Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-17-2017 Planning Commission Packet j Classen j----)IL AGENDA ��- ,.. City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for �01V _ ` r1i11y, L` March 20, 2017; 6:30 PM O _ /-_,-- i #17- 1 #1T-3910 j .r ❑ -14444,,, 4, ..00 Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, i i , '•,� it Orono, MN 55356 %F �� 1 �Q ��� t•', 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us `�kEsHoa` r ii !a_,3_'N\'c7tJ Council Representative: Aaron Printup .• Legend r�'-' �D � � �' New Business Roads _ i•� _ „ yt1. a. Approval of Planning U.STrunkHighway I 8 \` _ ;1___. = Commission MeetingS _ , : Minnesota Trunk Highway . LS -- -1 "� �•• 11 Minutes of February 20, = County Highway i �-20 2017. — Local Roads b. Approval of Planning �= — Private Streets Commission Work Session Railroad ` --- �- Minutes of February1, City Limits 2017. i--j ' ...\-'---k-' tt _�� ‘ 2. 17-3907 Ugorets 8098, Inc., i �V j� s -+ 2500 Shadywood Road, L.,.. 1 `:J _ —Intl Conditional Use Permit ��-a (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 3. 17-3908 Cube, Inc., II \ _� =� .} . 11/1 3320 Navarre Lane,Variances ) `-� (Staff Mike Gaffron) ,,, �t i North s L 4. 17-3909 Ken &Sheralyn Saddler, 1/4-A, �' .� A'"' • Maxwell I t � ( Tanager ` '• G 2755 Ethel Avenue,Variances _, �c :17-381ir tae g (Staff: Mike Gaffron) i �.�, French _ 4'•- . 5. 17-3911 Lakewest, LLC, \ Foes: Mash 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, f .Z cake �� 1 Zoning Code Text Amendment ❑W (Staff Mike Gaffron) S g ' Fj r -3919 1/� ` 6. 17-3910 Lakewest, LLC, , i I 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, #'171K l Conditional Use Permit i ~*'�,� ,'` i r' smith a (Staff Mike Gaffron) _, r 6 /��� �,, `' r 7. 17-3912 Bruce Birkeland, D { __ _:--, �i L• 4; West PID 07-117-23-31-0028 -'1 L1� =Q‘ i Mnes f , \. tar Bohns �' (adjacent to 1298 Wildhurst -•• M�„ �� Trial),Variances -----...r `� • I m : 7 ' S (Staff: Melanie Curtis) O ; pi.,,__ . ,i �. o�a++�,,' 8. 17-3914 Phillip& Darcy Otto, �y Harrison ` • 4116 Highwood Road, 11 � "! (' i = -- _ 1.1. ��`�� ��� i Variance fj�`,. , 4----- .. �JJ(�tY /t 5' � . i (Staff: Melanie Curtis) ���o � . i �Ir11r1//IIAIIi11i11✓r►� � 1� (Y!L/ �y„� �c � � ;� - ��L i 9. 17-3915 Lecy Brothers on behalf of �� - �- ` %Q ���� , Charlie & Nora Daum, �� �� � t� I 1920 Eagerness Point Road, L_A 0 I�I�r/ 1.11 11.IIi11i1 ,ON/ y�� R. Q .+ Variances %� t :�` 7 ` �i. iyanra (Staff: Mike Gaffron) �✓ _ ' 1J. �'�'' } J.. Island 10. 17-3916 Peter Eskuche on behalf of _ t\. nc-- -►g,' f rteere .; j� / Forrest Burke, LII C.,,,../- < y j 1020 Tonkawa Road, A _x Variances / Spring -Sr# ! ti-_ _�_ i A ��� - I _ t St gill Park 7 s _ p Ce,; (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Cook's Bay : o�� ti� h )) Bay eay r /�t�Y = 11. 17-3917 James &Vicki Splinter, 03-20-2017 0 � , „ A. / + ! } 4005 North Shore Drive, t C / PC Mt ... � pQa� /6-q,.._, / ' ,,( �;.,.- r) I - ,- . ' /____ _ Variances g ��r/1� ■ru■umI,iu�a�n.nil�innt (Staff: Melanie Curtis) Disclaimer:�,� ^ ` ,�� ' t Point 12. 17-3919 Amir&Ashley Mehbod, This drawing is neither legally recorded map nota 2625 North Shore Drive, survey and is not intended to be used as one.This 0 2,645 Feet drawing is a compilation of records,information,and data Variance located in various city,county,and state offices,and other sources affecting the area shown,and is to be used for ©Bolton&Menk,lnc-Web GIS 3/15/20179:28AM (Staff: Melanie Curtis) reference purposes only.The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE -;G1.v>. 1-1 21)17 ❑ COUNCIL IP PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Please complete the following information or C y records. PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1.,.(-4� Vlculi e 1 11G.r`-4'►2k 2.1► 3cldA Li 4i. 2. Leve Areleue J 517 / 4 (_.- 3. 3. SCYc\') \110'e\ k o1) 1 ' W 1( \�nk)� `CY�A c�Nn a. 'Mid It 2. /� Gam,' �.�/'/=r� L L%�76-/)-4`' 4. a/,L o :2 V. �JJ 5,._745 , � .p / 6. 1m-zieJ Vic- -,Z- 435 ta,octi P.,c4 m 1+-+ 7. 4,r rig ) -41// 3 f i r, @,d .A4 Iii,hi I)I- 8. ©"y1 Pa,V/55 0)/ h 11 /( lk k- 9. _ - „� 2oc c- Six. C61/44— —� 1 � �10. J 1� ti6it r- ( 5 ./.----'1 ' h-i 11. 1 ern ...C,tpoG(1-0 k)ibkn 0„ 1 .1) _ 12. DePolt I YDy 5 /Av.-ix), /1 r/J 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Kevin Landgraver, Bruce Lemke,Denise Leskinen, and Loren Schoenzeit. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Senior Planner Michael Gaffron,City Planner Melanie Curtis, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Lili Tod McMillan was present. Commissioner Chad Olson arrived at 6:33 p.m. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. NEW BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2016 Schoenzeit moved,Leskinen seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of October 17,2016,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 2. #16-3877 GEORGE STICKNEY ON BEHALF OF BPH PROPERTIES,930 AND 970 PRAIRIE VIEW LANE,AND 1020, 1050, 1100, 1160 AND 1180 MOONEY LAKE DRIVE, VARIANCE,6:32 P.M.—7:04 P.M. George Stickney,BPH Properties,was present. Gaffron stated the applicant, on behalf of the owners of the seven lakeshore lots abutting Mooney Lake, requests a variance to exempt the properties from the average lakeshore setback regulations. The plat was approved last year. An item brought to Staff's attention by one of the builders on the site was that the average lakeshore setback was not addressed in the plat approval resolution. The average lakeshore setback line is predicated on the relationship of the home locations on the immediately adjacent lots. Since Staff does not process very many subdivisions on the lakeshore, it was something that was not addressed as part of the Mooney Lake subdivision review. Gaffron stated the areas depicted in yellow are the locations of the proposed homes. These locations were approved at both preliminary and final plat approval. What was not recognized at the time is depending on the timing, certain homes could be built before others and they could have an impact on the lakeshore setback for a new home going in. Under the ordinance as currently written,administration of the average lakeshore setback is completely reliant on the location of the existing homes on the two adjacent lakeshore lots. When there is no home on one of the adjacent lakeshore lots,the required average setback is defined as the lake setback of the home on the opposite adjacent lot. When neither adjacent lot contains a home,the average setback is undefined, and the applicant's home may be placed at the required lake setback for that zone. Gaffron stated the language could result in some unacceptable scenarios. As it relates to Lot 1,the average setback line is defined by the point of the house on the two adjacent lots closest to the lake. The neighboring house is in the City of Plymouth. The house on Lot 1 will not have an issue if they construct on the proposed location. To build any closer to the lake would be problematic given the steep slope heading down to the lake. Lot 1 in its proposed location will be more than 200 feet from the lake. Page 1 of 26 f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. With regard to Lot 2, the proposed house site is just below the top of a steep slope about 30 feet above the lake and 200 feet from the shoreline. Placing the house any further lakeward would start to encroach on the average setback line and would require extensive grading or filling of the slope. Septic sites are also a limiting factor. It is not likely that this house would move nearer the lake,but if it did,there could be a slight impact on lake views enjoyed by Lots 1 or 3. The proposed house location for Lot 3 is about 150 feet from Mooney Lake and is quite restricted due to the wetland in the southwesterly half of the lot as well as by septic site locations. If the home on Lot 3 was pushed up against the 100-foot lakeshore setback line,there would be no impact on the adjacent lots' views of the lake. The proposed house location on Lot 4 is very near the road and approximately 400 feet from Mooney Lake. The relative distance between the homes and the shape of the lakeshore in this area means that no lake views enjoyed by Lots 3 or 5 will be affected. Although it is not likely,moving the house as far forward as possible toward the lake would not impact the neighbor's views unless the house on Lot 3 is moved far westward. On Lot 5 the possible house locations are very restricted by a wetland, a stormwater pond,topography, and septic sites. Moving the house eastward would require a different grading plan and potentially impact the wetland pond. The house could not move substantially westward,but angling it differently could negatively impact the average setback line for Lot 6. It would have minimal, if any, impact on adjacent homes' lake views. The proposed house location for Lot 6 is approximately 130 feet from Mooney Lake and lies westerly of the previously existing home on this site. If the home on Lot 7 moves west,the average lakeshore setback encroachment for Lot 6 will increase. There would be no impact on the neighbors' lake views even if the home moves forward. With regard to Lot 7,the proposed house location is about 150 feet from Mooney Lake and sits on a terrace just above a 15-20 percent steep slope. If the home on Lot 6 moves lakeward,that reduces the average lakeshore setback encroachment for Lot 7. Moving the house on Lot 7 westward increases the average lakeshore setback encroachment for Lot 6 but has no view impacts. The following unacceptable scenarios could result from strict enforcement of the ordinance: 1. If the first home to be built in the subdivision is on Lot 4,then if Lots 2 or 6 are vacant at the time someone wants to build on Lots 3 or 5,the average setback for Lots 3 or 5 would be established at the 400-foot setback of Lot 4, making Lots 3 and 5 unbuildable. 2. If a home is built on Lot 7 further west than depicted,which would still be conforming,that would potentially make Lot 6 unbuildable because the house on Lot 6 could not be moved further west due to topography and septic constraints. Similarly,because the home site on Lot 5 is relatively inflexible, if the first house goes in on Lot 5 as proposed with no house on Lot 7 when Lot 6 is ready to build,Lot 6 cannot meet the required 200-foot setback established by the house location on Lot 5. Page 2 of 26 } MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffron stated the bottom line from Staff perspective is, regardless of where the homes are built, there is no impact to the views. It is also very likely the homes will be built as shown,but if one is relocated even slightly,there could be an impact on the average setback line for others. Gaffron stated the way to resolve this is to grant a blanket variance over each of the seven lots that establishes conditions of approval that will ensure an appropriate review process in the event of a potential view encroachment. Staff would propose the following variance language and conditions: "The proposed house or possible house site location depictions for Lots 1 through 7,Block 1,as shown on the attached drawings which were established during final plat approval are approved for house construction in the locations depicted. Any substantial relocation of homes lakeward of said depictions, which, in the opinion of the Orono Community Development Director,might impact lake views of one or more adjacent lakeshore lots, may require an average lakeshore setback review by the Planning Commission and City Council." Gaffron stated an encroachment should not occur unless one of the building pads is dramatically altered. In that situation,the application would be brought back before the Planning Commission and City Council for review. Landgraver asked if the timing of when the homes are built is also a factor. Gaffron indicated it is. Gaffron stated if the house on Lot 4 was built first,technically the house on Lot 3 and Lot 5 would need to meet that 400-foot setback. Gaffron stated it is not reasonable to expect those two homes to meet that setback and that a variance should have been approved as part of the plat approval. Lemke asked if the existing house encroaches into the 100-foot setback. Gaffron pointed out the location of the original Dayton house on the overhead and noted that house is no longer there,but did have a slight encroachment. Leskinen asked if this would only come back to the Planning Commission if there was a potential impact on the lake views. Gaffron indicated that is correct. Thiesse asked if it would only come back if it impacts a view of anything that has lakeshore. Gaffron stated it would be the views of the lake. Gaffron noted currently the views of the lake are a function of the shape of the lakeshore. Thiesse asked if Orono's Community Development Director will determine whether there is an impact. Gaffron stated every time a building permit comes in on this development, Staff would review it to see if there are any view impacts. Given the existing layout,there are no view impacts,but if one of the homes does suddenly move to a point where they could impact somebody's view of the lake, it would need to come back before the Planning Commission. Page 3 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse asked if that would also be for the second and third go-around of building 15 to 20 years from now. Gaffron stated he has not looked at that. George Stickney,BPS Properties, stated the situation is a little unique given the new seven lakeshore lots and the fact that Orono's ordinance was made to address existing homes. Stickney stated on a new subdivision, if the seven lots were in a straight line, it would be easier to deal with the average lakeshore setback ordinance. Stickney stated a couple of builders mentioned the average lakeshore setback line to him and Staff and it was felt that this should have been addressed at the time of preliminary and final plat. Stickney noted they have a very strict covenant and architecture review committee for this subdivision and that they will not be allowing any homes to be constructed in the Big Woods. Stickney stated he can come up with some extreme examples,but that it is very unlikely those scenarios will occur. Stickney stated the only lot that might get within 150 feet of the lake with a pool or something may be Lot 3 and that all the homes were planned to be 150 to 200 feet back from the lake. Stickney noted Lots 1 and 2 will probably not get built on for a number of years since they were purchased by the adjacent property owner and that the house pad on Lot 4 is even further back from Lake Mooney. Stickney stated in his view they can handle it on a staff level and that they will also be managing it through the architecture review committee to make sure no one is harmed. Stickney stated it is his understanding the City of Medina does not have an average lakeshore setback ordinance. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:49 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:49 p.m. Leskinen stated in her view a blanket variance is a reasonable solution to a potential problem. Landgraver commented he is in agreement with Commissioner Leskinen and that there should be some termination date for the variance once all the homes are built. Schoenzeit suggested if an average lakeshore setback line is established,they should no longer be exempt. Gaffron stated there still could be potential issues. If Lots 5 and 7 are built exactly as shown,Lot 6 would need an average lakeshore setback encroachment to build where proposed. Thiesse stated the intent of the ordinance is to eliminate any surprises for the neighbors,and if everyone knows where the building pads are to start with,the surprise has been taken away. Thiesse stated his biggest concern is that the variance is shown to someone who wants to purchase a lot and then the owner of the lot next door would not be aware of that since he purchased his property before the variance was granted. Page 4 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Stickney stated they will govern that with the architecture review committee to make sure the houses are placed correctly and that the correct number of trees are cut in the Big Woods. Stickney noted the homes are proposed to be approximately 500 feet away from each other and that it really should not matter. Stickney noted when he was the developer for Brackett's Point,this same problem came up because they could not adhere to the ordinance and a blanket variance was recommended. Stickney stated with proper oversight and control by the homeowners, it should not be a problem. Stickney noted Lot 4 has to stay away from the septic sites and the owners desire a big yard. Stickney stated once those homes are built and the average lakeshore setback is established, it would be very difficult to deviate from that. Schoenzeit commented it is the second generation house that is the concern. Stickney stated given the price range of the homes, it is very unlikely that anyone will be tearing any of them down in the foreseeable future. Thiesse asked if there is a concern with having the neighbors make the determination of who can build closer to the lake and who cannot. Gaffron stated the City still has various other setbacks that would need to be met, in addition to the topography, and that the situation with the average lakeshore setback would be pretty much self- controlling. Gaffron stated based on a lot by lot analysis, he does not feel there are significant issues. Lemke asked what would happen if someone wanted to add on to the house, install an 8-foot fence,or construct an accessory structure lakeward of the house sites. Gaffron indicated someone could put in a pool,which would not obstruct anyone's view, but that they would likely not be allowed to place a building there that obstructs views. A property owner also would not be able to have a fence that is higher than 42 inches lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and no fence would be allowed within 75 feet of the lake. Lemke asked if the blanket variance would only pertain to the principal structure. Gaffron indicated that is correct. Stickney stated there is really no great need for any of the homes to move back or forward and that some of the lots are very limited. Stickney stated the location of the homes will be controlled through the homeowners, staff,the taxpayers, and him. Landgraver noted the City Council approved the final plat and that this is a technical amendment to take into account the timing issues. Landgraver stated his only reservation is that the blanket variance has a termination date, and following completion of construction,the normal rules and regulations would apply. Gaffron stated the only reservation is that Lots 1 and 2 have been purchased by the adjacent neighbor to the east and that it is likely they will not be built on for a number of years. Leskinen asked if it possible to add language in the blanket variance that this variance applies to the original homes in this plat so that subsequent redevelopment would not have the ability to take advantage of the blanket variance. Page 5 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Gaffron concurred that type of language would probably make the most sense. Schoenzeit stated in many ways the expectations with this development are that the yellow pads will be the building pads. Thiesse asked if Mr. Stickney is okay with the blanket variance only applying to the original homes in the development. Stickney stated the building pads would still get reviewed and they will have to comply with the covenants. Landgraver noted the blanket variance would supersede the covenants. Stickney stated given the nature and size of the properties,they will have enough room to build and have a yard. Stickney stated he will not allow anyone to be 100 feet from the lake. Landgraver noted the suggested language by Staff states the community development director will make the determination and that he would suggest the language also include"or a similar staff person" since titles could change. Leskinen moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3877, George Stickney on behalf of BPH Properties,930 and 970 Prairie View Lane,and 1020, 1050, 1100, 1160, and 1180 Mooney Lake Drive, granting of a blanket variance as proposed to exempt the seven lots from the average lakeshore average setback regulations, subject to making the variance applicable to the original homes only,and subject to the language being revised to say the community development director or similar city agent. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 3. #16-3879 SCENIC SIGN CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF LUNDS REAL ESTATE, 3333 SHORELINE DRIVE,VARIANCE, 7:04 P.M.—7:22 P.M. Mike Edreti, Scenic Sign Corporation, was present. Barnhart stated the applicant proposes to construct a pole type style sign 18 feet high,0.0 feet from the property line. A monument style sign, no higher than ten feet, set back at least ten feet from the property line is permitted in the business zoning districts. Barnhart stated the notification area included properties within 350 feet,with the large majority of the properties being commercial. Barnhart noted an email comment was received late this afternoon expressing a concern regarding the visibility of the sign. Barnhart stated the proposed sign is 18 feet,two inches tall and 36.22 square feet. The original pylon sign was 43.5 square feet and 8 feet, 2 inches from grade to the top of the sign and was removed in May of 2015. The proposed sign will be located at the property line in the northeast corner of the site. A portion of the right-of-way juts into the Lund's property to accommodate some traffic control devices. The proposed sign will also include two brick veneer columns. The veneer will match the veneer used in the principal structure. The sign structure will include a standing seam metal roof over the sign face, which will be green and backlit. Page 6 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart displayed pictures of the proposed sign and the existing sign. Barnhart noted there is an opening space between the two legs of the sign to allow for some visibility under the sign provided no cars are parked in that area. Staff does not have a concern with visibility for cars traveling along Shoreline Drive. Barnhart stated the proposed sign appears to meet the intent of sign regulations and provides opportunities for clear commercial communication in a way that does not impact the traveling public. The subject property, due to its development pattern established over the past several decades,has limited locations for freestanding signage that would not remove parking stalls. The planned two pole structure attempts to emulate the design goals of the monument sign regulations while preserving its functionality by elevating it above the parked cars. Staff supports the variances as requested. Thiesse asked if Staff has an idea of the height of the canopies and other signs in the area. Barnhart indicated he did not measure them but noted that there are two Holiday gas stations on the east side. Barnhart displayed pictures of the nearby signs. Landgraver commented this sign appears to be taller based on the view perspectives. Barnhart stated the ordinance requirement talks about how the accessory structure should not be taller than the principal structure and this would be lower than that. Landgraver asked how the sign is lit. Ross Elenkiwich, Lunds, stated the sign is lit internally and that the only part of the sign that would be lit up is the white part. Lemke asked if the parking spaces would be reduced. Barnhart displayed an aerial photo of the site and pointed out the location of the sign. Barnhart stated the parking lot presents some challenges and that the site has been maximized from a parking perspective. Barnhart stated Staff was unable to find any additional parking spaces. Thiesse asked if the 0.0 foot setback is from the recessed area and not the real right-of-way for the road. Barnhart indicated that is correct. Lemke asked if permission needs to be obtained from the highway department or any other governmental agency for the sign. Barnhart indicated Staff did submit the proposal to the Hennepin County Transportation Department but they have not yet commented. The sign will be located entirely on the Lund's property and there should not be any additional approvals necessary. Thiesse asked if any construction would occur within the right-of-way. Page 7 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart noted the overhang of the sign would be at the property line and that no construction should occur within the right-of-way. Elenkiwich stated some construction occurred back in 2015 when the original permit was issue but the construction was stopped. There is currently some plywood over the hole. Thiesse stated his concern is whether any portion of the sign would be within the right-of-way. Elenkiwich stated it would not be. Landgraver asked if the sign would be lit 24 hours. Elenkiwich indicated the sign would be on 24 hours as well as the lights in the parking lot but that the sign is not very bright and is low voltage signage. Elenkiwich stated there is no down lighting within the canopy. Elenkiwich stated they are excited to do this project. Lunds has recently completed a big addition on the front of the building as well as a small addition for a seating area. Elenkiwich stated they have updated the appearance of the store and they are glad they are able to help redevelop the area. Landgraver commented it has always been the intent of the City to upgrade the Navarre area and Lunds' efforts are appreciated and within the spirit of what the City would like to see in Navarre. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Thiesse stated he was questioning the need for the sign until he saw the photographs. Thiesse pointed out the sign may or may not be seen if a van is parked next to it,which raises a practical difficulty. In addition,the Holiday sign appears to be higher than this sign. Landgraver noted the email raised some objections to the sign but that the Planning Commission has discussed the lighting and the visibility. Schoenzeit stated the lighting is very point specific,and from a height standpoint,the addition is higher than the sign. Elenkiwich indicated it is. Landgraver stated in his view it addresses the concerns expressed in the email. Thiesse stated since it is set back on the other piece of the right-of-way,he is comfortable with the location. Lemke asked how large the island is. Page 8 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Elenkiwich stated it appears to be about 30 feet wide. The original intention was to landscape that entire area. Elenkiwich stated they would like to add more greenscape to that area to help soften the appearance of the corner. Landgraver moved,Olson seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3879, Scenic Sign Corporation on behalf of Lunds Real Estate,3333 Shoreline Drive,granting of a sign variance and a sign height variance. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 4. #16-3880 EVERLAST ENTERPRISES,INC.,230 TONKA AVENUE,VARIANCES,7:22 P.M.—7:28 P.M. A representative from Everlast Enterprises was present. Curtis stated the property owner is proposing to demolish the existing structure and construct a new two- story residence on the property. The applicant is requesting the following variances in order to do so: 1. A setback variance for a 30-foot setback where a 50-foot setback is required from Tonka. 2. A setback variance for a 40-foot setback from the undeveloped Brook Street on the north side where a 50-foot setback is required. 3. Because the property is a nonconforming lot of record and does not meet the area and width standards, lot area and lot width variances are also required. All the other zoning standards will be met. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties supporting the requested variances to redevelop the property. The setbacks proposed are consistent with the neighborhood and offers a greater separation from the home to the south. Staff recommends approval of the variances conditioned upon compliance with the City Engineer's comments relating to the grading site plan at the time of building permit. No public comments have been received. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. The Applicant stated he is here to answer questions. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Thiesse asked if it is possible to position the house north and south to eliminate the side yard setback. Curtis indicated that is correct. The applicants felt by positioning the house as proposed they have more distance between them and the neighbor to the south. The area to the north is likely to never be Page 9 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. developed since it is a platted alley. The other piece that separates the alley from the Luce Line is not available land to make a cul-de-sac since both streets are very tight dead-ends. Curtis stated for all intents and purposes,the applicants are meeting the 30-foot setback but they do technically require a 50-foot setback on the north. Thiesse stated he agrees with that but that he felt the issue needed to be discussed. Lemke moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3880,Everlast Enterprises,Inc.,230 Tonka Avenue, granting of lot area,lot width,and setback variances. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 5. #16-3881 CHARLES CUDD,2525, 2535,AND 2545 SHADYWOOD ROAD,EASEMENT VACATION, 7:28 P.M.—7:32 P.M. The Applicant was not present. Barnhart stated the developer has been working on final plat for this development. The Planning Commission has reviewed this development on a number of occasions. On the overhead screen is the final plat, which is very similar to the preliminary plat. One of the things noted during the final plat review is that this property was originally platted as Leach Addition,which consisted of two lots on Shadywood and one lot fronting Kelly Avenue. At that time drainage and utility easements covered the property lines. There is also a conservation flowage agreement over the wetland. The action being requested this evening is to vacate those easements. Replacement drainage and utility easements will be provided by the applicant to correspond with the new lot configuration. The conservation flowage easement will be replaced to cover the wetland. In the view of Staff,this is a housekeeping measure and accommodates the new final plat. Schoenzeit asked if there is no erase function for the underlying easements from a County standpoint when an existing property is replatted. Barnhart stated that is correct and that the applicants need to go through this process. Barnhart noted not all plats have easements and not all plats require vacation of the easements,but in this particular situation the easements do not correspond with the new lot lines. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Schoenzeit moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3881, Charles Cudd,2525,2535, and 2545 Shadywood Road, granting of an easement vacation, subject to the easement vacation being recorded as part of the platting documents for Shadywood Villas. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. Page 10 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. 6. #16-3882 JON RESSLER,3683 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,VARIANCE, 7:32 P.M.—7:35 P.M. Jon Ressler,Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to add an elevator dormer to his home which is under construction currently. The location of the elevator dormer will be approximately 70 feet from the lake where a 75- foot lake setback applies. The dormer will result in a bump-out upwards from the roof on the northeast side approximately four and a half feet wide and a 6.5 foot wide roof. A lake setback variance is required. The 10-foot side yard setback will be met. Staff finds that the location of the property as it is tucked in below the county road and served by a private frontage road, combined with the 75-foot setback, has practical difficulties in the limited buildable area. In addition,the footprint of the existing home has nonconforming setbacks on three sides. The proposed dormer for the elevator is a minimal addition to the approved home in this location. The improvement on the landward side of the home will likely not be visibly intrusive from the lake. Planning Staff recommends approval of the lake setback variance to permit the elevator dormer as proposed. Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Jon Ressler stated he would be able to answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Landgraver asked where the bump-out would be. Curtis displayed a sketch of the house and illustrated the elevator dormer. Thiesse asked if the shaft is already constructed. Ressler indicated it is. Thiesse asked if the shingles will be taken off and the dormer added. Ressler stated they were initially not planning on having an access there but that the third floor access became important as kind of an afterthought. Ressler indicated the elevator will be added later when they can afford it. Thiesse stated since the shaft is already there, he does not have any concerns. Landgraver stated in his view it will not be visibly intrusive. Page 11 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke moved,Leskinen seconded,to recommend Application No. 16-3882,Jon Ressler,3683 North Shore Drive, granting of a lake setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 7. #16-3884 JEFF AND PIA SCHUTT,2750 CACO POINT ROAD,APPEAL,7:35 P.M.— 8:07 P.M. Michael Schutt, son of Jeff and Pia Schutt,was present. Curtis stated the applicants have constructed a narrow pergola or arbor over an 11-foot long retaining wall. The retaining wall is located less than two feet from the side lot line and is detached from the home adjacent to a patio. Because pergolas are not specifically outlined in the Code, Staff reviewed the pergola against the accessory structure and non-encroachment standards. Accessory structures less than 750 square feet are addressed in the non-encroachment provisions and are permitted no less than five feet from a rear lot line and ten feet from a side lot line. In an effort to find an appropriate regulation, Staff alternatively looked at the fencing regulations as the pergola is lineal similar to a fence. In the encroachment section regarding fencing,the pergola in the current location would need to be reduced to no greater than six feet in height to meet the fence maximum. In order to close out their permit and receive a certificate of occupancy for the new home on the property,the pergola issue must be satisfactorily resolved. The applicants have opted to appeal the decision of Staff on this matter. The appeal process provides an opportunity for an applicant to present facts and prove that the City official erred in applying the Code. The applicants contend that Section Al under the non-encroachment section is applicable. Staff would note that that section relates to building elements which are attached to the building and are permitted to encroach up to two feet into a required side yard setback, still requiring on this property that the structure needs to be at least eight feet from the lot line. The pergola is approximately two feet from the property line. The Planning Commission should review the application and make a decision regarding the appeal. Thiesse asked if there is any City ordinance that would construe that the structure is in the right spot. Curtis indicated Staff was not able to find any. Landgraver asked if a landscape plan was submitted. Curtis stated this is new construction and there was a landscape plan submitted. Curtis noted there was a French drain shown on the landscape plan in the approximate location of the pergola. The builder assured Staff that the French drain is there but that is one of the features Staff has requested be shown on the revised as-built survey. Landgraver noted the Planning Commission did review a landscape plan and to his recollection the pergola was not included. Page 12 of 26 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Michael Schutt stated he is here tonight to answer questions on behalf of his parents since they are out of the country at the present time. Schutt stated given the fact that there is no structural integrity to the feature,the question is whether it should be defined as a pergola, an arbor, or a fence. Curtis displayed a picture of the structure. Schutt noted the retaining wall was needed for the drainage from the neighboring property and that the structure is an enhancement. Schutt indicated the adjacent neighbor is very much in favor of it and believes it adds to the aesthetics of her property as well. Schutt stated they would like to get some clarity on it. Thiesse asked if any public comments were received. Curtis indicated Staff did not receive any comments but that this was not noticed for a public hearing since it is an appeal and the neighbors were not specifically notified. Lemke asked if the retaining wall was included in the original plan. Curtis stated there was a patio and the French drain included in the plan but to her recollection the retaining wall was not included. It is Staff's belief that it is not a retaining wall but rather a sitting wall. Thiesse noted there is also a boulder wall that is adjacent to it but that this is more of a sitting wall. Curtis stated they are different. Thiesse asked if this would have required a variance if the Planning Commission had seen this originally. Curtis stated the wall at its current would likely have been allowed but it is the height of the structure that is at issue. Schoenzeit stated in some ways this is semantics, and that if it were a trellis with some type of plant growing on it, it would not be an issue. Schoenzeit stated the City would also want to make sure it does not expand. Schoenzeit stated the fact that there is not a lean-to on the house currently helps the situation. Lemke asked if a trellis would be allowed in this location. Landgraver noted the issue is the height of the structure. Schoenzeit asked if it being classified as a fence because of its length. Curtis stated Staff is not necessarily calling it a fence but were merely attempting to find a regulation that would apply to it. Leskinen noted it would not be allowed as a fence given its height. Barnhart stated the Planning Commission should look at the code and determine whether Staff misapplied the code to this situation. Barnhart stated while it might be a nice addition to the area, Staff could not find any code to allow it. Barnhart noted a stone wall is permissible up to 42 inches high depending on its location,but once the wood structure is added,the height is restricted. Page 13 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit asked as part of the appeal process whether there is any way to test whether the code was misapplied versus whether an after-the-fact variance is more applicable. Barnhart stated the applicants could apply for an after-the-fact variance. Thiesse noted that would be a separate process. Schoenzeit stated the issue is whether the code was applied incorrectly. Thiesse noted he asked if there is any code or regulation in the City that would allow it and the answer was no. Thiesse stated every time a different name is given to it, something else comes up prohibiting it. Schutt stated one of the issues is that no one has been able to apply a name to it since it is merely there for aesthetics. Schutt stated they are asking for some lenience on the structure given the fact that it is more or less an aesthetic structure. Schutt noted the wall was needed for drainage purposes and that they added the structure on top of it as an enhancement. Thiesse stated no matter what it is called, it is too high and the wall, since it serves as the foundation, is too close to the property line. Curtis stated the accessory structure regulations are pretty all-encompassing and allows a number of different structures but require five feet at the rear and ten feet into the side for the setbacks. Curtis stated from the standpoint of not calling it a fence but applying the fence standards to it, Staff was attempting to find a little leeway. Lemke stated in his view it serves the same purpose as an arbor and that he would call it an arbor. Leskinen noted even as an arbor, it would be considered an accessory use. Leskinen commented it is too high and too close to the property line no matter what it is called. Schutt stated it was included in all the original plans and was there when the property was inspected on different occasions. Schutt stated the difficulty was to depict it adequately on the plans given its height. Schutt indicated it was not until the final inspection that it caused concern. Schoenzeit asked if the circumstances would be different if it was a purchased sculpture and placed there with a forklift. Curtis stated it becomes a question of whether it is furniture, like a lawn chair or umbrella, or something that is seasonal. Curtis noted this was constructed onsite and is permanent. Thiesse stated it comes back to no matter what you call it, it is not allowed. Thiesse stated the role of the Planning Commission tonight is to verify whether the code was applied correctly, and if the applicants are not satisfied with the outcome,they could apply for an after-the-fact variance. Olson asked if the property owners were misguided and they were led to believe it was approved. Curtis stated to her recollection the original plan did not show a wall but depicted a patio in that location. Page 14 of 26 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schutt stated it has been a part of the plan from the beginning and it was not until the final inspection that it became an issue. Curtis stated City inspectors are normally called out to look at a specific feature, such as plumbing or framing. The inspectors are onsite for a limited amount of time and are there to look at a specific thing. Curtis noted this is a small feature, did not cause a drainage problem, and the neighbors have not complained about it. At the time of the final as-built inspection,the inspector walks the site,he takes photographs, and then meets with Staff to ensure that the project complies with the plans. Curtis stated Staff realizes there will be changes to landscape plans because they are somewhat,which is why that was not called out by any of the inspectors. Thiesse noted the role of the Planning Commission is only to discuss whether the code was applied correctly and that it appears the code was applied correctly. Landgraver stated as a service to the community,he would not want to say that all the applicants need to do is apply for an after-the-fact variance since that may not be approved. Landgraver stated he remembers discussing the patio since it was close to the edge of the property but that he does not remember discussing anything vertical in that area. Landgraver stated had there been something like this discussed,he probably would have had a concern about it. Landgraver indicated he tends to agree that Staff has attempted to find a way to say yes but that the height is the issue. Landgraver stated he is inclined to think the criteria used by Staff was correct and that he would tend to deny the appeal. Landgraver stated he also is concerned whether it will get a variance if it is at six feet. Curtis stated at that point Staff would probably apply the fence standards again. Schutt indicated it is 7.5 feet high and lines up exactly with the roofline on the house. Schutt stated bringing it down to six feet would result in it being directly in the line of sight from the house. Schoenzeit asked if this arbor was included in any of the elevations that were submitted to the City. Schutt stated he does not feel comfortable answering that question at this time. Curtis stated Staff could look at that. Curtis indicated she does not remember that being included and that typically landscape elements are not included in the building plans except for perhaps an egress window or a change in grade or where a retaining wall is necessary. Schoenzeit stated if it were included in the approved elevations at 7.5 feet, that would change the discussion. Curtis stated if it was not something that was called out in Staff's plan review or permitted, she is not sure that it would be approved by default. Curtis stated she is relatively confident it was not included in the building plan and that it is more of a landscaping element. Curtis stated the house is also right at the limitation for structural coverage and that this would have been an issue given its height. Schoenzeit moved,Landgraver seconded,Application No. 16-3884,Jeff and Pia Schutt,2750 Casco Point Road,to recommend denial of the appeal. Page 15 of 26 MINUTES OF THE • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Olson stated if the applicants were misguided at all in building this structure,they now have to tear it down and incur costs. Olson stated he is not sure if that is the case,but if it is the case,he has an issue with the applicants incurring costs to do that, especially if it was not their fault. Thiesse stated what he is hearing is that Staff did not tell them any one thing but that the applicants understood one thing but it was not on the plans. Thiesse stated if the applicants can come up with any documents that show it was included in the plans that were reviewed,they could bring it back. Right now the Planning Commission is talking about whether the existing code was applied correctly Schoenzeit stated if the applicants want to attempt to keep it,they can apply for an after-the-fact variance. Landgraver asked how much time the applicants would have to appeal the Planning Commission decision. Curtis indicated they would need to appeal the Planning Commission's decision within ten days. Thiesse asked if an after-the-fact variance would be necessary if they can show it was included in the plans. Barnhart stated if it is denied at the City Council level,the applicants will have exhausted their appeals, and another avenue might be an after-the-fact variance request. Thiesse asked if they would have to apply for an after-the-fact variance if the plans show the structure on it. Barnhart stated if Staff told them they could keep it during the review process,the remedy is not that Staff erred in applying the ordinance but rather the fact that they were misguided could be considered a hardship. Barnhart noted as-built surveys are required because things are sometimes fluid and typically it is not an issue. Curtis stated that is one of the reasons why a landscape plan is required. Curtis stated Staff requires the landscape plan to be shown on the survey. When the applicants came in for a building permit,they had a survey and a landscape plan that should have been incorporated into the survey. Curtis stated Staff is not interested in plantings but rather interested in hardscape. Curtis stated what Staff is approving is the survey. Schoenzeit stated if the applicants had provided elevations for the structure,this would be a different discussion. Landgraver asked if he would able to find documentation within ten days. Schutt indicated his parents should be back within the next ten days and that it is his belief they have all the appropriate documentation. Schutt stated he appeared tonight to show that they are willing to work with the City. Curtis stated Staff will also take another look at all the materials that were submitted. Page 16 of 26 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schutt stated if there is documentation showing that,they would be willing to submit that. Lemke asked what would happen if it was depicted on the plans. Curtis stated even if it was on the plans and somehow it appears to have been approved by Staff by omission, Staff still does not have the ability to grant a variance. Leskinen noted what is before the Planning Commission right now is whether Staff applied the ordinance correctly based on the information they have before them tonight. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 8. #16-3878 CITY OF ORONO,TEXT AMENDMENT EMERGENCY DOCKS, 8:07 P.M.— 8:45 P.M. Barnhart noted last April the City Council adopted an ordinance that allowed docks controlled by Hennepin County to allow boats to get in and out of Lake Minnetonka in a rapid manner. Discussion centered around what protections should be in place. The issue is that there is a dock that does not have a principal residence. The Planning Commission and City Council also expressed a concern about the aesthetics of the dock and nearby area and use of the area for unintended purposes. As a result of those discussions,the Planning Commission proposed an added clause that there be a fence and gate. Since it is a permitted use in the LR-1A,there was a site plan review. Also reviewed at that time was parking at the site. Ultimately the City came up with a new ordinance amendment that identified a county dock that would be owned and operated by Hennepin County solely for the purpose of facilitating lake to ground transportation of patrons in emergency or law enforcement situations. The original allows this as a permitted use in the LR-1A zoning district. The five criteria directly connected to this use included that it would need to be directly connected to Hennepin County right-of- way, no overnight boat storage,no canopies blocking visibility from lakeshore properties,the dock must be secured by a fence and gate, and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District also needed to approve the dock. Barnhart stated late this fall members of the Long Lake Fire Department approached the City requesting the ability to store a boat on Lake Minnetonka to facilitate emergency response. The Long Lake Fire Department does have a boat that they can use. The City Council suggested an amendment to the ordinance be considered that would allow the Long Lake Fire Department to use the dock and store its boat there during the overnight hours to allow for quick access to the lake. This would be an alternative to trailering the boat to various locations. Staff's recommendation is to eliminate the no overnight boat storage clause from the ordinance. The other four clauses would still remain. It would remain Hennepin County's dock but they would allow the Long Lake Fire Department to use it if they approve the ordinance amendment. Barnhart stated the City wants to avoid opening it up to other entities having docks on the lake and that the ordinance has been very narrowly tailored to these two outside agencies. Barnhart noted Fire Chief Van Eyll is present tonight to provide some feedback to the Planning Commission. Page 17 of 26 MINUTES OF THE • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Lemke asked why overnight boat storage was not allowed originally. Barnhart stated to his knowledge part of the concern was that the City wanted to avoid Hennepin County using this dock as kind of a satellite office versus the one in Spring Lake Park. Thiesse stated it is a fairly prevalent non-developed property and that it does not need to have a number of boats. Lemke asked how many boats can be accommodated. Barnhart indicated it largely depends on the depth of the water but perhaps three or four. Some of the issues initially raised will be reviewed again as part of this ordinance amendment. The City did receive site plan approval for the dock, fence,and gate. Barnhart noted this would be a modification to the site plan if approved and that the City will have to review all of those same issues. Thiesse asked if the fence and gate will be removed. Barnhart stated the fence is there. Fire Chief James Van Eyll stated the fence and gate were added once the dock was put in place after the 4th of July. Gaffron stated it is a clerical error that it was not included in the draft ordinance. Thiesse asked if Long Lake trailers their boat now and whether there is a reason why it could not be stored at a marina. Van Eyll stated there is one marina they have been speaking with and some of it relates to cost and the other part is traffic. Lemke asked if the Long Lake Fire Department is the responsible agency for any emergencies on Big Island. Van Eyll indicated they are the responding agency to any emergencies that happen on Big Island. Landgraver asked if this would limit them in any way in responding to other bodies of water. Van Eyll indicated it does but that they also utilize a smaller Zodiak boat that they use on the smaller lakes. Landgraver asked if by putting the larger boat at this site whether they are limiting their responsiveness to other bodies of water. Van Eyll stated they would be slowing the response time but not limiting it. Schoenzeit asked if the boat is tarped. Page 18 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Van Ey11 indicated the boat is exposed. The boat does have a small canopy or small top over where the captain sits but the rest of it is exposed to the elements. Schoenzeit asked if it will be left that way. Van Ey11 stated it will be left that way similar to the way it has been left for the past nine or ten years. Van Eyll indicated the majority of the surface of the boat is diamond plated and that exposure to the elements is not a big deal. Van Eyll stated they do have some seat covers that need to be replaced every few years. Landgraver asked if the Long Lake Fire Department have had discussions with Hennepin County regarding this. Van Eyll stated Council Member Walsh approached the sheriff about it and they came back and said that the City Council needs to discuss this and allow overnight boat storage before any other discussions can occur with Hennepin County. Landgraver asked if they believe Hennepin County will agree with this. Van Eyll stated he is hopeful that they will. Landgraver asked what would happen if Hennepin County does not agree to it. Barnhart stated the City could amend the ordinance back. Thiesse suggested that they phrase it as a singular Long Lake Fire Department boat. Barnhart stated he typically attempts to avoid situations where ordinances are so specific because it can cause issues later on down the road. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Richard Crosby,2705 Walters Port Lane, Orono, stated as a retired firefighter,he realizes response time is extremely important and that trailering a boat to a rescue does not work and basically adds 15 to 20 minutes to that time. Crosby stated this is a perfect spot for a fire boat and that he has had personal conversations with Sheriff Rich Stanek,who is behind this idea 100 percent. Crosby commented this is a perfect location and would allow them to serve the north bays, Crystal Bay,and Lake Minnetonka. Crosby stated in his view this is a terrific idea and the only caveat right now is the restriction on overnight boat storage. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:20 p.m. Thiesse commented he has mixed emotions over this and that he is concerned about safety but he also is concerned about scope creep. Thiesse noted Bederwood Park was going to have a temporary ball park and 15 years later it is still there. Thiesse noted Orono does not allow residents to share a dock but that issue has come up numerous times. Page 19 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated on the other hand,while safety is important, if the boat is at this location,they would be decreasing the response time to other lakes. Van Eyll noted in ten years they have had one rescue on another lake other than Lake Minnetonka. Thiesse stated asked if they would need to go up to Maxwell Bay. Van Eyll indicated that is correct. Thiesse stated in his mind there is risk,there is scope creep, and other issues that need to be addressed before changing the ordinance. Lemke stated safety is the most important factor and that it would be quicker to go anyplace on Lake Minnetonka from this location than to launch the boat from Maxwell Bay. Thiesse concurred that safety is the number one issue. Schoenzeit stated he does not see a problem with this spot and that safety takes precedent over some of the other issues. Schoenzeit stated if it becomes a problem, the City can revisit it,and that the Planning Commission should not stand in the way of safety. Lemke asked if Commissioner Thiesse is concerned about the aesthetics as well. Thiesse stated he is. Thiesse stated things tend to creep along and that sooner or later they will be asking for a canopy. Olson stated it sounds like there are ongoing conversations with a couple of marinas. Olson asked if the Planning Commission could table this to see how those conversations end up and what the costs might be. Thiesse stated that is an option. Schoenzeit stated there also is the issue of the boat rocking with the waves. Schoenzeit asked if there is a light at this location. Van Eyll stated to his recollection there is not power at that location. Schoenzeit stated in his view a request for a canopy will be next if they are to store a boat there. Landgraver asked how much the response time would improve. Van Eyll stated since July of 2006 to July of 2015,the Long Lake Fire Department responded to 66 calls for service for Boat 11. The average response time to put the boat in the water was eight minutes and the average response time to arrive at the scene was 13 minutes. Van Eyll noted it was necessary to respond to only 43 of those 66 calls with the boat since the other calls were cancelled in route. Van Eyll stated since the boat has not been docked on Lake Minnetonka,they have had to respond to five calls where they had to put the boat in the water. The average response time to go into service was 17 minutes for the boat and the average on scene time was 32 minutes. Page 20 of 26 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit asked how they deal with the no wake zone near Maxwell Bay. Van Ey11 indicated they have been told by Hennepin County Water Patrol that they can exceed the no wake restriction but that they have to yield the right-of-way. Schoenzeit commented going through the channel at Maxwell is probably one of the most dangerous issues they have under the current system. Van Eyll pointed out the majority of the calls come from north of Big Island or in that area and that Hennepin County is responsible for all calls in the water. Van Eyll stated Long Lake is the responding agency out to Big Island but that they do assist Hennepin County periodically depending on the location of the call. Thiesse asked if safety will not necessarily be at risk since there is another agency out there. Van Eyll sated when the Water Patrol is out there,that would be correct. Thiesse asked how often the Water Patrol is out there. Van Eyll indicated he does not know their schedule and would not be able to answer that question. Leskinen asked if the Water Patrol keeps a boat on the lake. Van Eyll stated they have some boats on the lake but that he is not sure how many at any particular time. Thiesse asked if the Water Patrol dock would be a good place to keep the Long Lake Fire Department's boat. Van Eyll indicated the Water Patrol is allotted so many boat slips and those are filled. Van Eyll noted the Water Patrol did allow the DNR to dock a boat there but then disallowed that. Thiesse stated he would like them to check other locations. Crosby stated every major fire department has a boat on the lake except for the Long Lake Fire Department and that they cover more lakeshore than any other city. Crosby stated he does not care about the aesthetics and that aesthetics are not really in play here. Crosby noted last year two people drowned on Lake Minnetonka and others were rescued and that safety is a major thing. Crosby stated it is about quick response time, accessibility, and response to the residents on the lake. All the agencies work in tangent. Thiesse stated he will not argue with that but that the two people who drowned would have been the responsibility of Hennepin County. Thiesse asked if their boat is going to be in the way. Crosby stated they would not be in the way since there are several sides to the dock. Crosby stated Long Lake would be assisting Hennepin County and that the more boats and apparatus there is on the lake,the more effective they are as a unit. Crosby stated trailering a boat to a rescue does not work and that this would make a tremendous difference. Page 21 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated it appears this is a perfect spot for everybody and last year the City allowed Hennepin County to have a dock there. Thiesse stated now Long Lake wants to have a boat there and he is wondering who will be next. Thiesse stated he is asking them to also look at different spots. Crosby noted this area is still within the City of Orono. Crosby asked why the City would prohibit it as long as the sheriff's department does not have an issue with it. Crosby stated he would like to move forward with this. Thiesse commented he is not ready to do that yet. Lemke asked where the other fire departments store their boats. Crosby stated Wayzata stores theirs at the Wayzata city dock. Van Eyll stated Mound has a dock just down from their fire station. Crosby stated to his understanding St. Bonifacious has one at the far western edge of the lake. Van Eyll stated he is not sure whether they do or not. Gaffron asked how many vehicles show up when they respond and how the parking situation will be. Gaffron asked whether there will be three or four vehicles responding. Van Eyll stated the response consists of the duty officer going directly to the dock to start readying the boat and then there is a dual response from both stations. Van Eyll stated they would go there,drop the people and equipment off if it is a Big Island fire call, and then leave the area. Gaffron stated one of the early discussions revolved around parking potentially becoming an issue. Schoenzeit commented there will definitely be a gawker slowdown on the road. Van Eyll stated there was one situation where they ended up having to direct traffic to keep people moving along. Lemke asked if the majority of the problems occur on the weekends. Van Eyll indicated most of the problems occur over the 4th of July holiday,with the rest mainly occurring on the weekends. Lemke asked if it would make sense to store the boat there just on the weekends. Van Eyll stated from a volunteer standpoint, it would be difficult to get someone to put it in the water on Friday afternoon and then take it out on Sunday evening. Crosby commented it is a very large boat and all steel. Leskinen asked if the boat would be on the water May through November. Page 22 of 26 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Van Eyll stated it was be during the boating season,which typically starts when the buoys go out. This year was an extended boating season and the last few boats have just been pulled out of the water Lemke stated his preference would be to table it and that they do not need to do anything at this time of the year. Lemke suggested the Long Lake Fire Department perhaps explore some marinas in the meantime. Schoenzeit stated he is not seeing the same issues and that in his view this should be rubber stamped given the safety issues. Leskinen commented there are probably details about boating that she is missing but that she does not see it being needed this minute. Leskinen agreed that safety and quick response time is important. Van Eyll stated the issue with tabling it is that they also have to go before Hennepin County and that they would like to put the boat in the water in March. Van Eyll stated it will probably be at least February before they get a decision from Hennepin County. Schoenzeit commented the City's hesitation also sends a bad message to Hennepin County. Crosby stated the problem with tabling the discussion is that it will delay the process. Crosby stated in his view this will get done but that they do not want to look at it after another death. Thiesse stated he does not want to see it tonight for the first time and have two people telling him that it is the best thing in the world because he has other people who are saying there are issues. Crosby stated this is the first step that lets them move ahead and that it is not just rubber stamping it. Thiesse stated he would like them to research response times from marinas, storing the boat there from Fridays to Sundays, and a little more effort put into this rather than just saying it is a great idea and let's do it. Landgraver stated he also fears stealth creep with this. Landgraver stated to the extent that it is not an undue burden, he would like to see an overall plan. Landgraver suggested they look at other marinas,this spot,trailering the boat, and then present the different response times. Landgraver stated the safety issue is a compelling case but that they need to research whether this is the best spot. Schoenzeit commented it is probably the nicest dock for egress given the wide, sloping dock. Crosby stated they can compare marina fees but that they probably cannot be at the old Sailors World since marina fees are around$5,000 a year. Crosby noted this dock would basically service the north area and that this is literally the perfect place for it. Crosby stated if they just went to North Shore Marina and Maxwell Bay,they would have to come all the way south to where the action is and that would be a problem. Crosby commented it is more fiscally responsible,the best location available,and allows the best access time to where the action is. Landgraver stated he is hearing that now,but if they were to present this to the Council,they need to have a compelling case for why it makes sense. Page 23 of 26 MINUTES OF THE • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. Van Ey11 stated he agrees,and that the first step in the process is to request to remove the language prohibiting overnight boat storage from the ordinance. Thiesse stated he would like more information and that they need to show him that it is the best place. Barnhart stated there are two parts to this application. The first part is to amend the ordinance so discussions can be had with Hennepin County. The other part is the formal approval of the site. The draft ordinance removes the overnight storage issue, which is an issue that the Planning Commission is struggling with. Barnhart indicated the Planning Commission could add overnight storage as a conditional use, and those issues in terms of parking, access,durability of the boat,those could be reviewed as part of a conditional use permit. Schoenzeit commented that would allow for additional discussion and they could prove that it is the best location in the interests of public safety. Barnhart stated that would also address the concern of the City with Hennepin County wanting to store their boat there at some point. Thiesse commented that is a brilliant suggestion.' Landgraver stated part of the role of the Planning Commission is to vet applications and that the requirement for a conditional use permit forces the discussion on some of the details. Barnhart suggested Item B read that overnight parking would be permissible by a conditional use permit. Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3878, City of Orono,Text Amendment,Emergency docks,with the draft ordinance being amended to allow overnight parking subject to a conditional use permit being granted and adding the language relating to the fence and gate. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 9. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS HELD ON OCTOBER 24,2016,AND NOVEMBER 14,2016 Barnhart stated he is presently working on a summary of all the applications handled by the City Council this year. Barnhart stated he should be able to provide that over the holiday break. Barnhart reported on the following actions by the City Council: • Approved vacation of Hill Street next to 290 Crestview and the front yard setback variances on Consent. • The application for variances at 1175 Willow Brook was approved on Consent. • The Tim and Amy Sullivan application at 440 Brown Road was approved on Consent. • The Ryan and Natalie Blackwell application at 80 Smith Avenue was approved on Consent. • On the Lyle and Gretchen Shaw application at 750 Shadywood, the Council approved the lot area and width variances as well as the structural coverage variance but had issues with the hardcover within the 0-75 foot zone. The applicant is revising their plan to avoid hardcover in that area. • The Windmiller and Blasko application at 3295 Crystal Bay Road was approved. Page 24 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. • The Beltnik application at 1380 Orono Lane was approved on Consent. Barnhart noted the Council followed the Planning Commission's recommendations for the most part. 10. PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON SCHEDULE Barnhart stated included in the Planning Commission's packet is a draft of the council liaison schedule for 2017. This schedule is shorter than in years past. Barnhart stated he is proposing that a Planning Commission liaison only be present for the first meeting of the month. Staff will be attempting to keep zoning items to the first meeting of the month, with the second meeting focusing primarily on engineering, finance and other issues. Occasionally a zoning item will carry over but with not enough frequency to require attendance by a Planning Commissioner. Barnhart stated the schedule can be rearranged if the person designated to attend is going to be out of town. Landgraver stated in his view it is healthy to interact with the City Council but that he would agree by simply going there and watching them agree with the Planning Commission recommendations is not the best use of time. Lemke commented the reduced schedule is a good idea. Barnhart indicated he will propose the reduced schedule at the next City Council meeting. 11. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Barnhart noted a joint Planning Commission/City Council work session has been scheduled for next Monday,November 28, at 5:00 to review ordinances. Barnhart indicated he will be sending out a working summary of the 51 ordinances identified by Staff for review. A vote on the top 15 priorities will be taken similar to what was done last year. The work session will be held in the police training room. Thiesse asked how many building permits are issued in a month. Barnhart stated through October,the City issued building permits for 35 new homes and 1,350 new permits,which also includes plumbing, which consists of approximately a third of the permits. Barnhart noted plumbing,roofing and siding permits amount to approximately 50 percent of the total permits issued. Barnhart stated the number of overall permits was a little higher compared to last year but last year 68 new home building permits were issued. Schoenzeit asked how the Lakeview development is going. Gaffron indicated six or seven building permits have been issued to date. Gaffron stated in his opinion the building is going much slower than what Staff anticipated but the homes that have been built have been a success. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Page 25 of 26 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,November 21,2016 6:30 o'clock p.m. None ADJOURNMENT Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to adjourn the Orono Planning Commission meeting at 8:56 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. ATTEST: John Thiesse, Chair Page 26 of 26 .„._____ v 7._ s �� ! c{=-_� , � « O,> cdr, f ``.cl�V 11■IIRII■a. .USO■Ir■IIAu■o•p■O .11.11■11�I1■0.11 U.Ir!♦Il■11■O■R. 1.1111■,I�t1■OrOr ' Lake J �llemso11.11■11■0 amaiim0.11 1160■0■Omin■11.11■Omnini \�L_IL ((�� C yF o Dickey', 1-1 � ■ Lake �i_-:� _-. - i.._` A._ .. A ■ •� uasan L AGENDA ■ 1C City of Orono Planning Commission Meeting for I I ton � � r � �� TUESDAY,January 17,2017;6:30 PM j11M11111111�#, Lok. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley —` �` q4%4 1 Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 ,�` �at 1 . - `c3,5•—`T 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us • _`12 _ 11� 2j C-,� ' ' �� '' // Council Representative: Mayor Walsh � CUi � �` JE New Business 84 :IMP \I l 17,4\� ,�� r • �� 1. Approval of Planning ) ___ �. � 1 • 1, r Commission Meeting 1� l� u■ .o■n - L_?� -`,, Minutes of November 21, A.....m.a, [--C) 2016. ___,____-_--- ••"- �% �11■1y O -J 2. 17-3886 Hennepin County ��1�. L II Emergency Management, -, �^ �.7� 3880 Shoreline Drive, t �V stt I -✓ , i �� �� Ir`r� �� Conditional Use Permit: t, k ,` Y _ J� m . \ . „ Essential Services1 l_ii. _ r IiiiL C �_ 1r � �, p ; (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) ' 111.1 II �✓ _ ^- •__ '' '1t 3. 17-3887 Revision,LLC on behalf of %.• '. L Geoffrey&Stephanie \ \ % North +-11 C� —__ _ - Browns --- --"..'. f,.•' Wayzata Martha, ! �' �` ,am tanager • Bay juy 2092 Shadywood Road, axw.x \ Variances, r - 1 Lake Bay - ` t ' (Staff: Melanie Curtis) t French . I ri _ Lake . ` Abash r +r _ 4. 17-3888 DJ Kranz Co.,Inc.on behalf f gi or //-' i i of Good Shepherd Lutheran Jennings ■ . ''''.--1--- .� + / ` Bay ' ? i Church, III IC if-': •:.. 'CD 'T- 3745 Shoreline Drive, ;l i r'" (, Conditional Use Permit: //� ■• Addition :-.' /U(/� .�'i,� '' . ■ y ear • ,} D` I ' �4-- °�t_ (Staff: Mike Gaffron) Ci r 717�n� .ld� ; amt Boohns iii 5. 17-3889 Timothy&Jane White, 1 &f: = ,6 , ' i Ni - ( 2170 Prospect Avenue, ■ ' Air + Y k� - _ Variances � ^ �♦♦ c--"y_ ((// IL •/}V r (Staff: Melanie Curtis) � Bay ': - - �' _Y , • ♦ -__. ji'� - "� {g Minnetonka �! ^` L.J� (� }� g t�uau■r1.e■0■ -388 „ -'"�� "/ !1 I Lv.,_.ii_~' 6. 17-3890 Denali Custom Homes on '? ! _ behalf of Steve&Stacia j,11u r � 1_ }o �_l 1 �7I [�f�f�� ii_D517 Ferndale Road N, • �� i-Fa --f1 u After-the-Fact Variance 7��+��� j 1 �� rju■u■Iv Loa�a® FADI �C��Q��� (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 1 9 It .: :I r ahra I \ �✓ `' -lt �� � 7. 17-3895 Ugorets 8098 LLC, 1 �,. [ � :' I aero r:aanr, \ 1/ �� , L j 2500 Shadywood Road, II t � ' _ ♦ Conditional Use Permit: L •' ♦� ��� l Restaurant ' a / sprang G _''f_ r� . rorwr I♦ jam- i~/`-! (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 1a,a� � . Pr, S c8a;ris p o p N 0 ' .. Y .1 tear �� � 1 ` WITHDRAW I/J � uafu■■�1■Inu.rgu■t1h'� (C7r-7.----7-- , --- 717-2017 /^—,M f` Casco I Point � Lao -- Poim�� r� 1 1�c �_ __a, �. \rI eeting ,,� ■ II ' „1 /�A _ r / _r �/����5 '� � •' `ter~� This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a BOLTON survey and is not intended to be usedasane.This 0 3 298 Feet drawing is a compilation of records,+nformation,ond data & M E N K looted in various he a county,and state offices,and other sources affecting the area shown,and is to be used for Bolton&Menk,Inc-Web GIS 1/13/2017 9:33 AM reference purposes only The City of Orono is not responsible for any inaccurades herein contained. Real People.Real Solutions. Item 2 Date Application Received: 12/12/2016 OA, Date Application Considered as Complete:1/9/2017 V 60-Day Review Period Expires: 3/9/2017 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members *kEsHors14,Jessica Loftus, City Administrator `` From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: January 17, 2017 Subject: #17-3886, Hennepin County, 3880 Shoreline Drive, Conditional Use Permit: Essential Service Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for an essential Service to construct and operate a mesonet weather station. A mesonet station consists of a 30 foot tall tower with small weather sensors mounted on the tower and other equipment mounted on the ground. This tower and equipment is located within a 40' square fenced in area to the immediate northeast of the existing garage building within Hennepin County's public works operations off of Shoreline Drive. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the request. Background Hennepin County is in the process of building and expanding its weather information (Mesonet) system throughout the County. This mesonent station collects weather information and feeds it to a central location for analysis, compilation, and further communication. Their system is intended to supplement other agencies' weather information gathering stations. Currently,the County has stations in Medina, Plymouth, Hanover, Saint Bonifacius, Maple Grove, Minnetrista, and Rockford. A photo of the St. Bonifacius site is attached as Exhibit E. The mesonent station is considered an essential service as it is communicates important information to County departments, including public works and emergency response. The mesonent communications tower is not considered a personal wireless or commercial wireless tower and the user is the county government using the device solely to communicate weather information. Should the County in the future desire to place commercial antennae on the tower, a separate permit may be necessary. FILE#17-3886 January 17,2017 Page 2 of 3 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: The lot in question is a backlot. The following lot sizes reflect the requirements for the principal structure on a backlot: LR-1C DISTRICT Required Proposed Front 45 222.8' Rear 30 87' Side 10 224.5' Side 10 320' Height 30(Max) Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: LR-1C DISTRICT(Backlot) Lot Area Lot Width Required 32,670 s.f. (0.75 acres) 100' Actual 279,683 s.f. (6.42 acre) 658' Section 78-1370 Accessory structures shall adhere to all requirements of this chapter, with the following additional requirements: a. Accessory structures within a back lot shall be allowed no closer than ten feet to a neighboring property's side or rear yard. b. Accessory structures shall not be allowed within the required street yard of a back lot nor within the required rear yard of a front lot which abuts the street yard of a back lot. c. No accessory structure shall be allowed within an access outlot. These requirements are met. Applicable Regulations:Conditional Use Permit for Essential Services(Section 78-946) A conditional use permit is required for all structures, including utility poles and rights-of-way, which are an integral part of a system for public transportation as for transmitting power, water, heat, communications, gas or sewage by any public utility.The council shall grant a conditional use permit only after a showing that the public safety, health and welfare will not be harmed by the essential services. Personal wireless services and commercial broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered essential services. Analysis: The most impactful aspect of the improvement is the visible 30 foot tall tower. The 30 feet height is the maximum permissible height for principal structures in the zoning district. The tower is to be located in the NE corner of the property. Immediate neighbors are the fire station to the East, and the Dakota Rail trail to the north. The nearest residential is approximately 220 feet to the north, in Spring Park, and across the trail and Northern Avenue. The tower in this area will be visible, as existing vegetation along the rail right of way will not completely screen the tower. FILE#17-3886 January 17,2017 Page 3 of 3 The tower is the necessary height to retrieve and send communication from its sensors to the main station in Medina. The equipment is not expected to generate noise, light, vibration, or odors. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the standards for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Essential Services are satisfied. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested permit? a. Staff suggests a conditional that additional, non-governmental antenna acquire express approval prior to placement. 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Proposed Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Existing site graphic Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map PC Exhibit A City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street address: Application# O 2750 Kelley Parkway CI Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: 1,2pA (o(i.0.4, Staff: Main: 952,249-4600 1 fax: 952-249-4816 Fee: Maikng Addrass: Escrow#&$ y; I f s, P.O.Box 66 or G -0066 Crystal Bay,MN 55323Permit Fee 441s1108 Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 3S$0 1'lor -\%,nom. 'Dv t•-•(_. 4 4 rorn0 MN 63•:;‘‘ APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION: Applicant Name: So.reon V. Yt..1 tlizrna•,r• Cot.,t4r2. Cmcr.J‘•-1(.1 WI%vNK"4 yr,-c,ni-) Phone(Primary): Ly11» Sot L, b"151 Applicant Email: Soor00r1.Ko.vc.l a 1ne nY rV•veN•u s Address: llvpc) PrdwAc. privt City: yslcd.‘►n2 ZIP: 55340 Agent Name: Agent's phone number Agent Email: Applicant is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: .INFORMATION: )4 check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: _ \'1C vv..,CP.d'• C - -- So. - ll-pay.t.\ Phone(Primary): OO Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Email: APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment)and/or consultant expenses Incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until It is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff,consultants,agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, If an applicant and/or owner Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend In place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant/Agent Signature: j..\... Date: t I 3 o l 1u' Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: ll Property Owner Signature: Date: i g 0 t ILP Property Owner Signature: Date: RECEIVED CUP Applica6on-January 2016 Page 2 DEC 1 2 201R # 3886 CITY OFORo ,, oCity of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form ;#4 14.NESHOT- 1 (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) dor Offlce.:see City Planner. Q. 1&t h/ .. . Meeting bate/rime: I PC Date: Met With: �!T/SMO ,j' t' 'kg What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal,inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code,and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFQ TION: !!��� Site Address: ` $O Cj 1 g t e 1r K e Vr,, Property Identification Number(PIN): Zoning District: Size of Property: LAND USE REQUESTS: ❑Appeal of 0 Commercial Site Plan ) Comprehensive Plan ❑ Easement 1 ROW Administrative Decision Review Amendment Vacation, without subdivision El PID 0 PUD- Residential 0 RPUD,without 0 Zoning Amendments 0 PUD-Commercial subdivision _ including Rezoning ❑Other: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTS: ❑Amend Existing CUP -Commercial/Industrial Use 0 Duplex Credit per bldg) ❑Grading and filling- 0 Grading and filing- ❑ Grading and filing-with 75 feet of OHWL 501 cy or more Wetland and flood plain lincludes seawalls and retaining walls) ❑Guest House/ 0 Institutional 0 Residential I Guest Apartment Type: 0 Renewal of CUP Residential Accessory Use Type: Applicants BILLS AND ESCROW: The land use application fee is for city staff time and overhead initials: costs only. Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred in review of Owner's this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, as well as Initials: provide an escrow in the amount of$ to guarantee payment of the above. OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your land use 'r conditional use permit will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this f•/ will e co plated b City staff. Applicant Signature: A Date: 1,! 1 . 11LP Owner Signature: ♦ � Date: ' 11`6 } fp RECEIVED CUP Appfioation-January 2016 DEC 12 201A Page 3 3886 CITY OF ORONO • PC Exhibit B Hennepin County Memo Hennepin -- Hennepin County Emergency Management Phone: 612-596-0757 1600 Prairie Drive Fax: 763-478-4001 Medina MN 55340-5421 TDD: 763-478-4030 Date: November 30, 2016 To: City of Orono From: Sarah Karel, Meteorology Coordinator—Hennepin County Emergency Management Subject: Hennepin County Orono Truck Shop Weather Station Accurate and timely weather, climate, and hydrologic data are essential to maintain the health, safety and welfare of Hennepin County communities. Hennepin County Emergency Management is developing the Hennepin West Mesonet to closely monitor hazards. Violent weather that forms tornadoes, extreme winds, lightning,hail and flash flooding can strike quickly during the summer. In winter, blizzards, sustained heat waves and arctic cold blasts can harm vulnerable people. Deep frosts can disable essential services such as water and sewer. Detailed weather information is also critical to public alert and emergency operations including severe weather warning, firefighting, flood control,and toxic material response, for example. Currently, official weather sensors are designed and located to serve just a few sectors,principally aviation and major freeway networks, Hennepin County Emergency Management is building a system that leverages existing official weather sensors,and identifies and fills and coverage gaps.The system also adds important new capabilities that will aid decision making by governments and emergency responders. This software project will ensure that Hennepin West Mesonet data will also be easily accessible to researches, industry and the public to multiple uses and benefits of this information. A 30 foot aluminum structure holds most of the sensors that detect wind speed,direction, temperature, humidity and barometric pressure. Rain gauges and soil sensors are placed on or in the ground nearby. Stations use solar energy and require no external power. Data is sent via cellular phone or radio to the network data base. A steel base is used with iron rods in each corner to keep it firm on the ground. 3 guy wires are screw anchored into the ground to keep tower from tipping or swaying. Total construction from start to finish takes 2-3 days and is done by Hennepin County Emergency Management. Our partner coalition currently includes: The National Weather Service(NWS),the Minnesota Department of Transportation, City of Minneapolis, Three Rivers Par District, Minnehaha Watershed District, Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric, City of Maple Grove, Minnesota Vikings, Minnesota Natural Resources—State Climatology Office. Sincerel c\''LN'/L Sarah Karel RECEIVED Meteorology Coordinator DEC 12 2016 # 86 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit C tECEIVED H 122016 00 CITY F OR( .. o o o a o p r V) a O IL - E o O 1.1 O p • vI p L a �. ._. i "NJ CO Ine 0 p ZZ -1:( 11'• o o i 11 W 0W <' o a O O p 0 0 IL x- t• • ) i( ..'4 . ' a+ • t t , 3�•' fig. � • ,, � , i- • >, t i , 1�1 o`, is.r. - ''Ix *t ``'-` `I. ' -00 , , 0:4 k . A r— e + + 4. ,s , _ ,,r, u .= H Z Z ' ,1.1i1; 1 v Q i'Y `"4 4 1 I- g ,,,,,t,,,,,- r .t.c 'it:1:1; i. - ' ''I t't I 4 •a •r *, • 1 ..,. ... .- - c Z Z , . .,.... .. . r .-....; ;Ill( g ,,,,„ . -„, \. 1, ' .., . i : ,i ".k , r•-__..,,,,*` ..7r, • ' ) i Z ~ 'R'It, 4, 0 4 ..!/.R, 43 Z 111 1_. 7414 ' { 2. I111; I ; . r f , A V, 2 8 8 Site Layout Overview: Lade Use Area: 40 feet x 40 feet Items to be put on land: 10 meter tower with guy wires, grounding probe, soil moisture probe, soil temperature probe, rainfall sensor. Items to be put on tower: wind speed, wind direction, pressure sensor, temperature probe, solar radiation sensor, solar panel, datalogger,battery, relative humidity sensor, and wet bulb black globe sensor. Power: Solar Powered with Battery Backup • Access tube for • soil moisture 0 Wind screen r 1 4 f Temperature under sod • t 1 b I I I I Rain gaRubber Temperature edging under bare sail O 1.5m.Mt-land 9m.T 3 M. (multiplate shield) 3 m. '!:' -3 m. 2 m.wind speed/1/ • 3.7 m_ Tripod mount for pyranorneter *pinning rod,solar fence panof ate aaloswos rat shorn lot clarity • • FK. S. Plan view of a remote station showing rain gauge and soil sites relative to the tower. 10-ni wind speed&direction 9-in wind speed* M /, Lightning rod 9-m temperature* 1 �) i .Antenna to the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommuneations System RE *- Solar panel 2-m wind speed` Barometric pressure, data logger,battery,and radio 1.5-m temperature& r i relative humidity \ tL r 1111 / 1.5-in solar radiation IN Rainfall (Alter shield not shown) t H Soil temperatureI Soil moisture' (5*, 10,30*cm) Ground rod (5.25.140.75 cm) Site locations will need to be chosen based on the following criteria: Accessible be vehicle during all seasons. Wind Speed and Wind Direction: • Standard is 10 m above ground level with no obstructions within 300 m for anemometer and vane exposure. • Slope should be less than 17 degrees to avoid separation of flow, producing large eddies. Solar Radiation: • Site should be free of obstruction above the lane of the radiation sensing element. • Important that no obstruction cast a shadow on a solar radiation sensor. • Slope of terrain should be less than five degrees to avoid having to consider aspect on surface radiation measurements. Temperature and Relative Humidity: • To be compliant with existing observations and airport stations, temperature and RH should be made at the standard height of 1.5 m. Pressure: • Sensors must be designed to minimize dynamic pressure. Precipitation: • Reduce the effects of wind by using a wind shield. • Gage should be over level ground and surrounding objects should not be closer to the gage than a distance equal to four times their height. Soil Temperature and soil moisture • Soil should be representative of the entire area. • Standard depths for soil temperature measures are 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 cm mi At II 1 ..,', -17' a `. - i RESTRICTED ARCA - .01 El WIC MI I.:fly 911 • . • PC Exhibit F RUN DATE:11/29/2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 17 17-117-23 33 0009 17 17-117-23 33 0043 17 17-117-23 33 0088 ROGER ALLAN BUEH L R E BERRETT&C M BERRETT EVALINA C KLEIN 3810 NORTHERN AVE 3900 DEL OTERO AVE 3876 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 ROGER ALLAN BUEHL ROBERT E&CLAIRE M BERRETT EVALINA C KLEIN 3810 NORTHERN AVE 1085 BROWN RDS 3876 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17.117-23 33 0010 17 17.117-73 33 0046 17 17-117-23 33 0094 HAROLD R KOKESH ETAL CHRISTINE SHEAR-MAN THOMAS LABELLE 3816 NORTHERN AVE 3926 DEL OTERO AVE 2265 HAZELDELL AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 HAROLD R KOKESCH CHRISTINE SHEARMAN THOMAS LABELLE 3816 NORTHERN AVE 3926 DEL OTERO AVE 2265 HAZELDELL AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN .55384 17 17.117.23 33 0016 17 17-117-23 33 0047 17 17-117-23 33 0137 ERIC ROBERT TISCHLER MICHAEL R ERICKSON C MATTSON&M MATTSON 3842 NORTHERN AVE 3934 DEL OTERO AVE 3822 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 ERIC R TISCHLER MICHAEL R ERICKSON MICHELE MATTSON 3842 NORTHERN AVE 3934 DEL OTERO AVE 3822 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17.117-23 33 0018 17 17.117-23 33 0061 17 17-117-23 33 0138 ANDRA L EMERY/KEITH J EMERY TYLER J ROETHLE DOUGLAS C TRASK 3852 NORTHERN AVE 3940 NORTHERN AVE 3832 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 ANDRA L EMERY/KEITH J EMERY TYLER ROETHLE DOUGLAS C TRASK 3152 NORTHERN AVE 3940 NORTHERN AVE 4569 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 35314 SPRING PARK MN 35384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117.23 330019 17 17-117.23 33 0066 17 17.117-23 33 0139 WILLIAM A ANDERSON GERALD ROLAND HANSEN DOUGLAS J SIPPEL 3877 PARK LA 3900 NORTHERN AVE 2241 HAZELDELL AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 35384 WILLIAM A ANDERSON GERALD R HANSEN DOUGLAS.1 SIPPEL 3877 PARK LA BOX 132 2241 HAZELDELL AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17.117.23 33 0020 17 17.117-23 33 0067 17 17-117-23 33 0142 JAN W STRUCK ROBIN L SHERMAN THOMAS TRUDEL 3862 NORTHERN AVE 2258 HAZELDELL AVE 3910 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 JAN W STRUCK ROBIN L SHERMAN THOMAS TRUDEL 3862 NORTHERN AVE 2258 HAZELDELL AVE 3910 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55364 17 17-117-23 33 0022 17 13.117.23 33 0068 17 17.117-23 33 0143 J J FITZLOFF 1L LJ FITZLOFF B W ADAMS do R G ADAMS JAMES J SMITH 3861 PARK LA 3913 MAPLETON AVE 3914 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 JEFFREY&LAURIE FITZLOFF BRENT ADAMS/REBECCA ADAMS JAMES J SMITH 31 CO RD 92 3913 MAPLETON AVE 3914 DEL OTERO AVE INDEPENDENCE MN 55359 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55314 17 17-117-23 33 0038 17 17-117.23 33 0069 17 17-117.23 33 0144 JOHN KARPINSKY BRUCE D WILLIAMSON R.1 CASHMAN R A A CASHMAN 3916 SHORELINE DR 3901 MAPLETON AVE 3916 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 JOHN KARPINSKY BRUCE D WILLIAMSON RONALD J&ANN A CASHMAN 3916 SHORELINE DR 3901 MAPLETON AVE 3916 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0039 17 17-117-23 33 0084 17 17-117-23 33 0145 CLARK R OLTMAN TRUSTEE T D&J L MASON GREG VANDERWILT 3924 SHORELINE DR 2254 LILAC RD 3911 DEL OTERO AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 CLARK R OLTMAN THOMAS O&JOLEN E L MASON GREG VANDERWILT 43 LAKE DORA PARK 2254 LILAC LA 3918 DEL OTERO AVE TAVARES FL 32778 SPRING PARK MN 53384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17-117-23 33 0040 17 17-117.23 33 0087 17 17-117.23 33 0146 JOHN P KASTER NOREEN F BENJEGERDES LINDSAY L ASHBURN 3932 SHORELINE DR 3872 NORTHERN AVE 3900 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55364 SPRING PARK MN 55384 SPRING PARK MN 55384 JOHN P KASTER NOREEN F BENJEGERDES LINDSAY L ASHBURN 3932 SHORELINE DR 1373 HIGH SITE DR 4321 3900 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 EAGAN MN 55121 SPRING PARK MN 55384 ..P 86 RUN DATE)II/29/2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 17 17-117-23 33 0147 38 17.11743 33 0007 38 20.117.23 21 MK JEFFREY 5 GARBERG M E BREWER&B L BREWER CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 3902 SHORELINE DR 3800 SHORELINE DR 2420 DUNWOODY AVE SPRING PARK MN 35384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JEFFREY S GARBERG MARK E&BARBARA L BREWER CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 3902 SHORELINE DR 3800 SHORELINE DR 2420 DUNWOODY AVE SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 17 17.117-23 33 0148 38 17-117-23 33 0151 38 20.117-23 22 0001 VINCENT K BURNHART COUNTY OF HENNEPIN C W SMITH&S B SMITH 3904 SHORELINE DR 3880 SHORELINE DR 3925 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55384 VINCENT K BURNHART COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CORTLAND SMITH&SUSAN SMITH 3904 SHORELINE DR ATM:REAL ESTATE MANAGER 3925 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 SPRING PARK MN 55384 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 17 17-117-23 33 0149 38 17.117-23 34 0050 38 20-117-23 22 0002 RANDY SCHUFT MICHAEL THEODORE CARL JAMES D BEDELL 3906 SHORELINE DR 378)NORTHERN AVE 3935 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55384 RANDY A SCHUFT MICHAEL r CARL JAMES 0 BEDELL 3906 SHORELINE DR 3780 NORTHERN AVE P 0 BOX 33 SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 17 17.117-23 33 0150 38 17-117.23 34 0051 38 20-117.23 22 0003 THOMAS FREDRICK BROUELETTE J R QUAM&J E QUAM RICHARD ADOLPH CARLSON 2242 MAPLETON AVE 3760 NORTHERN AVE 3905 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55384 THOMAS FREDRICK BROUELETTE JOHN R QUAM RICHARD A CARLSON 2242 MAPLETON AVE 3760 NORTHERN AVE 3905 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 SPRING PARK MN 55384 17 17.117.23 33 0152 38 17-117-23 34 0052 38 20.117.23 22 0004 ANTHONY R POLLOCK HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH JESSE E SKIER 3916 NORTHERN AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 389$SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 35384 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ANTHONY R POLLOCK HENNEPIN COUNTY JESSE E SATER 3916 NORTHERN AVE REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 3895 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 33415 11 17-117-23 34 0021 38 17-117.23 34 0065 38 20-117-23 22 0005 K P KALKBRENNER&K C'WALKER LAKE MTKA WOODS ASSOC KONRAD CHRISTOPHER KRUGER 3800 NORTHERN AVE 3755 LIVINGSTON AVE 3915 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55384 KIRK KALKBRENNER LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC KONRAD CHRISTOPHER KRUGER KIMBERLY C WALKER GO COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 4831 MANITOU RD 3800 NORTHERN AVE 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E#101 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 SPRING PARK MN 55384 WAYZATA MN 55391 17 18-117-23 43 0386 38 17-117-2334 0083 38 20-117-23 22 0006 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH LAKE MTKA WOODS ASSOC T M GREGORY&T A GREGORY 17 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3677 SHORELINE DR SPRING PARK MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC T M GREGORY&T A GREGORY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY CIO COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 1865 STEIGER LAKE LA 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 4)5 INDIAN MOUND ST E 8101 VICTORIA MN 55386 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0004 38 17-117-23 34 0085 38 20-117-23 22 0007 E J&M.1 HELD TONKA VENTURES LLC J MICKELSON&T MICKELSON 3890 SHORELINE DR 3$ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 3865 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 EDWARD J&MARSHA J HELD LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC JEFFREY&TINA MICKELSON 3890 SHORELINE DR C/O COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 3865 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E 4 101 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 33 0005 38 17-117-23 34 0086 38 20-117.23 22 0008 DAVID UMBEHOCKER CITY OF ORONO BRENT D WALTON 3860 SHORELINE OR 3770 SHORELINE DR 240S DUNWOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID UMBEHOCKER CITY OF ORONO BRENT D WALTON 3860 SHORELINE DR 2750 KELLY PKWY 2405 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117.23 33 0006 38 17-117.23 34 0087 38 20-117-23 22 0009 LEERYAN OF MINNEAPOLIS LLC DAVID C NESS/COLLEEN S NESS JEAN WALSH 3830 SHORELINE DR 3750 NORTHERN AVE 2425 DUN WOODY AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 5539i ORONO MN 55391 BARBARA S HENSLEY DAVID C NESS JEAN WALSH 3850 SHORELINE DR COLLEEN S NESS 2423 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 3750 NORTHERN AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 PC Exhibit G Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 11/29/2016 •a. w. 17-117-23-32 17-117-23-31 i Togo R o a rd I i. w. N . .. a, M w O. -117.23-34 ''4!