HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-1977 Council Minutes �
� . ^ �` CITY OF ORONO
� Regular Meeting of the Orono Council, 7: 00 P.M.
June 13, 1977
�The Or ono Council met on the above date with
� the following r�embers present: Mayor Van Nest,
• Councilmembers Butler, Paurus, and Pesek.
Councilnember Massengale absent. Also present:
� City Administrator Benson, Building & Zoning
Administrator P�Iuhich, City Attorney P�alkerson,
� and City Engineer Frank.
�
� Mayor Van Nest read the following resolution RESOLUTION #788
and presented it as a bronzed plaque to Mr. Gary Gary Welsh
� �7elsh for his dedicated service to the City.
� RESOLUTION #788
� A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR OUTSTANDIiIG
SERVICE TO THE VILLAGE OF ORONO
i �
� 6�FiEREAS, the Village of Orono has individuals
who contribute outstanding service to the
� community to help achieve basic goals that
enhance and perpetuate the "guality of life"
� for the residents of Orono; and
�WHER�AS, Gary ��Jelsh, as a resident for the past
• ten years, has been an active spokesman for the
principals and policies that will protect and
� preserve Lake Minnetonka and the Village of Orono
for future generations; and
•
WHEREAS, Gary 6Velsh has given outstanding service
� to the Village of Orono having served as Councilman
and having identified, clarified and drafted into
� meaningful legislation the basic goals of the
Village of Orono that enhance and perpetuate the
� "quality of life" within Orono; and
� WHEREAS, the Village of Orono desires to recognizP
� the significant contribution Gary �delsh has made
to tlie overall welfare of Orono.
�
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of
� Orono expresses its appreciation to Gary Welsh for
• his years of loyal and dedicated service to Orono
and special commendation to both he and his family
� for the time spent on behalf of the Village of Orono.
� Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Resolution
#788, A Resolution Of Appreciation For Outstanding
� Service To The Village Of Orono. i�totion, Ayes (4) -
�ays (0) .
�
�
f
�
� REGJL��i r1EETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 2
� Dick IIenson, City Administrator, administered the OATH OF OFFICE
Oath of Office to Mr. C. Paul Pesek, Councilmember. C. Paul Pesek
�
� At 7 : 10 P.M. , Mayor Van ilest announced that this PUBLIC HEARING
� was the time and place for the Public Hearing Navarre Drive-In Theatre
to reconsider the 1977 license for the Navarre
� Drive-In Theatre. Dick Benson, City Administrator,
presented the Public Hearing Notice, the Affidavit
� of Publication, and the Certificate of Mailing.
� Henry l�iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator,
� entered the following police and inspection reports
into the record:
�
� CiTY OF ORONO DATE TIME
CAL�ED-IN
INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED /
� PERMIT NO. COMPLETED d �L� � � I
� A D D R E SS _�,�/�i`t�✓t�_��/ /LP � �
� OWNER CONTR.
� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING RI p SITE �NSPECTION
O FRAMING p MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING
� D INSULATION p WATER HOOKUP D LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
� ❑ WALL BD. p METER SET/TURN ON p LICENSING
� FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP O COMPLAINT
PROGRESS O SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ FOLLOW-UP
� DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT.
FIRE PREV. , ❑ WELL TEST PUMP ❑ __
�
� COMMENTS: _ _
�• � . � _ _r.-!!�'_.1l1 �`2 _ -
�L --— '
_
�
� 1���!�,� __ __ - C_ I
� --
�� ' _-a<
--- " ^,
-- —���-
�
�
� /� ��''��
Q �
� �,� _� z�
��`�� - - - - ,
� • SYY o�43
5. �''-�'-�--� - �r -�-7 � - � �...-�
� ;
a !
� -- —
� WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED ❑PHOTO TAKEN i
CORRECT WORK& PROCEED �
V ORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING
CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. (
❑ STC�P ORDER POSTED. CAL� INSPECTOR.
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS.
�
�
(Continued)
i
�
REGULAF. MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 3
� '
� NAVARRE DRIVE-IN THEATRE
, (Continued)
�
• DATE TIME
CITY GF ORONO CALLED-IN
` INSPECTION NOT�CE SCHEDULED
� PERMIT NO. COMPLETED -�� 7 7 _����
. A D D R E SS ,,��LA/�i� �6'� -U-� ,�z�'Q� .
OWNER CONTR.
• ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING RI �ITE INSPECTION
w O FRAMING p MECHANICAL EXCAV./GRADING/FILIING
� ❑ INSULATION p WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
❑ WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ LICENSING
� W D F�NAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ COMPLAINT
� � PROGRESS O SEPTIC INSTALL. D FOLLOW-UP
• � ❑ DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT.
Q O FIRE PREV. O wELI TEST PUMP �
Z
� Q COMMENTS:
r Q - _1� ��2�- __ _� .
� w - �`_�
i
J
� Z
O
� � -
� �
W
�
�
• � -
• O �
�
W
� �
� Q
�
� �
W
• W ` -
�
� J � -
O
W
�
• W O WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED O PHOTO TAKEN
O
Q ❑ CORRECT WORK & PROCEED
Sl V ❑ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN.
O STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR.
� p INSPECTtON REQUIRED.CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS.
�
'� Attached Police Reports A through I
�
w
�
�
�
� (Continued)
�
- - . {� .i;iUP�O POLiCE DEPARTMEhiT �" � � � - �•
�__ � . �ol ` r - • . _'`; � �REC'D BY;� '•. �_� . . .:
�'�c�=�� - LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFENSE REPORT�:-� �� ��� ��
�'
r..
�E ' . ' . ' , DAY.: 3 M '1`� W T 3; ,
MESS. K Y CONTROL NUMBER IOCA) CONT.AGENCY NCIC IDENT; (CAQ) `� '' r ' . _ ;.
iC � � / /? . � � ( ' � M N D • 2 ' i 1 5 •p.�,p /� .� . F . .�
��"' D.4TE REPORTED (RPD) ~ TIME RPD STRP1 ' LOCATION GAItJD NBR fLGN) l r ' � .' `
/ .~ �� � � �� � .� � / •� ' • .
�� PLACE COMNIS►CTED (PLCI - c•' . .
, � . � . " � � - _ ,. �! / �` � _ � �� � � � :., t :'._'
��JBR HF70 BADGE NOtSBNI TIME ASIG:(TAS) '- ' TIME ARR:(TAR) • � TtME CLR. (TCi..j . : �NRD Codes,• ,
r� / �� n / �, � _�. � � 1✓.-� p , r+`" :� ..I - P-Phone - , •
— LNBR !SN ' UOC� . UCS . - LNBR ISN UOC ` UCS. R-��fo -
l . � �� � L ' �I � � �1,L I� � , a /�3 � -_ _ / A•Alarm _
:/ � 1- In Penon
�FRVISOR APPROVED: " ; . ' - ' - ;� : V-Visual • �
, ENTERED C.J.R.S. � _ `�. . _ -
• _ � • _ v` M - Meil _ ,
j T-Other
Re rted8y: � � L���/I/�'� . r��i.p/� - •� :e > - ,`. . ��. '>
est: -���.�% � � Dfl8/ `' ,8us.fVbr � 7 ".iC/
A8d r , ' �y,- ' . , . _ .. . � ._ i., ., .
. ���1�,Q' 'f/�dr �,�F. ,` Nome Nbr -
C�alaint: ` � �!J _: _ +,_ ,� .
/ a . . DOB/� ,.r '." . '..
" • . . . � .. . -,._ ,. -
f�c�6rest: � � � =? ._� .", }� , _ i ,
� PFtOne Nbt.
'InTident Detcription' . — ,:. „ • _ r . • _ - ,
. * �
- .!` -0 , . t• _ _ ..i . - - . .- . ... 1'. �.
- "' ' 4 � � � � _ `J' � ' fy ' _ . � ' 1 , .��' .
!�� : Chr�st�r�uen ��r�� Gr�ffi�� rG�o:�. � ����d c�n s�per��� �cve�s ,. _-
•� , � :- " ;; ; �- :. _ �. _ .
- . - - - , - � . � ::` .. '< � �
• _. - - _ . ' .. . �--• � ':1 = _ _' _ ,
. . � � �; � _ . ,,� �- . - - -
�C2 BL:.c3Ci1"Q �FiliO. , . . _ } . , • - �. _ c..` , -
• . . ' '• � . " ' ' ' � � . . '.T. • i.� � ._a - . � . .
. . . - . �. . - . ' . . � � .`�, - y.
� . ". . . . ' " � . . � . � , ' �t` . . . ' _ . . . .,,
_� ' . . . . . � .'. 1 ' _` . ' . � . � . � '- . .
: . . . . ' � . _ .. . .• y13 . - . ' . .
� ... . � . - . .. '. " . . . � -. ' �K • . ... ' ' ' . '
. � ' . � ' T � � - . �
.. . . . . � � .. .t . 1.. - . • -
. • . . . - _ � .' . '1 . , , . ' .
. . 1 _ li- . s .,
. . . . � • .• � - :��. _ - � .J,. .
. • . - -. . � � � � � . .. .. _ . . .. _ _ ' `,� ''. � _ '
. - . . � � . - - " .. . . . � _ 'i . . r ' , . • .
• . . . . . - .. ' .
. .. . . � � _ � � - _ . - � . �� �i � . : ,. ' .
� . ' . 1 - � 'k�' . � . '
_ � _- .
� . , - ��" , . ..
- .. - _ . .- • -- ' - ' . . - 1 . . - 'i ,
• � 'y� . - .�I _ . � � , .•t 1. . � � . . . .
� ' ' r ' _ - - ' _ yr t _
• - '..y " - . _' _ "' • •
� 4
• . . - . . " ' !' ' .
� .. . . . l _ _ ' ,•- � �
� " . .. - " . . y•- � .� �
�:S?OSlTION: Unfounded Cleared by arrest � � . Ref.other aaency Inactive Other � - •
OiICER'S � - 7 � - ,,, SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE .
.' i'i1,i_'__i�. . � • .
. _ . � i,�ONO P�LtCE��PAR_�t�t�; �� :, � <,,,q, ,} .���`�-, �i�' n. ,� � � .
• 't �". ",►{4'� � ��Y� � �` f a��}.v ^,R�� � k�� ��r n��S u <, ':'L'.
, . .'. . y^ �.,�' . !::':��!':' •S�»"�� ~\c,,.� -r. •�t,4./"� 'io.'`t � �� . � �[ `���SP� .
�•l:... �4 -- . 4�i f �i-
` _ . . Gt� �1�f f � •. RE(��3�i�'� f�
NcioEn+ � LAW ENFORCEMENTOFFEI�$�:R�POR_T �� '�.�`� "* -��' ''
'ODE , . .. �AY: : � id T_ W T F .
�: ;'.
• MESS, KEY , CONTROL NUMBER IOCA) CONT. AGENCY NCIC IDENT. (CAQ) � � ;� - . �
E C 1 � ' , '�. � _� M N 0 2 7 1 5 � � ./ •. . : . _ .
',�BR flA7E REPORTEO (PPD) TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRIND NBR (LGN) - '�
. __ � ^.Y Y / f"• / ' ' _ _ " . . . . � .. , � . . .
�. � �C r �� � ��� f � � I PV�CE COMN{�TTED IPLC) -
� .' . >r'�.i 'r••.<� �.r • .1 �)--...: r ,� � ,:� f . ��-/ ',
J "• _ ' � • i - : :r •- E
.. ,., .... , „ ,; ::. ,. . ' ._s� `." _
L'JBR HRO ��r BADGE NOISBNI TIME ASIO. �'TAS) • TIME ARf�, {TAR): � �T1tJ�E;CLR.'�(TCL)-�� i � J� K�tD Codes� � .
f x
'i g� / r,`�.. - �- :...L � .-ti�. �' ✓' � .. �� ,���., � '-�" ..' � � , � P-Phon� -_ �. :,, f
L_..J / � 1 _f
T LNBH fySN UOC UCS ' " �NBR � y5N - _ ,.: R -Rad�o :
n UOC- ' UCS
� � � � • y� / v - � I _( ,1 /� / / A-Alarm '
� . ���-1 1 - In Penon
::x,- �
SUPER VtSOR APPROVED: ElvTERED C J.R.S ❑': i � `•" ' V-Vfcua7� '; ,
�_•. . , _ . ���i � . . . �� ���" j 4��i� ` �� • �'ME1� f �'�`.f. �' .
�• . • [ �� ' ,� � � � .i ��?� � '. i. '
}� JJ r-- . -'✓ � :. »': . ,' T-Other
�e?orted Sy .�i/ /� "!f` �'�,�i� ✓� �_� � � - ' r . . . � �' ; . . .
� " D08f }-
J 3 6us..Nb� . .
A�dress:" � +f-'j� r� � f-� �� f�' �� � , � _ �r����_ fn�
� Home Nbc `�
.,�mplaint: -- _ . - ; .- , - _ .� • '
';,
- DOB/ - ;.:e
:�d��� . • . , . , _ .. Phone Nbr.-= •
' Incidont Descriptiqn: �- .��n�. i,� ,�,.a � � 'i • �.,/ � •' �: �� � . � �� r � '
/1,,_ 'f •.t,,,,fi .f. ./'y' .t �-�-� _.1��' . . .� . ' .. ` .
/'� _ �� �,� , � . � � .� � .�=' f v !�:-�:-7 .,,_:..tt �' _ r,n+.. f .�J ' ..
✓a� J� - f _ . - �. � -
� k7 _ .�. �r,.- _ f Lt �.; �1` d'fc' �'�e` �' �i, i � � ��
' i. ,�. �, n, rt �c
.�' � � �. � 1 za ' ,t ,.7-�"..�" �' _
.� ' - • ' .r �{' S -�i 1� ; `j �- ' � )
. . . Y 1 . � r.: T N .f J }
. . ' . _ -1 •j .: i � ( � � . � �' ' .
.. . '/ �) �" �
_• ' � ' . �. _ .. r .c. .� . . .""�j 7 � ..
r j. �b � � ✓ !., � s r L l
� �.. .. -i' . '3 . � y� S- '�T��V l �..; �.
L-C��11'�"• �if 9� �Lv�.C1�i�t� 1!SJ�!/.� W��. Q/� . .'t' 'v1 �j�j 1-[/{,�lZ.Y _� J� � ;e ,�?
� / r �. . .�y _' " .''ryf �, . ' '
� � (: ��,,,/� . - -� , �,�''� � ., .
_ � _ ���'`�� '/�(�'� ,� ' -.� /�'�,c�/�J�, ._'�y'--Q'`��-_.w�ry-�.� 2..- .�,�rj. ;{ n. 4 ., .
� ~ . � . � . - _ " ., � � - ../��' ",1� .� `�r Y,j_ ,� � . ` �� ` -
_ '�'�1.�.^��
-� �� .. ,. /�/ ` r`� ' } l._' .'r §'�' �t� �� > 4.•�.
_ � `Y
.< . � . �J'/�`"�.'�j� ���.� . � ' ;i .,�:� ✓ !'l� ,�J � �.
..• , .. .� - . . � ... . .// � T -./�� (• • r� { _ '� :'�'r �s��' '� WK�7q . .
V -�-------� . :f0 �� _��°�, �Y a� ,� � ..
.�r'� _�ti� 1 ;.�,�;�,���: � � . , � ' � °��: .
_ � t � y t
� / � -� .. . ' �_r -r• �' . h v.
�_� e �j1f
� s �
� � � - �
'��� • �'�'1 c ��� --�. �'", t _ � �' ' , - - .
* � .� -- � '�j� �, �.- '� ' - � ���'. , .
� lfi . : ` _ _ "�' -� . - �.� --
� ��"� '�Ti.ct'��<��0 ,�s., Gh� . _., _ . -
f r, . , _ : ti _
.�,,� '.,
"+ti'•��tit`'� t��':._�; .t2��..�f ��p _ _ - . - �`'`
�j� ��y �� ,� - � a�� � � .� . + V � �,,
, � --- ���a. � f . �L
. �, ,�l ,� ,,_.
_�' / 1' . ` - � ' " � � . ' _ r y`
F �'�(� ' ' ' . - . i ' , �,�J � - t
1 •j! �" . � .. ""_---�-, ��.� � ��.' -. .'�. �< r 1�.._. _.
� �� '� �> L `.`__ ___ -� . _ - .,t� �---..._�`�� _ ...
� � . O . . ��� .. s �
• \!� / � � --�if ~----�'_��_,_-___- s ` - � " .-.
,-
�,:- �-:-r:��c� =1 t�.t�i�! ��1� _�i' ; _ �-
,• '� j ' :� � . _ �-. � �,; ,
�-�-,�.;rte;J?;C� .-��,'��,�,�,� ;t, � . . . — ' �� . .. '
/ �' 1
I � �
�,k�� �t�„" =/�L�f�n�'{J1r� F� � .-� � , � - �
. �;= -�_ � . _ , . . , . _. . . ��;1 . .
. ��. - � - . . . . . _ . . .
.� � - _ _ _ �. . .�: _ _ .
. _ . . . . _ .z - _ - _ _. - . .
_ _ _ . � .
C':SPOS1710N: Unfounded Cleared by arrest Exc.Cird. Ref.other egency I�ectiw ?Other � f'��
. OrF{CER'S - ;- !� � /i �. . -.� � i� ;" SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE�� = :� "
�
�i�C�'•/L f,T-....�� ' 7 ' .��/�t�.c,�-4�-h.:.[s. �� f, �r/ �. + `' , -
�
. . .. - - - l t . _ .
. ...r ' . ;-' .. . • . )V��V �Q��CL VLPfti� �?T7C��3... C�`�;F y�.r�*�'�r,���tjY. ��.tt� , � �TG ����, �3
'• . . - • . � ,� , .4 � .lt ...'� i. . 5,'., ' i � t t��.i k'.�� � e- .4 .
� � 3 ,. . r"' '. �� �.; ,r r �'kY zN REC'�b SY� i. :- .
f'dCiDEN . ' � l:A1N ENFORC�MEN7OF�.ENtSE�E�POR�' � � � � '�.� ' � ' .,,°
� _ , �.. DAYi..
• , ,t ..,�s :.: , -4_.:1 , ,� . . � T W 7 F S � � �
_ �•• . ' f ' .- 4 .'
MESS. KEY CONTAOL NUb1BER IOCA1� ♦, ,�CONT. AGENCY NCIC I�DENT: ICAG) ' � ; ' ,S- �= s
� ;:
S E C l � - .� _ l . M � � � 6 fl �p � -,� � .
t � ��... N 0 � 2 � ;�. ,,
�R DATE REPORTE{�(RPD) � TIME RPD(TRP) - - LOCATtON GRiND NBR (LGN) � � ; ;.. + � �Y -'• ' y�,
/ � � �,� r- / �'yJ ''�, z � V -
�� � / FLACE COM1.�ITTED (PLC) � � "
i ��
. _ \,,�.li.�� .lt;'� � r � .
' '""' . / ' f, ..
�•tNBR liRD , � ��'BADGE N0158N1` ". TlME.45IG:(TAS1 �- TIME ARR.�(TAA1 -,;• 71ME CLR.�ITCL1 • HRD Codes
:�i� I (�: I; ' v �� I -, e t��, � - .1. Q � ' � � P��. -
� LNBR- 1SN tlOC� - • .UCS ; _ �LNBR�, -'1S1�! ' - = UOC.` ,• � UCS'- R- Radio : _ _ ' .
� � A -A�artn i
� ��`�, _ �, / � �� L---1 �L—1 /- .,, /'� 1 -f n P en o n. - .
•SUPEflVISOR APPROVEDC . . ENTEREp C.J.R.S..�Q . . .:. > (; �- � �`F' . ' V'Vi:usl ..
� '' ' � M-MaU
� ' �' : ���� f,i" , ! �- • . ' f ` � s T�OtMr
•RcPvrted By: ' � : If . I/ _�,f� i � DOB/ • . . , � - c ` ` _
� � Bvc�N6r �
Addrest..__� � i ,-.�'�A a �, � ,� '. ' _ i: •* - �
_""_=-v`��,--�1�:.�F--.��, � tiom�Nbr x- 1.
