The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland Delineation Report-2013 �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cel) Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com May 12, 2013 Pat Henry Prestige Pools 87 West County Road C St. Paul, MN 55117 RE: Project Name: Prestige Pools 525 McCulley Road Delineation Comm.No.: 2013-53 Project Location: City of Orono T118N, R23W, NW 1l4 of Section 31 Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Dear Pat: As discussed, Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE)visited the above referenced site to pertorm a official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. Adjacent site land use includes residential, wetlands, and woodlands consisting of plants and trees typical of a residential area. This parcel is a combination of a residential lot (Figure 6)with grassland, and wetlands north of McCulley Road and south of County Road 6. Figure 1 is a site location map of the property. All figures referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins and classify the wetland habitat. Rural Disturbed Species Noted Seasonallv Flooded-Shallow Marsh Species Trees Herbs Cottonwood Narrowleaf Cattail Box Elder Lake Sedge Green Ash Reed Canarygrass Red Maple Shrubs Black Willow Shrubs Common Buckthorn Green Ash Herbs Ground Ivy Brome Grass Kentucky Bluegrass Stinging Nerile Canada Thistle Tall Goldenrod Common Dandelion The growing season for this site is approximately from 4/15 to 10/15 where the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. The growing season in 2013 appears to be late due to a cold weather pattern. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys � Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com This site is in the big woods subsection ecoregion according to Minnesota DNR and the annual precipitation averages 29.27 inches. The presettlement vegetation was maple-basswood forest in this area. The precipitation for the previous three months along with the comparison of the 5/1/13 precipitation worksheet data was as follows: April March Feb Worksheet(Wks) 5.60 1.64 1.05 30% less than 1.55 1.16 0.41 30% more than 3.10 1.99 0.89 2010 Wks Interpret Wet Normal Wet Multi-month score (3*3) + (2"2) + (1"3) = 16 Wet(15 to 18 being wet) The delineation was performed on May 1, 2013 and it is unlikely the precipitation totals in this period affected the boundary of any wetlands in this delineation, even though the period was wetter than normal. Precipitation data is located in Appendix A. This wetland delineation was performed and reported by Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists—Professional Wetland Scientist#1000, University of Minnesota/ BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified #1019, American Fisheries Society—Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171. Methodoloav The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands De/ineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation, soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normaf circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests,wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps, wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. VeQetation The plant species within the parcel were catalogued and assigned a wetland indicator status according to the North American Digital Flora: National Wetland P/ant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland planfs.usace.armv.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2009. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne)acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv(�msn.com In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the planYs scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic piant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum (herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine)were assigned an obligate(OBL)', facultative wet(FACW), and/or facuitative(FAC)wetland status. a With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute %cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50%of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20%of the total vegetative cover. Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soi/s in the United States version 7.0(USDA NRCS 2010) if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in aaplyinq the Field Indicators of Hvdric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic(reduced) and aerobic(oxidized) conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. � OQL=Obligate Wetland,occurs an estimated 99%in wetlands. FACW=Facultative Wetland,has an estimated 67%-99%probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wedands,34%-66%probability. FACU=Facultative Upland,occurs in wedands only occasionally, I%-23% probability. UPL=Upland,almost never occurs in wedands, <I%probability.Nl=No Indicator, insutticient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+)or lower(-)t�equency of occurrence with an category. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 3 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2. Many of the soiis have a high organic matter content 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Field Indicators of Hvdric Soils A1 Histosol. Classifies as a Histosol (except Folist) or as a Histel (except Folistel). User Notes: In a Histosol, typically 16 inches or more of the upper 32 inches is organic soil material. Organic soil materials have organic-carbon contents by weight of 12 to 18 percent or more, depending on the clay content of the soil. These materials include muck(sapric soil material), mucky peat(hemic soil material), and peat(fibric soil material). A2 Histic Epipedon. A histic epipedon underlain by mineral soil material with chroma 2 or less. User Notes: Most histic epipedons are surface horizons 8 inches or more thick of organic soil material. Aquic conditions or artifical drainage is required. A3 Black Histic. A layer of peat, mucky peat, or muck 8 inches or more thick that starts within the upper 6 inches of the soil surface; has hue of 10YR or yellower, value of 3 or less, and chroma of 1 or less; and is underlain by mineral soil material with chroma of 2 or less. User Notes: Unlike indicator A2, this indicator does not require proof of aquic conditions or artifical drainage. A4 Hydrogen Sulfide. A Hydrogen sulfide odor within 12 inches of the soil surface. A5 Strati�ed Layers. Several stratified layers starting within the upper 6 inches of the soil surface. At least one of the layers has value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, or it is muck, mucky peat, or a mucky modified mineral texture. The remaining layers have chroma of 2 or less. For any sandy material that constitutes the layer with value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic soil material, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: Use of this indicator may require assistance from a trained soil scientist with local experience. The minimum organic carbon content of at least one layer of this indicator is slightly less than is required for indicator A7. An undisturbed sample must be observed. Individual strata are dominantly less than 1 inch thick. A hand lens is an excellent tool to aid in the identification of this indicator. Many alluvial soils have stratified layers at greater depths; these soils do not meet the requirements of this indicator. Many alluvial soils have stratified layers at the required depths but do not have chroma of 2 or less; these do not meet the requirements of this indicator. The stratified layers occur in any soil texture. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T &E Surveys 4 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans ,Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne.7acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com A10 0.75 inch Muck. A layer of sapric muck 0.75 inch or more thick with value 3 or less and chroma 1 or less, starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: this indicator requires a minimum muck thickness of 0.75 inch. Normally, this expression of anaerobiosis is at the soil surface; however, it may occur at any depth within 6 inches. Muck is sapric soil material with a minimum content of organic carbon that ranges from 12 to 18 percent, depending on the content of clay. Organic soil material is called muck if virtually all of the material has undergone sufficient decomposition to limit the recognition of the plant parts. Hemic and Fibric soil material do not qualify. Generally, the sapric muck is black and has a"greasy" feel; sand grains should not be evident. A11 Depleted below dark surface. A layer with a depleted or gleyed matrix that has 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or less, starting within 12 inches of the soil surface, and having a minimum thickness of either: a. 6 inches or b. 2 inches (if the 2 inches consists of fragmental soil material) c. Common in Mollisols—on this wetland site, could be Glencoe or Webster Loamy or clayey layer(s)above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less. Any sandy material above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less, and, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic material. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: This indicator often occurs in Mollisols but also applies to soils with umbric epipedons and dark colored ochric epipedons. For soils with dark colored epipedons more than 12 inches thick, use indicator Al2. A depleted matrix requires value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2, or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. Al2 Thick Dark Surface. A layer at least 6 inches thick with a depleted or gleyed matrix that has 60 percent or more chroma 2 or less starting below 12 inches of the surface. The layer above the depleted or gleyed matrix must have value of 2.5 or less and chroma of 1 or less to a depth of at least 12 inches and value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less in any remaining layers above the depleted or gleyed matrix. In any sandy material above the depleted or gleyed matrix, at least 70 percent of the visible soil particles must be masked with organic material, viewed through a 10x or 15x hand lens. Observed without a hand lens, the particles appear to be close to 100 percent masked. User Notes: This indicator applies to soils that have a black layer 12 inches or more thick and have value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less in any remaining layers directly above a depleted or gleyed matrix. This indicator is most often associated with overthickened soils in concave landscape positions. A depleted matrix requires value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2 or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 5 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne 7acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brookiyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com A16 Coast Prairie Redox. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface that is at least 4 inches thick and has a matrix chroma of 3 or less with 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses and/or pore linings. User Notes: These hydric soils occur mainly on depressional landforms and portions of the intermound landforms on the Lissie Formation. Redox concentrations occur mainly as iron dominated pore linings. Common or many redox concentrations are required. Chroma 3 matrices are allowed because they may be the color of stripped sand grains or because few or common sand-sized reddish chert particles occur and may prevent obtaining chroma 2 or less. S1 Sandy Mucky Mineral. A layer of mucky modified sandy soil material 2 inches or more thick starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: "Mucky" is a USDA texture modifier for mineral soils. The content of organic carbon is at least 5 percent and ranges to as high as 14 percent for sandy soils. The percent required depends on the clay content of the soil; the higher the clay content, the higher the amount of organic carbon required. An example is mucky fine sand, which has at least 5 percent but not more than about 12 percent organic carbon. S3 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat. A layer of mucky peat or peat 2 inches or more thick with value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less, starting within 6 inches of the soil surface, and underlain by sandy soil material. User Notes: Mucky peat(hemic soil material)and peat(fibric soil material) have a minimum organic carbon content of 12 to 18 percent, depending on the content of clay. Organic soil material is called peat if virtually all of the plant remains are sufficiently intact to permit identification of plant remains. Mucky peat is at an intermediate stage of decomposition between peat and highly decomposed muck. To ascertain it mucky peat and/or peat are present, determine the percentage of rubbed fibers. S4 Sandy Gleyed Matrix. A gleyed matrix that occupies 60 percent or more of a layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: Gley colors are not synonymous with gray colors. They are the colors on the gley color pages in the Munsell color book (Gretag-Macbeth, 2000). They have hue of N, 10Y, SGY, 10GY, 5G, 10G, 56G, 10BG, 56, 106, or 5P6 and value of 4 or more. For this indicator, the gleyed matrix only has to be present within 6 inches of the surface. Soils with gleyed matrices are saturated for periods of a significant duration; as a result, there is no thickness requirement for the layer. S5 Sandy Redox. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface that is at least 4 inches thick and has a matrix with 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses and/or pore linings. User Notes: "DistincY' is defined as readily seen but contrast only moderately with the color to which compared. "ProminenY' is defined as contrasting strongly in color. Redox concentrations include iron and manganese masses (reddish mottles)and pore linings (Vepraskas, 1994). Included within the concept or redox concentrations are iron-manganese bodies occurring as soft masses with diffuse boundaries. Common (2 to less than 20 percent) or many (20 percent or more) redox concentrations are required (USDA, NRCS 2002). If the soil is saturated at the time of sampling, it may be necessary to let it dry to a moist condition for redox features to become visible. This is a very common indicator of hydric soils and is often used to identify the hydric/nonhydric soil boundary in sandy soils. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys g Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue No�th, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com S6 Stripped Matrix. A layer starting within 6 inches of the soil surface in which iron-manganese oxides and/or organic matter have been stripped from the matrix and the primary base color of the soil material has been exposed. The stripped areas and translocated oxides and/or organic matter form a faintly contrasting pattern of two or more colors with diffuse boundaries. The stripped zones are 10 percent or more of the volume and are rounded. User Notes: This indicator includes the indicator previously named"polychromatic matrix" as well as the term "streaking". Common or many areas of stripped (unmasked) soil materials are required. The stripped areas are typically 0.5 to 1 inch in size but may be larger or smaller. Commonly, the stripped areas have value of 5 or more and chroma of 1 and/or 2, and the unstripped areas have chroma of 3 and/or 4. The matrix (predominant color) may not have the material with chroma of 3 and/or 4. The mobilization and translocation of oxides and/or organic matter is the important process and should result in splotchy masked and unmasked soil areas. This may be a difficult pattern to recognize and is more evident when a horizontal slice is observed. F1 Loamy Mucky Mineral. A layer of mucky modified loamy or clayey soil material 4 inches or more thick starting within 6 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: "Mucky" is a USDA texture modifier for mineral soils. The content of organic carbon is at least 8 percent but can range to as high as 18 percent. The percentage required depends on the clay content of the soil; the higher the clay content, the higher the content of organic carbon required. An example is mucky sandy loam, which has at least 8 percent organic carbon but not more than about 14 percent. F2 Loamy Gleyed Matrix. A gleyed matrix that occupies 60 percent or more of a layer starting within 12 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: Gley colors are not synonymous with gray colors. They are the colors on the gley color pages of the Munsell color book. They have a hue of N, 10Y, SGY, 10GY, 5G, 10G, 56G, 106G, 5B, 10B, or 5PB and value of 4 or more. The gleyed matrix only has to be present within 12 inches of the soil surface. Soils with gleyed matrices are saturated for periods of a significant duration; as a result, there is no thickness requirement for the layer. F3 Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent or more of chroma 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either: a. 2 inches if the 2 inches is entirely within the upper 6 inches of the soil, or b. 6 inches, starting within 10 inches of the soil surface. User Notes: A depleted matrix requires a value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less. Redox concentrations, including soft iron-manganese masses and/or pore linings, are required in soils with matrix colors of 4/1, 4/2, or 5/2. A, E, and calcic horizons may have low chromas and high values and may therefore be mistaken for a depleted matrix; however, they are excluded from the concept of depleted matrix unless the soil has common or many distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. The low chroma matrix must be the result of wetness and not a weathering or parent material feature. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys 7 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com F6 Redox Dark Surface. A layer that is at least 4 inches thick, is entirely within the the upper 12 inches of the mineral soil, and has: a. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma 1 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings, or b. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less and 5 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings. User Notes: This is a very common indicator used to delineate wetland soils that have a dark surface layer. Redox concentrations in mineral soils with a high content of organic matter and a dark surface layer commonly are small and difficult to see. The organic matter masks some or all of the concentrations that may be present. Careful examination is required to see what are commonly brownish redox concentrations in the darkened materials. If the soil is saturated at the time of sampling, it may be necessary to let it dry to at least a moist condition for redox features to become visible. Soils that are wet because of ponding or have a shallow, perched layer of saturation may have any color below the dark surface. It is recommended that delineators evaluate the hydrologic source and examine and describe the layer below the dark colored epipedon when applying this indicator. F7 Depleted Dark Surface. Redox depletions with value of 5 or more and chroma of 2 or less in a layer that is at least A inches thick, is entirely within the upper 12 inches of the mineral soil and has: a. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less and 10 percent or more redox depletions, or b. matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less and 20 percent or more redox depletions. User Notes: Care should be taken not to mistake mixing of an E or calcic horizon into the surface layer for depletions. The"pieces"of E and calcic horizons are not redox depletions. Knowledge of local conditions is required in areas where E and/or calcic horizons may be present. In soils that are wet because of subsurface saturation, the layer directly below the dark surface layer should have a depleted or gleyed matrix. Redox depletions should have associated microsite redox concentrations that occur as Iron pore linings or masses within the depletion(s)or surrounding the depletion(s). F8 Redox Depressions. In closed depressions subject to ponding, 5 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings in a layer that is 2 inches or more thick and is entirely within the upper 6 inches of the soil. User Notes: This indicator occurs on depressional landforms, such as vernal pools, playa lakes, rainwater basins, "Grady" ponds, and potholes. It does not occur in 3 foot wide microdepressions on corivex or plane landscapes. We have reviewed the report for vegetative species at the boundary and data sheets for hydric soil indicators and we have revised selected wetland boundary areas which were staked with flags and orange wetland boundary flagging, they are shown on the final map as red lines. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys $ Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne.7acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-fi619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com F12 Iron-Manganese Masses. On flood plains, a layer 4 inches or more thick with 40 percent or more chroma of 2 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent redox concentrations occurring as soft iron-manganese masses with diffuse boundaries. The layer occurs entirely within 12 inches of the soil surface. Iron-manganese masses have value and chroma of 3 or less. Most commonly, they are black. The thickness requirement is waived if the layer is the mineral surface layer. User Notes: These iron-manganese masses generally are small (2 to 5mm in size) and have value and chroma of 3 or less. They can be dominated by manganese and therefore have a color approaching black. The low matrix chroma must be the result of wetness and not be a weathering or parent material feature. tron-manganese masses should not be confused with the larger and redder iron nodules associated with plinthite or with concretions that have sharp boundaries. This indicator occurs on flood plains along rivers, such as the Apalachicola, Congaree, Mobile, Savannah, and Tennessee Rivers. Hydroloqv The presence of current wetland hydrology was determined through direct observation of free water in the excavated soil pit, saturated soil conditions or soil redoximorphic features. However, the effect of on-or off-site hydrologic alterations may not always fully be accounted for when routine delineation methods are used. In the Midwest Region, hydrology indicators are in four groups: A) indicators based on the direct observation of surface water or groundwater during a site visit Indicator A1: SurFace water Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the direct, visual observation of survace water(flooding or ponding)during a site visit. Indicator A2: High water table Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the direct, visual observation of the water table 12 in (30 cm)or less below the surface in a soil pit, auger hole, or shallow monitoring well. This indicator includes water tables derived from perched water, throughflow, and discharging groundwater(e.g., in seeps)that may be moving laterally near the soil surface. Indicator A3: Saturation Category: Primary General Description: Visual observation of saturated soil conditions12 in. (30cm) or less from soil surface as indicated by water glistening on the surfaces and broken interior faces of soil samples removed from the pit or auger hole. This indicator must be associated with an existing water table located immediately below the saturated zone; however, this requirement is waived under episaturated conditions if there is a restrictive soil layer or bedrock within 12 in. (30 cm) of the surface. B)indicators of evidence that the site is subject to flooding or ponding Indicator B1: Water marks Category: Primary General Description: water marks are discolorations or stains on the bark of woody vegetation, rocks, bridge supports, buildings, fences, or other fixed objects as a result of inundation. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys g Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans )acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne 7acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Indicator BZ: Sediment deposits Category: Primary General Description: Sediment deposits are thin layers or coatings of fine-grained mineral material (e.g., silt or clay) or organic matter(e.g., pollen), sometimes mixed with other detritus, remaining on tree bark, plant stems or leaves, rocks, and other objects after surface water recedes. Indicator B3: Drift deposits Category: Primary General Description: Drift deposits consist of rafted debris that has been deposited on the ground surface or entangled in vegetation or other fixed objects. Debris consists of remnants of vegetation (e.g., branches, stems, and leaves), man-made litter, or other waterborne materials. Drift material may be deposited at or near the high water line in ponded or flooded areas, piled against the upstream sides of trees, rocks, and other fixed objects or widely distributed within the dewatered area. Indicator B4: Algal mat or crust Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a mat or dried crust of algae, perhaps mixed with other detritus, left on or near the soil surface after dewatering. Indicator B5: Iron deposits Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a thin orange or yellow crust or gel of oxidized iron on the soil surface or on objects near the surface. Indicator B7: Inundation visible on aerial imagery Category: Primary General Description: One or more recent aerial photographs or satellite images show the site to be inundated. Indicator 68: Sparsely vegetated concave surface Category: Primary General Description: On concave land surface(e.g., depressions and swales), the ground surface is either unvegetated or sparsely vegetated (less than five percent ground over)due to long-duration ponding during the growing season. Indicator 69: Water-stained leaves Category: Primary General Description: Water-stained leaves are fallen or recumbent dead leaves that have turned grayish or blackish in color due to inundation for long periods. Indicator 613: Aquatic fauna Category: Primary General Description: Presence of live individuals, diapausing insect eggs or crustacean cysts, or dead remains of aquatic fauna, such as, but not limited to clams, aquatic snails, aquatic insects, ostracods, shrimp, other crustaceans, tadpoles, or fish, either on the soil surface or clinging to plants or other emergent objects. Indicator 614: True aquatic plants Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of the presence of live individuals or dead remains of true aquatic plants. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T & E Surveys 10 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv�msn.com Indicator B6: Surface soil cracks Category: Secondary General Description: Surface soil cracks consist of shallow cracks that form when fine-grained mineral or organic sediments dry and shrink, often creating a network of cracks or small polygons. Indicator B70: Drainage patterns Category: Secondary General Description: This indicator consists of flow patterns visible on the soil surface or eroded into the soil, low vegetation bent over in the direction of flow, absence of leaf litter or small woody debris due to flowing water, and similar evidence that water flowed across the ground surface. C) indicators that the soil was saturated recently Indicato�C1: Hydrogen sulfide odor Category: Primary General Description: A hydrogen sulfide(rotten egg)odor within 12 (30 cm)of the soil surface. Indicator C3: Oxidized rhizospheres along living roots Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing 2 percent or more iron-oxide coatings or plaques on the surfaces of living roots and/or iron-oxide coatings or linings on soil pores immediately surrounding living roots within 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil surface. Indicator C4: Presence of reduced iron Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing reduced (ferrous) iron in the upper 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil profile, as indicated by a ferrous iron test or by the presence of a soil that changes color upon exposure to the air. Indicator C6: Recent iron reduction in tilled soils Category: Primary General Description: Presence of a layer containing 2 percent or more redox concentrations as pore linings or soft masses in the tilled surface layer of soils cultivated within the last two years. The layer containing redox concentrations must be within the tilled zone or within 12 in. (30 cm)of the soil surface, whichever is shallower. Indicator C7: Thin muck surface Category: Primary General Description: This indicator consists of a layer of muck 1 in. (2.5 cm)or less thick on the soil surface. Indicator C2: Dry-season water table Category: Secondary General Description: Visual observation of the water table between 12 and 24 in. ( 30 and 60 cm) below the surtace during the normal dry season or during a drier-than-normal year. Indicator C8: Crayfish burrows Category: Secondary General Description: Presence of crayfish burrows, as indicated by openings in soft ground up to 2 in. (5 cm) in diameter, often surrounded by chimney-.like mounds of excavated mud. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 11 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne]acobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Indicator C9: Saturation visible on aeriai imagery Category: Secondary General Description: One or more recent aerial photographs or satellite images indicate soil saturation. Saturated soil signatures must correspond to field-verified hydric soils, depressions or drainage patterns, differential crop management, or other evidence of a seasonal high water table. D)vegetation and soil features that indicate that wet conditions are recent and not historical. Indicator D9: Gauge or well data Category: Primary General Description: Stream or lake gauge data, or groundwater well data, indicate that the site is inundated or has a water table 12 in. (30 cm) or less below the surface for 14 or more consecutive days during the growing season in most years (at least five years in 10, or 50 percent of higher probability), or meets an alternative wetland hydrology standard established for a particular geographic area or wetland type. Indicator D1: Stunted or stressed plants Category: Secondary General Description: In agricultural or planted vegetation located in a depression, swale, or other topographically Iow area, this indicator is present if individuals of the same species growing in the potential wetland are clearly of smaller stature, less vigorous, or stressed compared with individuals growing in nearby drier landscape situations. Indicator D2: Geomorphic position Category: Secondary General Description: This indicator is present if the immediate area in question is located in a depression, drainageway, concave position within a floodplain, at the top of a slope, on the low-elevation fringe of a pond or other water body, or in an area where groundwater discharges. Indicator D5: FAC-neutral test Category: Secondary General Description: The plant community passes the FAC-neutral test. With these indicators, only one primary indicator needs to be present, or at least two secondary indicators for the hydrology criterion to be met. Wetland Classification Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979)and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998) are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50°/a of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys �2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne)acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"-40", noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange "wetland boundary" flagging tape or flagging tied on vegetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped by others using modern survey methods. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Results Basin 1 Basin 1 is a PEMAd Type 1 seasonally flooded basin with a shallow marsh on the south comprised of 90% reed canarygrass, 5% narrowleaf cattail,1%lake sedge, and 1% giant goldenrod, along with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Lester soil to saturated Hamel soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. South Roadside Ditch There is a PEMAd Type 1 created ditched wet meadow comprised of 95% reed canarygrass, and 1% giant goldenrod with a few other species west of Basin 1 along McCulley Road which is a no loss non- jurisdictional area which was created as a result of road construction. The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI)(Figure 2) identifies the large Basin 1 wettand flagged on the subject site. According to the DNR Protected Waters Map(PWI) (Figure 4) of Hennepin County there are no public waters on the site. Figure 5 shows the jurisdictional wetlands present on-site. Figure 6 is a parcel map of the area. According to the Web Soil Survey(Figure 3)the following hydric soils existed on the parcel: Hamel Photographs were taken of the site and some are included in Appendix C. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 13 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans �acobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne 7acobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv a@msn.com Confrmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District)and other agencies. I certify that I reviewed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. � � ✓r//Z �3 Wayne E. Jacobso Date Professional Soil Scientist#30611 Professional Wetland Scientist#1000 Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019 Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. Regulators: Catherine Bach, MCWD Melissa Jenny, USCOE Lynda Peterson, BWSR Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 14 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map --- 93°39.000'W 93°38.000'W 1,NG584 93°37.000'W � — --_.� --- h- � — �-----r . . _ _ . � - .. ._ . v ..- J (' ��lalll � a _ - ---'�Je�k�r�• .' � i. � : �, i. � , . �:i InrlN�i�dEric� $t '•' ' �. I. , dtaie'�:5c� .i� ... �. . ��,,. ... ,-`� a Ka1ri»a '�- -Fsr}�nt S[ c e ` .'+;�l . I.a�� r . ... � .. .. p'!