/ 1 1 , „ .;7*,` , , 2 „ 41,0 t" Ifterrfin MIN PIM° • n „ u., 17-11 - C f E s 1,7‘t17 23-34 M1 • r -117-23-21 45iroop 20-117-23.22 131 Vo ., w !o 20-117-23-22 R ! j 20-117-23-21 I ` Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: I I l t l I ► I I COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 3880 Shoreline Drive RECEIVED For more information contact: Orono,MN 55391 Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South DEC 12 701 S Minneapolis,MN 55487 gis.info©hennepin.us CITY OF ORONO 3 8 b .. n $4012. Jeremy Barnhart From: Mark Brewei Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:50 AM To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Hennepin County Emergency Management Tower Dear Mr. Barnhart, I just returned from out of the country today and got your notice of the meeting tonight. My initial concern with the proposed project was if it was going to generate EMF radiation from any type of radar. It does not appear based on my review of the documents that it will. I would like added to the conditional use that any such addition of that type of equipment require notification of adjoining property owners. If in fact I am wrong about my assumption and there would be radar equipment or the like which would generate significant EMF radiation I would appreciate contact with me by email or phone at Otherwise,thank you for the notice and I have no other objections. Sincerely, Mark E. Brewer, DC 3800 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 1 Item 3 Date Application Received: 12/14/16 OA, Date Application Considered as Complete:01/12/17 =VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 03/13/17 A a To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members et �. Jessica Loftus, City Administrator IkESH04� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner W OO Date: 17 January 2017 Subject: #17-3887,John Daly with Revision LLC o/b/o Stephanie Martha, 2092 Shadywood Road Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance and a Tier 1 hardcover variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends a partial approval,see below. Background The property contains a modest home and a small detached garage.The owners would like to construct improvements to make it more functional. They are requesting a hardcover variance to permit 27.5% hardcover where currently 25.6%exists, and 25% is permitted in order to construct additions to the home, and construct a new 24'x 24' detached garage on the property. A side setback variance is also requested in order to allow a 1.3' principal structure setback where a 10' setback is required in order to connect the existing detached garage to the home. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350-Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed 30' House 98.3' House ^'90' House Rear/Street 15' Detached Garage 10' Detached Garage (new) 10' House 20' House 17.6' House North Side 12.4' Detached Garage 10' Detached Garage (new) 10' House 17.8' House South Side 10' Detached Garage 1.3' Detached Garage 1.3' House (existing) Lakeshore 75' ^'140' House 130' House Average Lakeshore The existing home and proposed additions conform to the average lakeshore setback. FILE#17-3887 17 Jan 17 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre) 100' @ OHWL&75' SB Actual 19,125 s.f. (0.44 acres) ±40' @ OHWL&±58' @ 75' SB Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 19,125 s.f. (0.44 acres) Allowed: 2,868 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,197 s.f. (6%) Proposed: 2,334 s.f. (12%) Section 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 19,125 s.f. 4,781 s.f. 4,900 s.f. 5,251 s.f. (25 %) (25.6%) (27.5%) Applicable Regulations: Side Setback Variance (Section 78-350) The applicant proposes to connect an existing detached garage which is situated 1.3 feet from the south side lot line to the home with an addition.This connection would result in the detached garage becoming part of the principal structure.The existing home is conforming with respect to setbacks; the connection would make the principal structure nonconforming as the house would no longer meet the required 10-foot side setback. Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) In addition to the number of additions and/or modifications to the existing home; a new detached garage is also proposed. This would increase the hardcover level of the property from the existing nonconforming level of 25.6%to 27.5%(a 351 square foot increase). 25% is the Tier 1 hardcover limit. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. FILE#17-3887 17 Jan 17 Page 3 of 5 Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant propose to construct additions to the existing residence on a residential property which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for additions to a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed hardcover increase is inconsistent with the City's goals for protection of the lake. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit additions to the existing home within the 10 foot side setback area appears to be reasonable as the existing detached garage currently occupies this space, therefore the adjacent properties may not be adversely impacted. The hardcover increases resulting from the new detached garage, home additions, and the new driveway areas increase the hardcover above the existing nonconforming level. Practical difficulties have not been demonstrated as of this writing to justify the variance. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The location of the existing home and detached garage were preexisting conditions and not created by the property owner,and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The connection between the existing detached garage and the home resulting in the detached garage becoming part of the principal structure will likely not have an impact on the neighbor to the south. However,the existing detached garage is setback only 1.3 feet from the property line and there is only approximately 11 feet between this structure and the neighboring home. It is unknown if this existing situation has an adverse impact on the neighbor or if it will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as a residential home and detached garage are allowed uses in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. FILE#17-3887 , 17 Jan 17 Page 4 of 5 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The size of the subject property is not conforming to the LR-1C area or width standards but it is not unusual enough to justify the additional hardcover requested. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property is similar in size to but on the small end of the range of the immediately adjacent property areas. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.The applicant has indicated the variances are necessary. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the hardcover variance for the level requested is not in line with the intent of the zoning chapter.Due to the narrow width of the lot,(the property is approximately 75 feet wide in the location of the home) the variance to allow the 1.3 foot encroachment for the principal structure may be reasonable as the existing detached garage is currently close to the property line. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. While the location of the existing structure and the width of the lot may support the requested setback variance; the requested hardcover variance has not been shown to be supported by a demonstrable practical difficulty. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has not provided the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form, and should be asked for testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis The structural coverage level is proposed to increase by over 1,000 square feet, and although conforming to the massing limitations, results in the requested variance to increase hardcover over the existing nonconforming level,470 square feet in excess of the permitted level.Staff does not find practical difficulties inherent with the property supporting the increase in hardcover proposed. Regarding the setback variance to connect the existing detached garage to the house,the location of the existing structures may support the variance. The applicant should be asked to describe in detail the intended project.Will the existing detached garage be demolished and the addition and connection be new construction?Are there alternatives which would increase the side setback? FILE#17-3887 17 Jan 17 Page 5 of 5 Engineer Comments The City Engineer has conducted a cursory review of the project and no concerns were noted. A comprehensive review will be done at the time of the building permit. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Options for Consideration 1. The Planning Commission may approve one or both of variance applications. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of both variances, the Commission should provide their findings and practical difficulty analysis supporting the approvals; or 2. The Planning Commission could deny both variances; or 3. The Commission could suggest the applicant to revise the plan to work within the existing hardcover level. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit C. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit D. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. Aerial Photos Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map . CityPc of Orono Exhibit A #17-3887 Variance Application 0 A Street Address: Application# //J—3� lJ 2750 Kelley Parkway Ilk O Orono,MN 55366 Date Received /05// / fv Staff e Main: 952-249-4600 'V{ �G � fax: 952-249-4616 Fee 7 A a„ Marling Address: ` •s• :, 'r. G�,c„ P.O.Box 66 Escrow#&$ 5� r✓f / Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee t-1kf S H O' Notes Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will=be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: ZOl2 Stn4Lrrk-NA 2.8 DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: k►a S♦ for S i de. Iva-i S u.. 4o A 41c�:L, AAdti't-clt, c't ry c.4u - (attached additional sheets bs necessary) 4,0 , '"1 .., .i\+ ,r. APPUCANT/AGEIET INFORMATION: Applicant Name: {.vtSipn Li-C. - -t>141,1/41 bAt1 Phone (Primary): qSZ-SW8- 7ISo Applicant Email: J6hn 0 rr u i Si nn H,I , CdA^ Address: 153 t✓ Wee cf City: 14/tyZ�TL` ZIP: SS3. 1I Applicant is: on ra w • Homeowner (Circle One) ! PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑ check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: Sie Pha.sjx, MO.--iiii 4. Phone (Primary): 9.5.1,— iy71- 63 Y c Mailing Address: 7 l l Nflol wwa. City:.��dfa •..Or b ZIP: s;s, Email: . ditt . VIL_ iuc.i t.tzn APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment)and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. I : applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an a i •rized :presentative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant/Agent Signature: G'..-- Date: 12-1 lb If IF Applicant/Agent Signature: _ Date: Property Owner Signature: aZielt.*e ��� Date: i,-/9/t, Property Owner Signature: Date: KtCEIVED Variance Application—May 2016 Page 2 DEC 14 2016 CITY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data,but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some Information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. 41)A4 bc..11 First Middle Last Address :a1izi (i44) s5"- � z- City State Zip Phone t unde : i rights as stated above. Sig RECEIVED DEC 14 2416 Variance Application—May 2016 Page 10 CITY OF ORONO PC -6; Exhibit B CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR (9.0 S.% #17-3887 ,.. GEOFFREY & STEPHANIE MARTHA 1,3 6) •• 41,* •WAD. IN LOTS 30 & 31, BLOCK 1, WILEY'S PARK LAKE MINNETONKA (.44,,) we 411.. LAKE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA . •11, -14 MINNETONKA . , • (9497) (937 0 I" Ilb CRYSTAL BAY ..... eil \ (665.6) EXISTING •\ . 1,6 lie HOUSE #2080 .4. '• . . -T:\ \ ', ......''''''--..., /•• MILO (4) ler e\ rx&mcsnrs,s,"A_dak\t. .929.4 CONTOUR 9-5.. , : : : , 1A4' . ---... .. •—.., -"LINE „of' ,.... V \s, . •OV .› >,, ..,0 .... r''.). \ \vs). 'lb' ,!.t,4, , a ,...-- N a v 1,1 s, ''),J, * r ' - (951 a) ,no5g.\ \ suRvEy..- ..,. ...? ' •, ‘4 ".. \ LINE \‘T, 193910 . . ..",00.. .......... \ ...- i .. ,v...., (955.1) (1-s;.. ..... . . , y- 'p ...es • s„ ...,,,,,- 'N (952.6) N°C5. \ 0 75, 19423) NC26. ....,;‹..P. .. ..'. . ) SE TBACK-'''N LINE \ -.,' 'N .... ,. C95.17) .... ....:....... .... ' coati% •\. IP \ \ ./.!...1(..% ' \ ...57)• "N bc-5 -- / .... „ ..........., \ .6•,‘.' 1, ..•.i ..-,, •--. ',940\ 004 caSCO)..,c0 C..' 43* ....-.-.... ,,,,F1.00310/L WALK ....,..k..-.. ..., .. ,TO OE 101209217,,..-- ,-‘ -,- ' '1, \ St T FENCE ono., 6-5 -- , . . ....NA 9$.. ,-Q.4. .. .', ....: .ION /442 - 940. i 93? \ .. R f iirg"me%.:• .1, -41. 'wo, .. : ' / . \ • I* ...' / ../ .......- (ests) bp . ,... ......./ ......•...„i. ,r,,,.........:..--K,.,.......,:.,1:1,01ii..4 / • itlit N::•••••••' t.310016. '.7'......r..:,' ..\\ PORCH // 14). ,... . '' (952.6)rl -:::::::•:- '.\ (0) . E) -,9 NW COR OF •' ""i ' ii f EXISTING ' - '-•,',\/00,0•7 , i •• .' .' 1 LOT 31 .--- I GRAVEL \ i... .-- DRIVEWAY ..;, wc HOUSE % , .:!. t$' 44.0. • .......- ••P ••,., OP'. .. /4) ' -Z 1—-71-- (c) 11. ...,„, ,., #20/92 ....,. 317W L_. MX STOOP 6 o • , . I - -_ I . . •. "":.. • PROPOSED ._4 019..A1v0v • MW'.V.# s..9 : S 6' i gs r iR -Pi -;., Cob % ' ig(p) GARAGE I sisa V 7-14-\ir. G ••'• . EXISING ./..s. ' 0, i' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES V, 7.- di .-"/' • . , I 1950.51-YEKcY '1 ., ARA ;,1019g "1 ay...." (pi STEPS" BLACKTOP • 'Os' . "iT (8), • Ili I Lot 31, 1 if,'ROADWAY I I . ' _... \, Block 1, "Wiley's Park'', Lake Minnetonka, except the following: Is >// , / lO 0 4 ., Commencinig at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot; thence Southeasterly J/l - 0 -4 „••.. 9,,,, • . (649.9) - /_...._.... ,..9 .Iv .....•'. -. .. 0 4-,-;. :'' EXISTING along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 20.00 feet; thence Northeasterly a distance of 109.35 feet to a point on the Northerly line of soid Lot ki.- •... •. • . e K) , ,... -•* 41,OP HOUSE distant 115.00 feet Easterly of the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence Westerly on said Northerly line to the point of beginning. • +.5‘*PIP ' PROPOSED '. ,... GRAVEL'''. 4P..).-.::V * #2100 / L5. SLI FENCE PARCEL 2 ‘%?1, 4.) ... (94781 DRIVEWAY -j." That part of Lot 30, Block 1, "Wiley's Park", Lake Minnetonka, lying N-YJ\ NO ro, '.'.C) .r. .. •• % NI'' ...,., ,: (4)_ • 9411 i. Northwesterly of a line drawn Northeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 30 to the shore of Loke Minnetonka, which line forms an angle .. -, .. 7 .-, 7 0\4 00 .9„ of 60 degrees 36 minutes 30 seconds with the Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 at the most Westerly corner. 0 • .7p ?k, °Iry t5N . ,• ,. . bC3 • : denotes iron marker found 0 'el 0 •. . . ... ... . . : ... . • .. ...... .. - eo. .s (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum 1 -•............ i- 1910.81: denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum 410.*•>. a 9.4%). -44 A....4., os„ 917 : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum O• (o/ , . 4. ' 47'44. 4- "it, 4c*tb e) --(930)--: denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum IVA t.9 '<.f 42 ocip Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, `,1''. DUSTING the location of an existing house and garage, spot elevations, topography, GARAGE the proposed location of two proposed additions, o proposed deck, driveway garage ond grades, and the locction of all visible "hardcover' thereon. It CP does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DATE DESORPTION r 12-12-16 PROPOSED WAGE..031000VER DM=9930+ GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC., hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report SCALE was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, 1".•20' • ond that I om a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under 12-30-16 TCP0010/P0 ADDED CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE 8-16-16 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 . "7../eits:fr.,/ .. .0,.... ..1.,. J08 NO 952-473-4141 16-3258 Mork S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 _ 16-325B jiw 7 - .. t ..itigiSemlizrie • 09 RAP5•,11 � r involows. r--. ___ ii . - -- o ____ � 4u ___. __ __ ... �� — •111101 r, °° • - a ` 6- r c f (937.2);' I ra� / C a ? C1 ----- ^ p � _ l I J �� O 2 f t..<''4. O a, _ --- - ' a M // • 4�°�,�„S°w`'o _ -` --- - , • fav o oo ••••./••... o� Q° co Y 51 0i'r Q� Qa 0 o a� .„° �,� E � 1 O� ,°rcv �° ° ° .��x r1N • 42) h ¢ yr 3 °Ua < ..� - � � _ 1.0 i*-942--,-, o- / &;e ;tar • • OGOfi1 f OV ^ cce' � v `" ° rr o � o '�cp � AD 0 i. 1-� I. S• '\41•41 1 �., N e mac,0 ..0 to °c L. �'ti a,��. °�' ° h O) '-- � � � _ 1 \ aa•0 •0 <v" oey.9o� b . — ti- N 44 ( �`' AAs —144—— a1ti� ��� ,�.,a a� o :. of `` to �i40?V� 4 -946-` °O 1. �o� 1 4C�o�� ( -948`` Q.. 1 v M1_ 4 r I I iia- a �_v ..- ------948_fr q 4 id ic0 1 ,E4 .Z. 0 -----„d______ ,_ ,e1R1 , cz, ,,-- i,s,,, 4(1...-'‘- 0 : ----- 'IN 4K I ' ,,,f31 --------: .i p (949.1 0 17 ti , 1 95 n^ ',� � *! .: II ---i - 24.9 N pcel `: C °° fj ;_'^ 9.0 Ar 14,/(moi/ rf /.. r-., _952_ . ,;,.: q P � ' � �� tN �j. ryc `'4 .N....%44444-fir,.. • .... .... ~o t „. 4 �u ~ + ,212.7 1 .....---------- ,„ \ ... % ___, : .1 NOV no... co,$) .,�' e ' 11 I 1 Q....r A;,i.:4i.m--\ Iisi N \ Q4444� 9'�6 \ q4 0 1 ,� uY wi ! 11 J � � 311 r o! i ' " 40 / �: of � it / � l ~ ' A. r Y A':',. LQ 4/ (, c..\' ' ^ ir, 0 / Yr\ O , r^ / =ca ! /!.” ' 4 0 ,. \ (•• 39.4 v, // )' i, 819 }0 ,›/ .. -• 1. 12 4 I\ cZ� 1 c'n ' / / ^� • /: . • ,° , r— .. ...• • .. -. i • • •• .:�i �. - .�— 9.35- l i 1 -• .0.6 i"1 .---I W � .3 ' •• a50 5 -A:4 .-----i (.O ,a' ' Y e V. / 9µ4 9 ,' o J f t,i Q I -til 0 • idyl , • O 0 �R .,„ pD 14) 00D .�� iv Sir ::,,,, i o 'x I v • Exhibit C • •. a..�, .a..� 17-3887 Mr 111111111 111111111 , 11111M111 Fin app �ll/.< " (In' " S- ,q i' I r i sT 1..(1._eT� �1■■Ii_ L J II NEN 1 -" Iinijiii i C—E iii: :II u■ _ aoi FAST u1v srar>:z ■N im u■ :■i■ I WAYlATA.MN 55191 `. ■■■ ;■■■; ■■J LUQ r:w�rvs mar; / . 1021 ML + -( IMI MY- FAX 9S,1-.3 )': ■11111111111111I/ri' '/.//111111111111111111111111111l!111111gk .: 11.11■■,Eiz! I 11 �^` 'i IIi1�11�JJ j� MINAoor �® —LL_ eft_— - --- — -- - iris, p t - OIC _mai 111M IIIII — ro 9 �.,_ iii' '1.i _ — 17.Millillinill TO. _:, � '. � „...y...,-, ■■■i 1� ■rr.'N ' Al L' I ■■■ .iimu 9 I■■■ It = ti I ■■■,, m w m 1.r ■_�: `��1 t , , i i • ■■■i ■.,I ■ ■■ 11111 , ■■■R N■F { _ _�.�i .�. — .-- ._ ._ __— •� A� PLOW MAII ROQe -. _ c _ E1:�:� . :nom. — II .:),+'4".'''''. t ., ,1. }° .z* iu 101= I _VW__ u 4i -- �__ y _- ._ —__ 0 walw7 s § -rr• Ft f I -- - - � tS NEW LEFT ELEVATION I NEW FRONT ELEVATION O. 11.11111 oa1..ante 1 IIIA A1111 11111111111.111 111111111111/1 maw if___ / - f i AN ■rr, U■ s �— ■■■. �u T' iii! iii' *16 I _❑ ■■■ ru■.. ❑—_D ■n ■■■� D- Aq1 M, //�� ,101111,11. - 1 �.W 7_ .� iii', _ P'i' 1 't�.lli j J J,l l l l l l) IItl11.L gin i■® .�,■■. � � �„ >a,� � [Hi 1111111 _ l ' I ! 1111 LI81E IT Ihi tul ! IIII I11SIJjlllltlLl ILI.IIIIll 1 J 1111 el&MD 1 NY « _ ,• tt fir• < *$' /'� X411. I ; 2 1 -� yi k a r'3.,. .'—• 1'O _ a inn ��1'' 1111; ilirity:: ■■rr , .;;.,4G'''' I 4r14 fl 1 -. --- A -4 3X41'4.'1:13,S � �y- .rK ----` _ - 31 +. • .?; P s a' .. ro- MINVe.ROOM .y, —\� Janniii Y r II ;.rm- -ate w:tit �-` - a —9C .-.. INE � '-' _ — ' //•:/:'y I — 1%%%%/x////////1//////////%///• i 1111EMAIM.MON 'he 1.MIL,,r RsltupoP g RECEIVED /'-''' OI NEW RIGHT ELEVATION Og NEW REAR ELEVATION , 'CAULwr.r.r I MALI.rw.r-r DEC 1 a 2016 �0 F� . 38 87 CITY OF ORONO /1 \h r 7 ,I I t, 1:.II - EE'43 TAY / / W.5 Yr / A'-4 / I14 Nto / ,.. .. 401 EAST LAKE SIREET WAYZATA,MN 17391 F AX::5247952.4733T17222 FAX:932�7SB771 r- N. N. 170.PEI „•61 --_ .- -. _ e �T� Y 10®10�r 44-1(0-110•�-� dUOtlll. 1 1 it \ 1 e r , I e 62 as f-- -'1 I WBev S i of-- -,°1 YroRAat I 0 I ceurai 11 t_ __-_1 E wan arca., I 5. I L----J W am.EOYtu I oactw WILL 0114.144..9I oar.MEM I + , i�.,J !Teri N4-4 — I email DR fDrtli Dtl� Ra Ne 1!1 Q I I 1144VI - Na y Edina g i 1 1 I /Ro Alen/ � A 1, c O / ERtw Salt 11 t I _ I (�„2 p --1-- • ~ i � .. �_,v 42.12441194 r.' anew fa•� corwn9 7s — _ NIP r '' fr-- amain "47$• come* 1, coir roscm , NW MIL ,i a.Er9a E-9. Scan roolErY.Millis T I• r aro tawda r UU44 • N11sIIW YWB ONO wtl:�011E 3 �C � �IOY.1 � • J 1� Ya ad IaoYAl. y 1 6 ^V • wal. /_ 1111 ' I - - •. —'� I N1 Irnw IW 9'[!1a Q Q I�yMLL I —� ' beat r E'.tn. 11. r1Ela+otn. 1� ..." It- II' I J y `I . '' __! !: r 11 ‘T4''.44.4#* taw 34• • III _41 MAVEN • }t . oa9cdar. d,•twE.rru.E --oats' I I. A k 1 1n iWiiiiA —41. 42.171. - VIZOR OMR d ; / py R I I W i lrsruc .. -..` L5-_-17--1 ,I II i I tscaa i • I L t l ( ! , \ R t 6 _ yq��y¢ 2 ___.. ��� / *4J I rm.raw EA! / LL • I __.Y.r. — -. = ... •I�L dt I , :7141%,..1. y €-. gg , r y % R 'Ica �. i (J I ra a•as I. it! Ti .'ase1°'.e • 3 ,y I alMtla ( i j ' b i WN . E� ,I (1 L_ [\ll d'R' ti�ia Ws L if I I O �3 -� Ya as - f-'L� x• __ _. li,,,,,m VI 1 I • •. FE.e DielUNIX WALT —1 ,���_ a4�v,_�— w....-.... WEN nUd Eder. a —� ' - !� I 7 \ °ori / .. .. _ .,; ► I A.---N ,�� ROf[ ■.�aal, ® 'haw ,- ...•__— JIM ----- • MO OT 1oN� I nw�i aaN "` f.-�_T_*arm« .1l I t omccertow n ainatner w79w "0Ow' I _ AB,WW0 •• — — J t ME ria NRYD \ 0MIT _1 rw.e ma 71x1 �1////n//Jow.r'73a.�///Q�//ice ��:� �-�'�• EtEV ..._. _ =r Ewacrarm rmsw r.116 r9 PLOW eot I ET=NIGER 1 EON EXST .41474 / / wee IN. 6••T/4. N W-1 W A,1'-M't VOW! 0'a v / /ill - .a.. * 1Y-Y' / 24.3 W --/ 1.4. 0'd]A' / umW t —I W gig NEW L 4 ai SCAM ,..1+ SCALA vase RM tLT41,8 MOW:ODEE CI 162ff•IL1.WDOI t DOOR WAD �( ^ 1 IKTd TOLE!ET AT i'-V Al MEW �l 4E5 .I►i.EE!4101®tT16r9tlE L 1:011111U14• •1w Itk�k1Vtua„,,, g:', r 2 Dew°'t' • 2 OF 4 DEC 14 2016 OM• CCP16:011'1016.,U.EiWlmER DF2K+4GR1PP.q: 3887 Ft, CITY OF ORONO ' -,. _ ,,, , „ NDNV.3dY90.' I r 1- .0., ,_ £39 3sM+Filvn 16666 ti.l bl'2A V(Tl 1� , . „ 1 ,--_ , ® si7FF1s;F-vo C1i>i dOOflUldo'fPi L6mL ,, r lam 134001.13e1 b'M.l.2db'W _ „tu. 91®L 2i39W3730 EI 6.2) _a T�9d�9�JF .INC [3 cin 0 MI6 vAll 1 AT FOC I6N ce 1 , ♦ LI, 0 v 0 Lu c 1Ili' 1. cl LLe J i 1 T41111, � � a 14%1t� ,,' 0 . IWO ra lit CO M 11111 ' ll ' CO ll 1111 �- = illi M li 0 ilf ...., 11 I ' t 114 NI i 1maii.' s 3 I ta zr, , low AI 1.- ; . IN i .„,-, f 1 ..:, t ° Y till0, Ig a II gI SII a - --__�_._ .. 1 ,„ I 110 DPW aca 11 I, waiiea h/9 1 11 I ii I 2V MI-WIN%F yi i 1 1 .: R-.47.= IMMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMMEMPI nal°0,-NM TI M1 lia Ill 01 !i 1(11 ,lb hi _6. : til —I W • I E 1111111•1 :: il ' mi. /-w- r:i;tib . NI 111 1111g MINI A iEli . III 11 : opi pls. X Ill I • li 1 d liiiiimirI \ ■s --11 I � 1 1 li.542!0-.5, fF 19 ! IIIIIINIININ i 7, Ell III/ ........ p aim= 1 r ,, a 11.11111111.11111111191101119 � % I'i 19,11 r rr I�41 rweei 11 7 7: 0412DX RATE WW2 7 • I t i _.-I 4 i' :. ...4 ili• it 1111 Ig :ill:: IF\. i1 mi 1 Il 1111121 \ n-li 4 . I— — — � –I '1 ' I•M MND', 11-27-0.-..--1_-__I--0.,,,,,_.- _ I5. p ���- Z , IIElIl-II i ;1 , __i•_', , Tr sr ,22•r ao 1 z1r r :1 � N�: Ili illi. I a •ll1 11111111 _e1 :I! i.1 y:i reelIII eI ILr-1 w I 7 ItlPWc.UPIE MEOW 4. S I1 1 I 113 I I � r ue ;� r rc rr r 74• r rr rs• 11111111 11 N 1.1 , ... naw erx R.aa. • D i1 i�i°i qz II ► :11111h L { 11 a i. 0III x { � � A A o - 1 °' 1� . n tt 0410 I ( - — — •rt SILM. 4. 1 I I I ) ; o .1:' C I I I o o m T. I I zo a3 C` Ili 111111II1I - I I I i ♦%r we OK o0.X 0<WIMP < f 6=1 •`' —'v 4 r-r i O'4' , a•-Mr 24.0. A !li ••• on NMI 5 a IIS` l 00 -D-1 00 2 1 V ...._ n MARTI4A REMODEL DRAWING DESCRIPTION= eeMEDATE,8ER E rE 3 DECEMBER R iib NEW pETAC.+ED�-�.« x ,�v v� 1097 SF4ADYWOOD RD WIRIAME SET nseermuomm��` ,"-s ,WAYZATA t t4 ISS33I w 2 N7.Aoa n.e ne1aM , ,1- • PC • Exhibit D City of Orono #17-3887 ,w ko, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared P by: G4.", 4'! r. A Date: '-16-t6' Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:(eXISTING HARDCQVE�g, In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Surve Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total y (Square Feet) (Example) jGarage) (24'x .F.) A �Ou1„ (720 S fit�f�t (rE _ St7 S.F. C _ 26-.9 S.F. GAl df.-1 .0,4f,ir,re r ii.r 2 7 9 2. S.F. D 406'CK -73 S.F. E CorvC,t ere GW c K rt t`TEfpS 7 2 R S.F. F 'nick PILMR5' 2 S.F. G FLA GrreArc" toli,{,Lk: P y S.F. H IftCEt 'pit S.F. I A/c ft.0 _ 9 S.F. . 7/ S.F K „ cor✓CRFr,F A.poff c,-' f6 S.F. L Ct�)}./4or,... W6-4./.... y S.F M N S.F. N S.F. P S.F. 0 _ S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T _ S.F. U S.F. V _ S.F. W S.F. X - Ss: FF: - S.F.Y Z - S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover N 7 o o S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 0 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line12)from line(1)] (4) Total Lot Area 4i,a o S.F. 9) i21 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage ((3)+(4)j Z 5.. C2 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) RECEIVED Subdivision Application-January 2018 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Elroy effort hes been made to DEC 1 4 2016 ensure The accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the C •Code,the Code provisions will prevail CITY OF ORONO Page 18 • City of Orono /.15-146, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet .11 *,' Property Address: 2092 . 1/44 rwore2 t as t? rA4d ar1YA} _ ' 1---' Prepared by: Date: 6-Rattle Fife 14 A.ifoc!A rex, iA/c. !Z- l3 - /6 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: ROPOSED NARDCOVi In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example? , (fie) (24'x 301 (720 S.F.) A Ex/•T/7,VG ,Ireocr l'E 2/T - 129J /a.‘ Armewei c _ f 9 S.F- S i-Xlil-Ji/C CAAItCc To Irwin f WAT or 4/IW ( 165 S.F. C F�r/.Pr4 t ♦LJbr ajiZ' 792 - 33Z I1.Mit Ai vco 2deco S.F. D `' `a (ra Br AcMs1�� S.F. E f i /t.r [a�r_ fs/t k t l T f S8� / ' RE,1siNd'I / S.F. f ri,rx' AFMaWD� S.F. G r_. (helm; Rd'M N►(' ) S.F !...; _l EX1fs1.✓G�t tr/� y S.F. fX1t1/A4: is !.4 S.F.i J 6Xifrf� %tdd`II 37 #.T f L1 4.01441 it S.F K _ era A f Rt=MD11E4 IIF- S.F. , (To Ate Arista of* -nitt. S.F. NI 6 S.F. N v%td� PSO iI�2t� 2 @ S.F. o ♦ s.•dre. ACR 3&i S.F. P F lls1ca GALA Cr s 2 S.F. o Aevidlci B t1/'4vB y .ia S.F. R /t1AI► 1 Attla S � - r8 S.F. S.F. T S.F. u S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. • Y S.F. Z , _ S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 3-2 3 4# SF. Excludable HardrmverlSee Ms Code Sec 75.1514) S.F. S.F. . SF. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Exduda b e Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract rinei2_)from line(1)I 52$f' S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 12, /2 S S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)3 27. 'f►I'% Vorst&EAViriclaon-January 2016 Am 1s an sdbrmatian packet reverting Hardcover Every effort has been made b ensure the accuracy of the Information contained hereT;however,iany Warrnation Is DEC 1 4 2016 not contestant vnth provlsans d are Cary Code,the Code proms ten prevail Page 19 CITY OF ORONO 41 '. + . I -• '' v : Exhibit E -: / �, �' -. #17-3887 , `• . ' . a i' 'fi ., :_ r r i i , ..44 _t ' ii . ,i111111,!,-;_, .•��..�§� ",s� r �" r!. ! t T ' ; �`� Y y ^ �t 0.� A ' ir ("L. ...,. ... ,l t. ,, . , ... ,....,.......... .,,„ ,�. +, y ' -�-_w l `r�k e 0. • • • .•t - If `� -:� _ 'fir . ,.. .,.is t ,. 4 a .�t FOR '4— . r$ , . 1 ". fit• i x t, y• r *, A 10 *fie' • 9 , ,• ! .. t 'F' r r � � rr t • r }^ •f... - . S 4- , 010.. 14k C-..' ' \.° ,, ,001,4:::,,t‘ .d, . �^ :T l -ri" a.•,„ ` 'fir `i` r m m ,* r N. 0. , ....., *�. ....„, `. * _ tib,mip 4itr �� ,. ... .. „,... _ - -- ., ,. . _, , „:„ ' • : - ' \ ....., ....,, V.."11.41 • ��r rt 4 �v *+` ems; 1 y{firsr ry ' t z .� . P” ` 0 • t N .4 ,, - 1 4 \ ;A•74 , ,. N • f T r a.i +4 ` _ am ,ti .lilic .• ., ,. ' ;..-7,. 4e. t. ' ,., ',,--"‘---. :-..,,,,;. � .. ...N.-1k io ,,,,, .....--i.,f. ?if 1 I SSS .rte 1_A" 1, U 4 �_: a-s'.,, y r t� ' N r F V �i gyp»•� `' ! IV. "*� t� 1• , 4 t..r. 4411L,, ff, ry N: J'`-� r Y ,fr. ,S} -"� mss' E 'C , - ,.., 1 ki : ti \ c til t . t . l'itX _ nJ ��` t` Pik * . ' I, 4. . M V,. i t, t 1n - YA /4e k Li To* 4- W .,.,....4,-,-,...1/4„..,, _ t • PC Exhibit F RUN DATE:12(13/2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: #17-3887 17 17-117-23 31 0003 38 17-117-23 31 0042 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC GEOFFREY&STEPHANIE MARTHA 3731 SUNSET DR 2092 SHADYWOOD RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 ORONO MN 55391 RESTAURANTS NO LIMIT INC GEOFFREY MARTHA 3746 SUNSET DR STEPHANIE MARTHA SPRING PARK MN 55384 2118 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0011 38 17-117-23 31 0044 J P KIEFFER&B E KIEFFER JEFFREY R WELDON 2024 SHADYWOOD RD 2117 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOHN PAUL KIEFFER JEFFREY R WELDON BENJAMIN EDWARD KIEFFER 2117 SHADYWOOD RD 2024 SHADY WOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0012 38 17-117-23 31 0047 STEVE E/NANCY C STRONG MICHAEL NOVAK 2032 SHADYWOOD RD 3640 TOGO RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEVE E&NANCY C STRONG MICHAEL NOVAK 2032 SHADYWOOD RD 3640 TOGO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 Al 0013 38 17-117-23 31 0048 DAVID CHARLES ZOSCHKE TRUST J E WELLS&K M WELLS 2040 SHADYWOOD RD 3600 TOGO RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID CHARLES ZOSCHKE JAMES E&KAREN M WELLS JUDY KAY ZOSCHKE 3600 TOGO RD 2040 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 310016 38 17-117-23 310052 JOAN L CARLSON K H SCHAEFER&T G SCHAEFER 2080 SHADYWOOD RD 2060 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOAN L CARLSON KATHRYN H SCHAEFER 2080 SHADYWOOD RD TIMOTHY G SCHAEFER WAYZATA MN 55391 2060 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0026 38 17.117-23 42 0016 CITY OF ORONO G S MARTHA&S D MARTHA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2118 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO GEOFFREY&STEPHANIE MARTHA POBOX66 2118 SHADYWOOD RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0030 38 17-117-23 42 0017 JOHN R CONKLIN STEPHEN T SIME/SUSAN E SIME 3660 TOGO RD 2106 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ADAM K LEHR STEPHEN&SUSAN SIME 3645 NORTH SHORE DR 17447 CHERRY DR ORONO MN 55391 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 38 17-117-23 310031 38 17-117-23 42 0020 CITY OF ORONO J P REILY&P S CRAFT 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2130 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JACK REILY&PAMELA CRAFT P O BOX 66 2130 SHADYWOOD RD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0032 MICHAEL P&LORI J ZAPPA 3670 TOGO RD ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL P&LORI J ZAPPA 19622 CO RD 35 ELK RIVER MN 55330 38 17-117-23 310041 THE MEGAN JOY TAMTE REV TRST RECEIVED 2100 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL&MEGAN TAMTE DEC �� 4520 LAGUNA DR iti EDINA MN 55435 RD 3887 CITY OF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED DEC 1 4 2016 # 3887 CITY OF ORONO PC • Exhbit G Hennepin Hennepin CountyLocate & Notify Map #17'3887 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 12/13/2016 17-117-23-24 17-117-23-13 rv) c24 117-23-31 ' °#"111111111 17-117-2342 w - r ISP 17-117-23-31 42, oft 1711 "42= 1131 an (r- 129nri. go goad (k) an i21) 7, 043} 17-1 i 7-23-31 17-117-23-42 05) (u) Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: 1711723310042 GEOFFREY&STEPHANIE MARTHA RECEIVED For more information County GIS contact: 2092 Shadywood Road Orono, MN 55391 DEC300 6th Street South E 4 ZU�6 Minneapolis,MN 55487 gis.infen�n s CITY OF ORONO 87 w r City of Orono t`o 'o Hardcover Calculation Worksheet I Property Address: X074 A10 rwafge r aid 6144Rrla) �`'ESHO~*`` Prepared by: Date: , /-/�f7 T Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) ier 9 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: ROPOSED HARDCOVE In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey ( q Feet) (Example) i (Garage) J24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A EKi Jr"/,'G ,t aer.rEfit` /.Z` �9sa+ A* v - (, 9S.F._ B �X7J''-f�G GO utGt° Ta �$�cart Ado T Ply,�/rul " 2 C14. S.F. C F)ci,r-rd,utr J,itifFt.E/u r 712 - 6II7 15i r 4 F i sJE`Q 2/9_5- S.F. D Qhs Pia BE A Fivi i?t/F- —74– S.F. F r pi.',..,41, Corte_ tda k tfr 05 722— 5?9 'r°; 7' AF ��l a /.'p S.F. G C�t"'/A/C AFM v aA -P- S.F. (BeirtIO RE'MoVr ) ~ '.'f- S.F. H >z`.A.t f�. ftr dt'At, , S.F. I E / /LI(r�A/s r10.1P 9 S.F. J FX,(Pr/,�.�G /1"$,0 ..t7 .). f L.r.f."0E�1 71 S.F. K ('TO AE' AEMOVE-!J —p4- S.F. fes' BE&Aria S.F. M P.tO12f�D 1®�/T1,t?i-1 Z73 S.F. N / tGl e '00 jVex/ S.F. 0 /dOFOfc.0 aACN / S.F. P JJEPPOf E GA to Q 592 S.F. Q !t°Parr, it1EL*c',Y /7.r S.F. R /Weir* r,rPs 2 ,Y S.F. S S.F. U S.F., v S.F. VS.F. X S.F. S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover Ys'S'8 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): _ S.F. S.F._ S.F.