The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutseptic info • � Mr. Richard W. Perkins RECEIVED 1699 North Farm Road Long Lake, MN 55356 qp� � 1 2010 CITY OF ORONO April 13, 2010 Mr. Willy Gibbs City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Gibbs: It's about a year ago at this time that I came in to see you about the possibility of hooking up to the sewer on Long Lake Blvd. We reviewed at that time my desire to do such and you suggested I should get some information together which would support my contention that there is no feasible location on my property for a mound. I did that, hiring Mark Hayes to survey the property. At that time he submitted a letter to me, which is attached, and which I believe was sent to you at that time. With summer just around the corner this would be an appropriate time to consider this project, especially in light of the fact that my neighbor to the east, the Offerman property, is also desirous of hooking up to the sewer line on Long Lake Blvd. I look forward to hearing from you in regards to this proposal. Sincerely, C� Richard W. Perkins RWP/jah . , /% � O \ '� � '�O O � »r�;,, � C ITY of ORONO � �� 1 ��- ';` �!� �� Municipal Offices �� " '�� G"�� Street Address: Mailing Address: �,, � ��kE$H�¢�� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66 = Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 April 26, 2010 Richard W. Perkins 1699 North Farm Road Long Lake MN 55356 Dear Mr. Perkins: I am writing in response to your letter requesting the property, located at 1699 North Farm Road, be hooked up to municipal sewer. I am in receipt of the septic evaluation report indicating there are no standard septic sites available without cutting a substantial amount of mature trees. Due to ever changing requirements from the Met Council, it is not as simple a situation as one would hope to hook one or two septic systems up to municipal sewer. Individual properties will not be provided service and will need to be a neighborhood project. I have received a preliminary estimate from the city engineer as to the expense of providing the entire neighborhood with a pressure sewer line. Please find enclosed a copy of that report. It works out to approximately $6850 per lot plus individual costs such as S.A.C. charge, permit fee and E-One (the ejector basket) costs. This could run between $8-12,000 additional. Patricia Bartholomew and Carin Offerman have atso received a version of this letter. The estate they represent needs a municipal hook-up asap since the property is for sale. I have identified three other properties that could greatly benefit from a neighborhood project. Those addresses are 1680, 1709 and 1729. The next step that needs to be done is to schedule this request with the City Council at a work session to discuss options. It would be very valuable information to know how many of the North Farm residents would be willing to be assessed or hook up to the system immediately. If you or the Bartholomew/Offerman's would be willing to take a petition around the neighborhood I would present that at the work session. If you or any of the other neighbors would like to attend the work session, that could be arranged. I will notify you as to the date of the meeting. Please let me know if you have any other concerns. Sincerely, � �-%��'� %�� Willie Gibbs SSTS Program Manager Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us . Y"'� �"'`.�'�c'� ` � !. `. � u �.� . �,. ��"� QI''j�z�ota ��ot�cluucal��tvtc�. c�� . _� :.: :�- .�..- .,. . �' 'e �'� Comprehensive Earth Science Consulting .�� x�. July 12,2009 Property Address Property ID 1699 North Parm Road 27-118-23-44-4007 Orono, MN To Whom It May Conccni: Thc septic system at the above address is non-compliant. By the rules set forth in MPCA Chapter 7080,the septic system is failing to protect to ground water, since an inspection revealed that rnottling of the soil was at 20 inches. T'hc property docs hZvc a couplc of possibilitics for an oi2sitc systcm,but doing so would greatly reduce the property value. The first site is where a$100,000 par 3 golf course sits on the property, thc homeowner is adamant about not u.sing that site. The other site is hcavily woodcd to thc point of littic or no grass covcr. A ncw systcm is not possiblc witi� out removing a large portion of the forest. Deforestation would be needed not only for the septic system site but alsa the surrounding area to insure proper evaporation. Deforestatian would result in drastically changing the characteristics of the lot and would most likely degrade the property value. The third site is the cunent system site. The cxcavation of thc cuncnt systcm would most likcly intcrccpt tlic spriiigs folind on 1669 North Farm Road and increase the risk of the system's long term performance. It is the inspector's opinion this would be a bad choice at best for a new system. It is my profcssional opinion that connecting the housc to thc municipal systcm that runs through or near the lot is the only viable choice for long term protection of the environment and human health. Sincerely, �Cr� � �{'C�,P�3 Mark J Hayes MPCA#L3203 MPCA#C5013 POB 771 ° Maple Lake, MN 55358 Phone: 320-980-6218� www.mngeos.com Geo-technical Field Evaluation SoilAtlas: HenneDin -�, �'� ' �, Location: i699 N. Fa�m Rd r ��' � .' ��` � � Perco(ation Rate: 45 to 60 mOr �;.; `y�-'" �°��`�• ; � ��.