The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-08-1980 Council Minutes Special Meeting ,, . ' � � CiTY OF GkONO Special Neeting ef the Grono Council, 7 : 30 P.M. October 8 , 1980 ,..� The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present : Mayor Van Nest, Councilmembers Butler , Hannah, Hurr , and Paurus . Also present : City Administrator Benson, City Planner Olson, Financial Consultant Chenowith, Finance Director Kuehn, and City Attorney Malkerson. Mayor Van Nest reviewed the proposed sewer projects 1980 LS-1 & LS-2 commenting that this meeting is a Special Council Meeting called for the purpose of making a final decision on the four areas included in the 1980 LS-1 and LS-2 , (1) County Road #15 (Marina area) (2) Orono Lane , West Ferndale , (3) North Shore Drive (4 ) Minne- tonka Bluffs. The City has held its public hearings receiving input from the affected residents and a public hearing was held September 8 , 1980 concerning the assessment roll which has been adopted. This evening, we will discuss each area in the following sequence : (1) County Road #15 , Marina area, (2) Orono Lane , West Ferndale (3 ) North Shore Drive (4 ) Minnetonka Bluffs . Our City Engineer Mr . Glenn Cook will review with you each area and the present status of easements, appeals, the final tabluation of the questionnaires mailed to each of you, and a summary of construction costs . I would like to again remind all of you that i:� as�ticipation of appeals and reluctance to submit ease�::ents to the City, we have included that cost in each assessment. If these problems can be resolved, your assessment will be reduced. T-�rea #1 - County Road #15 (Marinas) Mr . Glenn Cook reviewed area #l, the Marina area, com- menting that all easements are obtainable , there are no appeals pending for this area and the City has had no negative response to this par�icular sewer project. This project will have a reduction in assessments because of obtainable easements and lack ' of appeals, if there are no other unforeseen costs. A public hearing will be held in the future and a per- centage of the assessment will be abated when final costs are determined. The present assessment roll for this area is $9 , 641 per unit. Because the project is separated out from the other projects,the assessed cost according to contractors bids should be $7 , 900 . James Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive : Please start the project now. Mayor Van Nest commented that it appears �hat this project could be reduced another $2, 000 to $2 , 500 per assessment because of no litigation and if all easements are executed. � 5PECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 2 Dick Benson, City Administrator, commented that Mr . Born called and reQuested the sewer as soon as possible . Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION �1210-A Resolution #1210-A, a resolution ordering in the County Road #15 sewer imp�avement and proceed with the sewer (Marina Area) construction for County Road #15 (Marina area) , awarding the construction project to Latour Construction Company as the low and responsible bidder as per the City Engineer and bid tabulation, autnorizing the �ayor and City Administrator to sign contracts. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Area #2 - Orono Lane - West Ferndale ' City Engineer Cook reviewed Area #2 - Orono Lane and West Ferndale . Easement Phone Calls - Exhibit #1 Bill C. Fox - Will be out of town next week (Wednesday, Thursday) Has no problem with signing an agreement. Maurice L. Melamed - 473-8839 Mrs. Melamed (473-2588 office) is handling the easement. She says they have no problem with signing the easement. Frederich Betlach - work 473-8833 (off Mondays) Will sign easement. May want to change location of the line slightly. I indicated that I will make an appoint- ment at a later date to settle the easement. Don Gamble - Will sign this easement if he is reassured that someone in the area will not ask for a lot of money for easements . Gordon Ritz - Same as above Appeals - Exhibit #2 � Edward A. Cashin & Beryl J. Cashin , Newell P. Weed, Jr. & Joan D. Weed , ��PECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 3 Questionnaire Results - Exhibit #4 B]' FF.G-�F:'�']' Oi-,:ER �i'e� `ies ?:c � Ivo Resno-�se To�al Blufls S (2C�) 17 (68� ) 3 (12� ) 25 A;arinaG 3 (75� ) 0 1 (25�. ) 4 Ferna��' '�� ( 6��) 6 (2i� j 4 (15=� ) Oronc :�anE 2 8 Ivorth �}�cre Dr. 6 (50� ) 6 (50f ) 0 12 �2 (96� ) 2° (� 2�) E (12r ) 6� BY Ui�Z^S B1Lffs 5 (19�} 1� ( 69�,) 3 {12� ) 26 Narina= 5 (63��) 0 3 (37� ) & " Ferndale/ � Orono L�ne 18 (620) 7 (24�) � (14%) 29 No�th ��cre Dr. 6 (50�) 6 (500) 0 12 3� (�5�) 31 (410} 10 (14�) 75 Easement Acquisitions - Exhibit #5 - Pages Mr . Cook commented if the project is ordered in and the City does not incur added cost to resolve easement and appeal costs, the adopted assessment can be reduced proportionately. I feel a reductic�n of $2 , 000 to $2 , 500 per assessment can be justified, if all easements and appeals are resolved without a further cost to the City. , These costs can be abated when final project costs are determined. The project assessment for this project area is $20 ,197 per unit for West Ferndale and $14 , 481 per unit for Orono Lane . Mayor Van Nest commented that we have stated previously you will not be penalized with an interest charge if your assessment is all prepaid by November 15, 1980 . Mr . Glenn Cook commented that we do have a commitment from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission as neogitated by Mr . Benson to allow the City to pump into the force main. ' Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Letter - � September 29 , 1980 - Pages 4 & 5 � i � � ' -.-.v"-^n s .; i , , ^ _ Page 4 � �'• :_ _ .. ,�-, ;-- . : � . ,:f ..' �� , I � J. 1 � r- i"'�� ( ' , � : � '�� . � �= �� . �i �- . �---' � � �! ` � , . � ,�--� =- �.� ___� ;, � .�_ � v,��F oc o�s�.�� --�_��`—� � Septemher 29, 1980 �_� I I � � COUNCIL MEETING � I Mr, l�Jalter R. Benson City Administrator _ � �o8n j � � Ci ty of Orono ��T � Box 66 ? ' Crystal Bay, MN 55323 � ; CITY �F ORONO � � Dear Mr. Benson: � � � ' This letter is a follow up of our meeting of September 29, 1980 respond- ; ing to your resubmitted plan (received September 19) on sanitary sewers � in the City. These sanitary sewer projects (I-Tanager Lake , II-Orchard ! Road South and III-North Shore Drive) have been revised to show alternate I construction for each of the projects. I � The Commission reviews and approves connections to our interceptor based ; � on location of existing stubs , ability to isolate and determine sewage flow from an area, and whether the potential new connection may influence � ' the structural integrity of the wastewater. These conditions were con- j � sidered when we responded in our letter of September 2 to your earlier ; submittal of these projects. In accord wi.th our meeting of September 29 and after reviewing the bids for the Project II system the Commission agrees that the direct tap i I connection to o�r interceptor as proposed is the most cost effective � i alternative. Detailed drawinqs on how the tap connection is to be made I � must be submitted for our review and approval prior to the issuance of a connection permit. Since the sanitary sewer system described under " Project . II serves a substantial area , it is proposed to install a meter under-your contract at or near Lift Station No. 1 in a location accessible for routine service and maintenance. The Commission will reimburse you for � installing the pr�posed meter which meets our standards and in accord G,�ith � � an agreement. Please transmit costs figures to our attention when they � I become available. � � As per our agreement the alternate in Project III is the only acceptable solution for service in the area of North Shore Drive. The type of pump � necessary to pump against a sr�all uniform head is much more desirable and less costly than one designed to pump into the high variable head of the interceptor forcemain. For the foregoing reason and that this flow can be measured on the existing Orono meter (M-429A) , Alternate I is the acceptable mode of service. i50 fT1ETR0lOURRE BLDG. 71H 6 R06ERTlTREET/ � !RI(iT PRUL fTlfl 55101 + 6!2 222•8423 . I ^ . . : ' ' . COUf�CIr MEETING Page 5 �� 1�':r. :;alier i;. Bensor City Administrator Ci ty of orono OCT ` 8 �980 September 29, 1980 �aae Two CITY OF OROI�iO The Tanager Lake service (Project I ) connection should be made only via a direct connection to the interceptor pipe. No connection will be perr,�itted to the cleanout manhole (OP. 2�+00) as indicated in A,lternate III . If you have any questions please contact either pon Bluhm or myself. Ver +ruly yours , . R. Pay e Deputy Director of Engineering CP.P:DSB:hw cc: Saiisbury Adams Georae Lusher BRA ' �PECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 6 I do not feel we should relocate the lift station. If part of the project does not go, as the Minnetonka Bluffs area, we will have to assess part of the lift station cost to the Bluffs area, because the station will eventually be used by them. Mayor Van Nest : I think we should assure Mr . Gamble and Mr . Ritz that the City will negotiate easement costs with them if others in their project ,are paid for their easements , and are not part of litigation . Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to authorize the Engineer to submit a letter to Mr . Gamble and Mr . Ritz that the City will accept their easements subject to return and renegotiate easement cost if other residents in their area project are paid for easements, which are negotiated separately from litigation. Gordon Ritz , 1165 Ferndale Road West : I do not believe West Ferndale was included in the City ' s original request for Federal funding. Mayor Van Nest : Mr . Ritz, I have before me copies of a November 20 , 1979 memo to the Council and an October 10 , 1979 letter to Deborah Thurston of the Pollution Control Agency. The attached map does show West Ferndale as being included in the request for Federal monies . I ask that these memos and letters be entered into the minutes. Information concerning Federal Funding - Pages 7 - 27 Mr . Weed, 1385 Orono Lane : Aren 't the Pollution Control Agency people coming out this month? Can 't we wait? Mayor Van Nest: Priorities, which mean being entered on the municipal needs list, have to be accomplished. It will be years before a determina- tion ,is made' if Orono is to receive funding. Mr . Weed: I would like to see us wait. I want the project delayed until after the Pollution Control Agency determination. There are many including Mrs. Kelley, Mr . Thomas and others that live on Orono Lane that object to the sewers. Henry See , 1389 Orono Lane : Is Orono Lane lumped into one project? Mayor Van Nest: Yes, but Orono Lane and West Ferndale are bid separately from other areas. ' (Continued, Page 27 ) ' � , Page 7 COUNCIL MEETING OCT - 8 �°�0 CI i� OF OROf�O ��C'� C� L'J CCiL;:C1� t t:��i: �'i`.I: For.SUri � C�- �Ci:I�:i1C-F rc L�� D�TE : Se�teri�er 25, i��0 �L'�J�I;T: �i:T�i'��I1Z� G�"c;:L _ _ _ �iCc�10?