HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-11-1985 Council Minutes MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 1
ATTENDANCE 7 :03 PM The Orono Council met on the above date with the following
members present : Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Grabek,
Frahm, I�ynn �dams , and Tim Adams. City Attorney Radio was
present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning
Administrator Gaffron, Public Works Coordinator
Gerhardson, and Recorder Sutton represented the City staff .
City EngineerCook arrived at8 : 05p.m. Planning Commission
Representative Rovegno was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA* Councilmember Tim Adams asked that items 12 and 20 be removed
from the Consent Agenda* for discussion. Councilmember
Lynn Adams asked that item 10 also be removed for discussion.
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda* , subject to
removing items 10 , 12 , and 20 from the Consent Agenda for
discussion, with allstaff reportsconcerning these itemsto
be attached to an original copy of these minutes on file in the
City Clerk ' s office . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
the Orono Council meeting held January 28 , 1985 . Motion,
Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION
DISTRICT REPORT There was no Lake Ninnetonka Conservation District
Report.
PLANNING COMMISSION
COMMENTS - Planning Commission Representative Rovegno was present
substituting for Planning Commission Representative
Goetten.
PUBLIC COMMENTS There were r�o comments from the public present.
#881 RRUTZIG CDSTOM HOMES
1629 BOHN' S POINT RD
VARIANCE
RESOLiJTION #1726* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve Resolution #1726 , A Resolution Denying
a Variance to permit additional hardcover. Motion, Ayes
( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 2
#886 RICflARD RAGATZ
1945 CONCORDIA STREET
VARIANCE Richard Ragatz was present along with David Kirscht,
designer of proposed deck. Assistant Zoning Administrator
Gaffron explainedthat the Planning Commission approved this
application subject to Council ' s findings in the Krutzig
application . Gaffron stated that the hardcover problem is
then solved if the deck is not considered hardcover, but the
problem is that the deck extends into the 0-75 ' setback area
and decks are considered structures .
Richard Ragatz explained that the house was built in 1921 and
therefore he didn ' t have much of a choice on where to place the
deck. Ragatz noted that placing the deck on the side of the
property is not very acceptable to his neighbors in that the
deck would be located directly outside the r.eighbors bedroom
window.
David Kirscht showed the Council some slides of the property.
Planning Commission Representative Rovegno noted that
Ragatzdid remove some hardcoverwithin that lakeshore area .
Rovegno noted that Planning Commission approved the Ragatz
application contingent upon Council ' s positive findings on
the Krutzig application. Rovegno stated that once the
hardcoverissue was solved, then the Planning Commission had
to deal with the question of whether the deck structure
within the 0-75 ' setback zone is considered a non-
encroachment as well .
Councilmember Frahm stated that he was at the Planning
Commission meeting where this application was reviewed.
Frahm noted that the main problem with decks is they were
always considered hardcover and therefore the City never got
into review of decks because hardcover was not allowed .
Frahm noted that this deck does not block the view of any
neighbors which was his next concern.
Councilmember T. Adams noted that whatever acti_on the
Council ta)�es tonight will set a precedent . Adams stated
the City should consider drafting new setbacks for lakeshore
if certain decks are not considered hardcover.
Councilmember L. Adams asked for the average setback of
surrounding homes in the area. Adams stated that it looked
as if the homes were less than 75 ' from the lake.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that an
average setback study was not done but that it appeared there
were homes both less than and more than 75 ' from the lakeshore
in the area .
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985_ PAGE 3
City Attorney Radio stated that the City' s test for variances
has tomeet several tests . Radio stated that the question of
whether the property can be put to a reasonable use without
the approval of the variance works against the applicant in
this case, in that the property can be used without the deck.
Radio noted that the question of the plight of the land owner
due to circumstances unique to his property not created by
land owner works in favor of the applicant because of the
position of the house and the year the home was built. Radio
explained that the question whether approval of this
variance would alter the neighborhood works in favor of the
applicant in that it will not block any neighbors view of the
lakeshore. Radio noted that economic considerations do not
constitute approval of the variance alone.
Niayor Butler moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded , to
approve the variance request of Richard Ragatz and directed
staff to draft a resolution of approval noting the following
findings :
l. No view problem would be encountered.
2 . The proposed deck only extends lakeward as far as the
extension of the west line of the house to the south.
