Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-16-2018 Planning Commission Packet PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE JantAita/ I(p oZ�� F ❑ COUNCIL Ii PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. 0u c' tiOL1 STiZyv`-‘ a\5C- ( j 2. /27,/a ,o?`/L l L021 3. ,A(L-�' Ce i$l(0 i(BILA- R i ipw i ZA0- 4. i' Ad/4-)71)(47- ZZ-7 2-14 C.4: Lti, 5. C , ,-\_,?-Q,b" lel (.,Q`'S Z ? 1 Zv t(/ IPC/ / (f) 6. -:( ' 1 /300 &Zra-e4-A 7f, (!„ 7. /2,/ (;)(C 6 3r44.,4- 8. t� �-P rk <<;.,� 3 (2,-1 1 ,10 Chi S 9. --711�c �-�a ��- `S6 3 5 ( , 10. ( 6\7(-1( 1'-r`efeJc 3(SS CAsco 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC AGENDA City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for TUESDAY, January 16, 2018; 6:30 PM Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /www.ci.orono.mn.us Council Representative: Richard Crosby Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet— located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. New Business 1. Approval of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 12, 2017. 2. 17-3983 Eric& Liz Vogstrom, 2618 Casco Point Road, Right-of-Way Vacation (Staff: Laura Oakden) 3. 18-3992 Revolution Design Build on behalf of Kevin & Patty Kretsch, 3155 Casco Point Road, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 4. 18-3993 Michael Hayes on behalf of Weldon & Marcia Gilbertson, 684 Tonkawa Road, Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 5. 18-3994 David Knaeble, 3635 Togo Road, Preliminary Plat (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. 18-3997 Rehkamp Larson on behalf of George Halvorson, 1300 Bracketts Point Road, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 7. 18-4000 Jeff Martineau on behalf of Barbara Garcia, 1335 Arbor Street, Variances (Staff: Laura Oakden) 8. 18-4002 John Patch, 2745 Kelley Parkway, Concept (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 9. Update on City Council meeting: November 27, 2017 and December 11, 2017. 10. Planning Commission Liaison for February 12, 2018 Council Meeting: John Thiesse 11. Other issues for discussion. Planning Commission Comments ADJOURNMENT Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notifications ii3e L' <S 3 la OIrk Ave NI i u ° * t.ake Of(5F no 18-4002 Long tz i „ x ti c 0A 0 ilL aeM�N�; Is1ntIjr � fSHO*to I }rOio -i 44, i o - . i — may n i ,. : r *� AGENDA G ,��+ ',li•ay City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for -i+, r 'il `� ...r, TUESDAY, January 16, 2018; 6:30 PM ar. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, `,,,, � mob Orono, MN 55356 i �' 2hflunim 952-249-4600 /www.ci.orono.mn.us _ I. Council Representative: Richard Crosby ri to ,.„'r ! New Business ir 8-3993 o ' ` ' 1. Approval of Planning '' - 1 Commission Meeting Minutes of % It County Road 151 est Branch Rd '# n November 12, 2017. y r, v `” s 2. 17-3983 Eric& Liz Vogstrom, o a 6� lantzger 1 2618 Casco Point Road, z 151 a FrtrKtt * to° Right-of-Way Vacation a.farest y Lake . I (Staff: Laura Oakden) I LQIt i 3. 18-3992 Revolution Design Build on ` -*..,,,4,'k' 84000 #18.3997 . _'''a.•... = �hsr 8-3998 i 3155 Casco Point Road, ' �yi,� - hay i Variance (Staff: Laura Oakden) 4. 18-3993 Michael Hayes on behalf of j, ...as st, ; y j 4'. = Weldon & Marcia Gilbertson, } f,Ic�ai+,� a�4`.44 !Li 684 Tonkawa Road, Variance a li,.. .. i .�``* *,+*'�*44,r#• 5. 18-3994 Dav d Knaebl aff: Laura Oakden) f.+,„ a�.. �.,,.. �• , 1*moi 3635 Togo Road, Preliminary • r. i< Plat (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Lynwood Blvd- � iN � # $-3994 € 6. 18-3997 Rehkamp Larson on behalf of -_. , idiSpr�t� Pdi et htti�netonka 8e:�clI �r George Halvorson, ,� sn,,te,;n "j• 1300 Bracketts Point Road, tarrgden �`�;' �, ,1p ini1�U rS a Variances c ♦i ,�� (Staff: Melanie Curtis) o • ,., '�i • «7u.-4-O-'es68 t, v 417-3983 / i 1 , I I , ` I, Mica �`‘g1vd �'=a le '� [Ctaff Icrcmv o ._ _ • ex`t� l# `k. �i 7 18-4000 Jeff Martineau on behalf of i ,r "1. 1/ Barbara Garcia, �f "� *, 1335 Arbor Street, Variances • `.' .. • 4,,� #18-3992 '� 'rn�...�.. wmud% (Staff: Laura Oakden) * %re/ ** : x g /9'. 18-4002 John Patch, 0 �, �-4. j a 2745 Kelley Parkway, Concept i (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a 0mmil 2 240 Feet /� BOLTON survey riand is notm ionintendedo tobe used as one.This drawing is a of records,information,and data & M E N K located in various city,county,and state offices,and other sources affecting the area shown,and is to be used for CD Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 1/12/2018 9:26 AM reference purposes only.The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Real People.Real Solutions. 0 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse,Commissioners Kevin Landgraver,Bruce Lemke,Chad Olson,and Loren Schoenzeit. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart,City Planners Melanie Curtis and Laura Oakden,and Recorder Jackie Young. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.,followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16,2017 Landgraver moved,Lemke seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of October 16,2017,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 2. #17-3979 KIMBERLY AND STEVE SCHOTTLER,2740 SHADYWOOD ROAD,AFTER- THE-FACT VARIANCES,6:35 P.M.—7:05 P.M. Steve Schottler,Applicant,was present. Curtis stated the applicants purchased the property in August of 2016. In September of 2016,the City issued a stop work notice for unpermitted construction of a new screen porch on the lake side of the home. A follow-up inspection in July of 2017 showed that the porch had not been removed and no permit or variance applications had been submitted. The applicants have now submitted a variance application in October. The screen porch was constructed in the place of a smaller 26-foot wide second-story deck which extended 11 feet from the house toward the lake. An 11.6' x 11.6' deck was built where that portion of the existing deck was located on the southeast side of the residence. Next to that a new 25.6' x 31.5' roofed screen porch now extends 31.5 feet toward the lake,which is 20 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and approximately two feet into the 75-foot setback. Staff finds no practical difficulties supporting hardcover and structural encroachments into the 75-foot setback. In addition,the screen porch could be redesigned to provide for that same outdoor living space within the permitted setback areas. Although the project is supported by the neighbors, Staff does not identify sufficient practical difficulties supporting the substantial average lakeshore setback encroachment. If the Planning Commission identifies practical difficulties support the new screen porch encroachment lakeward of the average lakeshore setback,a motion for approval would be appropriate. If the Planning Commission recommends approval,the comments from the building official should be taken into consideration. Staff recommends denial of the 75-foot setback and hardcover encroachment since neither are supported by practical difficulties. Curtis displayed photographs of the screen porch and yard. Page 1 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver asked for clarification on the timeline. Curtis indicated the screen porch was built sometime after the applicants purchased the property in August of 2016. Some other construction was going on at the property,which consisted of a fence. Following installation of the fence,a stop work order was issued on the screen porch. Curtis indicated she is not sure what type of communication went on between the applicant and the inspector. Staff met this fall with the homeowner and walked through the process and the applicant subsequently applied for a variance. Lemke asked whether the design of the screen porch meets all of the City's requirements. Curtis stated that is unknown at this time and that the comments from the inspector indicate that footing inspections would need to be conducted as well as a review of the structural components of the porch. Curtis stated that process would start with the applicant submitting building plans. Steve Schottler,Applicant,stated they are new citizens to the Orono. Schottler noted he currently is a stay-at-home dad but that he previously worked for a real estate company and appeared before various planning commissions. Schottler stated he understands how important the process is and that he is here to ask for an after-the-fact variance for the porch. Schottler stated in their view this is a unique property because there is a long channel that connects into a cove located on one side of the property,which creates a practical difficulty as it relates to the lakeside setbacks. Schottler stated he was able to meet with four of his neighbors. The neighbor to the right has a deck that is 65 feet from the cove,another neighbor on the right has a deck that is 95 feet from the main lake,and then the other two neighbors have decks that are 85 and 75 feet to the lake. Schottler noted his house to the main portion of the lake is 144 feet. Schottler stated part of the problem lies with the fact that the City's measurements are based on the high water level. Schottler stated when he measured it from the water's edge,it was over 75 feet. The area where the measurement was taken is the former boathouse area of the previous owner. Schottler stated it is actually a manmade inlet just for the boathouse,and that if you measure it out to where the rest of the cove is,it is approximately 102 feet. The house sits back 144 feet back from the main lake and a little over 75 feet from the edge of the water to the boathouse. Schottler stated in their view they are using the land in a reasonable manner and not asking for anything out of the ordinary. Schottler stated the reason for the variance is the cove since the cove creates a special condition and is peculiar to this property and the immediately adjoining property. The condition this cove presents does not apply to many other structures in the district. Schottler displayed a photograph depicting the view from the porch to the property located at 2730 Shadywood Road. Schottler noted from their deck and back yard,those neighbors are unable to see into the back yard. The neighbor on the other side is also unable to see the porch since there is dense foliage between the two properties. Schottler displayed some photographs depicting the cove from the edge of the porch. Measuring from the water's edge of the cove, it is a little over 75 feet and approximately 144 feet to the main body of water. Page 2 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schottler stated they wanted to work with their neighbors and the City and it is unfortunate that the variance is being requested after the fact. Schottler indicated they wanted to build something that went with the rest of the neighborhood and that they want to follow the rules. Schottler stated in their view the porch not only adds to their property but to the area. Landgraver asked when they started the project. Schottler indicated they have worked in the past with contractors where they have gotten the permits and in this case they worked with somebody who said they would take care of everything. Schottler indicated they were traveling,and when they came back,there was a stop work order. Schottler indicated he has not heard from the contractor again and that there currently is no electrical in the porch as well as some soffits that need to be completed. Schottler stated he was told obtaining the variance is the first step and that they are willing to redo things to make sure everything is done correctly. Thiesse asked who the contractor was. Schottler indicated it was Duane Fredrickson of Master Carpentry and that he will not respond to his phone calls. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. Lemke stated the question is whether the porch would have been approved if the correct process had been followed. Thiesse stated in his view the fact that the neighbors are not opposed to the project has some bearing on the application given the intent of the average lakeshore setback,which is to protect the neighbors' view. Thiesse stated the cove effectively makes the area a peninsula and that the City has typically granted variances to properties located on peninsulas in the past. Landgraver stated he is not so sure the screen porch would have been approved originally. Thiesse noted they are also dealing with something that is manmade. Landgraver stated in his view there are some extenuating circumstances for the 75-foot setback variance, which leaves the average lakeshore setback. Landgraver pointed out there is starting to be some creep closer to the lake. Thiesse stated he would not argue with that but in his view the 75-foot mark is the actual setback they should be looking at and that the average lakeshore setback is based on the neighbors and the views. Thiesse stated while everybody wants their views protected,this project does not impact anyone's views. Olson noted if the cove was not there,this would not be as much of an issue. Page 3 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated it is not bothering anybody's average lakeshore setback. Schoenzeit noted the footings have not been inspected,and if they knew the footings have to be replaced,it should not be allowed to go back in. If the footings are not in concrete or rebar and they have to replace them,then it becomes a problem. Schoenzeit noted they have not heard from the building inspector on whether the members are the right size,and that if it needs disassembly to meet code,he is not comfortable with the location. Thiesse stated if it meets all the requirements of the building official,it could be approved if the Planning Commission finds the location acceptable. Curtis stated structurally the building can be shored up to make it work and that the Planning Commission should not base their approval on whether it is structurally sound. Curtis stated if it is approved in this location,the building inspector has indicated they can make it work structurally. Schoenzeit stated if it has to be torn down to meet code,it should be considered a clean sheet,and that a practical difficulty could be the fact that it already exists. Curtis stated they need to look at it as though it is not there and that the practical difficulty cannot be that it is already built. Schoenzeit stated if it is not there,it would not be allowed to cross the yellow line. Barnhart pointed out the property owners cannot create the practical difficulty. Curtis stated according to the building inspector,the structure can be shortened to meet the 75-foot setback. Thiesse stated he cannot vote for a motion requiring someone to cut four feet off of their porch and that they can make the porch structurally sound if it is lacking something. Thiesse commented it is the cove that is manmade that has created a practical difficulty. Landgraver stated he is disappointed that something was built and that they are now dealing with it after the fact. Landgraver indicated he would be willing to grant a variance to the 75-foot variance since it is already built but that he has an issue with the average lakeshore setback. Landgraver stated he is not sure the Planning Commission would have approved it that far past the average lakeshore setback line. Thiesse stated he tends to lean toward approval since the neighbors are in favor of it and that in his view the average lakeshore setback is something that can be manipulated depending on the circumstances. Thiesse noted the neighbor to the north is already 65 feet from the cove and that he cannot go any closer. Lemke commented he sees it both ways and that the Planning Commission likely would have approved the average lakeshore setback because it seems to be a reasonable addition to the house. Thiesse asked if the practical difficulty could be that this was created by his contractor. Curtis indicated the applicant is the person responsible for his property. Landgraver asked if there are any configurations that would have stayed within the average lakeshore setback. Page 4 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis noted the red line is the average lakeshore setback line and that there is room to construct a porch and outdoor patio area or they could have made it smaller. Olson commented he is not happy the application is in front of them but that he cannot see making them remove it. Schoenzeit stated since there are no neighbors' complaints and the setback is not in play from the neighbors' standpoint,that would be allowed by the Planning Commission. Schoenzeit stated if someone put a dotted line on the true shoreline and not the manmade cove,the structure would not be in the setback. Schoenzeit stated in his view this is a unique situation and that he could possibly buy the argument that the true shoreline is beyond the cove. Thiesse asked if he would consider the shoreline to be where the boathouse used to be. Schottler stated from the boathouse it would be measured at 102 feet. Schoenzeit commented he finds it hard to believe that a contractor did not know the footings had to be inspected and that the City should consider keeping a list of contractors who violate the City's regulations. Landgraver stated he believes the applicant took the word of the contractor,but if the Planning Commission goes ahead and approves this by saying no neighbors complained,they are kind of sending out the message that after-the-fact variances could be approved. Thiesse stated he is not so sure the Planning Commission would not have allowed this given the location of the cove. Thiesse stated if the cove was not there,the house to the north would be way up by the cove and the average lakeshore setback would have gone through the boathouse. Thiesse stated the cove was created at some point and is not part of the lake. Lemke moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3979,Kimberly and Scott Schottler,2740 Shadywood Road,granting of after-the-fact variances for the average lakeshore setback,75-foot lake setback,and hardcover within the 75-foot setback, subject to complying with the requirements of the building official. Landgraver noted he is opposed to the average lakeshore setback variance but that he is okay with the 75-foot setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 1,Landgraver Opposed. 3. #17-3980 SHAWN WISCHMEIER,540 BIG ISLAND,AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE, 7:05 P.M. —7:25 P.M. Shawn Wischmeier,Applicant,was present. Curtis stated the permit for the new home under construction was issued in May of 2017. Due to the remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching,the applicant made site preparations,brought materials to the property,and began construction of a 300 square foot shed prior to the issuance of a building permit this fall. The shed is located 6.7 feet from the principal structure where Page 5 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. a 10-foot setback is required. Construction on the shed has been stopped and the applicant has requested a setback variance. A detailed analysis of the practical difficulties was provided in the Staff report. However,while the applicant has provided a compelling argument supporting the placement of the shed, Staff finds few practical difficulties exist which support the requested variance beyond that of convenience. To date no public comments have been received. Planning Staff recommends denial of the variance. As the shed is only partially constructed,the applicant should be required to apply for a building permit for the shed and move it to a conforming location. Thiesse asked if there was a foundation previously there. Curtis indicated the foundation on the survey depicts the existing foundation. Thiesse asked if the shed is on frost footings. Curtis indicated it is. Shawn Wischmeier,Applicant,stated the floor of the shed or garage structure was part of the cabin building permit,which is why it is there. Wischmeier stated the reasons he is here is because he is asking for a variance for the base of the garage and that the concrete and the floor was approved as part of the building permit. Curtis noted it was approved as a patio. Wischmeier stated the patio as constructed is 3.3 feet too close to the cabin. Thiesse stated the patio could have been up next to the house but it is the building that cannot be that close. Wischmeier stated the patio was being built for the express purpose of putting a garage on it but the garage was not part of the building permit. Wischmeier stated he thought this was all part of the original package and that he makes no excuses for it. The intent was that it was supposed to be conforming in order to erect the garage onto the base and that his contractor clearly understood that was to be done. Wischmeier pointed out the 6.7 foot setback. Wischmeier explained the drop in elevation is approximately 12 feet,and that when they bought the lot,they thought it had a nice elevated area. Unfortunately that area has very poor soils and a bunch of fill was brought in to raise it up. Wischmeier stated the practical difficulties relate to the foundation and the extreme drop-off. Wischmeier indicated they are attempting to make the structure compact to hide it the best they can from the lake and to get it where there is good soil to pour the foundation. Wischmeier stated the practical difficulty is the grade,and that getting to buildable soil for the garage foundation was challenging,which is why the contractor moved towards the cabin. The challenge with extending it four feet means that they will have to dig down a good way to get to flat soil,which results in the whole foundation having to be shifted down three to four feet. Wischmeier stated the problem with Page 6 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. the backside of the garage is the way it is cut into the hill. Wischmeier noted the structure is not viewable from the lake or from the neighbors' properties and that the issue with all of this was getting it to fit proportionally with the house. Wischmeier indicated they tried to get it visually correct with the house but that there is no practical way to build a structure like this that is correct and looks right from the front. Wischmeier stated his contractor admitted the mistake but that he could not be here tonight. Wischmeier stated at first he tried to work with the builder to try to get it moved over,but as they analyzed it,they realized there is not a logical way to make it fit. Wischmeier stated bulking or massing should not be an issue because of the 3.2 acres and none of the neighbors can see the project. Wischmeier displayed pictures of the property from the lake and the partially completed structure. Wischmeier noted when there are no leaves on the trees,you can see the front of the garage from the lake, but that keeping the structure compact helps avoid challenges with massing. Olson asked if the two structures could be joined with a walkway. Curtis indicated he would need to make it a weather-tight connection. Wischmeier indicated he would be open to whatever suggestions. Wischmeier stated the garage was meant to have a little bit of storage on the top and room for an ATV on the bottom. Wischmeier stated he would prefer not to connect it since it might look worse in that case but that he will not completely rule it out. Wischmeier noted there is only about three or five feet from that corner,and in order to adjoin it,they would need to build some type of structure. Wischmeier stated if the hill was not so steep,they could have pushed it down,but they thought they could put fire rock and insulation and whatever else is needed to make it work. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Schoenzeit stated this is a safety issue in regards to the closeness of the structures,and just like when someone puts their monument or gate and there is not enough stopping room,they have to move the gate. Schoenzeit commented this is not really a variance eligible mistake. Curtis noted the building code allows buildings to be this close and that the City's zoning code requires ten feet,which is an open space requirement. Curtis indicated the building can be three feet away if the proper materials are used. Thiesse stated it is a massing issue and not a fire safety variance and that the applicant is well under hardcover and structural coverage limits. Thiesse pointed out it is located on a 3.2 acre property. Lemke stated the massing does not bother him as much as the fact that it is an after-the-fact variance,and that in his view if it had been connected,the Planning Commission would have allowed it from a massing standpoint. As a result,Lemke indicated he is okay with it. Page 7 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented it is a very big foundation for a patio. Thiesse stated he has difficulty requiring an additional building to make it compliant. Lemke commented that would not really solve anything either. Schoenzeit stated the applicant should be required to comply with the fire code,and if the applicant does not want to connect it,that is his prerogative. Landgraver stated the massing issue is important in Orono and that he views a component of massing being open areas between structures. Landgraver stated it does stretch the imagination that that used to be a patio and that was what it is proposed as but that it is now a 25-foot tall structure. Landgraver stated in his view there was an egregious error done in disclosure of the plans that could have been avoided by discussing the project thoroughly with Staff. Lemke asked if the foundation is sufficient to support the structure. Curtis stated she believes so. Schoenzeit moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3980,Shawn Wischmeier,540 Big Island,granting of an after-the-fact variance to permit construction of a detached accessory building less than ten feet from the principal structure subject to meeting building code and fire code requirements.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 4. #17-3981 TODD AND ANGIE OLSON,3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD,VARIANCES,7:25 P.M.—7:36 P.M. Todd Olson,Applicant,was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting variances for lake yard setback, side yard setback,rear yard setback,hardcover,and an average lakeshore setback and driveway to exceed eight feet in the Shoreland Overlay District. The applicants are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home and will keep the perimeter walls. In addition,they plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition of an upper story,new front porch,a wider deck,and removing and replacing the driveway to better serve the property. A majority of the home is currently within the 75-foot lake yard setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story is also an increase in the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11 feet to 21 feet,which increases the massing in the average lakeshore setback. The deck will not encroach any closer to the lake than the existing deck. The one-stall tuck-under garage will be moved to the east side of the home to allow for a two-stall tuck-under garage. The driveway will be moved to service the garage and is 16 feet wide where eight feet is the maximum width in the Shoreland setback zone. Hardcover will also be impacted with relocation of the driveway. The home currently sits six feet from the rear property where a 30-foot setback is required. The home is proposed to remain at the 6-foot setback with the addition of the upper story,creating the need for a rear Page 8 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. yard variance. The home also currently sits 1.4 feet from the east side property line where a 7.5-foot side yard setback is required. The second story addition to the home will increase the massing of the structure within the setback and requires a side yard variance. There is also a 75-foot lake yard setback on this lot,with the home currently sitting 50.9 feet from the lake. The setback will remain at 50.9 feet with the addition of the second story,thus creating the need for a lake yard variance. The applicants are proposing to remove existing hardcover within the 75-foot lake yard but will be adding a new 16-foot wide driveway for access to the home. A new proposed walkway will also be within the lake yard setback. There is currently 48.4 percent hardcover on the property,but with the elimination of the existing driveway and parking pad and the addition of the new driveway,the hardcover will be reduced to 47.3 percent. Finally,the applicant is also proposing a new front porch forward of the existing home footprint at 54 feet from the lake,but it will be set back behind the deck,which is 50.9 feet from the lake,and does not encroach into the average lakeshore setback. An existing deck will be widened as part of the project which will increase the massing in the lake yard. Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living space challenges,which does not result in an expansion of structural coverage of hardcover. The affected neighbor's views of the lake are not currently impacted by the applicant's property because it is set back behind the neighbors' homes. The applicant also has very few options for expansion or addition to the home. Staff,however,does not feel there are practical difficulties for the expanded deck and the average lakeshore setback variance. No public comments have been received on this application. Landgraver asked if other homes in the area have been built up similar to what is being proposed. Oakden indicated the addition would match the characteristics of the neighborhood. Thiesse asked if this neighborhood is expanding. Oakden stated it is and that this neighborhood consists of fairly small lots. Todd Olson,Applicant,stated the setbacks are a practical difficulty for adding anything onto the home and that the only reason why they want to widen the deck is to have a two-car garage and not a single-car garage. Olson stated one of the main reasons for the remodel and addition is to have a two-car garage and that most of the neighbors have a similar design to what they are proposing. Lemke asked if the heights of the buildings on either side are the same. Olson indicated one neighbor is slightly higher than what they are proposing but the other neighbor's house is the same height. Olson displayed a picture of the neighbor's house. Page 9 of 21 • • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Thiesse stated the need for a two-car garage in Minnesota is a practical difficulty,which requires the wider deck. Lemke commented the proposal seems reasonable. Landgraver moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3981,Todd and Angie Olson,3325 Crystal Bay Road,granting of variances to the lake yard setback,side yard setback, rear yard setback,hardcover,average lakeshore setback,and driveway to exceed eight feet in the Shoreland Overlay District. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 5. #17-3986 TRAVIS DeJONG, 1270 WILDHURST TRAIL,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 7:36 P.M.—7:41 P.M. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway,a conditional use permit is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District(LMCD)regulates docks on the lake and has not yet issued the permit. The proposed dock will extend approximately 100 feet from the shore and appears that it will meet all LMCD required setbacks. Orono's concurrent jurisdiction over permanent docks is primarily via floodplain regulations,which provide no significant standards pertinent to the approval of permanent docks. Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures,so with the exception of the RS District,someone cannot have a permanent or seasonal dock without a principal structure. This property is zoned LR-1B. The City will require that a zoning permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock. To date,no public comments have been received. Curtis noted last month the neighboring property to the south was approved for a permanent dock. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. Thiesse asked if the dock would go along with the rental of the house. Curtis indicated it would and that the dock cannot be rented separately. Page 10 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke asked whether the City has any specifications for permanent docks. Curtis stated Orono does not and that the LMCD has good oversight of permanent docks. The applicant was not present. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Lemke moved, Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3986,Travis DeJong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail,granting of a conditional use permit for a permanent dock. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 6. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002,and 20-117-23-42-0003,"3508 Ivy Place",Variances, 7:38 P.M.—8:35 P.M. 7. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002,and 20-117-23-42-0003,"3508 Ivy Place",Vacation,7:38 P.M.—8:35 P.M. 8. #17-3988 Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001, 20-117-23-42-0002,and 20-117-23-42-0003,"3508 Ivy Place",Conditional Use Permits,7:38 P.M.— 8:35 P.M. Curtis Fretham, Applicant,was present. Oakden noted there are multiple applications with this project and each application will require its own motion and public hearing. The applicant is requesting the following as part of the three applications: 1. A wetland setback variance for the driveway; 2. Consideration of a variance to allow beach improvements within the wetland; 3. Approval of easement vacations for an unimproved driveway; 4. Approval of a utility easement that needs to be relocated to correspond to the actual location of the utility; and 5. A conditional use permit to move over 500 cubic yards of earth in the floodplain,excavation in the floodplain,and over 50 cubic yards of fill in the lake yard. In regards to the 17-3988 application,the wetland has been delineated along the entire lake perimeter of the property. The applicant is proposing to place the driveway 1.8 feet from the wetland boundary at the southeast corner of the property. Per the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,a wetland buffer of 25 Page 11 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. feet will be required. The City requires a setback of 10 feet from the buffer for structures and hardcover. This will require a variance to allow hardcover to be placed within the City's wetland setback and relief from the Watershed's rules regarding buffers. The applicant is proposing to meet all other setback requirements for the two newly created lots as part of the plat. The applicant is also requesting driveway width variance for the 12-foot width proposed driveway to be placed within the 75-foot lake yard setback where an 8-foot maximum driveway is allowed. The 12 feet represents a reduction in the normally required shared driveway width of 20 feet. The Fire Department supports the narrow driveway with the condition that the homes be fitted with a sprinkler system. As it regards the 17-3989 application,the applicant is requesting vacation of two existing easements that are not currently in use. There is a driveway easement that will no longer be aligned with the proposed development and it would be beneficial to formally vacate the easement for clean title. The applicant is also requesting the vacation of an underground utility easement used for sanitary sewer by the City of Orono. The existing easement does not line up with the placement of the existing sewer pipe. The City is requesting the applicant vacate the unused utility easement and create a new utility easement over the existing sewer pipe. Per the City Engineer,the newly created easement must be a minimum of ten feet wide on either side of the pipe,creating a total of a 20-foot wide underground utility easement for the sewer line. This new easement will be created as part of the final plat. As it relates to the 17-3990 application,the applicant is proposing to alter the existing floodplain by adding fill to create a building envelope above the flood elevation for the proposed homes and to create proper drainage for the site. The applicant is proposing to add fill in the center of the project and then gradually grade away from the homes towards the lake. This grading will impact a small wetland in the center of proposed Lot 2. Based on preliminary discussions with the Watershed,it appears the impact to the wetland will fall under their de minimis criteria and will not need to be mitigated. The proposal to create a beach would bring the wetland impact beyond the de minimis threshold, requiring mitigation of all wetlands. Staff does not support the alteration of the wetlands for a beach. In order to achieve appropriate grading and drainage for the site,the applicant proposes removing 1,231 cubic yards of pool soil and bring in 2,817 cubic yards of fill. Overall there will be 1,583 cubic yards of fill being added to the existing site. A conditional use permit is required if there is 500 or more cubic yards of earth being moved on a site. A portion of this cutting and filling will occur in the 0-75 foot lake yard. The applicant is anticipating the total number of trucks could range between 130-230 depending on the soil conditions. Included in Staff report is a lot analysis. Staff finds the purpose of the variances for the wetland setbacks and exceeding the 8-foot driveway width are reasonable. The placement of the driveway is limited and the grading on the site is reasonable and consistent with the preliminary plat. The development of the proposed lots is consistent with the neighborhood to create two new single-family homes. The proximity to the wetland for the shared driveway is reasonable and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will not alter the character of the area. Page 12 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. In addition to the City's CUP requirements for filling/grading within the floodplain district activity is subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the MCWD. The applicant has submitted an application to the MCWD along with the required plans and engineering. Staff finds the proposed vacation and conditional use permits for the project reasonable. Staff does not support filling in the wetland for the beach improvements. The Planning Commission should discuss the impact of trucking and hauling earth to and from this site and whether conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the variances. Suggested motions have been included in Staff report,including recommended conditions. Staff recommends denial of the wetland filling for the beach improvements. Thiesse asked if anything has changed dramatically from the preliminary plat. Thiesse stated it is his recollection the Planning Commission had placed a limit on the amount of fill that could be brought in. Oakden stated she is not sure how that corresponded with the City Council's final approval but that she will look into that. Thiesse stated it was direction to the applicant to provide an idea of the amount of fill that would be brought in. Curt Fretham,Lake West Development,noted the Planning Commission has previously reviewed this and that he is here to answer any questions. Thiesse asked if the plan is pretty similar to what was reviewed before. Fretham stated the 8-foot driveway was felt not to be practical and that a 12-foot width is now being proposed. Fretham noted the Planning Commission also discussed the 2-foot elevation of the existing home and that it was recommended they consider going a little higher,which is why it was raised it another foot. Fretham noted that increased the amount of fill a little. Thiesse asked where the beach is located and whether they can live without it. Fretham pointed out the location of the proposed beach. Fretham indicated those two spots would be 12 feet wide on each lot and that they are asking for access to the lake for each home. Fretham noted this site has over 600 feet of shoreline but yet there is not a place to access the lake. Fretham stated the lot next door has 60 feet of beach and so do the other neighbors. Landgraver asked what his definition is of a beach. Fretham stated that area is currently defined as a wetland and that he does not know the technical terminology of what defines a wetland. Fretham stated a beach to him means that it would have an opening that would be free to the water. Landgraver asked whether it would be rocks or lawn. Page 13 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Fretham indicated it would likely be lawn or sand to blend in with the existing sand. Thiesse asked if they could mitigate those two spots. Fretham stated they could mitigate on site. Barnhart noted according to the comments of the Watershed District,when the beaches are added in,then the site goes over the de minimis criteria and it starts to become difficult to justify the impact to the wetland. Barnhart stated the Watershed District sees the creation of the beaches as an alteration. Thiesse asked if the beaches fall under the purview of the Planning Commission. Barnhart stated it would need to go through a public hearing process. Lemke asked why the beaches are on that side. Fretham indicated the other side is lagoon and not as clean of water. Schoenzeit asked if they will just be adding sand versus digging out muck. Fretham stated they would be removing earth about a foot along the whole shoreline in the event of high waters but that they would not be removing anything for the beaches. Fretham commented he is not sure whether it is really a beach but that it is more of an access point to the water. Lemke asked whether rain gardens were proposed at one time. Fretham noted they went to a 100-year stormwater system,which is shown on Lots 1 and 2. Landgraver asked if the neighbor's concerns about drainage have been addressed. Fretham indicated they will be capturing the hard surface runoff on the site and that the other dotted area on the plan shows the detail of the grading that will take place along the common property line. Landgraver stated the other concern was where the driveway would connect to the street. Landgraver asked what the Council's thoughts were about that. Fretham indicated the proposed driveway is as shown and that they have not made a lot of changes there. Fretham noted they do not have a lot of control over it because the road pretty much dead ends. Barnhart stated he does not recall any changes to the configuration to the driveway but that the resolution included language that the condition of Ivy Place and the private driveway be noted prior to construction and after construction. Lemke asked if the building outline is exact. Fretham indicated those are approximate. Lemke asked if they will get smaller. Page 14 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Fretham stated they likely will not get larger. Lemke asked if there is a consideration for the height. Fretham noted there is a view easement on Lot 2,which is why the building footprint on that lot is more stretched out. Fretham indicated they have been in discussions about purchasing the easement so the height of the building can be increased but that he is not sure where that is at this point. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Jay White,3560 Ivy Place,stated the yellow line on the map is the wetland border. White pointed out their property and the easement,which has been surveyed on their property. White commented he is not sure how they can fit a 12-foot driveway into a 10-foot easement and that he is not sure why the calculations are not four feet off. White indicated he has spoken with the Watershed District about it and they have verified that is the correct wetland border. White stated an 8-foot driveway would fit there but that a 12-foot driveway would be into the setback. Schoenzeit noted the applicant is requesting a 1.8 foot setback into that area. White stated he has been out there countless times,measured it a few times,and that he does not see how a 12-foot driveway will fit in there. In addition,the Watershed District has verified where the boundary is. White stated he would like to hear from the developer about what proof he has that he is not going into the wetland rather than coming back at a later time for an after-the-fact variance. White stated in addition,the practical difficulty statement made about the access easement for the property predates any knowledge of the presence of wetlands and therefore should be allowed. White stated the basis of the developer's argument for the driveway is that statement but he does not know what type of proof the developer has that that is true. White noted the photographic evidence at the sketch plan review showed that it was a wetland and that something changed in 1968 when the access was granted. In 1975,Orono had the whole point still as wetland. White stated he is wondering whether there is any proof that at the time the access easement was given that they had no knowledge of wetland. White stated it appears the City had knowledge of the wetland and that he is not sure what the basis is for the variance. White stated with regard to the fill,it was stated to be 1,300 cubic yards but that there has been no mention of the dirt being moved. At the Planning Commission meeting it was stated that if it is more than that,it would be a different project. White noted they are pulling 1,200 cubic yards out and bringing 1,600 cubic yards back in. White stated that was not addressed and it was proposed at a lot less. White noted the developer is talking about 270 truckloads and that the safety concerns are three times what was discussed and is radically different than what was discussed. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission is a recommending body and that amount was changed at the Council level because they requested the home elevations be raised. Thiesse indicated the number discussed at the Planning Commission meeting was just to give the Council an idea of where the Planning Commission's thinking was at. Schoenzeit noted the City Council can approve a higher number. Page 15 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. White stated he does not recall the Council talking about bringing in more fill. White stated his house is at 932' and this house is 934',which is where all the drainage concerns come in since the house will only be 15 feet away. White stated in his view there was not an adjustment made by the Council for the additional fill and that the developer was very vague about the number earlier,which is why the Planning Commission requested a number. White stated this plan is different than what was reviewed in October. Thiesse stated the plan is not significantly different but that the fill numbers have changed. Jonathan Paul, 3532 Ivy Place,stated during the time period he has resided on Casco Point,he has seen a number of homes rebuilt,some of them more than once. During those time periods the construction affects the neighborhood since there are significant problems with traffic,trash,issues with the subcontractors using the park as a urinal,and a lot of safety factors. Paul stated he would ask the Planning Commission to come out to Ivy Place in two separate vehicles, with one vehicle starting at each end and then drive towards each other. Paul stated the Commissioners will then see how narrow the road is. Paul stated there is no reasonable place to park pickup trucks and other construction vehicles and that this will be a huge encumbrance on the neighborhood. Paul requested the Planning Commission think long and hard about the impact to the neighborhood. In addition,Paul stated he has a lot of reservations about how the project will get done. Paul stated in his view the details need to be looked at closer before approving it. Paul requested the Planning Commissioners come out to Ivy Place and view the area that is proposed to be developed. Fretham stated as it relates to the wetland delineation,Page C2.0 depicts the edge of the wetland buffer and it shows a 1.8-foot distance between it with a 12-foot driveway. Barnhart stated the comment was related to the easement and it appears that the 1.8 feet is from the edge of the wetland and that the 12-foot driveway goes over the edge of the easement. Barnhart suggested the applicant confirm those measurements prior to appearing before the City Council. Fretham stated they can also move the driveway further over. Barnhart stated that may be necessary. White indicated he measured from the furthest the road can go to his property and that they are taking it as close as they can get to the proposed house. White stated the only direction they can go is closer to his house. Thiesse requested the developer confirm the measurements. Fretham indicated he is in agreement with that. Thiesse stated there was also a comment that the access easement predates the wetland delineation. Barnhart stated there seems to be some evidence that much of this lot was wetland back in the 1930s but that there is not enough evidence for the DNR to say that it is a wetland and therefore unbuildable. The recent wetland delineation definitively identified the boundary of the existing wetland. Barnhart noted wetland delineations do expire. Page 16 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver noted the most recent wetland delineation is the one that is relevant. Thiesse asked if the building elevations have changed. Fretham stated he cannot state they have been raised on the plan for certain but that he asked his builder to raise the floor one foot based on the direction of the City Council. Fretham stated the old set of plans from the Planning Commission meeting will have the lower elevation. Thiesse asked if construction vehicles will be confined on the site. Fretham indicated they will be and that the site is over two acres. Fretham stated the onsite parking area has been identified on the plans. Thiesse asked if the importing and exporting of material will be utilizing the same trucks. Fretham indicated it will be and that has not been taken into account in their numbers. Fretham stated the number of truckloads is a worst-case scenario and that making combined trips was not taken into account. Fretham commented while it seems like a lot of material,if they take a 2,500 square foot foundation and dig a 10-foot basement,that amounts to 1,800 cubic yards for both homes. Fretham stated they are not really doing anything out of the ordinary,and while there will be a lot of truck traffic,it is not extraordinary for a home construction. Schoenzeit recommended the developer keep the truck trips down since that will also help preserve the road. Schoenzeit commented the developer has a vested interest in keeping the number of truckloads down. Landgraver stated the reason for the refined numbers on the truck traffic is so the people in the neighborhood and the City Council are making an informed decision. Schoenzeit commented he would not want to say they can do it in 95 truckloads and then have it doubled. Schoenzeit stated it is unfortunate the developer is asking for so many but that the higher number helps set the expectations out there so everyone is aware of the number. Lemke asked if any time restrictions should be placed on the trucks. Thiesse asked if the grading will take place at a singular time. Fretham indicated they have found poor soils on the site and the soils are not supportive of a foundation without either soil corrections or pilings. Fretham stated it is potentially feasible to correct the soils but that there likely will be the need to draw the water table down while the correction takes place. Fretham indicated he is not sure if they will be able to get those permits and that the numbers assume they will be doing soil correction. Paul stated a comment was made at the City Council meeting about potentially limiting truck traffic times. Paul indicated the bus picks up at 6:50 in the morning and drops off 3:20 in the afternoon. Paul noted there are no sidewalks on Ivy Place and that the children walk down the street to get to their homes. Page 17 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. Landgraver asked what the existing constraints are on construction times. Barnhart indicated City Code includes hour restrictions for truck traffic,and if the Planning Commission feels it appropriate,restrictions can be placed on the hours. Curtis stated house construction is allowed from 7 a.m.to 8 p.m. during the week and from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on the weekends and holidays. Olson noted the Planning Commission can require a later starting time. Thiesse asked whether the applicant would be okay with trucking activity between 7:30 to 3:00 p.m. Fretham asked whether it would be satisfactory if they just take a break for an hour between 3:00 and 4:00. Thiesse indicated he would let the City Council decide that. Barnhart noted the City Council applied a similar condition to a project a couple of years ago while school was in session but not during the summer. Landgraver stated he would like to see that on this project. Fretham asked whether the Planning Commission's intention with the restrictions on the trucking was limited to the hauling of the fill and not delivery of materials. Thiesse indicated that is correct. Schoenzeit asked if everyone will be able to turn around on the site. Fretham indicated that is correct once the driveway is constructed. White noted the easement is for access in and egress out,with no stopping,no parking,and no meetings taking place in that area on his private property. Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission has any thoughts about vacation of the easements. The Planning Commission raised no issues with the easement vacations. Lemke asked if the condition of the road will be able to handle all of the traffic in and out. Thiesse stated they do not know that at this time but that the road will be put back like and kind. Landgraver stated as it relates to the beaches,anyone who owns a property in this area will want to enjoy that view. Landgraver stated practically speaking there will be foot traffic and the owner is going to go down to the lake. Landgraver asked if the Planning Commission wants to have a discussion on whether endorsing the beach is worthwhile. Page 18 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse commented he is all for it but that he does not know all the ramifications of it. Oakden stated it will trigger additional wetland alteration. Currently the applicant is below that threshold so no alteration needs to be done. Thiesse stated it would be a wonderful amenity and likely will happen whether it is allowed or not. Fertham stated the Lupients were being very friendly when they granted the Watershed District the right to put wetland all along the shoreline and place a wetland easement over it,which is rather encumbering on this site, and then not getting any wetland mitigation in exchange. Fretham stated he will probably bring that point up to the Watershed District. Schoenzeit stated regardless if the City approves it or not,the Watershed District will have the final say on it. Thiesse stated he would prefer the Watershed District weigh in on it. Landgraver moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001,20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003,granting of a wetland setback variance for a driveway exceeding the 8-foot maximum width for driveways in the Shoreland setback contingent on final plat approval and MCWD approval of the wetland buffer impact,subject to verification of the wetland boundary. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. Schoenzeit moved,Lemke seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001,20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003,granting of vacation to the driveway and utility easements subject to final plat approval,the comments of the City Engineer,and replacement with a new utility easement on final plat approval VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. Schoenzeit moved,Lemke seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3988, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick Lupient,PIDS 20-117-23-42-0001,20-117-23-42-0002, and 20-117-23-42-0003,granting of a conditional use permit subject to final plat approval; approval of all MCWD permits; approval from the DNR prior to obtaining the land alteration permit; approval from WCA; no hauling of fill before 7 a.m.or between 3:00 and 4:00 while school is in session; confining construction vehicle parking to the site; following construction of the driveway, trucks must go nose in and nose out; and subject to a review of the conditions of the roadway prior to and after construction. Vote: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 9. 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON SCHEDULE Barnhart noted a Planning Commission representative is only required to attend the first City Council meeting of the month. The terms of Schoenzeit,Leskinen,and Landgraver will expire at the end of March,2018,which accounts for the openings on the proposed schedule. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. Page 19 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 10. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS HELD ON OCTOBER 23,2017,AND NOVEMBER 13,2017 Barnhart reported on the following City Council actions: • Approved a modification to the Orono Woods Planning Agreement. • Adopted an approval resolution for 1565 Orchard Beach Place granting a variance to the average lakeshore setback but not allowing any variances for any other setbacks. • Created a priority list of ordinance amendments. Barnhart noted the short-term rentals will fall under the licensing ordinances and not zoning. The Council is looking to make some changes to the wetland setback,changes to the definitions in the code,and modifications to the accessory structure setbacks. • Approved the variance for LDK Builders, 15265 Long Lake Boulevard. • Approved the bank sign with upward lighting. • Approved a conditional use permit for Wildhurst Trail. • Approved a variance on Shadywood Road for the Hansberger's. • Approved an after-the-fact grading permit on Kelly Avenue. • Approved an ordinance amendment for personal watercraft regulations on Long Lake. • Reviewed the proposed sketch plan for 1400 Bracketts Point Road. The application will probably be before the Planning Commission in January. Barnhart stated the applicant at 795 Ferndale withdrew his application and is redesigning. Barnhart noted they had talked previously about holding a joint work session with the City Council in December and that will likely be postponed until June or July of next year. 11. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Landgraver stated he participated in an 8-week Hennepin County Citizens Academy course. Landgraver stated the group went on tours of different public facilities in addition to the classroom work and that the course provided some really good information. Landgraver noted there is no cost to attend and that he would highly recommend it. Lenmke requested the liaison to the council meeting be included on the Planning Commission agenda. Lemke asked if the commissioners whose terms are expiring next March will be able to continue to serve on the Planning Commission. Barnhart stated they are at the end of their third term and that they will not be able to continue. The City Clerk,at the request of the Mayor,has put out an advertisement. Thiesse noted following the close of tonight's meeting some Planning Commissioners and City Council Members will be getting together at the Red Rooster for a social hour but that no official city business will be discussed or acted upon. Page 20 of 21 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 20,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. ADJOURNMENT Thiesse moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to adjourn the Orono Planning Commission meeting at 8:50 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. ATTEST: John Thiesse,Chair Page 21of21 Item 2 Date Application Received: September 27,2017 �O�VO Date Application Considered as Complete:October 12,2017 60-Day Review Period Expires: December 11,2017 60-day Extension Period Expires:February 9,2018 -*‘S. To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members � L � 4A-ESHo �' Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: #17-3983, Eric and Liz Vogstrom, 2816 Casco Point Road, Right of Way Vacation, Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the City of Orono to vacate an unimproved platted right of way with lake access. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background Applicants Eric and Liz Vogstrom of 2618 Casco Point Road are requesting to vacate the unimproved right of way that is directly abutting their property to the north. The right of way was originally a product of the Winship's Subdivision. The unimproved right-of-way is a dedicated lake access for pedestrians according to the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant uses the right of way to access their dock. The applicant has included a narrative with the application attached as Exhibit E. Applicable Regulations: MN State Statute 412.851 VACATION OF STREETS. The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley,public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley,public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a vote offour fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks'published and posted notice. The council shall cause written notice of the hearing to be mailed to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation at least ten days before the hearing. The notice must contain, at minimum, a copy of the petition or proposed resolution as well as the time,place, and date of the hearing. In addition, if the street, alley, public grounds,public way, or any part thereof terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent to any public water, written notice of the petition or proposed resolution must be served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources at least 60 days before the hearing on the matter. The notice to the commissioner of natural resources does not create a right of intervention by the commissioner.At least 15 days prior to convening the hearing required under this section, the council or its designee must consult with the commissioner of natural resources to review the proposed vacation. The commissioner must evaluate: (1)the proposed vacation and the public benefits to do so; (2)the present and potential use of the land for access to public waters;and #17-3983 January 16,2018 Page 2 of 4 (3)how the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. The commissioner must advise the city council or its designee accordingly upon the evaluation. After a resolution of vacation is adopted, the clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings which shall contain the name of the city, an identification of the vacation, a statement of the time of completion thereof, and a description of the real estate and lands affected thereby. The notice shall be presented to the county auditor who shall enter the same in the transfer records and note upon the instrument, over official signature, the words "entered in the transfer record."The notice shall then be recorded with the county recorder.Any failure to file the notice shall not invalidate any vacation proceedings. MN State Statue 462.358 Subd. 7. Vacation. The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways under a home rule charter or other provisions of law. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve". Orono City Code.Sec.78-9. -Vacation of streets,alleys and public grounds. Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds shall follow the procedures set forth in this chapter; except that such vacation shall require a petition by a majority of the landowners abutting the property to be vacated, and a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice, all as required by Minn. Stat. §412.851.The council may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve which is not being used for sewer, drainage, electric,telegraph, and telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as boulevard reserve. Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter(4A-32) Less than 1%of Orono's lake shoreline has been dedicated as public access corridors. Nearly all the rest is privately owned, and not available to the public for lake access purposes, save for the DNR Maxwell Bay Access, Hennepin County's North Arm Access and the City's Summit Park on Long Lake. Hennepin County's Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park,while abutting Lake Minnetonka, has deed restrictions that disallow use for docking or launching boats.With shoreland abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka,Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors.Orono's lake accesses are enumerated in Table 4A-8. (See Exhibit F) Lake Access Policies #17-3983 January 16,2018 Page 3 of 4 It is the City's intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance.To this end,the City will follow these policies: 1. Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right-of-ways will be denied in all cases except where equal or better lake access will be granted nearby in return. 2. The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. 3. The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. Part 4E Parks, Open Space and Trails (4E): The Comprehensive Plan, in the Parks, Open Space, and Trails Chapter has the platted road is listed as a lake access point. Engineer/Public Works Director/Park Commission staff Comments 1. The city's policy is not to approve vacation of city fire lanes/lake access points per the Comprehensive Plan. 2. This is lake access point#39 with the listed purpose of providing walking access to the lake. These lake access are classified under the Parks, Open Space and Trail Plan (4E) in the CMP. The council just passed "A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF ORONO KEEPING ITS OPEN SPACES, PLAYGROUNDS, PARKS,AND TRAILS IN PERPETUITY" Seems like vacating this lake access point would fall afoul of this resolution. 