• `�' . Fr!J . � � ' 1`�� . . �,i t t[urUr' � 11 t� `' . �# ��• �� i„r_, � y'.`-�: �•� , G,i-�_ �� ., � � . ' , Jayce:5�., �f� � : � • �°;` i •v.;�� a , ; ___ - _ , �I�idusrrial�St g. Y r. ��"�GE3��r,�rd •s�l�i>iC �- ' ... . �: � �O ` `r>r., i .�'''.,� _ -, . ;.��■�� °�� ' iniber Tr{ Ei -• ¢'x', �� . � " z ' ��;'�,.�- � � _ . , , ' • o � ' .� o �,�,;ie / �� - � ---- ^-- x��'-��'' , ` r o o.�t .� �. ' i . '�(�.f�\"u " . � --:��it4• IRri UJ:y�O � �'i)I o � < t�, in /� 1 _ ._ . . �'/ � - � .t �[ � .. • .. , t1 0 v - _ :.� � �I�}!it t�.i )il}.I i�"` •�' v� a � � ' C�(1l . !' {'11LSi �2� � 1itPk9�:l� 1 J;�t�i lt - =� . . ' �. . . ,-✓.� . .o ' . . • . , ^--'�� . :��"\'T 1 pu,l2 1�, � h • . C '�\ . ' ` E3roadmoor Dr ��' v, ' . _ - � i • a �� ' �� 97 ; . � .i . . �. , , � �� . r - .�rr,,;k ;`' . `- l `_ r �� £. � �. _, ,y.. . � .._. .. A . '.� � .� - Counry.�.�iY 19� { x j�`�--.'� ' ' . . r. - , � ,.� � , �• " • • `„3,� ,� •• , • :,�-` � ' j''�� - : . y �` .� � .. , 1� o�"`.;� .a�%_ G , t rn 9 `��c I , �'.� � . O �..r�Wj%6,. • � ' z''�� ' (J>t u ! 1 \: . � .� �� `�. ' �) ' = Ner, �',` .,. .. ' f �i S._- � '�'.,. ' , � ,� . . �,�l � � 't E; . . . -,, . • . . . : - , .� � � _ `=t��adt',ti�t�;__ 'a ! . . ♦ ,; j� , � � �t U� t`at i .) _ .� �t � , �-� i y� �} �(\`.__ , , , • Z �✓\.� 6� ,,�L ' � �p~��.� l' f Ci� , `��,�• �.�! ' .. . �\ �Y N o ---_ '�•� • p1� "�p :hippev�a �� , . � � = o � t Q?�r - 4 • ' • � �. • . ; � � o � r '�' __ _ �.,� �" �f c � � '\-; �"�'`-_ .� o I�,loline F2il '� ' ''---_,--' ------Lure'L�ne Trt' o u af� ,- „ v, v :sbs ------------- §S�' � . v 9t3 � , ��:c tri�.,JI, ��j�� `�x"=; � . v :1 1 _��^,. +"v.� � . i��'��` �Cy ''7r `t . �� `•' �'"` i` - `�./ i `..;;;: �� i ��,-z�.y+}`Y,.. .\� � `\ � `~`�\ ! � � ��O) J. . � . . ; ��6 !� , ' � \. I 1'a�`��CC.-. � , . '956 Klif'511:1f{1' _'_' � • • `----"--'--- --- � � ._ ^C�: .j�q . __ , tsrn�u:�icti . - _ g1y . -,__"' _ � �- � , e Tr , r,. . r'`- .__ � �;} @ / �.. i � , l ayS \ ,�. L � tr �• ��t--`^7' • k7` �� ` sr • ^ � , , . �: ' �' :y -1.... 10?9 � nl . /�l .�� j . � ,��'�,/ 'r —�%S(tr"�C" -.J`n � �� (' ,.; �� K i � _ (� _""'� •.� ��• ,�� 9JS �c.,�.�, I��J"r., `/. �> -:A � � /'9 ' . . . ..e . � .� . .,,� •7 .] O ` \,��_. ' . � : . '•1. �M �� t1`- l}�' �� ' i " � ' ��OlC� 1��f11 �(. ` ' • - �.,.�`. � �, ., ,�; � 9i • • i-. �'' srd - � " �� a ,", +. ' ' t � _ �.' ` :' � ,�� i � I , J � ` �' ,�+ `_ i � ' � . .St3LbbS Ii�Q.t/ i 1 . co 1 . . �hn, 1T i � ,`.`` � s_� :/ n '`�.� � .��''' r �. ' �f. .1 .. Z \ s:-y� � �' � ��.. �,.% ;.: . - i ' � � -'- o j�' ��-t ''c:�< ro . �� r '='.• 4 O� �. o � � • � "� .x- � ( � y„ � �,f:,'� o u�l L'J /J' +Sa . ' _J�+ *`� '. i �`� 'i (� . ' �j3�'�'j�t { 00 � ; n �".:- G - l . ; •y � l. >• � � _ ,. a ., � . • �� - , , .• � i. , i v j';' .�A . • • .. . ' ` �'.'. �•r �� d� Ma.p cr ated with • (c;Z007 Nat�on�l Geograph�e;_(c;20QS,�Tele AtI�s�Rei,48/�2005 ;�� ' " '•: . _ ------ =- ' --- . „_ _ • T , � 93°39.000'W 93°38.000"W WGSEi4 93°37.000'UJ TN�N NATIONAL o.o 0.5 miies o,,,�, G EOG RAPHIC 0.0 0.5 t.0 km OS/09/13 ' "�� ' Figure 2 NWI Map , � , , _ _____�-. _ � • - - - � ^'�� Nat�ana� 'f=��fands invento �_� May 9,2013 - -- �—�--•---�--T--T �,� �q� t , .. � � .,.„,�� `�'��— - '��'. 'k ��, ��,�! �� .:,� ,�.,� .. ��`., ��'`� ��# � Wetlands � �,�.< � � ?r� , l�'�;� , �� . I ��y"" .�r� �,��. � �:#y�� . ' ?�"� " � . . . -r::ti"i.�.-1�-i .. . i b�#. ; °`x�", � .i`;� ` � .�,r'g. � � ��`��.... � '�. � �4 . � � . � > , ,:� � .�� M� ; �� ' � - � , . , � > „„ �, � . �"�. � , �' . �� - �. � � �` � s�an��e�i�:. .rr�� ,,.. ' �. � , , .�„` �� , f "r .._., . .. � �+ � � � '��i � �� , �`e 'a '�'�F � .- . 4" y t�YP,i"8$'1 , r, �� z ""f;,. ;:& �,�' ��: � `. �� r �� y�«�� s.P` � f.,'r.•:;tEf -, � _. , , .� � _ _ .� fi=. . . ; ° �:�" . �� , ',v I %.e. � �+�� . �� -� !� ', �s� - . � � �,�,� a � ; � � �� yy,� . - � � �• .�- �— I r4 � �"� '�� 4'T� .5e4� ; �. ` 9� � �� . � � ' ' �''.�� t." y ,� �(I.t'.. ' . .� � 4 � �, � ..�,;: I . . ' .- ,. t3 • �6 r4 . ;" . .. . - ' 1� m �� • ,,,,".,yn�y,�„�„�,� h� ' �H�rs'(� . . � `n� �;x . , m . , C. - . �1��`�a �" � � ° =$� �� .� � �*_�'� � , �, . �.. � , n .. - v �.� .i � � � � -�� '�'_ �� . „ ,�e�` w t�� ♦"`` : r . , /"+r�t'1{� � , . � ... » �� ' � �� '� .f� f f� � ;� y� . �� '��a . " �s �k� Y'►',�. � � � � � .>: .�' . °�.� .i�w�.... "e�. � x. �` � ,; ��:.�� . ` �a,.. �✓ �`, � ,. � R� a��«�.. � � M' ��`"�'">'" ,+l, �� 3�,:„' r�� '.�-.�� . � � a, ; *� � �� '�•,,;,� A :� . r -' i� .;� m,::..�, . _ s a� �.» � ,{ ,r,,` �,,.i ,i, � rG . ,�' �'ti G.^^� '�� v�,j� ` �� 3 7[�� . � a= � �� . . , 4w, ° -� . � u;, ��`�' F , , . � � s , �� ,,.� � � � �� '� r �� s` � �t� ��:. � . f w �.9 , . s = m. , . - - .�-+• '�r , � �"°�.,.... ' � � ��t"� � � . ". �.:„ ' �� €� �o �',�: . � s�Y r �.�� $ J#- ..; ��_ri. � �' � Y�f "�� :j� '�� t� „�� '� t �` , ��' � �� ' �� -"''` "�' { - N� _ _�-��- �. i i� �4 r' .,e + ' �� J� � �? z, � �a - � �?� *r'^ � J � 4 �,y. '7.5 r�a� �is fa• �e�e.3 •C•c•p,�ce on:'y i�e US F'.s�anC W.:C'...'c - - .s �:t �cipo^.a��:c'_'t!�i'� Cnt�fss o`Ihe ?a5e dald Sh0'w'n D'trlhi�Er ,� .]i xct ands re.ated dala�s'+ea!j be used�n acco�ea�ce w:tn Me�aye�meta^.ata f:ur.c or th¢',tictian�s Mappc.web s tt User Remarks: ` , . . . . . Saii Map—Hennepin County.Minnesota (Figure 3 Soils Map) .� M � � �, •M1� .. •:-M1'�, ,. 4dJ�'�'J .74:i'�U;J A=:��rt u +t:i!i'-14'J 43"55 21>. :tt•5J'27° � k i '�. v � � �. � . � � � .� .� . . f * �� .��• . � ... &i`,.� . . z, s ... `� ' � r , � � �.�� , � , ' * . � y� �r. �� ;� � �° ;� ,, . n, � . ,, � T �. -�,,, . � � �- s , . �. u�. _ � .>:�:. 'i: .. . , .r . .. �. �c <� � - . .� . �,t j ... �, _ .. . � �" � _ �-,_.._--f-�..__. „ , , , t :, � `",� �>�� . � .� �., , • ,�� :� � �� : '� � �� s. �:;� � � �,,:, ��R � � �,� ��: � .� � +� �� .� � ��$ � �� k �<°"'�' .�' b�t� , r°, m"'f� � t *,� . <, z . � ;�. E . '�& .'� �" ,:4k�* ._� ,. , V� ��. n, . ... . � ..� �� = ~� �+ � � .� , �, � i .,� 1a� � �: �� .. �'^ � �> r � :�� „ . . �,. Tu�, 4;,� � - � � .�. ., � �. � , � :'° . ' �`�� , * � - .. ` � ` ` ' :�' m ;,.� :v9 ,.' � " � a . .., � �� s ?ig' 4 �,.. � . . _ „�� .� '�`� . � I .» `�� _�� ;_, Mt'SSY 7" V ' a,: ti 3'/" �..�'i:) .,...�'�('. �.1`it:'.� ..1`)9Ji: Sr'::�H:'i :,��,.�i.if N Pdap Sca!e i?A'10�f prdile0 oi�r�tiitH�R t�'X 1 t'�)sSieel " '^ N r�teters o� t, U Y5 5ll 100 150 ,�, N �� (1 100 20U 4(JO fi00 USUA Natural Resources NJeb Soil Survey ,19I2013 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 oi 3 So�Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soils Map Map Unit Legend Hennepia County,IMinnesota(MN063) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L25A Le Sueur loam,1 to 3 percent slnpes 0.4' 0.9% L35A Lerda!loam,i to 3 percent slopes 0.2 0.4% L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel complex,1 l0 4 10.6 23.4% percent slopes L376 Angus loam,morainic,210 5 percent slopes 1.2 2.6% 140B Angus-Kilkenny complex,2 io 6 percent 7.8 17.2� slopes L41C2 Lester-Kiikenny complex,6 to 12 percent 20.4 45.19�0 slopes,eroded L4102 Lester-Kilkenm complex,12 to 18 porcent 2.5: 5.5°�t� slopes,eroded L41 E Lester-Kilkenny complex.18 to 25 percent 2.3 5.0'Y� slopes Totals fo�Aroa ot Intorest 45.3' 100.0% • ��ti�>A Natural Resources Web Soil Sun�ey 5/9/2013 t �� Conservatfon Service Natlonal Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____._- i54P N E N N � E � � /��P 4 � ♦ i °�-., �P I a�aw p6ERYF. /�y� ,�}, �1)l' I��+r � "e'W. _ M�ICM.. ._L!M �i�yl(�l] � �d ME�N\A � _ ly� ' ' �� •-i-•--'� �� D (�� . Y � _ an ��' � �` ��' '6 I�2P�. •�uj �T�iw.-�'�.NAP aw �, � ��' e . � �..�c y 1 ,` 5�1� �� I � ••,� ��LONG LAKE L � I . Y' - ls it • 9�LW f4� -----�-�� ,.�"�-,:_�,, w.�,�.. � i ,.923W __ •�, _ �,. �� ;3� , �� . ` � .—. _ —, ._.._,_,y � �J�'% 1' _ �._ , - ., . � . . . . ( _x_v_ ` 4« • _ ,ll� ._ '' ____ J, �� /�bb .`�• 'f I�`,. 91► `�� -, "�.� I+^ „>•�l, • , �� • .� �. � �� h��r,_ y tsr.� --- _�.___ � ,� •�._.� .��—•�r' Ro � � - il :��. s __. U 937 � !� N� �' �54/ 't'� � ., 5 �.�� '!! t�lyd, ! w �— _. . . � �� '� �� H�0 '° y „� __ 9��l� � riY � � �,_ ��P " � ,� �c -� M s..M.� I .., � Y�� -. _ _,�, _�� n+r' �l ! � qyow .,.,.,. � yop. �. il1H v ` '�1.�f�! --�--- �,. #��.,. �� /� - ��r,... �� _ "�' xrsr��, •�r . ,�� ES R n , ;;, wr ,� �f/P � �� ,�� ouN , �. , �"' -�� 1 �•o..0 r« 9 i f r �u � ti � fow� 4k� _ —T� /M A �w � �� r �'� i �(lr • �� \I � :n � I� �. ��.��.,�� ,, n 7 [AKO ".:�, �Mt MT 1 N1I ♦I � \�` ~' KA � �%/ • A�� u i^'" :S f d. v.L_ , � - . � � __ ,�.,. � . -''n� .. . . _...-.--..... Figure 4 DNR Protected Waters Map Scale 1" = 5,280 feet Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ^N � Building Permit Survey Prepared for. Prestrge Poo�s �� ' �. �� ,o�� tecend s t/�j �°l-f � E,r�srr�q wen ��, ;'`r>• y Olv �� 61� 7��trar(can!/arousJ a d��p d Q venr v�ne � qn �� y� sJ ��Power PMe �/Q- �pJ9 JJ � 8 �, ��. � So,�r Teat (Dy othe�) � � � • r Wet-3 o /, _ �' , �P � �i �y��g � � -- ,9 w��-t » ' _ / eYn �6791Y7Spp !� ��. � Droinaga�1/f if a�' � �E�esmxrnt �` � i � y .t� � '�---�,t d---- - -- �� ' �'(ue�ineatM on Moy t� 70�.7)�.._ � ^'8��.�� 'so> � 0 0' i y�"�ry� ,' • 7 �lla�d�'' i1 ; � , ky. �'� 4'� E09Q ol � Q 1 I �° i � �� E��ot Bufle+""'� A V c,�i t' : . j i �� `A ,y. �, { i m a ��.�dh� - C7?1J . � � � � � � � ' ?;�'. A ' l a 29�.3 ------------ -- �\�ti� Yf ------ --`- - �'y `�1 �� A yq p �r b g V `! l¢�` � �t �U�N �rt-r �°F� i ' `8., v A Q�� o �' �,. r �� A � �A� M1 j ,! . _I /d N UP-! r'�•� f�ir ��,�"�(eo w p�� /./ 3 '�' �y ��P• .s--� !��h '. i � .'^' _'_____ 007.4 ____�___"." �a'� qi �`�'`al°°09� �,pi C e a ��by�I Etr�e z � �� d fb `� See Sheef 2 . � � _._ ._....._..1_ . O ��bL'� l� �c o�r / a `�o'� / { 9d�ht..-,.� 525 Mr.cur�ey Rood p�ep�y� �� fir.v�o, A!N / ��Os 4 V etQ�• S1-1IR�-.i-?a-�72 � d� � ?�Cat_P,['si.' 22f,.SeS Sry. fl ,F S lk1 4Jns 0' � �Oa �� .aa-ia B��Q � `�ey A7�8 toNbe�oba tn��n�d Co?rmoln��on s5 �` s.1e. Pioposxd qrod/nq Desed vn 'iostqn p�l� � by nfter. � � `"` Auunderv Ces.-rlRll4*LL.+.YI��-�X cJienrl� LOt f, Wock 2, 7URNIIAN TOLL AOp1170✓V. occortimr� lo Me rrs,:wee0 plot lAeeeor: Hennep;n Counf�s Minnesoto. Sunject to ony and oll eosemxnts ol rceord. SCHOBORG LA D SERVICES s��'� INC. eo o w ao ,xo 76J-97?-3??f 8997 Ca Rd, tJ S£ 1 inch a 80 fa�t w�+r,SeAebagtond.can Delano, MN S,iJ2B 5. Job Number 7$I< !ha'eby eerfi/y fhof fhii CafifMofs O/aeMvs�raa ...—.- pro�nred by me or�nder my dirocl supervfwon ard Boak/Poqe: 74/�p thot l/,i��ty RsQlsfard Lmd Suraeyw under tne I lowa u/ e ote o/ innesota. 51�rvey Dofs: f-?-T3 Urowtng Nome: proslgrpaols-Ll-B?-ITA.dwq 1 � Or�nn by. KLB wa��ones ae�Meo�ed ey,rocansm[nwronmentm. - -rour U. Sr.n v Rewsiortx �....r3-t3 0-17_t$ 3-06-I3 Vndvrgrovnd ut/ifier sl�own os mmkeJ DY ofAe�. (weNartd de/ineofian, sUf/encc, woll Ner) BswMps bnod on p/of o/1URNHAM lOtt AOl�re. p�� ✓�_1��Raprsbolran Na �f700 _ �e�rrw�a bosad on NAVD?d Sh�et 1 0/ 2 _ _ _ I lcnnepin C�>unty (;IS - Printablc M��p l'agc 1 c�l� 1 �� i�teractive Property _ . ��'� Ma p , �. �, . � �, i��.. ."� . w > m�':, "�` � = � . , s y, y . i � �\�� w�#,fi � , �, "�iy �a a , 1^'��v�p ^. , ... /� � •g �� M �" +� 1. � . � A .. ,^ � -R§+''�1G', E ,i�+ � . . .t .,�� , �� .,�.„� i � . 'h� . � � . ,` �" . � . ..� ' .. ' , � , .�y, ::� #' .�,*h�.� �* . �� y9; ' ' �� .. . .w4� �� »,t,y' e.�T� "�� .t �'� ��q� �� — �dt`9 '�1� *i'Y . � i,r 7r- r" �`+k ''�°n . a � �� °� � , ,�Ai � ��i �:. �,'° ; �'� � . �x$ 1'<, i�tt: � 'i� � ��` � ��' ,•. �p;...�� ,'�f .i��+ � � ,� ,� . . �._ _ _ � � � ' i�tr' !; y � �c.4, ,.�o �r�.:' ':"r�.c-�:.�° „ r "R �� •�� 'y�1 . . � ' ; ��_ .. . . i� N � t. .$ ... , .. .. . .. .. i * . ��i � ,��. , ��•�� 4�� r �" f � 1 � . � � � . � �� '�!! l !