�'ompla;nr, � -- _ ' . . . . z:• , - ,
' sada��s: - _ . - , . . . , ., , �oal � : ��:
� ? PfiOM Nb►1i t a: 1J, �
':�cMent D►acription: - - - � - •r •+� ° - -� � } '`y tr �`
" _ _ ... <± �1�� ��.�J
- . . -� .. " .. . � � I _ - . - .1' � �� ;� '. ,
� � / � ' � : . .� - � �. �� - . i a;• :�a:
� _. Y , ,n "� l �/ J�� �. � _t✓ -' �-J,�LT�s✓��'.[�c.� a _
-:_ �. �* ., . .n. '-�, .� '�..T .^:_a.4__ c
- . . . . ' .- - �J� �t�, -._ SY' _ to
. t�,: ; ' � 1 �" {
�` - . � _ , ` . ..3 ^Y 1� . �. � J -� - I
� h �. - .� . . 't _ ' . : . t. )_ � _ " �51. �
-. - _ ' .. . . - . . _ . - _ . �r Y �"Y :A JI, Y t � ,}4�
� � _ .. . ... .� ��•.�l -•�• ,• N,- ," 't .3 � .
�����// �) ,��������T 1�
yF. �� I . . .s . . �1��� ""v � . ���I�����-���I S���C/W� ' _� �° ` .
��:�. . . ' . ._ �� D . , � � ... . !� - - �- .
: . , O �� _ - . : _.�-�- - �. .
1� _ . �.�� _ : g—� _ . _ _� . , .S ,, =
��. - _ , : . , - ,� � ; �s . t
. . _ . - -{:= . �..
�� s '. . ' . �S . . 'f+ f ��k� �'f i � � -, S ist . S� b'.
� _ ' . . . . . � � _ . . O ' �- - - Y .� k t._ -`r , �.� > .r^
_ �✓'�i--v�i . . '_' . ' J .� ,
�� 1. . T .>� � .
�.`. .. �/� ' ' _ ' . . i ti� . t� _ . � �
- �A/ i .F:. �1� yyy��� .. - ,T. . � .�.+� Z.
. �'. � . !�. j S'
� 'f . ' . . . _. �i: � _' :� .{� . ' i
- i/ , . � '" _ . . . : � . . , p.
••� ' ; - S � �+. �:
.. . . . .. - . . �i .. Y � r 7C{, .'jx' :f ;11� ..
- � " � �r , . . � -- � . . - � z-�. � r,�ra � i'- i t _ _ ; .
f� � . .
- z • . '� ' '��.
* / //, ' , '� _ .x � _ ; .�
� ��� �f�y�Fr//� , ' - . � -. � � � . . __� -.1-}� : r "+���� .4� ..s-� .� � ��.--
L�� t i �` , ��r�
• {I . � •. , � . - {� �- �*+�1 �-� 1 ,�t _
r � ..' .'" '} ..•}� y t; F
/ �,- �� `r t :
'��• �� (/_ _ • .. . . _ � . - � .� .. .- . . � r ..r _ j �
�/ L,/� V � ``• �'
C��!C����� - . . - - � . _ � . .
.. � . � - �r�s - . . � � � - �t- �- �;
. . .. oi.� . ..� � ' . --. . . -- . ., _ . . .�.. - - .
'��� �✓�✓— V . . . . � � � y � � T�
. . , .. . 1 - . . . !1 �:' �� _ < - '�F'. : �f� "
� /•�7 '� �'+ 4 � l'� �t �� �\
� . . . . .. � . . r '-� . " 'U..- . ' _ �- 4✓ �)l y..- .� .
• . ". . - - � - .."� t •T} . rf-; > .t. _ a; t 1 ....
. . - .. . . - - - .'4. _ .��' - �'�
, . . _ . . .a.�.,.; �,..
. . , � � j////� � � . - ) 'v i3 -�:� Y pi}'� .i.� �r, i ��' � !' 1.. .
�✓`--Cl— '.� .- L � 3 2� t :� 41 r� t �._ i
Y • � '{, ')- .� �� �
L':a?OSITION: Unfoun6ed C1ear�by arrtct '_ Eic.�rd. , ftef.othsr ay-�nvy r _� 7na��-�.. ther' . _ .a
�L3FrICER'S , , � - SUPERV150R'C5IGNATt1RE '� r"r ; �`+�
�� . . ` _- . . . - - . -i^. _ . . _ _
� . � �. �- - - . � - _ �-- - � ' - - _.. '� � �. c - ._ . ___ - ._ .- _ . . . . _. _ _ -. .�_ .. -:.�>
' _ . �,,,,�;.� F v r .a�:t�c vcrMn 1 mLc�l i _'�..;: n ' � ,_, , ,. .
y , � , s , tT•.• L, •, *.'_'. . � �`
� .• * • • � .- . ..' . '. .V i. _� ��.�
:� r'-;�: : REC'O EY: ' `"�' •� .
INCI"J :t�( . , � '-
LA�W ENFORCEMENT OFFENSE REPORT :_ oAy: s M T w T s , . ,
co� � ' _ - _
MESS. KEY CONTROL NUA�BER fOCA) CONT. AGENCY NCIC IDENT. (CAG) � "` �'�
� E C I � J M N 0 2 7 1 6 O 0 � r .. , . ...', " �t�` -
NBR OATE REPORTED (RPD1 ' TIA4E RPD(TRP) LOCATION GRIND NBR (LGN�.-�:`, �
� / O, � 10,3 �,] � `- . _; � <._� - �_-.
/ D O / � �,., .
' ' ' � � � � �� 1� PLACE COMMltTTED (PLCI
, . � r1Ei' � ,/ ' fl i C �f� � *" i I� � r ,
. , . . , -..a.:..
0 LNBR HRD BADGE NOfSBN1 TIME ASIG. (TAS! TIME ARR..{TAA) . 71ME CLR.��TCL) HRD Codes -
t - J / � J l � itiJ i � � / � O � ./ _ P-Phone. - r .
. . .� ,'.. R •Radlo : t� :..�
LNBR ISN UOC � UCS LNBR ISN UOC ., UCS "
. � /�1 / . /� ' ..� � r� / . � A-AIerT . , �,.-yJ
� , � � �-1 � ■---� � �- In Panon
' • , ' ' ^. .. V- Visual `T
�SUPERVtSOA A?PROVED: ' __, ENTERED CJ.R.S. ❑ � ' -
- . - -'- . - '
, • M-Mail •
.� � /. . ` � � • , T-OtMr -
Fie�rted By: L� C L DOB/ � . . Bus.Nbr. _� -`- � • �:.
�Addreys: — ----- � ' Hom� Nb�:''. . • �`,,-'
— r .� � �
•Comptaint: f�-UA �'�`Z=_—_�/��il�N���.�--fY� � ` D081 .a
Addrest:_ —�/�Q�`�_4-1__ �f _�_—__�SL��� _ ' Phone Nbt: ._ . � .
�lncident Descript;on' - . ' • ; ,, "
:� , zNSP ���,o - — . � . - � ;
. _ . . ' ,� -
_ . - -�,=
:a . _ - _ . , ��. ��: :.
_ , .
.. , _ .
_ , ._ : . _ �(
_� . - . . . . . , y. . . . . �d.��..
. . _. . .�� .. . _ .-- - ------ -- � — --� _ �t • '
: , - _-------- ----- -- . -_ - ----;- ���
._ �Lc,O O�/=1 c c�s f-►^o,-., �GJ�� �i • . " ' _ . '*�
1�i�S . S �Cccrif� , - T� '-
� i
' C c= (� ,�J �u ]�y — ,0 u r�•./e= ����/�1 d�r c K .�-- � /?--�d y/ 5 �n! f-d . ' .,r`� _-
_� � , . �
. �f�� c�,�� .�. - �,�� .� ,4 coP y Q,=. t-� - s�PP ��-.1 y ..,����. 'C��d r f,a.�s - A ,���_'
� y _
• '� � x�� A �,��� w h�.t- 1� c.w.4}�y ��, ' - � � � � _ "_-,'� " , .
• • - - � _ 1
. . 3
�� A
�Z •� �1� �°Y�� c K t=c;� .� - ' �. -..�.� _ .a -
�
:� �-.� ��.�-�,� .� �,� � . ' A 6��: r �,�`o �U���f _ � � '
� �R� R �n � � � - ' - � '-
� U r`v lo L� .-ri s . . -� .c-: .
'/ . : _!' ,
� ' . •• ._ s.�...;.
� � . ., '�
• _ . . . �� � • . � .
� : - � ` ]
" � �
� � - - ;_'
.,_
� , � ,
� ' *-
_• - ' ��' '- _ �- ' (.F-i .
� '
� ,'I,
`� �
DISPOSITION: Uniounded Clea�ed by arrest Exc.Cird. Rei. other aQency Inectiw Other !`
,
.OFFICER'S � ' / — SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE ,
i . _��,
�
( �� '� � �.� . � • . ' , ' . . , i
� F ` � S . . , �. . . . .
� t.
' �' , r Y '.
�� ., � ~i� �ti,� �h�• -y , � �� :, � �.y � .,+ 1 �, r � . � .. ,. �,
� }cY!... r� +c�5�.j y��� s9r 1 i� 't J yr.. 6c� �., �. � r ti �r ; n ....� . ,. � ��.. �. � ... � , .
, � "• . , �� i�„,,�i ,� t � kk ��, � ,. � � ,,•, �
� �. .�� , .. ,at� . .� � �- �ti, . ' "►T'�✓� I rT r .�'"�" ""I' •;y�„en.,,.. .
�� t �v� �f :�e�"R^'r:�l�;� ti,.J. i' ,w,*,�v.�. nnnrr•� S
r .� ,. q , a I,• „ f j t
� � � �� �. L. . �_� �� iti . . � . . , . , . �� �
r` h �1,, .� ' ,� ; .
r~ , `i � '+ � `E o — �1 , � � , ' +
t 1�- , . U � c o �' = yq .� � '�t '
''I a � g Q Q cl> � � + . . � . � .
• _ � ' � :' 2 a � Q _i> � O �,' � r� �,'.tlI . • ..$ � �+. � ��' �
� `'� . � ic�r ��" s i� ' y /�� �; ;�f; 1r� �()� ;i � .i � �Z � � , ..t�,
� �. � 'i - . �. _. U � �•��r � .�> ' .� I�. � � . , �. '� � . � �.p .
'r i�, t� t } �..� i � � G� p� �`' � - ,r � � ����+' r f . > 4. ' . .�
m � � .1�� O .r'""�'?`1 1` � � l.V y \ .�. ,4 . �'��f.,t da�,� d.'�! (, k.� , � ��J:`� .. . � i.
��,� � �w '' A ;Z 'z .�. ,r � 7';� l. � C c !
� � , *.
. ��;� � � i �'�' 'V �t t } . 2 .��i �g ,a � � ' '
'�• �.� 0 . i r.r '� � •U. ti '1 � �� �a';g ��,� �r,,- e� '� � � ' S, . �:. � .
��', , d Sf� x� � :� i,;'Z .�. .,r i t� � . ' f-1 ... � . ,
� .� .. ' ��.��� ' , 1 ��: 1��1{ � • 1 , .., . � �
;i T�f. ��-� • � � 1 �` 1 1 .�� � � - . ' �
r+ �. {�' ,,,• . . �� U . ' t� 4 • , � � ' � �
��,� ��.� • �. • ��� � •,�+. , � U �. - � �� ; . ... 9� .
� r ,�� . p a: •� dU. � ", �.1., t .r . ).' . . I
.� � � . - +e ' t' . '•._ t r. �:'1 �' 4 ��_ �,+ " ��� �. ,. . � .L'' .
1�..�' W 1�
r �;� , �,-a o z `� � � ` y ,, �� +y � t �
` •'V S� F- ' �.� � •� ..I �r �.. "� > � 's �
�. '..` ' J e .����• . , �� / � .l .i
� t, \ �,1, � � f`' �
� � Z w Q � � t p. , t � ,.. �
T ''o n Z _''� \ �Z� l� . ' ,
d '� ' z ,�-Q- • M;� �1� '� `�'
� . W U n � '"' N� ',j � ,+.,J . � . !
a .2 cy �� _ l�! `� " � ,� s "j � ' �r
T 't�
�. •� .iV N x ' ,Q � • � '� � �' �I ` � ` `I . � . . ' � . „^� ,�! 1 , . � . . � ..
y... Z W d 'r.w m O t � y':'�'.�' 'i .• .f
CL; �y� . � Q � Z ' �_. O �,. , r• . �
�. � Q O ~ J Y I ❑ � �� • � .�I . . . . , �:'��. . . , , . �� ' � ,
a. �.�. r-� z ,� � . � `P: J ,�, . ,
� , O � � �. N � ' y , � I� � 1.� '� � � ' , '� �•. .
c�.�i.. w � ~ � o ' . � � �� � . i: ', , . . ' �, , . .�
p� � � � �• �� � , :
cl. U o w ' `F-" - ��1 .I � ty ,� � � , � . • ' -
O � U w � �� w . , Z, J .'� � �-, '
CL W . � � ,. '�. �. . 1 { ,� �' i V '� .
,�I•.
��' Q � - �.. ; m Q '� � � 1 ,N � ; ., '
J Z '� .1({ � � I . . ' , '
1 :
O � � � U . N � '� i _
Q � W � � - • �
. z o o �9 _ ) !
o � !y m o I ' � ,� ��. .
g � o . � �
W � �,
� � � � � � �
�- i o �
_ � - a �� N ^ a � .�` `u , V . i .
� .J I
' W = o > I � � �c �C•
' Z. Y u � 1 � j ', m • c . �'` �+
w � � Q � � � � �ti � � j/��'
�W W m . � CA ul Fl � 1��'-1
�O � w J� �� � . . � � E v � ' p . .
. ¢ -r[ $ � `
� � ..��'Q�I t-:.�'.'i ! ;. � � �� l� �,� �� • •. � • ! •. • � • • • � • ! • •
,� _ - - �RaNO POLlCE DEPAR s MENT -�•, _�'_ '• . - -
. . ,.. . �, ;-` , �;.: : .-,
REC D 89'.: - i '�
�� �"c'°EH LAW ENFOflCEMENT OFFENSE REPORT �� _`
DE : , ' DAY:" S M T W T � ii .
MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBER IOCA) • CONT. t+GENCY NCIC IDENT./CAG) ' ' - ;� '
� E c � / , � M H o s > > 6 a o � ' : n �. ,� . � �
'�f1 DATE EPORTED (RPD) TIME RPD{TRP) LO�ATlON�RINQ NBR (LGN1 _ _ : .' ��
r
� � / O / I- , , , , � , � -� -- � �_ --
� PLACE COM!�IITTED (PLC) ' ?•
- - /' �
/ ' i
•LNBR NRD BADGE NOISBNI TIME ASIG. (TAS) 7lME ARR. {TAR) TIME CLA. (�CLl •� ' NRD Codes '� '� .
�� ��/ / � �0 �. �� � _ � • ' �f. :.
� -. � P-Pho+H .� � -
• LNBR . f5N UOC UCS : LNBR ►SN . =' •UOC ' ' UCS � -R-vdio .
� I� � . /� ' ` � J 4 'i �, 3 / ; ,- . 'y : . . q -Ala�rn: . 'i'� ' �
� � L__.1 � �� 1- In Puraon r,^
5UPERVISOR APPROVED: ' FNTERED CJ,R.S. � -- " �/-Visual
� � .- . . _ - " M - Meil - . .
.•P.c�.ortedBy: �Ll�-�-___.� ��/C� �� ' . .,- . �,3 �;. .,�� 7-Other s��'�.
c
/ DOH/ Buc.Nbr. ~ -
AAdreu:_ y��1�.1�/���:.. .. .. _. , , � . . , -- -
� F{oma NbI:
�mp!sint: 'S� . ---- , _ — .
�dr�� - _ . - , ---- ' , " " - p�n0 Nbt7 ' i_
. Incident D��cription: . •. , - t _ ,
U , � ' - ?'
�__ -'� ,a
�`_ " . . - .. , c_.
� . - . . . - _ � � �� ',' i' . '. - . ' 4 f .
. • . . . . . . '. . . �. �4 , i• _ .}, � .
• . ... - _ . ' i _ � . .F•�., ._ � .. . S��:J . ^SY r� . . .. . . .- � .
. � � ' " �.a. - .- .•� . . � .4�r� . \.
A check of the above business was made by this officer 'at the �folllowing ,; -_-
-�es.
. 2006FM , � � � �', .
�2 • 2058PM , . � � _ � - � I� .
� 0020AM � _ �
he first time at �the drive�.�in I s oke with R d - � � � �� ''
P n y Sando. and Duarie Handrick .: �_;;_.. •
�of ;the Twin City 6ecurity Co . They stated th�t they had a copy of the - -
rule and they were the two officers that f.had been� at the Drive in on
�F'riday night. They also filled out a short repor-� see ICR written by them - � �"`�` �
�in which-they listed two prob�ems that �hey had on�:this evein Both �` � `
roblems wer� handled by the security guards and no squad .car was called �-'�-�, '�
+into asst. Qur cars were tied up on the road and could �ot make too ma�ry� i :; -•
checks of_the drive in this eveing. �here appear�d to be no ��3t problems �{_��
�his ev�ng and at the tirae I'viewed the drive ir� ali rras quit�. �nd in _�"�::`
order. NFAR -
. . . �' � .. - . . . . _ • ' � -.J
� - . _ . . . � _ ��� . . _ '��
� . . . .'. . . . ' - - ' _ � r • ' ' _ .
• . - � ' .' . .: ' ' ' . �'
• . . '- . - � ... ' � .. --�' .
. ; _' : . . . . `i' � �
. � ' . ' . '�..
�'
• t , a
's
� . i.
� - . . �..- .
. �-�
. :.�.
—- _ �, '
D!$pOSIT10N: Uniounded Clearecf by arrest xc.Cird_ Ref.other agency Inactive Other '
FFICrR'S � _ ._. - __ - --- --- ---- .
� _— -
� � ' �. . . , .•' .� . • , '� . . ^ � ' . � .. . . , I,
� � ,
� 1 '� •r � .� ?;" + �. : , .y, � `', , .• ' T
. . . . . `� ,,..��rr..�..-�.m� .-..1!4f.:�..�,+!�+_�•wr tr a..� �., � .>,' i
, . � . . ^. . . . . . �'""�'"Ehw1� Z_ T'�,. 1"�^'�r'T•o�•+,f•,-,:r,..r�.��.r.......��..-�r.�'►^•�'e.�....,rr+...,t. .��.
� .� . a `� .. ` � ' . . 1 ' , � - 1 . �T� �+` � ' � , ' . . ., . � . . � � �. , ,
' � , ro e E �f a ' � � � �
„ ~ J V � � : a ��'w � , . � � ' \ \ •
3 , a Q a� ¢ QI c`> � p ` � ,
� � ' . � 2 0. CL Q' _ .� � F- t �/� n .
� : r`�j� � � � ; , � i:,, . . . . , L 1 � ��t . h� . . ` . � � ' .
.r' Z � . ] � . � f , .' (� ., 'i1 � ti: \� . . �. �'�: . , . . � i
1q . 'r � r�'� � .., , �� �, � . r, � ��} '� l�. .� . � . .• � .i .�. � ' , . . ' .. '
' Q �T W � .n Z 2 ,�. \\1 , . �, . .
, U } :^ V � 2' q, m a \J , ' .
• � p a � o O ,g _ � �� ,�� ',, �.' ' � �� .. . � , ' L
P.r a � � . m X Ll y �, - ,i,T. 7 . ?`' .�r�..� ` � �.� . ,�i� . . � - O
\ � � U . I ' � , . S'R�� �\\* \ 4 � , . 1:. . - � � � ;' '� � W� .
� Q ; � •a , � .
a o Z � � . ., � j:� � :� ��) Q , , `: � Q .
