Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Braun Intertec concrete info
BRAUN I N T E RT E C Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: September 23,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#10:Concrete Set 7;SI Rpt dated 8/26/10 Mail "42010 014,0PQt ft Rev:B/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 F. ' BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/23/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1009066 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 5066 Date Cast: 08/23/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:30 pm Specified Air(%): 6.0+/- ].0 Date Received: 08/24/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 559 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: 2505740 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 81 Cylinders per Set: 7 Air Temp. (°F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Hall,Courtney A. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Piers for East Canopy Entrance,Area F,near Door#E22 Sample Location/Notes: same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 7-01 8/25/10 1 1 2 45,420 4.02 12.69 3,580 2 N Al 7-02 8/26/10 1 2 3 48,130 4.01 12.63 3,810 1 N Al 7-03 8/30/10 1 6 7 54,700 4.01 12.63 4,330 4 N D2 7-04 9/20/10 1 27 28 77,970 4.01 12.63 6,170 4 N El 7-05 9/20/10 1 27 28 75,640 4.01 12.63 5,990 3 N EI 7-06 9/20/10 1 27 28 79,340 4.01 12.63 6,280 2 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: Al The sample is reported per contractor request. D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture EEMEEI [I 4 vuk TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Sep 23 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page I ofl_ SIDRPT Rev 1 o/o9 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ANQ Report No.: Date of This Report: 8-24 -l® Project Name: Ori 4-,Qdl}i�1`K Project No.: j, 0C.- 7—0-7 q G ti Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Project Manager: V Temp/Weather: G 170 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ;?"Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding& Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No Description and location of work completed: �PO 1 ba I IV) l NyL MOiWu,t,\ G ew,-,l6ed Atn f- 0CyA-) A- � v4� 4v cAC,� List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this clay's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: /1.� /�„ Date: Print Full Name: �/�{--� (C ; I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. 4 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I N T E IST EC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company RECEIVED Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: September 30,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation OCT — 12010 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis, MN 55438 CITY OF ORONO To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#11:Concrete Set 8 Mail Rev.8/6104 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/30/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1009590 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4556p Date Cast: 08/30/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:53 pm Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-1.0 Date Received: 08/31/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 61/4 Truck Number: 812 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.6 Ticket Number: 2511495 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 83 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 86 Cylinders Cast By: Hall,Courtney A. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Paving,Sidewalk,East side Entrance of Elem School,Building#765 Sample Location/Notes: YEAST OF DOOR Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) ' (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 8-1 9/6/10 1 6 7 40,020 4.01 12.63 3,170 2 N B2 8-2 9/27/10 1 27 28 61,970 4.01 12.63 4,910 2 N E1 8-3 9/27/10 1 27 28 64,660 4.01 12.63 5,120 4 N EI 84 9/27/10 1 27 28 62,770 4.01 12.63 4,970 4 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X E 0 E [I [1 4 ve�&b TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Sep 30 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 d RAU N I NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: September 09,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis, MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#9:Concrete Set 8 Mail ftCEIVED SEP 132010 Cm'OFORONO Rev.8/8/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 'BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/8/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1009590 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4556p Date Cast: 08/30/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:53 pm Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-].0 Date Received: 08/31/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 61/4 Truck Number: 812 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.6 Ticket Number: 2511495 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 83 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 86 Cylinders Cast By: Hall,Courtney A. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Paving,Sidewalk,East side Entrance of Elem School,Building#765 Sample Location/Notes: YEAST OF DOOR Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 8-1 9/6/10 1 6 7 40,020 4.01 12.63 3,170 2 N B2 Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture E 9 E [111 4vuk TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Sep 08 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 0. BRAUN INT RT EC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: August 26,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#7:Concrete Set 7 Mail OFOR 010 ONO Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTE BTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/25/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1009066 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 5066 Date Cast: 08/23/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 2:30 pm Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-1.5 Date Received: 08/24/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 3 1/4 Truck Number: 559 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: 2505740 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 81 Cylinders per Set: 10 Air Temp. (°F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Hall,Courtney A. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Piers for east canopy enterence,Area F,near Door#E22 Sample Location/Notes: same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 7-1 8/25/10 1 1 2 45,420 4.02 12.69 3,580 2 N Al * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: Al The sample is reported per contractor request. Types of Fracture E E 0 S 1111 �vul TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 25 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: September 09,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#6:Concrete Set 2 Mail RECEj�ED SEP 132010 Rev.-816104 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 9/8/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006314 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 10 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3140S2172 Date Cast: 07/14/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 9:10 am Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/15/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 41/2 Truck Number: 1463 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 1541554 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 83 Cylinders Cast By: Gross,Jason L Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Art Room Plumbing Infill Sample Location/Notes: 10'S and 10'W of NE Comer of Infill Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 2-01 7/21/10 1 6 7 32,450 4.01 12.63 2,570 3 N B2 2-02 8/11/10 1 27 28 48,410 4.01 12.63 3,830 5 N F1 2-03 8/11/10 1 27 28 49,940 4.01 12.63 3,950 5 N F1 2-04 8/11/10 1 27 28 50,160 4.01 12.63 3,970 5 N F1 2-05 9/8/10 1 55 56 59,580 4.01 12.63 4,720 3 S D4 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. D4 The 56 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. F1 The samples fail to meet the strength level requirements as stated in ACI 318,Chapter 5. Types of Fracture TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Sep 08 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 , BRAUN I NTE RTES: Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: August 16,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 � To: Lyle Oman Phone: Rzcz City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 �� 1 /1?®/d Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 (;fin, OFORONO Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#6:Concrete Sets 4-6; Daily Rpt dated 8/2/10;SS Rpt 5 w/Summary of Disc. Mail Rav:816104 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/6/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005798 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 4 Mix Design: 4056P Date Cast: 07/06/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:14 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/07/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 762 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 81 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 90 Cylinders Cast By: Petersen,Brian G. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Grade Beam,Loading Dock at Door E6 Sample Location/Notes: North End Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 4-1 7/13/10 1 6 7 34,370 4.01 12.63 2,720 5 N B2 4-2 8/3/10 1 27 28 55,800 4.01 12.63 4,420 4 N El 4-3 8/3/10 1 27 28 56,480 4.01 12.63 4,470 3 N E1 44 8/3/10 1 27 28 56,330 4.01 12.63 4,460 4 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sul,fur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. EI The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture X M 9 E 11 r] -/t16�b TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 06 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I NTE BTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/6/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1007359 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 4556PF Date Cast: 07/29/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 12:10 pm Specified Air(%): 6.5+/-1.5 Date Received: 07/30/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 41/2 Truck Number: 785 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: 2489203 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 84 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 85 Cylinders Cast By: Kollmann,Kaleb J Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Slab on Grade,Loading Dock Leveler Pit Sample Location/Notes: NE Comer Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 5-1 8/5/10 1 6 7 43,810 4.00 12.57 3,490 4 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 *Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture 0 9 E [111 4vak TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 06 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN NTE BTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/11/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1007460 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 6 Mix Design: 4556P Date Cast: 07/30/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 10:35 am Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-1.0 Date Received: 08/02/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 51/4 Truck Number: 630 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.0 Ticket Number: 2490010 Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 82 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 77 Cylinders Cast By: Jandro,Adam R Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Slab on Grade—Ramp,Loading dock for intermediate school,elevated slab on grade and steps Sample Location/Notes: NW comer of Scope Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 6-1 8/6/10 3 4 7 48,710 4.01 12.63 3,860 2 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231,Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture Emus [] [] �vu�a TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 112010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page_ of DFNTS Rev t t/oB BRAUN I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: C/ — 0'2— E Report No.: Project Name: 60no Amt' Date: !i�7—2—AD Project Manager: 7.51? 04A)A-L J:( Temp/Weather: Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours cm Areas and work performed this day: P'P,L 1112 Ce "-A eas r oN 7-3k) 7 ` v Performed By: Submitted To: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take precedence over,those indicated in a preliminary report. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page L of BRAUN SIDRPT Rev i mg I NTE BTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of I�fnv�a Report No.: S j�f,� �1 Sw\'h r Date of This Report: Project Name: ( Ek" a a '; i } Project No.: Project Address: Client: 10AA Client Project No.: &Project Manager: �1�s{n`�a1.. ej Temp/Weather: 46VIP �T Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases -Peri ic----------- .We .....❑..... ...Fir'eproofing.....-..........................-.:--:.... _. ....lding...&-Boltin9. Concrete Plotertent . ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Kcker A-C utdc1`�'�- ,mss „ .ret„ - R, �n►ae l �o�\o.ati'J CIS A3asi O_AA _ C,OA^W' SL • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,Work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable' Workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Q � . Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental sdumm since 1957 Page Af 4;- BRAUN SIDRM I NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of C4-w�o Report No.: S kaN, Date of This Report, W-4 1 Q Project Name: Ornmv Z QAMS,t„ 5i—)MMt Project No.: Qts-Obr" OLc-,SQ Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this continuation) Y, � 3U Sid- 'To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC,except as noted above. %Signed: Date: S-Itt'p Print Full Name: _ n ` P �,- I.D. No.- White o:White copy to Braun-Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing&ghweriuig and environmental solutions since 1957 Page BRAUN 506/04 Rev bl04 I.NTE�RT-EC Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancies Items Needing Correction or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: Project Address: The following items must be reviewed and approved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or re-inspected before work can continue in the area. Daily Report Resolution to Date statusReport Date Description Discrepancy corrected/ No. O/C Observed by ._._............ .._�_..... --.--��------ -- .......-.... -...._...._..._............._...............-—-._..... --- ...- _._.___.._...---._......._ .....- t White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Contractor. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 d 1' BRAUN I NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: August 16,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis, MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 zC /VZ® Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 �C 400 1??010 Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions CI 7-YOF ORONO Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#4:Concrete Sets 1-2;SS Rpt 2 w/Summary of Disc. Mail Rev:8/6104 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/13/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006272 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 1 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 07/13/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 2:31 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/15/10 Specified Strength(psi): 3,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 1488 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 1.9 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 81 Cylinders Cast By: Scott,Andrew P Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior,HS,Footing,Area C,duct shaft footing Sample Location/Notes: same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 1-1 7/20/10 2 5 7 45,540 4.01 12.63 3,610 1 N D2 1-2 8/10/10 2 26 28 63,480 4.02 12.69 5,000 4 N E1 1-3 8/10/10 2 26 28 63,530 4.02 12.69 5,010 4 N EI 14 8/10/10 2 26 28 61,220 4.02 12.69 4,820 4 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,5uffitr Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture E 0 0 E 1111 4-MG�k TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 13 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/13/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006314 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3140S2F2 Date Cast: 07/14/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 9:10 am Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/15/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 41/2 Truck Number: 1463 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 1541554 Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders.per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 83 Cylinders Cast By: Gross,Jason L Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Art Room Plumbing Infill Sample Location/Notes: 10'S and 10'W of NE Comer of Infill Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 2-1 7/21/10 1 6 7 32,450 4.01 12.63 2,570 3 N B2 2-2 8/11/10 1 27 28 48,410 4.01 12.63 3,830 5 N F1 2-3 8/11/10 1 27 28 49,940 4.01 12.63 3,950 5 N Fl 24 8/11/10 1 27 28 50,160 4.01 12.63 3,970 5 N F1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suyiir Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. FI The samples fail to meet the strength level requirements as stated in ACI 318,Chapter 5. Types of Fracture E 0 9 E [111 4vuk TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 13 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page of 1 SIDRPT key 1 oios BRAUN I NTE BTEC Special Inspection Daily Report I City of Or"'O Report No.: � , ��C e aZ Date of This Report: Project Name: pf.oylln Project No.: B��o�^ Vapgq�fi Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Project Manager: ltb tiNkn," A t Temp/Weother: 8()Op Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: n ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ .Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ConcrefePlacement Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ 3 E Description and location of work completed: ' O dss m )"' tr. E A 'TIO � 't+�a fl,& k6%113 10 k, 661 121A- - Solt �L1��P ty�titlt. bL1�.l'� Q;'!Met 9.�&A r ✓P nates pkv nm--k O'hLO uv 46LC 1DX.t- kbo t 'H �s�C- Rot fes" AL tQ 3 c �j �0 Ze Ith h4njbi$c're anci�es noh rrb�n �s s Ensu es L o • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the tth—e--current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: \ Date: •1 Print Full Name: AS � sai�..- I.D. No.. Inc ( +-I>?