HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-08-1976 Council Minutes * ' ,
�. � � CITY OF ORONO
� Regular P�eeting of the Orono Council, 7:02 P.M.
ilovember 8, 19 7 6
�'he Orono Council r.let on the above date with
� the following members present> Acting P4ayor
' I-lassengale, Councilmembers Butler and Paurus.
t�bsent: Ilayor Searles and Councilmember �lelsh.
� Also presente City Administrator Benson,
Building & Zoning Administrator P�Zuhich, City
� Attorney Malkerson, and City Engineer Franke
�
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the Minutes MINUTES
� of the Regular 1�Teeting of October 12, 1976, be
` approvede P4otion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) ,
� Jane Olson, Bike/Hike Committee member stated
� that at the Bike/Hike Trails Committee�meeting BIKE/HIKE TRAIL COI����TTS
of Idovember 4, 1976, a motion was passed to
• recommend to the Orono City Council that they
request Hennepin County to make the widened
� shoulders on County Road �15 and County Road #6
� as bike routes, and that all future improved
shoulders that will be designated bike routes be
� marked in the same manner. Approved unanimouslym
r �Tane Olson, also stated tliat the Orono Bike/Hike
rails Committee recommend to the Joint Trails
• �:ornmittee that their members ask their Councils
• to request immediate action on County Road ##15
in marking the improved shoulders as a bike
� route, and that they consider requesting the
County to so mark any future improved shoulders.
� A�proved unanimously.
� Ii�nnepin County brought out a reclarification
of the County's policy of not glyphing County
• road shoulders used as trails< Gerhardson
stated that the County feeling is that if a
� glyph ("Bike Trail") is on the widened shoulder,
� it can then be used for nothing else, and Class III
trails are shared with motor vehicles. The
� County will post signs designating a bike trail
if the trail is a linlc in a trail system--if the
� trails "goes someplace". There was agreement that
Hennepin County is not putting in bike trails--they
� are blacktopping shouiderse
� Hallowell st�ted that in her daily observation of
� County Road #15, the widened shoulders intended
for use as a bike trail between Vavarre and T7ound
� are in many cases being used by traffic as an
�ditional lane for turnxng, passing, parking. (Continued)
�
�
�
�
� '
• ORONO COUTICIL T�4EETING HE�,b NOV�I���R 8, 19'�6 Page 2
� The time to mark the shoulders �t� a bi�Ce t�ai�. BzhE/HSKE TRAILS
�is as soon as they are widen�c� for ��is ptirpt�Se, (Continued)
:ot after traffic is accustome� �o �i�ing trem as
� traffic lanes. Even though trail links may not
lead into completed trail system, bike route signs
♦ should go up as soon as shoulders are improved
for this purpose. The existence of signs would
• aid enforcement; without signs, such trail� cannot
, be safely used by bicyclists.
� Butler moved, P�iassengale seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #�724
Resolution �#724, A Resolution To Request Hennepin Bike/Hike Trail Signs
� County Highway Department To Post Bike/Iiike Sic�ns
On County Roads. T�Totion, Ayes (3) - Nays (Q) ,
•
Jane Olson, Bike/Hike Trails Committee member,
� also stated that at the October 12 , 1976 Joint
• Trails Committee neeting, Bill Short of Beckman
Yoder and Associates, Inc. , planners and landscape
� architects, presented a proposal for a trail system
for the Joint Trails Committee cornmunities. The
� cost of such a joint-community plan would be less
than if each community approached professional
� planners on their owno A formula to make each
community's share of the cost eguitable �vould be
� worked out, and would reflect number of communities
� participating, population, land area, existing
rails and those already planned, mileage of new
� _rails to go in, etc. Besides the cost savings,
another advantage of a joint-community systern
� would be that funding for a specific secfinent of
trails can be raore easily obtained if funding
• sources can see a definite trail system is planned.
� Beckman Yoder feels the Proposed Performance
� Schedule, consisting of the areas of: 1) Goals
and Policies, 2) Corridor Selection & Use Definition,
� 3) Specifications of Prototypes, 4� System
Irnplementation, and 5) System Adoption, can be
� corapleted in 8 to 12 months, the cost would be
about $26,000 -- each community to share according
� to the formula> Steps 1 through 5 �vould cost the
corununity $3,000 to $10,000 dependinc� on factors
S in the formula.
� The Joint Trails Committee members are to take the
� plan to their respective Councils and try to get
an agreenent to the concept of regional planning
• for communities.
� At our Committee rieeting, several points were made
� concerning the Joint Trails Cor,unittee proposalo
� uId it be �elpful for the Joint Trails Committee
to talk to a member of the Plymouth Trails Committee
� (Beckman Yoder did their trail system planning) as (Continued)
•
�
� � ORONO COUNCIL T•IEETING HELD NOVEhZBER 8, 197G Page 3
• to successes and problems? ��lould it benefit the IIIKE/HIKE TRAILS
Joint Trails Committee to contact another planning (Continued)
�:ompany? If the study could not be done by a
� private firm, perhaps there would be a public
agency that could undertake it--Highway Department
� of municipal agency. The Council supports the
Joint Trails Committee, and the JTC is supporting
� the joint trail study. Will the Council then
support the study? It had been suggested by
� City Administrator Benson at our October 7, 1976
meeting that our next funding request should
� perhaps be directed to a feasibility study for
Orono trails; perhaps a portion of the community
� study could go for this JTC study. Olson will
� take the plan to the November 8, 1976 Council
meeting,
� Councilmember Paurus commented that the Joint
� Trails Committee has been working toward a total
community trail system plan and at this time, it
• is difficult to recognize what is required for
cor:tplete community involvement. Acting tlayor
� P��lassengale commented that total community involvement
� is required and suggested a Joint Powers Agreement
�,rould not serve the local community. Councilmember
� Butler stated that the Park Commission and the Bike/
Hike Committee have been notified to study the
� Yequirements and goals for the proposed 1977
�nununity Block Grant Program.
