Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6829 Doc No A10529857 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Feb 20, 2018 8:01 AM Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, County Recorder Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 59 Pkg ID 1658399E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. (rci.10A/0 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL yF G� NO. 6 8 2 9 -kf$Hp�1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1279 FILE NO. 18-3992 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2017, on behalf of the property owner, Revolution Design and Build (hereinafter the "Applicant"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 3155 Casco Circle and legally described as: Lot 38 and 39,SPRING PARK,and all that part of adjacent Vacated Lake Shore Avenue, and of the tract of land lying between said Vacated Lake Shore Avenue and the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka,which lies between the southerly extension of the west line of said Lot 39, and of the east line of said Lot 38, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow for the construction of a deck within the average lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2018, the Planning Commission opened a public hearing and recommended approval of the variances; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2018, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council continued the public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #18-3992. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6829 F G /QS HOiLt mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.69 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 123'feet at the 75 foot lake yard setback. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . . The proposed deck will be slightly taller than the previous deck but is proposed to have a smaller encroachment of 11'6" into the average lakeshore setback. The applicant has worked to mitigate the encroachment by proposing a deck that does not encroach as much compared to the previous deck. The deck will not interfere with the sightlines of the neighbors meeting the intent and purpose for the average lakeshore setback with is a sightline setback for the lake. This criteria is met. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a deck in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The 2 ,cLONp CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITYpCOUNCIL *1\1111::''‘e NO. 6827kfsH00- owner proposes to install Improvements which are residential in nature and reasonable from a residential scope. This criterion is met. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The neighboring home to the east is set back further from the lake than most of the surrounding homes resulting in the unique average lakeshore setback applied to the Property. This criterion is met c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to permit the deck will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners.This criterion is met. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for improvements to a residential structure is an allowed use in the LR-1C Zoning District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The property abuts Lake Minnetonka with both abutting neighbors setback over 130 feet from the lake. The proposed deck is angled away from the neighboring homes as to not interfere with the sightline of the lake. This criterion is met. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The subject house if located closest to the lake in the area of Casco Circle, which gently curves. This criterion is met. 3 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6829 fgKfS H ov-t 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The applicant states that the variance is necessary. A deck lakeward of the home is a customary improvement in this area. This criterion is met. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The topography and location of the adjacent home to the east create practical difficulties affecting the Property; The applicant was working within the footprint of the existing encroaching deck but is slightly taller creating a new encroachment; the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow the construction of the deck within the average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 11/08/2017 submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the construction and commencing construction of said project. An inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (February 12, 2019). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. 4 iiiiviCITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL i NO. 60 p 29 L�kESHov-`" ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 12th day of February, 2018. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: 4 / P� (/(471j1- ' Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 5 6829 I0 Resolution.OF SURVEY FGR CERTIFICATE OP SURVEY POR LEGAL ocsw ExhibitA , KEVIN KRETSCH KEVIN KRETSCH 95 OF LOTS 38 AND 99,SPRING PARK AND PART OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART Imes HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE °'«eL. m ,.« ,..reLm v. r MN LC 3Ee31083 LEGAL uESPV-Ks.v HOSSES HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA_______-------- \---------. lots 313 DM ISSUE W]E:12/04/17 a s,SPRING 0 �:�n'e° REMO. p CIRCLE 9 .r.r1,L M.rr» ..« 7 CIRCLE 3 I«.,I: 1:::-.7t=„--- - .:«° -ASC •00.E t0soo-- .«L« . r CASCO E las.00- 3�D ..P..° •°L-. -N 8507. / _ .N B30]'00' .eo.Aa OT 64 RE" mos .._ Im.x .°«. «^P m rw°. I c 1 " .,_ � p.�° >e m.« ,: e.A.mrm m wxmavw w b y�--. I f i li � � "E-to w. m-7.A i, � —_— J �i IIII g .. 're °t rrvw 4 mei'..r t Ee 1 4 iRi x' , M r. 38 1 .) 1 « i arenas III Y�I /Y` II 1 w.a.-8® •••c. r. '��^y'"�"'�� '7r Ns.r t. Ii y 39 !" 3 J .AIS 1 i 775\. i'-� Z� n r• O03TN0 i .. 1 - r)mar'.'a,r.tela ter•• /� . tY..' 1 1 �/'y N (1 4 V •-•`.12.'''' N tlRaeE 11 4.) I ('';e+.!.°.. �/' + 1 FM]NC VI $y '8 IX57NG; �. L§' is i6 1 x IA., vROPO5E0 rralY .....�'a a`«�.°�- '1 IA' „q r'I CJ- I fii fi ROUSE ` m � C, a ,m et I , •' /// 1 ' Orb 1 . 1 1 ,I — r SII � t .3-,------n4,. 1y ter+- VACATED LAKE 1gHORE ;}tENUE - �" _-? . _ + aKt. _MORE A.JErv4L .'^ W -(rdi- -.... w. -_-1 haw z 1 m • W ' -5 8'P'!0'37 r , •• -..-6 8510?] Mme\I – II - srwr • _ ' .y am - �LLJ d _ 0 w LAKE MINNETONKAM M~ LAKE MINNETONKA V EAST UPPER LAKE _ EAST UPPER LAKE '^ CRONHERG AND �'ai.'•"'V...�^.,.°..-.. r•w E 4.--...=..--...2. ------ _ ONSERC AND _� i Y, U ASSOCIATES INC.«.r:«.C•rr.....«""... _ �"_ ASSOCIATES INC. W °t !yGR " mx ii sxGlxsaru En --- rnswEnxG ex01,HAa LAM ~� �}/xux.er „px �..e..IR TyAMxnlE .,�.r/!/ - r r __- - ___ ....11/WS,Ek4xx.xs IICE CC LO LO Cle m A AS-BUILT 1p3S1INGI SRE PLAN APROPOSED SITE PLANSCALE 1,3O-Cr SCALE 1..300' SHEET s1 .1 6829 �tioJy (cit . if' c Q l+t FSI I ,k-le/ �—""� _�t1 '„„ % ,` � � I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR 8 mOUMi ET RA KEVIN KRETSCH 95E.594.5037 ZATA.MN 55391 L ' OF LOTS 38 AND 39,SPRING PARK AND PART 0►ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE HENNKPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RE� ILD COM ilioi61i1 .lir. r,o; - MEMSES 5n. , . _ -. 