Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-27-1984 Council Minutes t MINUTES OF THE REGUL�IR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 1 ATTENDANCE 7 :00 PM The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Council- members Frahm, Adams, Hammerel and Grabek. City Administrator Benson, Zoning Administrator Mabusth, City Attorney Malkerson, City Engineer Cook, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, and Recorder Sutton represented the City staff . CONSENT AGENDA* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removing item #7 off the Consent Agenda for discussion, with all staff reports concerning these items reviewed at this meeting to be attached to the original copy of these minutes on file in the City Clerk' s office. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded , to approve the minutes of the regular council meeting held August 13 , 1984 . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmen�ber Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve the minutes of the special meeting held August 15 , 1984 . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . r !PARR COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no Park Commission comments . ��LARE MINNETONRA CONSERVATION � DISTRICT REPORT Jo Ellen Hurr was present. Hurr stated that the LMCD is revising their fee schedule. Hurr stated that dock license fees would be raised to cover the cost of the LMCD' s review. Hurr stated that if this new fee schedule is adopted that it may cut the cost to local cities by 50%. Mayor Butler asked Hurr to ask the LMCD to consider issuing DWI citations on the lake. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no Planning Commission comments . PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public present. .' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 1984 . PAGE 2 #832 HARRIET HEHL APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION OF FENCE ORDINANCE - FENCE AT 405 OXFORD ROAD The following neighbors and friends were present for this application : Harriet Hehl - 3348 Bayside Road Don Streeter ( spokesman for Hehl. ) & Rhonda Streete� 4740 Lakeway Terrace Hazel Anderson - 3780 Bayside Road Mary Lou Swenson - 3780 Bayside Road Rose Madden - 350 Crestview Avenue Beth Miller - 103 Inger Place (Buffalo ) Julie Zimonerly - 155 Gleason Lake Road (Wayzata ) Barbara Huker - 3390 Bayside Road Esther Addison - 3382 Bayside Road George & riildred L.inci - 3310 Bayside Road Daryle Hehl (relative of Harriet Hehl ) David Hehl (relative of Harriet Hehl ) John Millen �- 6530 68th Ave. No. - Brooklyn Park George & Kathe Jukish - 3280 Bayside Rd Don & Bonnie Boylan - 3240 Bayside Rd Art Burton (owner ) - 405 Oxford Road James Deanovic (builder ) of 405 Oxford Road Nayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, finding that the City staff did indeed act correctly in their interpretation of the fence ordinance. A vote was taken after discussion continued. Don Streeter stated that Harriet Hehl has lived there for 55 years and has enjoyed the view and breeze of the lake. Streeter stated that in 1983 , the land across fromMrs . Hehl was filled and then a berm was placed on the property. Streeter stated that after the bermwas constructed, the fence was put on top of the berm. Streeter stated that he believes that the intent of the Council ' s ordinance is to have a fence constructed at existing grade. Streeterstated that Burton has been reasonable and took two sections of the fence out, but really no change was made as far as the view from r1rs. Hehl' swindow. Streeter stated that Mrs . Hehl is not trying to find out who was in error but to correct the situation at hand. Mayor Butler stated that the base of the fence is at the same elevation as the street. Butler stated that there is no berm there but the yard which is the same height of the street. Butler stated that the filling was done to keep drainage off his property. Don Streeter stated that there is a berm there and there was extensive filling done on the property. ' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 3 #832 HAR.RIET HEHL Councilmember Grabek stated that the difference in grade is only about one foot from the survey submitted. Grabek stated that the grade is raised near the lake and the grade across from Hehl ' s property is even with the road. Grabek stated that Mr. McGreevy seems satisfied, who was once in opposition to the fence. Mayoz Butler stated that when an individual builds a house, they are allowed to grade. Butler stated that the elevation of the current yard is the same as the street. Butler stated that grading is allowed to controldrainage on a property. Butler asked did the staff do right or wrong. Butler stated that she felt the staff was right in interpreting the fence ordinance. Councilmember Frahm stated that the grading was done nearthe tennis court. Frahm stated that he