�
naurus moved, Butler seconded, to refer to the
� Park Commission for a study of a total community
� trail system plan, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
�
• No comments from the Human Rights Commission, HUT9AN RIGHTS COP�I�IISSION
• No comr�lents from the Planning Commission. PLANNING COr�u�lISSION
� iienry Niuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISIOtd
stated that the Planning Commission at their 2055 Sixth Avenue North
� meeting of November l, 1976, recommended approval #95
of a preliminary subdivision for Fred Lucas, Frec1 Lucas
S 2055 Sixth Avenue North, subject; to receipt
of a park dedication fee of $500 and County
• approval of any curb cuts for access from County
• roads,
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the
preliminary subdivision request for Fred Lucas,
� 2055 Sixth Avenue P7orth, per the Planning
Cornnlission I�Iinutes of November 1, 1976 and park
� dedication fee of $500 being paid. Piotion,
�s (3) - Nays (0) ,
•
�
� •
� ORONO COUNCIL P•4EETING HELD NOV�I�IBER 8, 19 76 Page 4
� Henry IIuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
�stated that the Planning Commission at their 1305 Sixth Avenue North
dovember 1, 1976 meeting recommended approval #172
� of a subdivision for Hugh Harrison, 1305 Sixth Hugh Harrison
Avenue North, subject to park dedication fee
� of $500 being paid.
• Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #725
Resolution #725, A Resolution Approving The Hugh Harrison Su�divis�.on
� Subdivision At 1305 Sixth Avenue North.
� P-�otion, Ayes (3) - P1ays (0) .
•
Henry T4uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
� stated that the Planning Commission at their 2925 Casco Point Road
meeting of I�Tovember 1, 1976 recommended ap�roval �Y177
� for G. Raymond and Ruth ��olf, 2925 Casco Point G. Raymond & Ruth �+lolf
. Road, for a side yard setback variance, based on
the following hardship basis:
� 1, Narrow lot.
� 2o Only practical location to preserve trees,
shrubs, etc.
� 3. Existing driveway will act as turn around
for side entry on garage so car will not
� have to back out directly onto street.
� ,aurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve the
� �ide yard setback variance for G. Raymond and
Ruth ti�olf, 2925 Casco Point Road, per the
� Planning Commission P�iinutes of November 1, 19760
iTotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
•
� Henry Tluhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
• stated that the Planning Commission at their 3527 Shoreline Drive
meeting of November 1, 1976, P�.r. Ed Lehman, #lg2
� 3527 Shoreline Drive, presented a certificate of Ed Lehman
Title of Lots 1, 2, and 3. Certificate showed
� i-7ro Lehman and his brother as joint owners.
� After much discussion regarding lot area compliance,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of
� ��reliminary plat because credit is given for marsh
areas in sewered areas, adjoining properties are
� owned by others, no other land is available in one
� acre zoned district to increase size of Lot D and
if LR-1C1 zoned area were developed under a PRD
� proposal, th� developer would be er�titled to four
living units.
�
The approval was recommended subject to the following
� ^�nditionso
� _. Conservation easement over marsh and wetlands
area be granted to the City,
� 2. };later drainage easement along drainaae ditch
be granted to the City.
� 3, Park dedication fee for four lots, (Continued)
�
� OROZ10 COUNCIL T�IEETING HELD NOVEP�ZBER 8, 1976 Page 5
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the SUBDIViSION
�lreliminary subdivision for Ed Lehman, 3527 Shore- 3527 Shoreline Drive
ine Drive, per the Planning Commission t7inutes (Continued)
� of Ilovember 1,1976, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
`
IIenry F2uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANC�S
� stated that the Planning Commission at their 1342 Rest Point Circle
• November l, 1976 meeting recommended apProval #187
of street and side yard setback variances for Harvey Larson
� a garage for Harvey Larson, 1342 Rest Point
Circlea
•
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the
� street and side yard setback variances for a
garage for Harvey Larson, 1342 Rest Point Circle,
� per the Planning Commission P�inutes of November 1,
� 19 7 6, rlotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
� Henry P�Iuhich, }3uilding & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
� stated that the Planning Commission at their 2447 Carman Street
November l, 1976 rneeting approved tYie lot area #189
� and width setback variance for Bruce Peterson, I3ruce Peterson
2446 Carman Streete Approval was based on the
� fact that there is no additional land available
and proposed addition would follow existing house
� �xtremities and not encroach the existing setbacks.
� ��he proposed addition would make a vast improvement
to the property.
� Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to a
pprove the
� lot area and width setback variance for Bruce
Peterson, 2446 Carman 5treet, per the Planning
� Commission ilinutes of November 1, 1976. Motion,
• Ayes (3) - TJays (0) .
� Henry T�Iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
� stated that David J. Kruskopf, 1200 Tn7ildhurst 1200 t^�ildhurst Trail
Trail, is requesting a lot area and wid"th �gg
� variance. David Kruskopf
i This property is located in a . LR-1.B residential
S zonee T•�r. Kruskopf is requesting a variance from
lot area and width requirements of one acre (43,560
� sq. fto ) and 140 ft. lot width. His lot consists
of 0, 7 of an acre and is 90 ft. wide; therefore,
� he is requesting variances of 13,968 sq. ft. and
50 fte
�
The proposed location does meet all setback require-
ments. However, we do have a problem in the existing
t �cation of the residence on the property to the
south. We have here a non-conforming situation
which we should rectifya At the time that the
� neighboring residence was constructed, surveys
� were not required with building permit applications. (Continued)
ORON� COUNCIL M�ETING HELD NOVEP�BER 8, 1976 Page 6
� This house is now encroaching the property line to SUBDIVISION
such a degree that it does not even meet the 1200 Wildhurst Trail
�ininum State requirements. 4Je might suggest as (Continued)
n agreement between the property owners, to change
the lot lines somewhat so we can resolve some of
� the problems. We could also consider slight
variances on the side setback to the north.
� We should try to meet the 20 ft. distances between
� structures and also prevent future �roblens from
any fences that might be erected under another
� property owners windows.
� Planning Commission Meeting - D4arch 1, 1976
• Although not scheduled as part of the regular meeting,
the Cor,�mission reviewed the above applications. They
then directed that I contact Mr. Kruskopf and state
that the Planning Commission would look favorably
� to a variance if he by private negotiations try
to realign the lot line with his neighbor in order
to alleviate the one foot setback problem.
� Planning Commission Meeting - March 15, 1976
Mr. Kruskopf and his neighbor, Gary Welsh, appeared
and presented a nap to show a revised line that
� would give Mr. Welsh 10 ft. on the side yard in
question. However, r�r. Kruskopf would have to alter
� his building plans by making a slight rotation of
the house on the lot.
�
ihe Commission recommended approval of the plan
� and the variances consisting of 50 ft. on lot
• width; 0. 3 of an acre on lot area and a 6" variance
on the side setback on the north lot line.
