Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-20-2017 Planning Commission Packet PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE oi1)I 2O , 20)7 0 COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information for City records PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. - �, c_ '� a-i4eS i `(izt 7- 3�� c 2. ; del r ��iIt O/V0-1/ 73 L5 Cty j 6(4 /23 V 4. Lail 09-42 we IC__ a--i to Cd S c0 5. OvVA-I tAA.1cv. ► .c_ 2 10( ne.e_e, (;41‘,4) 53-51. I 6. -,G QI- ens (-) 3 sv To, pi� 6l , S�3 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:1(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC --,.4i.1r1i I 411,1=_1.Zi.e.xIew-v-e-g,iEtjsraraAti.--i=l-z.le-iTxZlaWm..mvEiNM-AiamNdIN..e: �_,,�t, im az .. m �.�pg.moi_"�•11r.. �1,/Irr , ( 0* � .III.. — -._ ,_ *h-#ile'1 *+r'i1 1110L. �� gs� qt. �, UM IL *,G.fncitil€. l" �1�� -�NI 4. dik#* gKESHOP� .4:.. 1.1 Al 1 j`s.T ! "RC MN 11■ 41111 - / Legend 111 ► t � �, lll ► � �, i .' ' City Limits y ��17'll�r/ t� �� ~• l& 't `- 1111Lik � + Parcels(8-1-2017) ,.,��� � . # -11 ; a ow�- 11 Eri� . �I��I ■ I`iti , i mimM az,, 44 Ittimmwatioy o r. WI11 III ma .Ill-�l����ti AGENDA P �!!'�ilj '.E�i ��� j.�� � City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for ',�rtlr! X1/4 R'_ r �� November 20, 2017; 6:30 PM 111 #P741 -i�1111111 PM NW art/ 11I11�I�i�' " SIN.gill ■allied a + Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, flit �=ui�l�lm gm liME �� Orono, MN 55356 � a� 4141 I t `` +952-2494600/www.ci.orono.mn.us - �E — j4i . � fr Council Representative: Dennis Walsh I -71 m S. '+fir+ Pillib 11 New Business ♦A�'I f .� 4% 1. Approval of Planning �Ar . �*+ , Commission Meeting Minutes #*P �'�CS `� ��`++ar R11t of October 16, 2017. %4rt „�` "Is++"�1*,{#{+#r 2. 17-3979 Kimberly Schottler, *; . 1� 2740 Shadywood Road, I:* nalion 4e 4,,..« After-the-Fact Variances t" Nil ttl tc�tc'I il,tt E t.,:1I 1 (Staff: Melanie Curtis) msµ, 3. 17-3980 Shawn Wischmeier, .7.` , '; °r �111�� II #17-3981 .t�_ i 540 Bi Island, a 111IMMih. f 4 . • 9 �■■-1r�r�ru`��.■..0�1■ f tt 1 After-the-Fact Variance 11��1� +' r /ffl�i , (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 111111„I, '� � / �r ,t��u�`'` j 4. 17-3981 Todd &Angie Olson, kill Ii,_�•�. belt _ 4ii VW3325 C stal Ba Road, - ry y 111111=uruu■uuay'+Y �irfi+ i Variances `wring Palk . .��■I■■■I■■■ ildh, ,"1ia- 44 � t (Staff: Laura Oakden) I!�= ItIIuIiiii rilltiiiii iuii, r! 5. 17-3986 Travis DeJong, 1,E■ ����nlr-.•.■ri Illi, i 1270 Wildhurst Trail, �'�'�m 1 I-1fM II�I I-��-�' Conditional Use Permit ! +441, ' .'1 � ��, = a��. 0 ffi * (Staff: Melanie Curtis) �� TII6. 17-3988 Lake West Development on -., "" = #+'� 4j11 4`,� � �• 100. behalf of Rick Lupient, 14, it. �� �� � r '� PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, 1.19 .�� ,�1_ � � VIS�t `� 46,1,- 20-117-23-42-0002,and ` P `` imp ik1 1�1� * • 20-117-23-42-0003, f = ��/ � , +� "3508” Ivy Place,Variances „ �/ a`♦ �� 4 s ` 7. 17-3989 Lake West(Staff: Laura OAl ve Development on ` f4#ge #t�'ilt rilin f�� 4��I WMto .. #� behalf of Rick Lupient, �'We .4 li�1i r1litilrfr4 # 1. i t+t PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, C///t'leir• * #17-3988 , tr 20-117-23-42-0002, and : 17-3989 ..# 3 20-117-23-42-0003, t 1�� a► "3508" Ivy Place,Vacation */ # 4.f:117-3990 • (Staff: Laura Oakden) ,,fj► > �; • 980 8. 17-3990 Lake West Development on 1r 111 IL sy- behalf of Rick Lupient, ?46,_ �� �$ %n.m■■u.111.e.n.■■.■■mI7�■■-uI-1 PIDs 20-117-23-42-0001, .,+ � +�.�' 20-117-23-42-0002, and % an 20-117-23-42-0003, 'ivE*4, ■'��i�� �• 0 "3508" Ivy Place, *+ ,� Conditional Use Permits (Staff: Laura Oakden) � 1Disclaimer: +/— ■ - This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a ® 0 1,120 Feet B O LTO N survey and isnot entoended to be u ed as one.This drawing is a compilation of records,information,and data & M E N K located your'' eet,ng city,county,and state offices,and other a affecting the area shown,and is to be used for reference purpos nly.The City of Orono is not ©Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 11/17/2017 8:25 AM for any inaccuracies herein contained. Real People.Real Solutions. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Kevin Landgraver,Bruce Lemke,Denise Leskinen,Loren Schoenzeit,and Jon Schwingler. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart,City Planner Melanie Curtis,City Planner Laura Oakden,and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Dennis Walsh was present. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.,followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. NEW BUSINESS Leskinen moved,Landgraver seconded,to amend the agenda,with Item No.3 being heard first and Items 2,4,and 5 being combined. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18,2017 Lemke moved,Leskinen seconded,to approve the minutes of the September 18,2017,Planning Commission meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0,Landgraver Abstained. 3. #17-3966 LDK BUILDERS ON BEHALF OF LINDA AND DARRELL TAMOSUINAS, 1525 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD,VARIANCES, 6:33 P.M.—6:39 P.M. Scott Koppandraye,LDK Builders,and Darrell and Linda Tamosuinas,Applicants,were present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance,lot area and lot width variances in order to build a new home that will be located 29.6 feet from the rear property line. The lot is substandard. The applicant plans to demolish the existing home and detached garage. The existing detached garage is nonconforming due to its close proximity to the property line. Due to the contours of the lot,they are requesting a rear yard setback variance to allow them to be 29.6 feet away from the street side of the lot instead of the standard 50 feet,which is a 20.4 foot encroachment. The applicant states that positioning the garage further away from the road creates issues with the downward slope of the driveway,creating a hazard in the winter months. Included in the memo is a lot analysis,which goes along with the setbacks required for this parcel. Also included is an analysis of the practical difficulties. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the lot area,width and the rear setback. If the applicant wishes to do that in the future,they might experience challenges as they are currently at 24.6 percent hardcover on the site,with the maximum hardcover being 25 percent. The applicant is not requesting a hardcover variance as part of this application. In addition,the lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot and the curved road creates a small building envelope. The applicant will need to address how water will be managed on the site so it will not direct water to any neighboring properties. Page 1 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable and recommends approval contingent on submittal of an updated grading plan to ensure water will not be directed onto neighboring properties. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Scott Koppandraye,LDK Builders, stated their biggest concern was the curvature of the road in the front. The proposed house will sit further back. Thiesse asked if they plan to install stairs down to the lake. Koppandraye indicated there are none currently,and that if that should change at some point, they will reduce the driveway hardcover. Thiesse asked whether that should be addressed now. Oakden stated the applicants are not required to have lake access,but if they choose to add stairs at some point in the future,they should be aware that they are getting close to the hardcover limit. Thiesse asked if they will be meeting the 30-foot height requirement. Koppandraye indicated they will be. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Thiesse stated there is a definite practical difficulty given the steepness of the lot. Landgrver moved,Leskinen seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3966,LDK Builders on behalf of Linda and Darrell Tamosuinas, 1525 Long Lake Boulevard,granting of a rear yard setback variance,lot area and lot width variances. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 2. #17-3947 PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY,209 WALTERS PORT LANE AND 210 PENCE LANE,VARIANCES,6:39 P.M.—8:14 P.M. 4. #17-3970 PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY,2709 WALTERS PORT LANE,VARIANCES,6:39 P.M.—8:14 P.M. 5. #17-3971 PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY,2710 PENCE LANE,VARIANCES,6:39 P.M.—8:14 P.M. William and Sue Dunkley,Applicants,and Paul Vogstrom,Builder,were present. Curtis stated the applicants own two adjoining properties located at 2709 Walters Port Lane and 2710 Pence Lane. The applicants would like to move the common lot line between the two properties. The property line movement will help them accomplish their lot layout and property improvement goals. Page 2 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. In order to move forward,three separate applications have been made involving a number of variances. Tonight the applications will be reviewed together and the public hearings held together for purposes of efficiency. As proposed,the following variances have been identified supporting the administrative lot line adjustment: 1. A lot width variance for 2710 Pence Lane,which is currently the larger lot. It will become the smaller lot of the two once the property line is relocated. 2. A variance from City Code Section 82-256 to permit creation of a second back lot. 3. A variance from City Code Section 82-256 from the lot area requirements of a back lot. A back lot requires 150 percent of the district requirements. This lot just meets that requirement. 4. A variance from the requirement for back lot setbacks meeting 150 percent of the side yard setback standards for 2710 Pence. 5. A variance from City Code Section 18-136 which allows up to two residential lots to be served via a private driveway. This variance is triggered by the addition of the 2709 Walters Port property being addressed off of Pence. 6. A variance from the requirement that a 30-foot wide back lot access outlot,or 50-foot wide private road outlot(with a minimum of 24 feet in paved width)be created to serve the three lots. For 2709 Walters Port a variance is requested for the hardcover within the 75-foot setback relating to structural improvements to the home as well as a lake setback variance and an average lakeshore setback variance for the structural improvements to the home,the retaining walls,and a drivable path within the 75-foot setback needing a setback variance. The 75-foot setback cuts the home off at the addition. The applicants are proposing to use the addition as a connection to the home. For 2710 Pence Lane, an average lakeshore setback variance for the new home is requested as the proposed home is about halfway through the average lakeshore setback. In addition,a lake setback variance is required for the proposed retaining walls and a drivable path within the 75-foot setback. Staff provided individual practical difficulties analysis in each respective report. Curtis stated in the interests of time tonight, Staff will entertain discussion on specific criteria rather than review each specific criteria. Regarding the variance to facilitate the boundary line changes,out of 14 of the standards necessary for granting the variance,nine were not met and three were not applicable. Staff generally supports the reconfiguration of lot boundaries. However,the current proposal requires variances from City Code which potentially introduce long-term risks to protections required by the City Code. As a result, Staff cannot support this boundary line adjustment that is such a deviation from City standards. As proposed, Staff recommends denial of the application. As it relates to 2709 Walters Port,the preceding variance request to move the lot line lays the groundwork for the administrative lot line rearrangement and results in a proposed area for this property of 3.6 acres. Page 3 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Although they are gaining a significant amount of lot area,the property owners are proposing an addition which will triple the size of the home on the property,adding more structure and hardcover within the already burdened average setback and lake setback areas. They are proposing the connection in the most inconspicuous place possible,which will also avoid impact impacting the existing generator and mechanicals on the side of the home. However,the existing conditions do not necessarily constitute a practical difficulty supporting the variances. In addition,the necessity for the work proposed within the 75-foot setback area to install retaining walls and create a driving path for ATVs and lawn maintenance vehicles is partially self-created. The tree removal on the lake slope and the grading were done without City permits. The applicant was directed to provide a detailed restoration plan,some of which may be addressed on the landscape plan. However,the proposed lakeshore retaining walls are not supported by a practical difficulty in the opinion of Staff. As it regards 2710 Pence Lane,the applicants' preceding variance request results in a restriction of the buildable envelope for the new home on the property as it is getting quite a bit smaller. As currently configured,the property had ample opportunity for a new residence to meet the required average lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing a new home on the newly created lot which will increase the mass of the structure on the property within the average lakeshore setback. The applicant is also proposing to increase the mass on the east side,possibly further impacting the property owner to the east. The limited building area on the property after the lot line rearrangement results in the applicant creating existing conditions which do not necessarily constitute a practical difficulty supporting the variances. In addition,the necessity for the work proposed within the 75-foot setback area to install retaining walls and create a driving path is partially self-created. The tree removal on the lake slope and the grading were done without City oversight. The applicant was directed to provide a detailed restoration plan. The Planning Commission should open a public hearing to address each of the specific applications, receive comments from the public and review them as necessary. Three separate motions should be made regarding the three separate applications. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff Sue Dunkley,Applicant,stated they have lived at 2709 Walters Port since 1984. The adjoining property was purchased recently and discussions have been had with the City since May regarding the proposals. Dunkley noted they received an email at 6:32 p.m. Friday night that raised the back lot issue,which had never had come up before. Dunkley stated they do not have a variance request submitted for that because they were not aware of it but that they have attached information regarding all the other variance requests. Dunkley indicated she did speak with Melanie about the back lot earlier in the day. Dunkley stated their house sits on .56 acres,with the house being built in the 1950s. Dunkley commented the house is very sandwiched on the lot and that they were very excited about being able to purchase the other lot and bring their lot more into compliance. Dunkley stated when they started having discussions with Staff in May,they knew there were lots of questions and issues that would need to be addressed. Dunkley stated they knew they would be able to Page 4 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. handle the width of the road,and after meeting with all the neighbors,who expressed opposition to a 50- foot wide road,they decided to propose a 16-foot road width. Dunkley indicated they did meet with the fire department to discuss access to Walters Port and Pence Lane and as a result of the proposed improvements, access would be majorly improved. Currently Walters Port is a private road and Pence is a private driveway. Dunkley indicated they met between 15 and 20 times with the City and it never occurred to her when they closed on the property in August that there was not something that could be done. Dunkley stated the lot with their house on it would have three more acres added to it,bringing it up to 3.56 acres,and in order to do the improvements,they were going to sell a 140-foot wide,one-acre lot. Dunkley stated they bought 4.02 acres and that their hope is that there is a way to make this work so they can have two beautiful homes. Altogether there is 320 feet of lakeshore. Dunkley noted they did offer to the Huelers a portion of the property at the price they purchased it for, which did not work out. As a result,the circular piece was moved closer to their current house in order to provide more privacy for the Huelers. Dunkley stated the Huelers have to travel approximately 600 feet over their land. Dunkley stated she is hopeful that with the four plus acres they now own,they will somehow be able to have two beautiful homes. Dunkley stated her husband injured his arm and hip in an accident in 1981 and that they would really like the drivable access to the lakeshore. Dunkley stated they would like to move forward with their applications and go before the City Council on Monday. Paul Vogstrom,Builder, stated they did look at a number of options with the lot and how to provide access to it which meet the code requirements of the City. Vogstrom stated in his opinion this is a perfect example of where a variance is needed due to the setting. Part of the process was to try and create a safe driveway as well as to provide adequate emergency vehicle access. As a result,two access points were created,one for Walters Port and the existing one for Pence,which will only be for emergency vehicle access. Vogstrom noted they did present this as a sketch plan last month. What changed from the sketch plan is that there used to be a turnaround more in the middle of the lot. Vogstrom indicated they are also trying to minimize the hardcover by removing the portion of Walters Port that goes into the Dunkley's home currently and instead have the circular area in front of the existing home. Vogstrom stated they are trying to maintain everyone's privacy between the lots as well as along the roadway. Vogstrom noted he also met with the fire chief and that they have incorporated two areas where cars can pass one another. Sue Dunkley stated there are two places to pass around another vehicle and that they would like to make the area more landscaped and better taken care of. Dunkley indicated they are willing to plant lots of trees. Vogstrom pointed out the two fire hydrants on the property. Vogstrom commented this property illustrates a perfect situation for a variance and that they are trying to meet the requirements for access by improving safety and allowing Walters Port to also have access. Page 5 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Mark Howry,Landscape Designer,stated they worked with the Dunkleys and Staff at taking an overall comprehensive look at the lot and that it is a very difficult project due to the lot configuration. Howry noted four more items came up today that they were not aware of and that it is not a straight forward lot. Howry commented there is no other lot like this on Lake Minnetonka and that there are still some issues that will need to be worked through. Howry stated in their view they have done a great job at working with Staff and minimizing hardcover. The big issue was the second entrance for the emergency vehicles, which will be a locked gate and not a pass-through. Howry pointed out the existing walls along the lakeshore. Due to Bill's accident,they would like to plant switch backs so a vehicle can be driven down to the lake. Howry stated there is a property on Kelly that also has a switch back that was approved by the City. Howry indicated they will also plant vegetation to make the terraced area more natural. As it relates to the wetland area,work is being done in conjunction with Solutions Blue,a civil engineering company,and wetland delineations have been done. Howry noted they will be purchasing some wetland credits and making the pond bigger. As it relates to access,there will be the turnaround up top,which will improve the access and allow for better stormwater management and improve water runoff. In addition,a portion of Walters Port will be eliminated and turned into green space. Howry stated their plan is to add more evergreens for screening as well as deciduous and ornamental trees and making it more of a naturalized wetland. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Greg Hueler,2715 Pence Lane, stated they researched lake property for five years before purchasing their current home,and that what they found after working with the builders and architects was that there were a lot of restrictions along the lake that would prevent them from building the house they had originally envisioned. As a result,the plans for the house were altered and scaled down. When Pence Lane came on the market,a decision was made to purchase that property and sell the Kelly Avenue property because the Pence Lane property already had a house on it,had the necessary easements that protect their access, and is beautifully wooded. Kelly Hueler stated while they are new to Orono,their understanding is that all the residents live under the same City Code regardless of how long they have lived here. Hueler stated while the Dunkleys have lived here for a very long time and they would have loved to come to a compromise,they purchased the Pence Lane property for the privacy they had anticipated with a private drive with only two other homes in the area. Hueler indicated they went through quite an exercise when building their home to comply with as many of the regulations as possible and that they should have a reasonable right to expect that the City Code and regulations would continue to apply to other properties in the area. Hueler noted their easement is a recorded legal right. Hueler stated when they first found out about this project,they were very shocked and surprised,but they decided it would be in everyone's best interests to try to work with the Dunkleys and to try to communicate. Hueler stated they are quite familiar with real estate and the need for communication with the applicants and the City. Hueler stated they were shocked when they learned that there had been conversations with members of the City Council prior to them even being aware of this project. Hueler noted City Council Member Richard Crosby lives on Walters Port and that he and other families will benefit quite a bit with the changes to Walters Port. Page 6 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Hueler stated the fact of the matter is that on Pence Lane there is only one other property next to them, which could potentially be subdivided,but to say the variances being requested are justifiable is not accurate. Hueler noted they made repeated attempts to communicate with the Dunkleys as well as left a letter in their mailbox as a last ditch effort requesting a discussion about their continued concerns and received no response. Hueler indicated they then had to have their attorney write a letter,which was not a minor thing for homeowners who are not attorneys,and that they do not have the resources to deal with this type of a situation. Hueler stated it is a hardship to be engaging in this situation and that it is City's government's job to determine what is appropriate. Hueler stated they were unwilling to pay the lakeshore price the Dunkleys wanted for the lane and that they did not understand why the Dunkleys wanted them to pay for a lot that has no lakeshore access,no lakeshore view,and is not buildable at a price that included what the Dunkleys had paid for their lakeshore. Hueler indicated they had real estate people come out as well as appraisers to look at the land and that they told the Dunkleys they could not pay that much for the land. Hueler indicated they offered to buy a smaller section of the land,which was not acceptable to the Dunkleys,and that Mr. Dunkley told them the price was nonnegotiable. Greg Hueler stated Mr. Dunkley also said they would be paying for part of the retaining walls by the marsh and part of the driveway. When asked why they should pay for that,they were told it was nonnegotiable and communication ceased by the Dunkleys. Kelly Hueler stated they left on vacation over Labor Day and came home to a dramatically altered land. Hueler indicated they were not given any fair warning except for a demolition order for the home. Hueler stated when they arrived home,in their driveway was a large backhoe and a bobcat,with huge stumps and boulders pulled out of the lake area all the way down to the shore. Hueler indicated they called the City but someone had already called in and a stop work order had been issued. Hueler stated she could not get out of her driveway that morning to get to work and that the situation was very intimidating. Hueler stated the Dunkleys know they did not notify them about the work and that they are now in a situation where they are wondering how any project like this could get passed when citizens' rights are supposed to be equal. Hueler commented reasonable people can disagree but they need to follow the law and not thumb their noses at City ordinances and City Code. Hueler commented she is not sure what they are supposed to do as neighbors when they did what they did to the lakeshore. Greg Hueler stated their easement rights specifically state that 2710 and 2715 share the driveway and that additional homes cannot be added to that driveway without their cooperation. Hueler commented it is unfortunate they have to be here tonight. Kelly Hueler noted they did not say anything at the July meeting but that they tried to be neighborly and present a reasonable solution but they unfortunately have gotten nowhere. Thiesse asked if the easement document is still in flux. Greg Hueler indicated it is and that they do not expire. Kelly Hueler stated easements are legally recorded and are still in play. William Dunkley,Applicant,stated they did try to reach an agreement and that he offered the Huelers the land at the same price they paid for it. Dunkley stated while the Huelers were not purchasing lakeshore, they also were not buying marshland. Dunkley stated for the last month and a half their lawyers have Page 7 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. been contacting his lawyers,and when lawyers are talking back and forth,the neighbors are not talking. Dunkley stated the bottom line is that the Huelers have an easement to drive 600 feet on land he now owns and that they share the agreement for maintenance. Dunkley noted they will be making the driveway twice as wide and improving it and the Huelers do not have to pay for that. Dunkley commented all the Huelers have is a right to drive on the land and that he is not sure what the dispute is for them. Thiesse stated the easement allows them to be on the land. Dunkley stated that is undisputed and that the Huelers will always have that right. Dunkley stated it is their land and that they can make the driveway nicer and wider and relocate it. Dunkley noted he has two attorney opinions that support that. Dunkley stated if the Huelers have a legal issue,there are legal remedies and they can either commence an arbitration or sue,but that they will always have the easement. Dunkleys stated it is their land however. Schoenzeit asked if they are parking on it or blocking the Huelers' access in any way. William Dunkley stated one morning a company removing a tree blocked their way out and that he is not sure how that happened. Dunkley indicated he was not there at the time. Schoenzeit asked if the Dunkleys know they cannot block it long-term. Dunkley stated they are absolutely aware of that. Sue Dunkley noted when the driveway is paved,there will be an issue and that they will need to figure something out. William Dunkley stated that is why they proposed the road be 16 feet wide as opposed to 12 feet wide so cars can pass by each other. Dunkley stated they are proposing to make the road wider and safer and that they will be paying for it. Dunkley stated the Huelers have a permanent easement to use the driveway. Thiesse asked about the stop work order. Sue Dunkley stated the previous owners of the house had the right to remove anything from the house that they wanted prior to demolition. Dunkley indicated they did not touch the house and that the former owners removed a lot of stuff from the house. Curtis noted the work that occurred on the interior of the house happened prior to the demolition order was issued and that the stop work order was posted for the work within 75 feet of the lake. Mark Howry stated the tree removal company started removing boulders that were up against the back of the house and not near the water. The tree removal company then started removing buckthorn and a large concrete foundation. Sue Dunkley commented there used to be a boathouse down there. Howry stated once that was removed,they graded everything out and placed straw down. Page 8 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen asked if they were aware that a permit is required for any work along the lakeshore,such as tree removal and boulder removal. Sue Dunkley stated she is now. Howry stated they did not want them to do that and that they corrected it as fast as we could. William Dunkley stated they did not demo anything until after they got a permit. Schoenzeit stated they are not talking about the salvage of the items in the house but that they are speaking of the work within 75 feet of the lakeshore. Schoenzeit stated the landscape architect should have known better and that type of work is completely unacceptable. Schoenzeit stated it is important that any project in the future respect that no work is to be done in the 0-75 foot zone and that he wants to hear how that work will be undone. Schoenzeit stated he also sees as part of this project that the applicant has managed to get their dream property but that he would see if they can make the project work with the one lot. Schoenzeit stated the attempt to recoup their costs for the property appears to be pushing the project over the edge. Paul Vogstrom stated going back to the variances,they can do the project to conform with city codes, which means that they have to construct a 50-foot wide road with a cul-de-sac. Vogstrom noted he had nothing to do with the work in the 0-75 foot zone and that he does not know why that happened. Vogstrom commented the project makes sense but that the neighbors would rather not have them meet code because it means they will have to construct a really wide driveway. Vogstrom indicated they are trying to propose something that makes sense for the whole neighborhood,the Huelers and the lake area, and that in his view this project does that. William Dunkley commented the other neighbors feel their project is fine. Vogstrom stated this project is a perfect example of why a variance is needed for the road. Vogstrom noted they are creating a new access to Walters Port,which will help the residents on that road. Vogstrom indicated they did have conversations with the neighbors prior to doing this project and that everybody is happy about it but that there is a disconnect between the Huelers and the Dunkleys. Thiesse noted there are a lot of variances that are being requested. Thiesse asked how many variances are being requested. Curtis noted the City does not require a 50-foot paved road as part of the platting of an outlot for either a private road or an improved private driveway but that the City requires a 50-foot easement. Curtis stated in a redevelopment like this,it might be appropriate for some type of variance,but that some of the other variances are not appropriate because they are in complete contradiction to the requirements of the City. It is Staff's belief that the applicants can work out a solution with the fire department to take the place of the cul-de-sac. Thiesse stated if they were not to access the existing house from Pence and kept it off of Walters Port, that variance would be eliminated. Page 9 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Vogstrom stated he would like to handle one variance at a time and that he would like to discuss why they are necessary. Sue Dunkley stated part of the problem was the entrance into Walters Port. Thiesse commented now that they own the land,they can bring it out and around. Vogstrom stated there is also the wetland and some other challenges. Sue Dunkley stated their hope was to come in through the nice gated area,which creates the need for a couple of variances. Greg Hueler stated a couple of the things said by the Dunkleys are not in full disclosure. Kelly Hueler stated they would like to stay with the facts,which is what the Planning Commission should deal with. Hueler noted they are the only home on Pence Lane and they are the only homeowners that are being impacted this way. The landowners on Walters Port are being provided benefits and that they can understand those benefits because they are reasonable people. Hueler stated it does not,however, give the Dunkleys the opportunity to harm or take away from the rights of another citizen because there is only one on the shared driveway. Hueler stated the easement is a relatively complex document and it speaks very clearly to several things. The one thing that has not been mentioned is the fact that the easement gives everyone an undivided interest in the entrance to Pence Lane off of Kelly Avenue. Hueler noted there are three homes that share that right but yet they were initially told by the Dunkleys that since they now own two of the homes,that takes precedence. Hueler stated they had to calmly tell the Dunkleys that that tactic won't work because it is an undivided interest and that it would be better to discuss it and come to a reasonable solution. Hueler commented they are the only house on Pence Lane and the only one impacted by this development in the way they are being impacted. Hueler noted the new home will be triple the size of the existing house but the new home next to it will significantly generate more traffic on the driveway and will impact her property. Hueler stated this project will impact them and it needs to be dealt with in a rational, reasonable way. Hueler stated to tell them that there is a nonnegotiable price was untenable to them and that they are not in a position to spend their resources like that. Greg Hueler stated they do not dispute that the Dunkleys own the property,but the dispute is that the easement actually requires all affected parties to agree on what happens to the driveway. Hueler noted the Dunkleys cannot legally widen it without their agreement. Kelly Hueler commented it is not as simple as the way it is being presented. William Dunkley stated that last statement by Greg Hueler is absolutely untrue. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Thiesse asked if there is a specific reason why only one back lot is allowed. Page 10 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated the back lot rule was created for properties that have the acreage to subdivide but not the frontage. In the situation of a back lot,the City would require a 30-foot wide access lot be platted that provides access through the front lot to the back lot. Under City Code,the back lot area should be 150 percent of the zoning district requirement and the depth of the required street yard setback shall be 150 percent of the zoning district requirements. Thiesse asked if the second back lot would be alleviated if the existing home keeps their driveway on Walters Port. Curtis indicated it would because then the Hueler's lot would be the only back lot. Schoenzeit stated in his view the applicants need to bring back a revised plan. Curtis stated from Staff's standpoint,the issue with the application is the disregard for the access outlot creation and that a dedicated outlot is key in this scenario for the future. Curtis noted the Walters Port corridor is 20 feet wide and is smaller than some driveways in the City. If there is a way to plat a corridor that meets the guideline of the Council and the Planning Commission that will satisfy the access and the frontage requirements,that would go a long way to alleviating Staffs concerns. Curtis stated City Code requires a cul-de-sac if a private road is being created,but a variance can be granted to allow for alternate accommodations,and the applicant and the fire department have been working on that. Schoenzeit stated he is in favor of tabling the application and having the applicant bring back something clean because it is not the work of the Planning Commission to straighten out the application. Vogstrom noted there was a sketch plan review and everyone seemed to be on the same page at that time. Curtis noted there was a platted outlot on the sketch plan which has gone away. Vogstrom stated that can be put back on. Vogstrom stated he would prefer to discuss the variances rather than tabling it at this point. Schoenzeit noted Staff recommended denials on each application and that in his view it is kind of selfish on their part to be trying to get the Planning Commission to fix their incomplete application. Vogstrom stated there are a number of issues that have not been discussed at all. Schoenzeit stated the plan has gone backwards from the sketch plan. Vogstrom stated the reason for creating the outlot was that they were attempting to sell a piece to the Huelers and he did not know about the back lot variance until last week Friday. Vogstrom indicated he went over their applications a number of times with Staff and that he is very frustrated that they are not being able to be heard on the variances in front of the Planning Commission. Thiesse commented he has not seen an application with this many variances before. Schoenzeit suggested the applicant reduce the number of variances being requested. Vogstrom stated the Planning Commission needs to understand the project and why they are requesting the variances. Page 11 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission does understand the application and that variances are allowed when there is a practical difficulty. Thiesse indicated he is having a problem with the creation of a second back lot. Thiesse stated the first variance is a lot width variance for 2710 Pence. Curtis stated the applicants have indicated they could resolve the lot width variance. Schoenzeit noted when a new lot is being created,it should be conforming. Thiesse noted the second variance being requested is the creation of a second back lot and a third variance from the requirements of a back lot. Curtis indicated that is correct. Curtis stated it is a 1-acre lot. Thiesse stated the fourth variance is from the 150 percent of the setback standards and that Item No. 5 is where the outlot would come in. Curtis stated in her view a lot of the variances build on each other and hinge on the access outlot or the private road. Curtis stated if they create a private road,it would become frontage and it would not be a back lot situation.. Thiesse asked if that is what was presented originally in the sketch plan. Curtis stated she does not believe they presented a 50-foot wide corridor but they did present an outlot. Leskinen stated she has a concern about the easement,and the way she reads it is that it requires all parties to agree on any change or maintenance or repair of the driveway that are a part of the easement. Leskinen stated if the parties are not in agreement,it may be a nonissue. Thiesse stated if an outlot is created,the question is whether everybody will have access to it. Thiesse stated the easement will not work anymore because they will not be able to connect to the outlot. Vogstrom stated he is not sure since that issue just came up on Friday and they will need to address that. Sue Dunkley noted the easement covers the area before the gate and consists of around 100-plus feet, which is before the gate. Dunkley stated anything inside the gate is their land and that the Huelers will need to travel 635 feet on their land. Dunkley noted Pence was a city road at some time. Thiesse stated the easement is a legal document that the Planning Commission will not be discussing. Sue Dunkley stated it is the 135 feet from the gate to Kelly and that it has nothing to do with the huge, long driveway coming in. Thiesse recommended someone submit something to the City stating that. Thiesse asked if the outlot needs to be near Pence. Curtis stated it does not and that the applicants could propose to move the driveway. Thiesse stated anything going to the outlot would need to be accessed by the Huelers. Page 12 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Sue Dunkley stated the Huelers will be able to access it and that they just moved the circle so the traffic would be away from the Huelers so they could keep their privacy. Dunkley indicated they can put the driveway back where it was. Lemke asked if the Planning Commission can approve some of the variances. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission can take them one at a time. Schoenzeit commented he has a problem with the rest of the variances where the first premise is wrong and that the applications should either be tabled or denied as presented. Thiesse stated he would like to discuss the applications further. Landgraver stated he is in agreement with what Chair Thiesse said. Curtis suggested the Planning Commission provide direction on each request because the applicant would like to move forward to the City Council. Thiesse stated he appreciates the work of the applicants but that they are requesting a number of variances to get to that point. Thiesse stated he is not inclined to accept a second back lot and their reduced percentages. Leskinen noted the property does not lend itself to meet the standards of a practical difficulty and because of that she cannot approve it. Schwingler indicated he is in agreement. Schoenzeit stated he is also in agreement. Lemke stated the application is somewhat incomplete and that he would love to see the proposal tidied up a little bit more. Landgraver stated if the back lot is denied,the question becomes what remains of the proposal. Landgraver stated he does not think it is appropriate for the Planning Commission to deny the applications outright and that perhaps they should table it. Landgraver stated he is in agreement with allowing Staff to do a lot line rearrangement. Schoenzeit moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. 17-3947,Paul Vogstrom on behalf of William and Sue Dunkley,2709 Walters Port Lane and 2710 Pence Lane, due to the second back lot variance requests,the lack of practical difficulties,and based on Staff's recommendations.VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. Thiesse noted the next application for discussion will be Application No. 17-3970. Thiesse asked if the addition was shown on the sketch plan. Curtis stated she does not recall if it was included but it was discussed at the sketch plan review. Thiesse asked if the addition extends into the average lakeshore setback or the 0-75 foot zone. Page 13 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated the whole house is within the average lakeshore setback. Sue Dunkley noted the whole house is also within the 0-75 foot zone. Schoenzeit stated the fact that the majority of the house is in front of the line is a practical difficulty. Thiesse commented the applicants could not meet those two setbacks even if they wanted to. Thiesse stated the next issue is the retaining walls in the 0-75 foot area. Thiesse commented the area appears to be relatively flat based on a photograph he has seen. Curtis illustrated the area where the retaining walls would be extended. Sue Dunkley pointed out that there are 11 stairs that go down currently. Leskinen stated someone's physical limitations are unfortunate but that she is not sure it rises to a practical difficulty inherent with the property itself to justify the continuation of the retaining walls. Thiesse asked if there is a way to install a ramp. Curtis indicated the applicants are allowed by code to construct a lift. Landgraver stated he does not recall granting a variance in the past to allow this kind of access. Curtis stated the situation on Kelly was a grandfathered situation where walls were repaired and there was an existing pathway that had been in place for quite a while. The homeowners had maintained that with their project. Landgraver asked if that was a fairly steep hill. Curtis indicated it was not and that it was an existing situation. Thiesse asked if the only reason the walls are necessary is due to the ramp. Mark Howry pointed out there is a 13-foot grade change from the high point and that the Dunkleys do want to have handicap access. In addition,the property on Kelly Avenue is not even a half mile away and it does have a switch back,which is one reason why they proposed what they did. Howry stated he realizes there are a lot of variances going on but that they are requesting it because of the existing walls and that there is a precedent on Kelly for the switch back. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission cannot consider the Kelly Avenue situation because it was an existing condition that is being maintained. Thiesse stated this property already has a number of walls. Howry stated there is another switch back on Bohn's Point Road. Curtis noted the City did not approve the switch back and that they were repairing existing retaining walls. Page 14 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse commented it is a lot of wall already and that he would have difficulty with the switch back. Howry stated there are existing stairs there,but as far as reconfiguring the stairs,there is no way to get a ramp in there without reconfiguring some of the existing walls. Schwingler noted they would be adding more hardcover within the 0-75 foot zone. Landgraver commented he does not recall the City ever approving something like this and that he does not want to start now. Landgraver stated it appears the Planning Commission is okay with the average lakeshore setback variance and the average lakeshore setback variance but is against the hardcover variance. Schoenzeit stated he sees no compelling reason to add more hardcover in that area. Landgraver moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. 17-3970,Paul Vogstrom on behalf of William and Sue Dunkley,2709 Walters Port Lane,based upon the request for a hardcover variance in the 0-75 foot zone. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. Thiesse stated the Planning Commission will next discuss Application No. 17-3971,variances in order to construct a new home with a pool and construct shoreline retaining walls within the 75-foot lake and average lakeshore setback. Thiesse stated he stood along the average setback line and then stood further back along the line and his view was not changed. Thiesse stated the house will just be further back from the lake. Leskinen asked whether the scope of the variances changes for the new building if the lot line rearrangement does not happen. Curtis indicated it would. Curtis stated if the lot line rearrangement does not happen,it would change everything being proposed. Curtis pointed out the current lot line and the proposed lot line. Curtis stated if they were to rebuild on the Pence Lane property in the same location,it would result in a narrower house as viewed from the lake. The home that was removed was a one-story rambler and what is being proposed is a two-story. Currently the lot consists of four acres and they would have ample conforming area to construct a new home on. Curtis stated the creation of the new lot line creates in part their practical difficulty because it does not allow them to move the house further back. Leskinen asked if the Planning Commission should just review this application without considering the lot line rearrangement. Curtis stated they should make a recommendation based on what is in front of the Planning Commission for this application. Schoenzeit noted the applicants would not get the variances if the lot line rearrangement does not happen. Page 15 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated they would be recommending approval of a plan for a lot that does not currently exist. If the Council denies the first application,the second two applications become moot. This application is requesting a structural setback variance in the 75-foot zone for walls and not for the house. Schwingler stated in looking at it from the average lakeshore setback,it does not make sense and that it is contingent upon getting the lot lines moved. Schwingler stated he does not see a practical difficulty for the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone. Thiesse asked what the allowance is for stairs for access to the lake. Curtis indicated the applicants are allowed access to the lakeshore via a stair and that typically the City has enforced the minimal building code stairway width. Thiesse commented the lot line rearrangement is causing a lot of the problems with the property. Lemke stated he does not see a practical difficulty for either one. Thiesse stated if the lot line was there already,there would be a practical difficulty. Lemke stated he would disagree and that the house could possibly be configured to fit on the lot. Schoenzeit commented these are pretty big lots but that they will not be able to get a big house in there. Leskinen stated the lot line creates the practical difficulty,which is the part she is having a problem with. Schoenzeit stated it is a self-inflicted practical difficulty. Vogstrom stated in order to put the house in front of the average lakeshore setback,it would be completely in front of both homes on each side and the back yard of the new home would be looking at the front of either home. Vogstrom stated that would not fit in with the character of the other homes on the lake. Vogstrom stated moving the new home further back than the existing home seems to make sense since it is on a point and that type of situation has been approved in the past. Lemke commented there are too many unknowns at this time. Landgraver stated he would like to see some further clarity on the application before approving. Schwingler stated the back lot issue needs to be cleared up. Rief stated in his view this should be tabled until it is determined what will happen with the back lot. Vogstrom stated he would agree with tabling it so they can get the back lot figured out. Leskinen moved,Landgraver seconded,to table Application No. 17-3971,Paul Vogstrom on behalf of William and Sue Dunkley,2710 Pence Lane. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. (Recess taken from 8:14 p.m.—8:20 p.m.) Page 16 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. 6. #17-3972 JAN GASTERLAND, 1920 SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCES,8:20 P.M.— 8:31 P.M. Jan Gasterland,Applicant,was present. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting rear setback, side setback,hardcover and structural variances. The applicant is requesting a rear setback of 3.6 feet,a side setback of 4.3 feet,and to maintain the existing hardcover on the lot at 45.75 percent. The structural coverage variance is to allow 20.3 percent, which is 39.4 feet above the allowed structural coverage. Oakden noted City Code was recently amended to increase the amount of hardcover to 20 percent. The applicants are proposing to demolish an existing detached garage and reconstruct a new 3-stall detached garage. They are proposing to maintain the same 4.3' side and 3.6' rear setbacks as the existing structure,which are less than the minimum standard of 15 feet. The new garage will be angled slightly different to create a more conducive access for the vehicles. The new garage will be placed over existing asphalt so it does not alter the hardcover calculations of this parcel. The proposed survey includes a landing and stairs along the east side of the proposed garage,but the applicant has indicated this is no longer included in the scope of the project. The adjacent neighbors have submitted letters indicating they have no objection to the variances. Included in Staffs report is a lot analysis and a practical difficulties analysis. Staff can review that in more detail if the Planning Commission has questions. The small size of the lot and the practical difficulty analysis shows support for the requested side and rear setback and hardcover variances for the new detached garage. An email has been attached for the Planning Commission's review noting additional construction requirements for a structure within five feet of a property line. The Planning Commission may approve some or all of the variance requests; deny one or more of the variances; or approve the side setback,rear setback,and the hardcover variance. Staff recommends the applicant revise their plan to be within the 20 percent structural coverage. Landgraver asked if the removal of the stairs and landing would change the structural coverage. Oakden indicated it would not. Jan Gasterland,Applicant,stated his family has owned this property since 1964 and that he is the present owner. Gasterland stated his intent is to leave the property to his children but in the meantime he would like to replace the existing garage that is falling apart and construct a 3-stall garage in place of the existing 2-stall garage. Gasterland stated as it relates to the structural coverage,the calculated lot area varies depending on which survey you look at and that his surveyor shows his north property line at 194 feet. The neighbor's survey to the south shows it at 199 feet and the half-section map shows it at 204 feet. Gasterland stated there are discrepancies and that he will not belabor it but that he would prefer not to reduce the size of the garage. Gasterland noted his neighbors are in support of the proposal. Page 17 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver asked if there is any other structure on the property that could be removed. Gasterland indicated there is not. Thiesse noted the ordinance recently changed from 15 to 20 percent and that the Planning Commission preferred to stick with the 15 percent. Thiesse stated the City would like to adhere to the 20 percent. Gasterland stated the variance is to allow for a modest 3-stall garage,which is not out of line with the neighborhood,and that it will be slab on grade. Schoenzeit asked if they will see a variance to attach the garage to the house someday. Gasterland stated they will not. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Lemke commented it seems to be a nice improvement to the neighborhood. Thiesse noted the City did not say they would never grant a variance above 20 percent as part of the ordinance change. Landgraver stated the Planning Commission has encountered this issue of whether a 3-stall garage is reasonable and that in his view it is. Landgraver stated if the structural coverage limit was still 15 percent,he believes he would still be in support of it but that he is reluctantly in favor of it. Schwingler commented a garage is practical. Lemke moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3972,Jan Gasterland, 1920 Shadywood Road,granting of rear setback, side setback,hardcover,and structural coverage variances. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 7. #17-3974 SML ELECTRICAL,INC.,ON BEHALF OF BRIDGEWATER BANK,2445 SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCE,8:31 P.M.—8:42 P.M. Pat Lawrence,Applicant,was present. Barnhart stated the applicant is requesting a variance to permit a freestanding pole type sign to be located within the 10-foot side yard setback. The sign would be located less than two feet from the property line. Barnhart displayed a sketch of the proposed sign. Barnhart noted the dashed lines denote the existing boundary of the sign and that the proposed sign is smaller than the current sign. The reason for the variance is that a portion of the base is wider than existing and the thickness of the sign is wider than existing. In addition,the entire structure is within the 10-foot setback area and is nonconforming and Page 18 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. must be replaced in kind. The average person would likely not notice the difference between the two signs. Staff recommends approval based on the practical difficulties outlined in Staffs report. Thiesse noted the trend has been to have lower signs. Thiesse asked if Staff has any concern about that. Barnhart stated Staffs main concern is that a lower sign will block visibility for the vehicles on the road. Pat Lawrence, Sign Maintenance Lighting,asked if the sign could have up lighting rather than interior lighting. Barnhart stated the concern with exterior lighting would depend on where it would be located and that the impacts to traffic and pedestrians would need to be reviewed. Barnhart stated if the area could be screened,he would not necessarily be opposed to it. Thiesse noted this is a heavily traveled intersection. Thiesse asked if a lighting plan was submitted. Lawrence indicated this is a last minute request of the client and that it was initially proposed to be lit up on the interior. Landgraver asked if it is an absolute requirement that the lights point up rather than be lit on the interior. Lawrence stated the lights will sit back from the sign a certain distance,be on a post that is approximately two feet high to avoid the snow,and would shine up. Lawrence stated his client would prefer the post mounted lights. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8: 37 p.m. Leskinen stated the request seems pretty straight forward, and that if the Planning Commission recommends approval,it should be with the recommendation that more specifics on the upward lighting be provided prior to going before the City Council meeting. Schoenzeit stated because it is closer to the curb, it is more stuff for the public to interact with. Lemke stated his concern would be how far away the lights would need to be located in order to project onto the sign. Thiesse stated his preference would be a back lit sign. Schoenzeit stated the smaller base would be a preference and that the area should be kept clear as much as possible. Page 19 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart stated the recommendation would be based on what is before the Planning Commission tonight and that the applicant will need to provide additional information on the lighting. Barnhart indicated he does have a concern with the upward lighting due to the topography but that Staff can review that if additional information is submitted. Lawrence noted they do have quite a bit of room going both ways from the sign and that if some landscaping was done,people would see the light but not the post. Schoenzeit stated that would defeat the purpose of keeping the area clear. Lawrence noted there are already bushes around the existing sign. Thiesse asked if the landscaping would be an intensification of the use. Barnhart indicated it would not. Landgraver moved,Lemke seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3974, SML Electrical,Inc.,on behalf of Bridgewater Bank,2445 Shadywood Road,with a preference for a back lit sign. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 8. 17-3975 KELLY HANSON, 1284 WILDHURST TRAIL,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:42 P.M.—8:45 P.M. Kelly and Tom Kahlert,Applicants,were present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for a permanent dock installation. The applicant is currently building a new home on the vacant property and would also like to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock within the floodway,a conditional use permit is required. The LMCD regulates docks on Lake Minnetonka and has not yet processed the application fully. However, it appears the proposed dock will meet all of their setbacks. The conditional use permit analysis was provided in Staff's report. There are no specific building code construction standards for docks. The City does require that a zoning permit be issued for the dock to document the existence and construction of a permanent dock on the lake. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. Kelly and Tom Kahlert stated they can answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Page 20 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. Leskinen moved,Schwingler seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3975,Kelly Kahlert, 1284 Wildhurst Trail,granting of a conditional use permit subject to conditions of Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 9. #17-3976 SCOTT AND LAURIE KNUTSON,795 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH, VARIANCE,8:44 P.M.—9:32 P.M. Scott and Laurie Knutson,Applicants,were present. Oakden stated the applicants are requesting a rear yard setback to construct an addition to the home and are proposing to remove an existing 2-car garage and shed. The applicants would like to construct a 4,168 square foot addition to the home to replace those two accessory structures. Currently the detached garage is located 36.50 feet from the rear property line and the shed is located about 17 feet from the rear yard property line. The proposed addition would include garage space,storage, a gazebo/sunroom and attic space. The proposed addition would be 15 feet from the rear yard. The home is oriented facing east and is placed in the northwest corner of the property. The topography of the lot creates multiple drops in elevation surrounding the home and leaves only a small flat yard space to the north of the principal structure. The home also has septic and wetlands to the east and a well to the west of the principal structure. Included in Staff's report is a lot analysis which goes over the setbacks and lot coverage for the site as well as a practical difficulty analysis. Staff can review those in more detail if the Planning Commission has questions. The practical difficulty analysis by Staff found that the topography on the lot and the orientation of the existing home does create some practical difficulty. The existing home is built at the tallest elevation of the lot and the topography then slopes downward away from the principal structure creating many slopes and hills as you look out from the existing structure. The home also has septic and wetlands to the east. The addition would create a 15-foot setback from the rear property line. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties and Planning Staff recommends approval for the rear yard variance. Thiesse asked if the two neighbors to the north submitted any comments. Oakden stated it is her understanding the applicants did contact the neighbors and received no comments. Landgraver asked to see a map depicting the adjoining properties. Thiesse noted this property sits up higher than the adjoining properties. Oakden pointed out the front yard space and the rear lot line. Scott Knutson,Applicant,stated this is a very unique,private property,with a lot of acreage. The perimeter of the property is laced with natural barriers and the area is very quiet. The house was constructed in 1962 and they are running into a situation where they need space in the garage for storage of equipment and vehicles. The existing two-car garage with a lean-to shed is falling apart and the plan is to combine them as well as add a sunroom. Knutson indicated they are trying to keep the profile of the Page 21 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. structure low. Knutson stated the reason for the multiple doors is to provide for more than one way in and out to avoid the need to jockey stuff around. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. Steve Pierce,259 Hollander Road,stated they purchased their house approximately ten years ago and that they looked very long and hard for land that would offer them some privacy. Pierce stated they purchased the home in November and took the time to consider what the property would be like when there are no leaves on the trees. With no leaves on the trees,someone standing on their property would be able to see a structure. Pierce noted this proposal will leave one homeowner with an enhanced property but their property will go in the opposite direction by negatively impacting their property values and privacy. Pierce stated in his view there are laws in place to control how close a structure can be to the property line and that they should be followed. The subject property has a whole lot of acreage and that he is not sure why it has to be located in an area where it could be an issue. Pierce stated the structure could be located on the other side. Kathy Pierce noted their property is lower than the subject property and that the existing small shed already looms above their property. Pierce expressed a concern that a bigger structure would be more looming on the edge. Knutson stated they are trying to achieve the same thing with the natural barrier so that when the leaves fall,they don't see each other. Knutson stated once the leaves fall,however, if they see him,he can also see them. Knutson noted the neighbors multiple garages and a swimming pool. Knutson stated he does not understand the issue about seeing the structure and that people everywhere see their neighbors' homes. Knutson stated he does not intend to cut any trees down and that he would be willing to add some pine trees. Schoenzeit asked if they are completely tearing down the existing structure. Knutson indicated he is. Thiesse asked if the garage going off at an angle could be placed in front of the proposed addition. Knutson indicated they located it there to maintain the circle. Knutson commented he wishes he could fit it somewhere else but that they have a pond and the topography drops it off quickly. Knutson stated the proposed location seems to be the only logical place. Knutson noted the hardcover is also way low for the lot. Lemke asked what the existing height of the garage is. Knutson stated he is guessing it is probably 20 feet. Oakden stated the existing garage is one story with a pitched roof and that they are proposing some attic space on the new garage. Knutson pointed out the attic space. Knutson indicated it will not be a live-in structure and would just be for storage,with a pull-down ladder to access the attic space. Page 22 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit asked if he could put the garage on the other side. Knutson stated the problem with shifting it is that they ran into restricted space with one entry. Lemke asked if they could rotate the entire thing. Knutson stated they tried but that they wanted a walkway to the house. Given the size of the garage door, it turned out to be an odd configuration. Schoenzeit asked if they could put the garage on the other side. Knutson noted there are pine trees and a pond with some other large trees on that side. In addition,the other side has the septic and the back yard drops off fast. Knutson stated it is a unique orientation where the elevations drop off of the plateau,which is the high point of the area. Schoenzeit asked what the encroachment is on the current garage. Thiesse noted the garage is at 36.5 feet and the shed is at the spot where the proposed structure would go. Knutson stated he would like the neighbors to keep their privacy as well as their own and that they would be willing to add to the natural barrier. Knutson noted they will not touch any of the existing vegetative barrier. Steve Pierce stated he appreciates the suggestion of a landscape plan but that he would note the Planning Commission saw some other locations for the shed that could be explored. Pierce stated his understanding was that the corner of the shed was going to be the very corner of the new structure and that he was surprised when he looked at the plan that it is definitely not the back corner of the new structure and instead goes quite a bit beyond the existing shed. Pierce stated he can see the corner of the shed now and that it will go another 30 feet or so closer to the property and that they will be able to easily see the structure. Thiesse commented he sees areas where the garage could be reconfigured. Schoenzeit stated with this amount of property,there is no reason why it could not be relocated. Thiesse noted there are reasons why it cannot be relocated to some areas. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. Landgraver stated the issue he comes back to is if it was a replacement in kind,there would not be anything they could do about it. Landgraver commented the property owner has some rights but he could build a different structure that does not require as much of a variance. Schoenzeit stated if any of them were the neighbor, they would be hoping that the City Council or Planning Commission would be enforcing the code. Schoenzeit noted the applicant would require a variance for the extra height even if he built within an existing footprint. Thiesse noted the applicant's view is mainly down the hill to the northwest and that if the structure is rotated, it would be even more visible from the neighbor's property. Page 23 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Leskinen stated due to the topography of the lot,a variance is needed. Leskinen stated she understands the neighbor's perspective and she takes that into consideration,but if the Planning Commission looks at what the code says and what they need to do in order to grant a variance,they need to establish a practical difficulty,which they have done. Thiesse asked what the practical difficulty is. Leskinen stated it would be the topography and the wetland buffers. Leskinen indicated she would not be opposed to recommending as a condition of approval some screening of the new structure. Thiesse stated the intent of the setback is to protect the neighbors and to keep space between the neighbors. Thiesse stated in his view the intent has not been met and that it is an encroachment into space that the neighbors thought would not be used and that there is a lot of flat land in front of the circle that is usable. Thiesse stated it is a practical difficulty to encroach on the side yard when something can be reconfigured to not encroach in that area. Leskinen asked if the other area is flat enough. Thiesse pointed out the 1000 contour and noted the whole area inside of it should be flat. Lemke commented the applicants would not get the same thing as what they are proposing. Schoenzeit stated he does not see any attempt to place it in a more conforming spot. Landgraver stated the end result could be a 30-foot structure that is just as visible but it ended up costing the applicant more money to redesign it. Landgraver noted that area is at the top of the hill,which would make it even more visible. Schoenzeit noted it would be further away from the property line. Thiesse commented there is no doubt in his mind the neighbors will see it. Landgraver stated it will still end up with the same result in terms of visual impact. Landgraver noted if the structure is in a conforming location,the applicants will not need to come before the Planning Commission or City Council. Schoenzeit stated since the applicant is tearing down the existing structure,it would be a clean sheet and that the applicant can be more creative with locating it. Schwingler stated any neighbor can say the same thing about the leaves falling and that he feels the variance is a reasonable request. Lemke stated he would deny it. Schoenzeit stated if the roles were reversed,he would want the City to uphold the codes. Page 24 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. 17-3976,Scott and Laurie Knutson, 795 Ferndale Road North. VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 3; Schwingler,Landgraver and Leskinen opposed. MOTION FAILS. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission needs to make a decision one way or another. Leskinen stated the other option is they could table it to allow the applicant to come back with a more conforming plan. Schoenzeit stated if they brought back some of the whys of why it does not work anywhere else,that would be helpful. Knutson stated they have looked at every option and that this is the one that works. Knutson stated he wants to get along with his neighbors and that he is open to adding more screening. Knutson stated they tried the one that was squared to it with one opening and that was very difficult and then the grade drops off in the other area. Leskinen asked if the Planning Commission would be more inclined to approve if the motion had a recommendation requiring vegetative screening. Schoenzeit stated in his view there is plenty of land to be more creative and being that close to the property is not necessary. Schoenzeit suggested the structure be placed in the area where the word lot is. Thiesse noted that area contains a number of big trees. City Administrator Rief noted removal of trees is not necessarily a practical difficulty since the homeowner has the right to take them down if he wants. Landgraver stated the Planning Commission is interested in some engineering data that shows the structure cannot be placed elsewhere. Knutson pointed out the location of the septic tank,the well,and the drop in grade. Knutson stated he did not want to create a big foundation by placing it near the drop in grade but that they could maybe bring it in some. Thiesse stated he would like to table the application so the property owner can look at other options. Knutson commented there are very few options outside of screening or bringing it in slightly. Thiesse noted the configuration of the structure can be changed as well but that there is not much that can be done to alleviate the view of the neighbor. Leskinen moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3976,Scott and Laurie Knutson,795 Ferndale Road North,based on Staff's recommendation and with the further recommendation that vegetative screening be provided for the new addition. Thiesse noted anything on that side of the house would be visible and that adding some landscaping would help. Page 25 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented he would hope when there is no practical difficulty that the City Council and Planning Commission respect the boundaries,especially on a property this big. Leskinen stated in her view the practical difficulties are well outlined in Staff's report. Lemke stated moving it 20 feet away is going to lessen the impact. Landgraver stated he believes there are practical difficulties based on the topography and the location of the utilities. Schwingler indicated he is in agreement. Pierce stated if it is moved further back,they would see it less. Pierce questioned what the point is of having the codes if they are not respected,especially when it is such a big property,and that he would like other options explored. VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 3; Thiesse,Schoenzeit,and Lemke Opposed. MOTION FAILS Knutson noted his property sits up higher and that he can see the neighbor's property. Thiesse stated the difficulty is that there appears to be other land available to build on. Barnhart stated tabling it would allow the applicant time to strengthen the practical difficulty,to identify other solutions,or to have another Planning Commission present to break the tie. Knutson stated he can list the practical difficulties. Knutson stated due to the pond,they cannot build close to that; they cannot build by the septic or the sewer;and the land drops off in three different areas, which is why the existing garage was placed there to begin with. Knutson stated he respects what the Planning Commissioners are saying and that he is trying to make it work the best he can. Knutson noted he would have to take out the trees screening the other house to place it in the other area. Knutson stated he could perhaps shorten it up but that he is not sure he can tell the Planning Commission anything more. Knutson noted he if brings it forward,he is concerned about the well and that he is not sure how close he can be to that. Schoenzeit indicated he would be willing to make a motion tabling the application. Barnhart stated if it is critical that the application be moved forward,the Planning Commission should recommend denial or approval outlining the issues or comments but that they should make a decision based on their review of the application. Thiesse stated he is denying it because there appears to be room for a building of the same size but configured differently and that he would like it investigated further. Lemke commented the structure might not be the exact same size or exact same square footage but that something smaller could work. Schoenzeit commented he does not find three acres to be a hardship. Page 26 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Knutson stated three acres with that contour is a hardship. Thiesse stated he will not argue that the topography is a hardship to an extent but that the applicant also has a portion of land where the structure could possibly go. Landgraver stated he will change his vote to advance it to the City Council. Thiesse moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. 17-3976,Scott and Laurie Knutson, 795 Ferndale North,based on the fact that there appears to be an opportunity for a reconfigured building to be located on the plateau of reasonable size and that there is a neighbor that voiced opposition to the proposed location. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 2,Schwingler and Leskinen opposed. 10. #17-3978 ALEXANDER DESIGN GROUP ON BEHALF OF TRAVIS HANSBERGER, 1720 SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCES,9:33 P.M.—9:45 P.M. Kathy Alexander,Architect,was present along with Travis Hansberger,Applicant. Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a rear setback of 24.8 feet,hardcover of 33.98 percent lot area, and lot width variances in order to build a new single-family home. The applicant is proposing to demo the existing home and construct a new single-family house. The house was signed to meet the structural coverage of the lot at 20 percent but the applicant is requesting a hardcover variance to allow for adequate driveway space and a patio. The existing lot has 35.74 percent hardcover and the new proposed home would have 33.98 percent. In addition,the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback for the principal structure of 24.8 feet where 30 feet is required. Lot area and lot width variances are also required. The existing home is nonconforming to the 75-foot setback as well as the average lakeshore setback. The house has been designed to meet those City standards,which has resulted in the home being pushed further to the rear of the lot. The applicant is also proposing to move the driveway access along Shadywood Road. Since it is a county road,it would require approval through Hennepin County. The applicant is proposing to place the principal structure 24.8 feet from the rear property line where 30 feet is required. The existing garage is located two feet from the rear property line and the home is 52 feet from the rear property line. The applicant oriented the home to meet the lake yard setbacks,which are at a curve due to the nature of the lakeshore and caused the structure to be moved closer to the rear/street side of the property. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent to the land and the orientation of the existing home. The existing home is built at the tallest elevation on the lot. The topography then slopes down and away from the principal structure on all sides creating many slopes and hills on the property. The home also has septic and a wetland to the east and their well to the west of the principal structure. The addition would create a 15-foot setback from the rear property line. The encroachment does not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances if the Planning Commission finds the practical difficulties reasonable. A recommendation for approval should be contingent upon the applicant Page 27 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. receiving approval from Hennepin County for moving the driveway access on a county road. If not approved,this could change the shape of the driveway altering the hardcover of the site. Kathryn Alexander,Architect,stated they have a signature supporting the project from the property owner to the south and that they have tried to contact the neighbor to the north but have been unsuccessful. Alexander indicated she can answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Thiesse requested she address the drainage and the driveway. Alexander noted it is only the lake side that was raised as well as a little bit on each side of the house. Alexander pointed out the areas that would be raised on the survey and pointed out a portion of the area that slopes back down toward Shadywood. Thiesse asked if there is a swale in the area near Shadywood. Alexander indicated there is a swale there and that the neighbor's property to the south is actually higher than this property. Alexander stated in speaking with the surveyor,he indicated he would have no problem making sure there could be a swale in that area. Alexander stated the reason for raising the grade is that it is very close to the OHWL and that there will only a partial basement under the house. Alexander noted there is a crawl space that is 3'/10.5"tall and they raised the back side in order to get enough crawl space. Alexander indicated they are still working on the driveway with Hennepin County. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 9:41 p.m. Schoenzeit asked if a 7.5 foot side yard setback is now what is allowed. Landgraver indicated it is along with the 20 percent structural coverage. Thiesse noted the driveway is responsible for the hardcover overage. Thiesse stated when he drove in the driveway and turned around so he could drive out forward,the turnaround room was necessary since it would be dangerous to back out onto Shadywood. Thiesse stated it would be difficult to eliminate the 900 square feet of excess hardcover from the driveway and that the driveway might as well be a size that is workable. Lemke noted overall hardcover on the property is being reduced. Schwingler stated the applicants have also addressed the drainage. Page 28 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver commented the Planning Commission knew people would be encouraged to maximize the housing space and then come back for a hardcover variance when the City approved the 7.5 side setback and the 20 percent structural coverage limit. Thiesse noted the hardcover is being reduced in this case. Landgraver stated one of the positives with the proposal is that the applicants are reducing the hardcover on the lot. Landgraver agreed that Shadywood Road is dangerous to back out on and that the turnaround space is necessary. Lemke moved,Leskinen seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3978,Alexander Design Group on behalf of Travis Hansberger, 1720 Shadywood Road,granting of a rear setback variance,a hardcover variance,and lot area and lot width variances. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 11. #17-3977 BRIAN BENSON ON BEHALF OF JIM AND MARY JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD,SKETCH PLAN,9:45 P.M.—10:05 P.M. Brian Benson, Builder,was present. Barnhart stated before the Planning Commission is a sketch plan proposal for a 5-lot single family residential development. The property consists of 13.78 acres and lies near the southern end of Brackets Point Road. The purpose of the sketch plan review is to obtain the feedback from the Planning Commission on some of the issues associated with developing this piece of property. The main issue is the access to the site. Bracketts Point Road enters the property at the north end and then cuts to the west side. Within Bracketts Point Road is an existing sanitary sewer line that serves the area. The property owner is proposing to vacate the road,relocate it to the interior of the site,retain the existing sanitary sewer line and protect it with an easement with specific site improvements to protect access. The southern end is proposed as a cul-de-sac,with separate drives to maintain access to the private road. Barnhart stated the main policy question is whether shifting the road into the interior of the property is acceptable. Staff will continue to make sure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. Barnhart noted by virtue of adding four new lots onto the subject property,traffic will increase on Bracketts Point Road and will also impact its connection with Shoreline Road to the north. Input from the County is necessary to determine whether any improvements are necessary at this intersection. The proposal to relocate the road to the interior of the road will help remove hardcover within the lake yard of proposed Lots 3,4,and 5. The other issue is the establishment of average lakeshore setback. When new lake lots are created,the average lakeshore setback needs to be established at the time of subdivision. It is Staff's belief that the existing sanitary sewer line will be adequate to service the additional homes but that will need to be verified. Lastly, a Conservation Design Plan will need to be completed. A number of trees will need to be removed to facilitate the road realignment and house construction. Page 29 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart noted this project has been designed with the intention of following city ordinances in terms of lot size,lot frontage,and things of that nature. Barnhart stated at the present time no variances appear to be necessary. Thiesse stated he sees this as a Lakeview type development where it is quite critical that everything be met. Thiesse asked what the ramifications are with relocating the road. Barnhart pointed out there are property owners that are not part of this subdivision who may want to retain the access as it is now. Thiesse stated he was thinking on the north end. Barnhart illustrated the path of the proposed roadway,noting that the existing lots would still maintain their access. City Administrator Rief asked if the road would remain public after it is moved. Barnhart indicated it would. Landgraver asked what the pros and cons are of leaving the sewer line where it is. Barnhart stated the cost to relocate the sewer line would be pretty expensive. Thiesse stated the City would need to have vehicular access to that area. Rief stated one of the concerns with moving the sewer line is the need for lift stations. Landgraver asked if there is any additional maintenance cost with leaving the septic line. Barnhart stated having the road as access makes it easier and that there will probably be some additional impacts but that the City Engineer has reviewed it briefly and did not raise any concerns with relocating it. Leskinen commented having the road go down the middle might be better for the lake since it would help with salt runoff and hardcover. Barnhart stated having the road by the lake also provides some benefit to the area in terms of lake views. Chuck Alcon stated since they submitted their plan,they have met with the fire chief,which led to the basis of the radius of the cul-de-sac. The road would also improve emergency vehicles access. Alcon stated they also met with LMCD staff,and since there will be no marina,each property owner will be responsible to permit their own docks on their lakeshore. Alcon indicated they also met with the MCWD staff,and they are eager to get the road off the lakeshore. The proposal is to maintain the sewer line and provide an easement using grass pavers so the maintenance trucks can get down there. Page 30 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. A wetland delineation has been completed and that has been submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Alcon indicated they will have that information for the preliminary plat. Attempts have been made to contact the property owners in the area and that those attempts have not been successful at the present time. Alcon indicated they will continue to make attempts to contact them. Alcon stated shifting of the road improves the lake quality and that they will contact Hennepin County as far as the additional traffic going onto County Road 15. Onsite ponding and infiltration are the current concepts for the stormwater management onsite and sanitary sewer capacity calculations will be provided at the time of preliminary plat. Sanitary sewer maintenance access will be along the existing roadway area but with grass pavers. The grass pavers will accommodate up to 88,000 pounds. Alcon noted a Conservation Design Plan is required and that they will provide that at preliminary plat. Alcon stated the two major items are relocating the road,which will help the lake quality,and then maintaining the sanitary sewer. No new lift stations are required and quite a bit of hardcover will be removed down near the lake. Alcon noted water will be provided via private wells and the underground storage tank that was for fire protection will be removed because the fire chief has indicated he would not use it. Lemke asked if there are any issues with the grass pavers. Alcon stated to his knowledge there are not and that Mark Gronberg is the surveyor on the project and he has used them in the past at the Long Lake Library. Thiesse encouraged him to get in touch with the neighbors. Brian Benson noted they have a meeting scheduled with the owner who owns two of the three lots on Monday and that they have also reached out to a couple of other people but have gotten no response. Another neighbor asked whether the main house is staying and the other family is moving. Alcon noted the 45-foot radius continues on through the corner and connects into the private road as opposed to the curved hammerhead. Schoenzeit asked how the proposed grading for the homes will compare to what is there. Alcon stated they will be custom graded lots. Benson stated they might do a custom grading plan for Lot 5 since it is low and flat. Schoenzeit asked if these homes will have foundations or be slab on grade. Benson indicated Lot 2 would be a walkout,Lot 3 would be a walkout,Lot 4 might be a lookout,and then Lot 5 will likely need to be built up. Benson stated they are waiting to get feedback from this meeting and then they will explore that a little bit more. Alcon stated all that information will be provided at the time of preliminary plat. Page 31 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,October 16,2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver asked what the rough square footage of the homes will be. Benson stated the lots would be sold to end buyers and they would work with the City on their individual building plans. Benson stated they are not planning on having any architectural covenants placed on the property but that there would be an association for the pond. Alcon stated the association will probably have some architectural control. Lemke asked if an easement for the sewer connection will be needed for Lot 1. Alcon stated the necessary easements will be provided. The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. 12. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS HELD ON SEPTEMBER 25,2017,AND OCTOBER 9,2017 None 13. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION None PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Lemke asked whether anything can be done when the Planning Commission is deadlocked. Barnhart stated according to the code,the Planning Commission has to provide a recommendation. Leskinen noted typically there are an odd number of commissioners and would not be a problem. ADJOURNMENT Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to adjourn the Orono Planning Commission meeting at 10:08 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. ATTEST: John Thiesse,Chair Page 32 of 32 Item 2 Date Application Received: 09/20/17 O Date Application Considered as Complete:10/11/17 f VO 120-Day Review Period(60-day Extension)Expires: 02/08/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members ye Dustin Rief, City Administrator „ikESHO° From: Melanie Curtis, Planner moo Date: 20 November 2017 Subject: #17-3979,Steven & Kimberly Schottler, 2740 Shadywood Road, ATF Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicants are requesting after-the-fact approval of average lakeshore setback,75-lake setback,and hardcover within the 75-foot setback variances in order to allow the elevated screen porch to remain as constructed. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends partial approval, see page 5. Background The applicants were new owners of the subject property in August of 2016. In September, 2016 the City issued a stop work notice for unpermitted construction of a new screen porch on the lake side of the home.A follow up inspection in July of 2017 showed that the porch had not been removed; no permit or variance applications had been submitted. The owners responded to the City's July 21, 2017 letter(Exhibit F) and met with staff to discuss the process for applying for an after-the-fact variance. The variance application was submitted on September 20th and made complete (all information submitted)on October 11th The screen porch was constructed in the place of a smaller 26 foot wide 2nd story deck which extended 11 feet from the house toward the lake. An 11.6' x 11.6'deck was built where that portion of the existing deck was located, and next to that a new 25.6'x 31.5' roofed screen porch now extends 31.5 feet toward the lake; 20 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and approximately 2 feet into the 75-foot setback. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330&78-1279-Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' 31.3' house No change NW Side 10' 50.2' No change SE Side 10' 46.5' No change Lakeshore 75' 81' 73' Average Lakeshore The pre-existing deck was conforming;the new screen porch extends 20 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. FILE#17-3979 20 Nov 2017 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 46,050 s.f. (1.0 acre) Allowed: 9,210 s.f. (20%) Existing:2,621 s.f. (5.7%) Proposed: 3,427 s.f. (7.4%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay in Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier ±50 w/in 54.5 s.f. 11,512 s.f. 5,726 s.f. 6,383 s.f. w/in 75' Tier 1 46,050 s.f. 75(25%) (12.4%) (13.8%) (deck+ (driveway) driveway) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) The screen porch was constructed encroaching up to 20 feet lakeward into the average Lakeshore setback. 75-foot Lake Setback and Hardcover within 75-foot Setback Variances (Sections 78-1279 & 78- 1680) Currently there are no structures within the 75-foot setback area;an approximate 50 square foot portion of the existing driveway is located within the 75-foot setback as a result of the cove. As constructed,the new screen porch encroaches up to 3 feet into the 75-foot lake setback also resulting in 4.5 square feet of new hardcover within the 75-setback. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: FILE#17-3979 20 Nov 2017 Page 3 of 5 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The home and deck on the property in 2016 where conforming with respect to lake and average lakeshore setbacks.The proposed screen porch will encroach approximately 3 feet into the 75-foot setback; and approximately 20 feet into the average lakeshore setback line. Neighbors have indicated that the screen porch encroachment into the average lakeshore setback does not block their views of the lake, however there exist other reasonable areas to expand indoor/outdoor spaces without encroaching into setbacks.At this point,the minimal 75-foot setback variance requested is purely for the applicants' convenience as the screen porch is already constructed; therefore this criterion is not met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The screen porch addition to the existing home could be constructed in a conforming location and is not consistent with the comprehensive plan.This criterion is not met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The screen porch addition will increase the bulk and massing on the property within the average lakeshore setback(and to a minor extent the 75-foot setback) which is currently conforming. The improvements could be constructed in a way which would conform to the code. This criterion is not met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant has not demonstrated that the property is unique to justify the need for a variance. This criterion is not met;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The visual massing of structure within the average lakeshore setback and additional hardcover within the 75 foot setback will alter the character of the locality, particularly when viewed from the lake.This criterion is not met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a screen porch addition to the home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The home on the subject property and the neighboring homes are mostly in line and situated ±30 feet from the rear/street property lines resulting in a narrow area for improvements conforming to the average lakeshore setback line. This condition applies to the immediately adjacent properties. This criterion is met. FILE#17-3979 20 Nov 2017 Page 4 of 5 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The home on the subject property and the neighboring homes are mostly in line and situated ±30 feet from the rear/street property lines resulting in a narrow area for improvements conforming to the average lakeshore setback line. This condition applies to the immediately adjacent properties.This criterion is not met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The owners have an existing home on the property which includes lakeyard area to construct a conforming screen porch of a different configuration demonstrating reasonable use.This criterion is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The intent of the zoning ordinance is to provide an opportunity for development and reinvestment in neighborhoods while reinforcing Orono's goals of lake and natural resource protection,while preserving the unique neighborhood character. The proposed screen porch addition is out of character with the neighborhood,and the lake yard variances are proposed to avoid a tenant of the Code intended to protect against uncharacteristic bulk and mass.This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. It appears the purpose for granting the requested variances would be for the convenience to the applicants. This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds no practical difficulties supporting hardcover and structural encroachment into the 75- foot setback.Additionally,the screen porch could be designed to provide for outdoor living space within the permitted setback areas. Although supported by neighbors, Staff does not identify sufficient practical difficulties supporting the substantial average lakeshore setback encroachment. Engineer Comments The City Engineer has not reviewed this project as there are no changes to the grades on the site. Building Official Comments No building permits were issued for the deck rebuild or the new screen porch. Therefore, no structural evaluation was conducted for the new structure. In order to process the issuance of a building permit the following will need to be completed: 1. Applicant submittal of detailed construction plans for the structure; 2. To verify all structural components the Building Official must inspect the structure. This may result in one,or both, of the following: FILE#17-3979 20 Nov 2017 Page 5 of 5 a. The possibility that portions of the structure will need to be disassembled in order to evaluate the structural construction and components;or b. Submittal of certification by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota regarding the structural components (disassembly may be required for this as well). 