.K c� � j� :} � �'.�`'• V: � �. ' . . , . G z
,..;,� z �p tr \ `/ � .� �i � 1' '� � � N
O o o Q � � ., . ' � �� � � ; 4 . , � .
cr z ,� J � , o
�- � z � 1^ Z � � �a � �� � . . � > >
F- W z n Q � `�) � I � I � • V , . ` � �
2 �C � � L_' , � f •.� `� �V
w
W W U �V Z \ Q � � ' m . .•i }�.� . •- ' ... �
1— z w O u' m p • �� . � • � . \� � L �
f1� (7 O Q h � Z � � i � \ �
Q � a v � � C� � � ,c � Q d
a � � � � � I I � � � � � � �
w p z �; ; i " �t I � � � �Q O
,,�� `
O I- � � . � Q� �` t C
w �
� � � ���, Cw � ' ' � � ` � .v � �
J � \ ^ � � � � ,� \ ] .
� W h�- Q � W I �V `� ,uc
c..� w A � I,� ti �
o � Q�� � � w � , .
o u, o w Q � � � ��4 ..� \� � � '
z � � \ tl
^ w W � , � � � i � `� N > �
,� m �,
Q j � m U o � w �
..� N . . Q -�
z Q � . E
� � wl^ o � v ` � �
Q � � '} � � ` �
� — o � . t ��.
Z o � Q , � � Q �, � �,
o w Q � .
" g � Q � ', � � �J � � ��
W o � � � 0 � p � �
_ �. , � -� 4 � o � � , w �
� p z(�'� Q �� : �„, � N
W - Q �� � I I' � � � , � V �
Y � ` S � � � � I e * � � �
r V � �( �
1)
W .� Q Q � 2 � g �p g � _ � � � � N w
fc1 `� � U
�� � W �� J " ,j � � � � -a ., � � � V O � Q �
' Z S O�h- ��" � �a � �— � �..�� � � � � � � � � �
• ► � �
. � � . . � � �� � � � �
�,�R�NO PO�tCE DEPART�s�EN;''-: �' - � � � , ,� r .� ,�
'�_-;� ' , . � ' • -�, s�" �.� .: �/ � -���.�.1 � � �.�.� .
_ - �. _. . . � :�• REC�'o 8Y ��� " �
_ r, 2 �.
�CtbEht � LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFENSE REPORT t �� �`�
DE _ ,� _ DAY: 5 1�+1 7,W ..7 �--
.. =L: ' :. . ' . . -Y` � s >• ..
f1ES5. KEY CONTROL NUMBER (OCA1 '� CONT.AGENCY NC1C IDENT, (CAG)* ' ''� � �' " �� ��
_ l_``C � � Ll ! I� �J � .'. .� ' �:� j `� �. �� • ,
�—_ , � � 7, � J- M N 0 2:" � -� .5 0��� J ,t ,� � Y_ '-_ .� _
DATE EPORTEO (RPD) TIME RPD (TRP) ' LOCA710N GRIND NBR {tGNI � , � � ' F`� -
. • : % .. .
r ' '�r .� _ � ,r
� J 1 � . ' ,. . . � { ;` ry .
../ `� l , ' % � � , , ', � I � PLACE COMf.�11�TFD {PLC3. :^ _
. . �./ �., " �� '...- . .��" '. ;.r ..
., H
� " . .- .. . -'-"i� . .�.. . ... � •�, e. �.. . : � � . i' uT. � .
OtNaR HFtO BADGE NOfSBN) TIME ASIG._(7AS) ~TIME�ARR. t7AR .' �IME CLR. ITCL) � NRD Codet.' '�t �;.� ;
�--� � � � � , /L e=�1�",111� / / "' ,.� P•P ho n�' ,�
r � .
T h8R ISN UOC UCS . f � . • n R-Radio , i•=T`�`,.
LNeA ISN UbG" + UCS . .
J /�- / l i � t � � � T / A•Alarrt� : ).�.
C� � � /� /��.: ..��_� '-
_ � ' � +� i �' J �.1 J ln Pertan-
' r:
SUr^cRVISOR ArPROVED: . _ .. . ENTERE`DCJ.FiS � .::� ••J ~ _'� �:� .' 'J ' V-VisuB! .' � - )
_.� _ � _ .. , . � , rz �; :� ' .� M- Mas! . _ � ;:: _;,,�_
�� 4 . .�,. -' � ' ' : ' rJ ' �. .
-..� . . .µ. .. � _ �y: `�'y
.. . � .�. _ .. . . � �- ,� u ti � '' ,-a _ � �-flttllf l�T..
���ned ey: �/r�Z.��£_ _ �1/'�-__-�� � �as� ';� _ �- � 8 ` ,,— ,�r.�
' Ac{d�eu`��/ �j . -. _ us Nbr Y`�
s li,�f�� ��!�omt Nbr v �F � ...�
�mp'a�n t: /1/lf�✓ 0.� ��4�-�='��r- ` .>. _ ''^ '.�, y '� =`
- . - — aoal - ._ _ "' z.:
'�r-,ru �1 �.G�_.�• �� - Phox��F� /7�/- ��J
'fncident L}tsaipt�on. t' U �, -f ;t i � --c � o, ° .._
+ c ., r. �S �^ T_,�-
_ .. _ "- ' _ .av
. . . _ . � �_ - - . - . . ,' `� l .Y . �.' +,� .
�.�L � � �
' . _ _ e kJ� � - L' l/f� - - .� , - � ��,� ,r
//��i ,._� ,r 3
- . .� �� -. �'�!i" �� �• � � ��.1 f. � ti�, t� a ��' T �1 y ' ' y, + r {a+ � "�CY,�
•� .. ' � _ � v f r�tY �� �'' � 'g ti, �5..� � .�. -'�Y ,��' r,
.. . . . � � Y � > . --- i I� .- ' :` t,�- . y. . �'• r .
�.. �c... . " - .. �-? +... . . . _ � GS a `�T � � L! � f�� 's _ . �"��� .
� . �: � - . . xr � �Y �. r � f� � „+ ` ��'• a� � ,y� . �vY r �Y�.�.
, - _- - t s k� �. � '
• ¢'^r ' . . .:� ,1 S =`'_' ' ���? � -.a'.
�.�. �J��. ���/!';V � v. � .. ��, jyf� _ _ .'•� ; ' ' -. . t Y 1T
i � .. � irt��tz i.u��'4�--�'s-{s _ �� # s; � � � -
i QQ .�PGl•:�� l '` �.:� <�7��:� r� �:t^ : .
�� : . � � . l � � , - - �' � �. i � i� ` • __ .�.
��, _ ' � �.. , �t.{ �� ' a,g �,��,�-}`'�'Sr7t
. �J� p�/�J� � :'�, - '� .��� ��:� y,,, -?{ �,� ,� ,���� �Y`r t i 1 �=�+t, -..
�zea::J j�. Gv JC . � � ) - ) � '�y �.� "`'` ti : � � `' �`.��t, ,''
.•- _ NC' . "7� -' ��`z'r- �4 ' '.i ' }�-�s ^_ / ` ' _ r
`�] . � . . ..-'.' - � ~.,�, 0 / `` "W(f��y�� ? � � j�1 1�' -y���
,.. . �'}: A �1'ff�� ,S?,�q,,Lf- '°a � � i,y , _ �: ,.
=� - � �,.
�.{ '' �
• �p A ��'N� �c 4��C, MBw�•, �, s.� �e �,t�it�,� ��ae„�` � y �h -
- , � � ' , _ 1 � �
�: . . - - � .. c�*�r�j'� 'f�t .�?S'°y ....� '?L� y N Y: -�.�j, .�'Ti�'��iW��`t� ri.�-}�- � y � � ,
' rt
' . . � Yt�/l�.J � �.,i )��=�' �"4��" y _.t•'':- "r„ :�yC�3-_'._�,1 �. �r��� - �c .'�tyi��s�-y�t,�cf. i_ r,. ��',� _ ��� �7�� .l.i
; ������ 1�TC ��' ' .. ' , �,� s .' l a y _'s \y'a > }.,.�r*i ..'�* .v �`"�� _
t'9 r`s�' CrK} ���,- '` :T �
��2.�-�i.�5 r.-� �� � � ' . Q� j+;�s�"�a��: - - �`�
�s ��k �- � /�` _ s - , .
�r e � '-y— :��� r � t � -
_ ' Q v.7.-'r/t � ��` C . . fti�' �r 9 h.fS l/-��/�-e� y`I•�D �-�-h y �, t' Z` '�� - _ .
E J -�' ' f , ': � ' ,
-•' MC � �'(i�lr� Jv� + ��. � : �1v " .x T {s. �y �' � �e' � _ e
�J �1 _ ,�r rt s E r �
. - i,r . ri.+� . -t-: 1y� ••-2,,,,� >..:,p ♦ �} s . j j tiL�n
� � s� ��: � .. ' �' .� . f , 9, b-. ?�
. . . . . . .- t�`Y�� .,c,? •:'� ,:.t� -� i � r1 r. � � -a ". � .'. � �,y `�t.'
- � -, i c'��Y }r� i � :�f >t �a 1.� '� ��...
. . - u� .7 _,�� J . - .
' - - ! �.- , :f . � �j._. ._ .
• � .. � r _ C ..%:� _ :�_ 'b �� q �i -i,,.
_ . ' I � _ . ���' : . � i:1 ,S'
� - ' � • _ � L �- �� . t- ��' �- .
� . ' � } 4 _. �•-� '
{ :� ' � J ,
• �t � ' ` �,. �• ... �
� ' 1 r ' i � � r� _
�. i a4 '�t�. b �
� _ ' -� " , J �_.a '_ �,� 4 ' �r..
� - '�_ .� ' � _ . ,^ , � � ' ~ � +1� . . �.•�, .
� � � . . - r _ • - J�6". . -.
. � . - .. __. - . _ '`.. . 7 �..'• .
i
' , fi
DISPOSITION: Uniounded Cleared by errert .cc.Cird. Ref,othe��sovnc,y Inactive ..
� - _
FICER'S j� C , ., .T, T
/ ,i+�-o,• -; c�rt.� . . • /Il�
. _
. -�
- :RCNO POLICE UEPARTMENT � - ' - -i;- '
� � � - � . . ��:� .. �_ - . :.
,•. . RECD B ". � �
�DEEN LAW ENFORCEMEN7 OFFENSE REPORT`' ' DAY: M T w T F s
L_— . ,
�1.5ESS. KEY CONTROL NUM6ER (OCA1 CONT. AGENCY NC�C IDENT. ICA6)�.' � - !•
E �C 1 � ��7 ��(� � , �� � M N 0 2 7 1 5 O 0 � • J • , �
R DATE PJRTED (RPD) TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRIND NBR IIGN). ' � - ' ''�
�C_ � � � � ' I PLACE COMtiIITTED (P�C1 ' , -
• �C� � _ i ���/��.,�� �. � � � " 'i' , , � �' ' " r'� .
LP.BR HR BADGE NOISBN) TiME ASIG. (TAS) TIME ARR. (TAR1 71ME CLR. (TCL? ' ��� HRD Codes . ' :. ,
�3_] �� � � �C7 � �U�O � ! � P•Phone - ". '��.
��� R - Radio
l_NBR ISN UOC UCS LNBR ISN UOC UCS -
4� 1 � � .� � � �� A Alarm
L ' t � ���. � ' .. , �__1 ��L—i � . . _:.,�_ "�"� I 1n Parson ;
` ' � V-Vieuai �
SU?ERVISOR APPROVED: ENTERED C.J.R.S. � ' . — ,
•. . : _ ' M - Mail �
i '•�,' . T -O har
/ ,( ,/ `` �
�;r�rted By:.��l���` �/l� �/V "__ D08� ' ` Bus.Nbr.
AdCres�:_.�,���--� �i✓�--�' `- Nome Nbr. A_� � _
�-�zp',aint:_—��Ll� i� _����jti �` . .� . DOB/ ,�.-� :
� �. �� ��-- _ . _ ,
� —_�� �hone Nbr: '
Incldent De�uiption: _ ' - - � , - � �. ,
S � - rZ� — _ /l.' .� _ ;''
� � .. _ . _-_ -_ - . _. . _ _ .._.. A - . ' -F:
• . _ � ' .. . . " . . .. . _ . � ' S_,
• _ i • .. -
. ' ` . �: - _� <;; .. , _�:,
.._ . _ �
. 3.
ar.✓��'��' �r S 7 � - � .- _-. ;�."
1 `
�-- ---- —� - _ .
� _ . . - . ;.,
� ,�� C'�1� " A�S.r<<�:r�-�r ,,,i^ �.,�c.��t-.S 7e�:i - ��.. .
. ' 6.s�i' . . `��
� . - . " . • � :
_ . �:
� . _ " _• - __. �.•. .
� � " - — � - +�.
._.. . . •• .:r ,,
. • . . -1
� . _ `�
� _ _ �
� . 1 . . . ' -��• .
. t. . r
� - . . . • . � . � .. . � � _�, .. -
. . . . . . - ' . . - . � ' . . . - '- . '�.
� .. . - . . � . . ' . -. _ _ ' ..�.
• �.
� . . . . .._ . . . . . `.I
� � . • . ' � .. �.
• - . .. • . � . �
• . .. � ' ��._•
• . . . .. . ` . �
• • ' �
� .- � ' I .1` .
� "
• - �
DISPOSITION: Unfounded CI¢a�ed by arrezt Exc.Cird. Ref.other ecency Inactive O er
�FFICER'S vt'S.�.rs� SUPERVISOR'S SIGthATURE �
,—•.�r l.� SC�,�:
•
S R,�GULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 4
� Police Chief Mel Kilbo stated that the theatre has NAVARRE DRIVE-IN THEATR
been operating within the guidelines established (Continued)
� and that there has not been any problem.
� Mr. Louis Vilka, 3599 Crystal Place, and Mrs.
• Delilah Mosechini, 3593 Crystal Place, objected
to fast-moving cars, noise, and obnoxious mosquito
� spray used at the theatre grounds.
� Pastor Jack Niemie, Pastor of Good Shepherd Lutheran
Church, commented on excessive noise, litter, beer
� bottles , and cars entering the church driveway to
allow riders to enter into the car trunk for the
� purpose of avoiding admission fees to the dr_i�re-in theatre.
� Mr. Lebewitz, Theatre Manager, commented that he
� does require employees to control situations as they
arise.
�
Mr. Blohm, Attorney representing Northwest Cinema, ,
� Corp. , commented that the theatre would want to
` regulate police personnel as needed and possibly
reduce police security as situations change.
� Mr. Braverman, President of Northwest Cineina,
! commented that economics dictate what is feasible
and type of pictures shown does necessitate number
� of personnel required. '
� After all persons present were afforded an opportunity
� to be heard, the public hearing was closed at 7: 28 P.M.
+ Mayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to extend
Resolution #790 , A Resolution Suspending The License
� Of The Northwest Cinema Corporation For Navarre
Drive-In Theatre And Setting Forth Additional
r Restrictions Precedent To The Granting Of A
• Temporary License, All To Protect The Health,
Safety And Welfare Of The Citizens Of The City
� Of Orono, and indefinitely allowing the City
Adninistrator and Chief Kilbo to modify police
� personnel as needed. The fence requirement will be
held in abeyance until a later date. Traffic,
� inspections, and mosquito spraying to be monitored
and documented periodically. Motion, Ayes (4) -
� P1ays (0) .
� Resolution #790 - Pages 5-10
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
• = - - � � �
S , � Page 5
� .
� Resolution No. 790
•
� RESOLUTION SUSPE2vDING THE LICENSE OF THE
NORTHWEST CINEMA CORPORATION FOR NAVARRE
� DRIVE-IN THEATRE AND SETTING FORTH ADDI-
� TIONAL RESTRICTIONS PRECEDENT TO THE
GRAP7TING OF A TEMPORARY LICENSE, ALL TO
� PROTECT THE HEP_LTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE
OF THE CITIZErdS OF THE CITY OF CRONO
r
+ t�tNEREAS , the City of Orono has reviewed the files, the
• numerous complaints and the City Staff reports related to the
operation of the 2�'avarre Drive-In Theatre for the past several
� years and specifically since March, 1977, and
� P7HEREAS , the City Council has reviewed this matter at
a City Council meeting of May 23, 1977, with the management
� of Northwest Cinema Corporation, hereinafter referred to as
. Licensee, and with the staff of the City of Orono, and
� WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Orono has held
a public hearing on May 24, 1977, to receive comments from the
� public and from the Licensee to show cause why the license for
the Navarre Drive-In should not be suspended or revoked ir�med-
� iately,
� NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Orono
� makes the following findings of fact:
� 1. That the operation of the Navarre Drive-In in the
past year has constituted a pub,lic nuisance.
�
2. That th.e operation of the Navarre Drive-In in the
� past year has resulted in excessive and unreasonable interfer-
� ence with the private property rights of others.
� 3 . That the operation of the Navarre Drive-In in the
past year has resulted in excessive demand for and use of the
� police officers of the City of Orono, all to the detriment of
other citizens of Orono who rely upon those policemen to provide
� protection in other areas of the city.
� 4. That the operation of the Navarre Drive-In in the
` past year has resulted in excessive danger to the police offi-
cers of the City of Orono and of other cities who have
� responded to the problems on the premises, the patrons on the
premises and the citizens of Orono in the area.
�
�
�
�
�
� " �
� , � � ' Page 6
� .
� 5. The continued operation of the Navarre Drive-In
� without additional restrictions is adverse to the health,
� safety and welfare of the citizens of Orono and will consti-
tute a public nuisance.
�
6 . There has been no adequate control of the ingress and
� egress of the Navarre Drive-In.
� 7 . There were numerous juveniles on the premises who
� were drinking and who were present after curfew, all in vio-
lation of Chapter 61 of the P9unicipal Code.
�
8 . There has been excessive and illegal parking on the street:
� surrounding the h'avarre Drive-In by patrons of the Navarre
� Drive-In who trespass upon private and public property in order
to sneak into the h'avarre Drive-In without paying therefor.
� The illegal parking by the patrons has resulted in excessive noise
and disturbance late at night in a quiet, residential neighborhood
� and the littering of the residential neighborhood by the patrons
of the havarre Drive-In.
�
. 9 . There has been illegal consumption of alcohol on the
premises by adults and by minors.
� 10 . There is unwarranted tr�spassing upon the private
� and public property in the area caused by the patrons of the
Navarre Drive-In.
� .
• 11. There is a total lack of control of the patrons by
Licensee on the premises.
� 12. The Licensee has been operating in violation of the
� terms of its license as granted on March 28, 1977.
� 13 . The Licensee has been operating in violation of the
Orono Zoning Code which reauires the construction of a six foot,
� fifty percent opaque fence around the boundaries of the Navarre
• Drive-In.
� 14. The Licensee in the past year of operation has
allowed boisterous, profane and other objectionable conduct
� by its patrons and has not taken reasonable precautions at
all times to prevent such conduct and to reject from the premises
� persons engaging in such conduct or demonstrating propensity for
. it, all in violation of Section 61 . 080 of the I�iunicipal Code.
� NOFi, THEkEFORE, in order to protect the health, safety
and welfare of the citizens of Orono, the patrons at the
� i�'avarre Drive-In, the property owners in the area, and the
� Orono police officers who respond to problems at the drive-in,
the City Council of the City of Orono hereby suspends indefin-
• itely the license granted to Licensee for the Navarre Drive-In
on March 28, 1977, for the reasons set forth above and instruct
�
�
� �
• Page 7
� .
� the City Police Department to take all steps necessary to close
. down all access points to the Navarre Drive-In unless the
Licensee agrees in writing prior to 11 : 00 A .M. , Friday, May
� 27, 1977, to conduct its operations in the future pursuant to
the following regulations:
�
1 . The Licensee shall continue to comply with provisions
� 1 to 12 set forth in the Minutes of the Orono Council meeting
• of March 28, 1977, granting the theatre license.
� 2. The Licensee shall not charge admission by the car,
but will charge admission per individual and issue a separate
� ticket for each paid admission.