couldn ' t see any grading done that would have affected Mrs . Hehl`s view. Frahm stated that this type of fence along major thorouahfares are all over Grono. Councilmember Grabek stated that the fence was not put. up to spite anyone. Grabek stated that the code allows grading to be done. Grabek stated that the City can' t protect everyone ' s view of the lake when they don' t even live on the lake. Don Streeter stated that staf f stated at the Planninq Commission meeting that if the request to build a fence as presented along with a grading plan, that staff would not have approved the fence. Zoning Administrator biabusth stated that today she wouldn't have approved the fence because of the Council ' s position on fences . Mabusth stated that the grading was reviewed with the building permit and that staff approved the grading plan. Mabusth noted that at the time the grading was reviewed , the fence was not proposed. Kathy Jukish of 3280 Bayside Road asked Council if they could adopt a fence ordinance to prevent this type of fence from being constructed in the future. Jukish asked Council if they could adopt a moratorium on all fences. Mayor Butler stated that the fence ordinance needs a lot of work and that it couldn ' t be accomplished tonight, but staff could look into revising the ordinance. Butler stated that the City has tried before to redo the fence ordinance but has had no luck. Butler suggested adopting a moratorium on cons�ruction of all fences. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 1984. PAGE 4 �832 HARRIET HEHL Councilmember Adams stated that he was reluctant to put a moratorium on all fences . Adams stated that it is a normal part of construction of a home to grade and improve the drainage on the property. Councilmember Frahm stated that he is not opposed to putting fences along major thoroughfares . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays (0 ) . Councilmember Frahm moved, rTayor Butler seconded, to direct staff to clarify fence ordinance with regard to fill and fence height combinations for fences along major thoroughfares anc] fences classified as accessory structures . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . City Attorney Nalkerson noted that this is not a moratorium and does not prevent any others from building a fence just like this one. #84-0 NED DAYTON 2300 NORTH SHORE DRIVE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION 17 UNIT PRD Ned Dayton and John Bergh, planner , were present. Alex and Dianne Jentilucci of 1295 Briar Street were present for this application. Dayton stated that there would be no use of the lake at all. Dayton stated that the covenants will prohibit docks , boats , and engines on the lake. Dayton stated that it would be strictly a viewing lake. Councilmember Adams noted for the record that Ned Dayton sold some of the lots at the Farm at Long Lake but that he felt he didn't have a conflict of interest. The Council agreed. Zoning Administrator Nabusth asked if there was a proposed barn. Ned Dayton stated that the only accessory structures on the commons areas proposed are the gazebo, tennis court and nature trails . Dayton stated that they are trying to maintain the natural foliage , trees , and ponds. Alex Jentilucci asked if the City was going to take an easement over the drainage tile that runs through their property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City would take an easement over the drainage tile, retention ponds, and all drainageways . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 1984 . PAGE 5 #840 NED DAYTON r;ayor Butler moved, Counci.lmember Frahm seconded , to approve the 17 unit rural PRD for Ned Dayton finding that all standards of the PRD ordinance, applicable standards of the RR-1B zoning district and septic ordinance have been upheld subject to the following condi�ions : 1 . Access to all 17 residence pads must be off plat r�ad. 2. The approved building enveiope for each pad is as follows : front/street or rear = 35 ' sine = 25 ' These approved setbacks must be included in the restrictive covenants for the development of the property. 3. All drainfield areas must be staked and protected prior to any site grading or road construction. Finalresolution approving plat will specify need tc� protect drainfield locations . 4 . Restrictive Covenants must specify need to limit ail unnecessary gracling on each pad in order to fulfill primary purpose of PRD and protect designated improvement areas . 5 . Dedication of 33 ' of right of way for County Road 51. 6. Ur�derlying road and utility easements over road outlot. Private road must be shown on plat as ou�lot. 7 . Road plans must. meet standards of Section 11 . 33 for a private road serving more than 8 units. A) Typical section B) Horizontal and Vertal controls 8. Drainage easements taken over wetlands, retention ponds , drainageways . 