3. Verification acceptable to the Building Official of all footings. 4. Modifications may be required by the Building Official in order to meet the Building Code structural requirements or rectify any identified structural deficiencies. Public Comments Public comments have been received supporting the applicants' request. The comments are attached as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation If the Planning Commission identifies practical difficulties supporting the new screen porch encroachment lakeward of the average Lakeshore setback, a motion for approval would be appropriate. However, Planning staff recommends denial of the 75-foot setback and hardcover encroachment as neither variance are supported by practical difficulties. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Proposed Survey Exhibit E. Staff-Annotated "Proposed" Survey Exhibit F. Violation Letter Exhibit G. Public Comments Exhibit H. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit I. Site Photos Exhibit J. Aerial Photos Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map PC Exhibit A City of Orono #17-3979 Variance Application Street Address: Application# "cLO A ' 2750 Kelley Parkway <�/ Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: $700 a Mailing Address: . P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $700 / $2,500 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: -1KESHO Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete �applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: c9 `-t-CD S t k �� U3Cc) 4) 4` DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: \Jfc--1 && - C � �— C�P �( � `T-1-1-E_ C-T�- (atttach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFOR ATION: M" heck hertjt Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: l it -I--s- Phone(Primary): (01 a --q 30— 3 0 E Mailing Address: 9.14a CIO 4% QCity: i CC _ tc J ZIP: Email: £SGtoT PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ld'check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone(Primary): Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Email: APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via ail. Applicant Signature: ' . i O b ' Date: 9 - 19 — 17 • Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: Variance Application—January 2017 Page 4 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. K First Middle Last a'.140 SK-A-1 -1 if)Oc l K—1. Address L+r ( o iz.,.. 1;'1W SS 33 City State Zip Phone I Ode stand my rights tate ove. fJ v r \ T 11V\ t-- W Si nature RECEIVED SEP 2 O 2017 Variance Application-January 2017bt +^� Page 14 r ® - CITY OF ORONO t•, PC Exhibit B #17-3979 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2)requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted.The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community.To prove practical difficulties,address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception,you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation.If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." N/A 2."The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." We have a unique property. One side of our property is on a very small cove. Due to this cove, the house next door to us (on the cove side) sits further back impacting our allowances/set-backs. It's worth noting that the neighbor on the cove side is in full support of our porch and has stated they cannot see our porch from their property. The cove side neighbor provided photos from their property. Please see photos at the end of these questions. Our porch sits back nearly 150 feet from the main lakeshore, 75 feet from the cove lakeshore. The porch we're requesting a variance for sits farther back from the lake than any of our neighbors' homes. 3."The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality." It's a straight forward screen porch. The neighbors have all commented on how much nicer it makes the house look. The house has been rundown for years. The porch does not alter the character of the locality. 4.Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." N/A 5.Practical difficulties include,but are not limited to,inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116J.06,Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter." N/A 6."The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." N/A 7."The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." Candidly, we're not sure if this applies. Kim's parents, Don and Mary Ann Grimstad, have been married 60 years. Kim's dad has Alzheimer's and Kim's mom has bone cancer. Kim's mom has been determined to care for Don in their home, but it's become too much. We hope to move them into the main floor bedroom of our home. The attached porch we're requesting a variance for will be the only outside they know. 8."The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The peculiar setting of having a small cove next to us is the reason we need a variance. Our house sits very close to the highway. The porch still sits nearly 150 feet from the front shoreline, 75 feet from the cove. Farther back than any of our neighbors properties on both sides. No neighbors can see our porch from their properties. Both neighbors provided photos from their properties and can be seen at the end of these questions. 9."The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." Most homes don't have a small cove next to them and can build much closer to the lake. The porch still sits nearly 150 feet from the shoreline. The cove greatly impacts our allowances/set-backs. We're going to keep the house as-is, but ask for a variance for the porch. It's still far from the lake and doesn't impact any neighbors' views. 10."The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." 11."The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." No, it will not in any way impair health, safety or comfort of morals. We have full support of all our neighbors (please see letters provided). 12."The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." Although we were told the house is a tear down, we're keeping the house as-is. Due to the small cove which greatly impacts allowances/set-backs, we will never be able to have anything close to the water. We ask you to please alleviate difficulty caused by this small cove and grant us a variance that would allow us to keep the porch. The house is so close to the highway, this isn't a convenience we're asking for, but a necessity for us to have this porch. Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria,describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines(attach additional sheets if necessary): Our practical difficulty stems from the location of our property. We are located in the corner of a bay, right next to a very small cove. Because of this, the house on the cove side sits back and impacts our allowances/set-backs. Our house sits very close to the highway. Even with the porch, all of our neighbors houses on both sides are much closer to the lake. We are much farther back from the lake than any of our neighbors. Every neighbor strongly supports our request for a variance. We appreciate your time and thank you for reviewing our request. MEASUREMENTS OF OUR NEIGHBORS' PROPERTIES AND OUR PROPERTY TO THE LAKE 2730 Shadywood Road 65' deck to lake in cove 2760 Shadywood Road 95' deck to lake 2780 Shadywood Road 86' deck to lake 2800 Shadywood Road 75' patio to lake Our house 144' porch to lake 75' porch to cove Our house — 2740 Shadywood Road This picture if from the farthest part of the porch to the lake. It sits nearly 150 feet back from the lake. • • • Our house from the lake. Our house from the cove. t. • I! , • • `r' 'ithi. ■' v q � + 'fit 2730 Shadywood Road Our neighbor's house on the cove side. They cannot see our porch. Giy . • -Illllllllllllll '.. ' 1° r II a{ms „ ir.-. ..`.? ,fi > I!te u. 1. dV . 2760 Shadywood Road Our neighbor's house. They cannot see our porch. Our neighbor's house at the farthest point of their property lakeside. You have to go through the bushes and then look back to see our porch. • ,r • • • • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: _- 08837 W 104.0 PLAT -�3L PC STEVE SCHOTTLER /j`--_ 96.76 COMP- 3:7)1 Exhibit C LEGEND // c" #17-3979 / 1- pal / / �` .m,> o / e 4 Thal pod of'Trott.0.REGISTERED LA.SURVEY NO. 420 Hennepin County.Mmes..lino nod...1y of • 2 northwesterly of a,ne drawn Iran o paint on the ...,0 e .... \ ..gto (n 'Tr.e b 757 fee,frees,from.',c.v..tomo o,sou o. . ..,"\ O_ . ` `. 'Iryy�/� te' together wk.a onpetual e' nphw '� f 4 n.Crap . m..°. w i..a"w,'. '" , e.o..,. d � Thert port of Trod.,REGISTERED �pq° \ / N. u 420 Hennepin d. .BMmno, µ ,,No.. / • 9 the eouthweeterly 7.00 feet.and lel,ncedneesterly ol d kb \''''' o line drown from a point on ON southweeterly.of % sold Root,.21.51 Net...easterly IrOrn the N / . most western,corner of said Tract, to a po.1 IMO 11111°. r \ / Ad1e TRACT D '` so Os AD, '\..., V , ----. t4 / ` ,.,..e ./ �4�y�,, a \ p5 / \ / �� /AI ,e ^Oti 1m rnrmu'r r.l culP➢DH ` \ / .BocoKB Lot Arta to ow.-.e.mo s S \ hsT= o ry ®nor, - ,S0 y q tis;\ roo'w fr .4'4' soea-:e:s o °)o\ ')A O Bnumimoue Driveway-3.,i0 3 eodma.,.Car.Apron- o N, \ s, i nauo.BLcConcrete sw.,Boco,ca Stoop Sreae s \\ * ‘'00'... C04, / \ / demi.%14' , }ss \ / . .c. (#11--)-11, -- -ud seam.°e mode N.any easements. \ \ 0 20 40 40 -.loco.of all utill.eh.are from either obeerNed N. Iiiiiiiiil °i SCALE IN FEET NO. SCALE REVISIONS ,OB 212-177 1-� DATE n.,unxa SITE e,ADDRESS oyoy:, dm�ye mope,urt e,e°r unneaofo elven W.BROWNLANDSURVEYING.INC- BOOKIPACE ®.� BOBO C mew AVENUE So..Sumw 228. w.Bww/v �. ... .iIr¢c �/� _J G Stmt..864.9055 FAx 1•521054.42.38 ,SS» B SHE, 188-26 MITI i{yp,Y ,sW 4 Lb Y•Bl r- 00711. w r za Ew,,,wa,,,,,,,,,,,,,cwd 1 of 1 • • PC N88'37'W 104.0 PLAT CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: _ Exhibit D STEVE SCHOTTLER /, 96.76 COMP. — #17-3979 LEGEND // -., lr I < Retaining.1 F Existinp Contour ....e aR� Dw Set . / / i N a .�, g lhat port of'frost�n5'.RCpSRREO LARD Su 420. Hennepin County. to.13.3,northeasterly of the / o line bo southwest.,7.00 o eo.t on«pt soutn�..northwest..or •.�. • Aly �.. 1 , f ead• •D- Nolo...Abe..ora""pOn the enCrot...Orly /to / '""'42.j' .« • `p` � /'e Tract Tract'V o 7.r feet wet from f west corner of.oa / -P/ � X • A., tieh l O =:11:70=3="4/1 of m. . e« sD wt ef. R rr v/ \ $ '\ / a .•n` • ea w«w. That part of Irost,REWIRED ayE �e / � � timi`«e' e^ n.mtof ` j * n i .« 1 t ..i; inf . e.on mav 'y t =• :.., ..e435e + / � n Tract I 7.57 f e«f from f«northwest townof« ,«t D < O /\/ ti. \ i ,i • \`4p ` ` �.. ,�.. T \ . `w TR D ' 4 6 1 4&I I1P+4.I I I I I I:// 1 -----.._ , eg : r . •` N.•-•:',..., , . \ �� 'fiI LIQ � r Let..«N DRw 45.050 s �� / ,�/ � a ,IL, HA 0. .43,11 = M-E � ` \. « DS qO°ituminous Dr..._ 1w DC...C w .ovf1 sr Ow-Ner.akone Stoop 9B Y r. «+.. 11' .,, u N, y 1' �iEXCLUDABLE R.RD D ER • .O , ..I7', / " \ j \D«e Allowance e-100 Sf O J1 43',/ ' ' / rn am d n'ot"the bul for p measured N tM..tune. \ O q O '"' �%S � �, „ ., -Ho seam w«mm. \\ t //.«e. 0 10 40OD e.ence h me I.one/or frorn owns hon..by me nbnny 11 I companies celd ore approx... Utility comp..should be '..,,,,,. SEALE IN FEET notified.r location before cestne ony exc... roe 212-1'�« a' o.,e REVISIONS....n.. ��r mye..1^uaw �onr'df f of t er« - W.BROWN LAND SURVEYING.INC wace _ _ ®.r e:a's:.wan.. .ie" a:fo «a. r142/86 — Alc.Ifac. 110-10 tam �eon-Ye fb r r WI Y. B 1 of 1 :aoDRa.,..Dwa.,R,a�s.�,e.REG 15230�. tD se rR ENAlIL.Wet„eoA,r ...OLCOM • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: _N88.37'W 104.0 PLAT PC /� Exhibit E STEVE SCHOTTLER / 96.76 COMP. 017-3979 Staff Edits / NA. LEGEND / -- I Fence s RetenNg* Existing Derotl. 'CC' ON Existing C0Monnument ° Set Iron / /: .ss a TIma part of Tract•Ir.REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.420. �'�f• Hennepin County. o.,M northeSOuthwesterly 7.00 feet except thot port asterly of the or „• / / ,� uRe �� �? earnera Me drown Rom o pont on the southwesterly Trost w : : :M On north Of Tract b. elDo Deb v .u,a 2'y v Q \ it I R actVo 1.5'1 feet wet from the n....cern.of wk tree, 1P \PM / ,�,I /// n`..`- % e SIN �* /.mv PIP.7,'4i tft'''..,'0,.. ' tt•."" i , NISOS `�I•o �" ••/. -,,\ T`RACT D yc,.v �/ G„' v� '41L \ ® � SalDack '*Nt*fr AF4414r,4404.4e*O,0" IllittWie.'7 ' AA, ...L '''`..„., \\?.(14111P41107422rAgi&-10,k .t. i V A.• / . itips Ie,ADWRAE.EA�1n�� �i �! ftT ''9, L_-"'Ile.ANAAAA •House w 2.621 SE �� IOC.... be.on end StoopR-699 SF '-° .N,. o0ecic w 135 SA uWABLE HNICCOVflt. \\ \ , «, ip) - . N. 0.Ab.oce--100 SF / �/� « 405 '''" (LI t.s .IQ .N 4,...0. ..,-.. ..., bl M e m mweow le ler.mwee vi 9Q . /AN. •, \•\i‘,4„,:,,, , :, A ‘, ,- ` O / 00 40 tO -No.wren.«omode.any w«mwfr \\ \` III 6°11(1 , 0411 4011 IIMMMIIIMIM 444.44 in tn.I wa one/o,from plans hon..by tn.utility motN,n ler«om a«„.fere eo 9 . oNoNo". °° ` companies and `w' SCALE IN FEET .toe 212-17 SCALE 1 20' _ Ate REVISIONSIIM srtE�®- m1e' Hmv Mers....e°µ M peropiun�o any re eiww W.BROWN LAND SURVEYING.INC. BOOK/PAGE , OM.El r, w BRowN um iNc Stets er x.mwle. W 0030 CM.Ave..SO..S0rTe220. III 142/64 memo E ..— BOA 10511/354.40SS SHEET 119-N 1.40044 �,� Wsa.Om _a w WI Y. FAA 1452105-04260 �� B EMAIL.WBEAHEGURVEYvwa.CON 1 of 1 - NA,NEG I- NN99r ,,. : rO PC ' Exhibit F .VQ�O #17-3979 CITY OF ORON_ �. Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600 1. G• 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 `-9k>SH04`c Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us July 21,2017 Kimberly K Schottler 2740 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55391 Re: City Code Violations at 2740 Shadywood Road Orono, MN Ms.Schottler, The City of Orono issued a stop work order on 9/26/2016 for a project on your property at 2740 Shadywood Road. A follow up inspection was conducted by a City of Orono on July 18,2017 at 2:30pm,which revealed violations of Orono City Code. Your immediate attention to this matter is required. The violation cited on the above premises is the construction of a screen porch on the lake side of the home without a permit,which is a violation of the City of Orono Code Sec.86-66 Required and 2015 Minnesota Building Code(2015 MBC) section 1300.0120. Subpart 1. Additionally it appears this porch was constructed in an illegal location lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. In order to correct these violations the addition to the porch on the rear of the house must be removed or provide plans and an application for an after the fact variance ($1400.00 fee). Pending variance approval is not guaranteed. Following such approval a building permit is still required. Removal of the porch or submittal of a complete after the fact variance application must be completed/ received by August 1, 2017. Please be advised, if you fail to correct the violation prior to the deadline,this matter will be turned over to the City Attorney for further action. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 952.249.4625. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO a7:07z— Roger Peitso Building Official Enclosures City of Orono Code Sec.86-66,2015 MBC section 1300.0120 Subpart 1., Photos City of Orono Sec.86-66.-Required. (a) Permits required. It is unlawful for any person to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, or demolish any building or structure, or any part or portion, including but not limited to the general construction, plumbing, on-site sewage treatment system, wood stoves and fireplaces, ventilating, heating or air conditioning systems, or cause such work to be done, without first obtaining a separate building, sign,or general permit for each such building,structure or separate component from the city. (b) Zoning permit for land alteration. A land alteration and hardcover plan shall be submitted with the site plan or certified site plan and incorporated as part of the building permit approval, including the name of the individual performing the work. If no building permit is necessary, a separate zoning permit application for hardcover and/or land alteration shall be submitted by the individual performing the work prior to conducting any land alteration or hardcover installations on a property, including grading, patios and retaining walls.The zoning permit shall be reviewed and approved by the city prior to issuance. 2015 Minnesota Building Code Section 1300.0120 PERMITS. Subpart 1. Required.An owner or authorized agent who intends to construct,enlarge, alter, repair, move,demolish,or change the occupancy of a building or structure,or to erect, install,enlarge,alter, repair, remove,convert,or replace any gas, mechanical,electrical, plumbing system, or other equipment,the installation of which is regulated by the code; or cause any such work to be done, shall first make application to the building official and obtain the required permit. • a:. #>, fit' A 4 y, .� -x"•11. ♦ { , R w yy 40* xr • " 11 7,t,ael , � 7�9� 201 ' � :K � " '" 7�'1C ,.117 � PC • Exhibit G #17-3979 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) JEFF /'i- of 690 CAA' Oilt.A10 [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at Iso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapprov_ of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improv.m4 t plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. V/6//il `r- P ••e• • •wner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) 9JVL A . of 73 0 t ((At' [print name(s)] [print address] h.ve revi j, ed • e plan-' for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at A. A # - also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. /0°I rty Owner to Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED 7 ( SEP 2 0 2017 Variance Application—January 2017 3 9 CITY OF ORONO Page 15 = September 15, 2017 Dear City of Orono, As a brand new neighbor to 2740 Shadywood Road, I lend my full support to the Schottler's request to the City of Orono's Planning and Zoning Department for a variance. Their request is reasonable in terms of both function and aesthetics. We are happy to be new members of the neighborhood, and delighted to see a nice addition to a house on our street. Furthermore,their porch doesn't impact anyone's view. The porch is compatible with the site and is a welcome addition. As a neighbor, I urge the Planning and Zoning Department to grant the Schottler's a variance. Sincerely, PC(-41"\--- RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 r 3 9 7 a CIN OF ORONO September 15, 2017 Dear City of Orono, As a neighbor to 2740 Shadywood Road, I lend my full support to the Schottler's request to the City of Orono's Planning and Zoning Department for a variance. Their request is reasonable in terms of both function and aesthetics. I'm delighted to see a nice addition to a house on our street that was decrepit for years. Furthermore,their porch doesn't impact anyone's view. The porch is compatible with the site and is a welcome addition. As a neighbor, I urge the Planning and Zoning Department to grant the Schottler's a variance. Singerely, 10; ,e2C-21e;411 S 170 •r OOD RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 3 0 CITY OF ORONO September 15, 2017 Dear City of Orono, As a neighbor to 2740 Shadywood Road, I lend my full support to the Schottler's request to the City of Orono's Planning and Zoning Department for a variance. Their request is reasonable in terms of both function and aesthetics. I'm delighted to see a nice addition to a house on our street that was decrepit for years. Furthermore, their porch doesn't impact anyone's view. The porch is compatible with the site and is a welcome addition. As a neighbor, I urge the Planning and Zoning Department to grant the Schottler's a variance. Sincerely, t= / 7 11 4 10 IP (,,k_Cc4v--tev Z70 S(it1)-=a) C RECEIVED 3 9 / SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO September 15, 2017 Dear City of Orono, As a new neighbor to 2740 Shadywood Road, I lend my full support to the Schottler's request to the City of Orono's Planning and Zoning Department for a variance. Their request is reasonable in terms of both function and aesthetics. We are happy to be new members of the neighborhood, and delighted to see a nice addition to a house on our street. Furthermore,their porch doesn't impact anyone's view. The porch is compatible with the site and is a welcome addition. As a neighbor, I urge the Planning and Zoning Department to grant the Schottler's a variance. Sincerely, RECEIVED 397Q 9 7SEP 2 U 2017 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit H #17-3979 City of Orono ;sLoNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2740 Shadywood Rd. -' Prepared by: W. Brown Land Surveying Date: 10-29-2015 FIG:Fe-ajar, Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING.HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) ' (Garage) • (24'x 30') ' (720 S.F.). A House Irregular 2,621 S.F. B Deck 11.0' x 25.9' 284 S.F. C Bituminous Driveway Irregular 2.110 S.F. D Concrete Garage Apron Irregular 112 S.F. E Concrete Sidewalk & Stoop Irregular 699 S.F. F S.F. G S.F._ H S.F. S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. , l! S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X _ S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 5,826 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1884): F Deck 11.6' x 11.6' 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 5,726 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 46,050 to OHW S.F. Existing_Prepeeed-Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 12.4 (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is en information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to Insure the accuracy of the Information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with pmvisions of the City Code,the Code provisions wr7f prevail. RECEIVED Page 8 of 9 SEP 2 0 2017 t.1,1$ 9 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono •scNo Hardcover Calculation Worksheet se ; .I'I Property Address: 2740 Shadywood Rd. 'i ov Prepared by: W. Brown Land Surveying Date: 09-18-2017 rtFF `FZ- i Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING.HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Survey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width T(Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A House —_ Irregular 2,621 S.F. B Screen Porch 25.6' x 31.5' 806 S.F. C Bituminous Driveway Irregular 2,110 S.F. D Concrete Garage Apron Irregular 112 S.F. E Concrete Sidewalk & Stoop Irregular 699 S.F._ F Deck 11.6' x 11.6' 135 S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F._ J S.F. K S.F. L LS.F. M S.F. N S.F. o S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W X S.F. S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover _ 6,483 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1884): . . F Deck 11.6' x 11.6' 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 1 100 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract fine(2)from line 11y 6,383 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 46,050 to OHW S.F. Existing_Proposed-Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)j 13.9 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to Insure the accuracy of the information contained hRE C C 1 C`V E D however,if any Information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail Page8of9 SEP 202017 1 CITY OF ORONO 1 '-'4" 111 i., • ' • t - • • • IP, Ti t• • ' .4 • ., .41: .,. „i ..4"; ^ • \ • •' •.). .,IY !?.'' Or PC ,\( AI , • t i•4, — Exhibit I 4 / ,i , V 4.":•'. .,,414,.** ' l'.... •1 . ••••Y , • #17-3979 4,..: 1...., , -TT: :10. : s ,t:44.4:11:6.10.:7.,- t::17 : 400 4A • . • ' ' -' .7.,-; • •tt-'.4.It-,,.47 ,,- lt, ...‘.31A .. -4. >, ''.. ••- ' - W. r _, .., - . AL_ -* • , 04.-.. .- , -- •.-4- --- — . ..... -......z. ,,w ark. •,...4._ ,. . - ...1.... - :.----44,•- . t_. . , . .•--- ...t, •,• -, :.-„-2:1---c --,-;;44,,- .• ,..-,,1.1,.. . .• ,- •:„_,„ b. , ,•._ ,_ --..„„t,-,..-, .„...„...,...„ -4z..". -I ,___- ..„-_,,,__ ;...,..f•-•,.,..„,„ ....,.........4,k, .....-.a.k...... - , , • _ - - • - I - . „ .. . , -, ,.„.. _ .....,, ,„ „ ,.. . , „,,,, .. t.,,, 1 ir,_ „.., w.... ,,.,,„ ,, -,... „. ;- ik,, A II li ?•,--' .i '14 11111 4.4. .. ., ..‘ ,,, ,,. . .-.. .. , , I.- 4 - li ie,,-• •.. • I - g - I 4' s• 04%, iii ‘I 2 II \I , I j . t I r Z•C•'..Z ^ "ki ,„ 4,4. . 0411114/11.611116‘.- 7.. .4' . IF.' ( , • 4 44' f 4 Jr'. ft • •• .. . '4416. • i I ' •••• ‘ .-' • ” .".• . - 't` .�� ' -- .,� .. . --• - -' a- • J.. 1 R -- __ . Ts- t._ i _..... __ -. z ... ... �LT�- .n.. �l T.n .....e f�°i^7f—mac . t ' '" -rte .: '' 1 ;;;4',e r ,�,. 09/ 12/2017 • ' M ;!r - :" '.-ms's ,F e.',.� 4- ... -may,.......,-d”4 ;.t�J;. 7 y' ,d � x :r • �: .r r • -- __�:_ �" -, -- - - y '.CRjn ':..^�.g -Y.. ..:, ._., A:-.. / - S-;'i.•. • o • �'_• i�'r�..+\.�_ - f+u'^kawtt""ice. _ r 1 _ 3 fit• • _ :f. • _. -_ . ) •1 art At+y„'�-�'��". -'Y -.f • • c x ,- 09/ 12/2017 • r 'i V.' Exhibit J j ,. , , s$ #17-3979 r h" .�, , 'tia V `. 1,r. d1 tP 7` '"' . r' w cry .1•i_ F. • • • • iosligilik • a.9 t . i . .+.F S•,tom `� A 1411IN"413". ' , -t,,,,,,,... *, '. ',,,,k, a ' rcp • • • 'WI �' r �� , C' ,.., $ ititit 4 / ht � s PC Exhibit L #17-3979 Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Receipt Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Print Date Thu Sep 14 11:35:26 2017 This is a receipt only with 'paid'stamp or cash register receipt attached TOTAL COST: $36.25 Company or Homeowner Name: Steve Schottler Contact Person: Steve Subject Property Address: 2740 Shadywood Rd Orono Comments: 2111723240065 Buffer Distance:350 feet Mail Label Count:29 38 21-117-23 13 0023 38 21-117-23 24 0003 38 21-117-23 24 0004 38 21-117-23 24 0005 38 21-117-23 24 0009 38 21-117-23 24 0016 38 21-117-23 24 0020 38 21.117-23 24 0021 38 21-117-23 24 0028 38 21-117-23 24 0029 38 21-117-23 24 0030 38 21-117-23 24 0031 38 21-117-23 24 0032 38 21-117-23 24 0037 38 21-117-23 24 0038 38 21-117-23 24 0039 38 21-117-23 24 0040 38 21-117-23 24 0041 38 21-117-23 24 0044 38 21-117-23 24 0045 38 21-117-23 24 0048 38 21-117-23 24 0054 38 21-117-23 24 0059 38 21-117-23 24 0060 38 21-117-23 24 0061 38 21-117-23 24 0062 38 21-117-23 24 0063 38 21-117-23 24 0064 38 21-117-23 24 0065 RUN DATE:09/14120/7 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 21-117-23130023 38 21-117-23240030 38 21-117-23240048 HANS BERGH&SHARON BERGH DAVID F MAISER/MARY A MAISER MARGARET L LOWE 2800 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2635 WEST LAFAYETTE RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 HANS BERGH&SHARON BERGH DAVID F MAISER/MARY A MAISER MARGARET L LOWE 2800 SHADYWOOD RD 2700 SHADYWOOD RD 2630 LAFAYETTE RD W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0003 38 21-117-23 24 0031 38 21-117-23 24 0054 S S NEWRAI&J E NEWRAI DAVID F MAISER/MARY A MAISER CKONE LLC 2705 SHADYWOOD RD 2700 SHADYWOOD RD 2785 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 SOHRAB S NEWRAI DAVID F MAISER/MARY A MAISER CKONE LLC JULIE E NEWRAI 2700 SHADYWOOD RD 161 PRIMROSE LA 2705 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MEDINA MN 55340 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0004 38 21-117-23 24 0032 38 21.117-23 24 0059 MD&R A MEEK B A KVAM&J C KVAM TRUSTEES MARLYS J OGLE 2725 SHADYWOOD RD 2720 SHADYWOOD RD 2771 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 MICHAEL D&ROBERTA A MEEK JOHN C&BEVERLEE A KVAM MARLYS 1 OGLE 2725 SHADYWOOD RD 2720 SHADYWOOD RD 2771 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0005 38 21-117-23 24 0037 38 21-117-23 24 0060 JOHN MATACHEK&ALLISON HOLT BARRY 0 SEWALL T M RANDGAARD/M J BARRETT TR 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2765 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 JOHN MATACHEK&ALUSON HOLT BARRY 0 SEWALL THOMAS M RANDGAARD 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 2680 SHADYWOOD RD 1730 KENWOOD PKWY EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 38 21-117-23240009 38 21-117-23240038 38 21-117-23240061 R L LITTLE&D A LITTLE MARGARET L LOWE S E LEIGHTON&D L LEIGHTON 2775 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 RICHARD L LITTLE MARGARET L LOWE STEVEN E LEIGHTON 2775 SHADYWOOD RD 2630 LAFAYETTE RD W DONNA L LEIGHTON EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 8830 POINTE VISTA DR VICTORIA MN 55386 38 21-117-23240016 38 21-117-23240039 38 21-117-23240062 CHERYL&DARWIN LUNDSTROM ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER DEREK C PFLUG&JACK T PFLUG 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2655 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 CHERYL&DARWIN LUNDSTROM ANTHONY KRIER&ROBIN KRIER DEREK PFLUG 4201 SUNSET DR *514 2655 W LAFAYETTE RD JACK PFLUG SPRING PARK MN 55384 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 6211 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0020 38 21-117-23 24 0040 38 21-117-23 24 0063 THOMAS J&SHARON D CASEY 1 T ENGLER&E A ENGLER S SHANNON&C SHANNON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2760 SHADYWOOD RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 00000 THOMAS!&SHARON D CASEY JEFFERY T ENGLER RANDY&TRACY GUSTAFSON 4501 SHOREUNE DR*14 2760 SHADYWOOD RD 19565 ROSEDALE AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0021 38 21-117-23 24 0041 38 21-117-23 24 0064 R C SCHWALBE&D E SCHWALBE R A CARTER&1 M CARTER J R MINER&S L MINER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2780 SHADYWOOD RD 2730 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 RICHARD SCHWALBE RICHARD&JEANNE CARTER JAMES R MINER DIANE SCHWALBE 2780 SHADYWOOD RD STEPHANIE L MINER 8125 NARCISSUS ST EXCELSIOR MN 55331 2730 SHADYWOOD RD VICTORIA MN 55386 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117.23240028 38 21-117-23240044 38 21-117-23240065 JAMES 0 GINTHER ET AL THOMAS P LOWE TRUSTEE KIMBERLY K SCHOTTLER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2630 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 2740 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55331 ORONO MN 55331 UNDIVIDED THOMAS P&MARGARET L LOWE KIMBERLY K SCHOTTLER 2630 WEST LAFAYETTE RD 2740 SHADYWOOD RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 24 0029 38 21-117-23 24 0045 JOHN R MATACHEK MARGARET L LOWE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 JOHN R MATACHEK MARGARET L LOWE 2735 SHADYWOOD RD 2630 LAFAYE I It RD W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 PC Hennepin CountyLocate & NotifyMapExhibit L Ellp #17-3979 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 9/14/: s 4. 21-117-23-12 • 21-117-23-21 t s. 1 . 71 Mir . 'cry 21-117-23-24 ' .,y 21-117-24-13 1E4it-0 04 4-i . �;: J , .t x ,.' ytie � a a 4,-; _ Ah4 41 21-117-23-13 4of z 4, r s s4 " • „ i. ii 21-117-23-31 - . 1-117-23-42- ... 1-117-23-42• sS n , 4 s - 21;147-23-31 21:=117-23-42 . .. x IP Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 2740 Shadywood Road Orono For more information contact: MN 55331 Hennepin County GIS Office 2111723240065 300 6th Street South Minneapolis,MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin.us Item 3 Date Application Received: 09/20/17 0A, Date Application Considered as Complete:11/01/17 r VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12/31/17 6 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator .kESHOT'ti From: Melanie Curtis, Planner ►'Y1GG Date: 20 November 2017 Subject: #17-3980,Shawn Wischmeier, 540 Big Island, ATF Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variance approval to permit construction of a detached accessory building less than 10 feet from the principal structure. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial. Background A permit for the new home on the property was issued in May of 2017. Due to the remoteness of the Big Island property and winter weather approaching,the applicant made site preparations, brought materials to the property, and began construction of a 300 square foot shed prior to the issuance of a building permit this fall.The shed is located 6.7 feet from the principal structure where a 10-foot setback is required. Construction on the shed has been stopped and the application has requested a setback variance. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-570&78-1279-Setbacks: RS District Required Proposed Rear 50' +200' East Side 50' ±75' West Side 50' +300' Lakeshore 75' ±125' Average Lakeshore The shed will be conforming with respect to the average lakeshore setback. Structure to Structure 10' 6.7' Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: The property has 3.2 acres in area and exceeds 1.99 acres; it is not subject to structural coverage limitations. FILE#17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: The property, including the 300 square foot shed, is well below the Tier 1, 25% hardcover allowance. Applicable Regulations: Building to Building Setback Variance(Section 78-570&78-1438) As constructed,the shed and the home under construction are separated by 6.7 feet where a 10 foot separation is required. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The construction of the shed on a residential property is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance to permit the allowance of a detached building with less than a 10 foot separation from the home in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.The mass and building crowding is inconsistent with the City's goals for preservation of open space. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the shed within the 10 foot separation between buildings appears to be reasonable as the size of the shed is only 300 square feet and the overall massing on the property is minimal.The adjacent properties will not be adversely impacted and the location of the shed is less visible from the lake. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The shed was constructed without a building permit, and could have been constructed in a conforming location;crowding the buildings on the property is not consistent with the comprehensive plan.This criterion is not met;and FILE#17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 3 of 4 c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. It is unlikely the location of the shed in the existing location will alter the character of the locality.This criterion is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a 300 square foot detached accessory storage building is an allowed use in the RS District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The home is situated on the top of the hill on the Property.The grade drops in all directions away from the home.The shed would likely be more visible from the lake if it were to be constructed to conform based on the topography. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The conditions relevant to the Property are similar and apply to other adjacent properties.This criterion is not met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The owners have ample area to construct a conforming shed meeting the 10 foot separation demonstrating reasonable use. This criterion is not met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The shed, while not out of character with the neighborhood,could be constructed in a conforming location the proposed variance is proposed to avoid a tenant of the Code intended to protect against the appearance of uncharacteristic bulk and mass.This criterion is not met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The purpose for granting the requested variance would be for the convenience to the applicants.This criterion is not met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status Staff has completed a preliminary review of the project for compatibility with the septic system, and has determined that the project is not likely to impact the existing or future septic sites. FILE#17-3980 20 Nov 2017 Page 4 of 4 Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis While the applicant has provided a compelling argument supporting the placement of the shed (visibility, impact to the site/trees, etc), Staff finds few practical difficulties exist which support the requested variance beyond convenience. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends denial of the variance. As the shed is partially constructed the applicant should be required to apply for a building permit for the shed and move the shed to a conforming location. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map , • PC Exhibit A City of Orono #17-3980 Variance Application -"�. Street Address: �Q /�T • 2750 Kelley Parkway Application# ` 952- 49600 Orono,MN 55356Date Received: �I Main: Staff: I2fax: 952-249-4616Fee: $700 _. .,,, j Mailing Address: Fi ` / P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $700 / $2,500 G Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be plaJ ed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: fl V r S1 Nl I, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: r ii1 ,t•/� Pm/114 Sfrw,kit V L I ' f....II 1,a,litI,�1 (alta additional heets as ne essary) APPLICANT INFORMATIQN: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: r IIYW h UIQ t 541 1,4400, 0, Phone(Primary): — Mailing Address: 2.411S( a114 t . al p r City: (yi(t5,r( ZIP: 5S 3 3 Email: SW IS 4►14r1el t . ro_ La dirt PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: heck here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone(Primary): _ v Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Email: —� APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant ackn• ledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an appli ,nt and/or prope•y owner Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized epresentative . end in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed . -r 4, Applicant Signature: ' A,A / ate: q.f0,1 Applicant Signature: WM, Date: q ' >7l 1 /tiff f Property Owner Signature: IVDate: Property Owner Signature: Or Date: Variance Application—January 2017 Page 4 PC Exhibit B #17-3980 Practical Difficulties Responses 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter" The property is a single family residence, use of the property will not change from it's current form 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his/her property not created by the landowner" The current location of the property is on Big Island, and the contour of the land is such that any other appropriate spot for the ancillary structure would then become more visible from the lake, which we are trying to avoid. The goal is to minimize the visual impact of the ancillary structure from the lake, thus making the island more rustic as is the current status. 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality" If granted the variance will enhance the character of the property. The more collected the structures are the more rustic the island remains. 4. "Economic consideration alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use of the property existing under the terms of the Zoning Chapter" There is no financial gain by this request. Financial concerns do not have any impact on this request. It is solely for environmental and safety reasons. 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variance shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06 Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. No applicable 6. "The Board of Appleals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located" The property will be used as directed if this variance is granted 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a single-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling" The proposed/existing will only be used as a single-family dwelling. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediate adjoining property" The adjoining properties are not visible and will not be affected 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located" NA 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant" Yes, by grouping the structures we are preserving the natural beauty of the land. 11."The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code" There will be no adverse affect 12."The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty" Without creating a visual affect from the lake there is no other location applicable. Practical Difficulties Statement: Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary) To: Melanie Curtis Roger Peitso From: Shawn & Kelly Wischmeier Re: 540 Big Island Garage Variance Date: November 1, 2017 Pursuant to our discussion in October,we are providing additional information to demonstrate why the garage structure needs to be placed in its current location and why it was not practical to move it farther away from the house. Specifically, here is additional supporting information to elaborate on the original submission to the "Practical Difficulties Responses"that were received by Orono on September 20, 2017. This Memo is meant to supplement the responses to Items#2 and#8. Practical Difficulty Response#2 "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his/her property not created by the landowner" The primary challenge in building anything on this site is that the open area for construction,within appropriate setbacks, is on a large, steep hill. From the survey,you can see the contours that resemble a large upside-down bowl. These gradients are combined with a loamy/clay soil type that must be scraped and graded to result in a hardpacked surface suitable for construction (e.g., pouring a concrete floor). Here is a picture that shows how the garage has been "cut" into this hill. ' ,,' ' ''',4 , ,-;,:,:', l'''s',,,'c-,,‘ i :.4%V ' i.. ,i t -��. � / X',\` ,till' Q / 4 /wit` w��, may/^ / r �a , '4 '�l� .. ',«:•,� ,•,r� -.':ilk: � i tit,- ., , f � • ; , '4 � firf4r iqi + k r r�yV,ii,' +tom 4 Zr ` Y 4i.r'`i'•'.'0 Y ty yNe V$;.• -'M1'� . . .. .,vit t.ivtir, � . i, ' 4` +fir,T`, 'fit i 3! i �F ,n. Practical Difficulty Response#8 "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediate adjoining property" The challenge of building a structure on this plot of land with the contour gradients described in#2 above, is finding a structural design that will fit the existing space. The structure had to be designed in a non-traditional manner to make it fit the existing, unique space. The workable design involved two separate sections with access from two different sides of the garage(an upper section and lower section). The lower section is side-loading and will allow for small recreational vehicles, mowers, and other similar items to be stored. The upper sections will allow for the garage to both be functional and look normal from the front of the property(south or water side). The key is that the garage height had to be increased so that it would fit appropriately within the roof line of the main dwelling. If the upper section was not added,the garage roof would have sit well below the roofline of the main dwelling, and would not fit aesthetically or functionally on the property(the roof would have been on the same elevation as the main dwelling access door). From the following picture,you can see that the opening in the upper section of the garage is designed to be on the same elevation as the side access door on the main dwelling. orip,--744.4.-,..-...:,-,--41-4,,A,-.%,„,:, ,. 4:,?,--. , i F,..1 .., ' sioil ,,. 4\ l'., ..titsoffillt4.,mow i• t "kl- \ No Ilt e,,,,,; -- Tic:N fr,;";t. ' 1 t ' 'kVA 1 0 IV *•-• •:., ,P. It R } fs V `� a , Xr, 1c A "' tr,,,T. ''''' *I 1 , . ' 4 , '.NO , - *4,10. f y itis , ,r__ --nre 1 -MID - , By building these two garage sections, one on top of the other,this has caused the back (north) side of the garage to be extraordinarily high/tall. See the picture below for the back (north) side of the garage. ,I :://4 *11 W P-1‘ .. This is an extreme height that would otherwise be an eyesore, but fortunately,this side of the garage is to the rear of the property and away from the water and what can be seen from the shoreline. Thus, it is hidden from view. If the structure had to be moved to be farther away from the main dwelling by an extra 3.5 feet,that would cause the wall on the back of this garage to be higher. Because of the vertical drop in the contour on the garage's northeast corner, plus the requirement to keep the front of the garage (south) side at an appropriate elevation relative to the main dwelling entry door,the only way to make that work would be to materially increase the overall height of the garage on the back(north) side. In short, adding any additional height to this garage would be untenable and thus supports why the specific building site is unique and requires special consideration. Additionally,the extra height that would have to be added to the garage creates challenges in the block retaining walls used as part of the foundation for the structure. The front(south)side of the garage already has eight rows of block in the wall. To slide the whole foundation further from the main dwelling and thus dig it deeper into the hill and increase the overall height of the garage would cause a required increase in the height of the block walls,thus creating more structural complications. Here is a picture of the inside block walls of the structure. t a 4 , %; ' ' ,, , , , _, ‘ .. , r 4,101,_ , t nd tIRM• 4. iib ' ii ' i,i c, '?.,t ' .-' mss,.-; ,_ 1 i. t • 'Te I s p ,�, , . , , ,t, ,, - ,,, ..1.1 - ,7--,, ;fi, aa ..---,ii:,..„_:� �-� _"_++ '�' t4 ,.... . n � ' p,_M a� .aA!!;,,,- '' ' as . 111/4 „ gig ” The following picture shows the fall-off in grade on the northeast corner of the garage. Note the steepness and the poor soil quality. This picture is intended to help illustrate why moving another 3-4 feet laterally is not at all insignificant and would require grading down to a soil quality that is sufficient to support a concrete pour for the structure. This picture also gives additional perspective as to how much higher the structure would likely have to be to fit the contour. �, ', , , , t,... ,A.011,/,.„ , L , „ .,, ‘ ?A ION r 1 r - 4,000,40, i. moi. >Mt+i ; • iti+ 41, tea....:4 "mom. f , ' .. a "fir_ f+� r • ,,,,4,.. , 40 • „14 1144i‘0 , ' , „ilk ,1-4. -. ' 1 " ' - ' - ilk_ • r * • _ i'• , ., r i`' '''P,.. .�a y 4,• 10. In short,as homeowners,we would always prefer that we don't have to file for such variances and simply comply fully with established code. Also, we would have preferred the garage to be further away from the main dwelling as well. The modifications that would will be required to the structure to leave as-is (e.g.,shorter roof overhangs) are not desirable to us. However, we realize that the builder really had no logical alternatives given the site-specific considerations of this property. We support them and the decision they had to make. Happy to provide any additional information or answer any questions as required. • • PC Exhibit C #17.3950 U 8 i FOUNDATION AS-BUILT SURVEY FOR 13 KELLY AND SHAWN WISCHMEIER IN LOTS 1.10 AND VACATED ROADS,KATE B.PLUMMERS SUBDIVISION51, OF LOT 2,KITCNEL'S SUBDIVISION OF GOVT LOTS S 8 6, SEC.22,T.112 N.,R 23 W. � HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA bl z Fill O Al 11 1.4r✓'s / -S �, 0 —30 60 ISO _ �� -� 21ir'i€ � 1 ....... ti --- ii �� 5 — itti 7 SCALE IN FEET !1ti I. Y i tlIi11- 17-208 PC Exhibit D #17-3980 . 41111111616 , PSL co?' rr'(6 Elco¢ s.tN 7/. 411141kbh/,. 11.1711 2_0' a 1 I , / v J t J 4 4 \ ^ J ID Z _— n J i ----- 1 v• I 9' I "' PC Exhibit E #17-3980 I ' \ i' /. ......._ , ___,„„„„litt. -44111iiik .,1 +r li 1,411140:t i i A 011 1 !► ‘,\,,./.4.....:I 3 �ti� vat. ifitit 'J ' � , :r 1 n , At t . 1. M AP! r °II } 4,000, ` _ ;< + e '111711 ' "+'' F 4 1 'te� ."I.' ; ... ..,ems 4." `,Y+... ,,.y/ .,.,C.. t ,-s of _ - • „ J _;r- 1-"a•-•.. i • .;r '. - k I.. w y • •NP 04, { ' a _, a , , ,„. , .1, - , r __ Ne, f At, .... , ..51r, v -ost „ill.; v,d i, . f /.46, , . . • t i8 , _ 4iliti 4. I: j1 !tM . :; 11 .:„, ,-. :Ill . i t# . . ., s .'''.i.: : ' . P 4, rf#°y..S f.w y-y 'lt, y • 7 7. '4 y t�+ T 40. { LL{ �, �+ ` Pik t ,.-._ d �. 1,41,4#47..11.,..- . tr w � k=.. 44 ' '• ..g Bks o- ,„ 1"y kY ° l 'A f-x (� '.9 .•.,---, �" yy K. - -,'• illik . i ..'•.*:: ..,.e 4„, ••,\ ....., ' .r.i. t,..., . e , . i.,,' ..,..,n.,,. ., 4,,, r!,.. ,,,iiii1,-kv..!. 6 .5 , ,, t _ i• �j j I'I.9► l 'K + 4 fir.. ',.'��� .- t�- Ip • ' /4 1.' I NI$11 A ' ,. 1� �a +, yrs / Nig/ 1J 1 _- .,,, S it ) `fai„ii 1 r 44''. "s: r_' .,' ;. , , : �r� �i7ft. `,.� fi • SryYM .,+ i}+% P 44,` )1 • , a �i ‘,......:1, r ";e r.; a •' N f ,ti re • •t ! r c• .. ,4 a i to yL',..l.c;:i a• l4 J i o w - �a, rte'. ft IL 4 s _,.,......,, j• C,ivyVf ', \ + ,, , .�' ...u. ...:. -,' 't it - .? pi - :it , ,: - ..,4iiiiio, latim I: 111 Vii ._t, -t.f At;ii..,1 if.I i' "Iwo), 1,,,,-,.