- White S2White copy to Braun tntertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and enviwnn=W sohaions since 1957 ii Page SRODrolS BRAUN I NTERTEC Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancies Items Needing Correction or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: nrg3%&& Project Address: The following items must be reviewed and approved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or re-inspected before work can continue in the area. Daily Repo Resolution to Date status Report Date Description Discrepancy corrected/ O/C No. Observed by W CA-M �>r 1 Flet JeG �i,,,` �v. . (?1ac¢- -i+,,tz ��5�,1t t`�t1,�t �t� ►`` Av��c� �, a v,c� S 3 :q 1 White copy to Braun lntettec file. Blue copy to Contractor. Providing engineering and envkomu r wl solutions since 1957 . A - rA BRAUN INTERTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: August 20,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: F9 City of Orono Fax: AUG 13 2010 PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 CIrY0F0R01V0 Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#5:Concrete Set 3 Mail Rev.816104 Providing engineering and environmental solations since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 8/20/10 Test Method: ASTM G39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006852 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 07/20/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air(%): Not Given Date Received: 07/21/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) Not Given Truck Number: Not Given Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) Not Given Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 65 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 75 Cylinders Cast By: Contractor Liquid Added On Site: Not Given Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Area C,Lower Level Sample Location/Notes: Area C Lower Level Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 3-1 7/27/10 1 6 7 34,680 4.00 12.57 2,760 5 N B2 3-2 8/17/10 1 27 28 53,270 4.01 12.63 4,220 4 N E1 3-3 8/17/10 1 27 28 52,750 4.01 12.63 4,180 4 N El 34 8/17/10 1 27 28 50,850 4.01 12.63 4,030 4 N E1 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture E 0 9 E [I [1 �� TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Aug 20 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I ITE ITEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: August 05,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#3:Concrete Set 3;(2)Daily Rpts dated 7/16,7/19/10; Density Tests 4-6 Mail AUc; 10 2010 C17Y OF ORONO Rev:B/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 a BRAUN NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/29/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006852 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 07/20/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 10:00 am Specified Air(%): Not Given Date Received: 07/21/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) Not Given Truck Number: Not Given Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) Not Given Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 65 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 75 Cylinders Cast By: Contractor Liquid Added On Site: Not Given Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Area C,Lower Level Sample Location/Notes: Area C Lower Level Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 3-1 7/27/10 1 6 7 34,680 4.00 12.57 2,760 5 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture :7vu� TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 29 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page_ of DFNTS BRAUN Pav 3/04 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: AL, r K 7 � Report No.: Location: JJ�� 2`0 "`- 2— Date: [`b- IQ Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Areas and work performed this Oay: Weather: - y'� Performed By: Submitted To: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page_ of DFNTS BRAUN Rev 3/04 I NTE BTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: (,) `i Report No.: Location: (_/�o, -zc--(C, r "� Z Date: J-11- L Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Areas and work performed this day: b le,u-4 Weather: C- ® PerFormed By: Submitted To: ILA, White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 cuent: Project: BRAUN Field Compaction Tests I�T E RT E Test Method:ASTM D 6938 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company BL-08-02099F PO Box 158 Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additior. Report Date: 7/26/10 8625 Rendova St NE 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project#: 90270 General Proctor Data Field Test Data Specifications/Results Optimum Maximum Relative Min.Spec. Retest Test Soil Moisture Density In Place In Place Dry Probe Depth Compaction Compaction Test ID Of Date Soil ID Classification (%) (pcf) Moisture% Density(pcf) (in) N) (%) Comments(see key) 4 7/19/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 4.9 123.6 12 98 95 A 5 7/19/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 4.7 122.8 12 97 95 A 6 7/19/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 4.9 120.8 12 96 95 A ID Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge SN Field Technician 4 Structural Fill:Interior Wall Backfill,Area C Below Grade Wall 101 Top of Slab=105 38882 Maki,Brett S 5 Structural Fill:Interior Wall Backfill,Area C Below Grade Wall 103 Top of Slab=105 38882 Maki,Brett S 6 Structural Fill:Interior Wall Backfill,Area C Below Grade Wall 104 Top of Slab=105 38882 Maki,Brett S Key: A=Test results comply with specifications B=Test results do not comply with specifications C=Test results comply with air-voids specifications Van Abel,Josh "Tests are"Direct Transmission"(Method A)unless probe depth noted as'BS„ I approve the document Jul 26 2010 Ver 3.0 Confidential and Propietary Page 1 of 1 'Z a5 OC-13 IN BRAUN INTERTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: July 23,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#2:Concrete Sets 1-2;Daily Rpt dated 7/14/10;Density Tests 2-3 Mail Ce"I eD C/T ORO NO Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/22/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006272 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 1 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 07/13/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 2:31 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/15/10 Specified Strength(psi): 3,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 1488 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 1.9 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 81 Cylinders Cast By: Scott,Andrew P Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior,HS,Footing,Area C,duct shaft footing Sample Location/Notes: same Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 1-1 7/20/10 2 5 7 45,540 4.01 12.63 3,610 1 N D2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: D2 The 7 day test result meets or exceeds the 28 day specified strength. Types of Fracture TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 22 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/22/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1006314 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099F Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90270 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3140S2F2 Date Cast: 07/14/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 9:10 am Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/15/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 41/2 Truck Number: 1463 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 2.2 Ticket Number: 1541554 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 78 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 83 Cylinders Cast By: Gross,Jason L Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Art Room Plumbing Infill Sample Location/Notes: 10'S and 10'W of NE Comer of Infill Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 2-1 7/21/10 1 6 7 32,450 4.01 12.63 2,570 3 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C 172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suffitr Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture 0 0 E [111 4vuk TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 'TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 22 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page of BRAUNcrest-dfn 4,07 I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: _91—`09"b�g/"C— Date: !a Report No.: Project Name: Ln? ff"ri Project Location: 11 X / Client: Temp/Weather: /" Z Project Manager: L ® j Va vet 14-L I Time Arrived: = 00W Departed: _l -f 4 .. ' 3 Compaction Testing Concrete Testing Cylinder Pickup ❑ Proctor Pickup ❑ Masonry Pickup ❑ DCP ❑ Other(describe) Areas Tested: ❑ Mass Grading O Building Pad O Wall Backfill ❑ Slab Subgrade ❑ Parking/Walks Utilities ❑ Roadways ❑ Bituminous ❑ Other(describe) Method: X Nuclear ❑ Sandcone I #of tests: Fill Source: On-site ❑ Imported Tests taken met specification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Waiting on Proctor results? Contractor notified of test results? 0 Yes O No Name of person notified: Areas Tested: ❑ Footing Slab on Grade ❑ Deck O Columns/Piers ❑ Walls O Pile Cap/Pile Fill ❑ Pavement ❑ Curb&Gutter ❑ Other(describe) No. of placements: ! Yards per placement: Method of placement: Set# Cylinder Size Air% Slump Temp Mix Supplier Spec.Strength Workorder# �'• .Z.a � ' Contractor notified of test results? O Yes O No, Name of person notified: v '.max ..x16. �..; i 3 .•ti .a� ..