� 3 . The Licensee will prohibit the consumption of beer
• and liquor on the premises.
� 4. On Friday, Saturdays (and Sundays when preceding a
holiday) the Licensee will employ at its expense two off-duty
� uniformed security officers of the State of Minnesota, one of
whom will be present at the entrance of the Navarre Drive-In
� while the patrons are coming into the drive-in, and the other
• will patrol throughout the drive-in during all hours that the
Navarre Drive-In is open to the public in order to enforce the
�� regulations as set forth herein. After all of the patrons have
arrived for the evening ' s performance, the security officer at
� the entrance shall assist the other officer in patroling the
premises.
� �
5. The officers will escort from the premises any patrons
� who violate any of the regulations as set forth herein.
� 6 . The officers will check in all cars where they have
� reasonable cause to believe there is liquor being consumed by
adults or minors.
�
7 . The Licensee will insure that all patrons remain in
� their vehicles or in the immediate vicinity thereof except for
. traveling by the patrons to the concession stand or restrooms .
� 8. The Licensee will insure that there will be no loitering
allowed on the premises and no gatherings in excess of six people
� other than transitory gatherings that are not disorderly .
� 9 . The Licensee will turn off all speakers on the
• individual stands prior to the commencement of each evening ' s
show and the Licensee will insure that at all times during the
� show the fieldmen, as set forth hereinafter, will turn off all
speakers that are unattended and unused.
�
�
�
�
�
� .
` Page 8
�
10 . Entry and exit lights will be operational before the
� evening show begins.
! 11. The Navarre Drive-In will close promptly at 1 : 00 A.M. ,
f Central Standard Time, or 2 : 00 A .M. Central Daylight Savings
Time, and the Licensee shall insure that all patrons leave the
premises promptly at the conclusion of the movie or at the
time noted above, whichever occurs first.
�
. 12. The Licensee will eject all unruly , noisy or intox-
icated persons or any individual or groups of people that demon-
� strate a behavior or disturbance, unruly actions, intoxication,
or other activity which poses a threat to the public health, i
� safety or welfare or will violate any of the requirements of �
this resolution.
�
' . 13 . The Licensee will construct signs and place such
signs at the entrance of the Navarre Drive-In which shall state
� that there shall be no loud radios or horn honking; no loitering; �
no disorderly conduct or alcoholic beverages; that patrons must
� retain their admission tickets; and that any violation of the
foregoing shall result in a patron being ejected.
�
. 14 . The Licensee will develop a "trailer" which will be
shown at the commencement of each show and at least once during
� the show at intermission, which trailer shall set forth the
regulations as noted in the paragraph above. The Licensee shall
� also announce over the loud speaker system the regulations as �
set forth in the above paragraph at the commencement of each !
� show . . �
� _ I
15 . The Licensee will employ in addition to the two off ;
� duty police officers, five "fieldmen" , which fieldmen will be �
responsible for enforcing these regulations. Two fieldmen may
� assist in taking tickets until a majority of expected patrons !
have arrived. The fieldmen will wear orange fluorescent vests i
� at all times which will identify them as employees of the i
• Licensee to the off-duty officers, to the police officers of ;
the City of Orono and to the patrons. �
i
� 16 . The Licensee will meet the requirements of the
� State Health Department at all times.
� 17 . The Licensee shall clean up the premises by noon on
each day following the show . '
�
• 18 . Each patron must have in his possession at all times
a valid ticket 'for that evening show or else the patron will be
� ejected from the premises. �
i
� 19 . The two off-duty police officers to be employed by
� the Licensee shall meet with the Chief of Police at least once ',
prior to their working for the Licensee. In the event that
�
�
�
�
� - . -
� ' Page 9
� one or more of these officers is replaced with another officer,
that officer shall meet with the Chief of Police prior to work-
ing for the Licensee. In the event off-duty police officers
are unwilling to be employed as security personnel at the
� theatre, the Chief of Police may approve the substitution of
uniformed personnel of a private security service and shall
meet with the Chief of Police at least once prior to their
� working.
� 20 . The Licensee shall comply with i�innesota Statutes,
�299H, et seq. relating to the State Fire Code and obtaining
� a permit therefor prior to June 3 , 1977.
21 . The two off-duty officers shall be empowered and
• instructed by the Chief of Police to erect no parking signs
during the hours of operation and to tag all violators of no
� parking signs on the streets to the rear of the theatre.
� 22 . The names and addresses of the off-duty police offi-
cers and the manager of the theatre shall be presented to the -
� Chief of Police and Licensee shall notify the Chief of Police
. of any changes thereto. Names and addresses of the fieldmen
shall be given to the off-duty police officers .
� 23 . One of the fieldmen shall patrol the rear lotline
� of the premises during and prior to the show in order to
prevent trespassing and the entrance of individuals in areas
� other than through the authorized entrances to the premises.
. � The City Staff is directed to conduct weekly inspections to
� insure compliance with the provisions of this resolution.
� The City may impose any other supervisory and enforcement
regulations as the city deems necessary from time to time
� to insure compliance of the Licensee with the city codes
and in order t� prot�ct the health, safety and welfare of
� the citizens of Orono.
� In the event that the Licensee agrees to abide by the regula-
� tions as set forth, above, then City Staff is directed to grant
a temporary license to the Licensee, which temporary license
� shall expire on June 13, 1977, or sooner, if the City Council
determines that the provisions hereof have been violated by
� the Licensee.
� On June 13, 1977, at 7 : 30 P.M. , the City Council will hold
� a public hearing to determine whether or not the temporary
�
�
�
�
� � � .
_ � ' Page 10
� license should be continued, revoked, or the City Council
S will make such other disposition of this matter as it deems
necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the
! citizens of Orono. Notice of the public hearing shall be
given to all property owners within 300 feet of the Navarre
� Drive-In at least ten days prior to the hearing.
� From this date until the June 13 , 1977 public hearing, the
• City Staff and the Licensee shall review the question of whether
or not permanent fencing is needed around the premises as has
� previously been reauired by the Orono Zoning Code, and whether
or not there is a need to i�ple��ent procedures to control the
dust in the Navarre Drive-In and to prevent the dust from leaving
the premises and being deposited on the property adjacent thereto.
� Licensee shall have the responsibility of showing why a variance
. from the Zoning Code concerning the construction of fences should
be granted .
� .
This resolution was passed by the City Council of the City of
� Orono on ?hay 26, 1977, by a vote of 4 ayes and 0 nays ,
�
.
�
� illiam B . an Nest, T,ayor
ATTEST:
,
� � `� -
� Walter . Benson
Clerk/ dministrator
�
� Northwest Cinema Corporation has reviewed the above
resolution and agrees to be bound by the regulations and terms
� as set forth herein . ����
• �-e����---�-�-t.-t�.��-z ' ' �P r ;o n �f—t-�-e---�3 av a rr�--- �-�
� until June 13, 1977 t�v � � � r � -�- La�, c. v�� ;�
� -�. '--�� -�'r �- � ' `- � c � �c,d �o d' �e._ a ..�. � �'
Q-_ � -� s,
,
• �-�� - � � , ; n.,
• resident �
Northwe Cinema ��Corporation d/b/a
! 2�'avarre Drive-In Theatre, Licensee
�
�
�
�
s
REGL�LAR I�+"iEETING OF TfiE ORONO COUP�CIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 11
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the Minutes MINUTES
of the Regular Meeting of May 9 , 1977, be approved May 9 , 1977
� amended. 1�lotion, Ayes (4) - I�iays (0) .
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the Minutes MINUTES
of the j•7ork Session of April 14 , 1977 , be approved. April 14, 1977
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that the Minutes of P�IINUTES
S the Special Meeting of May 24 , 1977 , be approved. May 24 , 1977
•Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the Minutes MINUTES
of the Special Meeting of P�Zay 26 , 1977 , be approved. May 26 , 1977
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�No comments from the Park Comrtission. PARK COru�ISSION
No comments from the Lake i�iinnetonka Conservation LMCD
•District.
No comments from the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION
�. Otto Christensen, Luce Line Trail Planner, LUCE LINE TRAIL
discussed with the City Council a preliminary Rest Area
design for an 18-acre rest area located at Willow
Drive and the DNR Trail. The area will be
Sdesigned to accommodate users of the trail as a
rest area and horse, ski, and bicycle trails.
Mr. Christensen stated that the area will not be
used for camping, parking, or any over night uses.
�A fence will be constructed on three sides with
•proper signing listing permitted uses of the area.
Mr. Charles Ringer, 405 Willow Drive South, stated
that he and a number of neighbors feel that this
proposed rest area will be a favorable addition to
the area.
�
Mayor Van Nest asked if there were any other comments
from the audience--there were none.
�Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to give
•conceptual approval of the DNR plans for a rest
area on Willow Drive and the Luce Line Trail.
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
R�GULAFt MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 12
�ienry rsuhich, Building & Zoning Adr*iinistrator, WALTER' S PORT SEAWALL
read into the record that at the May 9 , 1977 #245
�Council meeting, the City Council approved
dredging of lagoon and channel with instructions
to provide protection against spoils seeping into
! the lake proper through the mouth of channel. Also
approved metal seawall for east shoreline of
channel and lagoon and riprap of north shoreline
of lagoon. Deferred action on shoreline protection
as proposed for west wall because several members
of the association did not agree with proposal as
submitted. Council also concerned with proposed
west wall protection because of necessity for use
of City right of ways for anchoring seawall.
Conflicts with City regulations for use of public
lands for private improvements and benefit.
Council directed the City engineer to continue
reviewing proposal and report back with most
logical solution. _
�
Staff - May 19, 1977
Latest report received from the City Engineer.
�, Council Meeting - May 23, 1977
�Directed applicant to submit final proposal in
detail with approval from Association. City Engineer
approval also required.
Suggested applicant obtain approval from City for
use of public lands for anchoring of retaining
wall. Directed City Attorney review and resolve
legal procedures for obtaining this approval
legally.
�
• Staff - June 8, 1977
Received a copy of the latest, revised seawall
proposal dated June 2 , 1977.
Staff - June 10, 1977
f ,
Copy of City Engineer' s report received today.
Council Meeting - June 13 , 1977
Henry Muhich also introduced a letter for the
record from Barr Engineering, which states :
(Continued)
�
�
, ' ' Page 13
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
CONSULTING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERS
� DOUGL/15 W.BARR 6E00 FRANCE AV ENUE SOUTH
)OMN D.OICNSOH MINNEAFOLIS,MINNESOTA 55�]S
L.R.MOLSATMER TELEPHONE�AREA612�920-0635
ALLANGEBHARD
LnwnENCE W.GUBBE
� LEONARD l_KREMER
DEMNIS E.�P.LMER
WARREN W.HANSON
June 8, 1977
Mr. Robert DeGregory
2713 Kelly Avenue
Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
Dear P4r. DeGregory:
On Thursday, June 2, at your request, I attended a meeting of your
neighborhood association for the purpose of reviewing the presentation cf
an aluminum sheeting system which has been proposed for rehabilitation of �
the boat lagoon shared by the members of the association. The purpose of
� the letter is to review the information presented at that meeting and to
transmit the conclusions and recommendations which can be drawn from that
information.
� The proposed system consists of aluminum sheeting which would be driven
into the bottom of the lagoon on the water side of the existing timber retain-
ing wall. The sheeting would be tied back to anchors consisting of aluminum
sheets buried in the bank of the lagoon. The anchors would be coupled to the
sheeting by means of aluminum tie rods which would pass through slots cut in
the existing timber sheeting.
The presentation of the aluminum sheeting system was conducted by
Mr. Robert Trees, a representative of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc.
Mr. Trees' presentation included many slides depicting similar aluminum
� sheeting systems which have been installed in other states. The slides illus-
trated several techniques which have been successfully used for installation
� of the sheeting and the finished appearance of the aluminum system at num-
erous sites. Mr. Trees also had several brochures describing the system
� and the computer program used by Kaiser for the design of the system.
Apparently, Braun Engineering and Testing, Inc. were retained to make
four soil borings in the vicinity of the lagoon to explore the subsurface
conditions and determine the soil properties to be utilized in the design
of the system. Mr. Trees indicated that the four borings were carried to a
depth of approximately 4-1/2 feet and that the soils at this depth consisted
of silty clays with shear strengths ranging from 300 pounds per square foot
to an excess of 800 pounds per square foot. The information obtained from
the soil borings was apparently phoned into the office of Kaiser Aluminum
& Chemical Sales, Inc. where it was utilized for the computerized design of
the sheeting system presented by Mr. Trees. Mr. Trees made copies of the
computer output available for review.
�
�
� ' Mr. Robert DeGregory Page 14
Page 2
� June 8, 1977
�� Based on the information presented on the evening of June 2 by Mr. Trees
and members of the association, I believe that there are several questions
� concerning the adequacy of the proposed aluminum sheeting system which have
not been satisfactorily answered. I also believe the design of the sheeting
� system which was presented would not be considered adequate by the current
standards of the engineerir�g profession. Specific questions and areas of
� uncertainty are as follows:
� l. The soil borings were not carried sufficiently deep to
• adequately explore the subsurface conditions. In this instance
soil borings should be carried to a depth of at least 5 feet �
� below the anticipated bottom of the sheeting. �
� 2. The angle of internal friction apparently used in the com-
puterized design was 28.5 degrees whereas the angle of
f internal friction for silty-clays or clayey-silts is nor-
• mally in the range of 15 degrees to 20 degrees. The angle ,
of internal friction may be higher than 20 degrees if suf-
• ficient sand is present in the soil. In any event, the
shear strength and cohesion of representative samples of i
� the soils should be verified by laboratory tests in order
to provide information which is adequate for the purpose
� of design.
� 3. Mr. Ellis has stated that the existing timber retaining
� walls in some portions of the lagoon are displaced upward
from 2 inches to 4 inches per year by frost action. I have
+ not been able to formulate a theory that would explain the
reason for this phenomenon, however, if Mr. Ellis' state- ;
� ment is accurate, the proposed aluminum system would prob- !
ably also be subjected to the same type of displacement. �
�
In addition to the points enumerated in the preceding paragraph, there i
� is also a question regarding the warranty of the system. Mr. Trees stated i
• that Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. would warranty their design only 4
for a period of one year. However, I beleive that under the laws of the
� State of Minnesota, it is required that the plans for a project of this
nature must bear the signature of a registered professional engineer who
� certifies that the design was prepared by him or under his direct super-
vision. By certifying the design, the engineer assumes responsibility and
� can be held liab�e for errors and ommissions in the design. At this time,
• there is no statute of limitation regarding the desinger's liability. If
my interpretation of the state law is correct, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical
• Sales, Inc. as the designer of the aluminum sheeting system must provide
plans certified by a professional engineer registered in Minnesota and
� would, therefore, be unable to limit their liability for the design of the
system to a period of one year.
�
I hope that this letter is of some assistance to you and that you will �
� contact me if I can be of any additional service to you.
� Sincerely,
• � ,� , ���
_��.�_��� � �
• �
Lawrence W. Gubbe
� LWG/mb
�
• RFGULAR MEETING OF THE OROPdO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 15
� idr. Greg Frank, City Engineer, commented on the WALTER' S PORT SEAWALL
three specific questions and areas of concerns (Continued)
� noted in the Barr Engineering Report, stating that:
� l. Mr. Frank felt that extra depth for borings were
• unnecessary.
� 2. Mr. Frank felt that lesser angle of friction
is satisfactory.
•
3. No comments.
�
• I�Ir. Rudy Hartmann, 2703 Kelly Avenue , commented
that we, the Homeowners Association, are proposing
� a plan 60o greater in strength than wood.
� Mr. Scotty Ellis , 2701 Kelly Avenue, has stated
that riprap is cheaper and more adaptable than
� aluminum sheeting. Mr. Rudy Hartmann also commented
that we have eliminated sheeting and dredging on ,
� l�ir. Ellis ' property and the total plan has been
• approved by the Homeowners Association 8 out of 10.
� Mr. Ellis stated that the Homeowners Association has
a proposal of $35. 00-$70 . 00/ton for riprap not
� $120. 00/ton as implied by Mr. Hartmann.
� riayor Van Nest: 6Vas the Homeowners Association
• aware of this?
• P-9e. Ellis: Yes.
� Mayor Van Nest: The Council is here to review
an application and not to interfere with public
� rights. The present proposal is to maintain
what does exist.
•
• Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve the
application for Walter' s Port, subject to:
� l. Update agreement
� 2. Provide safety lifeline
3. Verify west side as it exists today stipulating
� that there will be no changes�
4. Proper anchorage of sheeting near the Hartmann
� residence
� 5. Engineer' s Certificate of approval
6. Hold Iiarmless Agreement
� 7. As per Planning Commission recommendations.
� Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
�
�
�
�
. RF:GtJLAR MEETI2IG OF TI3E ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 16
• Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
stated that the application for a variance of 4735 Tonka View Lane
�T. Kenneth Rud, 4735 Tonka View Lane, was tabled #253
at the May 23, 1977 Council meeting for further T. Kenneth Rud
• review.
� Staff - riay 26 , 1977
� Checked site again for reconsideration. If this
� were to be approved as two sites, it would be
difficult �� provide access for the lot on Block 4.
� Access onta _ County Road #19 would be extremely
hazardous because of the two blind curves and
� topography of the subject property. To provide an
i alternative access to Tonka View Lane would require
extensive filling and destruction of most of the
� foilage on the property. The existing elevation
of this lot is much higher than County Road #19 .
� Any added fill would only raise this drop-off to
County Road #19. The City has had seven drainage
� problems in the area before. We have just recently
• completed a storm drain project for this area.
Any added fill would probably change the direction
� of drainage.
� The City just recently denied requests of Mr. Doerfler
and 4Jaconia Homes for smaller building sites on the
� adjacent Block 2. Final determination on these
• requests was combination of lots for two building
sites only. Applicants agreed.
� Block 3,just west of Adams Street, has three
� structures. The old store building on combined
Lots 1 & 2, (4736 North Shore Drive) . This building
� permit was issued in 1954. A home on combined
Lots 7 & 8 (4784 North Shore Drive) . This building
• permit was issued in 1966. A home on combined Lots 3 & 4
• (4750 North Shore Drive) . This building permit was
issued in 1972 justified by staff as a legal building
� site because of a variance approved in 1966 . This , I feel,
was a case of misinterpretation by staff. Two more
� substandard sites are located on Block 3 - combined
Lots 5 & 6 and combined Lots 9 & 10.
�
Staff - June 8, 1977
�
� I would like to reaffirm the fact that this property
consists of two parcels under common ownership.
� Based on the Orono Comprehensive Plan, the City has
adopted a zoning ordinance to provide for the health,
� saiety and welfare of the public. Over development
in lakeshore residentially zoned districts would
� result in excessive hardcover and storm water runoff
�into the lake.
� (Continued)
�
�
�
• REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 17
� A reduction in this natural filtration would result VARIANCE
in pollution of Lake Minnetonka and ground water 4735 Tonka View Lane
�supply. (Continued)
� Our current zoning ordinance and the ordinance
• previously adopted in 1967 (Section 31. 201)
states that a lot of record is one under single
� separate ownership, not two adjoining lots in
corunon ownership.
�
Council Meeting - June 13 , 1977
�
Mr. P�Iuhich also displayed maps showing how other
� substandard lots in the area were combined to
• provide buildable lots. Mr. Pduhich also cornmented
that there are other lots in the area that could be
� combined to this proposed site to create a standard
buildable lot, which will protect storm water
� runoff and other environment concerns in the area.
� Mr.Haglund, representing Mr. Rud, commented that
the City has an obligation to allow Mr. Rud to
� build a house on a small lot, particularly when
� sewers are available and when small lots
predominate. This proposal is not a threat to
� safety, health and welfare of the public. The
City is over-turning prior Council action and is
� denying low income housing. There is no factual
�asis for the Zoning Aciministrator' s recommendations.