- r'-z Depth to Mot[(ing: ZO" ' _ .w+�` S(Ope{%) Z t0 4% r• • =}*,�+�'` � y � � �o�r�� ., . . �� ls this lol within yes Whal is lhe name of �ong Lake 1000 feet of a Lake the lake? or Type I V W etland? ls this lot within 300 No Development unknown feet of a River or Classification: Stream? ls this lot within a No What is the name of NA 10-year floodplarn? the river or stream'? Soil Profite #1 genth Color Hue/Yalue/ Mo I Soil texture Water Bed 00 to 16 V. Darfc 10 YR 2J2 No Clay Loam No No Brown 16 to 18 V. Daric 10 YR 3/1 No Clay Loam No No Grey 18 to 20 Dark Gre 10 YR 4 1 ? Cla Loam No No 20 to 24 Greyish SO YR 5/2 20" Clay Loam No No Brown 24 to 26 Gre 10 YR 5 1 24 Cla Loam No No Mottling was 10 YR 5/6(yellowish brown)and 10 YR 5/4(yellowish brown)and soil structure was angular dodecahedron wq-wwists4-31 tomptiance Inspection Form for Existing SSTS 9/4/08 Parcef number. 2�-iie-zs-4a-000� System status: ❑Compiiant �Noncompiiant (as determined by this form) Map Page -�� rl� r� -+� �- .>'�- -�.- � � � �� ;'`; f�'� �"p 9�,��a1 � �y� f * � �;� � ' �`; � � Dt3tr5�°r1 �,„ 'd` i � ��''A ��: „,.--. � � �-. .� ��r, � �„" �.�:.�-- ,.,, . � _ •i:�^� �� ry.�, � . � �� `� {��,' . te `. '�' . . „- � y ,; � . �" .,�: �, ' =ti�.� � �_. �« t ��:_ �� * �.y. � -`� � ,�; ,. � .: '� ' �� , � , � , � ,� � �� v „�+r,.+�t '� �� • �� !. � � � �� `� � �� ` �'' � �� , ,, w �K� � �. � �a�� , #f ��_ � '�#�•,� t s , , :�art. �.� � r., . _ •v+#-�n � . .. , � �;�. �' . . .. . i' "y�r r . � ��'�`�� . } �'. �-��'.. �. . . . '�- , ..'�. �A.°` ..�z:. . � �� . _�. .,'LL "' t ,� �;': , � _ + , - �.� »� ._ � ` �.a ' !� ��'• �. �� , . 4r , , � : , .a r ,.. , � . : �� ;: : �. , ;�.��., , �: ��" � � �� : � �`'•� ,�'� ��. ,� '"'' � ,; �. '�, �,b.. - "� , . . > ,. . �� ,. , ��h..�, � ,; -a� '� „� �� s.. �. *-� , ,� . ,�;�� . _ �� , ��,� . wq-wwists4-31 Comptiance Inspection Form for Existing SSTS 414/OS Parcel number. 27-118-23-44-0007 System status: ❑Compliant �N�compliant (as determined by this(oim) pperating Permit Campliance and Nitrogen BMP Compliance Comptiance Issue#4 of 4 Applicability: Is the system operated under an Operating Pemdt? ❑Yes �No If"yes",then compiste�em A,below Is the system required to employ a nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes �No tf"yes",then complete�em B,below !f the answer to 6oth quesGons is"no",then tbis form does not need to be completed. Compllance questionslcriteria:(Required) (Check the appropriate box) A. For systems with operating permits: Has atl the required mo�itoring and mai�tenance taken place and does the monitoring indicate compliance with the pertnit thresholds? ❑Yes ❑No B. For a system that has a required nitrogen reducing BMP and does not have an operating permit: Is the nitrogen BMP in-place and appears to be properly opera6ng? ❑Yes ❑No Any"no"answers indicates noncompllance Date of observation: Reason for observation_ Operating permit number. This form eupires upon next inspection or in three years,whichever occurs first: Certification This form is to be completed�d attached to the Summary Form of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's(MPCA)Compliance Mspection Fam for Existing Subsurface S�rage TreatmeM Systems_Observations,interpretations�d oonGusions must be completed by an advanced inspector,service provider,or maintainer(mair►tainer for holding tanks only).Completed fotm must be submitted to the bcal unit of govemment within 15 days. Property owner name(s): RICHARD W.PERKINS Property address: 16991VORTH FAI2M RD-ORONO Property owner s address(if difterent): County: HENNEPIN P�e� !hereby certify that I personalfy made the observatiorts,�terprefations ar►d conclusions reporfed on this form and that they are correct Name: Mark J Hayes _ Cefification number: R5013 Business license name and number: Minnesota Geoted�nical Services �LC MPCA#L3203 a� Name of local unit of government: Wright Couniy Signature: M�J�'Wieb Date: 7/12/9 __ wq-wwis[s4-31 Compliance Inspection Form for Exlsting SSTS 4/4/08 Parcel number. 27-118-23-44-0007 System status: ❑Compliant �Noncompliant (as detemrined by this fom►) Soil Separation Compliance and Other Compiiance Compliance issue#3 of 4 Date of observation: 6126/9 Reason for observation: City update oroqram This infom►atan on this form does not expire. Compliance questlons/criteria: (Required) Verification Method"':(optional) (Check the a io riate box (Check the appropriafe box) For systems buiit prior to Aprif 1,1996,and not � Conducted soil observation(s)(attach bora�g logs) located in Shoreland or Wel9iead Protection Area or not serving a food,beverage or ❑ Two previous verifications(allad�boring logs) lodging establishment: ❑ Other. Does the system have at least a two-foot vertical separatan distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock? Yes No For nw►-perfprmance systems buik Aprit 1, 1996,or later or for non-pertormance systems Soi1 observation does not expire.Previous observations located in Shorefand or WN�ead ProtecGon by two independent parties are sufficient,unless site Areas or serving a food,beverage or lodging ��have b�n aliered. establishment: Does the system have a three foot vertical separation distance from periodicaHy saturated soil or bedrodcr ❑Yes �No For reduced separation distance systems(i.e., "perFormance"systems under old 7080.0179 or ` May be reduced by up to 15 percent if allowed in local Type IV or V system under new 7080.2350 or ordinance. 