� Council �eeting - t4arch 22 , 1976
� The Council approved the variance and lot line
rearrangeMent as presented in the revised plan.
� Planning Commission Meeting - November l, 1976
� Recommended approval of the final plan of the lot
rearrangement.
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #745
#745, A Resolution Approving The Registered Land RLS #
Survey # , for David Kruskopf, 1200 6�ildhurst 1200 Wildhurst Trail
Trail, per the Planning Commission P�inutes of
� Nover.iber l, 1976. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
• Henry r�uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, STREET GRADING
stated that the applicant, Charles Velie (David 2905 Fox Street
� Nitz) 2905 Fox Street, has requested approval to #140
commence with the grading of the proposed street Charles Velie
� in the subdivision.
(Continued)
�
ORONO COUNCIL NIEETING HELD NOVED�BER 8, 1976 Pa e 7
g
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded to
, grant a grading STREET GRADING PERT>IIT
�permit to Charles Velie, (David Nitz, ) 2905 Fox 2905 Fox Street
Street, noting that the applicant has not provided (Continued)
a title opinion to the City on this particular
property nor has a park dedication fee been paid.
T�iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) ,
•
• Henry tluhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDITIONAL USE PERTIIT
stated that at the Council meeting of September 27, 3340 Shoreline Drive
� 1976, the Council directed staff to proceed with #162
revieu� and preparation of resolution to deny Holiday Station Stores
� conditional use permit to Holiday Station Stores,
3340 Shoreline Drive, and forward same to the
• City Attorney for final draft for review by
Planning Commission and Council before adoption.
� Planning Commission Meeting - October 4, 1976
After rev�iewing the Zoning Administrator's report,
the Planning Commission recommended denial based
� on potential negative result from projected increase
in traffic hazards from proposed land use. Requested
Council review report and instruct legal staff
� draft resolution of denial based on data noted in
reporto
ouncil P�eeting - October 12, 1976
i
Tabled per request of applicant. Will be on agenda
• for October 25, 1976 Council meeting.
� Council Meeting - October 25, 1976
� Tabled,
�
Staff - November 3, 1976
•
Henry TZuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator,
� stated that he called for Brad Steinman at 920-7020
several times, but he was never in so he finally
left a message with the operator (Dianne Hanson)
S that the Holiday proposal would be included on
the Council agenda for November 8, 1976. He left
� the message at 2:10 P.M. on November 3, 1976.
• T-lra Steinman requested the Council to table this
• request until the November 22, 1976 Council meeting�
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, NAVARRE AREA REZONING
stated that the notice for public hearing regard- #192
ig the Navarre Area Rezoning and Zoning Code
�- amendment has been sent to the Sun Newspaper for
publication. The public hearing is scheduled
for 7s45 P.t�1. on November 15, 1976, The properties
(Continued)
OROP10 COUNCIL t�IEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 8
� being considered for rezoniny are only those three NAVARRE AREA REZONING
�which were part of the agreement s,tipulations (Continued)
betv�een att'orneys on the Navarre Area Litigation
matter. The stipulations also included completion
of the entire process by November 29, 1976 (as
' noted in circled paragraph on enclosed copy of
letter from our attorney's office) .
•
Our notice of public hearing does not include
� rezoning of any other Navarre properties as no
• final decision was ever made as to exactly what
properties should be rezoned. Once we determine
S exactly what other properties we want to rezone,
the Planning Commission will hold another public
� hearing on the matter.
Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to direct the
Building & Zoning Administrator to request the
� Planninc� Commission to make recommendations to
the City Council on what parcels Council should
act on, i�Iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
Butler moved, �aurus seconded, that Resolution RESOLUTION #723
,r723, A Resol�ition To Extend The Expiration Extend Expiration Date
� For Filing Date For The Ulmer Estates Plat, be Ulm�r Estates
adopted. t�iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
RESOLUTION #723
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Or�no,
T•Zinnesota, at a regular meeting held November 8,
� 1976, approved an extension of the expiration for
filing date for the Ulmer Estates Plat from
� October 12, 1976 to January 1, 1977.
a This resolution will expire on January 1, 1977,
if the aforesaid subdivision plat has not been
filed with the Hennepin County Register of Deeds.
� In that event, it will be necessary to file a new
application with the City of Orono for subdivision
� approval.
S I�lotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
� Henry T�Iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, STATUS REPORTS
informed the City Council that the following
items were being reviewed by the Planning
Commission for Council action at a later dateo
� Steve Wallack (T.M,G. Corp. ) , 4100 Sixth Avenue
North, for a preliminary subdivision; Robert
T`�hnson, 1121 Elmwood Avenue, for a lot area and
dth variance; and Robert Solie, 1085 North Arm
�Drive for a conditional use permit for grading
and filling,
� OROI10 COUNCIL NlEETING HELD NOVEPIBER 8 , 1976 Page 9
S Dick Benson, City Administrator, reported on the SU�u�2ARY OF RECEIPTS,
ySumrnary of Receipts, Disbursements and Balances DISBUP.SET�IENTS & BALANCES
for the month of September, 1976.
llick Benson, City Administrator, reported on the REVENUE & EXPENDITUI2�S
Revenue & Expenditures for the third quarter of
� 1976.
�
. llick Benson, City Administrator, reported that GOLF COURSE REPORT
revenue producing operations ended on October 1
of this year for the Orono Golf Course. The
Balance Sheet and Income Statement for the nine
months ending September 30, 1976 are attached.
The Gross Profit for the period is $33,396. 91
and the Cost of Operations is $24 , 578. 34 for a
• ilet Profit of $8,718.57.
Dick Benson, City Administrator, reported that LInUOR STORE R�PORT
the following is a com�arison of Net Sales, Gross
Profit, Total Ex�ense and Net Income for the nine
months ending September 30 for the years 1974 ,
1975, and 1976:
�
1974 1975 1976
Jet Sales : $249,220.32 $272,196.44 $277, 658.57
Gross Profit 74 ,104.07 71,026. 79 76,540. 82
Total Expense 44,006.66 46,071.20 50,103.42
Net Income 32 ,101.98 25,004. 85 26,753. 61
f The sales trends for the nine month periods have
held steady from the previous six month periodss
the growth being 9e2� between 1974-75 hut only
S 2°s between 1975-76, Gross profit on sales dropped
4o between 1974-75 but rebounded a healthy
� 7. 8o between 1975-76. The rate at which the
expenses have increased has declined for the third
quarter periods when compared to the preceedin_q
six raonth periods, The rate decline is reflected
as followsa
1974 1975 g Inc. 1976 � Inc.