�
• Mayor Van P1est commented that denser development
will create other watershed problems. There is
� documented rationale for the present zoning and
City policy is not to allow development on sub-
� standard lots or to create within a division sub-
standard lots. These particular lots were platted
� many years ago and the zoning has changed as has
• many other requirements which are in the public
interest and cannot be ignored. Other properties
� in the past have been combined and in the past,
assessments have been abated to provide one buildable
� lot.
� Mr. Rud was asked: when did he purchase the property?
� Pdr. Rud: Not sure of definite date.
� I�Iayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to table the
� request of T. Kenneth Rud, 4735 Tonka View Lane,
until the meeting of June 27, 1977 to allow staff
� tine to review previous Council actions and common
ownership status. P�lotion, Ayes (4) - P1ays (0) .
�
�
�
i
•
�
• RE�GULAFZP•ZEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 18
a Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #793
Resolution #793, A Resolution Denying Lot Area And 2237 Shadywood Road
�Width Variance For Robert Johnson For Property Denial
Jorthwest And Adjacent To The Property Located At
� 2237 Shadywood Road, (Plat 43620 - Parcel 8200) .
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
� Mr. Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney, stated that VICTORIA GRAIN COMPANY
� Mr. John Hacking, attorney for Victoria Grain 500 North Arm Drive
Company, has informed him that his client has #200
� several concerns related to the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District' s moratoriurn and the proposed
� City' s resolution and would want time to respond
• by letter to the City and has requested that this
matter be tabled until June 27 , 1977.
�
r4ayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to table
� the request oi Victoria Grain Company, 500 North
Arm Drive, until the meeting of June 27, 1977.
� Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
• Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to table the proposed PROPOSED SKI ORDINANCE
Ski Ordinance until the meeting of June 27, 1977.
�
� ��enry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA
�tated that the site of the North Shore Drive 3220 North Shore Drive
� P�arina was investigated on complaint from #235
� neighbors regarding some evidence of construction. Larry Hork
Found it to be on canopies of some of the docks.
•
Later in the day some grading was being done. Alan
� Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning Administrator,
will be checking site to inquire if this was for
� erecting of the ,controversial storage racks.
• Mr. Hork will be instructed to delay construction
until Council makes a determination on the use
� of this type of storage.
� Staff - June 2, 1977
� Received complaint from parties that North Shore
Drive idarina might be proceeding with the erection
� of storage racks evidenced by some excavation
� which appeared to be for footings for these
proposed boat racks.
�
Mr. Olson made site investigation and inquired
� if these borings were for the purpose of footings
for boat racks. A4r. Hork assured Mr. Olson he
f would not proceed with erecting racks without
` 'ity approval. Mr. Olson followed with a letter
of confirmation dated June 6, 1977. On Monday
� morning, June 6, 1977, 2dr. Olson reported the
footings had been poured over the weekend. (Continued)
�
�
s
• REGULAR �MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 19
� If these proposed racks will, in any way, increase NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA
the non-conforming use of boat storage, I believe (Continued)
� should be denied. No application, as yet,
s been filed for a variance from the non-
� conforr�zing expansion limitation.
� If these racks would exceed 15 ' in storage height,
� an application for a variance from this requirement
would also be necessary.
�
Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
�
Mr. Bruce Douglas , attorney representing Mr. Larry
� Hork, owner of North Shore Marina, stated that he ;
� and his client were not present at the previous
Council meeting because they were not notified in
� advance. They received a letter from the City
the day following the Council meeting.
�
Mr. Douglas read into the record the attached
� letter dated June 13, 1977 :
M Letter Pages 20-23
• Mayor Van Nest: You speak of a 300 boat maximum.
� What type are you referring to?
� -"r. Douglas : There is a substantial mix of boats.
� do not want to be unduly restricted to the
� type of boats. A 300 maximum as a representation
� of all boats is a proper mix. A 300 boat maximum �
is what we feel to be comparable to other marinas.
� Number of boats and number of slips is what we
are talking about.
r
. Mayor Van Nest: What is an average size boat?
� Mr. Hork: 8 ' X 18 ' . Mr. Hork also �ommented
that at no one time could we realistically
� store 300 boats.
� Mr. Bruce Malkerson, City Attorney, asked Mr. Hork
if we understand one another, there will not
� be over 95 leased spaces, dry or wet? ,
� Mr. Hork: That is correct. The balance would be
� boats for sale or rent, etc. Mr. Hork also commented
that P�Ir. Ron Harnack, of the DNR, does recommend
� dry stack storage and he will forward a letter
to the City commenting on this. (Continued)
�
�
f
�
�
�
�
�- --- ' • Page 20
Dou���s, J���co�,Tr���-icx. T1cMA�Tvs & LIPI'EBT
• ERUCE C.DO'JGLAS .l'1-l��iYJ1i�) �Cf��fl/" -
� JACK S.JAYCOX '
LEON A.TRAWICK 247 THIRD AVENUE SOUTM
THOMAS P.MCMANUS MINNEAPOL�S,MINNESOTA55415
• LEANDER G.LIPPERT -
AAEu.CODE 612
TE�EPriONE 339-�a9a6
• THOMAS I.HARA -
5 i E V E N C.A H�G R E N
, J.I.MORELAND�JR.
MARY D.HELGERSON
• JAMES C• PETERSON
lR15TAM O.HAGE � �
� Dt�r�IEL J.GOLDBERG
� June 13 , 1977
i
i �
T17e �onora;�le �-lembers of the
� City Council of Orono , i�4innesota
� Re : North Shore Drive Marina
• Dear P�r. Mayor and Council i•Iembers :
�
There ap�ear to be several misunderstandings resulting from
� communications with your body and its counsel , which I believe
+ can and should be clariFied at this time .
. l . i��ty client was led to believe that no building permit
would be required for the installation of dry-stack storage
� units at North Shore Drive .�arina. Without regard to whet?�er
this belief was caused by a city employee, by my client, or
� by the totality of circumstances, the fact remains that the belief
was indeed formed and subsequently acted upon.
�
• 2 . Based upon the foregoing belief, my client purcnased
two tizree-tiered storage racks at a cost of $34 , 000. 00 and
� expended $46 , 0OO. OD for equipment to utilize these storage
racks, for a total of $80, 000. 00. T�ese units have b`en paid
� for, delivered, and are awaiting asser,lbly.
� 3 . Tne units are of inetal construction and are easily
assembled and disasse�bled. The rnaximum dimension of each unit
� is as follows :
� H: 25 '
� W: 14 '
L: l0u '
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� Page 21
� Page Two
rlembers of the City Council
� Re : IJorth Shore Drive Nlarina
June 13 , 1977
�
�
� Th2 units can be asseinbled as two-tiered units , in which case the
height would be 18 ' instead of that set forth above. I•1y
� client is willing to erect two-tiered units as we have been told that
this is desired by you, as opposed to three-tiered units
� originally planned. The installation of an optional roof-type
• covering would add 7 ' to either such unit.
� 4 . These units can be erected as individual free-standing
racks and should be placed on small concrete footings to assure
� long-term stability. -•
� 5 . A cross-sectioned topographical :nap of the Marina property
�aould a�pear as a concave arc extending from the surface of
� North Shore Drive Road down to the main level of the marina
• property some 4 ' above the lake level. riy client is willing to locate
the dry stack units as far away from the lake as is functionally
� possible and to recess them into the upper end of the concave
are so that the tops of such units will be substantially lower
� than the roadway surface. In addition, my client is willing to
install at his own eapense appro�riate shrubbery along three
� sides of each unit so as to shield the units from view by users
• of the roadway and from any abutting homeowners. The
objective �ere is to make the dry stack units as unobtrusive as possible
� to the aesthetic quality of the area.
� 6 . My client is presently authorized to have 98 rental dock.
slips in the lake , which he has. He has 5 service boats in
� slips. In addition, he has 36 boats for sale on the i�larina
property. We are not here concerned with the number of boats
� in the water, except to the extent that my client is willing
� to remove from the water 20 of the 98 rental dock slips in
conjunction with his installation of dry stacks. While this
� body does , in �art, by licensing, regulate the number of slips
that my client has, a reduction in the number of water rental
� slips, as proposed, seems consistent with this political
subdivision ' s verbalized policy of reducing the number of boats
� actually resting in the water, as ��ell as the LMCD' s desire
• to remove boats not in actual use from the lake as notential
pollution sources .
� 7 . �y client has a lawful right to reasonable use of his
+ marina property as a commercial business . Presently, boats are
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
! ' Page 22
Page Three
� Members of the City Council
Re : iJorth Shore Drive Marina
� June 13 , 1977
�
� stored all over the property. This is �erfectly legal , although
� we believe, not desirable . He desires to place these boats
in proposed dry stack storage units which clearly will
� contribute to improved aesthetic quality in the area. This
alone does not increase the number of boats actually on the
w property. ,
� 8 . Under your existing ordinances my client may, if ne so
` desires, substantially increase the number of� boats presently
on the property. The exact num�er of boats he could put on the
� surface level of the property (probably in excess of 3'00) would
appear to be limited only by existing parking, set back and
, neight requirements. He has no desire to simply start
increasing the number of boats which could be placed on the
� ground surface, but rather, to establish a neat and attractive
storage system in the event more boats are acquired for retail
� sales.
� 9 . Adjacent marina operators have upwards of 250 to
� 300 boats stored on their respective properties, over and above �
boats located in slips on tne water. i�Iy client desires to I
� remain in competition with these other marinas and tizus, is not
willing to agree to an unreasonable limit on the total number of
� boats allowe3 on land at his marina. iae believe that a figure of
• 3�0 boats on land at any one time , winter or summer, would be
a fair and reasonable limit. This would assure the Council
� that it is not my client ' s intention to "cube" his �roperty
so as to place more than 300 �oats on it. He could �lac2
� ap�roximately that many on land now; hence, we are not asking
for an increase, merely for approval of an alternative method
� of utilizing presently existing capacity. Without such
+ approval , my client will merely be forced to spread boats all ',
over, just as his com�etitors have done.
� 10. Time is of the essence. The su:luner boating season is
� here . Substantial economic loss will occur unless my elient
is able to utilize the dry stack units and loading equipr:lent
� already ourchased. If not permitted to use these units, a
substantial sprawl will occur on this property as other boats ;
� are placed in inventory by my client . Pollution will continue
• to increase in the lake, rather than diminish. No good can come
of furthe r delay in reaching a decision by this body.
�
� .
s
�
•
•
• �
�
�
Page 23
� Page Four
� ilerzbers of the City Council
Re: North �hore Drive i�arina
� June 13, 1977
�
� If we cannot outain your L�ermission now based upon reason, logic
• and public policy, then my client will be forced to take
legal action to protect his interests . Legal action will not
• solve all the problems ; we recognize that. It wil.l be expensive
for the city and for my client. We cannot , however, merely sit
� back and a���ait an apnarently arbitrary decisional process
ti�at appears headed toward no decision whatsoever. We have
� tried to communicate effectively wit;� you. You, on the other
hand, nave told us we must dismiss our rezoning lawsuit and
+ must not have more than 95 bdats on land or in the water;
• tnese dernands are arbitrary, capricious , unfair and unreasonable.
You know it and so do we . s,ae 've even offered to put in one
� unit on an experimental basis to let you see wl�at it looks like �
and 'now it functions. Just exactly what more cio you want?
�
If we do not receive your permission now, I must assume that you
� simply wish to prevent any increase in the number of boats at
. my client ' s plac2 of business. If that is the case , then
neitner logic nor public policy can ap�arently convince you;
� and I will not take u� rlore of your time . If, on the other
hand, you can advise us as to what other specific infornation
� you need in ord2r to make an intelligent, reasoned and informed
decision, then my client and I await your request.
�
Thank you for your attention to these matters.
�
• Very truly yours,
• DOUGL�S, JAYCOX TRAWICK, i4Ci�`�ANUS & LIPPERT
• / , � � >
, .
� ,
,
, �, -�-�.
� _ , , . _ , -
,- ;- -__ _� _ _ _-;
Bruce C. Douglas �
� �
• BCD/aw ��4
�
�
�
�
s
•
�
•
•
�
• REGULA2 MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 24
� Mayor Van Nest commented that the total boat NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA
count should not exceed 110 until a formula can
(Continued)
�be de vised to relate boat size to square area
and number of boats to be stored and also a 15 '
� height limit.
� Mr. Hork replied that we would agree to a limit
• of 150 boats.
� Mayor Van Nest stated that the limitation should
be 130 boats of any type, 95 of which may be in
� the water.
� P�Iayor Van Nest noted several concerns of the City
• which are contrary to Orono' s Comprehensive Guide
Plan, they are :
� l. Exceeds 15 ' in height - limitation of zoning code.
, 2. Extension of legal non-conforming use.
3. Adverse to Comprehensive Plan.
� 4. Promotion of commercial use in a residential zone. �
5. Result in diminution in value to surrounding
� homes because of visual impact, additional
traffic noise.
� 6. Structures proposed and the footings already in
• the ground, reguire building permit and variance.
7. No application for a variance applied for.
• 8. � Result in introduction of additional boats into
congested bay. Applicant is just trying to
� increase number of boats to be placed in the
lake, resulting in an unreasonable use of the
� limited riparian rights and resulting in the
restriction and impairment of the riparian
� rights of all other properties along the bay.
S 9. Racks are authentically unacceptable in a
commercial or residential use district.
� 10. Inadequate screening of racks. Result in
congestion on premises.
� 11. Result in promotion of more traffic from a curb-
cut on the County Road near an already dangerous
� curve in the road.
� Mayor Van Nest continued by stating that the City
has to identify and maintain control factors.
� Marinas and their operations lend to hardcover and
pollution of Lake Minnetonka. Density promotes
� environmental concerns.
� Mr. Hork replied that he has owned the property for
26 years but felt that this would not enhance the
� area by utilizing this density and decided not to
• create this type of environment impact.
Mayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to request
� �pplicant and staff to draft an agreement to provide
plan for parking, slips, boat storage and utilizing
� the lagoon for ponding. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
r
�
r
• REG�ULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 25
� Mayor Van Nest moved, Pesek seconded, to table NORTH STAR MARINA
the request of North Star Marina, 3222 North Shore 3222 North Shore Drive
��lve, until the applicant is present and more #242
�Information is available. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
a
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
� read into the record the request of Engner 360 North Arm Lane
Johnson, 360 North Arm Lane, for a preliminary #258
� subdivision, as follows : Engner Johnson
� April 27, 1977
� This is a proposal to divide the six-acre parcel
• resulting from the subdivision of 10 acres approved
by Council on November 19, 1975. At the time this
� was' approved, we also approved a variance of 29 ' from
the width requirement on the south lot because of
� a natural tree boundary.
� We failed to provide an easement for possible
• future widening of North Arm Lane. The original
plat shows North Arm Lane to be 33 ' wide. This,
i of course, is a result of incomplete data indicated
on the plans. I believe we all took this as a
� half of a 66 ' right of way. Our new ordinance will
provide for this.
�is plan is preliminary only. It indicates minimum
� two acres on each lot. I believe some revisions
S will be necessary however.
� We should provide an easement for North Arm Lane
which is a public road. We usually require 60 '
width for public roads. We could provide similar
easements on properties along North Arm Lane as they
� are subdivided so we can eventually have adequate
• width for a road and utilities.
� The private road shown on the plan is only 33 ' wide.
Although this road provides access for only one
� lot, I wonder if we shouldti' t require 50 ' as we
do on all private roads. If we do require these
� additional widths, the dimensions of the proposed
lots would change in order to provide the necessary
� minimum 2-acre area.
� The larger lot consists of some wetlands and also
� includes the same channel that runs through the
Victoria Grain property. I do not have the area of
� the wetlands. The channel is an issue we must
consider again. We should stipulate that only the
�ne lot has riparian rights and only if the channel
• � determined navigable and part of the lake. (Continued)
�
�
�
REGTJLAR 'MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 26
� Mr. Johnson has subMitted a copy of the 1968 State SUBDIVISION
permit for dredging. Is this channel legal? The 360 North Arm Lane
�rmit indicates the dredging permit was conditioned (Continued)
approval of all other riparian owners. Up until
� now, everyone has indicated to me that Mr. Boeye
(previous owner of Victoria Grain Property) never
agreed to this dredging, The cover letter of the
• permit application also indicates a requirement of
notification before commencing with dredging. I
� have no document confirming this inspection or
investigation.
�
No park dedication fee was ever collected on the
� previous subdivision of the property back in
November of 1975. Records indicate the park
� dedication fee was waived until we amended this
• ordinance. The previous subdivision was up for
action the same time the A1 «hitman subdivision
� proposal was up for approval. We waived the fee
until we would be able to determine a satisfactory
� formula. This proposal should, therefore, be
assessed a park dedication fee for all th��� lots
that have resulted from the two subdivisions.
The raw land value of the total 10 acres is $16 , 700 �
� (this is less than twice the value of my 1/2 acre
non-riparian lot on Forest Lake Drive although it
is 27 times larger) . The park dedication fee for
�ubdivision will be $750 ($250 per lot for 3 lots) .
Public Hearing scheduled for June 6 , 1977
Public Hearing - June 6, 1977
� Heard from the applicant and the attorney of Mr. White
� who has property on the same channel running through
this lot. Mr. White was very concerned about allowing
� any additional dock rights or dredging on the channel.
� Mr. Johnson said that he has a dock off the channel
now and would like to use it for a new house on
� the eastern parcel. He was concerned with the
� required access width to the eastern lot and was
told that this should be at least 30 ' wide.
� Commission addressed the need to have North Arm
Lane conform to miminum public street right of
r way width of 50 ` through acquisition of 17' additional.
Planning Commission noted that no park dedication fee
� had been paid on this subdivision from last year.
� Recommended approval subject to:
�
l. Each parcel at least 200 ' wide and 2 acres in size.
�. Access to east parcel at least 30 ' in width.
Dedication of 17 ' additional right of way along
North Arm Lane (or applicant' s ability to negotiate
• with the neighbor across the street so that the
additional right of way would be requirements
w�ich can be shared by all affected properties) o (Continued)
�
REGULAR �MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 27
4 . No more than one lot to have dock rights on the SUBDIVISION
channel, and then only subject to any future 360 North Arm Lane
finding that the channel was navigable. (Continued)
�. Septic system testing on the eastern parcel.
6. Payment of a park dedication fee.
. 7. Conservation easement.
� Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
� �esek moved, Butler seconded, to approve the
preliminary subdivision for Engner Johnson, 360
North Arm Lane, per the Planning Commission
recommendations of June 6 , 1977. Motion,
� Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
read into the record the following preliminary 2640 North Shore Drive
� subdivision request of Sheldon Jacobs 2640 North 1200 Old Crystal Bay Rd.
Shore Drive and 315 East Grant Corporation, 1200 #261 .
� Old Crystal Bay Road, dated May 11, 1977: Sheldon Jacobs
315 East Grant Corporation is requesting a resub-
� division of properties located on the northeast
corner of the intersection of County Roads 51 & 84.
The land is presently divided into two parcels,
each containing one residence. One existing parcel
approximately 25 acres , the other is less that
e required 2 acres. The proposed division would
result in three parcels, each of which appears to
• meet all of the zoning requirements.
� Tract A: 18 acres less wetlands ; included one
existing residence which would meet all
� setback requirements.
� Tract B: 2. 99 acres (dry) containing the remains
. on one old outbilding.
� Tract C: 5. 9 acres less wetlands; includes one
existing residence and several outbuildings.
All setbacks would be met except for one
outbuilding which straddles the proposed
� lot line between Tracts B & C.
Consideration should be given to requiring removal
• of the outbuilding straddling the proposed lot line
and the remains of the outbuilding on Tract B prior
to final subdivision approval. Accomplishing this
would make the proposal conform to all setback
� and asseccory building requirements.
' ��'� should request a site evaluation for septic system
�stallation and County access approval for Tract B.
A public hearing has been scheduled for June 6 , 1977.
