Laserfiche WebLink
� o� <br /> 0 0 <br /> �� ��.- C ITY of ORONO <br /> � :� -� � <br /> �. ti <br /> �',�� � ��G'�' RESOLUTION OF T� GI�Y COUNCiL <br /> <9 4 NO. � <br /> kEsYi� <br /> A RESOLUTION GR.A.NTING VARIANCES <br /> TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 78-1279, 78-1288, AND 78-1403 <br /> FILE NO. 0�-3147 <br /> WHEREAS,Steven R. SundUy and Jam1a S. Slmdby,husband and wife(hereinafter <br /> "the applicauts") are the owners of the property located at 3587 North Shore Drive within the City of <br /> Orono (hereinafter tl�e "City") aild legally described as follows: <br /> Tl�at part of Lots 8 and 9, Blocic 2, `Baldur Park", Heiuzepin County, Mii�nesota <br /> lying South of the Southeasterly line of Cotuzty Road No. 51 (llereinafter the <br /> ��property„�� and . - .' - , <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono fqr variances to Orono <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279, 78-1288 and 78-1403 to allow constntction of a 5' Y 8' <br /> covered entry, including a lake setback variance to pennit a lake setUack of 49' from the 929.4' <br /> OHWL when 7�' is nonnally required and 21' cun•ently exists; a hardcover variance to permit 65% <br /> hardcover �vithin the 0-75' zone where 0% is nonnally allowed and 65% currently exists; and a <br /> structural coverage variance to pennit 28%stnictural coverage where 1500 s.f. (or 24°'0)is noi7nally <br /> allowed and 27% currently exists. <br /> �;pW, THEY2EFORE BE I'I' R�SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Mizulesota; <br /> I'INDINGS <br /> 1, This application was reviewed as Zoning File #OS-3147. <br /> ?. The property is located in the LR-1C One Family Lalceshore Residential Zouing <br /> r District, which requires minimum lot area of 0.� acres and minimum lot width of <br /> 100'. The lot contains 0.14 acres in area, and is 108 feet in width at the shoreline and <br /> 62 feet in width at the 7�' setback line. <br /> 3. The Plaiuzing Commission revie���ed this application at a public l�earing lleld on <br /> January 17,2006 and recommended approval of the variances on a vote of 3 ayes and <br /> 2 nays, based on tl�e follo���ing tindin�s: <br /> Page 1 of 5 <br />