The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-00882 - tree removal � � , CITY OF ORONO * 2 0 1 7 - a 0 8 8 2 * ,� 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 08/15/2017 ORONO,MN 55356- (952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616 ADDRESS : 1310 ELMWOOD AVE PIN : 07-117-23-41-0021 LEGAL DESC : SAGA HILL REVISED � : LOT 003 BLOCK 006 PERMIT TYPE : ZONING PERMIT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : TREE REMOVAL WITHIN 0-75 NOTE: 3-DYING BASSWOOD TREES ARBORIST REPORT SUBMITTED CONFIRMING DISEASED TREES FOR REMOVAL APPLICANT TOTAL Cottage Home Designs Payment(s) 1275 ELSINORE CIRCLE MEDINA,MN 55356- OWNER Cottage Home Designs 1275 ELSINORE CIRCLE MEDINA,MN 55356- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. / / Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issu By gnature Date �-� - DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION �tTICE SCHEDULED '7- 3!-1� PERMIT NO. V��"��OMPLETED ADDRESS �� l D �l f'Yl GC�UU� C�� OWNER ��'7�l'�ll ��;1TELEPHONE NO.'�/So7 7S�o�g�� CONTRACTOR � DESCRIPTION � - c� � �/�sSWGr� e� � ty ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FIN L ❑ SEPTIC FINAL � ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING O ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL _ v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERICONTNACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO y COMMENTS: -� OKe. �yjt.�.� � � r/�s � 6�X `ialla� + �s ��c�G 4s — 0 r7 � �lb f//�j � GiG r�%��e�9 4r�r�S�S �. t � �c�a f� �F� e d4-l�!��i�•ti D T d e r L�/e ts � � N-� G Q!ti W � Q � 2 W � W � � W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C 1 PROJECT COMPLETE � ❑CORRECT WORK 3 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 �CORRECTYVORK, TEMPORARY C,1 PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WFLL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cal1 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600 OwnerlContractor on site: Jk��S/L� - Inspector: �� Whits Copyflnapector's Flle Cenery CopyfSfte Notke � ' City of Orona r _ M Zaning Permit Ap lication Mailing Address: Permit number: U/ �-!/c� � �O�O CrysBtal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: - �j � � �� Escrow#and Street Address: amount: ,� � 2750 Kelley Parkway -� y � Orono, MN 55356 Permit Fee: � G l�kPsyO�� Fax: 952-249-4616 Approved by: Main: 952-249-4600 Notes: r..c.orono n�r u� This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. (Please print.) Job Site Address: ; ^J � `� �� ;�n�-.�-�d ��. (/�� 3� � CONTRACTOR/A�' N: Name: _ �4.,^, ��e�y � �v�c�. S�.-�� Phone: �i.,�� qs;�_ � �C�f S� Fax: Address: �` _�1�, r>52 S- ot�a Citv: ZIP: Contact Person: Contact's phone number ��- p� Z:� Email Applicant is: Contractor omeown (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ., � Name: C�� ..,...�. �� S � �� ✓L+�-'r"�'�N Phone(day): 9'S� 5 S�b- �, � v$ Mailing Address: l � �S f-1 s:�.��-e. �-��<<c., ; �'►�.,..•-. ZIP: Email and/or Fax I- i � ` S� ��J'r r_ 4J�L�J � Overall Project Description: � ; 3��s.0 o�d5 . r �/�v- h..�—�st J .��.� � »�� Check TYPE OF PERMIT EE Box col/ected when ermit is issued Dock,Commercial $50+engineering review costs Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs $2,000 Dock, Residential - Permanent dock on any lake or initial seasonal dock not on Lake $50+engineering review costs Minnetonka ermanent dock re uires CUP Hardcover Permit: Driveway, Patio,Sidewalk,etc.(New or Replacement) No charge Also requires is a Minor or Ma'or Land Alteration Permit Land Alteration,Major(grading,filling,or excavating)of more than 500 cubic yards beyond $50 the lakeshore setback OR more than 50 cubic yards within the lakeshore setback (also requires Conditional Use Permit) lReference: Cifv Code Sections 78-967. 