9. Apply for permit approval from the MCWD--final grading and drainage plans must show bench mark reference for elevations and erosion control measures. 10. Payment of Park Fee of $3 , 400 . 00 1 unit @ $200 per 2 acre density MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 1984. PAGE 6 #840 NED DAYTON 11 . Approval of landscape plan dated June 26 , 1984 (File 8420 , 1 of 1 ) 12 . Final grading and drainage plans must show erosion control measures. 13 . No riparian rights allowed on French Lake. 14 . Foot path location and construction within Outlot B to be approved by staff . 15. Homeowners association to maintain open areas . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . #841 CRAIG WINTERS 888 PLENTYWOOD ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION 9 UNIT PRD Gene Earnst was present. Earnst stated that in previous staf.f reports that it didn ' t specify that the - road must be paved. 7oning Administrator Mabusth stated that since recodification that there are new subdivision regulations . Councilmember Frahm stated that the resolution should specify why this property is using the PRD type of development. Frahm noted for the record because of the extensive wetlands . Councilmember Frahm moved , Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve the 9 unit PRD subdivision application of Craig Winters for the proposed development of Plentywood Farms finding all standards of the PRD ordinance, applicable standards of the RR- lA zoning district and septic ordinance have been upheld subject to the following conditions : 1. Access to all nine residence pads must be off plat road. 2. The approved building envelope for each pad is as follows : Pads 1-6 , 8 & 9 - front/rear at 50 ' , side at 30 ' Pads 5 & 6 , front 30 ' , rear 50 ' , side 30 ' Pads 7 - front/rear at 50 ' , right/westside yard setback at 30 ' and left/east side yard must be 50 ' . The approved setbacks for each pad must be stated in the restrictive covenants dealing with the development of this PRD. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27, 1984. PAGE 7 �841 CRAIG WINTERS 3 . Prior to final plat approval , the developer must submit a plan of the total PRD designating the septic and building envelopes on each pad and that this plan shall be made a part of the public record and used as a guide in the development of each pad . 4 . Dedication of right of way for County Road 6 . 5 . City to acquire underlying r'oad and utility easement over road outlot upon final plat. approval. 6 . Revise road plans as follows : a ) Road must be paved with 3" of bituminous surfacing , an 8" base of Class 5 gravel , ditches 2 ' below centerline crown . b) Realign road (stations 6-10 ) to the north providing Pad 2 with an expanded building envelope. c) Relocate cul de sac by moving it further south 325 ' out of the wetland ( station 16 + 90 ) - Pads 5 & 6 to be served by shared , paved driveway. 7 . After the final drainage information is reviewed and elevations are confirmed, drainage easements to be designated over all wetland areas placed below the OHM of both the west and east wetlands. 8 . Permit approval is required by the MCWD. 9 . Outlot A must be combined with Hagfors property. Outlot B must be combined with Gehrman property. 10 . Payment of Fark Fee of $800 . 00 . One unit @ 5 acre density = $100 . 00 One pad contains existing house. 11 . Applicant placed on notice that alteration of a designated wetland will require a separate conditional use permit and that all improvements involving hardcover within commons area must maintain 26 ' setback from wetlands--Applicant should advise if�there will be a need to address variances with this review. 12 . The existing barn need not meet 150 ' setback from all lot lines but must be at least 150 ' from all house structures . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 8 NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA 1984 COMMERCIAL DOCR LIC RESOLUTION #1664 Larr� Hork was present. Herman Renner of 3180 North Sho�e Drive was also present. Zoning Administrator Nabusth noted for the record that North Shore Drive Marina was dredging without a permit fromthe City. Mabusth stated that she contacted the DNR and that they had no record of a permit either. Mabusth suggested tabling the 1984 commercial dock license until North Shore Drive Nlarina applies for a dredging permit. Larry Hork presented a DNR permit from 1969 and 1977 and stated that the DNR permit had a maintenance dredging provision. Hork stated that there was miscammunication on the DNR' s part in that they couldn 't find a record of this permit. Hork stated that they found the permit and everything is ok with the DNR. Hork stated that he talked to the MCWD and they ne�ded to see where the fill was goir.g. Hork stated that he didn' t think he needed a permit for the wor}: done since it was maintenance dreaging . Hor.k stated that the fill was going to be used for the buil�ling of the garage. City Attorney Malkerson stated that there is a valid DNR permit. Malkerson stated that the City doeshave an ordinance which requires a permit for dredging and that Hork should apply for such permit. Malkerson stated that he is surprised that the MCWD doesn' t requ?re a permit. Malkerson stateci that Council must decide whether Hork should continue the dredging or not. Malkerson stated that the 1984 commercial dock license application should be treated as a separate issue and need not be tied into the dredging issue. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised Hork that this DNR �ermit was not valid with the City and that the City requires a separate conditional use permit. Larry Hor.k stated that only about 10 ' of dredging is left to do and that he is not dredging out into the lake. Iior� stated that he needs the dock license for his financial agency. Hork noted that neither the DNR or the �fCWD told him that he needed a permit with the City. Hork stated that the dredging is in between the two docks only. Herman Renner stated that if Hork keeps bringing in bigger boats every year he is obviously going to have to keep dredging. Rennerstated that the "temporary" houseboat is still parked there and has been parked there all summer . Renner stated that Hork should not be allowed to park boats on that east side of the property at all. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 9 NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA Hork stated that the portion that was dredged is the portion of the lake that the old docks covered . Hork stated that silt gathered underneath the docks and then when the new docks were put in that it needed dredging. Hork stated that the LMCD has already approved his dock plan. Hork stated that the City required him to submit a letter from that east property owner to park the houseboat on that side. Hork stated that the adjacent property owner submitted a letter stating that they didn ' t mind if the boat was parked there. Herman Renner stated that the battle with the marina has been going on for 25 years . Renner stated that they were promised that this marina would not use the east side of the property to park boats . Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1664 , A Resolution Approving a 1984 Commercial Dock License for North Shore Drive Narina subject to condition #1 being removed and Mr. Hork moving the boat on the east side of the property. N,otion, �yes ( 5 ) , h'ays ( 0 ) . Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to allow Hork to complete the dredging by Tuesday and further directs Hork to apply to the City and any other agencies for the necessary permits . Nction, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . CHASRA MARINA UPDATE ZoningAdministrator Mabusth stated that Steve Pauley notified her that he would be unable to attend. Mabusth stated that Pauley stated that one fence is up and that the other will be installed as soon as the materials arrive with concrete footings . PLAN REVIEW MAPLE PLAIN INTERCEPTOR City Engineer Cook gave Council an update on the plan review for the Maple Plain Interceptor. Cook noted that the size of the pipe has been changed. Councildirected City Administrator Benson to write a letter to the Net Council noting Orono ' s concerns about changing the size of the pipe . WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY BID AWARD City Engineer Cook stated that the lowest bidder was Bury and Carlson. Mayor Butler moved, Hammerel seconded, to award the Willow Drive Overlay project to Bury and Carlson pending approval of MN DOT. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays (0 ) . MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 10 NAVARRE FORCE MAIN BID AWA.RD City Engineer Cook asked that the Council table this bid award until the September 10 , 1984 Council meeting. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to table the bid award until the September 10 , 1984 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . CABLE TV REPORT Mayor Butler noted the Cable TV meeting to be held August 28 , 1984 at 5 : 30 p.m. at Shorewood City Hall . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING NAVARRE Maycr Butler noted that the City is in the early stages of discussingan appearancechangefor Navarre through the use of tax increment financing. Steve Emerson, Leonard Kopp, and Arlin Waelti represented Miller & Schroeder. Dick Keaveny, Chic Remier, and Ned and Carol Petod were present from the audience. Steve Emerscn of Niller & Schroeder explained the tax increment financing. Emerson stated that each community has pockets of areas where there has been obsolence and things that wear out. Emerson asked what happens when this obsolence takes place and how can you cure this. Emerson stated that tax increment financing can cure those areas that need improvement. ' Emerson stated that the definition for tax increment financing is the technique that takes advantage of new development, within any specified project area, and uses the taxes derived from that new development to pay municipal improvement costs within that area. Emerscn stated that the law says that there are three main areas for tax increment financing: l . Redevelopment of commercial blighted areas . 