„.A.:.,..T . 1 • : ., i -.t'7.:. ....:.1 , tv ;if , - iiii i ;,. - Jr'''. .',. .: ,,,,,. ,lam :I. 4 , s . \*%J'' 'go ;Ipt.'.` (s r 1� . ''s'' 1%1A r fi i i It7 11" clilf *•' 5 s ,�'1� �,4 ' Ir * /4- I— ' ' .c -. '' . 14r:I'Al--.::4--',1,),431:;' ,-',: - ', i /.: -,111 , ,. .z,,./VV.' 'NY?, Nr , r *V ' ' ' , ,his, i. , h , ' ;, i; . S; t V�,. V f :1.;,. , OA , f& ';;,,,,,C•i,i' ,. --..i [ , ' ',., , :•."4 4 . • • lhai '.I • r . ; . .4 _ ,�, v Y r. f��� _ ...a y x _ k. ' 0 11)ti111111.ip M .-!DOD yX� - 1' `° wx4 • _ 40441441140......,, '.• : w.fe. ( t� '� - "'d\ 1� - al— •41., ' t T wY.y: M.,a, W, • k x1 —"At-'' tj i,..;,''' t,A t . ' -.-.. i#,,,,;- AL 4 .,v4:...-- :-...... ;4--,-,..4).. - . , „. • ( ... . -,, ....e .... ; .,-, ,, ,- A,- " 't INN. '...: ,.;•4.-47.-. -'-^` ,. , )67"; itit',5c''.,,t-k -11:ii41..i.;';':. ‘.‘,-. , - sit ..,,.... ----f..;-- --: -, ...'--...-4, - .. ' ',. • - ',, • ,..„ 7. , - - , , kr, „.t A4v,,, e... 44.,,,,,. ,. i .4 ,,,.; . i 4:, ,,, 1,, i 111I'l — ..F . . ,,. ... ., ,, ..... 4., ',f ' • ...,,, . -,...11/4•J:7,c,- ,i.:t.:,,, • ..,4. ...,•:,,lt ,, ,,. • 4 : ir,A_ , „.__ i'XiAkt' - • . 74.' i <!, 4et- .i'• -..- - ,!,:• 4. -.:. '';. , ' i .' , .. !,..i.: '''... ''-',.,1•:•,„4,,•,V ', ,) Pr' -r" . 4, ,: •:v 14" 1 . R."'S' XIV-,'' ..".4*, .;-4.• ,' ''...- „. tii••• r', ' ' ' 'i If, irif ,..' -.;T... .4":-.. ' ' ',. ., ' a•••• ; f '• :, , Yr . .0,::414 -,..-,*,%,„-4,'.eokt• ,_.,:it....--i,.,5'11 . "”. ‘• r , • I . • ',. T ....... 4121444. il:-:',.' ..57.7 Friffo-vvr- ! fi- = - 7 :tiAtlifC.i. v, „ ... A.,. ., .,4 :. , i k, „,„ .. 4-4 , F•if, '- ".. II,, .„. t"if. -fc' - `'."4 !, . • i• .... 'i.'.i...,`.4 1 ' 1,.A ', 1- '. T V...','., :,.. . .i:it' ,-,:‘•, k=i; ....14 4 ''',3;.. % '1' ,T. ...;:t,,_‘.. ,k .. , - e, -.• , .,., j.: i!re.:17-, - •• .."- '''• .k 11'7') t - , ' ''' ' ' •.7' ' ' • -1- ,'!.. v - t., 1,'• ik,• •' elesoi ",' • ,'.*,! ,....4. • ...„. Ali , . ,d .., t •,.. . .,„.•. -. ... , .., -. 1 ‘ ;, •i . „ . . ‘ .• • , . , :. '.'.k..'11''''', 41 • : . ' ..'.,'• . T. ' •'".'7 ' . ' ''..'. ; :; - '.1 1 ,,,,. jr.,41. ..,,,t .1$ .. t ; ,..-- • :.... ,,,,,, '''; •-• 't. ' -J ' - • , • I . , • • . .., — -, — , .— , .4 .: ' 1/2' .ig1/2 <- ;.-.., i .t.,vi.V0 !,• I 1 ' ., lt;ici, ,,. 1:".. 4.2' '.i . ": .-4":ir t': ,- ii,.. ...:. .. .• ,!.,, orE ' ..... ... ,,.t",",': : ,,„ .,,, , k t'1,71::'7 -• .2.;:„..4‘ • 3- -- 14.4i ,!..t‘ - ., ,.. • 1 , . . .,,,, ., :-. •,A, „,..., .. i . ,.,--'''',.. -...,''........."' _ . ,,..;-'1^ ' - • '' ';11,•)" '. . :,• .-.•„. • ',4 ,r•';',Y,J-.. • .. - • •' / *f.', ',. ..,4.:;111.0.,...f.'IC. . - . k 1, t?' 1, t• ' , . ' i t•': - ' ' V iv:J:1... ,, . . v. ,- - , ';', '0,,''T '',I,','''‘1 • ' - . ' 2 t .' ' .' ' , • _- ,.., .. , , • .. 1 ' - • ' ''',3, .• ,' ', 1.' ,. : t, , ' ',.. 3. '•. 1,' ''',441t ': y , ' • . ,'-- - • t , . :1 , ,. . ...... , . 't. •r• • -Nr., i , . ....,....,, . , _ . . . . . ,••• , .. . •: • ,, , ., . _-_;-,4-tr4,-- .4 •, •-•. - - -- - , . -. -, , , A,...... .4.44, .. -- 4 , •.. •...- .!,:- fi . .. ..... - O.. _-- .11416,, ,......,,,,...,,,,,,,„.........----' . N" .' ".• ' ' ' - :•4 . .. ... .,,, . • •.• , ,„,.:.J•-.. -.t tk• '..•--,, • t . • : ' . , , . -...11001,41N -1- ' ;• ,' \ -,70_ --- ''. - - .. . . • i , . . . '-'-'i'''':--1 ; ?-• . .. , 7, .-•-''-,.,,4),"_,.-...,7t-'..."4:4..,#41--,- .-,.....• i,.c..- ..- .. —, . „• :.'i.t,-',"“"....:-,ZI'. —....."'f-4.,,,':•'.4.*7-74.--1 „.`':,";-,.-. ;,,','...i4i" ,. , „,- e.. , ,. 4.l,,.:,-•,:i,.1..i.74,•-k'i-;.,.,.:,. ,-_, :•;••=-•:'.-"47''--,„.:...:.-„-.:':,•"'.:--,..- --•- ,... _ -1i1/4.,•,t,-+t, ,.,i.1„--.,,-,. , ._. .-,. ill # T� R lfµ' 4 `k' Cr '/' t• g '" ! - ref t` 1, r A t • ' i 'fil • i t ', r *t P't R :rti,4, ` ' by it �nalt ' . � • 'ir , i li�'f S � .( L. p^ ' • • IT ••,I I .. � -+.. , i itibit. 4.' . r • ';4111t., ;( • —a' , 14 -:.4011110011 II 4 '' . 1. a€. ��� - 1 qq ` ' �4 4 .°h L • . . , _. t M1 •k - meg,. fit- ' ,may .*' r r ' t'- q fi7364.4 , f�r orgx,; • Lis Vmax r r _ .r +lres� s{ _-gar y+�, r . .a---te ‘..........• x- 09/ 12/2017 h: a ., ' .� , r, 2.' ; � 1 y 1 '�¢ '� ' tea. sOt �` , i. «. "MS ,^ ! ...-5,,•:---. 6„I / A �� � '. rf , R ,--o.... -1F -, -. ' - - } #. `: r .- `",,- cY . ,,..e.,* - ✓ �^1" �* ,Jy0• A%,v .,Ff K4. yP 0-. 4 09/ 12/2017 PC Exhibit F #17-3980 RUN DATE:09/28/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) 38 22-117-23310001 FAUS FAMILY INVESTMENTS LP 550 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 FADS FAMILY INVESTMENTS LP 3810 YORK AVE S MPLS MN 55410 38 22-117-23 42 0001 S WISCHMEIER&K WISCHMEIER 540 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 SHAWN WISCHMEIER KELLY WISCHMEIER 2851 WASHTA BAY RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 22-117-23 42 0002 GERALD A ERICKSON JR ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 GERALD A ERICKSON JR 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 38 22-117-23 42 0021 BIG ISLAND INC 520 BIG ISLAND ORONO MN 55331 BIG ISLAND INC PO BOX 188 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to product and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. PC Exhibit G Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map #17-3980 Date: Jizoizu I ca m • #A!!!!b#i!!bb#b!•ia4>ibs•b4lblsl5f 4b#b#bb"-e•b!!b!b...O.4bbi!#b##!!...... .. Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: 540 Big Island This data (I) is furished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shall not be table for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.infoGhennepin.us Item 4 Date Application Received: 9/20/17 • Date Application Considered as Complete:11/8/2017 �ON 60-Day Review Period Expires: 1/8/2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members < Dustin Rief, City Administrator �'� FSHO�`s From: Laura Oakden, Planner no Date: November 20, 2017 Subject: 17-3981,Todd and Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road,Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances for lake yard setback, side yard setback, rear yard setback, Hardcover to exceed 25%,Average lakeshore setback and driveway to exceed 8 feet in the shoreland overlay district. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variances. Staff recommends for the Planning Commission to discuss the practical difficulties for the average lakeshore setback variance request. Background Todd and Angie Olson are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home. They will keep the perimeter walls and plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition of an upper story, new front porch, a wider deck and removing and replacing the driveway to better serve the property. Majority of the home is currently placed within the 75' lake yard setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story addition is an increase in the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are asking for setback variances for this addition. They are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11'to 21'which increases the massing in the average lakeshore setback but it is proposed to encroach no closer to the lake then the existing deck. They will also move the 1-stall tuck-under garage to the east (other)side of the home which has room to create a 2 stall tuck-under garage.They are proposing to move the driveway which alters the existing hardcover on the site. The proposed driveway will serve the double garage and is 16'wide where 8' is the maximum width in the shoreland setback zone. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350 and 78-1680 Setbacks: DISTRICT LR-1C Required Existing Proposed (No Changes) Rear 30' 6' No Change West Side 7.5' 9.5' 9.5' (Meets requirement) East Side 7.5' 1.4' No Change Lakeshore 75' 50.9' No Change Average Lakeshore Does not meet 50.9' 50.9 ' FILE#17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 2 of 6 Section 350-Lot Area/Width: DISTRICT LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 4,676 s.f. (0.1 acre) 50' @ 75' 50' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 4,676 s.f. (0.1 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. Existing: 1092 (meets requirement) Proposed: 1136 s.f. (meets requirement) • On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 3720 s.f. 930 s.f. 1802 s.f. 1760 s.f. Tier 1 (4676-956) (25%) (48.4%) (47.3%) (Lot-Road) The hardcover and land area created by Crystal Bay Road have been removed from the hardcover calculations of the subject parcel. Applicable Regulations: Rear Yard(78-350) There is a 30 foot rear yard setback for this lot. The home currently sits 6 feet from the rear property. They applicant is proposing to add an upper story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 6 foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a rear yard variance. Side Yard (78-350) There is a 7.5 foot side yard setback for this lot. They home currently sits 1.4 feet from the east side property line. They applicant is proposing to add a 2"d story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 1.4 foot setback with the addition of the upper story,creating the need for a side yard variance. 75 Foot Lake Yard Setback(78-1680) There is a 75 foot lake yard setback for this lot. They home currently sits 50.9 feet from the lake. They applicant is proposing to add an upper story to the home increasing the massing of the structure within the setback. The home is proposed to remain at the 50.9 foot setback with the addition of the upper story, creating the need for a lake yard variance. They are also removing existing hardcover within the 75' lake yard and are proposing to add a new 16 foot wide driveway for access to the home. A new proposed walkway is within the lakeyard setback. , FILE#17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 3 of 6 The applicant is also proposing a new front porch forward of the existing home footprint (54 feet the lake) but it will be set back behind the deck which is 50.9 feet from the lake and it does not encroach in the average lakeshore setback. They are proposing to widen an existing deck on the home which increases the massing in the lakeyard. Hardcover to Exceed 25%in Tier 1(78-1700) The applicant currently has 48.4% (1802 s.f.) hardcover existing on the parcel.They are changing the structure coverage with the addition of the covered porch but they propose to decrease hardcover overall. They are proposing to eliminate the existing driveway and parking pad and are proposing to install a new 2 stall driveway for access to the garage which is less hardcover overall on the site.The new proposed hardcover is 47.3%(1760s.f.)overall. Driveway to exceed 8'wide in Shoreland Overlay District(78-1282) A driveway no wider than eight feet is permitted in the shoreland or tributary setback zone if the property has no other frontage on or access to a public or private road. The project is proposing to remove the existing 8'wide driveway and parking pad and replace it with a 16' wide driveway to serve the new 2 stall garage within the 75 foot shoreland setback zone. Average Lakeshore Setback There is an existing deck that encroaches into the average lakeshore setback by 6 feet. They are proposing to maintain that encroachment of 6 feet but will be widening the deck so there will be more square footage of the deck located in the average lakeshore setback. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The rear, side, and lake yard setback and the wider driveway variance are in harmony with the purpose of the ordinances. The hardcover is proposed to decrease being the site closer to conformance with the ordinances. The lot includes challenges with the small size in the LR-1C zoning district and the orientation towards the lake. The lot is also challenged with the existing Crystal Bay Road that runs through the lake yard of FILE#17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 4 of 6 the property.The average lakeshore setback is proposed to stay the same distance for the new deck compared to the existing deck but will increase the square footage in this setback. The applicant should demonstrate practical difficulties to support the expansion in this location. The visual impact to the property to the east is somewhat minimal as the existing garage in that location blocks lake view. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The applicant is proposing to keep the existing foundation to maintain the existing footprint of the home. The proposing upper level addition is a reasonable use of the property.There is no space to build a conforming structure. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant is working within the existing footprint of the home, which was not created by the current landowner and will be maintaining the existing rear, side, lake yard setbacks. They hardcover, driveway width and average Lakeshore setback are all being altered from the existing home.and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition and remodel of the existing home will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a single family home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The small building envelope with the substandard lot,and the right of way that passed through the lake yard of the property create a difficulties that are unique to the property. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.Crystal Bay Road is relatively unique within the LR-1C district due to the shallowness and narrowness of the lots,the road location,the proximity to the lake, and the existing Hennepin County Rail property to the rear. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this to be true to allow for the upper addition of the home and to address the driveway access for the garage. FILE#17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 5 of 6 The Commission should discuss whether the applicant has satisfied the practical difficulty requirements to support the variance from the average lakeshore setback. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals;nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicant has stated additional living space will alleviate a practical difficulty relating to the existing space within the home on the property.The property is unique in size as well as location between Crystal Bay Road and a regional trail. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status This site has sanitary sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that the setback limitations on the property create practical difficulties in identifying viable expansion opportunities. The applicant has provided a relatively low impact solution to the stated living space challenges which does not result in an expansion of structural coverage or of hardcover. The affected neighbor's views of the lake are not currently impacted by the applicant's property because it is set back behind the neighbors homes;and they will likely not have views of the lake impacted by the applicant's proposed upper addition,front stoop and deck.The applicant has very options for expansion or addition to the home of the property. While the expanded deck does not seem to impact the neighbors or their views, staff feels the average lakeshore setback variance request for the expanded deck is lacking practical difficulties for staff to recommend approval. Engineer Comments The engineer will complete his review with the building permit. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the FILE#17-3981 11/20/2017 Page 6 of 6 essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? Planning Staff Recommendation 1. The Planning Commission may approve the some or all of the variance applications. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances, the Commission should provide their findings and practical difficulty analysis supporting the approvals;or 2. The Planning Commission could deny one or more variances;or 3. The Commission could approve the lakeyard,side yard, rear yard setbacks, hardcover to exceed 25%and driveway to exceed 8 feet wide in the shoreland overlay district variances but suggest the applicant to revise the plan so there will not be additional massing in the average lakeshore setback. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Adjacent Property Owner Signature Exhibit G. Property Owners List and Map PC Exhibit A -V..01i4T City of Orono 17-3981 Variance Pre-Application tt‘ !� ' ' Meeting Form ESHO' (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) For Office Use Only: City Planner: Meeting Date/Time: PC Date: Met with: What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code,and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: __ /n Site Address: 312.5 Cry&fa,/ $4.3R.D Property Identification Number(PIN): Zoning District: Size of Property: DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST: ❑ Average Setback 0 Side Yard Setback 0 Rear Yard Setback 0 Lake/Front Yard Setback ❑ Hardcover 0 Lot Coverage 0 Lot Area 0 Lot Width ❑ Other: Applicant's PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practical Initials: Difficulties Documentation Form, understands it as it has been explained to them, and is Property tolc-v aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance Owner's application. Initials: i)sD Applicants KO BILLS AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred Initials: in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, Property ./•d as well as provide an escrow in the amount of$ to guarantee payment of the Owner's fJ" above. Initials: OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be completed by City staff. Applicant Signature: Date: Owner Signature: V'"' 4 Date: 9/i 11 17 RECEIVED 9 8 I SEP 2 0 2017 Variance Application—January 2017 � Page 3 =" CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Variance Application -viL0 V Street Address: Application# f 7- 3 5 O / 2750 Kelley Parkway 4,4 O Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: 9—An —/ 7 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: /A fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: Fee: $700 �1 ► P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $700 / $2,500 Crystal rystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: k � FSH04 2.-151 /dod Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: 33o2s Cry sf a44) '.0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Phone(Primary): Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Email: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 1'check here if Property Owner is same as applicant NI check here if Property Phone(Primary): 6/2, SG. Z- KZ.3y Mailing Address: 33 Z 5 C.'- -w.( R411 Ret City: Orono ZIP: 64-31 Email: ?vet D/Y8 e-t-- ,(4hov.G•w+ APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: Date: Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: S Date: /y 7 RECEIVED Property Owner Signature: �dLail Date: Py� $EF 9 0 ?Fro Variance Application—January 2017 ' Page 4 ft -igr 8 PC Exhibit B 17-3981 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The pro-6 At rtyowner roposes to use the.property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." 2. 'The I' ht of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." di nol t% cI,li:h laf 6r f/Iyaf 3. "The,vvarriiance, if granted, will not alter the essential character o,f the locality." s t� 4e ' /.'/ 4rr.� t f 1 Q p../6&1.7- 4. y4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 11 J. 6, qubd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." rein/y n ,oipk t 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapterforro erty in the zone where the affected person's land is located." RECEIVED SEP 20 2017 Variance Application-January 2017 • Pagejopi CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council may permit as variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." (.4.- 8. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining!property." • S Z-e 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of theapplicant." 46, / _ 4 �`' ("� ,, p�' T Le !� G> I iIl'lrl�v 14".1 h�.r� 4,‘ t7. Intl n.w t 11. 'The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." idt w,f / . f vle,--s 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.' !� "Z Ort IA dr'� � �e o F /3-0.1 7' 1i-- !'7 It'vskL 4141"* {,r Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): jmrs.1440. ara ne-Aghws odtemix. ,t4A - (mar., h 44-2thgc‘ 444.1 4/ leislf. nir 4ria Mout_ h RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 Variance Application-January 2017 3 9 8 Page 8 t CITY OF ORONO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p Lot 5,Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Exhibit r (` SCOPE OF WORK&LIMITATIONS: C 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope 17-3981 of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. jQX�' 1l1INN�'TON4 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. rAPPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER AND 0.H.W. LINE (929.4) 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. • * 1 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of — -� .� — — �— such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are l correctly shown before proceeding with construction. S 88'53'37" E H- ' 50.29 — ' 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be J�— _ _ _ _ existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. ' t. EXISTING ROADWAY-,` W l N STANDARD SYMBOLS &CONVENTIONS: (CRYSTAL BAY RD) m ',a frr , , "•" Denotes iron survey marker,found,unless otherwise noted. • -4 o , ' PARKING ' i `) a p PAD - 14.1 i t AVE LAKESH0RE\SETBACK r [] - ' i EXISTING ', u-la DECK ' N&8 ' GARAGE 9.5y �� t DECK - , -2 3 Z_ _ _ — , W 13 38.3 O � N 1 �W v! CO - EXISTING v co • N EXISTING py,�LLING EXISTING ( ,1 p DWELLING pWELUNG 4 r'1 oD T*T - a -�--- w - ----- -- EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS �t- 75, SETBACK HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. - -14 BITUMINOUS PARKING F.-..-...4 DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. 1 38.3 PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. I \ 1 PATI DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. �'• DECK 96 SQ. FT. �' low _i PATIO 120 SQ. FT. — -- ----- — TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. `-50.02 BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. �' N 86.42'38" E e TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. I r�G4� ccYYX AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. .556� ENN CO. R.R. AUTHORI TY HARDCOVER % 59.0% d}` -------ER'r--;‘,.. ... 11LS I X X `,-WOOD FENCE DATE EVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION b SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY Advance WAS PREPARED BAY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION TODD OLSON UNDER THAT LA OF THE STA E T SEPTEMBER 7.2017 EXISTING SURVEY Surveying&Engineering, Co. '�,// S I SHEET SIZE 11 EX 17 17917 " 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. Wayne W.PreuK' DATE DRAFTED: ORONO,MN Minnetonka, a 55345 DRAWING NUMBER 0 10' 20' phone(952)4747984 #43503 SEPTEMBER 13,2017 • m SEPTEMBER 13,2017 • • • mom Web:www.edvsur.com LICENSE NO. 17O918 WP SHEET 1 OF 1 1111111111 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • Lot 5,Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach,Hennepin County,Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK&LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. LAA ' 111INNETONII<4 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. APPROXIMATE EDGE of WATER AND O.H.W. UNE (929.4) 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. — 1 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of • • — . -�-- -�— —` . ' •— — �� • T 11\ such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are ; correctly shown before proceeding with construction. µ S 88'53'37" E I.�j_ 6. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be _50.29, — , ; existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones \ shown hereon. Itt\ `,"-EXISTING ROADWAY-,as � m 1 'I a, STANDARD SYMBOLS &CONVENTIONS: (CRYSTAL BAY RD) n ,m �'� y , "•" Denotes iron surveymarker, found,unless otherwise noted. _ t , cn �• 1 J r i ' :�: 14.1 __ . t ;•:49,-.......;•:..t.• ' y AVE LAKESHORE`SETBACK ;'= ..:% `: ...• , ' w�-7/ .PROP. t . _ ��/� EXISTING , wa6 r 1Vii% - -O . 0)fit ' GARAGE — _ t - -2.3 z' 1 9.5, 36.3 PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS P N LPROP• STOOP ' J!;"/,.: HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. HOUSE 1,092 SQ. FT. EXISTING 4ON CO EXISTING pWELUNG �l EXISTING p DWELLING PROP. DRIVEWAY 292 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY 240 SQ. FT. - p� DWELLING u L"1 CO PROP. STOOP 44 SQ. FT. PARKING PAD 189 SQ. FT. fTl __1__ u _ PROP. WALK 71 SQ. FT. DECK (STOOP) 50 SQ. FT. PROP. OVERHANG 126 SQ. FT. DECK 96 SQ. FT. t.-75' SETBACK PATIO 120 SQ. FT. PATIO 120 SQ. FT. 1 4 B1NM1NpU5 PARKING TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. TIMBER WALLS/STEPS 15 SQ. FT. t 38.3 BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 956 SQ. FT. \ PATIO TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,716 SQ. FT. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,758 SQ. FT. _"'.,.'',- — i AREA OF LOT TO 0.H.W. 4,676 SO. FT. AREA OF LOT TO O.H.W. 4,676 SQ. FT. ` 50.02 HARDCOVER % 58.1% HARDCOVER % 59.0% � �,, 0 ; N 86'42'38" E I �0�a�G x *VS'' �o�� � � A UTIIORIT VENN CO.� R• \--mommin;EZ-- 11.1111.11.X1________— X NOV 0b2 17 ,`WOOD FENCE CITY OF ORONO DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION&SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SURVEY OR REPORT DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE SHEET NO. 9/29/17 UPDATED PER COMMENTS FROM CITY WAS PREPARED BY ME CR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION Advance AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED -, • SURVEYOR EXISTING SURVEY 11/6/17 SHOW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TODD OLSON UNDER E U OF THE STATE TA SEPTEMBER 7,2017 Surveying&Engineering, Co. ' w 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD. ...–C– •"..._./ S DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 S I 17917 Highway No.7 Wayne W.Preu 0 10' 20' ORONO,MN Minnetonka,Minnesota 55345 DRAWING NUMBER am am ittttttt m Phone(952)474-7964 #43503 SEPTEMBER 13,2017 SEPTEMBER 13,2017 ol - - moo Web:www.advsur.com LICENSE NO. 170918 WP SHEET 1 OF 1 NOD IDV MOd 31fI 1SOdS3 J Se.QN ON OISO 3 W tl5 NOd 3'1 v NpaH N ONtl JNOISN OD S ////���� /�� L ONV NVRISquviga aI seSND ososnvi NO3JV01NOJ�f1S 41 a0 al /� G Onrv'a3nddns xdNn10 SettnJtlanJJtl MSS N1N ONOYO 1 n 9.moi�`•irla J _ 110A SNVId 353.13.AO ONIMVd311d ONtl ONODS-J OON AVO 1VZSANJ SZE£ f90fe\I%V MP•11 Q Q 'ONINOIS.SO SELL NI SO V W N339 S5H 1NOdd31\ t+PO+l1 NM: S + .. ASAS'SNOISSIINO NO 51100113110A,V.1'110d I5NOS3M NOS10 UQO.L e ON SId3JJV NOIS30 5511:3ION 1VIJ3d5 M < 2 0 la M r 7 X Z W o; Q ,ir >v ! I �I Q `I III `�. y il I1 11 I I I'' I,III Ibb1 k Il 1 11 1 1 0110 i. Or _/ I� 1110 ➢ ti ���1 11111111 111111111 Ahhh! -yam : �.— i - _1 h4y4► I j r_ i�il�l,E = _ 12 .1 tech !IIINIIIII� uiliuurl' 1.2.—e` BM o——1:L 1 i __.——.:,,-—-...7,.==,I ,,r- ww ,,i_1:: 1 V-'d-.7';4f!--'7-=1=1 -,--- 7---.7-E . o 111 ID _ E_._ , 0.11101111m 1 Ili H 7.. , 3 , \ =�. IIII fn '11 , 7. ( - _` 4 _ WIC.11111111111111 hILII d ! 10110. 11I 0. ovrri �ill rpur!' r ■iivQ ,f i Hir 6_ ' Ill V mnd 111111111 'z'-' III 11 1Iill 11111:1 HIu!P IIF Pl 4I O: iiviii 2 N k a SII 110I ' li •- I - - 1 HI , 1 I� m— 1fz 3 -7 - � - li 5_ -‹k . : z _4Q >v 2 , '' 1 2, , ct O = .. 4 $ _ 10 - ewsnr�-ter , xs,,U rt""'-•.,E.•-• - rn x rn x x lj LI' _ - _ 1 • - s _F • • ... . .. / o�s t •' t 2751 / 19-6 9" 6'-2" / . . • " _ _ __, r \ -{I ,..• 4 . • .. . . .. . II ,„ • �z.iovwr ..I .. oc� ew4ne•'410k lsr� >. I II'. 117 '3 _ = IT 1by4 Iz Qiii I I I ® x Z w • ct SI O / • 1I F. ll kY x ,a,s NELF }_ _ TODD OLSON SPECIAL NOTE:JLWERR DESIGN ACCEDES OMISSIONS.OE RESPONSIBILITY FOR BEEN MA RS DEIN HE EItY '73 t(4) d esign m"'x:"074 Way EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN THE DESIGNING, N _ PH/F.At TLV SS-TI 3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROD CHECKING AND PREPARING OF THESE PLANS FOR PH/Fo>t.t 10155065 ORONO MN 55364 ACCURACY.THE OWNER SUPPLIER AND SUB-CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK ALL DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME - DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. a. c.- i'•= , , i k. , ,, 11W I,,9 LT.C9-t" ,--,7z -,, -7-. 1. u) r---.-- , _ ,,> ' '.'' ?: * ' ' 0 ;'7.i.; ,)',. rf (-.) (7+7 a '', _ .,. - Z 7 '- '-c 7;7 ' ers L',:13 7-1 ME I 4 . . - .' 'E,2!Fi'-f-- , . S 4 , ,i , L :-; AA A Z 1 I f, I A . 1 2; '-7 . :, .•7g1ir - - s, . ,,:, .-,.., ',,t ,44i.'''' ' i ' ...• \ \ -'f'". -;'.1 1 ,,'A --: :, '--- 1 , , -,:t - . (,, < , , ,- , ,7, R, . 'i7, i' '',, ' 7, ' " i'l 4'7, , + •.- ,L-: , ,' ', ' , --.: ',1: 74 A ., ' ''If O'E rl ,, r=- 7 \ 1 4 MI [ _':,Al2/_,/,`5,, r_i • • • ., .- -,,--,, — <>' - 1. 6 9 / / - / P,9 •-. ;'ti ,, ;,ci" -'-', = ,:-..- A Z __,_ '-',' ,-4 „, ,,?,`i ,i 4 4.4,-', :, , '!- , . ,' ± t,,,, _ - .,4-. ,,7' ,,T,S C '''' ' ? I ,:”. '' 'A ri,) ,',., ,-, :- I ; S `L S ,--- u w -N-0 - \3 k = Z , . / 1 y. Pn--- - -- / .,: 'r71 ',.„ '','N' 5 5 .4. -,! _ __- §5 ; f ,,,-, 5T , ,,,: ,, . 475 .,,' '' , . —,,y y ,.. S A74, , cy,2 55 , I ‘9- 1 . ,i,.. .1 5i .. - - l'I' • :ZZ ,_ S , 2 : — 5 5 5 N N 5 5 5 , / / / SPECIAL NOTE:JLW DESIGN ACCEPTS NO :". - A TODD OLSON RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS.EVERY _ , – -. I iv Desig' NUN Header..Way Ftamiel A MN 5506.1 3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROD ErclIci:m j1-1:1,37,EM0A::::=IGI:INDNG, 7 -,:: '-' , n PH/Fax:507-263-A105 ORONO MN 55364 sCulEcCoKNING::::6:::TAHLFL.S.11EPTLZS A_F 70 ________----- D I M E NDSuI 0. ANDREINNSGACTUAL RESPONSERESPONSIBLE F OONR S A M E • tr z_s.. _z- 77 Nm Y ITI'lfi Iii 1 it-lam li��ii� Lx ;f il:V 1 1 . ,f l 1 1 1 1j �� live- -, -11 I ,,_ `i T !!x K TI 4 > xmb .�I ay g > � 5Ry T —1(\''7' S7 = M! �1:$ T $ir =•ef-Ls = T s =T= =1 icl IF. z _ J s _, / dL F_} _.y, -1 , .,1 .— I ':*••-r., =•i 11 I I 1.11 f �VI- ',', A :,..,..... L J _ T == I� __.... ,} Ow— c., ._ .. A. 1 _,,,,,,.z.r . .-- '= -L,--4'1 L-z- ‘.' • SPECIAL NOTE:JLW DESIGN ACCEPTS NO '� _ TODD OLSON RESPONSI BEA FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS.EVERY Dc > 2/138/1 I IenJ<nnn EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN"DIE DESIGNING. i 3 > GW De_v Rxndnl>h\I\X5065 3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROD CHECKING AND PREPARING OF THESE PLANS FOR - D -_ "?7 P11/En,507-263-NO ORONO MN 55364 ACCURACY.THE OWNER,SUPPLIER,AND SUB-CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK ALL DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. z` -;D li - z ; i t _ h fr S7 1 P 111.....1 : . IulS_:IL.I. e_L 7 r vo \ a `nti � ,A, gA5 g �� l, m 8 T' ►5 � -" ntt z �� gx 65 ', .w lig_ 1 I �-� T► ni—' , me' *�� r 1 1 ^ _ Z 11111—,-, �, --- t I. „a E .l�ihr1 '1,11t11 : I /dIP I z .I, I t .-.T4 . r I / - j s�4 1,IT l' ,,I '�-G II if ilii n1 III F-I I I1f7 - ( — , a !IT,["-,-111- I' -f I = 7rr.-.1 s44 A SPECIAL NOTE:)LW DESIGN ACCEPTS NO N , TODD OLSON RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS.EVERY D G I 6 ��//I A/�/ �� R.d{ind u 8,,, EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN THE DESIGNING, y _ ttv De J/-,Jv/n// Raddl.\I�'55065 3325 CRYSTAL BAY ROD CHECKING AND PREPARING OF THESE PLANS FOR m = PII�F�a:WI-N,I-51115 ORONO MN 55364 ACCURACY.THE OWNER,SUPPLIER,AND 7 SU DB-CONTRACT DIMENSIONSOAND BE ESPONSIBLE FOR ME ALL DETAILS D DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. PC . Exhibit E 17-3981 City of Orono o , Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 3-s z,c ��. 1. / ; • �"�"` Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify if Items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter within the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. I Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length h x Width Total Survey (ample) I ( S) � " (Square Feet) (24'_________ c3o. (T2o S.F /Ont S.F. B �/r-yra4 ZMO S.F. C Pae AA"' J a 9 S.F. D PASivkr �- Set SF E 9fr S.F. F .a /to S.F. 0 1701 a-�- i S S.F. S.F. I IS.F. J K �-� �1 J t S.F. M ,.,,,,1� •r S.F. MS.F. N S.F. S.F. P P S.F. R S.F. S.F.F, T S.F. TS.F. V S.F. S.F. W S. X � S.F. Z S.F. S.F. (1) Total Usti rc Hardcover ' �—t�c ' EXCttldable HONCOVOr(See City Gude Sec 71-111041 ,,, ,; S.F. (ivt 1 ki Y-0CA --- ________.q S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover (3) Net Existing Hardcover (Subtract line(2)from line(1)) (4) Total Lot Area 1& S.F. S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)]K 14 L4 '16 �- Vick (Proposed Hardcover next page) RECEIVED f 3-17-.J° SEP 2 0 2017 9 � Variance Application-January 2017 Fane it CITY OF ORONO i City of Orono ":•' :49 % OIv Hardcover Calculation Worksheet `AAfv% i r Property Address: 33 Z �'� s��c !�d ='' 3 �R •�� °1t sii - Prepared by: f y f / DateK7�F •'• .tV., ur { '. , . 1 is ..-sp �?'NNtS0� ,,- Z41 + �5, , Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier Tier 3 Tier 4 11b1"5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key tSurvey Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Dy (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B /lbtJk . Jay z S.F. D L7ritit/AiayS.F._ E 2 9 Z S.F. S.F. F Fda-Pf - 1-t-- S.F. H �ps� S.F. I r I S.F. S.F. J Cave r ha►,C 1 1 Z LA S.F. K J S.F. L f�et.'I.1 a J 2.-G S.F. M / S.F. N a..Bsr WAIF/S.1 f,f J r-- S.F. O 11 P 4`3-1 f 4OO4tL+J7 S.F. r Q f S'G S.F. W R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. S.F. S.F._ W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z I S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover -`Tt S.F. —1lP Exctudable,Hardcgver(See City Code Sec 78-1884) S.F. ,, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover ---- (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)) 1-1 k.470. '7 71 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area !a a` S.F. Ar-A, \3-12„( 7 S.F. C✓P4'1 Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)i(4)) : ,, y, -\avACvQX vii\\'1 c c : ` 41 . 3% ut,(AuAow\ This is an information packet regarding Hardcover Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained 0 �2 f1 herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. NOV U 2,01y Page 9 of 9 CITY OF ORONO PC • Exhibit F 17-3981 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM R4.b euk, , I(we) C hod P\C S{far,._ of M-°1 Cry si-ct 11&I ue [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 337_5 Cp cI- £..1 alalso referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval.1-7�j Or Alert . ner Date 0141,/ 11141 Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) -(,i. le ©13r of 1315 OrN1 S4-4( R [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3325 (',n `}4,1 g,1 also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Own-r Date / ' t—id—17 pe y wner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building &Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2017 9 Variance Application-January 2017 `t 81 CITY OF ORONO Page 15 PC Exhibit G 17-3981 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/1-..n., KA B EACH , •, INS::, . -.' * '// • " tJ i4.of d. J # i -*,,- ;''t,,.' s. u1 tCy Y _ _ % ��� F �` ..,.., 6 a ;or., 3#I 1-, „woo 7 , -1,,.,,,. .,:i 9 :,,,,,,,t,.. ,,,- „,::.,.,..ii..„0 ,..___, . ..., ..,,.,,,,,,c,....: ..,...wf,L. ,,,,...,,‘„,-.:,....:::: ,, , , co." - ,- , • V\ . .." , 4el _.. � " - F�' „ a l s . 16 6 I • rr '' +"• ate4. i ..-•;:k. y a s!C9: t §s kY / :' £ ms ~ • ► OY ys f p a • 1 inch =50 feet PARCEL ID: 1711723410018 Comments: OWNER NAME: Todd Olson &Angela Olson PARCEL ADDRESS: 3325 Crystal Bay Rd, Orono MN 55391 PARCEL AREA: 0.1 acres, 4,456 sq ft RECEIVED A-T-B:Abstract SEP 2 0 2017 SALE PRICE: $510,000 CITY OF ORONO SALE DATA: 04/2015 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no wale PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore for legal,ranty engin kind;or suand rvey) ing notpuip se for engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD: Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any MARKET VALUE: $475,000 damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: $5,103.82 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Lake Shore HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $530,000 , ' 81 RUN DATE:09/19/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 17-117-23 34 0052 38 17-117-23 41 0022 38 17-117-23 44 0104 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH SEAN R FOY/TERRESA K EGGERS CLAIR T ROOD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3240 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY SEAN R FOY CLAIR T ROOD REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3280 NAVARRE LA 701 4Th AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 17-117-23 41 0003 38 17-117-23 410023 38 17-117-23 44 0109 JAYNE MARIE PAASCH JULIE B LENSING GRACE MARIE DAHL 2150 KENWOOD WAY 3349 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3286 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JAYNE MARIE PAASCH JULIE B LENSING GRACE MARIE DAHL 2150 KENWOOD WAY 3349 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3286 NAVARRE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0004 38 17-117-23 41 0024 38 17-117-23 44 0110 PAUL MARKUSEN JOHN J GRAHAM FAMILY TRUST S C JOHNSON&B M SCHAUMBURG 2160 KENWOOD WAY 3355 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3290 NAVARRE LA ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL MARKUSEN JOHN J GRAHAM FAMILY TRUST S C JOHNSON&B M SCHAUMBURG 4915 SCATTERED PINES LN NW C/O PATRICIA J GRAHAM 3290 NAVARRE LA ROCHESTER MN 55901 112 ALWOODLEY WAYZATA MN 55391 WILLIAMSBURG VA 23188 38 17-117-23 41 0013 38 17-117-23 41 0025 GREGORY J BLASKO R A LUZAICH&J N URAL 3295 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 GREGORY I BLASKO RICHARD A LUZAICH 3295 CRYSTAL BAY RD JENNIFER N URAL WAYZATA MN 55391 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0015 38 17-117-23 41 0028 HEATHER M JOHNSTONE TRUST JULIE COPELAND 3285 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2180 KENWOOD WAY ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 HEATHER M JOHNSTONE JULIE COPELAND P O BOX 141 2180 KENWOOD WAY MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0016 38 17-117-23 41 0029 DAVID A SCHMID DONNA E KABANUK 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2170 KENWOOD WAY ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID A SCHMID DONNA E KABANUK 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD 5233 TWIN LAKE BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 38 17-117-23 41 0017 38 17-117-23 41 0031 DALE OLSEN&JONMARI OLSEN DONNA E KUBANUK 3315 CRYSTAL BAY RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 DALE OLSEN&JONMARI OLSEN DONNA E KABANUK 3315 CRYSTAL BAY RD 5233 TWIN LAKE BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55429 38 17-117-23 41 0018 38 17-117-23 41 0034 TODD OLSON&ANGELA OLSON PAUL J&LOIS E REHMAN 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 TODD OLSON PAUL J&LOIS E REHMAN 3325 CRYSTAL BAY RD 3335 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 41 0019 38 17-117-23 41 0035 C M MCSHANE&R A MCSHANE C G OWEN&J L HUGHES 3329 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2175 KENWOOD WAY ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHAD&REBECCA MCSHANE CLIFFORD G OWEN 3329 CRYSTAL BAY RD JILL L HUGHES WAYZATA MN 55391 2175 KENWOOD WAY WAYZATA MN 55391 men 38 17-117-23 41 0021 38 17-117-23 440057 RE�+/+CY Y ED J D&T J HOFER DAVID A KUPKA 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2215 KENWOOD WAY S�'n O no ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 I►"" JONATHAN&THERESA HOFER DAVID A KUPKA 3339 CRYSTAL BAY RD 2215KENWOOD 55AY �rP , CITY OF ORONO WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 :.7.r.33 Q '� ,3 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED 9 8 1 SEP 2 0 2017 CITY OF ORONO Item 5 Date Application Received: 10/17/17 QA, Date Application Considered as Complete:10/17/17 l VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 12/16/17 A a To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `�e �� Dustin Rief, City Administrator tkFSHO�`� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner IVGG Date: 20 November 2017 Subject: #17-3986,Travis DeJong, 1270 Wildhurst Trail, Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a '. permanent dock. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicant wishes to install a permanent dock. Because of the permanent nature of the dock structure within the floodway, a conditional use permit (CUP) is required. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District(LMCD) regulates docks on the Lake. Applicable Regulations: CUP (Section 78-1117) Floodway means the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. Permanent docks may be allowed as a conditional use within the floodway following the standards and procedures set forth in City Code Section 78-1148 and further subject to the standards set forth in Code Section 78-1119. The LMCD has not yet issued the permit; however,the proposed dock will extend approximately 100 feet from the shore, and appears that it will meet all LMCD-required setbacks. Conditional Use Permit(Sections 78-916&78-1119) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; Docks are anticipated accessory uses on lakeshore residential properties.This criterion is met. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; Docks are listed as allowed accessory uses in residential zoning districts.This criterion is met. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads,and stormwater management.This criterion is met. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Not applicable. FILE#17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 2 of 4 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; The permanent dock is not expected to generate an excessive demand for public services.This criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area,there is no proposed change of use.This criterion is met. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed in the Comprehensive Plan.This criterion is met. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; There are other seasonal and permanent docks in the general area,there is no proposed change of use.This criterion is met. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed permanent dock is not expected to impair property values or impact permitted uses in the area.This criterion is met. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD.This criterion is met. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration, odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness,or other means;This criterion is met. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion,or unsafe access; This residential dock on a single family property is not expected to generate excessive traffic or be an inconvenience to adjoining properties.This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; By the nature of the dock it will project from the shore into the lake as permitted by the LMCD.This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts;The applicant will be informed of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare.This criterion is met. Additional standards for floodway conditional uses (Sec. 78-1119). A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the one percent chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Accessory structures.Accessory structures, as identified in section 78-1118(1), may be permitted, provided that: (1) Structures are not intended for human habitation; (2) Structures will have a low flood damage potential; FILE#17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 3 of 4 (3) Structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (4) Service utilities,such as electrical and heating equipment,within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (5) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the state building code.All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (6) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the state building code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: a. To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure,there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure,with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding;and b. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. (d) Structural works for flood control that will change the course,current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (e) A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the one percent chance or regional flood.The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. (f) Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Orono's concurrent jurisdiction over permanent docks is primarily via the City's floodplain regulations,which provide no significant standards pertinent to the approval of permanent docks. Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures,so with the exception of the RS District,one cannot have a permanent or seasonal dock without a principal residence structure.This property is zoned LR-1B. There are no specific Building Code construction standards for docks. The City will require that a FILE#17-3986 20 Nov 2017 Page 4 of 4 zoning permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock and action of this CUP. Permanent docks (i.e.those docks with permanent pilings which cannot be removed without heavy equipment) sometimes result in requests by property owners for winter de-icing,to avoid ice damage.The proposed dock will be located in a fairly well protected area,so the potential for ice damage or the need for de-icing is relatively minimal. There appear to be other permanent docks in the area,and the city has received no documented problems or issues. Another potential concern would be whether the work is in a sensitive habitat or spawning area, and whether the permanent dock might affect navigation or winter vehicular traffic on the lake. Neither of these issues are apparent with this application. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the CUP, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for construction of the proposed permanent dock subject to the following conditions: 1. The dock may be allowed as long as it continues to be permitted by the LMCD and DNR and is in conformity with the rules and regulations of those agencies; and 2. The dock is not to be used for commercial purposes or rented. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Dock Plans Exhibit D. Property Owners List Exhibit E. Plat Map PC Exhibit A #17-3986 City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street Address: Application# / 7 - 3 9 oKelley Parkway Orono, OrMN 55356 Date Received: -/ 7-77— Main: 952-249-4600 Staff fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: x$7015 76 ysQ_ Mailing Address: Escrow: $700 I NA P.O.Box 66 Fl + C> Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: 4/C sHos- Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: I'L10 (hit -LtiZ —TVOL- i n ki 55 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Cl Re-Rs (4}{1/4L :-r ?LuIJf (attached additional sheets at necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: OS check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: -De--S014 Phone(Primary): 10114,5 et(' -144,082; Mailing Address: Iq--(� �" �t � IQA�L City: IypsANp ZIP: 55364 Email: -tY0.�,x3_ '�0 1 otvr. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: el.check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: "'raA.vn L�1F�t�iJ� Phone (Primary): tact f Sct% 91,158 Mailing Address: 12jt0 1,.U1Wt}Lt,9-51"'T'Qp�1L - City: Mou.k..st ZIP: 55* Email: +aimiS_K...d pnya h r at:t1 APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied Is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: �----".L/ Date: /0-/D-/ 7 Applicant Signature: 1 i... LArtiE'&i -9!1I'-b-$34.3 Date: Property Owner Signature: /�r .--- Date: /19-/0 -/7 Property Owner Signature: Date: RECEIVED CUP Application-January 2017 Pegs 4 OCT 1 f 2011 # 3 9 8lb CITY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning",we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 8. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. t n K 6, First Middle Last Address C3VOQO 3°t t lel $ City State Zip hone I understand my rights as stated above. ignature RECEIVED CUP Application—January 2017 OCT 1 7 2017 Page 14 # 3 9 86 CRY OF ORONO PC Exhibit E #17-3985 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR zap DOCK & LIFT, INC. wax OF TRACT A,R.L.S.NO. 1132 a 1 i HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA '6E1 00: Fif FSS ,3;1s a� % - c=3a•4 z . i'�", -' a o ti /I e��BPo,fflá'1J1t ,.e.,. 3tyjJ 788'7? a' ./ llllllll il. .a , , H N , HOUSE HOUSE o \ Om I / / 1 '3 ,�Z_,J AN__,;".1 —•--..//^ r„.., i -q, P \k:` f; � TRACT A/g \. ,.,�w ______I-, /'� / b N 91 1. 0 a 4)1 / / r FOREST LAKE q-!1. 267.28 _ --- �i- / II a § 391.00 "'4 E, PC ' - Exhibit C DOCK & LIFT, INC. DOCK #17-3986 DOCK6LlF1. Tim & Mike Letterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952 ^`e, •� a= • `• 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/4714 www.dockandlift.com e-mail: info@dockandlrn.com Customer Name Customer Address TCAV k Dd-Io+'ll i1.70 it -s4 �ra� ? Customer Phone Customer City,State&Zip Date 4212 -544-5F62R Orpnn a'/ai40 r7 Customer E-Mail •frrew is--K—d ores hof that 1-Com e r ------r ,. ,`iw 1- -1. ..t • i• 1,.i. 7.-.......). ... .. -..L ',- f i 7 .--. a s ' ... a 1 ..,.. _ ...f..., - ••_ - t • cl fa L t . . .... .....a...... . ., ..s. Irl- _....__t... .. ..1-.. . .--t f" l' V • iv Nra• o • • .....t.... ...1.