3. If we do go ahead with a vacation,the west end of the ROW has a city Storm Pond in it that would need protection either; a. Do not include the western end of the ROW in the vacation,or b. Obtain an easement over the pond,associated pipes and access way from the road to the pond. Staff Analysis The council recently approved a resolution in support for preserving parks, open space and trails within the City of Orono. This unimproved platted right of way is identified as open space for pedestrian lake access. Approving this request would conflict with the recent support for parks and open space. From reviewing the Comprehensive plan vacating this right of way seems to go against the policies that are set in place today for the preservation of lake access and open space. The challenge with vacating rights of way is that vacation is final. Should the public or the city desire access to the lake,or have utility needs in the future,the cost to acquire Lake Frontage will be premium. Vacation reduces options for the city in the future,and the importance of access to the lake is outlined in the comprehensive plan. Public Comments Staff received two written comments to deny this request. See Exhibit G for the submitted comments. Issues for Consideration 1. Does this request follow the Comprehensive Plan? #17-3983 January 16,2018 Page 4 of 4 2. Does this request meet the requirements for approval? 3. Would approving this action set precedent for future lake access vacations? 4. Are there any issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommend denial of this application because it does not meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. If the Commission/Council finds evidence for approval the west end of the area has a storm pond and city pipe located within the area will need to be addressed to stay protected; staff suggests some sort or utility/access easement recorded. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Area Map/Site Plan Exhibit C. Annotated Plan Exhibit D. Original Plat Exhibit E. Project Narrative Exhibit F. Comprehensive Plan Table 4A-8 Exhibit G. Comments received from the public Exhibit H. Property Owners List PC #17-3983 City of Orono Exhibit Vacation Application Street Address: Application# I r1- 3 C1 '3 2750 Kelley Parkway Date 0 Orono, MN 55356 Received: q" ))-7-1 7 Main: 952-249-4600 Fitt $700.00 fax: 952-249-4616 Escrow: $700.00 "S' Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Notes: Fees assume Hp�' application not part of 'fk Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 subdivision. I/We request an Easement or Right of Way on/or adjacent to the following property be vacated: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: <& Cir-SC.-v Submittal Requirements in 1 Completed Vacation Application _ ❑ 2 ••lication fee , N 3 Escrowfitmosit and agreement ❑ 4 Surve meetin• ALL re•uirements Click here for the C' 's Surve and Site Plan Re•uirements. 2 ■ 5 Date privacy form 0 6 Hardcover Calculation worksheets. Click here for the City's Hardcover Information Packet. © , , 7 Addtbnati intarnalion requested by City Stan ❑ 8 Electronic copy of all submitted materials via email, CD or flash drive. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name: � C Lt Z_ o Phone (primary): v G 57TtE'0wt -- �p/ — . ,O 9GO 0 Mailing Address: Z / G4-4,S co poi N-' 120/ City, State &ZIP j„g y z }4141,.3SS3 t l Email: LTG4e_ AL VoLgSrgvb1_ C�c.►� PROPERTY OWNER: • Agrees to pay additional fees(staff time not covered in the original fee payment)and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this extension application, and • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the City Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting,please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. , Property Owner Signature: v Date: l-' -7_ / -7 Property Owner Signature: Date: - RECEIVED Vacation Application--January 2017 SEP 2 72017 1 # 39 8 CITY of oRorvo DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. if your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. a°El_ V a 4572%-vi First Middle Last E3 GP\Sco PoiNr &0 Address Cti yz r-.p, q 60-AS0 -9S00 City State Zip Phone I understand my rig is as stated above. Com---- , Signature .4111 RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2017 Variance Application—January 2017 3 CITY OF ORONO Page 14 PC #17-3983 HExhibit B Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 10/1_.__ .. 1/' 4 r__h $ µ. r . ! W r% 4 T b L w c y W'''' f s: y _ I rte• -- ,��., .�.^ .,^e ,� ; t., c 444 , . N. i,. - ., V. '�. s+. • '.ts —..ere,.._... Lilryir 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 2011723240038 Comments: OWNER NAME: E J Vogstrom & E A Vogstrom PARCEL ADDRESS: 2618 Casco Point Rd, Orono MN 55391 PARCEL AREA: 0.64 acres, 27,983 sq ft A-T-B:Abstract SALE PRICE: $1,300,000 SALE DATA: 12/2013 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore warranty of any kind,and(iii)is notsuitab le for legal,engineering or surveying purposes HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any MARKET VALUE: $1,154,000 damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: $15,516.94 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 COUNTY 2017 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,361,000 - WQ ; u Em= g 4 1 if I it- '+ maYq Ei�I .. 'YO i1p w > Q.w ' a5`° 3 spm � ._ LL kg, - ,C4a LL OF 3°° » 6 5RiW w g o`o as (J ( ` =F3 a LOO ;d 'H ° oh'I ci) #' 0 7 - .7 N ! <�'o,v7-� m I\• {g6C ' '' ,�9y$Y g�CS � � ��1 J `�� °$ > � e W -' IJ_ o '`;'.•,°,'`;'.•,°, w ,HALL11N° p sof °1 � ° ° = sgZ I : — — — - - -0� -- EV,Os§44oa ,7,o I I ) e sg Y I E`• 4 CJ \o °„ \ n \ :5 \ \ i i , y \ of Ii \ -- 1 \ it ~ \� rii, TIII Cc , \ _'_'N t \2 I 0!'e yS o 3 p iti V, A $ I �e� F �_ . ., o� 5� ye i _ _ \n � E = E v) 1 � Q 1 R , . �d p-'2y E, qk))/ I Ob00 66 es ''1' e /extra/`'X a !g�p osyo li 4 5. • VJ 8 PC "`" wn Hennepin County Property Map #17-3983 Date:10/13/2017 Exhibit C a Q.�. \~-t* (34) +. �� 9,E (�` 2 ?� IN � V 1 (35) .. 427.65 N89'29'W P7 OF 14 30- \ 215.33 N89'35'W 115.51 DOC 4681295 ° ' ( COVE 313.55 '�6 0 TCO'15ao 1 it �� "N 2 4' �, - :•)". (42) — (43) �'�' a0 ,..;_.: 26224 p ,tit• N89-35'W 216.42 ,�h ..--1 / % �tiVVLi �' �iGcut� •• 0 91 1 0 40 40 40 ,' I `� 40 1 40 -- i • 95.34; 11 (38) .• 9. -8 7 6 ,5 N 4 N ,. 1.7 ;• •• r l' 10 ..;- 2 , , c4 14112 ea t ---15-2-2-`v.---11--5 .4 — 40_.�:�lfJ 3 a d — ..__JR,•..1(39) 25 , , r ..-- 120 6 %iv- 18:'19 20R 21.- -... 17 _108 7 1--40 1 40 40 ...t.qp_ OM_ .0_�_ 1 inch=100 feet PARCEL ID:2011723240038 Comments: OWNER NAME:E J Vogstrom&EAVogstrom PARCEL ADDRESS:2618 Casco Point Rd,Orono MN 55391 PARCEL AREA:0.64 acres,27,983 sq ft A-T-B;Abstract SALE PRICE:$1,300,000 SALE DATA:12/2013 SALE CODE:Excluded From Ratio Studies ,,,is data(q;s furnished'AS t6 with no ASSESSED 2016,PAYABLE 2017 accuracy;representation) .stmshhee w no or warranty of any kind;End SI)Isnotsulleble PROPERTY TYPE:Residential Lake Shore for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD:Non-Homestead Hennepin County shall not be labia for sny MARKET VALUE:$1,154,000 damage injury orloss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL:$15,516.94 COPYRIGHT 0 HEN NEPIN ASSESSED 2017,PAYABLE 2018 COUNTY 2017 PROPERTY TYPE:Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD:Non-homestead MARKET VALUE$1,361,000 II • . f-. Pc inimif i #17-3983 Exhibit D . .-- \9 \ N \ \ \I \A 0 \_.o-\ A _ .. , .,. '-: I • ,••• • \.4,-:.)..,,A,,oszl,$)..,\&,Q.,.-6-( •• • s•,.A.)-,5bN.A..vv../- . • ..• • -•-•: • ;__ , • / ..,.. • .„-•,,.; /..0 1 12 1/ /0 •I9 , 7 0 .... /.. • 2 •t-t i n n•• 1 1 •-n' • 1 1'6 ••... ... '11 - '1"'.'4, .4 cfpring, — ,..ftreit' ; AY.A...t ''. ,,. , - •s. __.,..... 1 • 4" I ' _ _', __. 11 lo 0 ,2 -2 .6,, 'a; , 2 • ,,.o. X ; -,,,,- 11 1 1 , :!.. I; ,,, ; f : \ 1 . ".6 /9201R/ 22 2* '2.... I z.,- 1 \/. 1 ' 97 1I I 2 . K._ / - - - -• 14 / j._ 92 , MIMI 1 Z k ; /3 • .! ..., 7... ; , • , ..`,1 1Z " fry- ,---ts---- >. ;>, 7.2 zo 2/ 22 22 n.,.. 1 25',2 i's•Fr . " ' :It 21- i I • ..., ; ..4,.. . . . c_fic.rot y eftreet '13,i 24 ,,,,- ,4,. •r /.4.I 4.)1/.., / 10 1 • II , 2 arm OF 1200171 OF DEMI 1 4, ---"'-'" . 1 1 I lkw.11,116 lbw Twit* Ur•14/1.ow 44 • , Ad Ilimellobe•Me ad, ... 4,4414A4 --.... . e „7. k S.., .R,•/”.9.7.1.•••/2/.. • -1K......-- ...ER' 1........... „,. .._ ,4,.........., a-i 0,,,,G1„„.6„.a)1,.......4.# ..... ....7.4:11,2•0 •‘., ••• 1'1-' .-1 •`-`-'•' 7."`'''"I a;R-).....,11.1.4,- Al,...,,..,..A., .• --r..6.i,....-.,...y .......,..........., --,-...7 .*, ti.a,,,-- ,,...77 .,...,4«,41,.. 4'...& ,4...---........t, --.4 ...../, 2...x 2 r._z-? 4, ,ii/e.2., ...., ,.2....,,Arz.....,,.--,.......e... t-...0,,..„..T.....id p...6, , z tz. ,............._, /"....,,a.,..,./,.-...-..."..a..,,. r../..../ .1.......1e..-/-4........K A'ir''''' ''''-'s&i,-.•-t.c....4.., :44.41 :.21.72) 044.4 .;?...444,..........4C-. 4.4 . .......„..........._.44,....‘17"4.4 -44.4,4 4./-I/4,i 4//.............—_,../..././...../„./ .2....-.4,e-are,..t M. e............T-k i.....,., J............,,.., ....,".z...z ...".22, .....,.. '.. .‘zz..,.,..•-.2 2...,, 4.4.......OW••..E2fr 2-2,-..-12 ..12.W•ilow c••_oot/k..4.222-vti .1•2;4...--,,,, .. , ..,-2.•2 1,22.i(,:, ...• it.r.1....._ ......,...-'2. ..7.,.....7 .t....4 .,,,, 44,-s', w.,...,,,t.....,............., 7'---;rfr --14---(7 ""-- ''''''- ---...- -.a.,' ...... .p -..:4,1610... ei2.•‘...-.4 k,, 4 -.......44 y.....r__, ............4.4.4..4........, .........4 72,....ile....- o_..., ......".ii air 21.-212..222.2-,-ootie........0 2••••.-,elle......7- Ofit,r3.1 ,o;:ti-.7 • ,,e..a....2...--.......t.:....v,..41 2, ..;—.2...st...4,,--42-...._....---, ..-.....•, ...V._ ........ ......,.......e.._ 4 04.- .7/4.4.2.4... 4-.4,„4.,2........_ tti..7......4 .e........ -- ....e-......- ..... .r.Z... ...."—_.,,,,...,-. -, 2.4---,14--4-4..216 ' •0 ...lg. 6.-... ......ilk..4.....,...-/ ......7A.:1......4 ....t-f...v.... ...C............. ..........1 ,....R. ' Oe-.a...-..30-, /1••/"12.a........i.e• .Sii `'.Y'A i,.• 4 4 Art,-t.., , 6- 1 4.,.,,,,_a-i_.1: b(i.,,......9,...6..• -.., &A....,X3 9211,7.1.e.e.".- , •.' V Z.. a X)itf.2,.Z.tta 7.21,....-.....A.,,,/ 4 ..-..1— CA.,,A e•1 AO.{.,....2.4•1 (s`,..,. „. ..,- id...ck...,..e....i.e...z.. .. R.,'.•P.-h...2,.t.r-,..&z::, , .......fra a..,... .C.Lt.e......ii.2., /AC 01.-•-••R;f.././pot/ cs,„, ,,,.........4 i'•.. ..A...k...".ii....—........,--. .2_4 iio.<7.2.2.•-au,/ A,.f.,4G-• G.,(2.,.......,.; ,C.,ih../,...ri,-7,"., Q.4,---o#- 4....... ay,2.21.,2e .t.i.... 21-....•- ....Ai...2...i ...• ort.,...Z 2-ti y e...-/..! 24.• , 11. ...•.... ................4..9.•..e- e."....!..e.-4 .r.e.r-r.r.4.4.iir.e-.............-./... ...e...... .... , * '7 /r ./ AL....2././ .......",,,,, ..e.4/4.-. ...e ......... .......,_5,6„.. d.,se............._ ,2 ::...,4,-;•• 1 ?'`'L'41^4- ....,..41,.. "'I 4. L , -..... /'-'*- ,....---, nArs, iF t.,, •. .' :s.. ...-4,.. . , PC #17-3983 Exhibit E Laura Oakden From: Eric Vogstrom <eric@vogstrom.com> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 2:42 PM To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Vogstrom I bought my property in 2004. Since we have owned the property, I have mowed,fertilized,watered, and maintained the unimproved road in question to the North of my lot.The city has not used this unimproved road since I have been there. This unimproved road actually runs next to my property allowing my house access to the lake.The only access to my dock is over the city's unimproved road. My intention is to keep a small path to access my dock and then naturalize the rest of the road area. I spoke with Dennis Walsh a few times about this and he encouraged me to apply at the city to have the road vacated. Eric and Liz Vogstrom 2618 Casco Point Road Orono Mn 55391 1 PC #17-3983 Exhibit F Table 4A-8: City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current Status ID Access Name Plat Between Designated UPDATED 4/2/01 (#5,7) UPDATED 5/21/08 # or Street Name Section Address#s Use Notes Brown's Bay(Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 Not open for public use;plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline -- Shoreline Drive-"Molly's 2-S Across from Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area and trashcans at this wide Corner" (Outlot A,Dragonfly 1410 Shoreline spot along Shoreline Drive;popular fishing spot;winter vehicular access feasible Hill) Smith Bay(Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at Spates 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Gated in summer;seasonal Long Lake Fire Dept.boat dockage established here in 2008;winter vehicular access allowed. 3 North Shore Drive at Shoreline 10-S Tracts S&U,RLS 192;these tracts are on the steep slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive Drive;due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay -- North Shore Drive 9-S 2605/2655 No longer a public access ("Town Road") 4 North Shore Drive at Baldur 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30'wide platted road right-of-way Park Road -- North Shore Drive east of 17-N 3685/3705 33'wide eastward extension of North Shore Drive(Hennepin County jurisdiction) Shadywood Road 5 Shadywood Road at Sunset Dr 17-N 1998/2000 15.2'wide platted alley-closely abutting homes on either side 6 Crystal Bay Road(West end) 17-S Adj to 2264 66'wide platted road extending to lakeshore;City also owns 4 adjacent tiny Shadywood lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200'of shoreline,over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for"boating and bathing"... status currently under discussion 7 Crystal Bay Road(Relocated 17-S 3405/3415 20'relocated alley from Railroad property to shoreline;potential lake access from extension of Bayview Place in railway corridor. The only known documentation is Doc.#507616 deed filed plat of"Wallace's Addition...") Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which states that the 20'strip is "heretofore taken for street purposes"and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 8 Crystal Bay Road(Platted 17-S 3339/3345 25'wide platted roadway;contains municipal sewer lines,potential access from extension of Hillside Place) neighborhood and Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing-Fox St. 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian Tax records show access as Outlot A,owned by owner of 3125,City has year-round, easement over Outlot,City maintains access vehicles winter only Stubbs Bay 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30'platted road gated March 1 -Dec. 1 11 Bayside Rd.at Stubbs Bay Rd. 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33'platted road ("Oak Street"in plat of"Bay View Park")Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from NA Two 60'platted roads and one 65'platted road to the Lake(Park,Spring,and 3640,3700, Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park;and Theresa St.in plat of Ottoville on 3750 Bayside Lake Minnetonka).These potential access points are not opened for public use. 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of NA 30'realigned platted road(Realigned"Lake Street"in the plat of Ottoville on 3775 Bayside Lake Minnetonka)(See street file 3775 Bayside).Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 30'platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore;walking access only. North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60'wide platted road,paved to shoreline-usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 30'wide platted road,not developed,steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from NW end of platted developed road as it extends to shoreline 1384/1392 18 Oak Place(Platted road in plat 8-S 3768/3818 40'wide platted undeveloped road extending from North Shore Drive across of"Crystal Bay View") North Shore Dr platted Cherry Ave to shoreline;mostly wetland or under water 19 Sandy Beach(Extension of 8-S 3898/3908 Swimming 60'wide platted roadway used for City beach Maple Place) Cherry Ave Beach 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/ 50'wide platted road,undeveloped 1330 Cherry PI 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 40'wide(remaining after partial vacation)platted roadway,undeveloped 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40'wide platted road;also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 60'wide platted road right-of-way,access not developed,walking use only 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 20'wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 "Summit Avenue"(Extension 7-S 1067/1101 50'wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to shoreline of Elmwood Avenue) 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 50'wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline,not developed 1453 Park Dr West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive west end 7-S "4795" 33'platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co.Rd. 19 plus tax-forfeited Lot (adjacent to Orono/M'trista Shoreline 10,Block 6,"Bergquist and Wicklund's Park...";undeveloped corridor primarily border) for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes 28 North Shore Drive at"Adams 7-S 4731/4745 40'platted road right-of-way extension in plat of`Bergquist and Wicklund's Street"Extension Park..."undeveloped,very steep,used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 33'platted right-of-way corridor,pavement does not extend to lake 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 16'platted road right-of-way widens to about 40'at shoreline,paved but no boat launching available 31 Orchard Beach Place 7-S West of 1530 50'platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline;tree growth and topography limits vehicular access 32 Highwood Lane Extension 7-S 4156/4167 20'platted alley right-of-way to shoreline;steep slope to shoreline,undeveloped Highwood Rd 33 Highwood Road Alley 7-S 4051/4075 20'platted alley right-of-way to shoreline,not developed 34 Corral Road Extension 17-N 1785/1825 20'platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking access Concordia 35 Eagerness Point Accretions 18-N Across from Accretions to the 40'originally platted road in the plat of"Eagerness";title 1965/1985 registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no Fagerness Pt Rd longer abutting shoreline;it appears that there is no public access remaining Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Swimming 60'wide platted road("Carman St")used as a City swimming beach Casco Pt Rd Beach 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60'wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle- undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane"(Ivy Place) 20-S 3486/3508 60'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline east of Ivy Place- steep,used for drainage 39 "Spring Street" Aka 2600/2618 40'wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along Casco Pt Rd south side of plat of"Kaster Cove"-undeveloped,walking access only 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Carman/ 30'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline,fishing dock 3555 Frederick 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Lydiard Swimming 66'wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline,used as a City Rd Beach swimming beach Big Island A N.End of"Lawn Avenue" 23-N 110 33'wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46,Morse Island Park B E.end of"Tooisit Avenue" 23-N 110/120 33'wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45,Morse Island Park-slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90'wide platted roadway between Lots 38 and 39,Morse Island Park-City has established drivable gravel road for emergency&service vehicle access D "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+/-wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54,Morse Island Park E "Meadow Lane East Extended" 23-S 280/290 20'wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60,Morse Island Park-steep slope makes use difficult F "Meta-Comet Avenue South" 23-S 340 33'wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Park and Lot 3,Morse Island Park 2"d Addition G "Massasolt Avenue West End" 23-S 440/450 33'wide platted roadway between Lot 1,Morse Island Park and Lot 1,Scrivers subdivision of Lot E,Morse Island Park-steep slope H "Meadow Lane Alley" 23-S 450/460 16'platted alley between Lots 5 and 6,Morse Island Park-drivable for emergency and service vehicles I "Pleasant View Street" 22-S 570/600 30'platted roadway between Lot 9,Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe PG #17-3983 Exhibit G Laura Oakden From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:33 PM To: Laura Oakden;Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Fwd: Changes coming to Orono density FYI -re: 2618 Casco Point Rd Sent from my iPhone. Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Tucker<maryltucker@gmail.com> Date: December 29, 2017 at 17:50:44 CST To: Penny Saiki <pennysaikiAgmail.com> Cc: Melanie Curtis<mcurtis@,ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Re: Changes coming to Orono density Hi Melanie, I voice Penny's sentiments as well. We have lived on Casco Point 22 years and lived under strict zoning codes we abided by. The fire lanes have been around along time. Does not seem right that all these people coming in building huge houses on their lots and then to ask for the fire lane. Very interesting these builders think they don't have to live by the rules, their rule is to build then ask. Why wouldn't they have to live with the zoning rules we all abide by. Thank you! Mary Tucker 612.578.6415 On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Penny Saiki <pennysaikingmail.com>wrote: Hi, Melanie- I wanted to jump in my 2 cents for tonight's Planning Commission meeting. 1. It doesn't seem fair to vacate the fire lane by the Vogstrum property, so they can use it as theirs. I'd vote NO. (Also the people at the end of the Circle have installed an electric fence in the fire lane next to their property- so we can all drop our dogs there?) 2. The builder could have moved the house forward street side or used a different layout to accommodate the deck within the setback, but they are going for the variance after the the house foundation and framing is in i place. We have all lived by the rules, so it doesn't seem right to allow a builder the `'I forgot" approach to zoning laws. In fact, it weakens all the zoning ordinances to allow that approach. I'd vote NO. 3. The subdivision of the Jundt's land is too bad, but if it falls in zoning parameters, I would think it OK if the developers pay the changes to the street and any utilitiy relocations or improvements. I don't know if it has been a policy of the past, but it also does not seem fair for the rest of us in Orono to subsidize redevelopment of a private property. I'd vote YES with those requirements stated upfront to the developers. Thank you. Best to you, Penny Saiki 2874 Casco Point Road Orono 2 PC #17-3983 38 20-117-23 21 0032 38 20-117-23 24 0032 Exhibit H WENDY W DANKEY THOMAS&PATRICIA KUBALAK 2599 CASCO POINT RD 2623 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 210035 38 20-117-23 24 0035 PATRICK FITZGERALD GARY L&JOAN M MARQUARDT 9509 PHEASANT CROSSING 2617 CASCO POINT RD ST BONIFACIUS MN 55375 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 38 20-117-23 24 0036 ZI IIHUA LIU&YING LII BRUCE J HEDBLOM AND 2677 CASCO POINT RD CAROL J CLINE-HEDBLOM WAYZATA MN 55391 2601 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20.117-23 23 0021 38 20-117-23 24 0039 DAVID D GUTERMUTH JEFFREY&BARBARA ESSEN LYNN J GUTERMUTH 2648 CASCO PT RD 2665 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-2323 0022 38 20-117-23 24 0042 KARL S FREIENMUTH PAUL J KASTER 2659 CASCO POINT RD 2600 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 36 20-117-23 24 0002 TODD M KIMMES 2660 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0003 /',�-1 C / DAVID L RUNKLE _� -�'l 2684 CASCO POINT RD •�' WAYZATA MN 55391 pL)1 ) 1 1z-i) 38 20-117-23 24 0029 DUSTIN J KINDL V 0 c " ( � L/r%f 11/k l CASTE L KINDL 2649 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-124 17-23 NORMA GREENE&ALAN GREENE # 39 83 2645 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0031 MISSA T ALBACHTEN RE(;EIVEt 1016 PARK PLACE BURNSVILLE MN 55337 OCT Q r' g n } CITY OF ORONO Item 3 Date Application Received: December 1,2017 A Date Application Considered as Complete:December 1,2017 �O!YTO 60-Day Review Period Expires:January 29,2018 60-Day Extension Period Expires:March 30,2018 � a To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members tie c` Dustin Rief, City Administrator �40sHo0" From: Laura Oakden, Planner `_`_0 Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: 18-3992, Revolution Design and Build o/b/o Keven Kretsch,3155 Casco Circle, Variance request Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for a new deck to encroach 11'6" into the setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval Background Mr. Kevin Kretsch and Mr. Rob Aldecocea with Revolution Design and Build have submitted an application for an average lakeshore setback variance. The applicants are currently building a new home located on the site and propose a new deck for the home. The new deck will be shorter than the previous deck and slightly taller. The overall footprint of the new deck is less compared to the original deck. The existing deck was encroaching into the average lakeshore setback roughly 17 feet and the new proposed deck will encroach roughly 11'6"feet into the setback.The previous deck was a two level deck that sat 7 feet and the second level was 5 tall both with a 3 foot deck railing. The new proposed deck will be 9'6"tall with a 3 foot deck railing.The new deck will be roughly 2 feet taller than the taller section of the previous deck. This home received a variance in September 11,2017 for retaining walls in the 75' lake yard to stabilize the shoreline. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 and 78-1680 Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1C Required Proposed Rear 30' 37.2 West Side 10' 25.2 East Side 10' 10.5 Lakeshore 75' 122' Average Lakeshore 132/137 feet 122 feet(12' encroachment) Section?78-350-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100 Actual 30,622 s.f. (0.69 acre) 123'@ 75' 130'@ OHWL Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier FILE#17-3992 January 16,2018 Page 2 of 4 7,463.5 s.f. 6,635s.f. 6,198s.f. Tier 1 30,622 s.f. (25%) (21.67%) (21.91%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback(Section 78-1279): Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. Though the new deck is smaller than the existing deck, it is not being built in the same location (higher)so non-conforming protections do not apply. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed deck will be slightly taller than the previous deck but is proposed to have a smaller encroachment of 11'6" into the average lakeshore setback. The applicant has worked to mitigate the encroachment by proposing a deck that does not encroach as much compared to the previous deck.The deck will not interfere with the sightlines of the neighbors meeting the intent and purpose for the average lakeshore setback with is a sightline setback for the lake. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a deck in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. FILE#17-3992 January 16,2018 Page 3 of 4 a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The owner proposes to install Improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The neighboring home to the east is set back further from the lake than most of the surrounding homes resulting in the unique average lakeshore setback applied to the Property; c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to permit the deck will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners. d. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable,as the use for a deck as an accessory to single family dwelling are an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property abuts Lake Minnetonka with both abutting neighbors setback over 130 feet from the lake. The proposed deck is angled away from the neighboring homes as to not interfere with the sightline of the lake. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The subject house if located closest to the lake in the area of Casco Point,which gently curves. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant states that the variance is necessary.A deck lakeward of the home is a customary improvement in this area. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health,safety,comfort,or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The topography and location of the adjacent home to the east create practical difficulties affecting the Property;The applicant was working within the footprint of the existing encroaching deck but is slightly taller creating a new encroachment;the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. FILE#17-3992 January 16,2018 Page 4 of 4 The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the average lakeshore setback variance request. Public Comments Staff received an email for an Orono resident who provided comments of concerns Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Neighbor Acknowledgement Form Exhibit D. Survey and 3D Sketch Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Resident Comments Exhibit G. Map and Property Owners List ' PC #18-3992 Exhibit A City of Orono Variance Application Sheet Address: Application# -3 5,9„t) l()A, 2750 Kelley Parkway < Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: ��_ O-- 7 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: h� fax 952-249-4616 Fee: $275�� 4.14.4e*- j1,({ / 3 Mailing Address: y� A. P.O.Box 66 I Escrow: $700 $1,000 G~ Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0068 Notes: 'fKESHO�� Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: 3155 Casco Circle,Orono,MN 55391 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Average setback variance request for proposed new deck construction. (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Rob Aldecocea,Revolution Design and Build Phone (Primary): 612-968-7655 Mailing Address: 18110 Minnetonka Blvd. City: Wayzata ZIP:55391 Email: rob@revolutiondesignbuild.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant lig check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Patty&Kevin Kretsch Phone(Primary): 763-226-8086 Mailing Address: 3155 Casco Circle City: Orono ZIP:55391 Email: kevinkretschacomcast.net APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed vi ail. ---, Applicant Signature: Date: II/.30/11 Applicant Signature: Date: i Property Owner Signature: /40, / /`_./7 Date: I/ zGf J7 RECEIVED Property Owner Signature: '\ Lit-,sci-i Date: tl 3c1 I \-1 DEC, 77tt Variance Application--September 2017 E 1 0 1 LU 1 Page 4 # 39 9p , CITY OF ORONO /o o City of Orono Variance Pre-Application asci MeetingForm smog- (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) I For Office Use Only ���� 11 City Planner t t1w+ V i f�, ii' v Date/ Time*Meeting Dateme• tO I7-V, PC Date. 441 t%O .?Lit) Met with• fob A`rt4COCe" What Is the purpose of a pre pp/Jastlon meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code,and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: Ij\ -[A CA 9- Property Identification Number(PIN): 2.p i 1.7 3 LSO ailtA Zoning District: . -' .- Size of Property: _0' DISCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: tlIW4verage Setback to Side Yard Setback ❑Rear Yard Setback 0 Lake/Front Yard Setback 0 Hardcover 0 Lot Coverage 0 Lot Area 0 Lot Width ©Other: _+legA&E. Sava- VAizon JG� Eli" fog- 141_4TICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practical Initials: Difficulties Documentation Form,understands it it hasb Property y aseenexplained to them, andis Ower' aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance v application. _Initials: Applicant's SILL.S AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall payfor consultant Initials: � expenses incurred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, Property as wall as provide an escrow in the amount of$--------- to guarantee payment of the Owner's above. 1 Initials: OTHER INFORMATION: _.fit---(- OM LaNI A ant.DEnJ trath tt/kcl j j$2,540 _eS41u�f 11.0. DGfr+e ar.Pow 00046 QF.rt.Mrr. tum, cov4- ttfrucktas.1._ °Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be completed��r�ity s Applicant Signature: q� Date: 044 ill Owner Signature: Date: l l/ 2117 RECEIVED Varf knce Appfkatlon-January 2017 es9 e3 DEC 01 ZU1 r 3992 CITY OF ORONO FILE NO.: 18-3992 PLANNER: Laura Oakden ADDRESS: 3155 Casco Circle Assign a Zoning # in Blue Book Owner: Patty & Kevin Kretsch / Sign w/zoning number and 3155 Casco Circle instructions Wayzata, MN 55391 Enter payment in cash register Applicant: (copy receipt for application) Revolution Design and Build Rob Aldecocea / Stamp with Date & App. # 18110 Minnetonka Blvd / Wayzata, MN 55391 "Notice to neighbors" labels Create File / Enter in Access / Report mailing label ✓ File folder label ,/ Tracking Sheet Record Application Number in Street File / Copy Application for Chris & Finance ✓ Scan in Application Create Electronic File Notify the Neighbors: Mail copy of legal notice to neighbors DATE(S) MAILED: For File: Certificate of Mailing Affidavit of Publication MC‘l#SID Pe4240 Ir 601.1 7-,-..- -... .••......-.-----..-.-...-.-................•-.........- .,..-.*-,....,-.,........,...-..............,-........-,--....,...,,................,.....,-....=.....,.,-..-,-..r.,..............-,....-..,,,...;,-......,,,,,.........,,......-....r.- . - OP LOTS 38 . N:' 39, PFLING 'F itRK ANT. 7.4.77,'T - 7 . • i Or ADJACENT V A:.-...1,T ED I,AKE Sti OPE .,.VT:"N'_.-E • - - HENNEPIN CfDi.:7'-'T1: MINNESCI.TA _— —----- .-- ; C A:,•••.,.--VO_, CiF.C/tE, , - . _...........___,.....-....----7,i- ......-•••••--....- --. . :%::•'• ' P- I • . . _ ..t.,•';-:ei-.....Is 1.-.,-•1 i - _-7.___- _...-..,----.^. : ; t_",‘...!) i ‘ - , . ' 1 ••• i _ ; $r•r--- . I. A . . , i .•:, .. . --— ,. .4 —.---• '• 1.. 7 .• I ... --t'•------: -- - I - - _ , - i ; -1 ---- -- , - • '',7---,-c_7----""• . ••• , •,.. •- •-..- - ' ‘ 1 ..., ... , --'''.- C ' ..-• V „ 1 ..' .F. - i \-- --; -_-.1-A--.. .•----------• 1.I A Ic E I A9-;N N PTO,:\ K 1 st:AS T SP:CI:1-? — , • f I 4 --mr-- ------ Hir‘ A6604....i A.1 V...6, UI . •••• -' ‘. -'- •. CON!VITINGV;GINEERS LAND --P. V.-V(3LS t V.TE PL.IIN:LRF — —— _elr- _ ______ -..,., ..7.30 • 10.,:3*of,..^,••• ..'!"'. '1"37" IRECEVE DEC u 1 Z01/ # 3 9 92 CITY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen waming", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5- You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. \- evtr\ First Middle Last 3155 CaSCO Ci Address -740 3--a aCo KCZ(c; City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. Signature ✓ariance Application-September 2017 DECU i� i Page u 39 9 I 3' t M CITY OF ORONO PC #18-3992 Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM ._. - ,.. This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2)requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties,address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. if you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." The proposed deck design is reasonable and typical.and is similar to other homes commonly found in the district. 2. °The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." - ' II •I - - .•• • .- . ..• ► '. A. l- - -.. . ..1- e. . ..'.• -.' '.• .- . .. .- prnpertyand the landowner seeks to reduce the size of said non-conformity 3. "The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality.' If granted,,the variance will not alter the essentialcharacter of the locality as the smaller deck design i5 in l eeping with other hopes commonly found along the lakeshore 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." The request for this variance is not based Qn economic considerations. 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116J.06, Subd.2,when in harmony with this Chapter." N/A 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." The variance request is for a use that is allowed by the City of Orono ZoningCode. RECEIVED Variance Application—September 2017 Page 7 It 3992 DEC 0 'all CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." N/A 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The special conditions of the structure in Question are peculiar to the landowner'spropertygs the condition js due to the existing non-conforming clerk and lean-to structures. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district as they are specific to this property. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant" - • .s 'J• • 1- • • •1 a • • - - - g- I•a • a- i 1- g • •- • • .g•• � 1 . 1- •• print a a- .•• . •- -4 . . - 11..1- I. ' •11•. '• - ' • .- a 1 '•a • .- .- l l.l l- .. 1- 1 •.•1 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health.safety.comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The variance is necessary to alleviate the difficulty of conforming to the existinggrandfathered deck and lean-to design that limits the functionality and potential of the new home,which is designed in a reasonable and typical manner.similar to other homes in the district. Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary); The landowner/applicant desires to construct a new deck in the footprint of the existing non-conforming deck and 4- • 1 . . A . g. ' 114 •11.. • - , 1 1- i- , gags- 1- • •.•.-• !- • •- ;g .1 taller than the existing deck structure.but significantly smaller in both area and setback from the Lakeshore.and eliminates the lean-to roof structure entirely.The resulting design is a good compromise in that it is smaller in footprint closer to the house.further from the lakeshorg.and utilizes agiass-baluster railing system which will improve sight lines of the adjacent properties.Additionally the immediate neighbors to the east and west sides of the propertyare supportive of the proposed deck design.We have articulated the size of the deck to be moderate yet functional and provide reasonable access to the beautiful la gshore and lawn for the landowner. RECEIVED Variance Application—September 2017 Pam e DEC U 1 'ZUi CITY OF ORONO PC ' #18-3992 Exhibit C ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM 1(we .t v i of "J /LI'S CeQS T (L -d . [print name(.)] [print address] • have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3155 Casco Circle also referred to as Land Use Application No.r— I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. /1-30 '? -rty Own: Date 4_r 4111111101.111111111111111111111IIP property Own 'r Date W If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Wore ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) 1-kti t • ofo c5Ci)-(.40 £f 2A- 400 55 l[print nialle(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3155 Casco Circle also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 7 I l /I/30 f k i Property Owner 1 Date ? LJI )&J4Za 'kP 1/ ,Pr rty Owner Deire _ If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. To: City of Orono From: Ward and Kathy Armstrong Re: Kretsch House(under construction) This is to confirm that we have reviewed the building plans and digital rendering for the new deck and are completely on board with its design and location. We understand that the deck will be slightly higher than the original deck and we appreciate the City's concern. However,given that the deck will fit completely within the prior decks footprint,will be set back further from the lake than the original and will be architecturally more attractive,we believe that the new deck will be an improvement. We hope this letter addresses your concern about how this new deck will be received by the adjacent neighbors. If you have questions or would like to discuss this further,please don't hesitate to contact us. Thanks! Regards, r/ aVntariAl Ward and Kathy Armstrong 3165 Casco Circle Wayzata, MN 55391 wardarmstrong@aol.com 612-801-0326(cell) November 28, 2017 To the city of Orono: After reviewing the plans and renderings for the new home of Patty and Kevin Kretsch we are in total support of the project. The new deck is a big improvement over the old one. It is smaller and has a much cleaner look enhancing the lines of the new home. The house itself will set farther back from the lake and has a smaller footprint. We are looking forward to the finished project. It will be a wonderful improvement! Sincerely, Chuck and Betty Downey c)d-e )616• l iI PC #18-3992 Exhibit-DB ' I0E9* NKA CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR 18110 BOULEVARD CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR _.cwi DEsae ria:or�xlnses �LNNETO KEVIN KRETSCH KEVIN KRETSCH 38eot god SFNtLake Aare A •••� WAYZnTq MN 55391 OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE r b,e 952.594.5037 HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART ,k„ REVOLImONOESI NMALEICOM OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE ,7.'A -SIT MN LIC.BO631863 — 'N.,,,,,,,......._ HENNEPIN DECAL IESCRPTON a?REWSPS HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA__— .�a K axe.,,.I• '" �" 'IsslA:DATE:12/04/17 Lale ae�.39.SPRING :.qac ofal,aseRt Vacated .I a lona • tract of aOVocal.LavAnue.ma ke�A • CLE La. EV 5gN5 CASCO CARE tos.00 $ a d.ol'I . 1 M ASC CIRCLE 1aA3t T• ' w,. Lot O m -N 83°07' :.m ma.ee s°! C 7.00„E 105.00 '® r r „m a N •. ,ns r \ ,,,,,,..:00_,./ 3 0 .1� rAaatN.b i...auan. '".oa- � `_-�„Nmean mea a �. I 64 IVII 1 1." ''' 747 v.,m, ''' , 1 v'/j. \ i 1 A b un [PAWNS,'SL.nGe i 1 I1� M nP aro based Wm .e , f I w=- _/ this rt intends ta show I.bounden,.of tRe .. -,�,+a'n F I .e 1 m, .dva�.• w-f ! 11salt, 'Par . e 1 I I . also.1 I��, Pal. lwOtte �nrapNr trees Ar the...et,,the....p. od,ocenl Rouses II 3 ,IIS., a I I I _ ilv go no' m I I :ow° too.,....a„d N `ian 11 I 1 1--. Aorwarmw,t. I l Pura, � �.a,.- ,„. .�., r 3•, \ 38 '; P sEo 1 1 n 1 I * x....I ='is .- X38 • { ';iriG r I .,,��, ..Z..� ; I jiI .77 1) I l 1 Ma) J.7 1 '1 �:�I ,1 / l' I .)Man roa._[ ,A) a 1 . . ; ,.a,.. N 0OSTNG i 1 .4! _,_ .,I _ .)0..,rnenl.o ` NTUSE °' °- °� �, 11 a.- Z 1 MI�� II o�P Pm 1 't ori i { N J6A,�, 'a EXISTBJG °� m I I ° 005TRIG1 ' ' .,. p I }'1 t l S,X:Sta. ° l • ... ',8039E ° HOUSE .� PROPOSED I ,..am j aS _ M HOUSE 1 1 �- -ILCM(AI I ti� - �_ NNettEASTND • I •t i iRtJ VMS i s J I e; r /A 53 % m3�____ ,, rv+a,<,no.M..• —4-- - twD.nel'_-,,--•1 _,.. t . !'..!. t , �tNc ...- . _I I.. W11-2'''. .g1 _— , — �� _Jyc IA : _ LLI U0r"JUL " • -17":„.____- L - J �`. ___ .T2797� ems: • �^� II- V..' 85'49227- 'a - _ -....5 85.20' w tai si... 1..: ` W - ^, a4,,,1 -�y 7 9 m- --_' > ,.. 2 'J` W , tip. y --- a„ -..-oma_ �'" uo- ,ti..,:;.` z LAKE -. o MINNETONKA LAKE MINNETONKA V EAST UPPER LAKE EAST UPPER LAKE GRONBERG AND 6 _ cl .., B - -- GRONBERG AND m"^ U ASSOCIATES, INC.:. — L° :,",°.u-= --. lvT` >r� .." ASSOCIATES INC a ,' -- - — - °ABLATING[NORMAN,LAND 5-8-17 - _G, CONSULTING BNGIACCRB,LAND ay a ,a a,e QU SUeV[w0 k 88 NNCRS a _-i°�^'—^ SURVAy°RB k SITE PLANNERS n [D � ,vrrn 1•. LOON LAAA.sw=See n 5 17-1711 17-1.58 i Ott CC Ili)) OMco z AS-BUILT[EXISTINGI SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE:1"-30'_0. Z SCALE 1'=3011' SUITT S1 [1 yfit 011Oly k Y te -Ir 'a v e, _ Vii (t 1 -a., : of--=,,o X �, tBt BOULEVARD t 4 t • _ A: ' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BOULEVARD ! WAYZATA MN 55391 KEVIN KRETSCH ? ' L, t�,r ill.' OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE 952.584.5037 REVGLUTGNGEBIGNBU Lo COM „`_ -S I til] I HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA MN LIC.BC631B63 ! f 1` llLeat pEsruvnaN vreus[s �'. /1{Il�ulll tlllu111 �.� 1 .€ 111 I.. !�� ` odp PH as.te SeNMG ore venale a and .1 of ISSUE DATE.12/04/1 7 cwrt VocalryMwq LAPP Shore♦.erne cl of IM ,I Q ♦.n«. 1.I,«teiv Isla.u`r1.E L4 whe, TEVISIGNS �" *'� CIRCLE a I IM a e+1`tM' . . ..,_ CASCO ,osoo .- .. , •. a«om„eo„«.«.ewe . ^ _'. ,.ou/ «se L.eI mtvn ro ,nwN arses ncn O T DAVIT I , .�IAlt °=":,:::::m iii A EXI:iTING EXTERIOR PHOTO __________ j - $ i f i \ 4 "•lam ;;;.7.7.7:,,'7,.°1:3;...,'05,',..,;,,,,,:vw. u. .... 1 � 1 este on IM IawMenone. oahe am u. 1 �.,,4 ' et a Ase,n...ono,theeon L.1 clow •.. 1 I - a *- ortcr purport tore ony etre,:,mro.mvnr I nr,e.. 1 E 4 38m I la (1 w 7 1 \ t 1 3 3 ' r ' n� s EXSTNG 1 N �r / • q .. 1R't.- -►a}1 N 110115E ' li 1 4�� 2 I ql, lei p a e,w rI •,^ IAT I Il _t I g 1 1 1 0 1 Jae! .xw t�1 1 4 .��I 1 I h i1 ;i I/ a EXISTING; +. ..., S. s- lac� " _- rr 111~" �Mqi' r r r — �.._�._.I, N i In _ Z .. 4. iI "6" 4 I.t4rg,_: 1 LjFT.' m . ,11;.,,._. c 1 0 C —‘--,..7...1---- � •/ W +r ——' ATEA LAKE. SHORE , 'UE __ Ci tko BEXISTING EXTERIOR PHOTO �e — !~' B— '- ` 1® ..... W LO IV"?'- W ‘ - <Y 1j -1' �1 ~I . W� o ! `�I MINNETONKA CA!) Vw / EAPE E -All � l " =RONBERGAND t " yoU3 LE 13414010 _ ASSOCIATES,^ Nr= CONSULTING AIOINBIlI.AIID ,-.-1, wo.. w•w. �Co,R e __ /'"14t54' 1rO5 .QNN RS1..."(./ . ,,,,,4 7.7—'7-1711 U-1 In, 1u11�rU LO 4041111110t I AAS-BUILT(EXISTING]SITE PLAN L7 SCALE 1'=3E O' SHEET/ ///��� . C /\i EXISTING EXTERIOR PHOTO l .1 I im 1 2F, , ri :, -1 • ; a- ,------= - , I 9 ,t 4 r-----zi _ _ iI r ''' :[---1 .' I,- , .-z-= ,,,, I , ....,. 1 o I I -7- z -:' \ \ i-------- I -- . ,,, , I i i , I I I i i '', PC-INI Si !I ih ,r—,I 1 11 1 f ! 1 1 Rn I N \ I I --" A'--4' 0 \ ;6 im 1 ... ,...„..,.,. A. , , ..„ r . , r.Tru,L if ' - 111111 h rnla A .< \,\. If ,,, ,, 1 , , is ; ,11,44 = ...... i ). '7,g', 16p1 !1-!_-_I 1 l' 1 < , \ „ • x i 8 \ 1 1 6-_-4_411 M.— I, I AI. \ , • , • , 1 z 1....1g mm • \Y\ 1 11 ! I t i I i I 1 I i___,., _, , 1 1 i F . I i '-- =-, I 1 , r --,--r----k\ 16. _T. MOM ,,__ 1 1 ; _ 4 1 ___, , 1 . ,PI— ----`1=— -------/ 111 1 , 11 , I 1 i 11 il i I i IL 1 II I , I L 111 I I , l I Ai, ,-iir 1 N I 1 I < l'ill - 1 .1._ ‘,E-671 -," 1 z bi ,1 iffigJ' 1 1111111 ' 1 ji ll 'i 1 cn PLANS FAEPARED FOR 1!111/11411Ti2 41:Ftliiii 5 -• `l< PATTY & KEvIN nINA1:2§114!1 A f2 F igal> E '' M F5221'ig8 CA • KRETSCH RESIDENCE n...) 3155 CASCO CIRCLE,ORONO,MN 55391 . . vJzIc , Q ' � R r� �cif1/1/41.14 um ase , e ti t111 I.,E, 11\ , , - 16110 MINNETONKA \{\{{{\{{\\ ) � CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCAPttM Cr MOSSES BOULEVARD 3 �. - Lata 3e me^s,Loi,e ea na WAYZATA MN 55391 mow. ■ ■� KEVIN KRETSCH �, 7�been Rams LAam R, 952.594.5037 j); -'''I III ��i I ,I�I���� I,,� I '''',4'::',,,''''•" OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART - M .c,.betatron Aso°w r�wLunwoESN euLocaM — --—— - 4OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE _ a1 as ,ea MN LIC.BC631B63 qw u`^' -,r, - - HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA_..-- r ISSUE 0A1E:12/04/17 I . owe]) aero rp e FEMSIONS .�: a me b N un CASCO CIRCLo 00 - E a BSOT 00 E ./ ..a wa roe,m illi ' 2,4 D v v eel on wH�:swH� I w\ PROPOSED DECK-PERSPECTIVE RENDERING :p I �L -sy ee nae ro•., lr. '•�a' n` �J I + r` y 1 lw°...-.7%,:,°,0r .ea. v a nwa nae • ena .yw __—_ o �e mn poae.a lne.eo' R 1- I ..7r,„;,,,y o 1 eon I 3. 1 , -..... .-_.. 1 �.I 38 PPOPOSED pHs:Ion non tool. .to) 1 • I 4. f II i)cw L.i591 ® rNEI - .ra 1 I I • gli, i i npP�DIi 7 banal.,- .. 1 �) 1 / 01 3)wa floe,.LACE !SI 199 II - - E MIMI 1 III �� N i A L ,+ N Al ea..roa f 4J • ar�� ��,� 1, ...m yj I}r ... HOUSE/RISS ;\ - 1 1 1 VIII° ' - 4 IN . 1 �...—,.= ,, -- il , J. i I 111w -�� 1 if I 1 1 1 r __,--- C E 4KE SNQP1- AVE LU \ A TED U *PROPOSED DECK-PERSPECTIVE RENDERING -, F., _ B b"v.... ` . W ..e ^1r 0 -- �" -l27 97' '/� .M -3 85.20 7::-11''31:---\..„.:*;"-:.„_-'-':-. " — — L. LO t - rLLJ cc � �ie PNS •04 o ! ---�- i. ,e 1 LAKE MINNETONKA w V o•iiiiiii-i, '�° P al MO .r. EAST UPPER LAKE ^' UIIA ����r A r � U3 E GSON ERGIATE AND »Y:w '�.. LU SOCIATES INC. E 1— 8 :w -"— SUL7INC SNCIN6�PS.LAND 0.2-1. ""' - ) 2AI' - _� 165 1I-9"'I .t PLANNERS ' itt CC un co PROPOSED SITE PLAN .. Z :1'=30-0' ,SHEET PROPOSED DECK-PERSPECTIVE RENDERING Al .^ 'C'' H {/ • PC #18-3992 Exhibit E City of Orono f�, onfo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet w Property Address: _ tEs �% Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle one) ? Tier : Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:01S11NG HARDCO) In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A h'' ''? 1 =` S.F. B _ r ?" S.F. C .. S.F. D /i S.F. K~ _ S.F. S.F. S.F. li { S.F. J is • S.F. • S.F. S.F. _ S.F. S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. •V S.F. w S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover r.- SF. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): r = S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 12) Total Excludable Hardcover --1 S.F._ (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from ane(1)) S.F. S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage 1(3)=(4)I °Xa (Proposed Hardcover next� page) Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has beenrtl+ lrE 0 V E D ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the CO Code,the Code provisions will pr�eryt r, 1 2017 017 Page 18 # 399 ? _ U[� 0 t CITY OF ORONO 1 , II City of Orono novo.,, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet �`Y f Property Address: - _ it` Prepared by: : . , Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle one) Tier ) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:{eROPOSgA ttAROOUVERs in the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Toad Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width (care Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 301 (720 S"F") A ��i ' , S.F. _ .? S.F. S.F. ", . 7c, S.F. E _ 1. . S.F. F I1 " ..... • _ S.F. G ,' .. S.F. H ` 1 S.F. S.F. S.F. I( 4 S.F. L S.F. N} S.F. N S.F. o _ S.F. S.F" Cr I S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F.1 S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover '. -7' S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78--1884): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract fine(2)from line(1)) a 6f 9? S.F. 14) Total Lot Area 3 0,e, "C. 2. S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] ._ . ; % Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has bellg 6F-JV ED ensure the acctracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Co ,dethe Code provisions rt revty 1 2 017 Page 19It 3 9 92- CITY,,OF ORONO • PC #18-3992 Exhibit F Laura Oakden From: Melanie Curtis Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2017 2:36 PM To: Laura Oakden;Jeremy Barnhart Subject: FW: Changes coming to Orono density FYI Melanie Curtis 952.249.4627 mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Original Message From: Penny Saiki [mailto:pennysaiki@gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 27, 2017 2:34 PM To: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Changes coming to Orono density Hi, Melanie- wanted to jump in my 2 cents for tonight's Planning Commission meeting. 1. It doesn't seem fair to vacate the fire lane by the Vogstrum property,so they can use it as theirs. I'd vote NO. (Also the people at the end of the Circle have installed an electric fence in the fire lane next to their property-so we can all drop our dogs there? ) 2.The builder could have moved the house forward street side or used a different layout to accommodate the deck within the setback, but they are going for the variance after the the house foundation and framing is in place. We have all lived by the rules,so it doesn't seem right to allow a builder the "I forgot"approach to zoning laws. In fact, it weakens all the zoning ordinances to allow that approach. I'd vote NO. 3. The subdivision of the Jundt's land is too bad, but if it falls in zoning parameters, I would think it OK if the developers pay the changes to the street and any utilitiy relocations or improvements. I don't know if it has been a policy of the past, but it also does not seem fair for the rest of us in Orono to subsidize redevelopment of a private property. I'd vote YES with those requirements stated upfront to the developers. Thank you. Best to you, Penny Saiki 2874 Casco Point Road Orono 1 RC #18-3992 _ Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit G �. Date: 11/13/2017 ) 20-1 7- I , (23► (30) (29) (28) (57) (26) 29-117-23-12 Buffer Size: 350 feet o 30 60 120 ft Map Comments: t t t t t 3155 Casco Circle,Orono This data (I) is furnished 'AS Is with no representation as to RECEIVED completens n ble forlegal, shed with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) lege engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or bas resulting from this data. DECU1 2017 For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 30013th Street South,Mi eapolis,MN 55487/gis.info©hennepin.us CITY OF ORONO RUN DATE:11/13/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 34 0007 38 20-117-23 43 0030 TAMI R WAHLIN G C BECKER/T I MARCHESSAULT 3131 CASCO CIR 3133 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 TAMI R WAHLIN G C BECKERJT I MARCHESSAULT 3131 CASCO CIR 3133 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-1 17-23 34 0008 38 20-117-23 43 0031 JOANNE D JONES TRUSTEE THE CASCO CO 3129 CASCO CIR 3100 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOANNE D JONES CITY OF ORONO PARKS 5100 FRANCE AVE S#104 P O BOX 66 EDINA MN 55410 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 34 0021 38 20-117-23 43 0057 R G&P A DUDLEY BELLE M YAFFE REV TRUST 3125 CASCO CIR 3185 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RONALD G&PATRICIA A DUDLEY HARRY YAFFE&BELLE YAFFE 3125 CASCO CIRCLE SO 3185 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0022 STACY R MARKS 3127 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 STACY R MARKS 3127 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0022 C ALEXANDER/D J HAWKINSON 3205 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 DOUGLAS HAWKINSON 3205 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0023 E STRATTON&D CALLAHAN 3195 CASCO OR ORONO MN 55391 EARL STRATTON DEBORAH CALLAHAN 3195 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0026 W D ARMSTRONG/K S ARMSTRONG 3165 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 WARD D ARMSTRONG KATHLEEN S ARMSTRONG 3165 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0027 KEVIN R KRETSCH&P KRETSCH 3155 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 KEVIN R KRETSCH PATRICIA KRETSCH 3155 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0028 B C DOWNEY&B A DOWNEY 3145 CASCO C1R ORONO MN 55391 B C DOWNEY&B A DOWNEY 3145 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23430029 RECEIVED K A SHEEHAN&N A SHEEHAN 3135 CASCO CIR ORONO MN 55391 DEC 01 2011 KEVIN A&NOELLE A SHEEHAN est 1 18479 SCHROERS FARM RD y ' 3 9 O EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 6 CITY OF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEWED DEC 01 2017 3 9 9? CITY OF ORONO , AO I%V vM//NO lo , 7Av+.-...vp,wwyw o,m,gno� • Y6 @D elZdSi wwA�enennMM ep� ; ! �a4 4 ei @ midst' eP sea5 ' (Duns®nadnv z. 9 ii�f i ialad @ nom sanbl;; 38 20-117-23 34 0007 38 20-117-23 43 0030 TAMI R WAHLIN G C BECKER/P 1 MARCHESSAULT 3131 CASCO CIR 3133 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0008 38 20-117-23 43 0031 JOANNE D JONES CITY OF ORONO PARKS 5100 FRANCEAVES#104 POBOX66 EDINA MN 55410 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 34 0021 38 20-117-23 43 0057 RONALD G&PATRICIA A DUDLEY HARRY YAFFE&BELLE YAFFE 3125 CASCO CIRCLE SO 3185 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0022 STACY R MARKS 3127 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0022 DOUGLAS HAWKINSON 3205 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0023 EARL STRATTON DEBORAH CALLAHAN 3195 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0026 WARD D ARMSTRONG KATHLEEN S ARMSTRONG 3165 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0027 KEVIN R KRETSCH PATRICIA KRETSCH 3155 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0028 B C DOWNEY&B A DOWNEY 3145 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 RECEIVED 38 20-117-23 43 0029 DEC 0 7 2017 KEVIN &NOELR SHEEHAN 184799SC FARM FARM RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 # 39 f? 2 CITY OF ORONO T „uehp,dn-dod esodxe �� Jaded pea, d5 a}e dwa ah as ® 315®J� � 1 of eull Wow Pie v ' I 1 a b' i' ®lead Ilse; Item 4 Date Application Received: December 6,2017 A, Date Application Considered as Complete:December 29,2017 60-Day Review Period Expires: February 27,2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Duston Rief,City Administrator qki sHo4t From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: January 16,2018 Subject: #18-3993, Michael Hayes o/b/o Weldon and Marcia Gilbertson, 684 Tonkawa Road, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background Mr. Michael Hayes has submitted an application for an average lakeshore setback variance. The applicant currently has a home located on the site and proposes to build an addition to two of the existing decks that face Lake Minnetonka. One deck, off of the master bedroom, currently encroaches into the ALS 2 feet,the addition would increase the encroachment to 6 feet. The other deck,off of the living room, encroaches 26 feet. The living room deck is requesting a 7 foot addition creating a roughly 35 foot encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is requesting these addition to make the decks more useful for the family. The applicant has written a narrative explaining in more detail the reasons for this requested variance. (See Exhibit C). If approved,the decks would be 250 and 92square feet. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330-Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1B Required Proposed Rear 30' 183' Side (North) 10' 10.5 Side (South) 10' 9.9 Lakeshore 75' 96.9 Average Lakeshore 97/ 145 feet from lake, 98 feet is furthest encroachment Section 78-330—Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1 acres) 140' Actual 29,808s.f. (0.68 acre) 87' @ 75' 87' @ OHWL Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: 18-3993 January 16,2018 Page 2 of 4 Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 29,808s.f. 7,452 s.f. 7,258 s.f. 7.428 s.f. (25%) (24.35%) (24.91%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback(Section 78-1279): The average lakeshore setback is proposed to increase from the existing 26 foot encroachment to 35 foot encroachment. The master bedroom deck is proposed to increase the encroachment from 2 feet to 6 feet into the average lakeshore setback.The closest point to the lake will set 96.9 feet from the OHWL of the lake. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed deck addition will add 7 feet on the living room deck creating a 96.9 foot setback from the lake and the master bedroom deck will add 3.75 feet to the existing deck creating roughly 105 feet setback from the lake. The deck will marginally interfere with the sightlines of the neighbors meeting the intent and purpose for the average lakeshore setback with is a sightline setback for the lake as the most impacted neighbor, to the north is blocked by the corner of the house,this neighbor would see only the new deck. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance resulting in a permit for construction of a deck in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The owner proposes to install Improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. t 18-3993 January 16,2018 Page 3 of 4 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The neighboring home to the north is set back further from the lake than most of the surrounding homes resulting in the unique average lakeshore setback applied to the Property;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to permit the deck will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a deck is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property abuts Lake Minnetonka with the abutting neighbor to the north sits behind the footprint of the home creating an angled average lakeshore setback which is unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The shape of the lot with the angled average lakeshore setback line and a curved shoreline is unique to this lot. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant states that the variance is necessary. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health,safety,comfort,or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The topography and location of the adjacent home to the north create practical difficulties affecting the Property The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. ti 18-3993 January 16,2018 Page 4 of 4 Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there are demonstrable practical difficulties supporting the average lakeshore setback variance request. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission feel that the increases to the size of the decks are appropriate given the setback constraints? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Project Narrative Exhibit D. Neighbors Acknowledgement Exhibit E. Existing& Proposed Survey/Pictures Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map PC #18-3993 City of Orono Exhibit A Variance Application d � h j Application#y,O r O 50 KellyV 55356 y - 3 Date Received: 1 a—1.-0_C 7 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: fax: 952-249-4616 ,.�, � a„ MaNkrg Address.' Fee: �� �j-r� / '� A. P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $ � OCIDI � `� �G� Crystal Bay.MN 55323-0066 Notes: KFSHO� kfr Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: (,---,',_-,,7---1' 775,,,_,k re;-.,..,..c. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: /e.41, , -t hln -ti.:, Phone(Primary): �,;; i-- s Matting Address: _ :,. ,1 Pte. Email: .� '�.r :- City �;• :-/ � ZIP: <� PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: .,t/-r- .:/).R.r ( ',fa' ... . le'04.;"4--, Phone(Primary): Mailing Address: 6 7a,,-, �.;,1,, - Gci City: L -- i� ' ZIP: ss --.c Email: APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the Information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until It is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: z: ,,% t 410 ,- .Mo City of Orono Variance Pre-Application 1.,‘ 'i .1� sKaa�`` Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) For Office Use Only: City Planner: Meeting Date/Time: PC Date: Met with: What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant In preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code,and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: k, T=� _4 ,i c • - J Property Identification Number(PIN): Zoning District: Size of Property: cq �f z -r S� DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: O Average Setback 0 Side Yard Setback 0 Rear Yard Setback 0 Lake/Front Yard Setback 0 Hardcover 0 Lot Coverage 0 Lot Area 0 Lot Width ❑Other: Applicant's PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or initials: iii,�. Applicant has received the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form, understands it as It has been explained to them, and Is Property aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance Owner's e- ,�' application. Initials: ` Applicant's _ " p -»W• Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred Initials. '' ''' in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, OwPrope erty s ` .; as well as provide an escrow in the amount of$ i �loti.r to guarantee payment of the initials: 4: ,"rte w, OTHER INFORMATION: �_ - *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be completed by City staff. Applicant Signature: ,, Date: /0- /- /7 Owner Signature: 4,0„ Date: /0--/- /7 - " i ' ::, mss. RECEIVED Variance Application—January 2017 DEC 0 62011 Page lit 3993 CITY OF ORAMA PC #18-3993 Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2)requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out It will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." Th4re X/-1,e45 rf�Ck R/c i '/tr� 1" ' i� °a cYJlu . �" '/ 7- f!<t a:a.+f.:, Lit a1 cv,r,nc- L v . aI S;ic p), ' P/vri.rk.i,, • 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." l- dw.titci (pvrc 1 Pi 1-101) c: .2o cc. cn...1L frc Gs 1/1.149/ n 7 Ir-_ T /4.--7)4 o >3e c tr_ 3. 'The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality" } !a✓:i 7�+�6 oAC /l✓�/</t_^;_t:< <�ec.�c SJZc, (/liJr' A-I. be A,lOJtct 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.* /J . 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116.1.06, Subd.2,when in harmony with this Chapter." nab, _ 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." iC)/4. RECEIVED Variance Application—September 2017 DEC 0 6 2017 Page 7 It 3 9 9 3 CITY OF ORONO 7. 'The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." iJ 8. 'The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." '7A c_ /,aus4 %' _sib.IL 1'S closc -fo -+4 Nd),-4i.. FS 41 RC ill 7c fr/v ,r r'I 9. 'The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." 74‹. T f CoAilow r o4 ?14 . cat- - 7Zez, d 55 31 Dr&sio Ro-n 7-0 lac 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.' 11. 'The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the Intent of the Zoning Code.' 12. 'The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.' MA Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): -Tarerc tl/C. 7choo ()ec.1<s o.J t Sicl. o - 't'L UVInt c.L Wc. �.►3c--j-a / IC/CAS P`> ' 'c ) A,u:a `7—c,s' (pies o..1t: y- ) 1 Al (t,..:y /12L L.N J/ z '/// ,51vg - S41v7� Awa— �' p/c. ' - Decks d o . a A(�ec4 4-4 Iii -.�;�, 1'i~ I') t'°G5,"4 _k , wa— "el:1-7 /yt 4 Id s 1,0-,a4 L 5 A"4 P+ t t 4 J.1 i, /(&"'c" i. c� l r w c. 0-‘ S)/L JA.) AJOA.4i. .s a k. p Pv Pcc 7 6,t) u vr,"roll £4j�2 .mow +Lc oova be c.i.. 40/c,)/4 a //-,4 AA J it/CJ �J/v>3�f�✓�°i L�- r=1:L "1-1-Le-- CIA IS S Cs5 RECEIVED Variance Application-September 2017 Page 8 DEC U 61,1 3993 CITY OF OR ONO PC 18-3993 Exhibit C Zoning Application # 18-3993 at 684 Tonkawa Road Statement of scope and purpose of project There are two decks on lakeside of house - one from family room/kitchen which is presently 7 ft towards the shore which we would like to increase to 14 ft. The other is off the master bedroom which is presently 4 ft towards the shore which we would like to increase to 7ft-9in. The deck off family room/ kitchen is not large enough to allow a small table for family meals with grandkids. A 14 ft deck is a small deck when you are having a table & chairs to entertain. The deck off the master bedroom would allow a chaise lounge. Over the years they have tried a number of furniture options but when they have grand kids over it is not workable Both decks were built with the house prior to when Gilbertsons purchased in 2009 and the addition is just to make it workable. We are asking for a variance from average lakeshore setback because of the topography of this area of the lake. We have a 58 ft drop from the road to the lake and deep lots (this lot is 340 feet deep), which created the situation of house placement not being uniform in this area of the lake. The house to the northwest is almost completely behind the Gilbertsons home. We have met with the neighbors and they are in agreement that the addition to the decks will not be noticable from either side, since the footprint of the existing house and trees are blocking the deck expansion from the neighbors' view. PC . #18-3993 Exhibit D ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we)/'i!eht4fZ. 9`aU W.a SPAOg7 of C40 0 /ou,<A w., 44en [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 44.