2 . Low and moderate income housing. 3 . Stimulation of economic growth. Arlin Waelti of Miller & Schroeder explained the legal aspects of tax increment financing. Arlin stated that Minneapolis used the tax increment financing for the development of Loring Park. Arlin stated that Minneapolis took a large amount of property, the state acquired the blighted property, and removed all buildings. Arlin stated that the developers walked away from the project and Minneapolis did not have any tax increments . Arlin stated that tax increment is that new taxable value that accrues from the new development that would not otherwise occur except for the public participation. Arlin stated that Loring Park rolled over onto the tax rolls . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27, 1984. PAGE 11 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Arlin stated that the complications of tax increment financing are the limitations . Arlin stated that a City will not get in trouble if they follow the intent and letter of the law. Arlin stated that Orono seems to have a good project. Arlin stated that you first have to have a plan of action and cooperation from the owners in Navarre. Arlin stated that first you have to have a project area. Arlin stated that you have to have a defined area where public improvements will be made. Arlin stated that you can take taxable values , in this case taxes from the new development, and use that money for paying for public improvements . Arlin stated that within that project area , tax increment financing, the pro;ect areas where the improvemet occurs , the tax incrementdistrict, is where the taxes are generated. Arli_n stated that where most Ci_ties got into trouble with tax increment f inancing and the big change that we made when we passed the law is that you should keep the project area large and thE tax increment district smail. Ar]_in stated that if you have development occuring on one parcel , take that new development and leave the rest alone. Arlin stated that the rest of the area will follow. Arlin stated that the new development in Navarre will probably be of limited size. Arlin stated that the development that will occur in Grono probably is outside Navarre that the City is going to want to capture and use in the Navarre area. Arlin stated that another concept of tax increment financing is that tax increment districts did not have to be contiguous . Arlin stated that the City may want to identify an area in which development is going to occur in that new project area, and include Navarre in project area, and in those non-contiguous project areas, the City will identify parcels on which the City' s public assistance is going to create new development. Arlin stated that the City can take the taxincrements generatedfrom a large development and use that to assist Navarr_e. Arlin stated that in oraer to be sure that the City has a structure and plan that works , the City should do its financial statements to make sure that the tax increment district will always support the development that is about to occur. Arlin stated that the thing that Loring Park did not do was to rea,uire development agreements . Arlin stated that if the City talks with someone, and they say they need a change in the road or whatever, and if the City will agree to do these things, that person will agree to acid onto their building or put a new facade on their building. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING flELD AUGUST 27, 1984_ PAGE 12 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Arlin stated that before the City enters into the project, that person should sign an agreement that they will be committed to redevelopment. Arlin stated that such agreement should state "not only do I agree to do development, but I will not challenge the City on this assessed valuation" . Arlin stated that it is not an inflated amount, but usually the value of the property plus the cost of the physical improvement of the iand. Arlin stated that the City must give notice to the County and let them review the City ' s plans . Arlin stated that the County does not have the power to act on the plans, but only to review them. Arlin stated that it is good to include the community in the plans and also the school district. Arlin stated that the three types of districts are as follows : l . Redevelopment area in blighted areas . Blight means that the City has something that presently exists, with five types of blight : a) Obsolete buildings . Should be torn down or totally rebuilt. b) Zoning type of blight. Buildings ok but the layout is wrong and maybe should be rezoned. c) Areas in which the soil conditions are such that you could never put a new building on it, so you have to excavate and bring in fill. d) Acquisition of railroad properties . If the City tries to cut off railroad lots , the City would have to pay large fees for the railroad lands . e ) Skyways over state or federal highways . 