-i iGl ?,�-1 ��-1 S L�-ZU�'v-L J i'.^,C ��'�G� SE'4:2� . -��'VC:'1�� r?"O-cC� CO::S�5�12'lO Ci I''__7'i?]ELOr�}:G �'�ILr �� Or ono Lane , h�e s� F'erndale , I-ien_�epin Coun�y 1 S , �nc North Shore Drive was formulated in 1979 �-hen on-site dispesa� inspec�ions incic�ted sys�ems were not furic�ioning p?-ope�iy . Foliowup i;�specticns Q2LEI"TTi1r1EQ a nPeC TO� Tll'?�C1�c1 ScLJerS 02" c C07�1�:.�lEtE O�'ErhdL'1 Of �� e?-1SL1TlC'j Or�-Si �E SEi��1C ��".�:5. I`1� . I`i1}'.E' Gaf�rOri ZT1C3 ?�i�r�' R1VE;S ��7E;"2 assiQneci t� tzSY Oi QP�ErIii1;�1?�Q the zvailab_li�:� ol a�-an�s . �•;:E erd i-esul� beinc monies tiTere not cVa��cD�? �7'ia 1� WOii1C ;JE i7E'CE�ScrV LO `lir:C �r1E D?'0�2Ct l�'1��"l �OCZZ =i?P_C1S . r The clecision was made to ordeY a ieasibility s�uay , p�ans and specifi- cations, and advertise for bid= to construct the project to take advantaae of 198G construction costs , inst�lling sewer pipes ir. ecSE?T�PP.� crE�S 1:? 1980 zI7C1 i1�c�_ Z?riC �C��l COT15�?"llCt10I'] 117 �G�1 . 0=iainal �ids we,-e no� accep�abic , the �.:=oject �:a= rebid ir, s��ne.-.�� allo�inc tne Ci��- to atiract more competitive bidd_ng. A� our budQet meetine September 18 , 1980 , it was b�-ought tc my c�Le71�107i }7l' NO?"I11cZl �'cllZ'L'S �riat Ii� �"lda received � Cali iOr G �ir . YjG�1� 1'OliT'iC, r�S10Eri� O� �:inne�0:7�i� ��L•i�S , COiiui�eZl�1T]� tt'ia� Dr . Quentir Lauer, N;r,netonka BZllSfS, had i_^_=OiTiIE�C� ti� �ha� �7c },ic�C �zl};E'C3 t0 the Pollution Co�trol Agenc�- anc the Pollution Control Agency inior�ec hirn tnat the CiLy of Orono had been notified in 1979 that they were placed on a municipal needs list ann grant monies were available but the City was not willing to participate . I met with Mr . Duane Anderson, P . C.A. Grant Coordinator , and Mr . Rooer Bjork, Grant Planning Analyst. Their comment was they found it very difficult to explain to Dr . Lauer that in reviewing Orono ' s plans for sewering their area , they determined a need for the sewer project but it had not been determined ii Orono would be officially entered on a needs list, monies were not available at this time and it could be three years , if at all , if 'funds would be available . • ' Page 8 ,� _ . COUNCIL MEETING . OCT - 8 i980 SL'Tu7izl"iZE G�ant Ap�lication . se�ter:wer �5 , 158o CITY OF ORONO r�ge 2 Dr . Lauer ' s com�r�Fnts to me were that the Pollution Control I�oency 4:dS f�C-L'D 4:.i�tl OrOIlO � : attltllC�� .OWcrC� C�i�I'it ;:10i71�S di]Q 'v:011l(� Se71C3 Oii� �t1�1� O�:ri enaineer" to GE�e?-mine CUa11i��1.T1Q i0I" QId?"]'� :Ti07l1eS. N11" . L.icP� Z*-:C�'_"SOI` � S CG?:!.�12I�L Wz5 t�lE�' rl'aVE' SO :�I�T:V rE�liE5t.5 fOr Q'_"�:it5 �fic� LI7eV i1CVE'_ �EC1Q�^Q t0 V1�i� 2�C�"l a1"EC 1Ti �I7E Si.d�.E �vliE�E a problem es:ists and neterT�ine priorities and then there is no guaran�ee money. will be available . rttachec _s � letter Trom the Pcllutio*� Control Ag�ncy qualizying tr,eir s�a�emen�=. �lso at�ached is correspondence concerr,in .c�, arant r�ories. No� attacned zre surveys completed ann sent to the Pollu�ion Control �gency determining soil conditions, etc . 2 : OG P.hl� Sep�e:n�,er 25 , 1980 I ticas recu2sLed by Vicki Co�ie ar,d Janet Dyr.an , Minnetonka B1uTfs residents,aurina athree-hour meeting with them, to aga2n request of the Po�lution Control Aaency , their .timetable and assurances of grant monies to assist them in their assessment costs . -, � � I reviewed the er.tire T�atter with Gordon Wetwart , Chief Pollution CorLrol Age�cy Grant Coordinator , and requested answers to the , ro�lo�•:ing questions : , 1 . When would Orono be considered to be included on the municipal " neens list? ' At tn� eariies�., ne}.� su1r�-ner , aossibly next �all or the -Following spr i�g. 2 . Your recent letter to us indicated your engineers will review �he areas in ques�ion to be sewered to allov.� the Pollution Control Agency to prioritize its projects. Based upon this, when will Pollution Control Agency, after reviewing all projects in the State, notify us of their priorities? There are 285 projects requesting grants. Most projects are each in the millions of dollars cateaory . Monies are not available to satisf�� all requests. Money couln be available in three years, possibly not at all , considering availability of funds today. � . GOUNClC MEETING Page -9 , ,f- ��-- . OCT - 5 1980 � ��. , ` J �� : ._ �� -� C 1 i Y O F Q R N _� �. -� �.. � �, � �� T � ��znc �. r ��.. � t� �inr�esoic� ro�l� ► ion_ Con� ro► , � y ��-�.._,r�"�_�' �✓ � r� ` �� S�r l .'�r . �ic�; �er.son � Cits° of Orcno P . O. Box E6 CIyS�cl �c�`� j��irt;"1250Ta ��523 ' i;Ear I�"r . �E,�o� _ Tri1S 15 �O CO?"ii1T'T Oi1� �EIE�:1Cr.E C'��VErSc�iOrl O:`_ �e��E?�`•�`'I I � r24�rC1I"l�`j �tl�t S�a'tll5 Oi �I'OI10� S req�uest f Or Pl"aCE?T12I�� Oil :ilE ?�lli?1C1Dc� '�:E2C5 1,15� fpr � ?vcSLEV�a�er �r2c�ri12i1L CI"d'7�. . � r��'iP'vJ O' t!'iE 4;ZS�E��c�el- r:ee&= �'lZ5 }J2eii cCCO"il��1SI�i2C � �:;� � � c"��c�c i.I;a'C �I-O?":O Q025 t1aVE c I"1E2� SO?" LiiL?"OVEi;12Il�S - FC%2P.�V S�cif 4,'1�1 =L'I"�Y121 1G2:7t1��' c'_�G V�i 12�' �hFS2 T'iEE:S du_-ing an on site visit in Octcber . Tne city �•�ill be nntiried �-�hen �his visit is �o be conducted . 1 ' VE E;!C!O�eC SOiTie 1P_�Oii��_O:, CSi Lt7e COT7S�1liC�10I1 C3r�!�-C� process �:,�� sno��lc e};�i ain �ne s�eps of �he procra:r,. Ii VOU ricV2 �L'2S�107:S r2�j- �I Q11"]a �he �rar_Ls pI OC��S � �IE c=�2 contact me at (612) 296-7312 • ' YoLrs very truly , . � ,,_ G .��.:�-.�� - . , Ro�e� D. ��ork - . • Constructio:� Gran�s Unit F'a��ilities Sec�ion ^ Divis ion o� tr�ater Qua�ity " RDB: cmg Enclosure Phone: 296-731 2 1935 �'��est County Roac B2, Roseville, tJ�inneso�a 5�113 �EOiCi12� �`��CES ' t7U�Uifl u�21^or'� LE,ror, Lakes't•�2;c',c'' �iC�heSi@' . EGua! OpPortcn�ty ER�p�cyer .�-��,i b � '� 'i� l,�lu�Ll JU.iIIIIL'.J.I� J�)L'h1 f�JSUCIU.IL� SUIJ�ir�S UOI�JJI�U� 1JMJ5 :f)Il'I`�I�J OSI�1 '1U3�5�{S i31�� fi�� )�, �� .i�� Il'I.�� IUL' Il'�LI�1lU�lUJI�UJ �lll! .)�L'JJ(.�0 �IJJL�I)Jl� U� f)J�)JJU �UJl11C�lfl�3 J�ll�O"�)U@ i.�if�l�� . .,.•�i•�� ul ��u,��:,15 �u�lti�L',ii� Jni�L•u.IJ)�L' ��I�� 'UL'11.I ��I�I.)L'� L' SUUI)l'�� UIC�UIfI(I :�JUI) 1JM�5 ��L'j�flU �)UL' 1UJCIJ�JJ1 I�l'.i) �I'' (�.��IwC1.� .�,Al'l� IIUA �l'l�� iJl�l� �l�l'�y '�JSIIIU 71L'l�3Jl� ��I��1 UI�M Jlll.'J�(I�UU_l i�U1.1JJL11[`�Uv-1�J�It�J.IL' -LII ;)L'JJL �)i).1JMJSUI1 LII SlUJ�S/�S )UaW�281� �l:fl�lAl� ��{I Il' �i.�u�iltlli )1 � i.il��.11� ')l.11ll))-;1II1'�UJLUUUJI�\uJ f)JI�IIL'fl�� L' �.)J'US��Jll�lij�/ JLI� �ll �)J.IU�UUI�, J_lU:i1J� -UI ��ue saue�cl yui�sixa �u �ua�u�no�dwi ao UUI�UL'Cj ��e .��,�,�,,��., ��uw .�yl Ic�� .,iuui ul si s��o�� -uu� uui�e:�i��lilL'-JJII e 1lui��u��e .��I)k'--C1NOJ7S -x� ;S�UL'IlI �UJLLI�L'J.I� MJU :J(�I1IJU1 51�3IOJCI J�C�I;J113 ie��! .��i�c� �� :iui��l lue�.iu�lwi �Suiu �� o �uU •`�u�uue�d 'u�� . !i i�e t��uao �� E�c1.�a�1 u JUL') I)SUOJ [' ��J �S , I I '� I � I 1 I . ! �u��a�nsuu.� � � ,(li�i�eJ ay� jo �(lixa�dwo� a�{1 pue u,��qo�d �iiu► ..,� �,.,.i� ;;�� u.�i�� s�;un� �u��a.i �,��L '1NV21`_) a��t'MJ�SL'M �no�( �o ivajxa a�► �uiui��no �(��n�s �, �I�11� r nu,( �N�en�c V�I� ,�y� 'uui�e_,��I�le �� ,w.i�l �o ue�d e aE�n��ui os�e y�iyn� 'uoi�e�i�dde s�i �ui �1�� ,�,��u �,,le��, V�� {i ��ue VJ�IIV .,y� ��y JI -ae�Ja�ci Jo s�so� ayi ao� ,(ed amw �(�i�edi�iunw ano,� � •��ui��i� iiui.��15 �euiJ �� '�y ��,��ri�en� �c� ,(��:�i� �(aan ��non� '��Iw�x,� ao� '�. ��:i.�eW �(c� p�nia�aa �s�nl»a V �uoil�nalsuo� �en��e aya pue 'SUOI)E'�1)IJJ(�5 . uu�aen�en� f�"� sue�d u�is�f� ay� '`�UIUUh�C� (�)I�IJ2�� r�JeUIlU1�3J(� �oJ �(.�u.,�lV �� u� u.�na�� F�ue s�n��,sw��! �u s�so� �y� �o %SL s�(ed �ue�� e�apa� �41 ��nE�uu� u�� (�� i��,�n ,t�n�ris e s�ei�ij�o ��cli�iun�u a0 i(�C� UI'.1,� aLj] IM L'l /�A S�]UJS V_)i�W Jl�� SJJ,ti1JS IIIOLI�IM SJIjIUIIUI L � � 1• 'I. � I/" -�uo� .iu � �su<�i��15ui ;,�i,-uc� ,1ui�_�n��u�j� ,lc� ��ue i��1.iU�u1�,�u;� Il!1:lI�J.� IiUL' J�L'�� JL�� t��ih1 �]L'1JUUJ . . �J1�1IClIl_)Illlllll I1JJJ,M.I� UI S�IJI.'ICI �LIJILI�L'JI� Ji�l'MJ� )Ill'1�� llUlj.)IIJ��UU.) L' UJUI JJ)UJ U� �)JYI1Ul��f1L' i1lII�iI�J JI�J LU(,1-1� ��1UC�J1 ijUIJOJIII�LU JijJLL�J � Ul�.AA UU)I:]C� �L'�C�� .)I�IJdI.�� 1' �U JIUL'U Jl�� I ) JLI1,1 )II�S �l f'I1J I.1J JSJI S.1Jl �Ly �l - - .I I I �. I� I VJ�1W Il - ��`'��iS '�iUu(15 Jl�'I �� u�.i� .,�ui�� i,�� ii�) �ti �/�5l-) l�u_� � ci,��5 :�� ui �a�i� �(�u,�t! �� ii cui �u� �u�.i�l '�( a�;i ui � �,r� �, �, r- ;,,,i�� i,�� iiu�{ ,rwi u uui��u IIXJ UL' • I tl V � I I I I J ( 5 I ��so� � i�ii � �� o � o ,(ed u� I ��C . II. { 1 I , ly. .I I 1 /�V6-/�U6 F�a�icluic» �,i� •�,� •c�N ��n�{ �i,.��uo' uui�n��u� i��eM s�u�.,�i a�e�s Nue �eaapa� a»clx� �t��e�i�s��ea� ue� no,� ;.'I.'nl��ii �Snw e�u5�uui�N ui ��ui��iiu eia��ia� uo F»sec� �(�i�0u�l •,(�ju�uu��3a �ni)eU.l�� PUe �ni�L•nOUui SJ511 ►»(OJC1 iJl�� .,�� .,��u V")��w Jt�� IUU.I� �1,�UIl'�i�U �LIIU� .IIJI�� U .l:i�l.lU UI ��::1J�1),I(1 )IIJILI�L'JJ� .IJ�L'�ti1J)SL'�1� JI10� �1 a7IC�P.III'�L' aJL' ��uSQ p) (:�fl �O SjUL'J`� �l'�J�]J j :sui�i� 'V�� ue V��IW ��I� °� .WV21J L d31_S �»su�luad si�ue� '�t��eiiuue E��leF�dn '�si� �iyl '��,1JMUH '�OIIL'CJI�IUfIUJ �no�( �(c� �u�oy �c� o� �/u0l J(l� li��l�l.'JIIL�I�I' UL' �IlUi�ll� U� r��ll'.iJ ��',UU JJL' Ilu�l O� C.�II `�UInL'J '�t.' � O � $� 7 l?lL � �7Uc�3`cj • � ' �s�- s»� r�cl��un �< <iu a � y 1 ros� y � cvadw) v �i�,,� �»�e�u�� , f 1 N 1 . . W l� � J �ua�uo� uo�ln��od ay� y�noa�� 'e�osauuiW ��sc» �19 ,� ,i� ��u� u��i ,i��e_� �� I��i.ie�l,;��l ai�� ;i,�nl�:,� . -i��a �eaol a��l �o �/�5L s�(ed (Vd3) �(�u��V uoi��a�o�d i�i�� .,.��i s.�u��iiu ��u� ��.u��oa�i uu��n��:��1 �,,1��un�u �cauawuoainu3 •S•� �ya ,�q u�ni� �uea9 �eaaP�� yl u��i i�iu.� �u ��n�cu ,�� 53��i�>>,,�� ,ti��ii�i �u ' ��1 �• .r�ccl,,a�l '��u,,a.,�uu� �y! yuih�u��ci�—C12111-I.L '1s�� S�Ul.I� al�� aa� a�a�� nnoH iN��N �ecl�:�iunw �� uv ��! u� �s�nt��.i �ui: �(�ua��/ � �1�,)I1)S )i� U!'�ll �' ��aL'(��a� �o��uo_j uui�n��c�d e�us�uu�W ayt ol Jl�.�nn-1S2J1:1 oNoao ��s l�� ol Mo�-� �s,�,,�,�,�a�� 0861 � - 1�U . . ��ue��i e aoj ��i�i,�i��l �c� 11ui�,�i�� S�ii�ii�� u� ��uc u�i�e.:�i�c! �19i�ii�a �c� �ou p�non� 'a�duaex:� �oJ '»ia)sip �ooy�s 1�� ui�a:i � 1iui��i�u. ns .i�� s�uuw.�ainl�,�i �� n�.iin:�i.� ' 1 1 . � I � •uu�,3a� �o �(aiunuiwo� aai�u� ue uro�� a1�nn��senn i •�u� �;��,,�1 ��u�.�y �� n�< <. uui�u�u.�u ui � �in� nc�ri JN1133W �l�N(10� ) 1 1 ' 1 q lsnw sasodand �edi�ui�d i i � . � . i � ��, �aa � �I.�u1�I u� U;)L'.JIL UI J,)I V lUUli1.�1 JL I1UL' 'SJSLIJLIXJ JJUklli)� { . . I� . IJ� i ' . V�13 I� , s,�{�i�i�c� �y� �o aup •sai�i�i�e� au�w�ea�� a�eM��senn �),Il�ti' .,��i u��,i� S�e�.��u �� iM .iui � -uiew ��ue uu��aa�lc� .i�n�� uu uj� s��n�_i�l �yl � I.�.;�� ,� dJU.