The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMN Wetland Conservation Act Notice of application-2012 i c Christine Mattson From: Catherine Bach [cbach@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:33 PM To: 'Stacey.Lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us'; 'Peterson, Lynda (BWSR)'; 'Doperalski, Melissa (DNR)'; 'Jenny, Melissa M MVP'; Christine Mattson; Ryan, Steven; Frank Svoboda Subject: WCA Boundary Notice of Application -25 Myrtlewood Road, Orono Attachments: W12-47_Boundary NOA.pdf Good afternoon, Please find attached a Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application for a wetland boundary determination for 25 Myrtlewood Road in the city of Orono. The complete application is included. Comments on this application will be accepted until 4:30 PM on November 27, 2012. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Steve, In response to your e-mail from Saturday, we still have to go through the 15 business day comment period (beginning today) before I can make a decision on the application. We currently have a very high volume of applications and act on them in the order in which they were received, which is why I wasn't able to start the comment period until now. I apologize for any inconvenience. Catherine Bach District Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 Direct: (952) 641-4504 Main Office: (952)471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or� �_ MINNEHAHA CRF�K WAtER5tsE1� D151'gICT �Think Green - please do not print this email unless_necessary i L ♦ Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit(LGin Address • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 1.PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Pxoject Name Date of Application Steve and Anne Ryan Ryan Home Residential Shed Ap�lication Number 10/11/12 W 12-47 T e of A lication check all that a 1 ): �Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑Exemption ❑Sequencing ❑Replacement Plan ❑Banking Plan Summ and descri tion of ro osed ro'ect attach additional sheets as necessar : Steve and Anne Ryan have applied for wetland boundary approval for the parcel located at 25 Myrtlewood Road in the city of Orono(PID#3611823330014). The application was received on October 11,2012. The delineation was performed by Svoboda Ecological Resources on November 22,2011. The boundary was reviewed in the field by MCWD staff on October 12,2012. 2.APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION I Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. ' 3�provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person. Comments must be received by (minimum I S Catherine Bach business-day comment period): District Technician November 27,2012(4:30 P1Vn Address(if different than LGU) Date,time,and location of decision: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following completion of Deephaven,MN 55391 the comment period. Phone Number and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952)641-4504 � Staff cbach cr minnehahacreek.org ❑Governing Board or Council Signature: Date: BWSRForms 7-1-10 Page 1 of2 i r 3.LIST OF ADDRESSEES � SWCD TEP member:Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us � BWSR TEP member:Lynda Peterson—lynda.peterson@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): ❑ DNR TEP member: � DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member):Melissa Doperalski— Melissa.Doperalski@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): � Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different):Steve and Anne Ryan—sryan@briggs.com � Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): � Consultant: Svoboda Ecological Resources(Brian Burgner/Frank Svoboda)— franks@gpsinnovations.com City: Christine Mattson—emattson@ci.orono.mn.us � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only):Melissa Jenny—Melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) � 4.MAILIIVG INFORMATION ➢For a list ofBWSR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/contact/WCA_areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives:www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP contacts.pdf ➢De artment of Natural Resources Re ional Offices: NW Re&ion: NE Re�on: Central Region: Southern Re�on: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemid'i MN 56601 Grand Ra ids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions,see:http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr re ig ons•pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers:www.mvp.usace.arm .y miUre u� latory/default.asp7pa�eid=687 or send to: ➢ US Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN:OP-R 180 FiBh St.East,Suite 700 St.Paul,MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications,also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St.Paul,MN 55155 5.ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application,list any other attachments: •❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ . _ BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 , � r � • . - • • - • � � • � • � � • � • • ' � �' • i • � . 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: Ryan home residential shed Local Government Unit:Orono, MN Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.):25 Myrtlewood Rd, Orono, MN 55391 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Steve and Anne Ryan Address: 25 Myrtlewood Rd City, State, Zip: Orono, MN, 55391 E-mail: sryan@briggs.com Phone: 612-803-6470 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable):Svoboda Ecological Resources Contact Person: Brian Burgner Address: 25580 Nelsine Drive City, State, Zip: Excelsior, MN 55331 E-mail:franks@gpsinnovations.com Phone: 952-471-1100 4. Description of Request ; Check all that apply: X Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.02 �on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The pplicant also at th re the owner of the subject poperty or have permission from the land ner to purs this eterm ati n. , � �� 10-11-12 Applicant or�1 horiz , nt Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 I t f 25 Myrtlewood Orono, MN Wetland Classification, Identification, and Delineation Report Prepared for: Steven & Anne Ryan By: Svoboda Ecological Resources Project Number 2011-034 November 29,2011 The contents and format of this report are considered intellectual property and are subject to copyright restrictions and may not be reproduced without the express permission of Svoboda Ecological Resources. i � •• � TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 METHODS.......................................................................................................................1 RESULTS.........................................................................................................................3 DISCUSSION...................................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................4 CERTIFICATION............................................................................................................6 DATASOURCES ............................................................................................................7 LITERATURECIT'ED .....................................................................................................8 FULL FIGURE SET: Figure 1: Location of Site Overlaid on USGS Topographic Map Figure 2: National Wetlands Inventory Figure 3: Web Soil Survey-Hennepin County Figure 4: DNR-Protected Waters Map Figure 5: Approximate Wetland Boundary and Sample Transect Location THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION: Field Data Sheets Plant Indicator Status Soil Series Data Wetland Definition PHOTO LOG i � ABSTRACT Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) visited the above referenced properry on November 22, 2011 to examine the site for the presence of areas meeting wetland criteria. The study parcel is located within the City of Orono, Hennepin Counry Minnesota, (Figure 1). One wetland boundary was delineated at this site. One sample transect was established along the wetland boundary in order to characterize the soil, vegetation, and existing hydrology within the wetland-to-upland transition zone. INTRODUCTION The subject parcel is appro�cimately 1.41 acres in size with a single-family home located on the east side of the property. The western side of the site is dominated by grasses, hardwood trees and some scrub-shrub vegetation. Manicured lawn is noted near the home on the east side. The topography of the site is mostly flat within the wetland areas and flat in areas surrounding the home on the east side of the property. However, there is a relatively abrupt decline extending from east to west starting at the central portion of the property leading toward the delineated wetland (Photo 3). The surrounding land use consists mostly of single-family homes. The identified wetlands were classified according to the Cowardin et al., the Circular 39 and the Eggers and Reed classification systems and marked with pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. Please find within the Technical Documentation Section; field data sheets, plant indicator status informarion, soil survey information, and wetland definition information. A Photo Log is also located at the end of this report depicting the subject parcel at the time of the site visit. The purpose of this wetland delineation is to identify the wetland boundary in relation to a proposed shed that will be located at the top of the hill close to the existing home. The distance from the delineated wetland edge to the proposed footprint of the shed at its westernmost side is approximately 125 feet. SER used GIS in the office to arrive at this measurement. Also please see Photo 4 on the last page of this report for a picture showing the proposed footprint of the shed area and the wetland area in the distance. METHODS The methods used to delineate the subject parcel are as described in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement Manual. In the 1987 Manual, the methods used were described under the "routine" methods for wetland sites less than 5 acres. This methodology is followed in order to assess whether the three Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 1 