2 . Low and moderate housing. 3 . Economic development. Bare land, but areas in which you have to put in public utilities . Arlin stated that districts 1 and 2 can run 25 years . Arlin stated that Navarre would fall under the redevelopment district. Mayor Butler stated that her idea of any redevelopment did not necessarily include the City going in and buying buildings and tearing down and starting all over again and then selling it back to him. Butler asked how the City would implement the doing. Butler stated that there is not a lot in Navarre for the City to do. Butler stated that the City doesn ' t have that much control over what Keaveny does with the physical aspect of their building. Butler asked how does the City make tax increment financing do what the City � wants it to do by making Navarre a little nicer facade. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNC�L MEETING HELD AUGUST 27, 1984. PAGE 13 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Arlin stated that tax increment financing originally was used for the acquisition of land. Arlin stated that tax increment f inancing does not have to be used that way. Arlin stated that the City needs a cohesive pla�. Arlin stated that the City may want to construct new roads , do landscaping, lighting, curb cuts, parking, etc. Arlin stated that if the City wants new store fronts and encourage the sprucing up of their buildings, the City is talking about private property and trying to encourage the changing of private property. Arlin sta�ed that legislation allows for commercial rehabilitation loans in which you can use tax incrementfinancing, write down the interest on loans up to $200 , 000 for rehabilitation purposes. Arlin stated that included in the loans could be bring the building up to code. Arlin stated that if the City is going to encourage people to spruce up their properties , the best way to do that is to assist them through tax increment financing. Steve Emerson stated that the City would borrow money eit�er through a bond program, and use those dollars for tax increment improvements . Councilmember Grabek stated that the citizens are going to say, "you the City are going to go through this financial strategy to improve the properties in Navarre, and all our taxes are going to increase and we are going to pay for the betterment for the businessment in Navarre" . Grabek stated that the citizens are not going to understand and how should the City answer that. Arlin stated that the City should never put any property into tax increment district unless the City can answer this "Would that development have occured without the City ' s assistance?" Arlin stated that the City has to encourage the people to participate. Arlin stated that commercial rehab program is only a small portion of tax increment financing. Arlin stated that the City is required by law to do: 1 . Have a development program. 2. Tax increment financing plan. Dic�C Keaveny stated that he would be in favor of this type of plan. Keaveny stated that he has wanted to do something with his buildings for years , but hasn' t had the money. Keaveny stated that the commercial rehab is part of the tax increment financing. One woman stated that Navarre is not all commercial but is interrupted by residential units too. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 14 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Arlinstated that the City hasto make policy decisi.ons whether they want to include the residential areas as well as the commercial areas. Arlin stated that the City would also have to make the policy decision whether or not they would want to include the commercial rehab as part of the tax increment financing. Counci.lmember Grabek said lets say there is agreement among the people. Grabek stated that the City puts toaether. a plan , which is not free. Grabek stated that the citizens don' t like it. Grabek stated that the City has taken the risk and spent money and incurred an expense that can ' t be reimbursed . Arlin stated that the overall plan is not that large of a project. Arlin stated that the development program and that tax increment plan is usually done together. Arlin stated that the architectural drawing costs for individualbuildingsare placed on the property owner , not the City. Arlin stated that the City has to commit themselves to the redevelopment and they the City needs one individual who is willing to add to their bui_lciing. Arli.n