3. The location of an existing Box Elder tree and the house
to the south are factors which limit the acceptable
locations for the proposed deck.
4. The location of applicants existing house poses a
problem in locating a suitable deck.
5 . Applicant has stated that he has removed 150-200 sf of
existing hardcover walkways in the 0-75 ' setback zone .
6 . The front line of the deck does not and may not extend
beyond the front line of the home to the south.
7 . Sand is to be placed under the surface of the deck as was
done in the Krutzig application to prevent encroachment
of hardcover into the 0-75 ' setback zone.
8 . The deck is low to the ground and will not be noticeable
from the lake.
9 . A deck on either side of the house does not appear to be
practical because of limited space.
10 . The steep grade of lake starting at about a 30 ' setback and
the average setback of the houses in the area which
appears to be 50-60 ' rather than the required 75 '
suggests that the natural non-encroachment area is less
than 75 ' .
MIN�TES OF T;:E ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 4
11 . The 15 ' elevation would give a true distance of 75 ' from
the lake at about a 70 ' horizontal distance .
1.2 . The variance will not modify the character of the
neighborhood.
Additional findings should include the Krutzig findings in
Resolution #1726 .
Before the motion was voted upon, discussion continued .
Councilmember Grabek noted that he did not vote for the
Krutzig application because he was building a new home on
lakeshore property and knew the zoning codes prior to
building the home. Grabek stated that the past phi]_osophy
of the Council has been for the benefit of the lake and the
City has been strict on any building within the 0-75 '
lakeshore setback area . Grabek stated that if the Council
passes this motion, that the philosophy of the City is
changing for certain reasons such as the home being built
prior to th� current owner and the general lay of the land
because other homes extend beyond this home. Grabek stated
that there are plenty of homes in Orono that may have the same
hardships as Ragatz . Grabek noted that the general
philosophy of the City seems to be changing. Grabek stated
that he would have to vote against this motion in order to be
consistent with past City decisions. Grabek noted that the
Council should be willing to allow everyone else to build
within the 75 ' if they approve Ragatz ' s application.
Councilmember T. Adams felt the same as Councilmember
Grabek. Adams noted that this is a 20 percent lakeshore
setback variance.
Councilmember L. Adams stated that he agrees with the 0-75 '
setback rule with the lake, but that there are many lots
around the lake which have special circumstances that
warrantavariance . Adamsfeltthat theKrutzig application
was one and that the Ragatz application is another one.
Adams noted that he did not feel that this would be a
philosophical change to approve this variance.
Councilmember Frahm asked that the deck be moved just so it
extends along the side of the home and out of the 75 ' setback
zone.
Richard Ragatz stated that a mature tree would have to be
removed if the deck was to be placed on the side of the
property. Ragatz noted also that the neighbors do not wish
to have the deck outside their window and that he is trying to
preserve the privacy of both homeowners.
David Kirscht stated that approving this variance would nbt
be precedent setting in that each variance is unique to each
individual property and should be reviewed that way.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBROARY 11, 1985. PAGE 5
Counc� lmember Frahm and T. Adams asked that a compromise be
reached maybe by extending only 10 percent into the 0-75 '
zone and placing decking on the side. They felt that the 20
percent variance was too much to allow and that a 10 percent
variance would be better .
David Kirscht stated that from a design and function
standpoint it would not be feasible.
D4ayor Butler withdrew the motion.
Councilmember L. Adams stated that he would amend his second
if the motion was made for a 10 percent variance rather than 20
percent.
Councilmember Grabek explained that if the City was going to
give the applicant a 10 percent variance , they may as well
give him the 20 percent variance. Grabeic stated that by
giving the applicant only 10 percent it doesn ' t make the deck
very desireable or useable ; therefore, the City should be
strict and consistent and not allow any structure within the
0-75 ' zone. Grabek noted if the City' s philosophy is going
to change and allow structures within that 0-75 ' zone, what
isthedifference between 10-20 ' . Grabek noted the City may
as well let the applicant have the 20 percent if they are going
to char.ge their philosophy. Grabek asked the Council why
penalize the applicant 10 ' just so the Council feels safer
that they are staying within the 75 ' setback.
Richard Ragatz agreed with Councilmember Grabek in that if
the City only approved a 10 percent variance the deck would
not be as functional.
Mayor Butler suggested that Council pick a number to give the
applicant guidelines on redesigning his deck.