\ � :� 1+. M_. SLK xs5 Was everything available to test/observe? Yes ❑ No Were there any delays? (Explain below if yes) Yes O No Was a copy of this report left on site? Yes O No If so,whom was it submitted to: e Comments �r �.0 Performed By: 105.s Reviewed by: Date: This is a preliminary report and is provided solely as evidence that field observations and/or testing was performed. Observations and/or conclusions and/or recommendations conveyed in the final report may vary from,and shall take precedence,over those indicated in a preliminary report. Providing engineering and environmental soludons since 1957 BRAUN Field Compaction Tests Client: Project: _ T E�T E C Test Method:ASTM D 6938 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company BL-08-02099F PO Box 158 Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additior. Report Date: 7/22/10 8625 Rendova St NE 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project#: 90270 General Proctor Data Field Test Data Specificadonv2?esults Optimum Maximum Relative Min.Spec. Retest Test Soil Moisture Density In Place In Place Dry Probe Depth Compaction Compaction Test ID Of Date Soil ID Classification (%) (pcf) Moisture% Density(pcf) (in) (%) (%) Comments(see key) 2 7/16/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 4.7 122.3 12 97 95 A 3 7/16/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 4.6 120.7 12 96 95 A ID Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge SN Field Technician 2 Structural Fill:Interior Wall Backfill,Area C Below Grade Wall 97 1/2 Top of Slab=105 38882 Maki,Brett S 3 Structural Fill:Interior Wall Backfill,Area C Below Grade Wall 99 1/2 Top of Slab=105 38882 Maki,Brett S Key: A=Test results comply with specifications B=Test results do not comply with specifications C=Test results comply with air-voids specifications Van Abel,Josh *Tests are"Direct Transmission"(Method A)unless probe depth noted as'BS" I approve the document Jul 22 2010 Ver 3.0 Confidential and Propietary Page 1 of 1 BRAUN N T E RT EC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: August 05,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#5:Concrete Sets 1-3;(2)Sl Rpts dated 7/26,7/30/10;SS Rpt 4 dated 7/19/10 Mail w/Summary of Discrepancies REC'EIVE AUG ,02010 CI rY0F ORONO Rev:B/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN I NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/29/10 Test Method; ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005305 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: I Mix Design: 3067P Date Cast: 06/25/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 11:49 am Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 06/28/10 Specified Strength(psi): 3,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 528 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 2.4 Ticket Number: 2466747 Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Scott,Andrew P Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: ES,Building Exterior,Footing,Loading Dock Strip Footings Sample Location/Notes: west side of school Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 1-01 7/2/10 3 4 7 31,360 4.00 12.57 2,500 1 N B2 1-02 7/23/10 3 25 28 51,380 4.00 12.57 4,090 2 N E1 1-03 7/23/10 3 25 28 54,650 4.00 12.57 4,350 2 N E1 1-04 7/23/10 3 25 28 51,690 4.00 12.57 4,110 2 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. El The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture E 0 9 E 1111 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 6 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 29 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/29/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005463 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3140S2172 Date Cast: 06/29/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 1:50 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 06/30/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 3 Truck Number: 1494 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 1.9 Ticket Number: 1541094 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 76 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Kollmann,Kaleb J Liquid Added On Site: 5 LB Fiber Reinforcing(per 5.00 cu.yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Bldg#5,Conference Room North of Cafeteria Sample Location/Notes: 5'SE of NW Corner Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 2-1 7/6/10 1 6 7 44,940 4.00 12.57 3,580 3 N B2 2-2 7/27/10 1 27 28 62,670 4.00 12.57 4,990 4 N El 2-3 7/27/10 1 27 28 61,660 4.00 12.57 4,910 3 N El 24 7/27/10 1 27 28 63,260 4.00 12.57 5,030 4 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture E 0 9 S 1111 �/1/GtX TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh 1 approve the document Jul 29 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/29/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005556 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 4556P Date Cast: 06/30/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 11:39 am Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-1.0 Date Received: 07/01/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 817 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: 2469446 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Rodman,Scott W Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Foundation Wall,Loading dock walls,West side of building Sample Location/Notes: NE comer of loading dock Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 3-01 7/7/10 1 6 7 50,300 4.01 12.63 3,980 4 N B2 3-02 7/28/10 1 27 28 75,660 4.01 12.63 5,990 5 N E1 3-03 7/28/10 1 27 28 74,310 4.01 12.63 5,880 3 N El 3-04 7/28/10 1 27 28 75,980 4.01 12.63 6,020 4 N El * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. E1 The average 28 day test result meets or exceeds the specified strength. Types of Fracture .el TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 29 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page— of SIDRPT Pm i o/og BRAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of_&Iza Report No.: Date of This Report; Project Name: oject No.: V Project Address: _ LO-A4 L�O&L kjA-t.7__ Client: Client Project No.; Project Manager: Temp/Weather.- Type of Inspection; Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous El Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations. El Special Cam Periodic---...._.......................... Welding--&-Bolting-- ...........EIConcrete--Placement 0*Firdpf6ofihO ....... C1 Piles&Piers El Tendon Placement El Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes El {Listed Below) No F1 Description and location of work completed: OVA se 1--cig '0 Ole, g7 Ust tests performed; Lk R+-D' • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes E) No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes [I No� • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name. I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Interfec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmentd.whidm 9=1957 UTAKI ' ::`: �;' TT° :C;•. Report of-Ultrasonic Testing:of:Welds' Ploied �'•� ."��.�7G Report# Weld identification Material thickness X + X Weld joint AWS S. Y Welding process14t/J Quality requirements-table# A-V-*S 1lto1,A � _ Remarks C _ o 'Dedbals Discontinuity ' m Distance E 0 _ c c a o ¢ Z 5 * m E �,. m . 2-- = o e c E... : o : .... _s :_.... .. m.. ® c E a wa, cor o From From Discontinuity A B C D v, X Y Evaluation Remarks 1 e —ST AJD AwW 100,1 2 3 G�L3 4 /AG 6ILJ i 7E� S4 71 ti 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 We;the undersigned,certify that the statements in this record are correct-and that the welds were prepared and tested in accordance with.the ' requirements of Section 6,Part F of ANS!/AWS D1.1,(Zt9-��'1 Structural Welding Code—Steel. (Yew) Note: 6-form is applicable to Section 2,parts B or C(Statically and Cyclically Loaded Structures). o N D1.5 . (Section 2,Part D). •ANSI/ADSHO/AWS Bridge Wres NO Test Date '~Z " Manufacturer or,contr9dor—__T9w . Inspected by. Authorized by. Date 1r'VyG�.. err o Providing engineering and envirannwnW solutions since•1957.•.. 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard BK>� Minneapolis,MN 55429-2518 NGi'NEERS �- (763)843-0420 Fax: (763)843-0421 www.bkbm.com Orono Elementary Schools Loading Dock 765 Old Crystal Bay Road/685 Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake,MN 55358 Wold Comm.No.082082,BKBM Project Number 10217.00 July 19,2010 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION This S.I.addressed the top of steel beam elevation discrepancy between Architectural FSK 107 and Structural drawing S 1.1. 1. SHEET SIA—NOTES,FRAMING PLANS,SECTION AND DETAILS . ...................... . _.-....-.-....--.......... . PROVIDE SLAB JOINT --��►�=/S1—,1- Footing-and-Foundation.Plan,.add..plan.note.-1.2-#hat_re d '.. . _ AT(4)STEEL COLUMNS." See attached sketch,FSK1-71910. B. 2/S1.1 ' Roof Framing Plan,revise plan note#3 to read"TYPICAL TOP OF STEEL BEAM ELEVATION 116'-4 1/2" ". F.\10\102171comnpondence\si 7-19-10.doc _._............................ ...... ....... BKSM ENGINEERS. ........ ... . .......... An Equal Opportunity Employer Page_ of_ BRAUN SIDRPT Rev 10/09 I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Report No.: Date of This Report: 7.30 Project Name: AV-,. '0-&— Scams Project No.: 1E1 Dg 0 CZO Project Address: 7 Client: C lent Project No.: Project Manager: �� L/ Temp/Weather: —77905� © G Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations El Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding& Bolting B]""C-oncrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Al 4re" le Ate4,- 'QaOy- �� . Gw� ad sl�t.;� .oaF►f�a,� .� .z�� lg Gtllf�i -� Dl.�5 r 7 List tests performed: y Av'�Q ® ���� '44r0 F 6y ,*// FYI 11 r Ctjl- • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 0' • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: r Date: Print Full Name: �J ,v n I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page•____ of_ F BRAUN SIDRPT Rev 10/09 I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report I i ' City of Ovnvo Report No.. S jtJ�Ya.