The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSAC investigation i Si j og Jessica: Sorry for the delay in reply, Lyle our Building Official & Mike both looked at this one more time, to confirm your findings. After reviewing the files again, they said you are correct; they didn't notice that comment before. 4 5 Findings: v--00 PA (`c�cL � 1', V ill) OS Mal° ,'3' Y ...1. ;7 • 2765 Wayzata Blvd=A demo credit was ned in This needs to be taken off than rit-i-r�S books according to your new findings. _i r V` 5 June 2008 Report—We still want to report this SAC Unit I(-C 4-47,h-:4, 7 I \ I i . r • 2785 Wayzata Blvd—We want to report the demo credit for this property. Note: Was Residential—New Use: Industrial & New Address: 550 Old Crystal Bay Rd. ' Thanks, ?e er le 17e 0 CI) Rachel 0�.-� C Ab� auvroa-n-ii- i'— ra Cotitl Udi ii 2-)nij app ro vc A 2 Vic. Crecd'-f-S ' I i-v-t_ > --for 2 I$S 030--L{zo- - 6 We , From: Nye,Jessica [mailto:jessica.nye@metc.state.mn.us] k)h t Ch S Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:13 AM ec 'i r To: Rachel Dodge; Barnebey, Kelly r cx— Cc: Lyle Oman �i`l ZCUS Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report \tide_ ` U.D facial�eS According to the Engineering Department who designed the SAC Program, grandparent credits are for those properties that were connected prior to 1/1/1973, not just built prior to 1973. The permit states "To house but not hooked up." The 2nd dwelling is not eligible for grandparent credit. Jessie Nye SAC Program Administrator MCES - Finance http://www.metrocouncil.org/environment/RatesBilling/SAC Program.htm From: Rachel Dodge [mailto:RDodge@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:44 AM To: Barnebey, Kelly; Nye, Jessica la.Slo? Jessica: Sorry for the delay in reply, Lyle our Building Official & Mike both looked at this one more time, to confirm your findings. After reviewing the files again, they said you are correct; they didn't notice that comment before. Findings: • 2765 Wayzata Blvd—A demo credit was turned in Jam—This needs to be til ► books according to your new findings. June 2008 Report—We still want to report this SAC Unit VCIr41/1/ ��• 2785 Wayzata Blvd —We want to report the demo credit for this property. ,\D Note: Was Residential — New Use: Industrial & New Address: 550 Old Crystal Bay Rd. \� Thanks, Rachel From: Nye, Jessica [mailto:jessica.nye@metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:13 AM To: Rachel Dodge; Barnebey, Kelly Cc: Lyle Oman Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report According to the Engineering Department who designed the SAC Program, grandparent credits are for those properties that were connected prior to 1/1/1973, not just built prior to 1973. The permit states "To house but not hooked up." The 2nd dwelling is not eligible for grandparent credit. Jessie Nye SAC Program Administrator MCES - Finance http://www.metrocouncil.org/environment/RatesBilling/SAC Program.htm From: Rachel Dodge [mailto:RDodge@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:44 AM To: Barnebey, Kelly; Nye, Jessica Cc: Lyle Oman Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report Just follow up The actual permit was issued on 12/27/72 &home built prior, if you look further up on the scanned image you will see this date. That is the date we issued the permit. Since this is before 1973, this too should be grandfathered in. I hope this is what you are looking for. Rachel From: Barnebey, Kelly [mailto:kelly.barnebey@metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:01 AM To: Rachel Dodge Cc: Lyle Oman Subject: FW: Question regarding demo on June report Hi Rachel, I was gone Monday and Tuesday. Today there is a note from Jessie regarding your email for the June demolition. She states the documentation proves there is one grandparent sewer connection(page 1 of your pdf)for 2785 Wayzata Blvd. Page 2 of your pdf states 2765 Wayzata Blvd was not hooked to sewer and the date is 9/10/73. In order to claim that credit,we need documentation that shows 2765 Wayzata Blvd was connected and paid SAC to the MWCC. Our database has no record of SAC payment for this address. If there is nothing further,then this demolition credit cannot be taken on the June SAC-D. Please let us know what you find-or contact Jessie if you have further questions. Thanks, Kelly From: Rachel Dodge [mailto:RDodge@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 3:34 PM To: Barnebey, Kelly; Nye,Jessica Cc: Lyle Oman; Ron Olson Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report Kelly&Jessie, I finally got the supporting paperwork back from our Building Official. The application that was submitted was filled out incorrectly using the 2765 Wayzata address—thus causing the confusion. Attached you will find: • 2 Connection permits for each property—2765&2785 Wayzata Blvd. • Both homes were built prior to those dates, making these both "Grandfathered Credits" • A re-submittal of 06-08 SAC-D Form, changing June's report to 2785 Wayzata Blvd. As a re-cap: This is an unusual situation. This was originally 3 addresses tied to this property 2745, 2765&2785 Wayzata Blvd.—these were all residential and my understanding 2 homes. These properties were residential. They have now all been legally combined and given an address change, the new address will be: 550 Old Crystal Bay Road. This address will now become an Industrial Use. Sorry for the confusion, I hope this is the information you were looking for. Rachel From: Barnebey, Kelly [mailto:kelly.barnebey@metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1:00 PM To: Rachel Dodge Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report Rachel,Thanks for your prompt response. I talked to Jessie and she is requesting documentation of the original SAC payment for both demolitions—or if these are grandparent credits, documentation there were two separate sewer connections. We do not have payment history in our database for 2765 Wayzata. Once we have this,the demolitions can be used for potential credits. If you have questions,please contact Jessie directly. She should be back from audit this afternoon. Thanks, Kelly From: Rachel Dodge [mailto:RDodge@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 5:14 PM To: Barnebey, Kelly Cc: Lyle Oman; Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: Question regarding demo on June report Sorry for the delay, I had to ask our Planning Director, since our Building Official had left for the day. Also, both of them will be gone tomorrow as well. Mike's response is: This was a property that had multiple buildings on the site, and each building had paid SAC—they were residential properties at one point. Now not only is the address changing, but the use will be changing from residential to industrial. Conclusion: This is a second demo credit for this address and is a valid credit. I hope this helps! Rachel From: Barnebey, Kelly [mailto:kelly.barnebey@metc.state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:37 AM To: Rachel Dodge Subject: Question regarding demo on June report Hi Rachel, I am entering your report information in our SAC database. When I entered the demo at 2765 Wayzata Blvd (P12144), there was already a demo permit issued for this address in 7/05 - P08879. Was that permit voided? Please let me know so I can reconcile the records. Thanks Kelly Barnebey SAC Assistant Metropolitan Council 651-602-1421 fax 651-602-1030 http://www.metrocouncil.org/environment/RatesBilling/SAC FAQs.htm