Six I�lonths 27, 851. 58 $31,169.94 11.9 $34,182.91 9.7
Nine P��onths 44,006. 66 46 ,071.20 4. 7 50,103. 42 8. 8
The net income for the nine month period suffered
greatly in 1974-75, dropping 22o from $32,101.98 in
1974 to $24,004, 85 in 1975. Iiowever, the increase
between 1975-76 was 7%, from $25,004. 85 in 1975
to $26,753. 61 in 1976. If the fourth quarter for
�his year shows a continued increase in net income
� f about 7� over last year's fourth quarter, the
projected net income for this year of $40,000 will
be reached.
OROi10 COUNCIL P�IEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 10
P�1r, Bill Gagne, owner of 77.13 acres loCated at GAGNE PROPERTY SE6�7ERS
�he northeast quadrant of intersection #12 and #12 & Old Crystal Bay Rd.
ld Crystal Bay Road requested the status of the
availability of sewer at that location. Acting
T•iayor ti�Talter r2assengale stated that the Long
Lake Engineer had informed the City of Orono
approximately three years ago that there ��ere
only 20 units available to the existing sewer
line to Long Lake because of the hy�lraulic
overload of the system. r1r. Gagne asked why
a metro sewer line could not be constructed to
tlzat areae i��Ir. Brad Van Nest stated that it
was a 1�Ietro Council decision to eliminate the
interceptor in that particular area. P�ir. Van
I1est said that the availability of sewer_s is
the basis for development in this area. Acting
IZayor [•dalter T�lassengale request�d City s�aff to
review the units assessed to this piroperty and
the current status of the existing sewer line
serving that acreage.
P-1r. John Lobben addressed the Council and read VO-TECH SCHOOLS
into the record the foliowing s�atemento
6de are taking this opportunity to request your
^onsideration of the Joint Independerit 5�hool
istrict No. 287 need for sewer �ervi�� to its
pro�osed West Site Campus loCater� i.�nmediately
north of County Road No. G in P2ec�ii�A�
As you khow, our ti9es� 5it� Cam�r�il� prr�perty is
171 acr�s in size (w th 23 p�o bsed at�ditional
acres) being four quarter sec��}�i�a �titc� a 10 acre
parcel bordered particall�i on tH� west by Haiuestead
� Trail and on the east by the I�2�t�irla-Morningside
residential development. We propose to develop
a cor.lplete area vocational-technical school
, complex consisting primarily of a main building
eight acres in size with a student capacity of
2,400 high school, post-secondary and adult
education students on a multi-shifted basis>
Our current development schedule is tentative
because we are not able to program the various
governmental authorizations which must be obtained.
However, we hope to commence campus construction
activities in 1978 with the detail design phase
of the project. This would mean sewer service
facilities will be needed by the year 1980.
Our Joint Board, consisting of representatives
roia each of our thirteen suburban Hennepin County
� �nde�endent school district participating schools,
has determined and established there is a need
for a vocational-technical school in western
Hennepin County. Such a facility will require (Continued)
� OROtdO COUNCIL T�IEETING HELD NOVEIIBER 8, 1976 Pa e 11
g
rublic sec�er services. As we see it, such service VO-TECH SCHOOLS
can be obtained and provided only by the cooperative (Continued)
�efforts of the cities of Orono 8nd Medina and the
Suburban Hennepin Area Vocational-Technical schools.
We feel the City of Orono needs to consider our
request in its comprehensive and sewer plans
because it appears the sewer line which will
receive the eftluent from our proposed campus
will lie in the City of Orono and will intercept
with the 1�n�VCC Orono-Long Lake Interceptor. Tt
appears this will be the case whether the concept
of a b4edina Interceptor or a local sub-trunk
facility is utilized.
As you are also a�caare, we have already developed
two campuses approximately 100 acres in size each
in Brooklyn Park and Eden Prairie. Based on our
experience with these campuses during their
approximately five years operation, we are confident
the development of our West Site Campus will not
� be a developrnent inducing project. In fact, we
are confident our �7est Site Campus will do much to
preserve the residential and agricultural character
of the communityo
�
�.��� recognize the Metropolitan Council has a policy
� �ch seeks to restrict growth and the need for
� ��an services in the area of our proposed develop-
��lento Our objectives are not inconsistent with
these policies and we feel confident the services
we need will not have the etfect of inducing
unwanted growth, We will }�e certain that our
activities will compliment all regional Policies
as well as the nlanning policies of the cities
of Orono and T�ledina.
�
I am attaching a copy of our correspondence to
T•�r. John Boland, Chairman of the Tietropolitan
S Council, dated T�1ay 28, 1976, and his reply of
Jurie 7, 1976. It outlines the concept of our
� proposed t7est Site Campus development and states
our resolve to take every reasonable step to
Promote all local planning objectiveso
In conclusion, we request you give our needs for
sewer service consideration as you develop your
secaer plans and other local as well as regional
municipal service policies. We will be pleased
to liave our administrative and technical people
�aork with your city departments to establish the
particularities o� the sewer service rec�uired
'^� our Joint Independent School District No. 287
st Site Campus,
End of Letter
(Continuec3)
�
� ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEIMBER 8, 1976 Page 12
� Acting Nlayor Walter P�assengale stated that the VO-TECH SCHOOLS
a-_ea in question is a rural service area and is (Continued)
�ot intended to be served by the Orono-Long Lake
� interceptor at this time. Mr. J. Lobben stated
that the Hennepin County Vo-Tech is requesting the
Orono City Council to include them in the service
�� area. ��r, Massengale stated that the City has not
!; had time to review this request, but it should be
noted that the P�etro Council made the decision
� to exclude the proposed Hennepin County Vo-Tech
from the proposed Orono-Long Lake interceptora
�
� iTassengale moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt the COP�PREHENSIVE SE[r7ER PLAN
Comprehensive Sewer Plan, subject toc
* 1. Revise Pages 8 & 21 concerning the T�Zetro
interceptor and capacity.
• 2o Revise flow projections Table �10.
� 3, Eliminate map #8.
4, Old Crystal Bay Road as having 20 units
! available for sewer connections.