70802400): "No standard protocol exists. This list is not exhaustive. Does the system meet the designed vefical in sequential order,nor does k indicate which separation distance from periodicaAy saturated combinations are necessary to make this soil or bedrock?` ❑Yes ❑No determinatrort. Any"no"answer Indkates that the sysbem is failireg to p�olect ground water. Certification This form is to be completed and attached to the Summary Form of the Minnesota Potlution Corrtrol Agency's(MPCA)Complianee Inspection Form for Existing Subsur[ace Sewage Treatment Systems.Observations,interpretations,and conclusions must be completed by an inspector or designer.Completed form must be submitted to the local unit of govemment within 15 days. Ptoperty owner name(s): RICHARD W.PERKINS __ Property address: 1699 NORTH FARM RD-ORONO property owner's address(it different): County: HENNEPIN P��= /hereby certify Hrat 1 personafly made the observations,interpretatans,and condusions reported on this form and that they are co�ct Name: Mark J Hayes Certification number. R5013 Business license name and nuln�er: Minnesota Geotechnical Services,LLC MPCA#L3203 or Na►ne of local unit of govemrt}qnt: Wright County S��: M�,�� Date: 7N 2/9 wq-wwlsts4-31 Compliante Inspectiai Foim for Facisting SSTS 4/4/08 Parcel number. z�-iie-z3-4o-000� System status: ❑Compliant �Noncompliant (as defem►ined by fhis fo�n) Hydraulic Perfonr�ance and Other Compliance Compliance Issue#1 of 4 Date of observation: 6/26/9 Reason for observatiort: City update prowam This form axpires upon next inspection or in three years,whichever occurs first: 6/26/12 Compliance questions/crlterla:(Required) Verfication Method`: (Optional) Check the a ro riafe box (Check the appropriate box) Does the system discharge sewage to the ❑Yes �No � �arched for surface outlet tound surfaoe? Dces the system discharge s�vage to drain ❑Yes �No � Performed hydraulic test tile or surface waters? � Searched for seeping�►yard Does the system cause sewage backup ❑Yes �No � Chedced for badcup in home inio dwelli or establishmenY? ❑ Excessive ponding in soil systemlD-boxes Do other situations exist that have the ❑Yes �No � Homeowner testimony potential to immediately and adversely impact or threaten public healtfi or safety ❑ Examined for surging in tank electrical unsafe covers,etc.? ❑ "Black soiP above soil dispersal system An�"yes"ans�ra,r 3ndlcat�that the system is an Imminent threat to public ieealEh and safety ❑ System requires"emergency"pumping ❑ Perfortned dye test Does the system pose a threat to ground �Yes ❑No � �r. water for any conditions deemed non- protective as determined by the ins ector? "�e5"ffldiCBt@5 Z/►af�SySEBAI IS�B�NIg t0 pf7Dt6Ct ground water.If`yes;desdibe the co»dition noted: 'No standaid protoco!exists.This 6st is not exhaustive, Mottled soils in sequerr6al order,nor does it indicate which combinations are necessary to make this determinatan. Certification This form is to be completed and attached to the Summary Form of the Minnesota PoNution Control Agency's(MPCA)Compliance Inspection F�n for Existing Subsurface Sevrage Treatment Systems.Observations,interpretations,and conclusions must be completed by an inspector.Completed form musc be submitted to the local unit of govemment within 15 days. Property owner name(s): RICHARD W.PERKINS Property address: 1699 NORTH FARM RD-ORONO Property owner's address(if differeny: County: HENNEPIN Phone: l hereby cerfily that I personaNy made the observatrons,interpretatrons,and conclusions reported on this lorm and thaf they are co�ct. Name: Mark J Hayes Certification number. RSO'13 Business license name and number: Mir►nesota Geotechnical Servicss,LLC MPCA#L3203 0► Name oF local unit of govemment: Wriaht Couniy Signature: M�J ��b Date: 7112/9 wq-wwists4-31 Compl innce Inspectiai Form for Existing SSTS 4/4/08 Minnesota Pollution Compliance inspection F�rm Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) St.P�ui,MN SSi55�747 lnstructions on page 7 Parcel number. z�-iia-z3-aa-000� System status: ❑Compliant �Noncompiiant (based on all compliance requirements) Summary Form Property information Property owner name(s): RICHARD W.PERKINS Property address: 1699 NORTH FARM RD-ORONO Property owne�s address(if differe�t): County: HENNEPIN Prope�ty ow�er phone: _ Permitting authority: ORONO Date system constructed� 1980? Reason for inspection; City update progtam System Description Brief system description: Septic tank(s)and drainfieid Local permit number: None Number of bedrooms: 3 Design flow rate: 450 Is the system: i�Shorela�d area? �Yes ❑No fn Weilhead Protection Area? ❑Yes �No An U.S.Environmental Protection System serving a Minnesota Department Agency(EPA)Class V Injection Well?