The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMCWD Wetland Delineation Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Governinent Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Na�ne Project Name Date of Application Application Number Matthew Hemsley 649 Ferndale Road 4/26/2017 W17-11 Type of Application(check all that apply): � Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Summary and description of roposed project(attach additional sheets as necessary): Matthew Hemsley has applied for a wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetland located at 649 Ferndale Road in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Sections 1 and 2,Township 117N,Range 23W. The boundary&type approval was requested Apri126"', 2017. A wetland delineation was conducted by Anderson Engineering on April 10`'', 2017. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on April 26`�', 2017. One wetland was delineated within the project area. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 3/4, Shallow Marsh/Deep Marsh wetland. The boundaries will be reviewed in the field b MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (miniinuin 15 Rachel Workin business-day comment period): Permitting Technician 5/31/2017(4:30PM) Address (if different than LGU) Date,time, and location of decision: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following the review Minnetonka, MN 55345 of the application and completion of the comment eriod. Phone Nuinber and E-mail Address Decision-inaker for this application: (952)641-4518 � Staff rworkin minnehahacreek.or ❑ Governin Board or Council BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 � � Signature: � � � � ' � Date: 5/9/2017 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES � SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us � BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.meyer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): � DNR TEP Becky Horton- becky.horton@state.mn.us ❑ DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): ❑ WD or WMO (if applicable): � Applicant(notice only) and Landowner(if different): matthew.s.hemsley@pjc.com � Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): bhodapp@ae-mn.com; kjusten@ae- mn.com; cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us; mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Ryan Malterud- Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION ➢Far a list of BWSR TEP representatives: ��ww.bwsr.state.nm.us/contact/WCA areas.�df ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern ReQion: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg. Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol. Resources Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemid'i,MN 56601 Grand Ra ids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr reQions•pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.anny.mil/reQulatorv/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: ➢ US Anny Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul,MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, list any other attachments: � Com lete delineation re ort BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 Project Name and/or Number: 649 Ferndale Road, Orono—AE 14636 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership, etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Matthew Hemsley Mailing Address: 4620 Moorland Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 612-303-6932 E-mail Address: matthew.s.hemsley@pjc.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Ben Hodapp,Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC Mailing Address: 13605 ist Avenue North Phone: 763-412-4000 E-mail Address: bhodapp@ae-mn.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 649 Ferndale Road Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): Si&2,T117N, R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): 44°57'S5.35"N/93°32'32.00"W Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 2.9 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: httq://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/re�ulatory/Re�ulatoryDocs/en�form 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. See wetland delineation report Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 5 • Project Name and/or Number: 649 Ferndale Road,Orono—AE 14636 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact15ummary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake,tributary, etc.) fdentify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the p�oject area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts.Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Type of Impact Duration of County,MaJor Aquatk Existing Plant Aquattc Resource Resource Type ��tl,excavate, Impact Overall Si�of �mmun watershed li, ID(as noted on drain,or Permanent(P) Size of Impact2 Aquatic � and Bank (wetland,lake, Type(s)in overhead view) remove or Temporary Resource 3 Service Area# tributary etc.) Impact Area° vegetation) (�1 of Impact Areas 31f impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the'"f". For example,a project with a temporery access fill that would be removed after 220 days wouid be entered"T(220)". zimpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impad by indicating flrst the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact In parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet). 9This fs generalfy only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exem�ltion under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter'N/A". •Use Wetlond Plonu and P/ant Community Types of M/nnesota ond Wisconsln 3'�Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Su bp.2. SRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Servlce Area maps In MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacTs have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a ere-an�liration consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below,I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work d ribed rei Signature: Date:��" I hereby authorize Anderson Engineering of MN, lC to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request,supplemental information in support of this application. 'The term"impacY'as used in this jofnt application form�S a generic term used for disclosure purposes to tdentify activRies that may requfre approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of thls form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those acthrRies may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 5 Project Name and/or Number: 649 Ferndale Road,Orono—AE 14636 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU)provide me with the following(check all that apply): �Wetland Type Confirmation � Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). ❑ PreliminaryJurisdictional Determination.A preliminaryjurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. �Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wet/and Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 5 . .��. Wetland ,-�----�-�..� � �=- A� --=� I nvestiaati o n -� E „o � V �� 4 ... -aR.,�.. � - _ Re ort __.. : __�� .= p -� .. � _. , ��.lt�l ..�.�T� � � ,� �: � �., B+ � { , �.r � � . l��q.