5, Indicate area �7 & �8 sewer service �ap as
a sewer service area.
i•Totion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
�
,ick Benson, City Administrator, informed the PUBLIC HEARING DATE
� City Council that notice is hereby given that Orono-Long Lake
the Nletropolitan i�Iaste Control Commission will Interceptor
hold a public hearing to discuss sewer in Orono,
� Long Lake, and t°�ayzata, at the Freshwater
Biological Instituteo 2500 Shadywood Road, Orono,
M T2innesota. The hearing is scheduled for Wednesday,
. Novernber 10, 1976 at 2: 00 P.P�I.
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to appoint PZr. Brad APPOINTA2ENT TO P�IWCC
Van P1est as Orono's representative to the Brad Van Nest
� iletropolitan ��Jaste Control Commission public
hearing November I0, 1976 at 2000 P,P•Ze concern-
f ing the Orono-Long Lake interceptore T•4otion,
� Ayes (3) - T1ays (0) .
•
Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve Orono°s ORONO POLICY STATEs�dENT
� policy statement to be presented to the Metropolitan
taaste Control Commission's public hearing concerning
� the Orono-Long Lake interceptor November 10, 1976,
� which states that the Orona Planning Commission is
charged with the responsibi�.ity to review and
� recommend to the Council actions which should be
ken to protect the public health, safety, and
eneral welfare in regard to land use matters,
� (Continued)
�
�
!
� OROI10 COUIICIL TIEETING HELD NOVEi1BER 8, 1976
Page 13
• Certain].y, the proposed Orono-Long Lake interceptor ORONO-LUNG LAKE
�sponsored by the r7etropolitan i4aste Control
ommission falls within the domain of revieca by INTERCEPTOR
� the Planning Commission sinc� a� sanitary sewer �Continued)
system installed within the Orono City limits,
e regardless of purpose, will have a profound effect
on land use. In fact, sanitary sewer has become
� the single factor which will drive ur.ban development
in spite of all other means of control.
�
• i�leans of Controle During the past several years,
Orono has developed a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
� delineating areas of both urban and rural service
area�, Ordinances have been enacted to provide
� for the protection of the general welfare of
the public within these service zones. Th�
• =letropolitan Council has further indicated agreement
with the partitioning of Orono into rural and
� urban service areas by their planning consistent
� with our planning.
� From a land use planning viewpoint, it is incon-
ceivable that installation of a sewer system within
� a designated rural service area would be considered
a protection of_ the general welfare, Regardless
of alleged controls, the tact that the sewer is
there, economic interests will find a way to subvert
� 'ie process of planning and gain access to the
� .,ewer system. Accordingly, it is recomrnenc�.ec� that
Alternatives A, B, C, or D be considered as the only
� acceptable, viable means ot serving the general
welfare.
•
It is noted that other alternatives appear to
� impact our environ*o.ental protection measures
designed to protect Orono wetlands and marsh
� areas. This conflict will be at best difficult
� to resolvee Here again is an excellent example of
how the planning process to protect the fragile
� environment could be subverted in the name of
"environmental protection", Clearly, it is not
i necessary to resort to sketchy quantifications
of environmental impact when relative measures
� of impact of the proposed alternatives are
� c�uite clearo ti7hen the designers and developers
have come and gone, Orono is still left with the
�result of t�e encroachments, Again, froM a
�lanning viewpoint, the Orono Council is hereby
�cautioned not to assume the risk of environmental
damage when alternatives are available which do
�not impact the wetlands,
� e tinal note. Location of the interce�tor
�stem along County Road ##15 is more likel to
serve the public interest in the long run tlian
�would the other alternativese Our experience shows
•
� (Continued)
�
• OROI10 COUNCIL I�IEETING H�LD NOVEMBER 8, 197C Page 14
� that the lakeshore areas are prone to suffer ORONO-LOrIG LAKE
ecologically from fu��are developments well ahead INTERCEPTOR
�f rural areas. Location of the proposed interceptor�Continued)
long this route would significantly aid future
� comprehensive land use plann�.ng activities beyond
the scop� of our present p�anning Cycl�e
•
Attached hereto is a review by the Planning
� Cor,unission of the "Addendum to the Preliminary
� Engineering Report" for �he Orono-Ldng Lake
interceptor dated April, 1976,
a
Addendum to the Preliminary Engineering Reporto
•
The Village of Orono does support as it has always
• supported the conclusions of the Harza Stuc3y, that
� tlie phosptiorus content of the seven wastewater
treatment plants caithin the Lake I�Zinne�onka water-
� shed should be removed by Aletro intercePtor from
the ilinnetonka ��atershed.
•
Orono has a deep-seated interest in the proposed
• Orono-Long Lake interceptor and its short run,
as well as its long run effects to our tragile
� environment in the following arease
� 1, The implementation of Village land use
� planning.
. The implementation of our wetland protective
� ordinances so important for the protection and
nreservation of Lake Minnetonka. The storm
� water purification and ponding abilities of our
� wetlands are so vital to the prevention of
adverse effects of rapid storm water runoff.
� 3e lhe erfect of potential urbanization causing
poor quality stornl water runoff and the
� secondary effect oi increased levels of
rnunicipal services such as roads, police, fire,
• school, etc.
" The,effects of potential 'urbanization requiring
• higher levels of municipal services in light
. of the 6o mill rate levy linitation imposed
on us by the State of P�Iinnesota.
� The Village of Orono has spent much time and
� considerable monies in the development of basic
lancl use planning tools such aso
�
le A storm water plane
� 2. The identification and protection o� wetlands
and water drainage ways to Lake Niinnetonka.
� 3. A comprehensive land use plan designed to
� protect our fragiie ecology yet allow a
� slow steady growth within our rural and urban
land use designationso A land use plan that
v�ill allow a slow steady growth of our municipal
! services to support the increased needs at a
cost that can be justified within our legal
� mill rate levµ� limitationo (Continued)
•
�
� ORONO COUNCIL PIEETING HELD NOVEPiBER 8, 1976 Page 15
� 4o The adoPtion of a comprehensive zoning ordinance ORONO-LOrIG LAKE
to iraplement the comprehensive land use plan INTERCEPTOR
� that protects our delicate environment througho (Continued)
� ao Adoption of Ordinance #125 prohibiting
� alterations or development of the u�etlands.
bo Adoption of a 75 ' lakeshore building set►�ack.
� co Adoption of hard cover limitations that
allow Oo hard cover within 75 ' of the
• lakeshore, 25% hard cover from 75 ' to 250 '
from the lakeshore, and 35a harc3 cover from
� 500 ' to 1000 ' from the lakeshore.