�Yes �No of Heath(MDH)licensed facility? ❑Yes �No CO�T1P�1dIlC@ $tdtUS(Based on state requiremen!s—additional local requirements may also apply.) Based on the information gathered and reported on attached forms,the compliance status of this system is(check one): ❑Certificate of Compliance—vafid until(3 years from date of repo�t): �Notice of Noncompliance-For Noncompliant systems: The reason for noncompliance is: Mottled soils at 20 inches This noncompliant system is classified as(check one below): ❑fmminent threat to public health&safety �Failing to protect ground water ❑Not in compliance with operafi�g permit C@t'tlflGdtlO(1(Completed form must be submitted to the local unit of government within 15 days.) I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system.No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system,inadequate maintenance,or fufure water usage. Name: Mark J Hayes Certification number: R5013 Business license name and number: Minnesota Geotechnical Services,LLC MPCA#L3203 or Name of tocal unit of government: Wright County Signature: M�J �� Date: 7f12/9 Required Attachments tnspector Complete:This inspection Report is 6 pages long. Check compliance forms attdched: ❑Hydraulic Performance ❑Tank Integrity �Soil Separa6on �Operating Permit Form(if applica6le) �System drawing/As-built drawing ❑An assessment of any local requirements that are different from what is required on this form �Soil Boring Logs ❑Abandonment form(if appropriate) ❑Other information(list): UpfjfHdE REquiY2t11En[S(derived fi'OIl7 Minn.Sfaf.§115.55)An imminentthreal to pubfic health end safaty(lTPHSJ must bd upgraded,replaced,or its use disconfinued within ten months of receipt o!this rrotice or wilhin a sAo�ter peiiod if iequired 6y bca/oid'manc�.Ilthe system is Fading to protecf g,aund water,the system must be upgraded.�eplaced,w ds use dlscontlnued within the fime required by bcal ordinance.d an exis6ng system is not failing as defined in lavi,and has at leas!rivo fee[of design soi7 separation,then ffie system need nof be upgraded,repa"red,replaced,or its use disconfinued,notrrithsfanding any (ocal urtfimnce that is moie s6ict.This piovisinn duc�nbf app/y(o systerns in si,v�e/artd areas,WeNhead Proter.tion Are�s,oi t6ose used in r.onneclinn wifh fiiad, beverage,and lodging estab/isnments as de(ned irt law. wq-wwists4-31 Compliance lnspection Form for Existing SSTS 4/4/08 � � ��,�, � O`�� '` � ��'�� o� Ult�l�� :.�;,:,. ::. _ .� - .. !+��`�`:r,4"7+' Y'� �.�j� {'i'� �'; '�.f.°.`, ``='' �, Municipal Offices '\ '��r��x'�;�;;;°:�;;I` �\�. '� ��"��`'y�`'��>��i"`.��?_'•�� G~�i Stceet Address: Mailing Address: ,F,:� •��. ,:•.,. �..�,�,i�� i �•;�'Z<q �� •"�'• �¢ ' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 kE$8� i%' ��. Crystai Bay, MN 55323-0066 ;� Orono, MN 55356 To; The Cunent Owner of Address j `�� .�� ` �� '�^ City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and tlle following is l:nown about the system. A sketch of tlie known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Ha1L � Imminent Public H�alth Threat Yes No � If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 952-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. The septic system must be brou�ht into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action. System Idenfif'i as Non-Compliant Yes No If yes, system must be brought into compliance by: December 31, 2007 � � . December 31, 2010 . Other Septic Tank(s) Pump out Needed Yes �NO The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced a.nd pumped out every tluee years. City records indicate the tank(s)were last pumped out on �.� - �<� � i'>�� . The tanl:(s) should be cleaned throu�h the manhole and not through the inspection pipes,dus allows for proper cleanin�. Comments: t r Date of Inspection � • Cr.� � Inspec� r Telephone (9�2i 249-4600 > Fa� (9�2j 249-461( _:O� . � � ,, ` ;; "O 0��,. �� .� CITY of 4RONU ,',.;'�t'`r��; �, .',. � . �1...P� . }A��s�;. ��YG` ,. �E„ � Municipal Offices �' .:,;.. , G ��;:, ::+.'f;;�".`��;�';� Street Address: �i5d.-a49-�6o O Mailing Address: '9kE$Hp�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 � - Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, M 55323-0066 To Current Owner: �� Address: ,�� /d�`'�t �� __ __ _ City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � 1 "CODE SYST'EM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and conshvction standards of the cuaent Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or eariier,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. �"NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction stan�ards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than ttuee feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil chacacteristics. .�-- TANK CONDITION(5-7): 5 Tank inspection indicates: aPumpout not needed at this time. 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped ). Make sure seatic tanks are aumued throush manhole and not throueh white insaection aipes. This allows for the nroper cleAnin2. Keea water softner and iron filter discharge out of seatic svstem to prolon¢life of drainfield. Ask pumper to test alarm float to verifv alarm is still workin¢in vour house. The alarm warns owner that seatage is about to backua into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. D INFIELD CONDITION 8-10 : � 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: �--�s�zr. '.s �o�- co��,Ra�� d- t�.