�x �l`. . • . � � � • � . . � �+l �:� � e� . � �1',�, , -.4 '�� x'� • ,.�. ��. r . �,� � � � �� Matthew Hemsle . � �,'�*"�K;i�'•z. ,v,,< � , r :��.�:y` t, � l. �'�r. . � � w-,. �,� M�, " ��+ „ . , ' `, Y M�' � �� 1�� c M�: , ��: 649 Ferndale Road West �r ��:�� ,�� . Orono, MN � � � � � ,,z�.., �� ' �� ' �� ' � � AE Comm. # 14636 � �.: �.. , , :�� t� � `i�;� ��t`�"�i�li� , -�� ,.�,,, ,. "° "-� .��'��; - � ,i �� April 10, 2017 Nrp"• '`R.•-;, � 'r { �� . � ��" r� 4 .'�, �` �,��. _�,y�„i,��. &� ,a,�v� �'� .. . . �,,;� � .R�. �i,4�7C�,�� ..� .. . . , f �A.F �'- �3",...` J� �� '�.�� . . � N _/y .,.rj, h 4x �� H. �,� r , ' : ��t , _'�.;,�'e .. �'^7p. V'�t' 7t'� A� d ��{;y�`��ii�$, � '�'� � =,�: �•-� 3g� . ( � { s ly��[yST�`��1��, !. �� x � ..1a1 � q a 4.y t}�I+* ftv' ., _ �{F ��7LF�".ryy� a� �;: ��'. 2 ` ��. -�'�S"'.�= ", , . ��'�- ' : ;� ��.�� .' . ,'�„ .� __aw � . . �� "� �. t ` - A .. ._. '+s � 3 ' . �'�..- �- �"�. -F.,a � � 'i � a: - �r4�- ' •° ��i�^ � � �� .�.` ••- �"t :� � ''�� ,�:^� �' �n�x� � t � . 'x$�,<,� ,%� . s �` �� . ' .. �� Anderson En i neeri n of g g Minnesota LLC -- � �� 13605 1St Avenue North ��x�°�� .�� Plymouth, MN 55441 � p y +� - -�, 763-412-4000 Main ,,� :�; �_,�,�, " . ` 763-412-4090 Fax '� � V , :- � �� `- '_ ' ' � ' � ��`='' A Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business ��,�� MATTHEW HEMSLEY TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ContactInformation .......................................................................................................2 ExecutiveSummary .......................................................................................................3 Background.....................................................................................................................4 Methodology...................................................................................................................4 ResourceReview............................................................................................................5 FieldReview....................................................................................................................5 Conclusion......................................................................................................................7 List of Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Routine On-site Determination Method Datasheets Appendix C Site Photographs Appendix D Antecedent Precipitation Record Appendix F MnRAM Functional Assessment Appendix E Credentials WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONo,MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY CONTACT INFORMATION Contact Information Prepared For: Matthew Hemsley 649 Ferndale Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 612-303-6932 Email: matthew.s.hemsley@pjc.com Prepared By: Ben Hodapp Environmental Services Manager Tina Justen Environmental Associate Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC 13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: (763) 412-4000 Fax: (763) 412-4090 Website: www.ae-mn.com WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONo,MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summarv Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC was retained to provide professional wetland services to identify those areas meeting wetland criteria utilizing the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (Technica/ Report Y-87-1; January 198� and all supplemental guidance documents within the residential properties located at 649 Ferndale Road, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Geographically, the area is located within Sections 1 and 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West. Portions of one Type 3/4, PEM1 C/PABG,Shallow Marsh/Deep Marsh wetland was identified and delineated within the project area.The wetland is hydrologically connected to Lake Minnetonka.The on-site portions of Wetland 1 total approximately 2.17 acres in size. WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONO,MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY BACKGROUND 8�METHODOLOGY Backs�round As requested by Matthew Hemsley,Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC completed a wetland investigation at the specified project area located at 649 Ferndale Road in the City of Orono, Minnesota (PID: 0111723330014, 0111723330015, 0111723330016, 0211723440003). Geographically, the area is located within Sections 1 and 2, Township 117 North, Range 23 West. The wetland delineation was completed in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the published regional supplement to the Army Corps Wetland Delineation Manual, Midwest Region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland, and classify the wetland habitat. Fieldwork for this site investigation was completed by Environmental Associates Tina Justen and Joe Aden on April 5, 2017. The weather was partly cloudy with a temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Methodolo�v United States Geologic Service 7.5"Topographic Quadrangle maps, United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory maps, United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey and available aerial photographs were consulted to initially locate potential wetland habitats. Routine On-site Determination Method was used during this investigation. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether it met hydrophytic vegetation criteria based on the indicators identified in the Midwest Regional Supplement. 2) Soil pits were dug using a Dutch auger to depths of at least 24". Soil profile was noted, in addition to any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Data from sample points were recorded on Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland Determination Data Forms (Appendix 8). At least one sample point transect crosses the delineated wetland edge. This transect consist of an upland sample point and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be tocated in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present; where questionable conditions exist;or to verify the absence of wetland criteria. Photographs are also taken at each sample point, and of the wetland and upland buffer(Appendix C). Sample points were marked in the field with orange flags.The identified wetland boundary was marked with sequentially numbered pink flags. All sample points and the delineated wetland boundary were located utilizing a Trimble Geo XH sub-meter GPS unit. WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONo,MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY RESOURCE REVIEW Resource Review The following resources were reviewed to supplement the wetland field delineation: National Wetlands Inventory: The National Wetlands Inventory (Appendix A. Figure 2) identifies one PEM1C/PABG wetland complex within the project area. USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: Soil Survey data for Hennepin County, MN were obtained and reviewed prior to the delineation. Table 1 provides a list of the mapped soils within the investigation area. Figure 3 in Appendix A contains a map of the soil units with percent hydric components. Table 1 -Summary of Mapped Soil Units within the Project Area Map Unit Hydric Soil Hydric Drainage %of Project Symbol Map Unit Name Rating(%) Soil Classification Area L16A Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton soils, 100 Yes Very Poorly Drained 49.3°/o ponded,0 to 1 percent slopes L22C2 Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes, 2 No Well Drained 39.3% moderately eroded U1A Urban land-Udorthents,wet substratum, 0 NA NA 9.8% complex,0 to 2 percent slopes W Water 0 NA NA 1.5% Hydric soils are defined in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soi/s in the United States: Guide for ldentifying and Delineating Hydric Soi/s, version 7.0, 2010(NRCS, 2010), The 1987 Manual, and The Regiona/Supplement (USACE, August 2010). Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory: The MN DNR PWI for Hennepin County, MN (Appendix A. Figure 4) identifies Ferndale Marsh (27085200) within the parcel. Antecedent Precipitation Data: An analysis of the University of Minnesota Climatology Working Group's 30 day rolling precipitation data for the previous three months(Appendix D) indicate that precipitation totals for previous weeks were below the normal monthly range for this project area. Hydrologic conditions were suitable for completing an accurate wetland determination and boundary delineation. WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONo, MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY FIELD REVIEW Field Review Wetland 1: Wetland 1 is a Type 3/4, PEM1C/PABG, Shallow Marsh/Deep Marsh wetland that is hydrologically connected to Lake Minnetonka to the south. Overall, the wetland vegetation is dominated by hybrid cattail (Tyoha X glauca), reed canary grass(Phalaris arundinacea),and lake sedge(Carex/acustris). The underlying soils are mapped as Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils.The investigated soil profiles met the 2 cm Muck (A10) and Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)) hydric soil indicators. Hydrology indicators observed include a high water table at 4 inches(C2), geomorphic position (D2), and the FAC-Neutral Test (D5). The upland buffer surrounding the wetland at the front of the property is a manicured lawn primarily vegetated with Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) crab grass (Digitaria longiflora) and the transition between the upland and the wetland is composed of gentle to moderate slopes. The upland buffer surrounding the wetland at back of the property is dominated by American Elm (U/mus Americana), eastern cottonwood (Popu/us de/toides) and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and the transition between the upland and the wetland is composed of moderate to steep slopes. WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONO,MN APRIL 2017 MATTHEW HEMSLEY CONCLUSION Conclusion Portions of one wetland were identified and delineated in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual within the project area located at 649 Ferndale Rd, Orono, Minnesota. The wetland in the project area may be regulated by several agencies at the local, State, and/or federal level. Activities which may potentially impact those wetlands identified within this report should be discussed in advance with the appropriate regulating agency in regards to potential permit requirements. The Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for implementing the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act at this project location is the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD). The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District inventory classifies Wetland 1 as a Preserve wetland. The MCWD and the City of Orono have wetland buffer and shoreline setback requirements. Please coordinate directly with the regulatory agencies regarding the requirements for this specific wetland and project. This wetland investigation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual all applicable subsequent guidance for an on-site determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation. 1 certify that 1 performed the fie/d analysis and wrote the report for this wetland determination. �/�-�u,a I � � r��`�t 04-10-2017 Tina Justen � Date Environmental Associate Anderson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC i ,'„✓� l ', ,'Zt l�`., �� _ 04-10-2017 Lucy Kozub Date Environmental Associate MN Certified Wetland Delineator#1279 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or reviewed work completed by above staff. /�" �G� 04-10-2017 �� Ac4 Benjamin J Hodapp, PWS Date Environmental Services Manager �ee�uewlNJ.NOpAPP� MN Certified Wetland Delineator#1016 ss 001°" Anderson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC '�,�,,,�,,,,�o� WETLAND ASSESSMENT 64J FERNDALE RD ORONo, MN APRIL 2017 APPENDIX A Figures •Y�� I s` Mr 4•. . , � t � .: . ��i ' ,.:, •• � '+ �.. • ��C�liflt(Y y�� t` � t • �.�", '.�� ! ��.. 4 •:�.� ^� Y�� U � .- -�..�_r-.1+�'t-^,,�--�i --- . , �,,� r •r-'—��_�,_,._ -�- �` � �. ,�,�.�.� " F � •�' �� .J ,• � • i:i�'""'• .e- �� "`-�- }�r - � �, � ., � �- �,,,�. ":�� . -� - � � � ,�',;,.,�'JY'1Y,"t • , a �`�;, ` �p�` . � , . .- � . , • � ^ _ -_.s�-�. 1..� • ,� � C-, .. �� -� - . �.� .� ... , . ... .� � , -`b,�,t , . _ �_ _ -�.. C � ` �►�+� � ��' � . �,� _ � . '+ ` �4 ! „�� '- ,�/� + � _+� � /�' .�► 'SC� � � �.� ;"=� O ,� . �'r'�aS7o� :-" .i' � � i -n � '��I'�O � � • CZ'11' �'�{�kkf __ s . ; ``� �+�� J�� r � %�' 1,• •• : `, , .�., . •1 .�-• � - � -- �� • .. _ •,'� � � N ^ � � " .-.-.� .+�-.- . _..+�� •�� / . �,� � - �-^� -'^ *'^Sn' ' __ . -.. � ._ �..,. f,`` • � � 1...."� •��_�... _ `). `�r' ,y. .�. . .. �..« _.. `,`' � ,V ��'F _ . •� ' ra. '.. � �� ,�� .. _ • �.. . F � . , S, � ; � " ! '� —�' . 'y-,.�_ t'L`� - r •�� `��\ r� , : ` `, _ t. - , r% ;';�.= �. - -� f� �'* , �� A:. a� �� -h .- '�- �•`� � . •y. 9 �httid• . p y v �y . , � �t .� � - - ��o ,.� , ,...--�• ;, ,...� ,b►�c�c�`� �_ ,:... • —�— . . _ .� .�. -=„'" '� '` � � J r i _ ~ ' - _.. �. � �- �_-� _�. '�'' w _. . .. ' 1� . _ _ s. . . � . - f �. j,; l� •-s•r_ • ,/_-. �'.�C'r t � ` :7.� _ � � . � ', � . • '� .. , _�,,,`. f s i - O +�.- � _ `ti. ._.- i I�'�-' } } ' ,. {i w.�C�' '�`� � � _ " t ,\i-•__ .�•,_� -�. 'r,r.�r•, ' + -„� € Y; • � �� 1 r . . _.. -- � •i�� ..A, ,� ♦ ..- � . � , : � � � ��l,,�,^ .. •r.'__.. + - . . •.. .y� .,.� I ... ' , j: Q ; . . � .. , . _ , � . .- i p �.' � '• ;, i - '. r , . �'�a - �� ' • ',,.�'-`_•�X _ .., i -�' ... �„w. � !�• � � - �� ,� � •' ` . . , j' -� �,,, � ;,,� ti � ,,. ,� . �.., . . -�- �.' , _ . _ . � , ' � i-=� �.�--`�,' � � . � � �� r �, '� ��,�' � � . �s, � 649 Ferndale Road - �� i , "• h� . , ..- . ,� -- - � •� - ` �.` . Jr .''-�1 • . A�� .. • „�': � • ,+'r,.-� ':'" , . . , +'. - .F'%i'-,... � � �!� •� _ '� �„ � ��,,•�C.� \ . ,' �'' ,�' �; • � - . � _` '"_'�w. -. ��. � . r.. . -- - - -• �"•!�r�� +___'y'�' .h� __ :' ,, p i�jr ��`'r' •+°�'-�---- ' , / �,�: .__ y:�.� . . '.:` � � '" �.�` �i—l� , f,,. � . , . � r� ` � ` � �_��' � • . : f '---�' J "F�� '"'' � �r`� ."r �' {�', - 1 � ' � �§ , :� � � A_ _.....-,.._., � ��.; � � .�� ` f � R . ... ` _ � � ' 3 � � • � f./ . . ....._ ..� ' � � ' l . � _ . �,a �. � .� � - , . ro w n$ � �.., � � . , -, � "� !� ,. 9 e r • `'�,, E � � � `�`.;• -..-. ;(, . _.. �. ; » , ''�� =� . �� t�. . ,;`� ,F" °�. � ; , ke �-� • f � �Q ; � , ��. ' ,,` - `` . '� '!: 1 �r'�,,�� ti._ -�{'J� � ` ; ti.