� \�►� Date of This Report: ala Project Name: Oroy►a e(4m m&law,. S-C1„00! Project No.: Project Address: Client: 1CtA Client Project No.: Project Manager: Jb%4,,U11%, ^,q t Temp/Weather: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: _❑.._Continuous. . ❑ Mgsonry.- ❑..R�l ar.Placement Q.Foundations _ ❑.Spec'tal.Cases... .. .. . -Panodic.. ldin 8�Boltin- . ... -h e - - -- --T _._._.... --- - g g ❑-Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Dption and location of work completed: Aq4 o 1 . V 0 reke *M. n V.0 � .: `� �•�f` f"'��•kov� F.<�'�' t.>pt�S !!S�n��,,. nle�� 4etre ��� QdC �..c' LnQrs �r owe ✓u2. ' 0.1E- �a exp<h,�, ctc =/QvpG,�' pe, A4*4, F • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. i To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: �9�� �ro�n0. I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since I957. yrs all. � .. Page-� SODIS Summa �6�4 of S ecia! !ns ection Discre ancie Items Needing Correction or Review b 'On the pes $ Project Name: t �9h engineer or Architect Projecl Address. � The following it continue in theems mast be reviewed and aAProved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or re-inspected before work can Daily Report Report No. Date Description Resolution to Date 4 1. 1 Diserepanry Corroded/ Status .. . _._. _.. ................. . --._._.-.. .- - c� - —o.n gk....._.. 1_a@e� -- ......................... Ob................. Observed by......... /..... . _... ... W� Z li �t Wh#e copy to Braun lntertec file. ,glue COPY to Contractor. i Providing ji . .. - • . �ganderevirontneri�(solvrim,�.».__ .,,,... _... BRAUN N T E RT EC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: July 19,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: RECejV City of Orono Fax: �® PO Box 66 JULCrystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 L 20'0 CITYOFORONO Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#4:Concrete Set 4;SI Rpt dated 7/6/10;SS Rpts 2-3 w/Summary of Discrepancies Mail Rev:B/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN INTTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/16/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005798 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/BS 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 4 Mix Design: 4056P Date Cast: 07/06/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 1:14 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 07/07/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 5 Truck Number: 762 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: Not Given Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 81 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 90 Cylinders Cast By: Petersen,Brian G. Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Grade Beam,Loading Dock at Door E6 Sample Location/Notes: North End Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 4-1 7/13/10 1 6 7 34,370 4.01 12.63 2,720 5 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Suter Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture 4vak TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 16 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 Page_ of_ SIDRPT Rev i 0/09 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of dfbno Report No.: Date of This Report: -7 (s t-p Project Name: Project No.: if Project Address: OQ , ,y, Q --i Client: _ Client Project No.: Project Manager: Joti� y� Temp/Weather: Q` Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding & Bolting Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: U61-16- - �dt?r ��• v I.-�.•�` A-..-- Plw- CQGC �sY \'O�''t.1� List tests performed: '*Lt 0c�� 1 OOS--A8 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ElNs❑ • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provision f the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: �*� Date: 2'(o!/6 Print Full Name: OC --so-i I.D. No.: 'G7-5B%3- 149 White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page of SIDRPT Rev t o/o9 BRAUN I NTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of VY-OVN Q Report No.: S �,W�1 e �'�v1 Date of This Report: '7 —gyp Project Name: broEUAMWINUc1.. 1 Project No.. C7",p g Project Address: Client. Client Project No.. I Project Manager: Vt't' Alk Temp/Weather: i Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: �,.....:M.„ ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑_Rebar Placement. ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases g' g `Concrete Plbti3mehf -" Firep roofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ i scripfion`and location of work completed: \�►�t�,. ��w[ c�1���°� 1b� y. o fi-�°`1 �j`L�rt o Ak.ti c.y.. (,V&a ron � � ��\lQ�" fl G.T f'Fyy�c, Codi coo/ r�RG.1Mg k2C. 3��` ewu , c.o \n \.t% skA geeyY. c�¢1 s�l•''c2 Listtmper6wed: ria e Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No �] e Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No e If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: —`d���, Date: Print Full Name: � ��bI.D.No.. White copy to Braun Jnfertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page t of SIDRPT ftv 1 o/og BRAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of a Report No.: s6Ad-,"k e4e\113 Date of This Report; -2-AS-%O Project Name, Qr Project No.: et. 0 44 Project Address. Client: kle, Client Project No.: Project Manager; "hN�v Temp/Weother: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: 0 Continuous El Masonry ❑ Rebor Placement . ❑ Foundations ' 66 ....................................................I..........- ..............❑. Special Cases........._................_...... ............ 'eiodic -K � n ncete-Plocement---- l-fireproofing------------- -------.--------- El Piles&Piers El Tendon Placement El Soils 9 Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description location of work completed: Vnp ion and a 6 3'kl V-MA6et- 'VeUt B n-4 E%-A Mk",okj A�g& vs J was eke EW e-0,0"ce)KO V-'- 0" rib uA 5 e-N w 4k\ INS t� G-" AuiawiNLa o.%- Is f1hoz &A,t, eee_wl'v J 0 Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes E] No * Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes [I No * If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance With the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current-IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Name: I.D. No.: >t 1-SL ........ ................. White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and envhwm=Wsolutions since l957. . Page 2 SIDWT2 Ray 10/03 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report j City of Oran c� r t Report No.: S1,O-W1AA%-k Ck L\ 3 t Date of This Report: i( Project Name: -ProjectNo.: BL:Q8r ©ZuQeiC Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has Information which should not be separated from this j ^ continuation) -rems roti. Co�..�y� 66 uh c'- Ayca - �ec� {vim s�l �.�- �4�.. r✓ mak,.` a1si,;�......��s�i `�ls�,3� r { To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable .workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC,except as noted above. Signed: OIJ Date: to -Print Full Name: c �,,t� �;t,,,� �,,.� I.D. No: Piz- SA+Sz. White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. --+ .. Provi& �8n+�8 and environmental soiutinns since 1957 Page BRAUN SW°'4 I NTE•RTEC Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancies Items Needing Correction or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: 510-k ( 1aMQV&,.4- Project Address: The following items must be reviewed and approved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or re-inspected before work can continue in the area. Daily Report Resolution to Date Status Report Date Description Discrepancy Corrected/ O/C i No. Observed by ..._........._.._.... . ..... .... _....._ . ............ ........................ _ .............._......_........... . . .....................................................-..........-. . _.. .. . _ - V. p\ate. �5 's White copy to Braun tntertec file. Blue copy to Contractor. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 i BRAUN I NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099F Date: July 19,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 AecZAS�® Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 V JU( 27010 c /7)'OFO Re: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions /10% Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#1:Daily Rpt dated 7/16/10;Density Test 1;Proctor P-1;SI Rpt dated 7/13/10;SS Rpt 1 Mail w/Summary of Discrepancies Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Daily Field Notes Project No.: BL-08-02099F Report No.: 1 Location: Orono Senior High School Date: July 16, 2010 Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Jamison Langdon Staff Scientist 1.S0 0.00 Areas and work performed this dayi Inspected the masonry grout along the bond beam where expansion bolts were not anchoring effectively. The scope of the inspection was limited to evaluating the condition of the grout. To do so, KA removed the faceshell of a concrete masonry unit, right next to one of the expansion bolts. The bolt was checked and found to be freely rotating when turned by hand. The condition of the masonry grout was solid and intact. The grout resisted being scraped by a steel blade and was not found to be soft nor friable. Overall, the grout appeared similar to grout used in normal construction practice. A photo of the condition as found is resented below. J Weather: Sunny, 82 F Performed By: J. Langdon Submitted To: J. Van Abel Date: 7/19/2010 Ret. 10 nb Prm idin,l� ntrd(,m irnnmcvNul���luliuns shirr 105' BRAUN Field Compaction Tests Client: Project: N T E RT E C Test Method:ASTM D 6938 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company BL-08-02099F PO Box 158 Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additior