Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-24-1984 Council Minutes MINUTES �F THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7 :00 PM The Orono City Council met on the above date with the following members present : Mayor Butler, Council- members Frahm, and Grabek. Councilmember Adams arrived at 8 : 55 p.m. Councilmember Hammerel was not present. City Administrator Benson was not present. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Engineer Cook, City Attorney Radio, City Recorder Sutton represented the City staff . CONSENT AGENDA* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda* , subject to removing item #2 from the Consent Agenda for discussion, with all staff reports concerning these items reviewed at this meeting to be attached to the original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk' s office. Motion, Ayes (3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Frahm noted on page 12 under McDowell ' s � application that he voted nay. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the minutes of September 10 , 1984, subject to thechangenoted above. Motion, Ayes (3 ) , Nays (0 ) . LARE MINNETONRA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT Jo Ellen Hurr was not present because she had nothing to report. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no Planning Commission comments . PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. #603 WILLIAM WEAR 2901 WATERTOWN ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #1680 Bill Wear was present. Mayor Butler moved , Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1680 , A Resolution Approving Roliing Meadows plat. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . MAYOR' S REPORT Mayor Butler stated that staff has asked that a member of the City staff be appointed as liaison between Council and staff during the absence of City Administrator Benson. Butler suggested John Gerhardson or Joanne Lattin. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded , to appoint John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator, as a temporary liaison between the Council and staff and Joanne Lattin, Office Coordinator, when John is away. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays (0 ) . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24 , 1984 PAGE 2 CABLE TV REPORT Mayor Butler stated that she is no longer on the Cable TV Executive board and asked if another member of the Council or public is interested to contact her. 7 :45 PM APPEARANCE - GERRY SIRORSKI Gerry Sikorski arrived at 7 : 50 p.m. Sikorski was present to answer any questions the Council had. Sikorski stated that he has checked into the federal and state funding issue for the Crystal Bay area sewer project and still has found no funding available. Sikorski stated that he would continue to try and find funding for the Crystal Bay sewer project. CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING 8 :00 PM PUBLIC HEARING TO BE � CONTINUED OCT. 29 Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Mayor Butler announced that now was the time and place for 'the public hearing concerning the proposed Crystal Bay area sanitary sewer improvement project. Thefollowing CrystalBay arearesidentswere present: Duan� Glew of 1135 Brown Road South John Story of 1233 Briar Street Arlene Jansen of 1045 Brown Road South LaDean McWilliams of 1130 Willow Drive Kath�erine Quady of 1223 Brown Road Mr. and Mrs . Flam of 1212 Arbor Street RicY�ard and Ardella Johnson of 1241 Brown Road So. Rich Kiemen of 1212 Briar Street Mr. and Mrs. Mike McClelland of 2170 Minnetonka Ave Mabel Belt of 1380 Briar Street Elizabeth Johnson of 1365 Arbor Street Maybell Kohls of 1224 Briar Street Alex & Dianne Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street Mr. and Mrs . Sandgren of 1215 Arbor Street Lawrence & Phyllis Symoniak of 1155 Brown Road Phillip Kaley of 1395 Brown Road So Steve Carlson of 1205 Arbor Street Marcus Blue of 2160 Crystal Avenue Evelyn & Pat Drummond of 2160 Prospect Ave. Jay Wood of 1285 Arbor Street Charlie Dobson of 1290 Arbor Street Randolph Lukanen of 1085 Brown Road So. Mr. Lukanen of 1085 Brown Road South stated that he did not receive a notice of the public hearing. Mayor Butler noted that Mr. Lukanen is on the mailing list for the public hearing notice. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 3 CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A,rlin Jansen stated that she did not receive a public hearing notice. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that Ms. Jansen is outside the proposed Crystal Bay project area and was not included on the list. Rich Kiemen of 1212 Briar Street stated that he did not receive a notice either. Mayor Butler noted that Mr. Kiemen is on the mailing list for the public hearing notice. Butler noted that Lukanen and Kiemen should have received a notice because they were mailed by the City. Butler also noted that the public hearing was published in the paper. Mayor Butler accepted the petition from the neighbors. City Attorney Radio stated that the public hearing could still be held. City Engineer Cook reviewed with the audience where the sewer lines would run on the streets . Cook stated that the septic tanks are failing on many of the properties in the Crystal Bay area and that the area is in need of sewer. Cook stated that the estimate f or the installation of sewer is based on 1985 dollars . Cook stated that for the installation of sanitary sewer it would cost $645 , 400 and for the street restoration another $467 , 500 . Cook stated that the total for the whole project is $1 , 112 , 900 . Cook stated there would be an annual cost of $4 , 500 to maintain the lift station. Cook stated that there are 83 units that would be assessed for sewer and the cost per unit would be $13 ,410 . Cook stated that an additional $1,500 per unit for the connection to the line was anticipated. Councilmember Adams arrived at 8 :55 p.m. City Engineer Cook stated that the Council has the option of how the sewer project can be assessed. Cook stated that a breakdown of the assessments on an annual basis has been provided. Cook stated that probably a 15 year assessment at 11 percent interest would be used. Cook stated that staff looked at three different options for the assessment as follows : l. The entire assessment based on 100 percent assessed against the benefitting property owners would result in a $13 ,410 per unit with a first year charge of $2 ,692. 