� �, +l. :��,-��,� �'f '`� ( � � ./' `' � . � . �:�� I .`�\ ;^ �/ � '\._'R , \ 5."�r � /� ,.✓„'�" � 1 E ' ,\,•� '•• � � ��'- V � . � ��/- � ! }t . l ' � � 5 Y �. �� ' /f � �^�*�4'+, x� ,F � �� ` �� .*, �.„ ' t .� j ,.r' 1�" r' 4 ��" �� ,� � ! f � � ;r��`{ �? • �-� f` _ � �� , � , r .. . >- .. . - : �,s� � � . �� / ' � . . „'`+ .�,:• j �( w4 , . y , l' � -•t� -, � /�� - ir= � Lookout Ppintll � t° '�, -. , ,._ .�� --_� _s.��,. . __ _ . _ � ��' � �� ....�` �,�� M�^ � � � �'`� � _ $�itii � __ � '.�''J� � .'1'� ,.-- �'� �`_ Is�and k�`- - . �� - � � � � ,--� � � � �. � _ ��` � 1 � s f, �;`� t � 5 � � �� . �` � 1 j �'.� �,-�"., j: r j '� ��/' , y _ i _ E ,f� �J ' �. r ` , • � ° �� ' � � f1 , � - �` t a r� PROJECT LOCATION SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA,ESRI,TIGER,Bing, Hennepin Co.,Anderson Engineering ---�. � 1 in = 0.25milese 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 9 Miles 649 Ferndale Road Orono, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County City of PID: Multiple State of Minnesota Henne in Count MN � ANDERSON AndersonEngineeringofMinnesota,LLC LOCATION - FIGURE 1 136051stAvenueNorth HEMSLEY WETLAND ENGINEERING Suite100 a� Plymouth,MN 55441 D E L I N EAT I O N ENGWEERING • ARCHITECTURE • LAND SURVEYING 763-412-4000(o) 763-412-4090(f) ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES • LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE www.ae-mn.com AEComm.#14636 Date:3/22/2017 By:J� \ . . �. �� '! +� "k �p� �K i Ci » ��. �� ..:� � '.� �+.�. �.i . .. ��.• � [{ . �� ; ��.` � .''��` � rtm 4 R� �#�"'�.�. # a `�g _�. �s� ..� 4a. ' � - ,_�, ,. � � PEM1C � ��' �. , � ,��; ` � • . - • - a y * ,� "�,�,��" '� 4 , ti. ,.:., � � ,•�' � �"''�� + ^ �, a:. : 4 .y.�f �� '� � . LL C.'�'�.� � ' �+'d� �.♦ ' . i b�- >I�`�� .�wi�iY.�J�� %'4,r 1� � �{ `9 i;.. ',� �.� ' ,�� "��'��w ,� i�.• �� . ,�`�. - ��, P�r . � � =. �_ , ,,_� ��,� � ��. �, ��' �ti'�`�' � a- ,•. � � . ' � � � �'"�'� . ,� . - . , . .�, �`# • _ {.� . ,� -�� - : . �.� � , ' �+� _ _� � ,,� `� ,�' ' � y , � ��m _ �Y " �� .g . . - k,'�,€ �� t�A -��.a• , '� . � � . x � � � r ' 1�F ..'f "� � -��,: � � •* �� t �� ... ��. � t. ,'� � ,�'��'; ��,u, " .•�4; e,'p. �, ' , �„ -, a � � ' _ . - ky � y�.�. ' `�,q. '� �� •��*�' � � � • • . . 'c •.• , �� . _ � ` � . ,:� , ....,,., ..:::._ . ... ... � _ A'��G� ,� i N q� - �.,� . ... �.... .., _ - a. �1y �.., , a . �_ �..-. . g f ^-�'. �- "'� � � .�°��i � � . . i� �• ,� y�,,,��' t' '�.�' ' -• � " � , -�—� _ ��t,� + �� '�4 '+5_ � - : -r ., � .� �.� �,�---�_ ' .,� � � � _'� .�.�'�� - � Lectend ��`�� F � - � s i �„� ri. !� g �„ ,;� , � t �� Y Project Extent � 4 `*� .� ° � � ! � ,,. . ,, ;. . � �'� �:�: � � ► Hennepin Co. Parcels ' "�� ,� `"' ; ��• r, ° �� O National Wetland Inventory � � ��fil�, �: �� +.�� t� � � ,�� , ��$";'�. ," � �'k PROJECT LOCATION SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA,ESRI,TIGER,Bing, Hennepin Co.,Anderson Engineering 1 in = 150 feet e 0 75 150 300 9 Feet 649 Ferndale Road - Orono, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County City of PID: Multiple State of Minnesota Henne in Count MN �' A N D E R S O N Anderson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC N W� — F I G U R E 2 136051stAvenueNorth HEMSLEY WETLAND ENGINEERING s��ce,00 's Plymouth,MN 55441 D E L I N EAT I O N ENGINEERING • ARCHITECTURE • LAND SURVEYING 763-412-4000(o) 763-412-4090(f) ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES • LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE www.ae-mn.com AEComm.#14636 Date:3/22/2017 By:.l� • r � � . . ��`�",` Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name �, ` � L16A Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton soils, ponded, 0to 1 percent slopes '` «.. ��' - L22C2 Lester loam, 6to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded �, �� ; U1A Urban land-Udorthents,wet substratum, complex,Oto 2 percent slopes �► � - � �.. W Water �,� .# ` . .�t ' � �.�� .-�----...T �,, ��`� - � �1 ..- . . � :�� .. • ' � k ��a.`. �k i�'. _ , �'�y�� ,� f. . �!. � �" 'rtj,3 , ��l; � -.r.wt �� ' . �� , .r �� ` • � �`�� , ' � ' �� , . , , • . � � , _ ,,. � � f, �, . < � , . • , � _- , �, � � . �- _ ffi �,� , �� . . ,• :, � � �� , � � »�., . �.� ,. : . : ,. �' , .� ..,_. , . , , , .. � ��'' � . � h� � � � r � �� _ ' *� � f , t Fti _ . ' ��9►. } 6� ��" �; t � ' y t1� � � , s �� — � ' �s .� � - r ` � � - a'�!'y �, � 4A��*s � � � ~ �, ' �—��,� i� . '� rZ1 §'�� ,'� � � j �-a.. � '~ �1�°�,�. . , ' ' � z-" ._. � ,� . � + F � _�` _- 1 J �'�',y4 - '- ---'_--_ _ �4�•. . rj`:' .. �� hVu'�� u��'; � $ �� . g , i �. *�" � � -. Leqend Project Extent ' � k" �� ' �` Hennepin Co. Parcels � `•�i , ,� � � �� '" �t , M1 - —r ._t � , Hydric Rating by Map Unit � � �� ;'�#i ,�, "�#�i` � . - �. J � 0%Hydric Components � � ��° � �" � _-' _- 0 1-32%Hydric Components � ' � � �� t �° � � � 0 33-65%Hydric Components � ��'"'��-.' � ► � � I __r�' �'� �� '.,, � 66-99%Hydric Components . , ' � �� xy y'" _ n� . � � •.� M ��i 0 100%Hydric Components � �� • "'`�� '�.� � d�`Q � , r �. �. , � PROJECT LOCATION SouRCE: MN�NR, USDA,ESRI,TIGER,Bing,Hennepin Co.,Anderson Engineering 1 in = 150 feet e 0 75 150 300 9 Feet 649 Ferndale Road Orono, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County City of PID: Mult/ple State of Minnesota Henne in Count MN ��_ A N D E R S O N '�derson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC S��LS - F I G U R E 3 136051stAvenueNoRh HEMSLEY WETLAND ^ ENGINEERING Suite100 � Plymouth,MN 55441 D E L I N EAT I O N ENGWEERING • ARCHITECTURE • LAND SURVEYING 763-412-4000(o) 763-412-4090(f) ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES • LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE www.ae-mn.com AEComm.#14636 Date:3/22/2017 By:,l� . ,� ,� �,�- § ., . `�,�;,,�� ;�,�r� �' ��T �. .R� ��;�; '`�� `� �` � � , �, �, � _ * � � .'�� i �` �' � �°�,�. � � . ,� ,�� ' "�� ,,� ; ,, � f �� - � ' �'' � ;' �� -. _ ,��'� .��"� Ferndale ° � �. .�,. .� Marsfi ;�� a � � �;# ' ,.��'r�t�.�, ��.,��- 27085200 �� • '�� a,��, ° .�,. �� m�.. .�. , � � +,�«.,� r, � �,e '��y �, �A t�, �'� 4'�t� k �i�.� ^g^� '��.: � � ��±�?� �A .,� �. �,�- "' , �' a�. �., t� � .. �� 4 ` � 4 , `:" - �'��;A��'� '.�►-'Z '�,i � �c , .. , � � �� L�y ..4;= �� i � � .w '"*k°�V�;". ' •i�. x � �I_a��_}'��`? �n. ,� fs .# .. � • „ _ • _.r �� " � ��"�^' "ti # w ,� � '�� t � � ��_ � 'yC j '� `,� . • ` 4.�,. � '� .. �� if4��` #�`� � `;� �li�� .r� '!��` ;,�. � ,� �i[..�. {', • � "" ,r - � y ,� .. ....aH y�yt , S r �y � Y k � �ai . � gn"' r � _. .. .♦ J' .. k� �. �'� `.��1. ..i� �� a _ _ g ��J } �,� �'�.. i ; ! ��. fi ` � ,�, � , �4,� ` � � w�� h _ � 3�'��.�r�yr.. �� ! f� '` :�ar,, . � •� __ " � + � � ��77:Y.kd►. "y "� ! /i .�.. ._ . . , ,. � , � . � _ • + 4,r- _�� Leaend r' ' ._,; � " `� � + „ � ; - �- ._r. � � � J � r� �� . G#�r�Q� Project Extent �- #Y �� :� � �, — _ ` -— c-- Hennepin Co. Parcels � �� C �� I , ,�I � � MN DNR Inventoried � � � " � � � '�� +�`�''�t '� � — Public Watercourse ��r + ` • �, r.. , A,:, � � �a I _ - - � � ; '� F ' ' MN DNR Inventoried - � � : � ,, �� , � � Public Waterbasin �� y - � +�� : , �� - t6 `�., � . `� �'�� k* PROJECT LOCATION SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA,ESRI,TIGER,Bing, Hennepin Co.,Anderson Engineering 1 in = 150 feet e 0 75 150 300 9 Feet 649 Ferndale Road Orono, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County City of PID: Multiple State of Minnesota Henne in Couni MN �" A N D E R S O N Anderson Engineering of Minnesota,LLC P YY� - F I G U RE 4 136051stAvenueNorth HEMSLEY WETLAND ENGINEERING Suite100 � Plymouth,MN 55441 D E L I N EAT I O N ENGINEERING • ARCHITECTURE • LAND SURVEYING 763-412-4000(o) 763-412-4090(f) ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES • LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE www.ae-mn.com AEComm.