`I -(b"ik b,ra 2j also referred to ifs Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the. .posed hbor's project or use requires Council approval. /�ProAp2e-e-L,PA°tinrrter p_ : c/ (/ �Ti R0/7 ') - /� /74,< /Paiejleile Owner ate tf you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ` ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I(we) of [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the •roposedprovement or proposed use of the property located at also referred • as Lad Use Application No. dn I (we) understand that In executing this . nowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but m = to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed ne • ••is project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner D to Property Owner Date C if you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED DEC 0 8 2017 Valance Application—January 2017 # 3 9 93 CITY OF ORONO Pape 15 PC #18-3993 ::: Exhibit E The Gregory Group _�--`'` - .o ,\\ INVOICE.C57 J� / A` �. . A��\ SCALE: 1"= JV d.b.a. / 935 • \ (\ F.B.NO. fin ` 'G r / „.„ -`� LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. L / s3 , • >�;4 a os Denotes Found Iron Monument LAND SURVEYORS 1962 b c i'\sae � / i �`� �� LA1V SUR V 1�YOitJ j 0��(t 0 �Oj \/ �d�9 \Y ••; ` a 0 Denotes Iron Monument REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA ;"�`' 1t" Qf/ - ' \ �, G, �' `� \\, �� x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 7601 73rd Avcnue North (763)560-3093 vk (, _' r . s l '-1.3',9 9 "- �''7'`. yt�''' _•a'> Minneapolis,Minnesota 55428 Fax No.560-3522 \ ' 40 ...._.V. .. - j o /�( \\ ������ 11111���j `9 ,_ F / trd 24 : nt i \ '954 \ \ \ \ \ 2 X�. -14:N. N� v' 9 . ,iA. \.956._ \--: \\ \ �� i .. .. 6s EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR: a� / s 6'--...,%.‘___ -,,,,„\.\ \''` ` \ \ \ , '�;�' MICHAEL HAYES HOMES _ S: , INF/ \�.. 1\ o \ `,.mss\ \ \ ` \N • ,' °.A. 1 ' : � � :;� \ .►/ \ . \ \ S. � 1933.6 \\ Property located in Section 5,Township 117,Range 23, y\Q / I. •f +. ~~ y `\ \ rd•• EzishggHarrloover Hennepin County,Minnesota. 1 / +\ r • u\k\ 'i'� \\, \ 14iiIL+a '3.3 Lot area to OHW =29,808 sq R I / / SAI. "'1 f\�L`) 1960.3 1 ? . 9S �49. ri . l4 Decks at house 41 58 s R Address:684 Tonkawa Road,Orono,MN i. \ o 3 / �, ;' 945.9 q 4(!o =2,844' / � `__��'`',�-�� ' �f / ...•per S�x ,`;\ ,'� '�, �, Residence ft / . �i 971.9 / •^` Y \ .k+ /95/.2 Porch = 73S[j$ • , g - : �_ Driveway&walks =3,359 R � / moi/ / ' / 0 fp. %= oma ,\��., ��t 5%�2 Garage y =671 sq 11 / w fh m y •�- ',OM _ •i. ^!\ o Dock at =153 s ft `'6' / i ,��� ; .97i. ' yyr V971.9 cpZ 1' i-� 951.4 G�Be4i~ / . .q. C�� , t, •� Total = 7258sgft ,' r 0( .-\ • . , \ S Percentage = 24.35% V / • •, i 1 ; 6 A,41X,"3 \\ 7 I ..c.• 0 I Cs �` U 376 sq ft of walls on property ,•)• t - 975.1 \ i 014 2 ,' . 9 .�� �� 197 8 ;''_�."6! . 04G 5 , + y�, v \ \ r:► f �\ �,. �, \Q 75 From OHW Hardcover .� sem`!. A ,� \. • . 5 / ►�3i.I�� �s t L.1+' ` 41.4` \\, I �� , ,< <_ -' ,6 aE 75'to OHW area - 6,408 sq ft / ° . / I'f �!'\�" J 1 973.8 1 5",• 95 \ `�` - / '`�: �. \4 c / \, Of a� Steps - 122 sq ft • Paver Landing- 44 sq ft /I I: ���' a' \ / l / 9G9 I I ,y_t J Rip rap - 653 sq ft / I 41e,tire `� \ / t l2 map a of/ _ Oir } l L`\ / !_ . � Y 2 ;-e ,` 1 I N .• Total - 819sgh \ / . ` \ l► 1 -� I `•, Percentage - 1278% \ / ..,. \l.8 A4; f s 18 v l / -r- 1 -/. - Ni ,� \ � � 131 sq ft of walls in 75'lake setback. t 1 Tr - \ / y :/" .... it Ti $&el 25 \4•.„.„ i f : :. t ` \e t\ 1`/ ;�� PIS Legal Description:The Southeasterly Half of Lot 5,and the Northwesterly Half of X987. -' %% '4 G Lot 6,EXCEPT the Northwesterly 15.00 feet of the Southeasterly Half of Lot 5, `l!/7 I. N`\ �' '® \ 9 �•, �6, Patten's Point First Division,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Pox{ -„Or- . - \ 7 ?.R'� ®\ ../,.. ,- \ .,a-' _ •s` Pole \ / \ \trd -,r:: , j`'. •� Ilf? ♦ \ \ o 979.8 g \ The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. �%i \ .5.6/ N \\ \ '2 I �,`���- \ t0 e• \ l -4 \ I 0 A 5 N \,' / l` _ 1 +`A` \ \. O I certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct I/ ` 9u CIN, / fr ,Q� 1 \\ N \ supervision and that I am a duly Ucensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of CE O� Src9c ,z r N o A /,�� • h \ wa Minnesota. 3 • / ® Gj t \ Surveyed this 26th day of October 2017. O�'jy `9�, c084 p , , \ m i 'S7 6 // /,, �, if \ L/ sq- 10 tiQ -90 `'; , , Gregory ' ,Minn.Reg.No.24992 • fr RECEIVED / o s /- 984.E , I L , N `� I DEC 2492011 Rev Drawn By $J / N / i I I-16-17 lake setback and hardcover ' N // 12-2 I-17 avg Lakeshore setback line File Name meq, N/ CITY OF ORONO , pp1-6 p5ib109450inv86985.dwg ' . C.-A.tA - A II _ _ ._ , —---—4,i... ... .. .' 1 / /. ..-ti / - r- -- -t ..,.. 4, IL... ,_,,. .,.. _ , A 1L2.— .1/ 4-...::.1 h. 1 - I- CI Ibefi-fcs") I I I ,3L1 TO,frAk Se0 4. 'A4'. 1 Lb Ce410P \i,8' 5çc. s.' je,,,•,..; Decl,.... c31 6 1 r°Jr ! • 1 1 ,. !, -...-.... Z.- --I RECEIVED DEC 0 6 tbli # 3 9 93 CITY'OF ORONO t (5K • • . 0 1 . 7=9" 361.0- aiIp. JvtSit .//J -- -- { t ._�.._. • •. • 'I- /yK11M Fh:'- . GI I(x1T1e.J 4,8y tia. SenlL 1A4 . i-b • bx4 69 S4464 Ate - 97 4 buy:. DP31tb 1. Recur, DEC 0 6E017 # 3993 CITY Of ORS Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 1/12/2018 .A • - '4.4ti,, ...00fre,- - ,) �, r ' • e= a. f..r 0 .-- 414 e de ..,.0'..'..:'•.' ••*^*s 1,'''''':' - 'It s .-• 4•-% e;ellk FYF �A,mark '�u•... , ,.. , \ tw; r. 1 35 = *' '-•,, ;. "1 r a, F •,• , '4, • • /fir ,' $ 44�` • t (, , ''.• 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 0511723330011 Comments: OWNER NAME: Weldon W Gilbertson Etal PARCEL ADDRESS: 684 Tonkawa Rd, Orono MN 55356 PARCEL AREA: 0.68 acres, 29,405 sq ft A-T-B:Abstract SALE PRICE: $1,125,000 SALE DATA: 03/2009 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 accuracy,(ii)isfurnished with no ble PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore warranty of anyinkind;inoansuiv is notpu pose for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD: Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any MARKET VALUE: $1,105,000 damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: $14,511.02 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 COUNTY 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $1,155,000 • 'tom 1 0 'S 'K .•c.. ,y r, 4 < j III a ,� Y ., k. `- 11 A-. of• iay. r l. ., ' + i 4 7 . '. -i., i Y t•^ • `• 1.i• . ♦ ac art ' t fidAAA '► / . �'' �£` ants p 4t\\ \1 iv 9 9' -. -- i li , , , 9f.c I liiiiki ,.. +he •.• 40°'' ii. 4• It ii# ...,. I , 411W'w 34 „,. 10.9. ,Api 99 1 .,. : . ...0,, po \ii 4' ......mor ,*. I .._,... ."-- .... 11.-18/4 40r...maw- f _ (VII „. t... - 4.. . ... ... -.- ':. ‘. . .4,. 't. ... . . wf „v.iiiiorivo ' 410114 .Nr "NW rns ... k .Ilk Allr 4/0 - po Wr 1 , ' ,,i0Air t .-..-.. 4. * . 1 - .,... , . . . .. , ...,, .. ........ 44.4 .. , . . eft PC #18-3993 Exhibit F City of Orono • Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: !lite 6$Y /04)/c yawt- Rci Prepared by "1 11a._i 1 .� Date: 12- y-)7 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier. (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify MI items of existing hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) iC eset : (24i OM • ;` -I ) A Re n cl e.v c4 N S.F. B Petri f"k. 3 S.F. C Of c.LA..n 4 ihd". 3 359 S.F. D Oaf/lett S.F. 67/ S.F. E s bcci /5 S.F. F het L. G '<ice S.F. S.F. H S.F. i S.F. S.F. K S.F. S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q - S.F. R S.F. _ S S.F. T S.F. S.F. ✓ _ S.F. W S.F. X _ S.F. Y S.F. 2 S.F. (1) Total Existi Hardcover 1 r7-2. , S'F' ' i .1004,4664004811*7414064 . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 7 y;,s, + S.F. (4) Total Lot Area U Se S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage i(3)+(4)] a4 3S X (Proposed Hardcover next page) RECEIVED DEC 0 6 2017 Variance Application—September 2017 Pepe 11 # 3993 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono 46 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: e?y Twv knwn RJ Prepared by: `c��`t i �� Date: `i )7.- y — ) Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier. (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tler 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier I properties,Identify any features by letter which are within the 75'setback Ine and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to TotalHardcover Item (Describe) Length x idthSUrveS ct nre Feet) A Re5)de,4-,4c X_Lf. S F. l3 Pin CL. ' 7 3 SI- C Of,�cA .. w21 s 3c5 S.F. nr-Inas. 5nlnyC 7f S.F. E Oe)•n0. gni., )4 hczk IK3 S.F. F Doe.lc d as 1-4s .»cs 3 i' S.F. G S.F. H S.F. S.F. J K S.F. S.F. S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 P S.F. S.F. Q S.F. R R S.F. S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. w _ S.F.X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1) Total Projoosed Hardcover S.F, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from the(1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area act, gUY S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] ;44,11 % RECEIVED Variance Application—September 2017 DEC 0 62017 Page 12# 39 3 CITY OF ORONO PC #18-3993 Exhibit G tit,-:,7:L.' Hennepin County Locate& Notify Map ' Date. t--Q,-4-o-ri t47 550 BSC 640 . tffj • i ih641° i � Ai y €'35 670 \\11 t �O. 64011. _ lif \::),,,ssos\,..\\*4 ' . _ 7'00 9�� r Orst.N 010(A ...."--......\\\ss ;,,,,,,,,,,, to 746 {A 750 o' 86 w, 760 m 'Q, 770 755 774 44 801 '• 780 ItW Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: t t t t I t t t ( 684 Tonkawa Road This data (i) is furnished AS 18' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy:(i)is furnished with no warranty of any RECEIVED kind; and (iii) is rotaultabls for legal, engineering or surveying purposes.Ftemspin County shall not be liable for any damage,lrtjuy DEC6or loss resulting torn this data. DEC 0 z U 5!f For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 554871 gis.rnfoQhennepin.us CRY OF ORONO RUN DATE:12/W2117 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 05-117.23 33 0005 38 05-117-23 33 0019 I M ADAIR&M ADAIR TEMPLE ISRAEL OF MINNEAPOLIS 650 TONKAWA RD 645 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JEANNINE M&MICHAEL ADAIR TEMPLE ISRAEL OF MINNEAPOLIS 650 TONKAWA RD 2324 EMERSON AVE S LONG LAKE MN 55356 MPLS MN 55405 38 05-117-23 33 0008 38 05-117.23 34 0001 DAREL J LEIPOLD STANLEY S SANDIFORD 678 TONKAWA RD 722 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAREL I LEIPOLD STANLEY S SANDIFORD 678 TONKAWA RD 722 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0009 38 05-117-23 340002 M R MADER&A M MADER P 3 MIDDLETON ET AL 670 TONKAWA RD 720 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK R&AMANDA M MADER P 3&K I MIDDLETON 670 TONKAWA RD 720 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 3B 05-117-23 33 0010 38 05-117-23 34 0003 TLMOTHY JOHN REINERS S V ZAWOYSKI&S E ZAWOYSKI 680 TONKAWA RD 724 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 TIMOTHY JOtLN REINERS STEVE&SARA ZAWOYSKI 680 TONKAWA RD 724 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0011 WELDON W GILBERTSON ETAL 684 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 WELDON W GILBERTSON MARCIA GILBERTSON 684 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0012 BRADLEY JOLNT REV TRUST AGR 690 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL S BRADLEY OLIVIA M BRADLEY 16277 W WINDCREST DRIVE SURPRISE AZ 85374 38 05-117-23 33 0013 BARBARA PUGH 692 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA PUGH-MCCREIGHT 692 TONZCAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0014 TED H SPOONER TRUSTEE 700 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 TED H SPOONER PO BOX 81 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323-9998 38 05-117-23 33 0015 THOMAS P GOODYEAR 712 TONKAWA RD ORONO MN 55356 THOMAS P GOODYEAR 712 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05.117-23 33 0016 M G LADD&C A STAINBROOK 660 TONKAWA RD RECEIVED ORONO MN 55356 MICHAEL 0 LADD CAROL A STALNBROOK DEC 0 6101 M /� LONG LAKE MN 55356 (7j 93 ` CITY OF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED N t DEC 06;11111 CRY OF ORONO 38 05-117-23 33 0005 38 05-117-23 33 0019 JEANNINE M&MICHAEL ADAIR TEMPLE ISRAEL OF MINNEAPOLIS 650 TONKAWA RD 2324 EMERSON AVE S LONG LAKE MN 55356 MPLS MN 55405 38 05-117-23 33 0008 38 05-117-23 34 0001 DAREL J LEIPOLD STANLEY 9 SANDIFORD 678 TONKAWA RD 722 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0009 38 05-117-23 34 0002 MARK R&AMANDA M MADER P J&K I MIDDLETON 670 TONKAWA RD 720 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0010 38 05-117-2334 0003 TIMOTHY JOHN RELNERS STEVE&SARA ZAWOYSKI 680 TONKAWA RD 724 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0011 WELDON W GILBERTSON MARCIA GILBERTSON M4 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0012 MICHAEL S BRADLEY OLIVIA M BRADLEY 16277 W WLNTDCREST DRIVE SURPRISE AZ 85374 38 05-117-23 33 0013 BARBARA PUGH-MCCREIGHT 692 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 33 0014 TED H SPOONER P 0 BOX 81 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323-9998 38 05-117-23 33 0015 THOMAS P GOODYEAR 712 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-1I7-23 33 0016 MICHAEL 0 LADD CAROL A STAINBROOK 660A RD Rpc ffIrED LONGG LAKE KE MN 55356 C `1 3 3993 DEC062017 CITY OF ORONO Item 5 Date Application Received: 12/12/17 �O�VO Date Application Considered as Complete:12/12/17 120-Day Review Period Expires: 04/11/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members y Dustin Rief,City Administrator i'EsHO From: Melanie Curtis, Planner hnOG Date: 16 January 2018 Subject: #18-3994, David Knaeble, 3635 Togo Rd,Subdivision/Preliminary Plat/PRD-CUP Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a residential subdivision of the 2.44 acre property to create a total of 3 lots for single family homes where one lot currently exists with PRD flexibility. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval contingent upon meeting the MCWD and City Engineer's recommendations and permitting requirements of the MCWD. Background This subdivision was introduced as a sketch plan application in 2017 Case#17-3964. PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW Conformity with 2010-2030 Orono Community Management Plan The proposal involves creation of three lots with approximately 0.5 acre in dry buildable area each within the area guided for Low-Medium Density(2-3 units per acre).The project has a prescribed density of 1.22 units per acre based on the gross area; 1.73 units per acre upon removal of the wetland acreage.The proposal is less dense than the prescribed maximum density contemplated within the comprehensive plan. Conformity with LR-1C Zoning District Standards The property is currently zoned LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential (1/2 acre). A delineated wetland near the center of property impacts buildable areas of the southern two lots.The lots will be served by City sewer and water. City Code requires that each sewered lot provide 0.5 acres minimum of contiguous dry buildable area. The lots, as proposed, meet the acreage requirement, however the acreage is not contiguous as required.The developer is requesting the flexibility that a Planned Residential District(PRD)would facilitate. The mechanism for establishing a PRD is the conditional use permit process which establishes an overlay district accommodating the desired flexibility. The proposal includes the subdivision of the single lot into three lots. One property would be accessed off of Togo Road where the current home exists;two additional lots are proposed to access off of Northern Avenue on the south. It is not known if the existing house will be retained or replaced. The proposed lots range in size between 0.51 and 0.94 total acres. The preliminary plat also FILE#18-3994 16 Jan 2018 Page 2 of 6 reflects additional flexibility requested in reduced front yard setbacks for Lots 2 and 3 off of Northern Avenue. The preliminary plat drawing illustrates the proposed building pad areas for all three lots. It does not appear that the contiguous acreage standard can be met for Lots 2 and 3. The LR-1C side and rear yard setbacks will be met; all lots provide the minimum 100-foot lot width measured at the front setback. Lot Areas Proposed: Wetland Dry Buildable Contiguous,Dry Total 3635 Togo 0.71 acre/ 1.73 acre/ North 0.98 acre/42,686 s.f. 2.44 acres/ 106,267 s.f. Road Existing 30,875 s.f. * 75,392 s.f. South 0.75 acre/32,709 s.f. Lot 1 NA 0.51 acre/ 0.51 acre/22,337 s.f. 0.51 acre/22,337 s.f. 22,337 s.f. Lot 2 0.42 acre 0.52 acre/ 0.35 acre/15,355 s.f. 0.94 acres/41,357 s.f. 22,870 s.f. Lot 3 0.28 acre 0.53 acre/ 0.30 acre/13,071 s.f. 0.82 acre/35,822 s.f. 23,437 s.f. Northern Avenue ROW Dedication 0.098 acre/4,283.6 s.f. Togo Road ROW Dedication 0.056 acre/2,468 s.f. General Site Characteristics This wooded site with somewhat bowl-shaped topography due to the 0.71 acre centrally- located wetland.There is an existing home and detached garage located in the northern portion of the property,which may remain following the subdivision;the setbacks are met. There is an existing 20 foot drainage and utility easement on the eastern property line accommodating an existing sewer line. The Conservation Design Report by Jacobson Environmental(see Exhibit H) provides a more detailed overview of the natural site characteristics. Planning Commission should review the Report and discuss with the applicant his plans for adhering to the recommended provisions for site management.Tree preservation within the site will be primarily the areas immediately abutting the wetland.The Report recommends reed canary grass and buckthorn removals throughout the southern portion of the property. Removals within the wetland buffer areas should be restored according to the MCWD's planting requirements. Hardcover Allotment and Tier Assignment.The entire property is within Hardcover Tier 3 allowing 35% impervious surface. Per the tier assignment methodology established in 78-1701, all proposed lots will remain within Tier 3. Hardcover calculations should be provided by the developer to confirm that each lot can be developed well within the hardcover limitation of 35%. Each of the lots are subject to a 20%structural coverage limitation. A summary review of each of the proposed lots is as follows: Proposed Lot 1: Proposed Lot 1 will have just over Y2 acre in dry,contiguous area and will have 123 feet of frontage on Togo Road.This lot contains an existing house and detached garage.This lot will conform to the LR-1C setbacks of 30 feet on the front; 10 feet on the sides; and 30 feet on the rear.The buildable envelope is reasonable with an approximate 120 foot by 93 foot buildable area. FILE#18-3994 16 Jan 2018 Page 3 of 6 Proposed Lot 2: Proposed Lot 2 will be the western lot, and have 100 feet of frontage on Northern Avenue. It will have a total of 0.52 dry acres;only 0.35 acre are contiguous.This lot contains a 0.42 acre portion of the wetland and the dry acreage is noncontiguous.The buildable area, including the additional flexibility requested for a 20 foot front yard setback,will be approximately 85 feet deep by 80 feet wide. MCWD-approved buffer averaging will result in a wider wetland buffer on Lot 2 than on Lot 3 to accommodate a reasonable building envelope;the buffer on the northern portion of the lot will be approximately 45-feet in width. The remaining wetland and LR-1C setbacks will be met. Proposed Lot 3: Proposed Lot 3 will be the eastern lot,and have 113 feet of frontage on Northern Avenue.This lot contains a 0.28 acre portion of the wetland; 0.30 acre contiguous area;and 0.53 acres of dry acreage is noncontiguous. MCWD-approved buffer averaging will result in a 15 foot wide wetland buffer on Lot 3 to accommodate a reasonable building envelope;the buffer on the northern portion of the lot will be approximately 45-feet in width. The buildable area, including the additional flexibility requested for a 20 foot front yard setback, will be approximately 70 feet deep by 84 feet wide. The remaining wetland and LR-1C setbacks will be met. Relationship to Surrounding Development Except for the Kingdom Hall property on Togo Road,development in the neighborhood bounded by Northern Avenue on the south,Togo Road on the north,the northerly extension of Blaine Avenue on the east and the Spring Park border on the west is single family residential.The proposed subdivision is generally consistent in lot areas and front setbacks with the existing single family development in the surrounding neighborhood. Road/Right-of-Way Dedication: A 20 foot right-of-way dedication is shown along both Togo Road and Northern Avenue. Northern Avenue was originally created as part of the plat of Townsite of Langdon Park in 1893, being 66 feet in width adjacent to the north boundary of the 100-foot wide Great Northern Railroad right-of way. In 1912, Northern Avenue was vacated by the town board for unknown reasons. Today, Northern Avenue exists as a 20 foot paved width public road half on the railroad right-of-way and half on the adjoining properties. As part of the plat of Southview Estates in 1983,the City was able to recover a 30 foot corridor near the western end of the vacated right-of-way. Since then,the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority has acquired the railroad right-of-way and has a recent history of attempting to eliminate encroachments on its potential commuter/light rail corridors. With half of Northern Avenue's traveled road on the railroad right-of-way, it is in the City's interest(and by extension, area residents)to regain the necessary right-of-way outside the rail corridor for potential relocation of Northern Avenue should the need arise. Property subdivision is one of the few opportunities the City has to acquire necessary road rights-of-way. Guidance is provided in the Subdivision Code Section 82-281(2) as follows: 82-281(2) Rights-of-way. Rights-of-way shall be in accordance with the following performance standard: FILE#18-3994 16 Jan 2018 Page 4 of 6 a. Minimum right-of-way widths. Category of Road Required Width Principal arterial, intermediate As recommended by the State Department of arterial Transportation Minor arterial 80 feet Collector 70 feet Local 50 feet Parkway 100 feet Culs-de-sac 50 feet radius b. Rights-of-way are needed for future roadways in the opinion of the city. c. Right-of-way widths or additional widths in existing rights-of-way in excess of the standards designated in this chapter when, due to topography, additional width is necessary to provide adequate earth slopes. Such slopes shall not be in excess of 3:1. Both Northern and Togo are local roads,suggesting the need for 50 feet of right-of-way(25 feet on each side of Togo, 50 feet north of the rail line for Northern). However, dedication of 50 feet of right-of-way would make the southern two lots (Lots 2 and 3) unbuildable.The Northern Oaks addition to the west along Northern Avenue was required to dedicate additional right-of-way,to get to 30 feet. The developer has shown a 15-foot right-of-way dedication beyond the existing Northern Avenue consistent with the Staff recommendation during the sketch plan review. City Engineer Comments The consulting City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary plat application materials; comments are attached as Exhibit I. The developer should prepare a final plat application which responds to and incorporates these recommendations. Drainage&Utility Easements The City requires standard perimeter drainage and utility easements around all property boundaries in the Plat and drainage easements over the wetland areas.The easements as shown on the proposed plat drawing must be revised to meet the City standards. Park Dedication The Parks,Open Space and Trail Plan element of the Orono Comprehensive Plan does not specify the need for a neighborhood park at this location. The site is near the Navarre Park, and is directly adjacent to the Dakota Trail. As there is no defined need for park land at this location, it would appear that dedication of actual land for park purposes is not required.Absent the need for park land dedication,a Park Dedication Fee in lieu of land would be appropriate per City Ordinance. The Park Fee is determined as 8%of the fair market value of the land being subdivided, but must be between a minimum of$3,250 and a maximum of$5,550 per residential dwelling unit. For the proposed lots,the Park Fee would be based on only the 2 new lots.The City's Assessor will be consulted to determine the market value of the land for establishing the amount of the fee. FILE#18-3994 16 Jan 2018 Page 5 of 6 Stormwater and Drainage Improvements The City's consulting engineer has provided comments regarding this proposed plat with regard to stormwater management and drainage concerns,some requiring additional action or plan revisions by the developer. However,the developer should contact MCWD and provide confirmation regarding the permits or approvals they will require for this subdivision. Rain gardens/filtration basins are shown adjacent to the defined wetland buffer. The development is subject to the 2018 Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee of$6,050 per acre. For the 1/2-acre zoning districts,any lot exceeding 0.5 gross acres, including wetland,shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 0.5 acre parcel.Therefore$6,050 x 1.5 [3 lots x 0.5= 1.5 total acres] =$9,075.00. Utility Locations and Availability The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The property was served with City water in both Togo Road and Northern Avenue as part of the 1970-LW-1 project which was assessed on both a front footage and unit basis. According to the as-built record plan,the property has one stub on Togo Road (presumably in use by the existing house)and two stubs at Northern Avenue. However,while the property was fully assessed for 294 feet of front footage,which includes both Togo and Northern frontages, it was only assessed for two units. Additionally,one additional water unit is due with the creation of two additional lots as the plat is proposed. That 3rd water unit charge would be$4,240.00 per the 2018 Fee Schedule. PRD/CUP Section 78-348(6) The developer is requesting flexibility to accomplish their development goals.The flexibility is able to be accomplished via the creation of a Planned Residential District(PRD)overlay. The mechanism for establishing a PRD is the conditional use permit process which establishes an overlay district accommodating the desired flexibility.The PRD process could provide the framework for development of the lots which meet the half acre standard albeit with noncontiguous acreage, and the requested reduced front setbacks with conditions. Planning Commission should discuss the merits of platting as a PRD based on the requests for front yard setback reductions and noncontiguous lot area minimums for Lots 2 and 3;as well as the proposed right-of-way width to be dedicated on Northern Avenue. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval in accordance with the current and going recommendation of the City Engineer as well as the requirements of the MCWD.The Planning Commission's options for action are: • Recommend approval with appropriate conditions; • Recommend denial,stating reasons;or • Table the application providing direction and guidance to the developer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Applications & Narrative Exhibit B. Existing Survey FILE#18-3994 16 Jan 2018 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit C. Preliminary Plat Drawing Exhibit D. Wetland Delineation and NOD Exhibit E. Preliminary Stormwater Report Exhibit F. Soils Report Exhibit G. Additional Plans: a. Preliminary Grading Plan b. Preliminary Utility Plan c. Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan d. SWPPP—Existing& Proposed Conditions & Narrative Exhibit H. Conservation Design Plan by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC 12/12/17 Exhibit I. City Engineer Comments 01/08/18 Exhibit J. Aerial Photos Exhibit K. Sketch Plan Meeting Minutes Exhibit L. Neighborhood Meeting Information Exhibit M. City Code Sections Exhibit N. Map Exhibit O. Property Owners List PC Exhibit A City of Orono #18-3994 Subdivision Application Street Address: Application# 18-3994 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono,MN 55356 Date Received 12/12/17 Staff: Main: 952-249-4600 Application Fee: S505 +S275 (CUP) pd fax: 952-249-4616 0 / Mailing Address: Escrow: $5,000 pd P.O.Box 66 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: C T-c Property Identification Number(PIN): 1719 Date Property Acquired (month/year): fp Abstract 0 Torrens (Please check one) Present use of property: ot Residential; number of Units I 0 Other(specify) Zoning District: I--( " )L APPLICANT INFORMATION: check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: -) k ti 't.r Phone (Primary): -7t, 5 Z 1(/ - 7 fZ-3 Mailing Address: ZZ-2 C, t City: Z_ Email: C)j IL ri c i If' N j 401;1`,;I -t PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: !��� Sc i �,�, Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: 1 ) -t r cto City: ZIP: Email: EXISTING LAND USE: Number of Tax Parcels: Development Size: 1• ; Acres Dry Land C, 7/ Acres Wet Land 41 Acres TOTAL, all parcels PROPOSED LAND USE: 0 Division for Tax Purposes Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units: New Units: Total Units: Proposed Gross Density Units per (- 11 acres Minimum Lot Size: 2-Z•;?-TSquare feet dry buildable land Proposed Use(check)5(Residential ❑Other(specify) Subdivision Application-January 2017 Page 5 APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred i review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: +''' �,�`� Date: I Z'(• )(--j Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Az.4.-3 Date: / 2 -6 -/7 Property Owner Signature: O Date: Subdivision Application-January 2017 Page 6 City of OronoEscrow: ConditionalMailingAddress: Use Permit A$700 /pplicationNA Street Address: Application# O/� >O 2750 Kelley Parkway 1�/ Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: Staff Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: ,#)filL-: Notes: $700 y P.O.Box 66 CGS Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 `IKES H ov•� Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: )(. 5 S . c- 12-fJ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 5 60'-'3'vs or Pioe(.e-t-y /A-E 3 G.-IL , SF..E /V ,a-rw..c a..,t, (attached additional sheets at necessary) 4141 /-Po, APPLICANT INFORMATION: 14 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: kt,1 r) I .N At P.A.£ Phone (Primary): -1“ Z 3'i - 3 5-2-'7 Mailing Address: ZZ 7 ': -'• "-1 C-10c.F L City:(TL„;., `' �:1 ZIP: 2 Z Email: ci' LA -C 1It (-...' y.-0...i. i:,..,-, PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: , :1/tC.-y )( I L Phone(Primary): Mailing Address: ;,; vt t.-c r=c 4n City: ,-!-..,-,'s-c ZIP: S S-3'), Email: APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributedrvia emiail. Applicant Signature: ) -6,0, I'II Date: 11.4 I'.7 Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: ,z7/1. -CYvi-i_„_.rr---i,, Date: / 2 - C - /7 Property Owner Signature: O Date: CUP Application-January 2017 Page 4 Class III Subdivision Application—Project Narrative 3635 Togo Road,Orono, MN PID: 1711723340014 December 12, 2017 Project Narrative David Knaeble is seeking approval of a Class III Subdivision in order to subdivide one residential property into three lots located at 3635 Togo Road in Orono.The property is currently 2.4 acres.One of the residential lots would remain on Togo Road,with the other two lots fronting on Northern Avenue. The property is located in the Navarre area of Orono and is currently zoned LR-1C,One Family Lakeshore Residential District.The existing zoning would be maintained for the subdivision. This current owner of record for this property is Mary Schommer,who has owned the property since 1979. During previous street and utility projects performed by the City of Orono, Mary Schommer granted a 20'easement along the east side of her property to the benefit of the City for a new sanitary sewer line. Mary also had the City install two water and sanitary sewer stubs off of Northern Avenue for the future subdivision of this parcel. This project will require some flexibility of the current zoning rules.The flexibility requested is to reduce the amount of contiguous dry buildable area required and to reduce the front setback required by the current zoning of the property.The flexibility would be for the two lots fronting on Northern Avenue. The proposed lots would provide the required dry buildable area in the zoning code, but the area would not be contiguous.The front setback requirement is requested to be reduced from the required 30 feet to 20 feet.This would allow the proposed houses on the Northern Avenue lots to line up with the existing houses to the west and east on Northern Avenue.This front setback reduction would also reduce the potential impacts to the trees on the property and could also provide additional protection for the existing wetland.A Sketch Plan review has been completed for this subdivision and both the Planning Commission and City Council have indicated that they are open to the flexibility requested. A neighborhood meeting was held on December 6, 2017 to get feedback from the neighborhood prior to making a formal application to the City.This meeting was not required, but allowed the neighborhood to provide feedback on the subdivision proposal.The attendees of the neighborhood meeting were the two property owners that are on either side of the lots on Northern Avenue. Both property owners implied that they were supportive of the project. Both owners also appeared to support the flexibility requested and indicated that they would prefer to have the new houses on the Northern Avenue lots line up with the existing houses.They did express a few concerns about property values and tree screening.The neighbor to the east was worried about trees being removed, but it was pointed out that the trees he was concerned with were on a neighbor's property and would not be impacted. This subdivision will fit in with the character of the neighborhood and will bring two new families to the City of Orono.This project should have positive impacts to neighboring property values,and will be a benefit to the City of Orono for decades to come. Sincerely,) ckti..) 4filt l David Knaeble Contact Information Owner of Record: Mary Schommer 3635 Togo Road Orono, MN 55391 Applicant: David Knaeble 227 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 Email:diknaebleftgmail.com Phone: 763-234-7523 Site Data Address: 3635 Togo Road Orono, MN 55391 Zoning: LR-1C,One Family Lakeshore Residential District Parcel Size: Total Area = 2.44 AC Dry Area = 1.63 AC Wetland =0.71 AC PID: 1711723340014 Land Characteristics This site currently is a single residential lot with an existing house and detached garage located on the north side of the property on Togo Road.A wetland exists in the middle of the property that has been delineated by ISG Group on May 22, 2017 and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on August 22,2017.The portion of the property north of the wetland has moderate tree cover with lawn. The portion of the property south of the wetland has heavier tree cover and is not maintained. The property currently is connected to the City of Orono public water main and sanitary sewer.Two water and sanitary sewer stubs were installed by the City of Orono for the two proposed southern lots during previous street and utility projects. Project Description The intent of this project is to subdivide the existing residential property into three single family lots. One of the lots will remain on Togo Road and two of the lots will be located on Northern Avenue. Flexibility from existing zoning rules is being requested for the two lots on Northern Avenue.The flexibility requested is to reduce the amount of contiguous dry buildable area required and to reduce the front setback required by the current zoning of the property. Application Comments As part of the subdivision application,the Grading Plan sheet C2.0 indicates that the proposed grades on the grading plan are to be used to establish building height per the City of Orono ordinances. Building and elevation plans have not been included in the application.The proposed building and elevation plans will be completed by a future builder on the new properties. A landscape plan has not been included in the application. The future home builder on these new properties will be required to plant trees as required by the City of Orono ordinances. 1 / CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MARY SCHOMMER IN LOT 6, BLOCK 10, TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK & PART OF VACATED NORTHERN AVENUE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ..--N Q9•42'30"‘"E 123.44 �y-�—TQ�'0- rt,,7 .,p.1d ' ROAD tt --'374- 1 U Z —c H N ; 4 'm 3 O e ax f N i 1 O _-1411.. ..a„ ' 1 . V tomo (( . ._ 1::, ]9 Y ,. 1, - N�,89°42'30 (E- 140.00;. t ,1 `• i 1 y o Ano ., tog �"-g\ ( / v k O ....IIS, 1 .....,4,41 9 1. . 50.00- S B9 2'30' W( 1 • f i ` S:mw u4wa.Es.I+U u4E el $ t "'t- '-.i ' .. �'•� ull v 1 :D Ac A.caw nor e� 0) - ...0 ----74 : -_ —"_-- S 81°54'27"W 213.55---"" • • 8 HENNE AIN AUTHORITY G10NAL RDAKOTA RAIL TRAIL - -- — LEGAL DESCRWT10N CF P01445ES . Ths!Oaring described Qhapelty as d n the Cownty of Itencep,City Or Wayzoto Store :r NAnnesot0 as b.M; Thal port of Lot Six(6).Eta,*ten(I0), mos, fork ,no r4,_angdon •k deenrtbed OS i t of _ro`n9 at o r the West line Of sold Lot 6 dtslonce _0.0 feet'crtn.of Ins Sa,!t•west we*tha,s01:' r^ ,$: angle Cost 00.0 test:'Mho,at'-ant nn4tes South 146.6 feel,more a southerly scuerly 1. nd etot 6,'hence easterly alenq said southerly,nn of Lal 6,214.0 tett,ma n.to ton S utheast c cid Lot 5.tan •Ofth to d the Northeast cof sad Lot 6.ttnnce Osst:long Won inc of nod. -5 24R t to Northwest AREA a 2.441 AC.. point 9400 feet east of the c of sod,.at 6,e:hence south p0(0100 ' a West Inc.of'.at 6.:50.0 f set.thane well We'.,SOI,the Nortn One of�I,.At 6. '40C/ lee..thence south 1200'eel,m n,to -he a AKAEXCEPT 2C' ROAD EA`5E4CNT=2.34' AC. oh begimmg,according 17:M p!a 'hereof eof un Nle and Cf re .hs. of^le Pe . Leeds n Hennepin County,Minnesota Iaudnq od,oin.ng Vorlhern Acerr,e s mates 00 ., DRY AREA= 1.631 AC. Book 1472 of Deed,.page 21. WETLANDS=0.71' AC. •: motes Onon maker foundIt m ZC0NC w tR-IC •'. denotes✓udcu Landmark ln44.1 ..l X .._.0,7. denotes nIti514sg canton,tole,per Courtly naps CO • 15 Bean tigs shown are hosed wan an oseu-ee dut n. t0 a :i to flys sur l ons to show the bOandores of It above4,4,0,2 occur.'Y.Nee A W exOsoong hu dings.d.ireoted wetlands and exning.opnOruply.( ty Ma, ,er-n. 1 0..,.rc1 purport to show any other,rt oronnr.,.. _I, ,,,,,enlf. .7.4----,....,..--,-,.-:—____ - w PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. `--" u 5 7 d Lad So , e s-Lote 26-17 / CIVIL RNOINNERS LAND SETNVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS wo,,f non1,40' 6V 441 via,'AA,. :re7_.ILAr. ..u, 55356 - -.- _- _ _— W.S Soros a e vvrkr 12/9,] -4., X17 . 4..-414 CU' iLVSS NW'A3TIVA N30100'3NV13OOINANNOS LLZ 33 w'.:. ,J ZZ Al Lo, "1 ! d =F d O aJa `V cw71 @! 3183VN)I 41Ava ,e ? 'g o 0 • VJY - Z O 1 b t' LBESS NV1'ONOMO'ONON 0001906 g g ° 7 _ O °o. bk, Wgi sa ,a .s g: V Ue3® i S000M S113NN38 % ga a 'a- a S 3 r.>3roaa O LL CL / a O �LL yew i X viii y in g gig w s <Ili -- —� _ 1iveii 1iea vlo>Iva ili As� �= _ _ ---- -- ill, , OWA Bm+ �,1 , K 1 I ilh 1� ,Ip IX: a.,...IX3 3S110H // °NLLSI%3imiuN / � wnoi 1��� ,. DvtMJ !,� 1 1 'JNLLSIX3 S 1.11 " 1 ** RN N 1 T (eu) /� / N ''''''' at \ // oll 1! Lmn is3N yy 3°dN.° �/Irl , 0NLLSIx3 / *fir B+ * 3� \ \ b IR r a.° NIu BNS ri:77 •:.. 1 , , ILLSI% / 41 1i 1 ! O — O1r.SO F z Oy u 0. 00'041 31„0',Zb.66 N 1 I / r 0 I 0 /' 1 O _ i N 1 1 J NLLSIX3 R� / L �� 1 I� I °NRYn33 1 / O / VI • XIWH //r O 1l =_ rONLLSIX3 / /' °N51%3 NOH ` F.: IIOH 1 / vN L 'JNLLSIX:TT// ZLLSI1 / it OW.;Abidl � � / ♦ / 1 I e+ �� ►\ — -- SOI oW� 000l.�.o R - •"`"^ l4£Zl ,Of,Z4.66 N \ —00'4Z l WS # UNG NW'1,3l,VA N3C1a 00'3Ntl1300NIANNfS LU Gs O ' 4.+`l $, `ffi = a a •I""I(/)21 hydie 3183VN)IOIAV4 € €3$W i a ids 16ESS NW'ORONO'OVON 0001 SC BE is`a O ii 1 z o i i � SaOOM SII NN38 P m ; _s; a V g i R C1aM ggi a4 111 4t I 17 gs I I ,/ HP 11 �1 a a$ sae[. $ i!aPi ffi � € e indA w 4 V 5 11 ii e1:11 g a !X 1agx�e8$9 R s k ° a .; i i . ... , F, „, , 2°z €yQ�1% 1411 g G 6 g 1 x i to Pgi SS`I�'y aR & q¢ I� y y co GCC 1 1 ; kx' d k ffiS ta�id'�G � i tri ! � i ',-g "�� R�� W RRS�y � 0 0 g� n 15,0 :,� ! 3 Z Ii! ; VA z u a ! itillk lilmm-. r mo�uwE mSa—, I 1. 0.1 , 0 0') B / 1 i ,,. / a il , n! �pptl'�x 1 l I` 13 n - -- -/ I 1 - Ili /` ,,/ S tr 669 .a. ;, F=- IA tllRN / R i I 1- N 1,- bt I R la" r���` ZW 1. I I z 114 �� x �� ,asv I g _nac- J L x x � _ —i t a / NI SW 1 8 f.,. „ / lli q i 4','' ' 1 w w R -:l 0 I s k' 'J tm Z R eq d I ' I I S Z 1 I w _TIP I CC o0 Of L H , PC Exhibit D #18-3994 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Mary Schommer 3635 Togo Rd 6/22/2017 W17-21 ®Attach site locator map ®Attach approved boundaries Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ❑Approve ❑Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary(or attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 08/22/2017 ®Approved ❑ Approved with conditions(include below) ❑Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Mary Schommer has applied for a wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 3635 Togo Rd(PID 053-1711723340014)in the City of Orono,Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Section 17,Township 117N,Range 23W.The boundary&type approval was requested June 22",2017. A wetland delineation was conducted by ISG on May 19th,2017.A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD June 22",2017. One wetland was delineated within the project area. Wetland A was identified as a Type 1,2,6, floodplain forest,fresh(wet)meadow, shrub/carr wetland. MCWD reviewed the boundaries in the field on August 17th,2017. MCWD was in agreement with the wetland boundary and types identified on site. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as documented in the delineation report submitted on June 22",2017 and delineated in the field on May 19'h,2017.This decision is valid for five years.A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq.ft.or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ['Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal:For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Heidi Quinn Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail -44S--e/OV51 • 8/22/17 (952)641-4504 hquinn@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days)has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal,the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and $0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul,MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacy Lijewski • BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP Becky Horton, ❑ DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): • Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Mary Schommer CO Members of the public who requested notice(notice only):Ralph Kempf,Lucas Mueller, Melanie Curtis,Christine Mattson ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Ryan Malterud ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION >For a list of BWSR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf >For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNRTEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg. Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy.2 Div. Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf >For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St.Paul,MN 55101-1678 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: 0 0 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 lieuMinnetonka-Crystal �,, sit, Lotatiori Bay .11E11 i 111 11 ll; ; 1�1 Togo Rd �::'�►=ykAnalliwir ill i Hennepin County y Sha t\-III Northern Ave 1. \ . Crystal PI v Z ' v a {{� c v I [O N Livingston Ave Z 12 411piti Cour Site Location . . _ , , , „, , „. , , , , , ,,,,,,,,, _ ,,,, , , ,, , , ,,„ .T117N R24W �. ' „., „ ... „,_„.„,„ , ..„,,,,, „ , , ..„ ,� t �T117N ,,a ttf t ii F a u ,de t a # .-'r {P •- P22W e 1-117N t. 44 101 f• r r va,. _a R2'.4011o,” , 'itg- ,a , TR121.36,,,,,N YV \ti , , ' 4 , , - . 40,, m R24i� �� A _ 4ii, a 01- v ' ' i ' '''' ' ''' ' ,,Alt '-) lli PN:17-20520 Source(s). Figure 1 ISGMunicipafties(MN DOT,6I24I2016) 0 2,000 4,000 e Dooe1 Project Location Map Lakes(MN DNR July,2008) � Counfies(MN DNR,July 2013) 1 Inch=8,000 fee[ 3635 Togo Road PLSS(MnGeo/Dscs) rnursday,May ia.2017Wayzata, Hennepin County, Minnesota Irl I g32 f� Legend - w ,:. 4- =Project Area q�, J ' q • -'0 , ; .\ P .... " 4 F ad • Wetland Delineation -p' -- • Wetland Flag x llii ' T Photo Location �' \ �R' rr 10'Contour �' • .} - ,Togo Rd . ' -- '2'Contour 1 7,---: Sample Point ( tth ` Upland r, Wetland i ' •F Wetland Type ;-.or,' c'i!�' Type 1-Floodplain forest Vim' eta` ,t # Type 2-Fresh(wet)Meadow � s. it, +' � . .3 n r'-^:' m Type 6-Shrub-carr .•1 f" r r je....... ..et*-r . m. ROI b; a r 5• Il' _, • r..3 1 'Ag. 1 r.�_J. II -- J ON ..- �' t. I:.. .- -, ,. . r/ %% SP 1-A Up , , `WetlanA °d - ...A, , ,_.,), c„ - « M1 . ..... ..... . '7 - i 5" \ �+R'r , SP 2-A Wet 'll r;* - 04 \ , 111- t_ ��� SP 3 A W et ` r' ' - t 3C5 , .4 . ""---------.: , '''..,.... -ft.,.q,-----"" - -ts,-L,--- -1044 .. i A0. \ / 9A6 / _ c -7---- \ ' �� T� , - Y, _ No rtn .__ho M .. :, .r - em�Ave _ ��- y Table 3.Delineated Wetland Size and Type,3635 Togo Road,Wayzata,MN - 3) .3.,: WetlandT .e 1 9m ,';. I W- . .ID W-tlandArea Circ.39 Cower.in Class. E::er : •-ed 1 5 Floodplain Forest,Fresh(wet)Meadow, .q. A 0.68 Ac.(29,654S.F.) Type 1/2/6 PFOA,PEMC,PSSC Shrub Carr / PH:17-20520 Figure 6 Source(s): 0 15 30 beet Wetland Delineation Map I S j"V OrNaphoto(USDA,NAIP,2015) Wetland Delneation(ISG,2017) 1 inch=75 feet 3635 Togo Road Monday,May22,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin,Minnesota çiyijsUP PC Exhibit E PRELIMINARY Storm Water Management Report #18-3994 Project: Bennetts Woods Subdivision 3635 Togo Road Orono, MN 55391 Developer: David Knaeble 227 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 All plans and supporting Documentation contained in this report have been reviewed and approved by the Registered Engineer listed below and it is hereby certified that the plans comply with the requirements of the ordinance. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. P:Aj k/40-216___ David J. Knaeble P.E. Registration Number: 48776 Date: 12/12/17 www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street• Suite 200•St. Louis Park•Minnesota •55416 (612)615-0060 fir- J l çiyij U P Table of Contents: Cover Sheet Summary Narrative Stormwater Calculations Drainage Area Maps Existing Drainage Area Map Proposed Drainage Area Map HydroCAD Calculations Existing HydroCAD Calculations Proposed HydroCAD Calculations çiyiy ,it P Summary Narrative: This Storm Water Management Report accompanies the Civil Plans prepared for the Bennetts Woods Subdivision project dated 12/12/2017 and attached to this report. Existing Site Conditions: The existing site for this project consists of an existing residential home, driveways, sidewalks, and landscape areas. The disturbed area for this project is approximately 0.9 acres. The existing amount of impervious surface area within the disturbed limits is 0.1 acres. Soils: Soil borings have been completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services, Inc. dated March 27, 2017. Soils on site typically consist of sandy lean clays. The site has been assumed to have a hydrologic soil Group (HGS) group D designation which is not conducive to infiltration. Groundwater: Per geotechnical report, groundwater was encountered in borings ranging from 8 feet to 15 feet below grade which equates to elevations between 928.5 and 931. Proposed Site: The proposed project will keep the existing residential home and construct two new single family homes. Site grading and landscape improvements will occur. The proposed amount of impervious surface area within the disturbed limits is 0.3 acres. Wetland Impacts: One wetland exists on site. This wetland has been delineated by ISG Group on May 22, 2017 and a Notice of Decision was approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) on August 22, 2017 (See Application Number W17-21). This project will not be impacting the wetland and will be providing a wetland buffer that meets the rules of the MCWD. çiyij UP Requirements: Per Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Redevelopment projects on sites that are greater than one acre and disturb more than 40% of the site and result in an increase in impervious surface area must provide BMPs for phosphorus control, rate control and volume control for the entire site. Rate Control: The site is required to maintain existing conditions for the 1-yr, 10-yr and 100-yr, 24-hour storm event. Utilize TP-40 Rainfall events. (Based on City requirements, Atlas 14 rainfall data will be used as it is more conservative) Volume Control: Required on-site retention of 1"of runoff from all impervious surfaces. Water Quality: Phosphorus reduction must be provided in an amount equivalent to that which would be achieved through abstraction of one inch of rainfall form the site's impervious surfaces. Requirements: Per City of Orono Same as Watershed District. Proposed Storm Water Facilities: Permanent Stormwater Facilities This project will utilize multiple BMP's to meet the requirements of the MCWD and the City of Orono. Tree preservation and soil amendments will be provided adjacent to the existing house to remain. Biofiltration basins have been designed to treat the increased impervious surface for the proposed single family homes. The overall system has been designed to meet the District's requirements for phosphorous control, rate control and volume control. The project will provide abstraction for the 1" rainfall over the impervious surfaces onsite. Rate Control: Rate control for the project is provided by the proposed biofiltration basins. The runoff rates for the 1-YR, 10-YR and 100-YR rainfall events will be less than the existing rates (utilizing Atlas-14). See the table below for the existing and proposed runoff rates for this project. çiyiJp'P Rate Control Summary Table: Drainage Area Existing Rate (cfs) 1-YR[2.49"] 10-YR[4.18"] 100-YR[7.40"] EX1 1.41 3.49 7.42 EX2 0.88 2.29 5.04 TOTAL 2.29 5.78 12.46 Drainage Area Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) 1-YR [2.49"] 10-YR[4.18"] 100-YR[7.40"] PR1 1.33 3.37 7.29 PR2A 0.24 0.64 1.40 1P (PR2B) 0.03 0.40 1.91 2P (PR2C) 0.03 0.55 1.78 TOTAL 1.63 4.96 12.38 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Rate (cfs) 2-Year Event 2.29 1.63 10-Year Event 5.78 4.96 100-Year Event 12.46 12.38 The overall discharge rates from the proposed site will be less than the existing discharge rates. Volume/Water Quality Control Summary: Water volume and water quality control requirements are met by providing abstraction onsite in the amount equal to 1 inches of runoff from the new or reconstructed impervious surfaces. The proposed tree preservation, soil amendments and biofiltration basins will be utilized to meet these requirements. The calculations are shown below: Required Abstraction Volume Drainage Area Required Abstraction Vol. Summary Filtration Volume= Impv. Area(sf) Required Vol. (cf) Required Filt. Vol. (cf) 1.0"*Dist. Impv. PR1 5058 422 843 Area/0.50 PR2A 0 0 0 PR2B 4050 338 675 PR2C 4050 338 675 TOTAL 13158 1097 2193 çivile GR OUP Storm Water Quality Control Provided Provided Abstraction Volume Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst. Vol (cf) Tree Preservation 81 TOTAL 81 See the drainage calculations for detailed tree preservation calculations. Proposed BMP Area Amended Soil Area Provided Abst. Vol (cf) (sf) Amended Soil Area 8832 368 TOTAL 8832 368 Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst.Vol(cf) Provided Filt.Vol(cf) Drawdown Tme Calculations(1.6"/Hour) Inf.Area(sf) Assoc. Inf. Height(ft) Drawdown Time(h) Filtration Basin 1P 434 868 1078 0.81 6.04 Filtration Basin 2P 339 677 914 0.74 5.56 TOTAL 773 1545 Total Abstraction Volume Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst. Vol (cf) Tree Preservation 81 Amended Soils 368 Filtration Basin 1P 434 Filtration Basin 2P 339 TOTAL 1222 Conclusions: This project is proposing to utilize tree preservation, soil amendments and biofiltration basins to meet the requirements of the City of Orono and the MCWD. The tree preservation, soil amendments and biofiltration basins will be designed to provide rate control to match existing discharge rates from the site and the required volume reduction and water quality control. 3635 Togo Road Civil Site Group-Stormwater Calculations Existing Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area Area[SF] CN Value Area[SF] CN Value Area[SF] CN Value EX1 5058 98 35315 80 40373 82 EX2 0 98 28426 80 28426 80 Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area Area[SF] CN Value Area[SF] CN Value Area[SF] CN Value PR1 5058 98 35315 80 40373 82 PR2A 0 98 7884 80 7884 80 PR2B 4050 98 6731 80 10781 87 PR2C 4050 98 5710 80 9760 87 Site Area Summary Impervious[SF] Impervious[AC] Pervious[SF] Pervious[AC]. Total[SF] Total[AC] Existing Site 5058 0.12 63741 1.46 68799 1.58 Proposed Site 13158 0.30 55640 1.28 68798 1.58 Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Existing Rate(cfs) 1-YR[2.491 10-YR[4.18"] 100-YR[7.40"] EX1 1.41 3.49 7.42 EX2 0.88 2.29 5.04 TOTAL 2.29 5.78 12.46 Drainage Area Proposed Conditions Rate(cfs) 1-YR[2.491 10-YR[4.18"] 100-YR[7.40"] PR1 1.33 3.37 7.29 PR2A 0.24 0.64 1.40 1P(PR2B) 0.03 0.40 1.91 2P(PR2C) 0.03 0.55 1.78 TOTAL 1.63 4.96 12.38 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Rate(cfs) Rate(cfs) 2-Year Event 2.29 1.63 10-Year Event 5.78 4.96 100-Year Event 12.46 12.38 Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary Required Abstraction Volume Drainage Area Required Abstraction Vol.Summary Filtration Volume= Impv.Area(sf) Required Vol.(cf) Required Filt.Vol.(cf) 1.0"*Dist.Impv. PR1 5058 422 843 Area/0.50 PR2A 0 0 0 PR2B 4050 338 675 PR2C 4050 338 675 TOTAL 13158 1097 2193 Provided Abstraction Volume Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst.Vol(cf) Tree Preservation 81 TOTAL 81 Preservation of Trees Tree Number Tree Type Diameter[in] Canopy Area[sf] %Interception Prov.Abst.Vol(cf) 4339 Bur Oak 47 1735 10 14 4340 Bur Oak 48 1810 10 15 4341 Green Ash 16 201 13 2 4343 Siberian Elm 16 201 18 3 4344 Green Ash 12 113 13 1 4345 Box Elder 12 113 10 1 4346 Hackberry 9 64 6 0 4347 Box Elder 13 133 10 1 4348 Green Ash 18 254 13 3 4349 Green Ash 20 314 13 3 4350 Box Elder 15 177 10 1 4351 Box Elder 10 79 10 1 4352 Green Ash 12 113 13 1 4353 Green Ash 9 64 13 1 4354 White Mulberry 10 79 10 1 4355 White Mulberry 9 64 10 1 4356 Box Elder 9 64 10 1 4357 White Mulberry 13 133 10 1 4358 Silver Maple 28 616 16 8 4359 Green Ash 24 452 13 5 4360 Basswood 8 50 10 0 4361 Basswood 10 79 10 1 4362 Green Ash 10 79 13 1 4363 White Oak 9 64 10 1 4364 Hackberry 10 79 6 0 4365 Red Oak 20 314 10 3 4366 Sugar Maple 11 95 8 1 4369 Silver Maple 10 79 16 1 4325 Box Elder 14 154 10 1 4326 Green Ash 8 50 13 1 4328 Black Willow 13 133 10 1 4329 Box Elder 14 154 10 1 4330 Box Elder 10 79 10 1 4331 Green Ash 13 133 13 1 4332 Green Ash 12 113 13 1 4333 Green Ash 13 133 13 1 TOTAL ABST.VOL[cf] I 81 I Proposed BMP Area Amended Soil Area(sf) Provided Abst.Vol(cf) Amended Soil Area 8832 368 TOTAL 8832 368 Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst.Vol(cf) Provided Filt.Vol(cf) Drawdown Time Calculations(1.6"/Hour) Inf.Area(sf) Assoc.Inf.Height(ft) Drawdown Time(h) Filtration Basin 1P 434 868 1078 0.81 6.04 Filtration Basin 2P 339 677 914 0.74 5.56 TOTAL 773 1545 Total Abstraction Volume Proposed BMP Area Provided Abst.Vol(cf) Tree Preservation 81 Amended Soils 368 Filtration Basin 1P 434 Filtration Basin 2P 339 TOTAL 1222 E • EX1 , / EX IMPV=5058 SF EXPERV=35315 SF TOTAL=40371 SF • • EX2 EXIMPV=OSF. ��` EXPERV=28426 SF TOTAL=28426 S i " i ...,- 1a=80-0a 40.0^ 0 80'-0a 3635 TOGO ROAD-ORONO,MN EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP Civil Site+ 4931 W 36TH BT K200RgeA Number Revisiw Number J `Q 6T. CN PANIC MN 55116 D� .250.2003 1763.213.396 G R O U P CivilSitecmrq wm Issue Date: 12/8/17 Rem.)Date. t PR1 PRIMPV=5058 SF PR PERV=26480 SF-TYPE"D" 7 PR PERV=8833 SF-TYPE"C" :•-•••••••••••••'•-•••• ' TOTAL=40371 SF :' NII1/4.\\: : .::::::.::.:::::::1 -.MN. •R2A PR IMPV=0 SF PR PERV 7884 4 SF \ii, SF � TOTAL=7884 SF Of* N • PR28 PR IMPV=673 SF10 �W� PR C IM -5710 F PR PERV=6731 SF PRIMPV=4050 SF TOTAL=10781 SF Ilit. .,0. ) y'�J � �� TPR OTALRV9760 SF 1"=80'-0" 40'-0" 0 80'-0" 3635 TOGO ROAD-ORONO,MN PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP • • • 1931 W.35111 ST..f2W Proletl Number: Revlabn Number: Cavi Site ST LOUISP�RN,III/SSI1B DA2 931.35 1ST 213�a Issue Date: 12/8/17 Revision Date. G R 0 U P www.CivilSiteeroup com 3 ‘ .:: , r� , .„,..,.„.,,,,.„44, EX 1 ,x.„, ,x f,,._,„3„71.7,:,xm,-,:v. ._..,„,4..447,.*,114..it, , gV , DRAINS WEST EX2 r;,,__,_:4, •:‘,„;.:,,„,,,,,m44.: ,,,l,„,;,,t,,,,m,v4p4: 4.04,„,,,16.,. DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Subcat Reach 'on• Link Routing Diagram for 3635 TOGO-EXISTING ----\\___ Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 63,741 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (EX1, EX2) 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D (EX1) 68,799 81 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 0 HSG C 68,799 HSG D EX1, EX2 0 Other 68,799 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Su (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Nu 0 0 0 63,741 0 63,741 >75% Grass cover, Good 0 0 0 5,058 0 5,058 Paved parking 0 0 0 68,799 0 68,799 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type 11 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,373 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.99" Tc=10.0 min CN=82 Runoff=1.41 cfs 3,333 cf SubcatchmentEX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=28,426 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.88 cfs 2,089 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,799 sf Runoff Volume= 5,422 cf Average Runoff Depth = 0.95" 92.65% Pervious = 63,741 sf 7.35% Impervious = 5,058 sf 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 1.41 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 3,333 cf, Depth= 0.99" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 35,315 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 40,373 82 Weighted Average 35,315 80 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph Runoff 11.41 cfs1 Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=40,373 sf / Runoff Volume=3,333 cf Runoff Depth=0.99" Tc=10.0 min LL / CN=82 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180.190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Runoff = 0.88 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 2,089 cf, Depth= 0.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 28,426 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,426 80 Weighted Average 28,426 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Hydrograph uRunoff 0.9. 10.88 cfs 0.65= Type II 24-hr 5_ 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" 0.7 0.7= Runoff Area=28,426 sf 0.65= v Runoff Volume=2,089 cf 0.557. Runoff Depth=0.88" 0 0.45; Tc=10.0 min LL 0.4 0.35= I CN=80 0.3 / 0.25 0.2' 0.15 0.1 0.051 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,373 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.45" Tc=10.0 min CN=82 Runoff=3.49 cfs 8,252 cf SubcatchmentEX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=28,426 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=2.29 cfs 5,410 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,799 sf Runoff Volume = 13,662 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.38" 92.65% Pervious = 63,741 sf 7.35% Impervious = 5,058 sf 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 3.49 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 8,252 cf, Depth= 2.45" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 35,315 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 40,373 82 Weighted Average 35,315 80 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph D Runoff 3.49 cfsj Type II 24-hr 3 ' 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=40,373 sf Runoff Volume=8,252 cf 2 Runoff Depth=2.45" LL Tc=10.0 min CN=82 jam. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Runoff = 2.29 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 5,410 cf, Depth= 2.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 28,426 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,426 80 Weighted Average 28,426 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Hydrograph / I Runoff 2.29f /1 Type II 24-hr 2 j 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=28,426 sf Runoff Volume=5,410 cf Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=10.0 min LL CN=80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type ll 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 11 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,373 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.38" Tc=10.0 min CN=82 Runoff=7.42 cfs 18,090 cf SubcatchmentEX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=28,426 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=5.04 cfs 12,196 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,799 sf Runoff Volume = 30,287 cf Average Runoff Depth = 5.28" 92.65% Pervious = 63,741 sf 7.35% Impervious = 5,058 sf 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 7.42 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 18,090 cf, Depth= 5.38" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 35,315 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 40,373 82 Weighted Average 35,315 80 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph ❑Runoff e .42 cf.I Type II 24-hr 7 j 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" 6 / Runoff Area=40,373 sf 5- Runoff Volume=18,090 cf Runoff Depth=5.38" 4 / Tc=10.0 min LL 3 /, CN=82 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Runoff = 5.04 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 12,196 cf, Depth= 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 28,426 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,426 80 Weighted Average 28,426 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH Hydrograph ❑Runoff r04 cfs 5 Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" 4 Runoff Area=28,426 sf Runoff Volume=12,196 cf 3 Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=10.0 min LL 2 CN=80 1 i 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) PRI DRAINS WEST <PR2A> PR2B <PR2C) DRAINS TO WETLAND DRAINS O RAIN DRAINS O RAIN FROM SOUTH - GARDEN P - THEN GARDEN 2 - THEN UNTREATED TO WE LAND TO WET ND i \ /4P RAIN GARDEN 1P RAIN GARDEN 2P KSubca) Reach 'on• Link Routing Diagram for 3635 TOGO-PROPOSED ----\___ Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 8,833 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (PR1) 46,805 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (PR1, PR2A, PR2B, PR2C) 13,158 98 Paved parking, HSG D (PR1, PR2B, PR2C) 68,796 83 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 8,833 HSG C PR1 59,963 HSG D PR1, PR2A, PR2B, PR2C 0 Other 68,796 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Su (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Nu 0 0 8,833 46,805 0 55,638 >75% Grass cover, Good 0 0 0 13,158 0 13,158 Paved parking 0 0 8,833 59,963 0 68,796 TOTAL AREA 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPR1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,371 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.94" Tc=10.0 min CN=81 Runoff=1.33 cfs 3,146 cf SubcatchmentPR2A:DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=7,884 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.24 cfs 579 cf SubcatchmentPR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=10,781 sf 37.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.30" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=0.50 cfs 1,170 cf SubcatchmentPR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=9,760 sf 41.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.30" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=0.45 cfs 1,060 cf Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Peak EIev=936.65' Storage=520 cf Inflow=0.50 cfs 1,170 cf Outflow=0.03 cfs 1,170 cf Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Peak EIev=936.78' Storage=484 cf Inflow=0.45 cfs 1,060 cf Outflow=0.03 cfs 1,060 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,796 sf Runoff Volume = 5,956 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.04" 80.87% Pervious = 55,638 sf 19.13% Impervious = 13,158 sf 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 1.33 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 3,146 cf, Depth= 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 26,480 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,833 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,371 81 Weighted Average 35,313 78 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph L l Runoff X1.33 — , Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=40,371 sf 1 Runoff Volume=3,146 cf 7,7 Runoff Depth=0.94" 3 / Tc=10.0 min LL j CN=81 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Runoff = 0.24 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 579 cf, Depth= 0.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 7,884 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 7,884 80 Weighted Average 7,884 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Hydrograph 0.261 O Runoff (0.24 ch Type II 24-hr 0.22= 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" 0.2= 18 Runoff Area=7,884 sf 0.16- Runoff Volume=579 cf 0.14= Runoff Depth=0.88" LL 0.12; Tc=10.0 min 0.1 0.08 CN=80 0.06; 0.04= 0.02- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1 P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,170 cf, Depth= 1.30" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,731 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,781 87 Weighted Average 6,731 80 62.43% Pervious Area 4,050 98 37.