Councilmember Grabek stated that puts the Council in an
awkward position in that i_t makes someone pull out of the air a
number that they feel appropriate without any basic sound
engineering judgment or any science of decking, or movement
of people, and opening of windows or doors .
Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to
approvethe setback variancefor Richard Ragatz to construct
the proposed deck and direct staff to draft a resolution of
approval incorporating all of the findings and conditions
made in Mayor Butler ' s previous motion. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) ,
Nays (1 ) .
Councilmember Tim Adams voted nay.
Councilmember L. Adams asked why Councilmember Grabek
changed his opinion.
�INUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985_ PAGE 6
Councilmember Grabek felt that t.he gener_al concensus of the
Council is that they would like to give a variance to this
applicant because of the hardships, and before the Council
gets to the point of creating an additional hardship on this
individual by giving him maybe 2-3 ' , which is the same as
giving20-25 ' , hefeltit should be approved. Grabek stated
that the Council should not pull figures/numbers out of the
air with no specific reason or engineering ratianale.
Grabek felt that before the Council gets to the point where
they would create additional hardship for the applicant by
not making the deck desireable or useable after redesigning
the deck, he felt it should be approved . Grabek felt that
the Council ' s general trend is that the Council is going to
allow some type of variance, and if they allow some type of
variance to the 75 ' setback zone regulation, then the Council
should give the applicant the 20 ' .
David Kirscht asked that the 1/2" strip condition be removed
in that it would create a "trip strip" because the decking
does not have railings , and people would trip over this 1/2"
strip.
Council agreed that the "trip strip" condition could be
removed as long as the applicant places this strip along any
portion of the deck that does have railings .
�887 FREDERICK WINSTON
765 SPRING HILL RD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION �1727* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve Resolution #1727 , A Resolution
approving A Variance for Frederick Winston to permit
construction of a storage building. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays
(0 ) .
#890 CLIFF OTTEN
875 WAYZATA BLVD
CONCEPTiJAL REVIEW Clifford Otten was present . Otten informed Council that he
was just polling them on whether the City would like this type
of use in Orono and what locations they would prefer. Otten
stated that this p�-oposed site at 875 Wayzata Blvd would make
it possible for him to combine his Long Lake and Wayzata
businessesinto one building. Otten stated that he doesn' t
know if this location will work or not so he may go back to his
other possible locations .
Councilmember T. Adams stated that this was a perfect use in
thatitsnon-sewered commercial. Adamsstated thatit still
gives the surroundings a rural touch. Adams stated that
nurseries are ideal in this type of non-sewered commercial
zoning district. Adams stated that performance standards
should be developed for this possible type of non-sewered
commercial zoning.
[INUTES OF THE ORONO COONCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 7
Mayor Butler stated that the site on Old Crystal Bay Road and
Highway 12 would have a better access to the property than the
property at 875 Wayzata Blvd.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Council that the
City should consider the MWCC interceptor that will run along
Highway 12 , and the developers that will be approaching the
City for commercial uses, and should develop and prepare for
this in the future. Mabusth asked Council if a professional
planner could be hired for consultation with staff to help
develop these performance standards for this type of zoning.
Mabusth stated that John Shardlow would be the ideal planner
to hire in that he worked on the interceptor issue and is also
famili.ar with the City ' s policies .
Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember T. Adams
seconded, to explore the employment and invite John Shardlow
to the Council to discuss a contract to act as a consultant
with the City staff for this specific project concerning the
non-sewered commercial area and rezoning of Highway 12 .
Notion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
Councilmember L. Adams asked that the City not put Cliff
Otten on hold until after the study is concluded and that the
City approve a request for a rezoning.
9 :15 PM APPEARANCE
MAYOR ART RUNZE
CITY OF LONG LARE
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
OF LONG LARE SEWER
PLANT PROPERTY Long Lake ' s Mayor Art Kunze was present along with attorney,
Arlo Vande Vegte. Kunze noted that he does not have the soil
boring tests yet. Kunze stated that the City of Long Lake
plans to furnish sewer and water to this site . Kunze noted
that this property is useless to the City of Orono in that
Orono is not receiving taxes off this property.