#14636 Date:3/22/2017 By:JLA • �' ^' t + - "ti _ � ,i^ ' '9� •. " { � '� �'� � •�a _�� u � �r . ., . �� .� �'. ��'�v '� " r` � g . , � �� ' '�n�� _ C" iy '�°r�"'b� - � "� �t�, �R' ! c..- T. �. r' � . � • � �.• .3 � . � K� �� -`�y t � '� P . � ,�e �3�•r�. • j - ' 's.B� _ � i } - �y� �. , a ,'ry,� ��`f -�+ ti�� "s c E � - iT � � . •� . T •� �# f� ait , �� .,� , . . - ' ' . � ' •`,� ` - �'� ' 4�,� ' " (f . r , , � ,�� { . a"�� .�"�`- �� f� « �.`�.,s� �..� � � ��,'� �is�a s_ � �� ' _ . � ��,. #r•' � ' _ `� ,�r � � 4�� _ 1 "'�.�t .,"" q ;�,� �, �►�e�� '�iw , z�L ,� s� � o-,�. a y Tb..�r��,��..� � s � . , �yy�-.�yy-�,,� � � �^� �'� 4� ��t'` � �� e � ' �. .'* UI.�IYL•1nA:J� , M{.� ►.. J�. � ri,�'.'s_ ��* i 1 • "�is�.. S�e.• �� „� { y �� a�� A � '�wfYr F `{ #�'�R.A �� ?* -`�j� �� r� �' �C�0� , �, a, �a' �; : � , � ,j, � . � a �G�r-. � '*14' � i �C� r'"'� f3�qq GY� '�R � �,,, .`?� � ' ' i •.�`_ �_ � 4 � .�u �n -��7�,w - - .� ^,.l ►_. �°':'w„., _ n'�" h � -5 �F�� . � �t -.�� •�*� � '�"��, ` ..'. Y .�� ,'� � •�„ �+€ a;��1 e. ._ i . �` `�M '�, , �'�►�� ,� ,� . -r � Y/' � 1w�•�• 'e•lF� �r��u�r, � .. ' � '�, �..� � 4..�,j ��, t �� ' s,��'� ' -��z ,. - Ai-. �a� 'l'� . � � _ . � �.- ' _ � �.. �1 ��, � � yr� , �{;, � �F -� �.- , � �i M�' %" �� .� , T �F �`�, '� +� . P ��j e t�,. � ,�-� �,; � �.�. . , . , _ r�,,.,.,� _ —_ . �M� . w �i w � '",�i��• -� ��, �j . Leaend = '� '� � � �► ,� r- .. ., _ , _ {.''"� �� T - � �_ - Project Extent - _ �'� '�� '� � - �.___ . Hennepin Co. Parcels � � , � � �� , � . Wetland Field Delineated � ; '��4 <—"'�• �' ! � ' � � � � 4/5/2017 N �� t ' , �i � �'" .� ,,.�, �. �_. , . ` . O Sample Point �.F�.,� '� Y.� . �,� ,,�.,�r�.. }� � _ _� �+ ��- '"�"��- �. 1 � PROJECT LOCATION SouRCE: nnN�NR, USDA,ESRI,TIGER,Bing,Hennepin Co.,Anderson Engineering 1 i n = 150 feet e 0 75 150 300 9 Feet 649 Ferndale Road Orono, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County City of PID: Mult►ple State of Minnesota Henne in Count MN , � ANDERSON AndersonEngineeringofMinnesota,LLC DELINEATION - FIGURE 5 136051stAvenueNorth HEMSLEY WETLAND � ENGINEERING Suite100 � Plymouth,MN 55441 D E L I N EAT I O N ENGINEERING • ARCHITECTURE • LAND SURVEYING 763-412-4000(o) 763-412-4090(f) ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES • LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE www.ae-mn.com AEComm.# 14636 Date:3/22/2017 By:JLA APPENDIX B Routine On-site Determination Method Datasheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecUSite: 649 Ferndale Road City/Counry: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 04/05/2017 ApplicanUOwner: Matt Hemsley State: MN Sampling Point: A Investigator(s):Tina Justen Section,Township,Range: S. 1&2,Twp. 117N,R.23W Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-2 Lat: 44°57'55.35"N Long: 93°32'32.00"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: L16A-Muskego,Blue Earth,Houghton soils NWI classification: PEM1C/PABG Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soit ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Fringe Wetland associated with Lake Minnetonka(Browns Bay).All three criteria were met.Area is a wetland. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. so u e omman n ica or Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Ulmus americana 10 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species That 2. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 4 (B) 5• Percent of Dominant Species That 10 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet ) 1. Cornus sericea 10 Yes FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 60 x 1 = 60 4. FACW species 35 x 2= 70 5. FAC species 0 x 3= 0 10 =Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Typha X glauca 60 Yes OBL Column Totals: 95 (A) 130 (B) 2. Phalaris arundinacea 15 Yes FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.37 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 8. _4-Morphological Adaptations�(Provide supporting g. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 75 =Total Cover �Indicators of hydric soil and weUand hydrology must Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. �' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 $�IL Sampling Point: A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6 N 2.5/ 100 Muck 6-12 N 2.5/ 100 Mucky Loam/Clay 12-16 10Y 2.5/1 98 10YR 3/3 2 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 16-20 10Y 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Sandy Prominent redox concentrations �T e: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis : Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surface(S7) Very Shallow Dark SurFace(F22) Stratified Layers(A5) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Remarks) X 2 cm Muck(A10) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data form is revised from Midwest Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/InterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:chedc all that a�olv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Surface Soil Cracks(66) X High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Pattems(B10) X Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(64) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace(68)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Fie�d Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 4 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecUSite: 649 Femdale Road Ciry/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 04/05/2017 Applicant/Owner: Matt Hemsley State: MN Sampling Point: B Investigator(s):Tina Justen Section,Township,Range: S. 1&2,Twp. 117N,R.23W Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-2 Lat: 44°57'S5.35"N Long: 93°32'32.00"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: L16A-Muskego,Blue Earth,Houghton soils NWI Gassification: Are climatic/hydroiogic conditions on the site rypical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: None of the criteria were met.Area is not a wetland. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. so u e ominan n ica or Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Pinus banksiana 20 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species That 2. Quercus macrocarpa 10 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 No FACW Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 4 (B) 5• Percent of Dominant Species That 35 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.0% (A/B) Sa�linNShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 15 x 2= 30 5. FAC species 50 x 3= 150 =Total Cover FACU species 20 x 4= 80 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet ) UPL species 30 x 5= 150 1. Poa pratensis 40 Yes FAC Column Totals: 115 (A) 410 (B) 2. Digitaria longiflora 30 Yes UPL Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.57 3. Phalaris arundinacea 10 No FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. 