�.,:, • ��n��suo� ��uc a�e�ado 'uMo o� �(ai�o��ne �(�o�n�e�s lu i �I��i�L )i�i��l'-JII� ,;�� _;,,lu�cl �� u J..)UC��JJ.)1'. '.IJ�I'MJ�SL'M Jl'J l{)IM ML'I J�L'�S �C� �a��'a1� SJI�OC� 1�1�i0 JO $UO11 i�i�ll�l `iUi' ;,,,U�iUll(i5 �L'��IJLUUUJI,IU� '1�:�UJAI��J��J �O �UJLLI�L'J.I� f)UL'I I)UL' �SJJMJS �.IL')IUI'; IJUL' lll.lU�S -L'LIUI,'JJO 't'.C�I.I� Ul.'I�]U� �5c71�UflOJ �SCjiLISUMOJ '$�1�1J :,�� t'�ui��ll .il�� L�l!l�� IIM UL'�l� ,��II1:1L'� S�lU.11� f�JLUlIl11U] 111U.1� UO1�11'IUII IOJjUO� O� 5�JJIU1l,� ,ZL�JL ��i�n�u�„ .,�� ni�.,,�� uu��i�� e�i��_� e si �i��l '�� :ic�u�:�� o� �oiaiJ :iui�siz� �u�uidu��n�E� an.ias o� L�U�J� L' .lO� a�(�i�l�� S�Ol�l�l� , :�uirecl to list their plans for includin�; �he public in he rli5cussion of wliat treatment systein sf�ould bc ��w�� 'e�� .ise�l.) _ yext, s(�bmit your completed Facility Plan to the �Q�S�,t''�.� Ct� Q�""� �j �'C�n tS v1PCn (or review and approval. I( it's approved, the ' itate will then consicler your project (or a STEP 2 �RAN'f. ' h (��'�1'1 w-.�r#„� �_ C� ,� .�.�,. ,�:�,�,�: ��. , . r This is tl�e Uesign SeaE;e, i( your �roject is approved � �� ,� , �� ;�t ,�'';�� for a S�c�� ? Grant, your municipality and its consul- � ;!��i �,� ;� lint �I�en �repare the actual en�;ineerin� plans anci I • (t� ''' ;.;��t� ��,, � , � , �peci(i��iii�ns based on Ihe approved facility plan, �, -•�—•� If �hesc ,�re also ap�roved, yc�ur projcci Koes on thc � � , ;;;F + �� h��l � i � �`'� � ; '4,� � i �, � Project Nriorily Lis1 (or construction. „''� � ,i•; , . �t � � " . � r ip r �� r��..�. �� - t ,� � ; i� I lf you have ,a�l�li�ional r��res(ions, , ,�„ �,��;; ', �;�'�,`� �t��'�d� � � ( ,:' you migh( al�o confact: i �..� �' �° 'N ',� l, (�•��t ; I ,�.1�;� �,r`. ; � � �t,,� q�� 'his is tl�e Construc(ion Stage, which involvc�s ap- Cons�r�ction Grants Unit—Facililies Section � ; r ' � � �lyinb for the Step 3 Grant which will be used to f,12/1.9f,-7205 ��----��` �; 9 � � � ... , ` +� -�e ., ,, �+ �uild the projecL l�his step includes adverlising Minnesota Pollution C�ntroi Agency ►,:..�»�I.':.�:..:.d�'.t�rc.�,;s;,ii��.;( �,;,�s,;;i.��;,,. iicJs fc�r the construction work and �;aining final ap- ' 7`�35 West Co�.inty R�ad F32 ' �rc�v,il ��( your construction contrac.t award from Roseville, Mn. 55113 f� n � /'�� he EPA and the State. ' facilities Pl�nning Branch � � 'ou're now rcady to break 6round ancl watch your , 312��53-2131 _ � ��0� �O U.S. fnvironmentil Protection Agency —� �lans I�ecome a reality. 210 South Dearl,orn St. -� p � Chicigo, III. 60G04 . O � � ��} � , p °° � ��l� tll �7 � n�-rn - O � rn _ . z � � final Reminder 4 z � . . , � ion'� fc�iE;c� �li�t the wastcwater tre;�lment (acility ' f- nu'ri� �,lannirig Io b�iilcl will rec�uire a continuii�}; . nanri,i► r�rsE�onsibility (rom thc citiz��ns o( your I , , c�ni�iiunity, This inc.�lucles nat �nly your ' ; , �ui�ic i��,�lity's share of the c�pital co5t, I�ut also the �"��x�"A'�•�r�hl�l►,�r.�.��.+�r-� per��li<,n �inci m��in�eii�nce expcnses, incluc)in�; ' " ' � � � � ' ' � j i� �,�I,�ii�� c�( c�uali(icc! o��erators, ll��t �o on (r�r � ,, �, ,� ,,, , . �. � :� ;) �d • � y �� E �, -. ,�,� ir� IiI�� il the nrujecr. To make sure lhat your tax- �jr ��I �' '^ �" � ,��,�II i� st ,�;:,. �� t ��,�„ w ,�y��,, �n��i��rstar�d tl�c len �th of this fin�incial com- �, , �� - r�� 6 ' Minnesota Pollulion �al�l�i�" '��'�"n•,�t:;' �,a�a.:� �,�� llllli�•I11, )�c)U S�IQU�(� Rl�{�C' 111� XII71Ufil CIIILCf1 ��1f- � , � "'�"�" �++rc*!lrb,'�', �'�,*"� � , , '�}� Contr�l A�ency �,�� , �,��-�ii ,, ;,� ,_., ci�,��ti�in rin inic�,ral 4��irt o( yc�ur ��ro�,r�ini. , �, ; � :. ,!Y,� ', 1 ' t�,�uiU.n I:i .t.yd+�JL....[i..'��rrkAiaLe��el-1.:9 Y . ' � • � � Page ,12 _ To: ��:c1tEr F.. F:erson, c;�,- ,.,.�.,�.L:�� `1-� ��,- COUNCI� MEETING �'t��'�: ?''_1 C r;c e 1 �'. �c i-r i 0 I-1 �[i i" i C C'�'c�E:-. T_',c T%E C L O I- . y . OCT - $ 1980 DtT�: A�tust 15 , 197° S��JECT: Flacement of unse�aFred areas of Orono on�}�eY?��NQ I�eeds L=�st The a�tacheC letter and forrn from the 1��A details the first s�eps Orono mus� take to be include� on the ?�;un� cipal T�eeds List for .�u-:cing of se��age treatmen� facil�ties . My reco:-�endation is that we co�plete and re�urn the su�le5� for the i�iinnetonka Bluffs �:rea and the ��est Fernd2le/Shoreline Drive Area as ��7o separate projects due to the ai=zering problems in these two areas . cc: John Gerhardson, Public t�'orks Coordinator Alberta Strom, Clerk �l�n P. Olson, Village Planner Eruce N?lr:erson, CitS� �ttorne_y Glenn Cook, City Engineer .�. , � ," . i� �; �nn� ti-, -..,� . R _ , � -� � � � Page 13 . , �'� ' , '�1�i .� �' ��` �'��'L` ��` �� I'c,�• l�`rcc h�,> f,( Cr_ :a� $��, �,iinnt-�ut., :,.,,;3:- �".::r�iciJ:�l (!,`iicc� i . 'I. j - � • On the .'�'urth Shr�rc of Lckc 1�finr,ctonka � - -'�. - 7 � �)_{�iii�� - . - ��. __Jf July 2, 1979 COUNCIL �fEETING "?�ir, T�,;ane Anderson � �CT _ 8 �950 . '�1:�nnes�ta Pollution Control Agency 1935 j'est �ounty Road B2 P.cseville, C1TY OF ORONp i��ir,nesot� 55I13 Dear Iir. Anderson: �'crlOilS reSld2Tl�1c1 crE2S lIl Orono were OeVElO�E'G T',cll�' �'E2rS 2g0 on s:;,211 l�ts u�ing individual septic svstems and wells . T`��o of these areas ddjacent to the Orono-Long L�ke Sewer Interceptor under construction have soils , topography, water table, or lot size problems �.-nich severel}� Iimit the reconstruction or reF� ir of e}:isting i�iling septic s��ste:r.s . Orono ' s Co;�:prehensii-e Se�aer Plan sta�es tnat �hese areas should be sewered within tnree years of co��pletion o�' the interceptor. • I am requesting infor,na�ion from you regarding the possibility of EPA or other grants to help in the funding of these projects . Sincerely, . � , , � , �'/��._.z �,--�� G�- i � �� • - � r T3ichael P. ' Gafiron Sep�ic S��stems Inspec�or � r��:kh 1 ' ' ' ' '. - 1� I�-�:�)liilC � .1 �. • . � . �'"'— - , � ` . '�age 14 � �'; �. � `- ' ��r��' �� -�t.�l�=`�� ; , l'n�t Uffice �c». Gr�• Cr�s:al Y.•r.y. P.�inne�oL;+ 7;;32�• J,h:^;ciS,�l l..`::;••. � �f f��i Jr ' ' On thc .��orth Si;ore vf La1;c '�lirnclonka : C�).i��E i� _ . __ September 27 , 1979 COUNCI� MEETING T:-s . 1�:ary Fivers �CT - 8 1980 1� 4U Snoreline Driv-e , ;�:a�•zata , T.�i7!i�ESGtc �5?91 V1 � Y O� OR�J'vO LCGi 1:�I"S . Rll'E�S : Dick Eenson in�orr�s me that you nave volLnteered to �elp us out ir_ Lryina to ebt�in iundinq for the proposec sewer project in ;�o�r r.eiahborhooc. I am enclosine some inzoi�a�ion �c ��date you on wr.at we nave already done. �lease rote that the survey reierrec to in i•.r. Be�ton ' s letter has been completec and I am ready to send it in anytime. You r,�a�� uant to review it before it aoes back to the I✓�PCP.. Plezse call �ny�ime ti�ith cues��o-�s or cc:�::��e:��s_ ��;e shoulc probably rieet to form a plan of at�ack as soon as possible . Sincerely, �^, ,�,` /� � �� . . 2�'�ici7ael P_ Gal=ron . Septic S��stem Inspector , , MPG:kh Enc. � - , - . • - " Page 15 . � Tv: Co:�nci 1 � F?0:�:: ►•:ichael P . Gaf`_on , Septic System InsDector COUNC(L MEETING DrTE : Gc�oi�er 11 , 197� s �9aO �C� - SuBJECT: ?•iunicip�l r:eeas List CITY OF ORONO %-,��.cC_�:�G 15 �::E CGVE� IE�-:.Ei c71C �!c�^. �E-1t rG ?•�1r!TIESG�.Z Pcllu�lOTi CG:i��Gl 'r�Er�C�' �•:] �1] �IE11'r:i'ic'_"'�' Gc�a �c�CLiYEC -0r D�aC2TT:EIIt Oi CErt.al7�i c�rEZS Oi �:OTIG OTi t�lE ��11P.1C1�clJ 1�E��CS Z,15't i OI" FECei al iLIlC1T1C Of se�:aoe LYEctIT1ET-lt projects . T}�E' S1?: crE'd5 1P.CZUGEG ,ic\�E bEETI CELeIi7�lr:eQ L}'i2OUQ}� Tf';�� 17�5'JECt10r;S t0 be c�-i :.ical �rea� �lo.,c the ��}:eshore �:i,ere se•�:aoe �rea�,<<cnt pro�r,le;,,s may have no Gr,-Sl�e rer,�ed�es . Co::�pletion cf theJlveecc Survey iorrn= is the f�Yst stea ir, obtainine Federzl �undinc cf �hese prcjects . y... , . �� ' J ' � 1 t I t a�I V I l I�� J"/J✓�I Page 16 �,�� -. y� . . : ;�. . •l�� . '�+ r "� T � �r - : . ,; t� �. ; �� .� � �� `��',�. �� i .� --yL ; " � , _ �i..�,,:�.. + _ }'ust U�f��r �io� 6c.. C,-��.a'. 81�, ��Sinnr�o::+ :.�5:;2:.. ?�',�.:n�c:, ��.`fi�r� �- H:TF� j , - �::•�� -�' �,c�-� ' � ` • On thc IVorth Shore o� Lahe l+iirnetonka -- ....,-1.F-.; - '� * ° ► �;j . - �' '� " October 10 , 1979 COUNCI� MEETING Ms . Debor�h Tnurston OCT _ 8 ��8D Facilities Section Division of S•:ater Quality , t;i�neso�a Follution centrol �gency CI f Y OF ORONO 1°35 t��est Coun�y Road B-2 Roseville, ?�innesota 55113 Dear Ms. Tnurston : I am enclos�ng copies or si}. "1Jeeds Surveys �or U�sewerea rreas" for various locations ki�hin tne City of Orono. In mos� c�ses , these aieas were oeveloped more than twenty years ago at a time when aeneral knowledge about septic s��stems , drainfield siting , 371G� S011 SU1�abilities 4.'�CS minimal a� beSt. TOGc}' , �hese developnen�= on small lots �ith steep slopes , clay soils , or hi�h waier tables are comine bacY. to haunt Ls ki�h �ailina septic systems posina health and pollution hazards in tne shoreland areas of Lake Minnetonka. ` Orono ' s basic philosophy is that further high-density de��elopment would be det-imenLal to �he Lake ?�Sinnetonka ecosystem_ This type of develormen� normally occurs with the ad.�ent cf municipal se�.ers. T�ere�ore, we intend to develop with septic systems on two anc r five acre lots in the existing unsewered are�s , with, an active permanent program of plan review, construction inspec�ion, and regular existing system inspection with mandatory maintenance_ This will necessarily include finding alternatives to septic svstem"s in a iek existing developments �:here site conditions or lot sizes Tr�ake it essen�ially imposs�ble to adequately treat se�:aae with or.- site methods. Once these existing problen� areas are remedied , all future development should continue in an orderly fashion without the problem of "leap-frogging sewers" . Our present priority list for remedying existing problems is : 1. Minnetonka Bluffs - Feasibility Study about to be called - (construction 1980?) 2 . Shoreline Drive - Feasibility Study about to be called (construction 1980?) 3. Crystal Bay Area - Proposed within three years of interceptor completion - 1983? . . ' . � • , � . �, ' �, i . . • _ Page 17 �c; cber '_ G, 1G-IG Ms. D�k�o�z:; Thurston 1:inneso�a Pollution Control �,��r,�}� GOUNCIL MEETING ��1�E�C5 S'.17'i'e}'S fOi Unsewered �iI"E'�5�� i aa� 1 OCT ' 8 1°80 � . �;�i�r� sr,:.r� D��E - r,.o ��.,E�� i� orCITY OFrORON� b � s�•��er vet 5 , ��i::iL'S bd�� ' . E. - 1�0 ti7TietcblE OZ r�Z?7S iOr SEti:er �'E't 6 . StLbbs Bay 2v. ��. - No timetable or plans ior sewer yet The fir�� our on the list a�e areas acjacer,t to e>:is`ine sar.itary sewer er i::`erceptor lines , ana couic be tiec in�o these exis�ing IiI�ES ct 2 SOT�24:i�ct I"Ec�S07'ia}J�E COS�. `1'rlE S�l:��.``,S �aV cZEZS W011IG - reGL1Ze SO:�i� S�llC�V tC QeLf'�7P,171E tl;e 7ilO5t. IEc�1�JlE SVS�EiTI OI collec�ion, treatment and disposal . • The City oi Orono would liY.e t�,ese si}: areas consioered ior federal fundine and place:��en� on youT ?�lunicipGl Neecs List. If yov have any auestions , please do not hesitate to call us at 473-7357. Sincerely, /� �� J �/, 1�� '/�_ /. �1 � ' � r Michael P. Gaffron Septic System Inspector N.PG :}ih > Encs. , � � � , . COiJNCIL MEETING Page 18 OCT - 8 1980 , :-\� �� ,�, -- Y OF O ONO �•J3-\ �_` �.. (1 � ..