78-1247 and 78-12861 Escrow for erosion control and engineering review costs As determined b CUP Land Alteration, Minor(grading,filling or excavating)of 51 to 500 cubic yards beyond the $50+engineering review costs lakeshore setback OR 50 cubic yards or less within the lakeshore setback lReference: Citv Code Sections 78-967.78-1247 and 78-12861 Escrow for erosion control and engineering review costs $2,000 Retaining Walls which exceed two feet in height above existing grade; or result in more $50+engineering review costs than 20 cubic yards of imported fill; or are located less than five feet from the property line. Escrow for erosion control and engineering review costs $2,500 lReference: Citv Code Section 78-1405(5.1)1 Retaining Walls which measure more than four feet(from bottom of footings to top of wall) require a building permit.Tiered retaining walls are considered one wall unless the walls are se arated b twice the hei ht of the lower wall. Stairway or Lifts to Lake(New or Replacement) lReference: Citv Code Secrions 7s-12821 $50+engineering review costs Escrow for erosion control and engineering review costs $2,000 Structure Permit for other structures 200 sf or less not requiring a building permit but $50+engineering review costs regulated by the zoning code fReference: Citv Code Section 86-661 Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs $2,500 Tree Removal or other vegetation removal within 75 feet of lakes No charge. Reference: Cit Code Seciion 78-1285 Pre-inspection required. Temporar Construction Office/Trailer associated with buildin ermit $30 Updated: January 2017 APPLICANTIOWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: � • ApplicanUOwner agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department; V ,- , . • Owner agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs where applicable; • ApplicanUOwner certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so,the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; . Applicant acknowledges the attached Escrow Agreement is completed and signed by Owner; • ApplicanUOwner understands their project may require an initial and/or as-built survey per City Code Section 86-68. • Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the a lication ma not be issued. The undersigned certify that the information supplied ' true and correct to the best of their knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: � -��7 � Property Owner's Signature: Date: 7 2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Except for tree removal permits, all permits require a completed TYPE OF PERMIT: application form,escrow agreement(signed by the property owner)and escrow check from owner,two copies of each,where applicable, plans,landscape plans,grading plans,surveys or site plans. Dock,Commercial 1. Structural plans for the dock 2. Survey/site plan showing the proposed location of the dock 3. Copy of LMCD permit DoCk,Residential Seasonal Dodc�urvey showing proposed dock Pertnanent Dock—plans as approved by CUP and copy of LMCD permit if applicable) Hardcover Permit 1. All Minor or Major Land Atteration Permit requirements apply as appropriate 2. Hardcover calculations,existing and proposed 3. Survey Land Alteration,Major 1. Survey/grading plan inGuding existing and proposed contours as approved by Conditional Use Permit 2. Erosion control plan. 3. A copy of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)permits or documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project dces not Vigger any of their pertnitting requirements. Please note,the City will not issue a buildin ermit without information from the MCWD. Land Alteration,Minor 1. Survey/grading plan including existing and proposed contours 2. Amount of fill to be imported and/or exported and haul route 3. Amount of earth to be moved around on site 4. Erosion conVol plan. 5. A copy of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)permits or documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project dces not trigger any of their permitting requirements. Please note,the City will not issue a buildin ermit without information from the MCWD. Retaining Wall 1. Plans for wall(s) 2. Unless repair or exact replacement of existing wall,submit an updated survey with grading plan including existing and proposed contours 3. Hardcover calculation worksheets if in shoreland disUict 4. Erosion conUol plan 5. A copy