HomeMy WebLinkAbout#2409-variances/CUP-1988 , M' ' (JJ 1 WI I � "`'
clty o� oR,oNo
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI�
• NO. 2409
� • • A RESOLIITION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO SECTIONS 10.22,
SDBDYVISION 1 � 2, 10.25
SOBDIVISION 2, & 10.55
SDBDIVISION 8, � GRANTING A
CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT, PER
SECTION 10.55, SDBDIVISION 10,
& DENYING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.25,
SDBDIVISION 6B
FILE #1258
WHEREAS, John and Kathy Ehlert, (hereinafter "the applicants")
are the owners of the property located at 1785 Concordia Street within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lots 9 & 10 , Coffees Addition to Shady Wood, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, The applicant has made application to the City of Orono
to permit the construction of an addition to the existing residence,
requiring variances to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2, 10.25 Subdivision
Z and 10.55 Subdivision 8, for structual additions and hardcover less than
75' from the lakeshore, a Conditional Use Permit and variance per Section
10.55, Subdivision 8 & 10 for construction within a designated Flood Fringe
area, and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6B to al low construction
of an attached garage less than 10 ft from the side lot line.
NOW, TH$REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1258.
2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore
Residential zoning district.
3. The property is approximately 0. 95 acres in area.
4. The �rono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March
21,1988 and made the following recommendations on a vote of 4 Ayes and
0 Nays:
Page 1 of 5
r
, � clty of oR,oNo
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
• NO. 2409
• ' . •
A) Recommended denial of a variance to Section 10 .25 ,
Subdivision 6B for attached garage side setback, finding that the
requested variance if approved would exacerbate an existing
substandard setback situation that already has an existing
negative impact on the neighboring affected property.
B) Recommended approval of the proposed hardcover increase of
43 s.f. in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, resulting in a 0-75'
hardcover increase from 7.2$ to 7.6�. The Planning Commission
found that hardcover in the 75-250' and 250-500' set back zones
conforms with the allowable hardcover percentages.
C) Recommended approval of variances to allow encroachment into
the 75' lakeshore setback zone, finding that the existing
residental structure ranges in distance from 61' to 71' from the
shoreline, and the proposed addition would extend from the 71'
setback point to a point approximately 76' from the shoreline,
resulting in 43 s.f. of additional structure within the 0-75'
setback zone.
� � �
D) Recommended approval of excavation, structure and grading
within the 931.5' Flood Fringe area, finding that the proposed
encroachment will not create added danger to life or property due
to increased flood heights or velocities, the proposal does not
increase any hazards to water supply or sanitation systems, and
the proposal has taken into consideration all factors of Orono
Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 12D. Such approval would be
conditioned on the crawl space floor elevation being maintained
at elevation 931.5' , and that proper erosion controls be
maintained during such period that the area is disturbed.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would
not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire
hazard or danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as
a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a
substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan
of the City.
Page 2 of 5
�
City of ORONO
� .
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
e NO. 2409
• - • •
6. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to
. allow the structure and proposed minor grade changes along the house
in the 0-75' setback zone and within the flood fringe will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public,
would not adversely affect light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding
property values, and finds that the proposed level of use of the
property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Conclusions, Order and Conditions
Based on one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22,
Subdivisions 1 & 2 and 10.55 Subdivision 8 to allow construction of an
addition that comprises additional structure, hardcover, and grading and
filling in the 0-75' lakeshore set back zone where no structure, hardcover,
or grading and filling is normally allowed, and grants a Conditional Use
Permit per Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 & 10 to allow work within the 0-75'
set back zone and work within the f lood fringe area below elevation 931.5'
where no work is normally allowed, and denies a variance to Section 10.25,
Subdivision 6B, disallowing the construction of an attached garage addition
located less than 10' from the side lot line, subject to the following
conditions.
l. .The attached garage addition, if constructed, shall meet the
required 10' side lot line setback.