�. �� . ...�.._"4 . . ._ , . �X�i � � ��}�� t '"� �� '�: . ' t` rr r''�t, �� €�;.� ,. _ . � � ; � - ,� .. ' y�! � , ��,, � ' r ,,�.�"' a,�.;�� j��,�,} 'r. i," "+'� a� � �Y..f "Jr � 'ti J� �r # ��q �'�a �r ♦ " � f� - �v�." .� - ��ti � � •�� ,. _ v -" �` "��' �,�p ' -'.� r � �. � �,♦ ' �� s� .s:� i�` : �yy+ . / �,� S�:g� " .. . . 1 � .. — •_ �, � � �-' ":�, '� . � °'� � ,�". �`; �,r' ' ,r'"`�"� `�_ ' •�.,tl � .,� � "�,"'' '��+.� 4 i;�i , � i ~� . � ,f 1 �a , �.,�, �°* �,� / ,.� � ",� _ •��'" f {;,�; � wy,'� ,1..'k.� ,�� 7 .r`��` •�t...,p;� :�,' I '.">;� ti � � � .. S � . a .. . ti e +� 1 �{ , � ` � a�/ l { �, J s. �� .;,��..�` . � i f,1 a �.,R ♦."•�. s"r .` �'.- 1 �#; ��i t}} �� / ,��'��, ' *1. �, . �t y � �� e �r .. ...*�'�i'w�'.��._ "� .� , ,. . S 1" P . ��, . 1 � ,�:., rn:: .. _� r �'—"}'�` ,�� `g �� .� t� �, , (`�:'~"..{ y . � ` ! • ` �" � �i � �� 1.�� pa ��4 � ... . � ,V� v,. � - 6 . Parcel Map Scale: 1"=2�0 ft. N �p. 31-118-23-24-0012 A-T-B: Torrens Print Date: 5/9/2013 ��- Owner B D Johnson&N E Johnson Market �655,000 Name: Total: Parcel 5?5 hllrc;ulley Rd Tax $7,995.52 Address: Orono, MN 55359 Total: (Payable: 2013) Pro ert p y Residential Sale $685,OOQ TYPe: PI'ICe: 7hi5 map is a compilation of data from various sourCes and is furnished"AS IS"with no Home- Sa1e 09/2011 re resentation or warrant ex ressetl or Hom?stead �' Y P StCBd: DBte: implied.inc�udmg fitness of any par6cul�r purpose,merohantability,or the accuracy and completeness of the mformation shov�n Parcel 5.08 acres Sale Warrant Deed Area: 221,464 sq fl COd@: y COPYRIGH T C'>11ENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 ii"t ' http:,igis.co.henn��in.mn.us/Pro��crty/print/dclault.aspx?C �4�19736.97189(02�1,4981850.3... 5/9/2013 : - �.�� "`� .' ��. .. —__ 'y�tl, 4 �..� :d;- ..�� .......... . M ' .T>- r�s ,�+ . �� „�r ¢ � F '� ✓.i Y_y;w . .� :°4 s t ,�,.> . .. v�,,, ,�+� h . � rp� . . �.�'.�`M�/��g�y� `T� �j .,. �. .� � �� . �� 1C�. I •1' ��/�I��\ `.4,4 � �a ;f Y y" � �¢� ..,��Y' � �7�� >�'' �`��f , `� �� ,�"`� � ��J � -+�..�`�` ,� � '. ��i, �a�." �y �� \' �� F � -:* � ^k- � � �. � v� ,� + �. } � �� '� � , ,��,�� "„ � `�*�t � \��, �d \\ ,� � %; ,�,. � ,4 ,'s , -� . ��Y� „ ( � "C.....',^ ��' s�� _ ' $,�,� �' r? � � � 1�'�;�,� , ;J . ��i+��`•� �\\ .� t m, '�rY,,� �;. �.A' �. .x�. .•°�"f �,�/ '�� ;_4', - �" � i � y�� l; , "-4;�, � ':. �I' "" �� '' Legend �-, � `��►� � � � \:,� � � �,� '� /� , , _ . �".: t ! ' ,\.,y -'-��,t'�i`.,�. ._ `_��__«: ��.:� # . Rail-oad �,�� - . � ;. ,,,+� ;�, ! � -, - " ",,,,,,,� -'�--.:��.. _ ,.-�'` I � i � City Limits .. ,- Y '; � a _ � � , a. _; ; � , �� Parcels(1-1-20 , � 1 } . ., , � �-�; �� =• �,y — � � ` 1� , '^,, �s� Wetand , 1 ` � � „'�. � ' _ . � .. ,, r , ,` t�, , �t . . r , ,e � . _ . ' ,--�,� R•� s * �* i 3 � � �� 'R . � "y4 . -r f�� 4 .e �... # y t� ��_ � PfESEf�i�-.., F 1` � ,a :k� � �� . � �z� � '� A' � �� L._l slanage t .... _ ��. �:i��.. "� �,` 1r - �` .� � ��,,,�^ �� w.� �� r �.J� � �—' �enaoe 2-25' _ � �_ _ ^� � � ., �r``" �; � �� `��+� .t� f'�`� � .. . � a�age 3- 6 5 � �� , � ; � . . �, �� ' � I , t _" - � � � � � . , ,�� v aj' .•' - �"j� �� "�� i.:les5ifie _.� . . � � ,,«.,`l'� � ,.r ��+.rit� �r. �,� ❑ ° 1'f� �.� � " Y F 'M'e i' '. '�F"�?".'+A' t�'y�,F� .�v�'w . i ..F�. � - ..k, � `� �. '},+'� '�..' . I�' M'. , `:yis" �t� � ..k � ��;{� t q„.� Y y� �f� �p .f "�� '� - ��`�� y a . i .r- � . � �`- � ,•�,„ �� = �� X�°<�� 's"�`�k- #'E � � �b � �' <.� �"'k ,...,� �.# . q`, i•� �� r i�� p `� � p, °r 3 �� ..^f��\ . . . � ,�� ,,q� ;J �µ � ��h.alY'��.t V� s .x"'R'"f � ��TY� �.� �� _� � '� "��` F ' �+ � ` 4: i1 ,{. 'E'� �a'�� ,�;vO ��' / ' ` �.1I '� '"` "!� �` ; � � sfi i i., �'t V' S� t # � 't�� t� I t � '� � . �� .,,'`''� �� , � 4�,.� �r ,��` "` ��'`;N.. _ .(y V"� . „!� �� ;.� �� ,"� , �:' . `� � � �~ � W{i"�,! +. %� . . - /' ;,:.+ � � r p�✓` ��t µt. K�?r�� /f'�'� •�'' . � � JY�,"�� .'�C` ��-* . n a . - . , : . { ... , .'� . � y. � �-.... .. , � 5i y � . , . �,»cf . y� z i+y� .4� � µ�` , SP a . � � ";aa Y.. ..i � � ` . �'1 '� ,�, �r�` /�� .s� � `r�. � I.��' �, r ��,� _ ��. ��y� � / :��JL��., f�'�.y��`:�� ..Tt� ._. �4 r40 � � �` � �s,s z �,� �� s� C*,.. ��v '�`��GG �:�r .,. , . ^ *.�..m°�a+:. ' t, .��/ � j y 1 . � i:. , s �,... '�� .r:� f ,,,, . ,i,i j/ y�` � w�,s :, i !'-� I y. tw .�c� '�' ti "�� .�`�i � � L / ..:. 4�1 �,.�" ? ,��a �� ., , � "•� �' .. �r.. � �� .� �' `� �i � �. ��' ".f` t.. "'3�a '�i. �. ,-' 'd4 k`� t s�� r � �� - , .,. . ;� , � ,+ e,��. �� ,,/' ;�,.,:- �� ,�,. �� '�� , . +� � ` . a � � �. � ti. a . �"` �--� � �� '�,. ��,�"`;��._� � i ��.� j,(� 9- tt' . 7 , ' � `. ' �,� ' �"�y. � ' � .i'n„L,�•. . ,xY .. � ��ja' � ��7" � �.. ..,�� j� ?� z trv"'."''�.1. .. %� � j � � v��: � C yt �� ! i � ./ s.. : � � `" % , ��°``� fr ' � " •��4 � `� � `� � s �, s �.— �--=—`.��.-- �"'`� � — "�" a� �-;� ,��, �` �" � �� _�,' � r� Culley � ` 525 Mc / � ./ `.�x�� .JOR •`�y�e��i`�`�a� .5Y y'> �f, 1��'" � 'll� _;4�'...��-� F`� r �� 1 �Y �^'"" �' '�.' Y 3�° .. �.. � �-e�4 '� _- 1�� 3 �� g �` � �� -� �btsu.�� i � � � `�� 1 �"� �'Q"a'.. z� r�. ,.t . r.� -- '� ��° � `�"�_ �' `�'' '�;'',�»�"`� �c-'., x n i -«��m�,: - - __.._ _.- _ .. ._.— . . �' ,.,,..��. ...�!;•��creea�.;,-o�.Y ---_ ._ . _.. . . .�rE . �.��,cyinCisn��nk•'.crdtete��ie7zscne ih•. � 23=f `�/ I ��< f a.'at . wei u. f r._opc., :a ea rv cr>ne saf o,t c d I '.n 1f.tt pth > .ii� .i. ' b u Z:.6v'¢on&tvSrnV. In��tSe��.,S �'^^ . �- �+• � " F��a��c a WTheC.,c(Oro c� .�� _ _ a .� r�ri.�r��r+�,.p .,...- . Irr�n�..� .,rrariwt APPENDIX A Precipitation Data Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Usin�; Gridded llatabase Page 1 of�2 Minnesota Climatology Working Group � State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota �..,.�.�.._,.�..,�....�...� .a;........w�.. ,, home �current conditions �journal �past data �summaries �agriculture �other sites �contact us �search �� Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 118N township name: Medina range number: 23W nearest community: Stubbs Bay section number: 31 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 Score using 1971-2000 normal period first prior month: second prior third prior month: (values are in inches) AP�� month: February 2013 March 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: 0.00 0.00 0.00 there is a 30% chance this location will have less 1.25 1.13 0.38 than: � there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:� 2.�� 2.03 0.88 type of month: dry normal wet dry d d monthly score 3 * 1 = 3 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 1 = 1 multi-month score: 6 (Dry) 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Score using 1981-2010 normal period WS first prior month: second prior third prior month: (values are in inches) APr�� month: February 2013 March 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: �r�,�� ,�,4 ��5-- there is a 30% chance this location will have less 1.55 1.16 0.41 than: there is a 30% chance this location will have 3.10 1.99 0.89 more than: � type of month: dry normal wet �,y,yf. No,yy�t� G,�uf- monthly score 3 *;3 = `f 2 '`Z= �l- 1 ""3 = � multi-month score: / 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) �`l W�'�� http:!/c limate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=449919&... 5/12/2013 HIgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Page 1 of 2 'Closest Station' Climate Data Retrieval The data matching your request is at the bottom of this page or should appear there within one minute. _ Target location is Lat: 44.98590 Lon: 93.63526 ___..__._..�-- i set location ; retrieve only this station: 215136 MAPLE PLAIN - years: 2�12 � to 2013 - number of missing days allowed per month: 3 retrieve data from the following data sources: Precipitation from Hrgh Density Network ;1 Precipitation from National Weafher Service Temperature from National Weather Service Snow from National Weafher Service ; get monthly �; � get daily_ � useDNRhid: False�True Target: lat 44.98590 lon 93.63526 mon year cC tttN rrW 55 nnnn o000000o pre aaaaaa Tmx Tmn aaaaaa sno SnD dis 7an 2012 217935 .49 3 mi . Feb 2012 Z17935 1.73 3 mi . Mar 201Z 217935 1.70 3 mi . Apr 2012 217935 2.96 3 mi . May 2012 Z17935 9.45 3 mi . Jun Z012 Z17935 3.55 3 mi . ]ul Z012 217935 4.75 3 mi . nug 201Z 217935 1.50 3 mi . sep 2012 Z17935 .30 3 mi . oct 2012 217935 1.35 3 mi . Nov 2012 217935 .85 3 mi . �ec 2012 217935 1.20 3 mi . 7an 2013 211448 .66 9 mi . Feb 2013 211448 1.05 9 mi . Mar 2013 211448 1.64 9 mi . Apr 2013 211448 5.60 9 mi . May 2013 212088 m 8 mi. 7un Z013 m 999 mi . 7u1 Z013 m 999 mi . ,aug 2013 m 999 mi . sep 2013 m 999 mi . oct 2013 m 999 mi . Nov 2013 m 999 mi . �ec 2013 m 999 mi . http://climate.umn.edu/HIDradius/radius.asp S/12/2013 APPENDIX B Sample Data Sheets WETLANO DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecdSite� �v�n.nw �i�s.c./-�f.,��ip/S City/County: /�isw��.,�f... SamplingDate S � AppliCanVOwner: �,�,� �4�,se..� State:_fi��, Sampling Point: �"Up Investigatw(s): �✓ES Seclion,Township,Range:�Tl 1 g'JV_ �3LrJ Landform(hilislope,terrace.efc.)� J(t( Local relief(concave,Convex,none): Go..i��. Slope(%):�_ Lat Lung: Datum. Soil Map Unit Name: �u1n�( NWI dassification. Are climaGc/hydrologic conditwns on the site typical for Ihis lime of year? Yes No�_ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegelation_� Soil_�,or Hydrology_��significanUy disturbed� Are'Normal Circumstances"present? Yes�_ No Are Vegetatan_�,Soil_�,or Hydrology�naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point Iocations,transects,important features,etc. MydrophytiC VegetaUon Present7 Yes_�_ No Hydric So�l Present? Yes No� �$tho Samplod Aroa Welland Hydrology Present� Yes No_��, within a Wetland? Yes No � Remarks. 7ji:a �s � w.a-�o...�� c�co.H.�,�, -�'b '�. h�.,,./oy,:a 9y.ty,s:s _��+^.M.,.( '�,..• -flt�s �...c:...4e,�,•ql�t, _ VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absdute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Pbt size: �O'p� :.�5) °/,Cover SDecies? Status Number o(Qominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �_ (A) z Total Number o(Dominant 3 Species Across AII Streta: _ � (D) 4. 5 Percenl of Oommant Species That Are OBI,FACW,or FAC: i Dfl (A/B) =Total Cover Sa�linalShrub SValum (Plot size:1��yL� � Prevalence Index worksheet: �. Total%Cover of: Mult�olv bv: 2. OBL species x 1= 3. FACW species x 2= 4 FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= � =Tolal Cover UPL species x 5= HerG Stratum (Plol size: � �/'�"� Colurnn Totals: ,. • �� 'AG �"► _ ce> 2 Prevalence Index =E3/A= 3 Hydrophytic Yegetatlon Indicators: q 1-Rapid Test(a Hydrophytic Vegetatian 5 ,LG 2-Dominance 7est is>50°k g 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' � 4-Marphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. ProblemetiC Hydrophyt�c Vegetatbn'(Explain) 9. — 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must � ��=To1a1 Cover be present.unless disturbed or problematic. Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:�S r�.,d�� Hydrophytic p Vegetatlon =Total Cover Presant? Yes�_ No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Cwps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2 0 $�IL Sampling Point: � - up ProFile Description: (Oesc�ibe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicaton.) Depth Matrix Redoz Features O�chesl Color(moistl °/a Color/moist) % Type Loc. Texture Remarks �� IoY..�e��/--�- -�L�.•4 ,�.