Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Re: hardcover review
, � DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN -� INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED � PERMIT NO. f v� COMPLETED ' '� ADDRESS �a � D l'f�L►'v� V� OWNER�I�-N SII�Vl�1,S0/� CONTR. z�€�Q2'�{ TELEPHONENO. G�2 -9�3 - �IZOZ � DESCRIPTION ��w� � 01 FOOTING 11 MECHANICAL RI 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q 02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y 03 INSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL Z 04 WALL BD. 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION Q 05 FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 06 PROGRESS � 07 DEMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPLAINT v 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOLL -UP i09 PLUMBING RI 23 SEPTIC FINAL 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUND REMOVA � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES.�NO � COMMENTS: a Z� �t,. �L`2'�U�i2 �t�oUArL S �.4?/����'U o Gow�P�7-� ,�� V/d2(/d�lUC,€s �'rt a � 0 � W � Q � Z W � W � � � �WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED �PROJECT COMPLETE W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED �ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING �_pERMANENT II-3D'+DS O CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. p pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in adv ce. (g52) 249-4600 OwnerlContractor 'te: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice To: Bruce Vang, Building Ispector From: Mike Gaffron,Planning Director Date: October 27, 2004 Subject: Hardcover review, 706 North Arm Drive Janice and I measured the driveway and sidewalks on October 26 to determine whether they conform with the approved plans. The driveway was measured and calculated to be approximately 1,073 s.f, including the concrete garage apron, rather than the 850 s.f. approved. Excess=223 s.f. The sidewalk along the southeast side of the house was measured and calculated to be approximately 132 s.f., rather than the 90 s.f. approved. Excess=42 s.f. Total excess in driveway and sidewalk is 265 s.f. It appears that this is due to the following: - the driveway is 11'wide where only 10'was approved - the driveway flares sooner than the approved plan as you approach the garage (see sketch) - the sidewalk does not taper from the house to the garage, and it also contains a 4'x8' stoop at the front door that was not in the original plan. The property owners should provide a proposal for review and approval showing what they will remove to meet the hardcover limitations of 850 s.f. for driveway and 90 s.f. for sidewalk. Also, virtually all landscape areas with woodchips are underlaid with fabric or plastic.. The resolution specifically states that these items are hardcover. All landscaping beds must have fabric and plastic liners removed. / . . � �1 �� ,�� �� . . � �.. _. ��1 T\' � � _ ,! �-.. N �__ -— � �, �e�� l� I . ^ - �' � � � � ��.. � � . � `_� � . � " .'�_..."�;_� � . �1� 3. –"'�' _ � �� � _.�........ __._.. �-�..--�.� ... �_.__. ___.__,.___-- . ......��.��"�:��- ____�-..�,.._.:.._::.;,________-.__ �� _�v �`� �� � � 's;�. �:.�-{ �� L> i�� c� �;;� ��-. !