The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-01424 - new structure PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS Address: f0oo Noirkti' ` ,Stelorc., 1110/. Permit No.: 2.01-1 ` `ri Description of work: N'Al oh 6 ' I t`I I114.-. Date Rec'd: 1 1. I'7 /It,.S .1- • , . . :4' `� � '�^ Septic review by: C�CX 9''W Date Approved: Zoning review by: Date Approved: 12-41 •r1 Building review by: GA. ' -4-5. Date Approved: 11/46/27 Grading review by: - _ ,_ Date Approved: 2/ 1\k,-11 Zoning District: Ctrl13 Zoning File#: ti -Ai/ Resolution? Yes Reso#: ocri Reso Date: Signed: Yes No Resolution I NA Zoning: Lot Area: l• l SF 0 Width: Structural Coverage:4Th SF it J Survey Submitted: Yes D No Date of Survey: 10 dl•t1 Revised date(?): 2.;21• I p Landscape plan submitted? D Yes Landscaper: 0 No/ None proposed Proposed Setbacks: Frit(Lake) ye(Street) ( N S E Wg) ( N S & W ) Other Buildings Wetland Side Side 511 _ 35o'-t-- %IL ' 15' Building Height Analysis: Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof* (See"building height" rj col-' definition): (a) I D cf 94" First Floor Elevation (from building plans): (b) Q ,4 Highest Existing ground level (per survey) or 10' above lowest ground level, (c) A0.0 whichever is lower: Difference between (b) and (c)*: (d) 51- DEFINED HEIGHT Jf-highest existing adjacent grade is above FFE-Height is(a)-(d): (e) IRO *If highest existing adjacent grade is below FFE-Height is(a) +(d) Shoreland District MCWD Permit Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff Met? / Yes 0 No Permit Number: l'1 - 6�� 'es 500 0 N/A 0 Yes No 0 N/A-see attached _ vari era 4pAYtD'-•6etback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed f Overlay District Tier Hardcover Hardcover Variance Required CUP Required (circle one) (% and sf) (% and sf) j� \iD C3 Sf- �3 t. �0, P Li,L3cb Yes 0 No 0 Yes /Jo ( 1 J 2 3 4 5 Smc.' Type(s):attud Type(s): v 1L9.kA� S 21.115070 a - 1 11'1754' (01-wid Updated: June 2017 a` Of- sA z:\forms\plan review checklist 06-2017.docx v 1.,'.vbal • Fees to be Charged • YES NO Plan Review L r 41 Investigation Fee Other(specify) t� Square Footage $ per Square Footage Basement X = $ 1st Floor X = $ 2nd Floor X = $, Garage X = $ 00 Estimated Construction Value: $ �%t/ 00(9----- Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Footing ❑ Site ;Plumbing 0 Grading/Filling A Poured Wall Silt Fence/Erosion Control F, Mechanical 0 Fire Foundation Survey /❑ Hardcover Removal (1Q1. Fireplace 0 Water Connection 0 Framing 0 Other(specify) 0 Masonry ❑ Sewer Connection Waterproofing/Drain tile Mfg. ❑ Lawn Irrigation 0 Foundation Waterproofing 0 Other(specify) 0 Landscaping 613( Framing 0 Septic A Insulation As-Built Survey Final Lathe Required State Permits 0 Other(specify) 0 Well Electrical REMARKS (in-house): OFFICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED: 0 See Builder Acknowledgement Form ❑ Prior to release of escrow money an as-built survey and hardcover calculations must be submitted and approved. Updated: June 2017 z:\forms\plan review checklist 06-2017.docx ."1 DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE A SCHEDULED /•-/7-/8 ,2=De PERMIT NO. C/7-61(-I COMPLETED/ ADDRESS 3010 Po/11A ,-)14-6(e_ J/i /"1`jv62— OWNER t / TELEPHONE NO. �6,/, --)606,- 3966 CONTRACTOR J- C&J / 4 4 e s /-14..Q._- DESCRIPTION �'cZ,�� ty ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL Q 0 POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL ❑ LATHE 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL r ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL Z• OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES NO COMMENTS: cc 04,10 -4.--V w ►-a 1-- 3<< - 0c)(-1-f,-5 <I- /Notd 5 ' j-QCA S li. q cc o l ` p AA- e> W cc y s o 4 il, (GC N,le 4 1- 5 Gh 114- W 4� -se_ 0n Ly l (r--chic ..e. �.4- �a�-c.r- jet_ f�Uk:-1-e% ay2e is a5 p/tot vt.o 2 WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE CC IL 0 CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY C.1 BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT O CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED O STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/ContraP-- cttor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTIONT)C SCHEDULED l-‘24/4.J 11. off) / PERMIT NO. r -C/Li c PLEJED ADDRESS 3GYD() i 5/teA-13-177 OWNER ' ELEPHONE NO462_3 '-3 /W CONTRACTOR • Liz S 747(12,_ DESCRIPTION C)6r W ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING ❑ FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL • ❑ LATHE 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS is ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL ✓ ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL - OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO cei• COMMENTS: S'.' Xe s lid ti esti. mA . ittti cc nW. per.r p .':# 4' o S.,as dy ct .f0 / o1C cc o W V 1711 uG /l c c.1 r a )•-1 Q -�w�"i�f S beA.,r-. pc,V r hs Ac7�'c