3-Prevabnce Index is 53.0� 8. _4-Morphological Adaptations�(Provide supporting g, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 80 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. �' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Presentl Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey 16-20 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy/Clayey �T e: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surface(S7) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Da�lc Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Gravel Depth(inches): 20 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that auolv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Surface Soil Cracks(66) _High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(613) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation�sible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) Thin Muck SurFace(C7) _FAC-NeuUal Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes ca illa fin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Regan—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecUSite: 649 Femdale Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 04/05/2017 ApplicanUOwner: Matt Hemsley State: MN Sampling Point: C Investigator(s):Tina Justen Section,Township,Range: S. 1&2,Twp. 117N,R.23W Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex Slope(%): 0-3 Lat: 44°57'S8.78"N Long: 93°32'34.10"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: L16A-Muskego,Blue Earth,Houghton soils NWI classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soi� ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Wetland associated with Lake Minnetonka(Browns Bay).All three criteria were met.Area is a wetland. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. so u e omman n ica or Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Ulmus americana 5 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species That 2. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 4 (B) 5• Percent of Dominant Species That 5 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Saolinp/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet ) 1. Rhamnus cathartica 30 Yes FAC Prevalence Index workaheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Muitiply by: 3. OBL species 20 x 1 = 20 4. FACW species 15 x 2= 30 5. FAC species 30 x 3= 90 30 =Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb St�atum (Plot size: 5 feet ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Carex lacustris 20 Yes OBL Column Totals: 65 (A) 140 (B) 2. Phalaris arundinacea 10 Yes FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.15 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 8. _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting g. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 30 =Total Cover �Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. �' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: C Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-5 10YR 2/1 97 10YR 4/6 3 C M Muck Prominent redox concentrations 5-6 5GY 5/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 6-8 5GY 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 8-20 N 2.5/ 100 Peat 20-26 N 2.5/ 98 10YR 3/6 2 C M Prominent redox concentrations 'T e: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ? Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Matenal(F21) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surface(S7) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Remarks) X 2 cm Muck(A10) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data form is revised from Midwest Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydnc Soils,Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/IntemeUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aoolv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Surface Soil Cracks(66) X High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Pattems(B10) X Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation�sibie on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: SurFace Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 4 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No inGudes ca illa fin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjecUSite: 649 Femdale Road City/Counry: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 04/05/2017 ApplicanUOwner: Matt Hemsley State: MN Sampling Point: D Investigator(s):Tina Justen Section,Township,Range: S.1&2,Twp. 117N,R.23W Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-2 Lat: 44°57'55.35"N Long: 93°32'32.00"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: L16A-Muskego,Blue Earth,Houghton soils NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normai Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Area does not meet criteria for hydric soils and weUand hydrology.Area is not a wetland. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. so u e omman n ica or Tree Stratum (Piot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Populus deltoides 50 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species That 2. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 3 (B) 5• Percent of Dominant Species That 50 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet ) 1. Rhamnus cathartica 40 Yes FAC Prevalence Index workaheet: 2. Ulmus americana 10 Yes FACW Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 10 x 2= 20 5. FAC species 90 x 3= 270 50 =Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Column Totals: 100 (A) 290 (B) 2. Prevalencelndex =B/A= 2.90 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. 3-Prevaknce Index is s3.0� 8. _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting g. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. �' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present7 Yes X No Remarlcs: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) No herb layer present US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: D Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey 16-20 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy/Clayey �T e: C=Concentration,D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surface(S7) Very Shaliow Dark Surface(F22) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Rema�lcs) 2 cm Muck(A10) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Gravel Depth(inches): 20 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that a�olvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) _Water-Stained Leaves(69) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Pattems(610) Saturation(A3) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(CS) Sediment Deposits(B2) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation�sible on Aerial Imagery(67) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) ? Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace(68)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: SurFace Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 APPENDIX C Site Photographs MATTHEW HEMSLEY APPENDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS �•�� 1 '�,1 ��'�t � g� � � i .,�}. +�1 .?f� k ��t� �� I • •' � �'- �. j � ��.. .. ,�i r � 5 , � ��,A' � �� . ,, �� v � ,� �,, '� ;r, r�'" �� , S ,�'� - _� %R s '4 y+..' �jy171 � � �� ` � �f ^� .' •` � �� . , ., . ..