(Continued)
�
REGL7LAR �iEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 28
Staff - May 13, 1977 SUBDIVISION
2640 North Shore Drive
�ceived letter from applicant' s engineer with the 1200 Old Crystal Bay Rd.
y buildable area calculated for each lot: (Continued)
Tract A: 18. 09 acres; 6. 22 acres wet, 11. 87 acres dry
Tract B: 2. 99 acres dry
Tract C: 5. 9 acres; 0. 2 acres wet, 5. 5 acres dry
�Staff - June 3, 1977 _
Staff received letter from Hennepin County Highway �
Department approving of the existing accesses plus
one new access to Tract B.
Planning Commission P�Ieeting - June 6, 1977
Public Hearing. Heard comments from the applicants,
�two neighbors and a Park Reserve representative.
General concern about the development potential of .
S the property, but also general acceptance of the
proposal at hand. Park Reserve concern was basically
one of encouraging minimal development along
Highway #84 frontage. There was a question about
the assessment and service of sewer to the property,
especially for any future home on Tract B. The
owner intends to have the dividing line between
�acts B & C relocated to avoid cutting the shed,
d the outbuilding remains on Tract B to be removed.
Planning Commission recommended approval of the
preliminary subdivision subject to:
�l. Moving of the dividing line between Tracts B & C.
2. Removal of the building remains on Tract B prior
to final plat.
�3. County access approval to Tract B.
4. No new access points to Tracts A or C.
5. Septic system evaluation on Tract B if the
applicant chooses not to connect to the sewer.
�6 . Payment of a park dedication fee (min. 3 lots =
$750. 00) .
Staff - June 8, 1977
Property abutting Old Crystal Bay Road is served
with sewer laterals and has been assessed for
sewer service. Therefore, it would seem that any
new construction on Tract B would have to connect
to the sewer rather than use a septic system.
�
(Continued)
RE�ULAR' MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 29
Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve SUBDIVISION
the preliminary subdivision for Sheldon Jacobs, 2640 North Shore Drive
�640 North Shore Drive, and 315 East Grant 1200 Old Crystal Bay Rd.
orporation, 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road, per the (Continued)
Planning Commission recommendations of June 6, 1977,
and also the following conditions :
1. 20 ' wide easement on eastern edge of property.
2. Conservation flow easement elevation 932.00.
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
read into the record the following request of 2967 Casco Point Road
Hamilton Moran, 2967 Casco Point Road, for front #259
and side setback variances, dated May 11, 1977: Hamilton Moran
� Variance request to construct a new detached garage
for this property. The existing home has no garage ,
at present. The variance required for the front
setback is technical only because the proposed
building is setback approximately 60 ' from the
actual travelled roadway. The legal setback is
from the platted right of way. The applicant
� has included a letter of consent from that
adjacent property owner affected by the side set-
�ack variance.
A variance from the accessory building setback may
require special fire protective construction
according to building code requirements.
Variances required:
31. 370 Setback from residence: required - 10 ' ;
� proposal - 52' ; variance - 45�
' 31. 552 LR-1C Zone: Front Setback: required - 30 ' ;
proposed - 7' ; variance - 770
' Side Setback: Required - 10 ' ; proposed - 7' ;
variance - 300
Hardships : Location close to the side property line
allows turning radius from driveway into the garage.
Location close to house is to avoid removing an 18"
diameter Norway Pine tree. Location across driveway
would require extensive excavation of a hill.
Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 1977
Recommended approval due to hardships mentioned above.
Took note of the applicant' s future intention to
��ibdivide the existing single lot which has contained
�o residences since the 1930 ' s. (Continued)
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 30
^ouncil Meeting - June 13, 1977 VARIANCES
2967 Casco Point Road
��or Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve (Continued)
variance requests of Hamilton Moran, 2967 Casco
?oint Road, per the Planning Commission recommendations
of June 6 , 1977. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
fienry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, read DIVISION
�nto the record the following action of the City 140 Brown Road South
Council regarding the preliminary subdivision for #243
James Kallestad, 140 Brown Road South, dated James Kallestad
April 25, 1977:
'�pproved preliminary plat and variance subject to
10 ' road easement along north property line and
�ark dedication fee and final mylars and hardshells.
�lanning Commission P�Ieeting - June 8, 1977
teviewed final plat drawings which included the
requested access easement along the north property
line. Recommended approval subject to payment
�f the park dedication fee, and title opinion
sent to the City.
Council Meeting - June 13 , 1977
�ek moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #794
,r794 , A Resolution Approving Kallestad Acres , Kallestad Acres '
-�er Planning Commission recommendations of June 8, 140 Brown Road South
1977. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
;
ienry biuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, read VARIANCE
into the record the following request of John 920 Forest Arms Lane
�ullickson, 920 Forest Arms Lane, for a variance, #250
�ated April 2, 1977 John Gullickson
'2equest for lot area variance to build a new home. �
Area requirement - 43, 560 sq. ft. This lot is only
'_9 , 500 sq. ft. in area. A variance of slightly over
24, 000 sq. ft. is necessary.
There is somewhat a problem here. we have three
�acant lots right in a row. This lot is the middle
�ne so we have one substandard lot on either side
�f this one. Each of the three lots is slightly
',ess than 1/2 the required area. To combine the
three lots as one buildable site would result in
:wo lots of about l4 acres. We might consider �
having the three lots rearranged into two building
.�= '-es if we can.
� (Continued)
i
�
� REt�ULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 31
� The three lots (1, 2, & 3) are owned by three separate VARIANCE
parties : 920 Forest Arms Lane
�ot 1 - Gordon Thompson �Continued)
� Lot 2 - John Gullickson
� Lot 3 - Carol Dongoske
� The property across the street consists of only three
building sites. Lot 2 of Block 2 also has the
� center of Lot 5 of Block 2 combined with it. This
appears to be some sort of access to the City lake-
� shore park across from Forest Lake Drive. I hope
• this does not consist of some sort of a private
covenant for lake access for all these lots.
� The lot (Lot 2) has been assessed for sewer as
� follows: Lateral - $1, 131, one unit - $1, 270 and
one deferred unit charge of $225 to be collected
� with issuance of a building permit. It seems this
• was considered a legal building site at the time .
the assessments were distributed. Once again,
� the tube in the ground has determined the zoning.
� Staff - April 29 , 1977
• The prospective buyer of Lot 1 has the same name
as the owner of Lot 2. They are father and son.
�he sewer data I listed above is for the wrong lot.
• t is for Lot 2 and the lot in question is Lot l.
The sewer assessment status of the subject lot is
+ as follows:
� Assessed:
� Interceptor - Levy #3302 - $110/acre X 0 . 44 acres = $ 48 . 40
Lateral - Levy #5382 - $7. 80/ft. X 165 ft. _ $1287. 00
� Unit - Plus one unit = 1270. 00
� #5382 Total $2557. 00
� _
� Ctirrent Status: "
� Total Annual Years Total Balance
, Assessed Payments Paid Paid �e
� Levy z 3302 $ 48.40 $ 3.23 12
� _ $ 38.76 $ 9.64
Levy �5382 2557.00 182.64 6 1095.84 1461.16
�
Due with building peimit - �225 hool,�up.
� Tax es are delinquent for year 1976.
�
�
(Continued)
�
�
�
�
• REG�ULAR' MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 32
� Planning Commission Meeting - May 2 , 1977 VARIANCE
ordon Thompson, current owner and seller of Lot l, 920 Forest Arms Lane
(Continued)
as present. John Gullickson, Jr. , prospective
• purchaser, was not present.
� Planning Commission suggested rearrangement of
� three vacant lots for two building sites as all
three lots are substandard and all have additional
� land available. Mr. Thompson objected. Said he
purchased lot as building site and was assessed
� for sewer.
� Planning Commission informed Mr. Thompson that one
unit might be waived if only two building sites
� resulted from rearrangement. Suggested property
� owners try to resolve problem as all three sites
are non-conforming and unbuildable. Tabled for
� revised proposal.
• Staff - May 4, 1977
� I have not been able to find anything in the records
� regarding any projected future utility assessments
as he informed us at the last Planning Commission
S meeting. Maybe he has some data to confirm his
assumption.
�anning Commission Meeting - May 16 , 1977
+
� Applicant not present. Item tabled.
� Council Meeting - r4ay 23 , 1977
� Directed staff research records for more data.
• Staff - May 26 , 1977
� I have been reviewing the records from the original
� subdivision proposal. The Council approved this
plat in 1958. It appears two lots were dedicated
� for park purposes so no park dedication fee would
be forthcoming with the building permit issuance.
�
Staff - June 3, 1977
�
Enclosed is a copy of the history of property owners
� of Lots l, 2 , & 3. It appears they were all under
� single separate ownership since 1967. I have asked
Mr. Gullickson for one other document - that is the
� current purchase agreement with Pir. Thompson. I
would like to know who the prospective purchaser is.
� TS it 11r. Gullickson, Sr. or i�ir. Gullickson, Jr. , or
� ,ckford Automotive & Construction, Inc. ?
(Continued)
�
�
�
�
� Rr,GULAR PdEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 33
� Planning Commission P�Zeeting - June 6 , 1977 VARIANCE
920 Forest Arms Lane
� Persons present were John Gullickson, Sr. , (Continued)
Gordon Thompson and attorney Roy Haglund. In
� discussion, Gullickson, Sr, stated that he
wanted a decision on the buildability of his
� Lot 2 . He also stated that Gullickson, Jr, had
� "dropped out" of the application. Gordon Thompson
said that he wanted to take over the application
� on Lot l, but that the application before the
Conmission was not his. Planning Commission
� advised these persons to make official application
to the City with the required documents before
� the Commission would discuss their situation.
` Planning Commission tabled the application of
, John Gullickson, Jr, for two weeks for hirn to
appear with a purchase agreement for Lot 1
� sliowing his legal interest therein.
� End of inemos
�
• I�enry I�luhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, RIPRAP PERMIT
read into the record the following information 722 Tonkawa Road
� ior Paul Mason, 722 Tonkawa Road, for riprap: �262
Paul ?�tason
� This property has an existing deteriorated wood
seawall in front of the large trees along the
w south end of the shoreline and has some concrete
` debris , or no protection at all, along the
remainder of the shore. The proposed riprap
� would replace the wood wall and would allow
cleaning up of the existing debris. The riprap
� would protect the existing trees and the badly
eroding shoreline. The application has been
� sent to the City Engineer for his comments.
� Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 19777
� Recommended approval pursuant to engineer' s
� report and due to extreme erosion on the property,
subject to using the standard 12" minimum rock
� riprap on the base and subject to the approval
of the other agencies.
�
, Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
� Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the
riprap permit for Paul Mason, 722 Tonkawa Road,
� per the Planning Commission recommendations
of June 6 , 1977, Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
�
�
f
�
� I'tEGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 34
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
read into the record the following variance 1442 Park Drive
� request of George Schultz, 1442 Park Drive, #263
dated May 11, 1977 George Schultz
r
• Variance request to permit addition of additional
living area to an existing home. The applicant
� also proposes to remove an existing garage
which does not meet the sideyard setback and to
� replace this with a structure which does conform.
The new addition is proposed with a plan which
� will allow conformance to the setbacks.
� Variances Required:
S 34. 452 LR-1B Zone
� Lot Area: Required - 1 acre; existing approx.
14 , 000 sq. ft. - variance - 68%
�
Lot Width: Required - 140 ' ; existing - 100 ' ;
� variance - 290
! Front Setback: Required - 35 ' ; existing - 25 ' ;
� variance - 29% - proposed - 35 ' ; conforming
* Hardships : no additional land available.
� Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 1977
� Recommended approval because no additional land
� available and addition has been designed to rneet
all required setbacks.
�
Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
�
Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the
� variance request of George Schultz, 1442 Park
� Drive, per the Planning Commission meeting of
June 6 , 1977. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
� F�enry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
read into the record the following request for 3120 Sixth Avenue North
• a conditional use permit of Harlan Strong, 3120 #265
Sixth Avenue North, for two animal units, dated Harlan Strong
� May 11, 1977 :
� Request for conditional use permit to keep two
� horses (animal units) on a 5-acre parcel. This
is part of the property which Cloutier recently
� subdivided for the Park Reserve acc�uisition.
Originally, the tract was divided into two lots
� of 4 . 14 acres and 7. 31 acres.
� (Continued)
�
�
�
�
• R�GULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUPJCIL, JNUE 13 , 1977 Page 35
� Although this property is located in a 2-acre zoning COPIDITIONAL USE PERMIT
district, Mr. Cloutier and the County revised the 3120 Sixth Avenue North
�division to meet our minimum 5-acre simple procedure (Continued)
method of subdividing land. The hashed portion of
� the enclosed map indicates this revision.
� Now to get back to Mr. Strong' s current request for
� a conditional use permit for two horses on 5 acres
of land. Our ordinance requires a minimum of three
a acres for one anirnal unit in a 2-acre zone and one
additional acre for each animal unit thereafter.
� The subject parcel of five acres would be large
enough for three animal units , so I see no problem
e here. I have suggested the applicant obtain
� statements of no objection from the imr,iediate
neighbors.
�
Thus far, Mr. Strong has not indicated whether or
` not his plans include a barn or stable. He has
been informed of the 150 ' minimum setback require-
� ment. He should be reminded again by the Planning
• Corimission so our minutes indicate he had been
instructed prior to any future plans of building
� such a structure.
� Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 1977
�Recor,unended approval of conditional use permit for
• two horses on five acres including use of existing
stable (barn) which does not meet the 150 ' setback
� requirement. Barn had been used for horses by
previous owners and sufficient fenced pasture is
� available. Permit is subject to review upon
receipt of any complaints from neighbors. P1ote:
� the Cloutier subdivision of this property has never
been finalized.
�
` Staff - June 8, 1977
+ Applicant called and requested Council to consider
approval for up to three horses or cattle all within
� the requirements of the applicable ordinance.
� Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
� Pesek moved, Butler seconded, to approve the
� conditional use permit for Iiarlan Strong, 3120
Sixth Avenue North, for three animal units,
� including use of existing stable. Motion, Ayes (4) -
I1ays (0) .
�
�
r
•
•
�
�
• REvULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 36
. Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
r_ead into the record the following request of 185 Bederwood
�andy Fredrickson, 185 Bederwood, for a variance, #268
ated May 11, 1977: Randy Fredrickson
�
• Variance request to permit addition of three bed-
rooms and an enlarged living room bay to an existing
w home. The contractor applied for a permit without
a survey. He was informed that a survey was
� required and a variance appeared likely. He
returned with a variance application May 10 , 1977,
� and within an hour, a subcontractor had called
for a footing inspection. Inspection was refused
�' and a STOP WORK ORDER was placed on the project.
• The excavation was already completed at that time
with no permit having been issued. �Should the
� variance be approved, the building permit will
be subject to the double fee penalty.
� _
� l'ariances required: ;
• 34.352 LR-lA Zone
� Lot Area: Required - 2 acres; existing - 28,000 sq, ft. ; variance - 68$
� Lot 1'�'idth: Required - 200' ; existing - 120' ; variance - 40$
Rear Setback: Required - 50' ; existing - 20' ; variance - 60$
� Front Setback: Requir�d - 50' ; ezisting to property line - 65' ; conforming
ezisting to roa�cay - 50' ; conforming
` �ropesed to property line - 60' ; co�forming
S proposed to roac�aay - 40' ; ��ariance - 20$
Ha n3ships: no additional land available: travelled access road nins through this lot.
•
� Planning Commission I�ieeting - May 16 , 1977
` Approved on work session because of hardships and
that addition would not require setback variances
� and because owner presented letter of approval
S from adjoining neighbors. Al1 neighbors will be
notified by City prior to Council meeting.
� Commission did question the functioning of the
septic system. Applicant said system was working
� without problems, but that he had no idea what kind
of system it is.
•
• Council Meeting - May 23, 19777
� Deferred action. Instructed applicant submit
necessary borings and design septic system to
� replace current defective system.
fter review and approval of septic design by
ity �ngineer and staff, application would be
brought to Council again for action.
* (Continued)
�
�
�
• REGULAR 2�IEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 37
� Council :�ieeting - June 13 , 1977 VARIANCE
185 Bederwood
� Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the (Continued)
variance for Randy Fredrickson, 185 Bederwood,
� subject to installation of new septic system as
• approved by City Engineer. P�Iotion, Ayes (4) -
Nays (0) .
�
� Henry P�iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator,
read into the record the following variance
• request of Dorotny Forcier, 4780 North Arm Drive
West, dated May 11, 1977 :
�
� Variance request to permit addition of an attached
garage and an enlarged entry area to an existing
� home.
� Variances Reqtiired: _
• �
31.410 Reduce existing confo nni_ng east side setback from the required s0'
• to 20' : variance - 33$
+ 34. 842 RR-1B Zone �
� Lot Area: Required - 2 acres; existing - 21,600 sq, ft. ; variance - 75$
� Lot Width: Required - 200' ; existing - 119' ; varinnce - 41$
Rear Setback: Reqt�ired - 50' ; ezisting - 41' ; ti�ariance - 18$
• Side Setback: Required - 30' ; proposed - 20' ; variance - s3$
� Hardships: no additional land available.
•
Planning Commission P�eeting - June 6 , 1977
�
Planning Conunission received copies of a Hunane
� Society Report including note of seemingly excess
� accumulation of debris on the property. The
applicant stated this proposal was partly meant
� to accomplish the task of cleaning up the premises.
Planning Commission felt that the variances
� required for the addition were reasonable, and
that by accomplishing the cleanup intent, the
� result would be an improvement to the neighborhood.
, Recommended approval subject to receiving a copy
of a signed contract wherein the contractor would
� be responsible for site cleanup.
i Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the
variance request of Dorothy Forcier, 4780 North
� Arm Drive West, per the Planning Commission
recommendations of June 6 , 1977. Motion, Ayes (4) -
Nays (0) .
�
i
•
�
R��GULAi2 MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUr1E 13 , 1977 Page 38
�
� Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to table FEE SCHEDULE
the Fee Schedule ordinance and resolution until
�he meeting of June 27, 1977. Motion, Ayes (4) -
ays (0) .
�
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, ZONITJG VARIANCE
• read into the record the following information PROCEDURES
concerning Zoning Variance Procedures:
�
Staff is recommending a revision of the procedure
� for reviewing zoning variance applications.
Proposed is a multi-level chain of authority
� designed to reduce delays for the applicant, to
• reduce Council and Planning Commission time
involvement on what have become routine matters so
� their time can be better spent on policy questions,
and to reduce staff time and cost involved in memo
� preparation. The proposal utilizes established
Council policy and professional staff judgment, yet
a retains checks and balances for citizen rights.
� Recommended is the establishment of a Zoning
+ Variance Board of Review to consist of two Planning
Commission members and one Council member. The
� Review Board will meet when requested by the
Zoning Administrator at times convenient to the
� Tnembers, No established meeting schedule is
�ontemplated.
�
� l. The Zoning Administrator will act on variances
for single family residential use which meet
� one of the following criteria:
� a. Proposal is for an addition to an existing
residential building (not exceeding 500 of
� the existing building valuation) which requires
variance for lot area, lot width and/or yard
` setback to the existing building. Yard set-
` back variance for the addition considered,
only if it will not further reduce an existing
� substandard yard (31. 410) . Not considered
will be variances for lakeshore and wetlands
! requirements or cases where the lot would
be more than 30% covered with structures.
•
• b. Proposal is for new construction on a pre-
existing lot of record in any residential
� zone where the lot meets or exceeds 80% of
the required lot area or lot width. No
� other variances would be considered.
� (Continued)
�
�
�
�
• R�GULA�2 MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 39
' c. Applicants may request in writing appeal ZONING VARIANCE
of any Zoning Administrator decision to PROCEDURES
� the Review Board, or the Zoning Administrator (Continued)
may require review of any application by the
� Board.
� 2 . The Review Board will act on all appeals from
� Zoning Administrator decisions and on all other
residential variance requests (except lakeshore
� and wetlands requirements) . Applicants may
request, in writing, appeal of any Review Board
� decision to the Planning Commission, or the
Board may require review of any application by
� the Planninq Commission.
+ 3. The Planning Commission will review all appeals
� from the Review Board and will continue to
review all variances for lakeshore and wetlands
� requirements and for all multi-family, commercial
and industrial proposals. As now, all Planning .