cT•Frew„ .F�o CC d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY QO ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN CISTOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector_ c L �.. White Copyllnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice ComL / TIME CITY OF ORONO '_ ATF jk CALLED IN t INSPECTION N / � ICE r C CHEDULED b / [7`� PERMIT NO. 0 /—LII /COMPLETED ADDRESS 1,2D Nth(o i L11eyY- / OWNERLEPrHt' NE NO. —7 3- -3\s' 45 0 r CONTRACTOR � � teVI J�' � e V 37. DESCRIPTION 10U,tY ( WWI W ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING O ❑ FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE 0 PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL ❑ LATHE 0 MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION • 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL • OWN ERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO COMMENTS: Fo 1I1 dal").dl-t G1w!/SCC t-17% .r// iivt.di in "p/a SCcc 0 Dh �o,�-.'1J cc EN9%haaltoj jeiy L,G✓'sdPI AV)c ass.vc►i1&s 0 W 2 12 W CC W \WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED LI PROJECT COMPLETE CC ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 LI CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY ✓ BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN CI O STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. /.< White Copyllnspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice DATE TIME 'I CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTIc Lj ,,,, CHEDULED /1 , 36 � PERMIT NO. ;'O1 / -1/`t-e- COM ETEDD , ADDRESS 6.01-A5")/Are` ,b;-)v-e OWNER /TELEPHONE Ne7^7C)7-,. 7,7 CONTRACTOR I7 /`'il�� DESCRIPTION gi,(.41.,et&/7 cr-J/1 ada-i7 /19aCt -- LU ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL 0 SEPTIC FINAL 1-1.. ❑ POURED WALL 0 PLUMBING RI 0 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING HUNDATION DRAIN TILE 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ LATHE 0 MECHANICAL RI 0 SITE INSPECTION Q 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL FINAL 0 RATED WALLS Z ❑ INSULATION 0 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 0 COMPLAINT Q 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP 0 FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY 0 SEWER HOOK-UP 0 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL r ❑ DEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR T MEET YOU:% _YES_NO • COMMENTS: ifir s,eli - k/4llep✓O Ky 4-- cc IQ • //1 Z.. ." OC -a r be a'oe -- 6 , cv4tl of O f1wtiot-co:4 — P d14.N, i be /ti aEL Ybck cc "rot/maid — 4 814(54. roG.t -rt ip,°x "Ces e, o .ra6✓'tc.. — W CC Q a Got* re0t: c 4 a. ,l (cos.-- n i . W Z W CC d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE CC 0 CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY LU O ®l�ORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY ✓ FORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN El STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR CITATION ISSUED 0 INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector. /i /1 White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice ATETIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN -2—73- INSPECTION OTICESCHEDULED -?- /2 //.'w PERMIT NO/0/ I 1 COMPLETED ADDRESS 0°(t!O (. -Jh y'L- ){l OWNER TE HONE NO. A ' tig7-2077 CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION o— v1uJa c i w ❑ FOOTING 0 DEMO-FINAL / 0 SEPTIC FIl AL LJPOURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLI ❑ FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL ❑ LATHE ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL El RATED WALLS • ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q 0 FINAL 0 WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP LI AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL v LiDEMO-SITE 0 SEPTIC INSTALL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO 2 COMMENTS: Cve r�/o : r y �f"a .r%a�Lbag in4 et T, /c. —F.c b r►'4 -6 r o k Go,^-.Plc+i. c`T —F,- T cc o Q-FI,arG /4oV54.. G e f;r►v t f hot 74 t R 1 ii 41)0 44 • a✓`t 5. r.71,1 11", (eft'et in pi C.) 14.1 cc W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE CCN CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OO ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY ✓ BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 Owner/Contractor on site: Inspector: O White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice From: Laura Oakden [mailto:loakden@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent:Tuesday, February 20, 2018 4:25 PM To: Rick Hendel<rick@hendelhomes.com> Cc:Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: RE: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Hello Rick, Roger and I have looked over your revised plans you submitted today. Thank you for addressing the issues so quickly. We have two remaining points of concern on the building plans. 