��r �e repi�e� ��/ i7.=3�-Za�O . Cs�.�41< ScD�^,c, ��.k� �Q� 1 o c1� �1'�k� ��,, ac c. (0'�� rt .n� � �•��-�s �. �tk. �v p ;n1r�p �a5c c�4nfi . -� �-� --�`� �a�. Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Inspector Note: In tlie event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or otlier transfer of property, be advised that this report does no� guarantee or certify that an esisting system will continue to function properly. but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current ,.....,r..;,,.,.ti.,..sa.....we...,..:r..�.�e t.,�...,�.:.... � O� .�� O 0�:. �� CITY of O]E�ONO , �-- .�� ,_�:.�:�. � S� �'• �;~l� G.ti,�' l�iunicipal offices r 4j�`,!•� �i;:• ��' l . ��•e•-� �'y ' Street�ddress: Mailiny Addreu: .�� g, �Eg�I4 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 . 95d-�4q-46o0 To Curreat Owner: Address: �6q�1 N�f� �4 f� �c� City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewa�e treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYST'EM CONFORMITY (1-31: ,� 1 "CODE SYSTEM"An IS'fS which meets all the location,duign and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the euaent Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requinment or two foot rcquinment for sysums installed 1996 or eariier.and which is not failine or �� an imminent threat to publie health or safery. •. (3 �"NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited iSTS;an ISTS located within a daignated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may �-� or may not meet all the location,daign,or canswction standards of�e current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturaud soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristiu. TANK CONDITION(S:71: 6 d- � Tank inspection indicates: . S Pumpout not needed at this time. 6O Septic tanks must be pumped out this ear (ciry code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumpzd 5-a.�S - �� l. rlake sure seotic tanks are numoed throuah manhole and not through white insnection nipes. This allows for the oroner cleanin�. � Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia,pipe)must be installed in each tank. DRAINFIELD CONDITION(8-�Q�: � 8 Dninfield is dry,no surfacina evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. � 10 Dninfield is saturated and visibly dischazging untreated ef�luent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. CO�I�IMENTS: 0 tc�:�F�.ttc� '�S no�- �o�Pl:a�-� a�� t'��5�" �� e��Acc� 6� \1-31 �--��O . _ N ee�� '•Sec S o� scp ►--� -�-��KS , �MG i-��5 � �-�eT— ��V�. Y�� Z�(� �L�CrY« �/V�•� 1-N� 3 ye�,�� . �-a.�7—Oa. �1�� /��?Jma� Date of lnspection Matt Boiterman- Septic System Inspector Note:In the event that this inspecdon rcport is used to satisfy the rcquircments for a mortgage or other transfer of property.be advised that this rcport does not guarancee or artify that an e!cisdng rystem will continue w function properly,but is mercly an opinion of the adequary of the sysum under currcnt conditions based on the available infocmation. � O� O ,, O �y � -�;�� CITY of ORONO I''.. � ,'�a3�f�;`+;�, '�+ ��v�� y� �;� � , �;' ,�l�r MuniCipal OffiCes �� `�: � .';��; rY�',�.�,�G � Street Addross: Maflina Addross: �j,+gg04' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 August 10, 2000 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Richazd Perkins 1699 North Farm Road Long Lake, Mn 55356 Dear Mr. Perkins: An inspection of your septic system was conducted on August 9, 2000. A summary of the inspection is below. Se�tic Tank Condition 1. Pumpout not needed at this time. The septic system is non-compliant due to a lack of a three foot separation distance beriveen the bottom of the drainfield to the seasonally high watertable. The three foot requirement is a State Code,not a City Code. A soil boring was conducted to determine the depth of the seasonally watertable. The septic system must be replaced by December 31,2010. Enclosed is a list of state licensed sepric contractors who work in Orono on a regulaz basis. Also enclosed is a fact sheet explaining how a septic system functions properly. Finally, an as-built drawing is enclosed that sho�vs the approximate locahon of the septic system. If you have any questions regazding this report,please contact me at the City OfFices at 249-4600. Res ec � �� C ris Pence On-Site Systems Manager Enclosures In the event this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does no guarantee or certify the esisting system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information This report must be kept on the premises with the system loc�tion and pumping records. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www ci.orono.mn.us � ��' . O :,#, O �,� ��; -� CITY of ORONO r�- �, � � �,� �S�,�:�'�� ,�ti Nt��i�t o�� _ l ! ��7��'��'�"�G Street Address. Mailing Addross. ,9 �� r,,��`;;� ,g, $EggO 2750 Kelley Pa�kway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � Owner: IC�Y � Address: 1699 North Farm Rd. ' Permzt #'s: 5747 Dates: 10/3/79 Contractors: Sullivan (This is [�] an existing system [ ] new construction) . SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. � Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is [�] or is not [ ] identified under this septic syatem. If the saturated soil level is not identified, this clasaification is subject to reviaion.) ,�'�K CONDITION (5-9) : 5 / 5/ Pumpout not needed at this time. �6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanka are [ ] or are not [ ] �vater tight or the condition is [�] unknomn. If the tanks are not confirmed to be vPatertight, this classification ie subject to re�iaion.) INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system aqe and condition, soils, etc.) : medium COI�IENTS: The septic system is non-compliant, but does not appear to pose an imminent threat to public health or safety (surface discharqe or backup into the dwelling) . The system must be repaired or replaced by 12/31/2003 or within ninety days of posing an imminent threat to public health or safety, whichever comes first. �� Date of Inspection Sep System I spector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 � °� 0 0 -� � -� � CITY of ORONO , ��. � r� ��1 �l'r�' -y ,'' �, �f ,�, '��f� �lS� Municipal Offices ,� �r�� ;r�r� G ,�, .,�� 9 ' �kk: ,.`,g,� Street Address: Mailin�Address: $EgyjO 2750 Kelley Pa�kway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 Richard Perkins November 14, 1996 1699 North Farm Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Perkins: The purpose of this letter is to clarify the condition of your septic system. The septic system at 1699 North Farm Rd. was installed in 1979 and routine inspections were performed five times since then. The purpose of these inspections was to identify whether the system was accepting the entire sewage output from the residence and to assure that the system was being maintained properly. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) mandated and the City adopted new regulations for properties within 1000 feet of protected lakes in 1992 requiring that septic systems meet a three foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water table. Your residence is within 1000 feet of Long Lake but because soil testing performed prior to the installation of your septic system indicated that the drainfield met a three foot separation from the seasonally high water table, you were issued a permit to add on to your residence without being required to upgrade the septic system. However, due to a portion of your future drainfield site being driven over with construction equipment, the Building Inspector asked me to determine whether the site was damaged. During the inspection I discovered that the existing drainfield site has no separation from the water table and is non-compliant. The future site was slightly excavated, but due to dry conditions this year, no significant damage was done to the alternate site. The City municipal code requires that the non-compliant septic system be upgraded within two years of being identified or in conjunction with any permit issued for the property. As we allowed construction to begin without an agreement that the septic system be replaced, you will not be required to upgrade the system at this time. However, repair of the drainfield will now be required by 12/31/98 or when a permit is required for the property,whichever comes first. Please contact me at the City offices if you have any questions. Sincerely, �� f Step n Weckman On-Site Systems Manager Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 .� o,�,. 0 0 ,�' ��;,��,:_ ,, CITY of ORONO �`',�, ��f��; "��, —� �15� Municipal Offices ��, � �� ,�,�� .t " � ,"-I:;-�:`'�`� Street Address: Mailing Address: 9$�gHO�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 ! � �� j'�r. Owner: ��`''1 i(�YL� l '-�l'`�in� Address:1699 North Farm Rd. Permit #'s:5747 Dates:l0/3/79 Contractors:Sullivan (This is � an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3 1 Code Svstem: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant Svstem: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant Svstem: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any s stem with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom o the drainfie and the saturate soi eve . (The saturated soil level �]. has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the saturated soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 6 Pumpout not needed at this time � Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. (During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanks [ ] were or � were not confirmed to be watertight by the licensed pumping contractor. If the tanks were not confirmed to be watertight, thia classification ia subject to revision.) INFIELD CONDITION 11-14 : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (svstem aae and condition, soils, etc. ) : medium CONII�IENTS: The non-compliant septic system must be repaired by 12/31/98 or within 90 days of failure (surface discharge),, whichever comes first. ,� �:Sd`/� �? ✓" Date of Inspection Se ic System Ins ector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 OF ORONO �O� CITY O O Municipal Offices Post Office eox 66 Crystal eay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON-SITE SEWA(�E TREATl�ENT �ti IN3PECTION REPORT ��9k o4�G EsH �//y/��y✓t�� C.