Zoning AdministratorMabusth stated that the property has 25
acres with only 13 dry buildable acres . Mabusth noted that
at a maximum Long Lake would only get 12 to 13 units if
developed on rural standards . Mabusth stated that the DNR
has new setbacks for structures from Long Lake creek that the
City will have to abide by. Mabusth stated that soil borings
are being done within the area of the pond to see if this
property is buildable.
Councilmember T. Adams stated that even if Long Lake provides
sewer and water, it is more of a density question. Adams
stated that it causes more problems for Lake Minnetonka to
allow that many houses on only 25 acres . Adams explained to
Kunze that Orono' s philosophy is different from Long Lake ' s .
Adams suggested that Long Lake take a look at some of the
recent PRD' s that have been done in Orono. Adams stated that
he would like to see the two acre density done in the most
economical way with or without sewer.
iINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETZNG HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 8
Councilmember L. Adams asked Kunze if he felt that developing
the land to Orono ' s current zoning code would be unpracticle.
Kunze felt that it would be unpracticle and Long I,ake might
not even develop the land if requested to develop without
sewer and water .
N,ayor Butler noted that this property is in a two acre zoning
district. Butler also noted that there is wetlands on the
property.
Councilmember Frahm noted that this development would set a
precedent if Long Lake was allowed to develop without regard
to Orono' s zoning code. Frahm stated that Orono would have
to change their Comprehensive Plan in order to approve this
development.
Arlo Vande Vegte, attorney, stated that this development
would not set a precedent because of the uniaue
circumstances . Vande Vegte stated that the land is owned by
another municipality and is adjacent to such municipality.
Councilmember L. Adams stated that the sewer pond is an
eyesore. Adams stated that he would like to see more than 12
units nicely laid out on the land. Adams asked why the City
doesn 't consider transferring the property over to the City
of Long Lake.
Mayor Butler explained that the annexation of the sewer pond
property over to Long Lake was discussed before and the
Council at that time was not in favor of the annexation.
Butler noted to Kunze that clustering of the homes in a PRD
type development would save Long Lake money in running the
sewer and water lines to the properties .
Councilmember Grabek moved , Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to direct staff to work with the City of Long Lake to
work out a reasonable and feasible plan that meets Orono ' s
zoning codes , and further directs staff to consider the PRD
type development. Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
Councilmember Grabek asked Kunze if Long Lake would be
interested in selling the property to Orono. Grabek asked
that Kunze come back with a price next time he meets with the
Orono Council if he is interested in selling the property.
Councilmember L. Adams stated that he is interested in Long
Lake' s developing the property to Orono' s standards ( 12
houses with no sewers ) and then deeding the property to Long
Lake because it is adjacent to Long Lake. Adams stated that
if it became a part of Long Lake and they put restrictions in
the title of the two acre lots , that they could not be
subdivided, it would be a buffer zone.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11 , 1985. PAGE 9
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER
PROJECT REPORT City Engineer Cook reviewed with the Council the plans and
specs of the Crystal Bay Sewer Project. Cook noted that the
assessment hearing would be held April 22 , 1985 .
Mayor Butler asked staff to reserve the Art Center ' s
Auditorium for the assessment hearing on April 22 , 1985 and
the regular Council meeting will be held that night also.
Butler suggested a bulk mailing to the general public so that
they know what portion of the sewer project they will have to
pay also.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember. Grabek seconded , to
approve the plans and specs and direct staff to advertise for
bids. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
City Engineer Cook stated that he needs Council permission to
begin the easement acquisition procedure.
Councilmember Frahm stated that the City should not go to
such expense until they are sure whether the sewer project
will go through or not.
Councilmember L. Adams moved, Councilmember Grabek
seconded, to direct staff to begin the easement acquisition
procedure. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays (1 ) .
Councilmember Frahm voted nay.
City Engineer Cook noted the additional costs in regard to
the cost of installing City water at the same time the sewer is
installed. Cook stated that there are two options for
providing water service to the area. Cook noted the
estimated cost for the lateral system is $297 , 060 resulting
in a unit cost of $3 , 580 for 83 units . Cook noted the
estimated cost for the well and pressure system is $289 , 800
and the estimated cost for the trunk water line from Long Lake
is $514 , 380 .
Councilmember L. Adamsmoved, Councilmember Frahm seconded,
to cease further discussion or investigation into the idea of
installing water at the same time in the Crystal Bay area.
Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Butler told the Council of phone calls that she has been
receiving from a Mound resident (Ron Johnson ) who is asking
that the Orono Council draft a letter to the City Council of
Mound opposing the development at Pelican Point in Mound.
Butler explained that this development is proposing massive
dockage.
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 10
The Council concensus was that Orono should not write a
letter. Council suggested that staff contact Jo Ellen Hurr
(LMCD representative ) and see if she can enlighten Mound on
Orono' s philosophy. Council also asked for an update from
Hurrregarding Chaska Marine ' s license application with the
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District.
CABLE TV REPORT T�ayor Butler announced an executive board meeting regarding
Cable TV to be held February 12 , 1985 at 7 : 00 p.m.
SEASONAL WEIGHT
RESTRICTIONS
RESOLUTION #1728 Councilmember L. Adams asked staff toreword some of the memo
to read "signs of any breakup" rather than "severe breakup" .
Councilmember L. Adamsmoved, CouncilmemberFrahm seconded ,
to approve Resolution #1728 , A Resolution designating weight
restrictions for most of Orono' s road, subject to the
amendment in memo noted above. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
CASH & INVESTMENTS
AS OF DEC. 84* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve Finance Director Kuehn ' s memo dated
February 4 , 1985 , concerning the cash and investments as of
December 31 , 1984 . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
POLICE CONTRACT Councilmember T. Adams asked for clarification on parts of
the police contract.
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the police contract for 1985 . riotion,
Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
EMPLOYMENT POLICE
OFFICER ENGLISH* Councilmember T. Adams moved , Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the employment of Irving Hubbard
English, III effective February 11 , 1985 , with a starting
salary of $1 , 576 per month. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
SQUAD CAR REPLACEMENT*
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the squad car purchase to replace squad
car #142 which was totalled in an accident. Motion, Ayes
(5 ) , Nays (0 ) .
EQOIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCR*
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the specifications of a new single axle
dumptruck and hydraulic sander and to authorize advertising
for bids with the bid opening to be held March 15 , 1985 .
Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 11
LEGAL NEWSPAPER
PUBLICATIONS* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded , to appoint the Laker as the official newspaper
which would service all of Orono and dropping the MN Suburban
News (Sun) . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
REFUND OF SAC CHARGE
TO HOMMEYER* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconcied to approve the refund of $425 (SAC charge ) to
Charles Hommeyer at 4125 Oak Street finding that two SAC
charges w�ere charged to this property. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) ,
Nays (0 ) .
SUMMIIRIES OF RECEIPTS,
DISBURSEMENTS & BALANCES*
Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the Summaries of Receipts ,
Disbursements , and Balances prepared by Finance Director
Kuehn. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
WINE-IN GROCERY
STORES--RESOLUTION Councilmember T. Adams asked that this item be removed from
the Consent Agenda. Adams asked why the City should be
opposed to the sa le of wine in grocery stores . Adams stated
that if the public wants to buy their wine from grocery stores
then they should be allowed to.
Mayor Butler stated that the City has its own liquor store and
the sale of wine in grocery stores would have a drastic effect
on the profits from the municipal liquor store.
Councilmember L. Adams explained that it might have
something to do with the control of sale of wine to minors in
that the liquor stores might have more control.
Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember T. Adams
seconded, to table this Resolution for futher information
from City staff . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
WELSfl MATTER
BENSON EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
City Attorney Radio noted his memo regarding the Welsh matter
wasfor information only. Radio requested approval of the
Walter R. Benson contract with the City.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember T. Adams seconded, to
approve the employment contract with Walter R. Benson.
Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
.
�� MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 12
LICENSES* Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, to approve the following licenses :
Lakeview Golf--Cigarette license
Crystal Bay Service--Cigarette license
Maxwell Alvord--Kennel license
Robert Waag--Kennel license
John Traul--Kennel license
Frank Kokesh--Kennel license
Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
BILLS* Councilmember T. Adams moved , Councilmember L. Adams
seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store
Accounts be paid . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) .
ADJOURNMENT 10 :23 PM
Mayor Butlermoved, Councilmember Frahmseconded, to adjourn
the regular Council meeting at 10 : 23 p.m. Nlotion, Ayes ( 5 ) ,
Nays ( 0 ) .
ATT�ST:
`// / . , ___���=!
�� ,��Ci<<'L
rothy . Hallin, City Clerk Nary C. Butler, Mayor
Thomas Frahm, Acting Mayor