Steven&Anne Ryan � � parameters of a wetland are met for areas on the subject parcel. The three parameters required under normal circumstances in order to delineate a wetland are described in the Technical Documentation Section. The Midwest Regional Supplement Wetland Delineation Manual is also being utilized to increase the accuracy of our wetland boundaries. This addendum to the original 87 Manual was created to address the many regional differences that affect wetlands and the delineation methods used throughout the country. The following explanations are passages from that document. "This Regional Supplement is part of a nationwide effort to address regional wetland characteristics and improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland- delineation procedures. Regional differences in climate, geology, soils, hydrology plant and animal communities, and other factors are important to the identification and functioning of wetlands. These differences cannot be considered adequately in a single national manual. The development of this supplement follows National Academy of Sciences recommendations to increase the regional sensitivity of wetland-delineation methods (National Research Council 1995).The intent of this supplement is to bring the Corps Manual up to date with current knowledge and practice in the region and not to change wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the current version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all subsequent versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this Regional Supplement takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications in the Midwest Region." National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2), Web Soil Survey of Orono and Hennepin County maps (Figure 3), Minnesota Protected Waters maps (Figure 4), and 2010 aerial photographs were reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating evidence of wetland conditions were examined in greater detail during the field survey. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual) and used to characterize wetland types and determine wetland boundaries. A sample transect was established in a representative wetland-to-upland transition zone in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Transects consisted of a representative upland sample point and a representarive wetland sample point. Information obtained from the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in the Technical Documentation Section. Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The wetland boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; areas below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in one or more of these criteria. Wetland classification followed methods described by Cowardin et al. (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification systems are also given. The indicator status of plants, as described in The Technical Documentation Section, was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands —Region 3 (Sabine 1999). Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 2 Steveci&Anne Ryan RESULTS Background Information-(Office-Based Investigation) The NWI map (Excelsior Quadrangle) illustrates one National Wetland Inventory wetland (one PEMF)present within the property boundary(Figure 2). The Web Soil Survey of Orono and Hennepin County classifies one individual soil series and one soil complex present on the subject property (Figure 3). The mapped complex (Houghton and Muskego depressional) is a "hydric" soil and the individual mapped soil series (Lester loam moraninic) was classified as"non-hydric" soil. The soil series descriptions for each of these soils are given in the Technical Documentation Section at the end of this report. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State Protected Waters Map (Public Water Inventory), indicates one Public Water wetland(27-830 V�present within the property boundary (Figure 4). This public water falls within the bounds of the delineated wetland. Site Visit SER ecologists examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria during the site visit. One wetland area met the jurisdictional criteria of a wetland for which a boundary was determined and delineated. The approximate wetland boundary is outlined in yellow (Figure 5). Wetland 1 Wetland 1 is located at the west end of the property. Dominant vegetation within Wetland 1 was narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia) and sedge species (Carex spp.) Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea)was also dominant within Wetland 1 along the fringes. Sample Point Data Analysis The vegetation transition zone along Sample Transect 1-1 at Sample Point(SP) 1-1 WET started with a dominance of reed canary grass, and narrow-leaf cattail in the herbaceous layer, red oak (Quercus rubra) and green ash (FrczYinus pennsylvanica) in the tree stratum, and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) in the shrub layer. Percent cover in the herb layer totaled 65 percent with the remaining area being dead vegetation and bare soil. Both the dominance test, and the prevalence index were met. The vegetation transition to upland yielded a dominance of red oak trees, common buckthorn e�sting in the shrub and herbaceous layer, and finally, garlic mustard(Alliaria petiolata) in the herb layer. The dominance test was not met at the upland point. Total coverage of upland vegetation was 32 percent at the upland point within the herbaceous layer. The remaining area was bare soil and some dead vegetation. Soils at SP 1-1 WET were black silt loams down to 16 inches with redoximorphic concentrations at 1 percent within the upper 4 inches, increasing to 5 percent redox from Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 3 Steven&Anne Ryan � , 4 to 16 inches. Below the 16 inch margin a peat/fibric layer was identified that emitted a strong sulfidic odor. Soils at the upland sample point were very dark gray loams at the surface with the same matrix color starting at 14 inches with 1 percent redoximorphic concentrations and clay loam textures. From 16 inches down to 22 inches the soils transitioned to black matrix colors with 5 percent redox concentrations and clay textures. Saturation was identified at 10 inches below the ground surface at the wetland point. Geomorphic position and a positive FAC-neutral test were also noted as secondary indicators. There were no hydrology indicators present at the upland sample location, however. SER delineated Wetland 1 as a Type 3,PEMF, Shallow Marsh wetland. DISCUSSION SER completed all on-site delineations based on the three required technical criteria as outlined by the 1987 Manual: the presence of hydric soils, a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and indicators of wetland hydrology in each basin. The site visit portion of the wetland delineation was completed on November 22,2011. SER personnel examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria during the site visit and delineated the edge of one wetland basin consisting of one wetland type within the property boundary as being jurisdictional wetland (Figure 5). Detailed soils, vegetation and hydrology data for Wetland 1 is provided in the data sheets of The Technical Documentation Section. RECOMMENDATIONS Activities which impact or potentially impact wetlands are currently regulated at several levels of government. In Minnesota, the two primary jurisdictions are covered at the state and federal levels by the provisions of the following legislative actions. ➢ State jurisdiction by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) administered by the WCA Local Governmental Unit(LGLn. ➢ Federal jurisdiction by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments. Wetland protection is implemented by the Corps of Engineers(Corps)with permit certification issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 4 Steven&Anne Ryan i � While the wetland boundaries that SER has delineated are not official until approved by a WCA approved local government unit (LGL�, SER advises the property owner/developer to refrain from any filling, draining, or excavating, or any impact to the area SER has delineated as wetland. No grading or filling in wetland basins should commence until all necessary permits have been obtained. Violation of wetland regulations has resulted in substantial civil and criminal penalties. Local ordinances may regulate wetland modifications such as brush and tree removal and burning in addition to grading and filling. Depending on the location of the property, buffers around the wetland may also be protected. Any activities in the proximity of the wetland should be cleared with appropriate WCA regulatory agencies. It is also advisable to have the wetland boundary surveyed by a licensed land surveyor. Since the pin flags used along the boundary can be vandalized or inadvertently knocked over, a GPS survey of the flags will assure the permanence of the boundary. The client should also be aware that approved wetland boundaries are typically valid for only three years from the date of approval. To avoid project delays associated with wetland regulations, it is essential that you acquire necessary permits from all jurisdictional agencies before continuing activities. A WCA Sequencing form, a WCA and Army Corps of Engineers Replacement Plan Application form, and a DNR permit application are among the materials that you may be required to submit if impacts are proposed for the delineated wetlands. By initiating the permit process as soon as possible,potential costly delays to the project may be avoided. Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrdewood Rd. Pmject No.:2011-034 5 Steven&Anne Ryan t � CERTIFICATION Brian Burgner completed the above-described delineation on November 22, 2011. This delineation was performed according to the procedures described by the US Army Corps of Engineers in the 1987 Wetlands Delinearion Manual and the 2010 Midwest Region Supplement Wetland Delineation Manual. The delineation meets the standards and a criterion described in these manuals and conforms to the applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the delineation was completed. Report and graphics were prepared by Brian Burgner(Wetland Ecologist II)on this day, November 29, 2011. Client: Steven and Anne Ryan Project Name: 25 Myrtlewood Road Project No.: 2011-034 Location: Orono, Minnesota Ecologist II Wetland Delineator-Certified# 1124 �--�°�-,- d. President, Svoboda Ecological Resources October 29, 2011 Date Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 ( Steven&Anne Ryan , , DATA SOURCES Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin County. 