41 on down to the year 2000 where assessment would be $992. 34 . 2. 75 percent of the total cost assessed against the _ benefitting property owners would result in a total assessment of $10 , 060 per vnit and a $2 , 000 assessment for the first year and on down to 745_ 11 _ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 4 CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT3. 50 percent of the total cost assessed against the benefitting property owners would result in a total assessment of $6 ,705 . One man asked why the Art Center was excluded from the sewer project. Mayor Butler stated that the Art Center was excluded from the sewer project because they have enough space to expand theirsepticsystemif needed. Butler noted that the Art Center is outside the MUSA boundary and to redraw that line the City would have to have approval from the Metropolitan Council. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff would have to research the exact location of that MUSA line. LaDean McWilliam asked that the Council continue to seek funding for the project. City Engineer Cook noted the time frame of the sewer �construction. Cook stated that approximately 1 mont� of preparation, a 60 day actual digging period of heavy construction, and 1 month to clean up. Gary Printup stated that the public ' s main concern is the cost of the project. Printup stated that they would like to see the Council choose option 3 . Printup stated that it would not be precedent setting to assess the cost of sewer like option 3 because there are only two areas that need sewer in Orono and that is Crystal Bay and Stubbs Bay. Councilmember Frahm stated that if the City chooses option 3 and the City has to pay for 50 percent of the sewer project, that 50 percent would roll over onto the general public. Frahm statec' that the general public in turn would ask why their taxes are going up because of the Crystal Bay sewer project when other projects in the City had to pay for 100 percent of a project. Frah� stated that assessing the cost of a project with option 3 would be precedence setting. Frahm stated that he would have to see the appraisals of the properties before he could decide which option to take as far as the assessments. Councilmember Grabek stated that the Council has to have some rationale to explain to the general tax payers when they ask why their taxes went up because of sewer that is benefitting the Crystal Bay area when they don't even live in the area. Grabek stated that he cannot decide which option to choose until he gets more information from staff in regard to how much the general tax payers taxes will go up if the Council chooses an 80 : 20 ratio or 70 : 30 ratio or 50 : 50 . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24 , 1984 PAGE 5 CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Grabek asked staff to have available grant information for those who are eligible at the next meeting. Grabek stated that he would also like to review the appraiser ' s appraisal before making a decision. Grab�ek stated that the general public should also have a pu�lic hearing if they are going to be assessed for the Crystal Bay area ' s sewer. Public Work Coordinator Gerhardson stated that there is CDBG monies available for those who are eligible but that they have to apply for this individually. Councilmember Frahm moved , Councilmember Grabek seconded, to direct staff to obtain an independent appraiser and to report back to the Council in 30 days and staf f to have the the dol lar f igures on October 15 , as to what how much the general tax payer ' s taxes would increase if they are assessed a portion of the Crystal Bay sewer project. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . Mayor Butler read George Rovegno ' s letter dated September 16 , 1984 , which is attached to these minutes on page 6 and 7 as Rovegno requested in his letter. Mayor Butlermoved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to continue the public hearing until October 29 , 1984 at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . SERVICE ORGANIZATION DONATION TO POLICE DEPARTMENT Mayor Butler stated that the Minnetonka Mist would like to donate some equipment that the police department would need. Butler stated that she had no problems with the proposed donation. Councilmembers Frahm and Grabek both had no problems with the proposed donation as long as there is nothing tied to the donation. MET COUNCIL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT City Engineer Cook noted that at the Met Council meeting he noted Orono' s concerns with the pipe size increase and that the Met Council assured him that there would be language in the approving motion to assure that properties will not be allowed connect to the interceptor. SCHLEE SUBDIVISION PARR LAND USE CHANGE Mayor Butler stated that the City has been requested to consider a park land use change within the Schlee Subdivision. Butler stated that the residents that are moving into that area do not have small children and therefore would not use the tot lot that was originally required by the City. Butler stated that Schlee is asking if they can use that land for a park instead of a tot lot. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24 , 1984 PAGE 6 George F. Rovegno, Jr. 2010 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 U.S.A. September 16,1984 Orono City .Council Crystal Bay, Minnesota In the matter of the Public Nearing on Sanitary Sewer in the Crystal Bay area: I regret that I am personally unable to attend the September 24, 1934 Public Hearing on the above matter. However, I would like to make a few comments and suggestions. The Public Hearing Notice, as published and as mailed, appears to be defective. It doesnot describe the same area as is reported upon in the feasibility report. As a result I suspect that action cannot be taken without re-publication and notice and a new hearing held. As you know we have occasionally had to do this for Planning Commission public hearings. T4J0 alternatives to the problems in the Crystal Bay area are apparente construct sanitary sewer or make private systems work properly. Those with functional septic systems might prefer the latter, while those with failing systems no doubt would prefer the former to the alterna- tive of a holding tank system. As more systems fail more pressure will be brought to ir.stall public sewers. Sooner or later ti�is area will be