The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland Delineation Report-2016 3590 North Shore Drive Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for William Abbot—The Broadway Group, LLC. by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2016-011) May 16, 2016 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 0.31-acre 3590 North Shore Drive Parcel was inspected on March 29, 2016 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed a PEM 1 C wetland within the property. • The soil survey showed Muskego/Blue Earth/Houghton as the hydric soil types present within the review area. • The DNR Public Waters map showed DNR Public Waters 27-113-13P (Lake Minnetonka)within the property. • The National Hydrography Dataset Map showed a lake/pond within the property. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the 3590 North Shore Drive Parcel Wetland Wetland T e Dominant Vegetation ID Circular 39 Cowardin E ers and Reed 1 Type 2/3 PEM1B/PEM1C Wet meadow/Shallow Bluegrass spp.,reed canary Marsh rass,cattail s . 1 3590 North Shore Drive Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The 0.31-acre 3590 North Shore Drive Parcel was inspected on March 29, 2016 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 8, Township 117, Range 23W, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Generally, the site location was north of North Shore Drive, west of Baldur Park Road, and south of Lake Minnetonka (Figure 1). The site limits corresponded to Hennepin County PID 0811723340062. A single-family home occupied the southern half of the site; the northern half of the site was dominated by manicured lawn and emergent wetland. Adjacent land use was primarily single- family homes and Lake Minnetonka. The topography sloped from south to north with an elevation of 938 feet msl in the southern portion of the site to a low of 926 feet msl at the lake edge (within Wetland 1). One depressional wetland was identified and delineated throughout the site (Figure 2). II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located by Schoborg Land Surveyors. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted)using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee far Hydric Soils, Version 7, 2010). 2 Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2015 National Wetland Plant List(U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2014. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.2, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover,NH). III. RESULTS Review of NWI, Soils,DNR, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed a PEM1C wetland within the property(Figure 3). The Soil Survey(USDA NRCS 2015) showed Muskego/Blue Earth/Houghton as the hydric soil types present within the review area. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on the 3590 North Shore Drive Parcel Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating L16A Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton soils, ponded,0 to 1 H dric percent slopes Y L64A Tadkee-Tadkee, depressional, complex, 0 to 2 percent predominantly Hydric slopes U1A Urban land-Udorthents, wet substratum,complex,0 to 2 Non-Hydric percent slopes W Water Non-Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed DNR Public Waters 27-113-13P (Lake Minnetonka) within the property(Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one lake/pond within the property(Figure 6). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on March 29, 2016. One (1)wetland was identified and delineated within the subject parcel (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time precipitation totals were below typical based on available 30-day rolling precipitation data and normal based on the three-month antecedent conditions (January, February, March) 3 (Appendix B). A survey of the delineation by Schoborg Land Surveyors is included in Appendix C. Wetland 1 was a Type 2/3 (PEM 1 B/PEM 1 C)wet meadow/shallow marsh dominated by Kentucky bluegrass, fowl bluegrass, reed canary grass and cattail that transitioned to open water (Lake Minnetonka). Saturation was observed at the surface with free water at 11"below the soil surface. Additional secondary hydrology indicators observed include Geomorphic Position and FAC-Neutral Test. This wetland covered 0.08 acres within the property boundary. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass and ground ivy. The delineated boundary followed a gradual change in topography and was placed along the transition zone from wetland to upland plant communities, where hydrology indicators were no longer present, and the transition from hydric to non-hydric soils. Wetland 1 was indicated on the NWI map as a PEM1C wetland and was located in an area of mapped Muskego/Blue Earth/Houghton (hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 1 is fringe wetland adjacent to Lake Minnetonka. Other Areas No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. 4 IV. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 � Report reviewed by: Date: Mav 16, 2016 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 5 3590 North Shore Drive Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure 1 —Site Location Map • Figure 2—Existing Conditions Map • Figure 3 —NWI Map • Figure 4— Soil Survey Map • Figure 5 —DNR Protected Waters Map • Figure 6—National Hydrography Dataset Map � ��.�� .�F� v � �: �'� � t- ��'�`�'� ,r� � �'*`��r�� '` -�' � � �� ,n. - � �g*:t"�� s,� s��,?�"� 'X> ��a:r ":'n•'� � � � � i.� `F � � . � CR . . "' � 5'� �3a�'�� ,� �:h . . �. s ,� �,'� � . 4 , �, . -. .. �,, ,. �,: -� ,. . , , . , :' . . y� �;. .. . 3 � °�"��` "�' � � �� s >3 ��°x�'��;�,�"*� � '�,"�'�#�y*° '�.. q,� : ,c�. , �'. ' ._ z.�.s^$:� v ��'.;zz � � �� '��"��'c'�"'�`' �. V f ".� � � � , ��R6 a"�a�"'?!'#ro� . . 'Pc�, < � �� e u� z�s " a � t�+k«'�Er��"� 'ZY ,°'� ��'s�'�v�'��,.,�� . �' '.� �� , . r �. +„° `tr.� � x � r�'�. � 3��2 �� r 5�.� ,. ��`� � � ��„,�. .� ,�� e,i�aw pd��R r��c� � 0`�' e��e �N�h51r� Project Location �P,,, ��,fi.��^�,�:;'; � a,. ��' � �r � Q Q � a z R x x OOpenStreetMap(and)contributors,CC-BY-SA 8 Figure 1 - Site Location Map N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) � 0 0.05 0.1 Orono, Minnesota Miles Note:Boundaries indicated � ..- � � Tu� on this figure are approximate KJOLL 11'1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�� official survey product. +�v � � �.• � �� i � � �� ,� ' �.�* � �� t ,� ��. � � �'`�,.,� � �' '��3 .�► �� .,; �;� � � ;�' � �,= b � , ., . �,. .,� �.� ... . `�., �ji ° � ... �.., ,.. .W� :. �:x:�� _., y;y ... .� �� +,_-. � ^k. �� °'°`�� ' � Wetland 1 � �� ''�� °�� .� 0.08 Acres � ,938 ' ,/��,� � � � � n1,;,�� ,�� f--A F�� ,,� �„� � ' �^r"�"' �/ � � '""�� ° �„� � �.�MIM!' ��e r'`�� ,F" "°`�,�" �� '� .� . �'` �� ,� .�.�� . ` �� . � � � � � � � �: 3� � � x�,.�''�� .� � ' k .�s � � /r � � �'�� R�Y / � �•. ,� ' _ W � > . , � � ,< ;'� � , � � ,�� . C� ,"' ,� '�.; �� ;� '�':' ;+ �� "�r" , � � �,,,��,�_� ;° _ � -�-� F . _� . -� � " ,'f � .,, - � . ,�+N. ��. �� . t � � � ,� �� w � �` � , _ ,� � � ,�� . ,� �� f �� .„ ,�� " �' f� �� . �► � �.�` �� °°� � ,� � �., � � N �� ' � �� i� � N �, � � .� � kc �b:� � #_ � ,.� � � , �� i, - ,��„�1 F�� _. .� � LL� �,._ �� ,�� :`..� � ka � � � 7� � . - � �� 4 �'.�' � y. � : � �, ' 938 , y� .,. ,.� , ` . �o �. � � � ° �..�� . � �` �� s „� � �,��,�,,- , -. } �� `� .K � '��}� �7 '�. � ��. , � Sample Point � ��;,�� Transect �� ; �� `_ �� ,o�"�=� �� *�� ` e � �� ,��r � Approximate Parcel Boundary - �/'� . g40 .� �. = ur�e. �sfl. ��t_ r -:�,., � � r �� ..c..., � . - 1,...5,,�`-, U�SGS.r"�Ey�: ..� � � GPS Wetland Boundary ` �� ,—t' � ,. � ir e �.'�`_'� User Communit�y Figure 2 - Existing Conciitions Map (World Imagery) N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) ' � 0 37.5 75 Orono,Minnesota Feet Note: Boundaries indicated �. .._ �. � Tu� on this figure are approaimate KJOLLII'1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �"`-�'�-�� official survey product. �1v � � � � �� . � � �,� " �b ,� '• �';��" 1 ;�r -- w � � : o �, x��t ,. xe� " ��' PEM1C ' � ,, � � a �� x�` � _ �. �� k �c � � � �.