--.-, t ......A..... ..4. ...f. - •.--.. ...........1 t i..-.J....- -.-. .. .. 4 .. ' • Na ` e j .... .....t..... t 1•-- _ . p • • . .• i i • i ;---. _ •■ RECEIVED G+D, . V OCT 1 72017 39-86 ' etribpdRONo--- DOCK & LIFT, INC. DOCK SKETCH K LST Tim & Mike Latterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 } 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.corn e-mail: infoC'dockandlift.com Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City,State&Zip Date Customer E-Mail , .. 3 it �1► ____4 . . . . . . , A • • • • . E: r I . . r f/A1 4 I_r, 7�►j �*Le �-^ 1L (� -- - . . apt - . , . ' . _fit�i+�G, , RECEIVED OCT, , . , , 7Z011 . . ., . . , . , : . . , , . . 3986 ORONO DOCK & LIFT, INC, DOCK SKETCH DUCK&LIFT Tim & Mike Latterner Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952/474-7934 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Fax: 952/471-2608 www.dockandlift.corn e-mail: infoC)dockandlift corn Customer Name Customer Address Customer Phone Customer City,State&Zip Date Customer E-Mail • 3 �3t� fl ppfo�c • • T 'I _..• . ti . I • ; V i 1 • rvs5 It ,i • .• • RECE1VEt y 1 7 90.+ . �C�1� If , 1 . , # ,3 ..9 ,.86 PC • Exhibit D #17-3986 RUN DATE:10/03/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE 38 07-117-23 23 0031 38 07-117-23 31 0027 38 07-117-23 32 0045 K WALLACE&3 WALLACE R L BIRKELAND TRUSTEE ET AL :P PRUITT&K A PRUITT 1180 GARDEN CT 1298 WILDHURST TR :220 GARDEN CT ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 KEEGAN WALLACE ROBERT L BIRKELAND JEFFREY P PRUITT JESSICA WALLACE 7205 2ND AVE SO KATHERINE A PRUITT 1180 GARDEN CT RICHFIELD MN 55423 :220 GARDEN CT MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0007 38 07-117-23 31 0028 38 07-117-23 320046 BRIAN&SANDRA RASMUSSEN TRT R L BIRKELAND TRUSTEE ET AL DAVID WHITE&TRACY WHITE 1186 WILDHURST TR 1300 WILDHURST TR :240 GARDEN CT ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BRIAN D RASMUSSEN ROBERT L BIRKELAND DAVID WHITE&TRACY WHITE SANDRA 3 RASMUSSEN 7205 2ND AVE SO i240 GARDEN CT :186 WILDHURST TR RICHFIELD MN 55423 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0027 38 07-117-23 31 0029 38 07-117-23 32 0063 PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES P SAWICKI&K M SAWICKI AMANDA ERICKSON/RYAN FLATEN 1146 WILDHURST TR 4510 NORTH SHORE DR 4620 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES P SAWICKI&K M SAWICKI AMANDA M ERICKSON 8634 VALLEY VIEW CT 4510 NORTH SHORE DR :VAN B FLATEN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MOUND MN 55364 4620 TONKAVIBW LA MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0037 38 07-117-23 31 0030 S W&M J ERIKSON BETH E BESSESEN 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4500 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SANFORD&MARGARET ERIKSON BETH E BESSESEN 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4500 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0047 38 07-117.23 31 0031 TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE PATTI MAE SCHIMMEL ET AL 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1299 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE PATTI MAE HYLEN 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1299 WILDHURST TRL MOUND MN 55364 MINNETRISTA MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0048 38 07-117-23 31 0036 T A&J B SUTTON B I CLOSE&J B POTTS CLOSE 1170 GARDEN CT 1214 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 THOMAS A SUTTON BRADLEY I CLOSE 1170 GARDEN CT N 1214 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 240049 38 07-117-23 31 0037 B H KEETS&V A KEETS BRIAN ROATH&LISA R ROATH 1160 GARDEN CT 1200 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BRIAN H KEETS BRIAN ROATH 1160 GARDEN CT LISA ROATH MOUND MN 55364 1200 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0008 38 07-117-23 31 0038 FRANK WEIGEL/ESTHER NAZAROV ASIM MAJEED/GRACE M MAJEED 4496 NORTH SHORE DR 1261 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FRANK WEIGEL ASIM MAJEED ESTHER NAZAROV 1261 WILDHURST TR 4496 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0015 38 07-117-23 31 0040 TRAVIS DEJONG/JULIE DEJONG A 3 ZABILLA&H N ZABILLA 1270 WILDHURST TR 1297 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 TRAVIS DEJONG ANDREW&HITOMI ZABILLA JULIE 1297 WILDHURSTMNTRAIL # 3986 1270 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 31 0026 38 07-117-23 32 0043 KELLY MARIE HANSON REV TRUST KENNETH I HICKEY 1284 WILDHURST TR 4640 TONKAVIEW LA ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 r _,. KELLY MARIE HANSON KENNETH J HICKEY C/O TOM KAHLERT 4640 TONKAVIEW LA 14410 GRENIER RD MOUND MN 55364 1s� 3 r, MINNETONK41 A MN 55345 '4 r Cfif(QQF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. k� 4 yI'4 E 3986 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit E Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map #17-3986 Date: 10/3/2017 1140 02••• 4450 4440 1131 1134 4475 44.5`` 1150 4445 • 1160 1146 4455 4416 r: 1180 12'18 1' 1 1240 4010 4620 35 4815 1300 132 1315 4406 134 4460 �►ordh..shore�p 1320" 4470 135 1310 ". 1337 4545 4535 4515 4495 '41 38 4460 1347 65 1360 • 4..,,,,1336 tm 4485 4465 4448 Buffer Size: 350 feet o 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I l t ( t I I I This data (0 Is furnished'AB Ib with no representation M to canpletenses r iftiouraos Idnd; oft 09 Is nobN lefurnished with no worried), d fay or oroofft‘ purposes.Hennepin Carty Mal liable forda0demean,i fury arloss weclthptorntodaft. RECEIVED Far more In ionmrdon.Contact Hennepin Cater 018 Moe 300 elh Beset Boast MMrwepola.MIH 55487/yk Infoli ..oPin41e OCT 172017 CITY OF ORONO it 3986 Date Application Received: 10/18/17 �VO Date Application Considered as Complete:11/8/2017 60-Day Review Period Expires: 1/8/2017 *Sis To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `�� �� Dustin Rief, City Administrator *SW From: Laura Oakden, Planner LLO Date: November 20,2017 Subject: 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 Lake West Development LLC o/b/o Rick and Barbara Lupient, PIDS: 2011723420003, 2011723420002 and 2011723420001(Lots 1,2,3 Block 1 Casco Point Addition) "Ivy Place"Variances, Conditional Use Permit and Vacation of Easements Public Hearing Application Summary: 17-3988: The applicant is requesting wetland setback, moving over 50 CY of earth within the 75 foot lake yard setback, and driveway width within the lakeyard variances. 17-3989:Vacation of easements to be replaced with a new utility easement 17-3990: Conditional Use Permit for altering the floodplain and land alterations of more than 500CY. The applicant also propose the filling of a small wetland internal to the site, and the establishment of a beach area,altering the wetland on the NNE side of the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends separate motions responding to : 1. 17-3988:Approval of Variances from the wetland setback, and from the standard that permits up to 8 foot wide driveway in the shore setback zone to facilitate the construction of a private shared driveway to serve the two lots. Consideration of a variance to allow beach improvements within the wetland. 2. 17-3989: Approval of Easement Vacations for an unimproved driveway, and a utility easement that needs to be relocated to correspond to the actual location of the utility 3. 17-3990: Approval of Conditional Use Permits to allow over 500 cubic yards of fill in the floodplain, excavation in the floodplain, and over 50 cy of fill in the lake yard. Approval of the wetland impact of filling the small wetland in the interior of the site, but staff does not support the filling or altering of the wetland for the beach improvements. All actions subject to WCA,Watershed, and Final Plat approval. Background In September,the City Council reviewed and approved (17-3962)the Preliminary Plat for Ivy Place,a 2 lot residential subdivision at the northern end of Ivy Place, a public street. The applicants propose the replatting the previously established the three lots into two buildable parcels and one outlot,as a front lot/back lot configuration.The application suggest the construction of two homes meeting the setback requirements. To facilitate construction, substantial grading must occur, a small wetland must be filled in the center of proposed lot 2, and most of the existing trees on site will be removed. The driveway serving the properties 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 2 of 10 would impact the Watershed's buffer and the city's setbacks. In all,several variances (17-3988), conditional use permits(17-3990),easement vacation(17-3989),and wetland impacts, all requiring a public hearing,where identified, and the approval of the preliminary plat was conditioned on approval of these requests. 17-3988 Variance: Wetland has been delineated along the entire lake perimeter of the property. The applicant is proposing to place the driveway 1.8 feet from the wetland boundary at the SE corner of the property. Per the Watershed District, a wetland buffer of 25 feet will be required. The city requires a setback of 10 feet from the buffer for structures and hardcover.This will require a variance to allow hardcover to be placed within the City's wetland setback and relief from the Watershed's rules regarding buffer The applicant is proposing to meet all other setback requirement for the 2 newly created lots at part of the Plat.The applicant is also requesting driveway width variance for the 12 foot width proposed driveway to be placed within the 75 foot lakeyard setback where a 8 foot maximum is allowed. The 12 feet represents a reduction in the normally required shared driveway width of 20 feet. The Fire Department supports the narrow driveway with the condition that the homes be sprinklered. 17-3989 Vacation: The applicant is looking to vacate two exiting easements that are not in use. There is a driveway easement that will no long be aligned with the proposed development. It is beneficial to formally vacate the easement for clean title. The applicant is also requesting the vacation of an underground utility easement used for sanitary sewer by the City of Orono. The existing easement does not line up with the placement of the existing sewer pipe. The city is requesting the applicant vacate the unused utility easement and create a new utility easement over the existing sewer pipe. Per engineer comments,the newly created easement must be a minimum of 10 feet wide on either side of the pipe,creating a total of a 20 foot wide underground utility easement for the sewer line.This new easement will be created as part of the final plat. 17-3990 Conditional Use Permit: The applicant is proposing to alter the existing floodplain by adding fill to create a building envelope above the flood elevation for the proposed homes and to create proper drainage for the site. The applicant is proposing to add fill in the center of the project then gradually grade away from the homes towards the lake. This grading will impact a small wetland in the center of proposed Lot 2. Preliminary discussions with the watershed indicate this impact will fall under their de minimis criteria, and need not be mitigated. The proposal to create beach would bring the wetland impact beyond the de minimis threshold, requiring mitigation of all wetlands. Staff does not support the alteration of the wetlands for a beach. Plan C3.1 (Exhibit D)depicts the change in the floodplain and the proposed grading for the development. To achieve appropriate grading and drainage for the site the applicant proposes removing 1,231 cubic yards of poor soil and bringing in 2817 cubic yards of fill. Overall there will be 1583 cubic yards to fill being added to the exiting site.A CUP is required if there is 500 or more cubic yards of earth being moved on a site. A portion of this cutting and filling will occur in the 0-75 lake yard. They anticipate a totally number of trucks could range from 130-230 depending on the soil conditions. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET for the Total Site Development Section 78-1605-Setbacks: 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 3 of 10 DISTRICT LR-1C Required Proposed Wetland 35' or 10'+ buffer 1.8' Applicable Regulations: Variance:Wetland setback(78-1605) The MCWD has established a 25 foot buffer surrounding the wetland and the city requires an addition 10 foot setback in addition to the buffer creating a 35 foot setback on the development site.The applicant is requesting a 1.8 foot setback from the edge of the wetland to create a driveway which gives access to the site. Access to the site is limited to this location without substantial impacts to adjacent properties. Variance: Driveway width to exceed 8 feet wide in the Shoreland Overlay setback. It was discussed during the preliminary plat review to allow a shared driveway verses a public road and through that discussion it was deemed a 12 foot wide shared driveway seemed appropriate and reasonable for this development. A shared driveway should be 20 feet to support fire access. Vacation: A Sanitary sewer easement(Documents 855727 and 862192) runs along the west side of the point, and the utility easement does not fully cover the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure. The developer proposes vacation of the easement,to replace it with one that fully supports the infrastructure. The new easement will be a minimum of 20 feet wide, 10 feet on either side of the existing pipe. An unimproved driveway easement (Document 1023891)supporting the original lots is proposed to be vacated as this easement is not needed and clean title is desirable. Conditional Use Permit: Filling 1000500+CY of fill in the Floodplain (78-1126) The applicant is proposing to remove earth from the floodplain, reestablishing a floodplain that will provide for building sites while not increasing flood impacts elsewhere. The project will create an additional 291 CY of floodplain for the overall development. Moving over 50 Cubic Yards of earth within the setback of the Shoreland Overlay District (17- 1286) The application is proposing to excavate 1231 CY and bring in 2814 CY of new fill to the site to make proper buildable space and grading for the proposed homes. A portion on this grading work will take place within the 75' lakeyard setback. Conditional Use Permit Land Alternation (Section 78-967 and Section 78-1286): According to the City Code,grading and filling activities exceeding 500 cubic yards conducted on properties within the Shoreland Overlay District require a CUP. Further,grading exceeding 50 cy in shore setback zone requires a CUP, per section 78-967. Alteration of Wetlands (Section 78-1610). The filling of a portion of wetland for the home, and the two wetlands for the beach areas requires a permit,following a public hearing and Planning Commission review. The driveway proposed will not impact the wetland,only the wetland buffer and wetland setback. 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 4 of 10 Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Variances (Wetlands,width) According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of the wetland setback is to preserve the wetland. The applicant proposes minimal improvements in the only location feasible. The applicant plans to utilize BMP to minimize and protect the wetland. The intent of the driveway width maximum is to minimize hardcover in the shore setback. Allowing for a 12' wide shared driveway to gain access to two parcels is in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinances, which is to manage hard cover in the 0- 75'. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan notes the need to protect the natural environment,including wetlands. The reduced setback, coupled with the management practices employed protects the wetlands. Allowing access and proper drainage for two newly created lots in consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The applicant's request to construct a 12'wide driveway and create proper drainage to serve the two newly created lots is reasonable.There is no other location available that would avoid impacts to the wetlands and outside the lake yard without impacting the adjacent residential lot. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant did not develop the point,or place wetlands on the property. The unique circumstances were not created by the applicant in either variance situation. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The encroachment is non-structural and connects to the existing access for neighboring parcels. 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 5 of 10 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been the only factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the use for a driveway for access a principle structure is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. Variances requested are from performance standards of the code, not uses. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The applicant's property is unique because it is surrounded by Lake Minnetonka with no access via vehicle that would meet the requirements of the ordinance without impacting the adjacent residential lot. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The orientation of the applicant's property between the lake and the wetland and having no direct access to a public road is relatively unique. The configuration of the property as a point into Lake Minnetonka additionally differentiates the parcel. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. There is no opportunity to place a driveway into the site without impacting the wetland setback,or improvements in the lake yard. Allowing the applicant to alter the land within the shoreland setback is necessary for the development of the two proposed lots. Without access, the applicant lose substantial property rights. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff believes this criteria to be met because the proposed 12 foot wide shared driveway ties into the existing access for the site and the grading within the shoreland setback will address water concerns that currently exist on the site. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variance is necessary in order to allow access and development of the two proposed platted lots. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Applicable Regulation:Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 6 of 10 application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature is it consistent with the permitted uses for the property. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed grading is residential in nature which is consistent with the permitted uses for the property. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; This criteria relates to whether the proposed grades resulting from the earth moment are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood.The applicant believes the proposing grading plan will allow for more floodplain and will create suitable lots for two new homes on the proposed lots.The grades,once established,should have no adverse impacts on the neighborhood. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed grades will help to facilitate stormwater runoff down property lines,and not toward adjacent properties.The proposed grades should not result in a negative impact to neighboring properties. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; This condition is satisfied. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed grading for creating a building pad,adequate drainage for the lots and stormwater management will not change the intended residential use of the property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The action of importing and exporting of fill can have temporary adverse impacts on the neighborhood. Often substantial grading in residential zones creates temporary noise,dust,and vibration. The Planning Commission may suggest hour restrictions and timelines,a public information program,to minimize the impact to the neighborhood. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses The applicant has provided a landscape plan which will serve to reestablish vegetation. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration,odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness, or other means; See#9 above. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion,or unsafe access; The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 7 of 10 the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13) Designed to take into account the natural,scenic,and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The proposed project will be creating more floodplain area to better manage stormwater for the site. The project will also create a drainage pattern and should help improve water quality off site. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts;There should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety,or general welfare.The Applicant will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Additionally Section 78-1286(e) provides guidance for the granting of a conditional use permit in the Shoreland. Specifically,78-1286(e) states the following: (1) Grading or filling in any type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: The grading impacting the small interior wetland appears to be supported by WCA,whose review is ongoing. Staff recommends any approval contingent on WCA approval. (2) Alterations must be designed and conducted in a manner that ensures only the smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for the shortest time possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. (3) Mulches or similar materials must be used,where necessary,for temporary bare soil coverage, and a permanent vegetation cover must be established as soon as possible. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re-vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (4) Methods to minimize soil erosion and to trap sediments before they reach any surface water feature must be used. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re- vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (5) Altered areas must be stabilized to acceptable erosion control standards consistent with the field office technical guides of the local soil and water conservation districts and the United States Soil Conservation Service.The applicant will be required to adhere to the 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 8 of 10 City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD.Timely re-vegetation and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. (6) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. The stability of the finished grade will be component of the approval of the permits. (7) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the city engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater. The project does not contemplate the creation of or work on steep slopes. Not applicable. (8) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. Not applicable. (9) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner of the department of natural resources under Minn. Stat. § 1036.245.The applicant will receive all approval before any work begins. (10) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. The proposed alterations are proposed to take place within the property boundaries and are necessary to allow the proposed platted lots to have a building envelope for single family homes. (11) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical,the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level,and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. A riprap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of section 78-969. Not applicable. Septic System Status The property will be served by municipal water and sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties for Variance and Conditional Use Analysis Staff finds the propose variances for wetland setback, and exceeding the 8' maximum width for driveways in the shore land setback seem reasonable and necessary for development of the proposed plat. The placement of the driveway is limited and the grading on the site is reasonable and consistent with the preliminary plat.The development of the proposed lots is consistent with the neighborhood to create two new single family homes. The proximity to the wetland for the shared driveway is reasonable, consistent with the comprehensive plan and will not alter the character of the area. In addition to the City's CUP requirement for filling/grading within the floodplain district activity 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 9 of 10 is subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the MCWD. The applicant has submitted an application to the MCWD along with the required plans and engineering. Staff finds the proposed vacation and CUPs for the project reasonable with meeting all the requirements for a condition use permit for grading the floodplain and land alterations. Staff does not support the filling of the wetland for beach improvements. Engineer Comments The engineer has given comments at the time of preliminary plat, see attached Exhibit F, which must be met before final plats can be approved. The engineer gave an addition comment to ensure the newly created easement over the city sewer line is at minimum 10 feet wide on either side of pipe,which totals a 20 foot wide easement needed. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission should discuss the impact of trucking and hauling earth to and from this site, as the applicant proposed a range of 130-230 total trucks to complete the project. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission may consider the following motions and make them separately as they pertain to their application number: 1. 17-3988: Approval of the wetland setback approval of a variance for a driveway exceeding the 8' maximum width for driveways in the shoreland setback variances contingent on the following a. Final Plat Approval b. MCWD Aprpoval of the wetland buffer impact 2. 17-3989: Staff recommend approval of the proposed driveway and underground utility easement vacation with the replacement of a new utility easement contingent the following a. Final Plat Approval b. Engineering Comments c. Replacement with new utility easement on final plat approval and all engineering comments are met. 3. 17-3990:Approval for the proposed Conditional Use Permits for filling 1000+CY of fill in the floodplain, moving over 50 CY of earth within the 75 foot lakeyard, and 500 CY 17-3988, 17-3989, 17-3990 November 20,2017 Page 10 of 10 within the site contingent on the following: a. final plat approval b. approval for all permits related to the MCWD c. Applicant shall receiwve approval from the SNR Commission prior to received land alteration permit d. Approval from MCWD e. WCA Approval; 4. Staff recommends denial of the wetland filling for the beach improvements. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application and Project Narrative Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Plans Exhibit D. Site Plans for Grading and Floodplain Alternations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Plat Response Comments for Enginner Exhibit G. Easement Exhibit H. Property Owners List and Map PC 17-3988 17-3989 City of Orono 17-3990 Exhibit A Variance Application Street Address: ti,„ 0 2750 Kelley Parkway Application# 7- 3 g Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: /6 //8/I 7 I Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: J tf fax 952-249.4616 Fee: f�. of/ ,- Mailing Address: $700 P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $700 ! $2,500 GCrystal Say,MN 55323-0066Notes' EsHO4' Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will pot be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SiTE LOCATION: Lot s l, 2, 3 Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION - ADDRESSES UNASSIGNED DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: VARIANCE OF WETLAND SETBACK (attach additional sheets as necessary) APPUCANT INFORMATION: ®check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Phone(Primary): 952-930-3000 Mailing Address: 14525 HIGHWAY 7, #265 City:MINNETONKA ZIP: 55345 Email: PERRY@LWESTDEV.COM , CURT @LWESTDEV.COM PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: RICK (BARBARA) LUPIENT Phone(Primary): 612-790-1800 Mailing Address: 20 2ND STREET NE City:MINNEAPQLIS ZIP: 55413 Email: RICKLUPIENT@GMAIL.COM APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make ed arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned of your project. • Information wiN be distributed via email. Applicant Signature: Date: 10/17/17 Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: SEE AGENT AUTHORIZATION Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: RECEIVE D Variance Application-January 2077 Page 4 JCI 14 /-01 f 3 9 88 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Vacation Application t Street Address: Application# / 7 - d v 2750 Kelley Parkway Date Orono, MN 55356 Received: ID 11$10 Staff: J �j Main: 952-249-4600 Fee $700.00 A ' a fax: 952-249-4616 Escrow; $700,00 14e. Mailing Address: 0_' - P.O. Box 66 Notes: Fees assume 4kES H O Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 application not part of subdivision. I/We request an Easement or Right of Way on/or adjacent to the following property be vacated: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: Lots 1,2,3 Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION - ADDRESSES UNASSIGNED Submittal Requirements 0 1 Compteted_VacaOoriAppticatjon -----, 2 Application fee 3 . Escrow dolt 91101#17egmerit O 4 Survey(meeting ALL requirements) Click sere for the City's Survey and Site Plan Requirements. 5 Data Privacy form ❑ 6 Hardcover Calculation worksheets. Click aur for the City's Hardcover Information Packet. 7 ACklitiOnet motion reQ400190 by OitV StOff 1 8 f Electronic copy of all submitted materials via email, CD or flash drive. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name: RICK (BARBARA) LUPIENT (AUTHORIZED AGENT: CURT FRETHAM, LAKE WEST DEV, SLC) Phone(primary): 952-930-3000 (LAKE WEST) Mailing Address: 14525 HIGHWAY 7, #265 (LAKE WEST) City,State&ZIP MINNETONKA, MN 55345 (LAKE WEST) Email: CURT:/LWESTDEV,COM RICKLUPIENTZGMAIL.COM PROPERTY OWNER: • Agrees to pay additional fees(staff time not covered in the original fee payment)and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this extension application,and • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of hisrher knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the City Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting,please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicantiowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed via email Property Owner Signature: Date: 10/17/2017 Property Owner Signature; (SEE uwNEri AU BOX1 LAS ION) Date: Vacation Application-January 2017 RECEWED 1 OCT 1 8 U 17 # 3989 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street Address: Application# /7- O2750 Kelley Parkway OOrono,MN 55356 Date Received: /D// 7cin 7 Main: 952-249-4600 Staff: 13 fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: $700 Mailing Address: P.O.Box 66 Escrow: $700 / NA r1 io rc, Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Notes: <tK�5 HO4� Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: Lots 1, 2, 3 BLOCK 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION — ADDRESSES UNASSIGNED DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: FILLING IN A FLOODPLAIN (attached additional sheets at necessary) APPLICANT INFORMATION: 0 check here if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Phone(Primary): 952-930-3000 Mailing Address: 14525 HIGHWAY /, #2b5 City: MINNETONKA ZIP: 55345 Email: PERRY@LWESTDEV. COM , CURT@LWESTDEV.COM PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if Property Owner is same as applicant 0 Name: RICK (BARBARA)check IENif T Property Owner address should be used for billing Phone(Primary): 612-790-1800 Mailing Address: 20 2ND STREET NE City: MINNEAPOLIS ZIP: 55413 Email: RICKLUPIENT@GMAIL.COM APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distributed vi •. Applicant Signature: 1 Date: 47,- Applicant Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: SEE AGENT AUTHORIZATION Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: _ RECEIVED CUP Application-January 2017 OCT7 Page 4 i O LAKE WrrIT DEVELOPMENT, LLC Class Ill Subdivision Application — Preliminary Plat Narrative Lots 1, 2 and 3 Block 1, Casco Point Addition PID: 2011723420001, 2011723420002, 2011723420003 July 17. 2017 Overview Lake West Development, LLC is seeking approval of a Class III Subdivision in order to consolidate three vacant lots of record located at approximately '3580' Ivy Place, Orono (addresses unassigned) into two lots for the purpose of constructing two new single- family homes. Jim Lupient purchased the property years ago with the intent of building three homes - for himself and for family members. Sadly, his intention was never realized. After much deliberation, Mr. Lupient's family decided to sell the property. Over time the property has become overgrown with a stand of poor-condition box elders and invasive species. The shoreline wetlands are low-quality and have no formal protection. The property is also encumbered with a variety of easements for access, utilities, and shore stabilization purposes. We are pleased to present a variation of Mr. Lupient's vision. Our plans call for two appropriate-sized homes and significant re-landscaping of the property, replacing unhealthy trees and invasives with high-quality trees, shrubs and native grasses that will provide long-term benefits. Our plans also involve cleaning up and reconfiguring areas of overlap among the various easements. We have already completed a Sketch Plan review and have integrated feedback from the City and from neighboring property owners into the plan. We are now submitting this Preliminary Plat Application with the anticipation of realizing the vision for this unique property. We appreciate the City of Orono's help in completing and submitting this Application. 644 Curt Fretham CEO, Lake West Development, LLC Office: 952-653-134 Lake West Development 114525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 553451 Phone 952-930-3000 Class II Subdivision—Preliminary Plat Application A. Contact Information Owner of Record Rick Lupient(Barbara Lupient Et AI Trustees) 20 Second Street NE Minneapolis,MN 55413 Phone:612-790-1800 Applicant Curt Fretham,CEO Lake West Development LLC, 14525 Highway 7,Suite 265 Minnetonka,MN 55345, Phone 952-930-3000 B. Site Data Address '3580' Ivy Place and unassigned addresses Orono, MN 55391 Zoning LR-1C One Family Lakeshore Residential Parcel Size 2.16 acres 94,080 sq.ft. Lot 1 =35,071 sq.ft. Lot 2=30,579 sq.ft. Lot 3=33,122 sq.ft. PlD 2011723420001,2011723420002,2011723420003 Description Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition C. Land Characteristics The property is located on a peninsula on Carman Bay surrounded by lakeshore on three sides,platted as three lots.The property was formerly wetland and lakebed but was filled sometime during the late 1950's-early 60's.The proposed grades in the area of the proposed home sites are at or above the 100-yr flood elevation of Lake Minnetonka(931.5)The proposed homes will have a low floor elevation of 933.5 per requirements of the City and the Watershed.Any floodplain filling will be mitigated on site at a 1:1 ratio as required by the City and the Watershed. The parcel also contains an incidental wetland(-168 sf)near the center of the northernmost lot. Potential filling of this wetland will be mitigated on site per City and Watershed requirements. Currently the property is improved with sewer and water but remains undeveloped. It is moderately covered with low quality trees(boxelder and elm),many of which are storm and beaver damaged. CUP—Page 2 of 4 Class II Subdivision—Preliminary Plat Application D. Description of the Project Our intent is to consolidate the three lots into two lots and build two homes that fully take advantage of the lakeshore on all sides.Although beautiful,the surrounding lakeshore creates a practical difficulty for development in that it requires a 75'setback on all sides. We propose to move the property line between Lots 1 and 2 five feet to the west. Lot 3 will be vacated and combined with Lot 2. The resulting Lot 1 will be 28,875 square feet; Lot 2 will be 59,715 square feet. The existing driveway easement will be vacated and a new,smaller outlot(Outlot A)with driveway easement will be created to serve both lots.The new outlet will have less crossover with other easements. A shared 12 ft.wide driveway situated at the northernmost edge of the outlet will provide access to both properties from Ivy Place.We are seeking a hardcover variance for the driveway within 75 ft.of the lake.This is the only option to access the lots. During construction,a temporary wood chip construction parking area will be established on site capable of accommodating 9-plus vehicles. Two wetlands currently exist on the site. Wetland A will have two 12-ft wide areas filled for private beaches.The entirety of Wetland 8(-168sf)will be filled as part of this project.All mitigation will occur on site and will expand on Wetland A.A wetland buffer meeting watershed requirements will be established around wetland A and will include high-quality seedings and plantings. Stormwater management on the project will be handled primarily by two underground rate control systems to match the existing conditions on the site.A swale will be constructed between the proposed project and the adjacent neighbor to the southeast.The swale will convey stormwater runoff from both properties and will ease already existing flooding concerns on the adjacent property. The underground utility easement will be vacated and a new one created that covers the pipe it was actually intended to cover. The drainage and shoreline stabilization easement will remain as is. The applicant will create an easement to accommodate the neighbor's small utilities encroachment upon the property,or if necessary,will relocate it within the common lot line drainage utility easement. E. Trees Currently the property is moderately covered with low quality trees(boxelder and elm), many of which are storm and beaver damaged.The site is overgrown with invasive species. Our plan is to replace the low-diversity,poor-condition trees and all invasive species and to replace them with high-quality plantings that are well suited to the site. Our goal for the landscape is to create a sustainable ecosystem that provides habitat and food for birds and provides long-term enjoyment for the residents and neighbors. CUP—Page 3 of 4 Class II Subdivision—Preliminary Plat Application F. Home Design In the early 1970s the peninsula was nearly devoid of trees. During this time a resident to the southwest of the point placed a deed restriction on the property constraining any future structures to one story in order to preserve the view of the bay beyond the peninsula. Even though the current tree cover obscures the view today,this deed restriction is still in effect. For this reason the proposed home design for the lots have an expansive footprint.The design is meant to harmonize with the natural topography of the land and provide timeless beauty for residents and neighbors. (See Concept Sketch) The applicant has been in conversation with the resident and is optimistic about resolving this restriction. In that case,the building footprint can be reduced. CUP-Page 4 of 4 PC 17-3988 17-3989 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM 17-3990 Exhibit B This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "ThTe/prroperty owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." A 2. "Theligght of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." THE ON SITE WETLANDS WERE NOT KNOWN TO EXIST UNTIL AFTER THE ACCESS EASEMENT WAS SHOWN, THIS HAS RESULTED IN THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE SITE BEING WITHIN 35' OF THE WETLAND. 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." DISTURBING WITHIN 35' OF THE WETLANDS ON THIS PROJECT WILL NOT ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE PROPERTY OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE PROPOSED PROJECT FITS IN WITH ADJACENT HOM 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." THIS VARAINCE IS NOT BEING REQUESTED FOR ECONOMIC HARDSHIP, RATHER THE PHYSICAL AND LEGAL SHAPE AND LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY. 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116J.06, Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter." N/A 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." .N_ .•1l It ':•'•. P 44.* d: t A . ► . e► k t 'I . N GECIVED Variance Application-January 2017 , i < <, �iC I i ` 1 I i Page 7 CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dw N/ " A. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." THE ACCESS LOCATION AND THE WETLAND ARE WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER, PROMPTING THIS VARIANCE REQUEST. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." MOST LOTS ARE ALREADY DEVELOPED OR DO NOT HAVE SUCH A LIMITED ACCESS AS IS THE CASE FOR THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." WITHOUT THIS VARIANCE THE OWNER CANNOT ENJOY ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY AND THEREFOR WOULD BE GIVING UP SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE DESIGNATED USES IN THE ZONING CODE. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO ACCESS THE PROPERTY OTHER THAN THIS LOCATION. Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): THE PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD BETTER EXPLAIN THE VARIANCE SITUATION. ACCESS TO THE SITE CANNOT BE MADE WITHOUT GOING WITHIN THE WETLAND SETBACK. THE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE PROPERTY PRE-DATES ANY KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESENCE OF WETLANDS AND THEREFORE SHOULD BE ALLOWED. Variance Application-January 2017 • Page 8 f- / CU� [i F� J SVC9S NW'VNNOI3NNIW'S9#311 f1S'L AVMHOI H 91Sb6 'ya=k 1 I• II 1 1 W (1) 50 J 311'1N3WdO13A3a 1S3M 3)IV1 ! iww .') _ 1,' • II 1 ciV, 50 W �` a5. 1 11 - O�G-141 x L6E99NW'ONOLIO'39VldAW1009E ivo; _ _ i1a1 1 _ U �! n, Liiokj�0ii: °4� a ,i S 1 1 1 1 y1 1 F 6 msSs„ A -1 0 33V1d AAI oad =-LLR"s a . 1 1 1 ala ;_ oa "S 1 1 1 lal'I 1II 1 i 11 I 111 hi 1 IL 1 1 li Io1 1 1 I WI ° <IQ 1 wrn0U m1�� 1 I UM06 0) r0) °IIS jO alp °1 aN- N- N- X ," 015 Id 131°1 1� 1 1 Lu o 1°I6 '; °! 11° °1 2 2 I z °I=1�°JI I a1 Io1a a!6 I I I w▪ 1 1 1 ka 1 1 1°11° I Ig W I I l y Q11,-..1.1:;`1? d a1a1 � l 0 I l wlw u<11 1 1 HRHlal 1 1 1 1 a11s1s sj-fla b 'll-1H15-u- 1 I 11 .1 .-,I�fit ofrt N-,4 r 313 3 3 3 31313!3 3131°°lulu n 3 13 k1 1 1 El , Hill 11111 II , 11 11 II 1 1 ' 11 rc 1 R' §LL -J W N W „ 401 o W VQDL. w X38 Z 1 J ? 0. 2 — .1ti II i ggg,' U3 3 3 i i 3 f 1 S Om m Z 1 Q 0 a .. I4s *u _ £ 8 O o w o s Y 3 b b 1 i 6 W 1� o bgEV/ :!: .,g .6.. gg § o$1 .L b 3 d ! 8 6 Eo i 1-71 R 88 1tl € n W - = i g/ . VI 2 LI-1 r' U K H W _ i (7 Q U gZ - O i7e N yw Z 6 i 4 Pr z g UL' o rig w:„ g o ax_ ”=fin _ ' Z..t. i'z.$ VW zg E ._Em 6 q a N NE U HIP Tree Inventory Survey for: - _ LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT e 0 . ---A:4--... . 0....t3.. -... . -. , ,,„4:1- a, cf• %.,-7 --• 0,0. 4 c60- , %, ., CY, PROPERTY OESCRPRON .1., '., '--,A;, ,s, C)''''-Xi'''' )( -. -- •- R 9.EAN.\`' ., ...... . -.....— •‘ ‘,7.-:.:-.V,' 's., .. ...... 7,' ,,= T. .4,= 0. -,-.-....- \.t , P. ' -s .-A.,,,. 4..•,t .., _........-....,..-.....—,......U.........-.....G.....-..E,..,,....N .... .2:..-F.•.:....:::.',.7....',..'•,,, .i,.t''e,.rr..:'',,:==...r.s=.—.:Z--..7--.-.....--...=-...,.....-.. =F"i.::-=•P::;-•.,'.-:,. .'r',..-..;4;-Ie.,.,.,,!..'==-..:-.._'-...._...-.,.-.....-:..:._'.... r,:2..7"',.......-.‘..`':a..:... ..:::.;I.':;"--.-_=.7=:==0Z;.-,7•..-..--7.-....777.,7:--.:.- ....::...:..7". ' ` .... .,....— m ,,. 4 s.}.... ‘.,-, • REVISION SMIMARY kk N :,..,=.. .... - - r" ...-...-.......- . - " \ •1.""- • - \14\ II --------- ' -\ \%. \ „------- SITE SURVEY 1 Render and Associates. Inc &.. '‘,..\ -----'-,,, N. S\_. 4\ -. . . i .1.---,4\." ,."` i •`\O i 9f • / .\IP'. . c. 'S.y6\\\ ga' �' d� / O'�6�_\�V 'E \ `' 9 e y fc\, \ i, g4ti �� \ ,a �C '\ J It /• e 2 a 9 µo` 9 0 z V i o g y Lq m 1 I I I INV y 1 I V7 m its ! 0 a $RF '' m m R:a F 41 e 4 4 PROJECT s s=;4. 4 ATR OI IVY PLACE . r— @ ®f`� m" K '° ��m o Pi 7C ?�t1t1 ' Z 4 R R i l l i 3600 IVY PLACE,ORONO,MN 55391 rill m E I'fir^ I I � A � o1F;{� LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC �_ u7 � A, 0, ' ) S "a 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE#265,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 �� 3 SbESS NW'MWOI2NNIW'S9#3Lf1S'L AYMHOIHSLSEL ,J 11 I '!.I I > N�Fe ai lu? 311'1N3WdOl3A341S3M 3)lVl --§z I L I g I; II l '_ trAl W a. ga PI a OGy7 cLI L6ESS NW'ON080'30b'ld AN 009E i--08 i d w> ' ` €l44a a d qi, i iI i1 I I a'1 I I �2 V '�'� aE be W o aj gt. m -a L' je I@ 0 scc =t3Ob1d AAI .�3r°n .g ayrt 5' S. 11 'ia i ' b d 1 e a � a e. io . P I I F € ° 91 "d Cw H k g �{g Iii a s. 3 FF 66 a y S ti p ii h f; §g2 Ili M " EN a gO 416 14 €i° z 1 11 1 yM 1 S� i dey , 1!Eps$ HII E g_ ,, "' IS .g. F ' r use F 4§ � @ 110 ii E € ig! 411Ilig 1!iy i b PE it' W r�r7 '11 o i, 1 $1 it e °IE = .i ;-x a.05 "ii I ti o t o g 0 L�,, y 6 WI 6s 0$¢`¢`e }� Egg gg3i3 jy 8$a c51 110 Ug888 liEI gp[as Q$E 6 ng4 ° W O �I ig P iG a 8i h d3 E! %6i y08 iik 7 gg I0i 81 b I Q li ° e 20 e LUu i 9 Ni i p p e�°Q u L' i a p � i e:F i e gg?i i 11 c R E 1 li is 44p2 4!Il 1 a 111C\ 0 G' alig A2e 8 Ar.1 j-'' Ch18r , .4r' 1 ` `O 77-7 PGrc �P� n , t Alli 414 1 \ G sii i( o � � PSP .0/,c' it til - .� --Al___ ''b, �l g lied # 11 * ), _,* 1bt 1bt 3 1, �45�r'1 �\;14\ s6 RR �\./t , i t A, L $) )). %/ $g `\ i \ <. • , N ,/' • WON°LIMBS /\ ........,? CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: C v kite ♦� ■•w• ��` ,. wows uvnRITANTTBLIC.wMw ion Ml'AT�%1w10%MInMr Ul ISW ITX SIC 1. MOM.Cda+mCTICO nuomoeirt NOLILuriD To.SITE a MEMO PRIOR a lw Loi Eti/V . ms1 wAsT.T.ELITE AN A ♦• ♦4\ NOTICE PRIOR TOMNWMNBENG PERFORMED AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINER.EASEMENTS.SETS...trtILITIES.BUILDINGS AND at.Louis PANE im SUN / ♦ ♦ 1. DE COMMON OF MY PLACE SHOULD RE REVEW.a THE MY AND PAVEMENTS.CONTRACTOR E RESPOSELE FOR FP.L0.11016 a ALL ELEMENTS rmn»w. aiTSPmm rM n<BfIE.ANrRMSIONB REMWED UTdarEENCEAeNTDIcorvsmlLTox. ♦ CONTRACTOR PRIOR TOMO WMx,AMI no OWING CONDITION sXdnDRE ''LDCAIpNunnJusDExrssxulw cORRE''aAT NDrowTER:KmT TO F ♦ \ 4\ 00014 ND WAN PICTURES.ATTER CCMPLETIVI Of WORK.THE STREET OLE / . aREWIRED10%MN OM pE�pIETDro 9E UU5FDer 9T1FDiMwA(. ERMLDOCAPE roTITECTM EXILwM-ATIONOF•ATE • OWNER RMASTI.T ARCHITECTPREP NONmAWMNIOf MATERIELS.STAKE / LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL / CF.� C� ,. DECM.ARIGHT EVAY TMNAND TR NECESSARY PERMIT PRNAroCMSTRULMM, LAKE M■r Y E L MGLODNT APoORNOLLAYAND 9MECTMSARY PERMIT FL I ). DE CONTRACTOR STALL VER.RECOMAEMATNMS NOTED M THE GEO TECHNICAL /' ��' "9, REPORT PRIOR TO INS.I ADDU DE SNF ILEREAMMENr MATERIALS. I % Vii,* °" F GaNTRAGTDRSHALL FIELDDVERIFY GDDPOM„ESMDLOCATION DNET6d6DFTHE DEVELOPMENT.LLC ♦ ;;:; 54 \ NP •\ / •d• REVEAL AND APPROVAL m TRE EITONEERAANOSCAPE ARCH.,PURI TO 53\ J '■ \ \ `029 NOT LIMITEDTO THE FOLOWI FUNISINDS,PAVEMENTS.WALE.RALNDS.EMIRICATION!OR ALL PREFAIRTICATED SITE IMPROVE..MATERIALS SUCH .Bui 1 ■ \ PpggEDPLppERry ” BEE'iES.F.PMES LNDOW EAS FORCEPS RAMPS.NN USW M6 POLES.. , ♦♦ °L OWIEB PEDESTRIAN RESERVES..RICHTTOµRE INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY p �� ADMADnow L� G \ T AEASM ACCORDANCE TMX ADA REO IREWNTOSEE Daa 12WR SND BFACN.TT. B. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BEEP,.WHITE PAINTED LINE,SPACED IE M CENTER �■ \ PADS COORS \ ` r ' i,, PERPENLIOWR TO TIE FLOW M Taal,WENN OF MOS..BIWL SE 6 VALE % ■ cam OAMEn PRIpI 6`�/W/e M� PRESENT OMER OR'RLOCAL GOVERN6E.STALL M..S.YORE•COLOR MESS OTHERWISE NOTED m \h U LO ■ •♦ i0 CO61RUILIION.M. - 2j} / ..../,c a REQUIRED mIDA GRADING LYITS ` V STN♦fDCONCRETF `\ / / a 10. CURS ALwrT.TVP:SHALL SE MIT Nana GTNERMSE NOD M THE DRAVANGSTADER BETWEEN CURB TYPE..DETML. J N OT ♦'♦O\4, MOTH COST,TVP., /''/ Yt� 11 AL CONRADN AE I,EALLM RUNLESS ODIERMSE NOTED. z ••♦:� ��� / / o, c 11. COMM.IxrsoNsPmoRroswaMFPLAT rMgmsdMDARIES Nwems.AREAS01 Z ♦ / / ,. FIELD VERIFY AL ERI,.SITECMaTwrs Due SIGNS W z ♦ ;; lnTI.PARE.G PRARFLGRPERPENDICULARTDF.GTGNALDBGMFBNOTED ,w1 a w S\ ♦ O• � J•. / ,j, NL PARE.LOT PAWMOM.TO BE WHITE.I•WIDE TIP. U O O Z •,� ♦♦ ♦4. ix � It N r` `` errUMINOUS PAVING AVEENrsxiTONS. naxeR36EA3,ED SEE MTAn J tt W Mi ` All TREES MT ARE TOMMIE MIE O VI \ 6 ♦ 4; / , TO CONSTRUCTOR FENCE THE DRIP eEPIOECTEDFNOMOAM,SRE n /^� ' F DSTOEPAVEAS ■ S -fk i l k \ R /� '* LIE SEE LANDS..DOGAENTSYAII LL U W F IAImSMaEALM. / .... *T,141'.;.D..1/6';',,,,>0),\ .l F} ♦ YYY S./ COORDINATE SALINES REWIRED.M. 41r O A. NO PRIOR TO CONSTRUC TYE �! r k '' •, w'IG EVER ND m LU `� v $? ♦.O� ///1� REFER°TOSSES MITER, SITE AREA TABLE: W I \ 4�e �� EmnoealvBenam \_°���g. �¢P' E dlsTmE PROPOSED TL PROMO/ 11.314 ammo LOCATOR COORDINPROPOSED ATE ; \ + 9 Alt PM/MMR Ltff U3.5 1,613 SF SOS 1.1E0 ar Sf 'SEa�t 2617 SF MAMt HARM AND OWNER I 1 C ALL PERVIOUS SURFACES flEa SP n.Te ]f.mF SF a. SOal Sr b.AS 2101 Sr SO. a ■{ t_ ■ I/, TOTAL SfEARG SNOW 3i MON 2.021 SP 1000% 51.21961 100 0% 5)00 Si IDDM 1: / � uweEnwEwLNna NW SF 03+4 uNoE. ATE OF SOU , / •3b PROPOSED CONDITION LOT I Sl1B SF RTS I �� ;RFyRb 6hh PROPOSED CONDITION LOT t1x SF asE OVARIA ENO SF 3DA I / / t� .. ems.. UNTOTAL(IOTT,ROT 31 Se,I31 SF 1637 mm 1D,Mn L05444111,11.... / TOTAL ROT 1 A LOTS.OLMOTA) 611E SF BSM ISSUE/SUBMITTAL IDT DIFFERENCE Id.K Mal 16170 SF IS9K / TOTAL DIFFERENRIER.VS PROP.) 1207 SF 1696 // NW emare mvenlPw reE I4 awed atne adaept prawn,owner d;nt l�_4.011111. uw L OA f/xs f. // PC ' SITE PLAN LEGEND: — 111 _— PROPERTY LME _. r. 05 -4M4Y4.