� �a Owner• y�'�L/T vi� �C,��7�,�Address• . Permit �'s: Dates: /C9-�� Contractors: � City ordinance nunber 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular besis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is l� an existing system [ ] new construction) STEM ONFORMITY 1-3 : 1 "CODE SYSTEM�'-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating setisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "N�I-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet alt the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any_system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic �has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identifi , this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: 5 Punpout not needed et this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be puniped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Yanks should be punped out as soon as possible. � System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be punped out within 48 hours to etiminate surface dischar�e. Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe> must be instatted in each tank at next p�npout. If tanks have not been pun�ed out within the last three years, they should be Fxmped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). if tanks have not been punped out Within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): D field inspection indicates: 1�j Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. T2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfietd is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repeirs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS Csloae,setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (decends on soils,water table.etc.): r COMMENTS: Date of Inspection e c System nspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion ot the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available informetion. This report must be kept on the premises with the system locstion and punping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homsowner CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWA(�E TREATME�IT � �, IN3PECTION REPORT ti ��9k'ESH.04'�G Owner: /��J�/If1 _��,i7�� Address: /� /LOYYI'� rpfrl'� ICLI. Permit #'s: �� Dates: �Q"3� Contractors: ��Z4n City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment _system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (7his is [�an existing system [ ] new construction> SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � "CODE SYSTEM"-A system uhich meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONfORMING SYSTEM"-A system uhich does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface uaters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM��-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 700-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic M has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accunulation in tanks indicates they should be pt�rnqed out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 5olids accunulation in tanks is at a critical level. 'fanks should be pianped out as soon as possible. �� System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be p�xnped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e. Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. k� qv DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr nfield inspection indicates: � Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 72 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City lnspector imnediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 74 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): /n��yy� �,,,iq, COMMENTS: d — Date of Inspection Se ic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner . - . On the Narth Shore of Lake Minnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66 � . � � 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 5�5323 473-7357 OWNER /_��J�L,//h �I� ADDRESS ![L!� ,��_/��'` PERMIT NO.'S. �� DATES l� `-'r� CONTRACTORS ��/�� City Ordinance No. 210 requi►es that each on-site sewage treatme�t system in Orono be inspected on a regular basia.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is ❑ an existing system ❑ new construction) 1G�� Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,a�d location.Appears to.be operating �� properly. � 2 Doea not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located,and constructed generally in accordance with previous codea.System appears to be functioning properly;no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. � 3 dces not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. � 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisancg.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action) Tank i�spection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.