1. This home received a side yard setback variance to allow for a 8.6 setback instead of 10'. In the bump-out along the west side of the home,the roof is shown a foot taller than the approved variance allows. This roof peak will need to be lowered to match the variance approved plans. 2. It looks like you redesigned the roofline on the lakeside of the home to address the height,thank you. However, the new overhang in the center of the shed roof seems to start higher on the roof and extends farther out than the variance approved roofline. This overhang will need to be shortened to match the variance approvals. I also have a few questions regarding the as built: 1. The as built submitted today show retaining walls along the tuck-under garage. If these have not been constructed yet they need to be removed. If they are existing the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations must be shown. The height and spacing of these walls may trigger the need for engineered plans. 21 Please have the surveyor confirm the lakeside walkout elevation. 4. Please remove all proposed elevations and only show the exiting elevations for the foundation that is on site. 4. What is the floor elevation of the tuck under garage? 5. Since the garage top of foundation has increased in height from 940.9 to 942.9 (raised 2 feet), a grading plan will need to be submitted and approved. I have included an updated survey we received from advances surveying this afternoon. We are available tomorrow after 3pm. Please confirm with me if that works or if you have any further questions. Thank you, Laura Oakden Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: loakden@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us From: Rick Hendel [mailto:rick@hendelhomes.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:09 PM To: Laura Oakden<loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc:Jeremy Barnhart<ibarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: RE: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Laura, Please let me know if you have questions on the plans and moving forward again with construction. If we can't get an answer today then we would like to meet to discuss tomorrow. What times are available for tomorrow afternoon? 2 Also, I do have the surveyor removing the "existing elevations" from the survey for the as-built. Rick Hendel HENDEL Building Highly Detailed Residences&Renovations 15250 Wayzata Boulevard#108 Wayzata,MN 55391 952.404.7204 OFFICE From: Laura Oakden [mailto:loakden@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent:Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:50 AM To: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Cc:Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: RE: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Hello Rick, Thank you for the email. It was during the as built foundation review that we realized the building permit plans did not match the variance approvals. The home in the building plans were almost 2 feet taller than what was approved by variance by the City Council.This new roof expansion created an encroachment in the setback areas where variance are needed. City staff can only approve permit for projects that meet the city code or where variances are granted.The building plans you submitted for permit do not meet the city code or the variance approvals because of the roof line expansion. If you want to move forward with the roof shown on the building plans you would need City Council approval for another variance, or you could continue construction by submitting new plans that match the already approved variance. Because city staff does not have the authority to approve permits that do not meet city code your current permit is not valid and construction cannot continue until the discrepancy is resolved. The city has placed a stop work order on this project until new plans are submitted and approved that match the city code and the approved variances. Additionally,the foundation as built identified old/preexisting foundation elevations as "existing elevations" all previous notations on the survey should be removed. Only current as built elevations should be shown. The garage top of foundation elevations called out 940.9 and 942.9, suggesting either a 2 foot step down into the garage or a 2 foot height increase of the garage floor. Please clarify the current elevations on site.Also, please include the lake side foundation as built elevation. I just revived your new plans. I will review them with Roger to confirm this has solved the roof line issue. If these are matching and we can allow you to proceed so you still want a meeting with city staff? It appears we wouldn't be able to have a meeting until tomorrow afternoon with all the parties. Thank you, Laura Oakden Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 3 Email: loakden@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us From: Rick Hendel [mailto:rick@hendelhomes.