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph 0.55.1 r Runoff cfs 0.5- tom Type II 24-hr 0.45 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" 0.4: Runoff Area=10,781 sf 0.35- / Runoff Volume=1 ,170 cf 1-3 0.3- / Runoff Depth=1.30" 0.25: Tc=10.0 min 0.2- / CN=87 0.15 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.45 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,060 cf, Depth= 1.30" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type Il 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,710 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,760 87 Weighted Average 5,710 80 58.50% Pervious Area 4,050 98 41.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph 0.5 I D Runoff 0.48= 0.46: I o.45® 0.44_ Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" 0.38 0.36_ / Runoff Area=9,760 sf Runoff Volume=1,060 cf 0.3 0.26: / Runoff Depth=1.30" 0.26- / 0.24- / Tc=10.0 min ,° 0.22= / 016 CN=87 0.16: 0.14: 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06- 0.041 .060.041 0.02 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Inflow Area = 10,781 sf, 37.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.30" for 1-YR event Inflow = 0.50 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,170 cf Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 1,170 cf, Atten= 93%, Lag= 54.8 min Primary = 0.03 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 1,170 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 936.65'@ 12.93 hrs Surf.Area= 932 sf Storage= 520 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 143.1 min calculated for 1,170 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 143.1 min ( 973.6 - 830.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,486 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic Jsted below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 0 937.00 1,078 868 868 937.50 1,394 618 1,486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.93 hrs HW=936.65' (Free Discharge) 4L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Pond 1 P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Hydrograph 55 ■Inflow i 0. 10.50cfs ■Prim 0.5 Inflow Area=10,781 sf 0.45 Peak Elev=936.65' 0.4 Storage=520 cf 0.35 o 0.3 0.25 LL 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 El Surface ■Storage 937- a) c 0 A m W 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 937.04 1,103 912 936.02 666 13 937.06 1,116 934 936.04 675 27 937.08 1,129 956 936.06 683 40 937.10 1,141 979 936.08 692 54 937.12 1,154 1,002 936.10 700 68 937.14 1,166 1,025 936.12 708 82 937.16 1,179 1,049 936.14 717 96 937.18 1,192 1,072 936.16 725 111 937.20 1,204 1,096 936.18 734 125 937.22 1,217 1,120 936.20 742 140 937.24 1,230 1,145 936.22 750 155 937.26 1,242 1,170 936.24 759 170 937.28 1,255 1,195 936.26 767 185 937.30 1,268 1,220 936.28 776 201 937.32 1,280 1,245 936.30 784 216 937.34 1,293 1,271 936.32 792 232 937.36 1,306 1,297 936.34 801 248 937.38 1,318 1,323 936.36 809 264 937.40 1,331 1,350 936.38 818 280 937.42 1,343 1,377 936.40 826 297 937.44 1,356 1,403 936.42 834 313 937.46 1,369 1,431 936.44 843 330 937.48 1,381 1,458 936.46 851 347 937.50 1,394 1,486 936.48 860 364 936.50 868 382 936.52 876 399 936.54 885 417 936.56 893 434 936.58 902 452 936.60 910 470 936.62 918 489 936.64 927 507 936.66 935 526 936.68 944 545 936.70 952 564 936.72 960 583 936.74 969 602 936.76 977 621 936.78 986 641 936.80 994 661 936.82 1,002 681 936.84 1,011 701 936.86 1,019 721 936.88 1,028 742 936.90 1,036 762 936.92 1,044 783 936.94 1,053 804 936.96 1,061 825 936.98 1,070 847 937.00 1,078 868 937.02 1,091 890 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Inflow Area = 9,760 sf, 41.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.30" for 1-YR event Inflow = 0.45 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,060 cf Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 12.99 hrs, Volume= 1,060 cf, Atten= 93%, Lag= 58.5 min Primary = 0.03 cfs @ 12.99 hrs, Volume= 1,060 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 936.78'@ 12.99 hrs Surf.Area= 808 sf Storage= 484 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 165.3 min calculated for 1,060 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 165.3 min ( 995.8 - 830.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,226 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 0 937.00 914 677 677 937.50 1,283 549 1,226 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 12.99 hrs HW=936.78' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.03 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Hydrograph •Inflow 0.5. 10.45 cfs 1 ■Primary 00.4.46. Inflow Area=9,760 sf 0.44° °04= Peak Elev=936.78' 0.38i 0.36= Storage=484 cf 0.34 0.32' _ 0.3' �' 0.28= 0.26 c 0.24= LL 0.22 0.24 0.18= 0.162 0.14 0.12 0.08= 0.06' 0.04' 10.03 as 0.02 0' 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 0 Surface •Storage 937- 0 m 0 0 a m _ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YR Rainfall=2.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 937.04 944 714 936.02 449 9 937.06 958 733 936.04 459 18 937.08 973 752 936.06 468 27 937.10 988 772 936.08 478 37 937.12 1,003 792 936.10 487 46 937.14 1,017 812 936.12 497 56 937.16 1,032 833 936.14 506 66 937.18 1,047 853 936.16 516 76 937.20 1,062 875 936.18 525 87 937.22 1,076 896 936.20 535 97 937.24 1,091 918 936.22 544 108 937.26 1,106 940 936.24 554 119 937.28 1,121 962 936.26 563 130 937.30 1,135 984 936.28 573 142 937.32 1,150 1,007 936.30 582 153 937.34 1,165 1,030 936.32 592 165 937.36 1,180 1,054 936.34 601 177 937.38 1,194 1,078 936.36 611 189 937.40 1,209 1,102 936.38 620 201 937.42 1,224 1,126 936.40 630 214 937.44 1,239 1,151 936.42 639 227 937.46 1,253 1,176 936.44 649 239 937.48 1,268 1,201 936.46 658 253 937.50 1,283 1,226 936.48 668 266 936.50 677 279 936.52 686 293 936.54 696 307 936.56 705 321 936.58 715 335 936.60 724 349 936.62 734 364 936.64 743 379 936.66 753 394 936.68 762 409 936.70 772 424 936.72 781 440 936.74 791 455 936.76 800 471 936.78 810 487 936.80 819 504 936.82 829 520 936.84 838 537 936.86 848 554 936.88 857 571 936.90 867 588 936.92 876 605 936.94 886 623 936.96 895 641 936.98 905 659 937.00 914 677 937.02 929 695 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr. 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Su bcatchmentPR1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,371 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=10.0 min CN=81 Runoff=3.37 cfs 7,965 cf SubcatchmentPR2A:DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=7,884 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.64 cfs 1,500 cf SubcatchmentPR2B:DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=10,781 sf 37.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.90" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=1.08 cfs 2,609 cf SubcatchmentPR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=9,760 sf 41.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.90" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=0.98 cfs 2,362 cf Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Peak EIev=937.13' Storage=1,018 cf Inflow=1.08 cfs 2,609 cf Outflow=0.40 cfs 2,609 cf Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Peak EIev=937.17' Storage=842 cf Inflow=0.98 cfs 2,362 cf Outflow=0.55 cfs 2,362 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,796 sf Runoff Volume = 14,436 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.52" 80.87% Pervious = 55,638 sf 19.13% Impervious = 13,158 sf 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 3.37 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 7,965 cf, Depth= 2.37" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 26,480 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,833 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,371 81 Weighted Average 35,313 78 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph / C Runoff 13.37/ Type II 24-hr 3 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=40,371 sf i Runoff Volume=7,965 cf 2 j Runoff Depth=2.37" LL j Tc=10.0 min i CN=81 o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 18 Summary for Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Runoff = 0.64 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1,500 cf, Depth= 2.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 7,884 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 7,884 80 Weighted Average 7,884 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Hydrograph 0.7' ❑Runoff 0.657 1 0.e4 cfsi) Type II 24-hr 0.6 0.55- I 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=7,884 sf 0.45- Runoff Volume=1 ,500 cf 77) 04= Runoff Depth=2.28" c 0.35- Tc=10.0 min 0.3- 0.25= CN=80 0.2- % 0.15= 0.1 ' 0.05= • o= 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 1.08 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 2,609 cf, Depth= 2.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,731 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,781 87 Weighted Average 6,731 80 62.43% Pervious Area 4,050 98 37.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1 P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph ❑Runoff i 1.08 yrs 1 Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=10,781 sf Runoff Volume=2,609 cf Runoff Depth=2.90" Tc=10.0 min LL CN=87 O 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.98 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 2,362 cf, Depth= 2.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,710 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,760 87 Weighted Average 5,710 80 58.50% Pervious Area 4,050 98 41.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph V C Runoff 1 0.98 ors Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=9,760 sf Runoff =2,362 cf, 0 RunoffVolume Depth=2.90" P_ ,_ Tc=10.0 min CN=87 0. % �I///////r 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Inflow Area = 10,781 sf, 37.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.90" for 10-YR event Inflow = 1.08 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 2,609 cf Outflow = 0.40 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 2,609 cf, Atten= 63%, Lag= 9.1 min Primary = 0.40 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 2,609 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 937.13'@ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 1,163 sf Storage= 1,018 cf Plug-Flow detention time=188.1 min calculated for 2,609 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 188.1 min ( 995.8-807.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,486 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 0 937.00 1,078 868 868 937.50 1,394 618 1,486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.40 cfs @ 12.16 hrs HW=937.13' (Free Discharge) AL1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 0.36 cfs @ 0.89 fps) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Hydrograph ■Inflow heads cfe 1 ■Primary Inflow Area=10,781 sf 1- Peak Elev=937.13' Storage=1 ,018 cf 0 LL 0.40 cfs 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 1 P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 0 Surface ■Storage 937- 4,2 0 0 d w 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 937.04 1,103 912 936.02 666 13 937.06 1,116 934 936.04 675 27 937.08 1,129 956 936.06 683 40 937.10 1,141 979 936.08 692 54 937.12 1,154 1,002 936.10 700 68 937.14 1,166 1,025 936.12 708 82 937.16 1,179 1,049 936.14 717 96 937.18 1,192 1,072 936.16 725 111 937.20 1,204 1,096 936.18 734 125 937.22 1,217 1,120 936.20 742 140 937.24 1,230 1,145 936.22 750 155 937.26 1,242 1,170 936.24 759 170 937.28 1,255 1,195 936.26 767 185 937.30 1,268 1,220 936.28 776 201 937.32 1,280 1,245 936.30 784 216 937.34 1,293 1,271 936.32 792 232 937.36 1,306 1,297 936.34 801 248 937.38 1,318 1,323 936.36 809 264 937.40 1,331 1,350 936.38 818 280 937.42 1,343 1,377 936.40 826 297 937.44 1,356 1,403 936.42 834 313 937.46 1,369 1,431 936.44 843 330 937.48 1,381 1,458 936.46 851 347 937.50 1,394 1,486 936.48 860 364 936.50 868 382 936.52 876 399 936.54 885 417 936.56 893 434 936.58 902 452 936.60 910 470 936.62 918 489 936.64 927 507 936.66 935 526 936.68 944 545 936.70 952 564 936.72 960 583 936.74 969 602 936.76 977 621 936.78 986 641 936.80 994 661 936.82 1,002 681 936.84 1,011 701 936.86 1,019 721 936.88 1,028 742 936.90 1,036 762 936.92 1,044 783 936.94 1,053 804 936.96 1,061 825 936.98 1,070 847 937.00 1,078 868 937.02 1,091 890 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type I/ 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Summary for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Inflow Area = 9,760 sf, 41.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.90" for 10-YR event Inflow = 0.98 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 2,362 cf Outflow = 0.55 cfs © 12.12 hrs, Volume= 2,362 cf, Atten= 44%, Lag= 6.4 min Primary = 0.55 cfs © 12.12 hrs, Volume= 2,362 cf Routing by Stor-lnd method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 937.17'@ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 1,039 sf Storage= 842 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 167.6 min calculated for 2,362 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 167.6 min ( 975.2 - 807.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,226 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 0 937.00 914 677 677 937.50 1,283 549 1,226 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=0.55 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=937.17' (Free Discharge) 4L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 0.51 cfs @ 1.00 fps) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Hydrograph •Inflow II I o.98 cis I ■Primary 1- Inflow Area=9,760 sf Peak EIev=937.17' Storage=842 cf if 1 0.55.fs 0 LL 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 0 Surface ■Storage 937- m c 0 d _ w 936 . . ., , . 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YR Rainfall=4.29" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 937.04 944 714 936.02 449 9 937.06 958 733 936.04 459 18 937.08 973 752 936.06 468 27 937.10 988 772 936.08 478 37 937.12 1,003 792 936.10 487 46 937.14 1,017 812 936.12 497 56 937.16 1,032 833 936.14 506 66 937.18 1,047 853 936.16 516 76 937.20 1,062 875 936.18 525 87 937.22 1,076 896 936.20 535 97 937.24 1,091 918 936.22 544 108 937.26 1,106 940 936.24 554 119 937.28 1,121 962 936.26 563 130 937.30 1,135 984 936.28 573 142 937.32 1,150 1,007 936.30 582 153 937.34 1,165 1,030 936.32 592 165 937.36 1,180 1,054 936.34 601 177 937.38 1,194 1,078 936.36 611 189 937.40 1,209 1,102 936.38 620 201 937.42 1,224 1,126 936.40 630 214 937.44 1,239 1,151 936.42 639 227 937.46 1,253 1,176 936.44 649 239 937.48 1,268 1,201 936.46 658 253 937.50 1,283 1,226 936.48 668 266 936.50 677 279 936.52 686 293 936.54 696 307 936.56 705 321 936.58 715 335 936.60 724 349 936.62 734 364 936.64 743 379 936.66 753 394 936.68 762 409 936.70 772 424 936.72 781 440 936.74 791 455 936.76 800 471 936.78 810 487 936.80 819 504 936.82 829 520 936.84 838 537 936.86 848 554 936.88 857 571 936.90 867 588 936.92 876 605 936.94 886 623 936.96 895 641 936.98 905 659 937.00 914 677 937.02 929 695 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPR1: DRAINS WEST Runoff Area=40,371 sf 12.53% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.26" Tc=10.0 min CN=81 Runoff=7.29 cfs 17,705 cf SubcatchmentPR2A:DRAINS TO WETLAND Runoff Area=7,884 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.40 cfs 3,383 cf SubcatchmentPR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=10,781 sf 37.57% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.95" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=2.13 cfs 5,349 cf SubcatchmentPR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN Runoff Area=9,760 sf 41.50% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.95" Tc=10.0 min CN=87 Runoff=1.93 cfs 4,843 cf Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Peak EIev=937.39' Storage=1,333 cf Inflow=2.13 cfs 5,349 cf Outflow=1.91 cfs 5,349 cf Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Peak Elev=937.37' Storage=1,067 cf Inflow=1.93 cfs 4,843 cf Outflow=1.78 cfs 4,843 cf Total Runoff Area = 68,796 sf Runoff Volume = 31,279 cf Average Runoff Depth = 5.46" 80.87% Pervious = 55,638 sf 19.13% Impervious = 13,158 sf 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type ll 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Runoff = 7.29 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 17,705 cf, Depth= 5.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 5,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 26,480 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,833 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,371 81 Weighted Average 35,313 78 87.47% Pervious Area 5,058 98 12.53% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PRI: DRAINS WEST Hydrograph 7 8 ❑Runoff Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" 6 Runoff Area=40,371 sf 5 0 Runoff Volume=17,705 cf Runoff Depth=5.26" 4 Tc=10.0 min LL 3 CN=81 2- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 29 Summary for Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Runoff = 1.40 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 3,383 cf, Depth= 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 7,884 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 7,884 80 Weighted Average 7,884 80 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2A: DRAINS TO WETLAND FROM SOUTH - UNTREATED Hydrograph U Runoff i 1.40ch Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=7,884 sf 1- Runoff Volume=3,383 cf Runoff Depth=5.15" 0 Tc=10.0 min LL CN=80 0 0-441110.11.111.101.1.10111.1111.1.110.111.1111.111.1.11111.1.110r 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Summary for Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 2.13 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 5,349 cf, Depth= 5.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,731 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,781 87 Weighted Average 6,731 80 62.43% Pervious Area 4,050 98 37.57% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2B: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 1P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph z n Runoff 2.13 cfs Type II 24-hr 2 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=10,781 sf Runoff Volume=5,349 cf y / Runoff Depth=5.95" Tc=10.0 min LL 1 CN=87 o 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type 11 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Summary for Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Runoff = 1.93 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 4,843 cf, Depth= 5.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,050 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,710 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 9,760 87 Weighted Average 5,710 80 58.50% Pervious Area 4,050 98 41.50% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2C: DRAINS TO RAIN GARDEN 2P - THEN TO WETLAND Hydrograph 1 C Runoff 2 11.93 I Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=9,760 sf Runoff Volume=4,843 cf Runoff Depth=5.95" Tc=10.0 min LL CN=87 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Summary for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1 P Inflow Area = 10,781 sf, 37.57% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.95" for 100-YR event Inflow = 2.13 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 5,349 cf Outflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 5,349 cf, Atten= 11%, Lag= 2.7 min Primary = 1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 5,349 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 937.39'@ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 1,323 sf Storage= 1,333 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 132.8 min calculated for 5,349 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 132.8 min ( 920.3 - 787.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,486 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 0 937.00 1,078 868 868 937.50 1,394 618 1,486 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=1.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=937.39' (Free Discharge) 4L1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 1.86 cfs @ 1.60 fps) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.05 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Hydrograph ■Inflow II 12.13 cfs I ■Primary Inflow Area=10,781 sf 2- ,1.91 cfs Peak EIev=937.39' Storage=1 ,333 cf u. 1- J 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 1 P: RAIN GARDEN 1 P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 ❑Surface ■Storage 937- 15 d 0 15 m w 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type Il 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: RAIN GARDEN 1P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 658 0 937.04 1,103 912 936.02 666 13 937.06 1,116 934 936.04 675 27 937.08 1,129 956 936.06 683 40 937.10 1,141 979 936.08 692 54 937.12 1,154 1,002 936.10 700 68 937.14 1,166 1,025 936.12 708 82 937.16 1,179 1,049 936.14 717 96 937.18 1,192 1,072 936.16 725 111 937.20 1,204 1,096 936.18 734 125 937.22 1,217 1,120 936.20 742 140 937.24 1,230 1,145 936.22 750 155 937.26 1,242 1,170 936.24 759 170 937.28 1,255 1,195 936.26 767 185 937.30 1,268 1,220 936.28 776 201 937.32 1,280 1,245 936.30 784 216 937.34 1,293 1,271 936.32 792 232 937.36 1,306 1,297 936.34 801 248 937.38 1,318 1,323 936.36 809 264 937.40 1,331 1,350 936.38 818 280 937.42 1,343 1,377 936.40 826 297 937.44 1,356 1,403 936.42 834 313 937.46 1,369 1,431 936.44 843 330 937.48 1,381 1,458 936.46 851 347 937.50 1,394 1,486 936.48 860 364 936.50 868 382 936.52 876 399 936.54 885 417 936.56 893 434 936.58 902 452 936.60 910 470 936.62 918 489 936.64 927 507 936.66 935 526 936.68 944 545 936.70 952 564 936.72 960 583 936.74 969 602 936.76 977 621 936.78 986 641 936.80 994 661 936.82 1,002 681 936.84 1,011 701 936.86 1,019 721 936.88 1,028 742 936.90 1,036 762 936.92 1,044 783 936.94 1,053 804 936.96 1,061 825 936.98 1,070 847 937.00 1,078 868 937.02 1,091 890 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 sin 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Inflow Area = 9,760 sf, 41.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.95" for 100-YR event Inflow = 1.93 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 4,843 cf Outflow = 1.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 4,843 cf, Atten= 8%, Lag= 2.3 min Primary = 1.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 4,843 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 937.37'@ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 1,188 sf Storage= 1,067 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 118.8 min calculated for 4,842 cf(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 118.8 min ( 906.4-787.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 936.00' 1,226 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic Jsted below(Recaic) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 0 937.00 914 677 677 937.50 1,283 549 1,226 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 937.00' 3.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 #2 Primary 936.00' 1.600 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Primary OutFlow Max=1.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=937.37' (Free Discharge) t1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 1.73 cfs @ 1.56 fps) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36 Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Hydrograph ■Inflow 11.93 cfs I ■Primary 2 Inflow Area=9,760 sf 11.78 cfs Peak EIev=937.37' Storage=1,067 cf 0 1- U. i 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Time (hours) Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 0 Surface III Storage - / 937- 8) a, 0 > d w 936 . . . , . . . , / 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 Storage(cubic-feet) 3635 TOGO - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YR Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by Civil Site Group Printed 12/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: RAIN GARDEN 2P Elevation Surface Storage Elevation Surface Storage (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) 936.00 440 0 937.04 944 714 936.02 449 9 937.06 958 733 936.04 459 18 937.08 973 752 936.06 468 27 937.10 988 772 936.08 478 37 937.12 1,003 792 936.10 487 46 937.14 1,017 812 936.12 497 56 937.16 1,032 833 936.14 506 66 937.18 1,047 853 936.16 516 76 937.20 1,062 875 936.18 525 87 937.22 1,076 896 936.20 535 97 937.24 1,091 918 936.22 544 108 937.26 1,106 940 936.24 554 119 937.28 1,121 962 936.26 563 130 937.30 1,135 984 936.28 573 142 937.32 1,150 1,007 936.30 582 153 937.34 1,165 1,030 936.32 592 165 937.36 1,180 1,054 936.34 601 177 937.38 1,194 1,078 936.36 611 189 937.40 1,209 1,102 936.38 620 201 937.42 1,224 1,126 936.40 630 214 937.44 1,239 1,151 936.42 639 227 937.46 1,253 1,176 936.44 649 239 937.48 1,268 1,201 936.46 658 253 937.50 1,283 1,226 936.48 668 266 936.50 677 279 936.52 686 293 936.54 696 307 936.56 705 321 936.58 715 335 936.60 724 349 936.62 734 364 936.64 743 379 936.66 753 394 936.68 762 409 936.70 772 424 936.72 781 440 936.74 791 455 936.76 800 471 936.78 810 487 936.80 819 504 936.82 829 520 936.84 838 537 936.86 848 554 936.88 857 571 936.90 867 588 936.92 876 605 936.94 886 623 936.96 895 641 936.98 905 659 937.00 914 677 937.02 929 695 PC Exhibit F #18-3994 0 r` Hennepin County Lidar j } �' ' .� m. QParcel Boundary "' ,#/ i Estimated Wetland Area i \\ .\ I 25 Buffer ,j av araaaM. 1 --) Not an Official Delineation - 4 C-~ . , - `� 2 1{( %t \ \ r ) It / • \ ( j1 \\ f;• r a�� \ `l � _ _ \/*), � 1 940 .__�___ \ �: i �` '•a \ yam.. �° i 4 .f \ ,' -7,....._.______,..., -----...\� '4,, •-•,________„„„--------______ fir'~~--Ar » go / ,,''''',,,,,'''. -"'-----______.---"::-.4---- -:'-,,,,,,____., rN-,............,.._______ 94 _ 9�t -----952.-- Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2016 Imagery) N 3635 Togo Rd(KES 2017-XXX) A 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota `. Feet Note:Boundaries indicated j� T LTA on this figure are approximate ` 1lJOLIT[AUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an ••••,........, Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imagery Baseman official survey product. HAUGO March 27,2017 HGTS Project Number:17-0188 Mr.Eric Zehnder Zehnder Homes,Inc. 4400 Bluebell Trail South Medina,MN 55340 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Housing Development,Togo Road,Wayzata,MN Dear Mr.Zehnder: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed housing development at Togo Road in Wayzata, Minnesota. A brief summary of our results and recommendations is presented below. Additional details regarding our procedures,results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Three(3)soil borings were completed for this project that generally encountered about 1/2 to 1 foot of topsoil overlying native clayey glacial till soils that extended to the termination depths of the borings. The exception was boring SB-1 which encountered about 7 feet of existing fill over about 5 feet of native sandy alluvial soils underlain by native clayey glacial till soils that extended to the termination depth of the boring. Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and/or after removing the augers from the boreholes between depths of about 8 to 15 feet below the ground surface. The topsoil, existing fill and soft clays are generally compressible materials and are not suitable for foundation support. These materials will need to be removed from within the proposed building and oversize areas and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill. If the new homes will include full basements,removal of significant portions of these materials will likely be incidental to construction. The underlying native glacial till clay soils, in our opinion, are generally suitable for engineered fill and foundation support. The footings for the proposed single family residences can be supported on the native soils or compacted engineered fill designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure up to 2,000 pounds per square foot. 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact John Carlson at 612-979-3542 or Brett Maki at 612-269-4027. Sincerely, Haugo GeoTechnical Services,LLC. b 43#1" \ Brett S.Maki,P.E. John T. Carlson,P.E. Project Engineer Senior Engineer 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Housing Development Togo Road Wayzata,MN PREPARED FOR: Zehnder Homes,Inc. 4400 Bluebell Trail South Medina,MN 55340 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue S Minneapolis,MN 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 17-0188 March 27,2017 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PAA t"IXWN $,,,,, John T Carlson,P.E. =NM Senior Engineer License Number:20663 Wit Expires June,2018 lbs ��� #4, p illi%tt •+R 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Site Description 1 1.4 Scope of Services 1 1.5 Documents Provided 2 1.6 Locations and Elevations 2 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 2 3.0 RESULTS 3 3.1 Soil Conditions 3 3.2 Groundwater 3 3.3 Laboratory Tests 4 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification 4 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4.1 Proposed Construction 4 4.2 Discussion 5 4.3 Building Pad Preparation 5 4.4 Dewatering 6 4.5 Interior Slabs 7 4.6 Below Grade Walls 7 4.7 Exterior Slabs 8 4.8 Site Grading and Drainage 9 4.9 Utilities 9 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 9 5.1 Excavation 9 5.2 Observations 10 5.3 Backfill and Fills 10 5.4 Testing 10 5.5 Winter Construction 10 6.0 PROCEDURES 10 6.1 Soil Classification 10 6.2 Groundwater Observations 11 7.0 GENERAL 11 7.1 Subsurface Variations 11 7.2 Review of Design 11 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 11 7.4 Use of Report 11 7.5 Level of Care 12 APPENDIX 13 Boring Location Sketch&GPS Boring Locations,Figure 1 Soil Boring Logs,SB-1 thru SB-3 Descriptive Terminology 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Zehnder Homes,Inc.,(Zehnder)is proposing to construct three(3)single family homes at the 2.4 acre lot in Wayzata, Minnesota and retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services (HGTS) to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions to support the proposed construction. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for foundation design and construction of the proposed single family residences. 1.3 Site Description The project site currently contains a single family home and detached garage in the northern part of the lot. The lot is grass covered with mature trees around the residence and becomes heavily wooded in the southern portion. A wetland area is located in the center of the lot. Crystal Bay of Lake Minnetonka is located about 1000 feet to the east of the site. The site is bordered by Togo Road to the north and Northern Avenue/Dakota Rail Trail to the south. Topography of the site generally slopes down to the wetland area,which has an elevation of about 934 feet mean sea level(MSL). The elevations at the boring locations ranged from about 9361h to 946 feet MSL. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC (HGTS)proposal 17-0188 dated March 8,2017 and under the terms of our General Conditions. Our scope of services was limited to the following tasks: • Completing three (3) standard penetration test borings, extending each boring to a nominal depth of 20 feet. • Visually/manually classifying samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for foundation support. 1 1.5 Documents Provided A partial copy of an easement plan (no formal title,dated November 5,1982) was provided. The plan showed the location of the existing house and detached garage, wetlands and property boundaries. Specific architectural, structural or civil engineering documents or drawings for the proposed development were not available at this time. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil boring locations were selected by Haugo GeoTechnical Services(HGTS)based on the anticipated construction and site access. The ground surface elevations at the boring locations were obtained by HGTS using GPS measuring equipment.The GPS measurements were based on the MN County Coordinate System (Hennepin County) in US Survey Feet using the GEOIDO9(Conus)model. The approximate location of the soil borings and GPS coordinates are shown on Figure 1,"Soil Boring Location Sketch"in the Appendix of this report. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES Three (3)standard penetration test borings were advanced on March 15,2017 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig,using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings,using the split-barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split-barrel sampling procedure,a 2-inch O.D.split-barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value,or"N"value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification. Soil samples recovered from the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils(Visual/Manual Procedures). A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contain visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes.The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered,the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, "blows per foot") and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions,variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 2 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions The borings encountered about 1/2 to 1 foot of topsoil at the surface. The topsoil consisted of silty clay that was black in color and contained portions judged to be slightly organic. Below the topsoil, boring SB-1 encountered about 6 feet of sandy lean clay fill underlain by about 5 feet of sandy alluvial soils. The fill contained traces of roots and organics. The alluvial soils consisted of clayey sand and silty sand soils that contained traces of fibers in the upper layers. Standard penetration tests (N-Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the existing fill soils ranged from 1 to 3 bpf which indicate a very soft to soft consistency. N-Values within the alluvial soils ranged from 7 to 14 bpf which indicate a loose to medium dense relative density. Below the topsoil, existing fill and/or alluvial soils, the borings encountered native clayey glacial till soils that extended to the boring termination depths. The glacial till consisted mainly of sandy lean clay with sandy silt and silty sand soils encountered at depth in boring SB-2. N-Values within the clayey glacial till soils ranged from 5 to 11 bpf which indicate a rather soft to rather stiff consistency. The N-Value within the sandy silt and silty sand soils was 8 bpf,which indicates a loose relative density. 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the borings while drilling and sampling and/or after removing the auger from the borehole between depths of about 8 to 15 feet,corresponding to elevations of about 928 1/2 to 931 feet MSL. Table 1 provides a summary of the water levels observed in the soil borings. Table 1.Summary of Groundwater Levels Measured Approximate Approximate Boring Surface Depth to Groundwater Number Elevation(feet) Groundwater Elevation(feet)* (feet)* SB-1 937.8 8 930 SB-2 936.7 81/s 9281/2 SB-3 945.9 15 931 *=Depths and elevations were rounded to the nearest 1/2 foot. The water level of the wetland in the middle of the site is about 934 feet. The Ordinary High Water Level (OHW)of Lake Minnetonka east of the site is 929.4 feet. It should be noted that the borings were completed in clayey soil and given the cohesive nature of the soil it is likely that insufficient time was available for groundwater to seep into the boring(s) and rise to its hydrostatic level. Deeper soil borings along with groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Groundwater measurements were made as noted and shown on the boring logs. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3 3.3 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Table 2 below summarizes the results of the laboratory moisture content tests. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests are also shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. Table 2. Summary of Laboratory Tests _ Boring Moisture Sample Number Depth(feet) Number Content(%)* SB-2 S-10 2"'/z 23 1/2 _ SB-2 S-11 5 221/2 SB-2 S-19 5 24 *=Moisture contents were rounded to the nearest 112 percent 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered in the borings at the anticipated excavation depths consisted of existing fill,alluvial sand and/or clayey glacial till soils corresponding to the ASTM Classifications of CL,SC and SM. The cohesive(clayey)soils identified in the borings will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. The granular(sandy)soils and existing fill identified in the borings will generally be Type C soils. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction We were not provided specific architectural or structural plans for the three (3) proposed homes. We anticipate the homes will be constructed at or slightly above existing site grades. We assume the homes will include one or two stories above grade with a full basement or walk-out style basement. Below grade construction is assumed to consist of cast-in-place concrete or masonry foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. The above grade construction will likely consist of wood framing,a pitched roof and asphalt shingles. Based on the assumed construction we estimate wall loadings will range from about 1 to 2 kips(1,000 to 2,000 pounds)per lineal foot and column loads,if any,will be less than 50 kips (50,000 pounds). If the proposed loads exceed these values,the proposed grades differ by more than 2 feet from the assumed values or if the design or location of the proposed building changes,we should be informed. Additional analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary. 4 4.2 Discussion We assume the existing structures will be removed to make way for the proposed development. We recommend that all remnants of the structures including footings, foundation walls,floor slabs and underground utilities be removed from with the proposed building and oversize areas. The soil borings generally encountered about 1 to 1 foot of topsoil overlying native clayey glacial till soils that extended to the termination depths of the borings. The exception was boring SB-1 which encountered about 7 feet of existing fill over about 5 feet of native sandy alluvial soils underlain by native clayey glacial till soils that extended to the termination depth of the boring. Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and/or after removing the augers from the boreholes between depths of about 8 to 15 feet below the ground surface. The topsoil, existing fill and soft clays are generally compressible materials and are not suitable for foundation support. These materials will need to be removed from within the proposed building and oversize areas and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill. If the new homes will include full basements,removal of significant portions of these materials will likely be incidental to construction. The underlying native glacial till clay soils, in our opinion, are generally suitable for engineered fill and foundation support. Groundwater may be encountered during deeper soil corrections and during utility construction. We anticipate that groundwater,if encountered,can be controlled with sumps and pumps. 4.3 Building Pad Preparation Excavation We recommend all remnants of the existing structures including footings,floor slabs, foundation walls and underground utilities be removed from within the proposed building and oversize areas. Likewise we recommend that all vegetation,topsoil,existing fill, soft clays or other unsuitable materials be removed from the proposed building and oversize area. Table 3 below summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the soil boring locations. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. Table 3. Anticipated Excavation Depths Measured Anticipated Anticipated Boring Surface Excavation Excavation Number Elevation(feet) Depth(feet)* Elevation(feet)* SB-1 937.8 7 930 1/2 SB-2 936.7 4 9321 SB-3 945.9 7 939 *=Excavation elevations were rounded to nearest 1/2 foot. Oversizing If the excavation extends below the proposed footing elevation, the excavation requires oversizing. We recommend the perimeter of the excavation be extended a foot 5 outside the proposed footprint for every foot below footing grade (1H:1V oversizing). The purpose of the oversizing is to provide lateral support of the foundation. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain site grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density(ASTM D 698). Granular fill(SP or SP- SM soils with less than 12% passing the#200 sieve)should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Remaining fill soils should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. Within 3 feet of the groundwater table we recommend the engineered fill soils consist of granular soil with less than 5 percent passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve. Additional fill required to attain site grades may consist of any debris-free, non-organic mineral soil. The on-site clay soils excavated for construction of the basement/lower levels appears to be suitable for reuse as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. However,the on-site clays appear to be above their optimum moisture content and will need to moisture conditioned (dried) in order meet the recommended soil compaction levels. Granular fill soils could be used for ease in compaction. Organic soils such as topsoil,the existing fill soils or soils that are black in color are not suitable for reuse as structural fill. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Foundation elements in unheated areas(i.e.deck or porch footings)should bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native soils. It is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 2,000 pounds per square foot(psf). We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and '/z inch,respectively,across a 30 foot span. 4.4 Dewatering Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and/or after removing the augers from the boreholes between depths of about 8 to 15 feet below the ground surface, which correspond to elevations of about 928 1/2 to 931 feet MSL. We anticipate that groundwater may be encountered during deeper soil corrections and during utility construction. We anticipate that groundwater,if encountered,can be controlled with sumps and pumps. 6 4.5 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is granular fill over native clayey soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 150 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage,but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type,use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. We recommend following all state and local building codes in regards to a radon mitigation plan beneath interior slabs. 4.6 Below Grade Walls Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the surrounding soil transmitted to them. The site soils were clayey in composition. We recommend general waterproofing of the below grade walls. We recommend either placing drainage composite against the backs of the exterior walls or backfilling adjacent to the walls with sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the#40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the#200 sieve. The sand backfill should be placed within 2 feet horizontally of the wall. We recommend the balance of the backfill for the walls consist of sand however the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing the#200 sieve. Clay may be used to make up the balance of the wall backfill. However consolidation of the clay under its own weight can be expected to continue even after construction. If not accommodated for, structures supported on the clay backfill could settle unfavorably or be damaged. We recommend installing drain tile behind the below grade walls,adjacent to the wall footing and below the slab elevation. Preferably the drain tile should consist of perforated pipe embedded in gravel. A geotextile filter fabric should encase the pipe and gravel. The drain tile should be routed to a storm sewer,sump pump or other suitable disposal site. Active earth pressures can be used to design the below grade walls if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If wall rotation cannot be tolerated then below grade wall design should be based on at-rest earth pressures. We recommend soil parameters found below in Table 4,be used for below grade/retaining wall design. These design parameters are based on the assumptions that the walls are drained, there are no surcharge loads within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall and the backfill is level. 7 Table 4. Soil Parameters Estimated Unit Estimated At-Rest Active Soil Passive Soil Soil Type Friction Angle Pressure Pressure Pressure Weight (degrees) (pcf) (pcf) (pd) Sand 125 32 55 35 400 (SP or SP-SM) Clay 135 28 70 50 375 (CL) Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.7 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain predominantly by clayey soils which are considered moderately to highly frost susceptible. If the clayey soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost- susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non-frost-susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve. Sand meeting this gradation is likely not available on- site. If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non-free draining granular soil we recommend a drain tile be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The bottom of the excavation should be graded away from the building. If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost-susceptible soils are not sloped, abrupt transitions between the frost-susceptible and non-frost-susceptible backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address this issue we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils at a minimum 3:1 (horizontal:vertical)gradient. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs. 8 4.8 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed buildings. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions. We recommend the lowest floor grades be constructed to maintain at least a 4-foot separation between the lowest floor slab and observed groundwater levels and at least a 2-foot separation between the lowest floor slab and 100 year flood levels of any adjacent water features such as wetlands,ponds or creeks. 4.9 Utilities We anticipate that new utilities will be installed (water and sanitary sewer services)as part of this project. We further anticipate that new utilities will bear at depths ranging from about 7 to 10 feet below the ground surface. At these depths we anticipate that the pipe will bear on native clay soils which in our opinion are generally suitable for pipe support. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements,the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. Groundwater was encountered in the borings while drilling and/or after removing the auger from the borehole between depths of about 8 to 15 feet. We anticipate that groundwater,if encountered,can be controlled with sumps and pumps. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The soils encountered in the borings at the anticipated excavation depths consisted of existing fill,alluvial sand and/or clayey glacial till soils corresponding to the ASTM Classifications of CL,SC and SM. The cohesive(clayey)soils identified in the borings will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. The granular(sandy)soils and existing fill identified in the borings will generally be Type C soils. Temporary excavations in Type B soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations.Temporary excavations in Type C soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 1/2 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 9 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills The clayey site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. Summer months are typically more favorable for drying wet soils. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches,depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed for the proposed house foundation. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density(Standard Proctor). 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedure)". Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 10 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the boring,the hole was checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the hole was once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected,if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structure as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall,flooding,irrigation,spring thaw,drainage,and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Zehnder Homes, Inc. and their design team to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for 11 other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 12 APPENDIX iti ;N ` `` Z 11:," , AtiE-K07 4. _; •..3 ;. a:- a:. v4 ,.-..w._.. i.__ xas- ..,.0 4. - _ qi), AZ' �,' N 4`' Fi'7ii,teri)CTics EASEMENT-! `i Ci t SB-1 !Y ! . rit . . 13 .1 .z ��? / RE 0..,,,t a at � ^E g / c'F CVLVfkt .... , , o1 l .--/ _ . t t34: I_ : Z i W 4 es, =Approximate Soil Boring Location 4' GPS Boring Locations Boring Number Elevation Northing Easting (US Survey Feet) Coordinate Coordinate SB-1 1 937.8 153900.830 440017.240 SB-2 936.7 153763.243 440017.398 SB-3 945.9 153506.106 439981.665 Haugo GeoTechnical Soil Boring Location Sketch Figure#: 1 Services. XXXX Togo Road Drawn By:RD 6/17 2825 Cedar Avenue S. Wayzata, MN Date:3 Minneapolis,MN 55407 Scale:None Project#: 17-0188 A SO Haugo GeoTechnical Services BORING NUMBER SB-1 2825 Cedar Ave PAGE 1 OF 1 SERVICES Minneapolis,MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Zehnder Homes PROJECT NAME XXXX Togo Road PROJECT NUMBER 17-0188 __ PROJECT LOCATION Wayzata,MN _ DATE STARTED 3/15/17 COMPLETED 3/15/17 GROUND ELEVATION 937.8 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILUNG CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon V AT TIME OF DRILLING 8.00 ft/Elev 929.80 ft LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING —Not Encountered NOTES ___._ AFTER DRILUNG --Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 3 feet LU o z A SPT N VALUE A a.U y w 20 40 60 80 to a F 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _J g Luo 0 D¢ Cee I- IL • IMC L E" d–I a D O x co O> D z 20 40 60 80 C7 <Z W U z ❑FINES CONTENT(%)❑ 0 M 20 40 60 80 Silty Clay,black,wet.(Topsoil/FILL) I AU •:+:* Sandy Lean Clay,trace Roots,trace Organics,brown and grey, e:,•:*♦ wet.(FILL) - . •••••• t SS 1-1-2 0- •:•:••• \ 2 (3) ce_ •• p♦p♦i _ ,_ 5 #: \ SS 0-0-1 ce♦♦O \1 3 (1) ♦.♦ w (SC)Clayey Sand,trace Gravel,trace Fibers,mottled brown and B grey,wet,loose.(Alluvium) / SS 1-2-5 4 7 (SM)Silty Sand,fine to medium grained,brown,wet,medium _ w 10 dense.(Alluvium) S z -7-7 i S5 (14) w m- - o 0 o m- ' % (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,rust staining,brownish grey, \ i a r, moist to wet,rather stiff.(Glacial Till) �; SS 3-4-7 A c w t j115 1... \V SS 3-4-7 N / \ 7 (11) O j C7 N - j O ii_ .0 N o I 20 y A 8S fA i 1 i, Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet. 0 Li, 0 • GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services BORING NUMBER SB-2 2825 Cedar Ave PAGE 1 OF 1 SERVICES Minneapolis,MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Zehnder Homes PROJECT NAME XXXX Togo Road PROJECT NUMBER 17-0188 PROJECT LOCATION Wayzata,MN DATE STARTED 3/15/17 COMPLETED_3/15/17 GROUND ELEVATION 936.7 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 Inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS _ GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon _ AT TIME OF DRILLING 14.00 ft/Elev 922.70 ft LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING __–Not Encountered NOTES_ -____ -AFTER DRILLING 8.40 ft/Elev 928.30 ft with Cave-In Depth of 9.4 fest w o z •SPT NVALUE• a O 20 40 60 80 0-= ILO MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _1 2 >O p D Q w o H PL MC LL W v _, o-D O r m O> �`-. .2' 20 40 60 80 O O z V? O ❑FINES CONTENT(%)0 co ce 0 2 20 40 60 80 '21! '2 Silty Clay,black,wet.(Topsoil) 1 I AU I, ,, __ 9 r %// (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,_rust staining,brown,moist to — we,rather soft to rather stiff.(Glacial Till) j XSS 2-2-3 23.5 R.- 10 (5) cio o X 5 5 v SS11 2(8)5 22.5 - U' F -/ 7\ S2 (�0) ilS co 1 10 ` SS 2-3-4 z /\ 13 (7) w �j O^ o co 67 SS 2-3-6 A rn / X 14 (9) 15 j \T SS 3-3-5 A j '\ 15 (8) con z it- 4 1 (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,brownish grey,moist,rather j stiff.(Glacial 1111) a 20 SS 3-4-5 .3 _ / !'.v 16 (9) W Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet. 0 w 0 GO Haugo GeoTechnical Services BORING NUMBER SB-3 2825 Cedar Ave PAGE 1 OF 1 SERVICES Minneapolis, Telephone: 612-729-29MN55405759 CLIENT Zehnder Homes _ ________ _ PROJECT NAME XXXX Togo Road PROJECT NUMBER 17-0188 _ PROJECT LOCATION Wayzata,MN DATE STARTED 3/15/17 COMPLETED 3/15/17 GROUND ELEVATION 945.9 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRILLING 15.00 ft/Elev 930.90 ft LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILUNG --Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING ---Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 6 feet Lu o z •SPT NVALUE• a.O �� r ww 20 40 60 80 ~" az r3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ >O S D< Ce o I- PL MC LL w *-1 0-n O W CO O> D— z 20 40 60 80 Z C1? ❑FINES CONTENT(%)❑ 0 2 20 40 60 80 "' Silty Clay,black,wet.(Topsoil) I AU (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,brown,moist to wet,soft to 17 % medium.(Glacial Till) SS 3-3-3 or j h 18 (6) a - o o 0 5 \? SS 2-1-2 x /\ 19 (3) 24 2_ ..i/ __________4 r. o j SS 2-3-4 j 1 20 (7) a A / � z o C (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,rust staining,brown,wet, w10 rather soft to rather stiff.(Glacial Till) •, / CO `/ SS 2-2-3 1 / %// A21 (5) w \ri, \, SS 3-4-5 ,=-,-_ /j \ 22 (9) (ML)Sandy Silt,brown,wet,medium.(Glacial Till) V 15 SS 2-4-4 F. 23 (8) • _ _ ( - 0 0 o m_ — 5 co z N j (CL)Sandy Lean Clay,trace Gravel,brown,wet,medium.(Glacial i Till) (SM)Silty Sand,fine to medium grained,brown,wet,loose. 0 20 (Glacial Till) p a VSS 3-3-5 • m p 24 (8) x \ 0 Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet. 0 w Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 248?•OD Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes iti II .,r:: .,,,.,, (Unified Soil Classification System) Criteria for Assigning Group symbols and _ Soda Ciassificaiion Partiei0 Size identification____... Group Names Using Laboratory Tests Group{ Boulders over 12" f Symbol'Group Name' Cobc;es 3 to 12' c-1 Gravels Clean Gravels C. a and s C,r 3 r OLG1N ! J7Eiln Qr»wl tatave x op More man 5.°r of r __� ...r_ 3 rn 4 r 5 e,S frnpR C <4 1,,dror t >{ y,c r F horse No to 3' CtlarMe 0.1„,rr ,-- .._- _ _. '�"'>h ^FC graver Foto NO 4 t4?;a' v E $ retained on 1 Gravels with Fines ! Fines class tv as Mt of Mll GM f slat�tras sand w F No 4 sieve -.Mae than 12 earl-S` h r nes c!assey as CI.or CH ; GC C; -- Coarse NO A is No i 0 ro . O _:....._ _,..--_. .....—.. ___ ""e"-`... byes Taw,' Medium Na 10 to No 40 il.n Sands Glean Sands t 'e and I < C, SW 1 wr lr ran 1:',../r,,1"..,..._ ler- No 40to Ne 200 • c 504.of more Of e45',-Or lest teres' r K 6 aricleer 1> re z c 2 coarse traction _- -_._._"_-_..--_,__z__.__._...____,_.__ SP t'�>`Y 9r�utc t�.truf' Sat <NII.It10.PIs 4 Or 2 ! Barras with Ftnas �r^Ps dhass fy a<M Or MN SM 5,14 Mona below"A"lire passes } Clay <Na 2130 PI?4 and No 4 afore Marrs than 12".b' ) F ares comely As Cl orCH SC i Cta ley sar>a.,,__- pi>7 ar*a lots en ur above'A•lone+ CL lean stay on Or above'A'line Jig Sips and Clays Incvpan,c P —._...__.._....- ___..____ _ ._�,_ i?i s Liquid lien! _ PI<4 or pots below A'_rrne+ ML g,t; - Retattve Density of v $ I '9 4 , teas Man 5Q Organv t rqr.7 amtt Oven Cried < r 75 -, OL Organic r c v �' Cohesionless Soils c m �,r_ _ -,,.lr^ d Pnt riot dried. f OL !Organic mit ' ' Very trx»E G ttl 4 BPF 1T a I PI n Its r�r lx abere'A"line CH---1 L rose 510 19 BPF e Sets end clays tncleana, r —_.—,.._...._---.___. 1 fat caa�L___.____ .__ ' M�t:in dense 11 to 30 BPI: O Pt plot:toner A'Flet MN 1 o`z t pyla oma _ f.__._ flash,:s rimae 31 to 50 BPF 5G or nitre ()rearm LPI time oven dried — v OH Organo ray tr;c+ __'C < 0 75 very dense over 50 BPF in j Liq.on firer nv dneC : OH Orpn, f,ft Mighty Organic Soils Pntnarrry°rganx..ratter.Oaria PI e0101 arid Organic odor j PT Peat Consistency of Cohesive Soils n Oaa4008eft matenalpuuv>grha?.<e;ifi- ,c4,.. *(ySOft 040 BPF IL n r.e d syrr'srt:048488;Lorkear c'tar.c'4,4'1 .-0,l:^ aa.: ..•, YG'+•.e or tte,:ecars r:o,it' sc fat;.,;—.,a:-.,- Soft 2 to 3 BPF c C D,,'0., C e.0 . Rather sot 4105BPF n.,C., Mecham a to a BPI n 8solu LO.IA4eSw,ss- AM w,»aa'O r:;,.80..L•f:48,4 Bather self 1 to 12 WI to 2serr.e w.weaw',sr"a+n SIM13 to tet'IPF • Coen en Ow-r;M .ex vatted vs..:-.n,sq. very Mitt 171030 BPF GW-GC: eiar.wooed,erase•444.•<4f, Heel . Over 30 BPF r,,P-GI.. ',`CO•y ori *0 0,444,air.4.I . OP-CC +,Orsi.-paned yra.r•ears:.'may I Clnrs 034If as f:t 411 .se duo'tyr,tri da:-,rife L'•5v Gm a Nrr+n arsan,-Aa:c OW.-e•arpa•r„-erees 14 77,4 ry;nr n d ma'rn+an.2 1<'s,graver son.r!•,.y WY.' It,pry.err. I Sanysarr.l ea li`b Mrs wire tka srreays ata Su wra.prarlvn carr...i..•, Drilling Notes SW SC svaf c'aaeci rw'<Y 4' Siandad- So-sat two.<"hoed..,.-.a,yen,;r ..e,Elea(,:. rest cru:ngs ware advarlxA try 3 i t4 or 5 tiA' tri^Oncw true A,.. Ars unless noted otherwise Jettingw.a4H was used o y+,,sacr Sr sc or ' a se.0 80. A M A?r. a ehers p er•,horn•»..are.., se'A a Ct Mt <•tr r-a. 4‹.:.+ear,tut auger prior!O aatnosftg only where indicated on togs k ys4„t.Or%a ,e,+eC is:7F:'4 GEtfrM.7t:sot w 7sa:rY:r +.r!h sx,4 r-<_r t-.,,-t aprrn,a.• Standard penetration test horings are designated by the prefix'ST" I )0,0,:0,r,1,,,, N,a rww.NIA X41 1,..r,.•.r,a'•r,,.h-..,AI,,,...-u„�4,,,4.-,8,,8' ism-rube: Allsan,oleS weld taken vat the standard 2'OD 6PM-tuba if is cmur623ri,.:,enNv t:X:;:,r+ar+.i 'ii vp.wv.w4.(r.,,, r, ,urx.•awn' SAnlp;er r-x'ept where noted e el 14 ane tiara on Of ah'h•'A .rip r, Pr<4 Er Om barn. A arse Powe.auyc'tonnes were advarulei by 4 or 6'diameter rOntrnuous- 4 PI Prow on re ar,-.e A t,. y Ptt,.,._l, ,�, n �, fi,Qht.solid srsr,augers God classifications and wrens depths were in- lotred trot-mr l r heti samples cuspated to the surface and are therefore sQ ( t ssrriewrr3r approxerate Power auger borings are designated by ire I t . I T 1 p'at:x. SO € r, t !taro.aper borings were aovanced manually with a t 112'Of 3 114• ! ! 4444, _ ( —...�, 's^ ' o:art,elr!auger end were;ended tattle depth trOmwh<h ttte auger could 0-- *3 r l ,, t ; be manually wrlhdraw•1 Mand auger borings ate indicated by Hee wee, w 1 ts _r'a 0+ l I 1 ! i ,-' ti r i BPF M,mhrs n 1rrate o,ows per root recorded to standard penetration C 30 - / __ _ f , test to;r•ieoW aa'N value. The sampler was set 6 wee urn:dowtfed 'If .-___4,444_-,. �.._ 77a - .� 4444......_ j5, q f ( s i _ 54 r be.s*w the holeaw..stein auger Dmeng resistances were Shen counted Z. {I s ` 3 tc,se and and lard 6'increments and added to get BPF Where they 29 - { !1 dffIelEo)M e 'reentry they are.reported in the foliova ng form 2/12 lot the et s 1 Ot .,-4444 � second and:bird 6 incrementr respectively t1. �, IGV MH or OH ' f 10 ^ ---*— .-J•--- --.._�_- 4.444.;4__444_-. fit: I'h f!n0 cate5 the sampler penetrated so i rattler weight of hammer l I and rods altrne orrvrng not reguire; 4 . ,,,../., cl,•eset n;•," j ML dr Ot. 0 t _ I I i J ➢ WI: V ri.cod=.na e.r•sampler penetrated sial under weight 01 rods af'ine har,r:ri v:a'Cnt r',C Ctiv,nO n0!regurred 0 10 16 29 30 40 50 60 TO 80 90 100 110 ' Liquid Limit ILL) TW,r;n•cale 0,-,wafted lundisi;rrt dple. ;tube gam*. Laboratory Tests Note Ar tet.:•err ro:a;gr a-ta`acramance with areplrcateeASTM DD On,a• 'sen Pd CC a!a^oar"` WD Wflr!fief fSety Kt S riC'I.LCr:of W't.ratron ., MC Natural r'cvstr%e co'eter r SG tic•crr:o-,a et, LL Lr9+:rid land `-. C <cres.;.,. t'r Pt. Pkasrrr env! .: 0f•>+(Vi 9f aY;5,*.,18..l'1,5!14 P1 Plasr-.''', „hat•. , qu J.,:cr.•,, C com;rress.ve strengfr: t.c P200 ii prising;1tfJ save qp N>:2w pt pK:+?et•O+r+alcr stet ngih ref fie.no7 cu i F MOSS NW'A311VA N301001NY1300I8ANNOS La } Tp 0:Q O moi 1 Za •"• I ich'i 3 ° 3TB3YNH OIAVO € € s i !.',-2 z N i OSESSNW'ONONO'O'MON gi€ t 7,• °¢ / 1 v�p€ c s `J •r 1. $ . SQOOM S113NN38 _ gaus a D; 1070. (4 q I a ^ R u K 0 � gei . i 6 6 g b I N i F9. 2 eeg Z a F8 1 i• 4 -r . �f M /� 9 gam/ f F---- ::,81::: g�# t '!, .,:,:.4 R go 8 et 1iL Q N w W ^ �!iIgi Ofg m 8 :7,4 atm ,12 ,:.. ,....,,.,:,,,i,, d ,1;:.11,1S,I.,. N 1 81 x s . sQ f Eam 4ff(. w 0 �` 1 C ' z q' (` 111: , ,r CU S ZZKS NWA3TVA N301093NV13D3121ANNIIS LZZ G>a„ ¢Q O � ill 7 t E-" 3183tlNN OIAVO i'l _w 0 at LeiNw'oNoao'avon Door scat 01 A 1 ` 1 AI Rog}i s ; �' a` F S4OOM S113NN38 3rotla _ °a'' a a a a s CO 1 W § W- `a I3 ` 1 i x w •.II+—i^•' < a . > Aill I - aw' . 5 b.e" - ga III 0 ® I I N ceT W ¢u I i / ram Ilk-, / ° Lu a / 1 Ji 1 < � I Ili i a?'K ', J a II W i 3S� I 41a1 I 1 I w: R l ,�-I fi I S O • 7" -g I °gZi$ Lbw I 6� z$ , ,s-!L _ 0 si0 fg w i T � I oh i ,, at%NW A311VA N30105 3NV1 3001tlANAMS La HIV •WID1 31133VN)1131AVO cr) 3 ISSN NW ONOHO OVOV 00019E96 saooM S113NN3E1 cP: 0 q <1 Li * Vg 01 1 5/111111111113iii i !WM! iliin illiiiiillill1111111111illiiiiiiiiiiWilli 1/10/01111 1 ti- " -ag.g..sgm...m.- 1.an5sataaA 324. anasiamosaamalg.amana2.a.v RA.5151.AR MRRA"t3 ^ = 1111WWW11155100111111101WWWWWililliWililliiiiiiiiiiii1111111118111111111111111111111161411111111 W . „. .I - , • SIP • .mis . Alg OAF all AIL Ail 'Pr • -Mr — Ai; WAX1/‘ i ,IfsTeA74 -/ _ 1 y.-- , _m r_ r:g. 4, c',-- • I I 1 I I 1 1 4" I 1 O 1 1 k , / • iv. < 1 ' , 6 '-- yo , „a9 L11 1 1 I 1 4 ; ; i_l g , / 1 tiv B z ' 0 JO1 " I, _ 401,04 A 1 _,utfilik < 4 16 1 , e j, 4yr . i• AM i\aim L1J LC ff.. r 40.,Arld 0 I- — i It I0,ff ,1 IS 11 , 15 Z22 Zci .9S9 NW1.311VA N301003NY73001tlANNS LR Wk ? O e`r 2It. 3183N)IOIAVO €'10- 3p E � 0 0o Ixss NW'oNoao'avoH000iscec €g� 'dA Y x 0 .�rl� � M 01 t g32 � �•, m g- 6; a" . .r1...'1e1e,I el a K SOOOM S113NN38 .`iit`aa ��g gos V p 1. Wit aroaa $` p$ Eb Y hk ggg, P € a p Ewg o a� o § d 9 di 5=a °i1 ¢h wi 3¢g 44 $ � O � r----i r-1 g d@ w L!'1';', g z 9c f; I in 4 O i2 _ � p.2 0; g r,1 1 aI 33 5o m� gw O � S �� [:.� J a a Io : z 1i--c-a" Et g w �_ �4 ° � M�,v '-I llii _vh rA m8 ,ro{ qi 2 t., K p' ' 1l Iw. ki F_�. 1 I tis k r4 K p'✓? • a w - . 4 ,%,,>'-_,,/, Y W ZZPSSNV A3l1VAN3010`J3NV13O01HANNf1SLZZ 33 G..,, OW 2 �5 di°3:w d O� •r.w..1 i 2.a 3183VN)1 OIAVO ; w tl iii r V,' i1 1.6CGG NW'ONONO.OVON OOO1St9E € 04 11 Y n0 o. �a i SUOOMS113NN38 arod .s�abaioas s; a Y a8 Y o g . *,`,t f 1 g a 2 0 O yQ p. wy 0g 2 w w .1..N 1'32 ow B Jg ccr:-;`I I. J tae w;ik ao 2 .1gtgu o 0 A,.'.YI I k O8o26' oO .1 I: a �o $Y - p w I % I 4 I. '',°- & 6- `.1," Lia' i 11111 3 Y 3 0 iFP w2 ig; as an «m., 1 C Ilk f• - . ,- / (5? 14 ' 11 ' 0 f In 1 %;:- ' �_----- Elii /.. li E N /1 'i sl - 3rzera.E. Z. ,Ad484 '{�0.111 z O o g /-- Sim,. W d Z215SNW A3l1VA N301O0 3Nb13O01SANNNSLZZ G>. e > I ^1 ��i�=" 31831/NA OIAtlO € I : I 0iE L6E9SNW'0NOtl0'OYo OD019pt Sg3g x's I 2 li a - � gsn € al, Ike 5 N owl E � SaOOM S113NN39 Obd _ � b r .s. I p o Y g. S WRg8 Er PH ri i"6 2t, i g s a iii 1: €e m E4 6 \ O k„ Ie U o k i A Pw I g g gyg I iso I 1 la „ g a n 0 fi tve \ i Ili kg x \ p '.9P W51 S i' 66qv Z WW i w fi it ?i g l! � z r;4W 4 51 441InvaUmg b h ggg z i =WillIg MOH im 1 y i p 1 Z y ak m lis ill 4 Eo y„ S � 3 e ° 3N3 N P TE, rod N f , go I_7 ,W U w�go tj m` 4 Yt• = 1 mgz � ..Illilq L �U AN :g/ cO zJZ Iin1m w ge F Eg e!g �,i5 N z •• wo g 58 1n g-«a .�m lw Ila 0 P IN- Y y AemwOLI a3aanisiaNn ONus 3 p �.11= t E gS $ y lion= g = Ng _ _.w3 as 60 ?g Cy MPT. , n°lai i r i q . a$ ` , i_x H �►. �€ 4a 411�I$i � `\ nau I �. EW U :_E T $1111 km 1i 411ll11 k Q • '�`�\, ao b� :1111 0” o' O 1\ . LL n—ll-1 `� 44filrb, Sli '.11.,.11.91 � � �}�}++ ��IA U Qe _ �tlll 11��:I y E' gE • `` +•1�11�11=" 5,::'d11AIF1 2p O6 1g N 6" Lit"' � s� "��r'Si�n�n �� Z ��l kF=W 1.�I1�1�vEf §i6=z-SS O E w hi � z i=nan_a e` €k s-„3 w ew a '4 JFII-1 mS f N < ko Z ��s��m 9 `�°alai= � �m��� �� � �we� �n' • R�� 4�o O £ ,, n,1 = m IRA! 1 Hi 3g� U z c uan-7 IVY =e e$e, m z 3Lm„ 0 w z jh Vr n ..e �m oh: MKSNW'A311VAN3010O'3NY1300IaANNfISLLi W..H > C1) t ��s a' ' 3183VN I OIAVO €1,�ia'. i v 3 I 1 • r 1v .10 i i MSS NW'ON0N0'MON 00015 t io ?S'A 1 Y o z �� `e I sWzx.'��a ngx ; 0 ''" SOOOM S113NN38 =�abi I a• m (,°LL 3 oed 6 y� 4„ € a ik ofb a 4 ii w,Id,! w z .