1985,Revised 1996. United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map—Excelsior Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs). USDA-NRCS Official Soil Series Descriptions. Retrieved from https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/osdname.asp USGS 1991-2010 Aerial Color Photos. Publicly Distributed Over the Land Management Information Center(LMIC) Website. USGS Quadrangle Map—Excelsior 7.5-Minute Quadrangle,Minnesota,U.S.A. Web Soil Survey(n.d.). Orono, Hennepin County, MN. Retrieved from http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htrn Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 '] Steven&Anne Ryan , , LITERATURE REFERENCED Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. 103pp. Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263pp,unclassified. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gleason, H.A. and A.C. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of VascularPlants ofNortheastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 910pp. Sabine, B. J. 1999. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands:Region 3—North Central(Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin). Resource Management Group, Inc. 77pp. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps ofEngineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Nobel. ERDC/EL TR-10-16. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Svoboda Ecological Resources 25 Myrtlewood Rd. Project No.:2011-034 g Steven&Anne Ryan I :• a ■ � --`+L;_r 1 i� � � 'ti� '- _ �' „� f "� t' �ti �o �+_-� ' � �! _ —z.�� (' `--tit�,,` ` 1�.�'y z1.t�._ ' ,rr ( �Itii41 '�t� .��Ir.- -• �,.� ` "� 1 � t � �r- - �y'�� I `,~' 4 � �'~ 7 l ��f.•.r'� .�Ly I .'�*, � � �^� ~,� � � . � �r [ �� + :�r � �` J^ -��, �:. - .y ._ � .,, • _# (`�' 61 '---�' r-.a f 7r ti.� i '�T t' � "ti 4 � ;y'� � r-" _ � - �4 1 �.�, ``��'. Y'��, _ _�r�` { i ,� �, I tti /�. 1� ^---` �p f.� 'r` "— 4. f•'�, �5�":� .i�la. }'� { ��.ti.. j A ' +� ff• ;.^-ti ,• � �'t r,r -z�� _ � f-- .ti _�� f � I ,t`;� J �'f. � �� t. II '�� _��I �e -„Jf �1� `��R,'�.}i tr�� t�r�t� .`'4 �•y- ,L -. 'r�. e y �� _,� � � r ' �� i � � �-�+� _� i .,•{.�r` �`7 (� . -- ?`.�� - _ --�_ .' ;` ,;F . _ •~`�, `'y` �\ f! .'�M� .�_�1 �,.�1 ti �r 1',��! t "!L (�!' S 4J .4 R ; '� 'r�.;.. �`' �� r ' � ,,.r f^.J�l' '� � � � ,.LL`�'ti� (J �. '? � J '��' 'J—�r��- , � �J f� � � �� 5h r !��+ '�'•ti�� '_ _ i _j h—�� ^�� -.�'S _ _.- �--� 3 ,l�'�`- ,� ! �-. ti�� - � I 'fr _ � . . `.`�`.� '�. �' " ' _ L�� -,_ � �� r' fd-`''_ k 'I}c. � ! J t 1 x - -' `�: -��1 r'� � ._ ''�'' + r '�y � f r-�4 �. �..�_ `�` � -�� r �~ ^ J r+�� "'�� t ,f �''�, _-. � � �:, j -�`'� `,_,. . .�-�-� �� .�.• �`�`"'y r`'-1 �' Jv� f 1,'` �;�. { ti=,. � _-� , �` � � "'� � �� ., �L.� .F�'''-.��^T � �� ti'"�r��.� ��-'-ti' ` ( t � ?,�.-.._ �._ 4� ti � �, �. .'rl "`�--�_y:`� � _ _�r.- ,`k�-n �'.,� l. ��,,_'•�"'�-t. f -- - }�� `_� `` -��rr =? ._--•j 'ti _ ,S� /' -� ''. . ti- ` ti ` r � � � - I` ��.�t�r� S � � �- � �]lr. /� �'__ ` -•,_`'�� ~ r ti 1 :=�:•'�lI1� ^-� a'� I �, r ,�v+ -•"�r� � �.�- J �r�._` ��' �tiy ti` �_', ( z-..I r��-.��.�1-tr r __ _—�•1 r �`t l�I'�!{ �-i+J -`elb. �� ti �� l `' '' � ' - 1 �'`-- "y._ �y �.� ^.�,J�� I i ��.,��'"� � �' �J� ��'- .. ��,�� _. ,.�M1 �� tX-. I� L �,` �J �>'''`�� '� ��,,I•��_'}Lti ' r "� ` �, ~�� ___. _ ,�- , . � '�r � .."' ` '�. 4 4`• � +� `t'�. - '` �� '�"�~�r, � -_ '� 1 F >�� .� .� .� ,. _ �`�'' i•— �` �� `�� -- 4'. \ � � � ''' `� • �" / �`� � � -- � �-� �4 � ', 1 `� ' j�i '".`y� � ��r � /�� .i•J`Y'��' •9� ��Aw 4 �1�4�1/� , L f r. I� �, 4 ,t � r� �� ' �. �'� �r � �ti.�. '•1 t 'S.�l.� A �-`y i� , � . , � � � � I ��'� �+ � y� t. ,,�t '—'--��.�� —'t ,� r s'"�� ` �. _ .� � �p Y .�+a ��r�� - �'� J� (�""-., 'y �y/,� � ��.1:. .� y y �j L - � 1 ti..tii J .�� — I-�y 'yt ."'1 �... � - ., ��•'•..� 5' � ��krl��l� �I ' � i� ��.-a..-A�.� _ ..�4 .... .r�•��-��S.-ar r' � ~� � _ r-,�1 '� ,`ti ��` f�f �'+ • I ~i_ � _ ,� .�-•, ,'��- ��--�i'j, — _ 4-� �� '� '".` � - Jf'' f i i _:�. - '�.�lr�''. ��-i.7r1. 4 �_ �� (f _�'� � �"'r+fi f I � � � r .` � �r�� '., � ,--, i ' � '1 '4 `;�J � ,-r-•_ I - --'� �r"—rr. ' j % 4 -', '��' •f � �e ' `'r _, r�� r`��} ti�_��~"�.' �` 'i �� I � {! �y~r_t' __ _ _d �`' �:'� ,.� .,�s� �,�' ��1ti`« r'r��' � . � � �,'ii �,�1 .il� i�'r�"r' `��t�'i-�_ #� .�, ,�_ "'''�. '� .'r-� �'�./ ��'�ti ',��. r y �� ;. :�u � r �..�� — -'"� --- � � � � } � f'_1-�:� _�'��`',, �,��-�,� � ~``�t�,;� _ __�• _ . ��.y•, � �'" -� f I'� - T-`'ti'�J'�{ -�^�,;,_ � : f: �ti-�� ., ;,��- ,1i_ �'� r tti�� 1 i � ,��--�,,�t_ _�ti t "'`==�. _ ,�•,�' � I _ - � ��1,', � J� ' : f�' �5 _��'� .t'_. —�1 ti'.� � .�` �: -'',�- 's,.�\� Y `7 '� f_`" ''`�-1 `''� , �:ti'�,� `l�``_ �.f}� - ''��'�� - -•':;'- ti-� y - ��._y,� ."�. ."•-. �,tl `' �e�'-. �-:� �' �,,.•' _ ..,r'.?'. '•l`al+� •yl � +'`, �. 't�''y'�� ` - �, � Y •_ _ ' �r'�.^ . :;�1;'':;; � 1 �' i� t ff \ '�} 1 -.� • ' •y u�ii - ~�_`�1' _ '��.:;,._�._`4'y: �'� � r ] '. '- �� I • •'�� . : -�' - � � �. _ _ :� f� .. -_„� ��:L'�',�.'.�"� ~� �1 1:. _ ,,rf' I�t',�+.i4:��.t,;_ _ -,� , � -� ;�. _ �, „ ��= ---� � .�� — _�,;. � � ,;�:�_::::s.:..... ,:. �- ,�' � � . �.'� 1r /F �� 1 ��' �T-, d t __ e +�1• '•,.•th -I.��',�_�� ,; r �r t �r !` . y� - :.�.:. ��- _ =�� .�� '- \'ti``1�, `� _ � � ;I ~��y} ,�' _~+�"�'_;�_� i_�,r�' `ti �'• '�i �•=-� � � a1 � :�f�{5�;;�,;:��'�': � � ��r 1 l�R ".,J' �� 1 � 1. �{r J � � I �� .,' ' _,'�' '`_rY f,.I• � �`�ti*R�.�.__.% �`� �, b'•ti L I�,,_ _ I ,i�. ti. ,,:'.- ; i`f,,i J. i�� .,'_.�� r ;� � s t� _ . s,;� ,.i�, e r' , • � . -r = ti �` :-:�`��;�,''_�:i�i `: +/ F S}� —�� __ 'C'�i ��`�`_� ` �� I {.�- ' 'i'ti,� -_ �� '�;y�.i r'.y,'.,�.-,'. `-�,�� - -. � -tti� �� I ,Y,c':;ir•-. _ -r� `�� ',l I �•1�1 �f •r� •'� -�` �,.� � ''� • - _ _ - i . �1;�.',L": `�' *;' '��I��fi��., ' r �4� .�Y�L ril � ..,,�t �r+ - �=-�':_�' r ilt, _ • _ ��'�+ `;k � r�ti,. !r '�r �'t� f ,+ �;�' .�` �t ti �,+- '� PartofSec. 36 Map of Site Figure 1 T118N, R23W. N Overlaid on USGS Topographic Map µ. .. L QApproximate Parcel Boundary C �y 2011-024 ;�:;��,SVQBC�DA o soo �,000 z,000 25 Myrtlewood Rd. .� • Ecvlo�'jCd� R[_'SOUf-CCS Feet Orono, MN ..�+� �.� � � ., «� ; ��t � � ,<r ��"`,� ;"`'`. ° .� ' • ,�, �• °' " -. r ��:�� . � �� - _ « * - , - . . ,s ` �, � � �� < ` � fi - 9 i � � � . v , . f , f �. ^�,.., . :. y , ; A _ . _ a. w .- t � t Y^� � . ' ... _ � . � .�, � `�. t �i� . . ,� x w �� - . ' .. �:� ��, , .. - �, ""� . � » a�, � ^ p a s . » �� ,r["�e m ,�_.. �° f[� �' �`� � � � �.; � �� :, .. - . �� °„ .�� v, �, . '�' ��`,� � t - �_ . �, � � - . . . d ,�� „ � � � �'�� +�, *� a , ,,�� ,,,,r�',�y,,� `=`: ' � • -. . "�.�� r..'��' �w+ �`r �� ,�� '`- : .-,�, � ,,� ..' , � s�; w »c � �, Y�; :�✓� �✓. �,'+� . - `� � �y�",�1�` �!�� . ,� �,�" " - . + . '� � ti� � 5 � � � � � � � '�. �� D �� t * ¢ µ�� + �,�` +�l� '"'" � = �. _�` m,, � s•,�'�b * �"'"� '¥ � #'! �`"a�` �'�s+ „�, � ��,� �� #�£� � ��'' y�^ ' �^'�k q �► ' *�'x - . . �., P "A� #� �a ��'" . C ,�§ p �� y"�`q,# � � , � �� D �r� �� =i ��. ;y ` P,. m "� > .i'� Y�.�, ^r� ..,� �,n� ��.° �S� � �' .�' :,,r�" ��,.at 8 �"�y� �°` . ��w, +$� . r �' �x! � a,�*# a . �.. � � ��. • � w; ,�"�d4� � . .�'�A� ..� ..��. `� �' i�'. .. 0�a�.r��L „�, "�� .. 2�i "4'$� �n;+$ �' ? � ,�3,� Y'S" ��. '.� ,. �- ,# � � r �, `� � � «. � . � : ,��`� W ' ` 3d•� aR :. . . � . p �- a �` '�^ � �I'�� .. ,.w�, �s�u � � �� .� '�'�f � �. �„ ,� �.' � ~� �*� alTlti\'I�J ��. z � ,, , y� yy � '4t � �, �' '�a L '�`� / s •=' -' �b `R# ' . .. tin . � ` r�, �k. •�y. sH i�Y .� '� `�'#�4. � + �* „ a , '4.. � ... 6 : II'��YZ��1.,//'�� n.... �:�y �� ' . 'K ,�. L�� ' � _ �� - , , , � � . � � .� � �""�p � � ��. _ � � r R . � ,� � , , �� ' � ,..��, � � r � � b �� ,� �.. �� ,� �:� � �.� � .e . � ,q. -� �a � _ ` - � �� , l k , _ - = - � � ,,, � � -�,/� � 3 , ��, �`: � - � : � a ��`- �� ' . . ,� e� <,.� • � � , ,, __�� x�:,� � �� i�" `��` '�, :�� s�. '�°•'� , '� ,� `'��A " �� a , -% � K�;�� ,�, �:�.�a .. ��m��,� . �'� �r.;� � .� . � ,.'�' � , . � '�� `� � ♦ � '"� • �y,�;` o � � � ,,, , < .. ,, ) � 1 � : �":� � > `ab :�x� Ji o ` . . .. +� ✓* , y - c x: „��w � . �C` "t' � . p r� � + ��' i �''yj$�#�r�. . .< . s.'� '�� . < 4 y s ' .;t� . ., � �,. : . - „_��, .. .. -. : . o. • .c . .� _. . .y� . �, - ,, �� „ � "� � � ��` ` � � °�� ,. � ��. �* ��' � ��.` 0 . ��.��; '� � ��3 4 � <�� '��^r� � k�,ns: �„ " ..°"�'tt; .;:-$^� �� .. --_.�• '.». �,a�, -rb��. w � , , k ' � � � � � ... , � - � k � t} '$�� '"x�i,.. � � r, ... s^t ��.."�' , �•'� p � . �94 `v` � f ['' t �6.t� 3 �,��y.i . . _ , . 4 �, �. �..- - A. �- ..y {,.. � . < < , _ `� -'�-. �� ., ' �` � ,k. �"� «�� s�,�� U'L3►'L" '� �.�! : �. . . � ' y . s� t �� „ , , � � a � � <. � � �`� � , , � � .�. ��. d , . „i�e� :, e� ..r. �� ..N' ,�' . � `,-,� .f� .3 ' � ~''�� '� ��: � �� *�� " � �. �,''c�� - .. :�� ?. . -��A . . f�... �p rqs, �� F�� {��„J D� �.� . �*.d ��y �y .`�* �<� � . t ' ^` ''� �, � ,� ♦Ar, ' p� � � , ,� : w, a '`s �, ��. � � . � a �. � �.:,; g � . �� .x ,, � � : f _._ ,� � - /'�y . � s� � '�� ,�� . �„'�z PartofSec. 36 National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 2 T118N, R23W. Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Photo " M' L �Approximate Parcel Boundary s +y 2011-024 ;►:;��SVUBQDA a 20o aoo aoo 25 Myrtlewood Rd. '��• Eco�obicaf R�suurces Feet Ofollo, MN ` ,�*. r � �'� �� ` � � � s�« �' � -.�� ' �J � .�"`�` � . ,�,� � � . . � , ,• • o � o � ��:- � -� . _� > � - _ : , � .' . . �= rt . x ;w(lv� o >," `€�$ � C" f "" � , ` i �' , �;- � , • . . < _ , n � �^ , a , � „ y , � , � - K a� . , ✓` N ' ,#.. ' ,. r , '. . 2'. � � „�,''�,r srr"'.. . v;� .... �;t�� . o o e � r �. •• y. ' �0 0 4 0 'Y Y �.`4��.Y"D 1 �,� ,a.1T r ..F.36" ' . . �a . w T ,+ 5 s z F'/ ,� '� � � sxr. . �,°'. V 0 ,� ` '.*"_. � � • � � •� "� �..' `�, r',,� � � ' . � ,� ,,r .. .. . - . ✓ , .',,✓��,A ' ,.� ` r�',� si`. /' "/`�rd �� . _ " �.° ,. , - g ... � /�" �o c ' c�� . a o c '. ' . ..<� '�' �,s �J�j'� �� {: , . „ � // �/�' Y � , .