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:40 AM To: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us>;Jeremy Barnhart<ibarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Re: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Laura,Jeremy, Roger, The homeowner and I are requesting an urgent meeting ASAP with all of you to discuss the"stop work order"that was put into effect less than 2 hours after we were notified of an issue with the roof height that was an approved permit#2017- 01424 on Friday Feb. 16th. It is extremely disturbing/disappointing that after the as-built foundation survey was completed,permit granted,and work had been commenced for over 4 weeks, it was realized that the city was in error for approving something different than the variance granted,which was unknown to us. This permit took almost 5 weeks to be reviewed and approved by the city, after most of the work had already been approved on variance. This city error, can easily be corrected with formal documentation. To shut down a job in a couple hours with no reasonable response when the solution could be as easy as documentation and a conversation is completely unprofessional and at the very least very not an example of what a new resident would like to see from their city. I would like to expect that since we currently have 5 permits with the city, and many previously completed successful projects in Orono,that we would be granted a slightly more reasonable response than"you have no permit&we have no idea what you are building"which was communicated via, Laura on Friday and a sign posted within a little over an hours' time. Let me clarify again,the permit was already approved by the city and the city missed a calculation and/or had an oversight on the permit, so I would expect a response back as swift as the stop work order to get this resolved. Valuable time and expense has been lost and the city offices were closed on Monday. It is imperative that this gets addressed immediately and that your actions can be explained to the current owner. Please let me know when you are available to resolve this issue this morning. Rick Hendel HENDEL HOMES 15250 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata,MN 55391 952.404.7204 Office 952.404.7205 Fax 612.490.7130 Cell From: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Date: Friday, February 16, 2018 at 1:54 PM To: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Cc:Jeremy Barnhart<ibarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: RE: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Resent-From: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Hello Rick, Per our phone conversation I have scanned in the home elevations that were approved with the variance and the submitted building permit elevation. Note,when you measure from grade to roof peak on the rear elevation (Lakeside). The roof is 2 feet taller then what was approved with the variance. This is a new encroachment in the lakeyard setback, average lakeshore setback and side yard setback. These encroachments were not approved through your variance and 4 are not allowed per the City Code. The building permit plans are no longer valid for your project. Rather than void the permit, please submit new plans which address the roof line to be consistent with the variance approval. To confirm, a stop work order have been issued to the property until this is resolved. I am available if you have any questions. Laura Oakden Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: loakden@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us From: Rick Hendel [mailto:rick@hendelhomes.com] Sent: Friday, February 16,2018 1:10 PM To: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>;Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Re: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Laura, Can you call me to discuss ASAP. I'm confused on what is of concern from your email. Thank you, Rick Hendel HENDEL HOMES 15250 Wayzata Blvd Wayzata, MN 55391 952.404.7204 Office 952.404.7205 Fax 612.490.7130 Cell From: Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Date: Friday, February 16, 2018 at 11:55 AM To: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Cc: Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>,Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 Resent-From: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Hello Rick, It has come to our attention that the building permit for 3060 North Shore Drive does not match the variances that were approved for the new home/addition project. The project will need to stop immediately until this can be reconciled. The building permit 2017-01424 has a higher roof by 2 feet compared to the approved variances given on October 9th,2017. The distance between the lowest floor and the top of the roof is longer by two feet. This has created a new height that has encroached into the 75' Lakeyard setback,the average lakeshore setback and the side yard setback. This height of the roof will need to be addressed before work can continue. 