� ►,t�ru �� ' _"r.:._�i��.'.��.�.�:^.2_.Y_ 'r�l,� ' � . �--� � ---'�'.p--�'�'�- -�- .��. G,� H � I a J �.��:K �j� �� ' � � i �— ,, - � - � � !� �� r- �" _�'� .� � �� --��_ � � �' �'" " � .r-Y � � � I� � � � �-�'� r �� I � \r I � f� \� � �~—� � v.i��v�' I � IU�^C7EN�.�� .—�.�..�� _ " u ( / . �� ' j !�..�:-f��-'�,'��. �--��I ��^.\2 , � . / � ' ,-z: � 3� � - ---- ��# �� -- , �� I �s�,� ` ��t � " � �. L-3 r �*`�� ' � ' �"" 'L_T ��, - r � I��.r--�?� �- 1� � �� ,�" � .— �� C _ � \�1 � _ .�.�r�/ �r `�� _�� \'-��i 4 , �C� �1� - � � ��,� I�� -c° ��_ , � � r�10-� i�_,-J�'[�`�- M„E,r+5�, <<� � �� __ �� 1 - ��-=T ~�=� I� i,, '--�; 5 �� ,.� �� - � ,��. 5� `� ----�� - � � ':�. � i - --�,� � � � � _� 6 '�� , t� , �= � � - 6 � - - ___. � - � I � �.4 � , � � �_, 2 �\ -;� i -/--> —— , ' , �. : � —_�__—__� .�, � y��:� � t.� � -- �� . � � � �`�� ( �.� r�.. d� �� l �_ _� �- � �� __ �� 7 . � �� , , ,..�v a -� - q ' , I ,000 � -- �.� -- y� ,,- � 8 ij, ` ...�.. A�Ac��.��q` "` � � i' .�"�;y� � v �- �—�.- - _ ?DO" .,'.i-�__�� —��.� ��_.�� `I �.�o � ..,�, . C " 1�"�`3�I f1 ? 'y^ �-� „�i;� '1 % •I 7 ..��Y� - � r I�'_ �'I _ ` . � I � �� . I � x�o �\ s,'�� i � � % I I �r `^I 'I _ ��l�� — --i -- � ( �0 `� ,, � � _ '` � �r I i �. � z�oo tt ��f ' % :� _ �•� �. _ � ��,Y ��— � ----'-�� -� � — `�° A `'`°° B '°°° C -D �°° E �°° F �`°° G �°° H '6°° i t �° J e°° K ,�° L �. C�y of �rano, t�iinnesota ��,'`�'�� ;�, �� s�t r�� t,a� r,� y _ 1 . � I• I�� • � ��" ' .. ' _� ;� ; , , ' � � _ Page .19 � . . — ; • COUNCI� MEETING r �� `^ � r �� ° ' �` �`�t� ' '� � -i ; � �� 0CT - 8 1980 `� ,-c . ; :_-� ' - � V 1 � -1�\ ��CE!'ii;EY L� l�J� .�� , � i � �-, `�. --� � .� ---, _�-__ _. C� ! � C='u�.0 I ��=� ��,-=;' �; Y OF ORONO c�TY o,,. � �' � \�-. _�'� ' .;r. �,-�c '.'�ri';��t, ',zyor � �1 i,\' O i ��r`C,�p : ��OSt U i�')�E _�0y: 6Fi � Crys;.a� G�y, '�inriesoi.a 55323 ;� i - , � ' �:�r ..r_. `.��r:';e5�. � ' j i Thi s ;�i�cr i s i n re�ly to vour rc�u�st to the ��;rr,esc��a Fol l ul i on � � i.Gntr01 f�,O�IiC,y rOr l f1C� U�l Il� Sl}: e�:i sti ng soni�ary SE�:o�� prCG� 2T�i ( � or-EaS. 'i n �he "��eed� SUYVC'VS �or Unsewered Areas". i _ ' � Tne Co��:��;ssior, h�s no ob�ec�ion io i.ni� 1-eGUE'Si 1or ir,clusion in �he . n2GC�5 i i SiS. �;��;ever, S�riCE i.��cSE ol'EaS are CCri�+GU0U5 i.0 2):1 S�i t1� . ' se�•.Er`d �rezc ��;i th �nE pos5i b i e cxcepti on of S�ubbs Eay t��. E. , �he � Com�ission �.;�uld obiect to cons�derino any alterna�ives to resolve ' the pro�l em o�h�r ��,an connecti n�, to the z��i 1�bl e se�ti-er sy�te�:�. : j 1�E1"y �r;,�1}� �� i I �1 � i �� . � � � � � j Richar� J. Dounhert � � - Chief Adrinis�ra�or' ; i Rlu_P„^-,O.nc - . � ; � . , , � I cc: MPCA. � i r��C . - l � ' i , � ' i � 1 ) � 35c m�TRo�ou:,=�e_oc. � i7Hb e:�sc-.,7.'7,cEv ; /AI;I�F�U:i��`_�IO! +t b1: 2:^ E�21 I '. ' j , r. I . . � > �T Page 20 � � COUNCII_ MEETING . OCT - $ »80 % � CI i Y OF ORONO =�r.TF : �l % 7 9 TO . ��.� �"U.J� � M7 ��..�� : `�i�,�l-L.�', �i a�� t�.�.c�.� �c��-�, . ��,�� . �� S5 �� `� �'R�'='" • C-��0.�'1�`r��`�'J� � ��,o�� : (o l�— �.9 �- 7�-�;�� A��=:�SS : ^"inr.esota Po�?Ltion Co��=o� �bency 1935 �'est Counry Roa� u-2 Rosev;1 � e , :`";nneSota 551�3 S'-'R.JF CT: �-r��J�'� �,'►,... C; � . ('�,E�'v�t'�2��C.�_,o-�� .�-,� v�� u � �n�. . y/ I1�'0?.�'�.'�'?0^� P,�V��'v; A,�'D CO'_"��"_�rr ApDKOV�iT ' ' 1 - , . ' ` L� 'L .` _ . �; ':.. lt `i � , .. - j�� Page 21 :- �- � :•, �.,�. � - ,/�� . � � .�' � � > Cl-� OF pRC't�0 -�-- � �� innesofa Pa�f�i ion Con i ro( A enc � �� . �, :�= 4 � Y �.��n-�' . - ��:;,� Division of Water Quality COUNCI� MEETING October, 1978 ocr -s �9ao INrOP..�:�TIOI� OI� COI�STRUCTION GRANTS PROGt�M CI►Y OF O�ONO In�roduction Ti�le II of the � Federal k'ater Pollution Control Act A.mencments of 1972 and �he Clean Iti�ter Act of 1977 authorize the award of con- s�ruction grants for wzstewater treatment facilities . Under the prograrc, funds are allocated by the U . S . Enviro:-�-nent�l Protec�ion Agency (EPf) to the State on the basis oi need and population. 1/ Of the to�al eligible costs of a project , the federal share is %5 percent. Grznts are �warded to nunicipalities of the State according to a priority sysLem outlined in State Water Pollution Control Rule 34 (WPC-34) incorporating criteria specified by �he EPA. � L,�C- 34 pro- vides a State match of 15 percent of the total eligible cost , leaving 10 percent to be borne by the municipality. In adcition, the 1977 Clean Water Act authorizes zederal grants oi 85 percent ior projects which utilize innova�ive and altern�- tive treatment technology. : The construction of a federally funded waste treatment facility " in3olves three sep�ra�e grants . The iirst g;ant (Step 1) is for facilities •planning , which includes a cost-effective analysis and enzTiron�en�al asses'sment of alternative �modes o� trea�ment and an anzlysis of infiltration/inflow into any existing sewer systems . If infiltration/inflow is excessive, a sewer system evaluation survey is also done during the Step 1 phase . A public hearing must be held to allow co�ment on the completed facility plan and it must be submitted for State and regional planning agency review. 1/ Federal Register , Vol . 39 , No . 29 , Feb ruary 11 , 1974 1935 West County Road B2, Rosevilie, Minnesota 55113 Regional Otfices • Duluth/Brainerd/Fergus Falis/Marshail/Rochester/Roseviile Equal Opportunity Employer a . • ' ti 1 _ _ � � � � COUNC(L MEETING Page 22 � Inio_,,,�tion on Construction 1 Grants Progr� P�� 2 OCT - 8 1980 • CITY OF ORONO The second grant (Step 2) is for the preparation of construction dra�.ings and specifications . The third gr�nt (Step 3) is for the actual cor.struction of the tre��:�ent iacility . In most ca�es no c�EP iL'�� beg-�n L'i1�1� ��"%E �'_-eV10ll5 SLEP 1";2S ��ET? 52�1�r2CtOZ'lly com;�ieted. The onl�- e�:ceptio:� is that the 1978 Clean l;��ter Act � provides that co�:LT,unities wit'r, a population of less �han 25 , 000 may obtain a combined Step 2- 3 grant if they have been placed on the State' s priority list for a S�ep 2-3 orant . . The FedEral Cor_gress originally �ppropri�teC Y11 billion to fLnd the construc�ion gr�nTs program ror FY i972 ��-�roLgh FI' 1976 . A small (ir,teri�) appropriation was �aoe for F'Y 1977 ($1 billion) and the Clean Iti'ater Act of 1°78 appropriated $8 . 76 billion Tor FY 197E through � 1979 . r�innesota ' s share of this �ppropriation will be $162 , 611 , 700 ir. FI 19 7fi through FY 1�79 _ The E�A con- ducted a surve}� o` e�is�ing �:astewater trez�men� needs in T�sinr.esota in 1978 and determined that based on 1978 dollars , it i�ili require $1 . 226 million to correct all e�:isting treatment needs in 2�Zinnesota. Deter�inarion of Fundin� Priorities �ne cri�eria ior deter�:iining the order in �,�hich projects will be funded is set forth in EPA Construction Grants Regulations (40 CFR 35. 915) and in WPC-34 (State of T:innesota rules) . 2/ The criteria include iactors such as : (a) population; (b) degree of � need,; which is determined by the current use of tne receiving water bod��, s�ringency of effluent standards which must be �et , and classiiica�ion of recei�=ing river se�ent ; and (c) abili�y to participate in areawide (multi-cou�nunity) treatment . For administration purposes treatment projects have been cate- gorized as : (a) wastewater treatment works ; (b) major interceptor ; . (c) interceptor ; and (d) sewer s}�stem. �n December 1973 , t�e � Ninnesota Pollution Control Agency (r�'CA) Board adop�ed a polic�� which ranked these categories for iunding. This polic�� is reflected in the 1978 revisions to WPC-34 so that wastewater �reat- ment works and major-interceptors receive the highest priority and interceptor and collection system projects receive respectively lower priority. 3/ �- - Ru e or the Administration of the Municipal Facilities Assistance Program and the Minnesota Water Pollution Control Fund and Federal Grant Funds Allocated to Minnesota (available from Docimments Section, Room 140 , Centennial Office Building , St. Paul , Minnesota 55155) . � ' 3/ MPCA Memorandum on Enforcement Strategy for Construction Grant — Program. (12/73 and 9/75) � � � COUNCIL MEETI Page 23 Inio��ion on Cons�ruction NU' Grants P:o€:am Page 3 OGT -8 1�80 • CITY OF ORONO -Ninnesota Project Frioritl� List . For each F�.scal �'ear the Aeency is reauired to cel�elop a 1iur.icipal Needs 'is� (?��L) wnich is a list of �11 �:�sn�c�palities in the State �.�hich are }:now-n to have se::�e t�rpe of need fcr :aastew�ter treat�ent facili�ies . Cities are prioritized on the I�IivL using tne point system specified in WPC-3� (revised in 1978) . Tne Pro�ect PriorTtv List (PPL) consists of those cities a� the top � of t e I�� for wnicn �ur,Cing is available . The PPL cont�ins info�- rra�ion on the ttiTpe oi project (i . e . , s�ep) �nd esLi��ated cost of the project being considered for each c��}� listed . Prior to the adoption of the final versions of these two lists for a giver. �iscal ;ezr , a public hearing is held zllo��ing inLerested parties �r. opportunit�� to provide an5� aciditional infoi�ation they ieel is pertinent . Upon �do�tion oz the PPL , � co��nit�- retains its priority until funded or until the PPL is rev�sed. 4,rnen a co��.inity achieves a priority rznking. surficiently nigh to allow p�acement on the PPL, it is sen� ar zp�Iicatior. kit and pertinent inzo L�,ation by the I�iPCA. Those cities whic. �re so noti- fied must submit an application and proceed with the �ppropriate step or risk enforcement action. After a pre-application conference with the city , the State reviews the completed application and the engineering data , and certifies the project for funding to the EPA. A federal grant ofier (75 percent) is tendered by the EPA and accepted by the conmunity. _ The scope of a project will be ini�ially defined by a prospective applicant, su�ject to revision and approval by the Sta�e when ' priority for the project is established. The final determination of scope will be made by the Regiona� Aamir.istrator or tY�e EPA when gran�� assistance is ��:arded. After June 30 , 1975 , nei �ner facilities planning nor plans and specifications may be ini�iated prior to approval of a Step 1 or Step 2 grant , respectivel�- . Any work done before the grant award will be ineligible for funding. ' ' . . � , , . ` Page 24 COUNClL MEETING TO : Council FF.O'�:_ ?:ic:,ael P . Gcirron � �e��1C s}'S�EI71 ?T]S�eCtOZ OCT - 8 i980 D�TF : Nove;r:ber 20 , 1979 . CITY OF �RONO SUBJ=CT: I�,��CC Rel�ieu: Application for Placement of Unsewered Areas or, ?'unicipal I�eeCs List In orCer to be eligible for future federal zn� state funding i�r iili:?"11Ci�al sE•�:�ge �rE��iiiEJ�t projects (i . e. sewer E}:LET1SlOTlS � CUiTlI71ll711t�' drainfielcs , etc. ) Orono had to first be placec3 on the I�iPCA ' s Municipal • i�eeds List (?�:?