, d. A 26 ' development setback from our protected
wetland and water drainage way to Lake Minnetonkao
� ee The preservation of natural land contours
within 75 ' of the lakeshore have been
� protected by a prohibition against dredc�ing,
grading or filling, and the removal of
• major trees and shrubse
� Orono, as a local municipality, has done more than
` any other community in the entire country in the
areas of preservation of a great natural amenity
� of major metropolitan significance such as Lake
Tiinnetonka through basic land use �lanning including:
•
l. Storm water manag.emente
* , . CornPrehensive zoning.
• �o Transportation planning
4. Identification and protection of eeologically
� sensitive protected areaso
� The Village of Orono is fully acaare and cognizant
of the magnitude of the problems of balancing the
� deleterious effects of urbanization with the fragile
ecologye It does not take lightly proposals
• presented for projects or programs that effect the
. ecology of our area that do not represent all
environm�ntal concerns required to protect our
, area and Lake Minnetonka.
� We understand that the interceptor as Proposed in
Alternavite lA, 5A, and 6A will traverse our wetlands,
• but without prior access to the final glans and
specifications showing the exact routing of the
'� rroposec� interceptor, it is impossible for us to
access the magnitude of the potential damage to
� our environment, Thus it is difficult for us to
�, determine vahat the requirements would be for us to
grant a variance under our Ordinance #125, the
� �aetlanc�s protection ordinance e Ordinance #k 125
makes provision for a variance �rocedure as follows:
•
riances. In extraordinary cases, variances may be
granted upon application therefore, but only cahen
� the proposed use is determined to be in the public
interest, and no variance shall be granted which
� the Council determines will or has the tend�ncy toa
� (Continued)
�
� OROI�O COUNCIL PIEETTNG HELD NOVEPTBER 8, 1976 Page 16
• 1. Increase the height or duration of flood caater ORONO�LONG LARr
in or along the rTinnehaha Creek. ID?TERCEPTOR
�e Result in the placement of an artificial (Continued)
` obstruction which will restrict the passage of
flood water in such a manner as to increase
� the height of flooding, except obstructions
approved by the Minnehaha Creek 6datershed
� District in conjunction with sound flood plain
management.
• 3o Result in incompatible land uses or which would
• be detrimental to the protection of surface and
ground water suppliesa
� 4o Increase the financial burdens imposec� on the
community through increased floods and overflow
� of water onto land areas within the City or
onto land areas adjacent to T•iinnehaha Creek.
• 5. Be not in keeping with land use Plans and
planning objectives for the City of Orono or
* ���hich will increase or cause danger to life
� or property,
6. Be inconsistent with the objectives of encouraging
� land uses compatible with the preservation of the
natural land forms, vegetation and the marshes
� and wetlands within the City of Oronoe
7o Includes development of land and water areas
� essential to continue the temporary �aithholding
' of rapid runoff of surface water which presently
contributes to downstream flooding or water
� pollution or for land and water areas which
provide ground water infiltration cahich dimishes
� the land area necessary to carry increasecl flows
of storm v�ater following periods of heavy
• precipation,
� Supporting Dataa No permit or variance shall be
+ issued unless the applicant, in support of his
application, shall submit engineering data, surveys,
� site plans and other information as the City may
require in order to determine the effects of such
r development on the affected land and water areas.
The applicant shall submit four copies of the
• application and the information. One copy shall be
• sent by the City to the secretary of the r�Iinnehaha
Creek Watershed District. The District shall file
� its comments and recommendations with the City
within 20 days after receipt of the information,
� unless additional time is authorized by the City.
• I�n application for variances to our Ordinance #125
must be made for the proposed interceptor as
� shown in Alternate lA, 5A, and 6A,
� he environmental Assessment makes note of the
�otential problem of excessive infiltration with
the use of gravity sewer lines located below the
� water line in marsh areas, as proposed in Alternative
lA, 5A, and 6Ae It has been our experience with (Continued)
�
�
�
i ORONO COUNCIL MEETING H�LD NOVEAZB�R 8, �976 Page 17
� our present sewer system that in tHose areas where ORONO-LOTJG LAKE
we liave in the past traversed marsh areas, major IIITERCEPTdR
�aintenance problems have occurred because of the (Continued)
instability of the marsh itself causing the pipes
� to rnoveo It seems to us that the cancern expressed
S in the Environmental Assessment, that infiltration
could be a problem, is a valid concern.
� In consideration of the man� com lex
1 p problems that
� must be balanced in order to preserve our fragile
ecology, it is our position that the public interest
• could be better served by installing the interceptor
that uses forced mains along County Road #�51 and
� County Road #�15 to the iriterceptor in 6�ayzata as
� shown in Alte�hates A, B� C, or D, tt seems to
us th�t there are many advantages to such a cbncept,
•
la Lower capita]. outlay when all local costs are
• considereds
2. Minimum disturbance of the wetlands.
� 3. I�linirnal risk of irreversible environmental
damage and unforeseen construction nroblems,
t 4. Zero infiltration.
` 5. T�1ore consistent with local municipal planning
in the areas of land use, parks, transPortation,
� utilities, storm water management, schools, etce
• T.t would appear to us that the increased operating
. :ost of the forced main wouZd be more than offset
by the operating costs of the gravity interceptor
� as in lA, 5A, or 6A through our marshes when you
include the costs caused by infiltration and the
� access difficulty of performing the necessary
continuing maintenance required by instability of
� the marsh terrain as opposed to total road bed
right of way as in the case of the forced main as
� proposed by Altervative A., B, C, or D. These
� operating problems of the gravity interceptor
located in the marshes are a continuing threat
� to the preservation of our wetlands.
� Is it really possible that supervision and control
of an independent contractor to insure that he
• will not make an irreparable mistake preventing
the marsh from being _returned to its natural state.
� ti�1e would be most interested in knowing what
� managernent controls would be instituted to insure
protection of the wetlands.