stated that the City doesn ' t have to wait for everyone to agree on one plan . Arlin stated that the City may agree to landscape, install lighting, fencing or whatever public improvementsthe City feels is needed. Nayor Butler asked how the City is going to cover its front end costs . Arlin stated that those costs would probably be covered under the first bonds issued. City Attorney Malkerson stated that if the City were to incur $30 , 000 in fees to come up with some plan, that within the next year or two, at least one parcel in the project area will develop even on their own and the City could capture that increment and pay those fees off . Malkerson stated that the City should have no problem paying off those costs because of the de�elopment that should occur. Arlin suqgested that the City hold two meetings . Arlin stated that the f irst meeting should be with the business community and then the Council should hold a work shop to discuss the improvements that need to be made. City Attorney Malkerson stated that the City should have staff locate an urban planner and let them give suggestions to the City. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27 , 1984. PAGE 15 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING City Administrator Benson stated that the Navarre RetailAssociation' smeeting willbe held on September 11 , 1984 , and that it would be a good time to discuss tax increment financing with the business people . One woman stated that another problem that the City wi 11 run into is that there is a lot of renters in the Navarre area . ORONO ASSESSOR - ROLF ERICRSON Rolf Erickson was present. Mayor Butler asked Erickson how he would divide up the field work. Erickson stated that he would do most of the field work and that he would have to hire an assistant to do data er�try, homesteads and abatements . Erickson stated that he would take care of the calls, court cases, and much of the appraising. ' Councilmember Grabek asked if Erickson would be able to use Hennepin County' s records or data . Erickson stated that he might be able to use some of their records. Councilmember Frahm stated that the City needs a good public relations factor. Mayor Butler stated that she expected Erickson to acquire a Comprehensive Plan and a Zoning Code and to take into account individual properties . Butler stated that as an example if a piece of property is all wetlands that it shouldn' t be assessed as a buildable lof. Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded , to hire Rolf Erickson as the Orono Assessor subject to staff review of the agreement. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . RESOLUTION #1663 Councilmember Grabek moved, Counci.lmember Frahm seconded , to approve Resolution #1663 , A Resolution not renewing the Hennepin County Contract . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays (0 ) . MINUTES OF TF�E REGUI.AR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27, 1984 . PAGE 16 RESOLUTION NO. 1665 ABSENTEE VOTING* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, toapprove Resolution No. 1665 , A Resolution Eliminating the Absentee Voting Precinct in the City Hall known as Precinct No. 5 . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays (0 ) . PAUL SMITH* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded, to call for a public hearing on September 10 , 198� at 8 : 00 p.m. for condemnation proceedings. riotion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . RESOLUTION NO. 1666* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1666 , A resolution crdering prepraration of a sewer and water feasibility report for 2477 Dunwoody Avenue. Motion , Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays (0 ) . RESOLUTION NO. 1667* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution #1667 , A Resolution receiving report and calling for a public hearing on the Dunwoody Avenue sanitary sewer and watermain exter,sion project. Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . RESOLUTION NO. 1668 CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CRYSTAL BAY SANITARY SEWER* Cou�cilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm sec�nded, to approve Resolution #1668 , A Resolution calling for a public hearing to consider the construction of sanitary sewer in the Crystal Bay Area set for September 24 , 1984 at 8 : 00 p.m. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . BID AWARD - SEWER DEPT GARAGE* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to award the bid for the construction of garage to Don Alhlstrom in the amount of $28 , 215 . 00 . Notion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . J�LY, 1984 LIQUOR STORE R.EPORT* Cour�cilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve the July, 1984 , liquor store report prepared by Finance Director Kuehn. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER FROM MINNETRISTA* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve riinnetrista Mayor Clevenger' s letter to Orono concerning Site M in Minnetrista as a potential landfill . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 17 RESOLUTION NO. 1669 JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT CDBG* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm secanded, to approve Resolution #1669 , A Resolution approving a joint cooperation agreement for participation in Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) . Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT GOLF COURSE* Counci.lmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded , to approve the temporary employment of Erik Selstad at an hourly rate of $3 . 35 effective September 4 , 1984 . Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER TO NAVARRE RETAIL ASSOC* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve City Administrator Benson ' s letterto theNavarre RetailAssociation. Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER TO SCHOENEMAN & RI�MBERG - RE: CHASRA MARINA* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve City Administrator Ber.son ' s letter to Marcia Schoeneman and Sandra Ramberg concerning the fence at Chaska Marina . Notion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER TO BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP - JERRY DONLIN* Councilmember Hammerel moved , Council_member Frahm seconded, to approve Builr'.ing Official Jacobs ' letter to Big Island noted fire code violations . Notion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . LETTER TO METRC� COUNCIL RE: MAPLE PLAIN INTERCEPTOR* Councilmember Hammerel moveci, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve City Administrator Benson ' s letter to the Metro Council concerning the Maple Plain Interceptor. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . CITY ATTORNEY' S REPORT City Attorney Malkerson had nothing to report. LICENSES* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve the following licenses : Art Center - One Day setup liquor permit Eberhardt Realty - One day setup beer license Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays (0 ) . BILLS* Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, that the All Funds Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts be paid. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 27 , 1984 . PAGE 18 ADJOURNMENT 11:09 PM Councilmember Grabek moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded , to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 11 : 09 PM. Motion, Ayes ( 5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . ATTE �: 0 othy M a11in, City Clerk Nary C. B ler, Nayor Planning Commission Council �I; �9 n'� i� �� � • q,���.�': 1��:_. ._. ._. 1 �J�'.,', PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE �' ���. PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAP2E OR NUMBr�R NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) l . ` 2 . C �o t� � - - �' � � A��,UIf fi �� , ;� r 3 .�-/�� -c�ir�?�.��-� 3?�"� /� � 4�-'� a�' --, �► 4 .�'�'�i :�s-�.� , �/�O,rt�c-•v�-� � j�'� �C_c_ r� � ��=�� �,�.�' �_v�'� s . �, � � �� � � �� �r , .� � � 6 . �, � - ��_ �_c,, ; , � �, � . .. � �1 < < � � �, , 8 � s �.c. /�-�� �� • � '� �_ �.. _ �� 9 . _ �O c� -�-�v.�l,�Q3, D 1t 10���a�,/ �'.�.���,,,>i �i�� �� � �� � 11 . � ' -z Si0 .�' ' ' /�' .� . i 12 .� ��-e� - .<�� ��/v �a, � �6 i i 13 . �/;' ! ,��/�4:. ��'�J ���,,� �> �5 f���,� �/ 14 . ��v;�Il ��L �� � � s�d� �� �, 15 %���._ S-�Q � ���,���, . ,:�y�cJ�^�; �/ 16 . � �� O �r..� �� • �, 17 . C�"l e o r �-. ��� `;}� ` '" � /� , � 18 . D �? I J � ��� `�d �a. .S i �t /L�� , l � � 19 . - � =��q ���, � �?.�i� � �-� �1� � � , 20 . ' n . ., . Council � Planning Commissio , - 1'��('+ ;7 r� ���� _ . .. 1 PUBLIC ATTENDAIQCF ; , .; . . - ..:. CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE �� ��� PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NADZE OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1 . �,��i.�•� � � � 9J�. ,� GE� ��iA �� � � � ,/ �,/cl'U ., - .��._f -C��'r� i .li' �'iY Jfl�;' ✓', {Zi '^�'�/� 2 . I !��rr�- ���i 1����c� cz����ft /��`-,/,���7�7��� 4 3 . J --, ��p s" #� �3� 4 . �J� `�' • � Cif ! , � rJ. N,!z�.�l �a `M 1'�., � 7 � W�.A �A. � � �0 6 . ��� � �/�,�1 J/ l�� 1� l0 7�%�; Gh'A%��-'-.� ��/ 7 . e f��"j 3'�S� �j'ST,��-,`'�-,dJ�;�y��T.4 �M1=� � 8 . �� �/ ��3�5 ;� �fl c��r��� �`fj�C 9 . �'i-�� ��=�u� o�� � , � � 10 . , � � ,��. /,.� ',� ,�12 s�/< %�� ��- J'��� .� �, -' 11 . i �.. .S� . S ,�� �"' � �2 . ' � I � h.�.�,,�, D r ��� �l3 13 . �.. , � ` t �' ��� �" '� 14 � �a- -L .�.��Ii � ��, 7:c�- ?c.����� ,� �_-��,�, 15. � '� ,� � �� �L��J� �c�sw '��� �- ���crea.,,�.� -Ft .� 16 . �� � �� �'�4 D 1 � �(°� � 'I # /� � -�-z c%.e��,-� : 17 . • ., � lC � )�'� ��S� � ��� �K' � � �c:� �- _, ,, �,. ��s:-� . • � '_�k.: .r�_� zt__.� c �., 18 . �,., �L L ; ��` �- � '���_ ���L--�_ t�!- /j 19 . 20 .