�L) . As the �;uaust 13th l�tter from Perry beaton e>:plains, ti;e r,�c to com��e�e � surve}� fo�, for each area �:e wan�ec placed on the r��;L. I cor��le�eo anc re'tL'IP.EC SLI"Ve�'S to the TiPC�: ior the following �i>: �_ea= in Orono: 1 ) P:innetonka E�lur�s , 2) tvest Ferndcle/Shereline , 3) Cr��s`al Bay, � ) I�:orth Si-�ore Drive, 5) Stubbs Bay Northeast , 6) Stubbs Bay 1.orth�:est (See a�tached letter to PCA . dated dcLober 10 , and attached map) . . I recer.tly receiveG a call zror,� ?�is . Thurston of the I•iPCA �:ho stated that �:hile �he surveys we sent them were acceptable , the�� must also be revie�ec b,.- T�etro Council and the N,wCC , and would we please send them coDies . BeTore •we proceed �•:ith this step, I mus� caution the Council that the =i>: areas su�veved �re not all included as ruture study areas in our existing Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Specifically , the Stubbs Bay areas are not part of the most recent plan. I ha.�e not been involved with Orono ' s necaotiations with NlWCC regarding our Comprehensive Sewer Plan and the riLSP. Line. Staff needs Council direction for the next step in this sensitive rna�te7' . The possible alterna�ives are : 1) Senn copies of all si}, surveys to MeLro Council ano , 2�I'v7CC; i . e . =proceed as requested. . 2} Drop one or more of the study ^areas due to conflict w�Lh existina Corr.preher.sive Sewer Plan, and send surveys for the r'emair��ng areas . This will likely result in local iunding of any future projects in the are�s droppea , including alterna�e comrnunity drainfields_ 3) Drop the whole idea of trying to get on the MNL, and use local funcing for all �uture projects as necessary. 4) Other alternatives? . - � . • , - � � COIt�ICIL MEETING Page 25 � . - � ��. OCT - 8 1980 i r ! \ � � � � � - -� ---- CITY OF ORONO , , /� r �` � . 1'...�1�., r.' , , � i• i I `�f ^Y� r� /" �� r �� r �!' ti;1; ��-.1�.�i� � L',�+� : I�'i� �'•Jt i� l �i !—��`:� fl.. ' �-, �:-, `�.-, - �„� ��-� �� AUG 1 3 J979 �...�, ',`.� __r . i-icrael F. Gafi�on City of Cror_o , , , ?ost Ci�icE Boa 65 C_rvs�al �at�, '�'_in-�esota 55323 Lear �ir. Ga�iror, : '='riis le�ter is ir. response to your reaues� for placina u�:se�::erec �rezs of Orono o� the ?'Lnicipal ?�eeds T•ist (T�_��L) ior fundinc oi tre D1271P.171q �71C CO715�1"UCt107] Or "v�ZS�2��c�21" �'_'2c�i::�71t raCl�1�125 b}' �ne .�'�nneso�a Pollution Control Aaenc�� (i��?C�) and the L . S . �.rz%irc-�- =r:ental Frotec�ion .aency (�PP.) . Beiore Orono can be inclucec on �he� '�_IvL, however , it r:�ust first nemo:�strate a nee� lor improving eaistinc sewage sys�ern= . In order to �uliill �his re�uire'nent in � t�mel,� manner , a ':eecs SLrvey �orr�. has been developed (See enclosure) . Com�le�ing �his survey thoroughly will provide sufficient in�ormation ior deter- mininc wastewater treatment needs in Orono. Specific inforr„ation � reauirec includes soils , groundwater levels, buildino site sizes , type .or age of existin� s��stems , and an�� other con�itions such a= dept?i to bedrock that nay afiect was�ewater trea��ent. In�er�::�- tion on building si�es , sewage systeTns , as v.�ell as existinc treatment problems may be obtained from local resieents while 'soils information including around'water levels , slo�e aepth, bedrock, and floodine may be secured from the local Soil Conser- vation Service (SCS) . '�f available , soil m�ps �:ith interm�e�ation sheets and a �laL map of the com�nur.ity should be incluced. iT , foll_owinQ �he submission anC review of this survey, it is ce�er- ' r��ined that there is sufficient need for imr�Yovina existinc tre�t- r.:ent systems, the co:nmunity ti�ill be placed on the DTNL for future tunding. rurthermore, if the survey is not received within 60 aavs from the date of this letter, the co.nr-�unity will not be considered for the next list. D c C r,�I� �r! L D �tJ;, l 5 1919 �n,:re�(F>12�2�b--�208 C1TY OF ORONO l�.s� VJeS? Coun;v RCad 32, RGsevil!�. I:�in�?5G',� c�113 -r1�^:J'n� �i{liCES �i:�U:h �f�:'7�'�G�.�?l�C:L �2"�; t:�c ..`�, �ii..`:�;�P.' =G:!"c.: l.':_��O"^:�' : _%,v�E' • ' . ' � � � • � � '. , Pag� 26 � COUNCIL MEETINu OCT - $ �Q80 ,�.T- . i'icr,ael P. Gzffron paae 2 �uc � s 3� CITY OF ORONO . �� . _ � 7 . � . � i I� there are any a,uestior_s , or if you would i ike to r:�eet ti�ith the � 1�aPCA �.o ciscnss th�,s r-�atter in more netail , please con�act Deborah � L. '^i.�u�-stan at (612) 296-7208 . � Sincerei��, Derrv '�'. Be�ton, P. E. Ch�ef , Fzcilities �ec�ion Division oi ;:ater Quality PTB/�'D�:�ah Enclosure . � - � �a � , . . i i ' S�ECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 27 Mr . Weed: Over 90� of Orono Lane are opposed to the project. Mayor Van Nest: We cannot wait three years or more for Federal funds. Mrs. Jester, 2515 North Shore Drive : I was not . aware of Federal funds. If there is grant monies available, we should wait. Gordon Ritz, 1165 Ferndale Road West: Some people have to borrow money. Let ' s wait for grant money. Mayor Van Nest : It will take three to seven years and it is possible Federal monies will never be available . We have to act now. Hurr moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #1218 Resolution #1218 ordering in the sewer improvement Orono Lane & West and proceed with the sewer construction for Orono Ferndale Sewers L3ne and West Ferndale, awarding the construction project to G and L Contracting Company as the low � and responsible bidders as per the City Engineer ' s bid tabulation, authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign contracts. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Area #3 - North Shore Drive and Scotch Pine Lane Mr. Glenn Cook reviewed Area #3 = North Shore Drive and Scotch Pine Lane noting that the adopted assessment for this area is $18 , 466 per unit. Mr. Cook reviewed: Easement Phone Calls Duane Luke - Against the project, will not sign easement. Donald Gustafson - Has signed an easement and gave it to Mike Gaffron. George Rector - Not home, however, Mr. Gustafson indicated that Mr. Rector is in favor of the project and has indicated that he will sign the easement. Charles Pihl - Has no problem with signing an easement, provided that all his property is restored to its original condition. John Eastman - l. Westerly cess pool (kitchen sink and water softener) 2 . 25 ' service line � 3. Hookup easterly cesspool through crawl space 4 . Replant trees removed If the above four conditions are met, he will sign easement. ' SP�CIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 28 Assessment Appeals: John H. Eastman and Anne Eastman C. Steven Wilson & Susan Wilson Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Carol G. Callahan Bruce Malkerson: The City; if it should continue to have problems acquiring easements in this area, should consider avoiding these easements and construct sewers in the street. This will mean a much higher cost to connect to the sewer pipe . Discussion centered on options : quick take, right of entry, condemnation. Mayor Van Nest : The City does have options. Mr . Wilson, 2485 North Shore Drive : This easement will have a severe impact on my property. Mrs. Jester , 2515 North Shore Drive : I am opposed to the project. Mr . Phil Chenowith, Financial Consultant, reviewed the current bond market commenting that the market today is 820. Mayor Van Nest: The City is faced with inflationary construction costs in attempting to sewer small dense areas and the City might have to apply some of the cost to the ad valorum taxes. Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #1219 Resolution #1219 ordering in the sewer improvement North Shore Drive & and proceed with the sewer construction for North Scotch Pine Lane Sewers Shore Drive and Scotch Pine Lane , awarding the � construction project to Nodland Associates, Inc. - as the low and responsible bidder as per the City Engineer and bid tabluation, authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign contracts. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . Area #4 - Minnetonka Bluffs Mr . Glenn Cook, City Engineer, reviewed Area #4 , Minnetonka Bluffs area, noting that the original assessment was $14 , 515 per unit. Bruce Malkerson stated that in reviewing the appeals, it appears that there are some that are not valid because an objection to the assessment was not filed by September 8 , 1980 which was the assessment hearing date and is required by law. ' . • " - • � . . • � SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 29 _ Mayor Van Nest : This area has a very Y�igh percentage of appeals. Also easements are not being executed which really inflates the cost to construct sewer in this area. If the residents in this area would agree to provide easements to the City at no added cost and agree to stipulated settlement of appeals, we can eliminate some engineering, legal, and administration cost and lower each assessment for � this area to $7 ,g00 or $7 , 500 . There are options : 1. Do not construct sewers in the area and assess part of lift station and other technical costs 2 . Or�er in the project and reduce the assessment noW if we eliminate easement and appeal cost 3 . Approve project, leave the assessment roll as it is and abate some monies by November 15 , 1980 if easement and appeal costs are reduced Dave Johnson, 500 Hanlon Avenu�, asked if he could review the summary of the construction costs . Mr . Cook and Mr. Malkerson reviewed the cost summary with the resident. Summary of Costs - Pages 31-35 Mr . Herr , attorney representing appellants: What are my clients going to receive in reduced assessments? We object to giving up our appeal rights. What is the bottom figure? Mayor Van Nest: The City will make that decision tonight. Friday, October 10 , 1980 is the last day the County will accept the assessment roll for this , project. If we are to construct this year, we must certify the costs now. The City has already � assumed some legal, engineering and administration costs. I fe�l we should assess each unit in the Minnetonka Bluffs area their portion of the costs also their portion of the lift station the City has to construct to accommodate future flows. Councilmember Hurr : Mr. Herr, would you like to meet with us again, possibly Saturday morning to work this out? Mr . Herr : My clients do not want that. Mayor Van Nest: If this project fails, the City will have to assess to each Minnetonka Bluffs unit a trunk charge. ' � 1 ' SPECIAL MEETING pF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 30 Councilman Paurus: I agree that costs are high but our last project was much higher than this. Tfie City would take advantage of grant monies if it were available . But it appears, it is not. Mayor Van Nest: After reviewing this, I would be � receptive to setting the assessment now at $9, 833 and reducing this $2 , 500 if, by November 1, 1980 , we have received assurances that easements and appeals have been resolved without added City expense . This will allow the City Council to act by their meeting of November 10 , 1980 . Richard Ford, 500 Orono Orchard Road South: I cannot afford to live here unless the cost is reduced $3 , 000 . Mr . John Massopust, 550 Orono Orchard Road South: 80$ of the people want to correct the raw sewage problem on their own. Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, in the event the City orders in the Minnetonka Bluffs project at the assessed cost of $14 , 515 per unit, the City will review this assessment cost at their November 10 , 1980 Council meeting and reduce the assessment to $7, 333 per unit, if all easements and appeals are negotiated to eliminate additional cost to the resident. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Mayor Van Nest moved to order in the sewer improvement and proceed with the sewer construction for the Minnetonka Bluffs area based upon the present assessment of $14 , 555 per unit being reduced to $7, 333 per unit, if by the Council meeting of November 10 , 1980 documents are submitted showing easement and appeals have been resolved without added cost to the City. The contract award shall be awarded to Latour Construction Company as the . low and responsible bidder authorizing the Mayor and Administrator to sign contracts. Motion died for lack � of a second. Discussion followed. � 1 Mayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to order in the � sewer improvement and proceed with the sewer construction � for the Minnetonka Bluffs area based upon the present � assessment of $14 ,555 per unit being reduced to $7, 333 ' per unit, if by the Council meeting of November 10 , 1980 documents are submitted showing easement and appeals have been resolved without added cost to the City. The contract award shall be awarded to Latour Construction Company as the low and responsible bidder authorizing the Mayor and Administrator to sign contracts. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (2) . Hannah & Hurr Nay. F�equires 4/5 " vote , motion failed. t �. � ' � ' ' ' ' SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 Page 31 Discussion followed reviewing summary of engineering costs as it relates to Minnetonka Bluffs share of preliminary costs to date. Mr . Weed, 1385 Orono Lane : When are you to going to reconsider reducing our assessment cost for Orono Lane and West Ferndale? Mayor Van Nest: As soon as we resolve the Minnetonka Bluffs matter, Mr. Weed. Hurr moved, Butler seconded, to assess only the Minnetonka Bluffs area units a portion of all preliminary costs to date including a portion of the lift station to be constructed to serve the Orono Lane , West Ferndale and Minneto�ka Bluffs areas. Letter to be mailed to all Bluffs residents outlining these costs which total $1,834 . 68 per unit. Motion, Ayes (1) - Nays (4) . Councilmember Hurr Aye. Motion failed. Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, that in the event the City does adopt a resolution to order in the sewer improvement for the Minnetonka Bluffs area and to proceed with the sewer construction for the Minnetonka Bluffs area and award the construction project to the. low and responsible bidder , the City of Orono will modify the Minnetonka Bluffs assessment roll and reduce the assessment to $9 , 833 . In the event the City of Orono does receive easements andsettlement of appeals at no added cost to the City prior to November 10 , 1980 , the City Council at that Council meeting will reduce the assessment for the Minnetonka Bluffs area $2 , 500 to $7, 333 per unit. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1) . Councilmember Hurr Nay. Mr . Weed: Mr. Mayor, when are you going to review a $2, 500 reduction for our area? Mayor Van Nest: In a monent, Mr. Weed. Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #1220 Resolution #1�20 , ordering in the sewer improvement Minnetonka Bluffs and proceed with the sewer construction for Minnetonka Bluffs area awarding the construction project to the Latour Construction Company as the low and responsible bidder as per the City Engineer ' s bid tabluation authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign contracts. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1) . Councilmember Hurr Nay. Mayor Van Nest: It must be understood that easements and appeals have to be resolved to assure reduced assessments. It is now up to all of you to cooperate in this matter. Now, Mr. Weed, I offer this motion for consideration of the Council. � � SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 8 , 1980 paqe 32 Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, that in the event any or all areas individually or as a whole forward to the City staff by November l, 1980 to allow preparation for the November 10 , 1980 Council meeting, for assessment roll adjustment by November 15, 1980 , all negotiated easement and stipulated settlement of all appeals without added cost to the individual assessable unit, the City will reduce all or any area $2 , 500 per unit. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #1210 Resolution #1210 , A Resolution Modifying Resolution Amend Assessment Roll #1198 And Attached Assessment Roll For Sewer Project 80-1 and 80-2 . Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1) . . Councilmember Hurr Nay. Paurus moved Butler seconded, to request staff to prepare Mr. Skarp ' s request for an assessment deferral by resolution at the October 14 , 1980 Council meeting and to mail to all residents an application for assessment deferral and the conditions that have to be met. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Butler moved, Hannah seconded, that the meeting be ADJOURNMENT adjourned at 10 : 55 P.M. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . All attached Exhibits are made a part of these Minute . illiam , an Nes , Mayor Attest: � ' Walter . Benson, City Administrator . 3 � '_ . EXHIBIT #1 �p�� MEETIN G OCT - 8 �°st� Easement Phone Calls MINNETONKA BLUFFS CITY OF ORONO 1 . Herbert Meyer - No answer 2. Harry Aldrich - Disconnected Phone 3. Dave Johnson - 4Jould not sign an easement. He feels city should seek Federal funding. • - 4. David Hill - Resident would sign easement if the project was awarded. 5. Y.evin J. Dynan - Resident would not sign an easement due to amount of assessment. 6. Robert Cotie - Would not sign an easement. 7. Koch - Resident is against the project and will not sign an easement. 8. Lawrence Stinson - Says their easement has been sent to the city. 9. Margaret Eisenger - 475-2761 Disconnected Phone. 10. Harold Carlson - No answer 11. Andrew Goetten - No answer FERNDALE ROAD 12. Bill C. Fox - Will be out of town next week (Wednesday, Thursday) Has no problem w,ith signing an easement. 13. Maurice L. Melamed - 473-8839 Mrs. Melamed (473-2588 office) is handling the � easement. She says they have'no problem with signing the easement. 14. Frederich Betlach - work 4?3-8833 (off Mondays) � Will sign easement. May want to change location of the line slightly. I indicated that I will make an appointment at a later date to settle the easement. ' � � � COUNCI! MEETING � • ' �EXHIBIT #2 OCT -8 1980 , EASENEt�f PHONE CALLS 1. Jack Lehtinen - Wants the sewer. Has no problem wi�th;�i�n��' ap��0 ment, provided that the City signs a letter regarding Flindward Marina. He says the Councii 5 City Atty. know the situation. i . : 2. Jim Rivers - Same as 1 above. ' j ��i)'/ � 3. Duane Luke Against the project, will not aign easement. � � � � 4. Donald Gustafson - Has signed an easement and gave it to Mike Gaffron. � 5. George Rector - 473-9101 Not home, however, Mr. Gustafson indicated that Mr. Rector is in favor of the project and has indicated that he will sign the easement. 6. 'Charles Pihl - Aas no problem with signing an easement, provided that all his property is zestored to its original condition. . 7. John Eastman - 1. Westerly cesspool �kitchen sink and water softener) 2. 25' service line 3. Hookup easterly cesspool through craWl space. 4. Replant trees removed. If the above 4 conmditions are met he will sign easement. 8. E. J. Callahan - Will not sign an easement. 9. Steve i�lilson - Will not sign an easement. 10. Don Gamble - Will sign this easement if he is reassured that someone in the area will not ask for a lot of � for easements. 11. Gordon Ritz - Same as 10 above. 890a . 1 , EXHIBIT #3 1 I ASSESSMFNT APPEALS COUNCIL MEETING LS-1980-1 � LS-1980-2 s �g�� CT � Edward A. Cashin and Beryl J. Cashin ClTY OF OROi�40 Newell P. Weed, Jr. and Joan D. Weed John H. Eastman and Anne Eastman C. Steven Wilson and Susan Wilson Edv�ard J. Callahan, Jr . and Carol G . Callahan � Attorneys Robins , Zelle, Larson � Kaplan for : Richard F . Ford Darold J. Dockendorf J�hn B . and Linda F . Massopust Roger J. Hawkinson Herbert D. Meyer Harry P. Aldrich David R . Johnson David M. Hill Kevin J. Dynan � Rflbert H. Cotie J. F. Koch and J. H. Koch, f/k/a Judith Lundberg Lawrence R. Stinson Bruce and Terry Clark Cedric and Marion Dettloff h'illiam J. Thies Quentin H. Lauer Leonard D. N,ackinnon Basil M. Young • Kent J. Norman ° LS 1980-1 and LS 1980-2 have a total of 75 units . These 24 appllants are 32� of the total units . ;'� • . 2 � GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY 5� BENNETT �iAPOLC G.CL�+TI�BE7-�fl73� LAW OFFICE� COUNCIL MEETIN�CHI.RG •. MOORC.JR. HCHRV n,w�VEAS�OCr IIB6<-IG7)� NES A�LANDE EPHENJ� SNVDEF �PANh.�IhD. G�+/�� 3Q� R�ANUKE E.UILG�N�i JCf�RE�' J. KEYES �RqNK w.G��.JA. EAUCC RpUGCA JOHN W,MOOTY WILLIAM L. KIII�ON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 MELVIN R.NOGT1' ��Or111 JOHN F.JOMES RUSSELL M. BEHNETT OCT _ � �v EIIZABE�N W. NOA7ON CI�NTOu /�.SCHqOEDEA . TE LEPHONE 16�2) 3 39-9.5 C 1 JD�yN q.rncSN<NE EDW�,qD J.C�LL<MAN,JR. SVS�N L.IENTZ JAMES 5.S�NONSO�1 D�V�D R. KELII' RICHqFD N,flln� JO�+N E. BpOwER ra�C�+nE L G_SUI.LIVAN 5 U�7 E 912, FI NAN C�A L C E N� ' Y OF ORO��^MELL N. MEAKLE CUAT�S C.�CRSLUND NOMI.S D/•A��N�+,-� qiC�AFC a.BCM'�+AN 3�443 NOATH SNE�DON T. �I.ECn DR V CE G. GF V S��NG C E NTFAL AV E N U E 1 NO�+AS J. PAT�N C.57EVEN wi��Or+ PHOENIX� ARIZONA 65012 J<rwES A.VOSE JONN S.GROUCM - DIPNE NOlLE�1N DAVID l. 6ENNETT 7H0�+�+5 R. WILNELHY EDwIN C. CAAPENTER TEIEPHONE (6O2)277-8961 D��D N. MOOTV EL�ZABETM M.SCHMIDT I.INDLEY S.EAA��SON qlC�+pRC P. HRCKETT � J O M N W,T H I E l c (�o NOEL G, MULLEF . OC�O�� V� �700 GEOAGE V.'. SOVLE JEr�REY R.BACOKE A�ZON• P wEH DANIEI P,SHULMRN 6EFFIEN C.E�vTON• MICMAEL R. CVA'NINGHAM O� CCU�+S[� I�NDAEw C.SELDEN ACEEFT L-HELLAN S�EPMEH E.