[Errnrm-Dux EASEMENT UNE • WETLAND UNE t-.. .— — /L- IN—E.MI a CONSTRUCTIONLIMPS PLFCT RIO 17.PRELIMINARY GOPHER STATE: fp, E CALL Isu a SITE PLAN 9 �� N,,,.MeMLa�, C2.0 J SbES9 MN'VNNOI3NNIW'99Z#311f1S'L AVMHOIH SZSVI G I I >m W cs) �;x -- .1▪ 1:!1 Oil`1N3WdOl3A3a 1S3M 3)4V1 s .19 1 4 I i f o .3i , 16ES9NW'ONO21O'30V-idAAI009E gg gg€& a1 7 KIK o wzy N • �i` �.. a Ly`li3= f r I n5� U ; r Q 0 io3ro. E a "$•F 1 �I I E R aI 3e gr 4 Z4 i gig i. a vi W I i Ie IP!,E N I I I •I'' \ `9ti9 / ••\ 0 1„e /, /' \•\s d \ a\ P • �P Poi /I \ , \ 6' E,yC' / `\\ s CC / \Q i" / ', \ \ /' — `\ / P '16' .\,C)\\*.\\ ... _ - ---'-- \ / / ��0' ` N ` / V v F� J Sb£SS NW'VNNOI3NNIW'996#311f1S'L AVMH9HSZSP C,„, rc K N /'\I Oh 'R .�. 011`1N3Wd013A3a 1S3M 37141 q g F ha ,I '4 n� V• JE- CN V• .1 ! 6ESS NW'ONOiJO'30Vld AA!009C g; koog,�q. kF yp oFy 'a I.LJ a § s, O U• 0Uja 0 33Vld .VU ,„_, H' E ale 11 .I I d1 1 1 Ii o a1Z VP1 HO W I I I � W y I I 1 I o',' ..o' /”�`\ P ?G -- \ .\- e''e'' // ,,\ \� �0 // /�•\ 3 , X00 /, - /, \,\s �`�P,{h / /�` // `,\\ \ t / ,/ ,#\ N. <" .‘ito , ,c›,-,-_,___-- ,___,, / ` -t , -_, / / / %� _ iys . �� ' 9VC99 NW'VNNOI3NNIW'99Z#3iiris L AVMHOIH SZSPI �, I 1 I >z (n31,1 �. v? W 311'1N3WdO13A3a 1S3M 3NVl € 114' „ ! W N ,1071 LSW L6CSSNWONOLJO30VldAA!009£ HO:i 1 7 I �No octal i' I J qr i e. I I d 111 I g a z '4 gg 1! WA§ 5 1-1 1-111—P- �- I f 1 g (.9 a U0 $ 0 3�d�d AAI 3,odd d a Q Z * 1141111 1111 o'" ,o �,\ ,yo /, \ -7/ \\.2\9'.6. ,,, P2JP /' `` v / ,,\ \ / �� , .`\\\ /" \\ X43 v \4y / \ / ,tra \, / 4 wO •O ` - +• j' . / .O .\ / / �� s 6 +y / /' / •/ ` ,�,�e i� _'" !q ,\•, ,/ it " `` N `e.-► CUL f� 94E99 NW V)NO13NNI NI 99Z#311f1S'L AVMHOIH SNP C t,a� 3 1 I '.. ¢wm > i ' �miq 'i J 011'1N3WdO13A3a 1S3M 3Nd1 L'l; ,p -.z • (Alig W g� s: foo N c .io q L6ESSNW'ONO210'30b'IdAA1009E zg,682 a -, z,;i v EFLL< ' ` ›ga3 I y 00 a �'g' ff` 1 8 az 6 u. f@ _. 0 30V-Id AAI o3roae JIM a 31ys15 I c m _o a #'R F flw I I I a a I I N I o'' 01 j�•\ 0\-\ e / 1 \ \,,,,,, ;C� / \ s PGF : ;o / / \a // ' % i� �\ /i j I -i'' ',.. \ / i 56£99 NW YNNO13NNIW S9Zt 3LIfS'L AVMHOIH 9Z96L c,,a � ' I Ill I O "14` i 1—as€a; E Qa13a3 „ g E I L,•.4 s .- 4.3 W L6£SS NIN'ONOHO'3�Vld AN 009C so gi18 Y �eII ' LLpQ ' ` ce mo6.2'4o` d C ��o3, { a a v owl 5m d y W F.: w ill! iE I I I isl Ig o �� ER —+ 0 ICE 30did AAI 3roaa z aye q , I' I I I p y F 4 i POI- it i 16 S as fE g t 161 S °� �q A s" g h ""0., Rt IF; e d W 31. " m A" -' 8 `l `k o a § f � s € � Q7 kk s e0 ° \r/ - 8.!1w @I � @ �� ��l �4 ahfl '� p�g � k���� �1 a� d Y � �S ��� lOgigiFI 1 ; as G lif a � IIP 1k €w a g ili DB2 i" 0 xp 1 'y ¢¢ g $ s bp! Yk g5 h L 4 tq °aL $1pU 41 i " 6.8 33 iRk R p� E 6° i N ,, wgA w W� Y �� � st 1a � �� o� � �i t� € 6 o� �� �� ��` k'k I r � ' fa 4 1dgt 3€� 0 � ialt ° l I l$ gP a OP2i UI 4 :y v 8 Wi °n4' ix4 al hitt 5g gi q g °; ilg ,6 kli it fp, iI 40,. iipgv! III 41 !i " 6k 4 REa$i k R ' ai .q. J 1 4� igakii 0Ig !apai,M 15 x L-fi t!4 � ig i � � r35= �Jgte ° ° YRy '4 � R Y��'e[b3 35yy 7S' yy gg 4 R i 3 § .,5 ii iii al i.a, a g Y R /Naig (2 O PE 4g w. Pil g 1 '6 , A ek \-S Y Z0,. \1/4,s\„\L96.05. ilit eit H€ R51 Fy ¢ O r,'� I •c6k Ba se o s ‘,..,j, e` �� oN J 6 313 i w WQp '6 1q \ W A E N ■■dAiia F U j\s„. Xi 11)0IV q L .m_", a°, ak n3 GG �. �,• Y \V e Jpe+ ♦ V Ai ♦♦ etk AN ! : Ba ki ♦ 0 'Y i�� X Qom,, a 0 d , # // . : *4 . /AIL4' `g °�♦ 4,....".• 5,4",;7' a a R j.�� � \- N. q_ y A4 a % i p( �Z ti 8 5e z #0*f; s; / 4. a A: ...--"/ oa,'„ ,--- ,- A3 o `: tZ a � I g %, /; \ •` •\ \ \` / \ / \\ . /, g`+�,d1 a a 4\ // \ r/ ? d� o c li `N s ` 1 - Y Y 44 , 1 44 .• it r te' E i. ' e� (4 ' r. yY� iY �a n � ,ky° . c a y d f Z. r R" btie,��oy a$ i m s _ in g� L-J Q Hi F a 4 � 1 I 1 m PROJECT � ._ IVY PLACE .1 o(1 x % I Z i :AWN,LO ill 0Z ,,,,, ., W m 0� i t I I 1 �s Y,, $1 53 £26. 3600 IVY PLACE,ORONO MN 55391 m 3 4 0 5 0 '1 :' I p Y 1 °1 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC 1 ,, u c Z 2 6) I 1 III I 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE#265,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 r 2 4 1Ft ' ' Oh a/ L... J 90£99 NW'VNNOI3NNIW'99#311f1S'L AVMHOIH 989bl l� I I I', 1 226 /�1 ; ▪ �` a J 011`1N3INd013A301S3M 3Wil O a V 1 bn �• �egd 17Jitr, co L6£99 NW'ON080 30,11,1AAI 009f i! ,,,Mi II 0 > U• 0 h mcg c 33,11,1 AAI 103r0ea F 4 a si a Izr IQW C) ki if'M I Y R a W 111 -a w w i ® R Z 8 W s,8 2 �- E 0151 PPr. a S1 iiii 1 554 w V0'*gliiw1 j ;diIIhI iII1318 yg III IT, if o = i r IP o" ,Ql asK Alli IR <, ',,,,,,'' y,,,, _„..„..... c, ...-‘,„ ..., 9 YZ h. NtOv�JpQ • `_ice a 4016,7 .„...,9 ow 8 -e it IIIPAW ‘ g 8 lig 8 k,i_t_tkk a 4 a \ '•• qR 1 41g ASIP. fiii ,4*\ 4 A / 1 1 . ''''4 ' .iir'' ', Ant s ;1 Allgf S , ;4' ; ,iii>4 .e• - --r-kw-.4. . ..,, ' �i44, a 441 �f � 8 x •ofi ..-. 1111..-. 1111/p,. /-� til4pi. g 88 '`_.i e i g MOND LISTS GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 9��71���� ,------.-'11 _—__�` SEE eTERANFOR xORRONTALOMFNSIONSwDUYWr. 1 Y ' 0444 ARO CS R Co U ♦�• -. - \• .....:.57,� R REAR HALF OF HOUSES rcpsapPIIIO FEAME9PNONICOHITOCTOR S.1.1.FELD VER.O COxs'TFO:iON.ECOMRMTOROCATOR NO ELEVATOR CF SHALL NO MTRES�RLA .1.31w 35TN3T stPTE ma './ ••\ AREA C =ANDNPE INTO Z ROT.THE ENONRA OF DECREPANCES OR VARATONS FROM THE NNIS. %. •'� NEaOE STM -+ A! EFOE: OS• NDERGFOUNDSYST �F SPECTOUTGHSFORWATERMAN.°..ELIRENSTALLA, AND�,NDARYSPA.IND LAKEI�(EST 0)HEADERS �/ STOW$EWER NSTNUnoRASPREPARED Br TECIN ENDMEER9 ASSOMIOXO ,r aDEd ENO STONE. FCF.L >L MMNEWTA MENG AND 6.L COF0IN WRN'xE REOLI.MEMS OF THE CITY ANODE %' •• tx STONE SEPARATIONB.STONE VER 9� S PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS • KU O. 07. Ol91NC89Wll aE 9ALVAGEDFPOI9TNUCMI[11EMWw9 NID REL9E0MNAGFO ATTE •• IE 12.CA1,03000 DI EGCNOEOVHER DEVELOPMENT.LLC ,\ • OE• CORIFICE=955050 .k 'It" Ni WATER PIPE SHALL BECWSSx DUMP IRON ME ORI LME580TKANiBE NpTEO. • SEB"ORIFICE=93O50OP 12.Cm1,931 OD pL ALLSALRTARY SEWER SHALL BE BORN POLYWNYL WLIME(PVC)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED V\` ••• iiOP = S? . B. NL9rWM SEWER NR SHALL SE HOPS UNLESS OTEIMtY VOTED ••tW RHWL=93138 O.5. Ccs a PIPE WHOTHS SHOWN ARE MONOMER TOM/4ERO STRO .OR'O00 O FLNED \ • •• 41114 YSTON a l EMO SECTOR. •• 9�e O//� ta. uCONTRACTOIS DITWTUT RFSPON9TOTES OR THE PLAN ARE SMOWN 00LE FOR THE FWAL CW.W 6 OE THE CCONECTION TO BLEOBNO LINES. VVING POOTDRINT THE \ ••• ) CI ACCESS RISER,TVP ALLOW, I WO�TNfEWTTIMCM1ELiMIL MO MEONNOH PLANS. AT\ 0 01 r OW.TY GRATE 929 I.uS..TCH 4°UTTERS E.U.SE SIPPED ONK O.MANHOLES 111 FARED 15 FEET PERSHALL DETAI ELEVATORS M TH ON THIS HOPE FEB 1, IRAN DO NOT REFLECT SURFED ELEVATORS. ,• „'cL P E'NIR60 CL I W.FRE MVOMxI13wY IE LOCI®BEEF,BEMMDBACN OCWBLH.E990ERWIY T\ • `� 1tl PJC NON—RETURN VAL VF_ab z NOS' AnECyT TO EOsi STETAE/F1000 WATER FROM t1 xYDRAl1TTYPE VALVE.AVO COWECTIONswII aENACC090ANCENHMCDY REOREJExT3 R�ZCONTRACTORe ORM•a50x :DENT GsvSTEM. , E�NOMSFEET� NNCOENIS�iKa OWER ALL WATDNAIN.UMf6r O,Hf F CONTRACTOR TO VR / CONCRETE HEADwNLAAO •' FINDINGS TO ENGINEER ,,,,JT MANUF.SPECS I WIED.EOMOEPMNAY SE RFOUPEDiO MANlAMAMNNUM OFIEVERTICII • ELEVwi ON %Sr�F.� 6v/ '/9 OV OECUYLNER ER �V / NSCES a BFPAMiON iO SANRARv ORaiORMlEW'ER LNESEMM OPM WATEPMAN roMCOENTAL. (, BEN MNNIEA O A RICHES OF LEITICLL SEPARATION ARO to FEET OF HORDORTAL SEPARATOR J . ORONO EWE S 11LF 2)PVC / NYLOPAST , AATON sysTEMs WI. IS MOORED FOR ALL ImImEs.LNEsaoMERWISE H0ie0. J ,O �: ,••�� STORM•1Wx,��� RIM=93zW w N ,e. ALL caK•eciwrN TOEnaTEa unrtEa slwLx NAcaaoAlkemmlam STANDARDS AND E=9zs77 • 29LF,,IVC CCGRONATEDTTNE VW PRIOR TOCOINiRUCTCN. i \ ♦' STORM•]3T. STORM•lsax T.CONEC1ONS TO EXST.STNOUTRES SMALL SE COREFILLED. .02- Z ♦�, x86% / 1T ACCESS RISER TYP IS.COMINATELOCATIONS AND SES OF SEANCE CONECTOM MWH THE MF.CWNCAL Wc z ` T�♦ F?P �/ , SLOTTED GRATE TO ALLOW 5056Nra_ z i w RAl SERV F ♦ STORM L'&''%: INFLOW,THE IP COORDINATE INSTAL LATIN AND SOEd6LNO O THE I1VAUrgN O MUTES WITH W E a E ♦ RM®079%/ AONFM CONTRA/CO.AM CM STAP �• • ♦♦♦ /,/ 7 DETENTION ETERGRWYSTEM IMWATER M.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHN09HN L R PERFORMED PER THE REWIRE...OF THE O O CM ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTOM99WLL BE SAW A,.ALL TRAFFIC COTRO951WLBE ,� PROVIDED BY rxEcoNmrcORAND SHALL IE EBrAELISHDPEN THREWIREMENt9OF tHE J 0 ; / / DETE RiOEaS°STEMI MINNESOTA MANUAL OR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OEOT=AIO TIE CIry.THS RY9�OE6EHISTONE 9WLLNCLLDE eurNm BE UNITED TO saNrE lUmllf.AUE.FLASHERS AHD FUWOS As d AA A -',1,,) ,O/ 1r STOKE PIPE MPS..PUIRES1NE.S SMALL KOPER TO TRAFFIC AT All TLES.NDRWD CLOSURES U W w R\ 1 WATER c 9v STONE COVER p SHALL BE PERHTTEormHOT APPROVAL.THEO. a Q % iFir ♦♦ (OUSE RNs /' ?cMF=93oW T.ALL 4TNlKN,EB.PIIBIACAW NMATE.BHNL 0E bA5TEOroPRWGSEOGRADES WHERE j I— N `�\ FROM romNCE-9JO aO RESET rO PAVED*.MUST WET REC.E ERTFOR iwsrlC 1.0.14'0.sNENG _ CO fi' OEp2)4.ORJFJCE=93025o W Q RSVi0 ♦♦&♦ • / AG1(10-1,Mr 0)1,921 00 TONE.50 u CONTRACTOR muucaIOrurewLwamrmm cnrvare muncamRwlEa .,,J�/,� R . , , .•'O{,` TOP TO CONTACTOR 9WLCOORNATE COMECTON OF NHO,TOH SERVICE TO UTLITEB. `.C`(/. ♦ ♦ �Q 1� COOIONGETIE RRTAUAnox O IRRIGATION SIEEVESH:CESSARV AS TO HOT MPACT LO ♦ ♦ / �• Ff NBT.ATION OF MUMS. W S _] / 1f6 `'� COM.CTORNwLMwrARMSBALT PLANsrNNODowur COHSTOCrON McsuwT LLA \N 1 t.'e [a. ' N.NEE PUMB TO EWNENR OCR=PLUM O WORN. \ A�',, c ALL ISMS Aro COHECrO.N STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTOHT \ TO E%STING A.OVFO RFSAIOIT RUBBER JP.MUST BE WED TO WIM WATFRTMNT CORRECTIONS TO 6 V • CANRECT WAGES.CHIP .VML.OR OTHER 9TRUCIUPES.. 1 / -M CONTRACTORCATSTUB A NLPORTP.OFTIE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FRT OF E SLAW.OR / S[IJ WATER SERVICE LINE MUST SE TESiFOwAOAIOAMCE YTM MIRUIEe.CIMPIERmA. SPECIFICATION cm Rpm,wm , / LocnrrAN,SIZION E AND acnal Tana !HERESY MOTO 11.P.T OAS ANN SANITARY.RVICE 7317:0•4"t174IrPArA'ZIT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL EEGS.. /// TSF. FOIwNGS To ENGINEER REPORTXISTING CITY OF ORONO UTILITY NOTES: GRADING FLOODPLAIN NOTES(CITY 8 WATERSHED): °M0E"�I/yE) "'EPF IA /♦ 1 TELEWSE EOSTNG9AHTARY SEWCL WIN ANDRE.. OMS TO I. FLLNONE ROOOPIAN MI L RE WOOED ON NW AT A1'VOLUME //. _vim 4 /V x ENNE.PRION TO mwTNOOW RATIO. �l,nn AM Sen.M.N.EXPOSED MD LOCATOR.8..MO z NRC.O ORO RULES,THE LOW FLOOR TERATISM FFEIOF PROPOSED DAM u� F I� Or A SERVI27 CEE COORDINATE WATER x FLEW.ARE.60 VERIFIED/AVOWAIC 0.11.OF SERVICE STRUCRRES1.1 BE 523.5 OR NGIIER DAM 10•10/17 u STUB i• SONG ERR WI MECHANICAL CONNE[MMI9MORUBE9U•WTTEDIOE CP FOR REVIEW NO APPROVAL AP IxISERWCES 1/ DESIGNING IN HOUSE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTOR S LER MNHSV.HACIEIX wATFRSHI®OSTIECTRLlE9.TIE LO//014MGO U SUMMARY WET EXISTING WATER SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROPOSED STRUCTURES MUST BE 5625 OR HCHR. TO COORS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION y51 T-LX,Fw,n Fw ,Oil UTILITY LEGEND: /5/t1 `=ii� CITY i�aRTOVERIH -.�.. Tr rzE,AND • OUCH WIN i/, E,EVATION OF EXISTING / FINDINGS TO ENG/NEER PROPOSLVE NE VALVES -1 / EREPORi � MANGE ---� ,.,' N wTEVALaE NO VALVE BOX _ _ _4444— —I— WAIT/IMAM REVISION SUMMARY KA CP ) SWAM 5EWER5c TI: PRELIMINARY GOPIERSTATE ONECALL 16.0.<1.1 , UTILITY PLAN 9 �,,.H�LR� 0< C4.0 N ffe-- ~ I� J I:III I Ts _ -1 ili F II 6 21 l0 8d Ilell:=1 X11-11=II-IL��.�I 0 Dill al II 1 g Psi o\\u\\\\„ o 1.4 1 q s 8� bb wa i 9 rn iii II Iii I �A g i tl gl 1= i i it it !I lip A W —y°'I m z rS y, � y n ma'~ F_kl ' � o 2 _ .'I... 2 1 \ ,r 4,il,, Inti p I 1 O n-rt 3 3 -1 Y f Ion a ` li,i A'"' IVY PLACE r a a ` ' i 'S k 3 5;i,;3:4$1 3600 IVY PLACE.ORONO,MN 55391 3 #"��` Cil m� § ; 4 Vi! LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC Z 'n �$�=;c-. OP s `T €$I en ffp N r :' R:'0 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE#265,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 c i �i 1 21 L3 S6ESS NW'VNNOI3NNIW'S97#3.LIOS'L AVMHOIH SLS6L C,s„ 2 • .LEA— , ./•�/� b �2 311�1N3WdOl3A341S3M 3NVl "c i ' s '- —CET , VJ,5.0 s W z gir_'t. /9 .z i rcp 0;i . 16E9S NW'ON060'30Vid AN 009E !oo€q63 Ch ._ o��.2b W b ¢' a �' SS j N or.,- 47; iP :� O 33V1d M� 6y. a 'tltl3.ee j !I NI~ !I as u 44444444444444444444444444444444444R4444444444444444444444444 t ill II a yy QQQ �L ¢¢ $$ < < !� !p�, yyy z lll�! IR 5 LSC p P05:„ 99 g111e1111111d111111111111211911111111G111ffl� it li ill 5U III [II tri g1;111 4 da3. onc444444s44 4 6s4 4s444n4s a 4 94� 444 aI444 �434s4s W=$ E 4 �wse ge- s-a ss•s^.^^.;•^aS ^...^a a^ee 5..^sans a " s ; j Nii' Rillgu lltilli4$E$��� =P. QQ1_ M B HIP.O 4�'�`IIIII I'I�� 'I'II9$$1114 e C $ liw O wox e444444444444444444444444444444444444444R4R4R444444444444444444444444 O s w AllIBM15111144ggglaMIPEIRBEIIIIIIIII125181 Mill 111 HIM 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444944444644444444443444444 •---^-^-^9."' s^sssaaaa-eaaa^aaaaaaaa„ S" „^g^'SS'-s-SS--^ S_ g •laaa55n5EEaaaax""Ilii!!!h!IIsi2liilLEiliiiiii'll?6EEEEEIIIRA III x o' st-P 2G a ate- \ ° irr tr 4- $ \ i P �y .P r •\ } Ops c 4' �f 4,, , 6 �i a_ Q�PG —4k 444k 4\41 Al y ch A y .3. • i te*- 16-_ -----*ate--•. Q9 SB • • ••• '.-21.4..>y ' 1OSFA • 7r* ; 24 I A * , N ' WL I W r__ SbESS NW'VNNO.L NNIW'998E 31If1S'L AVMHOIH SZSEL G,E, ' I I I C) � ' ` 8a ill 1N3WdOl3N34 1S3M 3>idl a = €. g D a � O gg g d 1.6M NW'ONOLIO:3OVld AA!009E L s`GE o J s6,J Et } F ict ��" P. , 33V1d AM 3oad say a a'' s $ T1 X11511 l. 1 1I i fili1il, III = s „ ! =lip c it 31 0311313 31331 333 s I :0 e® s a.'_a.: 3 111 3 3 113'.33 ��5 • 4:, /i g _8 se , -"t E 1 II « - tea@ c a s o �, I . eEe «e 14 e!w;� 3<3 � �� s �. e_ � !a- �� eeE a s p pa�A r�V � YrW hIt!t �� Y q �. eiaii{n�T9 n; _ a a HO tgh t} 5Ex 33_aE� «g_ .�8� d_�_�.3ala I I� I � � � g 1 I 1 (M I 1 III iliijin ij'III I II 14 1 U! I l P v I I e g 1 1 1 , I Ig g 34 i 3Q m 3 If; ll ICY s >F s $ a 1 `si s 4, w I, @,�II� I3 I �I�I LL 1 � 1 ..�35xrtx��ua�xxrtac.... � x3a1ssu««««Mxx444-5. :8l ,"I 014 31;51'15. m 2~ 25 =s t i la!13:020 she Marla'I SII€m1 145'1 o - @ 31E 3.3E1 5 /3i$2a§ i $ 1 @ @ '�'�3 j � 4s 83 s ? 3SQg¢, a q 3_ was /'•\ cgg o g e ?� / J .•. g w r y$, g ei f i 191,0 / �n s -1,4' i . e --r ! $ r 1. 1 g $ * 'G ? i gill ripep i gg 11 1 �{y. sif,z = , gip Ea ge2_ i5'e..-A, Nsvg'X a -, g!b 1p 6 p"•" "' ti • s .r gpgp \/,,P i s` - -tt• � i. " ! r �. g €5I gig 4), .✓�: .'`. s 4�" .a fit, u __ _-8«3.s GC g te gg L. 5 d f:0%,:-:•:-.- . s —1,4,-,40.4041.14N: ` , 4431, ,! :4410,t,, v,,,4 ..474.4 ...:_70,,,,,,...:.::-;:-..::::...::t...ms,44), . ./, .. ii 1 ,,:,. ,6,,,,4-',`;'ri:--rt,,,,....„:.. ----1: **iiiiiii- '''.::.`.1.40, ' / w / ,y ,`` �:'!{ baa �� g 3 a §o Y I� l 11 13 I aW 3 ,.� C. /I Sgt ( I:10 14 al0 1 t'i § LI' W i W 11 I� F. , gg €" a. RI 51 it �Erg W ill 14 1101 3 Wil l 4! 1 3 3,i 1g 8 11 ff \ ._../" E e .; Fl- F wig: 33 00 �y !3§ a 1lW 54 _1 rl. Fy, 14 4ggi 2N gi S I a; e 1 z 'AD. it ! 15.5 IN 1/ 5VP g? 8! 5 it ° I _ ., ., _ « ., _ . _ U Nigqfr g .i dao ;Mme _ `somrR- .:./• o, ,ate \-\\ pmp r i i'> tlt. z f s -4, oe%..x.. `� / _ ,g���oy,_\\ HP og ygip"mo µo` imp 1-1 ii r m AWi 2, 4 inm bb O >i p :'iso D in 0 !I' im�0 Irl S Ho- en:' I, ,I "gs m ;8 D 4 ig •L_J i.' ,)i L_J a; � €€ u8°, � 8�> P a 4 $ H! Ilio p q u t s ' Ram m g b $g Ti '^ A Ig 4 , ROI A ROE, IVY PLACE o a r— a( SyZ�I . a02! x 1'rl f ci O2 A �;"g ,q£$! 3600 IVY PLACE,ORONO,MN 55391 rn �j 4oT ' q if psi LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC �j) ;� g°►-' O.66A .a 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE#265,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 � — D •eD HI Viii N ,./.*" �• _ \2 ,./ \ zr I♦4illE%.• f i amc � '1, / /\g ` ttV�\ C" /�� \ i. ;041ird ,.., '' ..8,„,,-T, . HMI 1 ,o _ _, 10 ��ti � f/ mn �ti,° \'' $q �� a Po$ pi 7n f'l 1,i f'9 m Xn ji 3 $ X r0 FIV i ,I f i 0 0 3 O �ZS iiim 33.0 R^.O gA i• 1 f�7 7 g:g o b of 0,1 §; (. i 1 b 8m ao A rn g•a L_J L•_iJ L_J f I I�'d€o y im s o p RFS S 9 '5 -3� 0 i o s 600 Rey �N $ 5 m oq 4 y 1 1 pi i mm 4 b 82 gF ii N PR'''' n �/� 111 1 1 IQ I 1 r thx, IVY PLACE rAc a 4y ° o t/J C-'-''7tI21 .1.IT ,_! I &§ h'gg1 T PR 1 _•Sl•Co S y_ i 1 14 1III `£ I" `sq }na4 �. Opp g`� g g a" ��'t WOO IVY PLACE,ORONO.MN 55391 ; $240 ' : 0 81 1 1 1` 1 1 2 1 A ,¢ e € LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC - 1 $�_ °rt n 6 m$ R^,�^" 7 ra O I I III I 4 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE#265,MINNETONKA,MN 55345 e7 , �� V 9 ESS NW'VNNOIJNNIW'99Z#31uf1S L AVMHOIH EZEV .� 1 .4.1tinis L.... W• 011`1N3WdO13A341S3M 3NY1 .i4 g ' 1 11 1 1 1 I 11 o��� MSS l ONO O 3oe�dAA 009E NW' v :,. SII z o›g; 3 Laa 113 an €F M^ = ,Iii ? �+ " IF u, UM r 1 i_ifl wH— 1-11 �n f 0 3.7b1d AM ,o3.on3 ea" a S - III lal '1�a it P IP g- 1 ` 1 of V ®% slx g § O r ii iiia_ g , KJz °o E w II- Pill m �R Z 9 1g E 1 Elilli E i g 1 v g,,, iih. h '-n-''' gi 1 i! 2 2! V a ar=i 4//ir 111 _ O i b li [5 . ! ...--41\ !t , ,,, :411.1! 1 11 i, 51 R 0 :..•.: , ( , 4 Ar 9 ;1 . w §, :,.:_44, , / i'� w :11 \ ., �� w a ger a 79$� ..Jb Z p 'til. , � �� v7�� °,' �`.�' /..... , I,. Vill11.1.' "y , - LL �n z ih w ' ah 1 J 54E55 NW'MIN013NNIW'S9L.3iIf1S'L AVMH`JIH SZS4l �, aye .. . rb IW - O11'1N3WdO13A3O 1S3M 3)1V1 €iwa _b g M• ' C/) S•sl W a lF. z r X0;;11 L6E95 NW'ONOMO'30bld AA1009C L �� ag Y ;� e .p� aE LW g f'Ar ' l a I I I Ix!I• 1 W v) i b .7.1 i.,; mcc0 33`d1d AM 3 d -iEa"' s si, 11' fi, Ia n air a =r R. 6 .1- s t6 W s w ai - �1 8 ;gg 4 kg 6 $ rca` �' i 4m a U O >e qbb q . mi i 4 r S ip1 1 n! i g,-!a iiii a k phis is g < :E _ a i gg g 6 ; pg3FE p a g OJ IC n 11 LI "'q kit Y 0 4 y as z 4 1 9 e F N is g q q b q $ q�j g� Mgr °z g 09 h F� `1 Fr li a lig gJJ a l li w & g q f • rz 4 sr iiYiqi§ Pi R �1p AQ t !g a !' R6 t 9VSbSiil 21 11 , ( f g a a 1g `� 1. RF ggigggigi , i J 94E99 NWVNN013NNIW'SSZ;tl 311f1S'L AVMHOIH SLSbL W,� 4a r 1 �+.. i L r ie353 Wk 3 III III Z • cir) 1 :111 - W ill'IN3WdOl3n34 1S3M 3Nb l {1�il, 111 II III EL II >xz L6E9S NW ONOtlO30b'ld AN 009E fig!q. - Q > V 'i V'' a qy!6, 1i 0, £I I III 6611' li,,- L, Q ... : "' I " �i' 0 ii _1 0 3�V�d �I ��' e 3 III al n y , 6!, t i Ilii • •• ; ' 1 ! i >. 1:1.11 - 6 I 11 1 1 ' 6 1.1 1 1 i,l 11 i1 { . I 1`i 1 - E ill I Liiiii ill 1 ,i•: t �� g E� J 9b£9S NW'b'NNOI3NNIW'09E4311f1S'L AVM-100FISZSbL w,Fk I I I I I III a/2 '^ ��2 `.. Li" 721 311'1N3INdO13A3O 1S3M 3)IV1 €ilih 1 u , g ��I Illi 2 V/ t L6E9S NW'ON080'30V'1d AAI 009E �`i`l7 I 3 I >- 0`iQ Nn6g .of of 1 I P- ^. os+M 'ia dq,Wt e 4 I zF ,. >B W obe L7'j oze - I - 1,. I-g¢ �� 0 33V1d AAI 3roe w�E�=s K I U 111=r w w 0, N Y FN Z W F I F W ,mss 3 tn- : ` aOu< !DUI! ' yz€ S`o r# ,cF0.eV -:fxe yw n1R i , F, W4=101)1 o [ E > 11114,iea , . f slY A , F • r ti ,,i; g gsiF�r'3- e . dl iI: til - fie td 012i €a i E ei pi 1011 7 E stI € i111 4 iiiin. Ei� y=t kY -�, y '.:eYa €i. t; EE xr 'alis v iiir- k 44044;i',1 E/_ tiYil 1• a _ai `� t1PW 2 ;$1 F ;1;!1!!1 CCp€ 1 £ fi 3t i #a s ed ii ^ p"}� xg ,1lt x ;i 1i tE ilii `$eye iii lei` C-i�6 Pill E r O r Q i �;! iii E 1 1i 1 i P �,_ I. i ! I!'cili i I iii t! 'S:CECT , i I • + `s� 1 .;iii 1 U' y tt! t ( o i U' t I ill t�� ; oil{ t , t 3 I ! iii 1 ti i 1 NI , 1 t y t r, t i ; sian i Sn F t E !t ac�;of c; i 1114 i ` F o t I`i7 j11111 t d ;1!111,1 j1 s, filqi yO ii d 11 if a Ili 04 I a y !1!I!I .1i It I i' ,# {� 1 '� 7 t 1i!t' h !i# !! 1` 1i ! t ! ph, 0 1 ', MOS gu ti.y. m °JYj1 j: :�-• Pia0000coocco y.... oil E ' EEM '� yc000000coo CC`. 4 5` $" ft; i 171 i 5 a�n£ ° o ••••••• lcca caocoo 0 t a h 1�1 g 0 o Pi a a i f 1 IIIA e $ LL U Ili0 sF I 7 n[ t if t ; 1t t F fl PJ i it 1 t laiiiil i s sl a Jji malci If i t ! 1.1 i ;HflH1n1of pili . ass _ ��? :��`il! , it 1 I ISIJI, ! '-Ii W■ P J SPESS NW VNNO13NNIW'S9U 311f1S L AVMHOIH SL9 I , ,L I i1 I 1 1 1 I rc tir^�F, is O11`1N3WdO13A3a 1S3M 31i�11 i.1 LW e5!tf. s 1 g1 r+ l;i 1 L6ESS NW ONOfO 30V1d AAI 009E i'48:i 1 �1 1I 1 1 I d'75 r�, o�5: !/p1 a 1°''422 L- " til 1 11 III a V ■.tli al al :�6 �€ •i' NI 2 0 .., 33t/ld AM `� ��= 5 5 c 61 1 i I+ 00 O) O0 a00 co O .-.- pp yp7 CO CO CO X; 3 S .yyX. E 7 q ELS 8 R N- N-N- ~ x S i 1; 3i 1 6M i M S_r_ R w a�. a s s� € a n g o`_ a ■ &� I; ,!1:h go g 9 �' $ a 1 ytl ili;i1 Wig 2 o : g rr ° mg§ 2 ka .4y a Y1" a � 1 le iggY ,N1 ' o is rt w , 1 ,,e,46 Cn Mag it .1aY ' a;.44 ri1l■g li s: 9 9 V i !A 5n-Z B r %i'% i "was p 1 4 14i til tl t. i g k M a la; o 3 t B R 9 8q y , 4g ` i Oqw 0 M. ; ' .g gs 8 b 2 3 W' epi w I .i' giRa 6! gl en ;v1 1 010 i5 ";2 ;1 ' w. R ,;z 1 wl I n w I 1 0411 i g ig s a fl; in g41kt4g !Re iIIP gxr g 11 III ig 410:O li A 11! W II: pg1:11 I! ilil vi i 4 i 4 1 ii i ..,t..g § c) I 1 I I 1 .. .. ., a .. e m _• S -�'� A 6 8 m !g § !!i6 rtR i X; 045 5'1r 8 RMIDE188: II 414 1 w 6 1- < hi, IIJIJIIVI 401 0 ail 4 ig0 \ o.,-k. Ah \ '1\ at , 3 It +'•1 '`N \AA-i`F`, (. BJP 1l X997 tt F \ / OS P�� �:Y ^ 4' o �.•-h. _ .per \ G �% g.Eg h Fi / ---- ----- �\ GO /V j qn 44. ...# 4-01‘ / c • " * is ,.-- • ,, / i ll ...•' . ';. \ ri 0, -'- dr 1�y 3 5 \ J • ACTING .11�I s- ME EMUS EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GENERAL GRADING NOTES: iR ip Sit / 2 FEET 35111 NATE MO '" •�•• � 4.1P t-\ SEE ON SHEETS BW.aA 1WLs 1 SEE SITE PLAN FOR NdeEM"k WOVE a GENERAL GRADING NOTES. / '4 ]. E CONTRACTOR SNAl COMPLETE THE RIF CAWING CONSTRICTION INCLUONGNR NOT A.t1 ♦ •� NE INFORMATION: LAVED TO SITE PREPARAM SOIL CORRECTION EOCAVATIOH,FIRAINMENT..ETC t N N'n 1..,3111. :oaxa PER GEOTECMNCAL REPOT BY NORMEI N TECHNOLOGIES INC.DATED 0166»16 ACCORDANCE METE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.ALL SOIL TESTING GROLNOWNTER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROMI S IITO W5» SHALL.COMPLETED IV ME OYYNRYSShcB ENGINEER TCONDUCTORCONDUCTOREER. CONDUCTOR 9HAUBE Wy I., �YAIHDI TIE BORINGS 6 ORpNDWATER ARE A9 FOLLOWS RESPONSIBLE FOR CCORDTXNATINO AL FAWNED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTORSMTH THE SOILS TM; 0` SISI 9119.•0 ENGINEER. LAKE t\LY 1 S. GRADING AND EXGVATIM ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED N ACCORDNCE WINS THE / fr• » F?�L 7L S. 925.20 NH G11W NATIONAL POLLUTION peCHMOEENEMTION SYSTEM IHPRSI PERMIT REOMREMCNT56 : N 'FERIAE RECIAELEMS OF THE CRY. 131 9�/y REFER TO p[ORLINILIL REPORT FOR ILL MEMOS NO RECOMMfl1D1TON5. PROPOSED SPOT DRAMS AM RpNYME FINISHED OWE HEVATgNS.MESS 0TNERM6E DEVELOPMENT.LLC "'Y Nu,ED. \ W - '. tF'iw 9�Lq CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES: s GRADES OE WARS SPRY SE INSTALLED WITH SN RM IONDITUdNk STORE ANO,W AN,fru 'P�/ �/ xMM.FxmS BLaPE.uRE550Ee11wBEwTED. RESERVED FOR cm SPECIE GRiDNc MOTES ,\`• >i S 1 6. PROPOSED SLOP FS SHELL TERMEtO].1 MUSS INDICATED OTHERWISE OR DIE ORAWNW. \ % 1C. QOC ^� r W%NW SLOPES N MVNTASED MEAS XIII PROPOSED RETAINING WALES,FREESTANDING WALLS. COMMERCE OF Wkl TYPE. �� GREATER THAN F M HEIGHT BH.ALI SF DEEMED AIDFNOIEFNORY A REGISTERED RETAINING A` ••• �uoe /a.E 92e�/� CUT/FILL SUMMARY TABLE: WALL ENGReER.xsroN°WANGS SHALL BE KIVRT0MR REVIEW AND APRn+R PRIOR TO al. w��+' 8e '� CONSTRUCTION ` Eti , . H /y immoisommat TOTAIHNggSED iXGVATIOH MI ICI 6 THE CUNITADIOR!MEL BE RESPONSWE FOR MAINTENANCE OR GRACE STAKES THROUGHOUT \ • M00 JA00 �• `P9 TOTAL PROPOSED FILL na� -. THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES.ME CONTRACTOR SHALL ��11 • ,/,•„ MCT DEFERENCE ALSO K RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FEND NECK OF CASHED OXIDES ACCEPTABLE TO THE �\ Wbl :, L• O IiIW RSM IM ENONEERAMOSURE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOMMIE AND SODDING ACTIVITIES Q6E0 • '� J 9 IFEXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOL MATERIAL EXISTS ME CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT All 1.1E-t MTM w - EXCESS SOL MATER.CIF DIE ERE TOM'AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR°RINKE', `\ FFEH934.00 H.00 ♦ WEARS WTERMI TOTE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BEfURTERF%GVATEDOR REGRADED NO SrOCxREN U N // ; •• I • AREA DESIGNATED ON THE SITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENWON TOPSOIL FOR 1A\ ]100 - I. RESPEIpS ON lwsrrE AS SPECHf EO EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED N EMBANKMENT J N / SI RIDS * •T+ ION _ ,RTYhY...M'S ^ INR MEAB.WrNOE OF NUM.05.110X4.125 AOPA1/0K M b.THE C01111.201131.2. \ . O,]A 5100 l.]IMP 1OR601 MAREAS MPrinifNwSLEW CUT AREAS.WIERE TORE IS tnf SIAM INIFDTOO BE ESTABLISHED,roMNWM DEPTH OeOF SFCErt6PSAD iQ (ssss WA P HEWED OWING ME,BE LOLPLf1ED.Teo CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORM,OWE AREAS Frn+l Z �]]11''TTFI N���• MHq �`. MTHIN LMITS OFGMMp,INCLUDNG ADAM',MAMOIN ARM..PROVIDE A NAODTH h W X\ LW., 1• M'OR • 1 FINISHED SURFACE ADMIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES,NPH UNIFORM LEVEL.OR ROGER N `• M.00 ssE1 T/ ` d BETWEEN POWS WHERE ELEVATIONS EE SHOWN.OR BETWEEN SUCH PONT.AND EXISTING W a Z `\ \ �P GRADES.AREAS TATHAVEBEEN fMISRGRAM MERLBEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT U Z O Z •. CONSTRUCTER OPERATIONS.TNIf1L AND EROSION.REPAIR ALLMfISTNT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE.All Q O , -• •�: ]Sss �. 3 MCAS DREW.,BY THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHUN L BE RESTORED TO FOUNT OR OLO BETTER MM ORIGINAL CONDITION CR TO THE REOURR.EN-Sam MEW NON(. ♦ . pity �1 '•� 11A1�T~ E.utE m • I PL6GR ro PLAaMExta TLE ADOREGrE eAeE.ArtsTRdl wueE REDu.Da TIE d v W F .xi / .(. - t srREErANoroRPARNNDAREASIBFBADE.rHECWIn roxswLLPROVIOEALOFnEp \-\ g In � `'\ '� / M• iTE•9DAW , ^^ Sb ORFCTxINa 3049EHDIORI4ER AVD9HN.COAPLEIE MMFIeMd.CIEDBYTHf / , .. 1 3E.00 5100 ,.. ..4/...,,,SEE IHSETA SOLS EN(iNFFA.iHE50LSENGINEER SMALL OETfN.ME WHXB SECMINSOi TIES1IE£TGR (n - �•� ]1 FROM I PRN RG R G Sr,BLE GR.0 OxU ESDGRME OESSA OC[OMR TCOIH o W Q li ��l♦N,"��)�)„. ACCORDANCE MM ENE RFOxREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3 \ A O• TOW ,. R .$. �' a I. A I]. TOLERANCES (7 N, `�. • �•O,TNroUGH 9WNE,M� • 44 4, /� I.THE BULCxGSUBGRA4E FNSHEDSUNNCEEYEVATION SWIINDT VMYBVMOE THAR W 4 • • ' �, rf / I DT FOOT ABOVE,ORO]G FOOT BELOW,HE PRESCRIBED NEVATION NT NO NM MERF i 4'.\ m :. l� 1 g.P%^r-�6 .,,,51.'0# • /' \\I� r STREET OR PEEKIN-' NEASUREMENT G NEN SUBORN.FINISHED SURFACE Fl RATION RELAY NOT VARY w g B w /AP. 5j 1fx G BY MORE THAN 0.06 FOOT ABOVE CRSID FOOT BELCAV.T.PRESwEEMI.EVAROX Or NW\N `H` N 4.`�y• (�C.� }}g-V,R-� , M n AM PONT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS WOE �� �) ♦A4`l- MA�t - 3A0�o S.BELOW VIREO REV..,UNLES5AREAS 9...ARE TO RECEIVE TOMOS A0PECTED LL BE OiNERWSf BYRE ENSrvEFR D TO WWI 0.30 2002 ABOVE OR 1 ss ].A.TOPSOIL STEAL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MMB ID NONCE THE SPECTER°THCIDES4. PREPARES ar ME OR UNDER MY DIRER, ♦S' I R?/ 111 MNnIEHANCE I -/ NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOS® A.S.``aa,,,, 811E 510111.01K DIRECTED ,' `]SN �\\� M THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEW,GRACED MEAS FROM TMFTIC ND EROSION, /�L) 1 w1M / O.I ADJACENT / NAIw ` �J t. AAC NEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH ANDOEBBS, u' lR AsrcA or 4 /♦ ; •yGJ V� A PROPERTY WINER \O IN. CONTRACTOR SOIL REPAIR AND REESER..GRADE.N SET.,ERODED NO RUTTED Y�1E.�.H ♦ e6 , L WAS TO SPFC12400022741.43.W10.11E Cb5TRUCTpHA P REWIRED,MD DIBBS / N`y THE WARRANTY PERIOD ERODEOARENS WHERE ERF IS 1O BE ERARISHED SHALL RE ,..�,1mn .,rn,.,„....zw RESEEDE { ♦ 3# ]Go / /� �(�\ ,N MERE COMPLETEDO AND MULCHED. ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY L \ CWPACTEO AFEM ME DISTURBED BY SUB3E0LENTCONSTMCTION ./ / J OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE READER CONTRACTOR SIMI SCARIFY.SURFACE.RESHAPE —TE - -yHwmni 17tJ,RESUBMIT. J1ro �j ��\� MDCOMPACT EREWIRED OENSTry PRIOR TO EUR,IETRCOxSTRUICTON. rs w — ��,�o GRADING PLAN LEGEND: .,}(/ ./ Ilia. -� ((�P,R8�� MATw �NNorE slat. ]> 0 0 CONTOUR ELEVATIan mmERVkk im //;% •,_ „{":�,ri / ,{ p ARp3TE \6M.» UNE WDERWISEN TED) RELax LIVE -- //I`�WTOH TY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) IS n SPOT GTAIEESEVATC5OUTTF %9 6N 004 31- % ro O YR SPOT GRADE ELEVATOR TCP OF CURB REVISION SUMMARY es TM.00 Be/1S SPOT GADEELFVArpN Borrow O STARS/DP OF STAIRS "TE"...'.N VN M`WTEN _. -- HERB MOGUTTERIT.0 iPWT -— MATO EOR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW RR-ZERO.Ins �s� L� , PRELIMINARY O J26 COFFER STATE ONE CALL GRADING PLAN .. "''''''2177:::707E ".... �0' INSETA �� E s® v�•O 4 1 GRADING EFS }:.. _� CITY OF ORONO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: SITE LAYOUT NOTES: (" . GROUP1-n, .\` WORKS DEPARTMENT.CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48 HOUR BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING 6931 W.35TH ST.SLATE 200 i. fir' -�\ NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING PERFORMED. AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS.SETBACKS.UTILITIES,BUILDINGS AND Sr.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 /;1 I .'7" .' - \- 4, PAVEMENTSTHE CITY AND .CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS O4IS Group.mm MN Pavak PM Sarvet t"\\11 2 THE PRIOR T WORK,CONDITION OF IVY PLACE LANS TD BE HEVEJOSTRK`,IEWED YCONDRION SHOULD BE T0.}213-�4/ 952.250.2003 %.��• \\ DUE TO LOCATIONALANF ADE JI/S NTMENTSDISHALLREo BE CARRECTED A74N0 ADDITIONAL COST TO *If \Z. OWNER ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DOCUMENTED WITH PICTURES.AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK,THE STREET �"f' \.•,,,,' " SHOULD BE OREPAIR REVIEWED FOR DAMAGE,AND THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE ENGINE ADDU O5CAPE TO THE CT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS.STAKE Jy5 \^`. REQUIRED 10 REPAIR ANV DAMAGE DEEMED TO BE CAUSED BY SITE WORK I. / / LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL WM' b .. CFS ` 2. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, LAKE INCLUDED A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. //,,` ',' �� ;� 4.- -7/),._, 3- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOAMENOATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. DEVELOPMENT.LLC 1 11� I ,� w`\ a � vq 4. CONTRACTOR SWILL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE ``s`\"i i4 \ y� 2(y� PRIOR IOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.UILDNG AND STAKE FCR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DETERS REPRESENTATIVE % ♦ \ ♦ \ . l- "vim 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES.ROADWAY PAVEMENTS,CURBS AND GUTTERS,BOLLARDS, \``\:: 1 i 4 �.. ;` /S /� AND WALKS ARE APPROXIFMTE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FELD,PRIOR TO \ \ 7$2. 12'WIDE SMD BEACH,TYR: 1, NSTALIATION,FOR REVEW AND APPROVAL BY THE 9IGINERAANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. V♦ N. \ / 0, 6 �� 6. CURB[BENSONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB.BUILDING DIMENSIONS ME TO FACE ,: AA \ \ ` O O CF CONCRETE FOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND 0 \ '�" PROPOSED HOUSE PAD, 9 SHALL SEAS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 01 \ ti .,, COORS.WI FINAL DESIGN FROM 2CP ®, 1 \ / l'L ARCH..EYP. 68r�� 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERAANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO \11 , / ,''..y �,9 FABRICATEN FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE REPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS,BUT 4410. �9 NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING,FURNISHINGS,PAVEMENTS,WALLS,RAILINGS, R\t I \ 1`/\ `\ PROPOSED PROPERTY UNE i ` BENCHES.FLAGPOLES,LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS,MID LIGHT AND POLES.THE 11- ' % \\• C OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY \\N, .� APPROVED. < . 4.,:',„ B. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING �, \ \ \ jl \ \ ^�'\� AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA REOUIRERENTSSEE DETAIL \ - / A IT WIDE SANG BEACH,EYP. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24 WIDE WHITE PAINTED LEE,SPACED 48'ON CENTER '�_ \ TIO,STAC ED CONCRETE "/ /a^ �,'``�` PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC.WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SMALL 8E 5 WIDE. 1\\ TA PATIO,COORD.STYLE 8 11i�.gF J / J \.. \ !1 COLOR wl OWNER PRIOR •tf'll��. 5�///tea' ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED �It Bit. OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 1 $ TOOONSRRUCTION,EYP. .'11:x► \ / / .y V La GRADING LIMITS STAMPED CONCRETE *NE, \ 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL 8E13812 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE ..J M \r_______________Ti7 O O� MOTOR COURT,EYP. \ / / , tia A. DRAWINGS-TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL ..J i0, \1s 1 // ,- 're \- 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Z 414'0% 0 \',%, 4 / / 1 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL FIAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES,NUMBERS.AREAS I- 2 ^5 //' / ♦ AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. M Z \e''' \ �11 OO\ �. ./.4,// �J,\ 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS,DIMENSIONS. C . % \ .era4 / q�` U7 CW O Q \ 'S1wyy�i1i•iio / / 6 - 14. PARKING B TO BE BET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICl1UR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS Z G F ...../......00.-.7,' s -' � ^ \ NOTED OTIERVASE. LU r.\\ ♦ \ �Kt •tame •iS a \ ,-• U Q O 2 ♦ `/• 45 e/ �* /..4:,;;10 •10 :/,`eoo.: 15. ALL PARKING LOT PANT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE 0 WIDE TIP. ♦ 94,,,,..1,2,14,-..14.,-tlF .i `tri sifs• Z 2 \ ', N• .l�ei� \ / 18. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE LGM DUTY'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETAIL Q Q J c'L \ .?4,0714, 1��A.iq.►:- e1�L' t.�'' \ ./ � :. SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 1 O W ui � v i �' 9 �ti wic 0111 1�' t. 11-i�•.1 \ a �..70� 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A _/t i > FIELD STONE PAVERS. H 1 !:Pr/! 72 / ',AXV.a.S.0,8 p7 ^a^ /04J • _ CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE ORp UNE.SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUhENTS. 6L. v COORD.COLO.STYLE ♦ i I i�si�liwK ew W F AID MATERAL wI % d [`I`1l /.111.7 a �� / ^S LANDSCAPE ARCH., i 0 Q/1i4,e .eG O WETLAND BUFFER SDN, D. rn SAMPLES REQUIRED,T W. l,' ,�. as is Q\ ♦ / COORDINATE TYPE AND CO'r..\ \t�i�t Lt ryd OO /\ .� LOCATION W WATERSHED Aa' } / \ P6rt 00 LF OR WHERE \ /,..,�s e!!'�a;? PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,EYP. v-. a�• -,ta QO\ , // ��,�° BIIFFEREVERY iCROSSEs PROPERTY CO _ : F.�' (�,Q / e Y '4, LINE SITE AREA TABLE: \ vs. //,4f/6 /^a q,, 6 srrEAREA URLcuunoMls N u1 �t V 1g of' EXISTING PROPOSED LOTI PROPOSED L0T2 OIJTLOTAC PROPOSED DOCK \^ \': '*, #/n) o' .- ,> BUILDING COVERAGE O SF 0.016 4,653 5F 16.0% 7,296 5F 12.3% O SF 0.0% -J.44 LOCATION,COORDINATE \ \ " 1 ♦ 1 \\ #' } , . ALL PAVEMENTS 302 SF 0.3% 1,623 SF 5.6% 1,700 SF 2.9% 2,637 SF 49.4% WIARCHANOONNER �.r, r 1Sk \p 9{ .( /// .� ALLPERVIOUS SURFACES 93,778 SF 99.7% 22,827 SF 78.2.% 50243 SF 84.8% 2,901 SF 50.6% o- •II�,', / THEREBY CERTIFY THAT THUS PLAN. ,;;- II /l'.'" 0 TOTAL SITE AREA 94,080 SF 1000% 29,103 SF 100.06 59,239 SF 100.0% 5,738 SF 100.0% SPECWICERTIF THAT # SUPERVISION AND TNAARED BY ME OR TlAMOORD. R MY 1 I IMPERVIOUS 511 RF1LI3 / LAND R T1EE LA OF TIE` AAENGINEER IXISl1NGCON UNDM" 302 SF 0.3% 'I �.. /® 1 7Zb .h4)�� PROPOSED CON DITION LOTI 6,276 SF 6.7% E80TA F ,/ 41� 6." PROPOSED CONDITION LOT) 8,9%SF 9.6% 1'� / \�. 17 WIDE BRWINOUS OUTLOT A 2,837 SF 3.0% 1,N,I� M .Pavek crrU. / 1 ' DRIVEWAY IATTOTAL(LOT I+LOT 21 15,272 SF 16.2% DATE 11A9H7 LICENb£No.44283 W�.,,1.8' I(` / ,,,,,,i.,..;#- � TOTAL(LOT I+LOT2 rOUTLOTAJ 18,309 5E I92% ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY -"uaVTe L` LOTDIPFERENCF(EX VS PROP.) 14,470 SF 15.6% - id • ,\ TOTAL DIFFERENCE(IX.VS PROP.) 17,807 SF 18.9% DATE DESCRIPTION _ .All existing Impervious area Is owned by the adjacent property owner D3117117 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW . 7 10/1/3/17M7 CITY RESUBMITTAL l- 11/09/17 PLANKING COMMISSION COMMENTS G i ' 1 / SITE PLAN LEGEND: • ---- PROPERTY LINE " - - SETBACK LINE REVISION SUIFMRARY , CT, • - DESCRIPTION EASEMENT LINE - � - WETLAND LINE ` �S • ,L J- R ! - 1mi a CONSTRUCTION UNITS PROJECT NO,.17456 0PRELIMINARY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL © O SITE PLAN . WNK40PIERSTATEONECN-L.080 0 OM W 252-1165 TOLL FREE 0 6054om2 116LOCAL -302. 151P® C2•0 L.O OCOPrwGHT 2017 Ovu STe GROLF INC , 1 GRADING LIMITS Civilaite MB/ r:. 29.6e .1" app �1ArCH EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GENERAL GRADING NOTES: CROUP ' -,,,,N„` SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SWI,5SW 1.5 S• 28,12 SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT&GENERAL GRADING NOTES. ST.LOURS PARA,MN SUITE31 W.35111 ST. 55414 if, 29 69 rj � MATCH 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION NCLUDING BUT NOT MSI P•w2 ...........� Pet SMVM MATCH GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: 703-21„944 PM F: - LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION,SOIL CORRECTION,EXCAVATION,EMBANKMENT,ETC.)IN j/ ,/, ��_t PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES,INC.,DATED 03-30-2016 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER ALL SOIL TESTING '. 29.4-3 GROINOWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FRCN 914.90 TO 925.70 30.3E - ,�'W_. _! "w'�n. 1.117% SHAM BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MATCH rr,d- As TME BORINGS 6 GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS - - r .../,--,<,,, SB-1 91490 ENGINEER. LAKE FEST •,, . C S88 979.10 i ' F� S8-3 9X70 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTMTIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE v .,. '1..:' 29.49 F MATCH -. �� S8-4 92490 NATIONAL PERMIT REAPOLLUTION DISCHARGE UREEEMS OF THE OCT.IMEATION SYSTEM(ANDES)PERMIT REW IREMEHTS d N >d '9T 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES AREFLOW-LIEFNSHEDGRADEELEVATIONS,UNLESSOTHERWISE DEVELOPMENT.LLC -� • /O� REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. I O. � \':,,, �- -' `b' •N-29.34 X9p-6, NOTED. . ` ° `� ` MAT 71 y CITY OF ORONO GRADING NOTES: ( ~i•� �r 5. 22%MAX CROSADES OF WALKS OSHALL E ULNLESS OTHEBE ERWISE NOTED. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1%MIN.AND a, a �- 44., ,,..-,.,.\ 7s 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. ��71 2-', \ % - V 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3.1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON TME DRAWINGS. `\ t '414424C3H '/„. !/<� MAXIMUM SLOPES N MAWTAEED AREAS 134:1 t\ 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS,FREESTANDING WALLS,OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES k3. 33.00 O MATTCH 9�� OV,./,_ CUT/FILL SUMMARY TABLE: GREATER THAN 4' IEIGHT SHALL SHALLGNEO AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING • •8 ' WALL ENGINEER DESIGN DRAWINGS BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO 14111111% A Y CS' FARTNWORK SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION. 7 ',‘•-•., :� IS ) .� SI.W �•� _ \ ..� '''',,s, 9�� TOTAL PROPOSED EXCAVATION 1231[C11 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT ' N1 w. .. Ci ' TOTAL PROPOSED FILL 28141011'__ THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL I'1• _•��►A•2�7 H 1., i` Vt ** g 4/ NET DIFFERENCE 147[rn ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL HELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE tI i, ` i .� Q�v .' .,� x LO (PILL) ENGINEERILANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. Ck `V v AA ��� J 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOL MATERIAL EXISTS,THE CONTRACTOR SWILL TRANSPORT ALLy; .y P Y EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY TME CONTRACTOR OR IMPORT , •1 3100• t Q SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. .� ,`./.. 10 '. .1 , 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS 70 BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE N • ,+^«`-r nw a.c 4 \ AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR GRADING LR1TS ,- •"-,-R 2TcH "6 31.00•' j °�� J'' �` �29W RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED.EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL 0E PLACED N EMBANQIEM J 5; \ , y s'' 34.00 MATO4 AREAS,OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS.ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL Rl7 O • Y SW/CUT CUT AREAS,WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED,TO A DEPTH OF B INCHES.RESPREAO •• Z ` -33,30 '2 ?D SJ TOPSOIL N AREAS WHERE TURF S TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. r 2 O T !r „ x 7:1_ A 34.00 MATCH 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS Q } 31.77 Z t YA7� -34.00 I WTHN LIMITS OF GRADING,INCLUDING AD IAPFNT TRANSITION AREAS.PROVIDE A SMOOTH N W Z O i 20.92 FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPEpfEO TOLERANCES,WITH UVIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPESBETWEEN POINTS MI z 2 1- O ♦{ %ms O 34,00 33.74 / / 1 MATCH _ +(. ,.. J7 < �+ �1,: GRADES.AREAS THAINHERE HAVE BEEN FRSSHELEVATIONS HGGRADED SHALL SHOWN,OR BBE�PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT AND U O O Z_ 4• 2 CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS,TRAFFIC AND EROSION.REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME Z - f 7 s H 33.33 33.33 .`.0, RUTTED IBYS TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE.ALL Q• 0 J F• AREAS DISTURBED BY TIE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR W mcg .00 34.00 •. �' JO BETTER THAN ORIGNAL CONDITION OR TO TME REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. O \ Ry O. w- 12 / iR I- '44.,. �•_� , 34.00 `T.:y....i.. �2- ` PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE,A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE U W W / •� a\„°�'o `' STREET ANGOR PAIORIN0 AREA SUBGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED '.. 32.29/ FFE=934.00 l�� >,;•.., ' ..33.17 ` �!Y DRECT OF THE SOLS ENGINEER/VID SHHALLFBE COMPLETED N AREAS AS25 TONS.THE TEST GSHALL BE AT THE DIECTED BY THE a y -34.00 34.00 I SEE NSETA .� _ Cl) \.. •OO �pRN * PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE CORRECTION OF THE SUBEGRADE SOILS SMALLS BE CCOME PLETED LIN O LU Q 'A�0N RUNOFF FROM -I. . 1.70 < YIbJACENT PRO• - k �"O Ja. �/a�4. ♦ 1.2 ' ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOLS ENGNEER NDTOWARD 0 ♦ M\ 4- -'' ;y �s O0. O,THROUGH SWALE.TYP �� {R I� J 1.52 i 13. TOLERANCES +s' •�. \ Q ,, /"` // 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FNISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SWILL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN W = v �".. -37.83 34.00 P OL •Osi .. I 0 0.30 FOOT ABOVE,CR 0.30 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE p, .�{- . '€a' I a ��C� G��° .U' / MEASUREMENT IS MADE 9 •32; i \ 4 g .0 .i' 0 'PS 40 3243 G .2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY U 7 31.87 ATCH4.I , �yA BY MORE THAN 0.05 MEASUREMENT E.OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF I� 1 - -$. I� 31.7 ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENTS MADE. [Qt 32.1Z J2. HP ,s� AUMiW�I NOFF. + / - 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR'} IF P•.• • O BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION.UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEERI HEREevcERnrr TNA77w6 PUN. 1 11 Jt� VMS • g��-J2S1- 6PECIFIG.ERTIFOR ATTHISREPORT FRA q 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 12 NCH OF THE SPECEED THICKESS. 7'1tEPAiTm BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT , L' JJ. IAHD yS1'/ MATCH CSUPERVISOR AND THAT I AM A DULY Ti NAj LICENBEO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER - + ' - % ' NO RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED - 14. MAINTENANCE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FI+• / /.... SITE SHOULD REDIRECTED i� <� 11.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED MEAS FROM TRAFFK;AND EROSION, TA. '..+ "`533999 ♦ TOWARDS TWE ADJACENT i -32.55 �..t ,�I •[)4J y j� PRROPERN OWNER / MATCH 1. \ AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. �JT�.�'� 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED,ERODED AND RUTTED ME 144 / / ! / r� , \ • THE WARRANTY TO RI D,ERODED AREAS WHERE TURFS TTOLERANCES.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, BE ESTABLSHED SHALL MID DURNG M ew . mak N j ,�V RESEEDED AND WITCHED. DATE IIAIBN7 LICENSE NO M263 /FT 3� - 32.4-3 / \ ISSL1E)SUBMITTAL SUMMARY y r \\ 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION a /' J\CJ AND COMPACT TO REQU' OPERATIONS OR UIRED DENSITY PRIE WEATHER CONTRACTOR FURTHER CANSTRUCTK)N RESHAPE DATE DESCRIPTION RM2y17 S ETC9 PLAN SUBMITTAL maw 32.09 H' ._�. 4-0, ' i� 10NW77 CTY��SUBMTTAL REVIEW 11,011'77 PUHw300 S9 NCOMENTS (/�� '3224 A . gCa, r' `M�TCH GRADING PLAN LEGEND: • �I.- ,r MATCH .(I,•(-C J� : --_ EX.1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL . F ���111 NO' NOFF FROM THE 1137 1.0 CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL -T.ED1ITE SHOULD BE :. •RAN RUNOFF FROM TOWARDS THE `881.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION(GUTTER/FLOW UNE •NT PROPERTY' ♦' 20 + y -N OV+IER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) .. TOW -.- ;,• M / WATCH 691.00 C SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER .. / • THROUGH SWALE,TYP, n -. J2 • a * - e91.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP O CURB REVISION SUMMARY "----33.65 ./ 691.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS OATS DESCRIPTION 3224 MARCH . __ _-. _-..._ ___. CURB AND GUTTER(TD=TIP OUT) R �/ Cl // ,_ Y TOCH EMERGENCY OVERFLOW '• L� / EOF=391,00 PROJECT NO•17059 C )� gJZJ PRELIMINARY / 3245 r' GOPHER STATE ONE CALL © GRADING PLAN l MATCH �1. VANV.00PHER6TATEOIECALLORO /' (003)252-1 LL 1,%TOFREE / (051)4540002 LOCAL INSET A _ •0' 03.0 ® 15' Ocoe'R%•rt 017 CVA 0,T6 MIXT RNC PC 17-3988 17-3989 City of Orono 17-3990 Hardcover Calculation Worksheet// Exhibit E y z Property Address: L• 1;10 �, C.-4c,c o 1`p� • .►; �4ESH ORE Prepared by: • , D. , , Date: `T`r Stormwater Quality Overlay Distri Tier: (Circle one)CTter 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 301 (720 S.F.) A 70WCr",e J"`P-"+"f"r"P� �0 2 S.F. I S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. M S.F. S.F. 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F.- S.F. S.F. V S.F. S.F. X S.F. S.F. S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 362 S.F. exChidatdit Har over(See Cft Code Soc W04): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover b S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 302 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area q q,Qga S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 0.00 (Proposed Hardcover next page) F:n OCT t 8 2011 39 Variance Application-January 2017 Page 11 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono 04-0N� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Le4.c.7 1J 2/3 No � �OI✓►T kr 51401- Prepared by: j-oe PcQ e��L�S �T Date: toy/ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are within the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) itx0010144 (fie) q (24'x 34?') (720 S.F.) A B L 1 tIVIlaPPICi4416AJ�'aq6) S.F. ( �2 3 S.F. LO �r, uiln/��rtDL;�q 14._"• '��2/� S.F. C L o'''G Pw.Vty� J J U� 1/700 S.F. S.F. QLo YaVP e.. - 2y B S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. O S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed HardcoversTS-10841: i$, toe( S.F. S 1's�vei.-err}- ZS� S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover l.R)7 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 14, i42 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 914 Q$/, S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)j 16.2-3 % t�CCt-IV ., Variance Application—January 2017 page 12 ` (IC 1 1 8 1017 t,) CITY OF ORONO PC 17-3988 V17-3989 17-3990 Exhibit F Memorandum TO: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 FROM: Joey Diederichs, EIT Civil Site Group DATE: 10/18/2017 RE: Ivy Place Dear Jeremy, Below are the written comments regarding the Ivy Place project in Orono, Minnesota dated September 15th, 2017. We have included our response below each question in bold red. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Joey Diederichs, EIT Civil Site Group jdiederichs(d2civilsitegroup.com 612-719-1781 OCT 18Z017 B $ CITY OF ORONO www.CivilSiteGroup.con 4931 West 35th Street• Suite 200- St. Louis Park- Minnesota• 55416 (612)615-0060 1. No structure may be closer than 75 feet to the lake on either side. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, NO BUILDING IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE 75 FOOT SETBACK. DETERMINATION FROM MCWD ON WHETHER REMOVABLE DOCKS ARE CONSIDERED STRUCTURES IS UNDERWAY. 2. Regardless of timing of construction on lots 1 or 2, the Average Lake Shore Setback shall be 75 feet from the Ordinary High Water line on all sides. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED SFTBACK TOWN ON CIVIL PLANS 3. The property line between lots 1 and 2 shall function as a side property line, requiring 15 feet setback(150%of 10 feet side yard setback for LR-1C). CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, 15' SETBACK IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS FOR ANY PART OF THE PROPOSED HOMES. 4. All comments of MCWD, outlined in their memo of August 10,2017. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, PLANS ARE CURRf LY UNDER WATERSHED REVIEW 5. Declaration and documentation of wetland buffer as required by MCWD. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, FORTHCOMING FROM WATERSHED 6. All comments of the city engineer,outlined in a memo dated August 14,2017 shall be addressed. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, PLANS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING COMMENTS AND WILL BE REVIEWED 7. Comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed, including the principal structures within the Plat shall include fire suppression systems subject to the approval of the Fire Chief. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, FIRE SUPRESSION SYSTEM IS RESPONSIBILITY OF ARCHITECT/MECHANICAL ENGINEER 8. Ivy Place and the portion of the drive within the easement at 3560 Ivy Place shall be inspected and its condition noted prior to construction. All damage shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the city prior to release of financial security. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR C E IV EL OCT 1 bZUi1 F E? _ g pn' CITY OF ORONO 4931 West 35"'Street•Suite 200•St.Louis Park•Minnesota•55416•www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek,PE•763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver,PLA 952-250-2003 • 9. Additional approvals a. Variance from the wetland setback b. Variance of wetland buffer impact(Watershed District) c. Conditional Use Permit for filling in the floodplain d. Successful vacation of the existing Driveway easement (Doc.1023891) e. Successful realignment of a underground utility easement (Document Nos. 855727 and 862192) CSG RESPONSE: NOTED,APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE REVIEWED, EASEMENT DOCUMENTATION WILL RE FORTHCOMING ONCE APPROVED. 10. The applicant had represented they have legal access. To the extent that the access rights are modified through court order or other means,the plat would be voided. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, SITE ACCESS IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN AS IS 11. The following estimated fees are due at the time of final plat unless otherwise noted Stormwater and Drainage Trunk: The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee (SW&DT Fee) on a per-lot basis at the rate of$3,025 per lot for this half- acre zoning district ($6,050 total) per the 2017 Fee Schedule. Water and Sewer: The property was fully assessed for municipal sewer in 1965, only the Metropolitan Council SAC charge which is currently $2,485 per dwelling unit. City water was installed in 1970 and the property was assessed for one unit; if more than one home is built, a water connection charge of $4,240 for the second unit would be due at the time a building permit is issued. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER 12. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED 13. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. CSG hEsPONSE: NOTED, FU f URE COLVIPVMEN1 EXPECTED 14. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat will expire on that date (September 11, 2018). CSG RESPONSE: NOTED 15. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. CSG RESPONSE: NOTE ' 9 l'' kLLCE:VEL) 8, -t-t3 bo- ) 0c017 4931 West 35"'Street•Suite 200•St.Louis Park•Minnesota•55416•www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek,PE 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver,PLA•952-250-2003 CITY OF ORONO Memorandum TO: Robert Bean Water Resources Engineer Bolton & Menk 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318 FROM: Joey Diederichs, EIT Civil Site Group DATE: 10/18/2017 RE: Ivy Place Dear Robert, Below are the written comments regarding the Ivy Place project in Orono, Minnesota dated August 14th, 2017. We have included our response below each question in bold red. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Joey Diederichs, EIT Civil Site Group jdiederichsAcivilsitegroup.com 612-719-1781 RECEIVED OCT 18201 / 3 9 88 CITY OF ORONO 1.1 GENERAL: 1.2 Stormwater management for the site to meet City requirements is proposed through use of underground storage.The calculations submitted indicate a portion of the site currently drains to a wetland located on site with the remainder draining directly to Lake Minnetonka.These two runoff amounts were added without routing runoff from the first watershed through the wetland prior to discharge to the lake.To meet City requirements,the total proposed peak runoff rates for flow leaving the site per storms analyzed must not exceed existing conditions for the same events.Therefore,the existing condition analysis should be revised to route the first drainage area through the wetland prior to discharge to the lake.The sizing of the underground systems may need to be revised to restrict peak rates accordingly.A revised Stormwater Management Report should be submitted for review and approval. CSG RESPONSE: SEE REVISED HYDROCAD REPORT. WETLAND B IS SO SMALL IN COMPARISON TO THE DRAINAGE AREA COMING TO IT THAT IT DOES NOT AFFECT TOTAL RUNOFF RATES. IT IS MORE OR LESS A "WET DEPRESSION" AND THERFORE DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH STORAGE TO TRULY AFFECT THE EXISTING RUNOFF RATES FROM THE SITE. 1.3 Since common buckthorn and garlic mustard are identified in the Conservation Design Master Report,a Vegetation Management Plan should be included. The plan should indicate schedule and methods for removal of invasive species over the entire site.The Landscape Plan should also be revised to indicate areas of buckthorn and garlic mustard removal. CSG RESPONSE: NOTES PROVIDED IN REMOVALS PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. SINCE INVASIVE SPECIES ARE SO WIDE SPREAD AND TO BE REMOVED OVER THE ENTIRETY OF THE SITE, WE FEEL A VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REDUNDANT WHEN COMBINED WITH REMOVAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. 1.4 Work within public right-of-way must be coordinated with the Public Works Department.Contractor must provide a minimum 48 hour notice prior to any work being performed.Notes should be revised accordingly. CSG RESPONSE: NOTE ADDED TO C2.0 1.5 The condition of Ivy Place should be reviewed by the City and Contractor prior to any work,and the existing condition should be documented with pictures.After completion of work,the street should be reviewed for damage,and the Contractor should be required to repair any damage deemed to be caused by site work. CSG RESPONSE: NOTE ADDED TO C2.0 1.6 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)approval and permitting for their Erosion Control,Floodplain Alteration,Wetland Protection,Shoreline Stabilization,and Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rules.A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, APPROVAL FROM MCWD WILL BE PROVIDED 1.7 The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit(NPDES)to discharge RECEIVED OCT 1 8ZU1# 3 9 Be ! CITY OF ORONO Civ1 = t:tt stormwater associated with construction activity since more than 1 acre will be disturbed.A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, PERMIT WILL BE PROVIDED ONCE CONTRACTOR HAS OBTAINED. 1.8 The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities.The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project,specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities,and designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER/DEVELOPER 1.9 Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, RECORD DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED ONCE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE. 2.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN: 2.2 A Flowage and Conservation easement will be required over the wetlands to remain. CSG RESPONSE: FLOWAGE EASEMENT SHOWN ON C2.4 2.3 Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided to adequately cover all swales and storm sewer providing drainage for multiple properties and for facilities used to meet requirements. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, D&U EASEMENTS ARE PROVIDED AT THE SIDE LOT LINES. SEE REVISED SITE PLAN 2.4 Maintenance responsibilities for the shared driveway located in Outlot A should be outlined in the Developer's Agreement, and any necessary easements or requirements should be recorded with the lots at time of Final Plat. CSG RESPONSE: RESPONSIBILTY OF OTHERS 3.1 PRELIMINARY REMOVAL PLAN: 3.2 Extent of removal at connection to existing pavement should be coordinated in the fieldwith the City and adjacent property owner prior to any work. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED ON C1.0 RECEIVED 4.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN: OCT 1 8 2017 # 3 9 8P CITY OF ORONO www.CivilSiteGrouo.com 4931 West 35"'Street•Suite 200•St Louis Park•Minnesota•55416 (612)615-0060 4.2 Grading indicated along the southeast property line appears to require a Temporary Construction easement to perform this work.Any temporary easements deemed necessary should be submitted prior to final approval,or the plans should be revised to maintain all work on site. CSG RESPONSE: ALL WORK IS PROPOSED TO REMAIN ON SITE 4.3 Grading is proposed in too close of proximity to existing trees located along the southeast property line. Grading should be revised to tie into existing grade further from the base of trees, and the siltfence location should be adjusted accordingly. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, SEE REVISED GRADING PLAN 5.1 PRELIMINARY SWPPP: 5.2 Notes should be revised to indicate perimeter erosion control measures and protection fencing will be installed by Contractor and inspected by City prior to any demolition or land disturbance.Contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection. CSG RESPONSE: NOTE ADDED TO SWPPP SHEETS SW1.081.1 6.1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 6.2 Once sanitary sewer stubs are exposed and location,size,and elevation are field verified, layout and design of service connection should be submitted to City for review and approval prior to construction. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED ON PLANS, FUTURE COORDINATION WILL BE REQUIRED 6.3 The locations of hydrants and valves should be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief and Public Works prior to final approval. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED, COMMENTS FROM FIRE CHIEF WILL BE INCORPORATED 6.4 A concrete headwall and rodent guard should be installed on the 6"outlet from the underground systems. Details should be included on the Final Plans. CSG RESPONSE: NOTED ON UTILITY PLAN, DETAIL TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR IN SHOP DRAWINGS 6.5 Due to the potential for a high water table and overland flooding,buoyancy calculations should be provided for the underground systems to ensurethey do not float during extreme conditions. RECEIVED CSG RESPONSE: BUOYANCY CALCUALTIONS ARE PROVIDED OCT ,i 8 ?ill 9 CITY OF oRQhQ 4931 West 355 Street•Suite 200•St Louis Parc•Minnesota.55416•www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek,PE•763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver,PLA•952-250-2003 çiyijsflte P Storm Water Management Report Prepared for: Lake West Development, LLC 14525 Highway 7 Suite #265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Project: Ivy Place 3600 Ivy Place Orono, MN 55391 All plans and supporting Documentation contained in this report have been reviewed and approved by the Registered Engineer listed below and it is hereby certified that the plans comply with the requirements of the ordinance. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 714ge Matthew R. Pavek P.E. Registration Number: 44263 • Date: 7/19/2017 REV: 10/18/2017 www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street•Suite 200•St. Louis Park•Minnesota•55416 (612)615-0060 çiyiji UP Table of Contents: Cover Sheet Summary Narrative Drainage Area Maps Existing Drainage Area Map Proposed Drainage Area Map HydroCAD Calculations Existing HydroCAD Calculations Proposed HydroCAD Calculations www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street• Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota • 55416 (612)615-0060 CI.VI.l R O V P Summary Narrative: This Storm Water Management Report accompanies the Civil Plans prepared for the Ivy Place project dated 10/18/2017 and attached to this report. Existing Site Conditions: The existing site for this project is a vacant peninsula on Lake Minnetonka. The existing amount of impervious surface area is approximately 302 square feet and is owned by the adjacent property. Soils: Soil borings have been completed by Northern Technologies, Inc. dated March 30th, 2016. Soils on site vary considerably at depths as the site was filled in the past. There is an organic/peat layer with fill above at almost all locations. The soils at the surface have been classified to have a Hydrologic Soil Group "D"designation. Infiltration is not proposed as a part of this project. Groundwater: Groundwater has been identified in the in the soil borings ranging from an elevation of 914.8 to 925.7. Proposed Site: This project involves the construction of 2 single family homes along with a shared driveway that will split into separate driveways/parking areas. The total proposed impervious on the site is approximately 0.40 acres. Wetland Impacts: There are 2 existing wetlands present on this site. Wetland A, essentially borders the perimeter of the site against Lake Minnetonka and is approximately 9,781 square feet. Grading will occur within the buffer for this wetland but it will be restored to existing conditions and a proper buffer will be determined and planted. A 12-foot wide area of wetland A will be filled and converted into beach for each home. Mitigation for this filling will occur at another location along Wetland A. Wetland B is a low-grade wetland consisting of approximately 168 square feet in the center of the site. This project is proposing to fill Wetland B and create an equal wetland replacement area along Wetland A. www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street•Suite 200• St. Louis Park•Minnesota•55416 (612)615-0060 çiyij � U P Requirements: Per City of Orono Rate Control (City): Runoff rates may not exceed existing conditions for the 1, 10 and 100-YR storm events. Atlas-14 rainfall data will be utilized. Requirements: Per Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) Since the project is less than 3 houses the MCWD rules for stormwater do not apply. Watershed rules for floodplain alteration, wetland mitigation and erosion control will be met throughout the construction process. Proposed Storm Water Facilities: The project is proposing to utilize two underground storage tanks for rate control purposes. The underground tanks will be sized appropriately to slow the discharge rates leaving the site. The adjacent property to the southeast has concerns regarding stormwater drainage leaving their site and potential flooding concerns. As part of this project, a swale will be created along the southeast property line to accept the neighboring property's drainage and convey it to Lake Minnetonka. This will improve the existing drainage conditions of the adjacent property. Pretreatment Pretreatment has been provided to the underground filtration basins using disconnected impervious areas. Stormwater running off impervious surfaces will drain through pervious turf areas reducing the amount of TSS entering the system. www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street•Suite 200•St. Louis Park•Minnesota •55416 (612)615-0060 çiyijUP Rate Control practices proposed: Rate control for the project is provided by the proposed infiltration basin. The runoff rates for the 1-YR, 10-YR and 100-YR rainfall events will be less than the existing rates (utilizing Atlas-14). See the table below for the existing and proposed runoff rates for this project. Rate Control Summary Table: Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Existing Rate(cfs) 1-YR 12.471 10-YR[4.24"] 100-YR[7.501 EX1 1.48 3.86 8.68 EX2 1.37 3.59 8.06 TOTAL(REACH) 2.85 7.45 16.74 Drainage Area Proposed Conditions Rate cfs) 1-YR[2.471 10-YR[4.241 100-YR[7.501 1P (PR1A) 0.19 0.46 0.76 2P (PR1 B) 0.12 0.73 1.56 PR2 2.51 6.11 13.12 • TOTAL(REACH) 2.80 7.24 15.32 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Rate(cfs) Rate(cfs) 1-Year Event 2.85 2.80 10-Year Event _ 7.45 7.24 - 100-Year Event 16.74 15.32 Conclusions: This project is proposing to utilize two underground rate control basins to meet the requirements of the City of Orono. The underground basins will be designed to provide rate control to match existing discharge rates from the site. www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street•Suite 200• St. Louis Park• Minnesota• 55416 (612)615-0060 ♦r♦ ,' • ♦♦ II ♦♦ `♦ �•/• ♦, II /'` ♦ I I ♦♦ `♦ II •' /I ♦♦ ` II -I N♦` II // •• ♦` II / ' ` II '• ` • ♦♦ III . /I • • `♦ EX DA 1 I /.� ,'� ♦ EX IMPV = O SF II /•• ..'� •`♦ EX PERV = 48,753 SF • ,• ./I/ r.' •`♦ TOTAL = 48,753 SF �/.",I _ _ _•� •�♦` DRAINS TO EX WTLND B II/. I g '"`.�� • II / I `� .A I / / II� ,• , III i III /•/ / II •\\K:;# II / I . I I Z. I • i I /' /• 40 \- EXDA2 i I ��/ EXIMPV = 302 SF ` '• - EX PERV = 45,025 SF • • \ • TOTAL = 45,327 SF �4,• \.\ I0i /• �.i `. •\. / DRAINS TO LAKE MTKA ��,�._.- •.„10 el 1"=50'-0" �mM 25'-0" 0 50'-0" IVY PLACE-ORONO, MN EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA MAP CiviSite S32.1L2W0UI3S05TAT7K63M# 05. 546 Project Number: 17059 Revision Number: / Issue Date: 7/19/2017 Revision Date: DA 1 GR OUP www.CivilSiteGroup.com h IV- N.< Q N� ar ma e/ •:\% N:65 PR1A • MI I. n PR IMPV = 2,626 SF '. , o n om PR PERV = 2,573 SF I' a g M a o 8 i o M ,"1 TOTAL = 5,199 SF eM ` o M O 63 I9'N g M I o , ' - • \ Mr ' Q O A M M Oo° . M M ,' NZ /- PRIBt' n ‘1,1,;;\ Mo gi 1 ' M PR IMPV = 3863 SF , I ' „,,mPR PERV = 4,434 SF 49 , 8 I 4 Nn o o °o M n }2 n TOTAL = 8297 S , M � ga .,ilk ' 2 M 01 i o I d a if �n c M n n° NeYs\ 0' ,eit M Z M n °O Q,< O M O \n' # MSy -^ , h N /. I ; I 7 MZ nF /tl n II\ �^,yY nm,.h° • �xi .M�I ✓ I \ - c*,44III '�'' PR2 IIIII �,I PR IMPV = 11 ,620 SF .;< CD Nm PR PERV = 68,964 SF c...3,,, Oa nm %.•■••11.} TOTAL = 80,584 SF 1"-=50'-0” iii -IN ti 25'-0" 0 50'-0" IVY PLACE-ORONO, MN PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA MAP C •' 1 a 4931 W.35TH ST.,#200 Project Number: 17059 Revision Number: 'V i 1 e ST. URK6, 952.LO250.2003ISPA/73MN.213.39455416DA 1 Issue Date: GR OUP eww.CivilSiteGroup.com 7/19/2017 Revision Date: EX 1 2P EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 EX WETLAND B 1R TOTAL EX 2\ I EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 / \ Subcat Reach 'on. Link Routing Diagram for 17059-IVY PLACE-EXISTING J Prepared by{enter your company name here}, Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 2.153 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (EX 1, EX 2) 0.007 98 Paved parking, HSG D (EX 2) 2.160 80 TOTAL AREA • IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 2.160 HSG D EX 1, EX 2 0.000 Other 2.160 TOTAL AREA IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.153 0.000 2.153 >75% Grass cover, Good EX 1, EX 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.007 Paved parking EX 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.160 0.000 2.160 TOTAL AREA IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=48,753 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.87" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.48 cfs 0.081 af SubcatchmentEX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=45,327 sf 0.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.87" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.37 cfs 0.075 of Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=2.85 cfs 0.154 af Outflow=2.85 cfs 0.154 af Pond 2P: EX WETLAND Peak EIev=930.94' Storage=75 cf Inflow=1.48 cfs 0.081 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Primary=1.48 cfs 0.079 af Outflow=1.48 cfs 0.079 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.156 af Average Runoff Depth = 0.87" 99.68% Pervious = 2.153 ac 0.32% Impervious = 0.007 ac IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Runoff = 1.48 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af, Depth> 0.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 48,753 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,753 80 Weighted Average 48,753 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Hydrograph Runoff 1.48 cfs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Runoff Area=48,753 sf 1/ 1 Runoff Volume=0.081 af I� Runoff Depth>0.87" I� LT min LL CN=80 o1..,..1.,.,1. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Runoff = 1.37 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Depth> 0.87" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Area (sf) CN Description 302 98 Paved parking, HSG D 45,025 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 45,327 80 Weighted Average 45,025 99.33% Pervious Area 302 0.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Hydrograph LRunoff r1.37cfs I Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" ✓✓ Runoff Area=45,327 sf 1 Runoff Volume=0.075 af Runoff Depth>0.87" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 0/ 0 ///// 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach 1R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 0.32% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.86" for 1-YEAR event Inflow = 2.85 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af Outflow = 2.85 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: TOTAL Hydrograph / ©Inflow 2.85cfs I Outflow 3 Inflow Area=2.160' ) 0/ LL / 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Inflow Area = 1.119 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.87" for 1-YEAR event Inflow = 1.48 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af Outflow = 1.48 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 10.79 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 1.48 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.079 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.94'@ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 168 sf Storage= 75 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 14.4 min calculated for 0.079 af(98% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=3.5 min ( 859.0- 855.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 930.50' 84 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 930.50 168 0 0 931.00 168 84 84 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 930.50' 0.060 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 930.90' 58.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 10.79 hrs HW=930.51 (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.47 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=930.94' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 1.47 cfs @ 0.58 fps) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Hydrograph El Inflow Fa .s Outflow Inflow f.aa crs• ❑Discarded Area=1 .119 �,� E Primary Peak Elev=93O.48 of Storage=75 cf I 3 1 II o OPLL I^ / r" 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 ❑Surface / •Storage 931/ 0 930.95_ 0 • 930.9_ 0 930.85: j 930.8_ 0 30.75- co 1'930.7- 930.65= 930.6- 0 930.55: j 930.5 ...................................r...,....,...,,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,.........,....,....,....,....,....,,...,....,....,....,..,.,,,.9....,....,....,....,.... 0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224 2628303234 36384042 4446 4850 52 54 56 58606264 6668707274 76 788082 84 Storage(cubic-feet) , IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Elevation Discharge Discarded Primary (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 930.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.91 0.16 0.00 0.16 930.92 0.46 0.00 0.46 930.93 0.84 0.00 0.84 930.94 1.30 0.00 1.30 930.95 1.82 0.00 1.82 930.96 2.39 0.00 2.39 930.97 3.01 0.00 3.01 930.98 3.67 0.00 3.67 930.99 4.39 0.00 4.38 931.00 5.14 0.00 5.14 IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=48,753 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.24" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=3.86 cfs 0.209 af SubcatchmentEX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=45,327 sf 0.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.24" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=3.59 cfs 0.194 af Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=7.45 cfs 0.401 af Outflow=7.45 cfs 0.401 af Pond 2P: EX WETLAND Peak Elev=930.98' Storage=81 cf Inflow=3.86 cfs 0.209 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Primary=3.86 cfs 0.207 af Outflow=3.86 cfs 0.207 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.402 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.24" 99.68% Pervious = 2.153 ac 0.32% Impervious = 0.007 ac IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Runoff = 3.86 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.209 af, Depth> 2.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 48,753 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,753 80 Weighted Average 48,753 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 4 13.56 ch Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Runoff Area=48,753 sf Runoff Volume=0.209 af Runoff Depth>2.24" LL 2 Tc=10.0 min CN=80 4 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Runoff = 3.59 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.194 af, Depth> 2.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Area (sf) CN Description 302 98 Paved parking, HSG D 45,025 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 45,327 80 Weighted Average 45,025 99.33% Pervious Area 302 0.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Hydrograph 4 ❑Runoff 13.59 cfs I Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" 3 Runoff Area=45,327 sf Runoff Volume=0.194 af J Runoff Depth>2.24" LL 2 Tc=10.0 min P CN=80 1 % 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Reach 1R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 0.32% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.23" for 10-YEAR event Inflow = 7.45 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.401 af Outflow = 7.45 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.401 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: TOTAL Hydrograph / ■Inflow Y 6- 17”cis I 0 Outflow 1 Inflow Area=2.160'': 6 I • '' I� 5 '�r v 4 0 LL !� 2A AP o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Inflow Area = 1.119 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.24" for 10-YEAR event Inflow = 3.86 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.209 af Outflow = 3.86 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.207 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.1 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 8.30 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 3.86 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.207 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.98'@ 12.02 hrs Surf.Area= 168 sf Storage= 81 cf Plug-Flow detention time=6.6 min calculated for 0.207 af(99% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=2.1 min ( 830.2 -828.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 930.50' 84 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 930.50 168 0 0 931.00 168 84 84 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 930.50' 0.060 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 930.90' 58.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 8.30 hrs HW=930.51' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.86 cfs @ 12.02 hrs HW=930.98' (Free Discharge) t-.2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 3.86 cfs @ 0.80 fps) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Hydrograph / 1 ■Inflow 3.86 cis Outflow Inflow Area=1.119'°`5 C Discarded Jii Primary 4 Peak Elev=930':3875 • Storage=81 cf 3 - o o 2 rt %i 1 0/ r`�,/ ���i✓0.80 fsy 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area(sq-It) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 0 Surface` ®Storage 931 / 930.95 930.9- 930.85- = j 4930.8- 0 530.75- / A W930.7 930.65- 930.6- `. 930.55- 930.5 .................... ...............i...,i.,,,.,...,......,..,i,..,,,,,...,i,.,,..,,,,,,...,,..,i,..,,..,i..,.............,......,�,.,.i...,i,..,�,...�,,.,�,.,. 0 2 4 6 8 10121416182022242628303234 36384042444648 50 52 54 56 58606264 66 68707274 76788082 84 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 11 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Elevation Discharge Discarded Primary (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 930.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.91 0.16 0.00 0.16 930.92 0.46 0.00 0.46 930.93 0.84 0.00 0.84 930.94 1.30 0.00 1.30 930.95 1.82 0.00 1.82 930.96 2.39 0.00 2.39 930.97 3.01 0.00 3.01 930.98 3.67 0.00 3.67 930.99 4.39 0.00 4.38 931.00 5.14 0.00 5.14 . IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=48,753 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.15" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=8.66 cfs 0.480 af SubcatchmentEX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff Area=45,327 sf 0.67% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.15" Tc=10.0 min CN=80 Runoff=8.06 cfs 0.446 af Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=16.74 cfs 0.924 af Outflow=16.74 cfs 0.924 af Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Peak EIev=931.04' Storage=84 cf Inflow=8.66 cfs 0.480 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Primary=8.68 cfs 0.478 af Outflow=8.68 cfs 0.478 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.926 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.15" 99.68% Pervious = 2.153 ac 0.32% Impervious = 0.007 ac IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Runoff = 8.66 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.480 af, Depth> 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 48,753 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 48,753 80 Weighted Average 48,753 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Hydrograph / ❑Runoff 9- 1 8.66 cfs Type II 24-hr 8= 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" '. Runoff Area=48,753 sf !/ 6_ Runoff Volume=0.480 af Runoff Depth>5.15" Tc=10.0 min 4 CN=80 0/ /A_ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 11 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Runoff = 8.06 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.446 af, Depth> 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Area (sf) CN Description 302 98 Paved parking, HSG D 45,025 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 45,327 80 Weighted Average 45,025 99.33% Pervious Area 302 0.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Hydrograph 9 / C Runoff 8.06 cis I 8 Type II 24-hr 7 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50"� Runoff Area=45,327 sf6 J Runoff Volume=0.446 af Runoff Depth>5.15" 4= Tc=10.0 min •/ 3- CN=80 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Reach 1R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 0.32% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.14" for 100-YEAR event Inflow = 16.74 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.924 af Outflow = 16.74 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.924 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: TOTAL Hydrograph / ■Inflow II 18 iI 16.74 cfs I ❑Outflow 17= Inflow Area=2.160 '1 16= 15_ 14_ 13H ii 12_ X10_ o LT. 8_' 0 5 3 2 A-%- 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD© 10.00-20 sin 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B [93]Warning: Storage range exceeded by 0.04' [88] Warning: Qout>Qin may require smaller dt or Finer Routing Inflow Area = 1.119 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.15" for 100-YEAR event Inflow = 8.66 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.480 af Outflow = 8.68 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.478 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 5.56 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Primary = 8.68 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.478 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 931.04'@ 12.01 hrs Surf.Area= 168 sf Storage= 84 cf Plug-Flow detention time=3.5 min calculated for 0.478 af(100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 1.4 min ( 805.9- 804.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 930.50' 84 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 930.50 168 0 0 931.00 168 84 84 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 930.50' 0.060 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 930.90' 58.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.56 hrs HW=930.51' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=8.67 cfs @ 12.01 hrs HW=931.04' (Free Discharge) L2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 8.67 cfs @ 1.05 fps) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type /I 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Hydrograph /. IC Inflow le.sects 1 Outflow Inflow Area=1 .119868 ❑ Discarded Ell Primary 9= Peak Elev=931. / 8= Storage=84 cf 1i00 0� 6-_ !00 5- a 41 %� 3 /: j / /% 2 �' /_/ �/- 4 `/I//////////////..///////////////// /� 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Stage-Area-Storage SurfacelHorizontal/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 0 Surface / / •Storage 930.95 / 930.9- ,930.85- , =930.8 130.75- m j' 930.65 930.62 j 930.55- r 930.5 .r..,,�.......i,.,.i..............i,...,,......,.,,,....................,�,.....,,......i.......,..,.,,....,i.............,i.,,,.,.,.i,,,,i,,..�...,.,.....,,..,......,,.,..,i..,,i,...�...,i.,...,,.,�,.,. 0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224 2628 30 32 34 36 38404244 4648 505254 56 58606264 66687072 74 76788082 84 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - EXISTING Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 02202 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: EX WETLAND B Elevation Discharge Discarded Primary Elevation Discharge Discarded Primary (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 930.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.01 5.93 0.00 5.92 930.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.02 6.75 0.00 6.75 930.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.03 7.61 0.00 7.61 930.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.04 8.51 0.00 8.51 930.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 930.91 0.16 0.00 0.16 930.92 0.46 0.00 0.46 930.93 0.84 0.00 0.84 930.94 1.30 0.00 1.30 930.95 1.82 0.00 1.82 930.96 2.39 0.00 2.39 930.97 3.01 0.00 3.01 930.98 3.67 0.00 3.67 930.99 4.39 0.00 4.38 931.00 5.14 0.00 5.14 4R litT TAL 1P /2 :' UNDERG ND FILT UNDERG UND FILT DET P ND 1 DET POND 2 4)R 2 ) PR 1A PROP DA 2 PR 1 PROP DA 1A PROP DA 1B Subcat Reach •on' Link Routing Diagram for 17059-IVY PLACE-PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 1.744 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (PR 1A, PR 1B, PR 2) 0.416 98 Paved parking, HSG D (PR 1A, PR 1B, PR 2) 2.160 83 TOTAL AREA IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 2.160 HSG D PR 1A, PR 1B, PR 2 0.000 Other 2.160 TOTAL AREA IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.744 0.000 1.744 >75% Grass cover, Good PR 1A, PR 1B, PR 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.416 0.000 0.416 Paved parking PR 1A, PR 1B, PR 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.160 0.000 2.160 TOTAL AREA IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside-Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1P 930.00 929.77 26.0 0.0088 0.013 2.0 0.0 0.0 2 1P 930.25 929.77 26.0 0.0185 0.013 4.0 0.0 0.0 3 2P 930.00 929.77 22.0 0.0105 0.013 2.0 0.0 0.0 4 2P 930.40 929.77 22.0 0.0286 0.013 6.0 0.0 0.0 5 2P 930.50 929.89 22.0 0.0277 0.013 6.0 0.0 0.0 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff Area=5,199 sf 50.51% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.32" Tc=6.0 min CN=89 Runoff=0.30 cfs 0.013 af SubcatchmentPR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff Area=8,297 sf 46.56% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.25" Tc=6.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.46 cfs 0.020 af SubcatchmentPR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff Area=80,584 sf 14.42% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.94" Flow Length=100' Slope=0.0650 'P Tc=14.3 min CN=83 Runoff=2.51 cfs 0.145 af Reach 4R: TOTAL Inflow=2.80 cfs 0.177 af Outflow=2.80 cfs 0.177 af Pond 1P: UNDERGROUNDFILT DET POND 1 Peak Elev=930.44' Storage=185 cf Inflow=0.30 cfs 0.013 af Outflow=0.19 cfs 0.013 af Pond 2P: UNDERGROUNDFILT DET POND 2 Peak EIev=930.55' Storage=372 cf Inflow=0.46 cfs 0.020 af Outflow=0.12 cfs 0.019 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.178 af Average Runoff Depth = 0.99" 80.75% Pervious = 1.744 ac 19.25% Impervious = 0.416 ac IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff = 0.30 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Depth> 1.32" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Area (sf) CN Description 2,626 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,573 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 5,199 89 Weighted Average 2,573 49.49% Pervious Area 2,626 50.51% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Hydrograph L Runoff 0.32 0.30 cfs °3= Type II 24-hr 0.28 0.26-: 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" 0.24 Runoff Area=5,199 sf I/ °D2 Runoff Volume=0.013 af I/ 0.18- Runoff Depth>1 .32" i/ Tc=6.0 min 10 0.14- 0.12- CN=89 • 0.1 0.08- 0.04- 0.02- 0 i�1/Il///l%/ //.rn 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) r . IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff = 0.46 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth> 1.25" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Area (sf) CN Description 3,863 98 Paved parking, HSG D 4,434 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,297 88 Weighted Average 4,434 53.44% Pervious Area 3,863 46.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Hydrograph 0.5= [1 Runoff 0.48' 0.46 cfs 0.0.4644",- Type II 24-hr °.442= 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" 100 0. 0:36= Runoff Area=8,297 sf 1/ 0.34= 0.32= Runoff Volume=0.020 af 110 0.3= °.28_ Runoff Depth>1.25" o.2s 0.24i- Tc=6.0 min i u- 0.22 °6 CN=88 0.12 0.1-7 0.08 0.04= RE rr,Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff = 2.51 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.145 af, Depth> 0.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Area (sf) CN Description 11,620 98 Paved parking, HSG D 68,964 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 80,584 83 Weighted Average 68,964 85.58% Pervious Area 11,620 14.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 14.3 100 0.0650 0.12 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.83" Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Hydrograph ❑Runoff` 2.51 cfs Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" 2 Runoff Area=80,584 sf Runoff Volume=0.145 af• Runoff Depth>0.94" LL Flow Length=100' 0. 1 Slope=0.0650 '/' % Tc_14.3 min rO CN=83 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Reach 4R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 19.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.98" for 1-YEAR event Inflow = 2.80 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af Outflow = 2.80 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: TOTAL Hydrograph / 17 An rf El Inflow 3 Outflow Inflow Area=2.160 ac 2.8 cfs I 2 0 LL / /! 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Inflow Area = 0.119 ac, 50.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.32" for 1-YEAR event Inflow = 0.30 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af Outflow = 0.19 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Atten= 38%, Lag= 4.4 min Primary = 0.19 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.44' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 704 sf Storage= 185 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 43.5 min calculated for 0.013 af(97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 30.9 min ( 809.8 - 778.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 323 cf 11.00'W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,056 cf Overall - 248 cf Embedded = 808 cf x 40.0%Voids #2A 930.00' 248 cf CMP Round 12 x 15 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 5 Rows of 3 Chambers 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 14.0 cf Inside 571 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.00' / 929.77' S= 0.0088 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.25' 4.0" Round Culvert X 2.00 L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.25'/929.77' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.19 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=930.44' (Free Discharge) I1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.04 cfs @ 1.76 fps) 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.15 cfs @ 1.47 fps) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12(Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 5 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 4 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 11.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 15 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 247.8 cf Chamber Storage 1,056.0 cf Field - 247.8 cf Chambers = 808.2 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 323.3 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 571.1 cf= 0.013 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.1% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 11.00' x 1.50' 15 Chambers 39.1 cy Field 29.9 cy Stone f � I I IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Hydrograph / ■Inflow y 0.30 cfs 1:1 II 0.32= 0.3 Inflow Area=0.119 ac 0.28- Peak EIev=930.44' 0.26-E 0.24- Storage=185 cf 0.22= 0.2= 0.19 cfs N U 0.18- c 0.16 " 0.14' 0.12- 0.1 0.08- 0.06- 0.04- 0.02- ° ,, „ .. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Stage-Area-Storage / 13 Storage II 931 m .. C O > /1"71/- tit /j Field A+CMP Round 12 930 I�r!" / 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 14 Stage-Discharge for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.31 931.04 0.66 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.32 931.05 0.66 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.34 931.06 0.67 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.35 931.07 0.67 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.36 931.08 0.68 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.37 931.09 0.68 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.38 931.10 0.68 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.39 931.11 0.69 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.40 931.12 0.69 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.41 931.13 0.69 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.42 931.14 0.70 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.43 931.15 0.70 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.44 931.16 0.70 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.45 931.17 0.71 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.46 931.18 0.71 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.47 931.19 0.71 930.16 0.02 930.68 0.48 931.20 0.71 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.49 931.21 0.72 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.49 931.22 0.72 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.50 931.23 0.72 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.51 931.24 0.73 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.52 931.25 0.73 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.53 931.26 0.73 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.53 931.27 0.74 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 0.74 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.55 931.29 0.74 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.56 931.30 0.75 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.56 931.31 0.75 930.28 0.04 930.80 0.57 931.32 0.75 930.29 0.04 930.81 0.58 931.33 0.76 930.30 0.05 930.82 0.58 931.34 0.76 930.31 0.05 930.83 0.58 931.35 0.76 930.32 0.06 930.84 0.59 931.36 0.76 930.33 0.07 i 930.85 0.59 931.37 0.77 930.34 0.07 930.86 0.60 931.38 0.77 930.35 0.08 930.87 0.60 931.39 0.77 930.36 0.09 930.88 0.60 931.40 0.78 930.37 0.10 930.89 0.61 931.41 0.78 930.38 0.11 930.90 0.61 931.42 0.78 930.39 0.13 930.91 0.61 931.43 0.79 930.40 0.14 930.92 0.62 931.44 0.79 930.41 0.15 930.93 0.62 931.45 0.79 930.42 0.16 930.94 0.63 931.46 0.79 930.43 0.18 930.95 0.63 931.47 0.80 930.44 0.19 930.96 0.63 931.48 0.80 930.45 0.21 930.97 0.64 931.49 0.80 930.46 0.22 930.98 0.64 931.50 0.81 930.47 0.23 930.99 0.64 930.48 0.25 931.00 0.65 930.49 0.26 931.01 0.65 930.50 0.28 931.02 0.65 930.51 0.29 931.03 0.66 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Inflow Area = 0.190 ac, 46.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.25" for 1-YEAR event Inflow = 0.46 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af, Atten= 75%, Lag= 8.4 min Primary = 0.12 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.55' @ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 1,088 sf Storage= 372 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 80.9 min calculated for 0.019 af(96% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 65.0 min ( 847.2 - 782.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 494 cf 17.00'W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,632 cf Overall - 397 cf Embedded = 1,235 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 930.00' 397 cf CMP Round 12 x 24 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Rows of 3 Chambers 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 23.4 cf Inside 891 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 930.00'/929.77' S= 0.0105 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.40' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.40' / 929.77' S= 0.0286 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #3 Primary 930.50' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.50' /929.89' S= 0.0277 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf Erimary OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=930.55' (Free Discharge) -1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 2.09 fps) -2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.06 cfs @ 1.31 fps) -3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.01 cfs @ 0.75 fps) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 8 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 7 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 24 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 397.4 cf Chamber Storage 1,632.0 cf Field - 397.4 cf Chambers = 1,234.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids =493.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 891.2 cf= 0.020 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.6% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 17.00' x 1.50' 24 Chambers 60.4 cy Field 45.7 cy Stone I Ili I 111 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Hydrograph / •Inflow 0.5 10.46 cfs I _❑Primary Inflow Area=0.190 ac 0.45- 0.42 Peak Elev=930.55' 0.35 Storage=372 cf 0.3- f.; c 0.25 LL 0.2- 0.15= 0.12 cfs 0,1= 0.05- - " / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Stage-Area-Storage 0 Storage II 931 c 0 > a w / 930 / 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 1-YEAR Rainfall=2.47" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD D 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.09 931.04 1.16 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.10 931.05 1.18 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.11 931.06 1.19 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.12 931.07 1.21 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.13 931.08 1.23 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.14 931.09 1.24 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.16 931.10 1.26 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.17 931.11 1.27 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.19 931.12 1.29 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.21 931.13 1.30 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.22 931.14 1.32 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.24 931.15 1.33 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.26 931.16 1.34 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.28 931.17 1.36 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.30 931.18 1.37 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.32 931.19 1.39 930.16 0.03 930.68 0.35 931.20 1.40 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.37 931.21 1.41 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.39 931.22 1.43 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.42 931.23 1.44 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.44 931.24 1.45 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.46 931.25 1.47 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.49 931.26 1.48 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.52 931.27 1.49 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 1.51 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.57 931.29 1.52 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.59 931.30 1.53 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.62 931.31 1.54 930.28 0.03 930.80 0.65 931.32 1.56 930.29 0.03 930.81 0.67 931.33 1.57 930.30 0.04 930.82 0.70 931.34 1.58 930.31 0.04 930.83 0.73 931.35 1.59 930.32 0.04 930.84 0.75 931.36 1.60 930.33 0.04 930.85 0.78 931.37 1.62 930.34 0.04 930.86 0.80 931.38 1.63 930.35 0.04 930.87 0.83 931.39 1.64 930.36 0.04 930.88 0.85 931.40 1.65 930.37 0.04 930.89 0.87 931.41 1.66 930.38 0.04 930.90 0.89 931.42 1.67 930.39 0.04 930.91 0.92 931.43 1.69 930.40 0.04 930.92 0.94 931.44 1.70 930.41 0.04 930.93 0.96 931.45 1.71 930.42 0.04 930.94 0.98 931.46 1.72 930.43 0.04 930.95 1.00 931.47 1.73 930.44 0.05 930.96 1.02 931.48 1.74 930.45 0.05 930.97 1.04 931.49 1.75 930.46 0.05 930.98 1.06 931.50 1.76 930.47 0.06 930.99 1.08 930.48 0.06 931.00 1.09 930.49 0.07 931.01 1.11 930.50 0.07 931.02 1.13 930.51 0.08 931.03 1.14 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Time span=0.