5 We believe there to be two options moving forward. If you believe there are others, let s discuss. 1. You can submit for a new variance with the new roof line. The deadline for submittal is next Wednesday. The application would go to the March 19th, 2018 Planning Commission and the April 9th, 2018 City Council Meeting. You can apply online,through our permitting system. https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController 2. You can redesign the roofline of the home to match the height that was submitted and approved through the variance process. New plans would need to be submitted and approved before work can continue on site. Additionally,the foundation as built called out the existing foundation in the garage at 940.9 and also called out the foundation as 942.9. This suggests a 2 foot step down into the garage. (See attachment) not reflected on the approved plans Please clarify the as-built foundation elevations including what it is currently and what the proposed foundation elevations as part of the building permit. Also, please include the proposed elevation for the lakeside foundation and the as built elevations. Our inspector must issue a stop work order on site this afternoon. I am available for any questions as well. Laura Oakden Planner City of Orono Direct 952.249.4602 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: loakden@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us 6 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and A5 that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. L.LI ' IS c.7-6-ma , M. 0363-0-m Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720) S.F. A House (Outside 75' lake setback) 3,040 S.F. B Garage (Outside 75' lake setback) 391 S.F. C Bituminous Drive (Outside 75' lake setback) 8,982 S.F. D Shed (Outside 75' lake setback) 195 S.F. E Retaining Walls (Outside 75' lake setback) 120 S.F. F Proposed Patio(Outside 75' lake setback) 265 S.F. G Front Porch (Outside 75' lake setback) 80 S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J House (Inside 75' lake setback) 756 S.F. K Proposed Screen Porch (Inside 75' lake setback) 216 S.F. L Concrete surfaces (Inside 75' lake setback) 59 S.F. M Retaining Walls (Inside 75' lake setback) 42 S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 14,146 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684) Retaining Walls 162 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 162 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover[Subtract line (2)from line (1)] 13,984 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 62,298 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)/(4)] 22.45% LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract A,except the highway,Registered Land Survey No.717,Hennepin County, Minnesota. �s 1 -• �;�' SCOPE OF WORK&LIMITATIONS: ��0 - 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed r '''' • above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, �� ;, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or �� / �i consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct z � mr fi¢:76-- and that any matters of record,such as easements,that you wish to be included on �� , 4 ,.,° / the survey have been shown. y' msrut sxr • gA' �''.. / °c 'v ; _ 2. Showin the location of observed existin im rovements we deem necessary for TENSE -'4).., \o` r`, g g P'' - $ the surveyo^ a°9,ti ,, y/ ',5 / f�`� d " 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the *Pt,:`'! Sf - corners of the property. /,A�4d' ¢ r "t *y s 0. 4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the °��,�� ,f ' ''gq�s5P ' \ topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in • c� � determiningelevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate ASG +nnti_ • �� •O'� ,-INSTALL SIL ' ,' moi" '• ', FENCE/PIO eat �-'' ��/0 -,• A oe only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at � ' Fa''o. least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for �' j � RFIyOHMARK. use on this site or before beginning construction. _ *,° ' /,, , 61�' `""�,ri« 5. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property (✓CJk i,l' -- r�o «°d w lines,are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. \ �L 1 \S2 \ \�� a ;'q°F�°° 6 STANDARD SYMBOLS&CONVENTIONS: "Cl �, ° //�� .V� y ` < . 0°0&°` ti 4:, "•"Denotes iron survey marker,set,unless otherwise noted. INSTALL SILT-, �r d pian aa7 ,v° R`°Q '‘-PROPOSED \%'.•o,>, 4' c. \ACX-/ v; Ert awr£ �•S, 4 ->' ••C WSTA1 SK T� V':$@ , ° s Nro eat 4 :"tet \`.o / " '. 