protection classification for each wetland will be found on the 'Wetland Management 56 Classification Map & List"which is hereby adopted by reference, a copy of which shall be kept on 57 file in the office of the city clerk and shall be available for public review during all normal office 58 hours. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District required buffer area widths are based on the four 59 protection classifications. 60 SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its 61 passage and publication. 62 ADOPTED this day of ,2018 on a vote of_ayes and_nays by the 63 City Council of Orono,Minnesota. 64 ATTEST: 65 66 67 68 Anna Carlson,City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 69 70 71 Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2018. 3 Item 9 �lVO To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief,City Administrator A From: Jeremy Barnhart,Community Development Director 44-Esx00'G Date: March 19,2018 Subject: #LA18-000024,City of Orono Text Amendment: Definitions Public Hearing Application Summary: The city is considering an ordinance that would add or amend definitions applicable to the zoning ordinance. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should consider the proposed changes to definitions. Background Through the course of applying the zoning ordinance regulations, it becomes evidence that the definitions,which form the foundation for the zoning ordinance, need to be reviewed and when necessary, updated to reflect community goals. Staff has identified 7 additions or amendments to the zoning ordinance definitions. These nine are still being reviewed,and additional changes may be introduced as review continues. The Planning Commission is asked to give additional feedback,formal recommendation will be requested in April. Animal Unit: Amended definition. Occasionally,staff is asked to identify the number of alpaca,goats or pigs that equal an animal unit. Animal unit is useful in determining the number of farm animals per acre. Building Height: Amended definition. The change proposed removes the height calculation based on the location of the highest window,which does nothing to impact mass,which building height is intended to address. Building cornice. New definition. Building height calls on the location of a building cornice in certain roof types. Building cornice isn't defined. Dry-buildable. Not currently defined. Dry buildable is useful in determining the number of lots possible given a particular property,and is necessary in preparing subdivision plans. Dwelling. Amended definition. The change is intended to clarify the difference between renting a couple of bedrooms(allowed via the rental licensing program)and a second unit of bed, bath, kitchen,and living areas,which is not. Family.Amended definition. Intended the clarify the difference between one and 2 family dwelling units. FILE#LA18-000024 March 19,2018 Page 2 of 2 In-kind: New definition. Useful in replacing non-conforming structures and buildings. Comments To date, no public comments have been received. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft definitions PC Exhibit A 18-000024 Definitions Animal Unit: Animal unit means,for one animal unit equivalency, one cow or steer; one horse, donkey alpaca, or Ilamaeo;two pigs,three sheep or goats; or 25 fowl. Building Height:Building height means the vertical distance between the highest existing ground level or ten feet above the lowest ground level,whichever is lower, and the top of the cornice of a flat roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round or other arch-type roof, or the median height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be considered in determining building height. - • •• - -- • . • . • Cornice means any horizontal decorative molding that crowns a building or wall. Dry Buildable: Dry Buildable means that portion of the lot not encumbered by the waters of a duly recorded lake or river,wetlands,wetland buffers, bluffs, or slopes greater than 18%. Dwelling:Dwelling means a building or part of a building containing independent living, sleeping, housekeeping accommodations, and sanitary facilities for occupancy by one family, intended to be occupied exclusively for residence purposes, but not including rooms in motels, hotels, nursing homes, boardinghouses, nor trailers,tents, cabins or trailer coaches. A dwelling shall not be interpreted to include lodging rooms. Family: . • .. . . . ; - - - - ' - - - - ' - - =, ' . • - •• : •• •• : • • • • = :. Family means any number of individuals generally, but not necessarily, related by blood and marriage, living together at one location maintaining a common household as a single, nonprofit housekeeping unit, as distinguished from a group occupying a boardinghouse or rooming house, hotel or motel. In-Kind: In-kind,when used in the context of replacement of a non-conforming building or structure, means the replacement of a building or structure completely within the limits(location, height,width, and depth)of the previous building or structure.