� ��YQ 2�1 � ,or��-i� 'T e C=Concentralion,D=Deplelion,RM=Reduced Malrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location PL=Pore Lining,M=Alalrix. _ Hydric Soil Indicatore: Indicators(or Problematic Hydric Soile: Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Preirie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(AZ) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark SuAace(57) Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matnx(S8) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Hydroge�Sullide(A4) _ Loamy hlucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TFt2) Stralified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matriz(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A70) _ Depleted Matr�x(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 7) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surtace(Al2) _ Depleled Dark SuAace(F7) 'Indicators ot hydrophy�c vegetatlon and Sendy Mudcy Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) �vetland hydrolo0y must be present, 5 cm Mudcy Peat or Peat(S3) uniess disturbed or problematic Restricdve Layer(ff observed): Ty�� x Depih(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is reuuired:check all that aoolv) Secondarv Indicators(rninimum of Nvo reauiredl SuAace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained l.eaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) Migh Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Orainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) _ True Aquadc Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Livinp Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drifl Deposits(63) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or SVessed Planls(D1) Algal Mat w Crust(84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soits(C6) _ Geomwphic Posilion(D2) Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ FAC-Neulrel Test(D5� Inundelion Visible on Acriel Imegery(B7) _ Gnuge or Well Oete(D�J) Sparsely Vegetated Co�cave SuAace(BB) _ Other(Expiain in Remarks) Field Observatio�s: Surtace Water Present? Yes No�� Depth(i�ches): Water Table Present? Yes No� Oepth(inches):��_ Saturation Present? Yes Nv_� Depth(inches): }2�' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No� includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Oata(stream gauge,monitoring well,aenal photos.previous inspeCtions),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps o(Engineera Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjectlSite ///7p,�e /v1o.��TR „Pj��S CityfCounty �t.� Sampling Date � � AppliCanVOwner. �p�� iLI��ew J Slate:�� Sampling Point: �"'�ifJ�'� Investigator(s). �ET Sedion,Township,Range:�7/!f�N• �3(,�,J / Landform(h�lislope,teirace,elc.)�� • Locel relief(concave,convex,none) Go�n��_ Sbpe(Yo):�_ Lat: Lony: Datum Soil Map Unit Name: �s_� NWI classification: PF�J�I/� Are climatic/hydrdoge conditions on the site typical for this time o(yeer7 Yes No�_ (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetelion �� Soil_�,or Hydrology�L significantly disWrbed? Are'Namal Circumstances"present? Yes_� No Are Vegetation_�.Sail_�,or Hydrology_�L naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present7 Yes �C No Hydnc Soll Present? Yes_�C No �s the Samplod Area Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes_�_ No within a Wetlandl Yes� No Remarks: `Tyr:s c.�s e� �.+ p.�.,:a,�t c�ccr..t�� `�t� h,,.rn.��.:�. �r/�,-.s �a*E,er'.m...t �rSn.i- �:s �{el c.�er„F:e.,r. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absdute Dominant Indicator pominance Test workshaet: Tree Stratum (Pbl size:� D�r'w,r(r.Td %Cover S�ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �_ (A) 2. 3 Total Number of Dominant Species AcrossAll Strala: _L_ (f3) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �Op (A/B) =Total Cover SaollnalShrub Stratum (Plot slze: ��rw.[-.�,�„�) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Mw6nlv bv: 2. OBL species x 1= _ 3, FACW species x 2= 4 FAC species x 3=_ 5. FACU Species x 4= =Total Cover UPL species x 5= Herb Slratum (Plot size �✓` .. n • �° .� Q_ Column Tolals: (A) _ (B) 1. M1+�/�.wT Q�.M.��L4r,� � _� z Prevalence Intlex =D/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indlcators: q. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetalion 5. _ _ _ �,2-Dominence Test is>50°� g 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' �. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separale sheet) ProblemaGc Hydrophyt�c Vegetation'(Explain) 9. — 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrdogy must � �_=Total Covei be present.unless disturbed or problematic. Woodv Vme Stratum (Plot size��,�,��) � Hydrophytic Z, Vegetatlon =Tolal Cover PrQsant9 Yes� No Rernarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Regwn-Version 2 0 5��- Sampling Point: �—Gr�ET Protile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depih Matrix Redox Features Lches) Color(moisU °� Color(moistl % Type Loc Texture Remarks Q�)2 �n1I�1 Glw� l � �1� _,��,V�� Glo.. 1 � ' .1�'�- �o�� 7.4Y�2A-J� �- �� -1� 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Deplelion,RM=Reduced Malrix,MS=Masked 5and Grains. 'Locata�: PL=Pore Lining M=Malriz. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicatora for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrlx(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A18) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Reaox(SS) _ Dark Surtace(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S8) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Suliide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Sur(ace(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matnx�F2) _ Other(Explaln in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) �, Depleted Below Dark Surface(A71) _ Redox Oark Surface(F6) _ Thlck Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleled Dark Surtace(F7) 'Indicators oi hydrophy0c vegetaUon a� _ Sandy Mucky Mmeral(S t) _ Redox Depreuions(F8) wcllend hydrology rnuat be present, 5 cm Mucky Peal or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic Rest�ictive Layer(fi observed): Type. Depth(inches): Hydr�Soil Present? Yes C. No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Pnmarv Indicators fmmimum oi one is reauired:che�k all that anolvl Secondarv Indicators(mirnmum of Mro reauiredl � SuAace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained teaves(B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66) � High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Drainage Patterns(810) �,Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(87) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odo�(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposifs(62) � Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4j _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mal w Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) �,Geomorphic Posltion(D2) _ Iron Deposits(BS) _ Thin Muck SuAace(C7) �FAC-Neutral Test(05) Inundation Visible on Acriel Imegery(B7) _ Gauge or Well Deta(DO) Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surface(B8) _ Other(Ezplain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Wafer Present? Yes�(_ No Depth(inches): �_s Water 7able Present? Yes� No Depth(inches): +O.S' Saturation Present? Yes_y� No Depth(inches): -#�D•� Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes�e No includes ca illa fri e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspeCtions),if avaflable: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION�ATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecUSite: �Nato P_�,�•�� 1 S City/County. �btru�s;.n Sampling Date�� ApplicantlOwner:_/+an TeLl.�sn,il State:� Sampling Point;_�V� Invesligator(s): L✓bi� Section,Township,Range: 3�T[1�,��„?iGJ Lendform(hillslope,terrece,etc.):� Locel relief(concave,convex,none): CA�A/r� Slope(°h):_f� Lat: Long: Datum; Soil Map Unit Name:____��.I NWI clesaification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No,�,_ (It no,explain in Remarks,) Are Vegetetion,�,Soil�,or Hydrology��significanlly disturbed? Are"Normal CirCumslances"p2sent? Yes� No Are Vegetation_�,Sofl__�,or Hydrology__�naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDING�— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Present� Yes No�_ Hydric Sofl Present7 Yes No�,Ce_ Is tho Samplod Aroa Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within n Watiand4 Yes No_� Remarke: 1� 1 �j,�-� 7LJ�.'3 !�/�� /�J�+f�M'i OI� R<G�✓yC J�/� 7!� ,^�Q� ��/�✓b J�J� /(H'(.�3:S f�� TW' T�'!:.S BC b�S/f t�'�dor�/� � / ____...__l___._.... _.__--- ---- _- -.-__...-- ____ _. .- --......__ ._... _......__ .__ _.. ........... ... . .. ..._- -.... ._..--_ _---..._ ..._ _. .. .. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: �o��J��s) %Cover e iea9 Stati s Number of Oominant Species 1. Thal Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: _� (i\) 2. Total Numbero(Dominant 3� Species Acroas All Strata: �_ (13) 4. 5 Percenl of Dominant Species That Are OBI,FACW,or FAC: _�'� (A/B) =Total Cover SaoIIn9/Shrub Slratum (Plot slze:�,,�5��T�1:..a) Prevalence Index worksheet: �, Total%Cover of: Multiolv bv: 2. OBL species x t= 3. FACW apeciea x 2= q. FAG specles x 3= 5. FACU species z 4= =Total Cover UPL specfes x 5= Herb StraWm (Plot size:_Jr�✓�.1:✓�) Column Totais: (A) (B) 1. ��/...,c �Jr,1y�y.I�G•�f+� --�� .� 2. Sn�f-L��.�.;^�;,,�..�_ _� �_ ��,� Provalence Index =B1A= g. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon indlcators: q 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Oominance Test is-50% g, 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' � 4-Morphotogical Adaptations'(Provide suppnrting data in Remarks or on a separele aheet) 8� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 9. — 10. �Indicators o(hydric soil and wetland hydrology mwst ��=Tolal Covei be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woodv Vine Stralum (Plot size: �S�✓i.Lr,�C �• — HydrophytiC Z. Vegetallon =Total Cover Prasent9 Yes No_,�G Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on e separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 $�IL Sampling Paint: �—Ur Profile Description: (Descrlbe to the depth needed to document the Indicetor or con(irm the absence of Indicatore.) Depth Matrix Redox Featurea jjnchesl Color(moisU % Color(moistl 4'o Typer—LoC� Texture Remerks � -��?�� o,,.� — .� �, ,.� � . � 12-�s1- ��yrL 31 i � . � G �rL�- -c-l�1�n — 'T e: C=Concentratlon,O=De Ietion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked 5and Grains. Zlocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. � Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Hislic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surtace(S7) _ Blaek Hiatic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(SO) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Minera!(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Oark Suriace(A11) _ Redox Dark SuAace(F6) _ ThiCk De�k SuAace(Al2) _ Depleted Dark SuAace(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophydc vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictfve Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present7 Yes No,�_ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydroloey Indicators: Prlmarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired•check all that aoplyZ �econdarv Indicalors(minimum of Iwo reauired _ Suriace Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ SuAace Soil Cracks(66) _ High Water Teble(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Orainage Patterns(B10) _ Saturatlon(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(614) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Waler Marks(61) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Ct) _ Crayfish Burrows(CS) _ 5ediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drirt Deposits(83) _ presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algel Mat or Crust(84) _ Recent Iron Reduclion in Tilied Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Positfon(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck SuAace(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Vieible on Aeriel Imagery(87) _ Gauge or Well Dota(DOy Sparsely Vegelaled Concave SurfaCe(BB) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Fleld Observalions; Surface Water Present7 Yes No� Oepth(inches): �� Water 7able Present? Yes No_� Depth(inches): 7?