�EE Members of the City Council City of Orono Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Ladi,es and Gentlemen: I received in the mail the notice of a special meeting for October 8 on the sewer project. I am unable to be present at the meeting, but I do wish to repeat one point which again perhaps has not been mentioned for some time. The area through which the proposed sewer would pass along North Shore Drive is at the edge of the wetland area formed by French Lake, and the pipe will pass through part of that wetland. Although the part on our side of the road is par- tially dammed from the other portion of the area by the road itself, and although the wetlands may not be cansidered. of great natural beauty by themselves , they do add considerably to the enjoyment of the area in which we all live because of the variety of birds, such as heror., bittern, pheasant, geese, ducks of various kinds, red-wing blackbirds, and even because of various small animals which live around it. Moreover, they contribute to the openness and general charm of the area. Although there are a number of such areas in Orono, they are not too numerous in the metropolitan area as a whole. Damage to even part of the system damages the whole. Considering the fact that the installation of the sewer can at the very best only be marginally justified on the basis of possible future need, it seems that you should consider the � � . 3 . Orono City Council 2 October 6, 1980 n n possible risks of damage to the area in which the sewer w��.l d C be put as well. This possibility of damage arises from toe�'o o Z areas . � � n � r Iu the first place, it is impossible to tell what the res t � of digging the sewer and piling the bottom on a 50-foot e e- � � ment strip during the course of construction will be on t� o rn swamp as a whole. Whatever the engineers and contractors ay, ;.� it is evident that it is impossible to tell because it is�hat � fact which makes the bid for the sewer as high as it is i�our � area. The obstacles to be met by the contractor in digging through. the wet area are so uncertain that the bid must be as high as possible to protect the contractor. And if in the dig- ging, or in the use of machinery and the piling of heavy mud on the soil along the trench, even for a relatively short period of time, the bottom or general drainage is damaged or the area flattened, it will be a very long time before it returns to its present state, if it ever does . One thing is certain, the area will not be returned to its present state regardless of any form of contract because the nature of the soil and the work done will prevent it. This wetland condition probably runs from at least the edge of the Jester' s land across that land, our land, the Eastman land and on up toward Highway 84 . In the second place, a fact which will have a bearing upon the matter mentioned in the previous paragraph, the land in that area is extremely unstable. It is so unstable, and unstable in such an uneven -fashion, that in the springtime it is quite com- mon for even a car as light as a Toyota to get stuck in soft spots in the driveway while other parts of the driveway remain hard and stable. It is so unstable that historically it has proved impossible to pave the driveway even after corduroying it with willow logs because the logs heave out of the ground and the driveway breaks up. As a consequence, the long stretches of pipe which will be used will be whipped up and down much as one ' might crack the end off of a whip, or bend a coat hanger until � it splits from constant bending. Of course, the contractors and engineers• will describe the tensile strength of the pipe being used and the flexibi•lity of the material, but even if true this > fact will simply transfer the pressure of the movement to the joints, and the area from one side of our lot to the driveway of the Eastman' s is a long area. Should it be that the engineers are wrong and the pipes or joints break, the accumulated sewage from Scotch Pine Lane down to the point of the break will flow into the swamp. That such a possibility exists can be seen from the situation which developed in the Wayzata-Ferndale area near the end of their system close to the Lindberg' s where another wetland area exists. And should such a situation develop, the damage is not such as can be corrected by spending a few dollars . When Mr. Luke was speaking of this possibility of breaking, he mentioned that at least on his land the•re was a large area suitable for drainage, but if the effluent is discharged into the wetland, � � . ., . . . • 4 • Orono City Council � 3 October 6, 1980 there is no method of getting it out. And it will be concen- trated in its discharge. Whatever the current situation, at least the lots and the points of discharge are scattered over a broad and diffuse area, and it is certain that the Scotch Pine Lane area and the Lukes do not need their present systems revised nor in any event would they be discharging in the direction which the gravity flow envisions will occur with the proposed sewer. Thank you for your attention to these problems over the past months. . Very truly yours , � �. � � ��f � / � / vL'i.' "')� �✓, �G�-��7�-f � Edward J. Callahan, Jr. EJC/bk COUNCIL MEETING ocr - s 19so C1�"Y OF ORONO ' . .j • � ' . � 4 . 5 . ..._� G' ..�....LF�':h D1�7F1C' CC�I -;T ' C_ ..:"')� G: !il�iC::ris.. ?�:�L'R'.iS .'•L'::7C17.:. L:E:":CT ----------------- _________ COUNCIL MEETING � ::;�z7e .. cz_*:,:, �:,e OCT -819�� bFz�•1 . . Cas}:in, }:;� ti•i�e, ' _]]e... , ::—��i�r�,F-0�� zno Si£CI:,L I.ccEccr.•_.;- ' C�t� •o` Orcna, . • :E��.C+.':CE^i. ' FiEhSE '1'Ei:£ 1:C;ICE that the abo•.�e-.-.s-:eo oa�nEzs a:.F.eal :rc-, �.`�e �sses=_r:er,: Lcon the F�rcpertr cce�n^n:•y ):r.cwr. �_ ]'_OS S},o-e L=LE U7:'�'E ir. .ne City of Orcno fez s�r.::ar; �e'=:er _--roveaer._<_ �ce:.:siEG 2£ LS 14EG-1 �nc L£ �9FG-2 �certec 'a� the �eetinc o! tne Orono City Council or Sepcenber B, 15ED. ..._ �c515 r0� :fi1£ cLLEc� ��C1llCE�. �U: _.�51� :?O: rJE � 1�Ti1YeG :O� ttE fC��G'.i7iC� 2C-Ml�: � 1. ;'ne zssess^�er,t ie set hiaher cY,an the sneciel bene`it cc�`_erred �cor. the prcpe-t}• b�- ti�e zbove-re:arencec _-�ro�-e-ier.�s. .. The zssess-�ent coe= ::ct .al:e _..to cc-,s:cerst�or. the pre-in�rocenen: �-slce of the prcperty. 3. The assessr:ent is no� confiaec tc property spec;ally bene`ittec by ihe imarovement. 4. Notice of hearing or, the a=_sessment was not � proper. Ser��ec and filed this day of tober, 1980. ' / �;kl�'.� �---1%��l/r�� - Eo�..rd ��ashan � � l� ✓/ r� c� ' � �'�u'�' , G'_''�i` il, ' � EEry J.,Gzsnin 1305 Shore Line Drive � tiayzata, 2:h 55391 . � � . . • � � � , �� r r . � . -�'r�., • . ':- y .. - 6 • S:hTE OF F;11:1:iSG;F DiSTh]C^' CCJhT COUWTY OF Ai:'::;EPJ1: FOl�R7Y. JL'CICII,L DIS?h7CT � FicF.oro F. For6, Daro]d J, File 1io. Dockenoorf, Jc};n E. anc Liuda ' F. ';��LyL`SL, ��F� J. Y.tw�'r.ir.sen, COUNCIL MEETING Pc:Lert D. F;e-�r, Aa:r�• F. F.]drich. L-:ic F.. Jc.^.nec- Le��id A;. Y.i7] , }:Evin J. Djr��r,�„i.cce:i Y.. Cetie, �.F. _g 1960 }(och and J.};, }roch, f/k%a Juoith ��T ' Lcndberg, Lati•r'ence F.. �ti�scn, Ezuce . onc 7ezry C]ark, Ctcric �nd I;�rion � r;ettloff, �:i]];er J. Thies, 4uentin CI i Y OF ORONO ' b. Lauez, Lecna[o .,_ t:ackir,non, P.G?ICL Gr . L " ;-pnvz , bzsil K. }�oung. Fent �_ Ncrr,ar,. CF FSc«L1;7.-. Pi�int?f`s-bprellancs, v�. Cit}� of Oronc, a Yinnesota Municipal Corporz:icn and by the City Counci] tnereof, De_`encar;s-ke��cnoents. —----------------------------- , � IG _'HE N.T:TTEF OF 3iiE FSE�SS";EI:T OF C6F.TI�IF i�RG='LF._It:� It: TiiE � C17Y Oi ORO1:0, COG2::Y OF Hi:2:6EPI1�, 51F.Ti OF ;:I?;1:�ESOTh FOR 5'ti-:Eh FRQJECT' LS-19F0-1_ TO: CLERK OF T6E CITY OF ORONO AIdD TH� FSAYOT OF OkCNO_ . PLERSE TkAE NOT-ICE, that the above-na7,ed p]aintiffs- appellants hezein, do heceby zppeal pursuant to the provisions ^ of M.S.A. § 929.081, to the above-named District Court from� • the assessments adopted by the City Council of Orono on Septembe.r &, 19b0_ The lesal description ot the pcoperties assessed by ' the defenoant-respondent are as fcllow�s: hll in Section 2, Township 177, Fa�oe 23: • PID NO. 02-117-23 31 0004 G2-117-23 3] 0012 a � , .�. _ . , y-. _. _ ._. � . '� �- � • ' COUNCIL MEETIN6 02-117-23 3] oGC�S � OCT -s �°8U 0�-J17-23 31 OOUE o�-,i�-z3 :i ouc,� CITY OF ORONO 02-11�-23 31 OOGE , • 0�-1]7-23 31 OD11 02-]'_7-Z� 31 OGL`O- � 02-]i7-23 31 OC20 • C2-i17-23 31 OG10 , 02-11i-23 31 0013 02-11i-23 31 0026 02-117-�3 31 00]S 02-117-i3 3] 0015 D2-117-23 31 0016 02-117-23 31 0017 C2-i17-23 31 OG]6 02-117-23 31 0019 . 02-11�-23 31 0022 C2-117-23 31 0023 02-117-23 31 0046 02-11i-23 31 0027 02-117-23 31 0037 02-117-23 31 OD40 02-117-23 31 OOS1 � • 02-117-23 31 0048 02-117-23 42 0001 ' You are hereby further notified thzt above-named p]aintiffs-appellants appeal fror, szid �ssessrt�ent on the yrounds that the pcoperties in yuestion received no special benefit � fcon the project. Furthermoce, plaintifis-appellants apyca] , '� on the grounds that the zssessr,ent w•as n.ade w•ithout due c�elibEr- � ation by tt,e defenBants-respondents, and w�ss based upon an un- reasonable detecmination of tbe erea actoally benefited by [he sewer pcoject. In addition, plaintiffs-appe]lants �ssert tt,at I . a � -2- y .. � . t � - • � � , ' , COUNCIL MEETING 8 OCT -g 1980 CITY OF ORONO , t1�e r�nnet cf �_::rs�r,Er,t wes unfaic �nc in�ppropciate and w�a� ortitr�ril; r..acr r:it6out any reasor.able tt�i� in fe�t. FurtF�ec- r.o�e, pl�...tiif�-sypell�n:� zppe�l on cLc croui�6� t��at the �_sessr.ent is uncenstitutior.zl, illec�l, snd e>:cec�s i.e:enc�nts- . reepor�oents statutory autnority. In eooition, p7ainti:fs- • at;�ellznts �.ycal ot� c;:e crounos ct the iitr�cl�rity of the p:oceduczl process fel)ow•eo by tte oe:eno�rts-rEsponcer,ts ir adepting �aio �sscssr..ent. . s Tnis notice ef apaeal, signed end c�ted at N.:nneepolis, �7ra �;ir,nesota, c};is 7= o�p cf Octebcr, 19L0. F..^�L7RS, �ELLL, LF.nSC;: L }:r.FLht: �. R}'��"/� �avic F. t;ezr 33 So_th Pifth S:reet �;ir.nea�clis, !:inneso:� 5540% ' . Telephone: (612)335-5911 ' Attorne�:_= fcr Flaintiffs-I,�oellar.cs s o -3- ' � � ' � EXHIBIT #4 � COUNCIL MEETlNG OCT - 8 198a � T0: Council � ! FROM: Alan P. Olson, Village Planner CITY OF ORONO DATE: October 8 , 1980 SUfiJECT: LS 1980 - 1 & 2 � September 18 , 1980 Questionnaire Results ' Tabulated as of October 8 , 1980 � , , � BY PROPERTY OWNER J Area Yes No No Response Total Bluffs 5 (20%) 17 (68%) 3 (12%) 25 Marinas 3 (750) 0 1 (254) 4 Ferndale/ 18 (640) 6 (21%) 4 (150) Orono Lane 28 North Shore Dr. 6 (50%) 6 (50%) 0 12 32 (46 0) 29 (42%) 8 (12%) 69 BY UIQITS Bluffs 5 (19%) 18 (69$) 3 (120) 26 Marinas 5 (63%) 0 3 (37%) � ' Ferndale/ _ Orono Lane 18 (62%) 7 (24 o) 4 (14$) 29 North Shore I�r. 6 (50 0) 6 (50 0) 0 12 34 (45%) 31 (410) 10 (14%) 75 - � � �j � � CQUNCIL MEETiNG , ,. 1 . • ~ EXHIBIT #5 OCT - S 1980 MINNETONKA BLUFFS EASEMENT ACQUISITION C1TY OF �RONO Legal Description � of Easement Ea�ement (Pins No. ) Owner Units Te1.No. Required Acquired � 02-117-23-31-0002 E. H. Hamm 1 02-117-23-31-0004)* Richard F. Ford X 1 0012)* 02-117-23-31-0005 Darold J. Dockendorf X 1 Lot 5 Block 13 02�117-23-31-0006 John B. � Linda F. )( 1 Massopust 02-117-23-31-0007) 0008)* Roger J. Hawkinson �( 1 Yes Yes 0011) Lot 9 � 16 Blk. 13 02-117-23-31-0009)* 0020)� Herbert D. Meyer X 1 473-7788 Yes Lot 10 Blk. 13 Lot 15 Blk. 14 � . 