� �.. . ��g . �,�. ' y�( .� //�' . � � � �p o � � � � ,/I/` , . " s'F"..✓� .`'&+ti . -i�.- .r • a. �t , „�p. ,��_ " s��1 . l i . _ �. � � ' ..� _Jl _ 5 �� . r a.a. ; ",r - . � '� :i`.�K "`"� t..'�" .�`�'° . � G � o- o � o � o a-. a.y �.+ ,,� � � � . � , � �� `/ � �� #- � } . .� � * � c,. ,�r ,✓' `j�' _ `* ,�' , - , . `°N ,'�. b� - -, , �7 a � „�",: � . w. , p �, .✓''a _ �"`f � ` , f ` F � "r`��- ° i[ ,�^ _ ; � _•-�- . . ` '" � `s . �> , �!i' a, . "F"'� r �.' :<� 'x � '�+ � ` s rs, � �'¢ ,,�� .�.e"�/g ,� . . . . '..��. .. �..4,. w . . . � . . ' ! eq s f,f�,l �� _. . � a ��t�i+ ,� � g i^ . , n� � . '� s`� e��`.f�! ..., 'r . '<;` '�� ; b, ,." r �� 91w� � x.� �. 0 Y U . V '0 4 G � 0 ' p . �, . , � - �W � , �� -` •� _�`. �(v�}}� �T�� y � � ��* � � � ;:�� °�21`�yu� d � '` " �'' . �� , � _ - .- .^�� ,,. . � r � � � ,� - ' � � ;� � __. � � � � � �� _� �4 � r � a . � ,,s ," : . ��` � .., � , .�*� ' �� ^�,. �� :, �„. . ; �^ � , � � -��' . .��,_� fn'� o �� ,��r ,�' _ _ v � , . • � �� • o , � . , - �;= m '�',�'t,',� `�,. � �,� t� �� ` �� x - r `�» �` :f ' �� .� ff�, w , . / , ; , 3 _ < � �-`t �g �� .i�' --� �`;., "�+` � ",' � � �� ''7� , � - �` • . , •.� , �r � -., _ '� � �o , ^ o , a � ,� �"v�€, � . �•� —. Y. � �, .. - �� ,:� " �,� � *" 1\ '�4 � b'� � � � � � .i .•. � � ''.' �� ' � Q D % '� y r Y ^ a . . .� .. .� . ,�. � « . _ � / � (� r �s � . .� "C �. 0 C � �C`�S�`. 0 B f ' C } ��. � .�. ��' � r� � �� . .t. � . . -� �'� � � . ' �a �^ s:, `i' s 'h . . , ' , .� + .� e - f �� : +<� �+O ° � 5�''*.r,,, '„ ��fi r , ..fd�,"� A' � �,;� � #�y �- � ' �'� � ,��rt yt'�ry � � ,� - " � : � � � �t ,s^ . �_ < + , , �� '`-�' �. � � �.. ��, �,� � !', � _.�. .�ia ,� �.._ . ;__ �� ', �'„ � . �� `� � ,+,� � � ' ` ' � ""' �� ' � � �» , � ^. , _ . , . `" *. • � >� � . , a .�. � ' � y� �d�w � � , t:.. �a'� ,s= ' a, a- � �t �.«d= ... ,+��-^-T��' yy * . F► w+ -M►� ` � �� <Y+; ��`` � � * � �� , S , ,^� •��' � - .,", ,w: co �.w �.�a� a o "��. ' '�'�o' o.- � �. �. o a ' _. , • �'� axw R ` ` � u., .�� -� _ a �" . � A µ _ , � . � �r o � � F,� a �. � � � t , . s" . � . . . . , � ; :�. - � , , - - , dy. i " a ` � +�. � t � � � � �^' :� �'� �, �,�'� � °� ��.� ��# �f�,.. ,��. . ,�� . .< �r a.:.. .. . wf,'� lWI;�F,^. t��'� `'u " � ; .r,4� �bR�3�. . ` �. ' a ��. �o o ' r,,:� - u a � o �� 'o o� o o'o ..• u �� `s. : , , �� , � �,� �< x . ... . �� ,. � a - - : � nr...ey,e„ �,� �� - o. � � fu u5 �. n��r1�� ,�}} In7�/�U11.5 � '-�Li..CJ,S�"�' 'S.W�1'J' Y � . t}" '"f' ��.. �a 2 .y: ,.T y �-- o . :X�. � u e � a� ,�� o a �.��-' '°q ,�•^'}' - � ,y�`� `-�� ^ uv � ` � � .'; � -� . ��'� � YJ 'st . '�,F�`. �Y`'� ' 1`�"" ♦ _. r ° a� .i .� .�.' x . � y . � �� . � � .. �, .:> „ � , - „.��. . y .�� _ � „ ;� ' ' � � ' p� �p � � `�' � .� ,1 f ��/ � l.u u� - �' fy`�tLL11�Y7iTa� a o , W n� . . , � _., j ., , � � ,.�.��!}�.� - +„ , , , y � � � , � , , , � � '�f ' �' �'°lflRR)711JU5 i �'' ,. ��t., g �'z+. ♦.- � /� - f ' . *t. � * ..�. �:. d : � .g� � ��. � < e; s t *b;i � �, , �� ,r � ' j� � � � � � �: , �3 w . � . c �a� § , M �y � y �, ^�_ u �'. PartofSec. 36 Hennepin County Soil Survey Figure 3 T118N, R23W. Q Approximate Parcel Boundary Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Photo � � Hydric H I; � Non-Hydric �� 2011-024 .k...�*S`J(��(�pA o zoo aoo aoo 25 Myrtlewood Rd. > Ec�lobica( Resources Feet O�Ono, MN �� d� ��",.;,�,��% .w ��"„✓� '��`" �+Q��,: � r*�'�`§'v �� a �,.�, * �' "f�, - �,s a '' ' �, ��,t-�#�, } ,r�, s �° .+1k� . � ��. . s• �� ' '"�� ` �,��lF.,�n'� � . ' ��t�;�"'"�,�* 'F.'� °� a' � .. �r � � � . � � � . +t +'*N' �� `' � . . ` � ""� ° ��,�, _'� ��s." . �. � . ro a�; r�- � . �� , �. ', ' 1 �.� � . « � `� �,r►�' �° `,� � t'�`�:�� `�!� � �^ � � P�r � . � " � �, �� :� � �� ' � � �� ',�, � .� ��- � '�'� ' � ..i� �y� x � +t �n;��i ,{t,�l f.: Fr��°i'�i�,'ic� .� - � " � � } . > , .,��f�`�"' �,'` ,�,A„�� _� "l�'��'`�` � �'��`.'��1� ti ti' - 4 i a t + h�. t � - 'e�„ �. _ '*�,ay€.�'� + � r' .ti �.r .?� _ . . �: , A� �_"� � `�t!� 5:� . . � ��'- y� a � �� y ��y L � �; . � .. � �� WWU��IUl��lR°.�d7� V��7 � '��i � .� � g s� �.°�.� �� ' 4 � _ � ��a` ,tf�,..�� . � D �'a � � � > y, � . . 3 .-..� . . - ; ,-x .. ,�,,t� � .r'• ' - �� : . �� t ., 4 „ _ , •._ . � �` �,��. , ' , . �. ' � < , �' » � � � � _ _; �. _ ,�a „� ' �� ° ,� „` � � � � �� . , ,, . , � .��. �� .�� g "` +L � �� , �'�� "� .. � � . = o- � ,� . � � , .,. -.� � . ,a� � . � , �� , : �i ' .�'�''` ��. �� ; � � ,� �.��. � _� r. F � � � . ' .� �' �, �=;�,y.`. � �� ,� �,�� . , a ,a a „ . . _ �` ,. M,;a� � � � � ;,�" � �" � �� , '� *�fi �`'' � � `°" s ��, '� �" ,,. � � �x �, �e °»x✓ . `�" '�� - � ,,�,� ��, i.;�`�► !' �,�,� � q�,,� "' � � ` �. ' .�'„� „"� �=� � .�^• � .� ;�,� �� t t ,,,t,.; � � . `��`` . , . `'�,' fa. �+< .`�+ � ..� }k`�s _ . • r � �� '�'` � �� , � . v � , ?�'�7��I}}•� � � � - o , , �. ., _� � �� . �. .; ., � �,� � J-a ��J C�� . �`� � � _ � � , ., � �� ` � { � , z � �,r�: . ,�� -` - '�" ,� " >� ��--� .�;` i��` �„ �; ,, � �; ,�r. •e��' �� ~ _�'� r � �. X'�.�...� � '�� .��t � � � ,� � � � �� -+�� _ _ a:�"" , � � ' �� - � w, � ..+ . g , � „� � � :� f -�._ �'r'� �° �' a . �`�� ""��/' '" -' � � � 3 _, ^4.^,� �� -w�� +�� . , �' „ , _ T a` . ��' _P-" .s-� "" # 5� "'� � .� � � . . ' -.w�,� N'� �. �q� "� �. � i � . �9 .°q`�i, a. � �". P ..,. .� � �� :�. t" ,r'�� .: �p� � � �.'.; � '_ , ' g �� " . Q �� ' �' - . _ �� + � « , , fi � . �� , .yy� .. � �S .v��" . � ,.. ' y.�e^ ' .. ;h ��''�'�T�i - . . . W < ".ns r.::`a '� ` , a,..-3 6� �� 'i'A � �� '� � ��t� . .e � , ; . � i �,�^ _N5.'" s�`�, ' �:' A ��/:. �d...�'�,� � x n. 4, � � '�� . ." ' '' �{ � �'�Y� H�� - ' '�� . dt`€ � ��p` ,��" ��i��, � � e .�► �� •� . � ' ,� �� ',� wva � �i�p ' � � �� . ,��. .r . . �� «.. �" -. . x f . -d ,� ^pg�.;�$..°v' . F t 4 aT� /�.. S �y`�'F�� 3 .. �� " P . � ♦� V. _ . x „ ., *�:; (� . �". a� ; _ $r°. � P m'M � r 1 �� .',ycL«tt . � � �_ k Ii � (R ) �L � �' A. � .,,�y . o-t. '2 . .� � . ^ 64 yy�i� 1 � ♦ 4�� ," ,.:. . �, x`:�- � _. ,-�.. . � � g y�., � . � `�' %s�, � .. �j � S�."�� '", � A � � � � S :�µ � +�i �� .'z� t��'M1x 6 � . . � � � �� 4 � � s� 9. r� �1 ,f��" �',a. �..s .. i " � ��M1� ,� .�` , �. ., , I I' I�i,�i, 'li,,r �I � 4 x .` •• s +��°. "I , � � , ^ d A ��.n � q..� �� 4 �� . }�� °� �I , i I . � �s , � � . � � $ y � µ � , c � �a, , „a�`k„. x j r « : 1 .a� ` � y ��r , � `��+ 'Ea� p' q . �� . . y X� " ' � '.., a�._. � ��_-4� � � ��,�R',� ' � � . $�4 �: ��£ � �� 1I I�I� '�"'1��'I �.:. . a � � � � y '� � � "r,�; ., ,Y. � � i� r � - . - , �:�� , � a , + � �. .-�,� � � x PartofSec. 36 Public Waters Inventory Map Figure 4 T118N, R23W. Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Photo ti L � Approximate Parcel Boundary � {� 2011-024 .k.�*�,f(��(�pA o zoo aoo soo 25 Myrtlewood Rd. � Ecolc,�bica[ Rcsourc�°s Feet OfOno, MN q , ., ,, . � �� -� � � .� , � , - � � � .� ` > � _ °,�.� ` � � �� ` � - .. '�` ��"�� . � ��'`�� ';,. , � � .�� _ �; �; � �. u �„ � � �* "` � �= s��-- �� `� � _ M �� '�f��.y�� ; > �°�� " mu � � V� y, >.��;�� s , . �' + � � , �� . >� � '��i " • ,,� � � ��,' _ �� , , � `_ �"� � � ��,t` ' � `� � � �� ` -��` � � �. �„�:� f •� - � �� ' � �r� � ~�.. ��'� �.�'"' �� s , � , • � � � �� • � � �, m .� � a ,- � '� . " � .> � ;,,, � '�� . r �_� � �—� :�� *'�� ° � � - � � "� ��`" � �. � _ . � �t �.�. ; `!� *�"` �„ � � a d � � , �� . # � , , . . � � �" � ��. � `�� ` �r .� . � -� . _ , . �. � � �-�� . �., :� ,� � k� � =., � �, ,� , -� _ , . , � , #� � ,. �% � . t� � � � �� , , , � ,�� . �� >>9 �� ' � �- � � �� . � ��..;N > . ��.' . ''. . � .': ° - "r' .. ..�� .s, _:.- y�� . � .. � � �� ;� _ � Gt�a s� � � • .. �� rw �, � . . .. a . Y� � �� ., � , � � , �� '�- ld � - �� _� , n _ v t�t� � ,� � � ' � � _ P , : - ",�'� ,� �;. ,� 4' -�: � �� °'� � � � �� _ � �� . y� . � , r.r�� 0 .��; � ;e . . � � ` � � x- , �, .� . � . ,4 . � : . � , � . ,�. - � �� . ,, > �,` . it ; .�`�°"� x�s _ ..y a �F �. x:.� # �� ... .«. cY� ' �� '` ,� ',." . � � .- z . , . �, . [,. � lrk� . �� •:� �.�-a,� a �� { �k�� _ .: ,�.,' +r, s . . . � . . � � "� �.� � � ��..t � �Y`.y��,..�. � �'" ,�`�,`°�� .. �-�� -� �..� � � . .. w . . � . . 6 1 : �/ y. � e ��.. � ��xZ � . � As^ i . � �y� �$ @� � � . } .� ,�. M ♦� �wa , ,< r `� '��# .Q a �� " w `� � . � x .,. '�`F. �� "� � � � �' � . .. . � _ � . #e � . � � ,�tl` �. '�. � ,� �,d �.s„ � � �.� - ,�` ,. . �� : +�`, � � , „ " �� :�� r . � t. ' : � t� a t 1 e �� ,„• � � � _�� n k& � e a* , '�� ` ' �r _ 'uw" ��> q�, ._ � ��1� ��a i r „„ x - � n w.� „�° g a '�.',� � .� "� � �,.. �� a „ . -;� .�# t2 � � . . _ "`� a � � ��;t 4 . � , � ��'"�� ' �.,I�k �,P . , � �� . �� , � � � � � � � ..t�� ° � � � ,<'� - �: '� ` .- 1s � . � � �� ` �'�� # � m ' � `..� .i 'Y .� "'. " ' �� ' :� e a ' `� ' ,'��. �� _ g , �,� �� a � +� �� a �� ;�..�:.>.�`� � � � �g � p �°`�♦ � � " �+3 �, �� •�, , 2-.r , — � ��q M ..4, , . . .. 2 �� :i �5 � ��= . .N�. � �. � y� ,� �3� � � �� y�_ �` r.*� � _ ,�� ' i 'F, 'S � , „ . �� ,�, t � . - y � � :. � '�p� � � ��„< � �`§�� r � � � �,i �� '� �� =� �' �°�C` � .� s ',�,� �t � � . ,�s..k� � . Y a . ' ' �+�.... 1� ' �„ � � � � � �'�� '�� ' � �� ° �"�� . ., � _ � � � � ,,. �U.�,� ,_- ��_ -.� .e.,, �F � �. PartofSec. 