2. Proper erosion control methods, as determined by the City, shall
be maintained during construction. Final grading shall be completed
as shown on the approved site plan attached as Exhibit A.
3. Hardcover on the property in the 75-250' and 0-75' zones
shall be limited to that hardcover approved with this proposal, per
the square footages and percentages listed in Exhibit B attached.
Applicant is advised that total hardcover in the 0-250' setback zone
exceeds that which would normally be allowed, hence any further
proposals to add hardcover within 250' of the lake would not be
approved but might approved only in conjunction with concurrent
removals of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase in
hardcover.
4. The crawl space f loor elevation shall be maintained at 931.5' or
above.
Page 3 of 5
clt� o� oR,oNo
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
• NO. 2409
• - • •
5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property, not
with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will
expire on that date (April 11, i989) .
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms or
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood, and hereby agrees
to the terms of the resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this llth day of April,
��� 1988
,�
;
ATTE :
��• . _ .- �
o thy M. lin, ity Clerk � Jam s R. Grabek, Mayor
h
op ty ner(s
Page 4 of 5
Cit� of ORONO
RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY COUNCIL
• NO. 2409
. � • •
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this ���1 day of (��r�f � , lgg $
before me a Nota y Public within and for said county, personal ly
appeared p��.��t�2_ /� . E h �e r�¢� known to me to be
the person(s ) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
Patricia L. Petersun �
NOTARY PUBUC -MINNE30TA NOTARY PUBLIC
HENNEPIN COUN�
My commiasion exPtres
� �- /�- `�3
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this � day of �t;�,��, , 198 g before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
����� ��-C'l'� known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
a�� ��G?'�
NO ARY PUBLIC
Patrtcia L. Petersun
��HENNEPIN COUNTY TA
My commissfon expires 7-15-93 �� "�� —�
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION #2409
HARDCOVER
0-75 ' Allowed: (Area = 10,050 s.f. )
Existing House 4.5 'x 46 .3' = 208. 3 s.f.
" " 8. 5'X 46. 3'X .5 '= 196.8
Existing Deck = 313.5 s.f.
*Addition 19 'x 4.5 'x .5' = 42.8 s.f.
Total Existing = 718.6 s.f. (7.2�)
Total Allowed After Additions = 761. 4 s.f. (7 .6$ )
75-250 ' Allowed: (Area = 24,475 s.f. )
Existing House 9.8 ' x 18 .6' = 182. 3 s.f.
" " 20.2' x 46.3 ' = 935. 3
" " 8.5'x 46 . 3'x .5 '= 196. 8
" " 6 'x 2.8 ' = 16.8
" " 2.85 'x 2.8 ' = 8.0
" " 20.5 'x 10.2 ' = 209. 0 (Remove)
*House Addition (22'x 32 ' ) - 43 ' = 661.0
� * " " (22'x 3.5 ' ) - 4 ' = 74.0
* " n 2.5 'X 5 ' = 12.5
Existing Garage 26.8 'x 22.2 ' = 595.0
*Add. Garage 18 'x 22 ' = 396.0
Existing Drive 143 'x 9 ' = 1287. 0
" " 18 . 5'x 31 ' = 573.5
" " 4 ' x 13 ' = 52.0
" " 12 'x 4 ' = 48. 0
" " 5'x 5 'x .5 ' = 12.5
" " 2 'x 4 ' = 8. 0
*Add. Drive 25 ' x 11' = 275. 0
* " " 3 'x 4 ' = 12. 0
Existing ShuffleBoard 5.75 'x 50' = 287. 5
Shed 14. 2'x 10. 2' = 144 . 8
Total Existing = 4556.5 s.f. (18.6� )
Total Allowed After Additions = 5778 s.f. (23.6� )
& Removals
250-500 ' Allowed (Existing) : (Area = 7,069 s.f. )
Driveway = 702. 5 s.f. (9.9$ )
(Total Allowed is 30$ )