- £F w orldw pm b 111 w 30 L tliEYY C !1 G @ $ ,S n 8 0 5 z E !REA t010g0 q: N g w, il 5 §rz "x._ m 3 9 i w r l a 1 - z i PC Exhibit H Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com #18-3994 Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com December 12, 2017 RE: Project Name: Togo Road Conservation Plan Comm. No.: 2017- Project Location: Orono—Hennepin County 3635 Togo Road PID 053-1711723340014 T117N, R23W, Section 17 Project Description: 3635 Togo Road Conservation Plan Executive Summary& Development Steps The purpose and intent of this conservation design is to meet the goals of the City of Orono's Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management as specified in the Community Management Plan (CMP). In general,these goals pertain to water quality, wetland protection, and preservation and the enhancement of the"rural character"of the City. Emphasis is also placed on the preservation of woodlands,wetlands, and wildlife habitat. Additionally, the City of Orono's Zoning Code further describes the intent of the conservation design as to reinforce and establish ecological connections throughout the City and preserve and improve the aesthetic views of Orono. Subcategories that are listed within the Environmental Protection section of the CMP help to detail more specific individual goals and guidelines which can be related to the overall goals listed above. Pertinent to this project, the subcategories emphasize development densities, which require no less than two acres per one home. This regulation is enforced in order to maintain the historic identity and character of Orono. Low density developments will assist with the preservation of open spaces, and, from a sewer and water systems standpoint, will protect groundwater and surrounding lakes and other surface waters. It is also emphasized that the primary method of sewage treatment and disposal will be performed through municipal sanitary systems. Goals for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management as specified in the Community Management Plan pertain to water quality, wetland protection, and preservation and enhancement of the "rural character"of the City. This project proposes to split the 2.4-acre parcel located at 3635 Togo Road into three residential lots. The proposed lots will range in size from approximately 0.50 acres to 1 acre.An existing residential home on the northernmost portion of the parcel is to remain on the lot. The undeveloped southern portion of the parcel will be divided into two residential lots for the construction of a home on each lot. A wetland exists in the central portion of the site. Wetland impacts will be completely avoided, and wetland buffer requirements will be implemented. The constructed homes will be situated on the lots so that they will minimize impacts to existing trees, and will satisfy wetland buffer setback rules. The proposed construction plans shown on Figure 8 will impact a portion of Tree Stand Area 1, shown on Figure 9.Area 1 was typically dominated by red oaks, green ash, quaking aspen, bigtooth aspen, and cottonwoods. A few bur oaks, boxelders, and american elms were also identified within this area, along with a understory of staghorn sumacs and common buckthorn shrubs (see Figure 10)which was located on the southeastern portion of the site. The construction of the southwestern home will typically impact red oaks and green ash, and the construction of the southeastern home will typically impact the sumac- buckthorn understory and some mature quaking aspen and green ash. 1 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com The existing landscape of the site consists of a wetland and woodland areas, with a homestead on the northern portion of the site surrounded by managed turf. The managed turf typically consisted of kentucky bluegrass, ground ivy, and clover species. The mature tree species identified on the site included american elm, basswood, boxelder, bur oak, black cherry, black walnut, black willow, bigtooth aspen, cottonwood, green ash, hackberry, paper birch, quaking aspen, red oak, siberian elm, silver maple, sugar maple, white mulberry, and white oak.Young trees and shrubs were typically quaking aspen and black cherry. An understory of common buckthorn was located along the eastern edge of the property, and a patch of common buckthorn and staghorn sumac was located on the southeastern portion of the site. Figures 9 and 10 show the locations of the common buckthorn and tree stands. Green ash were the dominant tree species found on the site, followed by red oak and boxelder. The wetland consisted primarily of reed canary grass,with some lake sedge and tussock sedge. A few green ash and american elm trees were located within the wetland along the northern and southern edges. No rare, threatened, or endangered plants were observed when the wetland delineation and tree survey were completed in May and November 2017. Rural Oasis Study The project site is not adjacent to a documented corridor in the City of Orono's 2005 Rural Oasis Study, and is located south of all study areas. Because of the relatively small size of the project and the southerly location of the site, any impacts to the project area are not expected to negatively affect maintaining the rural character and environmental health of the City of Orono. Natural Resource Inventory A. MLCCS Land Cover Classification The City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory identifies the project site landcover class as artificial surfaces and associated areas(10000), woodland (40000), and herbaceous(60000). A more detailed look at available MLCCS data classifies woodland area as"altered/non-native deciduous woodland", and a majority of the site is categorized as"altered non-native plant community-no native species present". B. Tree Community Identification All trees with a DBH of 8 inches or greater were identified within the project area.According to the City of Orono's significant tree (8"-29" DBH)and specimen tree (>_30")definitions, 81 significant trees and 5 specimen trees were identified in the project area. The site was dominated by green ash,followed by red oak and boxelder. 2 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Species Quantity Size(DBH) American Elm 4 8"-16" Basswood 2 9"-10" Big Toothed Aspen 1 12" Black Walnut 2 12"-15" _ Black Willow 1 13" Boxelder 11 8"-15" Burr Oak 8 8"-48" Cottonwood 4 8"-30" Green Ash_ 30 8"-29" Hackberry 2 9"-10" Quaking Aspen 3 8"-18" Red Oak 13 8"-34" Silver Maple 2 10"-28" White Oak 3 9"-14" C. Wetland Delineation A wetland delineation was conducted by ISG on May 19, 2017 and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on August 22, 2017. One wetland was delineated within the project area, and was identified as a PFOA/PEMC/PSSC Type 1/2/6—floodplain forest/fresh (wet)meadow/shrub-carr wetland. The wetland was 0.68 acres (29,654 sq ft)in size. The scope of this project will not impact the wetland. D. Topography The topography of the site can be seen in Figure 11 —Topographic Map, depicting MN Lidar topographic data. The lowest area of the site encompasses the wetland at an elevation of 934. The highest elevation on the site is approximately 950 on the southeastern tip of the property. E. Conceptual Greenways&Open Space Corridors The City of Orono—Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment Map shows that the project site is outside of any conceptual greenway corridors. The project area appears to be partially mapped as existing wetlands. No rare plant communities were observed on site. A majority of the forested portion of the property has been classified by the DNR as "altered non-native plant community: no native species present" (Figure 13),which suggests that no management and/or protection of plant communities onsite will be required. Conservation Design A. Topography The topography of the site is highest on the southern and northern ends of the parcel, sloping down to the wetland located in the center of the property. Runoff from the site typically drains into the wetland from both the north and south. 3 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com B. Drainage Patterns The existing drainage patterns have been primarily maintained. The topography of the site is not anticipated to be drastically altered, therefore, site drainage will continue to flow to the depressional wetland in the center of the subject property. C. Invasive Species Invasive species were evaluated in November of 2017, and include common buckthorn, reed canary grass, and ground ivy. Outlined locations of these species can be found on Figure 10. Buckthorn shrubs were identified throughout the eastern edge of the property, and a stand of buckthorn along with sumac was found on the southeastern portion of the property. Dense areas of reed canary grass were found within the wetland, and made up most of the herbaceous portions of the basin. Ground ivy was found throughout most of the managed turf areas of the property, and the most densely vegetated areas are outlined on the Figure 10 map.A vegetation management plan for the invasive species observed onsite can be found in Appendix C. D. Existing Trees The majority of the trees existing on the subject property appear to be in fair to good health with no major diseases observed.A few dead or dying trees were observed, but they did not appear to be so as a result of being diseased. The dead trees will be removed from the site if they are within the proposed building area. Trees that must be removed for house and driveway construction will be removed and disposed of according to the Orono city code. The trees that are impacted will be replaced at the required ratio and will abide by any Orono city code regarding tree replacement. E. Significant Tree Stand Criteria A few of the forested areas of the project area meet the criteria for significant tree stands by occupying 500 or more square feet with contiguous crown cover and DBH over 6 inches. The tree stand north of the wetland will not be impacted by the project, and will typically consist of a wetland buffer. The tree stand areas on the southern end of the site are typically dominated by undesirable tree species such as boxelder and green ash, and some portions are dominated by a common buckthorn understory. The Hennepin County Natural Resources map shows that a majority of the site consists of non-native species. F. Wetland Impacts The delineated wetland in the center of the site will not be impacted during construction or development activities, and buffer rules and setbacks will be followed. Buffers and setbacks will assist in maintaining the quality and functionality of the wetlands by providing additional surface water treatment to runoff. G. Ecological Communities The ecological communities on the site are not of high quality. The majority of the site has been determined as altered with no native species present. The wetland basin was dominated by an invasive species, reed canary grass, and a large portion of the forested areas were dominated by a buckthorn understory. The project area does not appear to be connected to any higher quality areas, so any alterations to the site should not further degrade the ecological communities on site. 4 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com H. Positive and Negative Views The project plans propose the removal of buckthorn by the new landowners on the south, which will enhance positive views as defined in the Orono City Code. I. Landmarks No existing landmarks are currently on the site. A majority of the trees on the site are in the central portion of the parcel, which will be included within the wetland buffer and setbacks. Density& Performance Bonuses The applicant is not requesting any density or performance bonuses. Preservation & Buyer Education The new landowners on the south will plan to remove the buckthorn throughout the southern portion of the property. A riparian plant mix will be planted in the areas buckthorn is removed. After the removal of buckthorn, the existing wetland and required upland buffers will be left unaltered to abide by buffer rules. Home buyers will be educated regarding the conservation and natural resource management of the subject property as presented in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Natural Resource Inventory at the closing of the home sale. 5 FIGURES 1. Project Location Map 2. 2017 Aerial Photo—Site Location Map 3. Soil Survey Map 4. City of Orono Land Cover Classification 5. City of Orono Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment 6. Wetland Delineation Map 7. Existing Property Map 8. Proposed Two House Lot Split on South 9. Tree Stand Map 10. Invasive Species Map 11. Topographic Map 12. Rural Oasis Analysis Corridors Map 13. Hennepin County— DNR — Land Cover Quality Map 14. Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species APPENDICES A. Wetland Delineation Boundary—Notice of Decision B. Site Photographs C. Invasive Species Management Plan FIGURES 11 Minnetonka Crystal Bay 1 i v Togo Rd .■Ii�t �;;��, 3111i1 Hennepin County iiihjeill eaywO,iNa ` �a '~`'., on A 1 Norttu ve _ a w Crystal PI v I ' N A P m q s Livingston Ave z 12 .8 ', Site Location � �- f , ,. -.,.. ,..„,, ,...r.,, c,,,,.. 1„*., .„;,0-„.., 4,4 ' . 'fJ �i- T117N 'r R24W 4 $ at. a +- .,w LI , `'. f .�� fir#- " T117NF ' , 's ��Sz- pi ....-T ,- ,` 1,',,,-;',..i.'-';::-,3- �rP ' ,.'" o i T41 W 1 23W Sv + mac«. 1.,-74.1,','„: 7x ,, .t.10,_ y .'',a x'r �. *. 101 : Mi IIs' +z, - .. , jilt) r ..,...,,,, la T116N T0. 1111 R T11w R23W _ 1,111 R24W�"` * ao1: 6Tc: ilit 10* PN;17-20520 Source(s): Figure 1 Munidpalilies(MN DOT,612412016) 0 z,000 u,000 8,0000 Project Location Map I SGLakes(MN DNR.July,2008) 1 inch=8,000 feet 3635 Togo Road Counties(MN DNR,July 2013) PLSS(MnGeo/USGS) Thursday,May 18,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 2 - 20 rial Photo Site Location Map Goggle Maps 3635 Togo Rd r }j 4. ... tr., 3 m . 40 r �"Sa�/ i �® at - .. + ; / • , ., \ r. L !fes S t 4 ' '�P ^ • x • • , _, . IV imp i' , .., 1 V s. 0!' 1 • AO. - , ;. , Google. {� � t, o Imagery©2017 Google,Map data©2017 Google 500 ft Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota N (Figure 3-Soils Map) iT P 451380 451400 451420 451440 451480 451480 451500 451520 44°56'21"N 44°56'2r N Togo Rd i . ' 37B L22C2 0 R * L36A is [ # ---....., 1 \ t 1 \ P P L24A L36A L22C2 a 00 GaNp majr tf bQ wand 5e tthBffi g3goOQ° 44°56 14"N 44°56'14"N 451380 451420 451420 451440 451460 451480 451500 451520 3 3 NI-, Map Sole:1:1,000 ifprinted on A portrait(8"5"x 11")sheet Meters a N 0 10 20 40 8o °�' Feet A 0 45 90 180 270 Map projection:Web Mercator Caner 000rdnatas:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 15N WG934 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/12/2017 -411 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3-Soils Map) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) IA Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest(AOI) 1:12,000. Stony Spot SoilsID Very Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Map Unit Polygons '97 Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause r Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil 0 Soil Map Unit Points Other line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of Special Line Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Special Point Features scale. V Blowout Water Features Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map lii Borrow Pit measurements. Transportation `c Clay Spot Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service ,+. Rails Web Soil Survey URL: c. Closed Depression Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) X Gravel Pit US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Landfill Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more A. Lava Flow Back round accurate calculations of distance or area are required. 9 44, Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s)listed below. Mine or Quarry Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County,Minnesota ® Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data: Version 13.Oct 4.2017 O Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales Rock Outcrop 1:50,000 or larger. .- Saline Spot Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Sep 12,2010—Aug 2,2016 Sandy Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor • Sinkhole shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. , Slide or Slip • Sodic Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/12/2017 4111.— Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3-Soils Map Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L22C2 Lester loam,6 to 10 percent 0.4 15.1% slopes,moderately eroded L24A Glencoe clay loam,0 to 1 0.8 31.3% percent slopes L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel 1.4 51.8% complex,0 to 3 percent slopes L37B Angus loam,2 to 6 percent 0.0 1.8% slopes Totals for Area of Interest 2.7 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/12/2017 011. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Figure 4 Land Cover Classification - Level 1 City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory rot► A 4'� " • 4 T �-_— ;1� 7 roi, r ix ii,4_, .• $_, Iii. ,Liv, -3,;41,- .. 1? r- svip 4047). Ili Jtill i' k ...„„G * Alr* . I I N V r ... ;1"): ; ,..:,,,. Vd 4 " 4., k. 6,Y,tiodFti ..;etil 46 7 . r - rztc4sk-43r,• , '! f . ` 4 ���.•7) -11 1 °1.00 ,, r v r y Site - -'t i 4 J V 144 Legend c� =City Boundary fill 40000 Woodland Ill 50000 Shrubland Land Cover Classification-Level 1 60000 Herbacous 0 No Land Cover Classification data for this area 70000 Nonvascular 0 2250 4,500 9.1300 10000 Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas Feet 80000 Sparse Vegetation ,inch equals 4,500 feet 20000 Planted or Cultivated Vegetation MI 90000 Water Ill 30000 Forests City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 19 March 2006 Figure 5 Conceptual Greenway Corridor Alignment .. :'. Cit of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Invento 7' �"` # -.. - " u- f✓ tis, �rt�.: 1+ , '�- t;. r,it :' may'Dii..• ') , /ii fg ;I' ll° lie 1 `��.��7 +> - -_ i _ NI MI ,• • • a 11.••••: 414.. ...sir '"-4.-.? :-'';',-,,,...-- r'":41-1' $tt.,_. sa rilif �:..Ct . `A l Y4' ` t ,./" • y 4. . t- �T' '� 1"F �'' Al �t•'a off/ ,1. �} • ` A 1 -e,:' .• . A� • 1� lig ` : GVs, . •.'" -�'� T} r: r_41a r tln"i`•I/ ,, — . Gyr , titt ; tr Site . 4 tea. • .a. a �!-1 ' <i" ...c.....1 '�' 4.1, . . .{ . . .. •p .. ��^, x '1� ,- / ... d..;.,1 lea • .. .. *: ;* ♦ I. Legend Q City Boundary j Steep slope Soils cou Ell ONR Scientific and Natural Areas aLcarontnI a u su.vices anrn4on £,wn,rn -Regional Parks Natural Community Quality Conceptual Greenway Corridor ®High Quality —i Adjacent Greenway Corridors Medium Quality 0 2.250 4.500 5.000 Other Natural and Semi-Natural Communities i i Feet streams 1 inch equals 4 500`eet E Existing Wetlands 100 Year Floodplain Figure 9 City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 23 March 2006 r • .. ... „.. Legend to._ 6d9 > y hi r'. =Project Area gh \ a r - 'g `. 00 Wetland Delineation 1 az' app t • Wetland Flag . - $• - ' t. r a 4' Photo Location .� ^'+ ,,�� �r �r ` 10'Contour * a `+ rTO�goeRtlf:: i}x A \ ? 2'Contour 3 �. Sample Point ( r . ..- r , . . . �" Upland .{ _r, I, �✓ 0 Wetland 1 `.-. ` :et A 4 J. . • r► - i R 7 Wetland Type ;,, 8 c .,� ,' ,e t,#k x Type 1-Floodplain fores ,,,;74.\.`:%-.: `" - Type 2-Fresh(wet)Meadow ''• Type 6-Shrub-carr .• t. I at........: .r 101P, tib • 1 r .#*r 4..! • ` 1 f`�, /_ SP1-AUP cp Wetianij ,diA 6 y \_ SP2AWet ` `. 40, g . . . , lir 7* ..... . . , v. ... .. „....__,_,.. .. .,,, ...„ ..,.... SP,3-A Wet 14. u -.,� . ---- E n- - 41 _.�_, - RA �N r � r "'''' c j __ t !< .,fir'- w,,. —" No herntA _ - �yo� t 9 mix T-•I"3.'-h --t-.W- 1- .Si -. •Tpiallth. i3iL121er-1c15' - -19t Wetland T •e I - .I M I - Wetland ID Wetland Area Circ.39 Cowardin Class. E::ers&Reed Floodplain Forest,Fresh(wet)Meadow, to ,; `. A 0.68 Ac.(29,654 S.F.) Type 1/2/6 PFOA,PEMC,PSSC y . Shrub Carr -�' - .,i. '• _ • i t PN:17-20520 Figure 6 Source(s):ISGO hophoto(USDA,NAIP.2015) a 1 30 60 Wetland Delineation Map Wetland Delineation(ISG.2017) N t Inch=75 feet 3635 Togo Road Monday,May 22,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin,Minnesota awesilir S i I t s M - -r Tip tit'r uF r1 r # 1 t i 3 1 s. s1 Uo°�'� sr '.;q x� '!s A, f ' <0* :9 42 330 1 :41 K.«...'riU `° TOGO �' .xi., .:�. *`,. Sp.- i.taoa AIM. - - turf"e a Sk _ .,-.._ ,_._ — - . 11. "1' �viii �"' " • 4'.. 1 rit ,i r. 4,4 .,,,, ti,, ,,-, ,..,,,,-, . :._ 1201.4 -0. t t �` r, « I ; "ts oust Y m . 451 9 E Mme#° ak T ft , EXISTING r I r i 9 ^ ' , f �a&'- j\- /f V .. ''. 5 BUILDING . 1 S' ,,.4; 0. i.: , t[ ' ,,',1 '4. . . ' 1 Za f Aib EI, �"• "1ill #�(ft *, ,4q€;,.. r IP 1 Mi t. t>C�• r a n� Green A-r, tom., 1 ,, 444 4G, .g �P I- ,' 4:18 xT $ #" r 1y�yg' # -4 , i # 4,1' r '1'400_1_ 1 �4 Q I f i fv a 17 r _ A 7?' 4 fr�rFi » �aR a. F i li i•re r` # • �': k, ' �° ��• ' 4 'T q„� ,. •rnalD White Mul• rry r,*:; 4� 9 it}� ` F ti� X 'a' � / Qmo �m �a: �G, z8asswar ' 342.4, , .. *AV -)-- i. , . ,` �,, ,411,4144`34/ aIA:f i."' Eltler +'',i,1/1:: i ;:"4.1411i6 e:Ash •=i':' i c -:-.*:ter' ': :; -: " .t:4 Vi 4 14\p:Nt1:4*.ill6:L*44 .iirtgintle __,"'.. 41447i,„;.,.4,:4, EP 1,1 -;:4 4370 .e, /. �' # "eo-. '° 43`'22' Q Ook 4 1' / '',-:'- 1' y.` w fir } y t s; #- ;. 41'..., 6' Am- can Elm ,� T' :�"" '�'�A+d. �'�`t t I I "� } N ,*1-:.'; x r4. s. „. J ' Greer!Ash € # ' '� $ f :,,,,,,j„,,,,,4„.„,,,.,,:,..t', ' � +1M sh ),_ , a OUT 'I , ,, x 4 �W:16)_4111,'� enc Elm -t. ! - �` �_ € lot- c a 77T''''' '4 I{ ;;rig {If£- .1 ' 43.#• _ ��' I ,I N Y >,,; ,;4� fi � �` zi 4` e t a .• `+�j�f�.' '9ox PYj err ^' , ` .., e41 ",,' 1. Sam , µ=�.� # i a .. ne ' _':'#u d =;9� ' ✓` fes,+ 1` ti, .. ,, lot , : , a e'` .tip 74 K, .;� —3 T r + ..... lit 11d15G 6 t+ Ifirth) o ; t, . ' sit 4,--.-' miassilm"" _ AftwAL.- Olikirt 3...;111 .'amur`,Y _,, €' , f, • : ....-Zi-' ., . .. #` _• m.#;� i,..,,- ' w ; �.� -.—.,4 ,4"s' i .-Xr } tdY _ is j a yj: �. rya � -.1. . ._.4- y : 1" =80'-0" ili i i• -mi _ 40'-0" 0 80'-0" Figure 7 - Existing Property Map 3635 TOGO ROAD, ORONO EXISTING PROPERTY MAP Project Number. Revision Number: • • Issue Date. , Revision Date ,..-• 4 . . ,,t t olps. ..,,, T.,---,, .,,, J, :., .„. , „ , 57-,.. . . . ..... ....,,,,, i„..,_ s . .. ., ..f.* ,�� X, , f tea' " 1 .,, ?' I {' K , e, . r " ' �„.e0,09.1.14._�: :. ,� !1% t .^„.4:' Grein Ash S rw8 t p. •�. ' �' .een pg�h R171k, I ➢ �... 1 .,- 1 - ".' 'Uf a , / ♦Y . ' W. 1 J 'Vj::'kil . 'r i I:it . ' � � J m M''+ e. '. on EI ^+,s ',�, x..R. ` , m• �,f 4.:'r t, It' I'l:, `' Red Oc a41.04 ,. ,r p kLR-1C ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESI IK1 r .,. MIN. LOT 21,780 SF CDRY BUIIDABLEr q /,t+ q � „,, i..):, ,,,,,,.ft / N. LOT WIDTH 100' 4._.j 1 c'rI " :1,:. LOT DEPTH NA , I c ' •'• i...„1-4•••• . baa• SSB 10' - _ I +1„15„'3 '1 t! �� ,gy a. ♦ e ,�:. r ♦ • . RSB 30' ,. �•I ra A w'a ...4 43 • # f ,se' Ark.' ' %"•1 fF :6 . f . `. •' 17 � D WETLAND BUFFER RULES ,-� I trr� �a. w� » i'' MANAGE 3 WETLAND 20' S. �� n �J ,� * ) x. MANAGE 2 WETLAND 30' i � oir.k.,...,;: 44.,'� � `� � ; �����'MjiB r � MANAGE1 WETLAND 40' � ��`' ,)\L_ :, t .,,w ��c�34tMy 'rte ,yIPRESERVEWETLAN➢ 79cnnc " . , iy � ���V� � ■ORON❑ REQUIRES ADDITIDNAL Ib SETBACK • ji �� eei l#3 BUFFER ` , ,� M i,_• Via• • / 11111.1N11, �!0�_.q wx ' I�1 '�� 4370 .a° � p �aa r� Y ' • -d Elm �- • �t +� a • ,z ;yak . 12s� iln.;.f I"••ox-Ed , �'� 5� • � R �� 4,44 Green 'Es • - `'VI Green Ash • - ' � „-,,,-*:,-,;:”. ,,,, ,..;,0":„,:,:'4..,-..".,::,...,„- ,3 y s th • 1 # 1y• "� a s ;ar ash ��\� J+r� Ij�� 1 4, � ,.�, can , c'-., 110iftt.:4-,t'r:-. 1,7,4*....*.,,,,4,4, de 14 > 'i.,� :i `'��• Ifir' i �P � tS�����1. 'r��' � l,� 4 1 .,. , ri : • Ii AshenN C:4'1- *4 -,,.,--..„2/• o i II a 5,,. ....,.a—' • J @fa '`�' a � .I \,,,,,,, ,-„4.4,1,........, ,..,...,..,,. .,.,., ,,....„, ,,.„....._-_, 1..80'-0” - IN - .0'-0' 0 80'-0° Figure 8 - Proposed Two House Lot Split on South 3635 TOGO ROAD, ORONO PROPERTY MAP Project Number: Revision Number: /V"^1 .0'O Issue Date: Revision Date: Figure 9 - Tree Stand Map /1 �% , ( \ I .. ::ai;17 I)'' : - 1 A I 1 ` 'Ittf. IArea 4 \ I v Z -- iT Area 3 I I i I •. I I - \_ — Area 2 \ II II I at I \ .- I w I Area 1 1 I I I I Map layers — _ v • Trees>6"DBH_ ) )Hennepin County Parcels 0 .01 .02 .03 saaaaaai __>_ Miles Area 1: Dominated by green ash, Area 2: Dominated by green ash Area 3: Dominated by cotton- Area 4: Dominated by red oak, quaking aspen, and cotton- and boxelder. Some red oak, wood, green ash, and red oak. Boxelder, red oak, and burr wood. Some box elder present. hackberry, mulberry, and silver A few white oak and American oak. Some Siberian elm Common buckthorn and staghorn maple present. elms present. Understory of present. sumac understory in southeast. common buckthorn. Figure 10 Invas . Map - • ..c. • A► ,. .4 r .'-i / : / � • - Ir - ,,' . # >\\ f . • 44 y 0: . //,yam' . .4..,, .. / " ./..„..:-y!,i,,:.,.//r / ...t.t,:sz.,,, .2. ../ . .,, ..yy..._ .4. .,,,,. , 4.• : � Reed Canary Grass It,// �`N\ Ground Ivy Map layers ' f ' • Trees>6"DBH _ . • IIII Buckthorn I ;Hennepin County Parcels 0 .01 .02 .03 :_ Miles Figure 11 - Topographic Map 1 .17* " � _ I, rt�1 - i o o • 1 — A v,� ( '"--)i j / j, i `• y ( `i� t m t v ; \ CM iN ve a �� r-i Z --...s4 ..../ ^ ` r474b ` vv1 qtohAvr / '(i L 7� -1\t �._ Pte a y % �\ 1 Livin ston A4e Ck3 A ! vmq�ton vi 9 The Stale of MMIeso@ ata M Monseole Deportment of Nebrsi Reswn0et makes no repreee0Num 0 0015 003 a worst..expressed or arched.with reseed to Me we al nape a 9.07500 c data provided - W" herewith regerasss of b brut or M means of b Ira smbeb,Then 1s no guarantee or repreanbtlon tete um*.to the accuracy.currency.subbaly,or Mabariy of this dela for ata p1.pn..The we aaepte th.data•n l$ Sc ale 1:2.912 N The Stale of Mlrasote aaum..no r.lponelSy for baa damage marred sea remit of why use Manor on db data.N naps ata other material pravMM herein ere pr0Mded by copyright. 41 Eayema we was used dteleq Ihe conpbbn of lb product haver.,.doe to charges b ownership ata M need b rely on Mode Inbrmatnn.wrote or omissions may exist.If you Mead dscwer an owWOpb. we encourage you to tet us know by uig to DNR al 1-1588.044-11287 or by amll at bbulrr®ealam.us. Nob:010.05on images and amour.were 9.naaled horn MAR derived eteve1on.dace acquired 20074012. Created On 12/122017 Figure 12 - Rural Oasis A ,;is Corridors 1 (rlTr�( �irr .k —IT- kis — 1I I l I.I=iJ l + ��J_- lh �` I^-1 _tit //in ip cbla r ! B: CR 6 west ■' r 144-10 �w� l a�- ,.` '' -9 �' t , k i !- � r A: CR 6 east e— 11•111419 1 - �i h WWI ->> .al- ''? Y. C: Highway I �µ Long .. .�= J -L �i g y 12�� ! - Q " � I � i . . IBS 21 , icity of _ ,1,1,_ 081 )f .��� 1 fRI!o atert i. Long Lake I . . E. O M E.;' n1 -.........i... -own i I •• V kil ' ..,-1/4 _, _- - ii. 0),. , ,. ,dr_ . i 411111 tgillitL plittibA.;_l -L-1:111 C y .-01111111 Lt---.......1 - K 400 L U ,1 a fr. -I4,_ 1 AL likotiii 41 1 4 7. _ , 0 a"VI /---‘ 1 1 y'-e,,,,:ve i Stub 1 ``tea Ili44.1.--16,111! non IN 6111 = ;-Q 4.,,,/ _ 1111 • 1-1 G , RD. ` SJ[ ;hi , F l/j d 11 � " eoo loW 44-44 ,‘. rto i. -a~i *� .� - .. 1 l _— r- t :f lira Site '��I \ �', � . y �f„ '1-4" f�i'k �� -� J. North Shore .w }44 T. i ... . . �i1� i • t. +f '. ' x 1600 r'14 ] O1RONO 1Ziu i O;isis Analysis Corridors January.2005 Figure 13 - Land Cover Quality Map Legend H. Hennepin County Natural Resources Map LandCover-Quality Date: 12/12/2017 High Quality * • Good Quality „,� ` Moderate Quality - 4 r� Poor Quality ' f '4.11F " " ,F P 1.� - V.'' , ,, , Altered Non-Native Plant 4.-,,, l Community: Native Species • 9 '+i" ,' - -, . T geltdit ct. a ='',4 Present V :4' Altered Non-Native Plant z �. ; Y , " ` Community: No Native ! t Species Present 41• r It Cyt - r w R f r �- '`illIA tl i } . � YAI "°� f �i "a N PID: 1711723340014 Comments: N Address 3635 TOGO RD. 1 inch =200 feetA ORONO Owner Name: MARY E RIPPBERGER This data(I)is furnished'AS IS'wihnorepresentation as to completeness or accuracy,(ii)5 furnished wth Acres:2.4 no warranty of any knd:and(ii)is notsudable for legal, Point Location (UTM 15N):451439.389,4976260.838 engineerngorsurveying purposes.HemepnCounty shall not be fade for any damage,njury or loss resulting from this data COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 Figure 14 Natural Areas with Potential for Rare Species City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory A.,' IF �: a iik,.=� eat I g1104 . . - tY k , • ' liVf.'' 10kr .' '.44,M -- ..... n' i 4 A '1� .l i t z y • Site ,...\ `-. '1- a ii4. Legend QCty Boundary El Popo pWtbrest Ng Oakwoodlandbrusiland IIIIIWakr y cap reran.. -Lowland hardwood brew Pear fen sedge subtype 1.1 Wet mead** Natural Communities nth Poundal br Rare Speed's ism Mape-bassw000 forest Pop fen shut subtype wider**'endow-seasonally!owed Aider swamp M.sed emergent may' hal.Rich Out Wet meadow•son perma*etc y Anode.: Birch bogsprcaea shrubland-saturated sods -W lied emergent main-seasonal y foodec -Rich fen seeps subtype =Wet meadow shrub subtype MI Black ash swamp -Meed hardwood swamp Rids fen ahr;b subtype WYow swamp =Black ash swamp-seasonally flooded =M.ted hardwood swamp-season.ly/coded Mi Shr,b swamp seepage sfitype ILLS Canal marsh-seasonally f000ed M Oab brew En Tamarack swamp III Cared marsh-sent permanently flooded IIII Oak brew mono subtype Mg Tamarack swamp mmerotophc subtype 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 1 Feet 1 ouch equals 4,500 feet Figure 10 City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 26 March 2006 APPENDIX A Wetland Delineation Boundary — Notice of Decision Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Mary Schommer 3635 Togo Rd 6/22/2017 W17-21 ®Attach site locator map ®Attach approved boundaries Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing El Replacement Plan ❑Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ❑Approve ❑Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary(or attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 08/22/2017 ®Approved ❑Approved with conditions(include below) ❑Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Mary Schommer has applied for a wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 3635 Togo Rd(PID 053-1711723340014)in the City of Orono,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Legal description: Section 17,Township 117N,Range 23W.The boundary&type approval was requested June 22",2017. A wetland delineation was conducted by ISG on May 19th,2017.A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD June 22"d,2017. One wetland was delineated within the project area. Wetland A was identified as a Type 1,2,6,floodplain forest,fresh(wet)meadow, shrub/carr wetland. MCWD reviewed the boundaries in the field on August 17th,2017. MCWD was in agreement with the wetland boundary and types identified on site. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as documented in the delineation report submitted on June 22",2017 and delineated in the field on May 19th, 2017.This decision is valid for five years.A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq.ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑Financial Assurance:For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ['Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑Credit Withdrawal:For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Heidi Quinn Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail -W7A7V51 • 8/22/17 (952)641-4504 hquinn@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days)has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ® Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and $0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: Stacy Lijewski • BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): DNR TEP Becky Horton, ❑ DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): • Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Mary Schommer ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only):Ralph Kempf,Lucas Mueller, Melanie Curtis,Christine Mattson ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Ryan Malterud ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf D Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Reg. Env. Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol. Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy.2 Div.Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 _ For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see:http://frles.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul,MN 55101-1678 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: El I 11 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 APPENDIX B Site Photographs >!I:t!f f' "'e ! , ; '!'t Ilk ,reiaA-- - ,a sy 1 i ' _.s+ ifJ�' 1 i t atI x; i -....,41 41:".. :qv- ,, ' • rt ,. - /- !if,' . ill `" 4- � : d, Is, .4111kYy i'flo.'..,'••:•' r + i � • s 1Z9 qS e R a 3 • l " IMR'R . r,'., y . , . j Lyra ,l, • ,.. • Looking south at house to remain on north Garage to south of house to remain 1' ..,-- �. a.":6':Y i r '''leis" e4 q. g • • Looking south from garage t d south end of north lot 1 ,11,....iN." . 1 . „..--„•-. i- . I ',, 4 -.7', z-:.--;... "-.4;• •,-.4f7,1, ' -,;....7t.- .,. . . . -..4-........i•.z.... - ..-- .- . .,!,,..4...._:- .. .,. •:•:•....-. -... - N40,- __. ir..-`4,--- . • • . -- -:-.; ir, .....,.."_ -_. ---„....; -4-0 4: - '41.- _ .. - , , ' 1- ' \ - ..._ • -- ....*-4.........„ ----- co - . -.... '•, . i " -: ........._ — 4-, 7.•,•41.931F,ip:',1 - :•-. ' ' :,...-.. ' • ,,• - iLSOIONIPW=7-itrillar- "0 lin,••fdllf:: ..e.„:-, '-=,, ....Y 1:64131/44•----. 12 • '41,!4-... . . il 11! 1 c .*."— illigtaZw-s' co '.%•.:41,1,. ,../. 4' - '/6-, . -, . .-, IFAIIIIPP. ,,-. L cu ,'.e.ti,tiv,- .,. . .4,f;f - •,itir ' -;'- d... 0 '!I!, --' , "7.71.- e.".'411'1•Wil7.11; '''. ... .7, -. ,..........., -............,... ..._ „ .. - - k T , ..,..14.: , I ,344.--.. ..........:-, ---„---- 1,2 . •' ,-;'''.; - -,•-• ,.......-* --, „„„i,,.. f-,..--,..- - _ co '..41,4.41.A•, , , vo.. i, 0 VS 0 (S3 '1.4,.‘..St'40;...*:•:,k1 4::':,"• - , ' -CS '‘•%....' -AL. S ', A ' i -' . (1) -*'...„gr• ir It .,- . , 'at- cu - ....,'.'. e ? - tikAi *, I-,-. • .' 4-, . •- --.-'77." ...--431_1Z------ 61 •0,4,_... ,..,1 , . . IP, qto, ' - '• y ,•4. •: - . -, .. - ,?--- 0 f%.. o .,-.4 ..„-- ",, .... ;•" ,L•ex".',415-i---";,..7 910 - - r•-•nr, ... ..... ; -17- :C ; I ' V't4 Vgilr' ...e.''"..-..--.--....--.-- - - •-r. !. • 4-, .7tts:,.,"•Sti...,,,,, _ ------.. ro . .... s ' i ,"` •''' - - "it 4-, i- .• • • . , , , __I r.,..,„,, .S,C...t.7.4.."„... . . ',.- ... . , • ., OD , E.5X7/11111k, _. 0, . 4 C 1 %, , r .iv-i; , , ' - _ . •. , • ' ...lift, . 0 . • IN..'i'.,Flic",--,-.. - I ..; A 1 t , • , , . -% .7-eakt .:.•, ii. \iis.-.,„„....,,,_„.....,,,,Tr.!. , . ,,, .,.. ....I -• .., 9 •,• -.:1.,,,,.,... ,. , - •,,, ,...... ...,.-Mir . i'''; ,-•.4.;,O. 1 , . 1 . 1.... _ , :,• . ._ v. '.4. .. 1 • . . 1,,,', , , - r• ,_ .• '4 4.1" ...,. ,..... ,„ -..... Ai; _ .„, r ' •o•''' .- _ , . ikii;. ',..- - ......., •••..._ : .. • . , , ... , -,i ( ilk a.,`" *•"" t- ..): • \ a ' - • %oh 4 - 1 t '4 t - 1,1 , ''...f..,:-' '''''' -.?•-v 'lit. . , 0 ' ;4r•,-. ,.= / At . , -.0., =,••:-.' :, 1;,.. ..--.„, , • , - , -. ,,--00'?.••4•,;:r,"'•••••• ' - . . ; ....1'...... :. '; - - itittitiii ' -., ., , Cla ,Alr,e' '. :-. - , 7, ,k -••••Attit,-'. 'o'i•''411,-,4,40 . ,,a) h11111*4-.,,,,. ,,,-' '...0.:.:-..•-, › .I-, (1:3 .7:sk:". ,' .i..i.,..--- - i e • ', A ,q, t•-,_ ?T - (13 tio , ....-,;,•- -? tr g • - i '4 'V., 4- '''' • 2 ..--,.. , ' • • . - *4+ * $. eurr'''''• 4-' .- 0 / C • or- .....,., ...... • , .. _ - _ . .• . u, . ...: .4,.;..,":", .• •• • 7:5 ',i , • , „,/ • . .._ . a, - 0 CU - ' - -- - -,•-.7 I" A -0 itp-iit:; • '',.', ,••.-- '-• - -.• '', .„ • e -"I a) fr: - ,- -.It ' I • . _c OD = ';,;„,..-..0.•,..: _- .,.. „", • ' • • -0_, -,,,,,,, ,,....• 2 me).. ., ,,, ..... ,. -C ^ - - ,,,,,,et,..,.„.. ro ..--,r.V : - ..,C, - -.:- ‘-•*.iV 4'; '"`1..- -th ."' ' s- 0 116*-..k,..-, ...‘ : ,- -.. ,..... k‘,.....,..„.,.. . t• •::‘-, • .. s..... i .,- . 1 v, '''; ...7„,", „,, .41/1fiir..,..„, -IL,•••• !Ile---”.,..;•• , . OD ,.,.- ' .,r- ';".• '. . ' ''' kiri "'if. • ':14-a,„. C '?"- • ' ....',,4:61.,,z, . -.3'' .' i. . , C _ , . . . .1'.' - -,..::. •l .:, '_. , ., :0144. . it. , ,..,, _.'I. s', '.10,• ift,.. .,.4.1-,. , . 0 "" '; .1kit,,, • I,; 0 P -01....•'_•..- •-•sp. ...• 20: - It'll-f ° • - --41e1140. - : 1 V-• -).-''' I ° -I 4.:•Iji't-,. , --Al". 'V- 1. --1 iii.lr'>.- -4: ;:s3:0 ilr•i•Ii%.- -....-• ... • , t....F r'es.: '"' -:.-..4; 6i: * ..,f . Oc , i. • 'wi,41: - ..-- k r.,• ' r. -b . '4t'i. '-• •• . • .1....... _ '.til*..4.4",4...**, , • ...: i,_ .., ,...: ,....,, ,,ii,, APPENDIX C Invasive Species Management Plan Vegetation Management Plan The main invasive species located on this site include common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). These species are considered invasive terrestrial plants by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and should be managed accordingly. The applicant plans to remove these invasive plant species, and reestablish native vegetation. The buckthorn on the site will be slashed, and the reed canary grass will be killed.A native riparian plant mix and wet meadow seed mix will be planted to replace the invasive species. The removal of buckthorn will follow the guidelines outlined in the document following this text. The reed canary grass removal could be done by Minnesota Native Landscapes or Sandstrom Land Management. 4 Vi Natural Resources Conservation Service Pest Management — Invasive Plant Control Buckthorn Common and Gloss Conservation Practice Job Sheet MN-797 y: - I a% .A1261157 - ��� � Glossy buckthorn Buckthorn spines Gil Wojciech(Polish Forest Research Inst. Chris Evans(University of Georgia) Buckthorns Habitat Common or European buckthorn,Rhamnus cathartica Both buckthorns are natives of moist woody habitats and glossy buckthorn,Rhamnus frangula,invade the of Eurasia. In Minnesota,common buckthorn infests understory of woodlands and forests to the exclusion woodlots,fence rows,roadsides,ditches and of other plants or seedlings in the lower canopy. abandoned or neglected areas around farmsteads. It can be found in both upland and lowland habitats and ' r a 1,::f.J ' / •\, ''.4%: thrives on well-drained soils. Glossy buckthorn r' . t, .s,4 e, : J• i invades the same areas as common buckthorn � i .ki h `� f jai f';, ; however it prefers the upslope areas around ditches, :� 'Ql� i�; �, ;�' Y`,�� � wetland prairies and marshes. They tolerate full sun tic 4Q ' k` 1'4, ,'Lf �• to deep shade conditions. r .c. _ - Ecological Threat The sale of common buckthorn was halted in the 1930s after it was discovered that it is an alternate host to oat crown rot, a fungal disease of oat crops. T r-r::.,�,^: �; However,many windbreaks, shelterbelts and hedges In this woodland the whole understory has been were established with this plant and it silently and infested with buckthorn. perniciously invaded the Minnesota landscape. In Photo by MNDNR 2001 it was discovered that this plant is a winter host to the soybean aphid,a new insect pest introduced in Both species of buckthorns are considered restricted to the US. noxious weeds in Minnesota which means the importation, sale and transportation of the plants or Cultivars of glossy buckthorn continued to be parts of plants is prohibited. The buckthorns were imported and sold in nurseries until its restriction in brought into this country in the 1800s for use as 2001. This plant has spread widely near urban areas, hedges,shelterbelts and wildlife plantings. wetlands and native woods. Job Sheet—Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 1 of 6 Buckthorns grow aggressively and out-compete native fruit while glossy buckthorn fruit changes from red to vegetation for space,light,water and nutrients. They black throughout the growing season. The fruit and have a longer growing season than native plants both seed of both species float in water. in the spring and in the fall. This means that leaves break buds very early in the spring and the plants stay Buckthorns look similar to plums and cherries; actively growing well into early winter. The green especially choke cherry,so it is important to positively leaves are persistent;they stay on the twigs longer identify plants in the areas designated for treatment. than other trees or shrubs and remain There are many references to consult for plant photosynthetically active until leaf fall. identification. It was mistakenly believed that birds and animals Control Methods benefited from eating the abundant fruit. However Cutting,removal,burning and herbicides offer the due to its laxative nature,wildlife get no nutritional best solutions for control. However there are specific value from eating it. The fruit has a cathartic procedures that must be followed for a successful (laxative)effect(note the species name carthartica') control or eradication program. and is eliminated without digesting. However the seeds are eliminated without damage and get Disposal dispersed. They are very prolific staying viable up to It is important to consider how the stems,branches 6 years on the ground. It is thought that these plants and trunks generated from control or eradication contain an allelopathic compound that suppresses methods will be handled. Stems and branches without other plants from growing near it. berries can be left on the site to provide hiding places for wildlife. For small diameter trunks make sure all Buckthorn thickets are so dense no herbaceous layer is roots are exposed to prevent re-rooting. Other possible beneath it. The ensuing monoculture harms solutions include burning or removing the material for song bird habitat and destroys the natural biodiversity appropriate off-site disposal. If berries are present, of the invaded area. destroy the branches by burning. Decide how the excess material will be disposed before beginning any Description treatment method. Buckthorns are fast-growing tall shrubs or small trees reaching about 20 feet tall at maturity. Usually they Biological Control have multiple stems from the base. The brown bark There are no biological controls for buckthorns at this has prominent pale colored protuberances called time. Current studies for biological controls indicate lenticles. The wood itself is orange or yellow. Glossy that few organisms are available for study and none buckthorns have spines erupting from the stem and appear to be effective. branches unlike common buckthorns that have spines located at the ends of twigs between the terminal Mechanical or Manual Control leaves. Methods for mechanical or manual treatments are suitable for areas with small infestations and young The leaves of buckthorns are oval or elliptical,more plants or in areas where chemicals are not practical or or less alternate but may appear almost opposite. The allowed. These methods work best with stem veins curve up toward the tips of the leaves. Leaf diameters less than 2 inches. edges of glossy buckthorn are smooth and slightly wavy; those of common buckthorn are finely toothed. Mowing The leaves do not turn color in the fall and eventually For very young stems no more than 2 years old senesce(fall off),still green,in early winter. mowing the infested area in the early spring and again in the fall,after nesting season,will control the spread The flowers are fragrant yet very small. Those of of buckthorn and eventually kill the plants and deplete common buckthorn bloom in May and are light green the seed bank. Obviously this will be most effective to yellow-greenish. Flowers of glossy buckthorn are in pastures,cleared landscapes and newly restored pink or white,and the plant can bloom from May wetlands,prairies and marshes. through September. The plants are dioecious (separate male and female plants) and only the Pulling,Digging or Wrenching females produce fruit. Common buckthorn has black Job Sheet-Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 2 of 6 If stems are less than'/2 inch in diameter hand pulling ground when it is secured. Any sprouts that appear is effective since the whole root system is likely to be will not be able to escape the can and die,eventually removed. This method works best if the soil is moist, the root system will be exhausted and the plant will not wet,and should not be tried in dried soil. It is die. Heavy gauge black plastic or fabric will also necessary to shake soil off the exposed root system work if tightly secured. Remove the can or plastic and tamp loose soil back into place to protect the after one or two growing seasons. treated area from erosion. If possible replace the organic matter and leaf litter. Plant back any native Girdling plants that were dislodged during pulling. Repeat Girdling involves removing a strip of bark including treatments may be necessary as clearing the area may the cambium layer around the circumference of a tree result in sprouting from any existing seed bank. or shrub. If the strip is too narrow or not completely cut through the tree will heal and survive. Without the Stems larger than'A up to 2 inches in diameter can be cambium layer,water and sugars are prevented from dug up with a shovel. Start digging about 6 to 8 feeding the top of the plant and it slowly dies. This inches away from the stem completely severing the method works best with single stemmed trees or lateral root system from the ground. Pull out the shrubs with stems< 3 inches in diameter. If there are whole plant and shake off excess soil to fill in the more than 2 trunks,the method is less effective and hole,tamp down loose soil. If possible replace the may result in basal sprouts. organic matter and leaf litter as well as any desirable plants. Single stems are easier to treat with this Use this method in the summer after the leaves have method than multiple stemmed plants. fully developed or winter after leaf drop;not during the spring growth period nor in the fall when sugars A weed wrench may be used for plants that are hard to are moving into the roots. Just above the base of the pull or dig,up to 2.5 inches in diameter. This is a plant,remove a 1 inch wide strip of bark,including specially designed lever that grabs the stem so it can the cambium(green layer just under the bark),by be pulled out. As above,replace soil,organic matter cutting two parallel lines,about an inch apart into the and leaf litter and replant uprooted desirable plants as stem or trunk. Be sure you are slicing through the thin much as possible. cambium layer but not deeper than that. Bang on the strip between the two cuts with a blunt object like the Stem Cutting(Hacking) back of an ax and pull away the strip. For stems less Cutting or hacking stems up to 4 inches in diameter than 2 inches in diameter,the cambium can be killed will reduce the spread of infestation,but to eradicate with a torch by applying 5-seconds of flame in the plants it will need to be done several times during sections to completely scorch the circumference of the the growing season and on an annual basis until the stem. plants no longer sprout. Buckthorns root from cut stems if not followed by chemical treatments. The Girdling sometimes results in sprouting below the minimum length of the cut stump is 2 inches and the girdle or from the roots. The plant is responding to maximum is 6 inches. Cut all stems present 2 to 6 the trauma of girdling by sprouting before it dies or inches above the base of the trunk. Tools such as before herbicides get to the root system. To keep this hand pruners,loppers,pruning saws,brush cutters or from happening,leave a couple of 1 inch strips with chain saws,depending on the size of the site and the the bark intact between the girdle cuts and apply the diameter of the plants,are all used to cut stems or basal bark treatment,as discussed below. Less trauma trunks. to the plant may prevent this survival response. If stems are cut between flowering and fruit set,the Prescribed Burning rate of spread will be reduced by decreasing seed In prairies or savannahs where there is enough dispersion. This is an annual treatment and material for a hot burn,prescribed burning can be consistency of the treatment is key to its effectiveness. used to control buckthorn seedlings less than 1 inch in If the stump of the cut plant is small enough to fit into diameter. Larger plants may need a follow-up burn, an inverted metal can such as a coffee can,attach a or chemical or mechanical treatment for complete can with a long enough nail to keep it from falling off. control or eradication. Refer to the NRCS Be sure the stump is no more than 1 inch shorter than Conservation Practice Standard, Prescribed Burn, the height of the can and that the can is touching the Code 338,for information on burning. Job Sheet-Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 3 of 6 application to the point where products are reaching or Mature buckthorns will be a seed source if they are dripping onto the ground. located near a burned area. The exposed soil creates a desired habitat for buckthorn seedlings especially if Keep in mind that glyphosate is a broad spectrum the area is a wetland,wet prairie or marsh that herbicide and kills anything it touches. Triclopyr kills experiences drying after the burn. broadleaf and woody plants and is a safer choice for prairies and grasslands. Be very careful when using If there are buckthorn seedlings revegetating a treated herbicides in wetlands. site or resprouts from cut stumps following treatment, a prescribed burn is effective in knocking back the Hack and Squirt regrowth. This is the most effective and most preferred method for controlling or eradicating buckthorns. 'Hack and Chemical Control squirt' refers to cutting off the trunk or stems and The right chemical applied at the right amount at the applying herbicide to the cut end(s). It is imperative right time is very effective in controlling buckthorns. that the herbicide is applied as soon as possible but no Chemical treatments work best when plants are more than 2 hours later for most chemicals to be storing energy or dormant. For buckthorns,the most effective. Refer to the first paragraph under Stem effective time for chemical application is mid-summer Cutting for information on `hacking'. through winter(July to March)when the plant is moving sugars to the roots or dormant. The nature of The chemical can be applied with a squirt bottle,low the plants can work against them between mid-fall and volume sprayer, a wick or wand,or a paint brush. A early winter because their green persistent leaves can spray bottle set to `stream' with the nozzle placed be easily identified against native fall colors and bare against the cut end with a gentle squeeze will apply branches. the herbicide effectively without delivering a spray to surrounding plants. Soaking the cut end is not Chemical treatments involve several methods necessary since the herbicide concentration is including:basal spraying,cut-stump,injection,hack sufficiently strong to kill the plant. The most efficient and squirt, and effective placement is to target the ring of cambium(green layer)just inside the bark. Important Note Mention of specific pesticide products in this If using glyphosate,prepare a 25%concentration by document does not constitute an endorsement. These adding 1-part of a 50%active ingredient product(such products are mentioned specifically in control as Roundup)to 3-parts of water,and shaking or literature used to create this document. stirring to mix well. Apply the solution as above to all the cut stems on a plant. Avoid applying at Follow all label instructions when applying pesticides temperatures below freezing or if snow covers the including `grazing and re-entry level restrictions"and base of the plants. application site restrictions(Is the product labeled for "the application site"you are considering?) Basal Bark The basal stem treatment works through the bark By law,herbicides may only be applied as per label eliminating the need for cutting stems or trunks. Use instructions. If the plant to be controlled or eradicated on buckthorns with stems less than 3 inches in is not listed on the label,it is illegal to use the product diameter. A low volume sprayer is needed to use this on that plant. method. Triclopyr ester is mixed with an oil diluent (Bark Oil Blue,kerosene or diesel oil)at a rate of 1- Most products listed in this series of invasive plant part product(such as Garlon 4)to 3 parts oil and control job sheets are not acutely toxic but have high applied directly to the bark from the root collar up to potentials to move off-site via leaching or runoff about 12 to 18 inches. The buckthorn plants can be under certain conditions. Off-site movement potential left standing for wildlife purposes or cut later. can be minimized by following the instructions in the This method can be used as part of a'hack and squirt' "foliar treatment"and"cut-stem"portions of these job treatment by spraying the cut end and the remaining sheets. Specifically,avoid over-spraying or bark around the stump. Job Sheet-Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 4 of 6 Management After Treatment University of Minnesota Extension Service. Buckthorns are very prolific seeders. The seeds are Buckthorn and Invasive Woody Species Control, long-lived and sprout vigorously when given the handout,4 pages. chance. Areas newly cleared of buckthorn are quickly inundated with seedlings or stump sprouts if follow-up is not adequate or consistent. Post-treatment of the area includes destroying the seedbank and stump sprouts and replanting with desirable species. Seed the treated area with temporary cover and see if seedlings or sprouts appear. Mow,apply herbicide or annually burn until the seedlings and stump sprouts are completely eliminated. Once the seedbank is exhausted,plant the desired species mix to reclaim the site. Inventory or monitor the site and treat any buckthorn seedlings that are dispersed into the treated area. If nearby sites are the source of buckthorns,try to get those site cleared as well. Many native plants can be substituted for buckthorns. Choices include high-bush cranberry,nannyberry, chokecherry,grey dogwood,pagoda dogwood, American hazelnut,black chokeberry,blue beech, ironwood,downy serviceberry,common ninebark, witchhazel and many others. REFERENCES Anon,Manual&Mechanical Control Techniques for Invasive Species,pub.4 pages Brock,Thomas D.,2005,Herbicides for Weed and Brush Control in Natural Areas,Invasive Plants Association of Wisconsin(IPAW). Converse,Carmen K., 1984,Element Stewardship Abstract for Rhamnus cathartica,Rhamnus frangula (syn.Frangula alnus),The Nature Conservancy, Arlington,VA. Larson,Janet R.,2006,Buckthorn: A Threat to Our Native Woodland Ecosystem,EcoDesigns& Consulting,Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,Invasive Species Program,Buckthorn: What You Should Know.What You Can Do.,pamphlet.4 pages. Reinartz,James A.,2003,Plants Out of Place: Winter is an Excellent time to Control Invasive Shrubs Using the"Cut Stump"Method,University of Wisconsin— Milwaukee Field Sta. Job Sheet-Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 5 of 6 BUCKTHORN CONTROL QUICK GUIDE Control Activity Appropriate For Pros Cons Tools Process/Info. Manual Pulling by Small plots or parks< No chemicals Slow,may injure Gloves,container Best on plants<1/2 to hand or weed wrench /2 acre,back yards No cost for pulling back,may pull or for disposing 3/8 inches in or grubbing out with Natural areas,sites dislodge desirable plants if not diameter. Soil must shovels where herbicides can't plants,soil leaving on site be moist,loose. be used disturbance. Weed wrench, Shake soil off root Weed wrench can be shovels and lightly tamp in expensive hole. Cover with black Small plots or parks< Low$$for used Plastic or metal Gloves,nails,cans Leave 2-6 inch plastic or fabric or tin Y2 acre,back yards; cans,plastic or debris to clean up, or plastic,plastic stump,cover,secure can places where people fabric,nails,wire slow ties or wire cover to the ground to won't trip over cut keep out all light stumps Girdling stems Small plots,stems less Inexpensive,kills Time consuming, Sharp blade,ax, Girdle from 2 to 6 than 3 inches in only treated plants ineffective without maul,herbicide, inches above the base diameter herbicide follow up, safety apparel, of the plant,cut may result sprouting herbicide through cambium, application follow up with equipment covering stump or herbicide. Glyphosate—25% Fresh cut surfaces, Cost for herbicide, Non-selective Saw,loppers,tank Spray or squirt active ingredient hack and squirt, applicator of choice herbicide,keep off applicator,spray herbicide onto girdling,stem cutting desirable plants bottle,eye cambium or inner methods. protection,gloves bark of cut stem. Basal Bark Spraying Larger plots,can be Use on stems up to Expensive materials Ultra Low volume Wet bark from base done any time of year. 6 inches in diameter, and chemicals sprayer and wand, to 6 inches above very effective,low Triclopyr,gloves base for plants up to 1 toxicity,no cutting inch in diameter, Dead stems provide scale up to 18 inches wildlife habitats above base for larger plants. Cut stem with Large stems>4 inches Fast on large stems, Dangerous,loud, Chainsaw,safety Leave stumps no chainsaw should follow up high maintenance, apparel,partner, longer than 6 inches with herbicides costly chemicals above the base. Treat with herbicide or cover stumps. Cut with brush cutter Larger plots Fast on stems<2 Noisy,costly, Brush cutter, Cut stems and treat inches,should restricted during safety apparel,gas, with herbicide of follow up with nesting time oil choice. herbicides Drag out,load and Small to medium areas. Reduces fire fuel, Messy,physically Gloves,saws, Drag cut stems to a dispose stems Fire prone areas enhances aesthetics, hard,time ropes or chains, burn pile or hauler. Areas where aesthetics consuming,may small tractor or is important spread berries and bobcat seeds through the site Leaving cut stems Any size area where Inexpensive,no Piles or brush None Avoid blocking trails on-site fire danger is low or effort Looks`messy' when piling or aesthetics is May add to seed leaving brush unimportant bank Burn piles Open area appropriate Reduces fire fuel, Smoke,burn in Burning permit, Use for stems killed for burning enhances aesthetics, winter only DNR or other by the ultra low assistance volume spray or girdled Misting wand to Up to a medium sized Low labor and Late fall only Mist wand, Use in late fall;non control sprouts area chemical use herbicide,safety selective herbicide Use on resprouts from apparel and will not harm cut stumps equipment dormant plants (Garlon3 or Roundup) Mist Blower with Large area with young Low labor and Late fall only,drift, Mist blower and Use in late fall;non Electrostatic seedlings from seed chemical use for equipment costs electrostatic selective herbicide Accessory to charge bank or newly treated large area accessory,safety will not harm and attract droplets to sites apparel and dormant plants. live foliage equipment (Garlon3 or Roundup) Job Sheet—Pest Management(797) Revised Feb.2007 Page 6 of 6 PC Exhibit I BO LTO N I #18-3994 638 Shadow Lane t, Suite 200 a, MN & MENK 55318-1172 Real People. Real Solutions. Ph: (952)448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.corn January 8,2018 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 18-3994 3635 Togo Road Engineering Review#1 Dear Melanie: As requested,we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Stormwater management for the site to meet City requirements is proposed through use of bioretention basins, amended soils,and tree preservation. The calculations submitted indicate that estimated proposed peak runoff rates,runoff volumes, and water quality will meet standards necessary. 1.2 A Landscape Plan should be submitted with Final Plans. The following should be considered regarding final landscape design: a. The Landscape Plan should detail restoration types, locations and procedures. b. Since common buckthorn(an invasive species) is identified in the Conservation Design Master Plan, the vegetation management procedures outlined in the CDMP should be included on the Landscape Plan, as well as indicate areas of removal required. c. Signage should be indicated for Wetland Buffers and Amended Soils Areas. d. Native vegetation species should be utilized in the buffer,amended soils, and rain garden areas. 1.3 Work within public right-of-way must be coordinated with the Public Works Department. Contractor must provide a minimum 48 hour notice prior to any work being performed. Notes should be revised accordingly. 1.4 The condition of Northern Avenue should be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work, and the existing condition should be documented with pictures. After completion of work,the street should be reviewed for damage, and the Contractor should be required to repair any damage deemed to be caused by site work. 1.5 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 1.6 The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities necessary to meet regulatory requirements. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-18-3994-3635 Togo Road\BennettsWoods_PrePlatReview-1 2018-01-08.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Preliminary Plat Application 18-3994 3635 Togo Road Page 2 types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities, and outline reporting procedures. 1.7 Record drawings and copy of MCWD approval for the Rain Gardens should be provided prior to issuing a Certificate of Occupancy for each lot. 2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2.1 A Flowage and Conservation easement will be required over the wetlands to remain. 2.2 Drainage and Utility easements should be revised to adequately cover all stormwater management facilities used to meet regulatory requirements(i.e. rain gardens,buffers,and amended soils)and wetlands. 3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 3.1 The existing shed located in the proposed buffer north of the wetland should be indicated for removal on the Final Plans. 3.2 Details and sequencing of the amended soils area should be included with the Final Plans. 3.3 It appears that insufficient space is provided between the wetland buffer and the rain gardens to provide an adequate berm separating the two. Proposed contours should be revised to provide minimum 3:1 slopes and a 3' width for the top of berm. 3.4 The applicant should consider using Turf Reinforcement Mat(TRM)in lieu of riprap for the rain garden overflows. TRM will be more aesthetically pleasing and will require less maintenance over time. 3.5 Rain garden design should be detailed on the Final Plans,including section, construction procedures and sequence, and drain tile layout. Cleanouts should be located outside the estimated 100 year high water level. A minimum 0.5% grade should be provided on drain tile. 3.6 The overflow for the west rain garden should be moved west to remove conflict with the drain tile outlet location. 3.7 Since the distance from the end cleanout to the outlet is not very far,the middle cleanouts depicted in the rain gardens prior to the outlet should be replaced with bends or the pipe flexed to achieve horizontal alignment change. Cleanouts in the middle of the rain gardens will be susceptible to short-circuiting the basin through leakage and will be difficult to maintain. 4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 4.1 Layout and design of proposed service connections should be provided on Final Plans. Design of sanitary connection should include pipe material, diameter, length, and slope and if necessary, layout of cleanouts with rims and inverts. Cleanout rims should be located above adjacent 100 year high water levels, as applicable. Water connection should include pipe material and diameter and curb stop location. 4.2 A concrete headwall and rodent guard should be installed on the 6" outlets from the rain garden tiles. Details should be included on the Final Plans. 5.0 PRELIMINARY SWPPP 5.1 Notes should be revised to indicate perimeter erosion control measures and protection fencing H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-18-3994_3635 Togo Road\BennettsWoods_Pre PlatReview-1_2018-01-08.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Preliminary Plat Application 18-3994 3635 Togo Road Page 3 will be installed by Contractor and inspected by City prior to any demolition or land disturbance. Contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 5.2 Double siltfence should be indicated around the north side of the wetland to provide protection for shed removal,buffer installation, and amended soils operations. 5.3 Siltfence should be installed around rain gardens after grading of them is complete and not be removed until all upstream areas are permanently stabilized. If you have any questions or comments,please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton&Menk, Inc. -6Z Ot4 6-elk Robert E.Bean,Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, City of Orono H:\ORNO\C13115486\z-18-3994_3635 Togo Road\BennettsWoods PrePlatReview-1 2018-01-08.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. 1 PC x i i t ''ss 175 NB-9'4810T 21 264 264 80 264 to 264 _ 70 3994 •�..... ...... _..,.._...- .�...,.... .:,- d.. .. ,.,:.1„sw-.+...-'St -•y jt�+�•�.... o:.._ _ -•-♦ - .,.logo`-{2At;10 105 79.5 122 122 10 100 264 124 15 146.03 N89'2310'E ? (39) (40) z. JAMES BARTH g • (56)'; 46 b 1 1 ( ) 1 2 • 48 ?,.. . 6s.5 ( ) Z (50) 51 Z (37) (21) 38 (34) (33) 1 53 tN y ( ) N8g 65 37'E N 1 AC of ADDN 8 PT LOT 84 co �� W 3AC c., S89'23'30'W (35) (36) 2 (57) 122 122 90 Q -Ns (�� (22) 100 • PT LOT IOa 1 76.33 76.34 Nes'4'ao"E 76-42 76.42 55 X5/20 NOR 76 70 70 2566�; 7 6 Gu) !.� `V i PI ,,e' NOR7-1--IERN ,_N- 101 (49) im b PT LOT B (14) Q)� (13( ii 6 N 1 z 3 4 G (92) z 16 �� 128 50 m (89) $ ®O� �(87) (88) ;. (89) (90) $ ( ) ` 10024 36 PTLOT10 v 2 ,.0 § (15)--- m ,.y qo 169 41 74 1 ` 5 F, 56 4, (13) $ (91) : , (18) (17) 8 151 (21) .1 3 9 (138) CD ,.. § g 2 x (51) _ (50) N 70 9 OAKS • (10) ( ) v'� ��� �v 33,7 vAC By TO-NBOARO Northern''`�9OC NO 4772458 .81 4.9 C 18 30 g4. - - -- 78. ern 1 Ay e 14orttl . 78.02 Nj7a11'41E ----8-r6-61-8-7i'7. C t `� 78 U1 441 55, !� cV 39 50.28 50� 201 56 1033 8462 30 66'•. 84 63 (6 . :: - f 8 506 93" 1 ,$ 15 50 50 5( 66- .g - - ����_—_— 5p o g (23) �8 201 39 d a y 169 65 _ - ' 15536 a3 2-5:06°-- � n m > --12^ 11 r 10 Ave S7x•59'13ti 200 X10 9' 8 7 6 5'- 2 (33) (32) 463 47 30 2020 30 30 2020 30 (32) (31) (30) (29) (28) (27) (24) 1 43 2020 30 A 7 8 ..� 10 11 12 v I 3 m u 30 3 ',tip r. ep ccr) .- N il v'° 0 - c, .1- �2�, � so 50 50 so 50 so.ss- - ( ) 50 50 5c v + cr 20147 rn `!..n ..478.',..2(12..Sf39.'43'34"E. O..SV 250 . 04 :.-/,,..' Se-to A 2 1+5 t7 Cy r- V \ f N g ` �!� ,` ,. J i i t > Ur * , 4 1 /TC - _. + ._. -.__.... I 4 a ¥ • , ,1-1i;, , 1 y v i tir. A ', .'..; 4," - -- - ;- - .t-- ..., , -7.. ,, 71.:,..‘,.;-, ik• ..---,1 s ! • 4 s i t ; ' - -••.-. _�.�. 4 _ •. ,' " 0, ,fir -,i,..-- lio to,) .... iv `v,,.v ! ' n——1#1. : ,,,.. 144.: .r . .. ... . 1 , „. . 1.,. . z. . \ ,.„ ,. * .1„, , ..k \ r. G 4, ,. . ,.,..,4 . - — 1 ` � tom+ tr './ A • / . ,' y n� z .,. , • x t u s Win* ,r ,. w..-. s.. .may , • , r t i t \ , ' . f • ,tK \ , . . / / \ ' .;• 4; l ,,'!'T' ,. . s \ y , il \ i;, - — T % . 1 xt. ey ,. . �•, !q i,44„,-.:.; a \ r itOttv ;e.x A w 44 - ' , .-.-._ , . t • • • iw .# . `'` s" `� • �, .' t n c, f it Rp, •i •�.•. ../( .. C� I �� ¢y71 r 4 F .