� Saturation Present9 Yes No_ G Depth(inches):��- Watland Hydrology Present7 Yes No,� includes ca illa irin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,prevlous Inspecdons),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineors Midwest Repion-Version 2.0 WE7LAND DE7ERMINA710N OATA FORM-Midwest Regfon ProjecUSite� ��`ato ��?�_��i City/Couniy:__ �Onrie.s;,n Sampling Date:�f�,�� AppticanUOwner. �mn Te�u�� Stete:�t�/ Sampling PoinL Z—Lr� Invesligator(e}:__�Ij�,'T' SeCtion,Township,Range:___�7"l1,��L-1 landForm(hillslope,terrace,etc.): /J��r... Local rellel(concava,convex,none): Ce.nc...� Slopa(%);,�,_ Lat: I Lon9� Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:___f"# N.�1 NWI ciase�cation:. pF,M _ Are climetic 1 hydrologic conditlons on the site typical for this time o(yeer7 Yes No.�_ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetetion,�,Soil_�j�,,or Hydrology�significantly disturbed7 Are"Normal Circumstences"present7 Yes..,� No„ Are Vegetotion�,Soil_�,or Hydrology_„�L naturally problematic7 (If needed,explain a�y answers in Remarka.} SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampiing polnt locationa,transects,important features,etc. Nydrophytic Vegetation Presentl Yes� No Hydric Sofl Presenl7 Yes�_ No Is tho Samplod Aroa Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_� No wlthin n Wotland4 Yes_,�, No Remarka: • -�:s w..� q �.�-�...,:o,� a��.y �, �,�. ��vb Iw'Je ,�ti,�s:s e.�.�...�t -�,.� -�i-i.s d.>>:.�s..-uo,,,, _........_-..�°-�----�---�------�-------....__._....-—----.....-------�----------._. ._--------- . ... . ----------.....__._.-------�-�---_ __...--....._.._......_. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indlcator pominance Test workehset: � Tree Strefum (Plot slze: 3i� ✓k.��✓T % ove ciea ;��a u Number of Dominant Specfes �� _ That Ara OBL,FACW,or FAC: Z (A} 2. 9. Total Number of Dominant _ Species Across All Streta: � (13) 4. 5. '— Percent of Dominant Speclas — That Ara OBL,FACW,or FAC: - ��2 (1V8) =Total Cover SaullnalShrub Straium (Plot slze; `5��) Prevalence Index worksheet: � � _ Tolal%Cover o(: Multi�lv bv: 2, _ OBL specles x 1= a. _ FACW species x 2= 4 _ FAC spacles x 3= 6. FACU SpeGfe9 X 4= � =Tolal Covar UPL specles x 6= Herb nSlratum (Plot elze:�v�) Column Totals: (A) (8) 1. rhrlw.�:t w�'L��MG�aI _...L_ � 2. � �_ Prevalence lndex =B/A a 3. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indicators; 4. _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. �2-Oominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is s3,0' 7. _ _ 4-Marphological Adaptatians'(Provida supportin8 8. data in Remarka or on e separate sheet) 9. — _ Problematic Flydrophytic Vegetation'(Explaln) 10. �Total Cover '�ndicators of hydric soH and welland hydrology muat /�, � —�— be present,unlese disturbed or problemalic. Woq1fy Vine St�atu� (Plot slze; 1 J� �P_� � — Hytlrophytic 2• Vagetetlon =Total Cover P�eaent? Yea_� No Remerks: (Include photo numbere here or on e separate aheet.) US Army Corps of Eng(neers Midwest Region—Verslon 2.0 SOIL Sampll�p Point• ��T Proflle Descrlptlon: (Descrlba to tfie depth needed to document the indfcator or contirm the absence of Indicatore.) Depth Matrix Redox Fealuras (inches) Color(moisU % Color(mofsl) % Tyoe�—LoC� Texlure Remarks D-lo I oY/Z 2/rt �� .� lo-)g' �e 2/r �� 6M 2 -��-�- -�'� �-„�X�-4�c_. .�-- -� �- - r-�c�l�er��2— ._. 'T e: C=Concentratlon D=Oe letion,RM=Redu�ed Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Locatlon: PL=Pore Llning M=Metrix. r Hydric Soil lndlcators; Indlcatore tor Problematic Hydrlc Solls : _ Histosol(AI) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prafrie Redox(A1G) _ Hislic Eplpedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) Dark SuAace(S7) _ Bleck Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(SO) Iron•Mengenese Mesaes(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratifled Layers(AS) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrtx(F2) Other(Explaln In Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Dapleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Suriace(F6) � 7hick Dark SuAace(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators oi hydrophytic vegetallon and _ 6andy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Oepresslons(FB) wetlend hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peal or Peal(S3) uniess disturbed or prohlemalic. Restrictive Layer(If observod►: — • Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soll Presentl Yes� No_,_ Remarks: • HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrolopy Indicators: � Pfimarv Indlcators(minimum of ona Is reauired;check a�i that aoP1YL Secondarv Indicaiors(minimum pf two rea�!re�l,� _ Surtace Water(A1) _ Water•Stalned Leaves(69) _ Surtace Soil Cracks(66) �Hlgh Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Orainage Patterns(B10) �Saturatlon(A3) � Trua Aquatic Plants(614) ^ Dry-Seaeon Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulflde Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ 5ediment Deposita(62) _ Oxidized Rliizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vlsible on Aerial Imagery(Cf!) _ Drlft Deposlts(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ,_ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dt) _ Algal Ma1 or Cruet(84) _ ReCent Iron Reduclion In Tilled Sofls(C8) ,� Geomorphlc Posltlon(D21 _ Iron Deposils(BS) _ Thin Muck Su�face(C7) � FAC-Neulrel Test(05) Inundation Vlelblo on Aerial Imegery(87) _ Geuga or Well Dala(D�) _ Sparsely Vegelated Concave Surlace(BB) _ Other(Explain In Remarks) Fleld Observations: • Surface Water Present7 Yes No�_ Depth(Inches): �"— Water Table Present7 Yes� No Depth(inches): g Saturatlon Present7 Yes_� No Depth(inchas): b Wetland HydroloeY Prosent9 Yos�. No_,_ fncludes ca Illa frin e Deacriba Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,prevlous Inspectlons),if available: Remarks: • US Army Corps of Engineora Midwast Repion—Versiori 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecU3ile: ��e�,to ��.��R�s CitylCounty:_ �+G�rfe.d;,n Samplinp Date:�[��,� AppltcanUOwner, va►n 7'mfi��w n.il Slate;� �� Sampling Po1nL,�—/J�_ Invesligator(s): GII�►� Sedion,Township,Range:_.��"/)�r! . ��3t� �-�j-- Landtorm(hillslope,terrace,efc.): l�j�((�/�,Id Locel reliei(conceva,convex,none); Gar.n.,e Slope(%):,�_ Lat: Lon : 9 Datum; Soil Map Unit Name: �y�a2�s NWI classification; , Are climatic I hydrologic conditlons on lhe sile typical for this lirne of year? Yes No�_ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation„�jL,Soi!�_,or Hydrology��,signfiicenlly disturbed7 Are"Normal Circumstances"presentl Yes� No Are Vegetation_�,Soil___��[,or Hydrolopy__�naturally problematic7 (If needed,explain any answera in Remerks.) - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling polnt locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Present7 Yes X No � Hydric Soll Present� Yea No__�S__ Is tho Samplod Aroa Wetland Hydrolopy Present7 Yes No__j� within n Wvtland? Yes No �'G Remar s: • T�'�:3 w•.s .� N..f- ,�J.,.d od Cr<o.vrc�.,, 7�+5 7�.Q. G,r.l..,,��< q.9,.G�s:s �/L ti"f�oiyw+�.�! -�w� �-Tri.S o�vJ:�1 a..-�1or,I. ------�._...------._...._-----........._.__. ..---.____...----.__-------___.._..__..___,.---__.�...__._._........._..___..._.____.,._._. __..._-..._................. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absoluta Dominant Indlcator pominance Test worksheet: � Tree Stratum (Plot size: �D�✓�.[T t r,.�� °/ ove S cioe :�tetus Number of Dominant Specles �• � Thet Aia OBL,FACW,or FAC: �_ (A) 2. 3. Total Number o1 Dominent , Speciea Acroes All Strafa; (13) 4. —' Percenl of Dominant Specles 5' — Thal Aro OBL,FACW,or FAC: . 1 Q7 (,�VB) =Total Cover SeollnnlShrub Stratum (Plot slze; (��_� ,.ie) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1• _ 7olal%Cover of: Multlnlv bv: 2 _ OBL species x 1= 3 � FACW specles x 2= 4• _ FAC spaclos x 3= 6. _ FACU species x q= � =Total Cover UPL specfes x 6= Herb Stratum (Plot elze:��) ' � � � � �� Column Totels: (A) (g� 2. �*� 'T ��-��;•);.ar e.� �i Q `� PrevalenCe Index =8/A= 3. HydrophytlC Vegetatlon Indicators: 4. ^ _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. �2-Domfnance Test Is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ _ 4-Morphological Adaptations�(Provide suppoAing 8 data in Remarks or on a seperale sheet) 9 — _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegeletion'(Explain) 10. — 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mu:sl Woodv Vine StraWm (Plot size: ��✓frL:.�s) `Total Cover be presenl,unless disturbed or problematic. �' — Hydrophytic 2. Vegotatlon =Total Cover Present9 Yes k, No Remarks; (Include photo rtumbere here or on e eeparate sheat.) US Army Corps ot Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 $��L Samptlng Point:�=V� Proflle Descrlption: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or contirm the absence of Indlcatore.) � Depth Matrlx Redox Fealurea in he Color(moist) % Color(moisU % TYoe LoC Texture Remarks �-1v �sYR2�� _1j�� •— 1,_� -1�- J�.., "��-.,�4.- -- 20-24 _ 1 o�„j�44/4- .9.�_ 7.5�1�4,�,d. 2� �_ �_ �-'�d`f�" � �— 'T e: C=Concentraliai D=De letlon,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore llnln ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soll Indicatore: Indlcetors for Problematic Hydric Solls; _ Hlstosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Pralrle Redox(A1 G) _ Histic Eplpedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) Dark 5urtace{57) _ Black Nistfc(A3) ^ Siripped Matrix(S8) Iron•Manganeae Masees(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very 5hallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratilied Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Expialn in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10j _,,,. Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark SuAace(A11) _, Redox Oark Suriace(F6) _ ThIcK Dark SuAace(Al2) , Depleted Dark Surface(F7) �tnclicators oi hydrophyUc vegetatlon and _ Sendy Mucky Mlnerel(S1) ,_ Redox Depresslona(F8) welland hydrology must be present. 