Report Date: 7/16/10 8625 Rendova St NE 795 Old Crystal Bay Road N Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project#: 90270 General Proctor Data Field Test Data Specificadons/Results Optimum Maximum Relative Min.Spec. Retest Test Soil Moisture Density In Place In Place Dry Probe Depth Compaction Compaction Test ID Of Date Soil ID Classification (%) (pcf) Moisture% Density(pcf) (in) (0/") (%) Comments(see key) 1 7/14/10 P-01 SM 9.7 126.3 7.9 115.9 12 92 95 B ID Test Location Elevation Reference Gauge SN Field Technician 1 Utility Trench Backfill:Sanitary Sewer,HS,Art Room 16'S and I OV of NE 99 1/2 FFE=100 24545 Gross,Jason L Corner Key: A=Test results comply with specifications B=Test results do not comply with specifications C=Test results comply with air-voids specifications Van Abel,Josh "Tests are"Direct Transmission"(Method A)unless probe depth noted as"BS" I approve the document Jul 16 2010 Ver 3.0 Confidential and Propietary Page 1 of 1 Moisture-Density Relationship 126 124 122 a Z C Q 0 120 118 ZAV for Sp.G._ 1161 1 I I A i 2.65 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-07el Method B Standard Oversize correction applied to final results Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI 3/8 in. No.200 SM 2.65 8.0 18.0 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 126.3 pcf Silty Sand,fine-coarse grained,brown Optimum moisture=9.7% Project No.: BL-08-02099F Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Remarks: Project: Orono HS 2010 Phase 2 Additions Orono,MN Specific Gravity was assumed. JVA Area A,Art Room Lower Level 9 Source: Sample No.:P-01 7/14/10 BRAUN" INTERTEC Page I of SIDRPT Rev t oio9 BRAUN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of 6�0'-,y Report No.: .� ��-G Date of This Report: Project Name: fih/S � Project No.: ,dam OQ Project Address: �?7j ald C Z Client: 144 Client Project No.: Project Manager. ��� �G._ / Temp/Weather: .. Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous [I Masonry - Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ]'Periodic ❑ Welding&Bolting -(Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ,Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: �JI List tests performed: Lollell -mow G"t esrct/ G✓C�..f pn/A"'Oy .Ai Its/' /dt f`r .2li4&24 s� • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No-J!T- • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Na e- I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec fife. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page I— of SIDRPT Rev to/o9 BRAUN I NTE.RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of a roma a Report No.: � .�Autsl ` Date of This Report: 7 t 1 I Project Name: 01tokn fit��+. S l Project No.: ,�1 OZo!RQ9' Project Address: -7Q g- O k a Cy�C�_ l Ac�a.ej '" Client: �<%k Client Project No.- Project Manager: Jb.1/\ MQ` Temp/Weather: Sy� ($DoE Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous Masonry_.............................. ❑__Rebar Placement.............❑. Foundations_.,,,,_„•_,,,,...,,.,,_,❑,..Special Cases..__..........__....... Periodic 1Nelding&"Baltin'g'' ❑ Concre`PlacementF'-[1-Fire`'pffiofing"` ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Q ` � 9 14 11 6�f .3bt4k- f7AU t- y.>e --,. cx..T- QV Ss. 2 t� (FAQ K) ! KQ4wk So\h ¢2k ce-Q Qi ;0%0- 4�- r St” +A-* Vs ( " 1.►p,c�� s� G4�r•� ���1�.� . �10 d��c �, 'Us ed ex n (A • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes No ❑ g�'�rh • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes No ❑ gee 10 &000y, • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. l �,,��� � S�Lg .2 To the best ot�ourhl e,work inspcted wos\done in accordance,with the approved plans,specifications and applicable $ workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: % Date: Print Full Name: _` t'',�j, I.D. No.: IyM0 q1 -W p l.N-SZ White copy to Braun lntertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engn=mg aced eravironmentul sotutioru since 1957 Page </of SIDRPTZ Rev 10/03 BRAUN i NTE RTEC Continuation of Special Inspection Daily Report City of ov-tr.o Report No.: C.&t►•C"�Mrr k Date of This Report: t T-1 O Project Name: QrOIAQ l�nSt eex�� Project No.: (SU-0,8- Note: This is a continuation of a report. The first page of this report has information which should not be separated from this Continuation) `�'e_k ��lekat rf'r��nn �icv "Jb.�1- AexAc- '! A.tt C ` 801 1UUFA (')[ha Ivy cory'&J To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of-the current IBC/UBC,except as noted above. ,Signed: Date: ?- RIO Print Full Name: A Qi(qr1V)6- „ I.D. No: . .. .................. . . . ....... . ... _........ .......... White copy to Braun lntertec file. Blue copy to Projed Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental:solutions since 1957 Page IS BRAUN SODS I NTERTEC Summary of Special Inspection Discrepancies Items Needing Correction or Review by the Design Engineer or Architect Project Name: n r0U%,& ��° �t1►.^n Project Address: The following items must be reviewed and approved by the engineer and/or corrected and/or re-inspected before work can continue in the area. Daily Report Resolution to Date status Report Date Description Discrepancy Corrected/ O/C No. Observed by CI�� � __ � ____ ---------------- _.-._.._...._.._ -. . y..,� :::::.,� ...,�..n T.�...._.� ���m�, �,�. ,._-rn-.��- _ ��: � �n„�...y� �.,� .�.. �� ��.. ........ rc>F ww.plQl�' �2a.L Ste- �etezc� mow, Aww- C. �I,� E',cq f \a K n �' ?•ttir White copy to Braun Intertec fife.'Blue copy to Contractor. Pmvi&W engineering and envirmnenW wludm since 190 BRAUN INTERTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: July 07,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#2:Concrete Set 1 Mail RECEIVE® JUL 0 8 2010 CIN OF ORONO Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 7. BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/7/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005305 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 1 Mix Design: 3067P Date Cast: 06/25/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 11:49 am Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 06/28/10 Specified Strength(psi): 3,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 4 Truck Number: 528 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 2.4 Ticket Number: 2466747 Concrete Temp.(°F):(ASTM C 1064) 74 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 73 Cylinders Cast By: Scott,Andrew P Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: ES,Building Exterior,Footing,Loading Dock Strip Footings Sample Location/Notes: west side of school Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 1-01 7/2/10 3 4 7 31,360 4.00 12.57 2,500 1 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture �vu� TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 07 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 C • Is BRAUN I NTE RTEC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: July 08,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#3:Concrete Sets 2-3 Mail RECEIVE® JUL 7 22010 C/7YOF ORONO Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 ti r BRAUN 'ftz1V'e® NTERTEC JUL 7 22010 Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/8/10 QryOp Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005463 �R�Np Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31* Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3140S2172 Date Cast: 06/29/10 Supplier: Knife River Time Cast: 1:50 pm Specified Air(%): Not Required Date Received: 06/30/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM 0143) 3 Truck Number: 1494 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 1.9 Ticket Number: 1541094 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 76 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 70 Cylinders Cast By: Kollmann,Kaleb J Liquid Added On Site: 5 LB Fiber Reinforcing(per 5.00 cu.yds.) Placement Location: Building Interior,Slab on Grade,Bldg#5,Conference Room North of Cafeteria Sample Location/Notes: 5'SE of NW Comer Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 2-1 7/6/10 1 6 7 44,940 4.00 12.57 3,580 3 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 **Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture tlak TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 08 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I NTERTEC Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinder Report Date: 7/8/10 Test Method: ASTM C39,4x8 Cylinder LIMS WO#: 1005556 Client: Chad Rettke Project: BL-08-02099E Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Orono IS/ES 2010 Phase 2 Additions PO Box 158 685-765 Old Crystal Bay Road N 8625 Rendova St NE,Midwest Division Orono,MN 55356 Circle Pines,MN 55014-0158 Client Project: 90271 Field Test Conditions and Results ASTM C31 Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 4556P Date Cast: 06/30/10 Supplier: Cemstone Time Cast: 11:39 am Specified Air(%): 6.0+/-1.0 Date Received: 07/01/10 Specified Strength(psi): 4,000 Measured Slump(in.):(ASTM C143) 5 1/4 Truck Number: 817 Measured Air(%): (ASTM C231) 5.2 Ticket Number: 2469446 Concrete Temp.(°F): (ASTM C 1064) 75 Cylinders per Set: 5 Air Temp. (°F): 78 Cylinders Cast By: Rodman,Scott W Liquid Added On Site: None Placement Location: Building Exterior,Foundation Wall,Loading dock walls,West side of building Sample Location/Notes: NE corner of loading dock Compression Test Results Field Lab Test Max. Cylinder Cylinder Break Cure Cure Age Load Diameter Area Strength Fracture Capping Remarks Sample No. Date (days) (days) (days) (pounds) (in.) (sq.in.) (psi) Type Method** Code(s) 3-01 7/7/10 1 6 7 50,300 4.01 12.63 3,980 4 N B2 * Concrete sampled in accordance with ASTM C172 "Capping Method:N=ASTM C1231, Unbonded Caps S=ASTM C617,Sulfur Caps Break Remarks: B2 The 7 day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at 28 days according to a typical age-strength relationship. Types of Fracture 4'tI1.