02-117-23-31-0010 Harry P. Aldrich X 1 475-0834 Yes Lot 15 Blk. 13 02-117-23-31-0013)* 0026)* David R. Johnson X 1 473-0124 Yes Lot 1, Blk. 14 Crawford Inc. 546-4797 02-117-23-31-0014 David M. Hill )( 1 473-1872 Yes Lot 2, 3, 22�, 23 B1k.14 02-117-23-31-0015 Kevin J. Dynan )( 1 475-2832 Yes Lot 4, 5, 6 Blk. 14 ' 02-117-23-31-0016)* ' 0017)* Robert H. Cotie X 1 475-1348 Yes Lot 7, 8, 9 Blk.. 14 02-117-23-31-0018 Judith H. Lundberg X 1 475-1224 Yes Lot 10 , 11, 12 B1k.14 J.F. Koch 02-117-23-31-0019 Lawrence R. Stinson X 1 473-9306 Yes Lot 13, 14 Blk. 14 02-117-23-31-0022) Margaret Eisinger 475-2761 Yes 0023)* �Joan M. Rettinger) 0046) (Bruce � Terry Clark) X 1 • Lot 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Blk. 14 Pag e 1 . x �'i�-f� 'E �.�� Ji+c+� I 870a ��ty ` � , . t � ' ' � ° " 'z 2 Legal Description � of Easement Easement (Pins No.) Owner Units Te1 .No. Required Acquired 02-117-23-31-0027 Cedric b Marion Dettloff�( 1 473-6739 02-117-23-31-0028 Harold A. Carlson � 1 473-5912 Yes Lot 7 Blk. 15 02-117-23-31-0037 William J. Thies �( 1 Lot 24 Blk. 14 Gary D. Anderson 0 ? Ye3 02-117-23-31-0038 John T. Murphy COUNCIL MEETlNG (Ramona M. Sledz) 1 02-117-23-31-0039 James � Kathryn ziehwein ' 1 �CT - II ��v 02-117-23-31-0040 Quentin H. Lauer X 1 C!i Y OF ORONO 02-117-23-31-0041 Leonard D. MacKinnon X 2 02-117-23-31-0042 Sears Imported Autos 1 546-530t Yes �/e 5 Lot 6 Blk. 16 02-117-23-31-0048 Basil M. Young X 1 02-117-23-34-0001 Andrew J. Goetten 1 473-6633 Yes 02-117-23-42-0001 Kent J. Norman X 1 Lot 8, 14 Blk. 15 Ester Hayes 0 ? Ye3 Page 2. • 870a � , , COUNCIL MEETING 3 � ; OCT - 8 1980 WEST FERNDALE EASEMENT ACQUISITION Legal Description �k of �) � Y E�s�eTit "O'Ea�ement (Pins No. ) Owner Units Te1.No. Required Acquired 02-117-23-34-0002 Noel C. McDonald 1 Yes 02-117-23-34-0013 E. A. Cashin X 1** No 02-117-23-34-0010 Dan Vaughan 1 Yes Yes 02-117-23-34-0002T 0004)* Goodrich Lowry 1 No 0006) � z a 02-117-23-34-0003) ? 0005)* ' 0012) Henry M. Skarp 1 0013) 02-117-23-43-0007)* Douglas M. Skarp 1 0011) 02-117-23-43-0014)* Henry S. Ringman 1 Yes Yes 0017) 02-117-23-43-0015 Donald P. Gamble 1 473-8207 Yes ? 02-117-23-43-0016)* Bagley Grain Co. 1 0019) 02-117-23-43-0018 Gordon H. Ritz 1 473-0665 Yes 02-117-23-43-0020 Alice T. Mitchell (Robert Mitchell) 1 02-117-23-43-0021 Joyce Atkinson (Maurice McCaffrey) 1 02-117-23-43-0022 Odd R. Rovick 1 02-117-23-43-0023 Bill C. Fox 1 475-1236 Yes 02-117-23-44-0005)* Winston R. Lindberg 1 0005) 02-117-23-44-0007) � 0008)* Maurice L. Melamed 1 473-8839 Yes �/G S 0014) 0 2-117-23-44-0010)* R. C. Bagley 1 Yes Yes 02-117-23-44-0017 Dr. Charles P. Floyd 1 ' , 02-117-23-44-0019 Frederick E. Betlach 1 473-1490 Yes Page 3. 870a ' • � � • • � � COUNCIL MEETING 4 . � _ � NORTH SHORE DRIVE/SCOTCH PINE OCT - 8 19$� � EASEMENT ACQUISITION ' CITY OF ORONO Legal Description � of Easement EasemPnt � (Pins No.) Owner Units Te1.No. Required AcquirPd ; 09-117-23-44-0007 H. Douglas Hill 1 No i � ; 09-117-23-44-0006 L. J. Whalen 1 No � . � 09-117-23-4/+-0004 Samuel S. Marfield 1 Yes Yes ; 1 09-117-23-44-0002 Duane A. Luke 1 473-8989 Yes 09-117-23-44-0001 C. Steven Wilson* X 1 473-9113 Yes 09-117-23-41-0002 Joseph H. Jester 1 Yes Yes , 09-117-23-41-0003 E. J. Callahan* X 1 473-8149 Yes 09-117-23-41-0004 John H. Eastman �( 1 473-0357 Yes ; 09-117-23-42-0002 Charles R. Pihl 1 475-3336 Yes � 09-117-23-42-0003 Albert Andrews, Jr. 1 473-2322 Yes Yes 09-117-23-42-0001 George E. Rector 1 Yes ? . 09-117-23-42-0005 Donald W. (�stafson 1 473-1300 Yes �/e S X Filed Assessment Appeals Page 4. � 870a � COUNCIL MEETING 5 � .�: . OCT - 8 1980 � - ORONO LANE EASEMENT ACQUISITION CITY OF ORONO Legal Description �k of Easement Easement (Pins No. ) Owner Units Te1.No. Required Acquired 02-117-23-33-0006 Marie H. Hamm ' 1 No 02-117-23-34-0003 Newell P. Weed, Jr. X 1 No 02-117-23-34-b004 Douglas C. Moen 1 No 02-117-23-34-0005 Henry W. See 1 No 02-117-23-34-0006 Margaret L. Thomas 1 No 02-117-23-34-0007 Elizabeth R. Stone 1 No 02-117-23-34-0008 Rodney F. Relley 1 No 02-117-23-34-0011 Thomas Rudd 1 Yes Yes 02-117-23-34-0012 Craig G. Winters 1 Yes Yes 02-117-23-34-0013 E. A. Cashin 1** No � . i � i ; � � 4 Page S. ' � ; 870a i i i } , . `� � . � � � COUNCIL MEETING 6 COUNTY ROAD 15/MARINAS OCT - 8 ly�U EASEMENT ACQUISITION CITY OF ORONO Legal Description # of Easement Easement {Pins No. ) Owner � Units Te1.No. Required Acquired 11-117-23-22-0003 Lauren Born 1 Yes YPs 11-117-23-22-0004 James P. Rivers 1 Yes � . 11-117-23-22-0005 James P. Rivers 1 Yes ? 11-117-23-22-0006)* Jack Lehtinen 2 872-1209 Yes � 0007) , 11-117-23-22-0008 Oberg Boat 5 Supply 3 473-7305 Yes �/e S • Minnetonka Boat Works Page 6. • 870s EXHIBIT #6 � • . ; . � . � 1 `� � � . < ��11�� .+P�I14� /1�7L��, , , �Q, �d�'�«C�G�L�1� /'KC'.• Glrnn R. Cook.P.E. ! �C� ��,�/,sJ�L� « J Kruh A. Gordon. P_E. � O�m G. Doncshoo,P.E. Thama�E. Nnyrr. P.E. /j � _ p Robnt N'. Rosrnc,P.E. Richa.d N'. Fos�e�, P.E. � V Joatph C. Andt�lik,P.E. Robert G Srhunich�. P.E. .2335 �lf/. `I+.....4 eV��-L��'��36 Dradto�d A. Lrmbrrg. P.£. Afanin L.Sorvala, PS. � 'Y'�"7 RoGn�D. Frigaa�d,P.E. Dona]d C.Bwgnrdl.P.E. c�l. /��...�, M- -- �- 551f3 Richmd E. 7urner, P.E. Jnq�A. Bnu�don Jamrs C.Olson. P.E. Alark A.Ranson � /J�....•61z-636-�i600 s��,�„n�. ov��«�. - ' Ktr(n K. Wolka,P.E. Q�a�lrr A.E�ickaon -- " "---- - --- Lrn M. Pawdsky Oc tober 6, 19�30 , ; r=_•�_ - - x„m„M. aJo� _ ��-, � - ' ._� _ _ _ Da�'id E. Olsnn . � t' �.. � City of Orono Q� -- 7 �� ' ¢ Box 66 � �rystal Bay, Mn. 55323 -----._...�._ _ _ _ , � � �-�--`��- COUNCIL MEETING � Attn: Mr. Tom Kuehn ` � � Re: File No. 13903 ; Minnetonka Bluf fs , etc. OC't' " $ �98U � Dear Tom, CI � Y OF ORONO � Attached please find a summary o` the construct=on costs as bid along c:�it'.-i the estimated engineering , bonding and easement costs for the Minnetonka Bluffs , etc . sanitary sewer project. T�e costs summar_y shovld be reviewed bv the fis— cal consultant to determine the amount to be bonded. We have also attached a cost summary for each project area � isting the esti— mated cost and the amount assessed . The total estimated project cost on page 4 exceeds the total estimated cost on page 1 as the construction contingencies were indicated as a lump sum item for determining assessment rates. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 5 ASSOCIATES, INC. v' � - . _ �/ ,' - ;' ;� � � `'- -�;%� � �-�_ . ., , _ � ' Glenn R. !'.�ook � - GRC:li ��i f. _�"_ 844a . � , 2 . MZNNETONRA BLUFFS, FERNII4IB RUAD, �RONO LANE �oU� R�D �S, NORTH SHORE DRI� COUNCIL MEETING SANITARY SEFTER PROJECT TOTAL PROJECT COST OCT �8 ,980 A. Construction Cost Project z . CI i Y OF ORONO Pert A. Mitwetonka Bluffs $132,577.00 Part B. County Road 15 34,465.00 Project II Part A. Ferndale Road � $282,407.50 part B. Orono Lane 89,635.75 Trunk Sewer 52,E77.50 Project III - North Shore Drive $175,185.00 MFICC Force M�e in Exteas ion 15 ,000.00 Total Construction Cost As Bid $782,147.75 Construction Contingency 5� 39,107.39 Total Construction. ........... $821,255.14 B. Technical Cost Design Engineering 5.5Z $53,380.00 Construction �gineering Sx 41,060.00 Record Plans 0.5� 4,110.00 Land Survey ) 1,710.00 Soil Borings _ )--1� 3,000.00 Material Testing � ) 3,500.00 Total Technical. ............ .. $106,760.00 C. Easem�nts Y�igineering $12,b99.20 Land Survey Legal ` 4,000.00 Administration 14,080.00 ,�I,and . . 70,0�0.00 T�tSl ESS"`�cii�S. .. . ... . .. .. ... $IQa,77S.20 D. Bonding Costs Discount $21,412.00 Bond Rating 2,000.00 Capitalized Znterest 45,187.00 Legal b� Bond Consultant 8,0�0.00 9.3'� $76,599.00 Total Estimated Cost $1,105,393.34 Z.SX �iiac. 25,000.00 Bond Amount 1,130,000.00 Page 1. - �uUNCIL MEETING � . . 3 . � • OCT - S 3980 . � NINNETONICA BLUFFS - 26 tinits i y , Technical Eea�nent Coat $12�699.20 �- �3iTY OF ORONO $ 169.31 � Legal Eaaement Cost 4,000 } 75 53.32 , AdminiBtrative Cost 14,080 { 75 187.72 Easement Aquisition 20,000 + 75 266.66 ' Easement Contingency 50,000 } 75 666.66 Bonding 10,000 + 75 133.33 Capitalized Intereat & - Bond Discount 66,600 { 75 888.00 Construction Contingency 50,000 -} 75 666.66 $3,031.66/Unit Sanitary Sewer Trunk Construction Cost $52,877.50 Engineering 13'� 7,268.20 60,145.70 } SS $1,093.56/Unit Minnetonks Bluffs . Construction Cost $132,577.00 Engineering 13',G 17,235.01 $149,812.01 j- 26 $5,762.00/Unit Total Minnetonka Bluffs $9,887.22 ; Amount Assessed $9,833.00 � . 1 � i COUNTY ROAD 15 - 8 Units Technical Easement Cost $12,699.20 = 75 $169.31 Legal Eesement Cost 4,000 i- 75 53.32 Ac,ministrative Costs 14,080 } 75 187.72 Easement Aquisition 20,000 �' 75 266.66 Ease�ent Contingency 50,000 i' 75 666.66 Bonding 10,000 �" 75 133.33 Capitalized Interest � " Bond Discoutit 66,600 i' 75 888,00 Construction Contingency 50,000 � 75 b66.66 $3,031.66/Unit County Road 15 Conatruction Cost $34,465.00 Engineering 13� 4,480.45 $38,945.45 � 8 $4,868.18/Unit Total County Road 15 �7,899.84 Amount Assesaed 7,900,00/Unit Page 2. .� i � - COUNCIL MEETING 4 � ' OCT ' 8 198U ORONO IANE - 10 Unite Technical Easement Cost $12,699.20 + �SCITY O F O R O N O $169.31 Legal Eaaement Coet 4,000 + 75 53.32 Administrative Cost _ 14,080 {' 75 187.72 Ease.�ent Aquisition 20,000 f 75 266.66 Easement Contingency 50,000 {' 75 666,66 Bonding 10,0�0 f 75 133.33 Capitalized Interest & Bond Discount 66,600 f 75 888.00 Construction Contingency 50,000 �' 75 666.66 - x $3,031.66/Unit Sgnitary SeWer Trunk Construction Cost $52,877.50 Engineering 13Z 7,268.20 $60,145.70 + 55 $1,093.56/Unit Orono I,ene Construction Cost $89,635.75 Fngineering 13� 11,652.65 $101,288.40 -� 10 X $10,128.84 Total Orono I.ane /Unit $1i,254.02 ' Amount Asseased $14,481.00 � - � ! FERNDALE ROAD - 19 Units Technical Easement Cost $12,699.20 i- 75 $169.21 Legal Easement Cost 4,000 { 75 53.32 Administrstive Cost 14,080 } 75 187.72 � Easement Aquisition 20,000 �' 75 266.66 = Easement Contingency 50,000 �' 75 656.66 Bonding 10,000 -� 75 133.33 ^ Capitalized Interest � ' Bond Discount 66,600 � 75 888.00 Construction Contingency 50,000 { 75 � 666.66 $3,031.66/Unit Sanitary SeWer Trunk Construction Cost $52,877.50 Engineering 13� 7,268.20 $60,145.70 �' S5 $1,093.56/Unit Fernda le RAod Construction Cost $282,407.50 Engineering 13� 36,712.98 $319,120.48 + 19 $16,795.81 Totsl Cost/Unit Ferndale Road $20,921.03 Amount Assessed $ 20,197.00 Page 3. � . , r . � • COUNCIL MEETI�N�G �� 5 � � N�RTH S�ORE DRIVE - 12 Units ocT -s 19so Technicsl Ease�ent Coat $12,699.20 } 75 $169.31 Legal EEsement cosc a,000 �- �SCI�Y OF URONO 53.32 Admini6trative Coat 14,080 i' 75 187.72 Easement AquiBition 20,000 j' 75 266.66 Easement Contingency 50,000 } 75 - • 666.66 Bonding 10,000 } 75 133.33 Capitalized Interest � ' Bond Diacount 66,600 } 75 888•� Construction Contingency 50,000 } 75 666.66 $3,031.66/Unit North Shore Drive Construction Cost $175,185.Q0 Engineering 13� 22,774.05 $197,959.05 } 12 $16,496.59 Pi►aCC E�tension $16,950 } 12 $1,412.50 Total North Shore Drive $20,940.75 Amount Assessed 18,466.00 Estimated Project Cost $1,111,590.30 Proposed Assessment $1,069,003.00 � Page 4. ,