� Commission recommendations will go to the Council
i for final action.
� 4. Notice of any variances acted upon by the Zoning
Administrator or the Review Board will be sent
� to the Planning Commission and the Council for
their information.
�Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 1977
a
• After reviewing the proposed revisions , the Planning
Commission basically agreed with the concept. However,
� they voiced their objection to a Review Board. It is
their feeling that any decisions made by the Zoning
� Administrator should then go to Council, or if
appealed, to the Planning Commission. The Commission
� also felt that it would not be necessary to be
• notified of any variances acted upon by the Zoning
Administrator.
� Planning Commission recommended that the Zoning
� Administrator be able to act upon items in A & B,
but that the items would then go to Council for
� final action; the Review Board be excluded;
notation on the application that if denied by the
� Zoning Administrator, the applicant be advised
! of their right to appear before the Planning
Commis son.
+ Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
�
Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve
� recommendations A & B as recommended by the Zoning
�dministrator' s above memo and requested the
Planning Commission review and recommendation.
• Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
�
RE•�ULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 40
�
• No action at this time for application fees ior LUCE LINE TRAIL
parking areas at the Luce Line Trail.
� -
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, PLANNING COMP�IISSION
read into the record the following information APPOINTMENT
� regarding a new appointment to the Planning
� Commission dated June 1, 1977:
� I am sure you are all aware of the fact that Mr.
Paul Pesek has been appointed to the Council to
� fill the vacancy resulting from Councilman �Velsh' s
resignation.
�
• Subsequently, we now have a vacancy to fill on
our Planning Cornmission. I am enclosing copies
� of applications from residents requesting
appointments to fill our last vacancies in January
� 1977.
� Please review all applications and consider making
recommendations to Council.
�
� Planning Commission Meeting - June 6 , 1977
� The Planning Commission reviewed the applications
before them. Given the fact that several of these
etters were dated a couple of years ago, they
elt some new material was needed. They suggested
� ti-�at some form of notice be sent to the public
• informing them of this opening.
� Several members indicated that they were not
familiar enough with the present applicants to
� make any official recommendations. However, the
general feeling of the Commission is that there is
• sufficient real estate representation at this time.
They also suggested more representation from
� diversified areas of the City.
� Meriber Dunlap highly recommended Jo Ellen Hurr
� for her many years of service on the Park Commission
and also Peggy 6�atson for her dedication to projects
� that she becomes involved with. riember r�cDonald
also recommended Jo Ellen Hurr.
�
• The Commission also noted that past applications
have not been acknowledged. They recommended
� that all applicants be notified by letter as to
the status of their application.
�
Council Meeting - June 13, 1977
esek moved, Butler seconded, to appoint Jo Ellen APPOINTDZENT
Hurr to the Planning Commission to fill the unexpired Jo Ellen Hurr
� term of C. Paul Pesek, which expires December 13,
1979, r7otion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
s
�
� REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUP1E 13, 1977 Page 41
� Mayor Van Nest noved, Butler seconded, to table WETLANDS ASSESSMENT
until June 27, 1977 when Mr. Glenn Iiawkyard, POLICY
�Assessor for the �dest Hennepin Assessment District,
will discuss with the City Council �he ��etlands
� Assessment Policy. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
! Marina licenses were deferred until the meeting MARINA LICENSES
of June 27, 1977.
�
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDITIONAL USE PERI�IIT
informed the City Council that Mr. Ned Butterfield, 4705 Watertown Road
� 4705 Watertown Road, has applied for a continuation Ned Butterfield
� of a conditional use permit to rebuild after a fire
at his property.
� rlayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to waive
� review of the Planning Commission for Ned Butter-
field, 4705 Watertown Road, for a conditional ,
• use permit. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
� Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve
� continuing the conditional use permit for Ned
Butterfield, 4705 Watertown Road, subject to not
* exceeding original square footage to replace
buildings after a fire. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDIi'IONAL USE PERMIT
. informed the City Council that Mr. Conley Brooks, 1125 Spring Hill Road
1125 Spring Hill Road, is requesting a conditional Conley Brooks
� use permit for the construction of a guest house
at the above location.
�
Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to waive
� review of the Planning Commission for Conley
. Brooks , 1125 Spring Hill Road, for a conditional
use permit to construct a guest house. P�otion,
• Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
� Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve
a conditional use permit to construct a guest house
� for Conlay Brooks , 1125 Spring Hill Road, subject
to:
�
• 1. No variances to be granted
2 . Access to Hennepin County #6
� Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
0
•
i
• REGULAR 2�1EETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUi1E 13 , 19 7 7 Page 4 2
�, Henry t�Zuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, STATUS REPORTS
informed the City Council that the following
�tems were being reviewed by the Planning
Commission for Council action at a later date:
� Jack Rhode, 1410 Bohn' s Point Road, variance;
. Don Gustafson, 2683 North Shore Drive, conditional use
permit & wetlands variance; Home Federal Savings &
� Loan Association, 493 Park Lane, variance;
Donald Scott, 200 Willow Drive South, subdivision;
� Duane Hall, 700 North Arm Drive, variance; John
Kubasch, 1179 Plorth Arm Drive, variance; Carman
� Cove Association, conditional use permit; Linda
+ Skartvedt, 537 Park Lane, variance.
� Mr. Greg Frank, City Engineer, informed the City ORONO-LONG LAKE
� Council that Hennepin County has approved the INTERCEPTOR LOCATION
location of the Orono-Long Lake interceptor as per
� a letter received from David M. Feltl, Utilities
Engineer, dated May 26 , 1977, which states that:
�
• Hennepin County has reviewed the request from the
City of Orono in regard to the relocation of the
� proposed interceptor sewer on CSAH 15 .
� In order to comply with all the City' s concerns , we
agree that the location of the force main would
�have to fall somewhere within the mat of the
• travelled roadway. After some discussion and review
in the field, it was determined that the best
� location in this case would be down the centerline
of CSAH 15. The location would eliminate all
� the concerns as expressed in the City of Orono' s
letter in addition to having the following advantages :
�
Uniformity of location along the entire route on CSAH 15
�
` Would leave an unobstructed path for future utility
installations
� Would locate the manholes outside of the wheel track_s
�
Would eliminate the need for lane closures for
� maintenance on the manholes
� Provides for a more uniform excavation, backfill and
� coripaction technique within the roadbed.
� The installation of the forcemain at the location
described above would have to be contingent on the
� following:
That the project be coordinated with the reconstruction
of the Tanager Lake Bridge scheduled for the spring of
1978.
� (Continued)
�
�
�
• R�GULA�2 MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 43
i The ciisturbed roadbed subgrade and wearing surface ORONO-LONG LAKE
is restored to Hennepin County standards. INTERCEPTOR LOCATION
(Continued)
hat a high type overlay be placed over the width
� of the existing roadway.
� If there are any additional concerns you might have
� on this choice of location for the force main,
please give me a call. I will be happy to discuss
� tllem with you.
� End of letter
�
• Mr. Greg Frank, City Fngineer, informed the City CHANNELIZATION #19 & #89
Council that the City is in receipt of a letter
� fror�l Hennepin County, dated May 19 , 1977 , stating
that:
�
Enclosed for your information is a set of plans .
� for channelization of the intersection of CSAH 19
• and CSAH 84. The channelization will provide a
free right turn for southbound CSAH 19 traffic and
� a free left turn for northbound CSAH 19 traffic.
The eastbound CSAH 19 traffic to CSAH 84 and the
� westbound CSAH 84 traffic will be required to stop.
This project will eliminate the confusion and
serious accident potential between the eastbound
SAH 19 to CSAI� 84 movement and the northbound
� CSAFi 19 movement. The island will also provide
. separation of traffic through the present sharp
curve.
� This project is scheduled for 1977 construction
� by our Maintenance forces. If you have any
questions or desire further infornation, please
� contact this office.
� Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to instruct
• the City Engineer to request Hennepin County to
defer this request until the Ring Route is completed
� and the impact of this proposed channelization is
known. To be entered on the June 27, 1977 Council
� agenda for further information. Motion, Ayes (4) -
Nays (0) .
�
� Mr. Don S. Spielmann, Hennepin County Engineer, TANAGER LAKE BRIDGE
� requested Council approval of the permit application
and final construction plans for the Tanager Lake
� Bridge. Mr. Spielnann commented that the bridge
is designed for a maximum width of 36 ' and is to be
located not further than 12 ' west of the present
structure.
(Continued)
�
�
�
• REGULAR I�EETING OF TI�E ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 44
�
t�ayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to approve TANAGER LAKE BRIDGE
� the permit application and construction plans for (Continued)
� the Tanager Lake Bridge, subject to:
l. Engineer and staff approval
• 2. Bridge to be coordinated with the construction
• of the Orono-Long Lake interceptor in one
construction year.
� 3. Hennepin County sign-off of proposed resolution
� and instructed the City staff to present a resolution
for the Council meeting of June 27 , 1977. P�Zotion,
� Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
• i4r. Greg Frank, City Engineer, inf_ormed the City ON-SITE DISPOSAL
� Council that the On-Site Disposal Regulations REGULATIONS
would be completed by the June 27 , 1977 Council
� meeting.
*
Mayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to table FRENCH LAKE/UPPER
� the French Lake/Upper Storage Project item until STORAGE PROJECT
• further information is available from the r4innehaha
Creek Watershed District. Moti_on, Ayes (4) - Nats (O1 .
�
• Mr. Greg Frank, City Engineer, informed the City F.A.U. FUNDING
Council that F.A.U. Funding was not available for
� the year 1977.
� The North Star Marina curbcut item was deferred NORTH STAR MARINA
• until the meeting of June 27, 1977 for staff Curbcut
review.
�
• Mayor Van Nest informed the City Council that COMPREHENSIVE SE[�'ER
after several meetings with the Metropolitan PLAZ1
� Council, Orono' s Conprehensive Sewer Plan will
be approved designating Areas 7 & 8, that are
� along the route of the Orono interceptor, will
be classified as Rural Area and that the develop-
� ments C-D & G-H will be designed for local
sewers three years after the interceptor is
� completed with local connection to the interceptor
. two years after local sewers are completed.
� P•4r. James G. Holtz, owner of Jimmie' s Unicorn, Inc. , DANCE LICENSE
• appeared before the City Council requesting a Jimmie ' s Unicorn, Inc.
dance license.
�
i Butler moved, Pesek seconded, that Mr. Holtz set
forth in writing to the City staff the following
information, after which the City will review with
the City Attorney:
(Continued)
�
�
�
�
REGULAR riEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 45
�
• l. ��hat sort of music will there be--live music DANCE LICENSE
or jukebox? (Continued)
� . Provide a floor plan for all portions of the
� building.
� 3. What are the hours for the activity?
� 4 . What employees will be present at times
� when dancing will be allowed?
� 5. What other provisions are there in the
building to meet the requirements of Chapter
� 60 and Minnesota statutes related to bathrooms ,
. ventilation, etc. ?
� 6. Fiow many people will attend?
' Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
Dick Benson, City Administrator, reviewed a LIQUOR STORE RENT
� letter from Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store
. Manager, which states that:
Attached is a letter I received from Mr. Keaveny
regarding our lease at the liquor store. He
�explained that he had just gotten the assessment
figures and this increase is necessary at this
� time. He also said he should have some figures
• this week or next on the space and building
we previously talked to him about. �
� I do believe our original lease with IDS was
� reasonable but the $25 . 00 increase per year
since 1970 was not a realistic increase. In
� January 1977, our increase was $200 per month„
making our rent $875. Now, in July, another
� $125 making a total increase for the last six
• months $325. This makes a total increase of
$3, 150 for 1977. Our 1977 budget was set for
� a $1, 500 increase. If we break the increase
down over seven years, it is an increase of
� $450 per year, which is out of line I think.
One point of consideration is the fact that this
� does include heating, maintenance, and repairs
• on the furnace and air conditioner plus parking
lot repairs, etc.
� As you know, I have cut all possible expenses,
� expecially the �ayroll to the bare minimum, so
any increases in expenses now are non-control-
lable and we have to increase our sales and profit.
(Continued)
�
�
�
r
• REGULAR P-ZEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 4b
� With the amount of floor (sales) space we have LIQUOR STORE RENT
now for merchandising and sales , it is almost (Continued)
��mpossible to stimulate a big enough increase
in sales to cover this increase in expenses.
�
• Therefore, if the rent is to be $1, 000 per month
for the space we have in order to increase our
� sales, it would be to our advantage (almost a
necessity) to get a larger store, even if it
� costs more. Our cost per square foot will only
pay off if it is used as sales and display.
�
In conclusion of all these considerations, we
� have no choice but to stay on a month to month
• basis and possibly recorunend to P1r. Keaveny a
date for consideration of his building proposals.
� I am sure Pdr. Keaveny is as anxious as we are to
settle the question of where we can locate to
� our best advantage as well as his own. .
Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to approve
an amendment to Article I increasing the Liquor
Store rent from $875 per month to $1, 000 per month,
� effective July l, 1977 as per lease agreement.
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�Dick Benson, City Administrator, reviewed a letter EMPLOYEE TERMINATION
f:rom Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store P!Ianager, which Mona Gleason
states that:
� I am requesting that our books be closed on our
� former employee, Mona Gleason. The last hours
she worked part-time were December 3, 1976 .
�
Sh2 has applied for disability from Social Security
� and also her PERA. Therefore, her employment as
. a part-time employee should be terminated.
• Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to accept the
recommendation of Lorraine McGowan, Liquor
� Store Manager, to terminate former part-tirne
ernployee, biona Gleason. Motion, Ayes (4) -
� Nays (0) .
• Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the NAVARRE WATER RATES
City Council of a preliminary report on water
� rates in the Navarre area of Orono, dated June 10 ,
1977, which states:
� (Continued)
�
�
Rc,GULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 47
�
�
The Navarre water system was in operation during 1973. Resol-
� ution ,�420 dated November 22, 1971, established the water rate
schedule of charges. Since its inception the water rate schedule
� for the Navarre water system has not been adjusted. During the
� past four years there has been substantial growth in the num-
ber of units being served by this system. At the end of 1973
� there were 337 units being charged for kater service. That
� has grown to over 500 as of the first quarter of 1977.
However, it appears that the operating expenses have risen faster
than the operating revenues, resvlting in a net operating loss
for the period 1974 thru the 1977 estimates.
�
It appears from our preliminary findings that the revenues �
generated by the Navarre wa�er system will fall far short of the
amount needed during 1977. For instance, if the first quarter
� of 1977 water operating statement is adjusted for the ef�ects
of the Long Lake and Chevy Chase areas the net operating loss
before depreciation will increase about $350 from ($1, 637) to
� ($1 , 987) .
We have estimated the total billable gallonsto be pumped in
1977 at 52, 800, 000. The costs to be recovered are:
� l. The operating budget of $50, 974 less $2, 400 expenses
� allocated to the Long Lake and Chevy Chase areas or a net oper-
ating budget of $48, 574 for the Navarre system.
� - -
2. The depreciation estirr,ate on the plant, tower, and
wells of $6, 416. per year.
•
The following estimated flat rates are needed to recover the
foregoing costs:
s
•
•
•
(Continued)
�
RL'GULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 48
� Gallons Rate per/1 , 00
� " Amount 1 , 000 Gallons _
1977 Net Operating Budget $ 48 574 - 52, 800 = 91. g9�
1977 Depreciation 6� 416 - _ �
� 52, 800 � 12. 15�
_ Totals �_54_, 990 _ t 52, 800 � 104_14��
� This converts to $1 . 04 per 1, 000 gallons billed. This seems
� tx�ogreat an increase and we feel that the flat rate is not
necessarily tne way to go. It is illustrated only to indicate
the approximate cost per 1, 000 gallons. However, it is certain
that the existing step rate must be adjtisted substantially.
Based on estirrates of average �sagg_ and average user units
t'ne following results are projected if no increase is attained.
• Average Average Present Projected
Gallons No Units _ _ Rate Annual
Ste�__ Per Qtr. Per tr; Per/1 , 000 Revenue
Minimum " lOM 98 $ . 75 $ 2, 940
� 11-30M._ ._ __ 19M - - 283 - . 75 - - 16, �31-
31-50M 39M 72 . 60 . 8, 370
� 51-100M 75M 36 . 50 5, 868
Over 100M ll OM 26 .�40 _ 6, 604
•
�__3�913
• —_ —
� This would leave us about $15, 000 short of expected needs.
a If it is assumed that the Cit wants to
y give a break to the low
volume user, especially the senior citizens and have the large
• volume user pay a larger portion of the actual costs, a rate
structri�e possibility might be as follows.
S Average _ . Average Possible Projected
Gallons No. Units Rate Annual
Step Per tr. Per tr. Per/1, 000 Revenue
� 0-5 M 5M 36 $ 1- 25 $ 900 �
6-lOM 8M 62 1 . 05 2, 330
11-30M 19M 283 1 . 00 23, 206
31-50M 39M 72 , 9p 11, 404
S1-100M 75M 36 . 80 10, 008
Over 100M 110M 26 . 80 7, 644
S 55_ 49?
�,�...��:�,,,.a�
�EGULAR NiEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 49
NAVARRE WATER RATES
� (Continued)
The foregoing rate structure would Ieave the City a projected pro-
fit of about $S00 or . 9- percent.
We would like to point out that there has been some problem
in obtaining "clean" infonnation. We would like to point out
that this is only a preli�inary study to inform Council that
a problem exists and must be rectified.
k'e are therefore requesting Councils permission to seek outsi.de
professional assistance with this project. The costs of the
assistance should not be_ substantial and would be paid for by
water operating revenues. �
Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to instruct
staff to research Navarre water rates and present
a recommendation at a later date. I�Sotion, Ayes (4) -
' Nays (0) .
� Mr. Bill Carlson, Public Works Supervisor, informed ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT
the City Council of sewer and water rates for the Sewer & Water Rates
Orono School District, dated June 8 , 1977, on the
attached Pages 50-52
�
�
FLEGULAR P�IEETING OF TF3E ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 50
s ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT
(Continued)
�
Because of the request by tbe Orono School Di9trict i�278 to
. reduce �he water and sewer rates to this 1'acility, I have com-
, , piled some 1'acts that will shotia why the water utility cannot
; reduce the monies. that are being charged over the rate cnargad
b y Long Lak e.
a I would, at tnis time, like to state that any reduction in
rates given to tne City of Orono by Long Lake will be p�.ssed
on to the Orono custo;�er, or those customers designated by
Long Lake.