4 `_ s36 m I,./ 4 \v 1L'-< J(. s'i ,ss, L a`,"z Q,\/'11 0,\/ s O * = This information was supplied to us by -i, our client. This hos not been verified by `\ 4 plans nor field verified. �/ -\,r1 + \. /c. 6r ryS+ �e,� / 1 00\ / / /�f/ C:1Y CA.C%11 1n G 'J`' / - A , 6 177;0°j / ect // 01� S DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION / >o, NO� 8/22/17 SHOW 75FOOT SETBACK LINE FROM OHW / )l 8/22/17 SHOW HOME&DRIVEWAY ADDITIONS 9/7/17 SHOW AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK LINE 10/31/17 NEW ADDITION LAYOUT PER OWNER DRAWING ORIENTATION&SCALE CLIENT NAME/JOB ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SURVEY OR REPORT — 7� WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION SHEET TITLE SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 11/13/17 UPDATED TIERED RETAINING WALL PER CITY COMMENTS AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR HENDEL HOMES <� van c e UNDER KOF THE sT" /M/r"EsoT"• FOUNDATION AS-BUILTSHEET N0. 11/15/17 PER CLIENT COMMENTS ��l DATE SURVEYED: AUGUST 18,2017 Surve in &Engineering, Co. 11/15/17 PER CLIENT COMMENTS N y 9 9 9 3060 NORTH SHORE DRIVE Thomas M.Bloom 2/15/18 FOUNDATION AS-BUILT DRAWING NUMBER SCALE-1'=30' 17917 Highway 7 #42379 DATE DRAFTED: AUGUST 22,2017 S 1 2/16/18 ADD A NOTE ABOUT THE PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR. 0 30' 60' ORONO, MN Minnetonka,Minnesota 55345 LICENSE NO. TB 2/20/18 REMOVE OLD FLOOR ELEVATIONS FROM EXS. COND. SURVEY Phone(952)474-7984 AUGUST 21,2017 180076 MI / Web:www.advsureom DATE SHEET 1 OF 1 4 Laura Oakden From: Adam Edwards Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 4:05 PM To: Laura Oakden t. copy Cc: Christine Mattson Subject: RE: 3060 North Shore Drive/#2017-01424 Laura, As requested I revised the adjusted grading plan, stamped it approved and offer these comments: 1. If does not appear that the revised plan has altered the drainage patterns from those previously approved. 2. The change has resulted in two of the retaining walls being planned at exactly 4 ft tall. If the walls exceed 4 ft, engineered plans will be required. 3. Care should be taken to ensure the southwestern driveway does not direct water into the lower garage. Adam From:Christine Mattson Sent:Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:51 AM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: FW: 3060 North Shore Drive/#2017-01424 Adam, Please review the attached electronic copy of the updated survey. Paper copies have not been received yet. Thank you! From: Rick Theisen [mailto:rtheisen@hendelhomes.com] Sent:Thursday, November 16, 2017 8:52 AM To:Christine Mattson<CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc:getmsmith@gmail.com; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>; Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us>; Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> Subject: RE: 3060 North Shore Drive/#2017-01424 HI Chris. Please see the attached revised survey with the changes you requested. I will also drop off 2 full sized copies. We addressed the retaining wall issue by separating the two walls so these aren't considered Tiered walls. We've indicated on the survey the drainage pattern and was able to address the bituminous potion by directing storm water runoff from the car port area onto the existing front lawn. Please note that the properties to the north and south are higher in elevation that this property and our drainage plan hopes to accommodate this. We're in the process of completing a landscape plan and will forward to you shortly. Please let me know if this delays the permitting process with the other departments and I'll push harder for completion of the plan. 1 The MCWD permit has been applied for and they are currently reviewing this. Thanks Rick -Rick Theisen Project Manager HENDEL Building Highly-detailed Residences&Renovations 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata,MN 55391 952.404.7204 Office 952.404.7205 Fax 612.930.6264 Cell HendelHomes.com rtheisen@hendelhomes.com PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary,privileged,confidential and/or exempt from disclosure.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any viewing,copying,disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender,by reply electronic mail or telephone,of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From: Christine Mattson [mailto:CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:19 AM To: Rick Theisen<rtheisen@hendelhomes.com> Cc: 'getmsmith@gmail.com'<getmsmith@gmail.com>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>; Laura Oakden <loakden@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: 3060 North Shore Drive/#2017-01424 Rick, Attached is a copy of the letter being mailed. Please don't hesitate to contact us with any questions. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono MN 55356(physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing address) V 952.249.4620 A 952.249.4616 ® cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: November 10, 2017 November 23& 24, 2017 2