HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6782Existing Certs
1074637
l II�L hm1Y rl�t.Mx,�/iN�.
II IIIIIVIIIlullI� IIIAI� RI VIIIIII II
Doc No T05474817
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Sep 5, 2017 4:30 PM
Office of the Registrar of Titles
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 30 Pkg ID 1597763M
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6782
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING VARIANCES FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 78-420 and 78-1279
FILE NO. 17-3950
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, Michael and Meredith Kuhlman (hereinafter the
"Applicants"), applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 1760 Shoreline
Drive and legally described as:
Tract B. R.L.S. No. 617, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property");
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow development of the Property
which has 100 feet in width at the ordinary high water level, and 120 feet in width at the 75 -foot
setback where 200 feet is required; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new
residence and in ground pool lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2017, after published and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which
time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to
speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of the variances; and
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2017, the City Council reviewed the application and the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning the Property:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3950. The analysis contained within
staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6782
mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are
hereby incorporated by reference.
2. The Property is located in the LR -1A, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District.
The Property contains 4.0 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 100 feet at the
OWHL and 120 feet at the 75 -foot setback.
4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater
Quality Overlay District.
5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]:
a. Lot Width Variance
b. Average Lakeshore Setback Variances
6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values
of property in the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the ordinance ...." The lot width variance requested is consistent with the
general intent of the Ordinance. The requested average lakeshore setback variances are
in harmony with the Ordinance as the most adjacent neighbor sits at a higher elevation
and their lake views will not be impacted by the new home or pool.
2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a permit for construction of a single family
residence in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are
practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in
connection with the granting of a variance, means that:
a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner,
however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls.
The request to permit construction of portions of the proposed home and pool
lakeward of the average lakeshore setback appears to be reasonable as the views
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6782
of the lake enjoyed adjacent lakeshore property will not adversely impacted; the
distance between the homes, mature vegetation and topography separate the
proposed home from the adjacent neighbors.
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created
by the landowner.
The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the
landowner. The neighboring home to the east has lakeshore on two sides and is
set back a distance from the lake which is greater than most of the surrounding
homes resulting in the severe average lakeshore setback applied to the Property.
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. "
The lot width variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does not
appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variances to permit the new
home and swimming pool will adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed
by the adjacent property owners.
4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic
considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter
78." This condition is not applicable.
6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under
Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence and pool are permitted
uses in the LR -1A District.
7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling
as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable.
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property." The conforming lot area, yet substandard lot
width of the Property is not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood. The extreme
setback of the home on the adjacent property is not in character with the immediate
neighborhood.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6782
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the
land is located." The Property is unique because it has a non-lakeshore lot on the west
and the home on the lakeshore lot directly to the east is set back further than the other
immediately adjacent homes.
10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant." The majority of the Property is encumbered by
the applied average lakeshore setback; to push the home further from the lake would
nearly eliminate lake views.
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or
morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the
requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor will it
be contrary to the intent of the Code.
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but
is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The size of the Property; the topography,
wetland, and location of the adjacent home to the east create practical difficulties affecting
the Property; the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the
owners.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS:
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow development of the
Property which has 100 feet in width at the ordinary high water level, and 120 feet in width at the
75 -foot setback where 200 feet is required; and variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code
Section 78-1279 to allow construction of a new residence and in ground pool lakeward of the
average lakeshore setback line, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings.
2. The approved project shall conform to the survey dated 07/17/17 and building plans
submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as
Exhibits A & B.
3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require
further Planning Commission and City Council review.
4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. b 1 8 2
construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be
completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on
that date (August 14, 2018).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may
result in the termination of any authority granted herein.
ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of August, 2017.
ATTEST:
Anna Carlson, City Clerk
CITY OF ORONO:
qk�Q
Dennis Walsh, Mayor
xni� - A
a�
E
Resol. No. " "
Exhibit A
#17-3950
A'
O b W 170
SCALE M FEET'
eA' . emwa aa. nfr[IWII.
�+EN .. pxormlm Tttll ncvAna
_ artcn.. uv.[E ax+a
m+ . cn+l[[w1s o.wwo
aIa . owealo mam ua
R1. -Www Noa 111rATW
R +ulolnR[ nnLmll
Iff-LOWEAI n.eaW n[vLmW
xWAca a Ais er mp.
1[li!'[Wi C61lIW1Y, I!1
IAW W - 17W At M ROH
Ptl/10-1t]-23-14-W7
LOT ARLA . IMOO 9f( 4,0A
yn 9 3 c, TO 17111" P" Q
TITLE n1 EAOELW)at W~1,A
HIR -r ALL 5€TWI s WITH all
HNY µL OCIn10114 W) W
EEEYAS .1. W10 PLAW!
+ i�
' L
1
T
�
,
� � I
t
N
,
r ,
j S
tM l
3I _R
1 w
I
i
Resol. No. " "
Exhibit A
#17-3950
A'
O b W 170
SCALE M FEET'
eA' . emwa aa. nfr[IWII.
�+EN .. pxormlm Tttll ncvAna
_ artcn.. uv.[E ax+a
m+ . cn+l[[w1s o.wwo
aIa . owealo mam ua
R1. -Www Noa 111rATW
R +ulolnR[ nnLmll
Iff-LOWEAI n.eaW n[vLmW
xWAca a Ais er mp.
1[li!'[Wi C61lIW1Y, I!1
IAW W - 17W At M ROH
Ptl/10-1t]-23-14-W7
LOT ARLA . IMOO 9f( 4,0A
yn 9 3 c, TO 17111" P" Q
TITLE n1 EAOELW)at W~1,A
HIR -r ALL 5€TWI s WITH all
HNY µL OCIn10114 W) W
EEEYAS .1. W10 PLAW!
+ i�
SCALE: 1/8" = V-0"
1760
Shoreline Drive
.41111.-11
Variance
Drawings
20 June 2017
-AW,
NOR -SON
CUSTOM BUILDERS
KUCH
D E S I G N
00
i�
SCALE: 1/8" =
.n.U.L. .. ......
---W -------
4A40
1760
Shoreline Drive
Variance
Drawings
20 June 2017
NOR-SON
CUSTOM BUILDERS
eSKucHe
D E S I G N
N
Co
ti
POOL
12'X30'
a =____ __
OPTION COVERED PORCH
ro"aa
REAR
STOOP
FOYER _
COVERED
ENTRY
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
TYP. CEILING HEIGHT = 10'-4'h"
APPROX. S.F. = 1 646 FIN. + 915 GARAGE
a r .• a' r is n u• u•
GRAPHIC 5(II F
1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE (24"x36" PAPER)
DINING
a -,1n O 1
au
IH
PC
Exhibit D
Sh #17-3950
Variance
Drawings
20 June 2017
NOR -SON
CUSTOM BUILDERS
eSKUCHe
D E S I G N
L
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
TYP. CEILING HEIGHT = 9'-1 X"
APPROX. S.F. = 2.015 FIN.
V r + 1. a 1rc 12• u• 11
GRAPHIC SCALE
i IA" = i'.n" S[AI F 0A",W PAPFRI
1760
Shoreline Drive
Variance
Drawings
20 June 2017
44,
NOR -SON
CUSTOM BUILDERS
eSKUCHe
D E S I G N
N
OPTION TO FINISH
LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
TYP. CHUNG HEIGHT = 8'.71/,"
APPROX. S.F. = 1,133 FIN. + 434 A ECH/STORAGE
r r �• r r it iz• u- W
GRAPHIC SUI E
1760
Shoreline Drive
Variance
Drawings
20 June 2017
NOR -SON
CUSTOM BUILDERS
eSKCHe
D E S I G N