� . �� • ��::, F .. �y, .. � i . L2ABH = �` � �` ''� �� - �„�„ � � � . �t� � � � ,� � ; � � �'�� i+� . � 4 �� '�L : �� .:��'�� f)i': � ��; �� ,�^�..'" __ . �' � v ti,,.�� . �- �.e � ., '� ,. � .. ,�, .;,. �' � � � I:� .�� , � � , � �� . ��.`•. � �. � ' �`,.� �v � . q'�F�v��. ' 4 �� .� � . , � i '. , � .�°•� �... ,� E�� . � � 6 �� y +t � , .� . �� M�� w.y �,,. , �F C"'. . ,.�;... : ..«, � .., �, t ..—:. �t.-. , � �.: � ,. � �. . �. _ _ �� ..," �t '�� rr� . 'e[ �� .. �` :� � J� �� ., � j �, .�. , � , �,� , � �. •� . . .� ��„�, �, � � � � �� '� # �� ' � { '�� , ` �, � $ •"�'" � ��""�-"' � R �. �� '' L2UQH , A� ` ' v n . �� .� �� . �� ._ �� '� . � � �i �• . ' ' � � � . . . � ..fi. i 'Y - .. _. r r' *� . u- � y, ��,�r .' � <:� . �� :, � . 't�'� x,y,� .f �'� * � ,. 'k �" ,��k 'L � � � : a � � . � � � + ��r ::s� "te �.,f.: ".�� :� � �,�. ,..�a � z �u� . �, '�, s . ,�" �y„ � � � �� "'.. �� , _ � � � „ ,�# f � ��,� �1a:� �� ' �',. �b..4 Approximate Parcel Bounda� ��" ��i - ��, � Gtar�eograpn�c� CNEs�a,�rbus � � � „�;� �;-, �� t�i �t„��. � �� oarid�GN�IG�swis�opo. and � ��S User C,,�mmu��ity; "��tt ��, +� L2UBH Figure 3 - National Wetland lnventory Map (2013 MN DNR) N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) �' � 0 50 100 Orono, Minnesota � Feet Note:Boundaries indicated �. � � Tu�TT on this figure are approximate KJ�L11L1V� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�-^'� ofticial surve}�product. ��r � - ,,,� �� # �� ..,,X""` , � �� # �� .�, �, �` ' '. `� �� +�, ��' t � ,,µ� � � � ��, � �� !� � �' �� , _ .., �. ,rww .. ...,;� . �,� , . . �� .,, , ..� . „ . w� � �. �� .. - - � � ,� �., . . , � � , _ ., � � .� � v_ � . ,� , � � ;� +� � 4 ' �"r� �, � � � � � � � �� ,� ,��, , �°"'�� ,:.;�"��;+�. § #� ��.t z� � �` '"� ,a� a � �. # Tk, ' � , �� .. � ��e� � � � a�' �. � .�'>�r , ��'�'�'�� x L 16A � �� `� � : : ,� � � � � �� ,�� . � �l � �� W � � M - : , � , ��J „�� ` '"�°: '�`-k` ..,' .. _,. ,• �?.. �x, � f ..�� . : . .. � �..:,�w � t� � � �� .�� '� �� *,"�� ' � ��,�.<�' : � . " �,. � } * �U1A � � � �� * � � q�� a�. .,� t� , . ,� � ,� � �� " � <r # ��.. � , � � � ;� � . �� ; .�� .�,. .. .. ��_' � �� ,� � . � � . `�E , /�' � ,x*�� ' . .. ;�` . ......�"�'s � � - � �:�;,. � 'd� �� "'°�'" � " •�� _�` � � �..* � � � �� r,�� : �* � 9 ?F ' -" � a Y� �� . R _ , ,� � , � � . ,� . _ , � - , _ . _ � �. , , � � : , ,� ; �. � LG4A Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating "" �;` Muskego,Blue Earth,and Houghton soils, � Approximate Parcel Boundary L16A ponded,Otolpercentslopes Hydr�� Hydric/Predominantly Hydric L64A Tadkee-Tadkee,depressional,complex,0 Predominantly -�..>�a. to 2 percent slopes Hydric Partially Hydric Urban land-Udorthents,wet substratum, � UlA Non-Hydric complex,Oto 2 percent slopes Non-Hydric/Predominantly Non-Hydric _ .. W Water Non-Hydric Figure 4 - Soil Survey Map N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) � � 0 50 100 Orono,Minnesota -tr- - � Feet Note:Boundaries indicated � � Tu�TT�r on this figure are approximate KJ�LLIL'1VlT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �""�� official survey product. ��v � �. � �� ;��, �, .� ��'� � � �. �`� � � �� ¥ �► .�� ,�. � � � �� j � '�� . .' f r4e��. � �'. '! �u� # � t� � � � $ G� �a �'� � � � :� .. . ". �iV�e" �� ; �. +, q� :� � Minnetonka-North Arm (27.-133-13 P) F ��,� � y,� �� , � :�. � � �� A � � � ,��, � � � � ' �� , , P' a � � �.' . . �» �4 x �� . � � � � � �► ��'� � "�� '��'" , , �, . _ � � � s �. � , �, - W. • � � �-��" .� � � . � � � , ��- ��a� �� " � ,d �'" � �rt � ,� '� �'i`�� ' �. �:�;, �t�� , � "� ��y �3 `"��` �'�; � x , ' "�} �'' ��►� ,� �$a �, �, � � �.�� a �� ,�� o-��` "'"�� .�� , � ��' .. ��' � «� � �� fr� � � :� :� .� �� „�: f.,r .�F � .� � � { �� , � F� ; � ,.;',` �¢ - `'`� �" Minr�etorrka-Crystal Bay (27-133-10 P) � � � ;�� - ... « " �� Y#,�. �� Approximate Parcel Boundary ` - "� �. � �� :. � k I�igi�alGlobe?�GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics CNES/Airbus Public Waters - Hennepin County ,, �� ,r � �� .�; �S�P�EX�Getmapping.Aerogrid. IGN, IGP,swisstopo,and '� 'e � S User Community� Figure 5 - llNR Yublic Waters Map N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) ,� � 0 50 100 Orono, Minnesota Feet � �__ � Note: Boundaries indicated KTu�TT on this figure are approximate J�L111'1VG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�-^'� oi'ficial survey product. ��v . �_ �s t� /a .� "`� ,� � 1 r � x ,�•� ��, � e. , �,, � � � �� #' ; ,��''��'�=� f�',z `� �� , !�� * /� , • ��"�� / • v`� �� ,�; „y � E � �'��. �, � � � � ft � �,� t . � w .. ` '�,,r' � `` �P� ' � � �' � � A �,. �`€�i�� q��`'� ,� i � a `a � 2 ,;. � �,,,•�, 1 � � �`�'` �s+�;�i ." 's�" �'*"�� ,�, w �!' � `��'' * � . ` � kz� �� i,,� ' �rye � _,.^y� tl.� v / ,�'i ; �' . S � �� A � � �* � � µ� � ��, I r • ; : r _ .� _ � ,��'�'�� , � ��r � �� , � �� °„�„�� '�` „� , ` � � �� . � �-� R r ��'�lJu , k. �' . � � � � � � . - �A�v _ � A��• � ��I � ' �y� aY ,j �! n t+� � _y, a `� ��+F ��i, ��Wf�.v� k,g 1x .� �..��4 �yyi� �.�" y�.� ,� � W � � .: .;� . w� ' �€� / '°" ��*' ' � ( � { fi� �� ,�; � � � _,I !� ,.� '�� s, 4 ,� �i y � , - � � r �, � _o w� . ,. `�pr � � �.. J A f M�' ��,j� �� f' ,'_ �� . ��''�.`�.,' . �^ �{ . '�T�Y �� W � �� I � � �� ,�, { � � � s , '� ., 9E--^ x � �{ - � � r S ��. II i , . ,. x . � '� �.�, � , �. � , � .,� � �„ � , i ,r'�r�` l�I��* � ' � ,��,�- , f ,�� _ . � � :.. . ��.� � � 3� � � � - < � , �'' � �. � � � � a ,� � � � � «� ,,,,/ � �# + .�' ��`"'� '� , ..q�� k�� ' �.. �� ' �� :� �' �• ,� E �Y . '. _ ' a ' � �� x• ' �� ' .' �; .. '.. ..: � � �� : .�� s � . , � e� '�� '�� ,�� x � , . � � � _ � � ,� ' ��' � ` .�:, �; 3� . � ��, � , ��;, ,_ , � _ � � ,� �,�� - � � � 4 �� . . i . �. s , � �� . � k . � ..... . � �� .;�. ae.. ' �� .` �' ` . �� _. .�. ... `� �-�j � � �: � �� , �p'� � � �' � _. y � � e � # � � �� ,�.� .�"" � � ?,� �� • � � � ,� -��. �' , ,� w �� : " �� i./'� ..,,: ��' `"F,��"" ` �: � ��. � �� ' . . q �,. � ,. � �� " �.,.. � , .6 ], x � �� "*�A� �}.� t�. '� a� ;,:,�„ '.� ,�{.' � . ��. .,.,..f� $�� M . �' � + � � � � p @y �„ # �. � � � � �� r' � ��.� ,.✓"� � � � " ��.� .�� :��rce E'si,��q+alGlobe GecE I t- � , . , �; -i C IC -'�F�i � ��'� Z.�/ p"!' !�'1rY,I/M�,�� ' AppfOXllllat@ Pal"C@� BOUtldafV�� u� L�..DF,�,rUS�,F��Getma�pin, .�c.�; s.c�•. , ��ci � the GI�S�U"serCommunity�� Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Map (USGS) N 3590 North Shore Drive (KES 2016-011) ' � 0 50 100 Orono, Minnesota � Feet Note: Boundaries indicated � ..- �. s ru�TT/�r on this figure are approximate KJ�LIIIYV lT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�-^'� official surve��product. �ti 3590 North Shore Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Reglon ProjecUSite 3590 North Shore Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 3/29/2016 ApplicanUOwner: William Abbot State: MN Sampfing Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) 3ection,Township, Range: Sec.8,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,tercace,etc.): Slope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Linear slope Slope(%): 0-1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Urban Land(Non-Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation X ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is fhe samp�d area wNhin a wetland� N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation below typical based on 30-day rolling average and normal for 3-month antecedent. Manicured lawn. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saalin4/Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 90 x 3= 270 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 110 (A) 350 (B) 1 Poapratensis 90 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.18 2 G/echoma hederacea 20 N FACU 3 Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indlcators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphogical adaptations*(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) �� Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 110 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (PIOt SIZe: 30 ) •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop c 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Polnt: 1-1 Up Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflrtn the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) °/a Color(moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/1 100 Clay loam 8-24 10YR 4/1 100 Sand 24-26 10R 3/3 100 Oe(Hemic peat) 26-28 N 2.5/0 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M Silt loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. *"Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16}(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K�L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark SurFace(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark SurFace(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: Area potentially filled when home was constructed, not recent HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indlcators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that applv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) el ervatlons: SurFace water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 20 Indicators of wetiand Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 3590 North Shore Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 3/29/2016 ApplicanUOwner: William Abbot State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) 5ection,Township, Range: Sec.8,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0-1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameMuskego,Blue Earth, Houghton(Hydric) VWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation X ,soii ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area withln a wetJand� Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation below typical based on 30-day rolling average and normal for 3-month antecedent. Manicured lawn. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saalin4/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Workaheet 1 Total°/a Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 50 x 2= 100 4 FAC species 50 x 3= 150 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 100 (A) 250 (B) 1 Poapa/ust�s 50 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.50 2 Poa prafensis 50 Y FAC 3 Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indicatora: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is s3.0* � Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (P�ot size: 30 ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop c 0 =Total Cover vegetatlon present� Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Polnt: 1-1 Wet Proflle Descriptlon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type" Loc*" Tenture Remarks 0-8 N 2.5/0 100 Sandy clay loam 8-20 5GY 6/1 100 Sandy clay loam *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. '"Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric 3olls: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) X Depleted Below Dark SurFace(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present7 Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired;check all that apqlv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) le erva ons: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 11 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present� Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 3590 North Shore Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Data Minnesota Climatology Working Group � State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecolo�ical and Water Resow�ces Unive�-sity of Minnesota hoine � current c�mditions � �ournal � past data � summaries � agriculture � other sites � contact us � search � � Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Orono