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff Area=5,199 sf 50.51% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.85" Tc=6.0 min CN=89 Runoff=0.62 cfs 0.028 af SubcatchmentPR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff Area=8,297 sf 46.56% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.76" Tc=6.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.96 cfs 0.044 af SubcatchmentPR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff Area=80,584 sf 14.42% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.31" Flow Length=100' Slope=0.0650 '1 Tc=14.3 min CN=83 Runoff=6.11 cfs 0.356 af Reach 4R: TOTAL Inflow=7.24 cfs 0.426 af Outflow=7.24 cfs 0.426 af Pond 1P: UNDERGROUNDFILT DET POND 1 Peak EIev=930.66' Storage=288 cf Inflow=0.62 cfs 0.028 af Outflow=0.46 cfs 0.028 af Pond 2P: UNDERGROUNDFILT DET POND 2 Peak EIev=930.83' Storage=575 cf Inflow=0.96 cfs 0.044 af Outflow=0.73 cfs 0.043 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.428 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.38" 80.75% Pervious = 1.744 ac 19.25% Impervious = 0.416 ac IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af, Depth> 2.85" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Area (sf) CN Description 2,626 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,573 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 5,199 89 Weighted Average 2,573 49.49% Pervious Area 2,626 50.51% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Hydrograph Runoff 0.65 0.62 cfs l 0.6= Type II 24-hr 0.55 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" 4 . 05= Runoff Area=5,199 sf 0.45. Runoff Volume=0.028 af 0.4- 3 0.35- Runoff Depth>2.85" 0.3= Tc=6.0 min CN=89 • 0.2- °,00.15 0.1 ;AL3 0.05 0 � f �� "ZZ,—r/- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 '14 1b 1fi 117 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff = 0.96 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Depth> 2.76" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Area (sf) CN Description 3,863 98 Paved parking, HSG D 4,434 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,297 88 Weighted Average 4,434 53.44% Pervious Area 3,863 46.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Hydrograph ❑ 1 0.96 cfs Runoff` Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Runoff Area=8,297 sf Runoff Volume=0.044 af OA Runoff Depth>2.76" Tc=6.0 min LL CN=88 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff = 6.11 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.356 af, Depth> 2.31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Area (sf) CN Description 11,620 98 Paved parking, HSG D 68,964 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 80,584 83 Weighted Average 68,964 85.58% Pervious Area 11,620 14.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 14.3 100 0.0650 0.12 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.83" Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Hydrograph Runoff 6.11 cfs I 6 Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" 5 Runoff Area=80,584 sf Runoff Volume=0.356 af 4 Runoff Depth>2.31" �/ 3 Flow Length=100' Slope=0.0650 2 Tc=14.3 min 0 CN=831 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Reach 4R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 19.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.37" for 10-YEAR event Inflow = 7.24 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.426 af Outflow = 7.24 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.426 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: TOTAL Hydrograph 8 / 17 94 rf G Inflow C'Outflow Inflow Area=2.160 ac cfs 7 6 0 5 e A 4- o LL 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 , 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Summary for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Inflow Area = 0.119 ac, 50.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.85" for 10-YEAR event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af Outflow = 0.46 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af, Atten= 26%, Lag= 3.5 min Primary = 0.46 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.66' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 704 sf Storage= 288 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 32.8 min calculated for 0.028 af(98% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 24.0 min ( 785.2 - 761.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 323 cf 11.00'W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,056 cf Overall -248 cf Embedded = 808 cf x 40.0%Voids #2A 930.00' 248 cf CMP Round 12 x 15 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 5 Rows of 3 Chambers 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 14.0 cf Inside 571 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.00'/929.77' S= 0.0088 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.25' 4.0" Round Culvert X 2.00 L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.25' / 929.77' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.46 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=930.66' (Free Discharge) 'E1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 2.11 fps) 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.41 cfs © 2.35 fps) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 25 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 5 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 4 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 11.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 15 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 247.8 cf Chamber Storage 1,056.0 cf Field - 247.8 cf Chambers = 808.2 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 323.3 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 571.1 cf= 0.013 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.1% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 11.00' x 1.50' 15 Chambers 39.1 cy Field 29.9 cy Stone IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Hydrograph / ■Inflow II 0.62 cfs ❑Primary 0.65- Inflow Area=0.119 ac 0.6- 0.55- Peak EIev=930.66' Storage=288 cf [ 0.46 cfs 0.45 I/ w 0.4: I0 3 0.35: u- 0.3- 0.25 4w 0.15- 0.05 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Stage-Area-Storage 0 Storage 931 C O d W Field A+CMP_Round 12 930 111 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Stage-Discharge for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) _ (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.31 931.04 0.66 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.32 931.05 0.66 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.34 931.06 0.67 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.35 931.07 0.67 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.36 931.08 0.68 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.37 931.09 0.68 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.38 931.10 0.68 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.39 931.11 0.69 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.40 931.12 0.69 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.41 931.13 0.69 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.42 931.14 0.70 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.43 931.15 0.70 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.44 931.16 0.70 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.45 931.17 0.71 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.46 931.18 0.71 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.47 931.19 0.71 930.16 0.02 930.68 0.48 931.20 0.71 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.49 931.21 0.72 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.49 931.22 0.72 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.50 931.23 0.72 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.51 931.24 0.73 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.52 931.25 0.73 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.53 931.26 0.73 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.53 931.27 0.74 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 0.74 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.55 931.29 0.74 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.56 931.30 0.75 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.56 931.31 0.75 930.28 0.04 930.80 0.57 931.32 0.75 930.29 0.04 930.81 0.58 931.33 0.76 930.30 0.05 930.82 0.58 931.34 0.76 930.31 0.05 930.83 0.58 931.35 0.76 930.32 0.06 930.84 0.59 931.36 0.76 930.33 0.07 930.85 0.59 931.37 0.77 930.34 0.07 930.86 0.60 931.38 0.77 930.35 0.08 930.87 0.60 931.39 0.77 930.36 0.09 930.88 0.60 931.40 0.78 930.37 0.10 930.89 0.61 931.41 0.78 930.38 0.11 930.90 0.61 931.42 0.78 930.39 0.13 930.91 0.61 931.43 0.79 930.40 0.14 930.92 0.62 931.44 0.79 930.41 0.15 930.93 0.62 931.45 0.79 930.42 0.16 930.94 0.63 931.46 0.79 930.43 0.18 930.95 0.63 931.47 0.80 930.44 0.19 930.96 0.63 931.48 0.80 930.45 0.21 930.97 0.64 931.49 0.80 930.46 0.22 930.98 0.64 931.50 0.81 930.47 0.23 930.99 0.64 930.48 0.25 931.00 0.65 930.49 0.26 931.01 0.65 930.50 0.28 931.02 0.65 930.51 0.29 931.03 0.66 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Inflow Area = 0.190 ac, 46.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.76" for 10-YEAR event Inflow = 0.96 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af Outflow = 0.73 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af, Atten= 24%, Lag= 3.3 min Primary = 0.73 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 930.83' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 1,088 sf Storage= 575 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 57.8 min calculated for 0.043 af(97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 46.4 min ( 810.8 - 764.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 494 cf 17.00'W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,632 cf Overall - 397 cf Embedded = 1,235 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 930.00' 397 cf CMP Round 12 x 24 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Rows of 3 Chambers 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 23.4 cf Inside 891 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.00'/929.77' S= 0.0105 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.40' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.40' /929.77' S= 0.0286 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #3 Primary 930.50' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.50'/929.89' S= 0.0277 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.73 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=930.83' (Free Discharge) -1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.06 cfs @ 2.53 fps) -2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.40 cfs @ 2.24 fps) -3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.27 cfs @ 1.96 fps) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12(Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 8 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 7 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 24 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 397.4 cf Chamber Storage 1,632.0 cf Field - 397.4 cf Chambers = 1,234.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 493.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 891.2 cf= 0.020 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.6% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 17.00' x 1.50' 24 Chambers 60.4 cy Field 45.7 cy Stone I i IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type ll 24-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Hydrograph / ■Inflow 0.96 cfs ❑Primary 1 Inflow Area=0.190 ac Peak Elev=930.83' Storage=575 cf 0/3 cfs '/ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Stage-Area-Storage / Storage 931 m d 0 f/ ,. W .9- Field A+CMP_Round 12 930 ` 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 10-YEAR Rainfall=4.24" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.09 931.04 1.16 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.10 931.05 1.18 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.11 931.06 1.19 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.12 931.07 1.21 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.13 931.08 1.23 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.14 931.09 1.24 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.16 931.10 1.26 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.17 931.11 1.27 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.19 931.12 1.29 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.21 931.13 1.30 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.22 931.14 1.32 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.24 931.15 1.33 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.26 931.16 1.34 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.28 931.17 1.36 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.30 931.18 1.37 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.32 931.19 1.39 930.16 0.03 930.68 0.35 931.20 1.40 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.37 931.21 1.41 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.39 931.22 1.43 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.42 931.23 1.44 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.44 931.24 1.45 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.46 931.25 1.47 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.49 931.26 1.48 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.52 931.27 1.49 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 1.51 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.57 931.29 1.52 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.59 931.30 1.53 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.62 931.31 1.54 930.28 0.03 930.80 0.65 931.32 1.56 930.29 0.03 930.81 0.67 931.33 1.57 930.30 0.04 930.82 0.70 931.34 1.58 930.31 0.04 930.83 0.73 931.35 1.59 930.32 0.04 930.84 0.75 931.36 1.60 930.33 0.04 930.85 0.78 931.37 1.62 930.34 0.04 930.86 0.80 931.38 1.63 930.35 0.04 930.87 0.83 931.39 1.64 930.36 0.04 930.88 0.85 931.40 1.65 930.37 0.04 930.89 0.87 931.41 1.66 930.38 0.04 930.90 0.89 931.42 1.67 930.39 0.04 930.91 0.92 931.43 1.69 930.40 0.04 930.92 0.94 931.44 1.70 930.41 0.04 930.93 0.96 931.45 1.71 930.42 0.04 930.94 0.98 931.46 1.72 930.43 0.04 930.95 1.00 931.47 1.73 930.44 0.05 930.96 1.02 931.48 1.74 930.45 0.05 930.97 1.04 931.49 1.75 930.46 0.05 930.98 1.06 931.50 1.76 930.47 0.06 930.99 1.08 930.48 0.06 931.00 1.09 930.49 0.07 931.01 1.11 930.50 0.07 931.02 1.13 930.51 0.08 931.03 1.14 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Time span=0.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff Area=5,199 sf 50.51% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.84" Tc=6.0 min CN=89 Runoff=1.20 cfs 0.058 af SubcatchmentPR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff Area=8,297 sf 46.56% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.72" Tc=6.0 min CN=88 Runoff=1.90 cfs 0.091 af SubcatchmentPR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff Area=80,584 sf 14.42% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.14" Flow Length=100' Slope=0.0650 '/' Tc=14.3 min CN=83 Runoff=13.12 cfs 0.792 af Reach 4R: TOTAL Inflow=15.32 cfs 0.938 af Outflow=15.32 cfs 0.938 af Pond 1P: UNDERGROUNDFILT DET POND 1 Peak Elev=931.34' Storage=527 cf Inflow=1.20 cfs 0.058 af Outflow=0.76 cfs 0.057 af Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Peak Elev=931.32' Storage=813 cf Inflow=1.90 cfs 0.091 af Outflow=1.56 cfs 0.088 af Total Runoff Area = 2.160 ac Runoff Volume = 0.941 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.23" 80.75% Pervious = 1.744 ac 19.25% Impervious = 0.416 ac IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Runoff = 1.20 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, Depth> 5.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Area (sf) CN Description 2,626 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,573 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 5,199 89 Weighted Average 2,573 49.49% Pervious Area 2,626 50.51% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1A: PROP DA 1A Hydrograph / U Runoff 1.20 cfs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Runoff Area=5,199 sf Runoff Volume=0.058 af Runoff Depth>5.84" ;f Tc=6.0 min CN=89 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type ll 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Summary for Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Runoff = 1.90 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.091 af, Depth> 5.72" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Area (sf) CN Description 3,863 98 Paved parking, HSG D 4,434 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 8,297 88 Weighted Average 4,434 53.44% Pervious Area 3,863 46.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR 1B: PROP DA 1B Hydrograph D Runoff` 2 1.90 cfs Type II 24-hr �l 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Runoff Area=8,297 sf I/ Runoff Volume=0.091 af Runoff Depth>5.72" 2 1 Tc=6.0 m i n • CN=88 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Runoff = 13.12 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.792 af, Depth> 5.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Area (sf) CN Description 11,620 98 Paved parking, HSG D 68,964 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 80,584 83 Weighted Average 68,964 85.58% Pervious Area 11,620 14.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 14.3 100 0.0650 0.12 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.83" Subcatchment PR 2: PROP DA 2 Hydrograph Runoff 14- 13.12 cfs 13- Type II 24-hr / '2= 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" 11- 10- Runoff Area=80,584 sf Runoff Volume=0.792 af v 8� Runoff Depth>5.14" s] Flow Length=100' 5 Slope=0.0650 '/' f0 4 Tc=14.3 min 00,CN=83 // 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36 Summary for Reach 4R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.160 ac, 19.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.21" for 100-YEAR event Inflow = 15.32 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.938 af Outflow = 15.32 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.938 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: TOTAL Hydrograph Inflow 17= i 1 c 9 rf fp'Outflow Inflow Area=2.160 ac 15.32 cfs 15= 14 Or 13 • 11 a 10_ 0 8 6= 4 3 2 A 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 Summary for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Inflow Area = 0.119 ac, 50.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.84" for 100-YEAR event Inflow = 1.20 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af Outflow = 0.76 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Atten= 37%, Lag= 4.3 min Primary = 0.76 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 931.34' @ 12.04 hrs Surf.Area= 704 sf Storage= 527 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 27.3 min calculated for 0.057 af(98% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 20.8 min ( 765.0- 744.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 323 cf 11.00'W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,056 cf Overall -248 cf Embedded = 808 cf x 40.0%Voids #2A 930.00' 248 cf CMP Round 12 x 15 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 5 Rows of 3 Chambers 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 14.0 cf Inside 571 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.00'/929.77' S= 0.0088 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.25' 4.0" Round Culvert X 2.00 L= 26.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.25'/929.77' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.76 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=931.34' (Free Discharge) -1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.06 cfs @ 2.95 fps) 2=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.70 cfs @ 3.98 fps) • IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 5 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 4 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 11.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 15 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 9.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 247.8 cf Chamber Storage 1,056.0 cf Field -247.8 cf Chambers = 808.2 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 323.3 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 571.1 cf= 0.013 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.1% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 11.00' x 1.50' 15 Chambers 39.1 cy Field 29.9 cy Stone IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39 Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Hydrograph / ■Inflow i 1.20 cfs I ❑Primary Inflow Area=0.119 ac Peak Elev=931 .34' 1 Storage=527 cf 0.76 cfs LL r0 A 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Stage-Area-Storage RI Storage 931 �� c � o / > d w r f Field A+CMP_Round 12 930 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40 Stage-Discharge for Pond 1P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.31 931.04 0.66 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.32 931.05 0.66 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.34 931.06 0.67 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.35 931.07 0.67 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.36 931.08 0.68 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.37 931.09 0.68 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.38 931.10 0.68 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.39 931.11 0.69 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.40 931.12 0.69 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.41 931.13 0.69 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.42 931.14 0.70 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.43 931.15 0.70 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.44 931.16 0.70 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.45 931.17 0.71 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.46 931.18 0.71 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.47 931.19 0.71 930.16 0.02 930.68 0.48 931.20 0.71 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.49 931.21 0.72 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.49 931.22 0.72 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.50 931.23 0.72 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.51 931.24 0.73 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.52 931.25 0.73 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.53 931.26 0.73 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.53 931.27 0.74 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 0.74 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.55 931.29 0.74 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.56 931.30 0.75 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.56 931.31 0.75 930.28 0.04 930.80 0.57 931.32 0.75 930.29 0.04 930.81 0.58 931.33 0.76 930.30 0.05 930.82 0.58 931.34 0.76 930.31 0.05 930.83 0.58 931.35 0.76 930.32 0.06 930.84 0.59 931.36 0.76 930.33 0.07 930.85 0.59 931.37 0.77 930.34 0.07 930.86 0.60 931.38 0.77 930.35 0.08 930.87 0.60 931.39 0.77 930.36 0.09 930.88 0.60 931.40 0.78 930.37 0.10 930.89 0.61 931.41 0.78 930.38 0.11 930.90 0.61 931.42 0.78 930.39 0.13 930.91 0.61 931.43 0.79 930.40 0.14 930.92 0.62 931.44 0.79 930.41 0.15 930.93 0.62 931.45 0.79 930.42 0.16 930.94 0.63 931.46 0.79 930.43 0.18 930.95 0.63 931.47 0.80 930.44 0.19 930.96 0.63 931.48 0.80 930.45 0.21 930.97 0.64 931.49 0.80 930.46 0.22 930.98 0.64 931.50 0.81 930.47 0.23 930.99 0.64 930.48 0.25 931.00 0.65 930.49 0.26 931.01 0.65 930.50 0.28 931.02 0.65 930.51 0.29 931.03 0.66 IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41 Summary for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Inflow Area = 0.190 ac, 46.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.72" for 100-YEAR event Inflow = 1.90 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.091 af Outflow = 1.56 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af, Atten= 18%, Lag= 2.8 min Primary = 1.56 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 931.32' @ 12.02 hrs Surf.Area= 1,088 sf Storage= 813 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 45.0 min calculated for 0.088 af(97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 32.1 min ( 779.1 -747.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 930.00' 494 cf 17.00W x 64.00'L x 1.50'H Field A 1,632 cf Overall - 397 cf Embedded = 1,235 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 930.00' 397 cf CMP Round 12 x 24 Inside#1 Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Rows of 3 Chambers 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 23.4 cf Inside 891 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 930.00' 2.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.00' /929.77' S= 0.0105 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.02 sf #2 Primary 930.40' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.40'/929.77' S= 0.0286 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #3 Primary 930.50' 6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 930.50'/929.89' S= 0.0277 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf Primary OutFlow Max=1.55 cfs @ 12.02 hrs HW=931.32' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.07 cfs @ 3.14 fps) 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.77 cfs @ 3.94 fps) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.71 cfs @ 3.63 fps) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 42 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model= CMP_Round 12 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.78 sf x 20.00'L = 15.6 cf Overall Size= 12.0"W x 12.0"H x 20.00'L 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 24.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.00' Header x 2 = 62.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 64.00' Base Length 8 Rows x 12.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing x 7 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 17.00' Base Width 12.0" Chamber Height+ 6.0" Cover= 1.50' Field Height 24 Chambers x 15.6 cf+ 15.00' Header x 0.78 sf x 2 = 397.4 cf Chamber Storage 1,632.0 cf Field - 397.4 cf Chambers = 1,234.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 493.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 891.2 cf= 0.020 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 54.6% Overall System Size = 64.00' x 17.00' x 1.50' 24 Chambers 60.4 cy Field 45.7 cy Stone kill I iiv IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type II 24-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 43 Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Hydrograph / 13 Inflow 1.90 cfs I C Primary 2 Inflow Area=0.190 ac Peak Elev=931 .32' [ 1.56 cfs Storage=813 cf In 1 0 06 I o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Stage-Area-Storage El Storage 931 a a > Field A+CMP_Round 12 930 ,! 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Storage(cubic-feet) IVY PLACE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17059 - IVY PLACE - PROPOSED Type 1124-hr 100-YEAR Rainfall=7.50" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 7/17/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02202 ©2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 44 Stage-Discharge for Pond 2P: UNDERGROUND FILT DET POND 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 930.00 0.00 930.52 0.09 931.04 1.16 930.01 0.00 930.53 0.10 931.05 1.18 930.02 0.00 930.54 0.11 931.06 1.19 930.03 0.00 930.55 0.12 931.07 1.21 930.04 0.00 930.56 0.13 931.08 1.23 930.05 0.00 930.57 0.14 931.09 1.24 930.06 0.00 930.58 0.16 931.10 1.26 930.07 0.01 930.59 0.17 931.11 1.27 930.08 0.01 930.60 0.19 931.12 1.29 930.09 0.01 930.61 0.21 931.13 1.30 930.10 0.01 930.62 0.22 931.14 1.32 930.11 0.01 930.63 0.24 931.15 1.33 930.12 0.02 930.64 0.26 931.16 1.34 930.13 0.02 930.65 0.28 931.17 1.36 930.14 0.02 930.66 0.30 931.18 1.37 930.15 0.02 930.67 0.32 931.19 1.39 930.16 0.03 930.68 0.35 931.20 1.40 930.17 0.03 930.69 0.37 931.21 1.41 930.18 0.03 930.70 0.39 931.22 1.43 930.19 0.03 930.71 0.42 931.23 1.44 930.20 0.03 930.72 0.44 931.24 1.45 930.21 0.03 930.73 0.46 931.25 1.47 930.22 0.03 930.74 0.49 931.26 1.48 930.23 0.03 930.75 0.52 931.27 1.49 930.24 0.03 930.76 0.54 931.28 1.51 930.25 0.03 930.77 0.57 931.29 1.52 930.26 0.03 930.78 0.59 931.30 1.53 930.27 0.03 930.79 0.62 931.31 1.54 930.28 0.03 930.80 0.65 931.32 1.56 930.29 0.03 930.81 0.67 931.33 1.57 930.30 0.04 930.82 0.70 931.34 1.58 930.31 0.04 930.83 0.73 931.35 1.59 930.32 0.04 930.84 0.75 931.36 1.60 930.33 0.04 930.85 0.78 931.37 1.62 930.34 0.04 930.86 0.80 931.38 1.63 930.35 0.04 930.87 0.83 931.39 1.64 930.36 0.04 930.88 0.85 931.40 1.65 930.37 0.04 930.89 0.87 931.41 1.66 930.38 0.04 930.90 0.89 931.42 1.67 930.39 0.04 930.91 0.92 931.43 1.69 930.40 0.04 930.92 0.94 931.44 1.70 930.41 0.04 930.93 0.96 931.45 1.71 930.42 0.04 930.94 0.98 931.46 1.72 930.43 0.04 930.95 1.00 931.47 1.73 930.44 0.05 930.96 1.02 931.48 1.74 930.45 0.05 930.97 1.04 931.49 1.75 930.46 0.05 930.98 1.06 931.50 1.76 930.47 0.06 930.99 1.08 930.48 0.06 931.00 1.09 930.49 0.07 931.01 1.11 930.50 0.07 931.02 1.13 930.51 0.08 931.03 1.14 PC 4 .' 17-3988 ,,:. - •• -•,47,--:...-•••,,,•edi'• ..,s:.,..t,...':,; '....'. '..•.. 1,,..:1::"...." 1:4J.V../41**0.5.;$"';;••• ••`:(44;1;iT;.1. • I'..:‘:.:;.:.•. ..';-':;514'''f:. ii...7.-:.:'.:'.',4,..4,..?'•:.1:*:.V..:1 17-3989 ,:•,114`.4.:Af.•:•"••„•$ev4.44-,,_i•r•*:•.,0,,-,.-.:;,c•-',„vr.•,:17.tc.4.t.*: •••••.7.-...' 1023841 .i..1::1'.:::".'4%',..-...:..17:k-...:.•:••••..:•.:.:1*.:•4...%•,.1•••,:•:;k4;;; ;!kip,....,-,..,-:,...4.:,,..Fi.v......e.47,...1"..1.„-,4..-.:-,...-,..---.ve--11%,•••• 1 -ff. .4.4'''''',-.•••‘7..%1:...I.....C%9i.'....rr.::.;:fi't: .••::••••••••.•••At, 17-3990 t,:cl.i/Y,t..I,I.vq,v714-.54.1*.-v:i... .,Y,,,v.A.:.:•••.)-1. •••••,-:. • . • '''''' .,.....,'..'!......**WI•qt.IV•V•••:-.:••:••••!?!•!::/•:;,...."!4.,:-.4•••\4i •••`,410-.f,'.. .44TS'..14g.4:•;'"30•••Ufrif•',..f:-•,:k:•*:...i:.•••:''':• :-.•*. . , .; : .:,•*.".;':`..:',,f,':••,;;;,,e,i,...,,1?...ce.:•;,;..r.L.1,•';':ge.0:.:'4.„!:kiiiikie'..4.1,..,.., Exhibit G liglAwitalizalit;fttilr,4,7• !:!'::::24-;;;;41kfis i,;:, .c 'zi:•'Lliai$*=4',44..*.3&"4 .4e.POWs•VATF# . . , . . . . . ..• . .• •. •- • - ' - • . • • • . 1023891 ' . .. . . • '..• - '• • , . • . : ‘.. • : • • . . . . • : •:•.•-. n . • , . . . • •••• ...; •,•• . DECLARATION OF EASEMENT • —' • 7-4— • :1-... •;4 .. .. . - " .• ."•.,' . . • .. . .. •.• Charles A. Cox and-Mary Helen Coit, hiswife., ..- -. • . as owner and sponse, respectIvely, of I1ots 1, 2 and 3,' Caeca Point • .• Addition. in Hennepin County, Minces° according to•the plat.. . •••• thereof, hereby create•for the benefit o said•Lote nmpitt,911..14_ise.:•• : •.. ......ii. ••••••,..............awaan.,•1 . ' • menfor private driveway purposes and for-ingrese to,.and egress ' •' Tldfir diriclo-i7o7lijiiriiiiiles7e17; 370 feet in illirlEresilig-all •'.• : •'. :.'...:`I V..• • .. . .• .. - •that.nkr.t4tLpT_mkt Ilat,pat_stripixiti4 wititin,:.!Lisr ilde• . ..'.....:•;, ......?,' '. .. . . • '- .Of.the follawing described.centerline; . '-"• . .• . ' ,. • .4.• •• 1 .' : - • ' .. . Commencing at the Most Southerly corner of Sot 185,•; • ''. '•:•' •... •:•'., •j:•'I.•::••• : . . . . .- .. . - .•. . . TaylorsSulidivisidn of Spring Park Lots,thence on an . : . •• • •••••• •••: t . . . • • assumed bearing of North 47 degree. DO iti*ites East . . . . . .. .: •-: . along the Sontheasterly line of.es:id Lot 185,..a distance.. ' :...'• • •."•.-ks::::. ••:i; t2 • . . of 75.00•feet, to the beginning of the centerline to . ' ,• •;• . :•'.......:.-•:'..... .7. • „t; . . . • • described thence North 43 degree. 00 minutes Wept a ,. ...';...'.'• •''•• . f.,..,...:';.! f;•• . . . . , . . . . , distance•of 5:00.fnetilbence Northwesterly and Northerly : .'; • :',•,•••••'.•.... :....,-,',•rci ...alonia tingentint.curve:Concave to the'East hazing a •-• -• . -.• .••• - •.:....,.. ..;i.I.r.• .• ' - radius of 130titi feet and a central angle of 23 degree. • 'l'••••.••••-.."•• :' '''...?.... 1.; ••••. • • • ' ". 30'minutes for-a diatande Of•53:32 feet to a point of scoin.:: -•''.*: •...••''• •.:''' ..;.'••t I .. . . .. . pound Curve; thence Northerly, along a cortiPpiind curve• ••• •. :.'• •' •'-': .....t.;'......;,:t , ... .. . • concave to the Eifithaving,a radius of.50.00 feat:anti a ', • .. •••• • '.'" '• , ':',",- •,4. . . -•• central-angle of 45•degrees, 45.1ninutee and 03 secoruie• ' •..• -.. • • .., ,.• •• .....1 :11, • :. for a distance of 31:93 feetto,a point of reverse curvei• • '' , • .: . . ... . •It - thence Northerly and Northwesterly a distance of 4.5.- 0-- .:. ,''..•., ..- . •.•..•••ii, . . loot along a•reverse curve-concave to the West havinga . . •'.... .......; •,.. : i radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 5Z degrees,. '. • • • . . 15 minute. and 03 secoodS;thesicallorth25 degrees.00 . •:...•. zli•t •• . .. •minutes Weat;tangent to the last•described curve, a. * • . . . • • d ... ;. ••,•..,t ' •' . • ' istance-of 200.GO feet, more or less, to the Intersection.' • . . • . . .. with the Northwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said:center..• - ' - • t, • . • 'line there terminating. •• . . ' • .• . • Said Charism A. .Cox and Mar y%Helen Cox Alit breate . • ...;.- • 'I ... ..rt of said easeinglit...aA4Mat part.of Aaii14.iots 2..'und 3 lying.,ofithrri,'"-• • .. '..1, . . . circle Navin a•radium of.50...f.!10 a22.41V.1.07.:C441'Wili.r.t.07.14.K).Y,17€71114° . ' **: •' /".„,..•‘••‘:,,,,41..1.111..rcr ;'11;1:1frililai;itotwAtkte.the•Pjeet...praziougAy.,tles),.zuCtiii..hartiin. • "1 . . • • Ereinai;'A.:•Irciiiiii, els mortgage.in a mortgage of record of invil—. ... premises, hereby consents to the creation of eaaemento as herein stated. 2 .• • ,"• . IN WITNESS'WHEREOF, said parties have executed this D ration i '.' • 1. this /Lark day oi November, 1971. ......1 Cv.,...----ki . . . • . . e am to Charles A. (?1•444641.- de • . •. ....t. Cox • -• Mar .-len Cox: Charles A. Cox .• .-400i'. illiPIP ,,----• • .1... .. 1 * 0 Mary Helen ox ../.4.-........410• "..."...-.......4. ..I/ ''.. • .• , • .eases as to Eleanor A. •44)., • ' • ...! • Tomaa 0 No delinquent-lain* •• •••*--.' ',it).•;':•:•,; • • and transfer entered "•eci? 0 , 2,.411‘41.".1.• AP' • DEPT.OF-FINANCE ri- .• ''.:•• 'IF.../Jr.ef.e.,ero'' 4 /1"r. 1., HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINN. .. .61/ . . ..:• '"• ‘7.- • 44- .e• •`.‘- . - '•"....'"."•• :•. ••••••••••-•-••'',-...."!',:..:'-::•.:-••••..s..**•:•,;.•"....!`.;•:....'....,•' . . .. .,'. -...••.-.1.::.IIII:II:•• .......''• ''i••••M,wrixi or : eity44,i'•• ••••.1)tirEftlf SE:••••:::::. Ci ' . .. • '.• •• *:. :.... ' "••• sota .-• i•ITMATION-E:-;,.. . - •. • • ... . . :-.. :.:.-:••.;429_•;:.":11i..—./ Ione 4,‘,2,-..,.:,;„•,_: ,. ,...:::, ••gi-;•:...f.,; 1 014,441,.....s: 4,24P1'°1- ., .... . •it*;.DEED ' •••' '7.:--'•'•-1•',;'.••ire.I.••••24.V.'• 'ft • f . • DEPUT.t . - • ••.....'.5TAMP.-"°""4 •• t...1,'7.• • : •:. ..'"' . . . •,. '''''.: '• :. ...TAX..• ..% 1'; 110.4113..1 ..-'-'--••''':'.5g-;'-.•'bm arrtIlleatileti dal ma nithi.la 1141,011 • IMP VaMMII T•41.`04....e.:.,......:777' • ..,••••• ..2.•.:2;,1-7,•vt,;,::,:-4:4•0" ••••••••-••• -•"4". . miq . . " ' • . • •• -•• • , -•:). I Ns.\ c3' 4— lam. 2 \ ; ; `,� `,114/` M a+ ,. ... i i .,..J 01 -I 2 Z \---\NS, \ \ \...) 7 \` c9 ` 1N.\:‹13N C' ). \ \ \c>.\„:,6).„, , ....-eS \AO \\S \ ti // \\ X 1 ',II.. C_Y\ cm .Tri ^�.? \ \ \ ,,., f -d\ tY `\ \ J m.4, \ \ ,---, f .7� -I. \ �.,�� ♦,��� \ // G / s\ \e.:4-,,,(, ' / ...,,,,N___1\7\ ~ �J fir- \\ ` \ b ' f / C _- --- \ �" -' ^ / \ .- ,e-, ,..„\<<„ ♦ �``.,..__._. � f . �/ '`fi ' � GO sr .0.--- 'f� ./.............' \ < y, �moi. ay ��" __"' x i."/ � \\....\,... ' .s' ''' \,,, .\ / ntr• iii �sr'. � ....;v.„' '� i' / �`... .• 4',,,, O f i ;/ �'del / .r /. �� �� _tea "/.7•-‘1'N' t'� / /'r ) J j C...) _, �`/ � �/ r .G� r j 1 // �� /71 /I Y 1 Na // o c/1 ��lf• ' /- P •� jEY i � 0 0 Ct. / f = l Q kJ n In F2 //' Q f '_ a O 6i,� o at v (> 'C Grl 3: ....11. 0 o . -. 4. 1.92 Certificate of Title No. 370960 S6?_t92 Parcel 67 Revised 483' EAS E M E N T THIS INDENTURE, made this .„,/>" day of October , 1966 , between Edward A. Nicolay, unmarried, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor(s)", and THE VILLAGE OF ORONO, a municipal corpora- tion organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "Grantee"; WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of obtaining an easement on land hereinafter described, NOW, THEREFORE, this indenture witnesseth, in consideration of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, paid by the Grantee to the Grantor , , the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor4v) hereby grant(s) unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual underground ..--,.._ , � : bed asW allows: utilityeasement over, under, and across aystri , of land described\ , , ,s P 6c, \. ,, :a. That part of Tracts W and X,)and accretions thereto,)Registered Land Survey_No. 461,/files of Registrar of Titles, County of '4f,:,: Hennepin, _'! / all in Hennepin County, Minnesota,(lying within 10 feet on each side of the following-described centerline: Commencing at the most Westerly corner of Lot 185, Taylors Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly ' line of said Tract W a distance of 52.4 feet to the point of be- oP .f' ginning of the centerline being described; thence deflecting Ja ° left 39°30' a distance of 17.8 feet; thence deflecting right 10° 25' a distance of 100 feet; thence deflecting left 53°51' a distance of 253 feet; thence deflecting right 21°29' a distance of 86 feet; thence deflecting left 71°49' to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, and there ending. , including, but not by way of limitation a full and free right and authority to enter upon said land to construct, install, maintain, operate and repair a.aaisiiCar}. ~—liEt ciati.oa, sanitary sewer interceptor, sanitary sewer main or line, and any and all appurtenances incidental and related thereto, (such are hereafter collectively referred to as the Improvement), and to join connections to said Improvement, and the Grantee shall have the right to make such use of said land as is reasonably necessary and advis- able to the construction, installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the Improvement. By acceptance of this easement and in consideration therefor, the Grantee for itself and its successors and assigns covenants and agrees to restore the surface of the ground of said land where such is physically possible and practical, to approx- imately the same condition that existed prior to any construction, installation, main- tenance or repair of the Improvement within a reasonable time thereafter unless weather or circumstances beyond Grantee's control do not permit. The Grantor(a) hereby covenant(s) for himself and his successors, heirs and assigns, to refrain from performing any act on or constructing or erecting any fixture or improvement on said land that would interfere with Grantee's right of construction, installation, operation, maintenance and repair of the Improvement. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written above: "I In the presence of: 6e-e,„..___,/r/ ��. t!e.- -/' may EdwarA. Na.colay--- -•fes/ - tf' /Let- 2/ -,C�->,-- 97711-1,-7-4-4-c - 1.92 • STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this `7 day of October, 1966, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Edward A Nicolay, unmarried, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknow- ledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary P 1 c ROBERT W. MANN Neter/Public,Hennepin County,Mink My Commission Expires May 18,1973. I 92 • • . • • 862192 • 22-e-e..40-tey. . • a .: OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF TITLES STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HEONEPIN hereby ccriify that the wi'.kin instilment was Fled in this office on Op 9. day of NOV A. D. 1966 at 4 -o'clock M• • , • .-- • ;. • OF TITLES pt, D • •ESIS 4.R OF TITLES. • TRANSFER ENTERS) t4A)Ni 341.13Di ROBERT F.FITZSIMMONS,PAIBII61 RENNVIN COUNTY, MINN. FArit-dZY -145-EPUTY, • , A Description for Utility Purposes Across CASCO POINT ADDITION (11-8-17) _.p.M I1— i ;li /3 I I 1 / I 60h 1\ �; / I 2 \,moi' �'`�� . 7)9 Southeasterly Line of Lot 1 _.. .6:/ ___ I Lake Minnetonka .4 o I I N I e.t. S 165,34 `� \ I ..: . I , ---------„,„„„411JW9 ,.. t 4 .`-° - 20 I 0 .S4 \� t, An easement for utility purposes over under and across that part of Lots 1, 2 and 3, `''-L__ <1.Block 1, CASCO POINT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin 10.64 ' J \--r /-------— County, Minnesota, described as being within a 20-foot-wide strip of land the II,>g centerline of which is described as Follows: N / al Commencing at the most southwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, said CASCO POINT K ADDITION;thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Lot 1,a distance of - , 37.91 feet to the intersection of the most southerly survey line with said southeasterly t 7' t — line of Lot 1; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line of Lot 1, a y distance of 29.47 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; ia thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 124 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds, a g ?IN3 distance of 10.64 feet; thence northeasterly, deflecting to the right 55 degrees 03 r, ria minutes 20 seconds, a distance of 94.93 feet; thence northwesterly, deflecting to the 1 j<V left 55 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds, a distance of 165.34 feet; thence northerly, g -gig deflecting to the right 24 degrees 21 minutes 29 seconds, a distance of 179.51 feet; I thence northwesterly, deflecting to the left 68 degrees 51 minutes 37 seconds, a distance of 32.93 feet,to the westerly line of Lot 3,said Block 1,also being the shore of Lake Minnetonka,and said centerline there terminating. Easement Area= 9,667 +/-Sq. Ft. or 0.222 +/-Acres MINNESOTA CERTIFICATION o e • I eracertifyythat thissurvey,plan p rvisowan \ .: C�V 1 1 site prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. G R 0 U P Dated this 8th d- . . - ber,2017 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 200 0 80 160 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 1 / MiEliiMiii CivilSiteGroup.com Rory L.Synstelien Minnesota License No.44565 SCALE IN FEET Project No. 17059 SHEET 1 OF 1 PC 17-3988 P Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 17-3989 17-3990 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Servicespate,h Exhibit H 20-117-j3-24 20,117-23,13 r i cd ce.wi`c ? 20-117-23-31x'9.17-23-42 i. 20-117-23-31 ` ,. \ fa"r�+ 0117= -41_ `�; 20.117:23-34 X20-117-2143 - 2B-1174 -34 20.1 43 Fait i's-is 1 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: l r t i r i 20-117-23-42-0001,0002,0003 RECEIVED For more information contact: # i2 8$ ## 3990 NOv G 2 2B7 Hennepin County GIS Office 300 8th Street South Minneapolis,MN¢6487 # 7 CITY OF ORONO gicirt- RUN DATE:05/12/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LSSI) PAGE:1 38 20-117-23 31 0031 38 20-117-23 42 0006 DAVID J PICHOTTA HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2914 CASCO POINT RD 36 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 DAVID I PICHOTTA HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2914 CASCO POINT RD NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN WAYZATA MN 55391 LAKE MTKA 38 20-117-23 31 0032 38 20.117-23 42 0016 EMMA LOU POWELL WILLIAM S DAMPIER 2916 CASCO POINT RD 3550 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 EMMA LOU POWELL WILLIAM S DAMPIER 2916 CASCO FP RD 3550 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0033 38 20-117.23 42 0017 PAULA N D KANNE/RYAN G KANNE C S PELLETIER&J L GRIVICH 2920 CASCO POINT RD 3548 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT PELLETIER RYAN G KAANE JAMIE LYNNE GRIVICH 2920 CASCO POINT RD 3548 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0041 38 20-117-23 42 0018 PETER M GRAFFUNDER MARY F DRAZAN TRUST 3630 CASCO AVE 3546 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO INN 55391 PETER M GRAFFUNDER MARY F&MICHAEL DRAZAN 3630 CASCO AVE 3546 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-:17-23 3I 0042 38 20.117.23 42 0019 JONG DUK KIM&YOUNG HYI AN RAY F WILSON 3600 CASCO AVE 3534 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ION DUK KIM&YOUNG IIY]AN RAY F WILSON 4700 COVEY TR 3534 IVY PL MEDINA MN 55340 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0043 38 20-117-23 42 0027 M T&AM GERSOVITZ J C WHITE JR&T R WHITE 3650 CASCO AVE 3560 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MITCHELL T/ASTA M OERSOVITZ TERA R&JAMES C WHITE JR 3650 CASCO AVE 3560 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0001 38 20-117-23 42 0033 BARBARA LUPIENT ET AL TRES JONATHAN P&JULIE S PAUL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3532 IVY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 BARBARA LUPIENT JONATHAN P PAUL 7C/O10 WAYZATA AUTOMOTIVE0ORP 353WA IVY PLA 7100WAYZA:'ABLVD#200 WAYZATA MN 55391 # 3 9 (J GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 7 38 20-117-23 42 0002 38 20-117-23 42 0034 BARBARA LUPIENT ET AL TRES TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3545 IVY?L ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 C/O: BARBARA T 3 O 5413 TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC C/O:.UPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 5413 MANITDU RD 7100 WAYZATA BLVD 0200 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 # 9 8 8 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 38 20-117-23 42 0003 38 20-117-23 42 0035 B38 DDRE LUNASSIGNED G AE TRES Ph J SAM/SUSAN M BAZIL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3535 IVY PL ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 BARBARA LUPIENT PETER J&SUSAN M BAZ:L # 3 9 89 C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE OR? 3535 IVY PL 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 WAYZATA MN 55391 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 38 20-117.23 42 0005 i L t y VIL OF ORONO ° `' -- ` 16me. 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN0000' NOVJ 2 ?4'i7 CITY OF ORONO IVUY L PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 Ci"Y OF ORONO } ...., . .. ..... .� .a Dena along one to 1 AVEITYre, 59601M Use Avery®Template 5160® Feed Paper. expose Pop-up Edge*" 38 20-117-23310031 38 20-117-23420006 DAVID 3 PICHOTTA HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 2914 CASCO POINT RD NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN WAYZATA MN 55391 LAKE MTKA 38 20-117-23 31 0032 38 20.117-23 42 0016 EMMA LOU?OWELL WILLIAM S DAMPIER 2916 CASCO PT RD 3550 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-233:0033 38 20-117-23 42 0017 PAULA NUNES DIAS KANNE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT PELLETIER RYAN 0 KAANE JAMIE LYNNE GRIVICH 2920 CASCO POINT RD 3548 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 5539i WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23310041 38 20-117-23 42 0018 PE I h2t M ORAFFUNDER MARY F&MICHAEL DRAZAN 3630 CASCO AVE 3546 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 38 20.117-23 42 0019 JON DUK KIM&YOUNG HY1 AN RAY F WILSON 4700 COVEY TR 3534 IVY PL MEDINA MN 55340 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0043 38 20-I17-23 42 0027 MITCHELL TIASTA M GERSOVITZ TERA R&JAMS C WHITE JR 3650 CASCO AVE 3560 IVY PI, WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0001 38 20-117-23 42 0033 BARBARA LUPIENT JONATHAN P PALL CO LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 3532 IVY PL 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 WAYZATA MN 55391 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 38 20-117-2342 0002 38 20-117-23 420034 BARBARA LUPIENT TONKA BAY DEVELOPMENT LW Ci0 LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 5413 MANITOU RD 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 EXCELSIOR MN 5533! GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 # 3988 38 20-117-2342 0003 38 20-117-23 420035 BARBARA LUPIENT PETER;&SUSAN M BAZIL C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 3535 IVY PL 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 WAYZATA MN 55391 3 9 89 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 RECEIVED P 38 20-117-23420005 CITY OF ORONO7 POBOX 66NOV L2 (:i CRYSTAL BAY MX 55323 #. 39_90 c i i n F 4 c a Etiquettes faciles 6 peeler A Sens de Repllez ala hachure afIn de www.avery.cam Utilisez to gabarit AVERY®5160® 1 rhnmsrinnnt rAv#lar le r hnrrl Pnn-iinMe 1-800-G0-AVERY Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts so produce and publish the most current property information available.Thc viewer should understand.howcva;that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,ores to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. # 3 9 88 # 3 9 89 39 90 ; „, NOV u 2 2017 CITY OF ORONO