- S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. d S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover 'Subtract line(2)from line(1)] YAd ' S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Z i,2 S S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage ((3)+(4)1 25.Y5% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail Page 19 , . p 1,I fl: ITITF34 4:V111.05 m (o \CERTIFICATEOF SURVEY FOR GEOFFREY & STEPHANIE MARTHA\ \ \\1\ \ ..0 IN LOTS 30 & 31, BLOCK 1, WILEY'S PARK LAKE MINNETONKA ( \\ \\ \\ '!+, LAKE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ \ �.. ` �) v ��°�• MINNETONKA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ :O �\ 1 \\ \\ `\ (79 \\\n)\ \ ���`y CRYSTAL BAY \ \(8158) \\ \\ \ \\q. �0.._•i EXISTINGliit \\\ \\ \` 6 \��.....\......� O` HOUSE \ 1 (/,.6> �J4 \ \ �\ 02080 i •4 •` \\ \ S ( \ ' .04.9-51-1 \ \a}ypCg \\\\\� 929.4 CONTOUR owl .• i\ \ \ •� �• \ \ e . LME(O.H.W.) \, i \G 1 A31\ 9.32 \, J\ \\ \49 4 �s�y,� l," \ C/� \j yl (961.1) I kaa k, 5 \ \ S�RiVEY�\� \/ \ \ R/ ......-... \ \ \ LINE \s'� '( ) 7,,,. \lax,) g \ \F / F% ? + t,. \ atu 4 �j� VV�� \ \ \5 SETBACK"—� " gt9 r \ / / 55 \ \ Ar�J \ ice' LINE / I• \ \ \ \ 1 _ / (c)rul�rare wAu /�\ \ ass, \ oQ9 0\ spPv`� / Ta eE REuovEo -- ::.../?>.. \ \ \ ,\ �i 2 \ \\ \ \ \ 30 •.:,,\ iiiiiikAc,e ( \ 6� 1tiAA - �' PROPOSED-,:;---. .: j \E) \ Q .q�� •,•..t..•l \ \ \ g3,2 d. ae.9 -1-,4062...5 �i/ _ ._ /�/ (as,) lM) :` /�}''ro°'E �• 0•si, \ \ \ \ / (� \ i �� �Q��`� • \ ) �:\ 'ice •.�.: (951.6)\ r• ;•.r•' i•+ 1 ti ,. ,---. 1)- \'• \ ra. \ �� i i:::. - 1�1 e5 - Os/01,.} .•\ \ (0) * E) / ."I g.• \ . e\ NW COR QF .`�: °swoT EXISTING m ;`">' .\ \ �1 e \ 1 \ ��A�//�t/ABY SLOT 31 i .�<� GRAVEL t ;. /� °�' N• \ f i V� In�^{�n/,{/� \ •k i... `'•(930b) - .Y DRIVEWAY 5. Hit HOUSE % pi* X I �rL 9.2 •.. Y • t /� \ \ ,'•. �m`\ti./ A WDE STOOP e1 y ,',,,,2,'' iD 7D0. CI ' / Co \\\ �°s�J \)Ar " `:Nil ` ' EX ING �`` • ��\ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES \ \ \ GARAG/ ' l BLACKTOP \,x- \ �(". +\ 1NT•:' 3. (B)200;•••• PARCEL 1 �ROADWAv 4. \� �� Yr\ Lot 31, Block 1, "Wile s Park", Lake Minnetonka, except the following: - \ - PROPOSED \ ;' .;i, '' , y' P 9 Q,.....1 �. GARAGE ( -9) 4.0 Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot; thence Southeasterly �\ :'+OQ j � EXISTING \ along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 20.00 feet; thence Northeasterly ../(k) a distance of 109.35 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot sli: (wTs)\�\(P) ""��// / HOUSE distant 115.00 feet Easterly of the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence .61:e$ � • is \ ge/ / y /2100 Westerly on said Northerly line to the point of beginning. "-�`, S., \ \../ \ GRAVEL' ------ PARCEL 2 `,�'. G\ OQ': (917.8) DRIVfiwAY That part of Lot 30, Block 1, "Wiley's Park", Lake Minnetonka, lying \\ - (�.� �.9a�/`\ Northwesterly of a line drown Northeasterly from the most Westerly corner • • o�� yi of said Lot 30 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, which line forms an angle D of 80 degrees 36 minutes 30 seconds with the Southwesterlyline of said \\ �i '' ' s,,> QQ -e Lot 30 at the most Westerly corner. 00 0 4..11' 17.\i‘ (-SI \ • denotes iron marker found Q� O \•., I I denotesdexist spot eledevotion, mean sea level datum datum 908.3 : existing •on g0 --. I 910.8denotes proposedspotelevation, mean sea eve a um • e03)o 9 /'� r 9•004, i �S•. �.�\ ) A --917-—: denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Ir.,,,,.)) I �w lJ 0). \ 930 denotes tv�/ `7 ��} --- O/ proposed contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. .4`k. ,j \ This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, EXIST(IG the location of an existing house and garage, spot elevations, topography, / GARAGE the proposed location of two proposed additions, a proposed deck, driveway 0 / garage and grades, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It 6 ( does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DATE DESORPTION 12-12-16 PROPOSED GARAGE.wJ�cwER CHANGES swan I hereby certifythat this plan, specification, or report SCALE 12-71-16 TOPOORAPNY ADDED GGRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. nd that I am a y or under my Licen ed LanddSurveyor supervision, 1"=20' 1-1e-17 REVISED HARDCOVER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, St SITE PLANNERS the laws of the State of Minnesota. y DATE 8-16-16 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 553564--ef-Ifi �tl 952-473-4141 JOB No. Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 17-018 17-018 r , Item 4 Date Application Received: 12/14/16 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/29/16 V 60-Day Review Period Expires: 2/27/17 scf` G To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members 1gkFSHo�`� Jessica Loftus, City Administrator From: Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Date: January 17, 2017 Subject: #17-3888, D.J. Kranz Co. o/b/o Good Shepherd Luth. Church, 3745 Shoreline Dr. - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for expansion of the existing church building in order to construct an 18'x24' two-story addition for storage, office and kitchen facilities Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval subject to a number of conditions. Background Please review the submitted Narrative, Exhibit A. Good Shepherd Lutheran Church has been a fixture in Navarre since 1959, and is proposing to upgrade its kitchen and restroom facilities, including an 18'x24'two-story addition at the southerly end of the building.The addition requires a Conditional Use Permit,since the church operates as a conditional use in the LR-1C Single Family Residential District. The proposed addition requires no variances, as all setbacks, hardcover, and other zoning requirements will be met. The building plans submitted depict the proposed interior layout and exterior finishes. Under consideration and needing a conclusion prior to issuance of a building permit is whether the addition will trigger a requirement for fire suppression sprinkling of the entire building—this is under review by the applicants and Building Official Roger Peitso. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-348&78-350-Setbacks: Required: LR-1C DISTRICT /CHURCH CUP Proposed Addition Front: 30'/50' 332' + Rear: 30'/50' 425'± Side Street: 15'/50' NA Side: 10'/50' 71'+ Wetland 35' or 10' + buffer 150' + Lakeshore 75' NA Average Lakeshore NA , Y FILE#17-3888 January 17,2017 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-350- Lot Area/Width: LR-1C DISTRICT _ Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.50 acres) 100' Actual 209,569 s.f. (4.81 acres) 328.3' (def) 247.2' (perp) Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: (NOT APPLICABLE) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 3 209,569 s.f. 73,349 s.f. 51,611 s.f. 52,049 s.f. (35 %) (24.63%) (24.83 %) Applicable Regulation:Site Plan Review(Section 78-145) Before granting approval of the site plan review, the City Council shall determine that the proposal: 1) Is compatible with surrounding land uses; The extension of the building and the proposed kitchen expansion will have no impact on surrounding land uses. 2) Preserves existing unique and natural features of the site and minimizes impacts to wetlands, floodplains, and shoreland areas; Expansion of the building results in a minimal increase in hardcover at a level within required limits, and will be located approximately 150 feet from the wetland in the southerly portion of the site, far exceeding the 35' required wetland setback, hence there are no anticipated impacts to natural site conditions. 3) Creates harmonious relationship of buildings and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship of the development; As an architecturally compatible extension of the existing building, no negative visual impacts are anticipated. The addition also allows for removal of an existing storage shed located south of the building. 4) Achieves a safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation system; Expansion of the building will have no negative impacts on vehicular circulation. Pedestrian circulation will be improved by providing an additional exit doorway on the west side of the existing building. 5) Places no excessive demands on services and infrastructure, including local streets; The addition and remodeling of kitchen and restroom facilities will not increase demands on services and infrastructure. 6) Conforms to the city's plans for parks,streets,and walkways; The proposed addition and interior remodeling has no impact on and conforms to the City's plans for parks,streets and walkways. 7) Conforms to the Orono Community Management Plan;The continued uses as a place of worship and daycare center are allowed conditional uses and are in conformity with the - Orono Community Management Plan. FILE#17-3888 January 17,2017 Page 3 of 5 8) Incorporates sufficient landscaping to reasonably screen undesirable features and to enhance the image of the development; The proposed landscaping including a grass lawn area and low retaining wall, as well as the 50'-plus separation from adjacent lot lines, and the visually compatible facade treatments, are expected to enhance the image of the development. 9) Protects abutting properties and does not create detrimental disturbances to surrounding properties; The addition and remodeling is located and designed in a manner that should have no negative impacts to adjacent properties. 10) Conforms to all requirements of this chapter unless a variance has been granted. No variances are required. 11) Incorporates efforts to conserve energy whenever practical. The addition and remodeling are intended to bring the kitchen facilities to modern code standards. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The continued uses as a place of worship and daycare center are allowed conditional uses and are in conformity with the Orono Community Management Plan. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V,division 3 of the City Code; The proposed addition and remodeling meets the minimum setback and other zoning requirements for the continuing use as a place of worship and daycare center. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The proposed addition and remodeling does not require increases in services or infrastructure. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is connected to municipal sewer and water services and does not require changes to those systems. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; No increases in demand for public services are anticipated as a result of the proposed addition and remodeling project. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed use is merely a continuation of the existing use of the site as it has been used is the past,and no issues of compatibility are anticipated. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The continued use as proposed is consistent with the surrounding area,and no changes in the CMP are planned. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed expansion will be architecturally consistent with the existing church building and is anticipated to have no impacts on the character of the buildings and improvements in the surrounding area. FILE#17-3888 , January 17,2017 Page 4 of 5 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; No impacts to neighboring properties are expected as a result of the expansion and remodeling of the kitchen and restroom areas. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The proposed landscaping including a grass lawn area and low retaining wall, as well as the 50'-plus separation from adjacent lot lines, and the visually compatible facade treatments, are expected to enhance the image of the development. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration, odors,fumes,dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The addition and improvements to kitchen and restroom facilities are expected to have no nuisance impacts on neighboring properties. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets,parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The addition and remodeling project is not expected to increase traffic in the area nor require additional parking on the site. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; Expansion of the building results in a minimal increase in hardcover at a level within required limits,and will be located approximately 150 feet from the wetland in the southerly portion of the site, far exceeding the 35' required wetland setback, hence there are no anticipated impacts to natural site conditions. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The proposed plans indicate downcast lighting to avoid any negative glare impacts to neighboring properties. and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. There are no anticipated negative impacts to the public health,safety or welfare. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Analysis of Conditional Use Permit&Site Plan Staff finds that the proposed addition and associated interior remodeling, along with the proposed landscaping plan that removes an existing detached storage shed, are positive improvements to the property and its use as a place of worship and daycare center. The location of the addition should have no impacts on neighboring properties, and the size of the addition is very minor as compared to the size and orientation of the existing building. The slight increase in hardcover leaves the site well below the 35% hardcover limit. While it is anticipated that the hardcover increase will not require additional stormwater management facilities, the applicants are advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to determine whether any permits are required. Staff would note that the lower-level storage area (for lawn maintenance and snow removal equipment)includes a 6'wide garage door that opens to the proposed lawn. Applicants may wish to consider whether a hard-surfaced pathway to the parking lot might be appropriate in this area. FILE#17-3888 January 17,2017 Page 5 of 5 An as-built survey of the entire site, not just the area of the proposed improvements, will be required upon project completion. Also, as noted above, applicants and building official are reviewing whether this addition and remodeling may require fire suppression sprinkling of the building. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the conditional use permit, if granted, will not result in any negative impacts to the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate any impacts created by the granting of the requested CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for the addition and remodeling project as proposed, subject to applicant confirming with MCWD whether any permits or stormwater management improvements are required, and subject to provision of an as-built survey of the entire property being submitted upon completion of the project. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application & Project Narrative Exhibit B. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit C. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit D. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. Photos of Site Exhibit F. Property Owners List Exhibit G. Plat Map City of Orono Site Plan Application PC Exhibit A Street Address: ' Application# 7-3 F..? �� /�O f, 2750 Kelley Parkway j�/ Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: /A -/ - /. , Main: 952-249-4600 Staff fax: 952-249-4616 a t Fee: 11111 ,114- MPO.aNingBox Address:66 Escrow#&$ G� Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee t'1kEsH04`fc" Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 3745 Shoreline Drive APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION: Applicant/Agent: D.J. Kranz Co., Inc.I Bruce Quam,President Phone (Primary): 763-525-0100 Mailing Address: 725 Hiqhway 169 North Plymouth,MN 55441 Email: bquam@dikranz.com City: ZIP: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Phone(Primary): 952-471-8433 Mailing Address: 3745 Shoreline Drive City: Wayzata,MN ZIP: 55391 Email: pastortoren@goodshepherdmn.org APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered In the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject It until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. if an applicant and/or owner Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authoriz representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. frez....._ Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Applicant/Agent Signature: 1 Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: /2-// /7 Property Owner Signature: Date: RECEIVED Site Plan Application-January 2016 DEC 14 2016 Page 2 ;_ 3888 CITY OF ORONO City. of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street Address: Application# / 7-3 SO/�TO 2750 Kelley Parkway b Orono, MN 55356 Date Received: i a—I 4- 1 Staff: Main: 952-2494600 fax 952-249-4616 Fee: 70c) Ct- 74t/ 9' Mailing Address: P.O.Box 66 Escrow#&a�4 �5� ��G oZaUlo G� Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee ikEs H 04� Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 3745 Shoreline Drive APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION: Applicant Name: D.J. Kranz Co., Inc./Bruce Quam, President Phone (Primary): 763-525-0100 Applicant Email: bquam@djkranz.com Address: 725 Highway 169 North City: Plymouth,MN ZIP: 55441 Agent Name: Bruce Quam Agent's phone number 763-525-0100 Agent Email: bquam@djkranz.com Applicant is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ❑ check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Phone (Primary): 952-471-8433 Mailing Address: 3745 Shoreline Drive City: Wayzata, MN ZIP: 55391 Email: pastorloren@goodshepherdmn.org APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. .r/ Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: j - - Date: / /.,S' /�p Property Owner Signature: RE ED� CUP Application-January 2016 DEC 1 4 2016 Paget Et 3 8 88 CITY OF ORONO Narrative-Good Shepherd Kitchen Remodeling. December 14, 2016 TO: Orono Planning Commission City of Orono,Minnesota FROM: Good Shepherd Lutheran Church We are requesting permission from the Orono Planning Commission and the City of Orono to remodel our current kitchen at Good Shepherd Lutheran Church,3745 Shoreline Drive,Orono, MN, and to add on an 18' by 24' addition to the kitchen to bring it up to current standards and codes. The original building at Good Shepherd,which includes the current kitchen,was built in 1959. We did the second phase of our building, our last addition,which included the sanctuary, common or lobby area, and church offices, in 1971. We did a major remodel of our initial structure in 2003,replacing an energy-inefficient curtain wall of windows on the original building and the roof on the original building, as well as adding more efficient furnaces/boilers to heat the structure. But the church kitchen has never been remodeled,and is in its original 1959 format. The current kitchen area will be remodeled on both levels. The lower level under the current kitchen will only be slightly altered. The exterior exit door and hallway to the Sunday School/childcare classrooms will remain the same. The women's restroom will remain the same, and the men's restroom will be remodeled to include a handicap accessible toilet. A hallway to a lower level workroom in the new addition will also be created. On the upper level of the current structure,the proposed building project includes a remodeling of the current storage or pantry area, and a replacing of part of the current kitchen area with a family, handicap accessible bathroom, as well as an opening up of part of the kitchen area to allow more fluid flow of food serving into the Fellowship Hall. So the proposed project includes an accessibility upgrade to a lower level toilet facility, and the addition of a new accessible toilet facility on the upper level adjacent to the Fellowship Hall. The overall fixture count for toilet facilities will remain the same. The proposed new 18' by 24' kitchen addition will also be on the same two levels. The lower level will include a small storage area for our lawn maintenance and snow removal equipment and tools. This will eliminate the need for the current free-standing storage shed to the south of the existing building on our property. The lower level will also include a workroom for the Shoreline Childcare staff. Shoreline Childcare has shared our facility space with us since 1969, and they have never had and currently have no designated work space for their staff. Often during their daily prep times,the staff are sitting on the floor in the lower lobby working on computers to plan their class schedules or cutting out and laminating bulletin board projects. The new 18' by 24' addition on the upper level will update and expand the 1959 kitchen, allowing us to meet all current state, county, and city licensing and health codes.We are currently grandfathered in on many of these updated codes, and this new kitchen remodel and expansion will allow us to bring our kitchen up to date. The kitchen is used daily for food service by Shoreline Childcare,weekly on Wednesday evenings by our congregation for a pre-worship/confirmation meal for our youth and families, and as needed on Sunday mornings and at other times for Sunday church dinners, funeral meals, and special church events.This remodel and expansion will allow us to have an up-to-date kitchen which provides a safe,standard-meeting area for food preparation and serving. The floor plan modifications also address life-safety issues and improve building code compliance. The Fellowship Hall will have better access to the existing south stair and a new exterior door will provide a safety exit and access to the back yard. The raised floor(and step) inside the existing storage closet area will be removed. The hours of operation for construction will be from 6:30 a.m.to 5:00 p.m. Good Shepherd Lutheran Church has been an active part of the Navarre and Orono communities since 1954,and we are currently a strong,healthy congregation, with 300 people in worship each week and over 60 students in our Confirmation program. Shoreline Childcare has been a safe and affordable daycare space for children in our community since 1969,and they recently received a national childcare accreditation. We both look forward to using and enjoying a new, up-to-date, expanded kitchen space,and we believe that this new, improved space will benefit and enhance the ministry and mission of both of our organizations. Thank you so much for considering our request! Pastor Loren Davis Senior Pastor Good Shepherd Lutheran Church PC Exhibit 8 tb ____ ".„ _`` CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR x a n g�. .°�vE 3z$z9 `�, , GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH W2E CO• sLIllE ,30„ E e " IN LOT 5, BLOCK 7, TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK H- SI1°- S 69655 47• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA A oIX = ' wog \ ' Ill Kwa S`396 r'' : 4 vy, "" • 9. N. tw OE t Gd .3111X. % s 1 6 ry • EXISTING Mr I BUILDING I. / , , orA)45 A 4 depa ' \ ' ;;;.!,01\1\*S\ I l'27.1> f.,• NGS / TRACT G LP i— r L.I :•%101.... BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT IY (0) 0. �?� TRACT H v. ��` )3'•s>f U, 47 N 444 \ '1/4 32,E �_ 1" i..: :'c"... '° ' BLACKTOP \ i �` PARLWC LOT e4 n 1'sow mr. \ li.9RA\t 1.9 941; b !. S. TRAC T R Raj o5a _ \ \ \ ;i Feb i ( EKY .'� +, M ?�»\, 4 \-......—.„),:k\.4 i \ ! : . `. \ \\ ' ....,�y 1141 ° tre 96 y }e«.e • \ 1 j vi Ito, 6 } ` MOE Of {''... I \l \\ \ 1.01,1610:-0 1 / !Hi I ' 9A3t �e, 26 '' 1 - rli .., to 1 bk elf LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF Pt2EU6ES : 1 .A )RK Lot 5, Block 2, TOWNSITE OF LANGOON PARK O� 1• : denotes iron marker �' e (IN6.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum .? --siT— m denotes existing contour Ens, mean sea level dotuy'S Ay o OBearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. �Ry AA CB This survey htendsto show the boundaries of the above described property, the location Cl of an exist" building, shed, the proposed location of a proposed addition, spot elevations and topography near the proposed addition, and ail major visible "twdcover' thereon. O 1/43 It does not purport to show any other in rovement. or encroachments. NOTE: Accuracy of hardcover location, and extent of additiond / hardcover is limited by ice and snow cover. \� �*tye� `�-=`a LOTTaYeA�ONti •ib y E Taware s LNxx10 4 PW 16-453 .." - / n / n r --/H •• /c.0 Z Wa lilt d •—'1 J :o'er: t:14 . , O t';s�• .......... CC , , _—___._ .._14 _____ < 4-3-, __ __ U 1 / I %....., 0 I—0 e / i", _....---—, 7, .,.., .,,l, y Z t.2. 3-) / .------- 4 ..-- ,. .,... f• M Jrx -m 4 iii O ` • ~ m / / ` L L. A/ / ` /" 0H 0/ ,e--1 ` - `i, • .. ° 5......_.r,—., / Ny ,, r "' � A ..11 IC> tr'''' 414 WI—0 1 . 0. v.i.:4 .,,Icil ,.. _ _, , _cc. ... . -...... ,.$ §. 0-0 ,:.:„6 vi.... ____—, cf• •c•4 .-- _A,/' „N s / `t° ; `r ” '_ �, 4 J '---t--- O. • "- - '-'-.-- # Cibt- cP - / 43,.C! . /// rn `/ �9 .rye/ .': tip„ :°. el `9�1:1 1/er Q O ,.. il, o $r,f,-o LO c6 f - cr 'if / LIP Sell O>M / .......„440 r Cj `'' 4,1 tri Ney. ----._,..../ ....%7 tit° c"... , -,....... 0,4 ,, ..,, k, 1\ 4 41:- �I/ V atP 4) '''' i° .:.."•&t, 0!.i-112 y h+ �ti. t co 1 Lg ''.' 0. at 0� t•:•4 y4 _ M 4 J—' N, _' N'—s �-g4a §.) oO�\ 3 �,,� 41) N ta 2 \ Z o • 0 N v N r}W N.N W. "'Y \ 0. yY , w hry r • 1 �. 6-JAN tV Y CL ...i Z Yl PC Exhibit C _ ___ j_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ___. . _ ._ _ _ ____. _ _ S H C R E L I \ E DRVE CO. ROAD # 1 5 318.3 \ ___,_\ \ \ \\ • \ \\ \\ \ • • lilb W \ CE--i-/' E L/,, PARKING \ �'� ` i , LOT \ \ 2` ` f lti (JN.11' ADDITION \,` DESIGN DATA !E. s } \ PARCEL LOCATION TIER 3 ♦` ` ALLOWABLE HARDCOVER 35 -''s, 1 1 / s j F % ',,,_.,-7-'1 \ SITE AREA 209,491 SF cc ` �` .•VGxRDI�. s �♦ 4.81 ACRES \ ;',,s,./7>,‘ S _ _ _ EXISTING BUILDING AREA 13,010 •1 NEW ADDI ION 432 _ `\\\ \ Q E 1 • ` HARDCOVER \ \ C) EXISTING BUILDING G7 ♦\ `\ (-67) PARKINGAREA (c) EAST SIDEWALKS I \ \• + {-7_,D W• EST SIDEWALK Ql P• ATIO & STEPS ♦ P Cr P• EACE GARDEN \ ti,' (F.') EXIST SHED— TO BE REMOVED `n N • \ r+i,� NEW ADDITION e' (- ) NEW STEPS , \ \r \ j,b �.`? N• EW RETAINING WALL t \ 7s H 1 l r i m 0 20 4D 80 , m V A001 SITE PLAN :. RECEIVED t DEC 1 4 2016 3888 CITY OF ORONO 73.471.1 434315 O06Z OLS Z L9 _ - - INV 6YS01'ON'034 > _.__. , N 0.4S3NiaN V10S3NNIN'ONONO Ling 0 Y1 30 31V.S 3W:b saw Mil VOW=MOW, V1OS3NNIN 'Sf7OM3NNIN 0 031131SB3 [.1 1 Alfa V NV 1 ow on lammd1S 34aO WEIII0NS Oa d NINON 3f1N3.0 OMUI Oil x3lfOa 1bNIg7 s ONNNnd l.14 1116z/r1/z1 17360 N xJU ao 3w.e A NHra zw3 lr lIBW WO HOdf1HO NVH3Hlfll OH3Hd3HS awe spe)!goJy(alyo!J uenels FNWNW 603 143 ACM 1 A 130 1 NMI/UN/MSS 1 33V0 \0 CM Z cm 0 CV cC W "::7" a U r-- o IX W 0 U a) CO CO 0 / / r / ` \4.1111131 CK / U � ,/ `�\ / r, //d/Ve \ , co Z W / o ,` - Y 1' cr / N \\\_,_. ___ ,, -- /: {/ 1' 71 /J -_ 1 { 111 / / / /�j ' i. y'j� ,/ 1 =:1--- �1 w Ij I 1 Ij / b., 5' g I �� 1III / ii a s I{ / Sg *c W N Cr �I f p 3Y / �ES O f / z s v......)..., 5 1 E 1 W M { / oci ry N) r 0 N / // V ■■imisesi 07,0 ac9 z19 131tlDH rams ■rrr■err azro nit'ON•33a ■u■uu■11■ 1306310111, 10.06211.1111'OHM rrrMrrn■ tzrss AO 31113 3111 AO SBA 3Hi Elam 3a21.1DO r 3A210 301113/JOHS 2033 ■.■■■.■■ Y1a63NN93 '6110d0NWY1 Q MUM=Alf10 V IN I 111,1 ON 74002JAa3dn9 ■■...1.1111 N1aaN annum amyl'alp MIAMI xalnuo 4.ONINNVII a/3nss� 9100C1/21. 103100 J14 anon;�6 and S "�. 1.210430 HO HOHIf1H3 NVd3HJf110F13Hd3HS 000D 11.11..■•■ sloei431y 1e143U usnelS ■■10111a.1• 0C.00O W Z r > 0,1 o D A-,r2 .0-.L .1,-A .0-,t .0-,1, A-Al U r LLO W w L r 1 r .at-.1 .9 .9-,CI N yy,, GS y� CA u 3 N CO , _____ d CO \\ Z OD M kk Mg 11 -sl 1 / \ ((SII flvpw �� ! t3 I1'I 5�a ii7 Li, , '7 lit= O��1�1.r- _. ]]— .� f��� CC'Lf ---J , ,.s 1:1,+1 '1,5,a vt `k ..sm i... ._ . kgk Y III i s I 1 F L!!ON lir � > . /, M ,', Sp��r1' r Trel. + cc o Hiitt ICllati � � ` ix: I III . i d 1 I Y N }tI i pU g s te-D y - 1ri ak `\� A. 'l 'Lg-`� \ bl IYFFF Li.N EQUIPMENT NOTES �^ a a _ ® ® t° I L. sroRAOE -+ 000 '�1 CONVECTION WEN4` S10R"0E Q OO QO ® m2Q 8-Rl.7tl{R GAS RANLTEr ' ® ® i oj t Q355 HOOD-T-Li Fl LONG(MEIMFY) ,# I '\ ii <______111...,:ii, OSS HMO SDK LEVER HANDLED FAUCET j - ® ;I 0/111 g ©SS iNK AND COUNTER,DYERHFAD SPRAYfl „d J b : Q DLSHWVSFER,BCOSIER NEATER _ == , ® Q o _Sw ! J Q � , I Qe NOT USED 4 5 i 0 flii 0 SS TAB/ v x it Q SS PREP SIAM WSH DMNBDND �' 6TORIPf I 1 ,dJ SS PREP TABLE © ' J L I q fe1Y JJ ©TWO DOOR REACH-IN FREEZER YERIFT OD L TO U T�_'- T Q TWO BOOR REACH-IN REFRIGERATOR OPENING �M1JL.�I kl I Q Ra NCII DEETp MRE sHEIWAffi ® J UJ \ GI FLOOR LEVEL-LOP SINK _ __--__-__ w Q ES WALL NOI.'IVfED SHELF 1 — CI Q Q SERVING TABLE- K a Fl LONG) Q « ® I G 4 — Lx Q CABINETS on COUNFERTDP(ow FQ- K ' v t _ LLl \Ci t_ --a .M-„-w..+---a'^�.,,,�-�-�-„ :,4!,1, -,.,w?..,-,- ,:,„,^'''''''''''---,,,— _ FULL-ROW GLASS =I t\ j 432 SF 5o EXIT 0008 1 i 25 �.�.__a. _ - - ,.2, -77'-',-;77.777.-77:,777, .>. i I ..._.._ - 45.7.+, �. .r,M.. °3j�-A^�,....+�.,�'d.- TJ rT 1I,J� li� TiIII! ■■■■■■■■ KEY 11111111•1111111M111111111 ■■■■■■■■ UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN I li��ll ■■■■■■ F 1/4' _ -CI' '' m r EXISTING WALLS To BE REMOVED ��y±±: S Esr STING WALLS TO REMAIN WALLS c P EXISTING ma LL C m LD RECEIVED _ A102 DEC 1 4 2016 1 if 8 8 8 CITY OF ORONO — —--- — 1320.1 rams ■p_■■■!■ Does mg no 3L X01 ON.Mg ■■ ■■■ ■ _ ■■■■■■■■ Lz�ss O 'IUOS7iNYr MOWN'aNOLo ■■■■■■■■ Jo MIs Tru do WYYI 3+1 worm 1 N 3nwa 3N113Y0N6 OLE ■■III nom vLoso on•snodviroort .M=AinIA' 1v� a V 4 11 OW 11^'^W' M moi ■...11111111111111111.(121014 311N3AV al#Ya G =OM= x3„30,ow1m>p manna,,," ilouil/z1 1vYA amen w 3w JC mYYdale M 1Ya�Y Yo H3F1f1Ha MIH3H1f110d3Hd3HS 0000 ■■■■■■•■ sioei!4a j Iei4e1d IMAMS rM amen m 714 sai 1YX1 A1rY3a AMI O NOISIMS/3ns61 31.0 •••••••• `. 0 co Z LU> o 0 W0 U V_ 0 w v 00 00 00. EI I i -: , _I I ■1 I i f I : G m __ _ ■1 11 M M 1r \ \ I L...o I ii Ree i Il 1 > > 3 ri 2 CO ELI 0 0 I 0 w w I I � ■1 ■1 li 41 ! ;1li ■1 ■1 15 Bg gm III II FM I I 11, . / I' i\\ I MI II M 1I V 1 I 1' III I CM , r I II i =■ ; If 'I - co — 1 CD 0 [ N1V-Ti'IMMO V SNINVeld Aug FILOZ/Gltel NC/ISIAH/WM IWO MVO 111113LI POKLIS 90991 'ON'039 V10931099 .10 3W1S ILL JO SW 241 MOM.1.111,NOVI aokoustan Aino r ow I min ow*NOSNI111/15 1-131110 AN MOM/10 31 Aii 9311.40919 SVN lbeVON MO NOIAVIA33dS Wild 52141 alil kiLLIELS ALMON I r____ 11.0S3`0111'OhtlitiD 3#4210 3.11111i011S Vrif 1101111H3 IMI3H1.111 a El3Hd3HS 0000 :11:••••:••• ocaz CL9 Zl9 1111M111111101111 IMMENEMM a M•MEMI111111 10S34N 1111111111.111.11 KLIKINV"C 3111143141rWV3P44°""Iglift Urn Mil spalpialv laitpd uanais •• •• CV 0 — 0 0 C4 0 .4— LI. 0 0 C eW611:531 I: !) 1 i IC % P 1 1" gi 6 IA 2 g I•1 r 2 R ilt 11 I k ! / . \ i ,iir • 1 1: : . ir-1 I I I 1!1 i ! ! , 1 CO i i, • 11 i 00 ' 1 INCN 4; 1 z • i 0 1 i! • i I i WI i 1' I • I -91, 1 I i : I i m 7 J-1 :--- i I I f I I I ' --• — .c:-....„..........1 I : • 2 I i LI. . 5 P . ''.-1. — - VI _- - -- --- ---- ,o — - ..... _.. .... .. ___. _ ..., k---------) r------T----+ - •`----'1._. _ _ .... _..„. _. . — --•••••...._ --- ___.----_.... - g —..._---...._— ---• •- _ ._._ . ...._ ......... _._ — . • PC Exhibit 0 City of Orono • • • Hardcover. Calculation Worksheet ) Property Address: i:fi"f�`C "G .✓ ' ' . r � �r+� . fnit' 4°,e l%4.4•" /G �. �• !'tfsCyutPry Prepared by: n P Date: • Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 QM Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1XISTI NG HARD In the following tablCOVE e`i ent fy a items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier I properties. identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback tine and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width fatal Survey (Square Feer) I (Example) (Garage) I (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) ! A C ,f Chi gLe/4DS/41C J 4'c tJ S.F. 1 B TAW Er 5 S.F. J r C Aim ik/ tar o ORiiie 12r z:l 5 F I D Ger►.(IR ,f sF FTS' ;�6'5'5 S.F. 1 E A6-4 c CrcAAIA/ F/2, S.F. Re's-4F Retd/`r4.- "' I/GL` 2 6' S.F. L__ G 441ifte414 d.A L be 14 LI. C c S.F. + ; H .. r• `U _ S.F. A/c i'.r'0 3 y s.F. Jt�11�1C IOC S.F. f7'dDA _. /`ieR S.F. L �/��'tf 4 "�"et;/if/`/ /s,, i /7 S.F. M _ S.F. IvS.F.- a S.F. F S.F. __ P S.F. R S,F. S I S.F. T S.F. U _ S.F.V r S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y SF r Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover .57,13.6.M. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code 8ec 78-1584): .0 crt caas/'c ...tsj c1. _241 S.F. L 1 1.4..,r.9ot�J: itierAr isrlre,,C /.tri 44.• /7 S.F S.F. J ..� S.F.S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover tri,S.F. (3) Net Existinn Hardcover ;Subtract line(2)from line(1)] $,t/C// S.F. (4) Total Loi Area. _...