` t liwy. .1: - ., ' y` (r''''''''''''',•, -1 t t PC Exhibit K MINUTES OF THE #18-3994 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 9,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT None PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT,JON SCHWINGLER,REPRESENTATIVE 9. #13-3606 YOUR BOAT CLUB,LLC/BROWN'S BAY,LLC,1444 SHORELINE DRIVE— CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR BOAT CLUB USE—RESOLUTION NO. 6799 Barnhart reviewed his Staff report dated October 9,2017,regarding the expansion of the number of Boat Club boat slips from 20 to 30. In 2013,the City accepted a completed application to increase the number of boat slips,which was later tabled pending receipt of additional information. The applicant has not submitted that additional information and Staff has issued extensions since that time. If a decision is not made by October 15,2017,the application is deemed approved per state statute and the number of boat slips devoted to Your Boat Club may increase to 30. Staff recommends adoption of the denial resolution. Barnhart noted the applicant can submit a new application for approval after six months and go through the approval process. No public hearing has been held at the Planning Commission level since 2013. There were no public comments regarding this application. Printup moved,Crosby seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO.6799,a Resolution Denying the Conditional Use Permit amendment for the Your Boat Club,1444 Shoreline Drive,File No. 13-3606. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. 10. #17-3954 LONG LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT/CITY OF ORONO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR EMERGENCY DOCK This item was added to the Consent Agenda. 11. #17-3964 MARY SCHOMMER,3635 TOGO ROAD—SKETCH PLAN Curtis reviewed her October 9,2017, Staff report regarding a proposal to subdivide a single lot into three lots at 3635 Togo Road. The Planning Commission at its September 18 meeting reviewed the proposal and was generally in favor of allowing some flexibility regarding the contiguous lot area minimums, setbacks,and the width of the right-of-way dedicated along Northern Avenue. No comments from the public were received at the Planning Commission meeting. Ralph Kempf,3675 Togo Road,stated he is here tonight representing Mary Schommer. This is a sketch plan,with the goal to obtain a clear statement from the City Council on how they would anticipate going forward with the proposed 3-lot subdivision. There is a minimum of one-half acre for each lot,which would be met. The center of this lot consists of wetland which makes these lots noncontiguous. Kempf noted there is a development that is not only very close in the neighborhood but also very close in timeline to this application that was approved within the last year and a half. Curtis displayed an aerial photograph of the area. Page 2 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 9,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 11. #17-3964 MARY SCHOMMER,3635 TOGO ROAD—SKETCH PLAN—Continued Kempf pointed out the Northern Oaks development on the aerial photograph,noting that at the center of those lots is a pond resulting in the lots in that development not being contiguous and that in his opinion this is a clear precedent in both time and issue,which the Planning Commission also agreed with. Kempf noted the Planning Commission had some questions about the setback from the road. A 30-foot setback was allowed with Northern Oaks,but in this situation,a 30-foot setback would make the two lots on the Northern Avenue side unbuildable. Kempf stated the one difference is that Northern Oaks was totally willing to give up frontage because their goal was to have as many lots as they possibly could. In the Northern Oaks subdivision,they have seven lots,with each of them being approximately 78 feet in width. In this situation there will be two lots,with one lot being 100 feet wide and the other being 107 feet wide. The other issue for consideration tonight is the right-of-way. Kempt stated the roadway for Northern Avenue was vacated a long time ago and half of the street is owned by the Railroad Authority and the other half is owned by the applicant. Kempf indicated Mary is willing to relinquish her right to the street since she would prefer not to have to plow it. Kempf stated if the same 30 feet is taken,these lots would be unbuildable due to the configuration of the wetland. Kempf stated another item for discussion is the fact that Mary did enter into an agreement with the City a number of years ago to provide an easement alongside the subject property. Part of that agreement was that the City agreed to have two sewer stubs installed on Northern Avenue for this lot. Kempf stated it is his feeling that that shows intent of the City at that time to allow two lots and that Mary has paid the special assessment on those some time ago. Crosby asked what size homes are being considered for the two lots. Kempf stated that is unknown at this time since they are only at the sketch plan stage and that they are looking for a clear statement from the City Council that this is a plan that they would approve at some point in the future. Walsh commented he appreciates the extra width on the two lots and that he feels the same as the Planning Commission in that some flexibility should be given. Walsh stated there are the two stubs and the development seems like a natural fit. Printup asked what right-of-way they are looking for. Kempf stated it is his understanding Staff is recommending 15 feet and that would likely work for this subdivision. Kempf noted they have also contacted the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and that there might be some wetland buffer flexibility. Kempf stated it would be possible to have a smaller buffer on the two Northern Avenue lots and then take a bit more on the Togo Road side. Kempf stated there are a number of options between what Staff has proposed and the MCWD and that he does not envision any problems with that going forward. Dankey asked if the City would need to change the zoning to allow this. Page 3 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,October 9,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 11. #17-3964 MARY SCHOMMER,3635 TOGO ROAD—SKETCH PLAN—Continued Walsh indicated the zoning would not need to change and that they are looking to create two new lots under the current zoning. Walsh noted the issues relate to the pond in the middle of the site and the right- of-way. Otherwise all the same zoning standards would apply. Kempf stated Staff has mentioned that one option might be an RPUD,which occurred with Northern Oaks to his understanding,and that it would not be a rezoning. Curtis indicated there are different ways the City can be flexible with the subdivision and the contiguous areas. Staff and the applicant are wondering whether the City Council would be amenable to allowing some flexibility on this subdivision or whether they would prefer a straight LR-1 C plat. Crosby asked if Staff is generally looking for a 30-foot setback. Curtis stated there is a 30-foot standard for the district,and if something different is proposed,that would be built into the application. Kempf pointed out a subdivision is about the only time where the City can actually obtain a 30-foot setback. Kempf noted the lots just to the west of this property are not going to be subdivided since they do not have a 30-foot setback. As a result,the City will never have an opportunity to have a continuous 30-foot right-of-way along the entire street and there is no advantage to the City for having a wider right- of-way in this section of Northern Avenue. It was the consensus of the City Council that they would be in favor of allowing reasonable flexibility on this subdivision. The City Council took no formal action on this item. 12. #17-3968 SHARRATT DESIGN AND COMPANY OB/O FREDERICK AND PATRICIA JOHNSON,1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE(PH)07-117-23-0026)—VARIANCE Curtis reviewed her October 9,2017,Staff report regarding a request for variances to develop a vacant nonconforming property. After receiving feedback from the Planning Commission,the applicant has eliminated the structural and hardcover encroachments into the 75-foot lake setback. The applicant continues to request lot area and lot width variances,an average lakeshore setback variance,and a rear yard setback variance to permit a revised,reduced setback. Following the public hearing and further discussion by the Planning Commission,it was recommended the application be denied. Staff recommends the Council consider approval of the lot width,lot area,and average lakeshore setback variances. Lot width and lot area variances are frequently given and average lakeshore setbacks are often given when the lot is unbuildable,typically when the lot is on a point or peninsula. The Council should consider the applicant's requested rear setback variance to allow a 5.6 foot setback. Staff recommends a 10-foot setback from the rear be maintained. Mike Sharratt,Sharratt Design,commented they know this is a difficult piece of property but that it should be pointed out that there are old foundations on the property from an old house and a garage. Sharratt stated at one time this property had a single-family house on it but that they do not know what Page 4 of 23 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 18,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Peterson stated it is very typical in the development world to max grade the site and keep the footprint of the building down two to three feet depending on the type of soil. Once it is backfilled in,everything fits in nicely. Peterson indicated they have hauled in over 40,000 yards of fill and that they would rather not haul in more fill. Peterson stated they are just trying to get clarification on whether it is proposed or existing. Schoenzeit stated he is not interested in granting a variance to the height. Thiesse stated he would rather see the 30-foot height restriction complied with and that his understanding is that the existing grade would be the proposed ground in this situation. Thiesse asked whether Staff sees any issues with doing it that way. Barnhart stated holding firm to the 30 feet is appropriate and that Staff can address the proposed versus existing. Thiesse stated he would like to keep the 30 feet solid and base it off of the proposed grading plan. Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3969,David Weekley Homes,Orono Preserve RPUD Agreement Amendment,with the understanding the height of the homes will be limited to 30 feet based on the proposed grading plan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 8:33 p.m.to 8:37 p.m.) 6. #17-3964 MARY SCHOMMER,3635 TOGO ROAD,SKETCH PLAN,8:37 P.M.—9:06 P.M. Mary Schommer,Applicant,was present. Curtis stated this is a sketch plan for a proposed subdivision of a 2.34 acre property to create a total of three lots where one lot currently exists. The property is currently zoned LR-1C,One Family Lakeshore Residential,with a prescribed density of one unit per 1/2 acre. From a density standpoint,the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The northern property would be accessed off of Togo Road where the current home exists and two additional lots are proposed to access off of Northern Avenue on the south. The lots range in size between 0.51 and 0.91 acres. All lots provide the minimum lot width measured at the front setback. The proposed sketch shows the applicable setbacks and the resulting building pad areas. The project will be served by City water and sewer. A wetland has been delineated near the center of the property. The size and location of the wetland impacts the buildable area of the southern two lots. City Code requires that each sewered lot provide 0.5 acres minimum of contiguous dry buildable area. It does not appear that this standard can be met for proposed Lots 2 and 3. No house plans have been provided with the sketch plan. Unless otherwise amended,the homes will need to meet all applicable city standards. A Conservation Design plan will need to be completed as required by City ordinance. Page 17 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 18,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. The project as proposed will require approval of a subdivision with some level of flexible zoning approval to account for the lack of contiguous dry buildable area for the southern two lots. A 20-foot right-of-way dedication is shown along Togo Road. The sketch drawings do not include a dedication of additional right-of-way for Northern Avenue. With half of Northern Avenue's traveled road on the railroad right-of-way, it is in the City's best interest to regain the necessary right-of-way outside the rail corridor for potential relocation of Northern Avenue should the need arise. Property subdivision is one of the few opportunities the City has to acquire necessary road rights-of-way. Curtis stated the Planning Commission should discuss the appropriate amount of right-of-way to apply to this subdivision and identify any additional issues or concerns with this application and provide some guidance to the applicant. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Ralph Kempf,3675 Togo Road, stated he is representing the owner of the property and that her intention is to sell the property. Kempf indicated they are looking for direction from the City to generally understand if what is being proposed is acceptable. Kempf noted the proposed subdivision from a density standpoint is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that all lots meet the dry buildable requirement. To make this subdivision viable,the dry contiguous buildable will require the potential use of an RPUD. Kempf stated to the right of this parcel is Northern Oaks,which was done as an RPUD. The drainage from the pond in the middle of that development runs from the east and the west to a point just to the right of the big white parking lot. Kempf stated as it relates to Northern Oaks,from the left side of the pond all the way across those lots except for the two most to the west are noncontiguous. Kempf stated in his view Northern Oaks is a very good precedent both in terms of time and locale to this subdivision. Kempf stated in addition,all of those lots in the Northern Oaks development are approximately 78 feet wide,with at least four lots noncontiguous. The upper portion depicted on Exhibit B is the Togo Road side,which is 124 feet wide. Kempf stated there are no real issues there. On the south side the subdivision will create two lots of 100 feet and 114 feet wide as proposed on Northern Avenue. Kempf stated that width is very appropriate to the neighborhood and are actually some of the wider lots in the area. Kempf stated as to Staff's recommendation for a 15-foot dedication of right-of-way beyond the existing blacktop on the northern side, Staff is correct that if it was a normal dedication of right-of-way,the two lots on the southern side would be totally unbuildable. Kempf stated a 15-foot right-of-way dedication beyond the existing blacktop,plus the front setback from the right-of-way,would barely allow for an adequate 24-foot depth garage on the east lot. Kempf stated they would like to see a 13-foot setback to allow for a 26-foot deep garage. Kempf pointed out if you look at the strange shape of the buildable areas,the lot on the right will not support a garage on the left-hand side. Kempf stated it should also be noted that in 1982 the present owner provided the City of Orono a 20-foot easement all the way along the 525 feet of the east boundary. At the time of that easement,the City installed two sewer stubs at the Northern Avenue location and the owner paid special assessments. Kempf stated he heard earlier this evening it does matter if there is a sewer stub but that it is a little bit Page 18 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,September 18,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. different in this case because when the City was making the agreement to obtain that easement,at that time they decided they would put in two stubs. Kempf stated in his view that shows clear intent. As it relates to the buildable areas, 30 feet was given by Northern Oaks to the City. Kempf stated what the developer was looking for in that situation was to pack in as many lots from east to west as they could and that the 30-foot easement did not matter to them since it did not affect the number of lots that they were able to create. Kempf noted back in 1918,the City vacated that street and it was attached to the adjoining properties. As a result,Mary Schommer actually owns half of Northern Avenue. Kempf stated she has decided she does not want to plow it and that she is willing to give some of that back. Kempf noted it is a very different situation between Northern Oaks and this property because the 30 feet did not impact the usability of the lots in Northern Oaks. If 30 feet is required in this situation,she would be giving up the ability to sell the lots. Kempf stated as it relates to the statement that property subdivision is one of the few opportunities where the City has the ability to acquire necessary rights-of-road,all of these lots along Northern Avenue end just past the east lot. Kempf pointed out none of those lots will be subdivided and the City will never get 30 feet all the way down from Northern Oaks to the end of Northern Avenue,and even if they could get a complete stretch,the road ends at the next lot. Kempf stated he is not sure what the City would do with it and that it is not something the City needs. Kempf indicated he is in agreement with Staff that it is reasonable to give 15 feet but that it does not seem reasonable to give more simply because it makes the lots unbuildable. Thiesse asked about the front line of the buildable footprint. Kempf stated Mark Gronberg was unable to be here tonight but that he determined with the 15 feet and the front setback,they would be very,very close to the front line. Kempf stated part of the problem is the erratic boundary of the wetland. Curtis stated the wetland setback and buffer would be no less than 35 feet. Leskinen asked whether the Northern Oaks subdivision was an RPUD. Curtis indicated the resolution says RPUD but it is listed as PUD No. 9. Leskinen asked whether Staff has any preference. Curtis indicated they do not and that they are looking to see whether the Planning Commission is willing to allow some flexibility. Thiesse stated he recalls the developer wanted the lots along Northern Avenue to go through so the people would be responsible for that wetland area and that an easement was provided to get around to the other side. Thiesse stated in his view the two lots fit the neighborhood and that he is in favor of allowing some flexibility. Leskinen indicated she is in agreement with that. Page 19 of 21 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, September 18,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated as far as the flexibility portion,if the right-of-way is taken off the front,they could reduce the front yard setback. Schwingler commented he likes flexibility being allowed as well. Thiesse stated in his view the City would allow the noncontiguous dry area. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. 7. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,2017 Barnhart reported on the following actions taken by the Orono City Council on September 11: • The Dale Gustafson variance was approved on Consent. • The variance as part of the Dahl Road preliminary plat was denied. • Preliminary plat for the Lake West development for the Lupients was approved subject to 13 conditions. • The Council was not supportive of the YMCA sketch plan and generally followed the Planning Commission's direction. • Staff is moving forward with the Navarre Area Plan to ascertain what residents would like to see happen in the area. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission will start seeing more activity with the Comprehensive Plan in the spring. 8. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Schwingler asked how the Comprehensive Plan open house went. Barnhart indicated approximately 45 people attended and that there were some comments made that they liked the current direction the City is going and that the City should not introduce urban areas where there currently are none. Thiesse asked if the Pence Lane application was approved. Curtis indicated the Council provided some feedback on their sketch plan and that they are preparing an application. The applicants will no longer be pursuing a subdivision but they will be asking for variances like for the creation of private road,creation of a second back lot off the driveway,and the substandard back lot variance. Curtis stated once those variances are received, Staff can administratively move the lot line. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT Page 20 of 21 PC Exhibit L #18-3994 NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE Wednesday, December 6, 2017 7:00 — 8:00 PM Orono City Hall Council Chambers 2750 Kelley Pkwy Orono, MN 55356 David and Jennifer Knaeble are proposing a residential subdivision of 3635 Togo Road in Orono, MN. The parcel is currently 2.4 acres and they are proposing to subdivide it into three residential lots. One lot would be on Togo Road and two additional lots would be located off of Northern Avenue. This subdivision is being completed in cooperation with the current property owner of 3635 Togo Road, Mary Schommer. The existing property is zoned LR-1C, One-Family Lakeshore Residential District, and would maintain the existing zoning. Although this neighborhood meeting is not required as part of the subdivision process, we wanted to get some preliminary feedback from the neighborhood prior to making formal applications to the City of Orono. If you cannot attend this open house meeting, and have questions about this project, please call or email the developer per the contact information below. David and Jennifer Knaeble 227 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 763-234-7523 djknaeble@gmail.com 6'3S T-1 6---r) .4.' - I.moo ti, - r-r �- I2/4/-2 7 0 3 f'1-. Ste, , ��, ISN �u z27 5--,,...A.1 ,A,6, 1,./.., '?E 5 z?f•--7,r-t_.? t, AL.-,(N fi� �r,.'I cw-L, CPC 1 $ ÷ c<; 50 /\-)0 --I-,.+yen- 61 - 91'i-a6 l 5- ( . 14,is s C,-4 Mac" Z , �z u(4-°N0f !hN 7- ,c11 fM ., 1 <c", t6Z--Ai- rk*e_-;f -2Z 310 ('t1-1Z rW, ItI.vE- 14\Z - 6% (,--/-2(0 Tc.-AOMAE Ne"K< cSn'vv I\,cc),`-,` PC Exhibit M #18-3994 Sec.78-348.-Conditional uses. Within any LR-1C one-family lakeshore residential district, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses without a conditional use permit: (6) Planned residential development, limited to detached single-family dwellings only and subject to the limitations of division 10 of this article. Sec. 78-350.-Area,height,lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1C district shall exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Side Yard Lot Lot Front Side Rear Adjacent Area Width Yard Yard Yard to Street (acre) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 0.5 100 30 10 15 30 (c) Within the LR-1C zoning district, the side yard setback for lots that are non-conforming as to their width shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. (Code 1984, § 10.25(6); Ord. No. 18 3rd series, § 3, 9-27-2004; Ord. No. 173 3rd series, § 6, 6- 27-2016; Ord.No. 199 3rd series, § 4, 6-12-2017) DIVISION 10.-PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 78-601. -Purpose. This plan is available to land subdividers subject to council approval, as alternative to standard minimum lot size subdivision of land. The purpose of this plan is to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural open spaces, to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony, to provide cohesive structure to neighborhood design, to offer recreation opportunities close to home, and to aid in improving the welfare in general of city residents. (Code 1984, § 10.32(1)) Sec. 78-602. -Submission of plans. Landowners may submit land subdivision plans for any R district without adherence to minimum lot size requirements for each building lot, provided that the total number of building lots or dwelling units shall not exceed the number of such lots or units permissible under the minimum lot size requirements of the zoning district or districts in which such land is situated. (Code 1984, § 10.32(2)) Sec. 78-603. -Council discretion. Dwelling units permitted may be, at the discretion of the council and subject to the conditions set forth by the council, in detached, attached or multiple-family dwelling structures, subject to the limitations provided for in each zoning district. (Code 1984, § 10.32(3)) Sec. 78-604. -Open space. The dedication, ownership, use and maintenance of open spaces created by the application of a planned residential development shall be subject to conditions deemed necessary by the council to assure the preservation of such open spaces for their intended purposes. (Code 1984, § 10.32(4)) Sec. 78-605. -Dedication of open space. The dedication and ownership of the open spaces referred to in section 78-604 may be through: (1) Homeowners'association; (2) Landlord maintenance; (3) Special service district; (4) Municipal ownership; or (5) Any other method deemed appropriate by the council to accomplish the purposes of this plan. (Code 1984, § 10.32(5)) Sec. 78-606. -Site plan. The proposed site plan, including location, spacing and basic design of proposed buildings, street and parking plans, water and sewer (public or private) plans, and plans of open space available for park or recreational purposes shall be submitted for approval by the planning commission and the council. (Code 1984, § 10.32(6)) Sec. 78-607. - Hearings. The council may direct that a public hearing be held to review plans governed by this division. (Code 1984, § 10.32(7)) Sec. 78-608. - Final approval. Final approval of plans governed by this division shall not be granted until all conditions set by the council are met, and, further, the council shall not approve any such planned residential development prior to the legally binding establishment of the open space dedication, ownership and maintenance provisions, such provisions to be guaranteed by bonding or other means satisfactory to the council. (Code 1984, § 10.32(8)) Sec. 78-609. -Subdivision requirements. All provisions of subdivision procedure established by chapter 82, except as modified in this division, shall govern applications under this plan. (Code 1984, § 10.32(9)) Secs. 78-610-78-620. -Reserved. DIVISION 3. -BUFFER AREAS Sec.78-1605.-Wetland buffer areas and setbacks. (a) This subsection establishes authority for wetland buffer areas around protected wetlands. Buffer areas are necessary and beneficial to maintain the health of wetlands. Buffer areas protect the edge of wetlands from erosion while filtering sediment, chemicals and other nutrients from runoff that drains into wetlands. Buffer areas can improve the biological diversity and health of a wetland environment while reducing the adverse impacts of human activities. (b) All wetlands within the City of Orono are within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), which has rules and regulations for the establishment and maintenance of wetland buffers. In an effort to avoid overlapping or conflicting regulations, the city defers jurisdiction for the establishment and maintenance of wetland buffers to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If application of MCWD buffer regulations is in conflict with city regulations, the Watershed District requirements shall apply. (c) In order to provide for a minimum level of wetland protection where Minnehaha Creek Watershed District buffer rules do not provide for adequate separation between wetlands and buildings or other structures or surfaces, the city shall require setbacks from the delineated edge of a protected wetland as follows: Minimum distance setback from delineated edge of wetland to any building(principal or accessory) or other structure, hardcover, septic systems or wells: Where no formal buffer exists and where MCWD does not require a 35 feet buffer Where a formal buffer exists or 35 feet or established buffer width plus 10 feet,whichever is where MCWD buffer is required greater Areas within the required setback area subject to filling, grading or excavation as part of a construction project shall be revegetated immediately upon completion of such earthwork. (d) The City of Orono has established wetland protection strategies in the Orono Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) (January 2011). A protection classification has been assigned to each wetland in Orono based on the stormwater susceptibility and functional assessment for each wetland. The city has also established additional protection requirements for each classification. The four protection classifications for all properties except those zoned as "residential" are described as follows: ((TABLE REMOVED)) The protection classification for each wetland will be found on the 'Wetland Management Classification Map & List" which is hereby adopted by reference, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city clerk and shall be available for public review during all normal office hours. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District required buffer area widths are based on the four protection classifications. (Ord. No. 28 3rd series, § 1, 8-22-2005; Ord. No. 103 3rd series, § 2, 5-28-2013; Ord. No. 196 3rd series, § 3, 5-22-2017) Sec. 82-2.- Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Lot area, minimum, means minimum area required for each proposed lot as prescribed in chapter 78. In rural zones not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of wetlands, public and private rights-of-way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water or areas at or below the floodplain elevation for a specific property. All rural lots must comply with chapter 58, article II. In urban areas served by sanitary sewer, each lot must contain contiguous dry buildable land equal to the minimum areas as prescribed in chapter 78 or half-acre, whichever is less(exclusive of public and private rights-of- way, vehicular or pedestrian easements, surface areas below the ordinary high water mark of any surface water wetlands or areas at or below the floodplain elevation for a specific property), and have legal access to the building site without encroachment of a wetland or floodplain area. PC Exhibit N H.um pin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map #18-3994 Date: 11/18/2017 .1,' 1966 1.........••... Spring Parham 1972 1978 826'81880800 1990 1998 Udd Ln - 20554) 7 '..• 2000 4 .2059 > 3746 ,, 'S 2016 4063 . 2024 X1067 0 37.01Ilk 40 Y 381 00 2380p 3765 3731 \ 2060 3818 9:3781 *NIL 2080 324 ...**••••........................... X092 30 3801: ` iN 200 3829 :3800 38 38 QC•' 2106'" 3835 •" 3800 . 3841 • r 3720 ,1 ' .12- ' •: 3760 3740 3847 353 3802 371037003690 a 7)660 O 24/P 3820 7.3861190780 3,;, 3640 -3600 • Togo'Rd*. .,. 3813 3.0 37853765 3725 3705 1184 E64 63 329 311 y- 3745 7 �' 2171 2190 220408 3812 3803795 . [.,16 5 3655 [[ 33pp n ,"� 3775 22472 48 3813 11..a„, .� ''225e 329" 3801 : 375(3 7047303721670; ` , 3640 (1272 . 22E 3829 22372?45 3806;- ' 2859 '-,- 3#1310 +:37803760 ^ �: .. ..........• ..,822 : III 2255 E • - II • ' '" ' 2265 ' 3585, 3505253505 349338377t73b.n 4; f ■ - r. f j 0 285 ,101,•*.***''__---17. 37.55 -"IT, tv i n g s ton'Av ,, :;;572 3554 355 35203508 3488 34723 43 �_ 33FI)lde>•ugi 3697 369 -- g 3695 350 2391 ° 3599 5835755 359k43k33 52 3505 3,495 34 7534734, g � 3605 �a 3880 87 0147(2 3. 3075 3653[;40 3554 3520 3468 3770 �jr91 3665 2345 3596 e - 3536 .• 3505500�4963�43¢72 ,, 34 •t 3655 --L'--Lytic-Ave ,.e,.- �.. ,�- Q' - - - 3559 3525 4'3499 38 36.5 3585 359"541 35850 34773073 3 X6266157 3542 > 850 3800 363 . 23893596 3574 3572 ' 38 3465 350 2 Z 3496108A}87368 34 ',v,-,,,,-,..-,-..1,,,:;,....--,__ ,shoreline-Dry .,—a,_ .. ,..A,i'.''''=,.. ,=P ,- . S.k'.E' _ � .'. ,. 2420 3745 3701 3607 3605 2400 2413 2414 2474 2480 3465 34 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: I I i i I I i I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is fumished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487 I gis.info@hennepin.us PC Exhibit 0 RUN DATE:11/18/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE #18-3994 38 17-117-23 31 0029 38 17-117-23 31 0047 38 17-117-23 34 0025 K ATHERTON&ALEX HACKBART MICHAEL NOVAK PATRICK ALCORN/BRENDA ALCORN 3680 TOGO RD 3640 TOGO RD 2285 BLAINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KELSEY ATHERTON MICHAEL NOVAK PATRICK C ALCORN 3680 TOGO RD 3640 TOGO RD BRENDA B ALCORN WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 12365 LEES ROAD CASS LAKE MN 56633 38 17-117-23 31 0030 38 17-117-23 310048 38 17-117-23 34 0026 JT CLASSIC HOMES LLC J E WELLS&K M WELLS MARIE J INGBRETSON 3660 TOGO RD 3600 TOGO RD 3600 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 IT CLASSIC HOMES LLC JAMES E&KAREN M WELLS MARIE J INGBRETSON 1772 LAFAYETTE LA 3600 TOGO RD 3600 LIVINGSTON AVE MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0031 38 17-117-23 34 0013 38 17-117-23 34 0027 CITY OF ORONO CHRISTOPHER CHILDRESS CHAD JOHNSON/KATHLEEN WHALEN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3630 NORTHERN AVE 3630 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO CHRISTOPHER CHILDRESS CHAD D JOHNSON P 0 BOX 66 3630 NORTHERN AVE KATHLEEN E WHALEN CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 3630 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0032 38 17-117-23 34 0014 38 17-117-23 34 0028 MICHAEL P&LORI 1 ZAPPA MARY E RIPPBERGER PETER DUNLAP 3670 TOGO RD 3635 TOGO RD 3640 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL P&LORI J ZAPPA MARY E SCHOMMER PETER DUNLAP 19622 CO RD 35 3635 TOGO ROAD 3640 LIVINGSTON AVE ELK RIVER MN 55330 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0033 38 17-117-23 34 0015 38 17-117-23 34 0029 DAVID MADGETT&K SCHWARZE JEFFREY ROBERT ZELL M K GALIMOV&N N GALIMOVA 3637 TOGO RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3650 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID MADGETT JEFFREY ROBERT ZELL MINAKHMET K GALIMOV KRISTIN SCHWARZE 3680 NORTHERN AVE 3650 LIVINGSTON AVE 1350 ORONO OAKS DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55356-9480 38 17-117-23 31 0034 38 17-117-23 34 0016 38 17-117-23 34 0030 SAM BREMER/TATIANA SUBBOTINA JEFFREY R ZELL STEFANIE HOFMAN 3645 TOGO RD 3680 NORTHERN AVE 3660 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 SAM BREMER JEFFREY R ZELL STEFANIE PAULA HOFMAN TATIANA SUBBOTINA 3680 NORTHERN AVE 3660 LIVINGSTON AVE 3645 TOGO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0035 38 17-117-23 34 0017 38 17-117-23 34 0031 RALPH WILLIAM KEMPF SCOTT W GARDNER M M LARSON&D A LARSON 3675 TOGO RD 3640 NORTHERN AVE 3670 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 RALPH KEMPF SCOTT W GARDNER MICHAEL M&DEBRA ANN LARSON 3675 TOGO RD 3640 NORTHERN AVE 3670 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0036 38 17-117-23 34 0018 38 17-117-23 34 0032 NAVARRE CONG OF JEHOVAH WITN AMBER A HOECHST CHERYL K MOUM 3655 TOGO RD 3670 NORTHERN AVE 3680 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 NAVARRE CONG OF JEHOVAH WITN AMBER A HOECHST CHERYL K MOUM C/O KINGDOM HALL 3670 NORTHERN AVE 3680 LIVINGSTON AVE 3655 TOGO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0037 38 17-117-23 34 0023 38 17-117-23 34 0033 BARRETT M KIRCI-IENWITZ RICHARD E QUNELL JENNA WOLFF 3685 TOGO RD 2255 BLAINE AVE 3692 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MELVIN&DONNA KIRCHENWITZ RICHARD E QUNELL IENNA WOLFF 175 TONKA BAY RD 2255 BLAINE AVE 3692 LYRIC AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0044 38 17-117-23 34 0024 38 17-117-23 34 0052 JEFFREY R WELDON BRYAN D SINKEL HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 2117 SHADYWOOD RD 2265 BLAINE AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JEFFREY R WELDON BRYAN D SINKEL HENNEPIN COUNTY 2117 SHADYWOOD RD 2265 BLAINE AVE REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 RUN DATE:11/18/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 17-117-23 34 0065 38 17-117-23 42 0022 38 17-117-23 43 0138 LAKE MTKA WOODS ASSOC JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON B C MAENNER&A J MAENNER 3755 LIVINGSTON AVE 2171 SHADYWOOD RD 3590 NORTHERN AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON BRADLEY&AMANDA MAENNER C/O COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 2171 SHADYWOOD RD 3590 NORTHERN AVE 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E#101 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0092 38 17-117-23 43 0028 38 17-117-23 43 0145 CASCO VENTURES LLC DEAN YOUNG EVELYN J LANGE 3694 NORTHERN AVE 3555 CRYSTAL PL 3585 CRYSTAL PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CASCO VENTURES LLC DEAN YOUNG EVELYN 3 LANGE 16192 HIGHWAY 7 3555 CRYSTAL PLACE 3585 CRYSTAL PL MINNETONKA MN 55345 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0010 38 17-117-23 43 0032 38 17-117-23 43 0150 STEVEN B DORE VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV ET AL CHERYL KELLEY 2172 SHADYWOOD RD 3593 CRYSTAL PL 3572 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEVEN B DORE VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV CHERYL KELLEY 6530 CAMBRIDGE ST OLENA BOCHARNIKOV 3685 NORTH SHORE DR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 3593 CRYSTAL PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0011 38 17-117-23 43 0033 S LACROIX&SUSAN A LACROIX HERSEL H FORESTER 2166 SHADYWOOD RD 3599 CRYSTAL PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEPHEN R LACROIX HERSEL FORESTER SUSAN A LACROIX 3599 CRYSTAL PLACE WAY 2166 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23420012 38 17-117-23 43 0034 PC&M A MERLO MATTHEW BOLLIS 2142 SHADYWOOD RD 3596 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL C&MARCIA A MERLO MATTHEW BOLLIS 2142 SHADYWOOD RD 3596 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0013 38 17-117-23 43 0035 PAUL LAGUE BETTY BEGIN 2138 SHADYWOOD RD 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL LAGUE BETTY BEGIN 2138 SHADYWOOD RD 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0016 38 17-117-23 43 0134 G S MARTHA&S D MARTHA COLLIN F REESE 2118 SHADYWOOD RD 2199 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 GEOFFREY&STEPHANIE MARTHA COLLIN F REESE 2118 SHADYWOOD RD 2199 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0017 38 17-117-23 43 0135 STEPHEN T SIME/SUSAN E SIME JOHN H ANDERSON 2106 SHADYWOOD RD 2195 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEPHEN&SUSAN SIME ALEXANDER C DUSSAUT 17447 CHERRY DR MARIE DUSSAUT EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 2195 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 42 0020 38 17-117-23 43 0136 JPREILY&PS CRAFT KMHEINS&MDHEINS 2130 SHADYWOOD RD 2177 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JACK REILY&PAMELA CRAFT KENT M&MICHELLE D HEINS 2130 SHADYWOOD RD 2177 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 59391 38 17-117-23 42 0021 38 17-117-23 43 0137 THOMAS L&LEIGH A SNYDER KATHRYN L FRICKSTAD 3601 TOGO RD 2189 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 THOMAS L&LEIGH A SNYDER KATHRYN L FRICKSTAD 3601 TOGO RD 2189 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Item 6 Date Application Received: 12/13/17 �O�VO Date Application Considered as Complete:12/13/17 60-Day Review Extension Period Expires: 04/12/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator 4/ft SHo4t From: Melanie Curtis, Planner ITIGG Date: 16 January 2018 Subject: #18-3997,Jean Rehkamp Larson o/b/o George Halvorson, 1300 Bracketts Point, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a lake setback variance in order to change a flat roof to a gable roof within the 75-foot setback and an average lakeshore setback variance in order to make cosmetic improvements and structural changes to the home situated entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The existing home on the subject property is situated partially within the 75-foot lake setback, and entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line on the east side of Bracketts Point. The applicant, representing the owners of the property, is requesting a lake setback variance in order to change a flat roof to a gable roof within the 75-foot setback and average lakeshore setback variances in order to add a second story over the garage,convert a flat roof to a roof deck, add gable roofs where flat roofs exist,and improve the aesthetic appearance of the existing home.There will be no expansion of the footprint.The applicant's plan sheets(Exhibit D) illustrate the areas of change/expansion. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 &78-1279-Setbacks: LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 50' +250' No Change North Side 30' 145' No Change South Side 30' 73' No Change Lakeshore 75' 54' No Change Average Lakeshore The entire home is lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. FILE#18-3997 16 Jan 2018 Page 2 of 5 Section78-305-Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 131,820 s.f. (3.0 acre) ±320' @ 75' / ±320'@ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: The property exceeds 1.99 acres and therefore is not subject to structural coverage limitations. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 131,820 s.f. 32,955 s.f. 23,196 s.f. * 23,196 s.f. (25%) (17.5%) (17.5%) *Staff adjusted the submitted hardcover calculations to exclude all of the retaining walls per current policy. The portions of house and other hardcover within 75 feet of the lake have not been itemized out. However, the applicant is not proposing any changes to existing hardcover or building footprints. Applicable Regulations: Lake Setback Variance(Section 78-1279) The existing home is situated 54.4 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL)of Lake Minnetonka where, normally, structures are not permitted.The applicant's proposal involves replacing the existing flat roof of the one-story conservatory with a pitched roof,thus increasing the volume of the encroachment within the lake setback.Additionally the roof of the main portion of the home will be modified to add gables on the north and south ends to replace the existing hipped roof.The roof will not increase in overall height or peak height, however the mass of the new gable within the 75-foot lake setback will be greater than existing. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance(Section 78-1279) The home is located entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line based on the homes immediately to the north and to the south.Those homes do not appear to have existing views of the lake over the subject property rather, each of the homes are situated primarily with views of the lake away from the subject property. The applicant is proposing improvements to the existing home which will increase the mass of the encroachment within the average lakeshore setback. However,the addition of a covered entry; a second story over the existing flat roofed,single story garage;a new pitched roof over the flat roofed conservatory; and change in the roof over the main portion of the home are not likely to adversely impact existing views of the lake from the adjacent homes. The roof over the main portion of the home will also be modified to add gables on the north and south ends replacing the existing hipped roof.The roof will not increase in overall height or peak height, however the mass of the new gables within the average lakeshore setback will be greater than existing. FILE#18-3997 16 Jan 2018 Page 3 of 5 Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The requested average lakeshore setback variance is in harmony with the Ordinance as the most adjacent neighbors are situated so that their lake views will not be impacted by the changes to the existing home.The additional mass of the roof areas within the 75- foot setback will not be closer to the lake than existing and will not negatively impact the views into the property from the lake.This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of modifications to the residence without footprint expansions within the setbacks in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the proposed roof changes lakeward of the average lakeshore setback and within the 75-foot lake setback appear to be reasonable as the owners of the adjacent properties previously stated no objection to the plans;the mature vegetation,topography,and home orientation separate the subject property from the adjacent neighbors.This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; Based on the curvature of the shoreline,the subject property,and therefore the subject home, extends further into the lake than the neighboring properties. Also because of the shoreline curvature, the home to the north is set back further from the lake than the subject home resulting in the severe average Lakeshore setback applied to the Property.This criterion is met; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The requested variances will not result in the subject home being out of character with the neighborhood;will not expand the footprint of the home;or result in additional encroachment into the setbacks toward the lake.This criterion is met. FILE#18-3997 16 Jan 2018 Page 4 of 5 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for improvements to a residential structure is an allowed use in the IR-1A Zoning District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The extreme curve of the shoreline resulting in the average lakeshore setback which encumbers the subject property.The proximity of the existing home to the lake is an existing condition setback of the subject home and is generally not in character with the immediate neighborhood. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The shoreline's curve results in the extreme average lakeshore setback which encumbers the subject property.The proximity of the existing home to the lake is an existing condition setback of the subject home and is not in character with all of the homes the immediate neighborhood.This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Due to the location of the house and the applied setbacks, no improvement which expand beyond the existing footprint and walls of the existing home can be done without variances.This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The shoreline,topography,and location of the subject home as well as the adjacent homes create practical difficulties affecting the Property;the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owners.This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. FILE#18-3997 16 Jan 2018 Page 5 of 5 Practical Difficulties Analysis The subject home was constructed in the 1950's and predates the contemporary lake and sightline protection rules. The owners intend to keep the existing home yet wish to make improvements to better suit their family's needs and to modernize the structure. Staff finds practical difficulties exist which support granting the requested variances to improve the home. Public Comments Comments have been received and are attached as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Site Photos Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Neighbor Comments Exhibit I. 60-Day Extension Exhibit J. Property Owners List Exhibit K. Plat Map • PC Exhibit A City of Orono #18-3997 Variance Application Street Address: Application# ‘V0.4- f,.\ 2750 Kelley Parkway 18-3997 Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: 12/13/17 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: MC fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: Fee: 700 �d y PO.Box 66 Escrow: $700 I $2,500 000 F1l G�1111, Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: kES ti o0" Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. ' SITE LOCATION: 14700 (51401-SITS 'fbinlT tZeAV t .4 tz.or.1 n Mt.L 5539 I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: tsZ15- A1[ecut-77 (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: NSE A1.4 RSAIt. Mp .S#4 Phone (Primary): eiL.2.85.?275 Mailing Address: 274;2 WS.ST 4750-° ST City: Mrt,s ZIP: 55yto Email: ...A MMf4At2Sonl • co t✓l PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: [-t .o¢G.s. *kA►.Vol'6or,l Phone(Primary): '162 . 44'73_te9.I Mailing Address: It pp guccvitu,yx- a.o O City: o¢m,r.io ZIP: 55,,ti Email: [,leofAZ,ytsyfeLitt wl L'1 CrtMAt-.. CO A4 APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via -...H.dip Applicant Signature: /eI� Date: a •i34/. Applicant Signature: _ Date: Property Owner Signat s�_ 7 .111P Date: 2 ' 13 ' Property Owner Signature: Date: Variance Application—January 2017 Page 4 December 13th, 2017 Halvorson Variance Application— Description of Request Property Address: 1300 Bracketts Point Road Orono, MN 55391 Submitted by George& Lorie Halvorson along with Rehkamp Larson Architects This variance request includes 4 elements: 1. A new low-pitched gable roof on a sunroom at the Southeast face of the house. The current roof structure is a flat roof with multiple layered trellis-like eave extensions. Many of the trellis extensions are sagging and in need of reinforcement or repair. No change to the footprint. See before and after drawings. 2. A remodel of the current hipped roof into a low-pitched gable roof. The peak of the roof and the existing framing will remain with an addition of structure at the hipped ends to form the proposed gable. The rake end overhangs will be reduced from 2'-9"to 1'-0". No change to the footprint. See before and after drawings. 3. Raising the canopy at the front door one foot from 8'to 9'to create a more gracious entry. No change to the footprint. 4. A new family room set on top of the existing attached garage. There is no foundation work required as the footprint of this room is significantly smaller than the existing garage. A new link from the second level connects to this room. The existing flat roof height is 9'-4"at the eave from the garage finish floor. The new roof will vary from 9'-9"to a maximum of 14'-0" above this existing roof. No change to the footprint. See before and after drawings. The entire existing house falls within the average lake shore setback as this house sits on a slight promontory in the land as compared to its adjacent neighbors. Thus,any change to the volume of the existing structure, no matter how minimal, requires a variance. 1300 Bracketts Point Road Variance Application 1 PC Exhibit B #18-3997 December 13th, 2017 Halvorson Variance Application— Practical Difficulties Property Address: 1300 Bracketts Point Road Orono, MN 55391 Submitted by George& Laurie Halvorson along with Rehkamp Larson Architects The following verbiage responds to questions#1-12 on the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form of the attached Variance Application: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter" The entire home is nonconforming as it is within the string test so any change to the volume requires a variance. These requests for improvement are only vertical as the footprint is not affected. The homeowner would like to adjust the style of the home by altering 2 roof lines and a front entry canopy height. They would also like to add a family room that captures views to the west. 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner" The parcel is located such that the string test setback required by Sec. 78-1279(6)and the location of the lakeshore create an atypical zoning condition which places the existing home entirely within a non-conforming area. 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality" Correct. The essential bones of this house remain intact. The small addition and refinements to the roofs are improvements that will not alter the already eclectic character of the neighboring properties.The views of neighbors will not be adversely affected by these improvements. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter" The home is entirely within the string test set back/average lake shore setback precluding any improvements to the existing aging structure without a variance. The homeowners chose to invest in this existing home and do a significant remodel rather than tear down. 5. N/A 6. "The board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located" The home's use is to remain a single-family residence. Hardcover is unaffected. 7. N/A 1300 Bracketts Point Road Variance Application 1 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property" The entire existing house falls within the average lake shore setback, as this house sits on a slight promontory in the land as compared to its adjacent neighbors. The neighbors' homes are respectively 77.2 and 117.5 feet from the Ordinary High Water(O.H.W.)line of Lake Minnetonka. The resulting setback line on this property thus varies from 160.1 to 240.0 feet from the O.H.W. line. Due to the combination of the required string test and the peculiar promontory of land,a variance on this property is required in many instances where it would not be required on the adjacent properties. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located" See#8. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant" As the entire house is nonconforming,any improvements to extend the life of the home and maintain its value given its location require a variance. The variance will provide the opportunity to make a house with an aesthetic and spaces that meet the homeowner's goals. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code" Correct. All work proposed will be executed per code or above code minimum requirements. It will improve the energy consumption and quality of life for the homeowners. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty" As the entire house is nonconforming, any improvements to extend the life of the home and maintain its value given its location require a variance. The variance allows the investment in this property to be brought to fruition. 1300 Bracketts Point Road Variance Application 2 CO Ltar ': l'..,_.1 1 i, 1 ! a 1 Frillii 1 F 9a it POi i a i 11 i �. i , -€ 5b e0 Y1 St 3ii _ li 0.A i 44! i :l :.t8 e7 F5- fya qi go y ca IS 1 -= ig aF I till? I�_ Ii I I I_ ge i k�; E a z �r fjp a ir� ii ? t'+. lE t Ii Z l—• .. CO !Inc a& tg @@ F �ae eel ! �g p F 1• F ,E.-i Si r� 2 pa�j A a 5'2- YY 9 hs i i ii E1 @ i a ig ➢ -i 1aigafi >kill!1 fa i W� x1 g ii $ i3 F Kie r iia cc F i 2 N/F iz r -!e F$ 1 ie:1 a It f 01 FL s eiA li f jj J ..i F z r R �_ � ill Fk ie Fa il 1- 8 BC s E:: p n. Q i s e ?- F a ,1% € E t; iI/110111i "a t ii V $ IELa� 1 AO� la; i iF5 _ 1;, it; il€ sF £1.v 9§,, :0 . lcili i !IF 1 ° € ; f Ela 1 ii i ! l g F €j $iZ iy ?a a tiihiiiIIM a g I._ i€` _ - F aY ` 'i ii4 ii €6 ®•vs.pos4o,teolis®o b '' FEB fi-Gel 99 Si i E iliiy 1i [- t C U Z, F- lni d! U' ' Ws cc m II '"-c OQ A. ii ESW i4rl FQ 0.---, !.....,11 - §`7' 1 a A" as i , � E, p � =1� C 9 e �,..'•i��:,•aid i . *3$ii.16 IVIe .igk�liiig g0--t.ii• 11.9 # ,p �� R ,a 7 i r"i.. 3' i i"* >,.o a:4. g g 4j-'fi' 'g i A.' " SI i gf. � i�, £iy4 �,, °i� ? ? ti ? VI 1 g ii n iii` viii ' �a' g t1Itt31° I ii y �. gigX g ii _il "''i.3g i `a." i a t ll ia a x > iY i i !i i i is; g E1'_ i ' cg s' ,,,,, \‘‘, _„ "0 - . ' I \ i i\O i' g AP.t 1';`,.. mac•, $ .- s' 1.. ' t 3 . - • i ••_3 } 22 -a�,- , ? it€la, ill r w a ',,� a� a i 4ae ggg@ a apo 1 g '' 9 il Pa i • r g ;, o �d r' ' 1 13ai r i r r �: S 4y.700 E O. j�v�. ei41� f_6�6,' � -"-----;-"-,-\---1-,;:"; amus""'. _�__— 12 mow; 't@ j —,.--,--•--...... . °- `\ _ e°:N0 \ i �\ \ ,\ a ic, i SFE B A I li glitig d - tii 4LZL-98Z-Z1.9 9LZL-913Z-Z19'101 . 16E99 eloseuuiyy'oua0 =m O y 01499 NW'sidW'leeJ4S P�£41saM Z£LZ peoa luiod sua�oeJ9 00£1 1 . •ONI S1031IH021V NOSdY1 dWb)IH321 ■ uol;enouea UOSiOA w F 3 E f G NOIi3flaJSNOO 2104 ION-3DVN3Vd 33NYI IVA-L6OZl£4IZL an a. xI- W# E w s • ifr g2.4 Z g c { � Z, r GC W o8m W aW L Q '� E FW Hr I Ji1I - 2ruwi 5`,,q v Z J o m c n .,y W QWN�N my h CLI @ ab x i .) ht "YK s 0_-h-;L=2) m��m'� k. .xr '. mt'g " a) y n LL..Uw`m t_ w ill, c "m s L =aZ' E ,r ��.y `* CO E a E u h �{ N '. I CO 0cl) c a E }'` CU �j �'c �" i.1 E 5 T > ` q. N E E � LI.. Q y E°g.m y.2 3/6 •�..i It. ' •ii 0 .1 1_ _ t, I. • 0 C L 3 3 N!=?7.33 S. . CD 0 x .44.•., :',ki Ce 1 mam Ill.t, L o " o t Z, tli , O u o t.m6 p7 i 1`IIIIIIEIIn , p'iI ht' illi CtS '' I I� W 444 ) '�I 'ilk,', w OOOO ZZZZ IliCCL O a«< 0000 JJJw >>>> �:• �1 a Zw wwww J Jw J O Q N 2222 0 0 0 W W W W r a n w O O O O ¢g¢ .;:-r,:..;;;::::,' C�� { 0 O ���� OOOO OOO i '.. ° oM fl; c1 1 , W O a h"'h"' wwww O O O �:. 1 ''':::::,,,,,':-. .,::,-.1, r N RC7 wwww ��r Z2Z '+� i ) + '4 '� • X wp o0 0000 wwww aaa 11IJ Ihb' tt G xN yN m�vr,t1, 0.00 006 .;, Z w2 22 2222 zFzz &¢a ..:.•.,,,i,•:„ O 00 0000 ur,v,tnm ��� C7 �¢ �¢ ¢a¢a xxRx xxx ,ate • Z �a as aaaa wwww www .� .t ` -! - 0 aa is aaaa PX,CX ;"fl' 4."fit , AS -3 -y- 3.�0Z; "nye $ \ il 3 L0ZyY' •CC9 O ' gm0 t x e •J j \ _ ms� \ I `�9' \ \ �4w=g<i3m \ .P .1 \ N \ r, g 404EN2, \\- f J9nNBgx_ RIA 10.4 A -0-\ .0 2 \ \ aF •.: \ G pm11 'IiiTT:I i e� • e \----- \\ \e o \ \ � yo111-o-0 , 1rc ,11111OX) ©mmmGmmo o \ • • OMyr-0' m \\ .: _....""7:...••••'.....:.t. : OOnD7, r-OCD $ C Z ` \ " z 0M 951W, \ -\ \\ O, 1 1\ ow'orks r E < \ µ\. \�0���� • Its �* •A 1 E _ �1� '914'---.\ A, +G \ ter 7C�C m fT1 'rt i 1 4D \ \ (AZO • pD \�� • y lqg 4c,: �� �' \ n O D D �� p�"i \ 4°''' onITW \ \ m r 5; ___i; .‘ W }i / j. EBJw/.. 5 \ l�/ylll _'8 i a y //o�� 'Cv y -- 1,0 - _-______.::::. ,,,„,,,„„f>,,,,,„„ ,--_---- _/,.//// p '' /— _._ _ _ ��.�.,;_.•• SO4.4. I •/.010°` . f Gear 9 15•W _ i - _ ____________._=___, � �� - 227.47 _ - -�` -� S• >mii 2 g 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o 0Ill M' p m 'a a Halvorson Renovation REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. o O { '" .,s N 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 P Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 N D 7 MZ 4LZL-S8Z-Z1.9'xej 9LZL-98Z-Z19 lel l6£9S elosaum'ouOJO h im. Y 01449 NI1'sIdIN'1ea4S PCP 1saM ZELZ F--fl'WV' peoa lulOd spepaie OOE l e w o 'ONI S1031IHONV NOS21V1 dWMIH321 uogenoueb UOSJOAIeH . a o< Q & o NOI13fl IISNOO HOA ION-3OV)3Vd 33NVI IVA-L60ZICI•IZI• r , w F- wwO Ow> MW5 w w <0_1700-Z_, ~<0 iiiWwOXzz w0aa WMW =QLLOUW102F-awO gt � NKZo m"=WQwO0o~¢w - W 1- awmui�uD—co zzm>v a; a ? pWn7QWwaFUU�ow�O> a iti gi Q Q Z K TCTC D N Q Q O LL W Q J Z \ IR! g ai (O<O QJC J Xa a JO W mz0 /) W� Z w Q U 1 QwNw co fA w<Zwrn Oc7 ��% 'd W — 11 ' .j.... ._, ) ( , i Li a4 'g. S A 8m/ t LL 7 p 3 a % i ) - L, --- 'i ( • gp @ 'i ego g U god )( sil gd 9 ( ! I w o ) , V kg L ___ r r r-1 / i // 2lfr // /'// \5�"e o / LL i // d / a\ 8 E=o // a ?O VD a �iJW1 aJ_ h, // ga ll % / O a' O OJ N ;LI-J0 L„,,,-7 LL // dr` / CO-- w w -1m0 / / 5 �ZLL 0 o6I // / wLL ww0 w z,l ,i mi mLL& Qn o35 44, J y 4. <`" Ca00 R WwLL * P OW 0a- 00 ogo ;sfi wLL WWO _ W Z U.1,,< a W aNU aKI- ow da'wow> * /,`: as aw� a0 a0- / i C4 vi a v '4 4,,/ ii'49 Hi R @,9" la d is° I I 4 4. 4 ; ,o .7i' .q,i D Z (c c 1 \1 S MO F, o /NSD.. / ,� ii ii II o ,,ii a'i y I 1�, 7 t/ i Tot 0 x ®; § fi �,� µ L, 1❑ fl i � AXIOM ',I IIqA � r IIsm1 1 �� • -a;> ik. . 4 \ .. :,‘,i-' `� 0 1• \� ilii *#:\‘s ' \''''\\\\.\\\\.i\\ , / Clooli< 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C > Fm g 4 2 Halvorson Renovation IIIREHKAMPCARSON ARCHITECTS INC. A y` s p 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 .12 m x m A m Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 Z O 2 17LZL-98Z-Z19'Xej SLZL-98Z-Z19'lel R o0 16£55 elosauury�'ouap <m _ Y 011799 NW'sid,ry'leallS PCP iseM Z£LZ peoa lu,od slleloeJ9 00El E <_ _. 1 m a < 1 w 'ONI S13311H02,V NOS2,Vl dWVNH321 uogenoue21 uosionleH ' a a o "W ff NOI10f1b1SNO0 2103 ION-39V)IOVd 3ONVI JVA-L60Z/£6/Z6 Pi 38ILL 0 IqV = fla ill/ i � SI- r-T'11 1 � P 4a 1- LL mw Trr-: , Kw a 6 1 ssa !t °, '6," I l( 1 >w o z c o L �, g -HT . -,I a LLo. �� z� z 0z za I o. I �1 1 0 g w a cc 1 ` afr l_ ,1..,.. afr UV1 �W I _- I Ji Z@JW J � I' yR om> I�a ooco -Jo I-..1 i�o WS ' yb �oUWJo r-_ 7 �I ;a I I s s ctxp4LLOZce t__J �t gl -I_ U1 JOW05 , ooe .0,1 y '.,riwl I o`. ¢¢�mwLL j x a $1 a aag71 I 1 x K O 0 0,,, x co I..: co 0 0 IIS�II__,, I i �, FR 0 7 $ , I�,`I 1i6tco -1� © w aPhI , : .00€ : 18581 I 0 zL1 I EE0 L r cc -_.�.� 1 aw o a �N oiv I .I o iIl 1' —J !§ '' hyo sf O M W > J 1 1 j o a „ il I . Z 3, 1 i w co z ILII I i �' T t { ao W n3-, z_,> uf', I__ I `�' _ i„�' >I,-z w 1 t u_zzi r® z<0. iN LLg °z'1 1LL 1 i1 j Li IA. g.Q. �y s ow 0...._ ` ® -f r t 113 oviw� O I I wain =Zw 2 W d o a J , i„ . ,, I : I, r `3Ww N o W 2 2 , 1 I 1 _� 1 mZI-o 0 ; 1 w I I re�`% J Wwu,Zz W<K Z w o 1 7 1- pu_ i I ONww os - w X o i "1-1 v',. A EL J H 5 € I 'f.,' 0 0 W W 0 ; I 1 - gia„ - mc2na1-cc I % 8I:a:1 .0-,l 3SIV21 vi LU z>Z 1 I , A e fl ; -,—1 o¢ W z o r O LU L0 L �I 1 — I LU coa<U I ti I mam¢? m ... - .-(V to SNOI1VA 1330VUV080d CZV'I=' I N-- 00 PLZL-98Z-Z1•9'Xed SLZL-98Z-U9 lel 16£SS elosauuIW al N m< Y 0 01455 NW'eldW leeAS PJ£4 3sOM ZELZ peon mod sua>loe.19 00E l •e $ w Q x'w '3NI S1O31IHONV NOS13V1 dWVNH3M UOl;¢AOua21 UOSJOAIBH w a Q W W 0 g g NOI13f NISNOO?JOA ION-3DV)I0Vd 3ONVI HVA-LIOZIEWZ1 SNOIJVA313 301/HED ilO3 EZV 33S 7- -71__.._ . _--r r 41 I I LL 0 O 0 L__� IL....t..4— ...i7rj... —J ' �o Ef ® rI `�— --� gam, lli03 I I I q& Z U GF ` ° �w }}I� g w ill k I r ( LL� o0 F 1 I- I'� 00-1 -iOO f —` / xKLL Oce I, JJOw0A. 0303E[DC)~ Ico 1CL 00-DoCO -ri_ �� O W W 6 W W X 0 W �,-f f_ a 0 re 0 1 o.0 a. 0 L__ - — wi 0 00E-00; 1 4: _ 9 (I 1 1 $� Q N n Ti: 1 1( r� f �� ": — E� =MI 1MM I € § 0 -^ 'L — 0 z O z• ct 1� I� C 4 °• < ME Lit U l _ w ce t z _� oQ 1 l Z O MIN I.— n—I �'. 1 X-' ccwon Z I I 1 /1 j ` i C-1zzocn AMIL w ® 1 7 OvdU1 , co I- LL ( ' 1 PL 77 --61.7c1( ;� I' ( � Ov,w� ��M_ 1- D-1 UM I g . I 1T ¢ w w L J ® a N! i UU ` 1 I w zioz 60 am ac=f tf n sf 6 I i u,z w cao4 t x I` 1 0 z0Qw xw L---....) z: z LL;W W Ire rt I� .- _O; Owxz I �s ill ,-� yzW0 11 jj ,Q,� XLLl W Jl W~QZWJ eW= F x W W y Z IiI' �� Na HWw W0 ' Q fr __ I � w, W Q Z W 0 ce El I'. W b S� fly W f l U ~_ eg_ ZSeg I; Wa L _F'1 w0'uSm> [li z,n zx <cn 00_ . E: QmwOD. \ w <w O< 6__,J1 I H O2°O°z0 1,n o wwa0ww u' gi; Q ; C �I rI flip W aha gee 0 -N of R N o 0 PLZL-98Z-Z1.9'Xed 9LZL-98Z-Z1.9 lel L6£gg elosauu!W'ouoi0 w < s Y C\ ' F OI49g NW'sIdW'la9JlS PJ£P ls6M Z£LZ 4^: peon pod slla>loeie 00£l Si i- w a �> '3N1 S10311H3NV NOS2IVI dWV)IH321 uollenouaa uosJonieH a w w o < 4', 0 g NOI1Ol2IISNOO 21Od ION-30V)1OVd 3ONVINVA-LIOZICIIZ6 LI, U' u_ w 51 rc z w c7 Sy N 0 w ... . ; _ c O Z 0a c�1a Z_ o 2 02 QQ U' �= Sir i7-..-1' 0y �w afr E,�3 ° d W >0 Na r— -1 ya OSw0x�WO WWWCIX S S§ W W OD 2�- F i W 8; o rc==- QQmQ�QNQW -5I 31 x'C N8 ZX jt C7 U� Nr LCO CO CO CO W jo O W W W W xu hi' / g 0 p as as f3 00I-00 j II e$ a as o_� -- // rw as a0\81 $ ) a -�i a9 ss f 17H`bpQ �-I ) o iic �£s — I' { 1 0 I z w h. gP \ ' 1 0 3' 1 z I�. nt � a --- '� } `Cf) cwi iI 1�1 . po '.I �� UWJQ r II s§p^ y I I Z g W ct l j , :8 E i Z 'I w Q O Q r) i I�`1 I�11 >0ZW �4. 11 1 1 ea3 I Z 2 C= I I i 1�� III °—�z EE I I I I I *°124, Liy I 1 1I wWWO oa�w ) Li:y h z0 J0 1711— I, \ oN�0 I aj 1I �� II C oaZin INF { — JIB 3 $r y. _ nyZw LJ I r�ti 3 : aI �°0Qw �' o o w CeLce U- LLI LU ` — J 1 1 �I ��~~ §�§ ado ` ( =W co Z Lo Lu W LDI- ae' n og a a5 L-J I_____ O Za w w oxw0 <<U a 0 a b uJ i WZ (n KZ>J12 LLI a w 0 a I— OMMIZ° J mwOOj r c) m J a O J J a 0 V L m¢ na? 1 w 0 ,-c4 ri 4LZL-98Z-Z1.9'xej 9LZL-98Z-Z1.9'lel 1.6£99 elosauuryy'ouw0 <m x `^-J1 rc� 01499 NIN'skill'laaJ1S PCP leets Z£LZ peoa lulod sgareJe 00£1. € 2 B ` V w 'ON!S1 )IH 331IH02IV NOS IVI diNV321 UOl;6AOU821 UOSJOAIeH '8 : 3¢ < .es III ° w o E NOI10(1211SNO3 2IO I ION-30V)IOVd 33NVI21VA-L60ZISI 1. .E-.4 .6-.6 (oNII3I)(3) r —— 1 -o-.Z I. I v e i a= U- w -6 0:111'1 // i 1kiii — , — �g8 5~ w 0z 0 1PLL z le H w Z !HHi MR I �¢ t Js I Wbt w§� 8�1� 1�1 W `, W i ...� � III O Y C7U' NK(nF g �! �a K 000041 O� —� I Ob OOxOOw °g Illgi I I ter °W I!, °3a 1 . r zx as as 1. 1 r I L J 0 a Csi of v TL. 1 I B„,. „ o� I I !i FT _ w 41 J H ( w L'—i o �� Z ce N W U .0-.14 / (JNIISIX3) 0 w_a r-- ---$1,---, a e .o-.Z1. ¢O�u¢ 1 i i^ '-11r 01 P t pc5 a <U-00 1 y = 3 OwUO¢ "— i- LLz�x P2 F \ t 1 twwzw 1 pwwaw O 1 t, j � f ZOJC ( t Omw1— —�K— L � I �wwO 1 I 11.1 oazo1- z= Z 1Iyt D U W W a 4 Z O W w .11 OO¢w O I z0 www Owx >' I I >-s ugww0 I 0 I — I �Qx =w0WZ ao > 1 aq - ilg2LC28 3x gz mmQOa N 1.Y Z J L J o omaZw L--�_' ---=J o F;'Q T z mw0_� F; rE I m ¢DU p 8� ;°d° w m a w a? W 1I! s .0-34 / (ONIISIX3) .4-.6 .:4?::.''.',....44:il,t;,':, ; 77":,,,... 1.......::4. 1:E.:.....:11111:1;ill.t.: .17.:. ',,:,...010 ..,. . ' - 0 ....r. .-.. , 1.2, .,,^ .:.''.ti ..i./... 4:Vii-% '< =m ,.. vi• • MI .-'''' v.; ,,...,,,t...10,...:, 5.... Itik i0 ..-- • ill, ' ' .,_,-•• • z."1"4-- c cn jiiiiO4,.., ...1 'n- rn I-1.,., n m ...Atte , ‘ri,' ' m 0 C -'14' :lb.* '.." 0 ilki'v'r•'..411k4Vi. 0 AC- 0 0 < •:1`;--;-- .' e x. * NW' 04116----04,* -- x, ..nnrcumi ir '141.W.‘,1ti w , '. §;- 'r-t•.-1,,0.14,:- ... 't ,' '','•.:7414 ' . '4,1. !' ''''.,ie"O' , .. •'I ' I , iitio' _,.,,. 4 .4411. i • ... 4. .,. . te. -*...*...e• 11111.11110 . •'''' '."'• ' , 464011W, •. . 1. ,,,,, i',..;.-: ';'1 • , AlAr' ..'_-. •- lb.., , ,.. • Ikk, .--...' . '.,1..a, • ,„:";I a•'. 4., - sr= Ni , Ate„ -.0 -..•.. ri )1111,,,,, liw..•,,...„„,,,, ._. .,.,..„... 1i\ ..„. IF . sr:"...• .fir? .......- 0 141,4 II.; .••-•-•• t• `:;#1:'fr ' ...I' -. 0 .c.ril„ f ..,'''• • ..Aiii,„, .44: !!5 aser--.-- -,• x s allit!lbll, .-,. ii.ii,,. .,,oi. , , .. i m .:;.$- .' '' E'* 011,4 . 41 0 _ _ _ i o to - - - • m : , III i Amp. --- - m .4,1.,:r. 4:.4: Z 1 1' cn 51 '''' ' m ..... .. , ••) i '-:%;; ,!".•:,...; 0 • > ''•" ' 0 .11,. -....':,.... • . z • * til ; 0 1 %A 1 g O I i › . , ..._ ....„ ,. . . .,.... .0,-....' 4 ' ,..4 r I: 11 1 ,• 1 , • 1 1:' 6116 1 fi, 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 0 111m X 1°., '1"< '-1 Halvorson Renovation 1300 Bracketts Point Road U REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 9 2) CO 7 Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 g g ,,...' , . ..,.1.117 •V,,,, ., ' •4.- ,. . . .. 0 .t...-LAJ 0 , • . , .._ . ' Allitti . ,< -4 ,< -• •- •_ •.m .rn v.,0, . 1- •-,701.3 i-4; ' ,:;;;., Allik# ,,,e 're ----- -n '!-tf /ill ii ,-.4,.. 0 ; S. fir_ ',. * 19 ---- .., ,Attili.,0-• 1 x . m m . .g . -... - . , •--,"•-•-0°P-4';'1, m . .. . +9 .„ -..., 77 .:-•!.c- A,. *0kr,„1 711,1,4, .74 -< > 7:I it- 41 7,4k,S' Z V.--i 41 o . .....„, . 4- °to ZIF, f •-: 0',•••••- .. ,••• .,_ - ..• -, - -•-.4.-.,;,;'.'k';',1 . LA'hi — L rn Nip ; 1 ' trez. 1`..:••;'.''''''. 'f','-'1'.'fr.! . . . 11.•et ,,,,..", ...- r-sat '1;1- •I wit, 41, '14.7k Ir' _ . ....,..o... 4...... :.- i0..k.- 11 ,.. •.. -. ._ • - .., .•• 0 -Ike, . 1,• •••=-- .••,.. ---Amix. :Is,!: •;-: .VV1 .41 4 a it 4, ot - .'', 0.-:1441: .-, /Are 0 CO - Ilfr jr-orle' .46; .. Al i 0 1.• •,.. t;SI ..1 4's• -:41`1. t44. 0 • ... (") 0- • - co ID -1 m m - 0•., it 73 cn .MI :// IP 0 0.%). •4:•...T.......*- .. 31 V -< - 1, 7. . . W•.00. , . . . m . .4:;:',2'. - • 1- co • t:A,10?„;1*-4. ,..-:' „0.-i,, - i•'' .git m :.. , ',k., i'IP...,• '•'i, . . , . -.. .:t -....,. . *°,441`_ . .....