36 0 Wetland Boundary Map Figure 5 T118N, R23W. Approximate Parcel Boundary N Approximate Wetland Boundary Overlaid on 2010 Aerial Image � Sample Points N' � ` • Photo Point s �� 2011-024 _(..:��S�f(�B(Jp,� o so ioo 200 25 Myrtlewood Rd. � Ecv�c�bicaf Resourcc�s Feet Orono, MN THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Field Data Sheets � , WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite25 Myrtlewood Rd. City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-22-11 ApplicanUOwner: STEVEN J RYAN&ANNE E RYAN State: MN 3ampling Point: 1-1 WET Investigator(s): BKB �ection,Township, Range: Sec.36,T118N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9786 long: 93.5403 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameHoughton and Muskego soils,depressional JWI Classification: PEMF Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site rypical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlar Y Wetland hydrology present? Y yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute t Indicator Daninance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Quercus rubra 20 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (A/B) 25 =Total Cover Saaling/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 30 x 1 = 30 3 FACW species 40 x 2= 80 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 100 (A) 220 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 35 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.20 2 Typha angustifolia 30 Y OBL 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% g X Prevalence index is<_3.0' � Morphogical adaptations'(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 65 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) •Indicators of hydric sal and wetland hydrdogy must be � present,unless disturbed w problematic 2 y rop ic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region , . SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type` Loc** Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 99 10YR 3/3 1 C PUM Silt Loam 4-16 N 2.5/0 95 10YR 3/4 5 C PUM Silt Loam 16-21 PeaUFibric Strong Sulfidic odor *Type:C=ConcenUation,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. '*Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark SurFace(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): emar s: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that a�alvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High WaterTable(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Pattems(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Suffide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils �Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) �FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsey Vegetated Concave Surface(BS) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stai�d Leaves(B9) Other(E�lain in Rema�lcs) e servations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No —�Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region t � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite25 Myrtlewood Rd. City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-22-11 Applicant/Owner. STEVEN J RYAN&ANNE E RYAN State: MN 3ampling Point: 1-1 UP Investigator(s): BKB >ection,Township,Range: Sec.36,T118N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): slight hilltop Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 2 Lat: 44.9786 Long: 93.5403 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name Houghton and Muskego soils,depressional �WI Classi�cation: PEMF Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlar N Wetland hydrology present? N yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute t Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 QuerCus rubra 20 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 75.00% (A16) 20 =Total Cover Sa�lina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 15 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 7 x 2= 14 4 FAC species 40 x 3= 120 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 15 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 67 (A) 214 (B) 1 Allia�a petiolata 15 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.19 2 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC 3 Solidago gigantea 5 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Arisaema triphyllum 2 N FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% g Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 32 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Ptot size: 30 ft radius ) •Indicators of hydric sal and wetland hydrdogy must be � present,unless disturbed w problematic 2 y rop ic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type" Loc"* Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 3/1 Loam 14-16 10YR 3/1 99 10YR 3/4 1 C M Clay Loam 16-22 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Clay *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. "Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark SurFace(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): ema s: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aaalvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Pattems(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(E�lain in Remarks) ie servations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No —3Z—Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No — C�Depth(inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION P1antIndicator Status INDICATOR CATEGORIES* Obligate Wetland (OBL)—Occur almost always (estimated probability>99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACV�—Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probabiliry 67%-99%), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. Facultative(FAC)—Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probabiliry 34%-66%). Facultative Upland(FACLn—Usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67%- 99%),but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probabiliry I%-33%). Obligate Upland (UPL)—Occur in wetlands in another region,but occur almost always (estimated probabiliry>99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands in the region specified. If a species does not occur in wetlands in any region, it is not on the National List. *Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg,Florida. THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Soil Series Descriptions Acquired from Natural Resource Conservation Service Website,Official Soil Series Descriptions t � HOUGHTON SERIES The Houghton series consists of very deep,very poorly drained soils formed in herbaceous organic deposits more than 51 inches thick in depressions on lake plains, outwash plains, ground and end moraines and on floodplains. These soils have moderately slow to moderately rapid permeability. Slope ranges from 0 to 2 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 35 inches, and mean annual temperature is about 50 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Euic,mesic Typic Haplosaprists TYPICAL PEDON: Houghton muck- on a level area in a cultivated field. (Colors are for moist soils unless otherwise stated.) Oal--O to 9 inches;black(N 2.5/0)broken face and rubbed muck(sapric material); about 5 percent fiber, a trace rubbed;weak coarse subangular blocky structure; neutral (pH 7.0 in KCl); abrupt smooth boundary. Oa2--9 to 13 inches;black(N 2.5/0)broken face,very dark brown(7.SYR 2/2)rubbed muck(sapric material); about 5 percent fiber, a trace rubbed; weak medium granular structure;neutral(pH 7.0 in KCl); abrupt smooth boundary. Oa3--13 to 24 inches; dark reddish brown(SYR 3/2)broken face, dark reddish brown (SYR 2/2)rubbed muck(sapric material); about 15 percent fiber, less than 5 percent rubbed; massive,breaking to thick platy fragments; neutral(pH 7.0 KCl); abrupt smooth boundary. Oa4--24 to 32 inches;black(SYR 2/1)broken face and rubbed muck(sapric material); about 10 percent fiber, a trace rubbed; massive; about 1 percent woody fragments;neutral (pH 7.0 in KCl); clear wavy boundary. Oa5--32 to 48 inches; dark reddish brown(SYR 2/2)broken face,black(SYR 2/1) rubbed muck(Sapric material); about 20 percent fiber, less than 10 percent rubbed; massive,breaking to thick platy fragments; neutral(pH 7.0 in KCl); abrupt smooth boundary. Oa6--48 to 80 inches; dark reddish brown(SYR 2/2)broken face and rubbed muck (sapric material); about 10 percent fiber, less than 10 percent rubbed; massive; slightly sticky; about 15 percent mineral soil;neutral(pH 7.0 in KCl). TYPE LOCATION: Clinton County, Michigan; about 3 miles northeast of the village of Bath; 200 feet north and 400 feet east of the southwest corner of sec. 12, T. 5 N.,R. 1 W. USGS Bath topographic quadrangle, lat. 42 degrees 49 minutes 43.4 seconds N. and long. 84 degrees 52 minutes 56.9 seconds W.;NAD 27. RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The organic layers are more than 51 inches thick. The organic fibers are derived primarily from herbaceous plants,but some pedons contain individual layers which contain as much as 30 percent woody material,however, the woody fragment content averages less than 15 percent by volume in the control section. It is very strongly acid to slightly alkaline. The organic layers have hue of lOYR, 7.SYR, or SYR, value of 2 to 3, and chroma of 1 to 3, or is in 2.5/0. The layers are predominantly muck(sapric material), but in some pedons mucky peat(hemic material) has a combined thickness of less than 10 inches and peat (fibric material) less than 5 inches. Some pedons have coprogenous material or marly material below 51 inches COMPETING SERIES: These are the Carlisle, Lena, Peteetneet, Saltese, and Semiallmoo series. Similar soils are the Adrian, C�rbondale, Gi•eenwood, Linwood, Lu�tc�n, Palms, Rii1e, and Willette series. Carlisle soils derived dominantly from woody materials and contain an average of 15 to 30 percent woody fragments in the control section. Lena soils contain free carbonates throughout. Peteetneet soils are massive or platy in bottom tier, are on elevations of about 4,500 feet, and are substantially drier in the moisture control section during the 120 days following the summer solstice. Saltese and Semiahmoo soils are in areas with mild humid climates. Adrian, Linwood, Palms, and Willette soils have a mineral substrata depths ranging from 16 to about 50 inches. Carbondale, Greenwood, Lupton, and Rifle soils are frigid. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Houghton soils occupy closed depressions within lake plains, outwash plains, ground and end moraines, and on floodplains. Slope gradients are less than 2 percent. The mean annual precipitation ranges from about 30 to 42 inches, and the mean annual temperature is about 48 to 53 degrees F. GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Adrian, Edselton(T), Edwards, Moston(T), Muske�,�o, Palms, and Willette soils. Edselton(T) and Edwards soils are underlain by marly material at depths of 16 to 51 inches. Moston(T), and Muskego soils are underlain by coprogenous material between 16 and 51 inches. Poorly or very poorly drained mineral soils are commonly associated along the margins of the bogs. DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained. Depth to the seasonal high water table ranges from 2 foot above the surface in ponded phases to 1 foot below the surface from September to June. The potential for surface runoff is very slow or ponded. Permeability is moderately slow to moderately rapid. USE AND VEGETATION: A considerable area of these soils is used for cropland or pasture. Common crops are onions, lettuce,potatoes, celery, radishes, carrots, mint, and some corn. Native vegetation was primarily of marsh grasses, sedges, reeds, buttonbrush, and cattails. Some water-tolerant trees were near the margin of the bog. DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: MLRA 95, 98, 110, 111. Southern part of the lower peninsula of Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, and Illinois. The series is of large extent. MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Indianapolis, Indiana SERIES ESTABLISHED: Roscommon County, Michigan, 1924. � r REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Well decomposed organic material from the surface to greater than 51 inches (Oal, Oa2,Oa3, Oa4, Oa5 and Oa6 horizons) histic epipedon-muck from the surface to 16 inches(Oal, Oa2, Oa3); aquic conditions- from the surface to 40 inches. ADDITIONAL DATA: Soil Interpretation Record- (MI0024, MI0291 (PONEED), MI0532 (SLOPING), MI0390(MAA'T>50), MI0383 (FREQUENTLY FLOODED). Transect data(T98-MI-003)is on file in MLRA project office, Plymouth, Indiana. Transect shows 100 percent Houghton. LESTER SERIES The Lester series consists of very deep,well drained soils that formed in calcareous loamy glacial till on till plains and moraines.These soils have moderate permeability.Their slopes range from 5 to 70 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 28 inches.Mean annual temperature is about 47 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine-loamy,mixed, superactive,mesic Mollic Hapludalfs TYPICAL PEDON: Lester loam with a convex slope of about 9 percent on a ground moraine in a cultivated field. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise noted.) Ap--O to 7 inches; very dark grayish brown(lOYR 3/2) loam, grayish brown(lOYR 5/2) dry; moderate fine subangular blocky structure; friable; many fine roots; about 3 percent gravel; slightly acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick) Btl--7 to 21 inches; brown(lOYR 4/3)clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm; many very fine roots; common very dark grayish brown(lOYR 3/2)clay films on faces of peds and few very dark gray(lOYR 3/1) organic coats on faces of peds; about 2 percent gravel; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary. Bt2--21 to 38 inches; dark yellowish brown(lOYR 4/4)clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable; common fine roots; common dark grayish brown (lOYR 4/2) clay films on faces of peds and few very dark brown(lOYR 2/2)organic coats on faces of peds; about 3 percent gravel; slightly acid; gradual smooth boundary. (Combined Bt horizon is 10 to 40 inches.) Bk1--38 to 50 inches; yellowish brown(lOYR 5/4) loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine roots; common very pale brown(lOYR 8/2)carbonate threads; about 2 percent gravel;violently effervescent; slightly alkaline; clear wavy boundary. Bk2--50 to 60 inches; yellowish brown(lOYR 5/4) loam; weak mediuxn subangular blocky structure; friable; common fine distinct yellowish brown(lOYR 5/6)relict Fe concentrations; common very pale brown(lOYR 8/2)carbonate threads; about 2 percent gravel; violently effervescent; slightly alkaline; clear wavy boundary. C--60 to 80 inches; yellowish brown(lOYR 5/4)loam; ; massive; friable; common medium distinct yellowish brown(lOYR 5/6)relict Fe concentrations and few fine distinct light brownish gray(lOYR 6/2)relict Fe depletions; about 1 percent gravel; strongly effervescent; slightly alkaline. TYPE LOCATION: Wright County, Minnesota; about 3 miles west of Otsego, 1460 feet south and 200 feet west of the northeast corner of Sec. 15, T.121 N., R.24 W.; USGS Big Lake quadrangle; lat. 45 degrees 17 minutes 29 seconds N.; long. 93 degrees 41 minutes 3 seconds W.,NAD27 RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depth to free carbonates ranges from 20 to 54 inches. Rock fragments of mixed lithology comprise 1 to 8 percent of the volume of the control section. The A or Ap horizons have hue of l OYR, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 1 or 2. The E horizon where present, has value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1 to 3. The A and E horizons are loam or clay loam,but sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or silt loam is within the range. They range from moderately acid to neutral. The Bt horizon has hue of lOYR or 2.SY, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 3 or 4. It is clay loam or loam and has 24 to 35 percent clay and 30 to 45 percent sand. The B/A clay ratios range from 1.2 to 1.4. It is strongly acid to slightly acid in the upper part and moderately acid to neutral in the lower part. A Bw horizon is sometimes present below the Bt. The Bk horizon has hue of lOYR or 2.SYR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 3 to 6. The Bk horizon is loam or clay loam. It is slightly alkaline or moderately alkaline. Relict redoximorphic features are present in some pedons. The C horizon has hue of 2.SY or lOYR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to 6. It is loam or clay loam. It is slightly alkaline or moderately alkaline. Relict redoximorphic features are present in some pedons. COMPETING SERIES: These are the A�, Ar�vle, Baltimore, Bassett, Bloo�nin<,�, Caleb, Dowagiac, Duribrid�e, Gara, Koronis, Lauramie, Longlois, Lvdick, Moha��vk, Neda,Newcomer, Oneco, Orwood, Racine, Razort, Sebbo, Taopi, Waucoma, and Winneshiek soils in the same family. Angus and Sebbo soil have saturation in the lower third of the series control section. Argyle, Baltimore, and Oneco soils have B horizons with 7.SYR or redder hue. Bassett soils are very strongly acid to moderately acid in the upper part of the Bt horizon. Blooming and Racine soils have 15 to 35 percent sand in the upper part of the particle-size control section. Caleb soils have some subhorizons that have more than 45 percent in the lower part of the control section. Dowagiac and Koronis soils have less than 24 percent clay in the lower one third of the particle-size control section. Dunbridge, Waucoma,Newcomer and Winneshiek soils have sola terminated by bedrock at depths above 60 inches. Gara soils average less than 2 percent rock fragments in the control section. Longlois, Lydic, and Neda soils have more than 8 percent rock fragments in some subhorizon of the control section. Lauramie soils have more than 45 percent sand in some subhorizon in the middle part of the control section. Mohawk soils have a higher content of silt and have dark colors in the B horizon which apparently are inherited from dark shale. Orwood soils have no rock fragments in the particle-size control section. Razort soils have less than 30 percent sand in the control section. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: These soils have convex slopes on moraines and till plains. Slope gradients range from 5 to 70 percent. They formed in calcareous, loamy glacial till of late Wisconsinan Age. Mean annual temperature ranges from 45 degrees to 52 degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 25 to 33 inches. Frost free days range from 125 to 165. Elevations range from 700 to 1600 feet. GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These include the Cordova, Dundas, Glencoe, Ham�l, Hou��hton, Klossnel-, Le Sueur, Muske�o, and Nessel soils. Poorly drained Cordova and somewhat poorly and poorly drained Dundas soils are on flats and upper drainageways with a high seasonal water table. Very poorly drained Glencoe, , . . Houghton, Klossner, and Muskego soils are mostly in depressions. Poorly drained Hamel soils are on foot and toe slopes. Moderately well drained Le Sueur and Nessel soils are on slightly elevated flats and gently convex slopes. DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained. Permeability is moderate. Runoff is medium to high. USE AND VEGETATION: Mostly cropped to corn and soybeans. Some is in pasture and forest.Native vegetation is savanna. DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: South-central and east-central Minnesota and northeastern Iowa. Extensive. MI.RA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota SERIES ESTABLISHED: Dakota County, Minnesota, 1945. REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and featured recognized in this pedon are: mollic subgroup-the zone from the surface to 7 inches(Ap horizon); argillic horizon-the zone from 7 to 38 inches(Bt horizons). Type location moved from Waseca County, Mn. to Wright County, Mn., 11/96 to better exemplify the series concept within the MLRA. Slopes of 1 to 5 percent that were previously correlated as Lester may be included with the Angus series in the future. f `y � MUSKEGO SERIES The Muskego series consists of very deep,very poorly drained soils formed in herbaceous organic material over coprogenous limnic material(sedimentary peat)on glacial lake plains and flood plains.These soils have moderate or moderately rapid permeability in the herbaceous organic material and slow permeability in the coprogenous material.Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent.Mean annual precipitation is about 30 inches near the typical pedon site.Mean annual temperature is about 49 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Coprogenous, euic,mesic Limnic Haplosaprists TYPICAL PEDON: Muskego muck-on a slope of less than 1 percent in a cultivated field at an elevation of about 815 feet. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.) Oap--O to 9 inches; black(lOYR 2/1)broken face and rubbed muck(sapric material); about 25 percent fiber, 4 percent rubbed; moderate very thick platy structure parting to moderate fine subangulaz blocky; friable; many fine roots;mostly herbaceous fiber; neutral; abrupt smooth boundary. Oal--9 to 14 inches;black(lOYR 2/1)broken face muck(sapric material); about 30 percent fiber, 5 percent rubbed; moderate very thick platy structure parting to moderate fine subangular blocky; friable; many fine roots; mostly herbaceous fiber; neutral; abrupt smooth boundary. Oa2--14 to 30 inches; dark brown(7.SYR 3/2)broken face muck(sapric material)with few thin(less than 1 inch) layers of mucky peat(hemic material); about 50 percent fiber, 7 percent rubbed; weak thin platy structure; few fine roots; slightly acid; gradual smooth boundary. Lcol--30 to 48 inches; dark olive gray(SY 3/2) coprogenous material with fine thin(less than 1 inch)lenses of yellowish brown(l 0YR 5/6)mucky peat(hemic material); weak very thin platy structure; slightly plastic; neutral; diffuse smooth boundary. Lco2--48 to 60 inches; very dark grayish brown(2.SY 3/2) coprogenous material; massive; slightly plastic; slightly alkaline. TYPE LOCATION: Ozaukee County, Wisconsin; about 1 mile east and 2 1/2 miles south of Fredonia; 2,500 feet north and 500 feet west of the southeast corner of sec. 11, T. 11 N., R. 21 E. or 350 feet north and 375 feet west of end of farmstead driveway; USGS Fort Washington topographic quadrangle; latitude-43 degrees, 25 minutes, 58 seconds N. and longitude- 37 degrees, 56 minutes, 34 seconds W.NAD 27. RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Thickness of the herbaceous organic layers and depth to coprogenous material(sedimentary peat)ranges from 16 to 51 inches. Fibers are derived primarily from herbaceous plants. Some pedons contain fragments of twigs, branches, or logs that range from 1/8 to 5 inches in diameter and amount to less than 15 percent of the volume. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to neutral (water, 1:1) in the surface rier and from strongly acid to slightly alkaline(water, 1:1)in the subsurface and bottom tiers. Silty clay loam overwash, clay loam substratum, marshy(ponded), and flooded phases are recognized in some places. The surface tier has hue of lOYR, 7.SYR, or neutral, value of 2 or 3 and chroma of 0 to 2. The herbaceous organic part of the subsurface and bottom tiers has hue of SYR, 7.SYR or lOYR or is neutral in hue. Value is 2 or 3 and chroma is 0 to 4. It is dominantly muck (sapric material), but some pedons have layers of mucky peat(hemic material)up to 10 inches thick. The Lco horizon has hue of lOYR, 2.SY, SY, or SGY, value of 2 to 5 and chroma of 1 to 3. It is coprogenous material. Reaction ranges from neutral to moderately alkaline and carbonates are present in some pedons. The Lco horizon has slightly plastic consistence and shrinks upon drying to form hard clods that are difficult to re-wet. COMPETING SERIES: These are the Moston and Toto series. Moston soils have sand below the limnic layer within the 51 inche control section. Toto soils have marl and sand below the limnic layer within the 51 inch control section. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: The Muskego soils commonly are in depressional areas principally associated with glacial lake plains and flood plains, but other geographical locations are not excluded. Slope ranges from 0 to 2 percent. These soils formed in herbaceous organic material dominantly from grasses, sedges, and reeds over coprogenous limnic material (sedimentary peat). Mean annual temperature ranges from 46 to 52 degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 25 to 40 inches. The frost free period ranges from about 130 to 180 days. Elevation ranges from 679 to 1400 feet. GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Hour7hton and Klossner series. Houghton soils are in nearby areas where the organic deposits are more than 51 inches thick and coprogenous material is not in the lower part of the control section. Klossner soils are in areas where the coprogenous material is absent and the herbaceous organic material is underlain by loamy mineral material. DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained. The potential for surface runoff is low or negligible. Permeability is moderate or moderately rapid in the herbaceous sapric material and slow in the coprogenous material (sedimentary peat). Most Muskego soils have an apparent water table from 1 foot above the surface to 1 foot below the surface in most years for much of the period from November to August. Some Muskego soils have an apparent water table from 3 feet to 1 foot above the surface in most years for much of the period from January to December. USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas remain in natural vegetation and provide wildlife habitat.Natural vegetation is dominantly grasses, reeds, and sedges with scattered hardwoods. A few areas have been drained and are used cropland. DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Southern Wisconsin and southern Minnesota and in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Ohio. MLRA 95B, 98, 102A, 103, 104, 105, 108, 110, 111, 114, and 144A. The Muskego soils are of moderate extent. MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Indianapolis, Indiana � �' 4 SERIES ESTABLISHED: Ozaukee County, Wisconsin, 1971. REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: sapric materials dominant in the subsurface tier; saturated with water for 6 months or more of the year;have a limnic layer(coprogenous material)greater than 5 cm thick within the control section. ADDITIONAL DATA: Soil Interpretation Records -WI0046; WI0335 (OVERWASH); WI0437(MARSITY); WI0462 (CLAY LOAM SUBST.); WI0520 (FLOODED). � ,� � THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Wetland Definition , _ , WETLAND DEFINITION According to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "Wetlands Delineation Manual" (1987 Manual; the document used by all delineators to define wetlands) a wetland is "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." The Minnesota State Wetland Conservation Act Rules, Chapter 8420, further clarifies that "...wetlands must: (1) have a predominance of hydric soils; (2) be inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions; and (3) under normal circumstances, support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation." The 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual in Part II, item 24. states that, "The interaction of hydrology, vegetation, and soil results in the development of characteristics unique to wetlands. Therefore, the following technical guidelines for wetlands are based on the three parameters, and diagnostic environmental characteristics used in applying the technical guideline are represented by various indicators of these parameters." It is this premise by which SER ecologists has, in their professional judgment, delineated the wetlands on the subject parcel described in this report. Wetland Hydrology The most important wetland criterion is hydrology. The presence and persistence of water influences the vegetation types and changes soil morphology. Hydrology may be observed as standing water(inundation), or may be observed as freestanding water within the soil pit or auger hole (saturation) usually within the upper 12 inches. This is what would be considered primary hydrology indicators. Only one primary indicator is necessary to make the determination that wetland hydrology indeed exists. The 1987 Corps Manual also has a range of hydrologic zones established based on period of inundation or saturation. These zones and the periods of inundation or saturation for each can be observed in Table 1 below. Exce ted from the 1987 Manual,H drolo ic Zones—Nontidal Areas Zone Name Duration Comments Wetland or Not I Permanently Inundated 100% Inundation>6.6 ft.mean Not(Aquatic Habitat Zone,or Deep Water water de th Habitat Semipermanently To Nearly �75_ Inundation defined as II Permanently Inundated Or <100% �6.6 feet mean water Wetland Saturated de th III Regularly Inundated Or �25-75% Wetland Saturated N Seasonally Inundated Or <12.5- Wetland Saturated 25% Many areas having these Irregularly Inundated or o Wetland(if hydrophytic veg.and hydric V Saturated �5-12.5/o hydrologic characteristics soils also present are not wetlands Intermittently Or Never o �'eas with these VI Inundated Or Saturated �5/o hydrologic characteristics Not are not wetlands A-1 Y '� k The definition of appropriate hydrology according to the 1987 Manual includes two important terms that must be clarified. First, the definition of a growing season is needed. The growing season is defined in the 1987 Manual as: "...the portion of the year when soil temperature (measured 19.7 inches below the surface) is above biological zero (5° C or 41° F)." According to the 1987 Manual this period of time can be approximated by using the "starting and ending dates for the growing season based on a 28° F air temperature threshold at a frequency of 5 years in 10." Based on this definition the growing season ranges approximately 160 days to 180 days in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area(160 in the northern suburbs and greater to the south). Therefore, the required inundation or saturation to the surface for 5% of the growing season would be 8 or 9 consecutive days that ground water would need to be at the surface or saturated to the surface. The second term in the appropriate hydrology definition from the above paragraph to be clarified is "in most years". This means in 5 of 10 years hydrology must exist within a "jurisdictional wetland"for the 8 or 9 consecutive days of the growing season. This means that one observation date or even one whole year worth of detailed hydrology data may be deemed insufficient to determine if appropriate hydrology exists at a given location. In the event that precipitation events accumulate to above or below normal during just prior to a site visit or during a more intensive hydrology study, the data may be confounded by non-normal circumstances and may be considered outside the bounds of "most years". Ideally, both antecedent soil moisture conditions and precipitation would be normal during all delineations. However, this is not a realistic impression of climate. Therefore, primary indicators of hydrology must be reviewed with scrutiny prior to determining if hydrology indeed exists. Wetland hydrology may be observed as standing water (inundation), or may be observed as freestanding water within a soil pit or auger hole (saturation) usually within the upper 12 inches. This is what would be considered primary hydrology indicators. Examination of this indicator requires digging a soil pit to a depth of 16 inches and observing the level at which water stands after sufficient time has been allowed for water to drain into the hole. The required time will vary depending on soil texture. This level represents the depth to the water table; the depth