•
The alignment of the interceptor in Alternates
r lA, SA, and 6A traverse areas of Orono that are
located within the rural service areae Orono has
• o intention to provide sewer service to these
�reas and have developed zoning requirements and
otlier protective measures to insure that on-site
� septic systems will adequately serve these rural
areas. The construction of the interceptor as (Continued)
�
•
�
� ORONO COUNCIL T�IEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 18
� shown on alternate 1A, 5A, and 6A will provide p�plJp_LONG LAKE
� accessability that could legally force Orono to INTERCEPTOR
provide trunk and lateral systems which ��ould (Continued)
� require rezoning to allo� � higher level of
urbaniza�ion to pay the resulting cost5. This
� urbanization would have a primary adverse effect
on the quality of storm water runoff and therefore,
� be detrimental to the lakeo The secondary adverse
• effect of this urbanization would be the increased
cost of schools, roads, police, fire protection,
� and other municipal services which Orono cannot
afford. Alternatives A, B, C, and D more closely
� align themselves with Orono long range plans and
minimize the adverse effects stated above<
�
During the past five years, Orono has sPent much
� time and considerable monies in the planning process
i to insure a balancing of cornplex needs in this
environmental sensitive area contiguous to Lake
w NTinnetonkao These decisions have been made since
the time the proposed interceptor was originally
a justifieda
� 1. The determination of rural and urban service
. areasa
2o The development of a Comprehensive Guide Plan
� which was adopted by the T7etropolitan Council
November 7, 1974.
� 3. The adopting of a comprehensive zoning ordinance
implementing the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
• 4. The adopting of a Surface Tnlater P�anagement
• Plan developed in conjunction witli the
I•linnehaha Creek ��atershed District Board of
� Governors.
5. The strengthening of the �^?etlands Preservation
� Ordinance #�125e
G, The imposition of the 6°s mill rate levy
• limitation by the State of I�innesotae
7. The continuing battle with the Henne�in County
• Highway Department over our established policy
S to preserve the roads on the Minnetonka
shoreline as scenic parkways and to be consistent
� witti the ecology of the lake, rather than tne
County°s desire to pave the shoreline of
� P�innetonka into a massive transportation network.
8e The completion of a new Comprehensive Sewer
• Plan that establishes the sewer services area
of Orono consistent with the Comprehensive
� Guide Plan and zoning code.
, 90 The reduction of population projections by the
Pletropolitan Council from 35,500 to 12 ,900 and
� a saturation population projection by Orono
� from 23,000 to 12 , 871.
'� (Continued)
�
•
� '
� ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEt7BER 8 , 1976 Page 19
� t�e feel strongly that the introduction of the ORONO-LOP1G LAICE
�roposed interceptor as aligned in lA, 5A, or 6A INTERCEPTORS
egates the determination of basic land use planning, (Continued)
• including policies for the prese�vatio}� of Lake
I�iinnetonka that have been establish�d by drono in
S the past five years.
� �ae sti11 feel the importance to remove the phosphorus
� content of the wastewater treatment plants located
in Orono and Long Lake but are concerned that the
� interceptor as proposed in Alternates lA, 5�, or
6A have all the earmarks of containing potential
• environmental benefit for which the interceptor
+ was originally conceived.
For all the above stated reasons, we regard
� Alternatives A, B, C, or D as the only acceptable
� interceptor proposalso We f_urther strongly
support Alternative A as the most consistent
� with the adopted land use planning policy o£
the City.
•
` Ilotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) a
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, stated that HERRICK CIRCLE
� '-he Council approved the sewer plans for Herrick Sewers
�rcle, September 27, 1976, subject to:
•
• lo Termination of public sewers at the northwest
property line near ma�ho].e #G.
� 2. �ngineer's and Attorney's review and approval.
3o Performance bond submitted.
� 4, Contract signed.
� It has been noted that a hold-harmless clause is
not provided for. The developer has also requested
• conceptuai approval of the hardshell so he can
proceed with a building permit for Lot 8. A print
� of the hardshell shows that the sewers do not
� terminate at the northwest property line near
manhole #6,
�
Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #726
� ��726, a resolution approving the contraets with City of [�Tayzata Contract
the City of ��layzata and I•1r> Nafstad and conceptual Herrick Circle
� approval of hardshell and building permit for
• Lot 8 subject to:
� 1. Correcting hardshell showing correct termination
of public sewers.
� 2. Hold-harmless clauseo
� Park dedication fee being paid.
T�Iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) ,
•
•
�
! •
�� ORONO COUPICIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 20
� Dic3c Benson, City Administrator, stated that the ORONO-iy1INNETONKA BEACH
�ietropolitan Waste Control Comm�:ssion does intend Tnterceptor
�o acquire the Orono-Minnetonka Beach interceptor
� efore the end of the year,
� The agreement as submitted will be reviewed
during the proceeding months. Two exhibits are
� forthcoming:
� 1. Description of sewer line to be acquired.
2, Bond sales and payment date scheduled.
r
� Staif shall be prepared to review the entire
agreement and submit a finalized agreement as soon
� as the t=ietropolitan �aaste Control Commission has
determined when they intend to complete the
� acquisition.
•
P�Zr. Greg Frank, City Engineer, stated that �9ILLO�a DRIVE
� enclosed is the final Payment Request for Buffalo Buffalo Dituminous
• IIituminous on the T��TSA ��lillow Drive improvements,
� ��le have reviewed the request and recommend payment,
As soon as this is processed, I will make application
to the Highway Department for the remainder of the
funds on this projecte
•
utler moved, Paurus seconded, that the final
� payrnent for Buffalo Bituminous for tVillow Drive
improvements (n2SA) in the amount of $16, 310.22,
� be paid, subject to State approval. Piotion,
� Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
�
Dick Benson, City Administrator, stated that PUBLIC AUCTION
• ��ursuant to ordinance, Chief Kilbo wishes to November 27, 1976
conduct a public auction on ilovember 27, 1976
� at 9000 AD D�o at 1285 Brown Road South, to
� dispose of unclaimed, confiscated, or found
property consisting of a color television set,
� numerous bicycles, two bowling balls, two
motorcyGle helmets, and other miscellaneous
� items. Terms of payment are cash with sale to
the highest bidder. I request publication
� on November 10, 1976 as required by ordinanceo
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve tHe
� requQst o€ Chief Kilbo to conduct a public auction
on IJovember 27, 1976 at 9:00 A. TZ. at 12a5 Brown
� Road South, to dispose of unclaimed, confiscated
or found property. T�totion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) ,
�
�ck Benson, City Aciministrator, stated that the Orono Sta�NE FLU CLIN��S
Swine Flu Clinics will be held at Orono Middle School �
� 1"Ionday, IJovember 22, 1976 from 5 c 00 P.P4a to 9 e 00 P,r4o
and Tuesday, November 23, 1976 at the Freshwater
� niological Institute in Navarre, 10 0 00 A. r�i. to 2 0 00 P.PZ.