sewered. In fact, since costs would have been much less and the City certainly knew of the problems, this area should have been sewered years ago. For this reason I will assume that in my absence you will take action to cause the construction of sanitary sewer in this area. The passions � that surround this issue arise largely from tne cost of the project. Having read the minutes of your August meeting on this subject and the feasibility report, as well as having spoken with Mike Gaffron , _ it would seem that the big problem is the �12 ,230 cost per unit. I have a few suggestions. First the Council should carefully examine the costs estimated in the feasibility report. To my mind,� l���,������ for 11,,�7�s feet of sewer pipe, i .e. ��� 3 7 per foot, is exorbitant. Perhaps a lift station must cost �35,000, but $4,500 of annual maintenance on top of the capital expense seems unreasonable. The Council must exercise its management function. We should find out why parts of this system will be 27 feet under grade. We should ask these questions and many more before we spend a million dollars , a sum equal to the annual total City operating budget. If any of us was faced with this kind of expense at home or at work in the private sector, we would not accept this type of cost/benefit relationship. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 7 My second set of comments address how this project should be paid for. On examination of the feasibility report it appears that there are two projects each costing approximately $500,000.00. One project is the materials , labor, engineering and adminstration of the sanitary sewer and lift station. The other project, equal in scope is road and right-of- way reconstruction. Certainly these roads are among the oldest in the City. Certainly, the housing density here is much greater than all or nearly all of the rest of Orono. Certainly the cost "pe r unit" of main- taining these roads is much, much less than all or nearly all the othe r pu�lic roads in Orono. I humbly suggest that should this project pro- ceed that all road and right-of-way reconstruction be financed out of the City' s Public Works and General funds and that they not be assessed to these properties that have been bearing more than their fair share of road costs du� to the relative density of housing and limited length of public roads here. Only those costs having a direct connection with sewerage should be assessed to the property owners in this area. In addition the City' s lots in this area must assume their fair share of the costs . The above approach should serve to make the assessments equitable if not reasonable. Equity also demands that assessments be levied on a per unit basis. •� One last issue should be addressed. This area is perhaps the most dense- ly built area in Orono. As I remember, the CMP said the average lot size was one-eighth of an acre. We have traditionally maintained the LR-lA low density zoning district to support on-site septic systems . In this area the existing density demands that this area be reclassified LR-1C, medium density residential development, as part of this sewer project. To summarize, I suggest that: 1. The Public Flearing be rescheduled with proper publication and notices. 2. We proceed with this project only if: A. the costs can be divided bet4veen assessed sewer costs and city- abso rbed roadway costs ; B. the costs are assessed on a per unit basis ; C. the total costs are reduced by good management; and _ D. the area is rezoned to LR-1C. Failing any of the above, I feel the project should not be undertaken . Sincerely, �' �����Gl-Z'l '���-=o ?�I� �i��i�� � L� ` George F. Ro no, Jr. Susan J. Rovegno MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24 , 1984 PAGE 8 SCHLEE SUBDIVISION Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the request from the Schlee Development Corporation to make that a park rather than a tot lot. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . PARK FUND CONTRIBUTION* Mayor Butler rnoved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to accept the Park Fund Contribution in the amount of $200 made by Boonestroo & Associates and to officially thank them. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . RESOLIJTION �1681 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES* Mayor Butlermoved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1681 , A Resolution Approving the Appointment of Election Judges. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER FROM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS* Mayor Butlermoved, Councilmember Grabek seconded , to approve the letter from the county commissioners regarding the assesor ' s contract non-renewal. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays (0 ) . WORR SESSION - 1985 BUDGET* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to schedule Monday, October l, 1984 at 7 : 00 p.m. as the work session for the 1985 budget. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . REVENUE SHARING STATEMENT OF ASSURANCES* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the revenue sharing statement of assurances. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays (0 ) . APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR NOERENBERG PARR* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to appoint Diann Goetten and Barbara Peterson to the advisory committee for Noe�enberg Park. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER TO PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES* Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve the letter to the primary election judges and alternates . Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Radio had nothing to report. BILLS* • Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . AUDITOR REPORT Kennetn Malloy, CPA for Anfinson & Associates , reported to the Council that in his examination of the records that no irregularities were found. Malloy suggested that Council arrange a special meeting to review the report. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24 , 1984 PAGE 9 AUDITOR REPORT Mayor Butler suggested October 15 to present the results . ADJOURNMENT 10 :15 PM Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to adjourn the regular meeting at 10 :15 PM and to go into executive sessione Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . ATT ST: � � , , othy . Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. u ler, Mayor