„).„.-09‘ :ON ii t• ...... • 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ! -1'11' >< _7 1 !'l ,'- HtliVorson Renovation III REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. - , " 7 - i'1 f' ?, 1300 Bracketts Point Road ', 2732 West 43rd Street Mpls,MN 55410 CO 0 o 57.t .33 ' Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 . . l] ".q ;1 ,it. << r ;,..4., s 0 a 0 t♦ oma. =o _ '_ ,2 N s :w T ,S J g it O FI ����1�. A , .A m al Z tAa� A r 3 AMP 11 t a+b 11 . tii?I I' A )111° 4,4 I :4:17itrttk, r ... iViiittis illi tli", "-- - I\_' : i . ki 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ` ' o ▪^' X fT, i P < � Halvorson Renovation ■ REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. o P '^` z ';i3 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 0▪o /'1 a m p m Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 co x, /_1 'd' iN pT mTN Dx 9 1 --7 II 0 0 E f rmi \--3 1 ILS , i LI,© © _ �� e e IE3 1 I 1 rm, -1 I .„ ©H' L ..... 1_, . 1-I rc m /< 1111 r o L x 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o 0III p `x' 1g E Halvorson Renovation REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. `> ' ` y s S 73 n 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 N x p m Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 z� ON L 1 ff r 1. _ ... _ _ IJ o _ _ , i....._c • E r---1 I I li — H ,.. ,...,.., .. U IIIII"11 J II IMIb II, I I - ,,a1 l l ri um zmI Vm 3 Zj _ P - h0 r, a p - I i 2 aD 5D s m ys " ""i Dm _ m m z 1 m S D n i . Ch < m T. AF),",' .,-1 a6, 0p 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION go $� Halvorson Renovation ElREHKAMPLARSON ARCHITECTS INC. F.; y y m g E A 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 N x m A Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 z oo N {r P 1J L r p I, iH=1 .111 ' ''' ?,--' 0. r7 1 © J 0 1- „, 1 .x +d 1— i z 9 q Y$ r Y• Y• - R 2 _m 31 i m 3m r m m m 1 1 O Z Z or I 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION in o 0 Q X Halvorson RenovationIIIII REHKAMP CARSON ARCHITECTS INC. < A 1300 Brackens Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 0 z N.) x p m .a A m Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 N 0 V _i___ .x II 40Z smm rb h �y 'Iir 4D j - o �� I' - IME E07, �; D 1 O Z I I M; L-. A ) I 1 1 • r iii:. [I J ilii . Willow 1 11 \ mi_. ....ilw II -__�_ _ ._. 1I / iiii ...... 0 1 iii. x iiii ;1, © ��M� az K EMi. '= 4z ••••. =D 6-) iiimmE :m 61 1111111.1111 r D -m 1 1 I� o m z a z II 116 ... 12/13/2017-VARIANCE PACKAGE-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION III a o fm "1.< Halvorson Renovation REHKAMP CARSON ARCHITECTS INC. n��— n m S p 1300 Bracketts Point Road 2732 West 43rd Street,Mpls,MN 55410 z " $-6 - Orono,Minnesota 55391 Tel.612-285-7275 Fax.612-285-7274 ,y i/40\1\ \ • 0 1 • i • i 1 ti • ii, yrs �, . .. � L. ft /411111111111 - - i i , 4 . t 6 t1 11 ti • :% V iy mgpitli om.„ i, , All :'--.I."1 '4 1 1 kik, . 1. :. oi,,...2, ,•...,,,i i 1 etv. .a.J. ,..,t \ _ , . ...), .fir • _ ,,,.. , ,ir. .2,. .ite„...to; 1 „„i • p JO 1%, . ' ''' 1 i I II I”7 4 .., , III ilk • ir„, • „ , i 11110 , AL i �. Y. R 4' '`,Z 4,, 409,is /. w .. 1� d ! Y1 h. e yt .ct - .. �'� k''.*:•!.• sl,-A....!, a[/ , Kt�� ACti l'r t'f p' " i1 �: .� \y " ' y' , Cf" ,•a 35�,� 1 t1if� • G 1 • C9 . .,..,..,:" ,- , ‘ z•‘ F'�,z.�M ' rf •-. y,�' •.•° s • f+;1lA`r„• �.•C f" '"!' p • , l 44 .f • a+ r..x. 1 t _ r t 4' i '� I 1-1 s....A.,,,,:k. 44,...• • i,. , 1.- it -,•4•.,•;-• 4,;,, , V a--4: .,; .4 , ' r•i•I' : Ar..‘,4, .'p_b `t, 1 ' - • y izu sA: A 01741. pc\141 , 4i. /4.._ . {� •fi 9i.�4. j 8! ~ .: ,t <,•p _ 141 /' °me` ice•},., arr r ] IIIN i ..y'''''14,\It',ar4 '� ��.yyy .a tea W i• .t ,u.• 4. 1%'-'"47"--' ' ....''''' ' ' '."‘ - 1 i Il • . .. ;rat_ �f i='�ell s' "". _*(+cwt 4.. ,1r,? '!p.---4rto../.yil-..:..;°•.:4 ligirti 1--,4,-,-,,- j, + _..„.2.4 , it j {��j0�jj�y. r IIIII '-ii-,,Veli.;! �j. 44 , 1 . ,, }, T 4414't .diiiiiie ...rvitt -, i e, le►�\\� #�� "� .,K 'r�L, _ pyx`: !, fik" .,,,,.-A.,...:,,,....,-'4 'its •/../ ti, t'-'1 ...1:-,•„.r" Voz.... ,:-47,;•••••7•-‘ • 1 '', Wiz � '��iFl� , a, ,„ ...; ,,. `{ ,r - -{ • fEr: +f U �/ „,yr>� tom„ .'i> '1, - •R. i� - 3�I ;:y laa` y,�c. # %e` r C •i� a _ % • 1+ ,• ryr- 1. I.r � �It r .:it __ c. 00,ti1JI • ; M 4 f • �N �" � � 4i` fy iiir 14--••• •t s ,r.,,•�I "c,r ► • 'i • f 4 , ' \• 1 ... • 4 4 �jP r.n , 1. M,.� vi y r --, ... •sk,,...iiiiv. •t- .. 4 ir 'y.. -M€c ��,, ___.�... ......j.' v.. 1t1- .001:-,..,„,,,,-;,, . • ,.♦ 44,,, tih�i •foil f �.�-.' .ar.r' r 4�`� �•^♦q _` FAY s.� j jl. ,�•r• # • •4.I Nlik .o- - 4i'_l i y�yj � . �y Thr ' `_ of ®� \ t��• 3,�rt.n I -�..*.+se�� f '' �j kr... ♦ 1 ,„„ , ,,,... ...„• A . ,r. . ..aa. 4f ,. -„. - --...---7, , �. f r p,. ... .7,_ . .: t (7•• -`4:J �9 kir tl t+ ..yy J.j'° ' r ra ,, if Y I#;5.r b. :It :>•., is f',,it** .r -. .�. 7 ,o c A•. �'Irtirolfix; / h• • •A'4,44,80- . t t • '' ' 'r . [ ',4/t%r.., r -` .,' — I o • .-•: . —,•. s � '''Ir'' ,�, t� + — +� i�.� —‘,1•• w.t ( • l44iif_/ !l , A.4t ,eoi �d •' `Sy :I ,.'r•, s•o �, ,0 , A • • ." . '0,f •e•, 0. .-- -�. ‘' _•V`.• 7 1 'y�c1 -T7,-.'4...''`,. p tri r. ky ' •isit-S d' 4f. `.. :` .#0.-fes',` fi r.• 41�i ;' � 4. !x i .1 . gyp * our.. 2 • f il.te V Jo,.ilaw _ ! . i I'.1 i 1 t. V1/4.• . M x":1vm tom' ofit,i7 •Y• 1, ti � � ,` r ,<= Pi' , .40, • • 'r . ,- /. - 4 dr . ......... 0. . v i "J 1.., _. , ,1Qi . d , t•f ., I, • �� . ,J a to t , , 1. t J 8 t r ��j .4..... 1. f ♦ . tiS-£ �d 4 ', a �! er� r jY� � ` a •}' •,?:,....'',..... �, , z "' • Y� jit „Jr y{ � 1 / � 4J a p.} I EP Js drf� a .46"..y 'Ill, • 4 it-..,:i. :i. 4. • fib ' lair-..;,,,.t.,,..es► ; , 7j.! :nt4 'ki *�r!° a� ;'�rP � !." ( , �sjitill .4100 ' • �� . , p M. 'r\ • J o1 . 2..cI• i" - '` w ` Its ,, .... . ... • t � I�# s, i111 Q+ a. A� a , h r _ '7 • (►t / 4. .,..:. ‘ , ' : ..J i A:' s r i yam, .c-_ :- 'V :� ' ,.'4 '•1 i' .y -r rill .. to • J K• �ry !c f .. -J y Z�� -. ,J 4 v . ) , # f G s. y 7 U •--.1f..7•'M1 YF , � L rf rig �+? ,''a. .0,,1 4'.'�! ') ,rie Irttl,. - • ` .�`�. �j�% 7LiV p r . -. ytJ'e ,A��". - :-14:V.?k...,;'‘•.(.= ikfierW I.:;4- , , , ..,1'," ...s.'w.........- ,.- , ..,1`1.,::.#11": -4'''''‘.--.4. •:. .y l J +'! euteaLd j. 1 f i rj+ 01,4:1;: zf Ia , \‘ 1. . �x a?.�. _Sr E + I y o •r 1 c:.,. ,„t.4.., • . .. . ., .. t,.. a 4014.,k;.•‘•,4',i,.A .4::.. 1 44411! lik.,? . IC Ari. a . .' .4 . ,i-,...::.:0- ,-.,:,,, t :..'''..%, • • , , , / • , ..."•=r-- -::- Itig.\liq . , i ',,•4. \ •e .:0 .,, IV ----.2- —'ilk\ 4', ....'•,:,...'."-'‘..'8'..L../.42S-'":`:.• 7.`:,•:1';'''_'!.:.....- ,,:-..-77",,44,16, . • er,' i .i• 1 .:----- -.. • %. „fair..irt:t.,... -,•:1'..-•''‘. -'-';111,1,, ,,- - .---- .,- ,." MORI•--mr.--74W'40..-.:•• • ....'- •.71.reril-P -or "' '1,- .' Alf..--••,-'' v• , ..iii. --46',,:41r_.,-L••••Allii Virta6.‘ 0'11+ , ,;:• 141:--, •,,!..,..,,,,,„,,:.8464.1e.,7,....--,,,,-..-,;.,,,,,,,„74,1 • ,. ,:•... ..7-k-,,,,,,, 4.... •....... ,„.... ,„. ;.-..,.'1!—, is...A:..,---,wi I 1 I Ilk--.N11/•-• 1 V.11 4-7 ,..._ • ...,...ii.'...- . ^ . . 7 41 1 : ' ' :'1"-••-' ' e. i, dedekillt.: , . ,°1" ,• /,' ',. /-:—.7':" '' 9.:•.;:if-ri• '3,-..---, - - - -.. 117-1•iv— ... 7 1.-1 I .4b410- .4.2".• .---„:-.:-...-.•-•.t., ir -• .44 Ilt v ,-",.„,,,,...,,- r ic•'-' -,,„.•'*,;;44.1 "4'" :,-,-.--- - ' ...0 ,,- 7177/ ''''''./ --'• ''iammeli i . — - .'ic::•Ve.". /11", .1 .1 ..di 'Or ...,/,-:, , •,,,::-.361.1t...:4. F.*. ;ItrigiPrr,W' , ,Irramillni Al* `• .."4- '44 AO.;r•- 4' ,"%‘P • ,slit .4•111.,•..-",or f,;',,/ "a " 1•••.? . 1, 4 • .f. • ilh, ......N 1.. )...).-- c . . iti. =oak 1 , g A ..ith ,.... - ,.. ...,„, : .. A z. .coir - .01 -•• ;40.vgi . -t,- . • , • ,-tno.... , .411i i . ,, • . . ,.. - -, - -...,, -.0--, 54•-• , ,- • r•• •- 4 W . . .. ... ..•';..-1'.,'e;,-,a".Tt.t- 4 ee, ' ... • - ' t. ',,,,.'1 • , . . ,s. flit : ' ,v.wk,, .--......-..........---- . • .$(..41, 44',1';'. . . - ' Ver--'*:- -:•:L-7'- 4 ,..t . 0.- . .. 4H 0 ," ‘,.... 11;:11-„.. i .t..,..•-:,:q.,„_, ••• •-____!„.• -. .-., ,--„,..:,:,..,;3fir• i'1,4',.,',0;„, . . e.....,.;,.7,-z•...,r -, ..= •,- ‘ • t ...... -- =.. , • AL= . N , , 7o. „,,,, ,„,-,,,•,..,ii: r ..z : 4 A •• •. 4„;,,,.,;.,•-40.,i, ,i, .. ,, Y •51,.. '.-..10‘.../.4a • AIP 41. . , 4 40:.- %.;,-,.::let; ' •17" .,,,.f''':,',,,. , • ' 't. •. . -IL .,. ... ‘t= , 0 •"z i . li,1,- '•••*'. . 4 4P •. . ..! -4 I' - tb-1.7 C .. ' ' • 11110. ,. . . 0 ,-. .i. „,.. 1 4i. ,. • ,,- " . , - 4, .. ,-?.. , ....... , . . ..: „,.... . • if .if-i . , 4•,0,...N.5,,' • ;- 7''4.-;'i ',r - . - ____ ....... --.• ...,,,,...: • -,•.4 i i ".'-'4% ,,_, f - ...40!. ,.,„„ - •4,.`.. • At:44...•'..•` * -,'i-.;i'le•cKj‘olita , Oiri . •1= . 4"'. ..... e . ....„, :•.1, ,,PJ ' --PiA'sr - ,•,.1 •• ...A, 44•- .V, ‘C).?. ,d$,4 1 1 • r.. r:. /.. - i111111.,I P- -9. 1...4.1‘.4.7. •:^,I'4 - • • :' •., ), '" * Ii ,.... .41•07 -44-.4":"....:. ,', -- - :- ‘ a. ..• ,, -v• .,; ,. , .."4 :"./c.,..,- .4,,,„:"---... A\ -, • - -'•••- .t-,r4;.,.;,•,,A -,N-Nis,- r•,...---_,-,_ ; . •-<- ,"44.1% ,,,.„. . , - .--......... .0 ---K , . ,,4: '.... ;''if•;,...„ 'g .i 4% ,,...„... i \ L14.;.-4ii r , - -• '.;---- - •61, •-.:.- . •' , ' le N•v\ 40. • , -,-.4 , .-_ Aigi&VA: ,..-',::_t! -' ---• - ' :-.Jsifie---:--1"-'-' . . • "4"",. .. .,N, ''..,II',, •Vg _..1 , ..., , , - • ,. . „or-- .• , , . .4 Aer _ . , • ' - AO.. ' .., , Z......." -.0., ..... I _ .. . - --- "Al', ."-..-,'e..-• ' ' • 0 e..0•004114"0 r _. illIllft. ''' flgrt", ggr14\ 7.-......'* 2.' 'W*.....1......:-°!.."-:-`1.0..f 1, '‘.'"•*....'t 4.. -97_ :-:-.-: .4'7'--,•.4.-,fixiouvr,iiii -irot." . i. ok. --4.0%.„. ..--., • - ..,,ir,-.:. _ ..'4\' '. vri..., . . ‘10 It Ai ‘i 'J'' li ,41", --.4*.t„— „ • . - ,..:.!.,.i..i.,- ,„,......„--. 40-tv .„ , .. ....._ '" -- iIIIIIW • efi. 3 ' - 4.4*-- • - • L' liv_________ ,, L4...,mitaidAt,Ar '-!'• 4 11,-::: ';',.:4, IC 4;1 irr:,,.fi,;41•61r, . ---,i.i•fg-k- ..z-44).,-,'•-Y,,,,Ilk,t,:-'41i,f-..-ille xic,,It..._ ;v4,7.. 4ipt, itit.‘. ‘nt. .. ..4:, ,t, 14, wi. At .011,.11,44g. ,--• '..v,-..•1.1, „. _.,1 ? #rit,....,t ._-..tz %... ..k.t. :.---.....„;,...!..,....„,-.;!•••;., ..,„N , ' .11 • r*-3.. - - ...: - ..'10".-- - -•.,',;• •••'1,V--:,#4.„ 'IV :"...,.• "- •.„',,: ‘-,- - - ---- I* , . 1, ,,,,,, ‘ ,,, , -, • , . , . . . . . 1 . • - ,. . 1 ; , "5;,,,C • . P t;ir.4i -likp„..„..-..-- . , . , . r„...._- .•,.., , ,..1/4v,,.„,. ...,: ,4-... ...,,eiw.:.\,tr . , , 7 ,.•`!",'74-41r.*.,:..---4.4.;,7-!)-', *-.'w....-.*tr.- '.....--.7... .4 - ..., IF ';''',-.- :t.:,-*, i . . , ig ., • '-'0. -IV ,,.'clvtei.•( 10.ei , .,,oriaimmumminowwwwwwwwwwwir -ri r, \ . --N• li;•1.-. ,, . 1 _ . • ' .,•• - , _ _ . ,. • ' - • ' • , • -.doe; '', .`, i 11,... V •.-, - , • f.,*- '' -• . - . 401 '__,willovi*,),,„„,,,,, '., ' '-- ' s'il ".• ..,' •.A.a•..-....r.- ire--,.. . .-4•,,,-"-wiltro:11. • •.i 4:45,0,MIPAy.:04.. lioiNotor •.,,,--lrelk g.x:'s .!,..!. 43610.407111reli.:vapir - b, -..,_ _ for irilkiiik Alrerf-e"''3..i,:.,;1-061V-P"..r....":„ 4 41111E4.......413talevz.:A.......:,..ciii,, • ‘440111110.J.. •:-._, _i_t,4144%.4.1.,‘,,,,. . .4ii.;,,,), ,, „41,...40...7:.,,,, Ak.. .: . ,..,...mo . ..#17 , -,' - ‘;':.r.-,,-, -...- ..,-41/ ;0,,. -0 . .,,.. ..': . „-a. • ,.*., .1 i.:4111FIgar:444.1'41:c.4. -liatftillia..1 '•,..,1/4.,":..,. i*A; :'' ,.4'• ......- .•a..40.wr....,,sai ,Irt..i...., _ ..... .., re, ,..„_...44; ,. , 4,...f...... ,i314,,,... --f;, I 'mm.P--,A00- 011IW'Ve •-- .-.1,4 . r , 4411011F ,,,jr ' , -1.;,.1, ',4 • - -,--- - . .• ."-, -. • . ---- .......-1404.,-,"...._•--, ',.. "" _,.., . .„ ,7. .i. ., Or - . "'- •.... - 4.''' , ,, , '•Z\...'4 flt.' A'7 .7 , - I' # *: - • ::,,,,...- t '4 V '5' ,.0.. ' ''' , . 4. ., _. 3 . .. - .,,.... .._ , / ‘...„.„.„..„,.. .410.., ,---, --•-4- / - •_ -:. ,fira,-. - -•' - - - -ZAa...' _ 4 IL .'' ,,..- „:,....77-7.* 'frig -6:1,. , . ,, . --.,..,....„. „ ., '..*.*Nt: # '.. / ' .7' triA ........ ''' — 4. 21,,Af ICA': •— , . ft. ,V A; .4. / Ai ' / .: A.. , ,1-, •'roe..........,, '' i''* .0,440 /,' ,..r. 7-.51: ..,.....=.11 •1/1 ' 4,1 T:1* -',1 0 te _ 4. , i' * :O.- ....--.,.. . , • , . ,...,..„- ,,. 9 .. . evo_.. * id r .•, , :-: :`'.'41. i III , '.,.-.1•• „ ..-.. , i i , ,; ,„ • ' , .7 l i /111 • .„ -• 1.. 4 ''' , 10, LA , - ,'r 4 1 ,-1 I . — _ - •4.<`,.- .. . .. . • . . . . . ., .. . . ' . , cr, .4 . ‘ ., .. • • , .-.-,.- - •.,.._ . , ' ..... - '-7-/---.7.4.-.4-'4--....,.:-7,-,,,......,...,,,,:-.,---'-.-`:- ' '.''.0.;,-....:. ',..„„ ;...--•,'N•.. -.7r\''' - •' 7 1 • - -' • --,---.--.. • ' ,I.7.--1,--`rv.-- •''''' - •• -.•is . -%:•N-, •• • • - -: _.• , ''• ,......-/ ,, .• _-'•••••-•-__,—' , r .../ -•,;3.. ...f , -„.. •-••• c-"-.-• /-/ ,'-',•/•. .."• '• I 1 ' ;,%,:-. '4,-t-f, • .N.,,,-;,,•i',. • ‘ '6'4'•f'; .. ! • . x v ,•i •,.'• ,/ 1.,, , tig•4140,,,,, • __..--,-,--- ,/ \ , / , \ i ., I,:,, ,. (;.r?,.' ., .'A, k.te . .... - - ) . .., ,.7, I ' , C'c . . , y t ., , "'. -. ...: . atop...-:, ; •;,,, . "..•1',1:4••. L ;L.-,t 1 / , ii,/ . , 4. . .. ..... . ... . . -...„v'., '. -•,..,' . ,-, ,-. ' ' ''. .‘. :':Z'.1 't,., • ,, ; , 1• •t , / .', , • .,,, . .,., , ,..... • •,-. . • . ,, ' • , ' - -- .,--:i,,„ .:-...;q:1- ,----• 1 1 4 ' AL, 1, ,,•....., • ....,,, .,.. J ' ! \ ' .1 •, , ',,k t'•' ',At ,, / . , • . -..•' ,...; 1,..,44,.-, , ....kr,.. Aill,...,....41......;0251.........t. . , • --- a,„„.. -......... . ..,-,, 41111ebtoft,„,,,,,,_ .,- -..,,,: , ,. -).„...--,„,.,-,,.,i- . .,,.....-.. r-,- , y -‘• 7-7 ,6',k .7 '''•/ • .:.1•L • ..i''./ ' • ' ;IL\ iks ( ' "f '- :•• , :Jo• . .. , ( ,• - ott-" ,/ 7 t ' ...*.ki '4.'7' • "'''•.' V. `•,,1 ..1 ,'ir...". ; '''., ^',..' •r.-,',','':' - , 1 • . -...„ ,„.•„!:,-.._„„,,,„,....., ,\,.. ,,. .11,4 1.,...,-.„-.. .;---,,, • • ''-• - - ,;-. . .,,',,, I...,,.. , ri ,,,-,,'• „...t. .....,1,,,, • ' , • , . -,,fi, . . , . :. .. , - .,..„,,--,v,,-,,,,1-9,„.:-.'• .s.„ -Y.:, , .„ - , _,-- .-,,,,i,., - , -,,,- . . ',,•:-.t--'.,',. ,,f,..,,,,,-.0,-,r,..<,‘., • • , , •., i i ,-,0.4.... ,..., ,....::,w,,i,- ...-,-.„.... - - . • ,, 5,I, .,---.t., ' ' . i \ . -• -„, 4, , ' . ( . .., _ *VV . 1 ,A ...v,i r. ..,, r' . ' •.‘-. ..P... / , 'i - . • 7 ' ' k.- - ' • •'' '4- ' •''''',7r•',', - ''-''1'''"'' -IrAl/, '' .:• I I' , . T .xlii*- .. • 41, . ,'S•",••- -• ,iIk;''''''•.: . I. ' - I ..•-kr , .,.'4.4", .1". • - :7'•• ' ' --.*•'7,it'• ' " ' '''''• 1.,' 7'•' --;-7.-kr ..'r ',..,''7 "ikk. .' ' 7 , .; ‘,,f, I 1 , ',.' 'V..1) ,.,,' ••.., --,. 7Ik. . 7 --- ,a c„ - - . . . ., . . . . ,.. VV VV V _ . ' ' ' '' .0'. ':- •-- -,,,- --4; ---A '-i•""ii4-1-• - ' .- ,'-'-'"'''''`' '- .;. :4.,:.W ,'- •- dr, i ... ,.,,,, .,,-44V.° .' ,--.' - . '"„.40,-,0-",.1,,,t,.'4,-1... -,-•. „.$,T;,- '7 4,-' ,.,` T "4'1' •.' ', 77:.:14.•"Tiltitt'.+1,....•.,.." . elihatarr- -. ..... ......;4404r' -A: ......-..,. ,,,.,... ,.' ,- .. ---;.,:.!". ,', .- -- ....„..--',•-•---.01r,,sti..•.,. •. ,,,,...4 , . . • W 4 ''' 40114 .' - ' -9. ,,.-: . 4.4.":„..-„f."A'..--..A.-.•'''''''.'-'---; 0 v, „--- -,-' >,,, ..., lea... ., . , , .4-. . . - \ '. - •' . N ' 7 ... . . ....'....7, ... v , • goo , 0I -4411111 1 ,'-'... 4' '''''' -•'-"... ,,,•••.',-/ .4.- , .'-' ,s1...." ,- • ' ' , . \ ' • ' ‘ ' • • ..,„,ry„, .--. •--..::-,if,- .:fir :4-1 '.'.' 4-", . , .. ., , ' _ -,•1 • . - . 1 , . r,.-i,..e.e- da.. . t .,. ,., - /'''.........',..,. :,..- ..-4,.. .... '" - m......-----,...,••. . ..- .)' .?.•-•• ,.. ..i , . ‘1 • . '..1 10. •.• . "-.wpak‘ . . ..__. ''''‘' • , . . .„. - . -- ', ' . . .. ,. , . 4,,...1; \,,- , • VVVV .__. ••:.;•."1.., • ',, ., / ' ' •• i'.1.'4 '.;::".'' •' .• -• _ .• vq1 .. 1. ••••• .",s.•-/ \ •- ' i'' • ,, --.- 19 '' "i'• ' /.-i•P••••• '.'- .. , .. .. / ‘ / 4,•---./,'-_.,//, ''' -!-'1':',, 'I i.1• 4'••• / • -• .,'1 I -. ,fk, f''• '' ',. , t, —". •^ i • '' ,' "-..-:,"."t,:'"'"":"..-',... ...:,..1-, -91.0.0....•'- -tit'ZL' :t.t.,.' , ' _•,,. ..MN ,, . ' (Y..,i6-. •,,,) . ,.., .. . . im . .111.. ,‘,.,,...1/4'•t"*,,, ., , - -.--.....7, I t ' .. ' .. - flIft'' ,•'. . • . ) , ' 4., • i-k ',. , ' •',-•,“ /V ' ''‘ .'' ."-- ... ... - .1.0, , ..,., ' • l'i• ' • i' *1 . 1/4,':'" ( , '. ,, . S, ' ' I % 1 • ,.. . - .-i. ,- , v. , yr.• ., -. . -:-. ..tsi , ' • , - ., .74. • "' '44...;'. ..,,J.: - , . , • 1...ii ;- i I, . • ' i''4 • : ‘* • ' -v'.. .'•e,`• 4,. ‘:•• At: . /. • 1, I , ;. - ....,..... ,Ty2,-* ,,,i _.-7.--t. . • , -t• N ...,. .••. t.;0 -1,11/A- ,_ 44 ,t ,. ;_........,,----_,::.-11-•,/k.'`.-,ii, iT------:2177: ._,._r-t. ___77,1:,"•.4.:;:,..,......2:11.:71 •:1 1?q . ' 7 f ; '..,... , ,....-.. ._.._'' . , , 4 . 1 6 , „ -'''-'7":•4•::::•=__,.,•• '----* taititb:. k.,,:c•-,..4w I i 1.# _,_ . , „.„__ • v., , ., , .., ,, 7.-,-•-• ,,...,. ---1/11 --,A 37 -- ,... II, '40 „„.- , ..____ :..........._,,:) ..- , - 4 i At. c..- -,7— N-, .---ir------:--. ,... ....' ,. V . ,. .. ---‘,..... ._..:\._ _ . _ _..._ .,......._...,,_____,.... , ,--, •... .4,t,_ ..- •,,,o • •:t*f. ,,..„f • ., -. .. : '' ...... . .„ - . .. • . - - ., . . .. .. , ..... . - 1,ff.vit*.. , ' _., , iiii- ...., . - . ../ ,. ./ , _ . ...._- r; . OPP. ' , ,•, _,mig: ,„' ': ,..4 'ili,-/-- -t4•••-•----N - --'---';-.' ''". "..-1 N --, ,..,-- yam•• 1. • � tf 4 d„'-';;?:.10.*-' .7 - �. eo.., i 1�' . ss.,,,* y • -,--..i-:4 i"ir..iiiiit,40,-,,,•.....--- _,,.... um • ,-46116' '4•• T=7 ;lbs Ilr • � . +�.t .�' _.-— /A ' 4i t Darin : ►,"` Illf H. jor 04 s `,r • • • .. ._....•,... ,,. ,,, ,,.. , . ,.., .. „ . . .... ... .. . „ . . _. 4 I//It• • • Addr .. !Nr r , , 1 ! t ti -: ill ' - . -'. • - .. .-... •,.. ..-..1 Aik. .. : . Oft,4r1,94, /' ' k k. r, I 4. , •s T y 1 ',it • AR,, ,, Td" FF 'iiiiiieli ' ti ,.....:„ .. . . i . ... ... . . . . _ .• ,....; , ..,,, ..:. ;,,,,,,,.....,..,,,,,t.,..„.... t„:„..„-%1/4 vitok #.. . 44k*:.ft.,-**,-.• '4A;:kl.. ����'1 te \ tom „ kx 3'° •",� `:.:ear.' '+� G+ika. _ 1 P�NSdI..�_ice• •'' ♦ ,�� ' A ;l f r +`rf Ji. ;a yo l r V f r- /.1.', .' - :s.,. ,IV”, • 4, ...14 a ,. . .11.07. 4 -..,-.,4 reS.,';; *".44 , !t b r , . ,��!`�.!qa n"'r�'�+. tE � web lo it." 1��1r s®%� �r�+�f• �yfT tiff„1,4 'a,' i` .4:6. 4.-w �,�1{ /�/ . .i. , ., �,{� �1 f-0-0..„-;.,i 7 ,,,.,....„ . . 'lilt: -, �'. b tip •.�', • ..i Aar. .. . �rf i r.� � �)1 , �I i r tit•' ' .vy * 1. •� �' :r/ • k ', .., 1 ,. . . .,..., , •.. ..„ 110 • . . k A 1. .. .:),:'Y ' .6• i , i : iii A \ ' S ••,. , . . ...' — , t 4 .."., '• " 1 , • I -• Ili \ ' 1 \ , ..... .... -:-.1"....- . , k ,--i, I/ -•...-;I 0 r r,,r.,,, k ‘ , . ..a.- --'. ' ''', '. il ' -. -.-',.:,!•,-,, ... -...••••••A \... . . ."..'l;'. ?'P 4... , , ,,.e.', •, .' Vi . t°'••'`' 44401i4,.• r" .•": • •-i."-'4-'\• '" ' ''Iti•rt -'. . - •106'1!:.1 ' "' e islitk..?, ' • -,', 4 ' '', -'. ( '; '-i-Z.......-,•7'4„-..,mz 744.117*-91110, .. " ..1 *. *. ' i*AllX.'...`'ts*'. " ... ti',1.•.„It-,,...111:4,4r....N. \ ., ,.. . ",-.t4".tirk... - • .*,,*\ -t:V' ' ?i t *If-'''''.74.'‘......"11847Altar° 1 , • . ,. .4-i. t•- ,.....- -. - . - ,,,,,.. --, 0 .I .;14°'' .--,- ' - •.1" ' ' ' ' r., ->„ r,.....* -v.. .,, •:- ,1:,•-•s:' •N\ or:,?0,',/ ..--- . . ., • - ••• NT' -01tt.. ,10.,ifirn ', .:4•,.0111,,,,:.-- 4,,, , - _. .-viikli, ree,i,! ,-.!;,/.,-*. - ''.; • ‘,..'-‘, .., .. . --- - ' ' '1 .. f • ,,:-..'= -' ' . ..... . .., - ,.. " *,t ---itt.„;1- •" . . ' . - , .4,1*. ,.. .`••,:'ir ' • :--...,i...,,,,„.,:„;ii0i4-4'4,4 vir' 4,-, r II c 1 , , ,. • _.,,,_-- '3!!.`...41116‘ itc,... .":"7'Simi' • . I r• .,., , ,,,\• r . . - -- • . , .. .7.--_1;'-,,•---',-'--...'-•.•-c,7,—,--0.1-,z4.i fr,--,4r10--%r i--4rt,it....y....„.,-.•li.,p,_,F..'."*r"--!.-.....GY--..-,'.--,:--......-1c..--. _ C -.1-"4-"/Z1..1.V1f1.1.,1._11P,--,.-;"/,'"...ft.%..I.--P,.-.:.,0`.-..•------- "4.0.7...- .. . ....-, ., . .. i• •- • ,e ....,. ".'...‘"',Alli.',.'-.,„,40;e• .00'.1 4,0' /000' ' .'..t...• '.0.7. ,.'..7.2": .., ' .:. '.-..?iiik ......iiref,.. .1, ,. ..,.• . ,.,.,, ,, 0,..... > aim. - ,,,,,..,„;!,, . * • ., .. -!'"‹.....,..'•••• ...-7 ...•'. --,-;-.-• _ ..-. /0 ,... ••••• — _ --I--- _11,,i,r,49' 4 if 1111111101.011M1."" it ,,, . .. ...•. • . . .--,,2 '-'...!."-..---, , --...,-' /AT ,.47i•--- . . .. ' ''''',.', Iiiiil :,, ,-;ic.S. i - Eria".• - 7 • .-..- -.9 -"-"' -41 ',Ali,r'it;.. ' 0, j • „ . , 0 .... , • ,..,..^'' • _i4-:e4ig''. elief 1P-''''#"=„4" ' ' . , • , " i'7:' •,•k7.:i4TP..- ' .15,go,- • - ;., .. . „ ..... .. ....--....____ • ,. . - .-.;.;,,ii.p.-... .'- .,.- ..... -,,,,- ,.,...., ,,•I r.Al tiOl•• - •o' 's ' • - 't,. . .,4...11,1r'"• ... ....-: ...,' .: .."-"4:i ..41111.ms. - • ,,o, t -.• visiweigfr or '.C1 , , , •'.'''' , ,.,',;e! -:r"..Tgli', .".1...-...7''-'''. y. '46,41V. --"' • U ' -. .... . • . - i.„,,...1112:, .'" - ....,e , , 4,:ft ...14...1.71,r. "i'•t'r _„OP' __,,....-, -- ,..,.: --";.:''!NW- ,,,,,, -:'," ' n.4. .,,, b, ',-,- . • .,,,4,or off• - ,...,-;,...,,,4•••./. ir. ... . • -- -' - .A.V, z in• ..:4*t,-...4-` olit- - • -- .- -;. Y-'4 „e i,:":. Y,--A....,-- . .---..'"i"Afox• " - 1-..'-..r “Iffr, .,'• 44 1..'• . -.4%- "ftilliager41*‘' .....i..10.1A1/4404' . •...LiNgt.4, .. . ,.... ---..... , - . •\...; t's*AF-14.:/- • •• ,•.•,.104 As' ...;...-- _ -4611111.h-' •••:., ''•• 3'.- 4.-- ,i4c,00•''''' 1 . i• `•:•V,;„'::::'-\:s, fr, , ....,.. •..t.,... T.--,-. - -....., ....4.. t,-1 4%,",„ **),:. , _ toram.-,,,,,07.-•-•Zz............. •-•---- • ..-v-..14%;,•004 .;; ' • "bC''.-42;r1. . ' 7/4._. ,,_ , ,• •••,it.re'‘F.. Lop., - • .... . . . , ,0 SIVAI;7,-7,41:.01; •'' -- -`-...,- -:- *NW:--"''' ,..4i.',-,...:.AC' ' • ," L - _ ')--------- ,4 , - '''''''`' . . , , -• :..-....,..;. kv.,...,41-0#.,..iffv,-,..-4:_ ... . . . .t, .17.,:g '' i 4,...•`..- ,„ .. .;/---'''' # . ' .''4#.4'" '4' A Iiii,,,Iii, - ' • - . , . .• ...A",,,. .,„ ,,, •-•-. •4 ifir;''..-` . - - ::- '' • '. ,, . --,f.''......' ' ' -.4.4 -• '.• •• •tv,..,•.• -----•:P':- • - 1.,. ,. , - ?1."-P.4,,,..••': , •,7•:, - ,,‘••••••••-• --- .•••,V.,• - • :,, .......•,IP. 't f. ,i' -''.4 1V. ' ' 'ss • * • -'41'..:,' ,i;v:',10 .-,..,,.'-'1, 1 • ,,, , ..6,-;i4 ,,...,--. itF _ . -.-...,"4-C::7..p., - . elrarit-NY. . 't 1,'"I'I''- '' • fr ,— ':.••:;•`!`-.4." PC Exhibit F Subject #18-3997 Property 1 ., M1�.` I 1 y� j M T°n+.. �.• `Brat.°.vm r V E ,.--- . f lir„ ,, , 5 �' 1 y E - - �1 ,y 4 - • a .. , 4. !r if 4 Te : 1.�„ br fi i t. t § � � LR s _ v r "-4,-4/4„, ,f 1,1 t' , ' -,,...44. . ' ,4" ,,-: '''..,.., 4. � � tK p '�..= ra j � �' <*F��+ Y`, i ',"aN ,tea ;, y[ ' ". �, 'nom," .. Y 8 !^i-r- r'' �� _ J .J f R 4 _. la A- ,. ,::J P, .,.�,,•^ -.., 1 . - ,I y ' v .. - r ' y w 1rS, � yy r J sy. A. s ill a 4is' g I i'. y e � tr 4 .y • f _...:7 ,,,...,9 r w, �s!"�+R *.�� .�,., ..rt _ :. �"'ac4q.. - .. ` ,..k :� _ ^+M tA' ,rpt '9l. 11f Y. -.. ,.. y Rey *-y;* h ,,s t1 , tt e w y. � Facing East 0 0 0 ' . 7:••,1,-,.,4 ..,,• , .." r 0 5 7 Q' ..oc io .0! ., , 0' Ilic.„, „,,, ,,,” . , . , . , _..... , .;. .... ... .. ..., , . .... I , . _ 0 0 or, , , ,,, „‘„,„, .4 , , o , , •/ •P' ,. AO, '':. ;' '.'41,--..f.-.:';'li ' -P•-• • •.. . 1 - — ::.'1',A1-.•_.:::,, „, '• 40°. *44 ,74,iiihay.,:i 0(ke - ,Irt.w;tor fiMOIPIN.. . .,',.1•, .1/4,•:,.•,, ,--', ','• it Aek, er:4L - • ." . . , .. c.' Subject Property +� .v t 3 � �e' ..-1 r 4 # ..,` _ -` 1fitrjtdy, t ' c_.. --.77.,,,v. ,_,4cr----_-. --,.... +C l tee: • 1 +1 t. .- . ,fix. N �j ,t yam X47?- 1) , aIst .. ,, .w. �> .. + x �? x. .J f !w .r >. ' x ;1...- .,iveg.\-,,,,., .'mac . "R�f 5r,- 'M ,yea t - r r+ "p• R, �a Af l+ r ��e .s`^� as • �' ,�"�� : r . 4 i g r te ,.. �,>' g` +, '' `+„ •3"` • w.0 0 • U. n 4M f rs V .t • t rte"�� .� µ f 9 ....„14 +fir Apr .4,R' ... . 'l -... a" 'j=:, �- - ,+1: „a:'.r yts . •e-.' - ' .� - f.v )::::.*.l.,,,,,- . q•P . , Facing West 0 PC City of Orono Exhibit G #1s-3997 . otio Hardcover Calculation Worksheet ,l, Property Address: t30,o BP.�c LIN. roii.1. RoAt17 fir ' � � r Prepared by: Date: . . . _ - — _.►. 1.' c.,.. . A' 121 15 t7 Stormwater Qualityi Overlay District Tier: (Circle on Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier Ent:tb, 4 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER in the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width S Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A �Y,lttt,11..1 -}iauS - 1 QS.F4. H 305 S.F. B Ae,r}.l! DEW tk/l4"[ IA:R .�' `-�{ �2i.{4 S.F. C 6p►.1G�TE.-P121V�„vAy # At QJ7 DIA. t (L'�9iv[= 3 5 D o S.F. U GQuSNEYJ Steew16_ I._+v xrdiocLps.. 55' D14 23 6 41 S.F. E tt t -gRc' Fovw1'j-i,tw, , l5. pia; t 7 b S.F. F PAv6.2 A1Att-K•N74k1S t RREct. 3 t{6 S.F. G I-Sas'MAI_r ut/A1,- WAN'S 23 Z. S.F. H 5446.17 . _ rS.F. I 517)/46. G1PJP. TT LAIG: j3,1. S.F. J Natog,L palvaWo.'/ - 1 , 2 S.F. K Ci,w►eg f"f s SrFs , - I € 0 S.F. L R .i-_ ut1At_t.,s y ul/1nl -75 Of 11►E 1 5 1. S.F. M 17.E.r. INA1.45 NA)/1n 't 5' car /.1a1.5,- 90 b S.F. N bEtzt c� O Tr}► 0-1.4.9F 54{' A 2s 'teklazr 116.4 _ S.F. P at2t: n 5 TbI.& MuvttrUwy �'►7 0 S.F. eo Tirtaia.c.121.15Nu» srzesia S.F. R IMttE S't'mt? D[Ztd E L hut) G''7 2 S.F. S.F. S ,_ S.F. T S.F. S.F. V __ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 7-2.7c I G L b S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): 12z-r. u1ee.1.S titer i/114 ?S' or I.pGe t 5 b S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover t 5 io S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 7. S.F. ' (4) Total Lot Area • a S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)] i 7 , e %, Packet Last Updated: January 2015 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 17 PC Exhibit H #18-3997 Attn: Melanie Curtis, City Planner Orono City Hall 2750 Kelley Pkwy Long Lake, MN 55356 RE:Halvorson variance request for 1300 Bracketts Point Road To Whom it May Concern, I am a neighbor of the property owned by George and Lorie Halvorson at 1300 Bracketts Point Road. I have reviewed the proposed house and site plans and find the design favorable to the neighborhood. I am aware that the location of the proposed improvements encroach on the lake-side setback; I support the approval of the variance requested by the Halvorson's for these issues. Sincerely, F Address: 12(iC p , �tt� Qc,.,t P-4 Wmi , MA) -C-5-3(11 RECEIVED DEC 13nll 3 9 9 7 CITY OF OR ONO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM RiLA,,i,j 5 i-rsori55e t I (we) `J-Voc-ct4 of t? O 6rtscI4j+s P .,t Rd [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1.7,0-7 6,,:_, =e f}-s P ,.1Rlalso referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 7 _ �-r Il 2 Yll7 Property Owner Date // ZY Propertr Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ********************************************************************************************************************************* ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM c I (we) 5f •V-k of j2�t� uV PC:wt p [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewedhe plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 300 �r,,-,� 1s Yai,,,1 1d also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ///7"i /7 Property Owner Date — moi.€y,7 L----' -;,, Pr perty Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building&Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Variance Application-January 2017 Page 15 PC Exhibit I #18-3997 SWAT CITY OF ORONO Street Address:C Mailing Address: Telephone(952?249-4600 yc. � 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax ;952;249-4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.rnn.us 'lit-Est-1O9- 10 January 2018 Jean Rehkamp Larson 2732 West 43rd St Minneapolis, MN 55410 SUBJECT: 60-Day Extension/Application Review Timing Zoning Application#18-3997 Sent via Email On December 13th the City of Orono received your application for variances for property at 1300 Bracketts Point Road. Due to the extended holiday deadline timing the City hereby notifies you that it is extending the time period for City action under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(f). This is a routine extension.The initial 60-day period would end on February 11, 2018;the time period is now hereby extended until April 12, 2018. The application is scheduled, as planned, for public hearing before the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 16th at 6:30 PM. You will receive a copy of the Planning Commission agenda and staff memo via email by the end of this week. Please contact me with any questions at 952.249.4627 or mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO beetiojej(42 Melanie Curtis Planner Copies via email: George Halvorson, Owner PC RUN DATE:11/14/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) Exhibit J #18-3997 38 11-117-23 32 0010 ROGER D O'SHAUGHNESSEY 1265 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ROGER D O'SHAUGHNESSEY 1265 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0017 FERNDALE PROPERTIES LLC 1300 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 FERNDALE PROPERTIES LLC C/O CHRIS LAKE LAW FIRM 20840 PRAIRIE HILLS LA PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 38 11-117-23 32 0018 JULE M HANNAFORD IV ET AL 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JULE M HANNAFORD IV& ELIZABETH A HANNAFORD 1220 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0019 R J STOCKTON&L STOCKTON 1280 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 RICHARD&LARISSA STOCKTON 1280 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0020 JAMES R&MARY J JUNDT 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JAMES R&MARY J JUNDT 42486 109TH WAY SCOTTSDALE AZ 85262-5127 • Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. PC Exhibit K Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map #18-3997 Date: 11/14/2017 oo t ,, < x4 :H "�C p�p 1 ill _.,,k.- ro ' 0.v4 ,tioiI,,, ,,i.64;if kakii*Pitilk-11,44.-NiX-'_'::-$4,:''-',:,-,-.7f#:-'-',„V- 1-11-o.:-.; „:773.e--_,:•kle4,4,_ " a ';a t4. ogi,4 St"'`�x rt;.k v Y ,�t- z g „ -0,-,A(40,:-„,). y, -„ r x-,"vtf a _ `. k-'1,,,,4,z17.1 / .1, fit F� -r:: ,� 11 k ms`- :'4 *--,^pput ,41 :' ! f,+� "�, u3. t ., �sr; 0, !h es ;t; , ,nt F �' sem' i ��S f �; '+ r '� - tea°. e;, i r '7 • �' is r # 4---'-- # ,r as ,�,�,,;-,�S. -, ,s, a k' 3,'' X §4 �' ti �*«€ ?'a 'te to rh t : 4s 'C iq .iii.,,5ei -kratKi.4";---i.'?:-'-';':! -.1;1:--,.._.:;,-..--._;.:0-g-ltii--A.;'.,-...':',:-:-A4it:-,1-.. :-,-6,1!:) t+ #P a.. tr” ' , .,,,, ----,-..,i,..,;.,.;1;34,14ni*,.;4•,,i;:::::,,, ,,,7,1-3:..Fit,:if--4•A=-- \ 11-117-23-34 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I I I l I I I l 1300 Bracketts Point Road,Orono This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us Item 7 Date Application Received: December 13,2017 r VO Date Application Considered as Complete:January 4,2018 60-Day Review Period Expires: March 5,2018 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `�� �� Dustin Reif, City Administrator �kESHo�``` From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: 18-4000,Jeff Martineau o/b/o Barbara Garcia, 1335 Arbor Street,Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting multiple variances for lot area, lot width, front setback,side street setback,interior side setback and structural coverage to exceed 2,000 square feet. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. Background The applicant is looking to construct a new home located at 1335 Arbor Street, replacing an existing home on the propoerty. The proposed home will be more centered on the lot. The site is a corner and through lot with streets on three of the four sides.The applicant proposes to build a full basement rambler style home with two stall garage and a deck. They are located in the RR-1B 2 acre zoning district and the lot is extremely small at 0.20 acres in a zone requiring 2 acres. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420-Setbacks: DISTRICT RR-1B Required Existing Proposed Front (Arbor St) 50' 15.4 40' Rear(Briar St)_ 50' 97.5 65' Street(Prospect Ave) 30' 15.5 8.5' Side 10' 7.7 7.5' Section 420-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 9,100 s. (0.2 acre) 52' Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 9100 s. (0.2 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. 18-4000 January 16,2018 Page 2 of 5 Proposed: 2,348 s.f. (House and Porch) (25.8%) *On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area,the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 3 9,100 s.f. 3,185 s.f. 2,112 s.f. 3,184s.f. (35%) (23.21%) (34.99%) Applicable Regulations: Setback Variances(Section 78-420) The applicant is proposed to construct a new home that is oriented towards Arbor. They are requested multiple setback variances to use the lot for a single family home. They are requesting a 40'front yard setback where a 50' is required. They are requesting a 7.5 interior side yard setback where a 10'feet is required. They are requesting a 8.5 side street setback where 30' is required.The front and interior side yard setbacks seem reasonable for the small lot location. The Planning Commission should discussion if the 8.5 foot proposed street side setback seems reasonable for the home and location. Lot Area and Width Variance(Section 78-305) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met;such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met. Not Met. 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules,chapter 7080,can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer;and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 35 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. Not Met. The applicant's need for a multiple setback variances and structural coverage variance results in the property's inability to conform to#1 and#4 above.Therefore,a lot width and area variance is also required in order to develop the property. Structural Coverage(78-1403) The city code allows on lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area,the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 2,000 square feet.The application is requesting a structural coverage variance to allow 348 additional s.f of coverage over the permitted 2,000 sq.ft per the city code. The applicant is proposed a rambler style of home that is fitting within the neighborhood. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the 18-4000 January 16,2018 Page 3 of 5 proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family home on a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance.The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance.The variances for a 40' front, 7.5' interior side, 8.5 street side setback and a 2,348 s.f. structural coverage request is reasonable considering the shape and buildable area of the property. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The applicant is proposing use of the property in a reasonable manner with the construction on a single family home. There is limited space to construct a conforming structure on the site. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The plight of the property owner is due to the existing substandard lot size and shape,and its uniqueness being a lot abutting 3 streets. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The character of the neighborhood is not likely to be significantly altered from replacement of the residence which is consistent in character and size with the surrounding homes. d. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is 18-4000 January 16,2018 Page 4 of 5 located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The size of the lot with in the RR-1B zoning district and abuting 3 streets is unique for the requested lot width, lot area, setback variances and structural coverage variance. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The size of the lot and its locations as it pertains to the existing zoning district is peculiar to the property. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this statement to be true to allow for construction of a single family home on this parcel. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the requested variances would not impair health,safety,comfort or morals and would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application has stated the narrow corner lot has setback challenges for construction of a single family home.The property is unique in size location between three streets. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Engineer Comments A proposed grading plan should be submitted and reviewed with the building permit. Depending on roof line, roof overhang or small areas for drainage water may be able to be mitigated with a gutter system. The applicant should show how they plan to address drainage on the site with a submitted grading plan. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area, lot width, proposed setbacks and structural coverage. Due to the size of the lot located within the 2 acre RR-1B zoning district. The lot is also unique in that has street which is abutting 3 sides of the lot. The Planning Commission should discuss and ask the applicant about the visual impacts of allowing an 8.5'side street setback, placement of window wells for the basement bedrooms if they can create 18-4000 January 16,2018 Page 5 of 5 adequate drainage within the side setback space for the lot. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission should discuss the side street setback and the visual impact that may have. 2. The Planning Commission should discussion he placement of the placement for window well. 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Planning Commission options for consideration If the Planning Commission has discussed and has sufficient findings for the requests,staff would recommend approval of the request variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Site Pictures Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map PC #18-4000 E Exhibit A City of Orono Variance Application Street X 410 2750Address: Application# I '/ f V O i/ Parkway Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: (1 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: tr fax 952-249-4616 AiMailing Address: Fee: $275 �ti 4' A,C" Crystal Bay,MN 55323.0066 om $1,000 xESHOR Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: i c-- 'V va17 uz. g- ee6- •-- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: St. \I*.a ' eK (attach additional shee as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: Xcheck here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: - 4 e-'k 0 t --r ilk'e")01)---- Phone(Primary): Z. ZI D pZty Mailing Address:Address: 2.61 E ece• <srta-lie - . Lt1 i r .-:-10 ZIP: 6+ oy 1 Email: Min.p.—TI 1,1 E-b,IA--C° Cg gt.i ie4Je5-1 - _o"+— PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here If Property Owner is same as applicant ❑check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: p1vQ .ro%•p (Dm ff.,tiQ Phone(Primary): Aso tgES2240t Mailing Address: eA . c' L T1� OILI I 04 i City: ZIP: ,11,74W—Ail: im tr NliOis tDZ.?fPD APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her �g�that theyare solely knowledge. The applicant and re to do owner responsible for submitting a complete appGc�tion being aware that upon failure to do so,the • staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property of by coCity nsultants,nts,agents,Commission and Counal Members for purposes of investigation and verification • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled arrangementsato have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise meeting, ply Pinlease ce your project. • Informafion will be distributed .r .r.1. / Applicant Signature: -•f ) \ �� Date: j� 1� i T V.Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: B 00.1--e.A.a. 4,._,c t.„.._ Date: 1 z/ 13/]^) RECF f yr Property Owner Signature: Date: DEC •I 3 [u 17 Varfance Application-September 2017 Page 4 # 4000 CnIf OF ORONO -9._0*„., City of Orono Variance Pre-Application �t. G,• Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) - r Use:Onlif _ • Cttjr�ca . r _ ��i3at f $40..4411: What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal., inform them of the procedures and `!, requirements of the city code,and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. • PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: I33S AERJir. - 5-reE6 -t-- Property Property Identification Number(PIN): Zoning District: _ Size of Property: SZ X II DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: 0 Average Setback ride Yard Setback 0 Rear Yard Setback 0 Lake/Front Yard Setback D Hardcover ot Coverage 13 Lot Area 13 Lot Width ' 0 Other. Applicant's I Initials: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practical I Difficulties Documentation Form, understands it as it has been explained to them, and is Property aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance . Owner's 6 6 application. Inrbals: , Applicant's BILLS AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred Initials: in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, Property as well as provide an escrow in the amount of$ to guarantee payment of the Owner's Z G above. Initials: OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your *me- -ppli '•n I NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be completed •y+4taff. Applicant Signature: ��� Date: !Z117-117 Owner Signature: U p , . 0;4, ..._.„2-.),,,,,..,_„-_,1/4_, Date: 1 Z j 13 J j-] RECEIVED Variance Application—September 2017 Page3 .Y_ i 0 0 ii DEC 13 ZUt CITY OF ORONO PC #18-4000 Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. I Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The property,* r proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." /V/ 2. "The plightg the landowner is due to circumstances unique to hi property not created bythe Ian wner." I A. -)7a e 7!y _< OH% ,s-z- - "'e'I t t�I ?, /� TifoN I S I;))/D Sj 6iv I rsra?P. , 3. "The varia ce, if gr ted, will not alter the essential char cter of the locate " )� -17-)/3, r<e' ci T J.rn,e�f T A% Latek12r^L l I / ,9.0 "t' �0 rE T7 / 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms or oning Chapter." 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, VIn harmony with this Chapter." 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." RECEIVED Variance Application-September 2017Al, 41' 1�+ 0' DEC 1 ,'i L U I I Page 7ht' CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council ma permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." Iv/ r 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.'/ 7i,77�� .,�[ /° /0/2:0< ,, %., F �--" ( y r �i 1-- �? �1/� i_.-1.244.=% lC C 4_ 9. "The conditions do not apply,g nerally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." Ar A 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." T /X/.3 �>-i0/- ''G? /) 7 /)4,^f T /j1 LO Z7 / 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.' ; 11/3 >>L� ,,<r'- 7YOkK't. /f`t/ f/< r ♦ �' _ /7 'l_.rn 462y ---T.:-</ 4// -2s,,AA, 4Lut ib f,"il,ti,,,„,, pip,!-r 0 /tt ci Ah-/ /en s 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is'necessary to alleviate demonstrable diff ulty" Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): / /4 /V/o(Po„w 6 /9 7n or ,,,v/`7,' lik I STi,-, 7)i,t,e///n -7 /I kr it' nice �,-,1, ,�.t-- ,----_ -//, ci/f ,rr' ti (J l >r�l P I ST f /,0,/l 1 Pn/lit ))� 7�,,(- -TA. i<_ r 0T. 7 [ Akii L�e,cr -� �A.., �2) z.-7---/-1 , t..)1* /'L, I 11/1/1;'%1 ,. ladfp, / /2' /1-; 77 1D c.1 �(Ae Jl[?66T RE+CEINED Variance Application-September 2017 DEC 13 Ltl I 1 Page B '.F . 0 ® 0 CITY OF ORONO PC #18-4000 A. Exhibit C h CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR P l BARBARA GARCIA OF LOT 1 , BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROSPECT AVE. \ 0 t. i1 EDGE OF BLACKTOP Zi p% o _ —__ S 9-20'30"E-1 t5. — — ,__— (D) _ 9 ,_ \ O --r �'� _ O ,---- 'I _ `" STOOP N ,(C) O / ice/ THRESHHOLD 62.1 STOOP N / w ELEV=(959.9) (E) _y // o /� 3(F) �� P / to co EXISTING t o / / N HOUSE (A) c§ O o / #1335 N oCe Cti O GARAGE FLOOR (G) r- 0 SHED ELEV=(957.7) BLACKTOP Z Ca Z 10.0 62.1 DRIVEWAY Ce (B) // 15.4 Q i A FENCELINE •°' g / `�/ td '� l/ �,�/ S 89°20'30" E 175.00 NN. .// I \\ I I_ POOL EXISTING HOUSE #1355 lb LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 1, Block 2,MARKVILLE • : Denotes iron marker found SCALE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report RONBERG &ASSOCIATES, INC. G Gwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision 1" = 20' 0 : Denotes iron marker set CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under DA. — -- Denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE 12- 6 - 17 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property LONG LAKE,MN.55356 � and the location of an existing house,driveway,shed and existing 711.‘•%-21.1. ,,. f JOB NO. hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments 952-473-4141 or improvements. Mark S.Gronberg Minnesota License NUmber 12755 17-437 W CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BARBARA GARCIA OF LOT 1 , BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ...s =r..• .. .. PROSPECT AVE. ------\ EDGE OF BLACKTOP o __ _ — -89'20'�-E�.00 .. C „--/ DECK o asp,------49/5 .1.. .. o a N / (B)/w� o O O / w 12.bO PROPOSED tNi o cn WALK -- / = HOUSE o (C) (D) : ..._._. to I- // o# 1335 9.25 0 // (A) o BLACKTOP o W o / N DRIVEWAY .:...... . - 0 Er/ ) o m Z / 70.00 ..,:o• .:: _: ft /m -0 FENCELINE s • / N N,70.00 40.00 / —� \�/ S 89°20'30" E 175.00 �• _ — ii Zr-- POOL EXISTING HOUSE #1355 f LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lot 1,Block 2, MARKVILLE SCALE • : Denotes iron marker found GRONBERG &ASSOCIATES, INC.0... I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 1" = p : Denotes iron marker se was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 20' CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under DATE - 956 Denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property 445 N.UVILLOw DRIVE 12- 6 - 17 and the location of an existing house,driveway, ng LONG LAKE,MN.55356 9 ay,shed and existing JOB NO. hardcover thereon. It does not purport to show any other encroachments 952.473-4141 or improvements. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Num r 12755 17-437 fix` \ ti3 z- f." . r.••• ► Rola P W ♦ d� § CSF , '•' f, r y a r :r ' . r 743 r,. rw. • nrl!it 4#1 I t. • 4e+�II�EI. 111 kII y -. Yee III! ��.r R=•f -' 4 , fir ifrF • M . x .� '. ' 1 Ro- v ro. r3�' ��3 � -..Wit ,. r tom{ aY ilf. � y: TCS` ,a- ;k > • �.• R q. _ s. t € 4 ' + <'xi Ar f., J { • ti ... 'Y .' .' ,. ,,_� '/1...'''' x ;4..4' 7:1. N� / d, • i ii. 1 i iu—_—• 1 PIS �I � i19��'i191d I _isF O •6 • 2 • l pp�� —I 1 ■ \ e 1! O!',1' ;1 0 mi \ O !-1E! MEE Z , 1 IiI ' i n■ ■ S 41 II "'ll i 111 41:9L ti ► asses a I,rr.5111111 I ---- ` dis? aia:� � i lis ,�ii'sfjl-' p — nnn IIIIIIII�u l i 1 I , m Ii t�i�imi• p c °! Ii,iilll 111111illiM' \ ,, iII1[i 111i ireISI if 1 > v L/ 2 a � S � I —; m kr. � v ,:11!1'!111111,11‘11 I. @� m AA �r^/ E1,; 11 p� I1p — > r V /S' 1 I III IR I,�.r_ r 1..-^-, b fill j i f'� 1 �' id L g y'�vl Illi 1I1� , 1 - D ii 1 I1,�II, IIXI m j �1 i,iI iI11111 �l STI 2(? , 1 ,11,1 I'1, ij 0 �:�. VIII 0 r ' rn 11 1111'1 , c� m ice' III z 00 0 1 I ‘, 0 ._l P3 © 2014 GONYEA HOMES _1 11i 1 if p MINNETONKA VILLA LOT 2 N og — i 1 vi 0 + - STANDARD , .... , .„.. ,.. . , , 11 YFjj: ii Tr. LT 4z Z T ;lleitInf� t m ' r —II U�� m — } w1u It>_,._I .: f i it 4,34 , ,i ,,.. ,_, „ 4m� g 40 menj< 0 O - x a . I .J rs or CO,_r> ro. , ,.. , iv o cam:XL 1 oir .......K i . ,_ lli j « — .€ i II! .: Pi �� alb I s PI I y '.. 8 � 9 ,-L f l^. i,._—_ I ■�'°r I Tii S I A •. \'' d 1^ _�/ T . I, h 1+ """"IIID . i e }i ':/1 ,% as .4b=a, 64 ••/y --- ^ 4 i S 4 lxwIgl qZ; aT ,rw h ' a — 3 T h ' U - i r A _ ala : A at.mg. 4 E-L .11, : 1811 P i 1"'111 `'A 4 : M 4. nnor Z vim----� r-e Tft Re_ NY RV 71 Ai li -al r r r _I z 111 z 60 C 2014 GONYEA HOMES Ica o o F MINNETONKA VILLA LOT 2 N i gg ii oz !� Wo 8 y_ 8amm •IL_I og N y - STANDARD r _b1"9 ND t r r i 111 •cil I 73 • I m iv O4; 4m40 Z 0O › 1717 Ca WV Va. 1 - 4 111 • V -i$ 0 $3m.e.9 44 Ii i 4 -{- ---- '1 •, .-3, .a' x 1 zlx1Si -' r — P 1i ; t lis .--d 0 ri--_-:-:f- -----,4e + 1; — , Li I '— _ — VIMII ------ r L OWL PAM j _ I Si rn 4 m 1111 ii 1 1 iv iii ii ii iiif s tIIi iI .i r 11;8 ij-,g I Z 41.1 1 ; i1 -< 7 m on o -k. m z a, m o 0 © 2014 GONYEA HOMES I =P i ll A MINNETONKA VILLA LOT 2 Noo •' tm J 1-1 4' W � ��i �� - STANDARD � 1 ' ��(4> - From: Martineau,Jeff L To: Laura Oakden Cc: Melanie Curtis;Jon Connolly; Mark Gronbera(marka(&aronberaassoc.com'i Subject: RE:Application#18-4000-1335 Arbor St-Electronic Copies of Survey,Plans and Exterior Date: Thursday,December 21,2017 11:42:33 AM Laura, Thanks for your conversation today regarding 1335 Arbor St. This email is to confirm that the structure will be a full basement with no grading change. No lookout, no walkout,just the normal window well not in the side yard setbacks but to the rear of the home, so as to comply with city ordinances regarding bedrooms in the lower level. I will next week submit a marked up plan verifying no grade changes. Jeff Martineau REALTOR Coldwell Banker Burnet (952) 210-2626 www.jeffmartineau.com From: Martineau,Jeff L Sent:Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:23 PM To: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us>;Jon Connolly<jconnolly@gonyeahomes.com>; Mark Gronberg(markg@gronbergassoc.com)<markg@gronbergassoc.com> Subject: Re: Application# 18-4000- 1335 Arbor St- Electronic Copies of Survey, Plans and Exterior Not altering grade. No walk out basement Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Laura Oakden <loakdenPci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Hello Jeff, From your submitted application 1335 Arbor Street#18-4000 it appears that you are requesting variances for Front yard, Side Yard,Side Street setbacks and a Structure Coverage variance to exceed the 2000sq.ft maximum. I am concerned there may be more approval required if you are planning on altering the grade of the lot to accommodate a walk out basement. Creating a new engineered grade on the lot would also require a Condition Use Permit. Right now I do not have enough information to move forward with your application without clarification. If you are planning on changing the grade for a walkout basement. I will need a proposed grading plan that shows existing and proposed PC #18-4000 Exhibit E »,�A c rT'f` t-.-'4,7---;'.7 rt fix. `4:119S1BRIAR •fie 7-10 "6 m • -... ateP ' • _ ' - _ c . av N• }.. 4/4 Via.F' _ ._ ) v .—.- I a ! t. ;. 04/2512011 .414. 111!11. 4� • f' ;x ti ! - i' •.a -tet '. ��f/0 i I • F � tl, . ' g:,- . . 7, ' .f„ r , ...;.,.. ..,:,:. ...„.„ . _ . ,,,....„..,.. , . ,• .,, . . , ,, _ iY3 •a, • +,1911 q. Y� _ /! T a ye P _ ,ter. ,. 1 3 r` • —i i . "rt 3 3. * ,3, 3. - - t - * i 'it-: -.'::: '3',.', ...): 1 -.]:-',:::,,t ' 'Y . 33,..- fi A'_ �p "� 44 - ' 4 • Y 9p P • o � ' M L t • y + w a r s�FlMerowrw...ae.... _ ' - - r M ' � . . . '; / - = ' • ' • ,,,o- c .c4 - - # 4. – ,4, 71, ,-. - .., •,I • I-"'r — • 1. ..., " ..• • ,.. • • - f , ,... 1 i'.. 21 !`• ..... , i 4 , r•o• 7: 6 . i 415 1'''''fl., .,.., ."0 . .. ir$ , : 'fa!- ..- • . , : • . 4 . . A ,. . .. , t , . . 1 . 11 A „..,. ,.. U.. -' '4'1.'A.'1.---x-' -.. ',,, *- •. -.. ,-, . . .."..., ..,. . (.,,,, .. 4' .... • w . 4 s.i. ..... '' . • -...14: , # 4 '.1 • ' • ' • i '.." '.' '- ;"' 14 i - ,,,a... • - ,. , ---, . . , :1 ''' $': 7 :$ • f - .. -0 - . '. • 4414.-0 . . ,. .N ... . , . A ? • ' --.... , • , ..,, _, .? , , „ • ; t 6 , til ,..s e ,,. -. ..., • i . , ...„.,.. , . . • 'i. O'' 'itk.0 •'' I '' :. .4 " -'If Kg-,..0,Z,-•',' • .... . t. ..'.: . ., ,-•,,,,,__, , , .. it . . .- , .:... i ... : - • 1 .4ire • • Ir ' Po• t F t SP AM. IOC •,t fi I 4 3 4 . t A t S „.) ,v....1010111A 40:46;14; - ° - .40 rr 't y., t I. T -,� � y�, :- . -. - r `yam,,p,`*••••••,, 1t, by i ori-•l,+ �. ��4 .t. ,,,,,L,,,,r2... 4..j.,4:,........ .,:t.....4.1"„_ .., , ..,,.......,.„.:.....: 7.1 F411, ! a .. . , .........„44,_ _ii...,.... ..... ,,.....,...,:„.T... ,. i yam,, ��.; ti `�`` , N; , •.. ewe ,. i ..,� �""'. w w n iiir as let Aiiih. y....< _„may :r.,:... � titiaiiiiilagAii.hs.. _ _ till'^- ,, _.... ,.,.�.�. aw j 01' i li t t3 . 311ll ti tilt%Y111'1i t1 �w�w«a.ii: �r�, ': ..i3i l laaa '' S ate__ f -w If- l r �T - 'J>lzryKh1 47 ...e.. 4 " ft*' ' Yom,.. r • -�. ,:/. f,,,,:„.4,..,„3* , ,• I,14/1 r• t '!°'.l looki, a�► ` t • ,:'' ;.Ai....!; r ars `p ,� ` , ISM PC #18-4000 City of Orono Exhibit F � voA,o Hardcover Calculation Worksheet E Property Address: z 33 S ARB e,R 37-A Fsr tAsitov-e Prepared by: Date: GRO.vt�CRc 4.Apia c��r��; i�c, /2- S-i7 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 1) Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:tXISTING HARDCO In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width (Square Feet) ) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') 1720 S.F.) A NOU.TC /778 S.F. B J/✓F_ii 7O S.F. C .770a I' 3 5 S.F. D tA/A�k i 6 S.F. _ E ...rr e' 3 / S.F. F 66).1c/< it S.F.- G it‘•tcY?'/ 041 tiEcvl /37 S.F. H S.F. I , _ S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M _ S.F. N S.F.r O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. SS.F._ T S.F. U _ S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. -(1) Total ExistingHardcover 21/Z, S.F. 'ExCludilbie 114041gaver(See City Code Sea 78416114t S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. V S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 Z/12 S.F. ' (4) Total Lot Area 9/0 a S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 23.2/ % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code previsions will prevail. �+�f y G u Page 8of9 DEC `i 3 ZU1I „lit 4•'. 4. 0 0 0 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono .8Laivo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: `'K sNo•` Prepared by: Date: G,r Fie t f As^.;: .A t_�� ireC, /2 (f7 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:r1PR PD��D HARDCO� In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Example) (Garage) (Square Feet) A ,(24'x 30') (720 S.F.) �GuSE 2 262 S.F. B C fT�� /20 S.F. C Gr/4Gtk - S�' S.F. E /it I!/ftt/a y rs'y( S.F. F 7 0 S.F. F S.F. 1 H S.F. S.F. K S.F. L _ S.F. L S.F. N S.F. N S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. _ S.F. u S.F. v — S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover / 8 171 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1084): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(j)j ,i841 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 00 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 3' 9 9% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an Information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been madeRECEIVED tto ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if anij not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions wl I 3 /U17 Page 19 ' 0 CITY OF ORONO PC #18-4000 Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit Date: 12/13/2017 U: 1212 1215 ''r": 24:. -- 1233 1224 1223 1230 1W) 2220 N) CO �a, (711 2170 03) M; e4 1 24 5 1240 1741 a ( 4. Miiin tt r, ) .. 1251 1250 1261 i2`: t<.t� 1250 (106 , 2255 (36) (3'U ?3 . 123) 1'261 32; 1 %01275 • 2t35 i5, t (34) 1271M aq i 1270 1 650' 1 t 775 1 .�-.. Rei 2160 C� ra J 12..5 1/.. 295 i I 0s, _._.._.� 1295 ( '} tis! Avc• r 4444 \ 1 r/ 32 2170 ..__. 1 [mot f 2180 1>m ` (17) u� .,;>; 2160 f P105 'er:t Avtr _._...._._..., 2,1®5 1335 1355 °' gm 1335,Am 0 ,3 u T Isa) 0 1365 sr: 224fa `—"'" 1380 ,� 3 ow, 03) 661 C NS 1375 ,•tis}. b. Kt 1385 Q 1380 _ co 1r, 2180 {3, :390 r061 1 1395 ' i "i' ......... t � / !' / 2080 g) �•, / / North Sia l j/(fat 1 / .:xutil1425 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I I I I 11 1 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy,(ii)Is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (Iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying RECEIVED purposes.Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. DEC 13 2 U 17 For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 5544871 gis.info@hennepin.us CIN OF ORONO .71' - , RUN DATE:12/13/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 10-117-23 11 0002 38 10-117-23 31 0036 38 10-117-23 31 0055 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH M&I BLUE GERALD F SEILER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 1385 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY MARCUS J&JUDY A BLUE GERALD F SEILER REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 2562 WESTERN AVE N 7014TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 10-117-23 23 0004 38 10-117-23 310043 38 10-117-23 310056 C DAHL&D L HOPP ET AL PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1291 BRIAR ST 2140 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTOPHER DAHL PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY DEBORAH L HOPP 1291 BRIAR ST 2885 SANFORD AVE SW 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR WAYZATA MN 55391 #34389 WAYZATA MN 55391 GRANDVILLE MI 49418 38 10-117-23 31 0016 38 10-117-23 31 0044 38 10-117-23 31 0057 KYLA R HUDSON TRUST J A GERBER&P C REITAN KAREN BARTELT 2150 PROSPECT AVE 1295 BRIAR ST 1335 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 KYLA&CASEY HUDSON JOEL A GERBER KAREN BARTELT 2150 PROSPECT AVE P.O.BOX 74 1335 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0017 38 10-117-23 31 0048 38 10-117-23 31 0058 M MADDIE&M MADDIE CRAIG B SARNER AARON H PRINTUP 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1375 BROWN RD S 2195 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55323 MICHAEL&MELISSA MADDIE CRAIG B SARNER AARON H PRINTUP 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1375 BROWN RD S 2195 PROSPECT AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 P O BOX 104 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0018 38 10-117-23 31 0049 38 10-117-23 31 0097 JANE WHITE CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER VILLAGE OF ORONO 2170 PROSPECT AVE 1380 ARBOR ST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 JANE&TIM WHITE CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER VILLAGE OF ORONO 16820 CORD 122 1380 ARBOR ST P O BOX 66 MAYER MN 55360 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0019 38 10-117-23 31 0050 38 10-117-23 31 0098 D&K BECKER P F&L KALEY MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1395 BROWN RD S 2180 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DONALD&KATHERINE J BECKER PHILIP KALEY MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1395 BROWN RD S ATTN RAJIV GARG WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR#382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 31 0027 38 10-117-23 31 0051 38 10-117-23 31 0101 VIL OF ORONO BARBARA I GARCIA CITY OF ORONO 1285 BROWN RD S 1335 ARBOR ST 1335 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO BARBARA I GARCIA CITY OF ORONO POBOX66 POBOX114 BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0028 38 10-117-23 31 0052 38 10-117-23 31 0103 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ET AL R F CRAIG&S F CRAIG EMILY K FISCHER 1290 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST 2140 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55323 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ROBERT F CRAIG EMILY K FISCHER SHERRI STRELOW-LUNDBLAD SAMANTHA F CRAIG 2140 PROSPECT AVE 1290 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0034 38 10-117-23 31 0053 38 10-117-23 32 0019 C J ALBRECHT&3 L ALBRECHT J ZITZLOFF&B ZITZLOFF ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 1285 ARBOR ST 1380 BRIAR ST 2240 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 C J&J L ALBRECHT JEFFREY ZITZLOFF MINNEE;TONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 1285 ARBOR ST BRENDA ZITZLOFF 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310035 38 10-117-23 31 0054 TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1295 ARBOR ST 1365 ARBOR ST R E'.C E IVEI ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 Y G TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND CHRISTOPHER R PERRY 1365 ARBOR ST 3 2017 1125 HUNTER DR PO BOX 161 DEC0 uuLl� LU WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 i4 0 - CITY OF ORONO 8460°" 1 easy reerr►aaress r.aoels oto avery.corrl/templates. � ® 1 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge® I Use Avery Template 8460 38 10-117-23 11 0002 38 10-117-23 31 0036 38 10-117-23 31 0055 HENNEPIN COUNTY MARCUS J&JUDY A BLUE GERALD F SEILER REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 2562 WESTERN AVE N 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 10-117-23 23 0004 38 10-117-23 31 0043 38 10-117-23 31 0056 CHRISTOPHER DAHL PAUL ALLONBY LESLIE KENNEDY DEBORAH L HOPP 1291 BRIAR ST 2885 SANFORD AVE SW 1300 FRENCH CREEK DR WAYZATA MN 55391 #34389 WAYZATA MN 55391 GRANDVILLE MI 49418 38 10-117-23 31 0016 38 10-117-23 31 0044 38 10-117-23 31 0057 KYLA&CASEY HUDSON JOEL A GERBER KAREN BARTELT 2150 PROSPECT AVE P.O.BOX 74 1335 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0017 38 10-117-23 31 0048 38 10-117-23 31 0058 MICHAEL&MELISSA MADDIE CRAIG B SARNER AARON H PRINTUP 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1375 BROWN RD S 2195 PROSPECT AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 P O BOX 104 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0018 38 10-117-23 31 0049 38 10-117-23 31 0097 JANE&TIM WHITE CRAIG S BLEEKERJAMY B BUTLER VILLAGE OF ORONO 16820 CO RD 122 1380 ARBOR ST P O BOX 66 MAYER MN 55360 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0019 38 10-117-23 31 0050 38 10-117-23 31 0098 DONALD&KATHERINE J BECKER PHILIP KALEY MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1395 BROWN RD S ATTN RAJIV GARG WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 31 0027 38 10-117-23 31 0051 38 10-117-23 31 0101 CITY OF ORONO BARBARA I GARCIA CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 P O BOX 114 BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0028 38 10-117-23 31 0052 38 10-117-23 31 0103 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ROBERT F CRAIG EMILY K FISCHER SHERRI STRELOW-LUNDBLAD SAMANTHA F CRAIG 2140 PROSPECT AVE 1290 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310034 38 10-117-23 31 0053 38 10-117-23 32 0019 C J&J L ALBRECHT JEFFREY ZITZLOFF MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 1285 ARBOR ST BRENDA ZITZLOFF 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0035 38 10-117-23 31 0054 RECEIVED TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND f!' CHRISTOPHER R PERRY 1365 ARBOR ST 1125 HUNTER DR PO BOX 161 DEC 13 7017 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CrrY OF ORONO Pat:avery.com/patents i Etiquettes d'adresse Easy Peel* 1 Allez a averyca/gabarits i Rpnliez a la hachure afin rip reveler le rehnrrl Pon-un' I 1 Itilko,le nzhwit n.rer..Rdf41 Item 8 Date Application Received: December 13,2017 OA, Date Application Considered as Complete:December 13,2017 VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: N/A A a I To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `g‘� o� Dustin Rief, City Administrator tkfSHOQ� From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: #18-4002,John Patch o/b/o Berkshire Partners, LLP,2745 Kelley Parkway, Concept Plan Application Summary: The applicant is requesting comments via the concept plan process for a proposed amendment to the Community Management Plan (Land Use) and Zoning Map (Zoning)to develop the 2.55 acre parcel into an apartment building. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission is asked to give feedback on the proposed development. Background The property under review is Lot 1, Block 2 of the City of Orono Addition, and is located immediately south of the Orono Public Works garage. The property is currently zoned B- 6 PUD, and is guided and planned for Commercial Office use. The site is and has been vacant for many years. In 2004 a plan was developed for a proposed office building; that plan was never acted on. There does not appear to be a market for additional office space in Orono, and the city has stated its desire to prevent retail uses from expanding west of Willow Drive. Proposal The property owner has approached the city about a possible amendment to the Community Management Plan and zoning map to permit the construction of an apartment building for 56 units. The units include 1, 1+, and 2 bedroom units in 2 '/z floors. Parking will be provided via a surface lot and an underground garage. A portion of the surface lot also serves the adjacent medical office building to the west. Access to the site will be via Kelley Parkway in one of two driveways,one of which is shared with the medical office building. The building is U shaped and 2.5 stories tall, fronting on Kelley Parkway. The defined height of the building is proposed to be 30 feet, though final verification of the height will need to be determined with the final grading. The property has been located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area(MUSA) in the 1980's, and would be served with municipal sewer and water. FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 2 of 8 Review Parameters The proposed residential development is a departure from the CMP guiding of this site for commercial office use. For this reason, staff recommends that the Planning Commission's review should proceed by considering the following two basic questions: 1. Is this property a location where the City should depart from the current Comprehensive Plan guidance and allow for high density residential development? 