�b TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6 Van Abel,Josh I approve the document Jul 08 2010 ver 1.3c Page 1 of 1 BRAUN I N T E IST EC Letter of Transmittal Client: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Braun Intertec Project No:BL-08-02099E Date: July 02,2010 Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Ave.S. Minneapolis,MN 55438 To: Lyle Oman Phone: City of Orono Fax: PO Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Re: Orono IVES 2010 Phase 2 Additions Information Sent Delivery Method Transmittal#1:Daily Rpt dated 6/2/10;(8)SI Rpts dated 6/21-6/30/10;SS Rpt 1 w/Summary of Mail Discrepancies necelvan JUL 0 6 Z010 CrIvOFORoNO Rev:8/6/04 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUN DAILY OBSERVATION REPORT NTE BTEC Project c BL-08-02099'C Report#: Location: Myrtle G.Schumann Elementary School Date: June 2, 2010 Personnel Classification Regular Hours Overtime Hours Bryan Field Staff Engineer Areas and work performed this day: Requested by Kraus Anderson to perform a soil evaluation for a utility trench located in the electrical room of the Myrtle G.Schumann Elementary School. Upon arrival,the slab-on-grade was saw cut and soil was removed in the trench down approximately 2 feet from the top-of-slab elevation.The soil removed from the trench was stock piled adjacent to the trench.The stockpiled soil was visually classified as a dark gray to dark brown lean clay in a saturated to over saturated state.Two hand auger probes were performed to depths of 3 feet below the trench bottom. Below the couple inches of oversaturated"slop"clay,the soils consisted of gray lean clay that was judged to have a consistency of medium to rather stiff based on the turning resistance of the hand auger and considered suitable for slab and electrical utility trench backfill support. After performing the hand auger probes and the visual classification of the stockpiled soil,it was recommended that the remaining"slop"be removed from the trench and a clear rock placed to form a stable working platform for the utility crew. In its existing condition,the stockpiled soil from the trench was over saturated and appears unsuitable for use as a backfill material. It was recommended a suitable material that can be compacted be imported and used as trench backfill in-lieu of the stockpiled soil. Weather: Mostly Cloudy—60's Performed By: Bryan Field Submitted To: Brandon Larkin(Kraus Anderson) c: frm\daily obser rev form Page l of-L SIDRPT Rev to/o9 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ORZWO Report No.: Date of This Report: QZ1•[k) Project Name: Oa... j&a . SeA400J gAW Z"0., Project No.: a, Lo— 0 7.0171 E- Project Address: 04406,1Z Awn Onh GQ.t/SrR '&�K 2D. Client: Client Project No.: Project Manager: T,YA^r A ez- Temp/Weather: P49:E l 0-0"O Z ro 901-F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement f g-50ils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: A2aav6o dow-Sirf- 45 Rme-esma Aw- I iuos /�N06RSo��-U 06WW—&, .w 1QnNl � �n (AAh4^SMtOAT£Q Q&*AtSrn&M-% bUe,,w.fC Fxc.A,J-*-TUJ1 DEGA1lS on/ 101$�ifrrrrnlS VO [ 67 -fpr m 1,.JML� List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provision the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: ��Zt 1W Print Full Name: �� I.D. No.: OOGs--x White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page—L of SIDRPT Rev i o/09 BRAUN I RITE BTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of my'jo Report No.: Date of This Report: �01221[O Project Name: ,,,t. L, A4AW Z,4W, Project No.: (3Laf3�_p 2099 J` Project Address: o&O dw y 17 0 DLO GP.USwft eD- Client: Client Project No.: Project Manager: '�'�Y'W kstz Temp/Weather: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ca Periodic ❑ Welding& Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement (Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: AiL be6Q onf—SI A 2%44&%nW PC2 ui?Au c�„to G�nC -ro oPaw-Am Fy4 r- i l Rmw-a.t �1L Aat�v eF emmAjG CoR00% Dhow—Rm614 S , Due To Ai F,&W PM F. fr F Wftt)ould A=A VMQA[ d&SWXMM tW POST—pbu6J . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No cQ� • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions f the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: �,�� f(O Print Full Name: t I.D. No.: VO&SK White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page_ of SIDRPT Rev ioiog BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of OROAra Report No.: Date of This Report: G/Z3/to Project Name: OgwjcOt,&4, SCOent_.pllA,sbEZ40p, Project No.: j3Lp8—dao"!°�E. Project Address: d(4$4 wy 12_q^,o OLO 59,,tSTA%,8&, RD , Client: — le—A. Client Project No.: Project Manager: T.y/j A Qom, Temp/Weather: ppp�t yCevu()y 'r-v i.�0°� Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations if� Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing NEtatitLP�e,E� ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement CE!!�,Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Amgaa ori—srrr— fro PEQ4:iM _U-CeA ATL4d O/331ZAda-rtoa34S 4T- P&POSCJ AI&A)&)AAwe, bocw— Fa�nLJQS- ODSmwea MoO0Kd!F,,Ly &o&A4c-MQ Au_ AdftEgLOIC 4C 1 . 141Tlf 1a A&A$60 LAOS" DaCr—R101fl L4A�tT: 15.tALWAnE n w irm gasto Au4F-2 PaAkc-15 &a Qv-4--A—ml C- CONENE,t E2S . T�P�IewOS a+F I�EPaw.e;T1YL (.ol�rD 1�J G �ot�G S. tTOM S f!C'�tE26o t�J�/4/)L�erLowi fit.L 70 CZ&qrE A-4 AC9GS'% 12AMP 1E_fwlcr K- x WC Plt.ES�. "PAAtealpe-0 ApotnaA1AZ al SwoAnsoI of a tMeme—tainvayu G 12oGL acma&l&naml.Agree- 2-,Ao.cA-t-AffZSS PSP HNA Attie.TO 19b J!10T 49 N cp6TE PIA4Q4�. Us� O: 06 sM►C., OF IkLAcsft_ PUAM-S Ar 5 r;o &,,►I LecaTzeNS O&ACM_Pim T WAS rkO& TO 6 lAt &A ssft—1-tC &MO AJCE w 4-9 AbTsg-5?FuFtVA7W9S 40 4at4AGL'e h wS- • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No �--- • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No 92!� • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: (L� Date: —Oh 3/10 Print Full Name: W—"� I.D. No.: 0b6S$ White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions s*mce1957 Helical Anchor Record BRAUN" Job Name oho YAWAKE Z AaD, Job Number BL-08-02099E Observed by " S�- INTERTEC Date vl23lto Lead Section Length ON feet tip to pin Contractor Arg Specified Gauge 1,700 psi Equipment P.-o8C* -r T-ZSo gal dtoco TVW&wE, W&V> Pressure Anchor Type I Sp, SO4pt 12 u toy je TIS Length of Length of Shaft Shaft Start Cut-off above below cut Tip Maximum Grout Anchor Date Time End time Shaft 1 Shaft 2 Shaft 3 Shaft 4 Shaft 5 Elevation cut-off off Elevation Pressure Added Comments (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) I (psi) I (gal) I 't �i Z3 l0 9 45 lc�'•o' �O'O" nob" tU'O" -�� 1�t7ye .�.S�t y�e�*1Z .��t®� Z�n � pf:e =lo•i�Q4 10-4600, .F`. r- X70" 2. 1 CJ/10 td-0- 5 0- S'"Dy too-3.. �iOp Fes -104 t ►• 3 623 to 9'-ZS f-O" W-o" 1d-o" &W=3 3u t � " 55'-4of lfto F 5 FIFIS L L04'-O" to-tscw- 9 LO, 9�� 11,45 to'-o` �o'-o`� co=o . LOL6" .0- tan'-31` 9•�� =z'1�' 56=.72' 1goo � FF>" toLILO" Page I of L SIDRPT Rev t 0/09 BRAUN I NTE BTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of 094AA0 Report No.: Date of This Report: Project Name: OROAtO&&,1_ -SCMWLQ&1A%&Z¢pp, Project No.: (3Go8--oZc �q Project Address: 0c4p NW y I Z A*+n 0G4 rA j4nV gay � v Client: —k-.A- Client Project No.: Project Manager: T• YA4 Aad Temp/Weather: 5'wyA.A/ra 80 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: K-Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding &Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement CO.Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: _&EtMA0 dSSpgU14T � of 6%CAJA.,GQ 'OTtlC4 Pa "VL-S 4r lamN,J r, "ca_Aeff9 . 41awie Aaam...2 fk-4r=5 .4n V1suat-wao-vanAo-5 a szr-- use- ft ptc-'-p r u c A(u OFffice 56IC. of-CIO I 'M C105R6Le,C105E. Qo of &I r'dcwLltrtlf PA-%P En;5. P. 5.0. carotar—ae fa nac. wr- Sof:rJWe-r Som,& IjMecu�n� 40DWe '� � �x��tnsc. � . v�Citc�_ �cicFitLSol�g . tZI'�So►tr,4lisci�sel�� Gtr �o�>� ��rC: 31'z`A-�r Phmp nj*.Aea+ ,�uiD AO1 wc-Si kr-SyoP F2. A64) wirm= 5utnwi: sw3-eeAte SetcS awE &i qs - rte -peed: &WEO EG L&, C. QtW4 0,JEEZ—2 hu.. M. rV.WW— .em omm"J 3- 'd LI rr5 e V�R�/ l�,�f?ae�n2_ . i?�ttw>7� of= FaonNG 6Ycaawrru� ..5 Su�,�al5t.� F•2 �,cPW2�e�• Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No-Bk • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ Nq�5< • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provis' ns of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: (JZibe Print Full Name: 4 I.D. No.: pOGsg White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 BRAUNDescription: OZONO 64AMM. 4t-+OCX— 'pOAIC Z 40"1 L7 OA 9 NTE BTEC t,40"N-r` mac" Project No: l3 t 0r 0 7-049 F,— Date: tP/tc lD BY: � ! • � � LV iZ� w ' �r M ' F�C►�r � G-eMV�'t� _ .. B SIO G bJ t- ,; � _ q4 41 aim 3. ' , I i iglt' i j PS � ' - - - i t {. 1 , nn 2 03 � ' ' 0�-6'" `� � � ; �Icv3*rA'TI,d.I �?it�b�� di'; ►L� �N/�A•'Tlodl� CL� ��'!6a/L fir; r i 1 AM Alj 10 - o-s_ 5ioP eJ ' t'!O 'C' 5 -Providinti'ng a�1 o etas st �195`Ifs✓ i 5WA& -O' AlnrctPAMOS ero teAa S. Adhesive Anchors Inspection Checklist for Concrete & Masonry Special Inspection shall be in compliance with Section 1701 of the UBC and Section 1704 of the IBC as describerd below. (See Structural Drawings for Inspection requirements) CODES Project Name: 09040 $cwcut_ ?W4sire L i4to, OUBC 1997 BRAUN O —-- IBC 2000 nn-- O IBC 2003 I N T E RT E C Weather: I� Air Temperature: 'C) 4kI8C Zoos Product Name/Manufacturer. 