section number: 8 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Friday, Apri101, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches first prior second prior third prior month: A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from rad��r- month: month: January based esti�nates. Mareh 2016 February 2016 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: 1.09 0.9 0.33 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 1.12 0.42 0.45 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 2.03 0.85 1.19 type of month: dry normal wet Dry wet drv monthly score 3 � 1 = 3 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 1 = 1 multi-month score: , 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (norn�al) 15 to 18 (wet) 10 (Normal) 3 ----------__ ___ __—__--__ _ _ __.__ 3rd Prior 30 Days 2nd Prior 30 Days 1st Prior 30 Days ... � m a r 3509 North Shore Drive, j C Orono, MN Site Visit 3/29/2016 � •— i v � � i O ' ;''�_ 2 � fl. � •L ! a ; ; � � .� ; �+ ; _ __.__-.----�- i � c 0 � 1 c • � . . . _ � .� G T I i I, T T T 0 - 1/1/16 1/9/16 1/17/16 1/25/16 2/2/16 2/10/16 2/18/16 2/26/16 3/5/16 3/13/16 3/21/16 3/29/16 o monthly precip - daily precip 30d rolling total 3590 North Shore Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C: Project Survey �{OP �f 11t 02-15) i � � � Legend �oc�{ed � 93�--�/ • Found Iron Monumenf r-- I f' X D00.0 Existing Elevation I �� ` (000.0) Proposed £levation 1 � �� 32 f— Droinaqe tour Line-�- I � Manhole .5_�, 929c{ed�11�02~15� � � �i Telephone Pedestal � � � (lo � g3 1 �� Power Pole ', � o� Iine � I • � ` 93�- d��reot' � 4� I`� t ��nd � � ��y 1�� We v - - g36 Sfrucfural Coveroge (sq. ff.�: `\�� ` � a, � p ` 7 I � Proposed House/Garoge 1,769 9 , � o � Proposed Deck 182 � � � Total 1.951 � --Porch w � � . �\\ ti �� (to be removed) 1,g3�3 � 1� Boundary Areo uphill of 929.4 contour 3 I � . Iti �I g-9 � � ` s � � k ��; Percenf Hordcover = 15.09 .fl�� \ 930 �ti I1 9`�qs 9`t�? � 4 938 � �o � � � �f�, •s t �� + '�` �`�\��\ `N �0�� }�` _ �. I HaMcorer Item Existing � Prop .c ��c+� � �p / �� t � � g32 � ` _ _ � ',House&Garage--- -- t660 - I--1769 l y � �Y�i- �•>�� 6' � � i � ' I Screened Porch 761 � 0 �c � �♦ � I 'E1 93p2��f• ��\�� i' ,� 1 \ � / � 6 1 Deck 182 - �_. ..._._.. _ .. . --- ---- _._._._ •6 �N �o� �a�;` �\ �\ � �L . � � , � -� =�L. / Dri�eway _ _ 598 � _598 � �� ,y �� / � I X� , StooplSteps 35 71 6, --._. __- -- . i ' 932-__ 32.�� ,-_ ��`�`� i i-2 ff. COII f. � ' ' ,936.6 ui j Garage Sidewalk 47 i _.47 7 g31,4 0,� �_„�,.oPro �L _- ----- �.� � t�935• �/ Pa�ersUpper __ 31 __ o- 8� �„ ..933• 5 `s'fa c� _ - _�4—— - _ �o i 8" `o � � - __ � T�931• \ o. - o . Aadn.- -'`�¢. �+ -..._� xis�E9 947.l e x i Pa�Fron rWalk 63 i sz � • � - -- ---- - - - - .- - 26.0_--- - � � o�� GF =938• ,9 c� Retaming Wall Near Bou�dry Lines 275 275 , .� P►'oposed House/Ga�oge - -- �o I rn� Reiainmg Wall N&W of House 70 70 � v, _ GQ a9 ' Steps&Ret.Walls E of House 100 0 o �:* FE 9 0.3 (to replace�ex sti� _ .W._ ..._� ___ �, 1st 100 sq ft of Deck 100 "� ��" �o -co. 38,9 , Retaini�g Wall under Prop Deck 13 -13 y� GFE 931 x�sting House� �� c�, t,938 6 • ---- . - - _______. ,.,. -7 FE=941.8-�-�� N 8=9 " ,.,. Totals 3143 � 3od� . �� (l6wer) � LFE=933.� ��' � ° ' I -- - _------ _ _ - � � s6.� � , t,� ��` `?�„ � •�-Deck � � 8oundarv Descr' t�p ion (supplied by clien - 25.8 -�- s4p� 9s�p_ •.yg�`i N 939•� �� - I Al! that port o/ Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 -�--� g i �,, o BALDUR PARK, Hennepin County, Minne � d� �o J �5tooq/ � ':+ lying norfhwesterly of the northwesferly Po�ee re�r'°ue � � �� -- T -Ste� � `9�� of way line of County Road No. 51. Su (t a b �� / � � I �r t o b r e m�v e d � t o o n y a n d a l! e o s e m e n t s o f r e c o r d. � v t,938 g v' / �° rn I � � vere �e�'0�e d� --�; 6.3 - o I oa 8�9 ' �-Pr pt�Paver Walkwoy 1 � _ � - - N es: ... ... ... ' �. � 99.�' � � Lowest Floor Elevation obtained from c i L 9�9� Proposed groding desiqned by client. 1 Io + �-�8° __ _ _ , __