•
�
�RONO COUNCIL TJIEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 21
�'
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to adopt Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 187
i�oe 187, An Ordinance To Amend Chapter 63, Sections Amend Dog Ordinance
� 63. 010, 63.020, 63.030 and 63,150 Of The P�Iunicipal
Code Of Orono Requiring Licenses For pogs, Establish-
� ing License Fees And Requirements For The Issuance
Of Dog Licenses And Establishing Fees And Require-
i ments For The Redemption Of Dogs. Motion, Ayes (3) -
* Nays (0) .
� ORDINANCE NO, 187
� THE CITY OF OROP10 ORDAINS:
� Section 1, Chapter 63 of the Municipal Code of the
City of Orono is amended by amending Sections 63,010,
� 63s020, 63,030 and 63.150 as follows:
� Section 630010. Lote Any lot for which a deed or
� registered land survey has been recorded in the
office of the Registrar af Deeds or the Registrar of
+ Titles for Hennepin County, l�Iinnesota or combination
of lots necessary to meet the minimum lot area
• for the Zoning Code for that use district.
` Section 63,020. License Required. No person shall
` own, harbor or keep a dog over the age of six months
unless a current license for such dog has been
� obtained as herein provided; except also that any
�og kept for, or by, a blind person and recognized
� as a guide or seeing-eye dog shall be exempt from
this provisiono The owner of any dog 'brought into
� the City of Orono shal� immediately procure a license
. for such animal. Dog licenses shall be valid for the
whole or unexpired portion of the two-year period
� ending in January 1 of the next odd nurlbered year
following the first effective date of the license.
•
Section 63o030e License Fees and Requirementso Dog
• licenses shall be issued by the City Clerk upon
. presentation of a current, valid rabies vaccination
certificate and upon payment of a license fee of
� $8. 00 if issued in an odd numbered year and $4.00
if issuec� in an even numbered year. Dogs confined
� to a kennel need not be. lic�nsed, provided that such
kennel is licensed as provided by Section 63e180.
!
Section 63.110. Public Nuisance> The ke�ping of
• more than two dogs over the age of six months `on
� any lot or combination of lots necessary to meet
the minimum requirement of the Zoning Code for
� that use district, except by special permission of
the City Council, shall be deemed a public nuisance
� and unlawful, The keeping of a dog or dogs that
nnoy other persons by barking, howling or baying
etween the hours of 10000 p.me and 6000 a.m. shall
be deemed a public nuisance and unlawful; and upon
� the written complaint of two or more neighbors shall
� be abated upon order of the City Council within 48 hours,
• (Continued)
� '
�� ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVET�IBER 8, 1976 Page 22
� Section 63. 150, Redemption of Dogs. �ahenever a ORDINANCE NO, 187
�dog is picked up by the M.AoP.S.I, o or any other Amend Dog Ordinance
iuly authorized agent of the City, if such dog (Continued)
� has an identification tag the owner shall be
notified immediately by P�I.A.PaS.I. Any dog not
• claimed by the registered owner within a period
• of not less than five regular business days may
be sold for not less than $2. 00 or otherwise
� disposed of in• accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, S35e71.
•
Before any dog is released, the owner shall pay,
� in addition to any other penalties and the kennel
charges, the following:
i
* First Offense $20.00
Second Offense $30.00
� Third Offense $40.00
0 Fines imposed by this schedule shall be based upon
offenses occurring within any one calendar yeare
�
Section 63,160e Observation of Dog After Bitinq.
` Any person knowing of a case of a human being
� bittin by a dog shall immediately notify the
dog warden or chief of police, who shall then
� irnpound the dog for a period of ten days at
he expense of the owner of the dog before
� jurrendering the dog to its owner. The owner
of the dog may have the opportunity to choose
• the veterinarian kennel where the dog will be
� impoundede
� Section 630180. Dog Kennels, Licensee No person
shall operate a kennel without being licensed under
r this section, Application for such kennel license
shaZl be raade to the City Clerk, and shall be
� accompanied by a license fee of $100e The Clerk
shall refer the application to the City Council
� who may grant or deny it. Licenses shall be
issued on an annual basis, expiring on P��arch lst
� each year.
� i�2otiono Ayes (3) — Nays (0) a
•
� illr, Greg Frank, City Engineer, informed the City TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Council that the City is in receipt of a letter #12 & Old Crystal Bay Rd.
� from Egan-bZcKay, cqntractors installing the
� traffic warning signal on Highway #12 at Old
�rystal Bay Road, which stated that we wish to
� keep you apprised of our situation on the above
�ptioned project, After repeated phone calls,
finally received the pedestals and bases Qn
November 3, 1976e However, the traffic signal
� head KB-531 and Down Lite shipment will not be
� made until todaye To expedite this matter we
(Continued)
•
�_
�� ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 23
� have had these items shipped out of Austin, TRAFFIC SIGNAI,
�exas by air freight. We- have secured a promised (Continued)
hipment date of today, November 5, 1976, on
• the flasher unit, also being shipped to us air
• freight from Davenport, Iowa.
� We appreciate your cooQeration in this ma�ter,
and although we have been ready for ins�aTlation,
� our suppliers have kept us waiting, through no
fault of ours. We assure you that as soon as
� these shipments are received we will com�lete
the Orono project.
•
+ Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to extend the
completion date to Egan-McKay electrical
� contractors, to November 22, 1976, for
installation of traffic signal at Highway #I2
� and Old Crystal Bay Road, subject to all
additional costs to be borne by contractor.
� T�Iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
•
• Paurus moved, Butler seconded, that the following LICENSES
licenses, be approved: nZotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
� City View Plumbing & Heating - Plumber
Hansmann ��ell Company - Well Driller
ark's Plumbing - Plumber & Sewer Hookup
� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the Al1 BILLS
� Funds Accounts 04076 through 04135, 19421,
4034 through 4074, and Liquor Store Accounts
� 11604 through 11620, be paid. i�iotion,
Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
•
• Butler moved, t�assengale seconded, that the ADJOURNP�IENT
� meeting be adjourned at 10:55 P.M. Motion,
Ayes (3) - Nays (0) .
•
•
�
� [aalter B, Alassengale, Acti g Mayor
�
• /. . __
�
Attes�e �
� �Valter s n, C erk-Ac�}n nis�rator
• �'
�
•