�> ���c�,,� � 1 t, � � i �; }�`� Q ���=-�w �l�'s � �����` � � ,�y (��� , --'� , --• i ._..�"""` , � -_��.�, � l�, :,� = 'M � l� T� � � ;�, ,,.� , � � � � ��� � ��/ ��� ,� ,� \` \ U � �,� � �� � � � k �� r /�� �, -� � � J G To: Bruce Vang, Building Ispector • �� " s� �� From: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director �.N �� ��/��" Date: October 27, 2004 � � `C���I�� � �� :�G ����� �� �� ' Subject: Hardcover review, 706 North Arni Drive ��._ q"'� /„�'�' f�� �► �. Janice and I measured the driveway and sidewalks on October 26 to deterniine whether they conform � with the approved plans. The driveway was measured and calculated to be approximately 1,073 s.f, including the concrete garage apron, rather than the 850 s.f. approved. Excess =223 s.f. The sidewalk along the southeast side of the house was measured and calculated to be approximately 132 s.f., rather than the 90 s.f. approved. Excess =42 s.£ Total excess in driveway and sidewalk is 265 s.f. It appears that this is due to the following: - the driveway is 11'wide where only 10'was approved - the driveway flares sooner than the approved plan as you approach the garage (see sketch) - the sidewalk does not taper from the house to the garage, and it also contains a 4' x8' stoop at the front door that was not in the original plan. 'I'he property owners should provide a proposal for review and approval showing what they will remove to meet the hardcover limitations of 850 s.f. for driveway and 90 s.f. for sidewalk. Also, virtually all landscape areas with woodchips are underlaid with fabric or plastic.. The resolution specifically states that these items are hardcover. All landscaping beds must have fabric and plastic liners removed. r 1 ' .. � ,� ` �� . . . . -�. ��1 --�-- � ��t T�� � `�..�..". ` � � � .. • •V .' � . . ..�i . i��. ,,� � � F, �� , � t � � l, � _ � •� � .(• _ � _.._ � �� .l ` S- �l �.. �� ....... =_�.. .�....___._.. -�-•�--._.. . . . .. ....�_.. .:...::�1�.... -- _..�._._..._ ------.---� F r� .,,��- � � _, � �- � - ni� a:��,� .., -_� �� L� ,��,, ;y� ^i—�� �L.r� ,��.,.�;+ � ��� s � �f� +.._�.. �!..`,.�.a---� �l� ' . , :-� - Y" 4� • ,-, �` ��� (,� �,s .- �'� ,�_ � �., '�ti?,,'/�,�-. �,1 , �'s:� j.,.R // . .. , . �..�r �-.�nr.m �, `.� r�i � a� ��—�` ' '�'^n'r_-..c.a I . ' „*�y '. ....nt '•k� �� �._�, _ — .�.- .. ._ .�.,..� �..... , ' � � ,�� 1s � (� � � _ ',�+: .�� M �> �„ <.: � �� r � �—' �-- �� ; �.." � � ��. � � �� v �� ,I: �, �-- ,�:,.. �' �� ,� � . I 1 ! � r i` i _.._. ...._ . _ ;� � � �i r . GQ o � � 1-- 2 � . �, .� � � � � � � . . . ���v.�� � .. � � . ExL9tlng Hard Cover �rapese$Nard�over(New Construct[on) 0—75'Foot Zone 0—75'Foot Zone � Existing House=40031 S.F. Exiting House=400.31 Existing Deck=422.67 S.F. New Deck=95.00 S.F. � � Euisting 3teps w'I36.22 S.F. � New Concrete Pad=40 S.F. ��� � Pacis6ng Concrece=79.23 S.P. . Total=1058.43 S.F.(29A°lo) Tota1=53531 S.F.(14.890) � \\ \�� � Existing Hard CoVer ��od•�rd Cover New Construction) \\\\ \\ \�� 7S—250 Foot Zone 75—250 Foot Zone \ �� � �;� � Existing House=626.38 S.P. Eaisting House =542.38 S.F. � ,` \ \ � �\ �� Existing.Garage=419.61 S.F. New Attached Garage-400.00 S.F. \\� �\ �\ � �� �\ �. Existing Gcavel=90.88 S.F. New House AddiGion=62.31 S.F. � � Existin Bit.