of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)permits o�documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project dces not trigger any of their permitting requirements. Please note,the City will not issue a buildin rmit without information from the MCWD. Stairway or Lifts to 1. Construction plans for stairway or lift,including footings Lake 2. Topographical survey of property with proposed stairs or lift shown 3. Erosion conVol plan 4. A copy of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)permits or documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project dces not Vigger any of their pertnitting requirements. Please note,the City will not issue a buildin rmk without information irom the MCWD. Structure Permit 7. Construction plans. 2. Survey/site plan of property with proposed sVudure shown and with setbacks to property lines,other structures on property and the septic system indicated.The general location of any sewer and water services should be shown if applicable. 3. Grading plan if grading is proposed. 4. Hardcover calculaGon worksheets 5. Erosion control plan. 6. A copy of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)permits or documentation from the MCWD stating the proposed project dces not trigger any of their permitting requirements. Please note,the City will not issue a buildin ermit without infortnation from the MCWD. Tree Removal Call: 952-249-4600 to schedule an inspection for removal of an individual tree(s). A re-planting plan/erosion control/ mana ement lan ma be r uired for clear cuttin ,buckthom or other intensive v etation removal. Updated: January 2017 ' � IS�� Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client �� T(ZA�J i M,/}l� Date ��l Z�� Time ��" 30 �� Address/Tree location � 3 I o ELM Vv'ct�0 v_ nnov�vD M� • Tree no. Sheet of Tree species 55w��1� T► L( M�=1� � dbh��'�= 1�L�KHeight �� Crown spread dia. 3�� Assessor(s) 17Rr'H� F,.r��21 C�So� Tools used Time frame TargeF Assessment .. - �� d a � F o�. � Targetdescription � � _ ..� + j j, , , f 'c F i0 N u f0 F' � / + K G 1 J�H�(� �' (�� s..,; ` �..»�.. , ,,, . Z �� oG� �.. 3 �Q� s . J,� �Q�-, I ,2,� v�w�►�F� 4 �zk S�tE �`ra � s� "� g� g — Historyoffailures �--��'�� -.c�`�`� 1 J Site changes None❑ Grade change�te clearing0 C�ha�n ed soil hyc l �-<<� ��7iUrv Soil conditions Limited volume�Saturated❑ Shallow G3'Compacted[ � ��'� Prevailing wind direction �,�/ Common weather Strong winds[a I � �� ""'� Tree Nealth a ( l 1 O �' 1�� _ �� Vigor Low❑ Normal High❑ Foliage None(seasonal)❑ _% Pests/Biotic Speciesfailureprofile eranches❑ Trunk Roots❑ Describe �`'�+��P TiZ�nir WQ4:v.D o� /�i„Q�v ,ti�� 1 Load Factors Wind exposure Protected❑ Partial❑ Full Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium❑ Large� Crown density Sparse❑ Normal❑ Dense�lnterior branches Few� Normal�S �ense❑ Vines/Mistletce/Moss� V'r''�s Recent or expected change in load factors T��%'�%k ��'+��G� Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure —Crown and Branches— Unbalanced crown❑ LCR �C' % ,� .� Cracks❑ Lightning damage Dead twigs/brenches❑ � %overall Max.dia.�_ � "^—�K 5 Included bark Codominant �� g � U�2 � Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia. Over-extended branches ❑ Weak attachments Cavity/Nest hole%circ. Previous branch failures Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history �/ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark[3'Cankers/Galls/Burls O�wood damage/decay Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth ��'��"�� D ,..