044L" Y JSV M4X Lot No.: Wo 0(af 767 ICC-ES Report No.: A—U O 1 3 57 9— 1O0-z4,5,0__ Adhesive expiration Date:,0_t/0_&/2W ❑ Specified Dispenser a�Specified Mixer Discard Initial Adhesive: 3 (#trigger pulls) Adhesive Tempature: f!"O°F (°F/°C) Gel Time: 5! ill Cure Time: 30Mt� (per manufacturers unstapation instructions) Type: ❑All-Thread ❑ Internally Threaded ❑ Torque-Controlled 'Rebar ❑ Other Material: 4q Standard ❑ Stainless Steel ❑ High Strength Steel Grade/Coating: (CO Length: VArt1r-S (irVrtyN Rod Diameter ❑ 3/8" 111/2* ❑ 5/8" ❑3/4" ❑ 7/8" ❑ 1" ❑ 1 1/4" Rebar. ❑ #3 :K#4 X#5 ❑ #6 ❑ #7 ❑ #8 ❑ #9 ❑ #10. ❑ #11 ❑Others Base Material Type: ;&M Concrete ❑ LW Concrete ❑ Brick ❑ CMU ❑other Base Material Strength: ❑ 2000psi ❑3000psi ❑ 4000psi ❑Other U49&aw� Base Material Thickness. WA (in/mm) Base Material Ternporature: 1o*F (°F/°C) N / k Drip Bit Diameter. S 8 (ttthrxrt) Hole Depth: 1Prf (irt/nrn) (core bit chmneter.if approved) Drill Bit Type: Carbide-Tip Drip Blt ❑ Diamond Core Bit ❑Other - (ANSI 8212.15-19" of apipmpdata and ak w 4 Hole Condition: dR.pry ❑ Water Saturated ❑ Water Filled ❑ Under Water Hole Cleaning: Wornprossed Air ❑ Hand Pymp Owitre Brush ❑ Nylon Brush ❑ Other Hole cleaning in accordance with manufacturers' printed installation insUWIons: SKYes ❑ No Anchor Application: (please dneck as that appy ❑ Tension ❑Shear ❑ova-head ❑ Other Anchor insertion: 0 Twisting motion ❑Annular gap filled with adhesive ❑Air Void Free Injection Anchor Spacing: G ' 2a°/_� ) Edge Distance: Qn1mm) Embedment (hef): r in/mrn) Installation Torque(d requinxQ:_W_(ft-IbMm) Completed by: (Signature) Date: VanN0092W7 Page_ of— SIDRPT Rev io/og BRAUN I NTE BTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Report No.: �� Z"" A"'l Date of This Report: Project Name: Qia++t7 �, Project No.: Project Address: Client: /� Client Project No.: Project Manager: � �� / Temp/Weather: 3" 04 r Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ,,O�Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Special Cases 1..1;ylPeriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing '00"07 ❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: List tests performed: D d • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No-49--' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No ❑ • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: Print Full Na I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page—L of SIDRPT Rev i oio9 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Oho Report No.: Date of This Report: 44.51 to Project Name: b Ft&..t. SCMOCLP&LProject No.: B y 9-6 Z0CM I- Project Address: n�14w!;e fZ Atw5 Qt p��_ 2 f3a� b_ Client: LA. Client Project No.: Project Manager: T. VA0 A&I--- Temp/Weather: FARnXCU ILL ZO Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases (weeriodic ❑ Welding & Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement AKSoils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: 19�4–t&gc- GN6 P&yet'Rsxsyc _ CD.C-A ts-sr&CJER-: P62P 04 J;kDeZr '5�4,�a 6p) P–CAU45 A d5 ,P AQVA,•c� Fit &At Sat L-Cee2fe.�&n AaM.:' 0 94- D.C. =JA tCATE-5 Mh&E Qe.••.P 160 �PoP-7– &c– & _gAeE&r S S.rrMcx�c�_ Aim t 5eq-t Aaaei l Anew &e= 6&s& foie- An tfieWyl'(- 6X—MtlAn, ( ObS�u,4�rr�,s List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No.25, • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No CR- • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provision of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: 96KI r0 Print Full Name: I.D. No.: COW White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page L of SIDRPT Rev 1 o/09 BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of &&AID Report No.: Date of This Report: rha Project Name: 04,40 Z rf. &—tfi —kqnae Z Aw. Project No.: Project Address: 640/A V l 1 Z"a OGD C2ySr& RD Client: KA, Client Project No.: Project Manager: X. VASO A&Z Temp/Weather: to 5:5fc Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations Special Cases '`Periodic ❑ Welding& Bolting ❑ Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing �c�rr2�-eq2 ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement OSoils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description.and location of work completed: -06%6ZO60 7:A15TAU,47tdW �Po X� l' _�iA+2 F�at,JFo2cE.Ml T Rot &Rm&—iw �D At4o Piz UNmnaA/Leh" . X�e OE-6 2.RiS rcaW 0135&2066 id t -4S7W!n &br,• rVAAt An,,d yt"I4t.LS /.J&ZF—Fc+una ms 86 wkmwim ,/-ceym&=w,yA* Pmmcr- Anse cps&/A,taticamc.m e.Es Sous_ FbX�l P.�3,a2 ►s c.47w,�o+'s5c-auso t/tj / dAf2t�Amu— Afeeuuza 5gggW TyawN off— Onw?.MEnjoo 7o awrALJ IEAe y Ml QuU1 w CA.Vfr�/�70 tletDS i,.r 'Frtc�Baaerc. Imre�o,e d,2�PwEE r�jrw �,��s2trx. .9vn E.at•ll•WAtG. 6 S t LYsftEStS.Ior21#errned: � �•� �Z�. Si,/3�GR.t>i�.Jule cwrSlNnwC r /QErte�ts�L�7b�Cr"� A,vy �-0!�� /�lti atll-arzE rauaa-m &ey S-aiUsydC ACeapawm W em Aancr Sor.,xL� . • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ N • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ NcCE— • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provision of he current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: - �v Print Full Name: I.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page_ of_ SIDRPT ' BRAUN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of ng-On 0 Report No.: Date of This Report: Project Name: cy r.""n m 5 hF S /h .7�ts z, Project No.: iDL - C 0-.-2 C) 9 9"E Project Address: Client: Client Project No.: Weather: 6 GP.t,"- Temperature: -9 Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry R Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases Periodic ❑ Welding& Bolting 9 Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (Listed Below) No ❑ Description and location of work completed: Q l" m may- & ,�o,� t pc' �03 ., wol.11s 1 "A.O/ 10" Wets i-skbm. 1r-% car cconA p sica , w,7A►, P64114' 00121P act's cU y, O%e4 �„is /u,u.,eele.- leJtk!S SOMM 10 -A 46W ��• �y csr� uso�, List tests performed: Sli''''Tt /�{�r G� Syyn�Q t G V�sr,� c� (on too s55C-v �ge.� 3 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No Lez • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC/UBC,except as noted above. ,7 Signed: �!/ /%` Date: Print Full Name: �� aI.D. No.: White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 't i Page_• of i SIDRPT kev t o/o9 BRAUN . I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of_ Or NMID Report No.:. 56W61-t--( %,I `*I Date of This Report: (-.xy�t I Project Name; bt, , Sa,, Project No.: ,. .- gL u59 oZog4t I Project Address: j Client: ` Client Project No.: Project Manager: ( lw-� Temp/Weather: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement. .. ❑ Foundations. ❑ Special..Cases .. - Periodic'- ... ._................_.......... .. .Weitli'n" &Boltm _. ❑. _p _.... 8............_._._.._....__..........- -.. .._._._..__.._._ ..........,.__:..... .._. g g ❑-�"Contrefe Placement"`�" `Fire roofin �❑ Piles&Piers ❑ Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes ❑ (listed Below) No ❑ -Description and location off work completed: �A�,w._[�Nc���"tfll�L—(X, Guf✓`,�•o/ Ay;26. 4gsl�' s lac Akto 00211111-- I A t,,X.'�b 3 s��:,��t�4 �'\�llL� t►�� c�,� ����" �lli,� 1 @lc�ro,-. __ �xri�dlnr� E1J�� �C-� 1.b'd�� �V�.R��1HQ� �• List tests performed: 1 R • Are there any discrepancies noted from this da/s observations? Yes No ❑ le +�►'1 • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes L_� No ❑ 4(UJo l&toaV4.,1V, 8wleyq • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. .fig• C R.�cgee,�t To thefttrr knowled ,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable -workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. Signed: Date: -- Cn^z��-to Print Full Name: �k��� �,�?�t � I.D.No.. White copy to Braun Irdertec file. Yellow copy to Project Site Representative. Providing engineering and envirmnenud solutions since 1957 O:tono Ejem/Intermediatc School Page 1 of 1 E Orono Elam/intermediate School Quentin Odes [godes@bkbm.com] Y Sent: Thursday ,June17,2010 4:55 PM :.. X To: Larkin,Brandon Cc: krussell@bkbm.com Bzrandon, .Belcw is a summary.of our phone conversation. Concerning the two items we discussed: 1) In Area.E, the W8x13 spliced beams over the corridor for piping support that have been trimmed and are now approximately 2 inches short may be modified by welding an L.2x2x3/8"angle,6 inches long, perpendicular to the two existing beam bearing angles. Looking down at the beam,the end connection should create a"T"shape. Weld vertical and horizontal legs of the existing angles to the vertical leg of the new 6 inch long angle with 3/16"fillet weld. .. .........._..._..2.)......In..Aroa E,_atjhe w.estem end.D..fthe..corddor.nearest..the..1.990..pool..addition,..it..is.structurally............................... .............. acceptable to support the new piping supports from the flange of the existing W27 beam supporting second floor to. Per our conversation, the new piping supports carry(6)4 inch diameter pipes. Please let,me know if you have any questions or need further clarifications. 'Thanks, Quentin Odes,EiT Design Engineer BKBM Engineers 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 Direct: 763-843-0440 Maim.763-843-0420 Fax: 763-843-0421 E-Mail: ciodes bkbm.*c0'Mf,, Neb: www.bkbm.com The information contained in this email, including any attachments, is privileged, confidential and intended solely for the use.of the addressee(s).:if you received this information In error,any retention, review, use, dissemination, distribution or.copying of this communication or the Information contained is prohibited and may subject you to i -criminal or-'IW.•penaltles. .lf.yo.u.have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email then d pi elete all;electronic coes and destroy any printed copies. M1 p w https://mail.lQausanderson.com/owa/?&e=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABvJ5BVZWG... 6/22/2010 `i