=642,16 S.F. New Bi�Driveway-850.00 S.F. � \ � �� \ � ` " Pacisting Conc.Sidewalk=462 S.F. New Conc.Sidewallc-90 S.F. `� � ��� � � �� � \ �� \�� Existing Retain.Wall=16.07 S.F. F.�cisting Retain.Wall=16.07 S.F. �� � � � �� � � � � \ � Total=2Z5'7.10 S.F(51.99'0) , Total=196138 S.F.(45.1%) \ �\\ \ �\ � � \ \` \ �` --� ` \ � \ \ � � \ \ Total Lot Area=7946 S.F � ` �� Total Lot Area:0 75'Foot Zone=3600 S.F: ' �� ��\ �� � � � ��\ � �....�,. Total Lot Area:75'—250'Foot Zone=4346 S.F. '' 1 � 1 � � S o �\�� � � �� �\� -�-� \ 1 � � � � �lJr¢n\�cl�fe � ' Total Lot Hardsurface Proposed=1A96 S.F.=31%oE Lot Area � � ��� � ' � � � � 9 � p Total I.flt Hardsuiface as a pereentage oF�5'—250'zone=2496/4346�57% — � \ ��`� \� Total Structured Area-1500 S.F. � �` SM� � \ \ \ � � . .. . . � A ` ...�—— � \ +\ � \ � � . % � � \ � � � � Ex i,t i�;n9 Nou�e � � � � � � . �9s. . � ewndpov�. \ � . �rr /'•' \ \ \� � Neu/ 7'rcer �� . • � y� �� �� �(/9,rh�orM�p1@�� tw Dec1c � \ � � � � � ' 1\ '� �95� i� ires.) \ \ �� \ \��v�' ' 1 \ �Sb � � •' �\\ \ �\ \9��\� � °` NG!!! GOAG. � �` �� \\\�r.� \ - `, � �� \ t��)� � \ � '�K \ \ � �y �6 �, J` Exi s�;n House � � � �,.���� � � ' � ' f F.F!. �/cv. 59.4¢) � ��sr 53 \ \� �� '• Z'ohfre/jep' � � v �New d di�� r� Down S�od,v t �a � \ \ O/�rn-ftlt j7'� .-� 1 � / � � iI � \� \� \�9,r q6 s '1/ � \�Z. � \ i i�: II i II� ' ` � `� — — �: � � I I. � � ��r \ � � � ov ' I� o . \ v� \ i; � � �' -• \ \ � � �o � � � �� � \ J� ' � . _.�� � \ / . \ y6 � G�u�� N w ss . \ :.:: "� ��s8 � �� � J'wile i� So,c/ � �p.�' Wu( New fo� �\ �� �rgA. �.• e. �959.75) � \ N�w. Lon�. \ New Sod � �f'i d�we 1 K • �� ��� Arc� � �6� \ � � a j�I / , \ `` � ' � �O / I \` i0� C \ ! �� �� \ f v Q�'%VGN� � h . � \ �(' � ss �` ;�'efba fC�� 6t �\ \ �t a� \ 96 � � / i _ � � \ - � � . . �6 � ' • m�r— � F � ' ,�,i� � , „ k 966,25 . � ���A . . � -7 __= O O rfh_ �f�rm-��c.._.---- - �� •- � �� -�c v fs�-�r�.��_�-!-i,t7 0�-_. � - � 1 � —� --- - � • , � -�---=� – ` , . � ` � �. �� � . 1��. �\ . � ` • � • . � . , � � � : " _ --`� }�� �,'�, ,. k �-,,. �� �� ,.� ,�. �,,, � ,� _c. ,..,,,,�, � ,{.r� � �"' 4 � � �1 � �:.�- ��, �� � �.,.. �' � � -� � - ��'�����, �`�� � q ��." ,,p...�/ � .� �. ..,..,. , ...�.7 �.�... . � � `{ .� � ��`' � � 1� �i � � �� � \ , e ..:. 'R: � y .. . .. j' � :`.�1 �� �t �,V � (''�l; � h � Y �� 1t� � /��� �t ,, �' 1 �� � �'-'�` '�, / � � � �� ��� . � C� � �� �S �� �� � . �-' � �' ♦ ��',,, � .� �, � � 1 � � e� � ��� � ,, m..� . 2 , , 'J�1 p � \ �.�s � � � a � ` �;�.:� L `���� �' � `,� ._ � � . S�'�9�b � �� � ��1 � • � �` � , � � �.� � ,1 ��. � 1 �� , , " caG �,,� � ^ � �� � � . � 5�.� �� � . . �� � � , � ��� � � � . � 1 ( �� . � � �� � . -� .' � J�� � � ea ` � N �� � � .a n',n �� �' IO/ � _.. \ �' � � Q $S -' � �-r ,��.�� . , f � �os ��'�N � � o` �� � � �, � � d� . \ .� l o � •�G��'6l \ ��6 \ � � f-��, ' � t M J' � g . ; �,�� �-� . z `� p'�S �'� ,�,��J� \ `; ¢�;; , � :.�,,�� ., � , �- � N ` . • �,� o� � � � . �, � � . ` , �'�,� 2 � • . �4 �, .� �'_ ` � � __.- s ' • � . , (� / '' �- r J . �1 `� • / ` v ` � ��o♦ .• ` ; '•�,, ; /O� \ ..��- •�� � �. �\� ��, qb ` t � � �` 1 �' .1 . �.` � 1 , ' \ / ts �� >c - 1 ` '�'�r ..� �. '1 � , ' . \ . � � �. �, � � , � .r� � � � m�� �� � � � _ ,.�, ,p \ r _ �, , •� ) � t � ' � � ,bs• •A�/3 ��� X ��,� � � �' b ��,.¢S . .� � �1 . S��N •� � �, ,� �