__ . _._ �_._ _ 209, SR' S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)1 2.44.6.3 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Subdivision Application-January 2016 This Is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort hss been made to enatre the soa necy of the information contained herein;however,if any information Is not content with provisions of the City Code.the Code provisions will prevail. Page 18 1 . . 11 City of Orono 1 (.4 •No.N Hardcover Calculation Worksheet } Property Address: I ,4it .77'4 r h'aitC Atie 04 f VE f Cope 11(1.1Y€ Ltf =itifit r GweA t'M) 'V_ PreparSd by: (7_ Date:$E : 4,C:vC IA:'E' �/AA". Date: /2_21_,(i Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 1I) Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:':Ti0_1 _41 . -i. . 7 In the following table, identify al Items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover Items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, Identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key —to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) ' Length x Width (Square Feat) (Examp1e) , (Garage) �..L24'z 30° (720 S.F.).J A lrXJrth/.eG (. . . F.---e. S.F. B it rHed 'c; S.F. C ., ALICid zott.0 IM1L/tr g7,225-- S.F. D is �/LJt In? r Pc 7 S.F.a.6g E 11 AC,rr ry 4AQ EA., 0 i 2. S.F. F J1 A Er4 pLtdaVe 4'M e L S.F. ( G ii Mc th/L 1.1.4 i..L. h'1 S.F. H N C/ // . S.F. I w A je At p 3 S.F. J •. 14)1[.,X , :. S.F. K .. 0 r !ey$ S.F. L aro .* E'�. S.F. M '1 bhsieO I B10 t'/, if'3 2 S.F. N _ H S.F. o S.F. P S.F. ct S.F. R S.F. 5m, s S.F. i �_ _ S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y 111111111111101 Z 1 To ' ... • Hardcover 1 AIM Excludable Hardcover also City Cods Sec 76.1644): 2.1' S.F. /7 S.F. S.F. S.F. ._ S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 's S.F. (3) Net Proposed Heidoover (Subtract Mme(2)from line(1)) _4 np91 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 201/5`9 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 2 47t.83 % Subdivision Application-January 2016 7hIa is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort hes been made to enures the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the Clfy Co ,bthe Code provisions will pewit. Page 19 ECTEX �' RER rii :mi,..1c ... 4 11 � + PC Exhibit E 000: _ ..,- \ , � > t I ' - ' 44:.,...... , 4.d .... ' :•,..1 n ;,..,. .+A t...} 'Rif' '.w p a?:Attli.„... , 1,„ t ,.' , t t, 3'* - *. , . 10101ti: .. ` • 4 u �. , ,. m• ___— {r * em g ..;._ _ �r / ..,..„,....,,,),..,r,---,..,,,,,,. F i .e, . .. .., + a ° . .,. . ',44. w +* ♦I i *;: . f t � ! tg , #. . •fi♦a • M a. ?s a f-P ; t. • t- ., - i ar _ 99 ay. -i r', 1�l V w17 d•xi�� r / 9 t"t` a v r ' a 4. y .tea 'h x a .. »max. , a .F F r -Kf'' 4, _ f- _ {� • r r -+ P ' i :...°.°°.'°...::"""' ' .r AlE 9 f i2.3i4 •.1011- - i, w. . _ } t� ft • � • f?• tea ► • • I _ I gyp, map: Auto - 05/02/2015 (2015)- t image 1 of 4 ? 1 H2OS A�� l�D IV ID t,1 r -'y . . ° - '''' ' . ''''.. ' . •,'.^ t--.. ' - -'-•'.t.- .4 "t"',4i-;„:1...-Orttt'f.;,;.i.:-:', •,,t7;, • . • . . "It''i,-.4.'"...-; ,•?"' "„0.„,",. ""4 , t t4,- .'',7,'"'• -..,^,'t-^4.07" ;,.;-.:4of'.."4',40,,:,,,,, *e 14- .' . ,.. --. , ' . t. 4,`..•1::• , .1 ' s:/4,,,,, %,40. • v v , i Av.:: •. r v vavir., v,,,. . v 4 • '''',Al 4.*i t a •• .. 4,1•••••`` i \IV' ' e,... . . . ,,• ,, . 4, -- „.„. ,,, ,it. _ • I ^ .,.. ' "'"''''' ." -•..4. - '* •.'i,. • AV' ' ''',-,1, ' r .., ,., . ._.,,.'.1 - ,,I 0410 .. .... .•r ' • - ,.....,,,,„i im Ili , ,,- . . i : 11-4 •- - , i I ii*,,,, .; , _ • 1111101/4, "0' 1 ,1 t, , i . , - ., , •"--: . " i % k 1 . 4 v $ Z 4' .*". A , / ' 4' ° '•' ' I - f , ,. i 1111 . 41. li • t NI i iNititk1/4 11 .. . 4 . I ., .• • ' •••••' .* .*--- .....v••••••-*-- . ... ....... -XII*...-" ,,, ' •• , i, .... . 4.. ' ... ... .4.1.01010010r- ...••• , ... "' .rair""Illap.rii*. .,... . .. . - '•. • .. • If ---. --* ,• ...,,, , • ... * - . - *111'‘r4 ' ' -•,• ill . " u- -- -"- „...--*P-.1"......00.- 0106:00... ... — .- 4iiiirao..2.00.4‘. ,• via ___'....:....01.. .".. , :..,_. :03VP ......,.2 $7111°.-7.•i.461P4111- ..‘..-CIIII4C0,0114•'.. ' • ' ...0.'m ... ' - ' .'•r.",'-, v.;.-A..1 kf-.1:::: ' I P.....,h'; „,..i • 'Lt ...... .1.,. .. .. .. ... .i‘ AP,...1. ..a. . -. .to , . Al• All.‘”' .. ..P. - ......e..4.. 4,77.-1007 0.14.11111 ••,' * , .r...boor?* -- ' ' *.ea* *.* oor • or - 4.4., , ,.,, •• • a 4- A' A., •• . ••• •' • '''''' *. -.A• - ' ' •-,.. 8 „. �` . A i• '4 . " ` 4 : .Ail. iti ......:i. /1„---- .. ii. . , . 1 ... .„... ... . . . w _ _ .7.. ' •; 1 ,..,..1.„u . k r s �. „rn �► iia+-�7 � • ,._r»'maw a: X? v. ' • R - " t r 1, 7,,W°°-+ •0..,..1....;. 7, + e rr t:- - .' • ‘ . _ _ .. ;;: _ _ ,._ _ -__Iiiiarassigoor—of. __ _. , •„..wiebi. ... ...„. .... ___..4....,_ i- a R a A w -----==.z. .....„.4i , y,„..1.006.__,.... _ _ __,3„.:._. .. ... _ rt' y .n _s i 14 Sit je - i1 4.r,a ki I.r• i ! `- 40 4' y« _.- El I RI $ ill'y f i iie "" ,,,M , ,rosoill."" ni111.- - t - - f 4 - •*4 ` .11 • '...* 1 1 ® r , s r. .. . 1 «ttMI .-. .i c 1♦ ....._. ` - -•.... .�Ls r. * lV .+r-. .` iii �- r• j - -. j ' "`a` ..a vw�dr -" .,d.. ... .. ,w- - - - - Up sues i �rrr.IIyW lI V .1....-.1......*I"'w 1•ii • t O)LIeAe�MMM 1 ap up a,nipeq el a za!#daa i aeied e saioe4 Mien PC Exhibit F 38 17-117-23 33 0007 38 20-117-23 12 0025 38 20-117-23 21 0015 MARK E&BARBARA L BREWER JOHN T GORMAN MARIE A SVANO 3800 SHORELINE DR 3585 FREDERICK ST 4140 11Th AVE S WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55407 38 17-117-23 34 0042 38 20-117-23 21 0001 38 20-117-23 21 0016 KELSEY M BUSCH JOSEPH&MARGARET HENDERSON DONALD WESTRUM II 3655 LYRIC AVE 2464 DUNWOODY AVE 2534 ALPINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WOODBURY MN 55125 38 17-117-23 34 0043 38 20-117-23 21 0002 38 20-117-23 21 0017 JANE V COX AMY MARIE STEELE GAYLORD RONALD D&HOLLY S ROCCA 3645 LYRIC AVE 2001 LAKESIDE LANE 2520 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0044 38 20-117-23 21 0004 38 20-117-23 21 0018 GABRIEL J RODRIQUEZ JERI A NEUMAN CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH 3635 LYRIC AVE 2476 DUNWOODY AVE 2420 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0045 38 20-117-23 21 0005 38 20-117-23 21 0019 KATHLEEN L FINE PAUL W LARSON TIMOTHY J OGLAND 3625 LYRIC AVE 2470 DUNWOODY AVE 2500 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0046 38 20-117-23 21 0006 38 20-117-23 21 0020 ANNA M TAPTO PAULA ZACHMAN LINDA K O'NEEL/ROBERT O'NEEL 3615 LYRIC AVE 2406 DUNWOODY AVE 2520 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0083 38 20-117-23 21 0007 38 20-117-23 21 0021 LAKE MINNETONKA WOODS ASSOC JOSEPH&MARGARET HENDERSON KF-LLE M BOWE C/O COMPASS MANAGEMENT GROUP 2464 DUNWOODY AVE 2815 CASCO POINT RD 415 INDIAN MOUND ST E#101 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0086 38 20-117-23 21 0008 38 20-117-23 21 0022 CITY OF ORONO JOSEPH&MARGARET HENDERSON CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLY PKWY 2464 DUNWOODY AVE PO BOX 66 ORONO MN 55356 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 12 0019 38 20-117-23 21 0010 38 20-117-23 21 0023 BRENDAN OLSZEWSKI RONALD L VANACORA ERIC HARL&AIMEE EARL DENISE OLSZEWSKI SUZANNE VANACORA 2560 DUNWOODY AVE 3580 FREDERICK ST 2500 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0020 38 20-117-23 21 0014 38 20-117-23 21 0024 JEREMY A STEWART T CHALUPSKY&D Y CHALUPSKY CHARLES I)PRICE MAGGIE L STEWART 2530 CASCO POINT RD 2813 COSCO POINT RD 2474 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 Tr® � 0 r q,ebpg dn-dod asodxa Jaded paaj ! egg Ls alsidwet®Aland 1 ; oa suis 6uole puag -. Slege7 gaped wJ11OY/GeA6'MMM {op uge o nipe4 Q1 tF ze11da8 eE+swrb V oiled seipet sewn 38 20-117-23 21 0025 GOOD SHEPHERD LUTE CHURCH 3745 SHORELINE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 21 0028 CENTURY LINK ATM PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 2599 OLATHE KS 66063 38 20-117-23 21 0029 STEVAN J&DEBRA!WAGNER 5440 MORNINGVIEW CT MOUND MN 55364 38 20-117-23 21 0033 MERZ PROPERTIES LLC 2412 BLACK LAKE RD SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 20-117-23 21 0034 JAMES E BEST 2590 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 210036 IGOR YURCHENKO NATALYA CHERNEVSKAYA 2490 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 21 0037 STEPHEN J RUDOLPH 2480 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 21 0038 ALLEN J&JUDY B SCHEFERS 2540 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 RECEIVED DEC14201r CITY OF ORONO 38 8 8 riu096s e/l2jalAlot mon d11-6)41 umbra Jawed posy f 009LS aiidwet efuem 01,041 ala pangMEMV ! sown"IOW , ' Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map PC Exhibit C3 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 12/13/2016 .' '� ! �... Pn tO. I 1- /0. I - 1" ^ " 1 1 1 4 Livi 17-117-23-33 ` f" - '" ." . I 17-11r . ^ -' I - - ^ ^ li -i �}1 f17-117-23-43. N * 20-1 <_ , .,.....,..........,..ii— '3 3! .. +. dM a .. * fir=�' V. '' 1 �, 1 • h▪ 48%, fit ,,,c a .r,� 1 j _._ _ - 1 -. ▪ R .,'-`,4 'A .~... G ..1-.. `t M alp 1-s1:7-.,:,- `� � 1,,,,,!#.7.1',..,:6'. " 1.l" . " r j t :Q 3-12^ 1 ` t '117-2\ ' w 11, ' 1 ,• ...,re T ,,0 \t46,4 Ykes 20-117-23-22 20- i • :; 0. a " i• 20-117-23--23 20-119-23-13 f 20-117-23-24 • • • 20-117-23:23 --r- -�h117-23-24 20-117-23-13 a i• 1 M 7 J t Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 Oso ft Map Comments: I i i i L � I i I For more information 3745 Shoreline Drive Orono MN 55391 RECEIVE© Hennepin County GIS contact: 20-117-23-21-0025 300 8th Street South DEC 1 4 7.01 R Minneapo�s,MN 55487 ce !.0 gis.info�hennepin.us CITY OF ORONO 3 8 88 City of Orono Site Plan Application PCExhibit A Street Address: Application# /7-3 g, 2750q /f► rO Orono, Kelley Parkway Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: / -i 1_1=,- / Staff: Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: Melling Address: P.O.Box 66 Escrow#&$ Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee <10SH0V-8' Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: 3745 Shoreline Drive APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION: Applicant/Agent: D.J. Kranz Co., Inc./Bruce Quam, President Phone(Primary): 763-525-0100 Mailing Address: 725 Highway 169 North Plymouth,MN 55441 Email: bquam@djkranz.com City: ZIP: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if property owner is same as applicant Name: Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Phone(Primary): _ 952-471-8433 Mailing Address: 3745 Shoreline Drive City: Wayzata, MN ZIP: 55391 Email: pastorioren@goodshepherdmn.org APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered In the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject It until It is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants,agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner Is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authoriz representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. -444 Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: - Cv . Date: /2//3//� Property Owner Signature: Date: RECEIVED Site Plan Application-January 2016 DEC 14 2016 Page 2 ;1 3 8 88 CITY OF ORONO Item 5 Date Application Received: 12/14/16 0�> Date Application Considered as Complete:12/14/16 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 04/13/17 ":\S- To: a y To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members c• Jessica Loftus, City Administrator gkFSHo��` From: Melanie Curtis, Planner i'1'1GG Date: 17 January 2017 Subject: #17-3889,Timothy and Jane White, 2170 Prospect Avenue, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicants are requesting setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The applicants' property has street frontages on three sides, as it is situated between two streets and is also a corner lot.The street setback within the RR-1B district is 50 feet; the interior side setback is 30 feet. The property is 60 feet wide where the 21 foot wide addition is proposed. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420-Setbacks: RR-1B Required Existing Proposed Front (Prospect) 50' 44.2' No Change Rear/Street (Crystal) 50' 111' 96' Side Street(Briar) 50' 12.5 18' -21' (addition) East Side 30' 16.9' 17.9' (addition) Section 78-420-Lot Area/Width: RR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 20,305 s.f. (0.46 acre) 45' Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 20,305 s.f. (0.46 acre) Allowed: 3,045 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,596 s.f. (7.8%) Proposed: 2,016.6 s.f. (10%) FILE#17-3889 17 Jan 17 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 3 20,305 s.f. 7,106 s.f. 2,114.8 s.f. 2,534.8 s.f. (35 %) (10%) (12.5%) Applicable Regulations: Setback Variances(Section 78-420) In the area of the home,the subject property has a width between 53 feet and 61 feet; the home is 24 feet wide. The applicants have proposed an addition to the home on the north side, which encroaches into both the side street and side setback areas of the property. A 50 foot setback is required from Briar Street, and a 30 foot setback is required from the east side lot line.The 21-foot wide addition is proposed to encroach as much as 32 feet into the side street setback and 12.1 feet into the side setback. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicants propose to construct an addition to the existing residence on a residential property which is in line with the intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a permit for an addition to a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls;The request to permit additions to the existing home within the 50 foot side street and 30 foot side setback areas appears to be reasonable as the adjacent properties do not appear to be adversely impacted;the encroachments will not extend closer to the road, front lot line, or the east property line than the existing home. FILE#17-3889 17 Jan 17 Page 3 of 4 b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The existing home, and neighboring homes are separated sufficiently to allow for light, air, and open space between the homes and the proposed addition, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The scale or setbacks of the proposed addition to the home will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat.§216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residence is an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The nonconforming lot area and lot width of the Property are not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood. The Applicant is proposing an addition to existing home in order to improve functionality.The existing substandard setback to the side street and east lot line will not be increased with the proposed addition. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The proposed home with the addition will be generally in line with the neighboring homes with respect to size and setback. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicants have indicated that this criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety,comfort,or morals; nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The three street frontages, the substandard size and width of the Property combined with the 2-acre district setbacks create practical difficulties affecting the Property;the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. FILE#17-3889 17 Jan 17 Page 4 of 4 Septic System Status The subject property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds practical difficulties exist in the property's substandard area and width, as well as the street frontage requiring 50-foot setbacks on three sides. Applying the setbacks, there is no buildable area on this lot. The 21-foot wide addition is proposed to expand the home's footprint to the north 15 feet and will encroach as much as 32 feet into the side street setback and 12.1 feet into the side setback. The encroachments do not appear to adversely impact the adjacent properties. Engineer Comments The City Engineer performed a cursory review of the proposed plan and did not note any concerns. A full review will be conducted at the time of the building permit. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Aerial Photos Exhibit G. 60-Day Review Extension Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map • PC Exhibit A City of Orono #17-3889 Variance Application Street Address: Application# /7-38'467 9 ASLO/,0 2750 Kelley Parkway Y Orono,MN 55356 Date Received: /oi-/}'/k Staff: Main: 952-2494600 ,y fax: 952-249-4616 Fee: , It 4. P.O.Mailing 68 ss: Escrow#&$ ,���� ,' G� Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 Permit Fee j I t40$H01- Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: ) Ill 0 ?V-sSFec-:::t' AA_ W} t7(�, -1 41 DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: C&`., IOIWQP 24aQUOS (attached additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT I AGENT INFORMATION: pl Applicant Name: }} �(j f>, Phone(Primary): C1 - 4''1e 6L.64 Applicant Email: Address: % c �1�A .1g C4c )ca. City: alb, 5684 ZIP: Applicant is: Contractor Homeowne (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 ch if property owner is same as applicant Name: - .. YV Phone(Primary): (, S� - Mailing Address: A `ex c ick rz A,, City: 56 I ZIP: Email: JG,,c d',t - .(`C akk 1 C_+Om APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it Is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents,Commission and Council Members for purposes of Investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Nall , Applicant/Agent Signature: \lam ift Date: 1 A*\.\10 Property Owner Signature: - �_"s — Date: c9-I JO1 1 k Property Owner Signature: Date: RtcE1VED Variance Application—May 2016 Page 2 DEC 147_01R 3889 MY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Middle Last `(•)`(. \0A Address City State Zip Phone understand my rights as stated above. Signature RECEIVED DEC 142Q1R cnvoF ORONO 3889 Variance Application—May 2016 Page 10 PC Exhibit B #17-3889 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties,address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance Is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. 'The property owner,proposes to use the property io a reasoilablee nner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter.' Livtw tk merle - as kkow, 2. "The plight of the landov�er is(due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." .*PAW, r isp, S al s+Q.A\' 3. "The varia_nperif granted,will not the essential character of the locality." 4 LS lc .�-p 4. 'Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under thy tsirrr s of the Zoning Chapter." --n-1 Lc Lk A- SmaI I u&e rout a u ne _off: S$' - 5.,,,.."Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in t harmonyywih this Chapter." tt 6.—"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in t a zone where the affected person's land is located.' RECEIVED Variance A,ppication-May 2016 # 3889 I �, Page 4 DEC 14 7.�1 CITY OF ORONO • 7 "The Board or Council may per it as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining propert .° 9. "The conditions doof apply generally to other land or tructures in the district in which said land is located." �� � Q �c 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." \\F's.< tY1 reP_ _ TY)6) c 4\e‘e- S)253S-WPA'(...\ 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals, or in any other respect begntrary to the intent of thQ,Zoning Code." 1 ar- V j k ?0,0 7c)w)vim Q d[ 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate dem strable dr iculty."{ { v %1 G4.1 Ark .s mr�.\ 1 l!c Qa(e. S \xv_VOA Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the followin lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Vse ,\ ,t of kANI1 -RECEIVED- DEC 147i •I- CRY OF ORONO Va4,4 p k&tion—May 2016 Page 5 # 3889 , • PC SITL PLAN Exhibit C #17'3889 for 0 MR > CRYSTAL , •53.5 > ."5.23 UE TIM WHITE 952.14 < Rear/Street Lot Line (50122 00 "rs" AI.M.F. y • cl.M.F. C d I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the o ' 952! .53.2 •953.8 LM.F• I.M.F, boundaries of: g 1111)24" 95 .53 t 45 (--;-- . That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Vs) l N952.17 953.1 0 Township 117 North,Range 23 West,Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as 111 / Shed cc COMMENCING at a point 515.625 feet north of the south line and 208.00 feet Alla 'f, N east of the west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said II viii Section 10;thence East 72.00 feet; thence North 130.00 feet; thence East 50.00 a� feet;thence North 58.30 feet; thence West 122.00 feet; thence south 188.30 feet to `� 951.4 �+ 952.1 952.2iv �� the point of beginning; subject to street. 951.2 950.41 p ()3" CB e� And of the locations of all buildings thereon and all visible encroachments from or Shed 50.00 Side Str= t Lot ine •.SVD w ...._ on said land. As surveyed by me this 3rd day of June, 2016. f � Well Docarea, OL%sem ument ,.511144 16 N ,0 °' ., -Cf0:)c: ' „`"',!he., ,.,: , P'°p°'°2 F°'c''Pa" Willis L. Gilliard, Minn.Re . No. 9587 I� i �, g 9g ,� � '.-..-91-2-.3 '� 2' 082" ,• 17.90 0 15 30 21. East Side Lot Line ( ) IIIII 1 I PROPOSED HARD COVER 1�6" r1�' 952. Scale: 1"=30.00 rt. PROPERTY ZONED Ali%� � RR-1B ONE-FAMILY RURAL RESIDENCE-2 ACRES � 452: Proposed s Waddition I+ROMJSREI►ntProspect is the front yard,Briar Sz:rraaizi. Gross area of lot=20305.1 s.f.. 5... t.and Crystal Ave,aro caner side yards.The Existing house=669.2 s.f. 1 2170 `D setback I°so a``The interior lot lines Existing sheds (two)= 927.39 s.f. abutting 2160 and 2130 Prospect are RECEIVED Bit. i wy. 1 953 4 30 feet -* considered aide ram.anthe d a Existing gravel vehicle tracks =60.44 s.f. 1' 953.2a Sty 16.88 Existing bituminous driveway=311.47 s.f. DEC 1 1 2016 953. Existing south steps and walk and north walk= 146.31 s.f. E--- Denotes Proposed Proposed addition to house= 52.5 s.f. OF ORONO 12.903 = drainage direction Proposed covered porch/patio=367.5 s.f. CITY TOTAL EXISTING AND PROPOSED HARD COVER=2534.81 s.f. A point 515.625' orth o PROPOSED PERCENTAGE OF HARD COVER= 12.5% the south line an'l 2084,220 feet east of the w=.t line _Q `` of the NE 1/4 of e SW e 1/4 fr T.M.F. _954.78 I.M.F.` p' 47.00 .954.45 WILLIS L. GILLIAM) ' l • '953.56 < Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor 953. 6 tiG�� ont Lot Line (509 g PROSPECT AVENUE St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 612-382-0795 u 8 www.willisgilliard.com `# /�� s •• PC ' 0 Exhibit D f / 9'-6" / 9'-6" #17-3889 b\-- 1 ;:.\ :,,,_,_ 4X6 Treated(Typ) - 3-2X10 6 -,U r. oO 12"Dia Conc. Ftg(Typ) 3-2X10 1 U /-- 22X10 , -@ , \ v w 8`< 0 1 ` o • • s \ 1/41 = 1'-0" SAMUELSON Tim White Foundation Play As CONSTRUCTION isC� RECEIVED Project number Project Number ildr Date 11/22/2016 A_0 612.532.8400 DEC 14 2frch Addition Drawn by Author Checked by Checker Scale 1/4"= 1'-0" CITY OF ORONO 11/99/9(}16 11.M-OR AM 2'-0" 24'-0" ® / 22-0" 5'-8" 5'-8" co 2-3020 DH 2-3020 DH b , M '1r li 1 Mil I Porch 0 m N \ b m dl � O X \ 4/12 Vault N 0 K 7 Qo m r ii N 3-0X6-8 Dr cli :I '' ' it 4, 1_1 (47 11 •••�� xisti ! House����������. riP4• iw4r • • • "40i•'t►'T►j►•ifirPrIP►j►Titij►'s► iarOPi O Level 1 1/4" = 1'-0" I 1 SAMUELSON RECEIVED Tim White Floor Plan 3889 . CONSTRUCTION DEC 1 4 2 1 Project number Project Number porch Addition Date wn by 11/22/2016 q_1 fi12.532.840QClTY OF ORONO Checked by Checker Scale 1/4"=1'-0" 11I22IIm R 19-01-4a PM -) . @-) 1 1 1 L10'eel- - p.. ' 2 I ,, , t L - ' � - -.., Level 1 I ( 01 - 0" • .1- I ! 1 , x .1 I 1, ,1 1 .x .1 I I Grade 7 _-: „__.-=-, , ,.:_ :.:III , 11 =11 ------111 1 I III 1 : -11 I-1nff--1112- --- 7.• -11' - 1-13-: .:1' '1 = f I IIII I I-1 I ,1 I I I 1-1 I 1-1 I-11 .. '',•I I I I 1 IL 1I I _I 1 I_ 11- I -I 1 I-I -::E-1 -I 1-1 I -1 1-. .-11 H ,---1-)411-..,_ -1111_11 -i I III I 1_111 :1-11-111- 71 I 1_I±1-11 111_411:-e- -- 1-111 III 111-1 { 1 111=111 1. 11 III 111-111-1 [ 1-111-111 i i 111 I ( North 1/4 = I-0" SAMUELSON North Elevatio 3889 CONSTRUCTIOIa�RR'ECEIVED Tim White DEC 2016 Project number Project Number Date 11/22/2016 A-2 612.532.8400` Porch Addition Drawn by Author CITY 0�ORONC Checked by Checker Scale 1/a°= 1'-0" 11/92/7016 11.59.06 AM /\\N Level 2 10' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0" r 1 i 1 ' , s < < _� , ► �1 i Grade • -3' - 0" AP • BOF -6' 6" AP OEast 1/8" = le-0" Lev42 10' - 0" 111 • Leve4T_Lu 11 ��=.1.w ��=�� ..�ia,■i■�����M rade _ -3' - 0" BOF n -1"" West 1/8" = 1'-0" 3889 SAMUELSON Tim White East West Elevations CONSTRUCTIONRECEIO/E® Project number Project Number DEC 14X20 Date 1122/2016 A-3 612.532.8400 porch Addition Drawn by Author CITY OF ORONO Checked by Checker Scale 1/8"=1'-0" 11/2,M16 19.14.97 PM 0 0 „ .__ ,.. „e 1 ,. .-- 40. i--- - -- ---- n Level 2 oorli...' —41111%- i."4"1.- Ur - ” I 1 I _ Level1 ----T I I 1 1 IILIIIIIIIII 1 01 f 4x6 Treated Post 3-2X10 Treated Grade -III 1 11 1 I: -:,,1 I I 1111 I I III l l l 1 .--IH-111- III III-- 13' - 0' J.___ —I I I�-I 11-111 I-1 I 1-1 I HI 11� 111:-,::1117-111E1 I ; III_ -1 I Hf I r-111-_–___-il1-1 11—I I I—I :1::-.=1 I I=1 I I— I_I � IE-r.,-_1 I 1„111_11.11=_-_-1 —_ —1---_=111-11111111-_--1 1---111-111, _ 1117:i -1 I 1 L 1 66 BOF- 111 = =1 1 —1 I I11=1 I --I II -I I —1 11fflfflEfflH , 1 =_ - 6 _) HI rill-TIF-1117-_;111, . , 11 -fflfflH1--111- - - .;- -� ,I 1 0 Section 1 _._. 1/4" = 1'-0" SAMUELSON RECEIVEllith White Section East 43889 CONSTRUCTION DEC 1 4 2016 Project number Project Number Date 11/22/2016 A-4 612.532.8400 - crTy()FEW Addition Drawn by — Author Checked by Checker Scale 1/4"= t-0" 11!22/7n1R 17.14.27 PM 0 . Asphalt Shingles 11-0" 15#Felt 1/2"OSB Sheath'g- Level 2 Eng.Wood Truss vaulted 4" ( Facsia 8. Soffit To Match 1'-0" 41Exist'g Ii 2-2X10 Header .. coi' 2X4 Stud j 16:O.C. 1/2"OSB Sheath'g .-I :.i House Wrap •..' Siding To Match 2-2X10 Treated — Run Joist _Level 1 gip imil2x10 Joist 0' - 0" '' 16"O.C. Huricane Clip 1'-43/4" 2-2X10 Treated 4X6 Treated Post Grade Au Post Anchor -3' -0" 12"Conc.Ftg. 42"Min. I I I BOF jr 2 -0" /le -6' - 6" � 1 Section 1 - Callout 1 3/8" 1'-0" SAMUELSON RECEIVE White TYP• all :I 3 8 8 9 . CONSTRUCTION DEC 1 4 2016 Project number Project Number `CFrY OF O h Addition Drawn by ate 11/22/2016 A-5 612.532.8400 Checked by Checker Scale 3/8°=1'-0" 11 177/9111 R 19.14.97 PM PC • City of Orono Exhibit E #17-3889 4Ves, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet r* Property Address: Q(V 0 l-,i llJO Prepared by: ;Ilk L c LLim (S'vr1 '((o&) Date: ` 3(,L Stormwater Quality-Overlay District Tier. (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify ifi items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. ICey b0 Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square i=e�} ( (Garage) (24'x30'). (720 S.F) A f_v i a`iw • duce. 44- X9,c,t 114 • 8. S.F. B _ Ai . •- x .4 ( q44.7 .3 S.F. C FAY t ivoi 01.0.1k- .,j Y' , ' • V Q 6 o ♦4i- S.F. b'-(-�vcC5t�Lt • QYg 1 • S.F. E C`K , Ned� Sot► -VI Sit�c ., 1� �� W.' 3 Y .5o i�4- , � S.F. F G .. S.F. ----------. S.F. H I 4 }Iatit } S.F. S.F. J S.F. • K FINoQoSecl . ,. chtliv 41g x'10 5 K 19 S.F.- L Q P is Q o s it lyw (lanU�. 15_X b 3 '� r S.F. M S.F. N --•--) S.F. o .`...--- 4 44 01 b S.F. P 0 _ S.F. S.F. R S.F. s -*btu I .4)514-I L S.F. TS.F. T US.F. W S.F._ X - S.F. Y S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover etailditie tiardcdverisea City Code;Sec 1►$-'1C84j: - - S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover ,. S.F. S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from fine(1)] ,5 .ISS.F.F.. (4) Total Lot Area Existing Fiardcovor Percentage [(3)+(4)] i a.'5 % (Proposed Hardcover next ge) EEr- Packet Last Updated: Ja1YLi) y - This is an Information packet resp Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensue the accuracy of the information contented herein:however,1 any Information is DEC 7 -` not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions w>ppreys( Page 16 CITY OF ORONC 3 8 RQ I City of Orono •f• Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: cD1 CI d s c t - gOilr) Prepared by: Wit tit's L C i t {14e-10 Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,Identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form).Include all existing hardcover Items that are Intended to remain,as well as all proposed hardcover items that wilt be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property.For Tier 1 properties,identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet! (Esielple) A B 411, a- a • .p S.F. `_ . : i __ — x . M # S.F. Fx1 r UlniBtAls Via' - 1j S.F. E SAW4'►9tafisgYla 1 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. K etb�A c}lcstd )Q I S.F. 4c .r• �'� �� IrX c�� � IS S.F. S.F. S.F. 0 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. - d i1e Hardco ".{ Cit/Code_Sec 78-1e84r, S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover(Subtract line(2)from line(1)] c),p (4)Ttilal Lot Area a0i 305.1 S.F. • Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)) )4S % RECEIVED Pad 1 t Last Updated: January 2015 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to w The eoaaaey of the loof the crmafiochity oo incl herein;however,if any information is DEC 1 4 ?.I idt'o ant win,prvWstons Coale,the code provisions w8 prevail Y OF ORONO `tee 1 CIT e 2 Oft { 4. .. ' v F•* x" :: I f.. , , •r • ,,• .} Shed on property will be �' ' 1 ` �* .tC removed; neighbors shed will 1."F 4. •. remain. ■.�� ; ', tit ..1 :r r :,:,';.., , i ,. .1.1,", ,i ,, r;m 14u M 'W 4 4 ki,„ , _. , .. .. t ''....,-,-1,-7.7---;-,'.::, �� fry" 'd: t.' 4 , Y w R, g•ii ll t J 7+" S k.C. :-. Briar St r I " Facing East 4t X V = C4 Cr 0 CO CO cG M - Crystal Ave 1.' I, .,...,iike. , "ti, - '' .r1 µ s 40 1 1,1111 t e _ c 4 i go ., ..4:it.:,,...-.i.:„:.: ,'','''-':'''''''s..:'''''''-''''.w...1_'1'il.'1'.;,-i'-- � shed will be removed , °' �x. * Will i 4 ., ,,y.I 4I d„, -,.4 . . ___., .. • 3 + g„ ....1 ... .. ., it • A rIt pf, tf fi wi, sMrllr 44 w . s...- •rospect Ave , .per � ! Itv t _, rairwirTirm.mminm. . __ li : Aerial 2015 t f' j r •'..-I.....''..;,.....::-.1,1 itikr ';..4.;:'' '1 :' f. •.f ri 1 • "s w w t' .. .. ...... „ ,... ..„ ,„...,,,, ,,,,,. . ..,,,..„, . .,..„...... .. .,, : , . ... _ f F ....e / , . .. i . fir." . _. ` t.y �< t t � +. i ,•••.4-kr • #... . • . , `. e :,. r• ... ".. • �• r • s p: tit' . ,„ 1 j- i - , .. . .it � .^ .. w ..,. y a ¢" F r y.#x-� (/)* 7.....,;2:'," . vg7bn •� i.,e t t I + hIt- j t , A ' f ` i• i' r .. off r • , e4, :, ,,I,.. t, i 1 ,,t.„ ,_ r 414 ,.. . ,.:::: .. , r ..,,,,sir- , a `f - I- v r,. • ..:.. ...., ....... _ 1 tE, . 0 r i ii• _. t y X y 1 ,„ tj, r. it rl !, ' - .- Al'''. .!'. F , -. `�^T.. 4,..rte a•. ('.�^ _, ;. "1 a, J -..:». t / * '' 4 •-7111 ,1-, "3" •., `-A...44,',,,-,--4.e, ,- - •41.14*F•''''Ll°^4-"'4i''''''4":'' '''. -444.' '''''' , .:.,. ' ..' "T''''.4".......," ' . .4 ve it- . , • - _,........„.. Th.t.,____ ,, , ft-. ,,'..., - . •1 . , . . ' . .. , • . . „ - \ , . 4 . , • . , 11111&41.4 ils* •it.' 't it, '..... t. ,r 4 ,, ',.. ' -1, * 41.. • 1 , ,... 1% • Ai, „4.1kr- 1 .;•;,•:4;4,*''tit'*.firre";"'so: :'I- v' ' - '' • et ' ' '' r".."'04'.i , ‘-'4C1'1.7".,i . . I t ' ' 1..4 4`4.-.-- "."•'''''''", .4 -If.. 4•P'I , %.'1744# 7 . :-.-, , . - . . ' C •. *'A'"1:".. - 'II*. 1111111*... '../* •' ilirtIV„, ''.•. ''.A' 40' . , = '' 4' A... , - I .'- tf . ..-- -174‘% 241S**, 77:',., 7" - ....• e.--7.4.... .. `i - -7-- 7 . .........•••-•"" 0 '4.-4,"`tt41 , . t , At ..1-,Lik 4, iiik. i . * ' "5 ,..1;IL 4f.t51. .11 . ' ' It'v I .. .:•-•• •••". „...4 L .... ., . , - „,11113, . -', ''''‘'t. .4• - fr"°%."7--...., . -. t - _ '•••• -...... 4,, , 1 ,r r ... QV. r ' OW Illid 1 .. irtiji .-- ,41r . illt" 4 1 1111111k! ;,,4 -.. ' ' '"' ' • VI '''l t 0,.• ''''''' , ..914110.4.1rdimir. ..it, ' -JO, ''''' s• t" iltd,P41•41Z14 . ... , - . ,..., -.,„,,0 ,,*Lk, . • I , . ' "*‘: :4',4Av gritt . t. 4u Prospect Ave ,„.- * 7.---- 41411.11114" .... ,.., . , .., .,.. ...,.. - JI.41,• , 0" 4 .,.. • . '" ---' ...... A. • a .-. pi' — . . as —-__ ir$,. • $ $ Facing North �°moo CITY OF ORONO Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600 1;( � ,{\ , 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 �' Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us l'9kESHOtL 11 January 2017 Tim and Jane White Box 194 Excelsior, MN 55331 RE:#17-3889 On December 14, 2016, the City of Orono received your application for variances for property at 2170 Prospect Avenue.Your application is considered to be complete with an initial 60-day City review period expiration of February 12th. The scheduled City Council review on February 13th falls after this date. Therefore, the City hereby notifies you that it is extending the time period for City action under Minn. Stat. § 15.99,subd. 3(f).The review time period is extended until April 13,2017. Sincerely, City of Orono Melanie Curtis Planner PC Exhibit I RUN DATE:12/12/2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 #17-388! 