2. If so, what are appropriate standards for such a development? Planning Commission's primary focus should be on whether the proposed type and density of development is appropriate for this specific property. Conformity with the Orono 2008-2030 Community Management Plan The net development density based on 56 units on the 2.55 acre parcel would be 21.9 units per acre. The highest density anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan is High Density Residential at 10-15 units per acre. Met Council and Density. In approving Orono's 2008-2030 CMP, Met Council took into account that Orono guided specific properties for higher density sewered development(3- 7, 7-10, 4-15 and 10-15 units per acre) in order to offset the long-planned sewered development at low densities in the Shoreland areas. In effect,the higher-density guiding of a select number of strategically located properties established a numerical `buffer'which allowed properties previously added to the MUSA and guided/planned for 2-acre minimum lot sizes,to be developed as historically planned. Over the last several years, properties guided for higher density development have been reguided via amendments of the CMP to lower densities,and the `buffer' established in the 2008-2030 CMP has functionally been eliminated. Some of that buffer was replaced by the recently approved Orono Senior Housing(17-3948)project to the east. In addition,to meet work force housing goals in the Comprehensive Plan, and the desire to move density away from areas where it is currently guided,i.e.the Navarre Area,reguiding the subject parcel may benefit the city long term. Conformity with RPUD Zoning District Requirements The property was zoned to B-6 PUD in June of 2003. Permitted uses were those listed in the B-6 Highway Commercial District, offices, banks, motels, and hotels. There are no zoning districts that permit apartment buildings by right or by conditional use. To support the development as proposed,staff anticipates rezoning to a RPUD. The RPUD District standards are found in Zoning Code Sections 78-621 thru 78-629, attached as Exhibit G. The RPUD district standards indicate an RPUD site must be at least 5 acres in area,but does allow for smaller sites under specific conditions,as noted in the code excerpt below: Sec. 78-626. -Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in compliance with the following: (emphasis added in bold) (1) Minimum area; shoreland district limitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 3 of 8 floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed by the existing zoning district. No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level(OHWL)of a protected lake or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD.However, for a property that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially located more than 250 feet from the OHWL,the portion located more than 250 feet from the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other requirements are met. (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan,except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council for review. It would appear that the provisions of 78-626(1)b would be applicable, as the proposed use is adjacent to the Orono Senior Housing project which itself is a component of the Stonebay Master Development and is across Kelley Parkway from the Stonebay Lofts, which are similarly zoned RPUD. Further,because the site is guided for commercial office use with the intention of being rezoned for commercial use, the rezoning would fit within the provisions of 78-626(2). It should be noted that the Council has recently approved and supported three smaller RPUD developments (Orono Senior Housing, Shadywood Villas, and the Eisinger site) so that rezoning the Kelley Parkway parcel to RPUD would not be inconsistent. Additional factors which suggest this site may be appropriate for the proposed residential use include its proximity to the medical office, as a buffer between that use and residential to the north and east, and the separation from the Industrial Park provided by Wayzata Boulevard. Relationship to Surrounding Development The design style has not been fully defined, but in keeping with the parameters of the RPUD requirements, staff anticipates a building style similar to Stonebay and its buildings, similar roof materials, pitch, building materials, colors, etc. FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 4 of 8 General Site Characteristics The site is open. The property is very flat with a relatively shallow water table. There are no wetlands mapped on the property. Lot Layout and Lot Standards The specific lot requirements for a multi-family building in RPUD can be found in Section 78-626(7). A summary of those standards is as follows: Building setback from local streets(Kelley Parkway): 35' Building setback from arterial streets(Wayzata Boulevard): 50' Building setback from side lot lines: 35' Parking lot and driving lane setback from all lot lines: 20'* Parking structure setback from streets: 35' 50' (local streets 35 feet, arterial 50 feet) Parking structure setback from lot lines: Adj. to residential: 50' Adj. to non-residential: 35' Minimum setback must be no less than height of the building *These setbacks are met, though parking spaces on the west side are shared with the lot to the west, a 20 foot setback is impractical and counter to the shareing goals. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three stories (not including underground parking level) and shall maintain a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure. No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family building will be allowed. Outside storage limitations. Building materials, recreational vehicles, boats, RV's, snowmobiles, and other items of personal property shall not be stored outside within any site used for attached or multifamily uses. Maximum Floor Area Ratio(FAR)=Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area): 1.0. Additionally, the RPUD District standards include substantial requirements for landscaping as well as screening and buffering of parking areas. Conformity: The proposed conceptual site plan includes a two 1/2-story building with a defined height of 30', significantly lower than the Lofts across the street. The applicant has provided a sketch showing the height differential between the subject building and the adjacent Stonebay condos and the as yet undeveloped Senior Housing Project. Proposed underground parking constitutes a 4th level, mostly below grade. It is assumed that some filling to raise the overall elevation of the site is likely in order to accommodate the underground parking while avoiding potential water table issues. Building setbacks meet minimum RPUD standards. The shared parking lot to west do not meet the minimum 20 foot setback. Floor Area Ratio. The FAR for a RPUD is capped at 1.0 for residential structures. FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 5 of 8 Assuming 35,325 sq ft per floor and a 2,500 sq foot top floor, the FAR would be 0.66 (73,150/111,078 sq ft) for the 2.55 acre site. Access, Internal Circulation and Parking The concept plan includes 2 accesses onto Kelley Parkway, with no access to Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed Kelley access point does not appear to be directly across from the access from the curb cut on the north side of Kelley Parkway, staff would suggest that these curb cuts line up. Internal circulation is proposed to be provided by a paved driveway along the west side of the building for parking, and a loop driveway in front of the building. The Fire Marshal will need to verify fire access is maintained as required by the fire code. Parking as depicted includes 54 surface stalls and 77 underground stalls*. To be verified, but the number of spaces appears to exceed the number of spaces required, which is 2 spaces per multifamily dwelling unit. Assuming 56 units, 112 spaces would be required, 131 are shown. *The drawings label 53 surface spaces, and 83 underground spaces. The size and accessibility of the spaces will need to verified. Staff's preliminary review indicates that there are 54 surface and 77 underground parking spaces. Parks, Trails, Sidewalks This site is adjacent to the Stonebay Development, and staff anticipates the need to incorporate this project in some form to the Stonebay pallet to meet the RPUD size requirements. A trail along the south property line is anticipated as part of the Stonebay project. Preliminary Hennepin County plans for the upgrade of Wayzata Boulevard include a trail along the north side of Wayzata Boulevard from Willow Drive to Old Crystal Bay Road. Final determinations have not been made as to whether or exactly where that trail will be developed. The current plans suggest it will be in the right-of-way, while the Stonebay PUD Agreement intended for it to be within the commercial Outlots.Pending a final layout by the county, applicants should expect that a trail will be required along their south boundary, with a possible connecting link to Kelley Parkway along the west edge of the stormwater pond. An existing sidewalk within the right-of-way of Kelley Parkway extends along the entire frontage of the site, constructed with the original Stonebay improvements. RPUD standards include a requirement for 10% of the site being dedicated to private recreational purposes. The project does not show any private recreation. Development Fees Summary As the property has been platted most development fees have been paid. However, staff anticipates some fees due as part of the plan approval and/or building permit: Park Dedication Fee: The property is platted, no park dedication is required. Perhaps the Council could consider a 10%value cash donation in lieu of the 10% area required by RPUD zoning. FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 6 of 8 Water and Sewer Connection Charge: SAC and Connection charges may apply, to be determined. The current SAC is $2,485 per residential unit. Stormwater & Drainage Trunk Fee: Storm water trunk fees apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties and provide funding for the storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the City.The trunk fee is based on the land use and acreage of the property being developed. Residential>4 units/acre: $8,490/ac x 2.55 acres=$21,649.00 These numbers are based on the 2017 fee schedule and are adjusted at the time of final approval. Site Grading, Stormwater and Drainage Improvements No stormwater ponding is proposed on site. Reviewing the files for the adjacent medical office, it appears that storm water detention is provided via the large stormwater pond east of this site. This will need to be verified as part of the formal Master plan application. The property is not within the Stormwater Overlay District, but if developed as RPUD is subject to a maximum hardcover per lot of 50%. Hardcover will need to be verified in the master development plan. Stormwater management will be subject to City and MCWD review and approval. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee as noted above. Utility Locations/Availability/Connection Fees Municipal sewer and water utilities are available in Kelley Parkway to serve the property. Should the project proceed, the impacts of the project on the downstream system will be reviewed, and if improvements are necessary (lift-station, pump sizes, etc.), will be completed by the applicant. Connection charges as noted elsewhere in this memo will be due at the time of final plat approval. Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted There are no mapped wetlands on the site. Tree and/or Woodland Impacts The site is extremely flat and open. Conservation Design While the property is technically subject to the City's Conservation Design Ordinance, it is anticipated that due to the small size and open nature of the property, a Conservation Design Inventory and Master Plan may be unnecessary; Planning Commission should address this topic in its' discussion. Archaeological Site Proximity Staff is unaware of any archaeological sites within the property; the applicant should contact the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)to confirm. FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 7 of 8 Summary of Issues for Consideration Staff suggests that the primary focus for consideration and discussion by the Planning Commission should include the following topics: 1. Is there justification for the necessary CMP amendment and rezoning to allow the guiding of this property to be converted from commercial office to residential? If that conversion is not allowed, what other uses for the site might be acceptable (aside from office)? How will the City benefit from this development? Would the City see greater benefit by waiting for commercial development of this property, or is this the appropriate time and location to make the change? 2. Is the Planning Commission comfortable with the density of the development at over 20 units per acre gross? 3. Planning Commission should discuss whether this development should be required to create the RPUD standard 10% private recreation space or would a similar donation to the park dedication fund be appropriate. 4. Staff recommends that a 10' trail easement be retained along the south boundary of the property. Should this developer be committed to establishing a trail along Wayzata Boulevard with a connection northward along the west end of the pond? Pending Hennepin County final decisions as to whether or when should a trail be established (and who should pay for it) should the developer be expected to construct or assist in the cost of trail construction? 5. The conceptual landscaping layout does not provide any buffering from Wayzata Boulevard — is such buffering needed from a visual perspective from off-site, or from a perspective of the occupants of the building? 6. Are there any other issues or concerns with this sketch plan? Sketch Plan Review Parameters The goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent City ordinances and how they affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal. The above "Summary of Issues for Consideration" reveals a number of issues with the proposed development and should help Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant regarding the proposal. Planning Commission should review each topic and identify any issues to which the developer should pay special attention. As a sketch plan review, any comments or suggestions to the applicants are non-binding but will be extremely helpful as the applicant moves forward. Because the concept is a departure from the CMP, this sketch plan will also be presented to the City Council for comment. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Applicants' Narrative Exhibit C. Applicants' Submitted Exhibits: a. Site Plan FILE#18-4002 January16,2018 Page 8 of 8 • b. Garage Plan c. 1St Floor Plan d. Roof level Plan e. Sections f. Elevation Exhibit D. Building Height Comparison Exhibit E. Airphoto Exhibit F. Comp Plan Map: Land Use Plan Exhibit G. RPUD Ordinance PC Exhibit A 18-4002 City 'of Orono Concept Application Street Address: *Me Mon �, x ldy Paric -wa�y •'='`` tiiiai� \ Orono,MN 55356 Received_ X17 i' Staff: . Main: 952-249-4600 Fee- - w fax: 952-249-4616 Notes :_• • �• • s. Meiling Address: • f 0 . dt tf P.O.Box 68 • "N.„!!! - Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 • Gf'7-of o Applicable regulation Section 78-47. Concept plans may be accepted for proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan,the Zoning Ordinance,or the Zoning Map. Submittal Cheddiet: • O © •ication fee •O KR Buikiin• Plans O 6 Additional information • feel het•- describe the . . f.. O 8 Additional information re•uested • Staff PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: J i!-J Pn-rCH Phone(primary): 621z. 44 01 1 q,-/-7-? Mailing Address: (>> 0 A 0 i City,State&ZIP Z. ' + ti•hi S 5 3`� J Email: 1-410.i(Z,t�, c'l {nar, 9 t'1.v� `cti�'✓1 J r • PROPERTY OWNER: • Agrees to pay additional fees(staff time not covered in the original fee payment)and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this extension application,and • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for dental of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further euthor¢ae reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of Investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant acknowledges they must be present at ail scheduled review meetings. If an applicant and/or owner Is unable to attend a scheduled Meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • • 1Mormation will be distributed via email. Property Owner Signature: ,✓' t M, _ Date: 12-// 3)0 Property Owner Signature: Date: Concept Application—January 2017 1 # 4002 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd.2, 'Tennessen warning',we would Eike to Inform you that your request for a permit orlicense from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data,but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The Information may be shared with other local,state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some Information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. PAYC—ti First Middle Lest 7071 LA,.z_i . ‘floz4 L'%n Address (10PNZ-14± 55-. 9 I qs z-.-t73vX 53 City State Zip Phone fund L nd • as stated above. 4411, • i re Variance Application—SaptaMbw an? Page 14 4 0 02 PC Exhibit B 18-4002 19 December 2017 CONCEPT PLAN FOR JOHN PATCH ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC KELLEY PARKWAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION We are looking for concept approval on a 56 unit apartment project on a site adjacent to the existing medical building on Kelley Parkway. The site has an easement on the westerly portion which currently has parking for 14 parking spaces which will be shared with our project. The project is a two story building with partially subgrade parking which meets or exceeds all setback requirements and meets the 30 height requirement. The project tabulation is as follows; SITE AREA 111,318 SF (2.55 ACRES) BUILDING FOOTPRINT 31,535 SF SURFACE PARKING AREA 26,860 SF TOTAL HARD COVER 58,385 SF (53%) TOTAL BUILDING AREA: FIRST FLOOR 31,535 SF SECOND FLOOR 31,535 SF ROOF LEVEL 5,236 SF TOTAL 68,306 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO .61 APARTMENT UNITS: 2 BEDROOM 16 @ 1100 — 1200 SF 29% 1 BEDROOM + DEN 24 @ 900 — 1000 SF 42% 1 BEDROOM 16 @ 700 — 850 SF 29% TOTAL UNITS 56 PARKING PROVIDED: ENCLOSED 83 SPACES (1.5 SPACES/UNIT) NEW SURFACE 39 SPACES TOTAL APARTMENT 122 SPACES (2.17 SPACES/UNIT) SHARED PARKING 14 SPACES TOTAL ON SITE 136 SPACES (2.42 SPACES/UNIT) DENSITY: SITE AREA 2.55 ACRES NUMBER OF UNITS 56 UNITS 21.9 UNITS/ACRE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 72 BEDROOMS (2X16 +24+16) 28.2 BEDROOMS/ACRE AVERAGE SIZE OF UNITS 964 SF By comparison the Stonebay Condos at 2670 Kelley Parkway the numbers are: Site area 125,242 sf 2.87 acres Number of units 57 condos (19.9 units/acre) Number of bedrooms 114 bedrooms (39.7 bedrooms/acre) (all units are 2 Bedroom units) Average unit size 1800 sf (smallest unit is 1500sf and largest is 2100 sf) SUMMARY POINTS TO CONSIDER: We are limited in the ability of put the garage level totally underground by groundwater conditions. The project concept proposed meets all setback requirements and height requirements. 1. Market Rate Rental Housing There is a high demand in the area for high quality market rate rental housing. There currently is no rental option in the area of this quality. A full range of available housing will provide Orono residents a needed option which would allow them to remain in the community when looking for housing. 2. Density Evaluation The density of this project compares favorably with the Stonebay condo project. Orono Apartments density is 21.9 units/acre while the Stonebay project is19.9 units/acre. While units per acre is one measure of density other factors are worth taking into account. In addition to being similar in units per acre, Orono Apartments are averaging just over half the physical size of the Stonebay project. Orono Apartments average 964 sf in area. Stonebay units average approximately 1,800 sf When comparing the density of bedrooms Orono Apartments are at 28.2 Bedrooms/acre while Stonebay Condos are at 39.7 Bedrooms/acre. The number of bedrooms generate residents and car traffic. Both size of units and bedroom density are measures that effect the impact of the project on the site. And both are significantly reduced on our site. 3. Building Massing We will design the projects to have a height of 30' (average of roof slope). The highpoint of the Orono Apartments is 14'2" LOWER than the highpoint of the Stonebay condos. We are also comparable in height to the recently approved Orono Senior Housing Community on the adjacent site to the East of our site. We believe that our project will fit well into the community physically while meeting the needs of the community in general by providing market rate rental housing in an area that has a great need for this type of housing. We will look forward to concept approval so that we can develop the engineering and architectural plans for your review and final approval. Thank you for your consideration. We will look forward to addressing any questions you have of us. John Patch Orono Apartments Neil Weber, AIA Weber Architects & Planners KELLEY PARKWAY • rc=,_„____________-___ e"--- _________________,_ . e IRMO . ' ( . (a35SETBACK 39 PARKING SPACES e Na 1 • — • o 0 1 II a A I vl1 !K106 :066i . . r 1111 I O 14 SHARED 1� 11. I PARKING SPACES I i r - ' L 1 I 6 ( I • I L - -- 35'SETBACK I ff4O r Fir 35'SETBACK ( 1 1 1 t ' ! m al L.. f. 1 __ __________-_-_i______r_r-:-------= -1--L-- __I--.:-- L -4-----T------J-- *1 ,•..i (..._,) 0 • n • CID 50'SETBACK . le ••.1 .0 SITE CONCEPT _ tri n o 5- 00 The building is a 2 story (with additional roof units)with a height of 30 feet that meets all ii o setback requirements. n CASH 112 O APARTM NTS, LLC W FF B 10.R aronipero a.planner. Kell Parkway 2 of 8. .am14, Fa" 're.t est' 3664419 .a (q wt1 MECHANICAU r J TRASH r r I LI .111 8.-----4 _ -- ---t. 1 1-7-I - -- II1 as Ia r— e I + . `� I �®, f----- _ �-,__r • 1 4; „,u, '--....' #E L T f la • i 1I . _ { 83 PARKING SPACES I it t T et - PARKING GARAGE The parking is partially subgrade which provides 83 enclosed parking. This means that we are providing 1 % enclosed parking spaces•per unit. i i ORONO APARTMENT*, LLQ W.,' ' I Kelley Parkway . 3 of 8 asaovitiw�ewna ti•.w..MN003/b-6110 .as..7sw�a.• E.� 78ap.0[!9 car 14t 1a tots • J e '2 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM , 1 BEDROOM+ ! 1 BEDROOM 1111 ,1 1 BEDROOM . 1 BEDROOM+ + '+ I 1103 11 1 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM+ 2 BEDROOM — -------E-;---- ENTRY M 1 BEDROOM+ 41, 111111111 1 10 1 BEDROOM+ 4ii, STORAGE 1 BEDROOM+ 1 BEDROOM+ OFFICEI MAIL 1 BEDROOM+ STORAGE 11 ', 2 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM Ilil - III`� 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM+ 1 BEDROOM+ 1 BEDROOM+ 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM I' ' I =_r, _-_-- -_ , .. ,I FIRST FLOOR PLAN This plan shows 26 units plus storage area at the inside corners. The entrance area includes a small administrative office and mail.room. The second floor is similar with a "guest unit" for use by tenants at the elevator core. . 0.4W FB Ct R ORONO APARTMENT*, LLC &;mummers . Kell Parkway 4 of 8 •/3,479.4934•.Filo( 470.5993• l of neo weleeeen teed,Long �.00m M3 �^'C t 1 • / . uIIWIII twit - m ,4 tw uI •_- 1BEDROOM+ 2BEDROOM 2BEDROOM 1BEDROOM+ \ , . .w1sr �� _.. _ _ - j ROOF LEVEL PLAN Built into the overall profile of the building are 4 units at the "roof level"facing CASH 112. 1 , ORONO APARTMENTS, -LLQ W R arehfl OIs!.plwnnsrs. Kelley Parkway ' 5 of 8 INN WatenOWneted, 9112.474.44$4 Foot 11 G Ton • 6'0„ " r 6'0" 1 30'0" 4- APARTMENT APARTMENT If 104 i , APARTMENT APARTMENT i ! jir PARKING GARAGE 4-1 TYPICAL SECTION This section shows the partially subgrade parking with 2 stories of units and a midpoint of the slope roof meeting the 30 foot height requirement. OIRONO APARTMENTS, !AZ .rshl is a planners Kell Parkway95 °"1 � of 6 8 162.414.4434+�Faxx 76.5.63• nochM�cb.can 6'0" 6'0" ROOF APARTMENT 10'1 30'0" APARTMENT • APARTMENT 10'0' 11.:1!,r74 APARTMENT , APARTMENT 4'0" LI m .�..:. .. �. PARKING GARAGE SECTION. AT ROOF LEVEL This section shows how the 4 roof units are built into the massing of the building without adding to the height of the overall building. • WIPBER ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC wets ptanners Kelley Parkway 7 of 8 1C ' Cb l 9 MI 1o(1 • r t a !— i117 ,,,,,,' �' 1 �1 � 3 � ce ai l _-- II III II,_1► `' I�,I; �! �1111i1 y - SII I11I �� _ ��:ai� e� `11� tI 'fid, , �1 � _ .___. lei l ulnallllllar llkul — li I S WI IWUU 1,11041 -- �9 r ....I,.. '�.,�•:...'7I ELEVATION CONCEPT , This typical elevation (facing east) is intended to give a preliminary feeling of the . massing of the building. Since the concept plan process does not address architectural design we are showing an elevation concept that illustrates our intention of a fairly traditional looking building that will fit well with the existing medical building to the west, the City of Orono buildings, and the existing housing in the area. We intend to use quality materials in a simple straight forward way with classic architectural detailing. ORONO LL. �' R / VNO APARTMENTS, eN/h i planners Kell Parkway 8 of 8 >2eowrl.rerr", ►.aw a fa I .•11 Awl• Fac 9 47,11116$• nrahNWau.aom 19 17 et 7ot1 ORONO PROFESSIONAL CENTER II p .RCNITCCT CONTR.CTO. CIVIi, ENCINC[R LAY.PERT C'll 4 M] .LOYC ♦RCN ACCTS CO MN.STA • .4UTCTION LNGIN[L RING ,3037 NE Lin talo 3I. 11100 Br.Reed IL MO 1.1..2 en L•..NE N i C N',7.1.T E Nem Lah.,MN 3330a 6111.1Cnhe,MN 33141 Cr.,Plne..YN 33014 .hon.:SU-]03-1013 w,10 un.n•+g .nano 703-]33-1111 SWIG 1100 I' p I +u�a. .Phone 932-912-2127eII KELLEY ROAD MIMIMt VOSI OVING C« ,n[ CN.. I. le At NM -- -- a _ . , ___ . . _ . . -- 1. aYi6�a1O IL._ar11111 MAIG➢�I.1a►i 001ll�ia1 - /01M. -uaB J • - _ 1 .-. -I T - T -1-f -14.4.1--1 � .-i_ - _-�1, P11.106119“6 111. .`w"aTrw k "Re.t+`.l./ i-u 11 = O i 1 . I T} 1 Ce I. e II I 1I ! 1 1i z 1. i ,17Is 11 1 -ii I,,., ,,•.,r7 • ^� 0 \\\.Ss's\F i . � i `• I, 112104 10.1.111 ¢ 1.0003W10-004 ' v W _ 1 1 _,� 4 I O Q O a- mut" I — 6 I Q. = O Ca .—Llnnol �r<.__ _J.JI 0 I I �. .. _ . . _ . . _ . . —. . _ . . . —my- _ ..ter �� .. ar.ie 1 �r1 I 1rrraa wt..d , tra.e ia°.*47 u[ .r.. .--.la.. SWIM am.a 4 ria : v U . S . HIGHWAY NO . 1 21.= " 1 o.R.N1 U.•IN m :I torn moo.64 0101011 VW.IN SITE PLANI.' NNeabWM Shall Nrrtv Me[YN AlCRETE cu03 • WNW(IMP .S � .v�nN 04. VJ:e°�•'=,fie / \ 1 .na¢YL ;Ws.144 1St rNora•u n,l,. R,aI.aL„p 031CO3-2 PREVIOUS PROPOSED SITE PLAN The previous site plan was for a second medical building. With the building and parking • areas there was a total of 25% green space. ORONO APARTMENTS,- anuhlf•cts 1h PAwnnsrs • Kelley Parkway N1 of 8 2280 wwn o+o.e,Long Links,MN 6s9es ,e !02,4711.4434• Fa 2.470069.mewsbaweigteda.oan lei MG ?Ai Highpoint of roof 45'2" ■,L� ■. ■ UI i ■YiV■i ■■I ■to■■ tomo. ■Ui ■ i■■■■■■■' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ •■ ■ ■..1 mummify T. . . . t ■i1 ■ ■ tt r■ ■��■■ r■■■■r _ . ,', to'i"rrallr ■r law111111111111111111111111, / P tomo ■ .. ■fix i■ ■1 motor■/ - "_.._ \41,111111111111111111111111111•�r ■■� ■ ■w■■ . ::.. ■ Mid oint of roo�'7a -L-'�� ■ ■ tomo■ ■ ■u■■ ■ �r ; i n �.� ■ r �mo •1111:11411 M irEllatri� Mite ter V ,.„Ir';IIr: ::. ll ■ Il�i�■�■■i1 ■arra../ _�4 ■l:::�■■r ,t� tomo 11111411111 �■■R■■■■�_■ ■� �� ■� . 'wM■lJ1 tomo■ ■ tomo■ tomo ■mo■■ ■ ■► / «..+ .... ■■I ■to ■ ■to ■■ ■.■ ■ ■■'�;r ■■■ ■ �. .._./' ■ ■ HIGHPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENT ROOF 31'0" ;■ `Ir ■ Ir■i��mo ■ tomo %r r�— ■,aww•�i.wr. -liI� ■ � �A - litif. -- - r .-e.tiv�� ■ r.. - » 1111 111111 111 111 ;moi!! 111 1111 III r. Midpoint of Orono A•artments roof 2= 'IN I mi ■ ■ • 11.1 "' c 111111,"'---1,..,1; ■ 1® ■ 1■No -or iii "'t�■ror■ mss--r " ■a I♦ !■�; : ������i i. lilllll` 1. ' • •:,- :•-•:•;•. `-.i T■ f Third floor 21'8" ,.■ %rii � .., - .rtrrli...��riw :— ....�r.:111mom... ! ■,_. zLf-: =rl.:.. 'Ilifrig "�/ „-••/:- a 0 i t,�--/:rte:ilii w i l l i m i t i i i m i ra l t u f� --,1,,,,.7,•,---,f, : 111i =IH 0-,�....@ Ial, Mt! iii iiii• 1 ._ ._ -ii. : ��..• �r� ...VIII- II_w 11111,�• NE ' pi-:� m�� : � !r qme � �....1�; � Second floor 10'10„ I l l l l l„I l l f l:l l l ��.,. i� ._.. .w -. - ■_-�,. � ., - IA=....... -- ;.: II 11,•Mr ._I,7 .11- ��i W ril■■11 `� :I:', ;11417.11.71:1. fy : .. .':l1'111.,1111li111.Ir�t�llt5�► Ari v. : ■. ...A �r� I�YYI �'!■n --� .r wrd .l.iirilo V/■ ,M ; A :717 �1■ 111 I -,,, ��� �' .ren iim ii ` M'.' i 'moi( irrair..4-:...7==.=.: .. O. :n 1111111:mmn11111.111 -IMM _ �■ tw■ i - z. -- �- First floor 0 -.rr.1. �W -.`.w"�r r� —l ��.��.,i ---�Ll�-i.�. ii1111111.11 , Grade at entrance 0 I I I I Garage -9'4" _ b or, tri STONEBAY CONDOMINIUMS o BUILDING HEIGHTS @ MAIN ENTRANCE ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC RELATIVE BUILDING HEIGHTS WEBER , .rahHrwts a planner. Kel Parkway AT THE ENT, CE KLQ NMM....9toWBL�• L� 55358-9419 Highpoint of roof 50'2" Al rim vi7115riraViriVAIRWTINWIAtliii-"MerciargAINTAW17 :: ■ri i .i ' ►11■1111■ 1111 ■1111 11 rm ►/ ' ■11■II■ O ■ ■■■m■ ■ ■■11 ■ m ■m ■ ■v, I ''..i.,,■■ tl■ w•■■■I . ■■1111 r■■ M a■m ■ ■ 1111 r . I, m 111 0Ni_ ■��:asau•m■.11ti ■ a .� 11 ■jejiap m■ ■..• . ►1 . , „ •I��■ :u■1j"■:m■ions:: iu wasLYa o isilei11�m'�'ilimg�■r/ �. �' � 11 w, ,. ri Midpoint of roof 43 7 \ sii ■ ■w1111 -. ■� 1111 ■.._ ,w ��-------aw__ ..wm.,-- ... - � 77 ..�.:. � � �� • II■ 1111■■ �M���■�■�■■■■!�■■■■11TA�A�% ■�11■■11ti .,w. �. 7\T4r t'',^'TL,', T41-1-:■'II e. \ Am ■■ ■ a ■■mama 1111■■ m 1111■■ ■m■a r' ;:..... • .� ■ ■ ■■ ■Tmmm■m�m ■mmI■■■�■11�lam■ ■ ar r. , HIGHPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENT ROOF 36'0" ++ •■ ■■■■■■ ■ ■m■■■ ■ ■•■■ ■ ■ ■IM .■rin II aelleMMNINIM. INNINI4INNIMNIMININNINNO '�wA,j \■\�Or��������■UUUU•I�■/����■��/ NIr /;A .r.ar• Vim \ �f .1r� 1 111 1 alIIIIS bilk III!lir= Ili. �, " �i� 11111 �H■w; . � Midpoint of Orono Apartments roof 30'0" alfrarMINO finiiiial. MEM Ili__Il �■I . ■ ■ 11. IM _/ ■= ■r iI■■ .• ll ill I�'��llI�I I-.-• -- • ..� 1IIIII-'I 'di l ' Third floor 26'8" I . 01 .11.2:1,;,M.±1,1x11 _..-.. --- ---- ... iar - - --' -. lari _ ---. ...._ J__ I 1 - __!7.7.71=7.7.7:7;• -..,._' ■•^wr»*■"'•' I - _moi _. _.. . ... .._ 8 IIIlII/ milli i ',/ � *Z.. 1.- ! ..: ,, ,r ...'�"., .- .-: , -. ;,;,I/Iraallll�lll:lw,�.,t,i1= 'IP 111::i III 111 N :III III 1111; sill 1111N1 IIII• ! �, s— r..r r/11111111111111' w ■ - ■6 �. -` �_1 ■ _1.,_ '"■I _ = 1 Second floor 15 10 agg ; 1Loi ; ,�Ilf"IIIIIIIIIIi GEii III I IM 111 III = r:� �_ i----:;trio .... , ,;;;;, �I_ llll11r�111■ , .1 . 1t ; ; ;-:fM.;.,.f. t; ; ;;%; ; ;t111ioIIIIIIltir IIiIik: �.�.1 : I11' ;, 111III ( 111111' . c 111021121111: 1 1111116; ri . m11--� ._ - ., ,r ami., ag jiii. . IIIIIIII- ;..I -II-----AIMM OM NI....11 Li III;MUM ill1 " ril*Zr"' First floor 5'0" ._ C Grade 0 ■ Garage - 4'4" STONEBAY CONDOMINIUMS ` BUILDING HEIGHTS @ EXPOSED PARKING ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC RELATIVE BUILDING HEIGHTS srohitects i ptemrsors Kelley Parkway AT THE LOWEST GRADE 2280VV,I,AownLong Lake.MN55356-w+e *62.4784434• Fax Otte.6863•nwgwrb,rrd Nsdt.corn 1 AO tot HIGHPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENT ROOF 36'0" an+ +e) MIDPOINT OF ORONO APARTMENTS ROOF 30'0" 4 '. . .. ... .011Nra f�- 'cc' as gm —.- aw Ow -- Bs Rol— — N ■ I ■■a• ,.. a• wt es CU wa a ■Nt!a sia is — ■m 11111111 as a �' �. ■a gra - __ as as _ 1 urw m,m 1 I: = as_a '� Msuui#ini11. :I;– -i, — — IIIIIIIIII ..arr- Ota ah11111111r.=04.11M./11 �'�f i 'IMPICO lim'sgmammem."--- ,mg... Am:Amoull'01111"1111iiim-oniiiilasam an•a tc�;= as is """...` as ■a Ra a a■a ,, ium,� aw as aill sura as .: as ■ .-' - as—iro&tea 1w N ....+a► am www atm a1 ■ ....L..--a■as tt.,i►-,':.. on as =eft t*m a is 400V as ■ _l . ariiri ihm".�� "U rrrsipmegrnwwa _.._ . pez -1111N11111111111111 2...--,1111111111•111111 ...--.•11111.1111111111111111•1111.11111111.6•11111111111 • \` i..... T 1.. L. { I 'tel i �i ORONO SENIOR HOUSING COMMUNITY ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC WEBER architects i plann.rs - Kell Parkway 2280 Watertown Road,Long La 5356-8419 042.476.4434• Fax 952 476 5963•i architects com * :-.P..411k. rF � Pia 4.! _. i .. ti, k y r. • - I . ,e - ' C' bn x1 E ro 1,4 T 4 Y all': ' ' ', dr,„ . ' ^s coilly.;, 4 • MI� _ '; , . ... _ : *.. 1 pii-IC 9 ipls1c-J Pio N... i -ei i ,. - is R „a i. l 1 > m A • ' r d � ., N li 114)P 3tt ,- `�. .1 � I ' Wayzata Blvd 111110r,4, ' - . \ :1 i i t E ' _ r..iit F $ d' r yd++VF_ ., ¢ a • 4 . rn . Technical . �- - . .-. ,.��• _ Bodyworks I . & Aut 1 ss ` :-� - .- #7 . . r---.�'!Y ."'.. . ' r ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC ENLARGED SITE LOCATION ± 2.55 ACRES of COMMERCIAL LAND for SALE 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356 Orono it IIII ' . i1d . „tr.._ .6., ....1 . . H.S. I. *. 4 r` , . • , •-..d" ,..N . ,.„4,--*, 4,7 9—,- - -97-,.,',,,, - ii.,,..$ Orono r r is l� { Otte 11 .x: Intermediate _p . 1.4*!. \ y f +A• , r Gerd=[oder ` '..”` IN. .:��, School c'. ' -i �': [ T�':r- ; • " ?r " Public Works Building .. Ashi'• 'I +r4xs-tir `.- " r 1 'died 1 M .4�� . 11111 ` .. ��. .,a_ A;ttick,'kr ya'►. 6esersl SMe . `' " .-, � Wayzata Bhd # yro s . S I JEM rill t. W '``� L, E, A.. .._ Prsdsm } C).- r fi.,-,,.„...1,1....., Aifij ondos to the Northwest rfl ._sem 1=--- :. limm. �+... Z9 - fire r.' ORONO APARTMENTS, LLC GENERAL SITE LOCATION „..,, .:..... tip f.4 r'44.•iii ► 'a�Q ill: ► ' t 011,11k Li- � :;rs,� ,,,_ i �.•■ i 2030 Land Use Plan 4,4:1 .rw ♦ tita)7011.1:14:11: a I ,- $ '..sal. i .,;+ �- :_ City of Orono I!'• \ �� 111 . Minnesota ^'�. �k-P ' l 1111, ~--, /I ,,1"4,FL II --,-- -------77.„----- 6_,—_ •' MI_zel e�� R iM �.: +� \ _ �/ Future Land Use Categories ;1 1 i .,,:rill', 14,- tel itla rwwll o.■.. .; M� I r -Rural(1 unNS ac) Now p wl F• �� �� -Rural Residential(1 unit/2 Sc) r ^ 'fir:e rl o.i RilAi! y� �_� �.� "r I I Low Density Residential(0.5-2 units/ac) . .,_.„ ..._, _,,, ,.., • i _ " � '_t�-' :.:,..- • i --- r a I ILow-Medium Density Residential(2-3 units/ac) ��n aw; i ,` ,_,A..„\ 4 .� I Medium Density Residential(3-7 units/ac) �, 1 it ( ,.. 1 L Ix 1 11 Y. r ..y ..m..1at ---' i.�x•,q 'z7istA ~�,� Medium High Density Residential(7-10 units/ac) r y �ja�'� _I ��►.y 41.441111111 ` ;'= �IYr `.''.:;; High Density Residential(10 15 units/ac) Y cul IN 1 k �r,�etim im : �ti : -Mixed Use Residential(8-15 units/ac) 174, �1� + le n7011� it -Commercial lir# / ar1111 il 4. 13k 11►\ Deja .. i\� -Park,Recreational,and Open Space 'RF„7y�Il�H , ► ..',.:4,,.' I��/11� 1_;•.::4' -Institutional �i !1�: tat1.'r f 117 illo Proposed MUSA ” fj Open Water V.! I I 1 Parcel �$ `} —1---RaYroad City Limits IIIVI •� 1 - W mfr F. iiinuguIN : :i l�"� i S G_A�_ tr1.1 • , ‘1- off 1 0 4,000 8,0004 ' i ^I .^ Feet k JI` j,,?5,41,.J,i� ♦�1Mw1. �� i� 0 •lir twr• A• .. Iw. Source:, i, ( ostroo June 1 Northwest Associated Consultants. .ra..oa.i MAP 3B-6 PC Exhibit.G 18-4002 DIVISION 11. - RPUD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTI1 Footnotes: ---(7)--- Cross reference— Planned unit development. § 78 1001 et seq. Sec. 78-621. - Purpose. The purpose of the residential planned unit development(RPUD)district is to provide a district which will allow for the implementation of certain residential housing goals established in the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan ("CMP" or "comprehensive plan"). The RPUD district is established to accommodate the densities and types of residential development contemplated in the CMP by incorporating the principles of the planned unit development concept. The RPUD district will encourage the following: (1) Flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; (2) Provision of housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and moderate cost housing needs; (3) Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses; (4) Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, poor soils and trees; (5) High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; (6) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city; and (7) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(1), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-622.-Exceptions. This section shall not apply to any residential PUD or PRD which has received preliminary or final approval by the city council prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this division is derived, unless such application is requested by the property owner and approved by the city council. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(9), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-623. - Permitted uses. Within the RPUD district, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) One-family detached dwellings. (2) Publicly owned parks and playgrounds. (3) Municipal buildings. (4) Multifamily attached dwellings only when consistent within the areas of the city designated as urban area in the comprehensive plan. (Code 1984, § 10.20(2); Ord. No. 202 2nd series § 1(2), 2-26-2001) State Law reference— State mandated permitted uses, Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 7. Sec. 78-624. -Conditional uses. Within the RPUD district, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: (1) Public service structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings, such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power substations, provided no building shall be located within 50 feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an R district. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. Public service structures that have been approved by the city at required public hearings for public improvement projects shall not require a conditional use permit, but such structures shall be subject to all other appropriate standards set forth in this section; amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of these structures will require written notice by the city to all affected property owners 14 days prior to the adoption of the amended plans by the council. Personal wireless services and commercial broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered public service structures. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall be reviewed for compliance with the PUD master development plan and with the applicable conditional use permit standards of this division. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall also be subject to site and building plan review pursuant to this division. (2) Assisted living facilities. Assisted living facilities as defined in this chapter, subject to the general conditions and multifamily-specific conditions applicable to uses in the RPUD district. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(3), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 75 3rd series, § 1, 7-12-2010) Sec. 78-625. -Accessory uses. Within any RPUD district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (1) Private garages and parking space. (2) Private swimming pools, tennis courts, and paddocks. (3) Home occupations, as defined in this chapter. All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of section 78-1376, and the licensing provisions of section 26-76, when applicable. (4) Signs, as regulated in this chapter. (5) Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructing on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. (6) Gardening and other horticultural uses, including aviaries and decorative landscape features. (7) Communication reception/transmission devices as follows: a. Accessory antennas, which shall be limited to radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs, and amateur shortwave radio transmitting and receiving antennas. Accessory antennas that are accessory to the principal use of property are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: 1. Height. A ground-mounted accessory antenna shall not exceed 20 feet in height from ground level. 2. Yards. Accessory antennas shall not be located within the required front yard setback, corner side yard setback or side yard setback abutting a street. 3. Roofs. If vegetation or obstructions interfere with satellite signals at a location in any allowable placement area, the accessory antenna may be placed on the roof of any authorized structure on the premises. 4. Location. Accessory antennas shall not be located within a required yard or setback area or within drainage or utility easements. Antenna towers shall be set back from adjacent property lines a horizontal distance no less than the maximum height of the antenna. 5. Building permits. A building permit shall be required for the installation of any accessory antenna requiring a conditional use permit. Building permit applications shall be accompanied by a site plan and structural component data for the accessory antenna, including details of anchoring. The building official must approve the plans before installation. 6. Lightning protection. Each accessory antenna shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 7. Electrical code. Accessory antenna electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 8. Color/content. Accessory antennas shall be of a neutral color and shall not be used as signage. b. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers which do not meet the conditions for accessory antennas may be allowed with a conditional use permit in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: 1. Height. When an amateur shortwave radio antenna is mounted on an antenna tower, the total height of the antenna and tower shall not exceed 65 feet. 2. Yards. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within a front corner side or side yard. 3. Setbacks. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within any required setback area and shall be located no less than the height of the antenna and town from the property line. (8) Privately owned buildings to be used for recreational or social purposes, or for use as storage areas for maintenance equipment or rubbish. (9) Other uses that are customarily incidental to, and subordinate to, the allowed permitted and conditional uses in this district. (Code 1984, § 10.20(4); Ord. No. 161 2nd series, § 6, 6-7-1997; Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1 (4), 2-26-2001; Ord.No. 221 2nd series, § 3, 9-23-2002; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 12, 6-10-2013) Sec. 78-626. -Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in compliance with the following: (1) Minimum area; shoreland district limitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed by the existing zoning district. No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of a protected lake or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD. However, for a property that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially located more than 250 feet from the OHWL, the portion located more than 250 feet from the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other requirements are met. (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council for review. (3) Sewer availability. A site proposed to be rezoned to RPUD with proposed density greater than one unit per two acres must be in the metropolitan urban services area (MUSA) and must be serviced by municipal sewer. (4) Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. If the site is not designated in the comprehensive plan for residential use, the appropriate density shall be determined by the city based upon the city council's finding that such density is consistent with the intent of this division and of the comprehensive plan. Developments with proposed densities in excess of the densities contemplated in the comprehensive plan shall be allowed only on properties which are currently zoned and guided for commercial use, in order to maintain the character and integrity of the areas zoned and guided for residential use. (5) Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. Incentives may include modification of density(only for properties currently zoned and guided for commercial use) and floor area ratio requirements for developments providing lifecycle housing and affordable and moderate cost housing. Incentives for affordable and moderate cost housing may be approved by the city only after the developer and city have entered into an agreement to ensure that the low and moderate cost units remain available to persons of low and moderate income for at least 20 years. (6) Floor area ratio . Floor area ratios(FARs)shall be limited per the following table: Maximum Floor Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Ratio* Low or medium density residential (up to 50 and including 6.0 units per 0.5 acre) High density residential (in excess of 6.0 units per acre) 1.0 *FAR=Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area Individual lots within a development in the RPUD district may exceed these standards as long as the average meets these standards. (7) Development standards for attached and multifamily dwelling structures. Each site rezoned to RPUD and developed for attached or multiple-family dwelling uses shall be subject to the following standards: a. Setbacks and separation of uses. Within the RPUD district the setback for all attached and multifamily dwelling buildings and their accessory buildings from any bordering or abutting street line shall be 35 feet for local streets and 50 feet from railroad lines or collector or arterial streets, as designated in the comprehensive plan, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD site lot lines not abutting a public street shall be 35 feet, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. Building setbacks from internal public streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Parking lots and driving lanes shall be set back at least 20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a RPUD site. The setback for parking structures, including decks and ramps, shall be 35 feet from local streets and 50 feet from all other street classifications, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the structure. Parking structure setbacks from external lot lines shall be 50 feet or the height of the structure, whichever is greater, when adjacent to residential properties; 35 feet, when adjacent to nonresidential properties. Parking structure setbacks from internal public or private streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Where industrial uses abut developed or platted single-family lots outside the RPUD site, greater exterior building and parking setbacks may be required in order to provide effective screening. The city council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening proposed by the applicant. Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth berming, existing and proposed plantings and other features, such as roadways and wetlands, which provide separation of uses. Property rezoned to RPUD shall be considered a residential district for purposes of determining building and parking setback requirements on adjacent high density residential, commercial and industrial property outside the RPUD. b. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three stories (not including underground parking level) and shall maintain a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure. No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family building will be allowed. c. Outside storage limitations. Building materials, recreational vehicles, boats, RV's, snowmobiles, and other items of personal property shall not be stored outside within any site used for attached or multifamily uses. (8) Development standards for single-family detached dwellings in the RPUD district. Each RPUD site developed for single-family detached dwellings at medium density (i.e., densities ranging from one unit per acre to six units per acre)shall be subject to the following standards: a. Permitted locations: in areas of the city where smaller single-family detached dwelling lots will allow for clustering to preserve significant natural features, or in areas where a mixture of higher density attached dwellings and lower density detached single-family dwellings will result in a development that does not exceed the overall guided density. b. Minimum SFR lot size: 15,000 square feet. c. Minimum lot width at the setback line: 90 feet. d. Minimum lot depth: 125 feet. e. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet on internal streets within the RPUD site. On exterior or through streets a setback of 35 feet must be provided on local streets and a 50-foot setback on collector or arterial streets, as defined in the comprehensive plan. f. Minimum side yard setback: ten feet along interior lot lines; 15 feet on lot lines along the exterior of the RPUD site. Side yards abutting streets must meet the minimum front yard setbacks as noted in subsection (8)e of this section. Structures in side yards abutting another residential zoning district shall meet the side yard setback requirement of the adjacent zoning district. g. Rear yard setback: minimum of 40 feet or 20 percent of the depth of the lot, whichever is less. h. Building height: maximum of 30 feet. i. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. j. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the state building code. k. Accessory structures shall conform to the setbacks established for principal structures, except as follows: 1. All accessory structures located more than ten feet from a principal structure may be located a minimum of ten feet from a rear or side lot line when that line does not abut a street right-of-way. 2. No accessory structure shall be located closer to the front lot line than the principal structure, regardless of the principal structure setback. I. No accessory structure shall occupy more than 30 percent of the side or rear yard in which it is located, nor exceed 1,000 square feet in area, nor exceed 12 feet in height. m. Off-street parking shall be provided for at least two vehicles for each single-family dwelling. A suitable location for a garage measuring at least 20 feet by 24 feet without a variance shall be provided and indicated as such on a site plan or certified site plan to be submitted when applying for a building permit to construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage. (9) More than one building allowed. More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in a RPUD site. (10) Single housing type permitted. Any RPUD development which involves a single housing type shall be permitted, provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this division and the comprehensive plan. (11) Private recreational area. Each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of the gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area shall be for active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. Private recreational area requirements are in addition to the standard park dedication requirements. (12) Ownership. All property to be included within a RPUD development shall be under unified ownership or control, or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved master development plan and final site and building plan. (13) Signage. Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in a sign plan approved by the city and shall be regulated by permanent covenants. (14) Landscaping, screening and buffering. a. Landscape plan requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the city, drawn to the scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: 1. Boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; 2. Locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads, trails and other improvements; 3. Proposed grading plan with two-foot contour intervals; 4. Location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; 5. A planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; 6. Planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; 7. Locations and details of other landscape features, including berms,fences and planter boxes; 8. Details of restoration of disturbed areas, including areas to be sodded and seeded; 9. Location and details of irrigation systems; and 10. Details and cross sections of all required screening. b. Minimum landscaping requirements. 1. All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives, trails or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of deciduous and coniferous species, including overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in conformance with the following table: Minimum Tree and Shrub Requirements Vegetation Type Size Quantity Overstory 2.5-inch bb One tree per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint area or one deciduous trees (Caliper) tree per 40 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. 6-foot height Coniferous treesbb Minimum of 30 percent of required overstory trees must be coniferous Understory 3-gal. potted One shrub per 300 gross square feet of building footprint area or one shrubs or 18-inch shrub per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter,whichever is greater. Not required; but two ornamental deciduous trees may be substituted Ornamental 1.5-inch bb for one required overstory deciduous tree(maximum substitution deciduous trees (Caliper) equals 25 percent of required overstory deciduous trees) Credits for existing trees:The city council shall have sole discretion whether credit shall be granted for existing healthy trees In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in subsection (14)b of this section may be adjusted by the city to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this division. 2. A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. 3. All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 21/2 inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 11/2 inches. 4. All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, trails, patios, or similar hardcover shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. 5. In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one- and two-family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas, except areas to be preserved in a natural state. 6. Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. The city shall maintain a list of prohibited species, which shall not be used for landscaping. c. Interior parking lot landscaping. 1. All parking lots containing over 100 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the city. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the 100-stall standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. 2. Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the planning commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the planning commission. d. Maintenance of landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan, and which have died, shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. e. Retaining walls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height, and staged walls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than four tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. f. Landscaping performance security required. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this division, a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least 11/2 times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal, contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to two full growing seasons after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be appropriate. If construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the owner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping, if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions, which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. g. Screening and buffering. 1. The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this section: i. Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto used for residential uses at a density of greater than four units per acre shall be buffered from residential lots located in any R district. ii. Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet. Parking facilities shall be buffered with landscape zones. iii. Loading docks shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. iv. Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. v. Access roads serving multifamily buildings shall be screened as necessary to eliminate the impact of vehicle headlights shining toward adjacent residential neighborhoods. 2. Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. 3. All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or highway. 4. Screening or buffering required by subsection (14) of this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of subsection (14) of this section. Screening methods incorporating roofs over storage, trash or mechanical facilities to screen from higher adjacent properties or buildings may be required. Height of plantings required under subsection (14)of this section shall be measured at the time of installation. (15) Architectural standards. a. It is not the intent of the city to restrict design freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest of the city to promote high standards of architectural design and compatibility with surrounding structures and neighborhoods. Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified persons acceptable to the city and shall show the following for all structures other than single-family detached dwellings: 1. Elevations of all sides of the building. 2. Type and color of exterior building materials. 3. A typical floor plan. 4. Dimensions of all structures. 5. The location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. b. Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior materials for residential principal and accessory buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels. c. Accessory buildings shall be architecturally compatible with principal structures. d. All rooftop or ground-mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash and recycling storage areas shall be fully enclosed or screened so as to be not visible with materials compatible with the principal structure. e. Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and substantially renovated structures (the term "substantially renovated" shall mean when the renovations exceed 30 percent of the prerenovation value of the structure). (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. (17) Traffic studies. The city may require a traffic analysis to be prepared by a registered traffic engineer approved by the city to assess potential traffic impacts on local streets. If impacts on service levels of roadways and intersections are anticipated, the project will be approved only contingent upon a traffic management plan that adequately mitigates those impacts. The plan may include travel demand management strategies, use of transit facilities or other appropriate measures to reduce traffic generation, and necessary improvements to road systems. The developer shall have the responsibility to install all necessary road system improvements. (18) Building permits. No building or other permit shall be issued for any work on property included within a proposed or approved RPUD development, nor shall any work occur unless such work is in compliance with the proposed or approved RPUD development. (19) General regulations applicability. The requirements contained in this division pertaining to general regulations for residential districts and performance standards shall apply to a RPUD development as deemed appropriate by the city. (20) Lighting standards. All RPUD developments shall be subject to the general performance standards for lighting in this chapter. (21) Trails. When any portion of the project is within 1,000 feet of a public trail system, pedestrian access shall be provided to the trail system by means of a public trail constructed at the developer's expense. Where public rights-of-way are available, at the city's discretion the trail may utilize the public right-of-way. Trails shall be of bituminous construction, or such other material as may be approved by the city and shall be not less than eight feet in width. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(5), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 94 3rd series, § 2, 9-24-2012; Ord. No. 189 3rd series, § 6, 4-10-2017) Sec. 78-627.-Review of application; procedures. (a) Concept plan review. In order to receive guidance in the design of a RPUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large RPUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following: (1) Approximate building, road and trail locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized grading plan showing areas to be cut, filled and preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall address the consistency of the concept plan with this section. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall be for guidance only and, if positive, shall not be considered binding upon the planning commission or city council regarding approval of the formal RPUD application when submitted. (b) Master development plan and rezoning. Approval of a rezoning to RPUD and approval of a master development plan shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this chapter for a zoning map amendment. The master development plan shall contain the following: (1) Building location, height, bulk and square footage; (2) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (3) Number of dwelling units; (4) Detailed street and utility locations and sizes; (5) Parking layout; (6) Drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; (7) Grading plan and drainage plan, including two-foot contours; (8) Generalized landscape plan; (9) Generalized plan for uniform signs and lighting; (10) Plan for timing and phasing of the development; (11) Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; (12) Renderings or elevations of all sides of buildings to be constructed in the first phase of the development; (13) Trail plan; and (14) Lighting plan. Approval of the master development plan shall indicate approval of the listed items in subsections (b)(1)—(b)(14) of this section and shall occur in conjunction with rezoning of the property to RPUD. After rezoning the property to RPUD, nothing shall be constructed on the RPUD site except in conformance with the approved plans and this section. The procedure for notification of and public hearing on the master development plan shall be the same as required for a zoning map amendment by this chapter. (c) Development agreement/financial guarantee. Following the approval of the master development plan but prior to final plan approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city relating to the terms of the RPUD development, and shall also provide such financial guarantees as the city requires or deems necessary. Such agreement may take the form of: (1) A development contract; (2) A site improvement performance agreement; and/or (3) Another form of binding instrument as may be required by the city. (d) Final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan for the entire RPUD or for specific parts of the RPUD shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this division. The final site and building plan shall contain information as required by the city, including the following: (1) Detailed utility, street, grading and drainage plans; (2) Detailed building elevations and floor plans; (3) Detailed landscaping, sign and lighting plans; and (4) Detailed trail plan. (e) Substantial compliance. The final site and building plan shall be in substantial compliance with the approved master development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: (1) Buildings, parking areas, roads and trails are in substantially the same location as previously approved; (2) The number of residential living units has not increased or decreased from that approved in the master development plan; (3) The gross floor area of any individual building has not been increased from that approved in the master development plan; (4) There has been no increase in the number of stories in any building; (5) Open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original design or intended use; and (6) All special conditions required on the master development plan by the city have been incorporated into the final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans necessary prior to application for a building permit, subject to conformance with any conditions on the approval and subject to other necessary approvals by the city. (f) Simultaneous review. Applicants may combine the final site and building plan review with the master development plan review by submitting all information required for both stages simultaneously. (g) Basis for approval; conditions. In evaluating a site and building plan, the planning commission and city council shall base their recommendations and actions regarding approval of a RPUD on a consideration of the following: (1) Compatibility of the proposed plan with this section and consistency with the goals, policies, and objectives of the comprehensive plan and surface water management plan; (2) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the greatest extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general character and appearance of neighboring properties; (3) Creation of compatible relationships between buildings and open spaces both on the site and adjacent to it, incorporating natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development, giving special attention to: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community. b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (4) Promotion of energy conservation through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading; (5) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; and (6) Such other factors as the planning commission or city council deem relevant. The planning commission and city council may attach such conditions to their actions as they shall determine necessary or convenient to better accomplish the purposes of this section. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(6), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-628. -Term of approval. (a) If application has not been made for a final site and building plan approval pursuant to the approved master development plan for all or a part of the property within a RPUD by December 31 of the year following the date on which the RPUD zoning map amendment became effective or, if within that period no extension of time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of a rezoning, the approved master development plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (b) If construction on the property included within an approved final site and building plan has not started by December 31 of the year following the date on which such final site and building plan was approved or, if building construction in a phase of a RPUD approved to be built in phases has not started within this period, or, if within that period no extension of the time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of rezoning, the approved master development plan and final site and building plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(7), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-629. -Amendments. Major amendments to an approved master development plan may be approved by the city council after review by the planning commission. The notification and public hearing procedure for such amendment shall be the same as for approval of the original RPUD. A major amendment is any amendment which: (1) Substantially alters the location of buildings, parking areas or roads; (2) Increases or decreases the number of residential dwelling units; (3) Increases the gross floor area of any individual building; (4) Increases the number of stories of any building; (5) Decreases the amount of open space or alters it in such a way as to change its original design or intended use; or (6) Creates noncompliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. Any other amendment may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the council. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(8), 2-26-2001) Secs. 78-630-78-640. - Reserved.