��; C�✓:�'r ti�.. Condition�s)ofconcern �� '"��-- �S �'�`�'�-��_�� Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance LAad on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate�❑�ignificant C� Load on defed N/A� Minor ❑ Moderate�0 �Si nificant Likelihoodoffailure Improbable0 Possible❑ Probable L7 Imminent❑ Likelihoodoffailure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable C�Imminent❑ —Trunk— —Roots and Root Collar— Dead/Missing bark Q"/ Abnormal bar exture/color Collar buried/Not visible C�" Depth Stem girdling Codominant stems Cil' —/ Included bark� Cracks❑ Dead ❑ Decay ld� Conks/Mushrooms❑ Sapwood damage/d�e/cay C� Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity❑ `Y circ. Lightning damage G�' Heartwood decayl� Conks/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Damaged roots❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole �U%circ. Depth Poor taper Root plate lifting❑ Soil weakness❑ Lean ° CorrectIed? �7bj /}CLF��LC= Response growth j'1��"'� w00� IJu►A(��Lr Response growth ul�- Ccw+ C+' o� A�l �Z�nsK Conditi n(s)pfconcem �'� �' C�''�F��'�d`'✓ ON /} LL 3 Condition(s)of concern 5= � .3 1 5 �-,��N r 5 „ , , � Part Size Z�+ 2 �' ` Fall Distance �� Part Size '1-" 'Z� t ZJ Fall Distance �G Load on defeCt N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ $ignificant� Likelihoodoffailure tmprobable❑ Possible❑ Probable E3 Imminent❑ Likelihoodoffailure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable B�mminent❑ Page I of 2 � Risk Categorization Likelihood Failure Impact failure&Impact Consequences Target ((rom Moirix 1) Condition(s) (7arget number Tree part a, ordescription) of concern � a � L � c, � Risk o a m � o ' Y a3, a, :Y ��'" � °.' reting a � o E 2' 3 �ar '�m '� F Y 2' oo c° c � (from £ a° a � > � g = � ,° � > z g �° ,� Motrixl) #,�G�,,1� S i(�,��..�k "��,,,.�,/�G� O � � �`'��t� �L.,.f.�[.F a,J ►Ja 2�1-�,E�►J�,S� '� l I S c-�s ,-rz�N� � C�.u,��,� O O O �1�.,� L.�, -��-� so�� -,� 3 0 0 �1� 5-��S CPrvS1N� 0 Q Q M.�--�� R�,�— O O O p�C�-+o2�N6 �S Sv� �LSo 2 "�tL��v�-5 O � �� Co��r+aR�� S c��s C��<< O Q N��v{Z wr�r� � � o -��,.� k c1:.��v+�5 � � � o � � Matrix I.Likelihood matrix � . . . , . _ . , _ ; Likelihood Likelihood of Impact 'v �Y__� ____� i + of Failure � � � T Very low Low Medium High ; � I �� t � __.,. ; � ____� , � Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely , -� � i i l � � � Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely ��'�-� � j �i �-- � - Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlike►y Somewhat likely p�,�f.� ��-1 , � ; ; Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely - - 1\/' " ' i rt--_ . . _}� Matrix2.Risk rating matrix. � � = i ��P'—'� i _ + - - t.� Likelihood of Consequences of Pailure • ' � � �'�� Failure&Im act �� p Negligible Minor Significant Severe � ' � C � Verylikely Low Moderate High Extreme `,�� ' ' ��S5�E� , ._.._ . .__...._ _' '., i._.___�- I i_. Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likety Low Low Moderate Moderate Norch Unlikely Low Low Low low Notes,explanations,descriptions -�'R�.�,K wo:��v� l� n,t�t-�R "'— w� �� E��7Z�Rl� y �Pri L � CV��SL- ,�r..va�,E C c a,�;w�,..�p,-..�r 1 (Z J t�J��S �_ C��6 ,,�r.J-�K T2�.-..�k t��o� . S<` � L co nti!'�v-c i�o i.� ';` �5 � N�e� c�,��.�N ror� �� I-{r��;�1 � �-�� e n3<<,�r`'�' �S'b Pt�41c� i�� lcc�'�L; . �" �� Mitigation options _� 1. "T}2�-� W�� 1��A�t y 'F�9� � ��uh JZ' FJtL�v25 j�'C��l3,E0 l�7 ��'� � � Residual risk 2. �"'��6 �I��S S��'� �-�4 N �TE� ��-C �1i1.��8'�T� Residual risk 3. r5 k � �Z�.`L►�5 TO /LOP C—�� G S �' i(�f�{ ��'�'F'=`�- Residual risk a. �� I �' . �C�GV j3F C L�1-U/N- Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low❑ Moderate❑ High C�' Extreme❑ �"�^� � �� 3 �"v`��5 ��n� �..1 j 'r'�rc_c..� �� '�`---� �.�._ ^ Overall residual risk None❑ Low❑ Moderate C�High❑ Extreme❑ Recommended inspe�on interval r'�-�, `�e' Data ❑Final O Preliminary Advanced assessment needed❑No�Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ❑None OVisibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe �-' _/� 'Ihis datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculmre(ISA)—2017 Page 2 of 2 INTER O�JAL SOCIETY OF .��RBORIC�ULTCTRE CERTIFIED ARBORIST�" Dana J. Hendrickson Having successfully completed the requirements set by the Arborist Certification Board of the International Society of Arboriculture, the above named is hereby recognized as an ISA Certified Arborist° Jiin Skiera, Executive Director lnrernational Society of Arboriculture ,�� Kevin Martlage Director of Professionai Development Intemational Society ofArboriculture MN-0378AT 19 Apr 2002 30 Jun 2020 Cxrtification Number Certified Sincr Expintion Datr