► If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks i�dicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years,they ed out this year to help prevent future problems, should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfjeld inspection indicates: should be pumped out as s�n as possible. � Drainfietd is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is di3charging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to etiminate surface discharge. ❑ Dreinfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated �Inspection ri�rs missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- �Inspection risers (4"dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be compteted within 90 days. the tast three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS Limiting Site Factors Potential for:System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depe�ds on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table and system condition) j$(Adequate ❑ High water table � Low ❑ Fai� ❑ Lot size ❑ Medium O Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑System is causing visible � � surface dischar . COMMENTS: � r r�/��O Date of Inspection tic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspectio� report is used to satisfy the rei�uirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely a�opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on tNe aveilable information. This report mast be k2pt on�the premises with system Jocation and pumpirsg records. , WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner On the North Shorc of I_ake Minnetorzka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66 � _ � � 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 -��,. ��. OWNER �RQi�IN S�1i00�� ADDRESS �� NO�LZ'N PERMITNO.'S. ��'y� DATES t0�3�� CONTRACTORS �J1r1U.4N City Ordinance No, 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is � an existing system ❑ new construction) � � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. � 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly; no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. � 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, constructio�, or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. � 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design, co�struction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( � Checked items may require your action) � Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. � Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4" dia. pipel must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water F�ture Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system condition) ,�Adequate ❑ High water table ��ow ❑ Fair ❑ Lot size ❑ Medium � Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS:� F��ZeN GRo�tid P�EvckrcD rnis�c.r�c��N (lnrS��crro�v PrpGs ��ow �v2FAcc, c�r= G2d��v��(`Z�� 2��oe�s suck.� T�NIcS Ec�4v� v`1�J�2 d3e�r�1 E - T - P��v� i F' � P,�s`T f3EEN ni TN� !- 2b- 8 7 �.pts7' 3 y 5 Date of Inspection Se System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to functio�properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner On the North Shore o f Lake Mannetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66 � . � � 1335 S. Brown Rd. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER �� TI � �'t"2.fm�� ADDRESS �� r I�dI'7Nl �oc� PERMIT NO.'S. � �7 DATES ��+�� CONTRACTORS ' �+ Qm�jZnc City Ordinance No.210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment systern at the above sddress has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is �an existing system ❑ new construction) t1 � � Meets or ex eds current City standards in all reSpects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. � � 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly;no major upgrading of the syster+n is required at this time. � 3 Dces not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or location.Appears to be operating � adequately at this time,but has a,relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. � 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design,construction or location,but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: �Inapection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Dces�ot ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years,they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Dr infield inspectibn indicates: should be pumped out as soon at possible. �Orainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected. effluent to the surfa�. This condition may require replace- Inspection risers (4"dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. . the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: ' Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Stope (dePends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system condition) �Adequate ❑ High water table �Low ?? Fair ❑ Lot size ❑Medium � ❑Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS: q-a3-�i Date of Inspection Septi m Inspector Note: In the event that tMis i�spection report is used to satisfy the.requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner � Q-x Pea-; �� I i�s��Iqf�a r