38 10-117-23 23 0004 38 10-117-23 31 0033 38 10-117.23 31 0049 S CLINTON JR&M C CLINTON STEVEN G RICHARDSON EP AL CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1271 ARBOR ST 1380 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STANFORD CLINTOI4 JR STEVEN&SARAH RICHARDSON CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER MARY CHRISTINE CLINTON 1271 ARBOR ST 1380 ARBOR ST PO BOX 7420 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 JACKSON WY 83002 38 10-117-23 31 0016 38 10-117-23 31 0034 38 10-117-23 31 0051 CASEY HUDSON&KYLA HUDSON C J ALBRECHT&J L ALBRECHT BARBARA J GARCIA 2150 PROSPECT AVE 1285 ARBOR ST 1335 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CASEY HUDSON&KYLA HUDSON C J&J L ALBRECHT BARBARA J GARCIA 2150 PROSPECT AVE 1285 ARBOR ST P O BOX 114 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0017 38 10417-23 31 0035 38 10-117-23 31 0052 M MADDIE&M MADDIE TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC R F CRAIG&S F CRAIG 2160 PROSPECT AVE 1295 ARBOR ST 1355 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MICHAEL&MELISSA MADDIE TWELVE OAKS PROPERTIES LLC ROBERT F CRAIG 2160 PROSPECT AVE CHR:STOPHER R PERRY SAMANTHA F CRAIG CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 1125 HUNTER DR 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10.117-23 31 0018 38 10-117.23 31 0036 38 10417-23 31 0053 JANE WHITE M&J BLUE J ZITZLOFF&B ZITZLOFF 2170 PROSPECT AVE 2160 CRYSTAL AVE 1380 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 JANE&TIM WHITE MARCUS J&JUDY A BLUE JEFFREY ZITZLOFF 16820 CO RD 122 2160 CRYSTAL AVE BRENDA ZITZLOFF MAYER MN 55360 WAYZATA MN 55391 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10.117-23 3!0019 38 10-117-23 31 0037 38 10-117-23 31 0054 D&K BECKER JASON JIMOS DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1290 BRIAR ST 1365 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DONALD&KATHERINE J BECKER JASON JIMOS DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 2180 PROSPECT AVE 1290 BRIAR ST 1365 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10417-23 31 0026 38 10-117-23 31 0038 38 10-1 17-23 31 0055 VIL OF ORONO JOHN C RANGE GERALD F SEILER 1285 BROWN RD S 1270 BRIAR ST 1385 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO JOHN C RANGE GERALD F SELLER PO BOX 66 P 0 BOX 105 2562 WESTERN AVE N CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-117-23 31 0027 38 10-117-23 31 0039 38 10-117-23 31 0056 VIL OF ORONO L PEARSON-CASHIN&S CASHIN LESLIE KENNEDY 1285 BROWN RD S 1250 BRIAR ST 2140 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO LAURIE A PEARSON-CASHIN LESLIE KENNEDY PO BOX 66 SEAN P CASHIN 2885 SANFORD AVE SW CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 1250 BRIAR ST #34389 WAYZATA MN 55391 GRANDVILLE MI 49418 38 10-117.23 3!0028 38 10-117-23 31 0042 38 10-117.23 31 0057 DEAN T LUNDBLAD ET AL LINDA LAVERNE PRINTUP KAREN BARTELT 1290 ARBOR ST 1261 BRIAR ST 1335 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55323 ORONO MN 55391 DEAN T LUNDBLAD LINDA L PRINTUP KAREN BARTELT SHERRI STRELOW-LUNDBLAD PO BOX 104 1335 BRIAR ST 1290 ARBOR ST 1261 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 5539: WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0029 38 10417-23 31 0043 38 10-117-23 31 0058 TIMOTHY HANSON PAUL ALLONBY AARON H PRINTUP 1270 ARBOR ST 1291 BRIAR ST 2195 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55323 TIMOTHY HANSON PAUL ALLONBY AARON H PRINTUP 1270 ARBOR ST 1291 BRIAR ST 2195 PROSPECT AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 P O BOX 104 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0032 38 10417-23 31 0044 38 1C-117-23 31 0097 F&B PETERSON J A GERBER&P C RE1TAN VILLAGE OF ORONO 1261 ARBOR ST 1295 BRIAR ST 38 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONOMNS��UNASSIGNED F P PETERSON JOEL A GERBER VILLAGE OF ORONO POBOX 164 P.O.BOX 74 POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 RUN DATE:12112/2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 10-117-23 31 0098 MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10.117-23 31 0101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RD S ORONO MN 5539: CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0102 RJ ROTH&T QUAST 1251 BRIAR ST ORONO MN 55391 ROBERTA JEAN ROTH P O BOX 159 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0103 EMILY K FISCHER 2140 PROSPECT AVE ORONO MN 55323 EMILY K FISCHER 2140 PROSPECT AVE PO BOX 32 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 3:0106 REGINA ENGEBRITSON 1250 ARBOR ST ORONO MN 55391 REGINA ENGEBRITSON 1250 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 32 0005 S CLINTON JR&M C CLINTON 2235 FRENCH CREEK CIR ORONO MN 55391 STANFORD CLINTON JR MARY CHRISTINE CLINTON PO BOX 7420 JACKSON WY 83002 38 10-117-23 32 0019 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2240 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55391 MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin Comity has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the mast current property information available.The viewer should understand,however.that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or litrees for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy RECEIVED and/or completeness of the information contained herein. DEC 14 2016 CITY OF ORONO X3889 PC Hennepin CountyLocate & NotifyMapExhibit I p #17-3889 Provided B . Resident and Real Estate Services Date 12/12/2016 0' 11 3-23 / 10-117-23-24 7. r,� L (15 ffiS, 14) rrq in/ OW riles 10-117,ZJ1 10-117-23-31V/ � tai OMI IN , ...........1\ '7) MaI ,-''' '..,r, to Ii'/4.4 l'le. iii UI3J 10-117-23-32 -"'�' , :., ., ,,,, /:: I i no _ ,\\(.....::.....„.,........„.., _ . ,:: U.........04 ia, 10-117-23-32 10-117-t3-31 - 10-117-23-33 10-117-23:34 Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 60 120 240 ft Map Comments: I I r r t i i II 1011723310018 JANE WHITE RECEIVED For more information contact: 2170 Prospect Avenue v �/ v Hennepin County GIS Office Orono,MN 55323 300 6th Street South DEC 1 4 7016 Minneapolis,MN 55487 gls.info©hennepin.us CITY OF ORONO 3 8 8 9 Item 6 Date Application Received: 12/14/16 OA Date Application Considered as Complete:12/22/16 "- , =VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 02/20/17 y A, To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members e c; Jessica Loftus, City Administrator lkFs}j04`` From: Melanie Curtis, Planner VrOG Date: 17 January 2017 Subject: #17-3890, Denali Custom Homes o/b/o Steve and Stacia Anderson, 517 Ferndale Rd N, After-the- Fact Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting consideration of an after the fact variance to permit to as-constructed entrance monument pillars constructed within the setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial of the variance as requested. The applicant has not demonstrated practical difficulties supporting the variance. Background The applicant constructed a new residence on the property beginning in May of 2015; the project was completed and an as-built survey submitted in July of 2016. Upon staff review of the as-built it was noted that two entrance monuments had been constructed near the road which did not meet the required 10 foot setback from the edge of pavement according to City Code Section 78-1405 Nonencroachments. The entrance monument pillars are located 3.5 and 4 feet away from the traveled portion of the road. The entrance monument pillars were not included in the original building permit for the home. They were shown on the subsequent survey submitted for the swimming pool permit.A separate building permit is required for entrance monuments; construction drawings are required. Construction drawings for the entrance monuments were not submitted. The review of an accessory structure permit(i.e. swimming pool) does not typically include the review of the entire property survey to ensure everything shown beyond the scope of the permit is approvable. Section 78-1405—Entrance Monument Setbacks: RR-1B Required Existing 5' from lot lines; and East Pillar: West Pillar: Front/Street Not less than 10'from road pavement 8.5 property line 8 property line 4' pavement 3.5' pavement East Side 5' ±200' West Side 5' ±95' FILE#17-3890 17 Jan 17 Page 2 of 4 Applicable Regulations: Setback Variance (Section 78-1045) The subject property boundary extends into the private road. Entrance monuments are permitted to be closer to the street than other types of accessory structures.The Code requires a minimum of a 10-foot separation from the paved, travelled roadway for the construction of entrance monuments. During the finishing of the landscaping for the new home,the applicant constructed entrance monuments within the required setback from the paved edge of the roadway. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant's constructed entrance monument improvements within the required 10-foot separation from the road on the property. Entrance monuments are appropriate in residential neighborhoods. The purpose of the setback is to preserve a clear zone off the roadway and to preserve visibility though the roadway and driveway intersections. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Residential entrance monuments at the required setback are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The improvement is reasonable,given the appropriate location. The placement does introduce unnecessary structures in close proximity to a street, inherently increasing risk to the traveling public. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The narrowness of the private road serving a total of 10 residences was not created by the applicant. The entrance monuments were recently constructed and could have been constructed to meet the required setback; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are entrance monuments similarly situated throughout the City. The City received public comment stating that approval of the variance to permit the substandard setback will adversely impact the character of the neighborhood. FILE#17-3890 17 Jan 17 Page 3 of 4 Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The relocation of the structures adds cost to the homeowner. Economic considerations may not be a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd.2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential entrance monuments are an allowed use in the RR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.This criteria has not been satisfied. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Information supporting the uniqueness of the subject property has not been submitted. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has indicated that it is necessary. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The City engineer has indicated that from a safety standpoint it is ideal to have a minimum of a 5-foot clear zone from edge of pavement(this site has 3.5 feet),but acknowledges there are other similar obstructions and that the low speed and traffic volume of the private road may not be impacted by the entrance monuments (See Exhibit F). 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. It is feasible for the entrance monuments to be located to conform to the 10 foot setback. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Septic System Status The newly installed septic system is located on the opposite side of the home and are not impacted by the entrance monuments and vice versa. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. FILE#17-3890 17 Jan 17 Page 4 of 4 Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds that there may indeed be practical difficulties supporting the location of the entrance monuments. However, entrance monuments are an amenity and not a necessity. There is adequate space between the driveway and the road for some type of entrance monument to have been constructed to meet the 10 foot setback. Engineer Comments See comments from Adam Edwards, City Engineer, attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments The received public comments are attached as Exhibit I. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Should the Planning Commission find practical difficulties exist to permit the entrance monuments to remain at 4 feet and 3.5 feet as constructed, additional findings in support should be provided. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. As-Built Survey Exhibit D. Building Permit Survey Exhibit E. Swimming Pool Permit Survey Exhibit F. City Engineer Comments Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Site Photos Exhibit I. Public Comments Exhibit J. Code Section Exhibit K. Property Owners List Exhibit L. Plat Map PC Exhibit A City of Orono #17-3890 Variance Application Street Address: : Application# A, 2750 Kelley Parkway Date Received: iiitiLi.Vo VO Orono,MN 55356 Staff: Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 I Fee: Mailing Address: Escrow#&$ • �` P.O.Box 66 Permit Fee F L Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 !10SH04�, Notes: Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will ngl be placedion Planning Commission Agenda. SITE LOCATION: 5/7 F N r1Flan�--c iUQcz-- DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: frkR-i rt?U( Ft)( 1-0 CA-7-1 j Q 1J OC 01 Try Mc,vu imavr5 (attached additional sheets as necessary) APPLICANT I AGENT INFORMATION: • Applicant Name: Ili. .* ' '10 it-,G Phone(Primary): � 1�� Z't O I. - 4711,775.2t55E5 Applicant Email: s ` ,� :- t • Address: jri�iPlw % •� - �:>�A �����1, ZIP: e) Applicant is: Co , or Homeowner (Circle One) lMAI PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: 0 check here if property owne is same as applicant Name: 'S`'gUr v4 'i rf-[-tr4- /4� /moi Phone(Primary): /faffR S- �Q� Mailing Address: S 7 /if::rii,Z4-j /f.4_ /Uacrr City: /ZZ�vpr1l'1tJZIP: 5531/ Email: SA5L�}-� � << _ APPLICANT/AGENT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application,and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. 3 Applicant/Agent9 > f Signature: Date: ll*/41'/(� Applicant/Agent Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: Property Owner Signature: Date: Variance Application-May 2016 Page 2 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, 'Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary • to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04(see following page)to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. IDA1) I I') A- 6E14)4I'+CA.4, ro 444.. First Middle Last 1 3 5 rili>-v ti bki- {- I Address (-4/4-0-14/til 44 fJ 5 3 / % 64,2-Phonef / 6 j/1rd (/ City State Zip I understand my rig as stated -Xe. Signatu Variance Application—May 2016 Page 10 PC Exhibit B #17-3890 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. 0 Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of the twelve practical difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write N/A in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." A • O -� li i(1% . al t fi L '' •�..-� !S .l • .r _. J L_t1 •SS:�1'%�� „ • 4.0.1 401 r- i r Off A++ •*Lis? Very DA-cf, 'no-re -d iv:r}i-Nos`rr r Ly 2. "The plight of the Ian.owner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. •• r . �.� . ai ��a..s� I .- .�f C a.-.... #0.4.1r. Cv4i eivc.1a en 3. "The varianif granted,will not atter the essential character of locality.'� . &.w-;x,4.1 i cam. vt� �c cry ' `l� iA s �-r F. ,a m4c - �5� +�tiN�r>�T'�l Q F /til 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." TNF- MCA I -w-rr Lt_aE.re. prop ex.) A- (bre Pertu-cr A fpil . rie.0 u r vel, 1 4AC. 10D f E114 tA` lg d qt n/ co,f)Fa cps',LA., LL -7 arc. 0,1401 , Ti• h C ;reT 5. "Practical difficulties include, bug are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 4,8431c 116J.066, Subd.2, when in harmony with this Chapter.' /C/A- 6. C A- 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." Variance Application—May 2016 Page 4 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." AM A- 8. p, 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." 'TNS Noru.f., i1 -A. -i Be- (.oc- ,41. Very t(-' r pr 1 12,L D4 �� , � : Ta .4 .4 LOULOU� , ,4t�t� -To 1t4- r1 Prvper-rte_ 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." ti.i.VPF- �� - l 111 rv14� aF A Pr,v*rte DrivGTI r- 3�f✓'j ,4fw1T'jpr J 1�'a�� -S NvY ,,Ok . rlf�v.r?rr.A uv tii;,. p�FEeT F �i41`�*� , <,aA-Te 6 lav�vk L- fand enjoy164-41- ment substantial property right 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation ) ym of the applicant.' ?rE 1144,1),.cMJr.5 E z "no 5;ii•+i Av" ilk_ tire v rt-r ry i .r Dr. w/4-Y�'Er, �v�� u�c K�� T? AI't P,4r kL�rbc��f 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will nil in any way impair health,safety, comfort,morals, or in any other respect be J� contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.' �t-wet-Lur i� fe-0.4,t. Pei Ga",fz.- /MT-Gvi L /• Art"11- 4;04i • r '5;-rG ,q-,v .14.194-14 e /IUD S Ty Po4gi i/ 1 Are, , ant '11#0c.t.i Poo 4iNA- kr OF guk*k2 P5%moi S y' L,vx.) 12. "The granting of such'Variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty."Aael. td. L L �.. ' I _ WsaMW: • . �. ll 1. .; A,ti� , Trc 6. Practical Difficulties Statement ToCvi7 -Tri ,t,rs i .vrz -X Zvi i r F'rl Propfvr� ` �/J ' 5:•� T /4- i� o,QL-yrUi``r T4VF:,G'rC A' lV s3' ' Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practicalc� difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional PrLpov, sheets if necessary): Of 5r -t- P k i x..15 !5 t2 tz.,:,cFL-1,_ . No Qv s r reer P�k 15 per l, c.'Yte,Lorv.wev44,1" rB s C waL tai /��v ► To aar•<k w�✓�- E/J1.4,vu.r�•ei/ lav Dfl r co Pte`' �i 'iei PIArl, 5 We u5 i DcI ocwr e --r7 C fl o.c 114-e i2 - 14.1/ o•V Govvi, T rot- To ph-46 , (K1�j r 1� ? Le/t. DSS i r oy i l Lt i�vtT 1C#LJ OA) `T1�-:✓ 5 L ��_ . _ r1,l c.v oovivra/5 PrIcv ri . 7)4e, I a,,.,fej_ ID Fa-sl woL lL MlcJ cry -T1 tL1 Pio p'T1 , Variance Application-May 2016 Page 5 • • r.r. AS—BUILT SURVEY FOR DENALI CUSTOM HOMES, LLC IN THE N 1 /2, SE 1 /4, NE 1 /4 36-118-23 .,- HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 'p� "UNE A EXTENDS TO A POINT PQM' LNE \..y� S 89"59'22"E 180.00 AND 830.75 FT WTHFEST OF THEOTHE EAST Fw. ‘ LINE OF GOV'T LOT 3, SEC. 36-118-23 \e£. SOUTH UNE OF NORTH 200 �0'Gw'. FEET OFN12.SE1/4.NE1)4 �7" SEC.36-118-23 Fti. ` 3,7- • 'UNE A' • /'' 99C -- _.- -. N 992 R N 997 t4 W --9g,,,__ to En' i N / `- W • r m / \ m - / 1 / 1 •/• 1 / i I I L1NE PMALLE' '\ wiTN-u NE A' A I WDETLAEL NC A0 /) 1 POWER POLE N 89`58'50"W 123.04 OA READ WRC • ' I I / I j 996 I 1 I Noi / I / ww 1 i I // t • t ha,A I ,Q / i I S I I 0./, T / i 1,.1 n ( e_C- 1 newt\ 1 994 'G /" 99. I " • 1 // ..... I \ P OPOS\LD EPTIC • , \ 4 ‹' \ w` 'a \ -, .Kw aEtAC.r�y. ... .. >\ Z °A1 'L 1 . \ i \ \ Q0 /' ;'` / \\\ ((1SEPT�$EO '‘ 1 fou I A•\ /� ' / \rry,� ` SITE .,A.. (( 1 / J` '� / ALTERNATE \ \ \ ( I g / 1N,sl SEPTIC SITE INa«a\ \----- I / 9°)° \ I I -T / / Hof g \ .Jcan.a ,\ I 1 4 / (mu) °s / \ \`e \. 1 m Mon ./ /.,__—_____ \\ ,: \I Lia rel �, P'y Iwr) 1\ ` US / ` C j 4? % 1 \ \ - hmfx) 1 •V •\ 4,° o.m(max, «°,1 r ha9.xf I •\ 996 '\ c44,41fax. Kok, ,� • MANI \ \ ,i¢ CONCRETE PATIO u"'I mgN0p ��al •\ ,\ • ,0'o I(Wi,t • I ,\ Iwx, POOL �,� o a, .. l ? •\ �\ (E) P) 1/4,410'' EXISTING ° 1 ,e 0,° woo r«x., . _ _• lQnow .4 p' ° .• HOUSE Irwi t«. " 99e �— — — c S nea. /517 7®<) ..__ y.aaH Hews, \''*'' ri' ,ws) IIw a I - .I t,_.1.1aaf .. M.s.) _. y. s i6^a:x :, , -II-1l °room ... .rv. L1¢fa ''''' lhaaay - _ R,Og lou Nat,,, IN.N --- -I,amry.. (C1.� ' no a.• STOOP 6., + n JE r aft` „,�y,002 . 4. fru I ss' �' None, 0""f Imay SQA 1a (C)K °�� haa.3)/( Ml a) Ramo) Pam SI 1 es.o! P 5 I Lamy �0�/ I,mx.) 1'00D11 �!' BLACKTOP 1 aas) nor,,, Moos, DRIVEWAY `Im•y°..a, ,,a°.III E„?..... �j/ha.y halal Ems(0) n I Hoes) homy �j0 haa,1 No./ I SOSv'. ,,alw ELEC.BOxE ro.,ry e �1 holy n°asu nor .) r , mei owe.) I / t•�pTl '°°° p«h: ) N 89'58'50'W 330.00 / {'. \��211.00 I \.' eLAtRTOP ROADwAr ..._ I,'•••l hop., V211.00 �• POWER N 89°5850`W 391.00 PoeE SW CORNER OF NORTH 1/2. SOUTH LME OF NORTH 1/2, SE 1/4,NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 SE 1/4,NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : That pat of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a1 Section 36, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian-described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said North Hall of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 211 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along said South line 330 feet: thence at a right angle North 344.5 feet: thence at a right angle West to on intersection with a line running from a point in the South line of said North Halt of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. distant 391 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof, to a point distant 675 feet South of the North.ine and 830.75 feet West of the East line of Government Lot 3 in sad section,said lost described line being hereinofter designated and referred to as "Line A”, thence Northerly along said "Line A" to a point 200 feet south of the North line of said North Hod of the Southeast 0,aorter of the Northeast Quarter: thence West parallel with the North line of said North Hoff of the Southeast Ouorter of the Northeast Quarter to on intersection with a line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with aforesaid "Line A"; thence southerly along last sold parallel line to the point of beginning. A •- denotes iron marker found lik 190.3): denotes existing spot elevation.mean sea level datum - 917 denotes contour line, mean sea level datum Y Bearings Shown we based upon an assumed datum This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property.and the location of On existing house, spot elevations, topography, and of visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DATE REMARKS IHRAR6v CERTIFY THATOR THIS R sDIRECT STIDNVISION ft- 2-20--16 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 7-19.N monomx Alia,M9IYall°9 sow WAS PREPARED 6Y ME OR UNDER AN DIRECT VOR UNDER AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEY01)UNDER THE suM LAWS OFTNE STATE OF Mee1ESOTA 1"..20' CIVIL ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS.LAND PLANNERS 2i 4.,/,/s.f�" . IInn6-0834 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 DATE?-,9-r- MINN LICENSENUMeER/2 7.5.2- DWI PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:952-473-4435 * m -. x V S to rt 0 0 • / / ... - 3.d (10002) sp�p,,p��q� 1� / �,Ol !f11 : w� I ( ) g ' �, POOL .� 96e ) I / (E) (F �,2, - EXISTING ,ff►0 ,keg TONE (9974) _ _ HOUSE LEVEL t ) 0 tr moos X517 (e964) `(( 6 QC) 998, -,��_--_- --"--�- 045' +(,005.0) (,oars) l`,r fi� (1000.6) Moa,- (A) I ] p6ex) I ( ) 136.1 w6a I `� 2°4 (10092) I (j) (1000.0) I vi.. I ' `ti° I +00th ('o°°.°) -- -- (°°e.e� Ows.9 _, — I l (G ..,.v , STOOP b _ ` 1 >� 410 (B) ,2.e o rr6 — i � '� ran v � las I � � _ `)9og_ , k ��' (100 ) p, l`� /i srolc toolA 1007.0) ,.�• cwr (,2020)_. __ _ _ _. S ® P i 00 WALK I -r9@f ------- --- -- 1 low(x) `� .(C) I (ta 11 i I G)/ / l`�\ (10050) (10062) (,0202) ((\006.0) , / i ' (10o46) (1005.°) t0�% BLACKTOP .5' (IC) (1006.9 I; ��P` �(+60..01 (10065) DRIVEWAY ./ I; FP04 S (1001.5) (, +1006.)) II 00 ,:k (D) ,,,00°.9 %00.9) A1 roofs) i cti, l �,.\ Iy(66,.6 , (1006 ) I F% 4ss" (,003.8) , (mea (+2053) s/rI''i po0e.q I • • i\k� // r "', 0e2) (L 0 (L) I/\ ' y0 (10003) PLLAR (10069 ) (1002.0 N 89°58'50"W 33049 • \/211.00.- �//211.00.... • • B:AcKTOP ROADWAY (,oa,�) (,206.,) ......-... POWER N 89°58'50"W 391.00 Roe • ,ORNER OF NORTH 1/2, ..,SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 1/2, /4, NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 SE 1/4, NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : That port of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeost Quarter of Section 36. Township 118 North, Rongt Meridion, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of soid North Holf of the Southeast Quarter of the 211 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along sold South line 330 feet; thence at a right angle Nortl angle West to on intersection with o line running from o point in the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quar distant 391 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof, to a point distant 675 feet South of the North line and 830.75 Government Lot 3 in said section. soid lost described line being hereinafter designated and referred to as "Line A"; thenc to a point 200 feet south of the North line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeost Quarter; thenc AA line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to on intersection with o line drown northerly t and parallel with aforesaid "Line A"; thence southerly along lost said parallel line to the point of beginning. • : denotes iron marker found ( ) (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --917--: denotes contour line, mean sea level datum I -:- ! L Bearings shown ore based upon an assumed datum 61)-0 ILT This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property. and the t.. 10-- i(<U location of an existing house, spot elevations, topogrophy, and all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. LL 3.0 f� a aa� v . 7 . M r o, �r d , 11) 3.0 i v L00, As-Built Survey In Annotated by the 0 c,i0) Applicant. 7.0 ' * o § CO $ /Z 1- - . a _ c t'IIPP ' to II 41‘, , c, % vs! i ...1 ti. 4 to et. 1--0:3 - N%_v � i I-. I� I M0 x. 0 < % M v5a < > °° a it- 4 0) ‘1 ‘ _J Cr mo • .--c.. \ \ :g kg Ace ei. 2. i 5.- / kOt \ nI 52.0 v / 4 0 \ 11)/ AN r_. .._. o O Er in 1.6-70s- , 8 s: o v...---. in a o0 a . m Z o o / N c v/ / • r ,� /� 1 + I I\V I V...J L V H +� ran es' . \ " —__. \ �' /// ♦d` HOUSE 1\'' \ 998— ��_� • �• ,•-sPRu5 1002• : —__ , ��1�. 1ooa�oos •_ X517to . lrsmxce.• .i2•.• • 1>s.r apo :•a (A) / •\ / — -- _— • / , I •38 ♦ / 171)' csknuct I r • �r — ♦aP v Pt rte i).! + , • sir FE, !: •! •�� • N.- w.rq silica '10 v •{ \ w 1Y� \U WALK i 9---- • E • \. PROTECTION FENCE �V // I + I i ' E��t --1000 \ 1 4'C'"/"- • \ 1 1 �\ \ PROPOSED / I / I I c• -ELI .,� •�' . \ DRIVEWAY I i I \ // \ —`----1008 1 / 1002 ---- — 77,. .,__ f •� // \ \ OOO��� ELEC.B•X//. •orae •/ 'I \ 1// , —� • ■ • y — 1004 — —— — —— 1nro/ ar 11. ..... ... .L.. \ _ I L) PROPOSED stir soar — /—� --->r ........"7. • • • • • • • ,_•_—__-1 N 89°5850"W 330,00 1 _ l _10°€."— c < TRAVELLED ROAD ..� N �--� ............ N 89°58'50"W 391.00 POWER 0 POLE City of Orono 1/2, SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 1/2, Planning 3 Zoning l 36-118-23 SE 1/4, NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Site Plan Review D. That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 118 North, ,$APPROVED Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said CI APPROVED WIT, North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 211 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; DENIED thence Eost along said South line 330 feet; thence at o right angle North 344.5 feet; thence at a right angle West M�(���� to an intersection with a line running from a point in the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter Slat Mill & of the Northeast Quarter, distant 391 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof, to o point distant 675 feet South of the North line and 830.75 feet West of the East line of Government Lot 3 in said section, said last described line being hereinafter designated and referred to os "Line A"; thence Northerly along said "Line A" to a point 200 feet PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : (verify) south of the North line of sold North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence West parallel with the North line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to an intersection with a 1) Garage = 11008.01 line drown northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with aforesaid "Line A"; thence southerly along lost said parallel line to the point of beginning. • 2) Top of foundation = 11006.81 Iron marker found 17/1)1 L J 1!v`(,7 P a'Al r ORONO C denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum 3) Main floor =11008.771 —--917-—-: Existing contour line, mean sea level datum S L(` . i' is N1 1'U --1904} : proposed contour line ' �'v �� 4) Basement = 1998.081 o: denotes proposed wetland buffer monument ,%'q ' /15 1 5 Bearings shown ore based upon on assumed datum M (�� 1 This survey intends to show the boundaries and topography of the above described property, and the proposed location of o proposed house, pool, and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. S I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN.SPECIFICATION.OR REPOR M.P.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. 11-25-14 G RO N BERG ASSOCIATE! AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE SCALE 5101114 LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. awl CML ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND I 2... C' /.. ,. ,_. 14-450 ' fig• PJ 1/1/11 1 nut non= I ^Mn_ I A Ivr 1 4t it "D C''') Cr n CO .+ 0 0 tur / �E)I�1 1 I! ' - g �' Tw.aawa a•,,,•e \i .lrC1y r\ / i .. / DE kr / PROPOSED --- g''vl,l: •.\� -- .10- HOUSE ,rk 11002��--- — I I X517 / ,,�• ,►rs _ - ,� . loos ___� I : 111„ (A) I I :'-u •• /moi / ._._4...... _ _ _Iy.., , mow' _-;- V. ,mc, , c 1al BIRCH , rS.e I • lam i ADV.,. Ilk. • •• • /� '6)\1*. Cr I ti griq -- ,e Pa ; .-..-a• TREE `T9 t-0 -:-0 I „ --1000—'--- 4-\.-1t PRO crarl FENCE ; ` ,/ I I I 1 ' �" • / \ \\ y PROPOSED �i I I I I �gP � i I I l 4- 1 ASPHALT , 1 -- 1� \ ,� I DRIVEWAY 1 i \__ �� — --- / \ \ i — —_�D) —1008---- I I ` // \ \ i // ; --1002- �� / ELEC.B4X \ \ 1/1 — ,C PINE �/ \ 1 / \`--- __ , ' \` — I—� .mar STOPS . If —1 / A • � \ 0) s,.T I♦ 1 I L —� �.! • • `•TRAVELLED ROADC. N 89°56'50°W 391.00 PovuER 0POLE 2TH 1/2, `'-•.-SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 1/2. :C. 36-118-23 -SE 1/4, NE 1/4 SEC. 36-118-23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Bray of N That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 118 North, Planning d,Zon Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said She Plan nevi° North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 211 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence East along said South line 330 feet; thence at o right angle North 344.5 feet; thence at a right angle West to an intersection with a line running from a point in the South line of said North Haff of the Southeast Quarter0VED of the Northeast Quarter, distant 391 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof, to a point distant 675 feet South APPROVED 1 of the North line and 830.75 feet West of the East line of Government Lot 3 in said section, said last described line $IR DENIED being hereinafter desiignated and referred to as "Line A"; thence Northerly along Staff:s1l said "Line A" to a point 200 feet n�„�'' n"' PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (verify) southof the North line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence West parole) with the North line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to an intersection with a 1) Garage = 11006.01 line drawn northerly from the point of beginning and parallel with aforesaid "Line A"; thence southerly along last said parallel line to the point of beginning. 2) Top of foundation = 11006.81 Iron marker found inn/! �lM(N�1 9 o : denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum D�p�0 0 s(,q,' 1f RI 3 Main floor =--11008.77] --917---: Existingcontour line. mean sea level datum —frog : proposed contour line0.124.111) 1 4) Basement = 1998.081 0: denotes proposed wetland buffer monument ��� SE! Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum 6-`be--I 5 This survey intends to show the boundaries and topography of the above described property, and the proposed location CriY of a proposed house, pool, and grades thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. .-- ..— Itrn " x Wan c rt 0m From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject.. RE:517 Ferndale Road N(Variance#17-3890) Date: - Wednesday,January 11,2017 11:56:40 AM Melanie, I do not believe our ROW ordinances apply in this case as the structures are outside of the ROW. However the same principles should be considered: Best practice is to keep ROWs clear of immovable objects for safety and maintenance efforts. When objects are necessary with in the ROW we try and keep them 10 ft from the travel way. For local roads and streets, a minimum clear zone of 7 to 10 feet is considered desirable on sections without curb (AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets). When 10 feet is not possible due to topography or some other practical difficulty we try to get at least 5 feet of clear zone from the edge of pavement. That said this is a low volume, low speed private road with numerous objects(trees, utility poles) less than 10 feet from the edge of pavement so these obstruction do not seem to be out of the norm for this roadway. (1007.5) (1006.9) (1006.8) o •4,j 06.2) L = in , P4.----.1. --AR Pint CO (1006.3) (1006. "' N 89°58' 'NI-- Adam Y_Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Wednesday,January 11,2017 9:40 AM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject:517 Ferndale Road N (Variance#17-3890) Adam Please review the attached information regarding an after-the-fact variance to permit two as constructed entrance monument pillars within the setback. Please provide comments to me by Thursday afternoon to include in the packet for consideration by the Planning Commission and Council. Thank you. Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning&Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us _ . Ai* ,_,_;400molifawii64, iiimmittiiii iiipantitoolt. PC Exhibit G 0 111:1 #17-3890 l 41# 1 .,..., ,6 1 jitt:t.t 4" -^"- •4di miiik„_- ..-= - ' . ,g. c",A1'4 vi'Ll- .11.1!=-21/01t.ka '^ Z.11,114: ,-f '4:i.14 IliVi. - --- ; 1",r4 ,00 ,,-, .,- - - -.. . , . :-:f• 1 ,,,, 4-.. '4 4111,".^ st,„ -r-,04, -' r •.. .4„Apr„--,, =-'• "!it m -, 7 -• , - I t 411 -...- q . _ , .. k , .., . Ii.' 1-, ...:. ^-- Z i41111f -'41'^ .."0",. l -,, ., 11 - I 317.1111 ., .tf ',4 ..,; .4‘ . .p, :- - ...,.-,,- ,,,,,,,_,.., ,_,,• .i IF ..,...„ ... , _.. 3 , i,,- Subject Property 517 Ferndale Road N41111111/1t. 47 -,ifir :, ek ri its.: _ • V- 5 _�' +1� �1(j 01 i i j. il.- 'eE'. 747 N r "f. u, ' 515 ! 1 IX A. q ' • I ter...., �.,. 5k e-, } 4 '• ver. !+ 503 �, ...._ �'. I illi I ",.,;-,�,..... r. I ilk1 a25e i 0 „ Lu e: a - `'. � _ act r.ti tc 113 I€ *,...tt 195 U W U. I '''' '1 . `1-cyA ae ' i`1 `' �- N 1 .,yt SF♦. . :- 365 375' ' ...„ 7.;,'? •• •‘4,‘ . •- ,•-Al ri- , . , , .. ,. n .'.1: 732 r. 7;.. .Ir Neighborhood served by the private roadway. L F 4.4 i- . 7, mss' • - ......... .., do- • a � ` ti lk , . � � .._ rrt� �' } , { :N. • 3 y »; cn o „....,.,,4%r-• GF 4 Y� '^" LLT M _ • ii " w'i j i PC { Y ai' 4 r T d k.. . 1 i , : c't4.'4 Exhibit F ,. i #17-389( tr. /I ear ". p ,a f .'`4 y2 Rex -' ' pd�" �. 'IA rit, i $ i .fix e` F At q } j Fr iii$ : 1--! 1 :. •. i till ,%,t.,-.. ,_ t 40 -,,te .‘m,, I Li_ _ _ ,� al .. i " / i c'''''' l'jr--:.'"!'`. i it'''' S- - - all i , ._.:f .: , .; .4 ., . •,. ' . ._,,..„..... rfi b ,. ` fir Nr . , ..,Q y ,fit �.�. �. �_ C``'� •',* k?..: „Y.' it f. }'• j. x i }�. ,..s. � . 4. e, \ 7th ,� t f r a1 ' r , �p . \ ot•, '1, ,..",41 ilp R , 1 _ 'J `r'SFc �` a• f S: . e 1 44 i ' elk!" it Vi*,,..i•,‘'-.4 4-7,44 rii . .....,...,-.> ' a y.•►v 4` i .,..6„, \NAs, .a }� ter;'/+�Q.�r!!;f4M4, _,�� _ ( •', ' f y 'id . , d, i 2 '1W!`. r ' ,,r. 1'irAitwt `- -+'.^=-- , i , . 1 t 1 ' , .;-,.... -- 1- 1": ,,,.:. ,,,,e,*.7,7,i.:P'•`.. :. , • . „- -' .. • , ic ir :-:, fl i ..ir I 4 .., f., . ,,,,,„, , . ,. 0:•'.. .. J ' i 111 .'. .1 , 'f {1' i # . ,, t o x g i ,... _ I Fill , "a ' �*„ _ I r , ,,ii a * tf I 7.`1 ti 00000 41,1",/, $ ' 4fti,,,,,,_. , ti y f ! Y. hi 444.....i , ,. . , , ,.., loolk.1 i . i . „.,. ii: . . .......e.,_....,1 i �. 4 . . .. - : I ,rf ' i fir: ;g �,�,y� r • S y ( g;" ( ) , a F yi 1 / i44ff{{ ,3 y . • , I 40 4- ...: 1 i i 3 } " IIIIIIK II i .; i ., 1 1. a1. • • s 1' 'fix r£ - t.4 • • • t .5 a . 3 • f` _ _ • _ 1t�- a t— ' t• 'R �; ani F} , ,"4'• ,r,,, _ r " � y 7 a .q .,, 11'• ,. •,8 res WA 1 I - - -.._ miqii,a tfi. , N •,..••• r jkorp. 1.. • * *-,---.:',:--%.',.°:. yr + -,*44-0- "t ?6¢ ar. F fµ v a h ... . ,..„,....4w..;,,...,7 . - ‘1„-r.,... .,••,-- ,- - '`.- '- •,-.'.'''...4,,tik`"N ' ;4,,„•':-.1/4-4•1 . '-.,, .. fi i : t i A ' ' ' '1:14! _ • a rtes. K ..;CI �� � „s - - .--0.14 '', t `ice .` - .,.;'1:s';':!-,;"1--;10,;.-.'.i1...,".,.'.,7." fix; .. ?.A.'1 4 , e'. - ,• , ty ••„.... ] h v • sJ : � ai, • 'Y.' +c• t' ,.* w ... '., i, • as' 'I ,"` y ,- ys'A .''i . i • 4. • 1„,p , �� • rix y WO, r �, • u J�♦; ":•t r } •`�!• '�.. !. 1 C•,y:r , . `` '.. ,,,�� ..b;~ ./ orticipit w . - R{ r r-7+r .�.x.} Ark jy.•Q le — a..... rte' jtiov ;•j'IrAt" ' ! 1ikFT , 1. y .. '•^ - A • .• _ , - f•;•.-4.---=i-it..-,i•• M -. -=' ai ._}. t —... .,. . „ ,, !. ..t. •- •..,-..« • �- ` �'`.�r ,7-, a r '\ _;ri -•"L ''' . y, ^a.•-a :_ w IF ,• . .•. . ►,,,-A,40- , ."-"t* .'b. — _ • • .=k' - .'' 1 . . _ •4 .'4. .:.,,� _`ver • 0•c' .1 1 1 _-1�� yit`\¢' • �. -e p 4Da '• n o An •� It IL' `� n - , ' S ys« `ice ,,, t;54 % �' - kL ^- y + t i • %.d'._p •1 ,....4."7" -• n {: r Y y y4. t .'/. 'ice {y4A ,3 t ti r • s t"'•. y,�, leir`k" f(-ry� t. t 4' '" .•• f4 .. > yy 1 .*` ti '7 7'+V2 /• a .„*..,1`a of ` i 4 ..- . , . - - • • ,-,, • . . ,,,,,,, ...„,,,,.. .................., .... ,,.. ,...., : • .4., ,. . .........„ --. ..„ . +fit { . P-140111P2„ .. ti a-+ 'x qtr:,• _ _ '. ,_ ,n ..- +1/4 ,� •�_' ..,_iw,R. -•- ._ _„ r • ,, ., ti, , 4 ' • r .41': • • +�. , 4. . II 1I %, \4„x.1 . a _ 0 -.lei\' 1 ' " • .w r .-r.. "'-'''"'"77 4%� �. _ �' .J i-,'7 �� '1,1 t+ '. �Sm "%+ •.t , 'F3, • Vis •. a y �t.E` r�Y 3 W Y. . „.:..,..1,, ,,W4,1:,,.,,,,,,,-,-' '..;-..,--,, ^fllr 1C:' /jam/ 4- d- T „ r Wit. • • , t, C. i �,, l . . ... \.,i,. .., ,. .,.. , ..... . . w 4 .ro-d. -. a • efc - ' ........„,_ .. . .,.. +. ,-... . . . . .. • - • . . k.;. ..,xtr-- 4y,- . .- ..,,..1, ‘. .. • . '''.,,,, ' , 4," •-•• .•'•' '•.• ..,.. •i•-#7%; w..c-••*%,,,.::',.•-. - . \ ‘, ••••- ,', - , V •",s•••••I:‘-'•••' . • ' ' ;4',' V‘ . - t...._ .‘, • l• 1 • . . • 41--- ' • •• '' • 6•'• ' -...46 7.1* • - • 1*, - .. •••-- ,..''''' " .1.4,/ .....-2, \*..4..Vis,',;A:;•• '- 1,,,r'' , • k ,-- •,,; _ 4- it „ , ...„.. ..... -..,, ..•. '''''''t--"„t.'”•'t ,. .f'"S•'•#*`4.'-'4VA;ii.'!;1'-"iii!,:::4„,,,,o,--4;-•4;5:4ii-11;,;4•1:',' -: . '.4.,te".i ,•.4$'''. . ':.,.,• . • -.' --ti00.*3-._ -,.-•;••••-. 9--'•-•\*;i:•,-"`-:--t,20i30••-'4'•;-----'''1."• --•''''" ' t., '''' . ''''. _• - .1.:. . -- , ' "A•,. ?,.4 v‘• ;• •''..•-'41.4,-iVz . •• '''''''';:.-I'r-. ,<-•-.1r-,'' '' ..'" ' , .':'•Y.1. ''•1:1;' '''''',.l';','„ ''.., -. --,..-•:::--; ,: , - th ., ...., . ,. . • 4. ' - . .... ." - ;•„,. ,,,I A 4.4••,. . . ., ...„, . . ••••••• .. • A . ..,2 . . 4.:,...•..' , • , 3 ,, •.' ' R.; • • • .. • . '.'*.1 -°,, ' , ..,r.. , ,•'' -{,-... i. • * • ' -•• ,.. - 41-' .,-4-• --- Nt'' ' • - . or:.•4 ., •- ` . , , . . .-k. P141• -sZ.' * : - . , ..;.:4.;). . ',.. ......zt.,...;,- :- ..!'--.'.'''. '''',*:;c.,.......... :;:,:. ',4 ''ft. 4.7 -.•- "." •-`.0: ,'', ,':" • • ,-;:ii,- .--f . . . t• •r.,..t.*.:•.,.Air.. .-..., .. • , -.. :1,.. '. *, ,1.-':IL.:,•••:',4ks,-..., .n. .. , , ' ,.. -..-...'-.77 '41.-'7•r .-`...-7i..44.- •r ' -* '•"•-•• '•e-r . •'• '.,,....,....7. ;,'.. ,,41 i ,..i.4-,: "' .. ": '•. .7't.-- ' 4 tii4: A '" 1 41: :PI • I. .., • • ,. , ".. • . .It 1, -1z. 1..3#4 .; . ' •• ' •••• ).. ..:••..1.• .7,••••‘• --.1 Pt. :.•••••4",.t;"*" •.;"•••,:• ' '''-'-:•*-' .i,-.;,_A .,'.• .4.-, -It--Ire 4,t...."". .:.- . , •,,.- ...4-, . 43,. • .. , -: -r, -: • —.. ; , - ' ., ,..'I - -.•!..`..ft . , • , A s-7 ' ' 1 • . -4.-`:.;, ,,t.' - •••• -,' , ..,,..,,-4. ,.... :- .4.,,, .....,...;# 1 4 . 7t 7 • -•-7.. r • ..r ',•z. ... - • 7, ';.7.`-,7 .. -*-6- -•- ., . ....- . ., . ..; . • ; '*"" :IfitrFt .-..:,..,..ill',, •', "-MN -. ' 4•.' 1 '"-it'•'....*'4.6,'..."..j.;',,-' W ai 4. . ,-.t,:i .--i-.,.., . , . .4., 4 .1 " '"IM."1.1.___.... ....111 ....•......,... '.1 '. _ _. : • • 'V. • __,... • •. • - ------'•'''' .•••1-;.A. .: -.. ' . -4,...;'••' .---. • ••;,A ,.• 2 • - %Ma- '• • I s. -. .4111; 11.112111"-- - _ • ----__ ..11.1111111.11.01W= - • . .• . - - .. .., • • .. • ,.. . - •__ - _ • . _ .. , - -- ... . • .• .- ...4, --. -•,, '411011W) .'-4t111'•'1'..- 4_*#,Pe - .•'' --- , „411110P' . '••3 • .. - .. , ••:.' ' ' •".. -_, . , . . . ,•.,_.... . 2 ,,,,_ . • . , .- . • • • • - - ._ ..:.'• ,,,•,t•. ' • • .... . ,. Dennis D. Krurnsieg Erica C. Street 519 Ferndale Road N. Wayzata, MN 55391 January 9, 2017 , 2017 CITY VIA FACSIMILE(952)249-4616 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Attn: Planning Commission Re: Denali Custom Homes—Land Use Application #17-3890 To Whom It May Concern: We are the owners and residents of the property located at 519 Ferndale Road N, Orono,MN 55391,which is immediately adjacent to the property which is the subject of the above referenced land use application for an after-the-fact variance to permit two entrance pillars to be located less than 5' from the roadway where a 10' setback is required(the"Variance"). The property in question is one of eight homes located on a narrow, one lane, private road section of Ferndale Road N. Maintenance and utility of the private road, and adherence to the neighborhood requirements, are responsibilities of the individual property owners and critical to continued and unimpeded access to, use and enjoyment of the private common areas by all residents. The 10' setback requirement is in place, in part,to (i)ensure the ability of residents to navigate the private roadway by allowing sufficient room for pulling over and passing, (ii) eliminate hazards and liabilities for residents and service providers who must access the road to perform a variety of tasks in including,among others, snow and brush removal, (iii)preserve opportunities for future improvements to the road, and (iv)maintain the aesthetics of the neighborhood as a natural, open view environment. The pillars in question interfere with the rights of the neighborhood residents and create a private nuisance in the following particulars: • The proximity of the pillars to the roadway creates a navigation hazard to passing cars by limiting the space available for passing in the event of a problem situation • The proximity of the pillars to the roadway also impedes the removal of snow and other debris from the road by limiting the space in which such removals may be accomplished, creating the potential for unsafe build up along the road and liability concerns on the part of service providers who are operating near the pillars City of Orono January 9,2017 Page 2 • The location of the pillars within 5' of the existing roadway will also impede future maintenance and repair of the existing roadway and the possibility of widening the roadway in the future In addition, from an aesthetic perspective,the current placement of the pillars interferes with the visual appeal of the neighborhood and previous unobstructed view along the entire length of the roadway. As such, and on behalf of the neighborhood as a whole,we respectfully request that the application for Variance be declined. We are unable to attend the hearing on January 17,2017 to address these issues in person; we will appreciate the serious consideration of the Planning Commission of these concerns. If you have any questions and/or there is any additional information that we can provide,please feel free to contact us at(612) 532-2284. Thank you for the opportunity to be heard. Yours truly, Dennis D. Krumsieg Erica C. Street PC • Exhibit J #17-3890 Sec. 78-1405. - Nonencroachments. (a) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard setback requirements: (1) Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, cornices, eaves, gutters, and similar building elements, provided they do not extend more than two feet into a required yard. (2) Nameplate signs for one-family dwellings subject to the provisions of article X, division 4 of this chapter; lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property and is located at least five feet from the front lot line; public utility poles and overhead lines; mailboxes. (3) Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. Window wells including those for fire egress which do not extend more than five feet from the building. Sidewalks, driveways and parking areas when constructed, located and used in compliance with other provisions contained within chapter 78. Driveways may extend to within five feet of a side lot line. (4) In side or rear yards only, bays or cantilevers not to exceed a depth of two feet nor to contain an aggregate area of more than 20 square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of three feet and a depth of four feet, and open off-street parking. (5) In rear yards only, balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters, laundry drying equipment, and recreational equipment except as otherwise regulated; no accessory structure shall be closer than five feet from a rear lot line. (5.1)Retaining walls, subject to the following provisions: a. Retaining walls may be located in all required yards when all of the following conditions are met: 1. The structure is located at least ten feet from the edge of the traveled roadway; 2. The structure is not located within a drainage, utility, or other easement, except upon approval in writing for an encroachment agreement by the city; or similar approval from another regulatory and/or utility agency; 3. The structure creates no impacts to drainage direction, rate or volume for adjacent properties. b. Retaining walls which do not exceed two feet in height above existing ground level, which are located within the property and at least five feet from any property line, and for which the amount of imported fill associated with the structure does not exceed 20 cubic yards, do not require a building or land alteration permit. c. Retaining walls exceeding two feet in height above existing ground level or for which the amount of imported fill associated with the structure exceeds 20 cubic yards or which are located less than five feet from a property line, shall require a land alteration permit and upon recommendation of the building inspector may require city council review or a conditional use permit per the provisions of section 78-967. d. Retaining walls exceeding the allowed height of a fence in a given required yard shall be located so as to meet the required accessory structure setbacks established for that yard. (6) In side yards only, no accessory structure shall be closer than ten feet from any side lot line. (7) Air conditioning or heating equipment may be located within a required yard but shall be located within five feet of the building it serves; shall not be located within an existing or required drainage and/or utility easement; and shall be located at least five feet from any lot line. Page 1 (8) Fences erected in all zoning districts are considered as a nonencroachment when they conform to the standards listed below. For the purposes of this section,the following definitions shall apply: Permanent fence. A fence that is installed in a fixed or enduring manner that is not intended for a seasonal or temporary purpose. Temporary fence. A fence that is not permanently secured or anchored to the ground by posts or affixed footings, and is installed and removed on a limited term or seasonal basis such as: snow fences, garden fences, seasonal recreational fences such as hockey boards; fences installed for safety or access management purposes for special events; and fences installed for the duration of a construction project such as silt fences, erosion control bioretention logs, and septic drainfield site protection fences. Fence height. The measurement from the top of any part of the fence, including posts or other structural supports, lattice, ornate top design elements, and so forth measured to the existing ground level below the fence, as measured perpendicular to the slope (see Drawing). Exception: Post finials extending above the top of the fence shall not be deemed as part of the fence for height determination purposes as long as they do not exceed ten inches in width per finial and do not extend above the top of the fence by more than ten percent of the allowed maximum fence height at that location. Drawing: Fence Height Measurement on Slo s ed Site 1,44441211 `14111; „mit 111111411111 41111rftlit a. Nonlakeshore lots. 1. Fences and walls within a required front yard or side street yard shall not exceed a height of 42 inches above existing ground level . 2. Fences and walls within a required rear or side yard shall not exceed a height of six feet above existing ground level. b. Lakeshore lots. 1. Fences within the required street(rear)yard or side street yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed 42 inches above existing ground level. Exception: A fence not exceeding six feet in height may be located along the street lot line of a lake frontage lot which abuts a major thoroughfare. A major thoroughfare for purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. If such fence involves fill or berming, the total Page 2 combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed six feet above the height of the crown of the major thoroughfare. 2. Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed six feet in height, and shall not exceed 42 inches in height for any portion located lakeward of a line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner's principal residence structure and the most lakeward projection of the principal residence structure on the adjacent property abutting the side yard in which the fence is located. 3. Fences shall not be constructed within the defined lakeshore yard of a lakeshore lot, i.e., shall not be located within 75 feet of the shoreline for general development lakes, 100 feet for recreational lakes, or 150 feet for natural environment lakes. 4. When the building site of a lakeshore lot is separated from the lakeshore by a public or private road, the following definitions will apply for fence location purposes subject to the provisions of section 78-1405(a)(8)a.2: When the yard on the opposite side of the building site from the lake does not abut a street, such yard shall be considered as a standard rear yard. The yard between the building site and the street shall be considered as a standard front yard. c. Special provisions. Split rail fences of no more than three rails within a required front, street or side street yard may have a maximum top rail height of 48 inches above existing ground level. Board rail fences within a front, street or side street yard for the specific purpose of enclosing permitted domestic animals may have a top rail height of 60 inches and shall be no more than 50 percent opaque. d. Intersection sightline obstruction prohibited. No fence shall be installed so as to obstruct a required clear view at street intersections as required by section 78-1371. e. Fence construction and maintenance. 1. The owner of a fence shall maintain it in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance and shall not allow it to become or remain in disrepair or in a dangerous condition. 2. Fences shall be installed with the finished side facing neighboring properties or the street. The term "finished side" means that side having no structural supports. 3. Fencing materials shall consist of permanent all weather products. 4. Temporary fencing shall not be allowed to remain on the property following final inspection, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a permitted construction project, or protection of property during a similar project or winter conditions. Winter conditions shall be defined as October 15 through March 31 of the following year. Temporary fencing associated with a special event shall be removed within seven days of the end of such event. Temporary fencing materials shall not be allowed to remain on a permanent basis on a parcel. 5. Existing fences that are legal nonconforming as to location, height, design or other characteristics may be replaced in kind. (9) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered nonencroachments when they conform with the following standards: a. Each monument, with a maximum of two per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; Page 3 c. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with section 78-1467; e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; f. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; h. Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 and at the discretion of the planning director. i. When a gate is proposed, the following requirements must be met: 1. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and 2. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and 3. Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and 4. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met(if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405(8), and 5. Gates must maintain an opacity level of no greater than 25 percent, and 6. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and 7. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved,traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking.A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. j. A building permit is required for installation. A survey must be submitted depicting where the monuments will be placed, and the property corner pins must be located for inspection purposes. (b) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on structure height requirements: (1) Parapet walls that extend no more than three feet above the height of the building. (2) HVAC cooling towers. (3) Elevator penthouses. (Code 1984, § 10.03(15); Ord. No. 211 2nd series, §§ 1-5, 11-26-2001; Ord. No. 12 3rd series, § 1, 5-24-2004; Ord. No. 30 3rd series, § 1, 11-28-2005; Ord. No. 43 3rd series, § 1, 2-25-2008; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 22, 6-10-2013; Ord. No. 139 3rd series, § 1, 2-23-2015; Ord. No. 140 3rd series, § 1, 3-23-2015; Ord. No. 170 3rd series, §§ 3, 4, 6-13-2016) Page 4 PC Exhibit K RUN DATE:12/2W2016 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:I #17-3890 38 36-118-2311 0007 38 36-118.23 140009 NANCY W DANIELSON NANCY W DANIELSON 585 FERNDALE RD N 585 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 NANCY W DANIELSON NANCY W DANIELSON 585 NORTH FERNDALE RD 585 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36.118-23 11 0029 38 36-118-23 14 0012 S C KENNEDY&M M KENNEDY JOSEPH&SHELLY HOESLEY 627 FERNDALE RD N 475 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 STEPHEN C KENNEDY JOSEPH&SHELLY HOESLEY MARNAE M KENNEDY 475 FERNDALE RD N 627 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 5539i 38 36-118-23 13 0001 38 36-118-23 14 0015 STATE OF MINNESOTA WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB TAX SPEC BUREAU OF RE MGT 200 WAYZATA BLVD W 500 LAFAY! 1!b RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PAUL MN 55155 38 36-1118-23 13 0002 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BLVD W WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23:40001 KRISTIN L RONE 575 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 KRISTIN L RONE 575 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 14 0002 KRISTIN L RONE 575 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 5539! KRISTIN L RONE 575 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 14 0003 T W DONALDSON ET AL 555 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 TW&K C DONALDSON 555 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23140006 CLARK GASSEN&MARGO GASSEN 515 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 CLARK GASSEN&MARGO GASSEN 515 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23!4 0007 STACIA J P ANDERSEN ET AL 517 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 5539: STACIA J P ANDERSEN STEVEN L ANDERSEN 16825 ENCLAVE CIRCLE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 3E STREET6-118-23 DD RECEIVED E C STREET& D KRUMSIEG 519 FERNDALE RD N ORONO MN 55391 ERICA C STREET DEC 2 0 2016 DENNIS KRUMSIEG 9 FERNDRD N # 3 8 90 � CITY OF ORONO WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information.available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. RECEIVED DEC 202016 en't OF ORONO PC Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Exhibit L ' .r,. � #17-3890 1 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 12/20/2016 36-118-23-12 ,36=1-1.823-11 31-118-22-22 K , _________________„/ , . � rw - 36-118_23_13 .---,---2;1,-,--,--.,.,-,,- - ' 31-118-22-23 f tg ' . —it '.* i t 4, \ t s '31 118-22-23 w 36- 18-23-13 3f4 F q .,;1 1,.1.1442-32 36-118-23-42 36-118-2341 " -- o . 36-118-23-42 m 36-118-23r4V o- a 31-118-22-32 r Buffer Size: 350 feet 0 120 240 480 ft Map Comments: 1 1 IIIIIII For more information contact: RECEIVED Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis,MN 55487 DEC 2 G gis.info@hennepin.us i cny OF ORONO # 3890 Item 7 Date Application Received: 12/20/2016 �O`VO Date Application Considered as Complete:12/20/2016 60-Day Review Period Expires: 2/20/2017 **s � To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `�� �°� Jessica Loftus, City Administrator �kFSH°� From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: January 17, 2017 Subject: #17-3895, Ugorets 8098, LLC, 2500 Shadywood Road, Conditional Use Permit: Event and Conference Center(Restaurant) Public Hearing A public hearing on this items is scheduled for Tuesday's meeting. The applicant has put his project on hold, pending resolution of staff comments. When the project comes forward,the public hearing will be renoticed, including resending of the notification post cards. The Chair is asked to notify those in attendance that no public hearing will be held on this item tonight. Jeremy Barnhart From: Alex Ugorets <alex@midlandglass.com> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:41 AM To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: RE: 2500 Shadywood Event center To whom it may concern: I "waive the 60 day review requirement" for the "Event Center" project. I would like to put it on hold until we determine feasibility of the "Apartment Building" project next to this site. Sincerely Alex Ugorets Ugorets Properties LLC 410 11th Avenue South Hopkins MN 55343 952-928-7800 Main 612-363-3321 Cell 952-928-2279 Fax Alex@Midlandglass.com From:Jeremy Barnhart [mailto:jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent:Thursday,January 12, 2017 8:29 AM To: 'Alex Ugorets' <Alex@midlandglass.com> Subject: RE: 2500 Shadywood Event center Thanks Alex. I need you to send me an email that states that you "waive the 60 day review requirement" The State requires a city to make a decision on a land use application within 60 days of a completed application, and if no decision is made, the application is automatically approved. The applicant can waive this requirement. I will keep your materials on file, and we can pick it up after or as part of the apartment building approval process, at your discretion. Jeremy Barnhart,AICP Community Development Director Direct 952.249.4626 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us From:Alex Ugorets [mailto:Alex@midlandglass.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 11, 2017 6:16 PM 1 . r+eii2. Jeremy Barnhart From: Mark Brewei Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:50 AM To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Hennepin County Emergency Management Tower Dear Mr. Barnhart, I just returned from out of the country today and got your notice of the meeting tonight. My initial concern with the proposed project was if it was going to generate EMF radiation from any type of radar. It does not appear based on my review of the documents that it will. I would like added to the conditional use that any such addition of that type of equipment require notification of adjoining property owners. If in fact I am wrong about my assumption and there would be radar equipment or the like which would generate significant EMF radiation I would appreciate contact with me by email or phone at Otherwise, thank you for the notice and I have no other objections. Sincerely, Mark E. Brewer, DC 3800 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 1 i TEM * S r • City of Orono w4`o.ix Hardcover Calculation Worksheet �„ Property Address: 1 t?7 Uc` ylet Ae YI. af , rf 0 f +f 1Zr/a f`I EsHoO"`` Prepared by: tr./ea/11BFRG ¢A1,10C/4, - Date: /- d7 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2:i'. :i�:Z,171•x-y 4111:L1;l Il.P4 In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) , fGarage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A EX/Sa'"/A1G ,Psf0e.e.re Z/7 - l2Vje irrate*evr g 93 S.F._ B CX/fti_LteC GP A cc To .i-cOrvi f I°vA7 PR_',/arc 26-1 S.F._ C Fxi-tliefa A0,0'1E-LA Y 7?'2 - £+6f2 A9�ild ' iCA PiiCa s 2/9_5' S.F. C °- -- (7.0.8E R FM ez F' j --77- S.F. E 4 re/•-c low r: WA1.X rrr Is 72- 5'$1 IF.4/6-' AEit aNEA = _ /3'7 S.F. F Corm/6- R EM o vF, G 03e-diva RCM Ol/r � — --Py- S.F. I EX/ iiiC AAP S.F. i J F.k� riateG u/ODI T7I/.7 f L Ace, l 7/ S.F. (TO d'E I?ENt tl t/E'O - - S.F. L 00 BE fP!'Malicifi -� S.F. M f�411t14'll �l��/740,J 273 S.F. N /ti.dfc1G6+A 0400 I Tledi6' S.F. 0 ,E,t�►/orj. AN PX 3e f S.F. P fterveffQ k,A t A c r 3-92 S.F. Q iteoft 0two AiyrkciA y 1 7/ S.F._ R /121#J'cg -WAS 2" S.F. SS.F. T TS.F. S.F. ' V _ S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z - S.F. S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 5,,V,6,13 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] qj 0- ' S.F. (4) Total Lot Area ' f2S S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage (((3)+(4)1 25,y5% Subdivision Application-January 2016 This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 19 R. .i..., 74 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ( \ \,,,,,,,,,, j Wt04 GEOFFREY & STEPHANIE MARTHA\ \\\\ 4)IN LOTS 30 & 31, BLOCK 1, WILEY'S PARK LAKE' MINNETONKA ( ) \ \ \ iii HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ `\ \\ `\ 1100LAKE \ \ • \ \\ " MINNETONKA \ \ \\ `\ \ \\\\`\\`\ :o \ ` \ `\ `\ \ {'�" \\""` °y4 CRYSTAL BAY %\\ \ \ \ \ \�Jw, •�► EXISTING Ate 1 \ t'-•-'..\-.•...: HOUS \ f \\I 11 I (4,.a) 54. 6 1 \ `'` 2oao 1 \ \ \ W'lli 1 r^•. 1 1 n J -...... \ \wDpp sfSPs►�\\\\\� 929.4 CONTOUR `a,�y.l •v ... \\ 1 \ Al •7 \ :,1•..\..S \ \ ,�d LME maw.) I1 13, I \ 13'\ ` 9.32 1 vOj \\ \v9A \/X \ /�^//� 1 (esu) w, l(Do54\ 1 5 \. \\ S�IRVEY�\\�\ ) \ \ (935,) ...' / �(�. AO$Z l::..• t�s1 _\ 1 \ \ a \ s //� \mac\ //� (9324) \\ \ / (9577) • .....1 \ 1 75r 945 \O \: , \ \ \\ e. \ / - :•1 5561} \ \ sETBACK \ \ \-. .-. - ,c,.. // ' 1 \\\\ \\ \\\ �IV \ ! 1 \LANE \ x A \ �. \ \ \ ineA \ t1 ,or, 1\ I. \ \ is \ ;'Sg' \ \ \ , �-5 \ 44(__------------///. �/ • _- ' // lot 1 \ \ / \ \ \ \ (9901) ` 009 `�� �� / .................... .....................X.. ::::. \o.....) \\ \\ Q -C, ""1- --,.� �\ \\\\\ \'--93z,3p\ y�rrss.. - - \ 6 A i`�' ' PAROOPOO5CO..ON /17.1..\"(0.1i4- .. A, „;'.- /•yo1`�,:•\ :... \ fO E +i((O \ \ // •,qF. i �' 9f0. \ ,, \ \ t,:+F - � • (9499) '.\ ie625Li _ .i' festa) (M) ,.� "ic�r9no '• ....:-4,;.A.,''..j, PRO \ \\//•{9az� \ • f \\\ . A, / i 0.F ro et eoo•tn.: yf1.1 \ \\ a' ''•r':..... ^:i•.S /. .Loos-'•.; ,,V„`\PORCH \ E) \ /./.•••••• \ /�.y5� �:' \ \ CA ��/�/'�/ \ NW COR :`•� � %. �'3,04/ 95.0'.,') sy EXISTING '°'', \O e* \ �g \ L \ /A/ YVV�- \LOT 31 I ~� • -.:� GRAVEL v '� /� �+ �' \ i~j V� ���nn 1/ \ :(9soe) % DRIVEWAY wo HOUSE g'....•••• x I 1,� 9.z 11I(('IV 'v\ t ! : `fib ///�'/ /, \\\?�O'q_ \ .lul-(e3o.Y) '�\, 7. 1Rµ (C) WEBTW9 0, �(A)�A 'JJ' // \t \\ . \ : ,ii -.‘';'.--. --- , ‘S. V,4 „s C6 \\ \ i PROPOSED Opp ', Ex1STiNG % LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : \.• \ S• GARAG/ 7 BLACKTOP �. �” �\ '�Nl: _, (9) :' PARCEL 1 A/ROADWAY / `(�\ -'' Lot 31, Block 1, "Wile s Park", Lake Minnetonka, except the following: 1 �\ / PROPOSED \ '' / Y' P 9 Commencingat the Northwesterlycorner of said Lot; thence Southeasterly Uk_9(.,, 4::A\\ GARAGE / (8499) ; Z-6...•�� /. EXISTING along the outhwesterly line of aid Lot 20.00 feet; thence Northeasterly �O S\ (w7s)\:� (P) / �K) /! / \� a distance of 109.35 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot ti: ti"/ ''/ / HOUSE distant 115.00 feet Easterly of the Northwesterly corner thereof; thence (� 4) Sfwe s \ \/�/� ��.' / 2100 Westerly on said Northerly line to the point of beginning. "� GRAVL•• ,, / PARCEL 2 \ or-'-•'•. (947.8) '� DRIVEWAY That part of Lot 30, Block 1, "Wiley's Park", Lake Minnetonka, lying \\ - (.ri / �, Northwesterly of a line drawn Northeasterly from the most Westerly corner �� V of said Lot 30 to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, which line forms an angle �9G -°A� .9,c,,\ of 80 degrees 36 minutes 30 seconds with the Southwesterly line of said �j \ Yo S 0 Lot 30 at the most Westerly corner. • ?7 \\C��,..., 4)4 �s / �g°�� \\ • : denotes iron marker found (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum / 1 1910.81: denotes proposed spot elevation, mean sea level datum 4) • • 16\ _ _ O.'� j \ 9 r ;3s. s.._ \ 1 ' —-917-— : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum ti \ 01'6 -19301 : denotes proposed contour line, mean sea level datum ) Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 9k7r-\ This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, EXISTNG the location of an existing house and garage, spot elevations, topography, / GARAGE the proposed location of two proposed additions, a proposed deck, driveway 0 / garage and grades, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It 6 ( does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DESORPTION ` 12 -12-76 Y ADDED ""�`°"`"CHANGES S'°"° GGRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. l hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report SCALE is-So,e TOPOGRAPHY ADDED was prepared by me,, or under my direct supervision, 1"=20' 1-16-17 REVISED HARDCOVER ' the laws and of the Sate LofeMinnesotad Surveyor under CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS DATE 8-16-16 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 •".71‘•'417-.0(.. � y 952-473-4141 ,,,a."-e.-44-.7 jos Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12755 17-018 17-018