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. RestMctive Loyer(ii observod►: • Type: Depth(Inchea): Hydric Soll Presentl Yes No� Remarks: • HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydroloey Indicetors: • Ptimarv Indlcators Iminimum of one Is rea Ir�y(;�F1g�k�Jl thet�p��l �gyondarv In�lealo�s(minlmum of rivo reaulre�l _ Surface Water(A1 J _ Water-Stalned Leaves(BE) T Surtace Soil Crecks(BO) _ Hlgh Water Toble(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(613) _ Dralnage Patterns(810) _ Saturatlon(A9) � True Aquatic Planta(B14) , Dry-Season Water Tabla(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) „ Hydrogen Sulflde Odor(C1) _ Crayfiah Burrows(C8) _ Sedimenl Deposits(82) _ Oxidlzed Rhizospheres on living Roots(C3) _ 5eturalion Vlsible on Aerial Imegery(C43) _ Drifl Deposits(83) _ Presonce of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reducllon in Tilled Solls(C6) _ Geomorphlc Positlon(D2) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck 5urface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(DG) inundation Vieiblo on Aerial Imegery(87) _ Geuge or Woll Dota(DOy _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) ^ Olher(Explain In Remarks) Fleld Observationa: • Surface Water Present? Yes No_� Deplh(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No_� Depth(inches): �Zi4. Saturatlon Present7 Yes No_� Depfh(Inchesl:� Wetland Hydrolo�y Prosent7 Yes No� intludes ca illa irin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerlal photos,prevlous InspecUons),if available; Remarks: • US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Varsion 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Mfdwest Region Project/Si�e� ��`o„to �w.�L-•�� {��s Cily/Counly:_ !l�b7rfe.s S.� 5ampling Date��_�_?�__ e T� AppllcanVOwner: vmn 7'uG�.n�n✓1 State:�'1_� Sampling Paint:�=L,�_� Investigator(s):_ /i✓�►� Sadion,Township,Range:__�`�"!1 ��L 1 , Landform(hillslope,terrece,etc.j: �rr.n.,i sr�n Local rellet(Concave,convex,none); !'�. – Slope(°r6j:�_ Lat: �0�9� Datum; Soii Map Unit Name:_ �AufilQ i P�� NWI classification: Are climatic f hydrologlc conditlons on the site typical for this time of yeer9 Yes No�„ (If no,expiain in Remarks.) Are Vegetetion_�,Soil_�L,or Hydrology_�signilicanlly disturbed9 Are"Normal Circumstancas"present? Yes� No Are Vegetation_�,Sofl_�[,or Hydrology�[_naturully problemetic9 (If needed,explain any anewers in Remerka.) . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sarnpling polnt locations,transects,impo�tant features,etc. Hydrophytic Vagatallon Present? Yes_�_ No � Hydric Soil Pre9ent7 Yes�_ No Is tho Samplod Aron Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_� No wlthin n WotiandZ Yes_� No Remarka: • 7'L��3 H/.�! R IJ�+f-,/f!�oiI R<Gwi+d a-t, 7�s 7�►Q. �if.f�✓b J�J� qrw.�L�s:s �� 7 t/`Eeilrr��.�! '�W "'�^1.S ol�e�1=�a.�'�oH. _.__-----�.._..----�----....__.____._....---- •--------_...--------.....--------._.._..------�---._.. ......____.._....---•---•------....__------.�_._...._..___..__. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants, Absolute Dominant Indlcator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: � %o Cover 5oecios9 3te ue Number of Dominant Species �• � ThatAre OBL,FACW,or FAC: � (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3' _ Speciea Acroas All Strafa: �_ (13) 4. — Percent of Dominant Specles 5' — 7hat Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: ,_,�_ (NB) =Total Cover SaaIIn�IShrub Stralum (Plot slze: �S�.ti..A:..I� Prevalence Indax worksheet: 1• _ Totel%Cover of: Multfolv bv: 2• _ OBL specles x 1 = 3� _ FACW species x 2= 4� _ FAC spaCles x 3= 6 _ FACU speciea x 4= =Total Cover UPL specles x 5= rb tr tu (Plot size:–�s �;�) � p� Column Totals: (A) (8) 1. L1s(wr.'S',��.1�/a..�,��/rl --L.� �L 2. Prevalence Index �B!A� 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. T 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetalion 5. �2-Dominance Test Is?50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. _ 4-Morphologlcal Adaptetions'(Provide auppo�ting 8 data in Remarks or on a separete sheet) 9 — _ Problematic Nydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. — �Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mu:;t � =Tolal Cover be present,unless disturbed or problemalic. Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: �� : �� ' — Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Tolal Cover Present7 Yes_� No Remarks: (Inciude photo numbera here or on e separate sheet.) US Army Corps of E�gineers Midwest Regbn–Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Pofnt: �� Protlle Descriptlon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indfcatora.) Dopth Matrix Redox Features inc e Color(mols� % Color(moist) �_ Type�—�' LOC Texlure Remarks d-12 IoYR2l� ��h -- �?� �o'''�;. � l.a.., �=1�. l2.k�'�-4/1 �� 7��4/� -Z._ _�. ....�._ � �— 'T e: C=Concenlratlon,D=De letlon,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Gralns, �locatfon: PL=Pore llning M=Matrix Hydric Soll Indicators: Indicetore for Problemattc Hydric Solls: � _ Hlstotol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Malrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A1(i) _ Hislic Epipedon(A2) � Sandy Redox(55) � Dark Surface(S7) _ Bleck Hiatic(A3) _,,. Siripped Malrix(S8) ^ Iron-Menganese Messes(F12) _ Hydrogen Suifide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Sur(ace(TFt 2) , Stratified Leyers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrlx(F2) _ Olher(Explaln in Remerks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _, Dapletad Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Oark Surface(A11) _ Redox Oark Su�face(F6) �Q Thick Dark Surtace(At2) ,_ Depleted Dark Surtace(F7) 'Indicators oi hydrophyUc vegetatlon and _ Sendy Mucky Minarel(S1) _, Retlox Dep�esslons(F8) wetlend hyd�ology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S�) uniess disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layor(if obaervod); - Type: Deplh(inches): Hydric Soll Present7 Yos�_ No_,_ Remarks: � HYDROLOGY � Wetland Hydrolopy tndlcetors: � Prlmarv Indicators(minimum of one fs reryyfred�chec�C�I e ly) Secondarv Indlcators fminimum of hvp�eaui�gd,� � Sucface Water(A1) _ Waler-Stained Leaves(B9) _ SuAace Soil Crecks(BG) �C Hlgh Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Dralnage Patlerns(B10) �,Saturatlon(A3) _ True Aquet�c Plants(B14) _ Dry-3eason Watar Table(C2) _ Water Marke(B1) _ Hydrogen Suifide Odor(C1) _ Crayflsh Burrows(C8) _ Sedimenl Deposita(82) _ Oxldized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Seturetion Visible on Aeriai tmegery(C�)) _ �rlft Daposlts(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stresaed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tillad Soils(C8) X.Gaomorphic Positlon(D2 i _ Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) �,FAC-Neulral Test(D5) _ Inundation Vislbla on Aerlal Imegory(B7) _ Geugo or Wall Dote(D�J) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) _ Other(Expialn In Remarks) Field Obsenatio�o: — SuAace Water Present9 Yes�e No Oepth(Inches):�_ Water Table Present� Yes�_ No Depth(inches): �h 1 Saturatlon Present� Yes X� No Depth(Inches>: -F I Wetland Hydrology Prosent7 Yes� No includes ca Illa frin e —�— Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerlal photos,prevlous inspeclions),Ii avallable: Remarks; • US Army Corps of Engineors Midwest Region-Varsion 2.0 APPENDIX C Site Photographs ;.� � ^� . . Q''�'��.� '°;� : ,�, xR,� '�� a S y I. \,: j y7.� �� / • ��i � -�n .��r �� +'R� �i �a,4�'i��'��''�'' � �� t� *��av v,��,e��i lE:P"' i ae� t � d•,�f 47 `�� 0 4ya�1�` � ��4l! ! �t � ` '�� e. � _ �i: '�'Nb�i M��_ I " '� / .,'�� ';4��,'-��„� �p�'�� .� �.-�-�_.: __ , �;. . _ _ ' ��' �,. ',s�.. ,�. _; _. , �<„ . � , ; � . ,,,,.•x_. , , . . - h: , , � _ .. -- . � .i. .... ' �lu,:,a... . . . . ��.�-`'.',_ . � ��,: • <. i�� - ti ` �� ..� � . _. � „ � ��r.. � 6 '� v�^ ' a.'."r, .0�,;a,.. . . . ~F ` � '�`.. �". '- '� � _ - e � . . . . � � ��ey�: ,:�,�� .�-�1. �� _ ... , . ;::Y,�,,� . - � �,v�.•..,�, - �' r . . . � �N�� -K. a ... - ' � � �':�.Z: . . ' .. . . . 1�;��yy �. ,.�� „i�. f � . �.. �- , — . . ;j�:�� . .. ' . ' _. � �.'S �yr'�_ . . . . . ' � ."I:v . F . .1. '_ _ . .. _ ._ � � 1 1 � 1 ' 1 11 d, ��f � i, ; �Q� '� �j'i" ,3/�� /, �`� � ` ��n� � 4 . . 1'�� 4 / A � ' ` �, '� � `,!} � 1 a 7 � e �'� ,Y,�Y� i��y ��:'� � �. �e:.� / '� i � �� Il�]i� i A�� , ` ' � � � �' . _ ��•� �� i��. y � � � „./..r�� tCw � ' '. `1 . ��1� � � 1 I � .�"W '__. �,'_'_:/ _ �.�� _._ ._ . . _ ��f . { K +Md� -.�T"+<-�a.�r . .�. . _-�i� � ., . . _ . _;.1, � - �i .`yry� `��.,, ^�, _,.. . . .. . '�` � _ .. , �i��, ,. . '_ ,. . �� t:Y T��.�.� .,�,[�y� .`P�, d ��C'-!�'j��y.��4 . .. . ' ,fa�'� `,�" •i 7f' >.� ' .f'� . � .� . . ..'/4� . , . . � �i+�'J4�.1�'w ,. 1 ' ' . . ' . . . � ;,��p 'Z ti�t�:y'�`rn�i- _,Jd . ,;A.��:¢�y�,�f' � . . � . . . .. .. . '� .. r _ Y4_ 1 .f * f;�. �, e� �, x. r , a:. - . }.. .. S .�1,. . . . _y.,.. � y,. �� :. � .� . . ,., . . .. .. ^ , � . 1 , . `.;, . . �- . . "�. . . ' y r��_ ' _ ��k ;�e. - ` � �:'�_. . . . .. .-`�" - . .. - . . � i �. . . _ � - � ' .. :_ y . . .. , .. . . . . . . . �'. , _ II � � 1 / 1 � � 1 1 APPENDIX D WCA Wetland Type and Boundary and USCOE Approval Forms - • . - � • - • ' ' � • • � � • • • • - • •- � C • • . 1. ProjecUSite Information Project/Site Name: p,.��',r ��5 p,,�,ra Local Government Unit: C:�y ef �,�,,,,o Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): -7'��gy,t� �22,3G�J J�/r•✓�/¢, aE S-�• 3� 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: g� ��s� Address: �Zs�(,1G�-�/l� �� City, State, Zip: pv,r,��J ��N ��_�1�� E-mail: b,jotiNa-o.� QS't'�jo:+,�J. co,•,� Phone: �IZ-- 3G� — 9'77¢ 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name(if applicable):��s,o,,, ��;,,,�,�,,�,�'�ontact Person: ��,,,� �� Address: 5g� ( �v..�1rok-} �`�f City, State, Zip: 8,.�,�j�� t,�j�/ 3`S¢-3a E-mail: `jR�b�.,.,�.*v� ►�v�srl, ��q,r,� Phone: �012 —�`D2 �1o6/q 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: f�.Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) �Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner to pursue this determination. � �/3/2oi3 Applicant r Autho d Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 Print Form � � „� � L�S Army Cnrps of�nginecrs SI.Paul Uistrict Request for Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Review Please enter the following general information about the property under review: Name of property owner � �'.�irrr�.,, Property Address (No. & Street,City,State,Zip Code) 32.�' �IG L�//�, /� o.�o /G�'�/ L�tt. ° I.on�.� ° decimal de rees Coun � Loeation: � 1/4 ection �f 1 Township (jp��/Range 23W Size of review a rea ,p acre(s) By submission of this wetland delineation report ! am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of�Engineers, St. Paul District provide me with the following(check only one box): � Wetland Delineatian Concurrence. Concurrence with awetland delin�ation is a written notitication trom the Corps concurring, not concurrinb, or cammenting on thc wetland boundaries delinea[ed on a property. Under this request, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of�the wetlands on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area. ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination is a non- binding written indication that there may be waters ofthe United States, including wetlands, on a parcel or indications of the approximate location(s)of waters of th� United States or wetlands on a parcel. Preliminary jurisdictional determinations are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Uetermination. An approved jurisdictional determination is an ofticial Corps determination that_jurisdictional waters uf'the United States or navigable waters of the Unitcd States, or both, �re cither present or absent on the property. An approved jurisdictional determination preeisely identities the limits ofthose waters on the project site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved jurisdictional detenninations ean be relied upon by the aftected party for a period of tive years. An approved jurisdictional determination may be appealed through the Corps' administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in aucordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota and Wisconsin (http://www.mvp.usaee.army.m i I/regulatory/). Requestor�o �«4,8a Date J'r�/31��?, Name(typed)