1ao'n': xr eor:°a vr w aecrZ Ya.no5wrw" ISSUE DATE 12/04/17 ( CSCOQooRCLE . vmr ya«m 'aa.� REVISMS AN83 ..E 105.09 • eloneloo won...kw sal a"nr«.n mgr.ra"e -OT 64 MIS ...r PANM,.a„E. FJOSIING IXTERIOR PHOTO __Y---- 1Ill • "'v"'' v. "r,..� 44.1.4 1 . 19 3 • 1 11''' Fir i '\ {.sr> A I I I pp �''}� hl g.. IXSTNGi ... ' rl�tl ^°°r'^ .77 ®« f, rNri.5i911A"i�1ir [ . C 1..1.E 11tril:Hcus:: !!^.� a , .a." ,e. --:a ,r 41 1 f ,1-a Iv n 1 C J.r - ATED La E#HORE , NUE '" V 0 _, 6,--,"- - LU ©EXISTING EXTERIOR PHOTO "" — Z LU .,r m 127 a7 ' '^ m = II 111= i - ------- . , Y CC ,;: "_ _ LAKE = 3 I I f I Z�,....�.�■�..Ei� MINNETONKA C,� U �. _ !s -1'1'� I1 _ ...� EAST UPPER LAKE "� '^ e _ _ GRON8ERG AND ^•erfi''i7°::::.....1.7.:::`,...,=;..,',.., w _ U) U . iLJ„ r.11' _.- --.. ASSOCIATES INC - `•"'" � � _ a �, rY��.' A112 E70SDNGISTEP PLAN , SHE ©EXISTING EXTERIOR PHOTO A1 .1 6829 Jt�oly �Ov %�m5 *31 AG 817nm1 I ---—_ , I . J ISSUE OM:12/00„7 L' _ I 1 /\ I I , , ^ ..... I I / / > i i h\ / / / 1 PROPD`?,?,—PLAN STM a�.,ia�•,�o W U 2 W III _ ZEn E -III _ 11.11 •I'— •I— —— El I•■ - W o =111 w =�n nn n _ � _ rA i E IIIIIIIIII Iglgll!IIIIII''I 1111111 ,^ o- h 1111111 0III0 11111111111@110111umlmuur lllllllllll, 1 ,I II E = 's _ .11...yI�I �I YYYyI _I_ ...- -L-,, ,.I 11111111 III 111 11 II a 11 1111 V, IIII II I ;�fl. w y^„ -# mvmusi ® 1■ �{IIIIIIIIIII I I1II III'•. _— mucus =_',___.______ � 2 1 I_ 1,— QuaU 111:-.71111$3:7.2 . — pa II 3_ ` Jllfl, !I II T _IIFri �' ;1.. , g W C7 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION s�EEr SCALE 1/81-101 SCALE 1/8_10 SCALE:1/8.101A1 .2 6829 0..„.„, Irigior 0 wycit , ac:7. a I ;,, . Il . .,,,,,, ,„„, /....M ear .... ..A,, ,. ,B110 MANEILI3101 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BOULEVARD ) ri,m r"..........),,- WAYZATA PANI 55391 I , ....- 211 i. : --s1 11. a ll .I.1 KEVIN KRETSCH Ili 214.!•144 IN mil"pli91111119121111101 OF LOTS 38 AND 39 SPRING PARK AND PART OF ADJACENT VACATED LAKE SHORE AVENUE ° ,=.:.,T,' °.72. **,!"z.z „...:,,„ —m GIEVCLUIIENCEISIGNOIALDOOM HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA.------- MN...53- 1853 . . 'n'n...-----_--- SM.0.518 12/04/17 )9 AEveRANS 4 Will' A g i Ct--hcO CIRCLN Nre7.0.0 E ,o,soo .,.. t” LOT64 ..,'''..1,-r.? O PROPOSED DECK PERSPECTIVE PENCERING ___W------ s. , / \,, 1 , _ . 1. W:annninrtp.arel:orm."Z.g:c.•51VZINN i S i 4_, , ni N O•e;:m r•or cl•tr'::n,77.:114.'•eN. 1 l'( ..., . . I I 1* • n I 1 { n 38 ..• , riik ),.....-SOK 1 i I Ila I 3, 3)von fkm.-3631 III iiii ,. ..... I I VI '''.''L''"4 7::::712:4:14:'tro•I' \ 4 0 7; ir--lri"'CH Ma iii -% DASTM Ff I NOV. '•••'...NOLP .....7:,..,.4.:"::.:en.: , ..,ii,r.71,al. ma LIMP' t / A PROPOSFD or t. II 1 I 1 WIMP fh,I ,i IN 111 1 II own 1 ', ,li ,As:, If 4' ,, A IA1 Fr 1 i ED „1.- * 41 k _,, 2„_,r---\...,, ,,, - , • q ; - ,.. .:. ,-- 1 .... * it.. -T-i-k ° - - 1--- ---'-------- , Aiopt_ A,/f NV. W iCt —1 i F.S.C. __--- ,. , `7•)— 0 .-, 0•-,,:,..,..,,..., - -..1.,,, -4,.,R — ------- CO .,''' '. IA 0 ..,„, t t, S. ----'"-T+-- 12,97 .. S) ....• 5 esno 27-,,,"A 2,..._ ,,..: UJ .00 IJJ z , hi .4 pi moll. VA, , ---;--_--,,,,v--,i0— vrev- •1111 I -1-rA ., .. I.as / LAKE 1 :23.114,11,..111 11-1101 Li I MINNETONKA —... L3 1.1 EAST UPPER LAKE OM Oliiiiiligai i inE 41,.. , 01111 ..... En ff, ...._ 8335,15C 015156&LAND i itC CC n ,..A A FO SITE PLAN PROPOSED CEO(PERSPECTIVE RENDERING @ A1 .3