Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, February 27, 2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (7. #06-3173 CITY OF ORONO IND USTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING STANDARDS <br /> ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> Mayor Peterson moved,Murphy seconded,to table the City of Orono—Zoning Code <br /> Amendment,Industrial District Standards for further discussion. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> *8. #06-3175 JAMES AND JUDIT�i PEIRPONT, 1801 WEST FARM ROAD— <br /> RENEWAL LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT—RESOLUTION NO. 5431 <br /> White moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5431, a Resolution <br /> Approving a Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Properties Located at 1801 and <br /> 1849 West Farm Road—File#06-3175. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> 9. #06-3178 CITY OF ORONO,NONCONFORMiNG USES—Z01�ING CODE <br /> AMENDMENT- ORDINANCE NO. 32,3RD SERIES <br /> Gaffron explained that, in order to be consistent with State Statute revisions passed in 2004,the <br /> proposed code amendment results in specific changes in the way the City does business regardin� <br /> rebuilds and expanding nonconforming residential structures.He continued,noting that with regard <br /> to residential rebuilds where there are pre-existing nonconformances, the Planning Commission has <br /> attempted to establish tlueshold levels of sh-uciural removals or expansion that would n-igger the <br /> entire new construction having to ineet code. Gaffron cited specifc changes on page 3, #3 of <br /> Nonconforming Structures subsections 1-3,to further detail the limits to expansion of <br /> nonconforming structures. <br /> McMillan moved,White seconded, adopting Ordinance No.32,3�d Series,Amending Chapter <br /> 78 of the Orono Municipal Code by Amending Section 78-71 Regarding Nonconforming Uses <br /> and Structures.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 10. 1331 NORTH ARM DRIVE—REVIEW CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. <br /> 4026 <br /> Gaffron reported that the property owners have requested that existing heating and plumbing <br /> fi�tures in an accessory building be approved for continued use,requiring a revision of Resolution <br /> No. 4026 adopted January 26, 1998.While the original approval resolution required the removal <br /> of plumbing and heating facilities prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, today's <br /> codes allow plumbing in accessory structures and do not address the issue of heating accessory <br /> structures. Gaffron stated that staff has recommended an amendment to the language of the <br /> original Resolution No. 4026 to allow plumbing for a sink and to allow heating facilities for the <br /> accessory building,but would request the bathroom fixtures be disconnected and removed from the <br /> building. <br /> Gail Wilder and Peter Beck, representatives of the owner,requested that the residents be allowed to <br /> disconnect without completely reinoving the tub and sho�ver, since this would require a great deal <br /> of demolition. Instead, Beck suggested that the applicants build a bookshelf unit over the <br /> tub/sho�ver to obscure their presence. <br /> PAGE 6 of 9 <br />