�� „' + 9 . � �`�� , . . .. � 'r.4�.nM�� .. ,� ,� � -'�.� ( '�J ,` 3a ' i .. .t+�' ,. ,:S "�' �,�nPrrA �. . . �b=` . 7n ib. , . .r . w»•y .��.� � - . 7 ,. .. ,.-,1°- '� ..,a^1�e'4'�r,�c... '.; . �}� - . ,.++.- r,� . . � '! :!:. � � yy: „�. . . � _�-; . ,�,„k..; } .. �' � �, j �,�� ,"s-�p r - "` �� :+r J�, "' ., .` �-_ ya��a -� � � : �F � ��„` i � , �. ,wN�'�'� f . , - g� � .:' :. {,��;m' �/ - .. 'i„"i� � .� � �.-s ra�i s.,�,: k.; r _ f- 't,-•r -� �f : 4 . ". .e : , .�'�i�,q'�Y+�.c'-'i�,�.3t X .:^6"' ,k �..id�t f}3:,� '. +�it �. � � 'R' ,s, '4 r� r � ��!�� '� 1 . p� q��-t � "'�r^ �ia'!�'��i4'!*�a�' �6P � '� y +A�'.� y�`1 � y r . '� ` 'c^� .F . .,�> Z.*.,#� x , y��,. ^'" ' � : ��'t" ...r •.�'Y 'x�Y, ,y,�°ka� i':s ^t�x .x c`„pa�.s�`�w-,�,'�+ � � '�%� '. -�,v'�.��Ii.t+ E'�i a`}�wr�" ,�'�.�` +,-:ag'� f5�' ...,- ,,�" '��J w , �t : sA--. 1,�' ia....� � ,'+ ?�, �,., � �c' c� r'�'`• F."K��.`;.','��%�� . 3_e-�,v.s5r"_ "' .� . '_�. ` ^� '' . . <.'�l." ' L�� "2 ¢ -;+'W�"'^'� � , 4 y�„�. .''' r n,` '. _ ..a...a�th ::c�eA�`w..�=�� . �•�n?w.... a a, sa'�r .'`�ti4��.��r.�,�/`��t�. Wetland 1, Viewing Northwest Along West Boundary Wetland 1, Viewing Southeast Along West Boundary ,y ;.e .�� ,.w > �s,: � �1 �;, T'�'y. � 1 �, �� ` �� .`,�� 'r ° ��,� �� ` �;��,t��°�r.t�r� `+ , � �,�, � , �' ; � , � �t` � ' �� . - -�'� b � ' ` '�,,�a � '� t ,�''�,!. _ __. {.y..� � -�'� � -i . � �t U'r: .;'��13�ty y'f�, C..-: �� . ,�, 4.^:'� y��._:.>_. . \.' !k" � ^ tYx ��..;s-. U. . �.^.I� � . . z.r,�, 3. iw '- .._. �'y, � �' r.r'ti LAP d ,,r 6 � . -- r � � � �: y '��i �� +� `+.,;'7`,�`' �. .' ��1 �� .z l� �,{ �.{. �3'::� �}�'b y�i �c- �, : 4},� �3 Pr` j. ��.� `�.. �� a �f' ".""�".�:� �� ,..- .. r ,j"r�,T .;�' f ,-'. f'`'. i? 5t,+��'f,.r �, � �s, .�,�1'4 �►^��'� wy, tiT � � ' \ 1% ►f- ,i y a p�.. � ' -^� `.A@' ,t 4 �� L. �..�' �j�g� .� � � '_ � �rc�.� a.�:'+.� ti : ` ,�~ �;� :�;�-�n ��.� . �.r f�i . . '+.:, .,.�', �-+�Wi �,�,` y � ��;•e y 4 ` «g� . � y� � a % �� F� � � �.... .� i � �� ✓., e ..,, f� $ .L,�4'�� : �i�w .Ysj; #a s.'�s„:. y. �1�^'� F 1�� ,�q�,"�R - v ` 1W � .T�`�Pt� � , �` .�P gK'� ' N �♦ .,.i � ? .,�,/" � 4`l�ai,�: �*'�`,�. n.K,.�a( t R' . t ��/ �._. � '.� -I��YJ,! ,�R�CY �k) !y . �. / �'• l , .� "ii� •4�i..'.yj�� `S 4��,1 �' F; , L t� ��' t `� :. 7 � •.�: "1 r :�� ,r�'1� : ` ,�'. � � t' � r,. .^c �ytr A + �". - .sf��r � � . ��`, tI .�,�'� x • '` �° . .1� ,�� k it7L� � {•.. _�. � � p� .�. .,��*¢a, �� L��,eF `4 �:� `�."�,� � � `y ,�� :�r , . � � , � ,. .r :` s r �,. ,� j. r �,', -�r s r • ; �� ;>„ s �`-'r_' �� •x�.'` L.`�t' r t,}�� . i 7` v' � y� �� : . .� tx':i .s � � � a} . "�y+K'�"v � y �..:1 1 f� ¢;�*{^T�'�^�:N � b -3wl� !T��:. '�.+ a�G �►i� a y� ,�� ..,�� . (�r,,,�c�'�"'"ei >�' � -• � f3 -rs a'si " r,�' �t' . 3e' .� �: ��f' "t_ t►. S�+`pr�,��r'y''"j{+� ��" i ,r.. :' �.��{ } ,h�� al f �, ��. n __t �n�"/� � .�7 1�• yr c a ,�,� �..r) .y jr'� . . �` � 1 rt �I.''�T :.a..JJ . Gy.:, � .�.t'' �G�v`f.. t t i r-�., fR Si'�� ,i� �-�� 1� i �. .,. . F? - v`,.G� I 'y -.�F "� h� F^! 7 . V ♦ �� A A 41 t �,,�.,. � .� g a.. .. %� w �F' 1 a � �`� 6� ! �� - � ? :.� t�w'`` �� i.+�d-'"�z .s f�s ° .�.a'�w�° Fx wT�-�`s,�"�' �,'e,;E� r-�s� +Ry, � �L �fi ti a� �� ' '�j a-,� �+R� � '3�"r,. � .� p 3%' a '�yk 4 �]., ��,. } �"�'�bk �f�,��7 `�r � .�� , �'�s_� ��" �. � � � � . , ��'�'��.��l�+i �.-�+��.t �1 n�'.�`�'�,'�tM�,`.'��'•�� '� . � r.�t,..,ti�. . ^�f' �'a,K au.� i �;•.. i..� -Ca u''�4.1lrp fs..,a;-l -.�ir_* � . Wetland 1, Viewing West Along North Boundary Sample Point A, Viewing West •a�u� v „�n �y �e r r� �f F��'�x�,. ,,.,,...�, �, ��u�°� ��" #;; � {� , + 1" ' *,� � ,< ��,n-,�t�. ' �x.n.y $ �� J�r ,. -�� '" � �L. �• ' � y ��' �� +��'�f�l�� 7��,��'� i• � � j// !-c rn'i � � � t �'`4� y tS ; f/I ��.rj,�Y�s.�{(� � yy,' . . �.- ,y� t.':.l._ � ,[ `�.� '..i'\ ��y I .i;- .�^ .r.�.tw^ '�p~ �_ e�{ '!�,� / 1 �t' �'.�. " - y, `� � t � '�� '\�� . ��'r'. � �{ �� d. s� , ` �Sz�4� , fi j�s `-: f�,,�r ��*.*` � r a t Y r_��;.. .t �..k.�. '� � ' ! `°�{> ! c �s c a f - +i., aa _ �;'.r�+�L1 _ �'*�"� ,*R� r d i '�. � I y � . � � �� +/ � : i . C ,,�a � `�{t . r t .: � .�< . ��` r 1Y � �� r,j�;Ta (� ,+l'�'ri" r �' 'E tV;�,. "+�'`�i.a ��2.''+s- 4�' S�' s.�., ll ; 94 Aa t . ry-R � � ..t M� ��. �,ljK.� �-�� . }� , J�� ,� � '_� .c, ,�� P L"t, '.'�e� :" t �'�� .:�` ¢� � 3� t�� "�,�'� ��.. t� .i�, r��'�"fr��. ,w. � a� � _* � �. ` � �r. �t-� '?� � T�y � �"{ -,y�'e.� x�� j � �� ti 1� _ � s� �.b ,t ¢.�' ro � ._'� 'Y � �^� E `.�".�•s�. x ��.� y.�c;. � . . . '`4.+�, ,{�', � .�a `` "_ �s.�t��' . ,'�, �' � t �.-i e ��` "�` `�-.�� `�� s �gr `,�x. r . y�„�S;"�Qc r �.;. x' t m �,w � i�. � �+ �� - � +"�ay.-6,.�..:e ; ,t1 � y�� f, y,` S '�� .�,y��i f . 4 wi �', ,�",c, Y d` '. � + � � a �p �,� .:y� y�a �.�(, r 3 p, �. ;� J+[r� . ' r Y . ryr� � .� { . 7f',. j 1 ��•4.' a E�.Ya.*� _� , i`�'�'�jy ?.T�: � . '�C ; ..`��ly, .�yraF �� r : �y ?, '.�• � •.r Y ,� ,I �, �s .y' Y� ,'„S' 1 S+� �.: Y. "�h� ,� y� < �. Y 1�+�,. . t. � .c �,� � .y �`t�, . .�z ..; . �-. �' # ti �� -�,??c^�� -� z `�,� �'s_�q»�� r . �. .�'„�y �,' .y�.'S� 5� y1tk �` • � �� `(@�; °',r�k _�,,��.�`�'..�"�y�,� . +�.� v�a.''�..�'.�k �1F �:.iilk��w , ,..'}� -. 'Kv�b .' S r�-, , . .�. .•Q,°. �^rF..'KJf''{.� '-��I f`�"�'! �'�:.T:i'i' �x � _. . . . _.Y..:"�.Y.'O�_a a�l: Sample Point B, Viewing East Transect, Sample Points C & D WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE ROAD ORONo, MN APRIL 2017 APPENDIX D 30 Day Rolling Total Precipitation Record MATTHEW HEMSLEY APPENDIX D: PRECIPITATION RECORD 30 Day Rolling Total Precipitation Analysis 649 Ferndale, Orono, MN - April 5, 2017 3 � a 7.5 L V � ewANw Daily Precipitation c � c o ♦ Site Visit � ��" � �_ .`—' ].5 �;, ,, .�- � 30 Day Rolling Total* � �� L a � Normal Monthly Rangc ��-� 0.5 ,� �,,;,�,: x� � i 0 i I� .. � ,I , � I �.. i2/3i/Zo16 i/3o/zoi� 3/i/zoi� 3/31/2017 �/�o/�oi� Source: http://climate.umn.edu/ WETLAND ASSESSMENT 649 FERNDALE RD ORONO, MN APRIL 2017 APPENDIX E Credentials .� ANDERSON � �. E N G I N E E R I N G summary of Experience: Benjamin Hodapp, a Project Manager and Water Resource Scientist, brings a broad background of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the BENJAMIN J. HODAPP, PWS Anderson Engineering team.Benjamin has a unique combination ofenvironmental Environmental Services Manager training and field skills in addition to working experience at various levels of government(USADA NRCS, USDA FSA, University of MN Extension, Watonwan County Soil and Water Conservation District and Watonwan County Environmental Services). Education: MS Water Resources Management Benjamin's project experience includes environmental review document University of wisconsin-Madison preparation, Environmental Compliance Audits and program development, natural BS Biology;Ecology resource inventory, watershed assessments, biologic assessments, BMP Minnesota State University-Mankato implementation, Threatened and Endangered Species analysis, wetland determinations, delineations, mitigation design and monitoring, regulatory permit applications, wetland functions and values assessments, flood plain analysis, Specialized Training: ordinary high water determinations and aerial photo interpretation. Environmental Awareness