The figures below are 1'or i.he same period the Orono School
District used:
1 st Q�r, of 1 977 1 , 861�, 900 Gallons
2nd Qtr, of 1 976 2, 635, 800 "
3rd Qtr. of 1976 3,7 �7, 800 " �
lrth Q�r, of 1 97b 2, 0�6,200 "
Total Purcbased by Orono : 10,331�,700 Gallons
Of tnis �otal, we _sold: 9,575,� 70 "
A breakdown as to the cost of water to Orono, the cost to the
� customer anci �he profit to Orono by the sale of good, saf e,
potable ka i,er S'ollows :
l�:ater Purchased �'rom Lon� Lake b� Orono:
, 2nd Qtr. 1976 2, 635,800 Callons @ . 90� per/th �2,372.22
3rd Qtr. 1976 3, 7�7, 800 " @ . 90¢ per/th 3, 373 .02
�}.th Q�r. 1 976 2,0 6, 200 " @ . 90¢� per/th 1 , 877 .58
1 s t Qtr. 1 977 1 ,86t�, 900 " @ . 90� per/th 1 , 678 .1�0
�
Total Gallons : 10,33)�, 700 Total monies paid: �9, 301 . 22
f
Water Sold �o �he Orono Customer:
2nd Qtr. 1976 2, 600, 770 Gallons @ �1 .1 7 per/th �3,O1�2. 90
- 3rd Qtr. 1 976 3, 377, 800 " @ 1 .1 7 per/th 3, 952.03
, ?�th Qtr. 1 976 2,058, 200 " @ 1 .1 7 per/th 2 1}_08. 09
lst Qtr. 1977 � ,538,�-00 " @ 1 .17 per/th 1 , 799. 93
Total Gallons : 9,575,� 70 Tionies Received: $1 '1 ,202. 95
Profit to Orono on Sales :
2nd Q�r. � 976 2, 600, 770 Gallons @ .27¢ per/th �702 . 21
3rd Qtr, � 976 3,377,800 " @ .27� per/th 912 . 00
I�th Qtr. 7 976 2, 058, 200 . " @ .27� Per/th 555- 7�
� 1 st Q�r. 1 977 � �538���� t' @ . 27¢ Per/th 415-37
Tozal Gal�ons: 9,575, � 7� Profit Received: �2,585,29
(Continued)
� , ,
RLGULAR 14EETIPJG OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 51
�
� ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT
(Continued)
�
� Monies received by Orono S'or the sale of 9,575,� 70 gallons of
• wa�er arr,ount to �1 1 ,202. 95. ?�oni e s paid to the Ci ty of Long
I�.ke, .for 10,3���-,700 gallons of water, amount to $9,301 .22,
� w'nich leaves a gross proi'it of' �2,585•29. From this gross pro-
fit, there are fi�ed costs of app�oximately �625.00, There is
� also 769,530 gallons of water that was used �'rom the hydran�s
that was not metered or sold. Any water passing throu�h tne
� rne�er from Long Lake to Orono costs the City of Orono 90� per/
� �housand gallons, whicii multiplied by 769,530 gallons, cos�s
�692.58.
s
By tak�ng �he gross profi t of �2, 585. 29, and subtrac�ing the
• fixed cos�s for maintenance, of �6?_5,00, and the cost of water -
purchased, but not sold, of �692.58, it leaves the City of �
� Orono the figure of �1 , 267.72 as a ne t pr•ofi t for the period i.hat
� was used for this review.
� Z'he Ci ty of Or•ono has been eh treme?y for�u�ate in regards �o
main breaks, replacement of nydrants, etc. This, of course, is
� due to �he main�enance procedure we �ave in flusi�ing of lines
and general main�enance of h�drants, shut-oif valves, e�c. But
� if �he need should corne for a replacement of a h�drant, �he cost
• of �he �ydrant would be �57ti, 00, plus installat�on. A main
break could cost up to �'l ,000. 00. Hopefully, this will not
� nappen, but if it did, an� profit would then be h-iped out.
• The City of Or•ono al so mainta�ns the water me ters; if' the me�er
does not opera �e, Orono 1'i�es or replaces it at no cost to the
� customer. If �he me�er f'reezes and breaks, or is tampered with,
s we will then chaz-•ge f Qr �rA ���3ir.
� Mr. Pat Farnand, ?�avor of Long Lake, was going to get a le�ter
of in�ention to me as to what Long Lake would do in regard to
� a reduc�ion in ra�es. As of �nis wri�ing, I h4ve received
no�hing 1'rom him.
•
• Ily recommenda�ion is �o deny any reduction in our charge of
27¢ per/thousand gallons; but to pass on �o the Orono cus�omer,
� or cus�omers, designated by Long Lake, any reduction in rates
given to the City of Orono. I would also recorr�uend �hese rates
� be reviewed again in Ja�uary, 1978. We �hen will have �he full
ye�rs � history of 1977 to use, along with the last three quar�ers
• of � 976.
` Sewer Ra�es: Our budget and the ?•,e�ropolitan Was�e Con�rol
� Corunission charges and depreciaiion and monies to be repaid �o
the PIR f��nd, for a total of �1 L7, 8IT8. 00, is to be recovered by
�
�
�
� (Continued)
r
�
REGUL'AR MEEIING OF TI�E OR0210 COUNCIL, JUP1E 13, 1977 Page 52
�
� ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT
(Continued)
� a unit cnar•ge of �?_2.75. Yr'e have �
• 1 626 units, times the unit
charge of �22.75, w'nich amounts to �1 �7, g66.00. If the rate of
� �22.75 per unit were used, starting January 1 , 1977, we would
break even; however, tne rate increase is being institu�ed,
� s�arting with the second quar�er billing, with all homes with
se�aer available bein� charged. The S'irst quarter billing
� leaves us a dei'icit of �8,56�.00 pl_us �he accounts �nat will
� be certified for the tax roll. The second, tnird and fourth
�ar�er billing will hold tneir ow�n barring no major problems.
q '
� 12is means �he sewer utility f'or �he �ear of 1977 �ill also run
in the red. The ra�e breakdo�.�n per e�pense i�ems i s as follows :
• _
� - EXP�vTSE RATE P�R UivIT
� 977 �udget �61 ,500 � 9,I�6 � .
• 1977 I�1wCC 68, 227 1 0.�9
� 977 Loan Repayrrient ,5,000 . 77 •
� � 977 �eprecia�ion 1 3,l 21 2.02
� Total v�1 �}-7,8�8 �22.�4
� '�'he ra-te s adopted by �he Ci ty Council have been reviewed by the
t�Te�ropolitan Waste Con�rol Cor-�u-nission, and in a leti,er from the
• I��WCC, it is s�ated that �he cnarges better reflect our actual
sewer costs,
� Tne reason we use a unit as a means �-
• of charging the cus �omer is
because �here are areas in �ne City that do not have City water;
` �herefore, we base a llnl -� as 15,000 gallons per quarter, or 50
gallons per person per day, wi�h tne nai,ional average of 3.2 per-
f sons per unit.
� My recorrmendation in regard �o the sewer rate, is to s�ay with
� the �22.75 per unit charge and to charge �1 .50 per/Lhousand
gallons to the users being charsed by �he gallon.
•
�
a Mr. Bill Fenholt, Business Manager of the Orono
Scllool District #278, entered into the record the
� attached letter dated June 2 , 1977.
� Letter Pages 53 & 54
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to table the request
� of Orono School District #278 for a water rate
reduction until after January l, 1978 to allow
� adequate time to deterrnine this year' s water
usage at the school complex. Motion, Ayes (4) -
� Nays (0) .
�
�
�
�
� � , � Page 53
� ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DlSTRICT NO. 278
INDEPENDENCE- �ONG LAKE-MAPLE PLAIN- MEDINA-MINNETONKA BEACH-OROMO
* 6850LD CRYSTAL BAY FOAD
LONG �AKE, 1.':INNESOTA 5535b
"r �:�
��
� DR. GALE G. IENNON '�x,nucw
SUPERINTENDENT Of SCNOOLS W. A. FENHOLT �
� � (612)173-7313 ASST 10 7HE SU�ERINIENDENI
. (612)473-7313
; � June 2, 1977
� .
�
�
ifr. ;tialter R. B�r.son
f City Administrator ` .
+ Orono City Hall �
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
�
Dear rsr. Benson:
�
�•7e have two concerns as we continue to review t�e water and sewer
� sit.uation.
� First, Long Lake records show the following water volume charges to
� Orono during the past year:
� r'arch 31 , 1977 1, 864 , 900
� June 30 , 1976 2 , 635 , 800
Sept. 30, 1976 3, 747, 800
� Dec. 31, 1976 2 , 086 , 200
i Total gallons 10 , 334 , 700
� At 27�, this produced approximately $2800 in annual revenue to Orono
or over five times your out-of-pocket costs ($500-$600) as reported at the
� meeting on May 23. We feel a flat rate to the school ($100-$150 per quarter
• would be very helpful to us and would not escalate as our water consumption
increases . At the present 27� rate , those of us on the Long Lake wa�er
� system appear �o be subsidizing Orono' s water service operation_
� Our second concern is that we see the potential savings of 45G on
Long Lake water charges practically wiped out by a planned increase of 33C
� in Orono sewer charges. Those of us along Highway �12 who are served by
, the Long Lake sewer system and who have paid the excess rate for many years
deserve a rate comparable to Long Lake ' s normal ch arges , plus maintenance
� of the lines. To be fair, we do not feel your overall sewer operation ccsts
for the new plant should determine our rates when we are not served directly
� by these new faci�ities in Orono.
� The ?✓etropolitan Waste Control Com�-nission has sugoested to us the
• possibili�y of a joint powers aaree;n-nt for those of us served by Long Lake ,
�
DR. K. B. WINTEA W. V. NELSON RONALD E_ GILBERT
' �. HIGH SCHppL PF.Ir�UPA1 MIDDLE SCHOOI Pi'INCIPAL ELEMENTARY COJfDINATOR
�l3-u� <73-7301
<73-73ll
• C. YIAYNE 5�.�.ITH J:MES E. SfITER MRS. I.'.t;RVF� A, gpNGART
ASSOC_ SR. HIGH SCNOOI F..IN��pql ASS7 MIDDLE SCMOOI FRIt�UPAL MAP�E P1AM ELEMFN7::RY PRINUPA�
. 473-5l72 473-7301 479-19T7
� -z- �
� ' Page 54
� tfir. T��alter R. Benson � �
� .
� setting us up as a separate sewer district served by Long Lake and/or
• Orono. We intend to pursue this sugcestion as it may be a solution to
what we view as a very serious problem. '
� �
We appreciate the opportunity you gave us to voice our concerns to
� the council and we are receptive to further discussions with yo u if you
feel anything might be accomplished at this point in time.
�
� Sincerely,
� �- �• �''_���r'
� � . W. A. Fenholt "
� Ass ' t. to th e Superintendcnt
�
� iti'AF:r j � �
c. c. 2�1r_ Brad Van'Jest, T�ayor
� -
�
� -
ti
.
.
.
�
. .
�
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
�
.
.
.
! -
Ri�GULAR MEETIPIG OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 55
�
+ Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the City ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
Council that on June 9 , 1977, Lyle Swanson from wELL
�McCorlbs-Knutson Engineering and myself received
informal quotes for a new well for the Administration
r Office at 1335 Brown Road South.
r Quotes were for a six-inch and four-inch well with
� a separate price for plumbing from the well to the
office building, a distance of 220 ' .
•
Of the three quotes received, Stevens Well was low
� at $4, 989 . 00 for a four-inch well and $2 , 375. 00 for
the plumbing for a total of $7, 364. 00. The highest
� quote was from Bergerson-Caswell for $6 , 619 . 70 for
i a four-inch well and $1, 633. 75 for the plumbing.
We did contact Bergerson-Caswell to see if they
� wanted to do the plumbing only. They stated
they would not do the plumbing unless they could
r install the well.
S I did contact Dolder Plumbing in Navarre and received
a quote from him for the plumbing for $1 , 725. 00.
� I have talked to Tom Stevens from Stevens �4e11 and
• he would not object to someone else doing the
plumbing, in fact, would prefer that it be done
� that way.
� There are some unknown factors to be considered
on the project and could alter the total cost of
� the project.
� l. The price for the well was quoted at 190 ' deep.
` If they should have to go deeper it would be
$7. 00 per foot additional for the four-inch well.
�
2 . As noted on the bid tabulation for Stevens �Jell,
� if Northern States Power Company can furnish
underground service to the well the price will
� be $100. 00 less.
� 3. If Dolder Plumbing makes the connection from
� the well to the Administration buil�ing, we
will use the City equipment to dig the trench,
� unless a trenching machine is available. If
the trencher is available, I would certainly
S recor,unend it because of a quicker and cleaner
• job. This should not make a great deal of
difference in the plumbing costs as it may
� lower the labor portion of this quote.
� 4 . When I asked Dolder plumbing for a quote, I
asked him to include a freezeless yard hydrant
� and to be installed at the location of the well.
� ihis will allow us to water the lawn and trees
and will also allow us to use the water supply
a for steam cleaning equipment in the area of the
long gold equipment shed. This cost is included
� in his c?uote (approximately $50. 00) . (ContiT:,�ed)
�
� .
R�GULAR P�IEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page �6
�
. Therefore, it is my recommendation to accept the OFFICE WELL
quote for a four-inch well to Stevens Well Company (Continued)
�in the amount of $4 , 989. 00. It is also my recom-
endation to have Dolder Pluribin_q make the connection
� from the well to the Administration building in the
amount of $1, 725. 00 .
�
It should also be noted that this well is capable
� oi supplying water to the Police and Public �Jorks
,� buildings at 1285 Brown Road South and that
connection should be made as soon as �ossible in
� the near future.
� RESOLUTION #795 RESOLUTION #795
� Office Well
A Resolution Declaring An Emergency Situation For
� The L•�ater Supply I'or The Orono City Office Buildings
� WHEREAS, the Administration staff of the City of Orono
has, through the necessary testing, determined that
� the present well for supplying water to the Administration
Office Building at 1335 Brown Road South in Orono,
� Minnesota, is beyond repair; and
� WHEREAS, the Police and Public ��orks Building at 1285
` Brown Road South in Orono, Minnesota, uses a cistern
for water supply, and said cistern is in dire need
of repair and is no longer feasible.
� OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orono City
• Council does hereby declare an emergency situation
and does instruct the Orono staff to solicit
� informal bids for a well, of a size to be adequate
to supply the Administration Office at 1335 Brown
,� Road South, ir.unediately; and of a size to accommodate
the Police and Public 47orks Office, Garage and
A Council Chambers in the near future.
� Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt
• Resolution #795, A Resolution Declaring An Emergency
Situation For The Water Supply For The Orono City
` Office Buildings. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
` Mayor Van Nest moved, Butler seconded, to accept
the quoted price in the amount of $4, 989 . 00 from
� Stevens Well Company for a four-inch well and the
quoted price of $1, 725. 00 from Dolder Plumbing Company
� as per the City Administrator' s recommendation.
• Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�
�
�
•
�
� ,
R�GULAR MEETING OF TFiE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 57
�
• Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the City SPECIFICATIONS
Council that on April 22 , 1977, the City of Orono FRONT END LOADER
�received three sealed bids for one articulated
front end loader with attachments. Of the three
� bids received, only one met our specifications .
� At the Council meeting held on May 9 , 1977, there
. seemed to be a great deal of concern about the
total cost purchase method that was used when
� writing the specifications and contract. Therefore,
it was the Council' s wish to table the bid award
� until the Council meeting of May 23, 1977.
r During this two-week period, the staff reviewed
+ all specifications and concluded that it would
be in the best interest of the City to reject
+ all bids and to rebid the front end loader only,
without the plow and wing. It is the opinion of
� the staff that this will give more manufacturers
an opportunity to bid.
� �
Therefore, it was recommended on May 23, 1977 to
� the Orono City Council, by Walter R. Benson, City
� Administr�tor, to reject all bids and to rebid the
front end loader only, without the plow and wing;
` no guaranteed maintenance or guaranteed repurchase.
The plow, wing and quick coupler will be purchased
�at a later date.
� Therefore, the Public Works Department is requesting
` permission to advertise for one 2-yd articulated
front end loader. Bids will be received until
� 10: 00 A. M, CDT, July 8, 1977 , when at that time,
they will be opened and reviewed for Council
' approval at the July 11, 1977 Council meeting.
r Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the BID OPENING
Specifications for one articulated front end loader
� with bid opening Friday, July 8, 1977 at 10: 00 A.M.
. per the City Administrator' s recommendations .
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
`
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the City EMPLOYMENT
Council that in February 1977, the Building & Zoning Building & Zoning Dept.
� Department advertised for someone who could qualify
as an inspector for the septic systems existing in
� Orono to correct pollution problems resulting from
� inadequate, on-site sewage disposal systems.
� From the standpoint of economics and qualifications,
my recommendation is Tom Jacobs. He has conpleted
� an architectural course in a local vo-tech school
�nd is just completing his second year of
rchitecture in college. Some of his courses
' included the building inspection field so he is
familiar with the Uniform Building Code. (Continued)
0
�
� .
R�:GULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 58
�
* He has also worked in the construction field during EMPLOYMENT - B & Z DEPT,
the past few summers. With this background, I (Continuedj
� believe he could qualify to assist on building
inspections so Alan Olson can spend more time with
� me on some of the policy and ordinance changes we
are now considering.
�
• Tom Jacobs is 26 years old and a veteran of the
military service. He has indicated to me that
+ he will continue his education during the
evenings and will take courses necessary to
� obtain State certification for building inspection.
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to apPoint Tom EMPLOYMENT
• Jacobs as inspector for the Building & Zoning Tom Jacobs
Department conditioned on his obtaining State
+, certification for building inspection within one
year, with a starting salary of 55. 00 per hour
� to June 20 , 1977, as a temporary status , permanent
status starting June 20 , 1977, and a three-month ,
� evaluation, t4otion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the City LMCD MEETING
Council that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation June 18 , 1977
�; District would like to invite them to a rolls-and-
coffee meeting at Hart' s Cafe, Wayzata at 8 : 00 A.M.
�on Saturday, June 18 , 1977.
� This informal get-together should give us an '
• opportunity to discuss our various approaches
to Lake-related problems such as law enforcement,
� boating density, access, and bo�t s��rage, as well
as other matters which may arise.
�
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, reviewed with the CASH FLOW REPORT
City Council the 1976 Bond Refunding on the debt
� service cash flow.
�
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the City 1976 AUDIT
Council that the audit of the 1976 records of the
� City of Orono has been completed and presented
for approval by Mr. B�errill A. Hansen, C.P.A.
�
• I have reviewed the report and find it to be in
order. I recommend that Council accept the audit
` and approve payment of the audit bill in the
anount of $2 ,083. 50. The bill presented is $516. 50
� less than the estimate presented of $2 , 600. 00.
� If Council has any questions on this report or
�requests for additional data in subsequent reports,
we should let the auditor know so that he is made
' aware of these at the earliest possible time. (Continued)
`
�
� � � .
a REGULAR NIEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 59
wI have been informed by the auditors that several 1976 AUDIT
changes are anticipated in the manner of report (Continued)
�rresentation for next year. I anticipate a
tter from them regarding these, and I will
�inform the City Administrator and Council of
them as soon as I have anything regarding the
�particular changes.
�Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to accept
+the 1976 Audit. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�Butler moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to approve
payment of $2, 083. 50 for the 1976 Audit bill.
�Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
•
�Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt Ordinance ORDINANCE No. 192
No. 192, An Ordinance Extending The Duration Of Extend Moratorium
�A Moratorium On The Granting Of Variances For Wetlands I
Fill And Excavation Permits Or Other Authority , C
�To Allow For Filling Or Excavation In Any P�Ianner
In Any Of The Marshes And 4Jetlands In The City
�Of Orono. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
� ORDINANCE NO. 192
�
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORO?10 ORDAINS:
� l�Iunicipal Code of the City of Orono is amended
�by amending Section 4 of Ordinance No. 190 to
•read as follows:
*Section l.
s"Section 4. Duration" . This ordinance shall expire
November l, 1977, without Council action, or it
�inay be repealed earlier if the counsel determines
that the requisite studies have been completed
iand adopted and that appropriate evaluation and
`action, including any necessary revisions of
the Zoning Code , have been finalized.
�
Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
�Butler moved to amend Ordinance No. 191, extending PARKS MORATORIUM
the moratorium for 120 days for parks. Motion
�died for lack of a second.
�
,�'I'he proposed platting ordinance was deferred until PLATTING ORDINANCE (
the meeting of June 27 , 1977.
� i
�
ie Liquor Store Lease was deferred until the LIQUOR STORE LEASE
�meeting of June 27 , 1977.
�
�
� � � i
� REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUrdCIL, JUNE 13, 1977 Page 6'0
� Pesek moved, Butler seconded, to approve the LICENSES
following licenses : Notion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
�
:oger Stubbs ' Company - House Movers
� Wayzata Plumbing & Heating Company, Inc. - Plumber
�
• Butler moved, Pesek seconded, that the All Funds BILLS
Accounts 5440 through 5481, 1001 through 1065 ,
� 19541 through 19545 and Liquor Store Accounts
11952 through 11973, be paid. P�otion, Ayes (4) -
� Nays (0) .
�
• Butler moved, Paurus secondec�, that the meeting ADJOURrdP�IENT
be adjourned at 12 : 28 A.D4. Motion, Ayes (4) -
� Nays (0) .
`
� o % �
�
� -
� William B. Van Nest, Mayor
�
�ttest:
� 4alter R, e son, Clerk- mi istrator
�
�
�
� �
r
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
♦