to saturated soils will always be nearer the surface due to the capillary fringe. According to the Hydrology criteria in the 1987 Delineation Manual, for soil saturation to impact vegetation, it must occur within a major portion of the root zone, typically within 12 inches of the surface. Only one primary indicator is necessary to make the determination that wetland hydrology is present. However, since a single observation is not enough evidence,based on the percentage of the growing season this inundation or saturation is required, these data are only valid when reviewed while also considering the abundance of recent precipitation events or the seasonal trend of climate when the site visit was made (this may be done through review of precipitation records where available). In addition to the primary indicators of wetland hydrology, there are secondary indicators (e.g. oxidized root channels, water-stained leaves, local soil survey data, FAC-Neutral test), of which two must be present to consider the sample point as having wetland hydrology. A-2 Y " r Hydrophytic Vegetation (Wetland Vegetation) Wetland vegetation is defined in the 1987 Manual as "The sum total of macrophytic plant life growing in water or on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. When hydrophytic vegetation comprises a community where indicators of hydric soils and wetland hydrology also occur, the area has wetland vegetation." In more standard terms, some plants are more adapted to growing within inundated or saturated soil. Based on literature records and professional experience, a panel of experts compiled a list of plant species and assigned each a hydrophytic status (described below and includes five major classes of probability of a plant occurring within a wetland). In terms of delineation there is a gradient of plant species that are adapted to "growing in water or on substrate that is at least periodically deficient of oxygen". Fieldwork associated with wetland delineations includes a procedure (the 50/20 Rule, for determination of dominance), which is also outlined in the 1987 Manual, by which to determine if hydrophytic plant species dominate the vegetation at a given location. This procedure has been used for the wetland delineation at the subject parcel of this report. Hydric Soil Defined in the 1987 Manual as "A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Hydric soils that occur in areas having positive indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology are wetland soils." For the purposes of delineation of wetlands, soils cannot be viewed without digging pits or extracting soil using an auger. Therefore, transects of soil samples are taken from perceived upland to perceived wetlands along a transitional boundary. There are specific color indicators, textures, and depth requirements in the soil that are reviewed in order to determine whether hydric soils occur at a given point or not. After a transect of soil samples has been taken, upon consideration of vegetation and indicators of appropriate hydrology a working prototype for the given wetland is developed by the delineator. The wetland delineator then uses this working prototype to complete the location of the remainder of the wetland boundary, unless the wetland is large enough or the landscape features (vegetation or topography) change enough to warrant additional transect samples. A-3 Y � r PHOTO LOG Y �� .+ See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location. , � , �s=.:r,,�-�r_ ,� >r� ° I, � � �• �� ,� ��,t � , . � � ,(,-��.'tr ti r' , ,n� � ; , �� ' -- ` , � ,�` ' r x . �1` � �� -�'' ' � �' ; k; � f �` . , �._ ` 'i .� � �� ` ��,�� t� � � -.. -��, � � �t ✓ { � � �� ✓�x�� rt;�' � , �� - �' `� . �� _ ��. � �� . � . . .. , � " ' � �� ' , � . �s � �.�" � � ' ��,�s,� h i <� , ` � �` �'�� "�;�;t� �t�_ �- i � � #,� � ��f �6 � � ��y:�� > �� A � �r � � =t ��.� � }� �� '�, �'��";'� �e..,v t { �a �� + �t ��i�� ' ,�"'�, � � ��.� k�t 'tic � �� `k€.*�,. �� "��y� i� �; `,r� ,,,'��Sa. -w � � ,t`y4 4`W 4�.l�� i t :Z� � �:�,�� '��, � a �..+ � ;.c• 'Y-'`� c �.r;:t h �±^;� �. �€. y ..�;,.�,�et s ` ' ��, � _ �=� ,.f- ;i'.r-- ,#�,'"t' �': '`S '5,;.,,� �'�,- { � :. � #{�t-.� �.�w,ia..,�'�,N+—* .,1�T -�.,� a'` .r � * � ' ' '`c' '�'f �"�"' a 4 iY r'`+- „i., r "'e j- v fr' '^��"��a�,+rY'*'.�,�^'.�r••�+' e�`'- y.« q�s+' '� '�. �� " '�i �.,ls,,K,�+ ; ,� � „ �.. .1! � ,y�.''.,,£"� �"," +� �'�"� `�•�;..�a•g'�1 . 'A. , f`ru.R * tit"''2�+ .,,,,1iF � R#'*�t.,.� � �'„,�r�� s�nF.-t .F�,�,��e;r,�.}"�*��z�.��Y p'-;f.,��L �f+�... �; �, ..: ��r^w, '1'e�.''�t^ n.w�'lS ,s s-f�� '' T'F 1 y.t. 7" "�r ��2=.'. .� � , �� n � �,+� � � � � ��, �y,"�, �J "��,�„r.;�„�� Lv.�g��+, �J1r�- � ��f�f� ��.` �C-„r�-• � .r y� 1'' t �.+F 4�t_�j� �'w. �� t�� '1'�+�� Ka6��+"�'.f�� `!i'+� ."�11c "+�"�� 1��"�}�1J iep�.�R.,�F` ' '�jyj��' �+`�,yY��C'�'.,�y,'�r`� *`,�t�,{�,�y� .."'D'.txf.'�wrlvi..�-'?-'4... ":,.✓�^.:��.te�'LR.�ir�l:��'•f2:..aM�2 ` i�Jr.Q.}��T..i�a:�� #.,�^�.�l�il� PHOTO 1: Wetland and upland interFace at PP1 facing northwest. Wetland 1 is located beyond the willow shrubs consisting of a dominance of reed canary grass. - t��. � � � ' i� f ' � ,^�+� ,��,. � ` A'" .. �"� � � ;-� ' , �l..�E�?"` "�� !� e;�� . � Y! „ v'�� 'r� ,/ �.�� t �� t� �`ti t1a�d' *'+ � ^� E f ` � � � .. i ,( �' �, � � $� k cY�� 1 ;4i� � t r � �� s E�� `� fy`� =F�rr' .�$! � �,� X�f � (i 5 .� �` � ..f� >� �a> , � ��j �n � �r � �t.r� '��. ��,,,., ,�� . �.� � ��r��,°�'� '� �yv }��_ � -c� �� ;r: a � •�,' � ,i �, �� "t ,'.� ��i�� s '<�� '� � � � �� .�� `+' � �,` a�, e �. �t �.s ; 3 ��i f�'�" '� .a.'-i- �,•, � y ��I� � �� ./��F. � `� ` • I ' Y� ,� , � �+ ��$.f 3 � .P�f'+ �`� ;d �,��{ �'� 'I _ � -a,?�a k �'�.e C.,,..i��`.�x.��*e �a i ��5� ��8'""� '��z�� 'y'�� ., .r��,��.R �.�� .. � � �`'�� t � '�',.� t�t`�� c� '.:��..��.� �t�`� t�'��` �' .��,�. ;��..S„ .,� -.... ��, _ �!"`�1?�,�.�� ff,�. *.�j� <��w�4 p�,�� ts".'i}�'aY � ky�,�y,�. (,�'}�.��k ��f g vg' ,, ' ^�+�°�^`(1 � , � , p � j' +aq , �. Y�+F� �'4z.'d�,,� �C �s{�' 4,� ^� S M �t�1 �G + ' ti�. `i�"��-'� ��; ��.��a: �,�*!G :, �eM�d " ' ' 1.,�0 (,1 � . � ��r�-`: '°«r ��w� p' �R w ��''. t��. �/� �i o�. t,�, i ai� .� - q�.:� 3t x�.�a r^�y".'� d$ � �p i + � . , y •_. � ,,: w y, ptit"`} »+^ F �!�( �� r "'4'".'t� �i��.� �R �� • �,�� (��.�, ''�\;.� ��.. ��t. a. . 1,c�i�rt� �" • t �„'� � .`A'�a`° y. •� t 3!'. � a n ,s 4 . j �� I'1"�;�F, �"��. �6 n � �k� 1 . . �i,t .. Y �. *.�.�..:+y.. �: ��y'"�,}'/�""�e;;,+:r p ��"'��d��'�� .jf '��'(�11P�tr 1�1if- °� e. <�Q`�'� ' r y t -k.;� : s „��y . .� ��. r" .a .ti ` "A•'� '�*'!'x ',�" �^ y� C. f q _ s � .�,� S � ✓ �C � �?"so-M�7� .�:.7 �� y.f�"t'i�ie. •'. �I f/� � .:'�� . �O �.„,�� 4` � x ,�. ^�•.'+r .: r! � `�. ?�"�- ^r. R". a, �'�`,3.i: »yi.�.•«f {� �.w,� '` i� �...-.� �•��, ,4 `�f � r'M�y w. �+. : �n �:�''�'7�"'� .,;� �r�• tij�d"-,'.,'yM' ��"')q„ Sh.` ��S'Yti� **�ti � i�� "��'�[ �'� �a.�� "�' � I +��rt�i�^ ��a�r��M�� . '4' � ''�:' q. "�'i �� /�� , . �y�wY�K'�»P! .nt ' :. �, „�'�' . ,x.� ��'T� 'k ys�.�� le��... "�„r r +.a.�"w(rY�:°�.�"6 t�'��3��e°"�.��a y►��r � �`.., `''L�'��'": r v��^"� .... . ,_. . . _ ..,. �. ., d.�rx. ,.. _ i�... . .. PHOTO 2: Wetland and upland interface at PP2 facing southwest. 2011-034 ��.SVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 25 Myrtlewood Rd. :':`� Ecolpgical Resources OrOf10, MN � � . See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location. �� , �� - �s_ � � . ... � � � 7� �` � ��' ,'� _ �� .;'` � � i `i F , � - � � - ,, � � � � �- � / 'try .�. . ` _ Y �. j .Y-_J� , t. .a: � � .� ^ . /((�, � '1.. ' !�`� ', j� �f .f *h`� u�y .�^l . i j.�, � Jj � •Y `Y l• . ,: m�l _ ... r, . " �� . .� .. i . E.�� . . " ' i� �,r � � , .. w . ' # s . p v r�[' � ,� +.. p J : R �� i� � x � �'��a�� ' `�'��. �- �, (k ��. FY x �3��"� ' t i � _ �� .. � !A a ��:. . � .�� q sR , . ,�. z1 ��i .i . � '. � �� ` : + p� � 1 # . ,�, �� +�y� � ��. ��t � «,.� �r ��""�' '� � v�M �� g r � �{ �i �A � # ,* 0 �' � ��" `� x s k �: #f}' .., £. h &� ��h��jj}}( : ��.-��`M+'� Y v�+<" �,�., i. S� £ 5 � �� f�c"'°�� ar\�� YtyE V �' , �� . ' � � � Y,g �:. �3 pt � . ,+ F}S1 .yCj..<.s.�,.-.+k"'s'.e .. '€ �.. � ... � � - . �� " �' +�m .JA . A : ,...�tc� �w �^a�, ._ x,�� , , �; �p �s � - ,s ` .3. � . .,, . .P,.�, _ � . ,�. _ -a� .� � +w .. „ss�„��, '� �� ``{n "�ya� �aa.,��i, �w ,. ' "`�r��'�„' � �,� „, � `��.sr.-��,g'.,�`� ;�_ . ��a , �� J � � �� '� � w � ��" �S{ �� "' , s .s '" .v:� rt�l'�x� � „�� "� '�� ,� �' �, ,-'�"� t�: ��.'L� � . ;7ih"'�"r��k��:,� �wH9A'��" „�fr�;.�'��'i :�' * ` , . . � . . .,� :..5 ��.-i ' .a',�;�A.�l". ... . ..r.19�,.' PHOTO 3: Western portion of the subject property at PP3.This photo shows an upland area with red oak trees. Wetland 1 is at the bottom of the hill where the lighter reed canary grass is located. �'; ' } . , 9 . .�.p \ a 1 �' 7 y. �_ :r� yC �l' # +r- . � . ��., � - � � .. /'�� ,� ,i � �. .`.y� ..i� : t, �~ � t � ' �� f * '�' t � v �k t5 � �„ ` .3-* r� �_ � , � R ` 1 ,'� ,f ��y� { � �'. ' �r .. ��. � t �° 'yXy }+ sE S;` � Q €} '�r 4 � �e t rs (r� . �� . � � p ' �� 1 <�('� � ,� ...A . ��t f� # :.4$� �`'j��. ��t. � �. n f �� „��, .�°��,f�: �i � �"�:_ �'�-�� p}� P d !� V�.� '�f e �� ; ['�'9 �/e . � � 4 Y M . � . �, . . �� . �� ` .� � ;t�,,�A � r ;��. M �.��' ��t S �,e j() j� � "�' ' _ � �> x --+,s�f' y�� ' ' ( ..� w ..,'"��.��'�.. '� '�+ a�3e iYlr,Y'yrTl",�Yi�,;.Yk�9 f i�+L,�A,'.S'�.'r ��i�6!t.Ya'3 . .��t _� . ..� ��r ' • �Np•v�M1r.• ' � .. . .. .. "t 4��.��X i�s+77�w y a � �+�� yY =,.' .. �,..,� . � ' '� � �� . $ . . . . . �"' ., �.:p� 't. . J"_� ': .�Vr w�". 1M 2 A a( 6,� +3`y +M .. �... � � Y x ,�..�C A` ~ $+' ��"�.�'Irl` o. . y. q 'Y+T' ".s`a¢ � t`f�d' �p-,a Y Y. •� } � +c 1G . :7 . � x�� *� ��. .�s e. y, . . � bS.`�..� .�a . w� . ' .r+;# �,,. �',*Jfi +�x,aryW":... t ��i:un `s+*�:'t �t ' �'' �.�'+' °i��t sY`a" �� "' re � . � � .� � � �r'��'` �:j w "C«'��`�" ,,,i..� � aF.. �,.ar�� . 8;a..a,�C' ��.r +.r� � - �aw �� "R. ,a e y�, f` �''�,. ,�'` �r"r,., } { u„�,. .r'..3.'..'�,_.., ae.��ww:.ti.e�"y"`�k:,J. +w.�`fNi.� �._.m.. _.� "�v�.��t.�..._a...��.d,� ..� . . . . ., PHOTO 4: Proposed shed area showing staked points at PP4 facing west just behind PP3 at the top of the hill.The proposed shed area is approximately 125 feet from Wetland 1. 2011-034 �''hSVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 25 Myrtlewood Rd. , '� Ecological Resources Orono MN