Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 15,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: <br /> Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Denise Leskinen, Chad Olson, Loren Schoenzeit, and Jon <br /> Schwingler. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Senior Planner <br /> Michael Gaffron, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Wendy <br /> Dankey was present. <br /> Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> 1. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of April 17,2017 <br /> Leskinen moved, Schwingler seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission <br /> meeting of April 17,2017,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 2. 17-3925 City of Orono,Text Amendment: Small Lots/Setbacks,6:35 P.M.—7:03 P.M. <br /> Barnhart noted the Planning Commission reviewed this item at their April meeting where it was tabled. <br /> The issue of setbacks for small lots within the City has been on the ordinance review list for several years. <br /> In the Council's goals for 2017, it ranked as the 5th most important issue. <br /> In 2016,the City processed 41variances of various types; side or street setbacks were included in 19 of <br /> them. This is as a result of a number of properties having been developed prior to the enactment of the <br /> regulations, resulting in the property owner having to request a variance of some type for many <br /> improvements, depending on where the house is located. At the time the original ordinances were <br /> created, property owners were encouraged to combine smaller lots into one bigger lot, which did not <br /> occur as often as the City anticipated. <br /> There are several areas of the community where the development pattern is inconsistent with the zoning <br /> district. Barnhart displayed several maps: Map A shows lots in red that are less than 1/4 acre, with <br /> clusters of these lots being located in 1/2 acre, 1 acre, and 2 acre zones. <br /> As an example,the LR-1B district has a minimum one acre lot size. A number of lots are a quarter acre <br /> or half an acre. The front yard setback is 35 feet,the side yard setback is 10 feet, and the back yard <br /> setback is 35 feet. A majority of the lots do not meet those setbacks and are nonconforming. In the <br /> nonconforming situation, any property owner who would like to expand would require a variance,which <br /> tends to be a 6-week process. The question before the Planning Commission and the City Council is <br /> whether the ordinance should be modified in some manner to allow these properties to be improved <br /> without the need for so many variances. In the case of a variance,the property owner needs to <br /> demonstrate a practical difficulty. <br /> Map B shows lots in blue between 1/4 and 1/2 acre, with clusters of these lots being located in 1/2 <br /> acre, 1 acre, and 2 acre zones. Each map includes the zoning legend. Approximately 95% of the non- <br /> conforming lots are within one of these four zoning districts. <br /> Page 1 of 23 <br />