Bootcamp EPA Alliance Representative Projects: Wetland Delineation&Management Training . South Shore Lake Bemidji Remediation & Restoration — City of Bemidji - Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Bemidji, MN: watershed Academy Web Certificate Lead Natural Resource Scientist involved in the concept planning, design, United States Environmental Protection Agency construction and monitoring of the City's south shoreline of Lake Bemidji. Project tasks included field investigation, existing vegetative condition mapping and report, wetland avoidance measures, native planting plans, stakeholder Professional Associations: meetings, permit applications, post-construction monitoring and concept Society of Wetland Scientists development of public outreach educational kiosks. MN Wetland Professionals Association . Olympic Hills Golf Course Renovation&Stormwater BMPs—Olympic Hills MN WPA President 2010 Golf Club- Eden Prairie, MN: Wetland permitting lead for temporary and Wisconsin Wetlands Association Minnesota Native Plant Society permanent impacts associated with sediment cleanout, vegetative Ecological Society of America management, shoreline stabilization, cart path rehabilitation/realignment and pedestrian bridge construction. Project tasks included field investigation, resource mapping, coordinating regulatory meetings, preparing permit Total Experience: applications, developing mitigation and monitoring plans and coordinating 17 years purchase of wetland bank credits. • Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail — City of St Paul, City of Years with Current Firm: South St. Paul and Dakota County — St Paul, MN: Project manager for 2004 to Present wetland delineation, mapping and assessment efforts in support of multi- disciplinary consultant team responsible for preliminary engineering and final design of trail improvements, realignment and new alignments. Project tasks Publications 8 Presentations: included project management oversight and coordination, supervising field staff The Future of Rowan Creek watershed: in completion of both off-site and on-site wetland determinations, boundary Connecting Land Use and Management with Water delineations, GPS mapping and functional assessments. Oversaw preparation Quality. 2003. Water resources Management of and responsible for quality assurance and quality control of all deliverable Workshop 2002 Gaylord Nelson Institute for Products including wetland summary reports and GIS shapefiles. Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison. . Southwest Light Rail Transit- Metropolitan Council — Minneapolis, MN: The Tumultuous World of Drainage Districts: An Project manager for wetland delineation and water resource permitting in Analysis of Existing Management Arrangements, support of multi-disciplinary consultant team for preparation of Final with Recommendations. Working Paper Series Environmental Impact Statement for proposed 16 mile light rail alignment. 2002-1. water Resources Institutions and Policies, Project tasks included completion of wetland delineations, regulatory agency Department of Urban and Regional Planning, coordination, negotiations and preparation of all federal, state and local permit University of Wisconsin,Madison. applications and mitigation plans. South Shore Lake Bemidji Remediation& Restoration,Society of American Military Engineers meeting June 22,2016,St Paul, MN. /�, ANDERSON � � ENGINEERING SummaryofExperience: Kristina Justen, an Environmental Associate, brings a range of knowledge and KRISTINA A. JUSTEN experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Prior to Environment8l Associate her employment with Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC, Kristina worked as a technician for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The skills Kristina has developed through her educational background and experience as a technician make her proficient in assessing and addressing a range of environmental Education: issues, and clearly communicating solutions to clients and various regulatory BS Biology(2010) agencies. University of Wisconsin-River Falls Kristina's project experience includes natural resource inventory, watershed assessments, biologic assessments, Threatened and Endangered Species Specialized Training: analysis, NEPA project management and environmental review document Certified in Stream Electrofishing preparation, wetland determinations, delineations, mitigation design and WI DNR,April 2010 monitoring, regulatory permit applications, wetland functions and values assessments, flood plain analysis, ordinary high water determinations, Environmental Compliance Audit activities,wetland macroinvertebrate sampling, Professional Associations: Floristic Quality Assessments, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)investigation, MN Wetland Professionals Association and aerial photo interpretation. Kristina has experience with Global Positioning Systems(GPS), remote sensing,and Geographic Information Systems(GIS). Total Experience: Representative Projects: 6 years • Southwest Light Rail Transit- Metropolitan Council — Minneapolis, MN: Services for wetland delineation and permitting efforts in support of multi- Years with Current Firm: disciplinary consultant team for preparation of Final Environmental Impact 2010 to Present Statement for proposed 16 mile light rail alignment. Project tasks included completion of a wetland field investigations, boundary delineations,functional assessments, GPS mapping and preparation of federal, state and local wetland permits. • Wetland DelineationlAssessment — Fort McCoy Alderwood Dam Removal—Fort McCoy,WI: Services included a wetland determination and delineation of wetland associated with a proposed dam removal project at the Fort McCoy U.S. Army installation. Project tasks included completion of a wetland delineation following the 1987 USACE Wetland Manual and the Midwest Regional Supplement and preparation of the wetland delineation report to document findings and help assess potential wetland impacts for Section 401/404 permitting. • NEPA Documentation/Wetland Permitting—Omaha National Cemetery— Omaha, NE: Services included preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA)and Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI), and supplemental permit coordination with the Omaha District U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACE) for proposed wetland impacts. Wetland permitting activities included completion of a wetland boundary delineation in compliance with the 1987 USACE Wetland Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement,and preparation of a USACE permit application package that included a design for an on-site compensatory wetland mitigation area. • Wetland Delineation, Permitting, and Compliance Activities — Various Locations: Services include completing the following general tasks in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations: performing routine wetland determination and delineations to identify regulated aquatic resources; preparing wetland permit applications that outline impact sequencing and replacemenUmitigation requirements; providing technical assistance to clients to develop and implement corrective actions to address compliance violations.