Laserfiche WebLink
-- _,_ <br /> �,_ <br /> � o� <br /> O O `, <br /> T::�:. ._ CITY of ORONO <br /> � -, "�" �tw�ic;pai oFeces <br /> •�n � �' ; ; 'y�;, Post Offke Box 66 <br /> �\ '� �' � � �, (�j � Crystal Bay,Minnesota 55323 <br /> ������ ,�:�a��r',������`�j �� <br /> �\kESI3�// <br /> _�- <br /> June 4 , 1991 <br /> Bill Bockman <br /> 1090 Loma Linda Avenue <br /> Mound, MN 55364 <br /> Re: New Deck Replacing Old Three Season Porch <br /> Dear Mr. Bockman: <br /> Several issues have come up in trying to get a permit issued <br /> f or your deck. <br /> First of all , at the time of the permit for your second <br /> story addition approval was given to remove the superstructure of <br /> your old porch but to leave the deck in place. Mike Gaffron <br /> pointed out that a variance would be required for a new deck in <br /> that Iocation. <br /> When Lyle and I visited the sight you had already torn down <br /> the old porch floor and started a new deck. It appeared at first <br /> that a new deck might be possible while still meeting average <br /> setback distances from the lakeshore. <br /> After discussing this with Mike Gaffron, we discovered that <br /> your deck does indeed encroach into the average setback area. We <br /> therefore suggested the deck would have to be considered a grade <br /> level deck to meet setbacks. You proposed keeping the deck below <br /> 30" high so a railing would not be required. <br /> In continuing with the zoning review we discovered that you <br /> are over the 25� allowable hardcover in the 75-250' zone. In <br /> your calculation the driveway had not been included in your total <br /> hardcover. You have approximately 32$. Thus a variance is still <br /> required to replace your deck. I would also like to point out <br /> that a variance will be required if you wish to build a porch on <br /> this deck in the future. <br /> T'ELEPHONE-473-7357�FAX-473-0510 <br />